Klinton Bicknell: Leveraging AI to Power Language Learning

14 Dec 2023 · 42 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Generative Now | Klinton Bicknell: Leveraging AI to Power Language Learning

Podcast Overview Title: Generative Now Host: Michael Mignano Description: A series from Lightspeed showcasing stories and insights from AI innovators and their impact on work and life. Episode: Klinton Bicknell: Leveraging AI to Power Language Learning Description: Discussion with Klinton Bicknell, the Head of AI at Duolingo, covering the intersection of AI and language learning, and exploring future trends in AI and education.

---

Episode Chapters

  • (00:00) Klinton Bicknell at the Generative NYC Meet-Up
  • (03:04) What separates the human mind from an LLM?
  • (08:15) What makes Duolingo an AI company?
  • (10:49) How Duolingo competes with nimble startups
  • (13:33) Future transformation of learning through AI
  • (18:36) Initial reactions to ChatGPT
  • (21:19) AI's impact beyond education
  • (22:48) Audience Q&A: Addressing learning modalities with AI
  • (25:53) Audience Q&A: Is AI nearing a development plateau?
  • (29:45) Audience Q&A: Quality vs. Quantity of data
  • (32:15) Audience Q&A: Utilizing AI's learning efficiencies
  • (33:57) Audience Q&A: The future of language-learning
  • (38:30) Audience Q&A: Teaching pronunciation with AI

---

Key Discussions

Klinton Bicknell's Background

  • Transitioned from academia in cognitive science to Duolingo's AI division.
  • Emphasized the synergy between AI models and cognitive patterns of language processing.

AI and Human Cognition

  • Explored the differences between human cognition and language learning models (LLMs).
  • Discussed parallels where LLMs serve as high-dimensional function approximators akin to human learning.

Duolingo's AI Integration

  • Duolingo has employed AI since its inception, focusing on personalized learning experiences.
  • Examples include intelligent placement tests and predictive models that adapt to user learning curves.

Competitive Edge of Duolingo

  • Duolingo’s vast data collection (10 billion exercises weekly) enhances its AI capabilities.
  • The company fosters innovation through multiple teams exploring various AI applications.

Future of AI in Education

  • Bicknell forecasted a significant shift towards personalization in learning experiences, becoming more tailored to individual needs.
  • Anticipated richer interactive experiences, such as realistic conversational partners in language learning.

AI's Broader Impact

  • Discussed potential applications of AI beyond education, including healthcare and bioinformatics.
  • Speculated on the potential democratization of AI tools, enabling broader access to AI-driven functionalities.

---

Audience Q&A Highlights

  • Learning Modalities: Challenges in automating speaking and writing assessments.
  • AI Development Plateau: Concerns about reaching limits in AI capabilities versus the pace of real-world applications.
  • Quality vs. Quantity of Data: The ongoing debate about the trade-offs in data used for AI training.
  • Pronunciation Feedback: Exploring how AI could effectively correct mispronunciations and aid language learners.

---

Closing Thoughts

  • The episode revealed deep insights into how AI is reshaping language learning and education as a whole.
  • Bicknell's perspectives offered a glimpse into future innovations and the evolving role of AI in various facets of life.
  • Continual exploration of the intersection between human cognition and AI technology remains crucial as advancements unfold.

---

Stay Connected

  • Lightspeed Website: [www.lsvp.com](http://www.lsvp.com/)
  • Twitter: [@lightspeedvp](https://twitter.com/lightspeedvp)
  • LinkedIn: [Lightspeed Venture Partners](https://www.linkedin.com/company/lightspeed-venture-partners/)
  • Instagram: [Lightspeed Venture Partners](https://www.instagram.com/lightspeedventurepartners/)
  • Email: generativenow@lsvp.com

---

Disclaimer The content presented in this podcast does not constitute professional advice and is intended for informational purposes.

---

This summary encapsulates the core discussions and themes presented in the podcast episode while providing a structured and detailed overview for readers interested in the intersection of AI and language learning.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04Hey, everyone, and welcome to Generative Now. This is the podcast where we talk to the builders who are creating the world's most exciting AI products and companies. I am Michael McDonough. I am a partner at Lightspeed. And in this episode, we'll be featuring another conversation from one of our generative NYC in-person meetups. This one from December of 2023. At the meetup, I sat down with Clinton Bicknell, head of AI at Duolingo. Now, you might not think of Duolingo as an AI company, but it turns out they've been using machine learning to power a lot of what they do for many years. And in the middle of this ongoing AI revolution, they're only leaning into AI a whole lot more.

0:44And so in this conversation with Clinton, we got into a lot of things like AI and education, what machine learning can teach us about the human brain, and where he sees further AI development heading. Check it out. Without further ado, please help me in welcoming Clinton Bicknell, head of AI at Duolingo. Thanks, Clinton. How's it going? All right. Thank you so much for doing this. Absolutely. So you have been, like I just said a minute ago, you have been thinking about the world of AI long before many of us in this room probably. Give us the story of your background and your journey to generative AI.

1:27Sure. So, yeah, my journey to AI and to Duolingo is, yeah, it's been a long and interesting one. If you go back far enough, I started going in this direction through cognitive science and the cognitive science of language. So understanding how the mind works, understanding how the brain works. I was doing research into that in academia. And it turns out that AI models or machine learning models specifically at the time can provide really good models of how humans do a lot of things and how the brain does a lot of things, thinking about the brain as optimization system, et cetera. And so I was doing research in academia.

2:07I was a professor at Northwestern into, you know, how people learn and process language by building kind of machine learning models that would act as sort of model systems that you could interrogate for how people can do these things. So that was kind of where I was and the AI that I was doing was very kind of interdisciplinary work at the time. And then about five years ago, Duolingo decided to start up kind of a proper AI group and reached out to me to be one of the first people there. So it seemed like the right fit at the time, the right time to make the move from academia into the exciting world of consumer tech.

2:49It's been a really fun ride since then. So tons of questions about Duolingo, which we will get to. and that transition, because that does seem like a big transition going from academia to consumer tech, but maybe focusing in on your experience that you were just talking about your studies. I think so many of us, myself included for sure, have been so blown away by the power of large language models and really what is enabled by transformers. And definitely for me, and I'm sure for many others, it starts to make you wonder, wait, is this how our mind works? Why is the LLM so good and is this how i have learned things maybe talk to us a little bit about the the similarities or differences between the way transformers work and the human mind yeah that's a great question uh so and it's something i i thought a lot about um i think a little bit less about these days i guess but uh i've definitely thought a lot about this question the similarity between the two is at a particular level of analysis so the brain is not literally a transformer It doesn't have that same architecture.

3:49It's not doing exactly that thing of having an attentional pass on a layer and moving that to the next layer. But at a high level, I think what modern transformers are doing, what a lot of different neural network models are doing is essentially just high dimensional function approximation. Can you... Yeah, yes. Sorry. So basically, in most machine learning cases, you're trying to predict something from something else. So there's a function that takes the input and goes to the output, and that's what you're trying to learn. And those functions are often really complicated functions. You can describe functions in simple ways, like a regression model.

4:27That's not a very complicated function. But most real functions are much more wiggly than that, very complex functions that you have to use a lot of different parameters to describe. And neural networks, it turns out, are really good at doing that. They have a lot of parameters that you can wiggle, and if you do gradient descent, that is a process that can make the network learn kind of functions of arbitrary complexity if you have enough data. I think there's a lot of evidence that at least parts of learning in the brain work kind of that same way. They also have a lot of degrees of freedom to approximate functions on the basis of seeing lots of data.

5:04Brains are kind of prediction machines in that same way. So I think that's a lot of the similarity. I think actually back when I was working in this space, the regime was such that as our AI models got better, they also became better approximations to what humans did. That is actually changing now though, because now our models are actually getting, as they kind of get like superhuman in certain domains, like in visual image recognition and things like that, they're actually now starting to look less like humans. It's starting to diverge a bit. So kind of interesting. Why is that? Just because the different types of data you can train them on now?

5:44Like unpack that for us if you don't mind. Yeah. Yeah. It's a great question. So I think, I mean, I think we don't know for sure, but the speculation is I would, I would guess the reason for this is that when models are just to make a very fuzzy kinds of predictions for the world, like they're not that great of predictions. predictions, human predictions are pretty good. And so if you make the predictions better, they're going to look a little more like humans because human predictions are pretty good. But once the predictions get as good as humans or even better than humans, then now making it better might take it further from what humans look like, right?

6:23If that makes sense. Yeah, it does. That's fascinating. Wow. So, okay. So you're doing this type of research for years and then Duolingo comes along and says, hey, stop doing that. Come build consumer products with us. Tell us what that was like. Yeah, yeah. So this was an exciting time. I was a restaurant at Northwestern. I was doing a mix of teaching and research. The research that I was doing was working with different communities of people, you know, people who understood the brain, people who understood, you know, how people think, people who, you know, did AI. And at Duolingo, the opportunity was very different.

6:59It was very different in a lot of ways. So Duolingo had very large amounts of data. We have the, you know, possibly the world's largest data set about learning. This is, you know, I don't actually know, remember what it was at the time. These days, though, Duolingo learners do about 10 billion exercises every week. And we get data about all that that we can use to personalize learning and build models of learning. And so I think the opportunity in terms of research, just by having access to all that data was quite large. That was a big part of what drew me there. I think I was also doing a lot of teaching at the time as a professor and realizing that being a single person teaching a single class, there are obviously some advantages to it, but it is not the most efficient thing in the world as you can scale education much more highly.

7:52At Duolingo, by contrast, you do a single A-B test and it's affecting tens of millions of users every day. It's a way to have a lot more impact in terms of education. And I think that the opportunity of just helping define, you know, what does the future of education look like when you put together the power of a well-designed consumer app with very large amounts of data and AI. So fascinating. You know, I think probably most people, especially people not in this room, just normal average consumers who don't think about AI and AI products probably don't think of Duolingo as an AI company, but clearly they've been thinking about it and building this space for years.

8:29Like what are some of the ways that that Duolingo has leveraged AI and machine learning over the past five years or so since you joined. Yeah, yeah, so that's right. So actually, Duolingo's history with AI goes back even before I joined. It's been really since the beginning of the company that they've been doing some AI. The first, you know, about over 10 years ago, the first AI models that Duolingo was building were in the service of using people's learning data to personalize learning experience. So for example, one of the first models was a model to use to figure out where to place people. If you say, hey, I already know some Spanish, where should you start in the course?

9:06We have to give you an efficient test to figure out where to place you. That's AI behind making that test efficient. So it's not like a test when you're trying to place into Spanish at college, where you go take an hour-long test somewhere. People are not gonna download Duolingo and then go do an hour-long test to start Duolingo. It's not gonna happen. So we need to make that efficient. Or another one was trying to predict what words people know and which ones they need to practice, things like that. So there was a lot of AI around personalization early on, and that is still a big part of the AI that we do.

9:40Over the past, I would say, five years since we had a proper AI group, that has really expanded to lots of different parts of the company now. And I would say over the past year, that's accelerated even further, expanding into even more parts of the company. And so that includes things like we have a Duolingo English test, which is an English certification test, like the TOEFL, where the people might take to go study in an English-speaking country typically. That test uses AI to help generate test questions, to help with grading. It's also a test you take at home, so it's remotely proctored. We use AI for security to prevent different types of cheating, things like that too.

10:16One of the things that Duolingo is known for is being a very engaging product. As we found, that's one of the real secret sauces to getting people to actually learn languages, is that you have to keep coming back to learn it. That's the only way. And so we focused a lot on engagement. AI is useful there in several ways. Some of those things that you would recognize from other consumer apps, like Duolingo's notifications that we send people are optimized with AI. But also building delightful, more interactive experiences. That's another big thing that we're doing with AI. So Duolingo used to be a startup, not a startup anymore.

10:52I think it's, last I checked, something like a$9 or$10 million market cap publicly traded company. But clearly, thinking about innovation and thinking about sort of the forefront of AI, there are a lot of startups out there that are moving insanely fast, right? And just shipping new stuff constantly. How does a big company like Duolingo keep pace and innovate at the level and speed of a startup in this moment of sort of AI explosion yeah yeah it's a good question um i i think a lot of different a lot of different ways i could take the answer one way of taking this is to say that the advantage of being the dominant player in this space right now is the data we have access to to lots and lots of you know 10 billion exercises people do every week and we are as we have been for a while we're investing more and more in trying to leverage all that data to really make the experience better and better and get that into feedback loops with our AI models, right?

11:49So that as we make the experience even better, then we get even more user data, and then we can make the AI models even better. So I think data is one way that we're thinking about this. But the other thing I would say is that I'm not sure how unique Duolingo is in this regard, but it is certainly the case that we are, like, there is a lot of excitement about AI throughout the whole company right now. There are lots and lots of different teams exploring lots and lots of different directions. Multiple teams working on things like more conversational experiences or teams working on generating longer form content, like a little radio show that you watch that's actually just launched, I think, in certain courses.

12:31Yeah, right, where we are using AI in a way to make a feature that just wouldn't have been at all feasible before. So I think it can be a tricky problem, but I think that by investigating AI in lots of different places, we're innovating pretty quickly. Duolingo, as you mentioned earlier, has possibly more data in the space of education than any other company. And you're leveraging it right now to change language learning and learning more broadly right now. But if you were to extrapolate and look 10 years into the future, how do you think education will be transformed by AI? So, okay, the first thing I feel like I have to say here is that 10 years feels like an eternity right now, given how fast things are changing.

13:16I feel like two and a half, I can maybe kind of say something, although even then I have to be very humble and cautious. This stuff is, you know, I've been working in AI for a very long time, and, you know, just the pace of progress in the past year has been quite surprising. So that said, I do think that there are two themes that I see as going to be really transformative in the learning space. One of those, I think, following up on what I've already been talking about a little bit, is personalization. I think just being able to have a product that knows you extremely deeply, knows exactly what you know, knows how you're learning, knows when you're going to learn, all of that.

14:00and uses that to really optimize learning for you in particular. I think that is something that we've been making steady progress on, but I think as AI is advancing quickly, that is something that's going to get much, much better at Duolingo and possibly at other places. The other, I think, theme there is going to be more richly interactive experiences, right? So for language learning, one thing that this might look like is having a lot more like, you know, realistic conversational partners or something like that, right, who are also adapting things, you know, to your level and helping out fill in parts that you're clearly not understanding and things like that in a realistic way that gives you, you know, the confidence to go have a real world conversation.

14:43But I think in other in a lot of other parts of education, this might look more like you're trying to understand some, you know, scientific concept, and you don't quite understand a part of it. And you can, you know, ask useful follow up questions to some agent and critically trust what the agent actually, how the agent answers those. That's, you know, you can kind of do this now, but you can't act, the trust part is not there. So I think those are going to be the two themes that really change what education can look like. And when do you think it leaps from, you know, self-serve consumer tech product that I download on my phone to being in the classroom?

15:17And maybe what types of classrooms do you think will first sort of really see AI enter? Yeah, that's an interesting question too. So, you know, Duolingo is already, okay, so two things. Duolingo, in particular, has been a consumer-focused, you know, education company. One of the few, I would say, that people airs in ed tech that are not focused on, like, selling to schools. But that said, we are, in fact, in the majority of school classrooms already. People use Duolingo as supplementary materials in the majority of foreign language classrooms in the U.S. and in many other countries as well. At all grade levels?

15:59I think so. Wow. I didn't know that. That's awesome. Yeah, it's kind of crazy when I first heard this. But yeah, it's all over the place. You know, often it's not like the primary mode of instruction, right? But it's more teachers will like assign people doing a little bit or it will be like, OK, if you finish this thing early, you go do some Duolingo or different things like that. And so I think that having that kind of like personalized study aid is something that is already having an effect in a lot of classrooms where the people who finish early can actually go learn more on Duolingo, which actually knows they're at a more advanced level and they can get that.

16:33while the teacher then spends their time focusing on the students who actually need a little extra human assistance. That is already happening to some extent. Yeah, and that's probably happening. I mean, definitely heard anecdotally that's happening with ChatGPT, right? Students are using ChatGPT to supplement their studies in the classroom, so that makes sense. I'm curious to imagine what the next phase of that might be, right? And I guess language learning is a great example of where that is already happening. Yeah, yeah. I mean, as a personal tutor that's like in your pocket gets more and more powerful, I think, yeah, the role of what, you know, what is a classroom and what our classrooms for, I think will have to change to some extent, right?

17:13Like, I think the most important part that I think we are unlikely to replace for a very long time about teachers is the humanness, right? The human touch, the human relationship that gives people the motivation to do something or to believe in themselves enough that they can do something. I think that those aspects of teachers are things that maybe someday in a sci-fi novel, like robots can do or like machines can do. But for quite a while, you really need teachers to do these things. And you need the peers, right? Like you need your peer group, you need your classmates. It'll be interesting to see what happens there as well.

17:47If the teachers could be supplemented or a long day even potentially, yeah, an AI tutor, like, but what happens, what happens about your classmates? Like you need that connectivity, you need that community to learn, right? What happens there? Yeah, that's an interesting question. Um, yeah, I asked, you know, Duolingo has, it has like leaderboards where, uh, which many people find extremely motivating. Um, it's not, that's not the same as, uh, as I think like your peers in a, in the classroom, but yeah, I think there's a tension a little bit, right? Between learning as a social thing and, uh, and learning that is deeply personalized to be exactly what you in particular need right now, right?

18:28Because, you know, if everyone is learning on their own personal trajectories, then you might have less in common with the other people in your class. You have been, as we've talked about a couple of times here, you've been thinking about AI long before many of us. What surprised you most about the past year since ChatGPT launched? Like maybe you saw that coming. Many people didn't. But what has surprised you? Yeah. So in full transparency, I did not, well, I saw chat GBT coming. I did not see GBT4 coming. And we actually saw, so Duolingo got early access to GBT4 back in September, before chat GBT was a thing.

19:08And yeah, did not see that coming. That was pretty shocking. I mean, I think the, like the quantitative progress that the models have made in terms of scaling them is actually very predictable, has been very predictable for a while, but the translation of that into real-world impact was very surprising. So that was honestly the biggest surprise, was the first time of seeing GPT-4 and what it could do. So you're saying even the capabilities of GPT-4 surprised you? Yes. The capabilities of GPT-4 surprised me, certainly. I mean, that was, you know, for people who were working in this space for a long time, been using lots of large language models.

19:45it was just a substantial advance and one that no one else has actually quite gotten to get otherwise I think maybe one other thing that comes to mind a slightly less technical point from the past year that surprised me surprised me in a way is that it's really changed who is involved in the AI conversation it used to be the case that a lot of companies where there were AI experts that are like hey we should use AI to do X and you have to go convince other people like, oh yeah, okay, sure, yeah, we can try AI for that. Yeah, let's do it. But now it's, you know, like every executive at any company is like, oh, we should use AI.

20:22We should, let's use AI for this. Let's use it for that. So I think that that is very different in a surprising new way. Another part of what's different or another related piece is that AI is much more democratized, right? Like two years ago, to do any real stuff with AI, you had to know a decent amount about AI and decent amount of technical knowledge about it. Right. Be somewhat of an expert there. And now anyone who can talk can do some useful AI with a large language model. You mean about the usability of the products or you mean training new models? Sorry. Yeah. Good clarification question.

20:57I mean, if you want to build a new AI feature, right. If you're doing it by basically like prompting a large language model, anyone, you know, anyone who can write language can do that. You don't have to know. you don't have to have any idea how the model works. And so that is the kind of democratization I mean, where AI experts have a somewhat different role to play now. What are maybe outside of education, some of the things coming in terms of AI that most excite you over the next year or so? We won't say five years or 10 years, over the next one year. Yeah. So, okay. So yeah, it's always hard to predict what's going to come, but yeah, we've been talking about education for a while.

21:37I will say one other area that I am particularly excited about is I'm curious to see how this is going to play out in the kind of bio and medicine domains. I think there was just the past few days, I think, there's a paper from, I believe, DeepMind, where they used AI to predict a very large number of new crystalline materials for material science stuff. but this is, you know, it seems like a pretty big advance for that field. I'm very excited to see, you know, what a similar result looks like in the biospace, right? I have to imagine a lot of this is coming and I think it's very exciting to see what the possibilities could be.

22:24Well, I could ask you questions all night, but I know people in the audience have questions as well. So we're going to open it up to audience Q &A. If you're in the audience and you have a question, somebody's going to bring a microphone over to you if you just raise your hand. Please wait to ask your question until you have the mic since, as I mentioned, we're recording this. And just say your name and what you're working on and then fire away with your question. Hey, how's it going? My name is Cyrus. Thanks for the talk. I really enjoyed it. I most recently worked in financial technology at Stripe.

22:55I left recently pursuing a number of AI opportunities. I worked in ed tech for a long time, including a company named Quizlet, which is a well-known consumer product, also does AI tutoring. One thing that I found at Quizlet during my several years there is that certain modalities in learning were really tricky to solve via AI. Or, for instance, you were talking about the English proficiency test. Speaking and writing were really hard to sort of get automated answers against versus multiple choice questions, reading comprehension, et cetera. I'm curious how developments in the last year or imminent developments moving forward are allowing you to, for instance, grade someone's writing better.

23:33I know that Duolingo has some speech recognition, but you alluded to this concept of multi-term conversations. Yeah, if you could walk me through what your thoughts are in terms of present day, what it's improving, and maybe in the next year or two, what's going to go on over there as well. That would be super interesting. Thanks. Yeah, that's a great question. Those are, you're right. Those are certainly some of the challenging problems that we face. So what's been happening in the past year there that has made some advances. So one of the reasons that speech is really hard to work with, both for a person's e-test or for just language learning applications, is that speech recognition is not a completely solved problem, especially in the case of people having very strong accents, especially people who are learning a language.

24:23right? Or non-native speakers of a language. And especially if you're doing it in a somewhat noisy environment, right? But I think speech recognition has also advanced quite a lot in the past year. To name one, the latest like whisper model from OpenAI. Sorry to keep talking about OpenAI. I guess it is their anniversary of ChatGPT today. That's right. One year today, right? Also, they've been in the news a bunch lately. So top of mind. It's true. Yeah, Yeah, that was a week. Yes, so the Whisper model, for example, we found to be hugely better at feature recognition than a lot of other models that we had been using.

24:58And that has been really game-changing for a lot of what we can do with those features. I think it doesn't fully solve the problem. And we're also, we have a lot of in-house research on how we can do better on, in particular, like learner language, right? Like English from people who are learning English early on, for example. but in terms of grading writing and things like that I think that is where the current generation of large language models really shine right I mean you you can at a high level I mean you could just like ask a large language model you know here is how we here's how we think about grading essays here's an essay what do you think it should be graded right you're not we're not doing just that but you can you can do that and get quite far actually quite a good start And so I think as large language models get better, as future condition technology gets better, these problems get easier.

25:53Hi, I'm Bhargav. And it's just exciting to hear your story because I'm kind of six years, you, like before six years, because I'm in academia now. And I came actually from industry into academia, but in cognitive science. And basically that's where I could connect to what you were describing. So my question to you is a bit abstract as well. So there is a certain history and philosophy of language and how it played a role in civilization and how basically we evolved, right? Different languages in different places. Now, if you agree that a lot of the recent progress, whether it's LLMs or just GPT itself, is owing to the great computational power that we could get in the past few years.

26:38and then the current pace, acceleration that it's going, are you still wary of some plateau that we might hit in the coming years in this side of things just by the virtue of the structure of language or what we can learn from how it played a role? So do you see any kind of plateau that we might hit even despite this computational power and this innovation? Yeah, that's a great question. I think it's not, to me, it's not a very abstract question. It's a very practical question that is a central one, I think, for the coming couple of years. Like we've, as I mentioned, as you analyze these models, like large language models, to take a single example, you can quantitatively analyze them.

Read the full transcript

27:26When you train these models, they're basically predicting the next word. And you can quantitatively analyze how good are those predictions. right and people have done have done large-scale studies that show that if you know if I tell you how much compute you use to train the model basically like you know how big is the model and how much data did you train it on you can actually make quite accurate predictions for how accurate those predictions are going to be for each word right that has been a law that has scaled many many orders of magnitude across the amount of data that you're training and the amount of the model size.

28:01So progress from that dimension has been very regular. But from that side, we are actually getting, if you think about it, it's just in terms of the amount of compute you use to train the model. We are not that far in terms of orders of magnitude away from the most compute we could use. The latest models we're training are quite expensive. and we couldn't increase that by too many factors of 10, I think, at this point for it to be at all feasible. And so if that is the main way that you're scaling, you might worry, oh, wow, maybe we are getting close to hitting a plateau. The flip side to this, though, is the other thing that I said earlier, which is that how you map progress in making those predictions to real-world application usefulness is nonlinear, right?

28:51So for a while, you had some predictions, they got better as you scaled, but they were still not that useful. And they got somewhat better, but they were still not very useful, right? And then all of a sudden, you know, around the past few years, they've gotten very, very useful as you just made that same steady progress. And so we're kind of, we've been in this like exponential. And I think everyone's question is, no one has a real theory about why there's been exponential progress there. And so does that exponential of steady progress keep being exponential? If so, then even if we're about to plateau in terms of the amount of steady progress we can make, it might still produce radical new changes.

29:30Or is this an S-curve that's about to level out? In which case, maybe we need a new approach. And no one knows the answer to that. So the next couple of years will be very exciting. where we find out. Hi, I'm Imalik Njai. I'm a neuroscientist. I'm also the founder of Ecotone. We build custom foundational models to what you were saying about what is AI in health. So we're building what we call the large genome models, the cousin of the LLMs, to find out what are the root causes of rare genetic diseases, where they go to make medicine secure these diseases. Fascinating. Thank you. I wanted to just ask you a question about the never-ending question of quality versus quantity.

30:20So I think GPT-2 was based on web text, which was on a more scrub side of things. But as the GPTs progressed, they incorporated a common crawl, which was a bit more dirtier, but a lot more data. What is your thinking on that spectrum? And I also imagine Duolingo, having such a large data set that is probably very well structured, has a combination of quality and quantity, but we'd love to hear your thoughts on that. Yeah, yeah, that's another great question. It's something that I neglected to mention earlier, which is that it's another reason you might imagine that we're about to hit a plateau, right?

30:57Is that not only can we, not only, we can't scale the compute too many orders of magnitude, but we're sort of, common crawl was already like a very large part of the internet, and we're reaching the limits of how many more orders of magnitude we can scale the data as well. You know, one thing that offsets that is the creation of a lot of bespoke data, which I know a lot of companies are doing, creating, you know, domain-specific data, which can be very high quality. But, of course, it is expensive to create as well. I think in terms of how Dual Lingo is thinking about this, we are, you know, we do a mix of building in-house models on our own data and also fine-tuning external models, you know, on our data.

31:40and I think the from my perspective I think everyone is just is still figuring out how far we can really get with fine-tuning I think it seems to be the case that the latest generation of models can be fine-tuned with quite a small amount of data to be good at a particular at a particular task and so that raises the question that it maybe you can take these kind of generalist models and specialize them for various different tasks with a pretty limited amount of data, then maybe that can actually solve a lot of different data problems. ZACHARY CLINTON - First of all, thank you so much for taking the time to share some wisdom with us.

32:19My name is Zach. I work at Google in ads. And my question for you is something that you said earlier really jumped out to me, but this idea that we may hit a point in the future where machines are able to learn faster and more efficiently than humans. I wonder at what point, when we reach that point, what does that mean for language learning? I mean, how do we lean into that from a user perspective? That's an interesting question. Yeah, I think I didn't exactly say that. I think what I said was that at certain tasks, machines can perform better than humans, right? So, like recognizing you know recognizing very small images for example things like that but yeah it does also seem plausible that uh machines i mean i think they can already learn a lot of things faster than humans can right uh this is already definitely the case uh you know if you have a large if you have a large data set i can build a you know i can build a simple progression model or whatever kind of uh in my model of the data set that i want to uh to really learn a lot of generalizations about the data set much faster than i as a human could like look through all the examples and make my own generalizations, right?

33:34And so I think, yeah, I'm not sure this is exactly a new world at this point. I think it's already the world we're living in, where we found ways of using AI as tools to learn from a lot of things where humans can't conveniently learn very quickly, and humans are sort of focusing more of their time on the kinds of domains where humans still have advantage i'll echo everybody and thanking you for giving the talk i'm jack i'm working on generating time sheets on an automated basis for lawyers accountants and consultants saving them a bunch of time i'm going to cheat and ask a two-part question one kind of tactical are there languages that lend themselves better or worse to sort of token-based next word prediction and how would be, out of 40 ,000 foot view, what is the impact of AI on a thing like Duolingo that helps people learn languages?

34:31Like, are we eventually going to have some sort of localization layer that just sits in between two people talking at all times to the point where everyone only ever needs to learn their own language? Or is that so totally sci-fi? All right. Great questions. And And saving time on timesheets. It feels very meta. I love it. Let's see. So I'll start with your second question, which was, yes, the layers. So this is a really interesting question and one that we get a lot, right? It's like as machine translation gets better and real-time translation, you can already do this on Skype, right? Probably some other services too, where you can have a conversation where basically it is you know automatically translating and then doing text-to-speech on your voice and have a have a conversation with someone who you don't speak a language in common with that is already that is already possible in the future presumably this will become more widespread in a lot of cases I think that's right and so I think the question of whether what the future of people learning languages is really depends on why people are learning languages one thing I think I would say is that in in a lot of countries like especially English-speaking countries, people learn languages mostly for, mostly because they want to connect with a culture, right?

35:51Often people's, maybe people's, you know, family speaks it and you want to understand the traditions better or, or various reasons you feel like you just really associate yourself with French culture or something and, you know, you want to learn French for that reason. So I think people learn, people learn languages for cultural human connections in a lot of ways and for that same reason, you know, people who are, you know, might want to read an author in the original language, right? Not don't read a translation, right? Things like that. So I think for that reason, people who are learning languages for passion like that, it's not going to go away, I don't think.

36:22For people learning languages, so a lot of people learn English, for example, largely for business and reasons like that. For some of those use cases, yeah, maybe real-time translation can take some of that away. But I think it's also important to realize that real-time translation always is going to have somewhat of a lag just because different languages express things in different orders, and there's just ambiguity. And so you always have to wait a little bit before you can be confident in how you're going to translate something because you have to kind of know what's coming next. And I think because for that reason, people who are using even an ideal, perfect, as fast as possible, real-time translator will have to be dealing with some lag.

37:03And I think if you think about like a business context, you're going to be at a disadvantage to the people who are not doing with a real-time translator and don't have the lag. So I suspect even then people are likely to be learning languages. We'll see what the future holds. You had a first question too. So yeah, you actually had a technical part of that question, which is whether languages differ in terms of how easy it is to predict the next token, depending on a type of language. I don't know the answer to that part. What is certainly the case is that in the current generation of models, they are certainly best at English, and there's a handful of other languages they are quite good at.

37:40But then there's many other languages that they are worse at. And I think probably the main reason for that is just the amount of training data, I'm assuming, but I don't know of any deep analyses on that. That is absolutely something that we have to deal with at Duolingo. For now, we are mostly starting focusing a lot of our features using these models around the languages that the models work quite well for. But we are starting to do some work in figuring out if you can do a little fine-tuning to make the models work well for languages that don't have as much data. There was actually a proof of concept of this done with Icelandic as part of the GBT4 launch, actually, that opening I did with the Icelandic government, where they showed that with a not super giant amount of Icelandic data, you could fine-tune the model to work pretty well, it seemed like.

38:26So it seems promising. I have time for one more quick question. Hi, how's it going? Thanks again. Brendan Giles here. We're building AI for data analysts. My question is, do you guys plan to solve the pronunciation problem set? So when you're transcribing, a lot of times if someone mispronounces something, that would never get told as something they need feedback for. And how do you guys plan to solve that? I'm not fully sure I understood the question. So for learning a language, if you speak it with some sort of mispronunciation of an actual like word or phrase, maybe the AI would pick that up and it would think that it's correct because it's getting better and better over time.

39:07But as a human speaker, you might say, hey, you need to enunciate better here or there. Do you guys plan to solve that? Okay. Yes. Yes. This is a great question. And it's a really, it's an interesting issue. There's a lot of, it's a lot of complex issues here, right? So there are, there are some very proficient, everyone here knows very proficient speakers of a language, let's say English, who have an accent. but nevertheless they are extremely proficient speakers of the language but you can tell oh yeah it's somewhat of a Spanish accent or something right it doesn't really hinder your understanding of them right but obviously there's other speakers who are just learning the language who maybe have you might call it a very strong accent but it may be actually very hard to understand them right where it hurts intelligibility there on the AI side the speech recognition models are pretty good actually at understanding what the person with the light, kind of the light accent is saying, but they're often not great at figuring out what a person is saying, who basically is pronouncing a lot more of the sounds in a non-standard way.

40:11But even the light accent is actually mispronouncing some sounds, right, in terms of how the language is spoken by native speakers. And so there's a tension there between figuring out, like, okay, what kinds, well, okay, one problem to solve is you have to figure out what is the person actually trying to say? And that is sometimes challenging if people's pronunciation is bad enough. But then once you figure out what they're trying to say, then there's the question of, okay, which parts of that is it worth actually correcting? Which parts is it worth improving? Which parts are maybe not going to hurt understanding and probably fine?

40:46There's some hard problems there, but we are working on those now. Awesome. Everyone, let's have a huge round of applause for Clinton Bicknell. Thank you so much, Clinton. This has been awesome. Hope we'll stick around for a bit. Yeah, pleasure chatting with you. And thanks, everyone, for all the great questions.

41:06Thanks for listening to Generative Now. If you liked what you heard, please rate and review the episode. It really does help. And if you want to follow us, you can follow me at Magnano on all the socials or Lightspeed at LightspeedVP on all the socials. Generative Now is produced by Lightspeed in partnership with Pod People. I am Michael Magnano, and we will be back next week with another awesome conversation. See you then.

From the publisher

Duolingo is a worldwide powerhouse for consumers looking to learn a language, with a reputation for being engaging and interactive. Less known? All that AI does to power it. 

In this episode, Duolingo’s Head of AI sits down with Lightspeed Partner and host Michael Mignano to chat about AI’s exponential growth, the connection between AI and the human brain, and what comes next. 


Episode Chapters

(00:00) Klinton Bicknell at the Generative NYC Meet-Up

(03:04) What separates the human mind from an LLM?

(08:15) What exactly makes Duolingo an AI company?

(10:49) Why a behemoth like Duolingo can keep pace with nimble startups

(13:33) How will AI transform learning down the line?

(18:36) Caught off guard by ChatGPT

(21:19) What will AI revolutionize beyond education?

(22:48) Audience Q & A - Solving tricky learning modalities with AI

(25:53) Audience Q & A  - Is AI development nearing a plateau?

(29:45) Audience Q & A - Quality vs. Quantity of data

(32:15) Audience Q & A - Harnessing AI’s learning efficiencies

(33:57) Audience Q & A - Will language-learning become obsolete?

(38:30) Audience Q & A - How AI can teach pronunciation


Stay in touch:

The content here does not constitute tax, legal, business or investment advice or an offer to provide such advice, should not be construed as advocating the purchase or sale of any security or investment or a recommendation of any company, and is not an offer, or solicitation of an offer, for the purchase or sale of any security or investment product. For more details please see lsvp.com/legal.

More from Generative Now | AI Builders on Creating the Future

All 90 episodes
Klinton Bicknell: Leveraging AI to Power Language LearningGenerative Now | AI Builders on Creating the Future · 42 min
Listen in VO