In short
Generative Now Podcast Episode Summary
Episode Title
Mike Krieger: Product Building Lessons from Co-Founding Instagram to Leading Product at Anthropic
Episode Description In this episode, host Michael Mignano interviews Mike Krieger, co-founder of Instagram and current head of product at Anthropic. They discuss the challenges faced by AI product builders, the evolution of product innovation, and draw parallels between the social media revolution and the current AI renaissance.
Key Themes and Insights
- Mike Krieger's Journey to Anthropic
- Transition from Instagram to Anthropic:
- Krieger experienced a brief retirement before joining Anthropic.
- He sought a role that allowed him to build with larger teams and embrace AI technology.
- Product Strategy at Anthropic
- Collaboration with Research Teams:
- Constant innovation in AI models necessitates rapid product strategy adjustments.
- Product development is akin to preparing for predictable drops (similar to WWDC for Apple) but with unpredictable research timelines.
- Dynamic Prioritization:
- A need for a flexible product strategy that accommodates both unforeseen advancements and potential delays in research.
- Rapid Iteration vs. Safety
- The challenge of balancing the rapid iteration typical in social media (like Instagram) with the rigorous safety and ethical considerations in AI.
- Importance of careful experimentation with user interactions due to the attachment users develop with AI models.
- Differentiating AI Models
- User Experience and "Vibe":
- Similarities in AI models (Claude, ChatGPT, etc.) can lead to differentiating factors based on user experience and emotional connection.
- Anticipation of certain models excelling in specific areas (e.g., coding, creative writing) which will enhance user loyalty and product identity.
- Impact of AI on Consumer Products and Business Models
- The evolution of consumer products as AI integration increases.
- Discussion on how advertisements and content consumption will shift as AI becomes more prevalent in personal and professional settings.
- Enterprise vs. Consumer Strategy
- Understanding the differing needs of enterprise customers versus individual consumers.
- The importance of enabling users to derive tangible value from AI tools in both realms.
- AI in Personal Life Management
- Future potential for AI products to assist in personal organization, family management, and everyday tasks.
- Open Source and AI Integrations
- Anthropic's initiative to open-source model context protocols to foster an open ecosystem of AI product building.
- Future of AI and AGI
- Vision of helping individuals reach their full potential through AI, facilitating creativity, and enhancing societal contributions.
- The role of thoughtful product design in making AI accessible and beneficial for all.
Episode Takeaways
- Building with Purpose: The necessity of focusing on core problems that AI can solve while maintaining flexibility in product development.
- User-Centric Design: Understanding and respecting the unique user relationships with AI models to ensure a seamless and satisfying experience.
- Future Vision: Krieger envisions a future where AI enhances creativity and productivity, fundamentally changing how individuals interact with technology in their personal and professional lives.
Closing Thoughts The episode highlights the evolution of product strategy in a rapidly changing technological landscape, emphasizing the importance of safety, user experience, and the potential for AI to enrich both professional and personal aspects of life.
Additional Resources
For more insights and updates, follow Lightspeed on
- [Twitter](https://twitter.com/lightspeedvp)
- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/lightspeed-venture-partners/)
- [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/lightspeedventurepartners/)
Contact Information
For inquiries, reach out via email at
generativenow@lsvp.com
---
This summary encapsulates the discussions and key takeaways from the episode featuring Mike Krieger, providing insights into the evolving landscape of AI and product development.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:28Hey, everyone, and welcome to Generative Now. building product at Anthropic, differentiating Claude from competitors, and applying lessons from scaling Instagram. Here's my conversation with Mike Krieger. Hey, Mike. Hey, good to see you. Good to see you. Thank you so much for doing this. Thanks so much for having me. Man, I have like so many things I want to ask you, and we have limited time, so I'm sure I'm just going to like rapid fire at you. The biggest question I have had since I learned that you were joining Anthropic was, how did you go from building one of the most beloved consumer apps in the history of technology to building at a place like Anthropic?
1:08So focused on research and technology and building sort of state-of-the-art AI models. It was such an inspiring and surprising move. I would love to just start with the story of the transition. So I lasted two months in semi-retirement, which was not as long as I lasted between Instagram and the second company I did was called Artifact a year and a half off. This time around, I think the difference was Instagram, I kind of felt complete at that end of that journey and needed some rest. It was like a very intense, like eight years. The Artifact, it was like, you know, the product was really good.
1:39We did hit product market fit. So I was like, like champing at the bit, like, I want to get back in the seat and I want another swing. But I'm a builder. I love building. I love building both products and teams. And so So as that was ramping up and I was thinking about what was next, I realized those things I absolutely love about doing that zero to one startup journey. There's huge uncertainty bars on whether you actually get to work with a bigger team at any point of that journey. If you do it really well, then you get to hire up and it's great. We got to do that at Instagram. Didn't really get to do that article.
2:09I could be at 13 people. I realized I just missed being in that larger, multiple teams doing multiple things at the same time, feeling like you've got all these parallel threads happening. And I started seeking out where will I get to do, and I thought it might be impossible, where do I get to do zero to one product building? But in the context of something that is more of like an existing team and a company that's already got some momentum and some energy going and a culture that I'm aligned with. And, you know, the kind of two options that kind of leads to is you go start a brand new initiative at a much larger company, which has its benefits, but you always have to ask the question, like, why hasn't this existed before?
2:49Or, you know, like, why is this company finally investing in this now? And, you know, their trade-offs. Or, you know, in Anthropik's case, which was company existed, the research team was already world-class and product was still really early. So there's a really good confluence of what I wanted to do next. I wanted to get closer to AI, the kind of company I wanted to be at, which was one that, you know, had some momentum, but was still really nascent on product. And then just the need from Anthropik, like they'd been looking ahead of product and it kind of all coalesced really beautifully, like, you know, it was meant to be.
3:19When I think about a company like Anthropic, especially as someone who has also built product and led product strategy, I feel like it must be challenging to build a product strategy around just constant model and research innovations, right? Like you're working very, very closely with the founders who are researchers and you're building strategy based on whatever is state of the art, whatever is cutting edge, which I imagine was probably much different than building, say, an Instagram or an artifact where I think probably in real time you're sort of inventing, you know, product dynamics and new social experiences and new UX paradigms.
3:58It feels like a different type of innovation. Just talk us through some of how that strategy comes together, working hand in hand with research. Well, the closest parallel, I think, of the Instagram days was like the yearly drop of things that would happen at Google I.O. or WWDC. We're like, OK, this is this has been delivered to me, you know, from Cupertino. And now I got to go figure out if there's some product to be built around that. This is like that, but on like a monthly basis that it's inside the building. So it's as that similar sort of in the WWDC case, you kind of plan around those moments, right?
4:30There's going to be a new phone or there's new OS. Here it's unfamiliar and unpredictable timelines in both directions, right? Sometimes you say, great, I'm going to have, you know, my beautifully lined up, you know, three months, like three months. And something on research hits sooner than you expected. And, you know, computer use, for example, for us, like it was October or November. As we were getting ready to launch the model refresh for Sonnet, we realized computers was actually at the point where we wanted to at least put it in the API as a beta. And we went from, yeah, that's probably like early next year to, yeah, let's actually get this out once it gets through all the safety testing in like three weeks.
5:05So, you know, that sort of can pull forward, but also it's research. So it also could take longer, right? So it's, it's, it's a lot of sort of dynamic reprioritization. And I like to joke with the product team that like, if we froze our researchers, we shouldn't, we love them and they shouldn't be cryogenically frozen. But if we did, we should still have a year of roadmap ahead. I think the models still have a tremendous amount of juice left in them, even for the current generation. And so what it's meant is a portfolio approach where we've got a team we call Labs, which is paired with early research.
5:36And the idea there is if research hits sooner than expected or on the timeline we expect, we're not waiting for them and then starting the product process. To that point, you're a month behind where you could be. Let me have model-dependent or model-adjacent features that are either in the current model or upcoming features, but still require a lot of research product collaborations, something like artifacts, which we launched last year, ongoing improvements that often require some fine tuning of the model. So you got to stay close to doing research and product. And then there's stuff that's just like good product work that is like probably using the model in some way, but not requiring some model leap or some model like customization.
6:10And I've learned over the last year, having that portfolio of those is healthy because at any given moment, you'll either need a spike on one that you didn't expect to, or if something's taking a little bit longer, great. You can put that time into product polish or rounding out our mobile features or doing some other work that is a little bit outside of the model work. So would you say like the biggest steps forward in the product often come from, you know, a certain product vision that then drives the research work or is it the research, you know, there's some breakthrough and then you and the team are like, hmm, what's something amazing we can do with this?
6:44Oh, it can write code. Let's turn this into artifacts. In what direction does it normally go for the biggest product innovations? The way I would put it is the sort of model gets you to like another sort of like level of capabilities. And then it's a loop of what product ideas do you have and can you fine tune them into the model? So I'll use an example of like agentic capabilities, like in Cloud 3 by Sonnet, especially the refresh, which unlocked a bunch of coding startups doing a lot of interesting work around agentic coding and code editing. And then, you know, even for us within Cloud AI, like artifacts and improving artifacts, we could do that in a tight loop with research.
7:21So it's sort of these step changes that happen probably at model release time. And then you can do some incremental work, sometimes even in just prompting examples, but often in customizing the model as well. And so it ends up going in both directions. But the research team has more of, you know, sort of a three, six, nine month roadmap that they're trying to deliver on. And then we could do tight loops on top of each of those. Speaking of tight loops, another thing I was thinking about with building product at a place like Anthropic is I have to imagine, given all of the safety considerations I'm sure you all are constantly making, it's probably really hard to do the type of rapid iteration that products and companies like Instagram and Meta were famous for.
8:01like ship, you know, ship fast, move fast, break things like, you know, Meta's famously testing, you know, however many different variants all at the same time. I guess with the constraints of safety, that's got to be really, really hard to do. Is that right? The way we think about it is there's kind of two ways in which I think that ends up being plays out in the day to day. Like one is for like model releases, you know, that there's like a safety sort of testing and responsible scaling kind of evaluation that happens there. And that's, you know, when you you just think about timelines, you know that model releases anyway don't end up happening so quickly that that ends up being like the difference between being able to do like one or four in a month.
8:40You know, they're more deliberate anyway. And so there's that component there. Then there's the piece that I think is also really interesting around the relationship people have with the model. And what I mean by that, and this goes into the testing question, you know, because in some ways you can imagine, like maybe we train like five model variants and we A-B test them and we do some of that. But we also find that people become very attached and attuned to how the model reacts to them and how it talks to them. And so people will catch, I love there's all these sort of cloud related reddits and you go on Reddit and people are definitely like, are they testing a new model?
9:11And sometimes we aren't, sometimes they're not, and people are just like looking for changes when they don't exist. But it needs to bring up, like we have to take an extra level of care in terms of like how we treat experimentation and the sort of like commitment people have or relationship people have with some of these things. The other piece is, you know, versus an Instagram where people, you know, some people rely on it for business, but the vast majority are using it for more of like a, and consumption and entertainment use case. And here people are getting like work done. And like that, if you like change too much about the model or even the UI from day from one day to the next, it really breaks their workflow and you've gotten in their way.
9:46And so I'm still trying to find that balance between, you know, at Instagram at any given point, we probably had like 50, you know, different AB tests running, right? That combinatorial thing of like, have you sliced the possible universe of users into like enough slices where you know you're not intersecting different treatments with the like extreme of like, hey, we ship software once a year and we don't want to mess with people's workflow. And the answer is definitely at neither extreme. And maybe there's more UI experimentation we can do on this rapid iteration. And then maybe model releases form a nice cadence of, right?
10:18This is a time where we're like getting people to see that there is a different way that they might want to get work done or we're okay disrupting work or at least like offering an upgrade about how we might do things but know that there's a reason and there's like a name that we're putting around those things but if you identify something that is definitely true which is the nature of experimentation looks quite different here yeah it has to be and that's surprising but also i guess not so surprising that your users are noticing even the slightest differences in the model um it makes sense i mean one of the reasons i love claude and i use it is because of the personality, the tone, the way it speaks to me.
10:52These models, they seem to have different flavors in some sense. One of the things I've been thinking about, especially as it relates to models coming out of different labs, and we'll talk about things like DeepSeek, it feels like the pace of model release and leapfrogging, it's such that it's moving so quickly. And so I guess my question for you is, do you think we end up in a place where there actually is not a lot of difference between all the different models in the end? Or do you think the things that make something like Claude unique or, you know, a ChatGPT unique will remain and that will become a key differentiator between the models?
11:34Yeah. And I think it's probably worth talking about like models and products. We had Instagram's kind of most interesting kind of like competition with Snapchat at the time. And people would ask like, well, like, you know, you took, you know, the stories approach that they took and made it more Instagram and put it in Instagram and things with the other way as well. And I had this like non-mathematical formula. I always joke by non-mathematical formulas here as like the non-researcher in the room, like what makes a social network? And to me, it was like formats. At first we had feed and then we had, you know, stories, which we had reels.
12:05Now they have like, you know, shopping. And then there's audience who's actually, you know, visiting your network. And then there's Vibes, which like I realize is a fuzzy term, but it's also really important. And so like I would compare like us and Snapchat where formats were similar in a lot of places, right? The audience, maybe they skewed younger, but over in the fullness of time, there was quite a bit of overlap and the same people would actually use both. But the Vibes could not be more different between the two, right? You know, Instagram, we had started from a place maybe more like curated, polished.
12:35And then with stories, we maybe took that a little bit, but you took the stories from Instagram and Snapchat but they still feel quite different, right? I think there's a similar thing, and I haven't formalized my non-mathematical formula yet for LLM and AI-related applications, but I think there's something similar at play where I see people go on X and talk about how Claude is their therapist or Claude is their trusted friend or they delegate decisions to Claude because it's a trusted person. Our friend was having a medical situation and Claude eventually, all caps, was like, go to the hospital now, shut up, leave.
13:09And like cloud just has like a bit more personality than perhaps than some of the other models. And so I think that'll continue to be really important, which is even as, you know, we'll all co-evolve what the right UI is around these things. I think, you know, like artifacts, JTBG as canvas, I think we'll both like continue to evolve it. Like we'll see what Gemini does. I think there's lots of Google teams experimenting with different ways in which they could use, you know, these models and different product applications. You see a deep seek come in and like have a different take on whether you show the reasoning versus not like these things will happen.
13:41They're not absolutely different. And sometimes the team here is like, well, like anything about differentiation, like any kind of product differentiation in the short term is fairly short lived because you're going to see, you know, different ideas get borrowed. I think that that's fine and actually probably healthy for the ecosystem. I think what is different over time is probably two things in this case. One is actually Vibe, which is like, what does it feel like to use a Cloud versus a Gemini versus a ChatTBD versus a DeepTik? Those things, I think, should probably evolve to be quite different over time because the people that gravitate to one or the other will want more of that.
14:13And I think that will naturally lead the product to lead in that direction. And then the other part is capability where at any given point, I think you'll see different models spike on different things. So right now, Cloud3 drives on it and coding is like one really clear sweet spot. Cloud and Creative writing is another one that we hear a lot where the model does a good job of producing output that way or even just content creation. I think over time, it's likely that those differences become more acute rather than less acute. And even if on the eval side of things, you get a lot more parity where we're all chasing some similar evals.
14:47I see the disconnection between what the evals are measuring and what's valuable to individuals or even companies get wider over time until maybe we have some different way of evaluating these models. They're super important for the training part. So don't get me wrong. They'll continue to be really important, but they're not in the full picture is what I've experienced on the product side. So you're saying customers more and more will come to associate certain products and models with certain capabilities like, oh, Claude is great at programming and ChatGPT is not. I'm making that up as an example.
15:17You think that actually becomes more pronounced over time? I think that's what will happen. And this is how I feel when I use this versus the other. I want this for this experience versus the other one too. Right. The vibes, the vibes. That's super interesting. I mean, I do feel like you said formats are easily, you know, ported over to different products. But I do feel like Anthropic has done a really, really good job sort of at the presentation kind of application layer. I feel like you have in many ways out-innovated or at least outpaced in terms of innovation at the product layer. Things like artifacts, projects, computer use.
15:54How important is that to you and your strategy? And I guess in the context of what you just said, will that remain an important part of your strategy? The way I see it is, are you unlocking something novel that somebody can do? This journey is 1 % finished. I think we're even less than that in terms of how these AI products kind of manifest. us like we're so early. And so can you build these sort of product primitives that are going to unlock some novel behavior? I'll give you like a specific example. We have projects and everything you can do with projects you could cobble together either with just regular chats or you're doing your own thing.
16:28But the fact that we have this container for it means that we hear from people that say, hey, I have a project for all my health records. It's like one place where I know to go put like every single thing. I definitely do too. I got to chat with Claude all the time about, yeah, I've got this new blood work. Like when it was in me, I was having low blood pressure for a while and I was like tracking all that. It gives people like sort of like a container and a shortcut for how to use it. A lot of what we're thinking about over the next couple of months in the product is what are the sort of surfaces or capabilities we unlock that help people like take what is a expert use case or something that if you absolutely know how to prompt it and get the right data in, it's great.
17:02And then just get Cloud to do it for more people so that it can unlock value for others. And like, that's like a lot of what I think we need to be doing on product overall, not even just that anthropic, like industry wide around like lowering that barrier. And like the state of the art on lowering that barrier mid last year was like suggestion, you know, chips around like, ask them all about this things. But even that, without the actual right context, you're actually not going to get a satisfying answer. You're going to get some like fun entertainment use case, like tell me a joke or write me a poem.
17:31Sure. That was great. And like the beginning of 2024. for. Now, I think it's much more like, and it's a challenge because this is like not an instant thing, but, you know, is it connected to the right data sources? Does it have the right context about you? Do you know how to then use it? Like, is it producing useful work on the other end that you can then port or use into whatever actual like daily work you have? Like those things become much more important. And like we build products in service of that versus just, you know, as additional ideas on top of Cloud AI. Shifting gears a little bit, arguably one of the most successful ads-based products ever with Instagram, it feels like something that is happening with the internet and sort of the business model of ads and the internet up until this point is it's shifting as a result of AI and agents.
18:17Is this something you all think about, especially you, again, given your history and given your background, like how do consumer products, especially those that are ads-based, start to evolve when more and more non-human agents are starting to access the world on the internet. Yeah, I think you can look at it in a couple of different ways. In one way, you know, if we deliver on the promise of these tools collectively as an industry, it should ideally save people quite a bit of time that is, you know, maybe now can be spent on like more entertainment use cases. So like ads and like that sort of like set of media might actually become more important because maybe we have more free time.
18:52We'll see how that ends up working out. Then there's the other piece, which is how does the web evolve? if our primary user, if not the primary user of the web, ends up being like more automated agent wise. And we started seeing this with Artifact. Artifact was an AI powered news recommendation app on iOS and Android. And I think we're experiencing there was like peak, like overly, you know, and nobody's individual fault, just like the way things are commercial. But like the mobile web is just, you know, you land on a website, it's like full screen video ad, pop up, subscribe to a newsletter. And ultimately, like an interesting question, like why didn't Artifact work?
19:28I have lots of thoughts on it. One of it is like as polished as we could make the raw feed experiences. Unfortunately, like the kind of like content behind the click was not very like easy to consume or good. There's systematic reasons why that was the case. You know, I think local news is, you know, really hollowed out. I don't think anybody at these local news types wakes up and is like, how do I put more ads in here? They're like, we've got to do it to stay afloat. So I absolutely get how we got there. But then I think the next leap is like from, you know, different sites that can browse the web and summarize them, et cetera.
20:01Like you're not even seeing that content. And so regardless of whether it's agents or whether it's, you know, perplexity going and doing summarization or, you know, any number of these search places, we're going to have to see a shift in business models for these sites anyway. We're going to have to see a shift from this relationship between a writer, publisher, and an individual around what does it mean to have, you know, even if it's not a pure agent, it might be like a short-term browser. And I don't think anybody has the answer there yet, but also a world where, you know, we're so detached from the writers.
20:31But in the content, I think it's like a not great world. And so how can AI products actually be better conduits? I tweeted about this email product called Quora, built by the folks at Every. and I get newsletters in my inbox and it does summarize them, but I actually find it really valuable because before, you know, you get like, you know, no opinion, the latest no opinion. You're like, okay, there's a subject line in the first line. Like, do I want to read this? Like, I don't know. I've got a lot going on, but actually now I get like a paragraph of what it's about because it's like summarized around with the rest of my email.
20:59And I'm finding I'm reading more because I'm like, oh, that actually sounds great. I actually am going to click through. I'm confident that like, it's going to probably be worth my time because it has a lot of what the things that I'm interested in. So there is a way in which it's symbiotic. It'd be foolish to believe it's like purely going to be additive in terms of like read time and clicks. But there's a way it can be more symbiotic. Do you think that publishers on the web, whether, you know, writers, publishers, or really just anyone that's hosting a website or a service on the web, like, do you think there's going to be resistance to agents or computer use going out there and browsing on behalf of users, either because, you know, whatever, it's going to break their business models or, you know, it's going to overload them with traffic.
21:39Like, do you think they're going to try to fight that maybe like at the CDN layer? The tactics we'll have to sort of see and see how that evolves. I think that like the relationship one is really the question I come back to, which is like, you know, I read The Verge a bunch and I saw that I started subscribing to their sort of monthly subscription. And like the impetus for it was like, I want to read one of their newsletters. But now it's like, I feel like I have a different relationship to that site or I read Defector for sports news, right? And so I think there is that like evolution happening.
22:07And while that's happening, maybe there's, you know, resistance on some sides, innovation in some other places, you know, different sort of approach to monetization, a different approach to meeting people where they are. Email's actually been an interesting one where like that's where a lot of content gets consumed now. We'll be in shifting sands for sure over the next couple of years. Speaking of this topic and Artifact, you know, I know Artifact was somewhat recent. And I think it was only, you know, you started it only maybe two years ago, but it feels like the world was completely different.
22:36Do you think you would have done things differently if that company had been started today? Like, do you have, are there far more capabilities today through AI that maybe would have made that product and business work as you originally envisioned? Yeah, it's interesting just watching how quickly things evolve. I think the final version of Artifact, we eventually sold it to Yahoo, but if you take like the version that we had like right before we shut down, had started incorporating a lot more of what had become available just in those previous years, like LLM APIs. So we could do summarization, we could do clickbait rewriting, we could add AI in hopefully value-add and user-focused ways.
Read the full transcript
23:12But you're doing it off a base that doesn't assume that, right? So the product has to evolve. I was playing with Particle.News, which is another take on AI-powered news. They feel like if you had started Artifact in 2024 rather than in 2021, like we did, where would you start? Well, you'd have a lot more around AI aggregation and you'd have even the ability for AI to read you the top news of the day. You would approach the product in a different way. But I think the really fascinating question is, is that going to be true on a yearly basis? Like a year of pornography? Oh, that was great for 2024 and maybe it continued to evolve.
23:47But actually now we've got this different approach. It's just the capabilities that you have access to that previously might have taken you like years to build out as a startup, it might not even been achievable without a much larger research team or a much larger data set are now available. And like they get cheaper by the month, it feels like. So like, how do you like think about that in product and be willing to like actually question a lot of fundamental assumptions about how a product works? Like I think I would have been interesting to do with Artifact was like in the last few months, like actually like pare it down completely.
24:17Actually, that's great because at this point, we'd ingested like three years of news data. We had like a really rich corpus. We had one prototype that was fun, which was, right, like, what if it was more around, like, conversing with that knowledge base and asking questions? And maybe some of these are canned questions, but some of them aren't. And it was fun. It was very different. Super fascinating. So, Artifact, obviously, consumer product. Instagram, obviously, massive, massive consumer product. We talked a little bit about product strategy inside of Anthropic. But overall, like what's it like for you to be building inside a product that I think in many ways is now catering to enterprise customers, completely different type of customer than, say, Instagram in some respects?
24:54What has that been like? Yeah, it's interesting to kind of build both at once because, you know, there's plenty of people that go to Cloud AI, sign up for, you know, free and a pro subscription. You learn from them in some ways. But what's really interesting is our enterprise customers, because two things are happening simultaneously. Like one, you know, it's often not the individuals at a company that are making the decision about like which LLM like enterprise, you know, software are they adopting? And instead they might get CIO or CTO buys it for them. So the buyer is a bit different. But then what's really interesting is actually the opportunity for feedback and engagement is much greater because you're really, you know, hopefully mutually invested in the success of that sort of partnership.
25:31And so in some ways, we're getting richer, like actually much richer, like feedback on the ground from, you know, some of our enterprise deployments. And it's great because then you could send our applied AI team and go on their troubleshoot or go learn from those things. In the way that like Instagram, you have a data science team and they could try to like find the in aggregate what's happening across all of the United States. It's an interesting like societal question, but it's much harder to get at that texture of the individual product. And so that was a difference in what I expected. I was like, oh, like one of the things that's gonna be hard with enterprise is like, you're gonna lose that touch of the customer because it's gonna be like, uh, you know, the buyer is different.
26:06But actually it's, it's been quite different. We were able to lean in there. The other piece too, is you start from a different place of, all right, your company's paying for you, this for you, at least it will be, you know, while they're doing this, you know, either trial or like this engagement, how do you prove value to people there? And so that it's actually become successful. Cause the worst thing would be like a year in be like, oh, I guess we subscribe to, you know, cloud for enterprise and like, you know, not that many people are using that's a failure on our part. And so shifting the balance of like what user education looks like and what, that's a term I didn't even know before I really started here, which is like enablement.
26:38You know, there's a lot of like sales and enterprise terms that I've like ramped up quickly on or I'd heard, you know, tangentially. The principles are the same. You want to build things that are useful to people and then learn from what they're using it and then iterate on that. But the like approach is a bit different. Do you think about products and the product strategy? Do you, do you separate it by sort of consumer and enterprise or are you sort of building stuff and it's like oh let's now build the enterprise version of this or maybe vice versa how does that all work it's flowed the other way in a couple of ways i think it's interesting as well like as an example like we enterprise first we built out google drive and you know google suite integration get up integration and those are great uh you know starting points for enterprise because hopefully like the admin can configure that once and then everybody the company has access to and there's like some onboarding that you can do there.
27:24But ideally, like individuals can use GitHub just as much or connect their Gmail, right? Or connect their Google Drive. And so it's flowed sort of in both ways where some more like general purpose features mentioned projects and artifacts, like those started like fairly general purpose and then made up some customization for the enterprise. But then also like these like knowledge integrations, I think are ultimately like how we succeed is like, can we connect cloud to the knowledge at your company and actually help you do real work? That's a company problem. that's an enterprise problem, but individuals are trying to do that as well, just as much.
27:55And so you'll see that cross-pollination for sure in the product. And an active product strategy question I have on the team brings up is, right now there's manifestations of a similar product, but maybe with different feature sets. Do they drift further apart over time or do they stay fairly similar? And there's differences of it within internally. I think for the coming six months, they stay pretty similar. I think where they might start to diverge is in the kinds of work you might delegate to cloud over time, right? Where if you're actually automating parts of your workflow, we think a lot about like how cloud can be a virtual collaborator for you.
28:27That looks quite different, I think, for somebody working in marketing or somebody, you know, working as an engineer versus somebody using cloud for their personal life. Yeah, totally. I mean, even if you think about when I've tested computer use or, you know, some of the other products that are doing this, like the ideas of things I want to test it for always jump to more productivity or work oriented stuff. Like it feels like the things I want to do as a consumer or things I actually want to invest my time in. It feels like in work, I have all this stuff I want to delegate. So yeah, it feels like that would be a surface area that would get far more investment in the enterprise.
28:59Yeah, I think that that's right. And I think there's also sort of a modality to it as well, where you're like, you're doing work to probably like have an organized task list. I try to do it in my personal life. I don't always succeed. I do a better job of it at work. It kind of lends itself a lot. These are the kinds of things I want to carve off or like help me organize my thoughts on this. I actually think there's a lot that can be done in people's personal lives as well. Like we have two kids, um, they're going to two different schools because they're different ages. And I was talking to a founder of a successful, like sort of productivity company that uses a lot of bunch.
29:30And he's like, he's just like, let me share a project for you. I've got this whole workflow that ingests, we have their kids go to the same school, ingest all these emails because the emails are very, very dense, very long. And like actually produces an action list out of it. I'm like, that's really smart i should use ai for more things in my personal life just around like family life management as well that's fascinating by the way i'm in the same situation as you two two young kids two different schools two different like school newsletters and all this it's it's surprising we haven't really yet entered that moment where where products easily integrate with our personal life like ai products specifically like nothing yet is summarizing my email i imagine google will have some wedge there but yeah that level of productivity hasn't really crept into to personal and home life yet.
30:12I imagine that's coming soon. MARK MANDELYIERIENOVICIENCY In October or November, we open-sourced the model context protocol, which is our take on how do you bring data into LLMs and how do you get data out of them. And we made it open-source because we wanted to sort of foster an open ecosystem of people building on top of it. So you can use them with Cloud. You can also use it with several editors that have integrated MCP as well, like Block just open-sourced their agentic coding tool called Goose, and also has an MCP component. So it's gotten adoption even beyond Cloud. What's really cool is seeing what are the MCP servers that people build.
30:43So if you get cloud for desktop, you can write and integrate your own MCP servers. And if you look at the sort of things that people have built, it's things like Apple Notes. So being able to talk to your Apple Notes using cloud, like Google Calendar, like these things are actually personal. You know, even if they're like productivity oriented, they're still like, they're pretty personal in nature. And I think that's pretty neat. And like, especially as these models, like we think a lot about these models coding and Maybe in the first instance, people think, oh, great, it's going to help software engineers write code.
31:11But actually, it's going to help everybody solve problems that can be uniquely solved by writing code. And so that might be today writing an MCP server or like a pretty technical term, but like helping you connect to something that you already use, like Apple reminders or Apple notes. But in the future, it could also be, hey, I need to do some data analysis on those things I collected. that Cloud can actually write code to do that data analysis and give you that response. And that is Cloud coding, even if you're not producing software. Well, yeah, that's what I was going to say. Like, yeah, these things sound technical and challenging for your average person today.
31:47But also creating software and creating products is going to get far easier as a result of Cloud or AI writing code for you. And I haven't yet been able to fully wrap my head around like what shape and what format that ends up coming in. like at what point does somebody who's not technical at all start creating these workflows out of software using AI? I'm really fascinated to see what that looks like and where that all goes. I mean, is that, is that something you're all thinking about? Like for sure, what does Claude do when consumer behavior intersects with software creation? Exactly. Or what, you know, one, like what problem we can solve for people?
32:23And then two, how do you help people sort of take an idea in their head and express it visually? I think that thing that was really fun over the holiday break is a couple of people in our go-to-market team, so non-engineers, like people without a coding background, started using things like V0 by Rissell to like prototype ideas they had for Cloud. And then they came back from a break and they were like, yeah, I've never written a line of code in my life, but I actually built a fully functioning web application. Let's talk about what Cloud could do in this situation. I think that's really interesting, right?
32:52I think the ability for AI, and not just like LLMs, but also more of these media creation ones as well to like help take ideas in people's head and then bring them to life so they can then either become sparks for further like human creativity or something else downstream i think is like a very cool flywheel speaking of that like how how has ai assisted you in your role as cpo i mean obviously you're dog food and clawed all day long but maybe in what ways and maybe what other ai tools are you using so um i'll talk a little bit about core just i I think it's a really interesting take on how LLMs can break up a traditional workflow.
33:28But even in the CPO role, I think two things that have really stood out. One is being a great critic slash sounding board slash just external voice. So I'll often be writing alongside Claude. So maybe I'll write an outline and have Claude produce something for a requirements doc or even just a product strategy document. But even if I'm writing my own things, I rely on Claude now to be like, all right, what am I not thinking about? Like, what did I forget? Or like, you know, what are the holes in this argument? And I think it does quite well. You know, it's not at the point right now where it's going to produce a like flawless strategy from whole clause, you know, but it is very good at like seeing what you've written and saying like, Hmm, you know, you haven't thought this through, you know, we actually did this as a leadership team.
34:10We did our whole like, okay, our process late last year. And the first thing that is like fed it to the cloud. And I was like, great. What are we not going on that we should be going on? Like, what are we missing? And I had three very good answers. Like, this is really interesting. So, so cool. Critic and then way of filling in. Also accelerant, I use this, we have our Google Docs integration now. And I was filling out a table, it was actually relevant to your question, which was how can Claude help accelerate product development itself? And I started building out this end by end table, and I did half the cells.
34:42When I was typing, I was like, I bet Claude could actually do the rest of these cells. It's got great examples now at this point. And I was basically just like, please just fill out the rest. And it did a great job. And I was like, okay, great. And then Adds about the cells I added, again, I had better ideas than I had in a lot of cases. So this companion assistant piece has been absolutely valuable, and I use that all the time. But some of our newer knowledge integrations, even stuff that we have internally, those have just been valuable in preparing for the day. I was like, Claude, help me get ready for the day.
35:11We've got these MCP integrations. And I was actually talking to this morning, it's like, you've got this podcast recording, and here's the briefing doc, better review that ahead of time, like be thinking about this. I was like, great. Like now I'm in that mindset as well. So as a increasingly aware of my work and the conversations that we're having, it is just a very valuable, like additional sounding board. Do you find a lot of people on the team are doing similar things? Like are people using it in this way or is it mostly just you? It's been interesting because, you know, three months in I wrote like observations about Anthropics so far.
35:46And one of the things was like, we need to do a much better job of like using Cloud internally to accelerate our own selves, because it's not that it's not happening. It's very unevenly distributed. I should go back to the conversation we're having earlier around, like what's the role of product design and product strategy in improving the ability of people to use these models to their maximum capacity? I think we could do that just even internally. And so we had a really fun hackathon in November. And one of the things that was really cool is that we took one of the go-to-market people and they had a whole workflow around like, all right, I'm meeting with these three prospective, prospects that I want to talk about Cloud for Enterprise to.
36:22I go through the same process every time around, researching the people who matter, getting more context on this company, what's going on with them, reading their S1, all of these things. A lot of that can be done really well by Cloud in terms of summarization. They partnered with an engineer and they basically built that out in an automated way. It was awesome. It was like, that's so cool. We need to do those kinds of things to take the seed of what is a good use of LMs in the workplace and then make it so that it's like, you don't have to think about it. It just actually happens for you. And that's like a push I've been having actually shifted a lot more of my own attention towards internal products and internal productivity more recently, because I think there's a lot we can learn from, hey, have we actually made our sales team more productive?
37:04Have we made our engineering team more productive using some more like cutting edge things that we can do with Cloud? And then can we externalize those ideas into like actual products? That's really, really cool. I meant to ask about the team. I mean, obviously, after you all sold Instagram to Facebook at the time, probably experienced, you know, massive hyper growth, not only in the product, but the team, scaling up the team. I imagine you're experiencing something very similar right now. Anthropic has gotten very, very big, very, very quickly, you know, still scaling massively, it seems, all the time.
37:35What's that been like, scaling up the team inside of Anthropic? but also while you're still, you know, I'm sure acclimating in some sense, this new type of company and new type of product. Yeah, tell us a little bit about that journey. Yeah, I mean, I think there's a few things that are different even from the compare contrast. Like one is you're scaling a team that is more distributed than Instagram was. Like with Instagram, we were doubling basically year on year, but for most of that growth, it was all in Melo Park, right? We moved to the middle part post-acquisition and we wanted like, stay close to other Facebook technical teams that we were collaborating with.
38:06But it just gave you, you visually saw how big the team was getting. It's much harder to see that when it's primarily growing in like Google Meet, Hollywood Square style or like Slack, you know, sort of participants. For better and for worse, like in some ways, like one sort of ritual that I did at Instagram with Kevin was we had product reviews. We realized that like too many people in the product review room started feeling a lot more, it was like a presentation rather than like a place where you could have like deeper, like nuance, like kind of like hard talk about like whether this thing was on the right direction or not.
38:39And here what I found is since a fair amount of people are like in New York or joining remotely, the room can actually feel smaller. You get a different feeling of scale with this like remote aspect of it. That's like one very notable difference that we've had here. And then the second piece is even the product has grown a lot. It is like a small chunk compared to like our research teams, the people working on trust and safety, the people thinking about all of like the threat modeling and like societal impacts. There's a lot more that gets into Anthropic. And so as much as we've grown, I think I still feel like, oh, we're like we're a small part of the company, even though, you know, proportionally we're growing similarly.
39:16And it's a different feeling to have that as well. Have you been able to take lessons from Instagram, either in terms of building out the team like we're talking about now, or even, you know, specific product lessons that you've been able to apply to Anthropic? Yeah, I think one of them has been, you know, thinking about, like, what is the ultimate problem that you're solving and, like, remaining obsessed with that. I actually think it's much harder to do. it's hard on Instagram to get on Instagram, you'd have people that internally that would come up with fantastic ideas that were interesting applications of technology, but weren't on the path of what we were like, what I really wanted to solve for like the most people as possible.
39:54In AI, I feel like it's even more tempting because there's no shortage of like very cool ideas that you will come up with, you know, in prototype using Cloud. And I think if we like staff teams are on all of them, we'd like to have like, you know, one, a pretty complex product, but two, I don't think we'd make enough progress because we'd be like sort of like peanut buttering ourselves over a lot of things. And so it's harder to say no, but even more important, you know, and having that focus within, within the team. And like, it's a discipline we've got to build up. And I don't think we've gotten it quite right yet around like harnessing bottoms up excitement.
40:25Like that's really important. And like, I'm definitely not going to have all the best ideas. I might not even have like most of them, like there's going to, they're going to come from the team, but retaining that like user focus and like adherence to like what problem you're fundamentally solving, like it is just as important, but maybe twice as hard in this space. That's like, I think one, one lesson that we've, we've carried. The second one is something that, um, I learned, you know, in Instagram and somebody told me like, every time your company doubles, like your processes will break and your culture will break in some way.
40:52And Instagram, we basically doubled every year, um, in, in engineering. And so it kind of like, we had to evolve and unbreak ourselves like constantly. Um, we've grown even faster at Anthropic in the last like years since I've drawn on the products that offer a smaller base than you know Instagram is growing but still and I think we're probably like one organizational and process refactor wise away from like things really humming and I'll really get any given point I'm like oh that part's feeling good that part's not feeling good one thing I learned at the time at Instagram was you could put all the processes and like organizational stuff in place nothing beats like either getting on the ground and trying to do some work yourself like I would still IC engineer at Instagram until the year I left, or just having really high bandwidth communication with ICs on the ground.
41:40And so immediately after our conversation, I have a couple of one-on-ones with people that are all over the place on the org chart, but I want to hear from what is on-the-ground building product at Anthropic today and how can we make that better? And I think you need to maintain that contact. It's harder as a non-co-founder. Like Instagram, I knew who everybody was. I started there. I hired up a lot of that team. I was still engineering. I think one of the challenges coming in is like, I don't know everybody yet. Still, I probably know most of the people that, you know, I'm going to interact with, but two, like, I don't have as much that on the ground tactile feeling of like, what is the state of our code base?
42:13And like, what's it like building an anthropic today? Yeah, that's fascinating. Maybe zooming out a little bit, you know, thinking a little bit broadly about AI and sort of the future. Obviously, you know, one very topical think is DeepSeek, especially in the beginning of the week, seemed like the only thing anyone was talking about. What did you take away from that whole moment for, I guess, the state of AI and sort of model development moving forward and maybe Anthropik more specifically? My wife's great aunt texted us and I was like, OK, that's definitely. Oh, yeah. My parents were asking me about it.
42:45Crossed over to something. Three takeaways, like in no particular order, like one, open people's eyes up. you know, Cloud, I think we've gotten great business penetration. Our API has used, you know, really well, but I think we saw a lot of ways to go on, like just getting the word out about Cloud AI and like getting people to at least experience and like make a choice for themselves. I think it was interesting for people to like see that there was, you know, more to the world than just chat GPT, like transparently. I think that's like a good thing to have people like experiment with these different tools.
43:12So I think that I see some positives there. Two, like many sort of like personal opinion, like overreactions that I've like watched in the market over the last 10 years, like just fascinating watching it. Like one of my favorite writers is John Adley. He writes for Bloomberg and, you know, he's like a finance writer. And he had this great column once where he was like, if you had like fallen asleep two weeks ago and woken up today, and it had been like some like market swoon. And he'd be like, wow, the market moved like half a percent, like not that much. And like if you're awake for all of it, it was like the whole like sort of like bumpiness.
43:44I really try to take that perspective, which is like the short-term ability to like overcorrect and snowball is very real. Totally. And so now I'm just doing those things like, okay, let's write it out. What's actually changed? We need more compute than ever over here. So the role of chip companies and the role of scaling up on, if previously it was purely on pre-training, now more on the RL site is absolutely more important than ever. And then Darvay made this point this week and really resonated with me too. which is if you now have an even more like sort of high value scaling opportunity around RL, you should be incentivized to do that for even longer, you know?
44:24And like if you can train for five times as long now and have, you know, five times the intelligence, that's a very worthwhile investment to make. So that fundamentally has not changed at all. But in the third piece of like just perhaps the four sort of like the geopolitical implications of all these in a way that I've been bubbling over and is now like unignorable and like great. it's on that conversation now because, you know, as timely as time has ever to have. And I think like it's sparking the right conversation by WhatsApp groups or anything to be seen. And beyond just like the broader, you know, sort of reach that it's had for society, like it definitely sparked some real, I think, very timely conversations around that.
45:01And I think that's a plus. On the last point, like it definitely seems like it's forcing conversations and forcing people to kind of like confront how or why this happened. And I agree, like, that's probably a conversation we should have. And yeah, it's forcing people to ask questions like, you know, did a major distillation happen? And what's your thinking on that? It's really hard to say. I mean, I think like the whole separate topic that he gets to come like model tells, like we, not the refresh sonnet, but the previous one used to start a lot of answers. But certainly it became like an internal meme where we'd be like, so you tell if a model been distilled from it.
45:33If you ever saw like, you know, instantly start like a, certainly like that sounds like sonnet-ish. So I don't know the OpenAI models well enough to know if like some of those kind of tells were present or not. But yeah, I think it's on all the labs, I think now to be like, OK, great. Like if there's things that we need to lock down and protect or at least detect like that work to be done. And then like the imperative to continue innovating and scaling is like more important than ever, I would say. And then, yeah, I totally agree on the second point. And as far as like the overreaction goes, Anthropic, OpenAI, like these are companies, they're products, they're more than just models.
46:08And yet it feels somewhat reductionist to be like, oh, there's another model here. Let's wipe a trillion dollars worth of value off NVIDIA just like that. Like there are lots of other factors here. I spoke to the CEO Summit on Monday and people are like, well, what do you think the sort of impact is on the enterprise? And like my honest answer was like little to none because every enterprise conversation I have is not we want to buy your model or like we want to exchange input tokens for output tokens. Like that's not what people are looking for. They're like, we want an AI partner that will help us co-design our big bet on our internal transformation and also assist with getting our products to be more AI focused and also be part of your customer advisory board.
46:50So we're also part of the community of excellence around using AI. That is the relationship that you want to have. You're picking an AI partner, which just transparently, the list that you're going to choose from is going to be quite small. And like, that's a lot of the capability that we've been building up in the last year is going beyond that tokens in, tokens out and being more of like a partner that can connect you with the right solution as things evolve. And that's going to continue to be more and more important. And like, if you look at like the, you know, valuations of these AI companies and you think it's just purely on model quality, like model quality absolutely matters.
47:23But it's also like the company and the sort of support and the infrastructure that you build around that is like equally important. Yeah, I feel like this has forced a big conversation in recent days. People have not only recognized and acknowledged exactly what you just said, but it feels like it's put a whole new spotlight on the product, which obviously you're in charge of, and the application layer in general. Do you think now is the moment in AI where the application layer is going to start getting a lot more attention and people will be more and more excited about the products, which is something I think people have been waiting for for some time?
47:56I think there's a lot that will happen there in two ways. One is as the models get more and more intelligent, especially as they think for longer, the things that they excel at, like competition math and what a lot of people are using them for, are going to be more and more disconnected. I think we have a really interesting product challenge just to find what are the real problems we can solve for people that are solved by models that use more test on compute. Nobody has an answer to that that's really solved yet. If you talk to most people, how are you using these reasoning models in your day of life?
48:27They're like, I don't know, ask them to check them out something for a long time. That's an unsolved problem. So I think it's an exciting problem still. But then the second part is how do these models actually start playing longer and longer roles in people's lives? Because it's not just the ability to reason about something for a while, it's also the ability to sort of agentically act and then reflect on that action and go off and do things like our computer use thing or operator that that uh open ad put out like that's really interesting that's a whole new front on on the consumer and business product that we'll definitely see over the next few months looking back your former life building in the age of social media you know you experienced that whole whole cycle and now like you're right in the center of this sort of next cycle around ai again sort of with a zoomed out view like what what parallels are are you seeing between these two eras?
49:18A Cambrian maybe explosion of companies that happen in social media kind of mirrors a lot of what's happening somewhat in AI as well. Like either companies like doing their own models or building software, take your incubator, startup accelerator, like AI, AI, AI, AI, AI, right? And like we saw that actually in social media as well. And definitely some breakthrough and become sort of a important long-term company that is like self-sustaining. And then lots like get absorbed and good ideas end up somewhere else or they consolidate or they sell like i think that parallel is definitely real as well you know remember like what's who's going to be the instagram of video and it turns out instagram and there being the instagram video but also like not social merge yeah exactly but like other apps like did emerge in carpool their own space and so the moment i think is definitely one of like the sort of outward sort of ideation and creation i think is great and there's inevitable consolidation that we saw on social media i don't know if we've seen in every way but like we'll see in ai as well and then another one of these and then we'll expose.
50:17So that's one piece. The second one is like, and in some ways the deep seek part contributed to this too. Like you would have these moments of like greater awareness, right? Like for us at Instagram, it was like the first time Instagram was in like a major hip hop song. You're like, this has now emerged beyond like early adopter, you know, Instagram photographer. It's now culture beyond that. Right. And so that's cool. Like, you know, the first time it started in a movie, you know, it's in a trailer. So we're like, okay, great. You know, and I think it only ratchets up because like it gets ever sort of wider reaching implications and like the name DeepSeek did that, but like not the usage, right?
50:56Like regardless of where they were in store, I don't think like, you know, then your answer might be super technical, but like, yeah, it didn't break through like usage. Like they're not like everyday people being like, I'm going to compare and contrast the chain of thought between, you know, three, five, sign and I don't know what it's like not happening right but like that will happen they'll continue to happen and i think the really exciting part being in product in person social media and now here is that you get to play a part in in shaping what that sort of looks like and how you introduce it to people and then also like one of the reasons i joined the topic was like hopefully shaping in a way that is like really positive for people and solve their problems in a way that they feel is like really serving them um and that sort of you know step by step is is it mirrors it's probably gonna happen faster than into social media.
51:40And that whole journey for me was about eight years. And it obviously continued afterwards. But, you know, I'm a year in here. And how do you feel like we've got like four of those moments in the last year? Last question. If we were to look out into the future, maybe 10 years as we sort of race towards AGI or ASI or wherever we're going to end up with that, what role do you envision Anthropic playing in that future? There's two things I think a lot about. One is, have we helped people be their maximal versions of themselves? So if you're a person that is creative and you want to explore that creativity, 10 years from now, is there basically no impediment to realized ideas or realized creations other than your creativity, your time, your effort, et cetera, and multiplied by Red Dropic?
52:29I think we'll be serving people well if we are doing that piece. and then like i often joke you read machines of living grace which is an essay that dario wrote like he's like in some ways it's like manifesto or sort of you know like visionary piece and like i joke with him i'm like i also think of it as a roadmap like it's not going to be one of your roadmap but it is like what i want to get to like we should be helping in life sciences we should be helping in civic society um and we should be helping and like helping the economy thrive and all of those things. And that's not today, you know, but I think the greatest challenge, I think the reason I am here is can you translate the model capabilities and potential?
53:09They're not going to magically have societal impact. They need products. They need people using them and they need to be put into the context that they're actually going to be successful. They need the right guardrails. That's how we succeed. You know, like there's The word I learned last year is viscosity, at least as applied to society. The world has a fair amount of viscosity and the way that you get ideas to penetrate. And so it's not just the future tiered, just unevenly distributed, but actually evenly distributed or more evenly distributed. I think it's through good design and good product and good building.
53:42That's how those two things coalesce. Love ending on optimism. Mike, thanks so much. This has been a blast. Really, really appreciate you joining. Same. Really enjoyed it as well. Great to see you. You too. Thanks so much for listening to Generative Now. If you liked what you heard, please rate and review the show on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and YouTube. And of course, subscribe. All that stuff really, really does help. And if you want to learn more, follow Lightspeed at LightspeedVP on X, YouTube, or LinkedIn. Generative Now is produced by Lightspeed in partnership with Pod People. I am Michael Magnano, and we will be back next week.
54:17See you then.
From the publisher
Mike Krieger is known for cofounding Instagram, one of the most beloved pieces of consumer technology, and now he is leading product at Anthropic. This week, host and Lightspeed Partner Michael Mignano talks to the product building legend to discuss the challenges AI product builders face and the evolution of product innovation. They draw parallels between two transformative eras: the social media revolution that gave birth to Instagram and today's AI renaissance.
Episode Chapters
(00:00) Introduction
(00:54) Mike Krieger's Journey to Anthropic
(03:17) Building Product Strategy at Anthropic
(07:43) Rapid Iteration and Safety
(10:58) Differentiating AI Models and User Experience
(17:57) Impact of AI on Consumer Products and Business Models
(24:39) Enterprise vs. Consumer Product Strategy
(29:19) AI in Personal Life Management
(30:15) Open Source and Claude Integrations
(33:09) AI-Assisted Product Development
(37:13) Scaling Teams and Processes at Anthropic
(42:17) Reflections on AI and Future Prospects
Stay in touch:
LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/company/lightspeed-venture-partners/
Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/lightspeedventurepartners/
Subscribe on your favorite podcast app:generativenow.co
Email: generativenow@lsvp.com
The content here does not constitute tax, legal, business or investment advice or an offer to provide such advice, should not be construed as advocating the purchase or sale of any security or investment or a recommendation of any company, and is not an offer, or solicitation of an offer, for the purchase or sale of any security or investment product. For more details please seelsvp.com/legal.




