Live from Wimbledon Day 13 - Swiatek’s dream day a nightmare for Anisimova

12 Jul 2025 · 1 h 7 min · 25 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Live Wimbledon Day 13 recap focused on the women’s singles final: Iga Swiatek’s 6-0, 6-0 demolition of Amanda Anisimova in 57 minutes, plus discussion of why the match felt “awkward” and psychologically brutal, and a broader debate about whether women should play the same match formats as men.

Guests (backgrounds)

Catherine Murtica (host). David Law (tennis commentator/analyst). Charlie Eccleshare (The Athletic). Matt Roberts (tennis writer/commentator). They discuss match psychology and tennis history.

Key claims

Swiatek’s ruthlessness and “in the zone” movement/shotmaking made Anisimova “freeze,” with Swiatek exploiting Anisimova’s nerves and fatigue. Anisimova attributed the collapse to physicality/being burnt out. Wimbledon’s final format and crowd atmosphere can accelerate worst-case scenarios in best-of-three. Swiatek’s grass turnaround and serving improvements underpin her dominance.

Notable examples

Swiatek’s similar “awkward” Grand Slam finals (e.g., vs Paolini); Swiatek’s backhand width/counterintuitive targeting of Anisimova’s backhand; comparisons to Steffi Graf; Wimbledon’s recent trend of lopsided women’s finals; Madison Keys’ 2017 US Open nerves; Davenport–Williams 2005 as an “epic” benchmark.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Swiatek's Dominance and Anisimova's Struggles

0:45 to 2:56

Discussion on Swiatek's impressive performance and Anisimova's disappointing final.

“where this is a very different pod and my hair is very different tomorrow.”

Psychology of Playing in Finals

2:56 to 5:59

Exploration of mental challenges and psychological strategies in high-stakes matches.

“Amanda Anisimova has provided some incredible moments within it, and she deserves to be remembered for those.”

Match Dynamics and Performance Factors

5:59 to 9:00

Analysis of match dynamics, including the impact of nerves and physicality on performance.

“And I'd be curious, and maybe she wouldn't answer that, I don't know.”

Swiatek's Skills and Anisimova's Limitations

9:00 to 13:09

Detailed examination of Swiatek's exceptional skills and Anisimova's lack of form.

“But actually, these days, it's very common.”

Processing Performance and Expectations

13:09 to 14:00

Discussion on how players process their performances and manage expectations post-match.

“I think the way I read that is that it's physical things are easier.”

Processing Performance and Mental Elements

14:00 to 14:39

Discussion about the mental aspects of tennis performance and how players process their feelings during matches.

“And so I think if you're trying to process, it's far easier to be like, I wasn't feeling physically great.”

Swiatek's Dominance and Unexpected Victory

14:40 to 16:32

Analysis of Swiatek's powerful performance against Anisimova and her surprise win at Wimbledon.

“Like, this isn't just a story of Anisimova freezing on the big stage at all.”

Reflections on Previous Winners and Player Journeys

16:33 to 18:42

Exploration of past Wimbledon winners and the journey of players like Swiatek and Anisimova.

“a five-time major champion, as a really surprise winner of Wimbledon.”

Anisimova's Future and Grand Slam Challenges

18:43 to 22:22

Discussion on Anisimova's performance and potential future in Grand Slam tournaments, comparing her to other players.

“And the press conference did ease that fear a little bit.”

Leveraging Experience and Overcoming Nerves

22:23 to 27:22

Conversations about how players can learn from their experiences, particularly in high-pressure situations like finals.

“She's, as you say, a great doubles player.”
Show all 25 chapters

Psychology of Performance in Tennis

28:01 to 29:09

Exploring the psychological impacts of performance and anxiety in tennis.

“If you keep going, he's going to feel better.”

Women's Tennis: Grand Slam Format Debate

29:10 to 36:22

A deep dive into the differences in formats for men's and women's Grand Slam finals.

Impact of Match Dynamics on Women's Tennis

36:23 to 39:56

Discussing how match length and dynamics affect perception of women's tennis.

“I just don't think that's the direction of travel.”

Swiatek's Historic Achievement at Wimbledon

39:57 to 42:04

Celebrating Iga Swiatek's impressive victory and her journey in Grand Slam finals.

“and if there were also men that were losing Grand Slam finals in 57 minutes, love and love, I would feel less sad and uncomfortable about what we witnessed today.”

Swiatek's Wimbledon Triumph

42:04 to 43:36

Discussion on Iga Swiatek's impressive performance at Wimbledon.

“And like we've just spent like a whole podcast talking about how hard Grand Slam finals are and they are really hard.”

Men's Doubles Final Highlights

43:36 to 45:35

Recap of the men's doubles final and the historic win for the British team.

“This one has that bit of a bigger gap and it's not such a sea change.”

Wheelchair Tennis Achievements

45:35 to 47:55

Analysis of wheelchair tennis finals, including key performances and results.

“set the latter stages of the first set it was an incredible watch i've never seen anybody be more intense than Alfie Hewitt on a tennis court and Martin de la Puente was that today.”

Rivalry in Men's Tennis

47:55 to 49:47

Exploration of the rivalry between Carlos Alcaraz and Yannick Sinner ahead of the final.

“and also beat Dida De Haute in Roland Garros.”

Final Predictions and Analysis

49:47 to 55:58

Hosts discuss predictions and strategies for the men's singles final.

“They played a lot together as doubles teams.”

Previewing the Men's Final: Sinner vs. Alcaraz

56:00 to 57:24

Discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of Sinner and Alcaraz ahead of the final.

“And if he serves like that, then he doesn't get out of sight.”

Nostalgia and Classic Matches

57:24 to 58:50

Hosts reminisce about iconic tennis matches and players from the past.

“I don't think those two would have done it since.”

YouTube Algorithms and Tennis Content

58:50 to 59:24

Hosts discuss how YouTube recommends nostalgic tennis content and its enjoyment.

Predicting the Final Match Outcome

59:24 to 1:00:06

Hosts make predictions on the outcome of the final match between Sinner and Alcaraz.

“And the karate champion sort of then turns on Tim and starts kind of hitting him a bit as well to be like, you've got to learn to take punishment on the court.”

Mascots and Shoutouts

1:00:06 to 1:02:16

Segment featuring the introduction of mascots and listener shoutouts.

“We'll be back tomorrow, as David has teased, with our pre-men's final preview.”

Women’s Doubles Final and Closing Remarks

1:02:16 to 1:06:20

Discussion on the upcoming women’s doubles final and reflections on the episode.

“We have Bob Seifert from Boston, Massachusetts.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:10Hello and welcome to the tennis podcast live from Wimbledon on day 13 of the championships, the day of the women's singles final won by Iger Svjontek to claim her sixth major title in the most emphatic possible fashion. Six love, six love in 57 minutes. I'm Catherine Murtica, joined tonight by David Law, Charlie Eccleshire, special guest from The Athletic, and plain old brunette Matt Roberts over here, just as we've always known and loved him. Yeah, there's an alternate timeline where this is a very different pod and my hair is very different tomorrow. But alas. when Charlie signed up to come on tonight he thought it would be vibes-y, that man would be blonde.

0:57Yeah, I did have very different, you kind of have a rough sense of it and you know initially we were going to come and do it straight, we'd all be buzzing off a great final yeah, didn't quite pan out I think it's better to say It's a really difficult one isn't it because like there is lots to celebrate here, Iga Shiontek being back to her best, seemingly being a force right at the top of women's tennis again putting in the most astonishing performance that deserves to be lauded and celebrated and analyzed and yet like there's just undeniably a sense of awkwardness and discomfort and sadness really that you just you just can't get away from so we're going to have to kind of just embrace all of those elements to today I think in equal measure David yeah I think so because that scoreline is the result of two things at the same time.

1:54One, Iguys Viantic playing out of her mind, doing what she does so well. There's nobody in the game today that can do that. She is talked about for her bakery for a good reason. This is not an isolated incident. It's been fewer and far between this year, even though her ranking and her race position have stayed good and she's put in good performances. We haven't seen this type of run for a while. And yet, as it was going along, it was all very familiar, if you just think about her other Grand Slam final performances. But I also think, had Amanda Onissimova come out and played as she can, and I know those two things are not in isolation, but she was capable of doing a lot better today, had she not, as in her words, slightly frozen out there.

2:50And it's a shame for the occasion, for the competition. It's been a brilliant tournament. Amanda Anisimova has provided some incredible moments within it, and she deserves to be remembered for those. And it's a shame on that level that you've ended up with this awkwardness. But you're right. I mean, the sheer brilliance of Shiontech must be celebrated too. it's not an easy one to sum up in a simple way. Yeah, this might be her first love and love Grand Slam final, but she's got previous for playing Grand Slam finals like this and making them a bit awkward. Yeah, her most recent one against Paolini wasn't dissimilar.

3:29I think the thing is, she is really the worst, the absolute worst player to play. I mean, even if you're playing Sabalenka, even if Sabalenka's peaking, she might just throw in a loose game or two where she goes for too much. you know she starts showing off almost or maybe she throws in a loose service game where she double faults a bit. Fionnick was so unbelievably dialed in to the point where she's like fist pumping in the last game and you know with a lot of players you'd be like that's almost mean and a bit sadistic but I think she's just so in the zone and taking so little for granted like even at that moment she's probably thinking next point next point got to win the next point and you're you know and you feel if you're on the movie must be a bit like come on like can I have a game I mean it was yeah it was a really tough watch and I think it's it's a strange one because if Siobhan Tech had won comfortably but with a sort of respectable scoreline she would absolutely be the story you know way much and it's a strange one because from a tennis perspective she is the story really this it's an amazing recovery and journey from where she was even as recently as the French Open but I think for the sort of casual fan they're they're watching that final today and all their thoughts right now are with Anna Samova because it's such a horribly relatable it's the thing anyone who's played tennis at any level dreads you know because tennis unlike a lot of sports has like a very obvious worst case scenario and it's always there kind of in the back of your mind this could happen and weirdly I said to Matt Fatima and I sat next to you, we were talking about the psychology of when you go into a final, do you prepare for the worst?

5:08Do you even give voice to the worst that could happen? Do you say to your player, what do you do if you go four left, five left down, don't panic? Or do you not even voice that because you don't want to make them think about it? Well, sports psychologists say that you shouldn't even allow the worst case scenario to be in your mind as a, you should never say to yourself, don't do this, don't miss this putt. or don't drive into the rough because all your brain hears is into the rough or miss the putt. Apparently that is very rudimentary sports psychology, but I just don't know how anybody does that.

5:43You sit down at Six Love Down, a Grand Slam final. I know these are elite athletes that employ sports psychologists and all the rest of it. How any human mind can not go, bloomin' heck, just don't lose this love and love. I just don't know. how that doesn't pop into your mind. And I did want to ask her that actually, but I was going to ask, that was my question, but then she talked about not feeling fit and having a mischievous, and I just wanted to, I used up my question clarifying exactly what she meant by that, but my question was going to be, at what point did you start thinking about the love and love?

6:15And I'd be curious, and maybe she wouldn't answer that, I don't know. What point did you start thinking about love and love? At love too. Really? No, seriously, because honestly, the very first point of the match was a warning sign. She put in her first serve, but it was a slow first serve. She didn't hit it properly. She didn't strike it well. And then the return came back at her and she shanked a backhand. Immediately, I was like, okay, this is... We didn't see that in the opening stages against Sabalenka, for example, which was another huge match. So immediately, I was worried in that first game.

6:50I wasn't thinking love and love. But at love too, when that was the only game she had game point in and when she couldn't get over the line in that one and lost it and went down a double break I was thinking about it because of Iguis Fiontech like against anyone else I don't think I would have been because as Charlie said there's there's a chance of there being a poor game or a lapse in concentration or something but we've seen how ruthless and I use that as a total compliment Iguis Fiontech is she's she's relentless in her brilliance and you could just tell that she was playing well she was putting the returns deep she was middling the ball she was finding a high percentage of first serve she was doing all the things she needed to do and down the other end Anissa Mova was frozen with nerves as as she said and as we later found out from her press conference as well she just said she had no energy she was tired she was fatigued she was she was burnt out by kind of everything that she's done these two weeks and and that combination plus her opponent honestly I was thinking about it early in this match and I was just so desperate for it not to happen not your best day Matt you called it David I know you didn't you didn't want to be right but you did foresee this maybe not love and love but you did you did foresee a version of this as a likely-ish scenario certainly one of the two really I mean, I guess there's three because there are two other scenarios whereby Anissimova wins and Svantec wins a much closer match.

8:29But I definitely thought, I mean, I can't remember who won the toss at the start of the match because the moment that Anissimova was serving first, I was a bit anxious for her because, you know... I had the exact same thought, yeah. I sort of thought she might be better off... Because if you think about it, I think when she won the Sabalenka match, she had to receive for it in the end. And she lost her serve trying to serve it out. And it's very fashionable these days to elect to receive, even on grass. I remember when I'd be in the studio with Greg Rzedsky in Amazon days, whenever anybody would elect to receive on grass, he'd go, what are you doing?

9:02But actually, these days, it's very common. I watched it on TV. We have one centre court seat. I watched it on TV with the sound on, listening to the commentary. And there was a moment towards, I think, the end of the first set, or maybe the start of the second set where Tracy Austin and John McInerney talked about whether you have that conversation before a match. What if I'm six love down? You know, what mindset you need to have? And neither one of them seemed to be able to entertain that idea. They didn't feel like that that's something you could do. But to get back to your question, I mean, I said I thought there's a possibility it could be a 50-minute match, and it was 57.

9:45and I don't take any enjoyment about that being the case, but I've just seen it too many times with Svantec. She's the master of it. The only other player I've ever seen like that is Steffi Graf. I mean, Martina Navratilovi used to get results like that, but the era wasn't as competitive as it is now, I don't think. There were a lot of weaker players. I mean, Anissa Mova isn't a 6-love, 6-love against player when she's playing well. but Svantec has that ability it's the single mindedness that Steffi had and it all goes so fast she's you know the worst feeling of the lot must be in Anisimova's shoes occasionally she hit a good shot you saw her hit one of those shots and Svantec just dealt with it and that must be a horrible feeling to see one of your better struck shots just come back and it's in Anissa Mova's case it's out of the way of you and you've got to move to it and she doesn't have that.

10:48There was a point wasn't there in the final game of the first set which ended up with kind of both of them at the net and Anissa Mova somehow ended up losing it and her body seemed to say like I mean this isn't my day but I mean yeah I feared a comprehensive win but I thought that would look sort of like a one and three or something like that I think you know that's so extreme and I think there's an additional fear Wimbledon there have been a disproportionate number of really bad women's finals here I don't think I don't feel like that happens so much the other slams I know if that's a grass thing and it can just sets can suddenly go really quickly but we have had a few I wonder if it's what Matt is always saying about like the atmosphere of a final well you were always making the point about grand sum finals just feeling different but that is particularly exaggerated here isn't it like so much yeah ceremony and things it's so quiet still or it freaks me out if you were designing a situation to make somebody feel anxious and yeah it would be exactly like create an anxiety dream scenario you would create this and honestly i thought it would be a long time before we did a podcast about a match that i found as tough to watch as the Ons Djerber when we were in the final from two years ago and here we are.

12:07Just one other little thing I wanted to say on just how brilliant Svantec was and you know obviously watch a lot of Amanda Nisimov and this wasn't obviously anywhere close to Pika Nisimov but even in the rallies where she did get into it as David's described the thing I noticed about Svantec was her ability to still get to the ball and break the sidelines with her shots. You know, in particular on the backhand, okay, Anisimova was not striking her shots well today, but Svantec's ability to be in the right position and get width on her ground strokes so early in a rally is something that I just don't think anyone else in the tour can do, really.

12:47I talk a lot about how Sabalenka's improved at that in terms of generating width on her ground strokes to go with power, but Svjantek at her best does it better than anyone and that was absolute kryptonite for Anisimova whose feet weren't really moving today because of the nerves and she just wasn't in position and Svjantek just exploited that just expertly. And there was a double thing on that because often she was doing it to the Anisimova backhand which felt sort of counterintuitive you're going after the player's strength but it moved her out of position and it was also quite an alpha move of the like when we've seen Sinner do that sort of thing before I'd be like oh you like your backhand yeah i've got a not bad backhand myself and i'm gonna back myself it was a message to matt you like that backhand yeah exactly let me rip it to shreds yeah i read that in your piece actually i thought that was fantastic i also saw the the line a portrait of nerves in action and i don't know were you were you we were all just in the anisimova press conference just now and look she didn't claim she wasn't nervous she wasn't backing away from that at all But were you surprised at all about the extent to which she put that performance and scoreline down to physicality?

13:55I think the way I read that is that it's physical things are easier. There are quicker fixes for them. And so I think if you're trying to process, it's far easier to be like, I wasn't feeling physically great. Next time I'm going to feel physically better. And I thought there was a bit of that with Jack Draper earlier in the tournament. You know, he went really, really heavy on just like, it's not a mental thing. It's not about pressure. This is a tennis thing. And I totally believe him. But I also think that's just because that like. Make it something within your control. Make it something you can control and that it's easier to make improvements on.

14:32So, yeah, because I think we all went in there expecting her to kind of pour up, not pour a heart out. She's not that kind of player necessarily. but certainly for us watching it it's hard not to put a huge amount of stock on the psychological the mental element but i think yeah that's a a way to help her kind of process it i was just going to say as well i think again to try and bring all of this back to giving sviontek the credit that she deserves as well like just her ball is just a nightmare i think to face if you're not feeling the racket well like that heavy spin I remember there was a point when we were watching Shontek against Bencic and obviously you were riding high on Anisimova just having won that incredible match against Sabalenka but we were watching Shontek demolish Bencic you know we shouldn't forget that Bencic only got two games in the last two matches 20 games in a row she's won to win it's wild you pointed at the screen and you said that is what she's going to do to Anisimova and that's going to be a problem.

15:40Like, this isn't just a story of Anisimova freezing on the big stage at all. No, I think Anisimova could have started like that today against other players and been able to slightly work her way in and find something, get a lift from the crowd somewhere, but there was just nowhere for her to go because Fiontek was sublime. And what a point to finish it as well. like really great one I was kind of pleased it did at least end on a on a Svantec winner yeah she she was awesome it's crazy isn't it that we're here with Igor Svantec Wimbledon champion after the year that she's had the clay court season that she's had I mean like she's not going to be looked upon it's very strange to talk about a former world number one a recent world number one, a five-time major champion, as a really surprise winner of Wimbledon.

16:38But honestly, if a few weeks ago you told us that Igor Shontek was going to win Wimbledon, we would have been really shocked. Especially when she was losing, what was it, one-on-one to Coco Golf? Something like that. My mind goes back to the pre-tournament press conference with Jessica Begula, when she was describing the surface and how you can suddenly kind of have it. on this surface. And she pointed to Vondrusova and Krachikova as players that had shown no real form and suddenly won Wimbledon, you know? And it's kind of similar here. Yes, Svantec did have more form on the eve of this tournament getting to a final on grass.

17:20But, you know, those last two performances, I don't think that they were brewing all the way through the tournament. I don't think she did well. But she lost a set against Katie McNally, I think, along the way and she was very good but yeah it's it clicked for her the last couple of days and uh i mean breathtaking i was looking at the the only other six love six love final that any of us can remember is the steffi graf natalia's vareva match which was 34 minutes long in 1988 in the french open final she won six six love sets that that fortnight but three in a row from shantek to to culminate in the tournament is something else.

18:01I think she's the first player in the Open Era to win a slam, first woman in the Open Era to win a slam with a six-love set in the semi and the final. It's extraordinary. I mean, as soon as you, yeah, Vareva's name being mentioned is like a tennis bogeyman. You could sort of like, and you... And you don't want Anisimo to come that. Exactly, exactly. Her name doesn't deserve to be synonymous. She won, I think, 20 doubles titles across women's and mix. She was a former one, number five, but ultimately, that is what most people know her for. And I was thinking it's a weird thing in sport that in many ways, if Anna Simova had lost 7-6 in the third to Sabalenka, we'd all be saying, what a tournament.

18:38And, you know, can she kick on at the US Open? Because she's shown us she can go toe to toe with the very best. Well, she beat Sabalenka. And yet, you know, there's a fear. And the press conference did ease that fear a little bit. But there is a fear that she comes off this. And there's a bit of a rebuilding job that needs doing, which, you know, there shouldn't be in many ways. She's just achieved this incredible thing. I think on Shviontek as well, what's interesting, you know, now we've had, what, nine different winners in the last nine Wimbledon's. Is she just another one of those nine? Like, does she slip back into being a, oh, remember that year when Shviontek was great on grass?

19:15Because she's very different from all those players, obviously. She's not a Vondrosseva, she's not a Krojcikovic. They were kind of bolts from the blue. She's not that in a wider sense, but in a Wimbledon sense, she is another shock winner. She is another player who never got beyond the quarters or really looked like a natural on it. And also, like, if this is a return to champion Svantec, we're expecting her to win the French Open next year. And would she have won Wimbledon if she'd won the French Open? Like those, I know it's days, but like in a five week long season, days are critical. Practice days are critical.

19:51And those seem to have been very critical this year in eager Svantec's success. Now, maybe she won't need them next year because of what she's accumulated on the surface this year. But can, will the Yiga Shontek ever do the channel slab and win both? Well, I think this year almost reinforces how hard she thinks it is to do. You know, the way she was talking about it after the semi, she was kind of like, I just don't really know how you do both. Was pretty much the sentiment, you know, and it makes think of what Alcaraz, which we'll get on to, is trying to do to do it back to back. Ibiza, Ibiza.

20:23Yeah, well, yeah, exactly. Is that just the answer? I'm finally on board. That's the common thread there. But yeah, and I mean, you know, she's now won as many Grand Slam matches this year as Sabalenka, Sviontek, you know, which again is kind of feels mad. And I wonder, obviously we can never know. I just wonder how that final would, like would Sviontek have gone out and just destroyed Sabalenka? Or would that have been a really close? I mean, obviously we don't know. I'd love to know Sabalenka's thoughts on that. I bet she's in Ibiza. No, Mykonos. Mykonos is her thing, isn't it? Does anyone want to speculate on that completely ludicrous sliding doors?

21:05Would Fiontek have done a version of this to Sabalenka? Would it have been a completely different match? I think completely different. I think the way we've seen Fiontek play this tournament, I would have to say she likely would have won it. I think she was playing better than Sabalenka this tournament. but I think it would have looked completely different Sabalenka wouldn't freeze and understandably so she's used to these occasions I also think just comparing Zvereva who I do remember watching and Anisimova I don't expect Anisimova to kind of be remembered only for this I think she will have other moments I think she will reach other Grand Slam finals I really do You're telling me I should keep, like Matt brings his Breathe Right nasal strips to Grand Slams.

21:54I should bring the blonde hair dye to every slam. I should bring Matt. I bought it. It costs£3.49. Every Grand Slam, that is going in your luggage. So, yeah, to be clear, we're extending the pledge to any slam. Oh, excellent. I was trying to get you to commit to that yesterday. I said to Matt, are you happy for your look to be dependent on a pack of dye that costs£3.49? He was like, yeah, OK. My concern would be, because her game is so complete, OK, maybe movement aside, the rest of it's so complete. And Zvereva was never that. She's, as you say, a great doubles player. This was a bit of a surprise that she reached the final.

22:36I would worry for what happens the next time Anissimeva is in a Grand Slam final. He would. How do you not, how do you, I mean, for her sake, I hope she isn't playing Svantec next time, that she gets somebody that allows her to establish her feet in a match. Well, look, I would love Amanda Nisimov and Madison Keyes to have a chat, because we were talking about how much is Nisimov going to do a Keyes this weekend in terms of the Australian Open, where she beat Svantec and Sambalenka back to back to win it, which was what obviously Nisimov was having to try to do here. Well, if this was reminiscent of any Grandstand final in recent memory, it was very reminiscent of Madison Keyes' first Grandstand final, the 2017 US Open.

23:27Good point. The total freeze didn't show up. And look, it took many years for Madison Keyes to eventually win one, and it was absolutely no given that she would. And as much as I'm a believer in Amanda Nisimov, but it's not a given that she wins a grand slam title but it was also interesting I think to hear her talk about her serve you know she said I got to the women of final with a mediocre serve an average serve and honestly yes like I've been saying it all week like she's not been serving that well generally it's not a particularly brilliant shot for her she doesn't strike it as as cleanly as her ground strokes, for example.

24:08But it has improved kind of until this tournament, to be honest. I think she's been serving better this year than she has this tournament. So there's definitely an area there where she can still improve. And, yeah, like, I'm absolutely going to be the one who stresses, like, this is a tremendous positive tournament. You know, she started out on court 15. And she went to court 12. she went to court three you know she worked her way up from from those outside courts all the way to the final you know that's that's amazing and i bet there's definitely going to be some some scar tissue from this i'm not i'm not thinking that you just click your fingers and move on from experience like that because that was chastening and sickening and brutal it was horrible but i i do think time will will help her here and i do expect to to kind of see her back in in these sorts of moments again and just when i was at a low ebb robert mcnichol he popped up in whatsapp and said if you need a boost yvonne goulagon lost six love six one in 38 minutes to billy jean king in 1975 five years later she won the title it's gonna make me cry thank you robert Reggie popped up, being the spirit of Wimbledon just when he needed it.

25:32Oh, yeah. What a man. I mean, I think, yeah, I mean, if you're thinking as well about little warning signs, as well as the serve, I mean, from the nerves perspective, how she closed out the quarterfinal and you could argue the semifinal. You know, this isn't a player still who's kind of immune to nerves in big moments. She said that as well. Exactly. And I mean, she got through those matches, but, you know, it was pretty shaky. and again hopefully she kind of learns from that and I think yeah the final thing is so interesting as to whether as you say that you know when she gets hopefully she does get into another one whether you're thinking well that's good she's had experience but when something's like overwhelmingly a negative one how helpful that is I tend to think it still is helpful and like in my own life when I f things up I often say to myself well you were probably going to make that mistake at some point now it's happened you're not going to make it again and i think she probably you know that's healthy yeah well as long as it's not like totally catastrophic do you know what i mean and i guess but you know what i mean so i think she she's probably her way of processing it is like well whenever i played my first grand slam final this was probably a distinct possibility and i wonder if i don't know if she and coco goff are friends but i wonder if you know listening remembering what Coco Gauff had to say obviously the French Open this year wasn't her first major title but after winning it she was reminiscing about the first Royal Garros final that she played wasn't she and sort of revealing how she said I was beaten before I stepped on the court yeah and that wasn't what we heard at the time exactly was it that's quite interesting it was quite a big reveal from her I wonder if she striked me as a sort of person that would probably reach out.

27:19Yeah, exactly. And it's almost like you just need to get that first one out of the way then if that is how you're going to be. And it's different because some players say, well, actually the first one I felt less pressure because it was kind of a free hit. But clearly that wasn't the feeling today. I mean, I don't have a champion's mindset, but my attitude in Anastasia Mova's shoes in my next Grand Sam final, which I will hopefully reach, so that the£3.49's worth of hair dye doesn't go to waste would be, well, it can only be better. It literally can't be worse. It literally can only be better, like total free hit.

27:55Yeah. Could be 56 minutes, I guess, but realistically it will not be better. If you keep going, he's going to feel better. That's my sport's psychology for the day. Also, I thought we'd hired a professional. I didn't tell you this because today's been an all-around low ebb, but she was actually, she became unavailable. It was going to be me. Oh man, I wish that had happened so much. It's good that you didn't know. As if your anxiety wouldn't have been high enough. Today has not come up Matt Roberts. Wow, that might be why it happened. She's not been very well today either. Imagine if she'd won and the professional hair colourist wasn't available and you suddenly found yourself with me in a£3.49 pack of hair dye.

28:38I've done it before. I back myself. I back you. Thank you. That's not what your face 15 seconds ago was saying. Yeah, no, same. Almost as big a winner as Igor Shontek today. Potentially the guy that published an article before the final with the headline, tennis wants Grand Slam finals to be epics, so why is women's tennis not given the space? Good timing, Charlie. Yeah. I mean, it's... yeah just I mean yeah basically the article I wrote was uh yeah on basically the cap that's put on women's grandstand finals it was hooked on the fact that it's 20 years this year since the epic Venus Williams Lindsay Davenport final and it occurred to me you know it was just like that was I think it's the longest women's final ever still two hours 45 Davenport had a championship point served the match but I mean it was about as dramatic and epic as a final can be and yet it's never it's not in the pan you know it a women's final can't really be in the pantheon it just can't because five sets the length the undulations you don't get that and so because initially i wanted to do a piece just to kind of you know 20 years since let's remember this final but it felt like a good jumping off point to have that discussion and i think a final like this that we've watched today is kind of in a way supports both arguments because the critics will say well you know would we have wanted to watch another set of that like it was terrible but I think that the format really contributes to a match like this because there's an anxiety so much more quickly from a player like Anastasia Mo being like oh my gosh this was my dream and it's getting away from me and as Matt said there was a fear from about two love three love that it could be six love six love and I've got no time and you can feel it from the crowd the crowd feeling like oh my god I paid a lot of money for this and I'm this going to be done less than an hour it just adds to the pressure and anxiety that you're already feeling, that there's no time to turn it round.

30:36The reminder in your piece that Carlos Alcárez lost the first five games of his 2023 final against Novak Djokovic, that I just don't believe, this is unprovable, but I just don't believe that final would have panned out either in result or in epicness in the way that it did if they were playing best of three set. Yeah, exactly, because he knows at that point if I get broken early in the second I'm on my way to an all-time drubbing basically in a final in the same way Anna Simova would have felt that rather than feeling okay it's a set I've got I can kind of get my way back into this but yeah just bigger I mean I mean we've had these discussions before but it just is it does feel a little bit of one of those moment where you're like you need to take a step back and in a sport like tennis the idea one of the most in theory equitable sports and where you've got the biggest superstars that we're telling Serena Williams and Irina Sabalenka and whoever, you have to play a smaller format.

31:36You know, if they're talking to a women's footballer, the women's footballer would be like, yeah, that's like telling us our matches are 70 minutes or something. It's wild, isn't it, in a sport with the rich history of relative equality that tennis has, Billie Jean King and the original nine, that they play different formats. It's wild in other sports that don't have... it's just it's unthinkable in sports that don't have anywhere near the history of yeah but it's because it's basically saying like let's stick with rules set in the 19th century when women didn't have the vote i mean like that's the time period by which we are still sticking to these rules and i think tennis might almost be a victim of its own success because it established itself quicker and those formats took hold as being kind of sacrosanct in a way that in other sports maybe they didn't and they could build them from scratch a little bit more And I think if we were playing, look, my argument isn't get rid of best of five set tennis.

32:35I think the ideal is best of three sets for both first week, best of five sets for both second week from quarterfinals onwards, maybe fourth round. I don't really mind about the details there. The most important thing to me is that both sexes play the same format. but given the way tennis has evolved and the length of matches sort of going from first principles imagine you're an alien dropping from earth and you haven't seen any tennis previously and you watch an epic best of three set tennis match in a final I just don't think anyone's mind would go God I wish there was another couple of sets and another two and a half hours of this I just don't think that would be the case obviously we're conditioned by everything that has come before but I wish there was more of like a let's come at this from first principles with a clean slate and fresh eyes and do this differently.

33:30I mean it was a reminder as well because I spoke to Lindsay Davenport for the piece for her memories of that match but also about this three and five set argument and she you'll remember David the WTA finals final was best of five from 84 to 98 so she's actually played a couple of best of five matches I think her defeat to Martina Hingis in 98 is the last five set women's match. So it's not this, you know, there is some precedent for it. And I think, you know, and she said in a thing, a lot of players will say, well, a change of format midway through could be problematic. I just don't really see why necessarily, given that you can have wild undulations in match length, especially on the men's side in a tournament anyway.

34:11And you have, if you're a man and you get to the final of a tournament the week before a slam, you're jumping from a three set match to a five set match. in no time but it's hard because as you know I asked a number of the leading players about this there's very little appetite from the women players and I understand that because for them they're already mentally and physically exhausted and so saying to them do you want to do more of that doesn't really appeal but that's why it shouldn't you know it's not necessarily they're not necessarily the best people to ask on it because yeah I get from their perspective they're playing enough tennis they don't want to play more but but it should be a sort of conceptual practical question above and beyond what any individual exactly that happens to be playing at that moment in time should i mean eager shantek et al are only playing best of three now because of as you say customs that were set 100 you know 100 years ago like it's but in the set Olympics until 1984, the biggest distance women were able to compete in was 1 ,500.

35:18I mean, how crazy is that? Or that where we are at Wimbledon, until 77, I think, there couldn't be ball girls, couldn't be ball boys, and it wasn't until 85 they could be on the centre court. I mean, these things all sound ludicrous, but you would hope in 50 or 100 years it will sound as ludicrous to be saying, well, women played three, they played a different format. I mean, why? That would seem, I think that if you actually step back, it does seem crazy. I don't know what you all think about this. I personally, as much as I desperately want change, the one thing I don't want is for anybody to go, okay, we'll have a best of five set women's final.

Read the full transcript

35:57I think that's terrible. And nothing else. And nothing else. Yeah, just a best of five set women's final. Because imagine today that it was not only Amanda Nisimovas' first ever grandstand final, but it's also her first ever best of five set match. Well, and also, and then she's a kind of like playing to prove herself and the whole sport and her whole sex. And yeah, that's a lot of pressure on one player. I think it's so unlikely that we see best of five women's matches. Ever. I just don't think that's the direction of travel. I think if we're going to even it up, it's going to be men playing best of three.

36:41But do you think that will actually ever happen after what we saw in Paris three weeks ago? That's the thing that bothers me the most about the inequality, that idea of there being this cap on the women in terms of being able to play those sorts of epics. Because I agree, honestly, that Davenport-Williams match is the first tennis match I ever watched. and it got me into the sport, but I know that it didn't have that effect on maybe as many people. People don't bring that match up. I'm always bringing that match up because it was incredible. Matthew behind the camera is nodding harder than he's ever nodded before.

37:25But when people cite the best matches, they so often cite the five setters and that bothers me. But I don't know. I just think I just I just think we're going towards more best of three than more best of five and honestly the the thing of freezing in a final and that awkwardness I get it it's it's look I hated what happened today in that sense but I do also think that's sport like I know it's I know it's hard to come back from from that deficit and when you're playing like that, but there are also lots of examples where someone has started slowly in best of three and come back. Like, there is time.

38:12I know it's not as much time as best of five, and I know that that inequality bothers me, but it doesn't bother me, the fact of having best of three set finals for that reason. Like, there is time. It's hard, but there is time. And, yeah, I just think, I just think if that's the argument to play best of five I'm not I'm not quite on board with it I'm more on board with the argument in terms of missing out on that that epic quality that we have but I just don't think we're I just don't think we're going that way I also don't think we necessarily should go that way like but there is a way of still having net a net reduction in tennis matches and getting the three and five equality if you were to do the first four rounds as three and three and the, you know, then that would, I completely agree, Matt.

39:02I think everyone you talk to, clearly there should be less best of five, which I agree with. You could elevate the latter stage. Yeah, exactly. You do it that way. But I still think it's very unlikely. I basically go with any proposal that could be adopted tomorrow where the men and the women play the same format. I mean, I'd probably go with Fast Four if they were playing the same format. Like, just, it's ludicrous. Sort it out. I don't eat your wood. I would. Okay. I'd be in a bad mood about it. But I would begrudgingly accept it. I accept that. But look, I agree with you, Matt. Like, I would be part of, a big part of why I wince at finals like we had today.

39:42Obviously, part of it is just the human level of watching Amanda Anisamova go through that experience. But it's the fact that I know a lot of the world is going, oh, women's tennis. Or looking at it as this is bad news for women's tennis. And honestly, I wish we lived in a world where a final like today wasn't bad news for women's tennis, but women don't have the luxury of not representing their sex and women's sport every time they step out onto the court. And that's a fact and it's depressing. and if there were also men that were losing Grand Slam finals in 57 minutes, love and love, I would feel less sad and uncomfortable about what we witnessed today.

40:26I would still feel extremely sad for Amanda Renesimova, but it would feel different, I think. So fast forwards, guys. Let's start the campaign. We're starting with the mixed doubles and the US Open, Catherine. Two days to shape the future. Yeah. Anything more we want to say about today's final before we move on to other things? Just a few stats on Igor Svontek, which I think really just show what an amazing achievement this is for her. She's the youngest woman to win majors on all three surfaces since Serena in 2002. And what I find so interesting about that is that what we talked about, like, it's a narrative change.

41:10You know, we come out of this Wimbledon with a narrative change on the women's side. And maybe we will tomorrow on the men's side as well. If Sinner gets a win over Alcaraz, that will, like, change the narrative. I just think Fiontek winning Wimbledon, that's cool. Like, that's really exciting for the tour. Like, you know, she's now one slam away from the career slam. I love it when players are chasing a career slam. I love it. I was genuinely wondering whether she would do the career slam. You know, we still have to wonder. you know she might the australian open might be something that that she doesn't get her hands on but now it feels like something she probably will do i always take an alcaraz both chasing career slam in australia always be there i always thought wimbledon would be would be the hardest one for her to win so for her to get it now just sort of changes changes what we thought we knew which i just think is is really really interesting and now she's obviously won her first six major finals which only Monica Seles on the women's side has done in the open era.

42:06Amazing. And like we've just spent like a whole podcast talking about how hard Grand Slam finals are and they are really hard. She's never lost one. Like that's crazy. That's so good. She also just on the turnaround from Paris point, remember how bad her serve was at times around a garrison in that Sabalenka match was getting absolutely feasted on to the point where I was like, I just don't think she can win Grand Slam she's going to keep serving like this well she's come here served incredibly higher proportion of service games won than anyone it was 90 going into this match and that so that would have gone up slightly as well so that's a pretty incredible turnaround and i know surface is partly to do with that but relatively speaking as well she's served better than anyone it's pretty amazing yeah on a surface where the serve is more important than anywhere else yeah great point well congratulations Iga Shiontek a Wimbledon champion I think she's going to I hope she's going to really enjoy this one and get a bit of breathing space to properly process it you get more time don't you I mean obviously she won the US Open as well but I remember that tournament even felt a little bit stressful in some ways for her because she's not a massive New York fan I think she's going to really really enjoy this and be able to go home have some time off and properly let this soak in.

43:31It's a huge deal. Ibiza? Well, maybe. It also must be quite nice to actually be able to celebrate a Grand Slam and unlike the US Open, that they were all in Roland Garros where you celebrate, but then you do have in the back of your mind, I've got Wimbledon in a few weeks. This one has that bit of a bigger gap and it's not such a sea change. So yeah, hopefully she can enjoy it. We always immediately asked her about Wimbledon in her French Open victory press conferences. Brutal, brutal sport Congratulations Igor Sviantek Some other finals that were played today before the women's singles final, the men's doubles final, Julian Cash and Lloyd Glasspool beating David Pell and Rinki Hijikata 6-2, 7-6 to become the first all-British team and this stat floored me to win the men's doubles here since 1936 obviously individual British men have won it but no all British team since 1936 89 years of hurt and you know that final was did you say 6-2 first set?

44:406-2, 7-6 so first set was 6-2 I think it was a break at the start of the second as well and in about 38 minutes that was very nearly looking like the same sort of story as this one in terms of time on court and then the next thing I know Cash and Glassport were serving five, six down trying to get it into the tiebreaker. I mean and talk about a grass court season, 14 match winning streak for them, they won Queen's Eastbourne and Wimbledon. Like the perfect grass court season, unbelievable Bet they'll go to Ibiza

45:14Wimbledon chartering a single plane Are you going to Ibiza? Maybe. That's where the champions ball is this yeah um some wheelchair tennis results today the incredible martin de la puente and ruben spargaran beat alfie hewitt and gordon reed 7 6 7 5 for their first wheelchair doubles title as a team this match played on court one with a great crowd i watched um all of the second set the latter stages of the first set it was an incredible watch i've never seen anybody be more intense than Alfie Hewitt on a tennis court and Martin de la Puente was that today. He was just not going to have that title prized from his hands.

45:59Like this whole match was Martin de la Puente's. It was incredible really. Like they served at the first set, did de la Puente and Spargerin and Hewitt and Reid broke them back and took it to a tie break but then a very one-sided tie break, Hewitt and Reid went a break up in the second and yet still it just always felt like De La Puente and Spargeron's title and you know Ruben Spargeron bless him owes De La Puente a point tonight I think like he was unbelievable De La Puente like the combination of power and touch was Alcaraz-esque it was his third major doubles final with three different partners and he'd faced hewitt and reed in all three of those those finals um and it's his second major title after winning the u.s open doubles in 2022 so get them on board the plane to ibiza by the way expensive pints there by the way so in ibiza yeah shout out to the uh the camera people on that court you know they have that ground level camera in the corner i'm not sure how they do it because they're not on the court physically, they must be poking them through the backstop but the players were virtually colliding with it as they were hitting these shots and you saw the physicality and the trajectory of these shots that they were whipping and it's not it's very often not a backhand, it's a reverse forehand the way they grip the racket it's astonishing the strength and the timing in the forearms there yeah, Alfie Hewitt's backhand is, I just don't know where the power comes from, well I do I mean, it's the core strength and upper body, but it's unbelievable.

47:45In the women's wheelchair singles final, 26-year-old Ji Ying Wong stunned Yui Kimiji 3-3. Look, an incredible performance from Wong, who beat Dida De Haute earlier in the tournament and also beat Dida De Haute in Roland Garros. Dida De Haute, I understand, isn't quite physically herself. She had surgery earlier in the year. I think she's expected to get back to more where she was before. So this might be one of those little window periods in women's wheelchair tennis. But boy, is Xi and Wong taking advantage of that. Yui Kimiji, the top seed, world number one, was going for the career Golden Slam today.

48:31And was outplayed 3-3 by Wong. and she'll have to wait another year, Kameji, to try and complete that career golden slam. And look, I hope she does it. I hope she has a Jana Novotna moment. It felt a bit like this was her chance. I hope I'm wrong, but yeah. It's a bit like watching Alfie Hewitt last year. Kind of finally somebody beat Takita Oda and he didn't have to face him in the final. I mean, I know he's beaten him before, but the young ones are coming through. you're getting older it's not going to get any easier it's been an incredible year for Kimi Ji she's had this incredible resurgence but that's why I say this felt like the one she's back to world number one but look Ji and Wong is incredible first ever wheelchair major title winner from China so that is absolutely huge and the quad wheelchair doubles was won by Guy Sassen and Niels Vink 6-3-6-2 over Donald Rampardi and the Brit Gregory Slade.

49:35Niels Vink will also play in the quad wheelchair singles final tomorrow against Sam Schroeder. That will be a 39th career meeting between the two. Niels Vink is only like 21. I read an interview with the two of them today. They're both Dutch. They're great friends. They played a lot together as doubles teams. Vink said, I have a better haircut. We were recently in Turkey for the World Team Cup and went to the hairdresser together. Sam got his head shaved I got blonde tips How much did the dye cost? Well exactly So I'll be going to Niels Vink for advice on hair dyeing Right on to tomorrow the final day of Wimbledon 2025 there's obviously the women's doubles final there is also the men's singles final and look a number of other finals as well But let's talk men's singles final, Carlos Alcaraz against Yannick Sinner.

50:40Charlie, do you fancy playing the percentage game? Well, I'm obviously sticking with Alcaraz not winning the tournament. He's going to lose early. You've got to go with that. If he loses in the final, do you still take some credit there? Well, in a sense, the initial premise was from when we spoke a few weeks ago, and it was post-Queens and the premise was he's in a much better place than he was last year. Does that make him borderline unbeatable? And my point was that he is in a better place but his two biggest rivals are in a way better place. Certainly one of them, Djokovic. And Sinner I felt was in a way better place in the sense that he had another year on the grass and he feels like a player who's kind of built incrementally each year.

51:24And I'm going to stick with that thesis and say that Sinner will be a far far harder opponent for him than Djokovic on one leg was last year and you know Alcarez obviously Alcarez won that match comprehensively it got a bit sticky at the end I don't know I obviously Alcarez is the favorite and maybe I'm saying partly what I want to happen because I do think for the sake of tennis for that great rivalry Sinner does like I wanted Alcarez to win in Paris because I felt if he doesn't then it's three slams in a row for Sinner and he's the world number one all of a sudden that feels a bit in balance well now i feel if alcaraz keeps winning it's a bit in balance it reminds me a little bit of in 2008 you were desperate for one of federer nadal to get the kind of away win because it was getting a little bit repetitive of okay well so nadal wins in paris every year federer wins at wimbledon every year and winning one against the head was obviously huge and i feel like sinner needs to do that for the sake of the rivalry in the sport more generally.

52:24He needs a win against Alcaraz, doesn't he? Yannick Sinner. I think it's not far off because at this point you can still rationalise it. Some of those matches have been crazily close. Obviously, the most recent one could not have been closer. But yeah, you don't want it to become too big a factor. Rivalries, you don't want to be too imbalanced one way or the other. Matt. look I know I had a feeling for this moment today I've got a feeling for Sinner thank you I just keep thinking I just keep thinking about the lead he took at Roland Garros and how how like it took it took Alcaraz magic dust to get that one back and I know that like that's Alcaraz's thing he keeps doing that and therefore we should predict it.

53:23And I do always predict it. I do always say Alcaraz. I just think it sort of takes that level of brilliance and genius to be able to beat Yannick Sinner. And look, if anyone can, it probably is Alcaraz. And actually on the grass, I do think the grass rewards some of the stuff that Alcaraz likes to do to throw him off, the net rushing, the drop shots, the slice, that slice on defence, all that stuff is perhaps amplified here. and that's why I think Alquaz does go in as the favourite. But I don't know, I think Sinner will know the importance of trying to get a win as well. I just think Sinner's going to bring it.

54:05And I've said Alquaz all the way through, I will not be shocked if Alquaz wins. But right now, I think my pick is Sinner and I wasn't expecting to say that. And folks, Matt needs a win. No one needs to win like Matt Roberts right now. Alcaraz winning is always great. Always. But Sinner winning would, as I said, and as Charlie said, change the narrative a bit, which would be fascinating. David? I personally don't really think of the wins in a row that Alcaraz has had against Sinner as being a big deal, really, because most of them don't feel like they've been in the biggest matches. The most recent one, yes.

54:51But I share your view. Well, hold on a minute. He was two sets to love up and five, three up. He virtually beat him, didn't he? So it's rabbits out of hat stuff from our crowds. I think there are a number of scenarios that I could see being completely plausible. My expectation is actually that they both bring it because I will never forget the first game they played in Paris. It was one of the best first games, one of the best first points of a Grandstand final I've ever seen. I was so excited when I saw that first point. And I just hope they come out like that again. And I'm going to just give myself a night to think about it again.

55:33And give myself license to maybe give a definitive on tomorrow's preview show. And it's not just a teaser. Good tease, David. But it is a partial teaser. but I think that there is, one of these days, I think there is going to be a grandstand final that Yannick Sinner wins against Carlos Alcraz in straight sets. I think it'll be four. I think tomorrow will be four. I think he'll go two sets up, Alcraz will win the third and everyone will think, oh, it's happening again and then Sinner will slam his foot down and win the four. I think that's a very good case that you make there because the manner in which Sinner plays, the reliable ground strokes, the reliable returns and serves, the bullets down the line the constantly asking questions if Alcaraz is not on it a bit like today he could find himself miles behind before he gets going and then sprinkle the magic dust a bit like when he played Zverev in Australia at that time I still think it's a final, he'll turn up more likely but if his serve's a bit off his serve was amazing against Fritz early on.

56:40And if he serves like that, then he doesn't get out of sight. That's the thing, Sinner doesn't get out of sight. But he might not be on his serving game. And I think Sinner can hurt him on the return, big time. Have we got three Sinners here? I'm telling you tomorrow what I think. Okay. What do you think? I think Alcaraz. I just always think Alcaraz because I think he's, when he shows up, he's the best player. And he shows up in Grand Slam finals. I find it very I find all of your points incredibly compelling and I will not be surprised at all if Sinner wins but I just find it very hard not to pick Alcaraz It's the beauty of it isn't it?

57:16These two they just give you so much possibility It's amazing that we're getting it off the back of that epic I mean it's rare as well isn't it? 2016 Australian Open and French Open was the last time you had men's Grand Slam finals the same back to back Yeah it doesn't Like, you know, and even in the Federer-Nadal, I mean, I think the last time Federer-Nadal, it must have been 2008. I don't think those two would have done it since. Nadal and Djokovic had a mad run of four in a row. Djokovic won the first three. And in the women's, it's a long time since it happened. But yeah, I keep thinking the same thing.

57:51I'm just like, I can't believe we get this. It feels almost spoiled. It's such a lovely combination. I personally didn't really enjoy Nadal against Djokovic over the years very much. I used to find them quite arduous matches to watch. I enjoyed Nadal Federer. I loved Sampras and Agassi. That was the one I always loved to watch. And Borg and McEnroe. And I think Sinner and Alcaraz have got that. We watched Agassi Shelton yesterday, didn't we, David? We did. Really? YouTube just keeps presenting with stuff. Oh, my God. YouTube algorithm has got him absolutely nailed. This morning I watched a 20-minute reel of Sampras against McEnroe in the 1990 US Open.

58:33Oh, it was so great. that's a great crossover I don't think of those two sort of overlapping it's fantastic and now it's presented me with the the San Prasagasi final of the same year that I'm just I'm going to go and watch that Charlie discovered the same BBC British tennis documentary yesterday that we watched the other night David what do you think well I mean I think a lot there's a lot that gets said about AI and computer you know oh it's so scary that my computer knows me so well there are also times when you're like I'm really YouTube you know me so well and I'm grateful thank you for 20 minutes of pure joy 1994 can britain produce a good tennis player is sort of the premise i mean you've got to it's just incredible on the floor is the best it's the best anything i've seen this fortnight if you want to see tim hemmon boxing if you want to see tim hemmon like zinedine zidane head butting a karate champion karate champion yeah that exists that That footage exists on YouTube.

59:33It's honestly incredible. And the karate champion sort of then turns on Tim and starts kind of hitting him a bit as well to be like, you've got to learn to take punishment on the court. Yeah. I mean, you'd get reported if you did that training now. It's amazing. Maybe we'll pop a link in the show notes. You won't regret it. You will not regret those 20 minutes of your life. Okay. David, you're exempt until tomorrow. Let's get a, you think, Sinner in four. Definitive prediction. The first two, then Alcres gets the third and then send a fourth. OK, I appreciate your punchiness, Charlie. That is very, very welcome here on the Tennis Podcast.

1:00:09We'll be back tomorrow, as David has teased, with our pre-men's final preview. That will be at 3pm local time. Obviously, it was supposed to be at midday today, and then we changed it at 3pm to give Matt time to have a nap. I had a nap as well. And actually, we realised this is a great time to do this show. So thank you, Matt. You are welcome. So we're going to do it at 3pm tomorrow as well. And then, of course, we'll be back after the final to talk about it. And hopefully Matt will be feeling better. I think I'm confident. You're confident that it can only get better from here? I'm confident that tomorrow will be better than today.

1:00:50Right. OK. Folks, we have a mascot for today's show. In fact, we have two. We have Tito and Spritz. owned by Sean Frost. Tito is three years old and Spritz is two years old and they are long-haired chihuahuas that Sean's husband, Kenny, and Sean got to expand their family. Oh, that's lovely. They love tug-of-war with squeaky toys and games of chase in the park. They're also now older siblings to Jake and Jack. Jake is one and Jack is a baby. Our human baby additions to the family. Wowza. Tito and Spritz stay just close enough to the babies to catch any food that falls from the high chairs. Very relatable stuff.

1:01:33But just far away, far enough away to avoid any tail pulling. Yes, there was a big process of Nina learning to stroke Billie Jean very nicely, which she does now. They're best of friends. It's lovely. And like their dads, says Sean, they like Goff and Alcaraz. big day coming up for Tito and Spritz tomorrow wishing you luck lovely dogs we're live so I can't just spend the next two and a half minutes looking at their faces but that's what I would like to do hello to our mascots Phoebe, Maisie and Roger hello to you hello to our top folks and executive producers Greg, Chris and Jeff Matt do you have shoutouts in you.

1:02:16I do. I do. We have Bob Seifert from Boston, Massachusetts. Hello, Bob. Bob says, I'm retiring in June, so a couple of weeks ago, and my gift myself is four days at Wimbledon. Very good. He said he'd be wearing his In The Mix t-shirt. Oh, Bob. I hope he had a great time. Like Bob Brian, who I can only assume won the Legends doubles title with Mike because obviously yeah they beat who was it they played Cabal and Farah Cabal and Farah and I was like that feels like the doubles draw and like the late great Bob Brett who yes he's just come up in the chat actually yeah what a coach he was absolutely thank you Bob hope you enjoyed your Wimbledon we've also got Robin Hodge from Melbourne hi Robin Robin Harsa yeah so this is Robin with a Y and Robin's actually come up with Robin Maudsley a WTA player in the 60s and that's Robin with a Y I love the name Robin with a Y I don't know whether the spelling was with a Y but there was a brilliant tennis writer from the New York Times, great friend of Mary Carrillo, Robin Finn who covered the sport for many many years I remember very good, we've got a Robin Montgomery Marie coming up in the chat.

1:03:45Robin Sirdling. Excellent. Great stuff. Thank you, Robin. Thanks, Robin. And finally, we have Stacey from Queens, New York. Stacey Alistair. Yeah, this is our second Stacey of the week. It is. And this Stacey shares a birthday with Pamela Howard-Shriver. Oh, 4th of July. Stacey, what a birthday. And Nick Imerson of the ITF had sent me last week when we had tennis Stacey's. He sent me Stacey Margolin, who was an ex of John McEnroe. Circa, like where did she fit into the timeline? That's all I have. I will Google it afterwards. That is incredible from both you and from Nick Imerson of the ITF, who's always sending us I know it's great Nick's the best yeah that's absolutely lovely incredible Stacey Bob and Robin Robin Stacey Bob and Robin thank you ever so much we'll be back tomorrow just to mention by the way that before the men's singles final it's the women's doubles final that's at 1pm local time it's Shea and Ostapenko against Kudmetova Mertens what do we think Ostapenko thought of today can I play the winner and on court number one tomorrow if you have a ticket for that it's Taquito Oda against Alfie Hewitt I think that's what I'll be watching at 11am yeah me too yeah God he's desperate to beat Taquito Oda isn't he Alfie Hewitt good luck okay so that is all coming up tomorrow we'll be here with our preview show at 3pm local time and then we'll be back at the end of play with our final tennis podcast live from Wimbledon, Charlie.

1:05:39Thank you very much for your time this evening. Thank you very much. One more day of your big Al Coraz prediction to come true. Still doubling down. That's the thing to do when you make a big prediction. Don't back down, double down. And then just keep quiet afterwards. Yeah, absolutely. Talk is very true. Matt, bed beckons. Tomorrow is a new day for you and Amanda both. David, thank you for keeping the ship afloat today. I wasn't that bad, was I? We just feel for you. You were great. We just feel bad. Lots of people commenting on how pale you look. Yeah. Oh, great. He's all right, folks. Sleep and drugs are wonderful things.

1:06:19People, bounce back. We will be back tomorrow, live from Wimbledon for the final time. Please do join us then. And thank you for listening and for watching. Bye for now.

From the publisher

Catherine, David and Matt were joined by Charlie Eccleshare of The Athletic to talk through Iga Swiatek becoming Wimbledon champion and her 6-0 6-0 win over Amanda Anisimova. 

In part one we talk through what happened in a match that had the most one-sided of scorelines and the most brutal of defeats for a nervous and – in her own estimation – tired, Amanda Anisimova. We discuss how nerves played their part in limiting Anisimova’s ability to hurt Swiatek and how much the semi-final against Sabalenka may have taken from her in emotional energy. Disappointing as it was from her point of view, however, we had plenty of space to talk about the brilliance of Iga Swiatek in grand slam finals, her ruthlessness and power today, her resilience in coming back after a number of disappointing results to take this title, and how her victory changes the narrative of women’s tennis. Finally, it’s a scoreline which once again got us talking about best of three vs best of five. 

In part two (44m04s) we discuss the other results from today, including a first victory in a very long time for an all British pair – Cash and Glasspool - in the men’s doubles, of an intense and dramatic victory for De la Puente and Spaargaren over Hewett and Reid in the men’s wheelchair doubles, and of a new star in Chinese wheelchair tennis as Wang Ziying denied Yui Kamiji her first Wimbledon victory and a career golden slam. 

In part three (50m18s) we give you a brief preview of the men’s final tomorrow and look ahead to the final order of play at the Championships 2025. 

Check out our ⁠⁠new merch shop⁠⁠! 

Talk tennis with Friends on ⁠⁠The Barge! ⁠⁠

Sign up to receive our free ⁠⁠Newsletter⁠⁠ (daily at Slams and weekly the rest of the year, featuring Matt’s Stat, mascot photos, Fantasy League updates, and more)

Follow us on ⁠⁠Instagram⁠⁠ (@thetennispodcast)

Subscribe to our ⁠⁠YouTube⁠⁠ channel.

More from Friends of The Tennis Podcast

All 222 episodes
Live from Wimbledon Day 13 - Swiatek’s dream day a nightmare for AnisimovaFriends of The Tennis Podcast · 1 h 7 min
Listen in VO