Unbothered: with Natasha Jen

29 Oct 2025 · 1 h 1 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: Front and Center - Episode "Unbothered: with Natasha Jen"

Overview In this episode of *Front and Center*, graphic designer Alex Center and co-host Kevin Batory welcome the award-winning designer Natasha Jen, a partner at Pentagram. The conversation dives into Jen's experiences, insights on the design field, and the inner workings of Pentagram.

---

Key Guests

  • Natasha Jen: Award-winning designer and educator, partner at Pentagram

---

Episode Summary Introduction

  • The episode opens with a flattering introduction of Natasha Jen, emphasizing her legendary status in design.
  • Discussion begins with a surprise gift for Jen - a pint of Van Leeuwen ice cream, which serves as a reference to her work in branding.

Discussion of Natasha's Work

  • Van Leeuwen Ice Cream Branding:
  • Jen reflects on the simplicity of the design she created back in 2015, which has remained timeless despite the frequent rebranding seen in the industry.
  • The initial packaging had excessive typography, which was simplified to create a memorable design.

Pentagram's Structure

  • Pentagram Overview:
  • Pentagram operates as a collective of 24 partners, each running their own small design studios with shared resources.
  • Team sizes range from 5 to 15 members, promoting intimacy and collaboration.
  • Project Allocation:
  • New projects are discussed openly among partners, who express interest based on past collaborations.
  • The "dibs" system previously allowed for first-come, first-serve project allocation, which has since evolved into a more collaborative approach.

Profit Sharing and Internal Culture

  • Profit and Loss System:
  • Pentagram partners review financial health monthly, sharing profits regardless of individual studio performance, fostering a cooperative culture.
  • Team Dynamics:
  • There is a culture of support and encouragement among partners, leading to a positive atmosphere and high-quality output.

Insights on Design Thinking

  • Natasha discusses her controversial take on "design thinking," explaining how her provocative stance during a conference created ripples in the design community.
  • She emphasizes the importance of critical perspectives in design and how her talk influenced discussions around design methodologies.

Generative AI and Future Trends

  • Jen expresses skepticism about the hype surrounding generative AI in design, suggesting that while it may enhance certain aspects, it should not replace traditional design processes.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Timeless Design: Simplicity and accessibility in design lead to longevity in brand identity.
  • Collaboration at Pentagram: A unique structure of autonomy combined with collective support allows for a high level of creativity and collaboration.
  • Critical Dialogue in Design: Challenging popular methodologies like design thinking fosters healthy discourse and innovation within the design community.
  • AI in Design: While generative AI tools are worth exploring, they should complement rather than dictate creative processes.

---

Fun Moments

  • Jen's humorous take on the design community's response to her statements and how Pentagram's culture doesn't focus on drama but rather on creativity and collaboration.
  • The playful banter about snacks, including favorite bodega finds, and personal anecdotes, illustrating Jen's relatable side beyond her professional achievements.

---

Conclusion This episode serves as both an insightful look into the design industry and a personal glimpse into Natasha Jen's philosophy and work ethics. It highlights the importance of collaboration, critical thinking, and the evolving nature of design practice in today's world.

---

*For more discussions on branding, design, and pop culture, tune in to *Front and Center* every Wednesday.*

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28We have a very special guest in the house. thinking is bullshit talk, but I know her as someone who keeps it real and without question, one of the most legendary designers working today. Welcome to Front Center, Natasha Jen. Thank you. That was a very big and flattering introduction. Glad to be here.

0:51She's a legend of the game. Only legends on the program. I'm a humble designer. only legends in the building that's a rule of the company of the podcast i got some ice cream wow that's my design right there what a timeless work there is timeless literally i went out i didn't have to go very far to go get it you know seriously we didn't anticipate um that simple design would carry out for really for for all this time the project was done a decade ago And, you know, it was a very enjoyable process, you know, and the outcome was really great. But as you know, nowadays, brands tend to change their branding and packaging design very often, right?

1:36So we didn't know that how long this design would actually survive. But obviously, this has become part of the brand language. yeah for the listeners i just surprised natasha with a pint of van leuwen ice cream cake french ice cream i picked this one only because of the color i thought it was really great this is like free advertising free advertising yeah yeah yeah for you and just to put it right there in front of the camera right here yeah it's one of my favorite products of yours honestly i was going through all of your work thank you um i think you and i were talking about a second ago i like stuff i like brands that you can pick up in a store and uh you know bodegas yeah you can feel that you can touch, that you can experience the sensory aspect of the brand.

2:20That and also the democraticness. Like, I like that I could just go to a bodega and I don't need to go to some fancy store. I don't need to go to Soho. I could just go down to the corner store and get a beautiful piece of design. Yeah, it's not dependent on Wi-Fi or, you know, it's not dependent on technology. No, no. And I don't need to buy it for$1 ,000. It's not a sports car. It's not a piece of fashion. It's just a beautiful. It's accessible. It's accessible design that anyone and everyone can love. And then, of course, you get the delicious ice cream. There's actually a Van Leeuwen shop. You should go after we record.

2:56Right here? Right outside. Oh, wow. It just opened. It just opened. Wow. They're doing great. Yeah. They're opening up stores everywhere. Yeah. They call it like a flavored lab or something. I guess they're testing us. We're the guinea pigs. Amazing. In Greenpoint here. Amazing. yeah amazing but no it's a great project i want to talk to you about van lewen because the project when did you do this uh i think it was around 2015 2015 so it's 10 years 10 years and when you first got the gig the packaging had like tons of shit on it right like if i remember it was very claims it was like all type it had a lot of typography it had a lot of different variations um across not just only packaging but overall throughout the entire brand you know from menus to anything you can imagine.

3:44I don't know how Pentagram works, but do you pitch multiple directions? Do you pitch one idea? Was this like one of the first things that you presented? Do you remember? Well, first of all, you know, every Pentagram partner works a little bit differently. You know, each of us has our own team, has our own interest areas, has our own clients. So I can't speak for other partners but I always try to present different options and the way that I look at options and I have to say the word options isn't really not great because it feels it feels very transactional but they're more about directions meaning that you know the same problem can be looked at different ways and that's that's how I always try to frame these different directions and these directions may not become the final direction and some of them can actually be reconsidered, hybridized, you know, combined together.

4:40But, you know, I always try to present different ways to solve the problem or to answer, you know, a question. Yeah. And I think I went to the Pentagram, like, Partners Tell All. It was an AIGA event last year. Yeah, yeah. And I thought it was going to be, like, some sort of, like, salacious, like, reality show, Andy Cohen kind of thing where everyone was, like, giving secrets. Were you disappointed that it wasn't? There was no slapping. There was no drinks poured on anyone. No, no. We're very modest people. I know, I know, I know. Yes, we're very modest and polite to each other. No, I'm used to my reality housewives.

5:15Yeah, okay. That's what I was hoping for. I think we can actually have a little bit of that. If I would have hosted that event, I would have tried to cause more drama, some more chaos. Well, then you can host the next one. Please. Yes, that's my dream is to be like a reunion host. But you had all the partners there. And I thought it was so fascinating because here I am, a design studio owner, a team of 10 people. And I've always loved Pentagram, right? I've always admired the work, but I never knew how it worked. And in that hour and a half, two hours, there was a lot of behind the scenes breakdown of how it works.

5:52And so believe it or not, you're the first Pentagram partner we've had on our show here today. And you have 22 fellow partners, right? Yeah. 23. 23? 23, no. Okay. Can you name them all? I'm just kidding. If I can actually think about the website bio page layout, I probably could. Yes, no, I won't make you name them. But I thought it was so interesting. And so for maybe the listeners who don't know, Pentagram is essentially 23 small design studios or small to medium design studios, all run by individual people, a lot like Center. who have their own P &Ls, their own clients, their own businesses.

6:34And they come together to form a mega design powerhouse institution. Correct. That's correct. Designers are running the show. And how big is your team in comparison to the other teams inside of that building? So at Pentagram, the team sizes are more or less the same. Oh, really? We stay within a range from, say, a small team would have maybe five people. Oh, wow. Very small, up to, say, 15, 16. That would be considered a bigger team. And then everything in between. But we're an organization that does not pursue scale. So this idea of scale is really not that important to how we do design, to how we take on projects.

7:32But we prefer the kind of smaller teams just because, first of all, you can really curate the right people on this team. Because the working relationship has to be really intimate. And you want to know every person on your team. You want to work with them very closely. So smallness actually works out for us really, really well. And, you know, my team size ranges somewhere between, say, eight people to, say, 12. It's honestly fascinating to me because my – and we talk about it a lot on the show because we have a lot of founders on. Yeah. And we talk about sort of like finding the right number for your studio.

8:12And for me, it's been roughly 8 to 12 or around that range because I just feel like once you get bigger than that, you start to – yeah, it's hard to go to dinner together or you start to like create clicks inside of a studio and you just want everyone to be in it together. But I never realized that Pentagram had already figured this out for me, that there is a perfect size or there is a right size for a studio. It's really fascinating to me. And then you guys formed together like Voltron or some sort of Avengers. Avengers is the right analogy. To become this mega powerhouse Pentagram. To be a mega house was never and still is not in Pentagram's sort of ambition.

8:53Having lived many, many decades, you know, Pentagram is 54 years old now. I think having lived through many decades as an institution definitely helps because there's a long trail of works as well as experiences behind you, right? And that contributes part of this sort of the mega perception. But in fact, you know, we don't see ourselves that way. And we don't talk that way. We don't operate that way at all. Yeah, no, it's fascinating. And from the outside, it looks like this big thing. But when you break it apart, it's fascinating how small. We're all small. We're smallness that actually work together.

9:34And that, I think, probably leads to the great work. How many projects do you take on at a time? Depends, depends. You know, we always on my team, we always have one or two what I would characterize as this sort of mega size projects, meaning that they are, you know, they are very known brands, you know, big brands. there are a lot of stakes in the ground and it's a kind of you know full full package type of project looking at brand positioning messaging by architecture design and then design has to live in many many different places we always have one or two that type of project on the team and the rest of projects are more small to medium sizes right for for startups for example we always have a handful of them or, you know, very small nonprofits, for example, or fun projects that we take on for pro bono.

10:36Yeah. So there's always this sort of, you know, mixture. It's always a mixture. One of the things I found out at this AIGA event I thought was fascinating was that you guys all come together at some point. Because I think about this as like, what's the benefits of having all these separate teams? And you're like, well, you can learn from each other and you can kind of help each other but you also come together and you do two things you put all the money together so that no one is making more money or less money correct it's a sort of uh it's a socialist system yeah um amongst the partners it's a socialist system what are those meetings like do you are there meetings where everyone comes in and like uh do you share like how much profit and how much sort of loss and sort of like how you're doing it here?

11:21Yes, we do. We look at profit and loss on a monthly basis, you know, so it's by the office. So New York office and the partners here will actually look at our monthly profit and loss, you know, team by team, partner by partner. So we always have a very up-to-date view on how we're doing together as an office and how each of us is doing so that that that is reviewed on a monthly basis we're pretty um i don't want to say relaxed yeah about about profit and loss you know we do care about um you know running a healthy healthy business but like i said we're not going after big profits yeah um so you know um a little a little loss here and there is actually totally okay because we operate on the collective because someone else maybe having a better because someone else someone else would have a better year so it's this sort of very intricate equilibrium that we have yeah fascinating it's really it's really fascinating even for me as well because you know i have to say i contribute to the overall performance but i also benefit from it yeah right there are times when we're not doing uh super great right we're just sort of like you know floating there right but then but but then you know other partners are doing great and then they care they they sort of we have this sort of net effect that is by the collective probably take some of the pressure off right because you're like well if i'm not having the world's best year, maybe, you know, sort of Michael Beirut's kicking ass over there.

13:05Well, here's the thing. Michael Beirut did kick ass. Thanks, Michael. But I think that the pressure is more about your own pride. Yeah. As one of the members in the collective, because nobody wants to be the downer. Right. So it's that pride that kind of keeps everybody going. So ultimately, it's a kind of positive reinforcing system. But the stress actually comes out purely from that, just from your own self expectation and your own pride. That's where the stress comes in. You never hear partners sort of looking at you or your numbers, right? And you know, question, hey, we got to intervene here.

13:47You know, that does not exist. At least in my experience, in my 13 year experience at Pentagram. Well, that's amazing. I think that's really wonderful. I guess, do you feel more pressure to deliver great work then? And in comparison, of course, with all these incredible legends, right? Because there's also meetings from what I've heard that where you guys showcase what you're working on and what you guys are doing. So how often are those meetings? So the entire partnership gets together twice a year. These meetings are in-person meetings. They're, you know, four days retreat where we would we would be together for four days and there there's show and tell, um, from different partners, you know, every single day, there's a, always a dedicated session, you know, in the early evening, um, where we look at several partners work.

14:40And that is when inspirations, you know, come about. Um, that is also a little bit, uh, this sort of what I call peer pressure because, you know, So when we're really busy with our own practice, we're not looking at other partners, other teams work as deeply as what you would see in those presentations. So those presentations are really, really important to the business as well as to the general understanding about the quality that we're doing as a whole. That sounds really interesting. I have an idea for you. You should film these meetings. I feel like... and then made them podcast. Yeah, yeah, yeah.

15:22Video podcast, four days each partner. Password required. Yeah, yeah. No, we'll sell them. We'll sell tickets. Yeah, pay-per-view. Give me in there. Let me produce. Yeah, no, this is because - You're a fast thinker. Listen, you know. Yes, you're very business-minded. I mean, listen, I'm just trying to make money here, you know? Well, you're a sole proprietor. And that's important. No, it's great, but I think there's pressure that comes with that, of course, right? Absolutely, absolutely. Of course, you know, there are going to be some years where things are flowing And I imagine the release of that pressure allows you to focus just purely on the pressure of doing great work.

15:55And then you have these 23 other partners and, you know, they that that to to meet the standards of what Pentagram puts out there is kind of, you know, that pressure is probably plentiful. That is plentiful. One of my questions also that I had was about the case studies. So how do you guys decide which projects turn into case studies? Every project can turn into a case study. Every project. Every project. And the decision is really up to each of the partners, which explains why we had so many projects on our website. Well, we revamped our website. We actually parked the majority of our work into a different related site that we call the archive.

16:43And the archive is where you can actually find all the projects that are older than, say, four years ago. And then you can actually just do, you know, AI, language-based research, you know, whatever that you have in mind, right? You can say, hey, you know, show me all the red posters. And then all the red posters will actually show up. Hey, show me anything that has dogs, right? So all the images that have dogs would actually show up. But then you can then dive into each of the images and see the project behind it. So that is something that we just did on our new website. Okay. This is why people can go search this?

17:29They can actually just basically look at past work without being overwhelmed by the sheer volume of Pentagram's work. And yeah, every project can turn into a case study. It's fascinating. It's total freedom. I imagine people come to Pentagram and they say, I want to work with Natasha and I want to work with her team. But I imagine there are also some people that come to Pentagram and they're just like, I want to work with Pentagram. I have a snack company. I have a museum identity. How do they decide or who decides what projects go to what teams? Our new business team would first understand, you know, if the client saw past Pentagram projects that resonated with them, right?

18:15So if there's a connection there, then the partner and the team who worked on that project may be the most, you know, the best, you know, to actually take the new project on. But if the client does not have any particular project in mind, then we will actually have a conversation amongst the partners. Hey, you know, who's interested in this project? Who needs a new project right now? So it becomes like a pretty open conversation. If there's something really good, right, does it become contentious ever? Does people try to like… No, no, not really. I'm trying to create drama here. Yeah, I mean, I wish that we would have more drama to share.

19:01You know, like I told Alex that I'm a very boring person and it's going to be a really boring interview. I wish that we had more drama, but somehow we don't. Just nice people that care about each other. Well, let me tell you this. It's like, you know, this sort of, hey, who is the most qualified partner to work on this is a relatively new thing that happened in the last, I would say, maybe five, six years. Before then, it was a simple email to all the partners. Hey, we got called by so-and-so who would like to work on this. So whoever that responded to the email, the first would actually get a job.

19:44I'm not kidding you. wow no that's shocking that is shocking because someone comes in and like they're like i want that is shocking right but that sort of kind of you know underscores the the how chill the spirit of the spirit of pentagram you know we're really the kind of we're the opposite of meg like mega institution yeah kevin's right the dip system i call dibs you know that's it that's a system I mean, it sounds utopian. It sounds a little, it sounds insane. Yeah, it's a socialist utopian system where everyone is just nice and everyone is kind to each other. And yeah, it doesn't matter if Yale or like, you know, SNL or Ben Lewin.

20:29They're just like, oh, I want that one. I want that. I want that. Okay, you responded to the email. You got that. Oh, sorry. They responded first. You're like, oh, I was at dinner. You know, that could have been me. Well, now we can probably use AI to actually do some sort of auto reply, right? Now we're thinking. Yeah. Are there people that just work on Pentagram alone? They're not on any of the teams. They just work on Pentagram, the business? Meaning that any sort of central staff. Yes, we do. We do share a lot of the central admin level staff, such as our comms communication team is shared by all the different teams and partners.

21:09Our accounting team is shared. Our HR team, our new business team, which is pretty small. So these central functions are an IT as well. So they're shared by all teams. So this sort of like another pentagram design is that when it comes to design, it's a hyper individualized, right, by partners, by the teams. But when it comes to central support, right, we all share the same pool of great central staff. Interesting. Yeah. So if your computer breaks and Paul has computer breaks. So that means that they sometimes have to juggle a little bit because they do encounter, you know, pressing priorities from multiple teams or partners.

21:58So they have to juggle a little bit. But we somehow all learn how to work with this sort of, you know, democratic slash socialist sort of set up. You know, when to step back a little bit, when to push forward a little bit. I think we all intuitively know how to be nice. Yeah, no. Do you think other design studios should band together? This is a thought that I've had with other smaller design studios like our size. Should we pool together and try to be a socialist pentagram utopian business? That's really a fascinating question. And we actually really welcome… Competition? I would say experiments.

22:42Okay. Because Pentagram, for us, it's an experiment that started 50-something years ago that actually worked out. I'm sure that there must have been similar experiments by other designers and teams, but didn't work out for whatever reason. But that does not mean that you can't try to actually do that again. Yeah, it's an amazing experiment and it has absolutely worked, but I don't know that anyone else has tried to copy it or try to do it. No. There's not a one-to-one example out there. In my knowledge, I think that that is definitely a worthy experiment to take on. It's been pitched. More at a drunken sort of rooftop party.

23:33Roof at the party level. But once you sit down looking at the spreadsheets, right, things become… We haven't even gotten to the spreadsheets yet. As yet, yes. Which can be daunting. Which can be daunting. Yeah. But it is interesting because it's such a fascinating idea to do it this way. Yeah. Like you said, it does feel a bit like an experiment. But for 50 years, it's worked. What truly amazes me is the socialist profit sharing amongst the partners. That is the most shocking part. That actually has worked. That is always the thing that baffles people. Because people are like, you know, what if you're actually bringing in the most profit, right?

24:19Do you just take home less? Yes, we take home less. You know, that is the most baffling part. But I think that this sort of design collective can be done in other economic models, right? That is not entirely socialist. You can actually look at different ways to, you know, to share the profit or not, right? I'm sure there are different math formulas that can be tried. Yeah. Well, I think also what's interesting about it is like, you know, designers, you know, maybe profit and being the richest like monetarily isn't their goal. They want to be happy. They want. Correct. They want to make things.

24:58They want to do great work. They want to do it with people they enjoy working with. And we talked about that a lot amongst the partnership. Yeah. We talked about, you know, making, making things. I think this idea of making is so fundamental to Pentagram. And of course, making then is manifested in different ways by different partners. But we really see ourselves as a making studio, as a making company. And that is critical, too, to us. It's very different than all other companies. Is that right? No, I think, I mean, creativity and design, like I think a lot of companies are sort of oriented towards making and the joy of making.

25:38But most businesses are oriented around making the most amount of money. Well, here's the thing. It's like, you know, for us, there has to be a balance. And sometimes it's really a tradeoff there that, you know, if doing certain things brings you more joy, but you're actually making less money, be it, right? But at the end of the day, you know, we still have to be a healthy business across the board, right? And that is where the network comes in. But again, you have to also negotiate with your own with your own pride that you do want to contribute to the group. You don't want to be making losses all the time.

26:15Right. So that is something that each of us has to negotiate. Right. You have your own interests. You have your own impulses, but you're also you're you're part of a group that you're responsible for. Are there ever any trades between teams? Like if someone's like, I'm going to take Kevin and Hannah and we're going to trade them for Steve and Jennifer on your team. That sounds like human trafficking. No, it's just, you know, like a football team, you know, we're all in the NFL, you know, we're just like, we're going to, we're going to, I like, you know, a future draft pick and a couple of, a designer, a writer.

26:52We do have borrowing. Borrowing. Okay. Now we're talking about traffic. Not so much trading, but more borrowing for short term for particular reasons. If there's a talent on this team who's so great at animation or coding, for example, these more specialized skills that we can actually benefit from, then we borrow pretty freely. Okay, that's cool. So the borrowing is just a quick conversation, partner to partner, and you talk to a designer, hey, you know, is your workload okay right now? Can you also, you know, take on this work? Can we deprioritize this? And you can jump in on that. So it's all very informal.

27:47I love that, borrowing. Yeah, because I think about like, what are the benefits of having all these teams? Because it's not just that you guys pull the money, that is obviously a huge benefit. but you also all work in one building. So there's got to be other sort of benefits or sort of advantages. And borrowing is one I hadn't thought about where you're like, oh, Maisie over there is amazing with motion. Can we get her for a six-week contract or a six-day contract? Until the borrowing gets a little bit expensive. You have to pay. You have to pay. No, it's not about paying. It's more about workload.

28:21It's more about that. you thought you thought the borrowing has ended meaning that okay we agreed that this whole this whole thing will be done by friday right right exactly but then you know next wednesday you walk up to a designer this the designer is still doing doing it you're like hey what's happening oh hey i just got pulled into this over and over again right you know that that that that that does happen yeah but but that's never a huge problem and you just have to actually go figure out you know how to how to kind of reprioritize things and making sure that yeah other projects are done too so i love it is there anything else that people would be surprised to know about pentagram in terms of like the you know sort of this this model and these benefits and these teams while working together there's this sort of pretty pretty fixed perception on pentagram that it that is we're you know we're massive we're we're a mega you know we're we're slow you know we're not cool right you know and i think that the last thing is very subjective you know like what what is cool yeah yeah well you know commenters on instagram yeah there there there's a lot of you know small sort of memes yeah like out there right that you see here and there um So like, you know, this week I just came across a diagram.

29:41It's a quadrant, okay? It was created as a joke, okay, by somebody like a mean journalist type of person, okay? So the quadrant goes, the upper half is good vibe. The lower half is bad vibe. And the left is traditional. the right is like new or you know cool or something right yeah so pentagram is situated at the lower left quadrant which is bad vibes and traditional okay so so so so we we looked we we saw it right we we laughed but we're not really bothered by that i think this is sort of another quality about us is that we're not so sort of entangled with this whole media and sort of critiques on who you are and what you're not whether you're cool or not because we care about work and we do know that there are a lot of things that we can really reconsider right you know um because time is evolving you know the landscape is evolving ways of working is evolving like we were very cognizant of that but but but yeah like this sort of you know uh bad vibe you know they hate you because they hate you yeah traditional you know like sure yeah we don't really care well did you guys hear that out there you meme generators natasha saw your meme and she's unbothered.

31:19All right. You know, unbothered and they have a good job. Exactly. Yeah. They, they saw it, but they are unbothered. It's where we're not bothered. You know, you know what you need to make is a pentagram meme account. That's really fight fire. That's another opportunity. Yeah, no, I think we got, well, there's a lot of opportunities to fight, fire back, you know, people that would be unexpected. You know, you should get the official account just to be like, we are unbothered by this. Exactly. Yeah. Official statement from all 24 partners. Or, well, you know, you basically just offended 23 partners and then will never take you on as a client.

Read the full transcript

31:57That's your loss. Yeah, they want to work there. That is your loss. It's just a disgruntled designer that wants to work at Pentagram very badly and probably got declined. And now they're out there making memes, probably millions of dollars a year. It got a lot of views. It got a lot of views. Does Pentagram have all company-wide events? Do you guys ever go anywhere? Like every person that works for the company, how many people work for the company, I guess, technically? We have, in my understanding, we have about 220 to 240 full-time, full-time pentagrammers. We also have small networks of artists, freelancers, you know, we, we, we work with, but as far as the whole like pentagram level company wide, retreats we don't have that but activities are happen more locally so in new york we have you know um after hours where you know the whole company whoever wants to show up we will get together have drinks that happens uh pretty frequently we have um lectures now inviting designers from the outside to give a talk at pentagram you know we should definitely get you to come.

33:13Fine. I would love to come. Yeah. We have that kind of thing. Yeah. But, you know, we do have another sort of funny pentagram tradition that is, so I mentioned that, you know, partners do get together twice a year and we will go somewhere, right? Somewhere nice? Somewhere with a beach? Somewhere, not always with a beach, but somewhere where you don't have access to civilization. Okay. Yeah. So that there's very little shopping, meaning you can't just say, hey, you know, let's go window shopping or do shopping. So we try to really get everybody to just do marathon style meetings. So those are called IPC, I think International Partners Conference.

34:00Okay. So whenever we have an IPC, that is sort of like parents are away. okay so in new york the local office like all the the the teams they would actually throw an ipc party oh that is that is actually themed after wherever we go so for example if we go somewhere um in mexico there's there will be like a mexico themed party and these parties are really fun and of course we don't get to go right because we're somewhere else but we do see oh you're the parents because you know what i mean this sort of that that's like i thought you guys were the kids for a second no like we can be the kids but you know there are situations where more like the parents or you guys getting down on vacation yeah yeah yeah um so so so so so that that is a that that's not fun that that's a that's a thing no those are fun do you guys ever work from home this is my last question big hard-hitting question do you guys work from home or in new York, most teams work from home at least on Fridays.

35:07Okay. My team, we work in an office four days a week, and it's been that way since, you know, COVID kind of, you know, went away. But some teams work in the office three days a week. And, you know, we serve lunch in the office, so that helps a little bit. Every day? Yeah, Mondays to Thursdays. and Fridays we work from home. Nice. What do we get for lunch? Taco, salad? You get amazing. You get really amazing food. You know, of course, you know, our kitchen is small. We're not like, you know, any of the big tech companies where, you know, the food is just so amazing, right? You know, but we have really great chef.

35:50We have a really great small, you know, kitchen team where they would just try to make different things every day. It's really, really amazing. Yeah, you get to eat different different food fine i'll come yes um so how important is working in an office together do you think to your team obviously there's a lot of talk about people sort of like questioning work from home people don't want to come back to the office like people yeah i think that you know there there's no straight answer to this i think it really it really depends on what type of work that you do and how you prefer to work right for me i get i get a lot done when i'm working in person i'm the type of person who would just you know like creep up behind somebody right you know i i'm not so good with um with scheduled zoom call reviews okay i'm just not good with that but that that's me i find it i find it just harder for me to kind of get the get ideas across you know um sort of diagramming things out together right so i work a lot better in person and i wanted to you know when i when i hired new designers i want to make sure that they understand that so we always say that hey this is you know four days a week a job you have to be here in the office and people have to be okay with that yeah and you know we did have uh candidates where they're really great um but then they're like well you know i would really love to work from home the whole time then you know sorry then we can't work together yeah yeah i can't creep up on you behind and look at your screen i have to be able to creep up that's that's really it's critical to natasha's to our work yeah all the work was produced more or less yeah by that just creeping up i think when people are prepared to present their work in a meeting type scenario that's too easy you know it's really when you catch them off guard hey what's what's on your screen what's what's on your screen yeah that's how you really get the best work um keep them on their toes always ready yeah for me yes gotta keep them on their toes natasha i can't have you on this podcast without talking about the topic that you probably are so sick of talking about what is it uh it's gonna be design thinking.

38:09Okay, bring it on. I know that for a lot of people out there, that was an entryway to you and your work and to sort of, again, you've had quite a career, but design thinking is bullshit. Not only was like a viral moment, it was like, it really changed the course of design in many ways. So I just want to ask about it. In terms of that idea or that concept of going to that conference, I believe it was 99U, right? 99U. Yeah. You go on stage, remember, you're just standing on stage. It's like a black room with a blackboard. And then you just, the first slide is design thinking is bullshit. And people are, you know, there's like a gasp.

38:53They gasp. How dare you? Design thinking, bullshit. And, you know, since then, you know, a scorching hot take on the show. We love hot takes. What was the origin? What made you want to go and do that in front of that room at that moment? And like, you know, what inspired you to sort of make that bold decision to make that a declarative thing that has now, you know, sort of half a million people on YouTube have watched it or something? So 99U invited me to be one of the speakers there. And I thought that was great. But we had, I think each speaker had about maybe 20 to 25 minutes. It wasn't like a full one hour kind of presentation.

39:33you know when you have an hour you can really present your work right or projects but when you have um very little time you i had to kind of think about what are the other topics uh subject matters they're not um directly about our work but something that i actually did care about and design thinking was really at that time um the only thing that i cared about and i think that when I really cared about something it typically at that time meant that it really bothered me yeah yeah and I worked with um you know a designer who was also he's who was also a great researcher we we research on the on the topic and we felt that hey we can actually put together a pretty clear sort of point of view kind of presentation right it wasn't so much about this sort of like any sort of there's any scientific evidence that i would bring forth but it was a kind of very personal point of view on on that on on that thing and also questioning yeah the um the the benefit of that yeah did you think that people were gonna find it as uh humorous or as kind of uh you know did you think maybe uh 10 years later you would still be talking about it did you feel like that Well, I kind of expected that I would get a lot of haters immediately because design thinking was really packaged and sold and consumed and practiced by so many different organizations and so many different people.

41:19So to actually make a statement about that was sort of like an attack on the people who practice design thinking. So I kind of expected that there would be a lot of haters. And there actually were. Turns out there were. Yeah, there were. I remember that I was trolled quite a bit. Oh, really? Yeah, on Twitter. By the design thinking community. On Twitter, for a little while. But I actually chose not to respond to that. You know, I just I tend to have this sort of approach that is, you know, just to retreat into the background. Right. You know, just let the noise go go away. I did expect that. But, you know, I but I think the aftermath, the ripple effect from that was something that I didn't I didn't expect.

42:14expect and I can talk a little bit about that so you know um the ripple effect was that well there were actually other scholars who also felt the same way about design thinking and their their their PhDs their university professors and um they also wrote um more I think you know rigorously researched paper and critique on the subject matter and that again I think got rippled into institutions that really championed design thinking you know they were like they're like what is going on in this right should we actually say something about it should we not you know so there there was a kind of ripple effect that that went on um for a little while and that was unexpected but i think that you know ultimately if if that talk did anything it was just about providing a different perspective yeah yeah if not the opposite perspective on things which is something that we have harder and harder time to do nowadays you know there's this sort of culture that doesn't really tolerate um different perspectives you know what the opposite point of view that's going on right now so i think that if there was anything that that talk did was to provide a very different and opposite perspective yeah and i think what you did was, you know, you didn't just say it and just sort of just not back it up.

43:43You had actual evidence, you had done some research and obviously it sounds like people did way more research after, but I think you came with, you know, perspective and you came with sort of proof. Let's look at some of the things that design thinking has led and, um, you know, sort of some, some very funny moments, but also some, some real truth to the fact that like, this is not the process that most designers that that you have ever worked with use and obviously as a legendary designer you're um versed on this on the subject and so it was a it was a fair criticism of design thinking and post-it notes that was the main thing you know not yeah and the five steps yeah the five the five steps in hexagons yeah and post notes it just it just feels really strange yeah where do you stand on post-it notes now are you using them i'm totally i'm totally okay with post notes as an object i actually find it a pretty a pretty great invention yeah okay yes but if actually you is if it's actually used as a sort of you know brainstorm kind of device with a lot of people i think we do that digitally now right there are different boards that allow you to do that you know i'm totally okay with people doing that yeah but you know i i don't i don't practice that way no yeah I really don't.

45:01Again, it's highly personal. Yeah. Yeah. Put a star on the post-it notes. Put a star on the post-it notes. And then there are all these other, you know, post-it notes and, you know, start organizing them. That's just a very different way of designing. No. And it's not how us designers work. And I think that was what you were trying to say. And it, yeah, it certainly had an effect. I think people, design thinking has never been the same, you know? It's lying in its grave, you know? Thank you. Any design pseudosciences today that you think of? And when you're like, you know, buzzwords or things that people are using today that bother you?

45:40That bothers me? Yes, I get bothered. Yeah, are you bothered by anything in 2025? Well, not so much bothered, but I think that Gen.AI is hyped. Generative design? Using generative AI to design, I think it's just hyped right now. Of course, I think with any new invention, any new technology, when something is really novel and never seen before, there's always this sort of phenomenon that happens. And I think that as we understand these tools a lot better, but also kind of understand how we really work and how we really want to work. I think that is a question that we haven't actually really answered because our attention is just so much on, you know, AI right now.

46:38Oh, yeah, like this thing can do this, that thing can do that, right? You know, or you can actually do, you can prompt here in ChatGPT and then take the prompt into that whatever program and that will actually do that and then you bring it over here. That is pretty much the conversation right now. But I think that what's more important to me, and I think that for the design field, is how we actually work and how we want to work. So it becomes a kind of human-driven question, not so much driven by what the technology currently is doing or can do. Yeah. So it's kind of reversal. Are you integrating it into your workflow a little bit in terms of generating or sort of imagery?

47:24Yeah, I would say I, you know, personally, I dabble a little bit in different tools because I'm really curious about them. I really want to learn. So I dabbled a little bit. And my team uses some tools when the situation requires. meaning that when we need something that is imagistic in nature, that we need to actually sort of, you know, create something that aesthetically is pleasing to us, meaning it's not something that we can find, then we will actually deploy Gen.AI to try to do that. But it hasn't actually taken over the way that we work at all. I would say that we use it occasionally when we need to.

48:15So we're not the type of design group who would just like use Gen.AI all the time. You know, we're not there. Yeah, we're not that. But we're not rejecting what it can do. I agree with you. And we haven't talked about AI that much on the show because we're unbothered. Unbothered. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The title of the episode, Natasha Gen is Unbothered. But, you know, I think it's an amazing tool and we welcome amazing tools, right? Yeah. We've had amazing tools. Adobe has been using these amazing tools for years that have done things that make our lives easier and make things possible that designers before us couldn't, right?

48:55Like designers of the 60s and 70s, they didn't have the tools that we had or I had when I started my career. And now these are new tools. They are very powerful and we're still learning how to use them. But they're just tools that allow us to do what we do and visualize things in ways that we put in before. Yeah, they can enhance things here and there. Yeah, which is nice. Which is nice. But that I think is its effect right now. Yeah. And people need to just like calm down with the general sort of thing. I think calm down. Yeah, just generally. Overall. Just overall. And also just kind of really sort of raise a question, right?

49:29Like do I, before this tool appears, before this tool shows up, did I ever, ever work in the way of writing prompts? ever once in your life no no right so so that that is a but but why do i have to do that now i mean certain people you may right but that's okay but you know visual design um at least for me is a highly um intuitive but also real-time process meaning that it's not pre-deterministic right a prompt itself once it's written it's very determined right but when you're actually working working out visual problems right you do something you see it immediately and you make decisions many many decisions in real time so there's that really rapid eye hand mind communication yeah and and very intensely right rapid yeah yeah but you can't do that with it's sort of really neat prompting you know you know what i mean and that that is a really interesting difference right but that is actually a new like prompting is a new modality of working that we need to learn we need to understand you know but the difference like also is that when you're actually just you know having control the thing that process is happening very fast yeah it's not so neat yeah yeah i think uh i've got a hot take that maybe you can explore you can take this with you if you want um but there are a lot of people out there calling it prompt engineering and I think prompt engineering is bullshit.

51:10You're writing, you know, you're just typing it out. It makes it sound nicer, but it's prompting. I'm sure that there are certain techniques and certain sort of, you know, syntax structures that can actually make one prompt better than the other. That is something that can be learned, I believe. But I think that that still does not beat this sort of very intuitive and rapid process between thinking, seeing, and making in real time. It doesn't beat, it does not compete with that. Kevin's right, though. If you type in prompt engineering, you've got a lot of graphs and charts. Graphs and charts. Yeah, I know.

51:50A lot of LinkedIn prompt engineers out there. Oh, you're right. That's a job that someone gets hired to. We'll engineer away. Yeah, and you can borrow one from the other team. We'll borrow. Hey, can I borrow your prompt engineer? Are they available next Wednesday? Yes, exactly. No, it's shocking, the sort of discourse on LinkedIn. So we don't, you know, we're unbothered. We're unbothered by that. Natasha, I'm so thankful that you're here before we let you get out of here because we're borrowing you from your job today. No, we're having a chat. Yes. Guilty pleasures when you're not designing. What does Natasha like to do for fun?

52:33I believe I read that you like to cook. Is that true? I cook occasionally, but when I do cook, I get very competitive with myself. That is, I want whatever that I cook tastes amazing. Okay. So I would actually really put effort into cooking. But the other thing that I do is that I like to look at beautiful things. I like to look at art. I like to look at objects, new design. So I go out to, you know, museums, galleries, and even stores a lot. Outside. Outside. Just to look at things. Do you go to bodegas? I love bodegas. Yeah. What's your snack order? What do we like to ask this question? Well, okay.

53:20Snack order. Van Leeuwen, of course. Van Leeuwen, of course. I would say Doritos. Oh, okay. Cool ranch, nacho cheese. Like highly processed. Not good for you. But, you know, you can resist. Yeah, you can resist. Doritos are incredible. Everyone can agree. If you don't like Doritos, what's wrong with you now? Do you watch TV? I do. I do watch streaming a little bit here and there. I have a hard time keeping up with series. And everything now has turned into a series that really requires lone engagement. I'm more like, you know, give me two hours, one movie, that type of person. So I tend to watch, you know, old movies like Criterion Channel, Criterion Collection.

54:13Occasionally, there are good series that really kind of catch me. I would then engage. Yeah. Any series that have caught your attention or anything of recent that you... What's your bagel order? Do you eat bagels? Bagels? as a New Yorker? Yeah, I like cinnamon bagel. Cinnamon raisin. Cinnamon raisin with a lot of cream cheese. Okay. This is a good order. That was really like one of the first things I tasted when I came to New York. Really? Yeah, in 1998. I was just so amazed by it. I was like, wow. Cinnamon raisin bagel. Yes, it's a big dough. Yeah, no, I'm still amazed by bagels. Yeah, we were just talking about them and I was just like, yeah, no.

54:56I never not want to be helpful. Yeah. This is the best. It's just. Are you on TikTok? I am. I am on TikTok, but I'm not doing, I'm not creating any content. I do. I do look at TikTok quite, quite frequently. Yeah. Stalking or. I try not to. I try to actually resist addiction. I can see how, why TikTok is a really addictive media. You forget about time because it's just a short entertaining format. So I try to be very mindful about that. So I go there a couple of times a week just to kind of be up to date about what's going on in the world. And TikTok is a really interesting algorithm to always try to explore and expand your interest areas.

55:49And that's something that I just started learning about TikTok's algorithm. it really sucks yeah why are you putting this in front of me you know like are you testing if i'm interested in this so that itself is an interesting experiment like on myself do you ever think about getting the dogs on instagram or on uh tiktok well i know they already have an instagram i i got into a lot of uh dogs like she twos particularly i have two she twos and then you know i started just seeing a lot more cute shih tzus and of course they're they're irresistible and just like like i just clicked on like i like all of them and then the next thing that i knew was that i was just getting so many shih tzus from all the world you know content exactly shih tzu content yeah they're sending it in well yeah i'm just like well i need to work yeah okay stop this She's too business.

56:42Do you see designers on TikTok sort of remaking logos or sort of doing their own personal projects? I think that, you know, if you have ideas to say, if you have sort of interesting ways to actually communicate your ideas, why not? Of course, I think it's just it's a different form of communication. And I also think that TikTok, you know, has its particular in terms of the types of content and design. it has these very specific archetypes, meaning that they're there right now, but that does not mean that the medium itself cannot be reinvented in some way. From a design point of view, really that is how do you actually create a kind of short video content?

57:30How do you design it? What a visual looks like and so on, right? That can actually, I would say, set a new standard, right? were new archetype yeah that i think is very interesting yeah yeah well natasha you're an absolute legend thank you an absolute honor to have you this is really fun thank you thank you i'm the biggest fan and you're just a gem thank you thanks so much thank you thank you all yeah just thank you thank you all everybody

58:22I don't care I love it I don't care

58:31I got this feeling on the summer day when you were gone I crashed my car into the fridge, I watched that let it burn I threw your shit into a bag and pushed it downstairs I crashed my car into the fridge I don't care, I love it I don't care You're on a different road, I'm in the Milky Way You want me down on earth, but I am up in space You're so damn hard to please, we gotta kill this switch You're from the 70s, but I'm a 90s bitch I love it

59:16I love it

59:24I got this feeling on the summer day when you were gone I crashed my car into the fridge, I watched, I let it burn I threw your shit into a bag and pushed it downstairs I crashed my car into the fridge I don't care, I love it I don't care I love it, I love it, I don't care I love it, I don't care You're on a different road, I'm in the Milky Way You want me down on Earth, but I am up in space You're so damn hard to please, we gotta kill this switch You're from the 70s, but I'm a 90s bitch I don't care, I love it I don't care

1:00:19I love it

From the publisher

We have a legend on the program!! She needs no introduction, but here is one anyways… 

Natasha Jen is an award-winning designer, educator, and partner at Pentagram. Born in Taipei, Taiwan, she joined Pentagram’s New York office in 2012. A six-time National Design Award nominee, Natasha’s work is recognized for its innovative use of graphic, verbal, digital,  and spatial interventions that challenge conventional notions of media and cultural contexts. Her work is immediately recognizable, encompassing brand identity systems, packaging, exhibition design, digital interfaces, signage and wayfinding systems, print, and architecture.

Working at the intersection of technology and culture, Natasha has developed branding for some of the most well-known brands in the consumer and tech spaces. Her clients include a wide range of collaborators—from global technology brands to cultural institutions and start-ups—including Google, Pfizer, Waze, Reddit, Lightmatter, Galaxy Digital, The Asian American Foundation, Harvard Graduate School of Design, the Metropolitan Museum, Fernando Romero Enterprise, Bjarke Ingels Group, and OMA New York.

Natasha, unbothered by the outside noise, offers insight into the inner workings of Pentagram. How they decide who gets what project, how they split the profit amongst 24 partners, how they borrow talent from other partners’ teams, what they think about the memes about them... and more! It was a delightful and insightful conversation, and we are happy to share it with you!


More from Front and Center

All 134 episodes
Unbothered: with Natasha JenFront and Center · 1 h 1 min
Listen in VO