In short
Sebastian Thrun (Waymo/Google self-driving, Google X, Udacity, Kitty Hawk) explains why driverless cars matter (safety and cost), how Waymo achieved high reliability, the competitive landscape, and how AI-driven “singularity” acceleration could automate education, work, and other industries.
Guest backgrounds
Sebastian Thrun is a computer scientist/roboticist who invented Google’s autonomous vehicle (now Waymo). He co-founded Google X, Udacity (online education), and Kitty Hawk (flying taxi; sold to Boeing; now risk.aero). Hosts are Cameron McLean and Tommy Stadlin (Giant Ventures).
Key claims
Traffic deaths exceed 1 million/year; self-driving can be safer by removing texting/drinking/fatigue. Cars sit parked ~96% of the time, so shared autonomy reduces cost and parking needs. Reliability requires handling “hallucination”-like failures with near-zero tolerance; hybrid ML + 3D/physics logic is needed. Data compounding drives advantage; “winner-take-all” may occur via network effects but regulation/local players matter.
Notable examples
DARPA Grand Challenge (2001) led to Stanford’s winning autonomous car; Waymo has driven 100M+ miles without harming a person; rare highway cases like deer/cows/strollers with crying babies; Udacity launched in 2011 with 160k signups; AI could personalize tutoring.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroducing Sebastian Thrun
0:45 to 1:30
Overview of Sebastian Thrun's achievements and contributions.
“He's Sebastian Thrun, the godfather of self-driving cars.”
The Importance of Self-Driving Cars
1:30 to 3:35
Discussion on the safety and cost implications of autonomous vehicles.
“Why don't we start with autonomous vehicles?”
Personal Motivation Behind the Mission
3:35 to 4:40
Sebastian shares personal tragedies that drive his passion for safety.
“But then why do we use technology that's extremely dangerous as if it's just something completely casual?”
The Birth of Self-Driving Cars
4:40 to 7:30
Sebastian recounts the DARPA Grand Challenge and its significance.
“Yeah, and we love incredibly mission-driven entrepreneurs, and it sounds like you are exactly that.”
The Evolution of Waymo
7:30 to 9:10
Insights into the development and milestones of Waymo's technology.
“Give us a bit of a color of how we got to where we are today and where you think we are in the adoption curve.”
The Self-Driving Landscape
9:10 to 10:50
An overview of competitors in the autonomous driving space.
“and bridges, places where there was just no GPS because you're in a tunnel, everything.”
Future of Self-Driving and Market Dynamics
10:50 to 14:00
Discussion on market dynamics and potential winners in the industry.
“I guess it'd be great to hear from you just on how do you see the landscape.”
Network Effects in Ride-Sharing
14:00 to 15:24
Learn how network effects impact the ride-sharing industry and self-driving cars.
“And when you look historically, the smaller players that don't quite get the liquidity end up losing because there's a network effect.”
Machine Learning in Autonomous Vehicles
15:24 to 17:16
Discover the evolution of machine learning in the context of self-driving cars.
“given there's been these huge advances in foundational models and multimodal AI?”
The Future of Driverless Cars
17:16 to 19:58
Explore the timeline and challenges for the widespread adoption of driverless cars.
“win today, which is one that uses machine learning for understanding and prediction, but also uses this kind of 3D logic, the physics, the point cloud to understand the physics of the space involved.”
Show all 18 chapters
Innovations in Air Travel
19:58 to 22:18
Understand the advancements in air travel and their environmental impact.
“They're also not just greener, which is actually really remarkable.”
Automation in Industries
22:18 to 24:20
Examine how automation is transforming various labor-intensive industries.
“You almost certainly didn't have a flashing toilet at home, like basic stuff, like a warm shower.”
Understanding the Singularity
24:20 to 26:34
Delve into the concept of singularity and its implications for society.
“You've said we are living through the singularity now in terms of superintelligence.”
AI's Role in Meeting Basic Needs
26:34 to 28:00
Learn how advancements in AI may lead to the fulfillment of basic human needs.
“They got the world's text data together, which is hundreds of billions of documents and emails and pieces of software.”
Episode Discussion
28:00 to 42:00
“about in the next period of time, because of those advancements, the pace of those advancements, we're going to enter a world where the basic needs of humans are going to be met in a very significantly different way.”
The Future of Fashion and AI
42:00 to 42:40
Explore how AI can transform the fashion shopping experience.
“Well, we should be watching the future of that very, very closely.”
Sebastian Thrun's Path to Success
42:40 to 45:08
Learn about Sebastian's unique perspective on success and learning from failure.
“on Giant Ideas, and modesty is not allowed in this answer.”
Advice for the Future
45:08 to 46:00
Sebastian shares valuable advice for resilience and curiosity in life.
“I feel like a complete novice and I have no clue what I'm doing.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Today, I cannot even predict the next seven months because things are moving so insanely fast. That to me is a singularity. 90 % of what software engineers us today, in terms of writing computer code, they cannot do this automatically.
0:15Tommy:Hello, and welcome to Giant Ideas with me, Cameron McLean, and me, Tommy Stadlin. We're co-founders of Giant Ventures, which builds and backs purpose-driven companies. At Giant, we're lucky to meet extraordinary people with Giant Ideas that are changing the world. This podcast brings you behind-the-scenes access to those ideas and the inspiring stories of the people behind them. We explore how one giant idea can kickstart a billion-dollar company, shape culture, and transform life as we know it. Today on the podcast, we've got someone who probably is going to have more impact on the way the world looks and feels than any of the guests we've had on Giant Ideas so far.
0:51Tommy:He's Sebastian Thrun, the godfather of self-driving cars. Sebastian invented Google's autonomous vehicle, which is now known as Waymo. And Waymo is doing about a quarter of all rideshare journeys in San Francisco. But Sebastian's life has been full of moonshot ideas. He co-founded Google X, which is the moonshot factory at Google, as well as the flying taxi startup Kitty Hawk, and Udacity, which democratized elite education online. He's widely seen as one of the greatest computer scientists and roboticists of our time. I first met Sebastian about 12 years ago when I was researching my book, Connect.
1:25Tommy:It's really, really great to have you with us on Giant Ideas, Sebastian. Thanks for joining us. Hi Cameron, hi Tommy. Well, lots to cover. Why don't we start with autonomous vehicles? Why do driverless cars matter, Sebastian? What's the impact going to be on society? Well, there's two fundamental things. One is safety and one is cost. On the safety side, we lose more than a million people every year in traffic accidents. It's the leading cause of death for young people worldwide. And that is just not acceptable to me. Self-driving cars have proven to be exponentially safer already at this point.
2:05But the second thing is cost. It turns out that a car is mostly not used. Whoever owns a car on this show, please check. Your car is probably parked right now. In fact, cars are parked 96 % of the time and maybe 3 % to 4%. and that means that you're wasting a ton of resources okay by virtue of not using your cars of the cars being shared among multiple people you get much higher utilization you don't get these inner cities full of parked cars you don't have to have a garage at home and all that stuff and never have to look for a parking spot again am i right in thinking that for you the
2:42Tommy:the safety issue and and this goal of trying to eradicate almost all of those million lives lost every year was a very personal thing based on sort of tragedies that happened with you in Stanford with your colleagues. I've now lost a number of friends and co-workers to traffic accidents, but the most stingy thing was when I was 18. My neighbor, Harold, went on a drive with a friend. They found themselves on a sheet of ice, crashed into a truck, and both died instantaneously and It took like less than a second. I was thinking, wow, here's a promising life of an 18-year-old, my best friend at the time, gone for no reason.
3:28Why do we do this to ourselves? Why do we have teenagers drive on a sheet of ice in the first place? But then why do we use technology that's extremely dangerous as if it's just something completely casual? casual.
3:42Tommy:Has this therefore been a very, very mission-driven thing for you all the way back to that incident that you felt you simply had to solve this problem? I mean, that's basically the way I live my life, that I see things that are just not okay. I want to fix them when it involves people's death. It's particularly painful. And I'm sure many of your esteemed listeners have similar experiences with themselves or loved ones. And yes, it's driven me to really think about as an an AI researcher, as a roboticist, how can I fix this big problem of more than a million deaths every year? And the answer is, make the car smart.
4:20It's artificial intelligence. Just make the car smarter than people are. Computer self-driving cars, they don't text. They don't drink. They're not distracted. They don't are on the phone. They're not fatigued. They can look in all directions all the time. In virtue of doing this, they can be safer than human drivers can be. And now we know for a fact that they're safer than human drivers.
4:40Tommy:Yeah, and we love incredibly mission-driven entrepreneurs, and it sounds like you are exactly that. You've been at the center of the autonomy story really since the very beginning. It'd be great if you could paint a picture for our audience of where it started, your role, maybe give us some tidbits, and then where we are today. Yeah, in 2001, 25 years ago, my God, the U.S. government came up with this idea of creating a competition for self-driving cars. Their focus at the time was the war in Iraq. They lost lots of soldiers to IEDs, improvised explosive devices. And they wanted to be able to move about without putting people's lives at risk.
5:20Beat as it is, they came up with this thing called the DARPA Grand Challenge. DARPA is a part of the U.S. government that's responsible for the Internet and stealth bombers and many other great innovations. and the grand challenge was intended to be a challenge to the scientific community of professors around the world to build a car that could drive itself 140 miles roughly 200 kilometers through a desert environment similar to iraq they picked the mojave desert here in southwest united states and they said whoever can build a car that can drive itself without a person inside completely autonomous, 200 kilometers, it's going to make a million bucks.
6:00And look, a million bucks doesn't go far in terms of research budget. When you run a university, you have billions of dollars that you use for research. But as an individual professor, I was at Stanford at the time, it felt like a lot of money. My God, I can put a computer in a car. I can make it safe. I can live out to my mission and figure out how to make cars safe. And I can win a million bucks. That's how it started.
6:24Tommy:And then you won that challenge, right? And am I right in thinking that Larry Page, the Google co-founder, was sort of incognito in dark glasses watching who would win this and then came up to you? It was the most surreal thing possible. Because normally I do lots of racing bicycles and marathons and the race is always the hard thing. You sweat. But when you send your self-driving car off to a race, it's almost like sending your child off after training it for a year or so. And it races, but you're sitting there with you zipping coffee and possibly champagne. the race unfolded over seven hours we had a total of almost 200 296 contestants applying for it 20 23 finalists allowed to race and of those uh 23 finalists uh five made it um four within the lot of time of 10 hours and i was at stanford our little Volkswagen was the fastest so we we kind of won yes we did win but i always told people look it's not really important that we won at stanford as important that the scientific community won because that was the birth moment at least in the states for the self-driving car so fast forward to today and getting into a waymo in san francisco is one of the most amazing hero product experiences i've ever had it just it just blows your mind my son uh when i was there with him was was uh very confused to see cars driving around without people in the front and now he he's he's five years old but he talks regularly about the waymo um but you You spent 25 years from the time that Larry watched you in his dark glasses to today, 25 years has gone by.
7:54Tommy:Give us a bit of a color of how we got to where we are today and where you think we are in the adoption curve. Thanks, Tommy and Cameron, for asking that question. I appreciate your son being enthusiastic. Hopefully, he's going to be a future computer science student. Right now, he's showing a lot of proclivity for art at the moment. Okay. A little bit is art. Mostly it's just straight math, physics, computer science and what we built. We then founded a team. And the very first team, which is a company that Google acquired for me, built StreetView. And StreetView showed the world a sliver of the self-driving car.
8:30And it was able to record data. But it wasn't really robotic. It was mostly like human-driven to record the world from the street level. And then we moved into what we called Project Chauffeur. In 2009, we started a team at Google trying the impossible. And we built, in the beginning, eight cars that we drove on public streets in California with a safety driver. It could take over, but still, if you go like 100 kilometers per hour, it's pretty scary to be in a car that has been programmed overnight. And we started driving pretty much all streets in California. There were city streets like San Francisco, including the Vicente Lombard Street, if you've ever been here.
9:09But like surface streets all the way from Highway 1, the Seating Highway to Los Angeles and around Lake Tahoe. and bridges, places where there was just no GPS because you're in a tunnel, everything. And we had to get it to a point where the car was 100 % correct. And just to lay out how hard this is, when you use chat GPT today or any large language model, you have what's called hallucination. Hallucination is the moment when the model makes something up that's not correct. And it happens, okay? There's nothing wrong with it. The technology is amazing, but it's a side effect of the way these things are being trained.
9:46When you have a hallucination in a large language model, you shake your head and you move on. And that's okay. But if your self-driving car hallucinates, it'll run a red light. It'll hit a person. It's not acceptable. So the bar in terms of reliability is so high that it took a much, much longer time to train our artificial intelligence to be really, really reliable. And you get a lot of appreciation for people because people are good at this stuff. They're really good at this stuff. When we focus and we don't drink, we're not fatigued, you're generally pretty safe, okay? But to get the same capability in your computer, talk about 15 years.
10:27Tommy:And maybe let's just talk about the landscape of competitors out there. Obviously, Waymo is very dominant in the US. In China, Baidu's offering, Apollo seems to be doing very, very well. Strangely undervalued, I think, because Baidu, I think, is valued essentially at its cash reserves, which seems odd given that Waymo, some people think, is worth almost$200 billion within Google, within Alphabet. I guess it'd be great to hear from you just on how do you see the landscape. There's also Wave here in London, which was founded by a friend of ours, Amar Shah. They're doing great, very different approach technically.
11:02Tommy:Maybe give us a sense of the competitive landscape. Is there going to be one dominant winner? Is it going to be a whole bunch of players with different technical approaches? And also maybe unpick for us, if you can, just the importance to Google, to Alphabet of Waymo. How central to Alphabet's future do you think Waymo is? Look, in the US, and I'd say globally, the number one player right now is obviously Waymo in that Waymo is now driven more than 100 million miles and never harmed a person, which is something that people just can't do. In 100 million miles of human driving, which takes many, many people, in expectation you kill more than one person.
11:42On its heels in the US is certainly Tesla, which has a different approach. Tesla has been trying to do the same capability based on camera only. And while the hypothesis is correct that eyes are sufficient to drive in practice, it has been a bit more challenging than using lighters and more advanced sensors. But yes, you're correct. unbeknownst to most people in China, there's been massive progress in not just Baidu, but Pony and Diddy and other companies who effectively started the Silicon Valley lab and hired a top dog from places like Waymo and then eventually moved over development to China.
12:17And Chinese people just work twice as hard as Americans. 996 is the famous word from nine in the morning to nine in the evening, six days a week. If you work on the math, it's more than the German 37.5 hours. Okay. and they've been now launching systems and services in China that are effectively on par or getting very close to what Waymo can do. And similarly, we see this in large language models between, I don't know, Grok and Alibaba and Meta and OpenAI and Google, that there's a race going on and the teams by and large are all surpassing each other all the time. So there's nothing really secret about how you defend this.
12:59The basic rule is the more data you have, the more experience you have, the more reliable your system becomes. And anybody who puts the money into generating the data and trading the systems eventually can increase the liability to the point where you can drive in public. So big motion in China right now. We are waiting for Germany to follow suit. German companies, of course, German car companies are the best in the world. There's no question. They put a lot of emphasis on driver system where the driver is still the driver in charge. And Germany has not yet made the move to a complete autonomous system, but that's just a matter of time.
13:33Tommy:Given the compounding data you alluded to there, do you think it's a winner-take-all dynamic where there will be one leading autonomous driving car? Will it break up by region? How do you think about that? That depends on first local regulations and how the big player is playing the game. In the ride-hailing or ride-sharing world, we find historically it's a winner-take-all position. In the United States, it's effectively Uber who is the winner, even though Lyft still exist. In China, we find Diddy is the winner. In Singapore, it's Grab. And when you look historically, the smaller players that don't quite get the liquidity end up losing because there's a network effect.
14:12And the network effect says the more people participate, the more people participate, the better the service to everybody, right? So early network effects, for example, is the fax machine. the more people used to, I mean, this updates me, you say fax machines, the better for everybody. And in ride-sharing, the more people use your ride-sharing services, the more you can afford putting cars all over the place and the shorter the wait time for the next car and the less the waste in terms of time wasted on the driver's side so the cheaper you can make it. So there's a possibility that a single winner emerges in this place.
14:46But we are far away from this. We are far away from even making the capital investment, and the ability to build, let's call it a million self-driving cars. That itself is already challenging. But then also you find that local places differ in regulations and they favor certain companies, right? So I would say Uber worked really hard in China. I wasn't part of the Uber or the China team at the time, but it reported the time it went into headwinds because China is China and America is America and America likes American companies and China likes Chinese companies. That might not be fair, but overall, local companies seem to have an advantage in these things.
15:23Tommy:And if you were starting the Google self-driving car project today, how would your approach differ, given there's been these huge advances in foundational models and multimodal AI? Or would you take the exact same approach? Well, when we started out first, we thought of this more as a 3D geometry game. Think about a video game where I use a lighter to really figure out how far exactly is this car away, up to a millimeter precision? How is the range changing, meaning what's its speed and so on? And it became this big blocks world of blocks moving around in the beginning. There was a good amount of machine learning involved ever since the Dabag Grand Challenge, but it wasn't the predominant solution.
16:03As time moved on, machine learning, AI, has massively improved, especially when it comes to the understanding of images or video. So, for example, going from a pixel cloud of like a 3D point cloud to saying this is a person, this is a dog, this is a trash bin, that became much more feasible in the last 10 years or so. So there has been a shift on the team to use much, much more machine learning. But there's one important caveat, which is machine learning doesn't solve everything. there's always going to be situations that are extremely rare but you have to handle correctly and if you they're so rare that there are no training set you can drive 100 million miles you're never going to see the situation maybe it's i don't know we had a case where a lady lost a stroller with this crying baby inside and the stroller zipped across the street and you can't train for this right you still have to work correctly the machine learning model cannot say all never seen.
17:07They just keep driving. That's not okay. It has to be able to react, correct it, even completely unforeseen situations. And that's where, to be quite frank, a hybrid method seems to win today, which is one that uses machine learning for understanding and prediction, but also uses this kind of 3D logic, the physics, the point cloud to understand the physics of the space involved.
17:27Tommy:So Sebastian, are we envisaging a world where close to 100 % of cars on the road are going to be driverless or are we not approaching anywhere near that? How long is it going to take? Try to paint a picture for our listeners, if you can, of when this world is going to arrive. Because it's arrived in San Francisco, but in cities around the world, there are almost no driverless cars on the road today. I really recommend everybody to come to San Francisco. Just like the cable car and the Golden Gate Bridge, the driverless car has become a tourist attraction. And it's surreal to sit in the car without a driver inside and see it drive you.
18:00It's something that takes a lot of courage from the beginning and after a few minutes, a lot of appreciation, and you feel how safe this really has become. This technology can now be rolled out pretty much all across the world. Maybe not in crazy places. I recently visited India and India has different rules of traffic than the United States. Leave it at that. But by and large, in European cities, this could be rolled out if the regulatory framework and the governments play along. so it's it's not a um if question it's more like a when question now i want to say to this um i also worked on flying cars and i believe those are basically where the self-driving car was like 10 15 years ago so there will be more innovation and traffic it's not going to stop there like there's going to be i mean the car itself is no older than 150 years the aircraft the airplane is no older than 150 years that in the history of humanity which is like hundreds of thousands of years, all these new things are relatively recent and don't expect innovation to stop.
19:04Tommy:So is autonomous air travel the future then? Yeah. So if you look at the air-based stuff, the work we did at a company called Kitty Hawk that I founded with Larry Page and we recently sold to Boeing, what happens there is it's not really a flying car, it has no wheels, but it's something that takes off like a human drone electrically and then goes in a straight line. And we were able to prove that these systems are about three times as energy efficient, as green as Tesla is, which at the time was the benchmark for most energy efficient vehicles on the ground. And by virtue of being in the air, they're actually safer, it turns out.
19:40Air travel is safer than ground travel. And it's because there's almost nothing to hit in the air, but there's lots of stuff to hit on the ground. So you could kind of conceive we have a future where you don't really need roads anymore, right? You can use roads, turn them into parks or whatever, right? Into bicycle lanes. But then have these places where these things just take off like a drone and fly on a straight line. They're also not just greener, which is actually really remarkable. People don't think of aviation as greener than ground transport, but by and large, it actually is greener. This is something we can debate at length.
20:14When you look at the actual energy consumed per traveler passenger mile, a plane wins or a train. Turns out, even though people hate it when I say this, especially in Europe. But it's also quieter. These things are so incredibly quiet that you can't hear them anymore.
20:29Tommy:We had Reid Hoffman on the podcast a couple of months ago, and he came up with an interesting analogy that intelligence is to the AI era what connectivity was to the internet era. And everything is going to have intelligence. Everything is going to have autonomy. You are a godfather of autonomy. We see aircraft. We see cars. What are other big ideas or big sectors that will become autonomous and really impact the world? If you look at companies, let's say telcos, complete different example, right? So telcos employ tens of thousands of people. And what do they do? I mean, lots of stuff from sales to customer service to fixing the network and cell phone towers and so on.
21:10You can imagine that with intelligence, you could build a telco with like 10 people. How would that work? Well, all these things that break all the time, you have to fix. You would automate. Every time you interact with a customer, you automate this. And that's underway. I'm not making this up. This is definitely underway. So you can take industries that are very labor intense and highly automate them. That's happening in manufacturing. So SoftCon's vision, the company that employs about 1.5 million people to manufacture things like your iPhone, massive numbers of people. Thierry Gou, the CEO, recently said he would like to go to one employee.
21:50The entire company is one by one person and the rest is robotic. That sounds very much like science fiction, but bear with me in the following sense. Everything that you take for granted, listener, like your cell phone, your car, even very basic things, your food, your clothing, is a result of massive automation in the last 100 or so years and didn't exist before. Even like your light switch is home, right? Didn't exist 150 years ago. You almost certainly didn't have a flashing toilet at home, like basic stuff, like a warm shower. So if you look a little bit, zoom a little bit out and ask yourself what's happening in society, you find that things are moving really fast and there's really no reason why human labor is being used today.
22:36It's being used today. The same way there's no reason why 150 years ago So we all worked in farming and should have stayed this way. Now, less than 2 % of us work in farming because of automation. And in the future, less than 2 % of us will work into any company that we know today.
22:52Tommy:Yeah, I think that's really interesting when you think about the debate of reshoring manufacturing jobs in the US and Europe. If you look at BYD, one of the biggest EV producers, I think they make one car per day per two employees in the factory. And I think the US is closer to six, Europe probably even more. And so you look at that and wonder where those jobs are going to be as we reshore them into the U.S. and Europe. Yeah, look, when I talk to my Silicon Valley friends about the mandate to rebuild manufacturing in the U.S., we talk about things like 3D printing, which would allow everybody to effectively factory in their basement.
23:28The best 3D printers today cost less than$2 ,000. works best in the sense that there's a lot of innovation happening at the grassroots the same way in the 70s and 80s there was a lot of innovation for PCs in the grassroots for computing with all the innovation was back then and we all benefit from it today. So there's thinking about how can we change manufacturing and maybe we can make it on demand as opposed to, I know, like you take the clothing industry. The clothing industry is responsible for 10 % of global emissions. people don't know this, and only two in three garments ever get sold. Okay, so a third of the stuff just gets disposed, destroyed, sent to Africa, what have you, or donated.
24:13If you could make clothing on demand, right, all of a sudden, you could cut global emissions by, I don't know, 3%, it would be amazing.
Read the full transcript
24:19Tommy:Let's talk a little bit about what you describe and others describe as the singularity. You've said we are living through the singularity now in terms of superintelligence. What does that mean for you in practice? this so what is the singularity a singularity is a moment where things accelerate so vastly that you won't be able to say what happens at the other end okay that's a singularity and we can we can scribble about the definition but you look at um look at society today um if you if you think about yourself back say 100 000 years you could have easily predicted the next 10 000 years because not much really changed to be honest maybe a few little innovations like you know steel what have you but that's pretty much it stone ages were boring okay if you lived 500 years ago same thing europe would be engulfed in war after war you lived 100 years ago things a little bit faster we have the steam engine you have the airplane innovation stuff like this and you have 50 years ago 20 years ago when i was a student i was able to predict the next seven years okay so in computer science my own field every seven years there was a major new programming language and no major, no programming framework, and things changed.
25:30And past that point, I couldn't predict. Today, I cannot even predict the next seven months because things are moving so insanely fast. And that to me, even the experts in the world can't predict what's happening. That to me is a singularity. We now see for the first time that for the vast majority of people, the machines are as good or better in big aspects of their daily work. And I'm not scared of it. I actually love it myself because I think we're wasting a ton of time ourselves doing stupid stuff. But it's amazing to see how big machines now are so smart that they beat the world's best chess player and the world's best goal players, but also are as good as the world's best or maybe close as good as the world's best lawyers and doctors and all these things that we inspire our kids to do to be safe in life and have a great job.
26:17Tommy:And why is the pace, the exponential pace of improvement and change? What's going on there? Why is it happening now? Well, so the big innovation in the last few years, which I'm sure all your listeners have been talking about every night for many, many years now, is data. Okay, so OpenAI was probably the first to see this. They got the world's text data together, which is hundreds of billions of documents and emails and pieces of software. And they're put in a big table, a big machine to predict more data. So how does this work? Like you can always predict the next word in a similar way. Let's say like the dog ate the dog food is a good word or maybe homework, but not the propeller, right?
27:03That's not a good word. So that idea of statistically figuring out what's a good next word based on three, four, five words has been around for several decades in statistics, machine translation, linguistics. but now with the largest language technology you can predict the next word based on hundreds of thousands of words in context and it turns out strangely enough predicting the next word if you take enough context and you're smart enough about it looks really intelligent so intelligent that large language models can write a rap song they can write a haiku they can translate languages. In fact, they can do 90 % of what a software engineer does today in terms of writing computer code, software engineering software, they can now do this automatically just by looking at past data and extrapolating from it.
27:57Tommy:Sebastian, I think I've read an interview where you've talked about in the next period of time, because of those advancements, the pace of those advancements, we're going to enter a world where the basic needs of humans are going to be met in a very significantly different way. We're going to have essentially close to free food, energy, even clothing, potentially housing. And it's something that almost every one of the senior leaders in AI that I've spoken to and that we've had on the show on Giant Ideas, people like Mustafa Solomon, who founded DeepMind, that seems to be a view that people right at the center of AI's progress share.
28:33Tommy:And it's never actually been particularly clear to me the leap between the pace of change we're talking about and all the amazing things that AI can do and it can be a great lawyer and so on. But why does that mean we're going to get almost free energy, almost free food, these very physical basic needs that human beings need? Yeah. I mean, if you look at even pre-AI and look at automation and what we're doing in society, food is now so massively available that obesity has become a bigger problem than malnutrition. There's still pockets in the world where food is very short right now, usually for political reasons.
29:10But if you were to distribute food better, we could feed every human being, to be honest. And that's new in history, right? If you go back 200, 300, 400 years ago, all Europeans effectively lived in extreme poverty. Take clothing. 300, 400 years ago, you would rip the clothing off dead people's body as you supply for clothing for many people. Now, I mean, often the t-shirt is cheaper than the laundry to wash it. It's amazing how disposable that has become. Or look at education. Education is effectively available worldwide for pretty much everybody. Maybe not the same quality, but online education, I built a company under the topic that we democratize the access to high-quality online education.
29:59k-12 education for kids is available vaccinations are available i think 95 percent of kids under the age of five are vaccinated some very large number so all these things have been improving even pre-ai and they're all amazing accomplishments because what they did to us people is they allowed us to escape the daily churn of farm working and learn for example how to read or write and how to become scientists and how to really advance the world knowledge. We've done amazing work in making agriculture more effective and all these things. It's all pre-AI. Now, AI will superpower all this even faster.
30:39So we still live in a world where all of us effectively work, most of us do. And we work mostly in offices now. In the Western world, it's like 70 % or so. And what we do in offices is communicate with other people one by another right so we write memos we write orders we listen we go to meetings what have you we write email um all that stuff now can be automated very soon which pre-apps enormous creativity in society which will put us into an incredible position historically never happened before that we have a lot of free time to be creative how amazing would that be
31:13Tommy:one last question on the topic of autonomy uh you have designed some of these systems from the ground up you've been really at ground zero what are some of the potential failure modes that can be designed into these autonomous systems that aren't maybe being talked about enough especially in self-driving cars what you find is that there is a long tail of situations that even the smartest engineers might never anticipate that might come to bite you so for example let's take Waymo. Waymo is just about now to go to autonomous highway driving. And highway driving in many ways is the simplest or the easiest way of driving because if it goes well on a good day, nothing really moves.
31:59In the United States, all the different lanes have the same speed limit. So we all basically run rolling around the same speed. And relative to you, all the other traffic is effectively standing still. But why did it take Waymo a long time to do autonomous driving driverless driving on highways is because there's this very rare incident where like you have an accident in front of you or like a pedestrian or a cow or what have you something that you haven't really thought about like a cow on a highway okay you think that is impossible unless you're in india but in reality yeah there'll be a cow on a highway occasionally or a sheep or whatever a dog a coyote a deer deers are pretty common on highways So how do you deal with these very rare instances that could be conceivably fatal?
32:42Like deer can actually kill people. They're very hard to avoid. Moose kill people regularly when cars and highways hit a moose. So how do you deal with this incredibly rare instance and still make your car safe? And that's challenging because, as I said before, your tolerance for error, your tolerance for hallucinations, and self-driving is effectively zero.
33:03Tommy:Maybe let's talk a little bit about education. You obviously founded Udacity, this massive online learning startup. Maybe before we go into some of the questions about the future of education, just tell us, if you can, the story of how Udacity came about. The company was started in 2011 when I was teaching as a professor at Stanford University. And I taught a graduate level class on AI. Today, a very hot topic, but trust me, in 2011, it was an esoteric topic. and I decided to put the class online and not just the lectures as videos but I created a classroom environment where people had to take homework exams and quizzes and pass the midterm exam and the final exam and I made it so that the online students would effectively have to pass the same exams as like the Stanford PhD doctoral students, okay?
33:54We put it online, we sent out one email to a couple of friends and I expected maybe 500 students would sign up. I mean, Stanford's campus was about 200 every year, so maybe 1 ,000. That would be optimistic. The next morning, this was a Friday evening, we had 5 ,000 signed up. Sunday morning, 10 ,000. And Monday morning, 14 ,000 people had already signed up, which is when my dean at Stanford found out because I was being plotted on the blogosphere for finally doing away with Stanford tuition, which a message he didn't quite appreciate. And then it went on to reach about 160 ,000. And I realized, my God, my impact teaching 160 ,000 students is more than I can do in 10 years of life, 10 consecutive lifetimes at Stanford University.
34:49So I really focused on how can I teach these 160 ,000 students effectively. So we really built this new modality, online, interactive, quiz-driven learning system overnight. They would teach 160 ,000 students. And these were not just your typical Stanford students. Some of them were like soldiers in Afghanistan. Some were like, it was a single mother trying to raise their infant. There was a person on the deathbed whose last wish really was to finish this class before he died. People you would, Stanford would normally not admit, let's put it this way, okay? But anywhere smart is the best Stanford student.
35:20in the end 23 000 of these students finished and i got a chance to stack ranked the stanford students relative to these online students and guess what the top 412 finishers were not at stanford and the best stanford doctoral student ranked number 413 and that opened my eyes to i mean stanford is an amazing institution i love stanford and it does a fantastic job but it's very confined. It only accepts a few thousand students every year, a few hundred students. And the world has 8 billion people. So if we just open the floodgates and let everybody study at Stanford, we would have so much more impact than having a small elite university here in California.
36:08Tommy:And is that the way that the world is going to go, particularly now with AI? And how do you think AI is going to supercharge the efforts that you began really with Udacity to democratize education yeah first let's i mean udacity became a global force we do a lot of middle eastern education in places like egypt and saudi arabia where people in nigeria and northern africa where people really have no chance to ever get a great technical education and even material moved the needle for probably 10 million or 20 million people at this point in terms of their life income and so on it's quite amazing um now ai is the next chapter and um there's a very famous 1982 paper by a gentleman named Bloom who proved that if you give a normal kid a tutor to the entire like youth and lifetime when they grow up they will perform at the level of a highly exceptional gifted kid so you can turn a normal kid into a world-class gifted child it's all relative of course just by tutoring it one-on-one and what does a tutor do the tutor is much better to adapt to kids' needs, right?
37:12So whereas a teacher might teach 30 kids at a time, a tutor teaches one kid at a time. And it turns out in terms of math, English, and so on, a tutor delivers better results. Now what AI can do is, AI can now understand the learner deeper than ever before. And rather than putting a single curriculum out for every kid identical, like today when we teach kids, we have an identical curriculum for all the kids effectively, it could adapt to the child and say, this child is more of a visual learner, or this type of needs more exercise, or this type of cares more about history and less about math. And then really evoke a conversation with the child and help the child to become better and better.
37:49It's unproven. It's a hypothesis. In child education, it hasn't been shown. In adult, in professional training where I work, it has been shown to work better. And I think they're going to go into a world where all of a sudden, even learning gets superpowered and all the kids learn so much more than in the past.
38:07Tommy:So to maybe summarize, moving from democratization of education to mass personalization, where everyone gets an individual tutor tailored to them. Amazing. You've had some huge successes like Waymo, but you've also had some challenges. You had to wind down Kitty Hawk. What heuristics do you use when you're committing years of your life to an idea? We know building a company is a challenge. It's an adventure, but always has ups and downs. What are the heuristics you use? The majority of Kitty Hawk was sold to Boeing. We did okay. It's still available. as a company right now called risk.aero. It wasn't exactly the path I anticipated in some cases.
38:44I always think that there are some of these amazing things where we can change the world. And my goal is to make the world better for other people. So for example, education, what if you can truly democratize education, right? That's the mountain you want to climb. So you pick a mountain in life that will motivate you 10 years later, right? So self-driving cars motivates me 10 years later. Transportation, health motivates me 10 years later. and that's the mountain you are to climb. But then you, if you actually, this is a mountain never been climbed before, right? So you pick something that hasn't been done before.
39:13There's no book you can buy on Amazon that says how to do it because it hasn't been done before. And then you go and start climbing, right? And as anyone knows, that's a complete different story. You're going to put your first foot forward a second and then you, I know, you run out of a false summit and you have to retract, which happens all the time in innovation, that you build something that doesn't work and you have to undo it, possibly even fire people in this process. that is painful for most people, but it has to keep motivating you because rather than, you didn't make any progress maybe in terms of getting your goal done, but you learned something interesting that other people don't know yet and you didn't know.
39:48So you're not going to make the same mistake again. So you're constantly making mistakes. You go into, as a climber, let's say, take the mountain climbing analogy, you go into bad weather, right? So all of a sudden there's a thunderstorm, right? You can't see the summit anymore. That doesn't mean the summit is gone. You still have to believe it exists, but maybe your colleagues can't see it and they get frustrated. it you have to keep climbing and you have to be very flexible my estimate is if you know what you're doing if someone can be a little bird in your ear and tell you exactly every every moment exactly what to do you're typically five times faster than if you're a true entrepreneur it takes five times longer to figure things out than if you could pick up a book at amazon it would tell you how to do it so if you do something new like building democracy education or building self-driving cars four out of five days are effectively spent learning something interesting without making real progress towards the goal and then pick something that really is meaningful and to me the most meaningful is stuff i always have this thing called grandmother test like can i go to my fictitious my grandmother's or passed away obviously my fictitious grandmother and tell her i'm working with something like this okay and if i tell her look i'm building you a car that can get you anywhere that's self-driving she probably gets it but i say i'm building a lock likely with discriminator that goes into blah blah blah and does blah blah blah i don't care about that stuff so if i think what are the basic things that people really deeply care about is communication it's health it's education it's safety these are the things we truly maybe travel experiences we care about can you relate your innovation to those things and i would say when you do things like transportation or education almost recently i've been working on shopping and e-commerce these are things people do care about and you can you can explain to somebody's non-technical tell us about the new startup yes i haven't really talked much about it but we have a startup that's called shop on gold which has launched just last week uh it's a personalization app that goes on the internet and in the space of fashion finds everyday stuff for you that has been recently discounted and you might actually like and uses AI to match those millions of things we find every night that are showing up new in the fashion industry and finds those 50 pieces it believes you will love the most and then it also has an agentic AI where once you like something with a single click it does all the shopping for you so you don't have to go and create a password on some obscure website and sign up for some newsletter you didn't want to sign up for and all that stuff so it really changes the interface to the World Wide Web, instead of having 30, 40, 50, 100 different shops you might actually attend to in your lifetime, there's just one that now does all the shopping for you.
42:35Tommy:Fantastic. Well, we should be watching the future of that very, very closely. Maybe if we can just wrap things up, Sebastian, by asking something we ask everyone who comes on Giant Ideas, and modesty is not allowed in this answer. So what is it about you, do you think, that has allowed you to have the kind of extraordinary success that we've just talked about for the past half an hour i'm both extremely arrogant and extremely humble okay i'm arrogant when i say let's democratize the world's education i go to a stanford dean and say screw this stanford should admit 10 million people not just 7 000 700 people and that's certainly unappreciated by the people who care about the status quo and i do this for everything it was for government it was for health these mountains that have to be climbed you have to pick them and when you when you proclaim you're going to climb the mountain of making cars drive themselves you're surrounded by people who basically think you're an idiot okay let's be plain in the beginning that's the way it feels but then you can just pretend you know everything the actual process of climbing this mountain is extremely humbling because you've constantly proven wrong and you have to be able to motivate yourself when you constantly do the wrong thing so give an example for my most recently startup which is now doing extremely well, Shop on Gold.
43:51We did five iterations of building something that just didn't work. We tested it with users and they basically hated it. And it's not because I'm not smart enough. Maybe it is. But it's very hard to understand what makes people really tick and what makes things work. The same is true for Gadasity. The same is true for self-driving cars. Did many, many, many iterations. Didn't work. And to me, those give me energy. I love uncertainty and I love learning. I love learning new things I love being proven wrong I have a rule in my life I'm allowed to make every mistake but only once if I make it the second time I haven't learned anything about it so I mean then I'm actually an idiot but I drive enormous energy out of this idea of like you do something it doesn't work and you make a mistake and you look in the mirror and say I screw this up and it's okay that's great I allow myself to make mistakes and that's I think where many people fail they they often move in and say i know everything and if you take the position you know everything you got to be extremely lucky to be cracked because you're dealing with something it's never done before and it's hard it's more likely you believe you know everything but you don't and then you're being stuck with your mistakes and you can't understand that you actually have to learn right so i feel like i'm like a first grader in what i do every single day.
45:09I feel like a complete novice and I have no clue what I'm doing. I'm learning from the firehouse every single time I build a new company.
45:16Tommy:One final question, Sebastian. What advice would you give to your 10-year-old self? Be curious. I think the world is changing so rapidly. Don't get married to anything that exists today. And let's say develop grit. Grit to me is the one thing that is really driving success. Grit means you stick with it, right? If you're the person who jumps off quickly when the first failures come along, then you're not made for Silicon Valley. You're not made for this world of innovation. Pick a job, like work for the German government or the UK government where things are more predictable. But if you want to be in a world where you invent something, you innovate, you push something forward, in fact, pretty much any job, if you have grit, you have a much higher chance for success.
45:59Tommy:Superb place to end. Couldn't agree more. Sebastian, thank you so much for sharing not just one giant idea, but about three or four in this episode. Really, really appreciate you taking the time to join us. Thanks so much. Coming Cameron, it was a real pleasure meeting you. Likewise.
46:16Tommy:Fascinating conversation. One insight I take away from that was just how advanced technology is today. It's essentially pretty close to perfect. And by Sebastian's estimation, we have close to million deaths a year from human drivers. Given that's the situation we still, as a society, as people aren't quite comfortable with the role of that technology, even though the cost of doing that is fairly high. That's pretty fascinating, both philosophically and socially. Yeah, I agree. I think it's so striking when the technology is so far rolled out in San Francisco. So we heard there that a quarter of ride shares, a quarter of the Uber equivalents are now Waymo, driverless cars.
46:55Tommy:It's working. It's just working. It's there. And go to San Francisco and it's a part of daily life. And it's so completely foreign to people in Rome or London where you just don't see that at all. I think it's unusual because mostly the technology that we get out of Silicon Valley is just widely adopted everywhere all at the same time. And it's an example of that not being true at all, basically because of regulatory differences. I think that will probably increase over time because of this kind of geopolitical differences that are now being accentuated. It's a very tangible example of the future is here, but it's not yet equally distributed.
47:24Tommy:Yes, totally. And I feel like we need in Europe to get on it pretty quickly. Absolutely. We're going to miss out. I think one thing I would have liked to push Sebastian on more was this question of why exactly AI is going to suddenly deliver free food, free energy, free clothes, which, as I said in the interview, every single one of these top AI thinkers are all saying. But no one, to me at least, is actually nailing down exactly what is the jump between AI and free energy, which obviously would solve climate change and all this, and to me just seems a bit of a fantasy. For you, do you see that?
47:55Tommy:Yeah, I think it's an assumption of this extrapolating from the progress that's happening that it will continue, which I think is an assumption, and that there will be these emergent, incredible benefits. And we have to use our imagination. But I also feel it depends on the day that you ask me whether I think that's going to happen or not. One thing I wish he would have gone a little bit deeper on was the failure modes of building these autonomous systems. He's built them from the ground up. you know it would have been great to go maybe a level deeper on how it could go wrong and how we should design these systems for those edge case scenarios to protect us and protect the planet and and protect uh yeah our lives agreed but overall i thought it was great i mean it's really nice you know i saw him 12 years ago in silicon valley in his office and he told me driving his cars are going to be a thing it's going to work and at that point no it was a kind of the the pit of despair for for autonomous vehicles yeah and it's now happening and it's kind of down to him lovely fellow and a clear visionary yeah
48:49Tommy:if you like the episode don't forget to like subscribe and follow the show and you can find many more giant ideas wherever you get your podcasts
From the publisher
Today on the podcast we are joined by Sebastian Thrun - the “Godfather of self-driving cars”. He invented Google’s autonomous vehicle, now known as Waymo, which is doing a quarter of all rideshare journeys in SF.
Sebastian’s life has been full of moonshot ideas. He co-founded Google X, the moonshot factory at Google, and co-founded the flying taxi startup Kitty Hawk and Udacity, which democratised elite education online. He’s seen as one of the greatest computer scientists and roboticists of our time.
Tommy first met Sebastian 12 years ago, when he was researching his book co-authored with Lord John Browne, Connect.
Building a purpose driven company? Read more about Giant Ventures at www.Giant.vc.
Music credits: Bubble King written and produced by Cameron McLain and Stevan Cablayan aka Vector_XING.
Please note: The content of this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It should not be considered financial, legal, or investment advice. Always consult a licensed professional before making any investment decisions.




