Epstein's Brother Orders Bombshell Autopsy That "Will Prove Jeffrey Was Murdered"

10 Jan 2026 · 12 min · 4 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

IHIP News Podcast Summary

Episode Title

Epstein's Brother Orders Bombshell Autopsy That "Will Prove Jeffrey Was Murdered"

Episode Overview In this episode, hosts Jennifer Welch and Angie “Pumps” Sullivan discuss recent developments in the Jeffrey Epstein case, including claims made by Epstein's brother, Mark Epstein, regarding a new autopsy that he believes will prove his brother was murdered. The hosts explore the implications of these claims, connections to the Trump administration, and the ongoing investigations regarding Epstein's activities.

Key Discussions

  1. Mark Epstein's Claims
  2. Mark Epstein announces a new autopsy that he believes will confirm Jeffrey Epstein was murdered.
  3. He has hired a former New York City chief medical examiner to conduct this autopsy, with results expected in February.
  4. The discussion emphasizes skepticism surrounding Epstein’s death, referencing a lack of belief that he could have committed suicide in federal custody.
  1. Trump Administration's Involvement
  2. The hosts remind listeners that Donald Trump was president at the time of Epstein's death, and Bill Barr was in charge of the Department of Justice.
  3. They suggest that if Epstein was murdered, it implies a possible connection to the Trump administration.
  4. The speculation is that the death of Epstein was orchestrated to protect influential figures.
  1. Ongoing Investigations
  2. The episode discusses the ongoing investigations into the Epstein case and the connections to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago.
  3. Robert Garcia, a Democratic member of the House Oversight Committee, is highlighted for probing into Mar-a-Lago's involvement in Epstein's sex trafficking ring.
  4. The hosts express optimism that survivors of Epstein's abuse are being heard and that justice will be pursued.
  1. Accountability and Legal Proceedings
  2. The hosts underscore the need for accountability among those who may have been complicit in Epstein's activities, including members of the Trump administration.
  3. They mention Thomas Massey's efforts in Congress to hold Pam Bondi accountable, discussing the potential for inherent contempt charges.
  4. The importance of following through on subpoenas for key figures, including Les Wexner, is emphasized.
  1. Cultural Context and Public Perception
  2. The discussion reflects on the broader implications of the Epstein case and how it intersects with issues of justice, accountability, and political influence.
  3. The hosts critique the condescending attitudes of political elites toward their constituents, particularly regarding the Epstein case and its coverage.

Key Takeaways

  • Skepticism of Epstein's Death: The majority opinion among those discussed is that Epstein's death was unlikely to be a suicide given the circumstances.
  • Political Connections: The episode draws strong connections between Epstein's activities and the Trump administration, suggesting a cover-up of significant proportions.
  • Potential for Justice: As investigations continue, the hosts remain hopeful that survivors will see justice and that the truth about Epstein's connections will come to light.
  • Accountability is Crucial: The need for accountability and transparency in political dealings is emphasized, particularly in light of the Epstein case.

Conclusion This episode of IHIP News delves into the complexities of the Epstein case, highlighting the ongoing investigations and the potential for new revelations that could implicate powerful figures. The hosts' comedic yet critical approach provides listeners with a refreshing take on serious political topics.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Mark Epstein's Claims of Murder

0:45 to 1:54

Discussion about Mark Epstein's assertion that his brother was murdered and upcoming autopsy results.

“And then if you go into the body of the article, he has hired a former New York City chief medical examiner to conduct a new autopsy.”

Theories on Epstein's Death

1:54 to 4:27

Exploration of various theories regarding the circumstances of Epstein's death and the implications for the Trump administration.

“And I remember saying to my husband, don't you think probably that DOJ did it?”

Mar-a-Lago's Connection

4:27 to 7:20

Analysis of the role of Mar-a-Lago in the Epstein scandal and recent political developments.

“To see the ranking member of a House committee investigating this, what was the role of Mar-a-Lago in the sex trafficking ring, I found that to be somewhat shocking.”

Investigations and Accountability

7:20 to 10:15

Discussion on the ongoing investigations into Epstein's associates and the call for accountability among political figures.

“But I also want to remind those folks at the DOJ, you can be prosecuted by a future DOJ for violating this law because it's a law.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04I wanted to give everybody an update on the Epstein files. We've had so much with Venezuela and then the execution of an unarmed American citizen by ICE. But the Epstein files are still lurking and there are deadlines being missed and new information that's coming up. And something that just I've heard it before, but Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein's brother, says that he was murdered. And then in February, we're going to have a new autopsy report that shows that. So this came up and this is a bombshell after all these years. We find out from NewsNation that Mark Epstein refers to a new autopsy report that will prove his brother was murdered.

0:47And then if you go into the body of the article, he has hired a former New York City chief medical examiner to conduct a new autopsy. Those results will be released in February. And I think this is a really important update because Mark Epstein has been saying this and you've seen the doctored footage and you've seen every single person that we've asked on this podcast and at large. Do you think Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide? The answer is no. And Jennifer, just a quick reminder, who was president when Jeffrey Epstein was murdered and in charge of the Department of Justice? Well, that was Donald Trump and Bill Barr.

1:27So I think this is going to ignite again the conversation about we want to see the videos of how Epstein died. I mean, this is this is the whole ballgame. I mean, I remember when he died and I remember like I wasn't super into following all of the Epstein stuff. But I remember I was more following all of Trump's, you know, fuckery and Trump 1.0. And I remember saying to my husband, don't you think probably that DOJ did it? Like, how could he commit suicide? Like, how could that happen in federal custody like that? My husband's a criminal defense lawyer, goes to federal prisons all the time. A high profile prisoner like that, this just would not happen.

2:16And then I am no pathologist, or even though I do watch a lot of true crime shows, armchair. um pathologist when i saw the the the room and i am a human being and i thought about okay if i was trying to do that with what he had to work with it seemed impossible so let's just say he was murdered then that means that the trump administration and the trump doj somebody connected to it murdered him. Right. I mean, that's just, that's just all it means. And it's, it's the biggest bombshell of them all that he was just quote unquote handled. And I just don't think it's possible that he just anatomically with that room, I just don't think it's possible that he committed suicide.

3:14I think they killed him. That's my opinion. Well, and I remember when I heard that, you know, I've heard of prisoners committing suicide, so that didn't strike me. But when they said the video that the officers in charge of watching it were asleep and the video was out, I was like, there's no question. All of this stuff is not a coincidence. It just doesn't happen that way. And you look at who stands to gain from the death of Jeffrey Epstein. And that's an obvious question. And then another thing I found interesting this week was Robert Garcia, who is the ranking member for the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, he comes out and we've been talking about Mar-a-Lago's connection to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking ring.

3:57Here's Robert Garcia. And so there's a lot happening and we're actually right now taking testimony from survivors, some of the people involved. So our work on the Epstein case is just starting and moving forward. Donald Trump thinks it's over. He doesn't really understand the breadth of what we're doing here. There's so much information about Mar-a-Lago, what Mar-a-Lago, what their role was in the trafficking of girls. There's so much happening. And so all that will come out, the truth will come out, and we're just looking hard to make sure that people understand that we want justice for this virus.

4:32To see the ranking member of a House committee investigating this, what was the role of Mar-a-Lago in the sex trafficking ring, I found that to be somewhat shocking. I mean, that's very pointed in my opinion. And of course, Pam Bondi's covering it up. Of course, she didn't meet the deadlines. Of course, she's violating the law. That's just what they do. What's your response to that? I mean, I didn't think that was, because we reported right before all of the Venezuela stuff that they had released that Trump was sending girls from the Mar-a-Lago spa to Jeffrey Epstein's house. To me, there doesn't seem to be much new information on this as much as it is confirming what everybody always thought about all of this.

5:31And I didn't think the Mar-a-Lago stuff was as pointed, but I don't follow this as close to you, dude, because it's like, duh, of course. We know he got Virginia Giffre from Mar-a-Lago. We know that Donald Trump has ended this thing up to his eyeballs. Yeah, he stole her as Donald Trump's exact words. And, you know, I look at the people, the survivors that they're seeing this. And I feel happy for them that they know that people are working towards releasing this information. And you have Thomas Massey, who is a Republican, who's been out front of all of this. And he is saying to Pam Bondi, we're going to hold you accountable at some point.

6:15And I cannot wait for the day that so many members of this administration, Pam Bondi, Pete Hegseth, Stephen Miller, J.D. Vance, obviously Donald Trump, I wish, but the Supreme Court gave him a pass. They need to be in handcuffs because, in my opinion, they are committing nonstop crimes every day. But here's Thomas Massey giving a very solemn warning to Pam Bondi. And like you said, there are next steps beyond that. There's contempt, which requires a referral to the DOJ. Now, the problem with that is if you refer contempt of Congress to the DOJ, they're not going to prosecute it. They never do, and they wait for Congress to expire.

6:59So there's also inherent contempt, which hasn't been practiced in over 80 years. We're drafting that. And that's more desirable than impeachment, because inherent contempt is resolved in one chamber of Congress, whereas impeachment would have to go also to the Senate. So those are the escalating degrees of things that we can do. But I also want to remind those folks at the DOJ, you can be prosecuted by a future DOJ for violating this law because it's a law. It's not a congressional subpoena that expires at the end of this Congress. It will last forever. This has got just crimes, crimes and more crimes.

7:40It just none of this. I wish they wouldn't start out politely because this has been a cover up since. that we've been aware of as a public since May of 2025, that they have been actively trying to cover this up. So I don't think they should get any graces. But one thing, and nobody might think this is great, but me. Les Wexner, who Victoria's Secret, Jeffrey Epstein's first sponsor, so to speak. The Oversight Committee is subpoenaing him to testify before Congress. And here's the thing. Here we have the reporting. In the House Oversight Committee just now, ranking member Robert Garcia just secured subpoenas for Les Wexner, billionaire businessman and longtime benefactor of Jeffrey Epstein, plus Darren Eideke and Richard Kahn, the executors of the Epstein estate.

8:34Okay. Okay, on a personal note, I think that Epstein and Les Wexner, I think Wexner loved Jeffrey Epstein because I don't think anybody gives somebody a$77 million penthouse, or I'm sorry, Brownstone in New York without being stupid in love. And then he took millions and millions and millions of dollars from Les Wexner and Les Wexner let it ride forever. So this is something that I find absolutely fascinating. And these women were victimized because of the name of Victoria's Secret. Come model for us. I represent Victoria's Secret. If you looked online, if you even did your research, you would find there was a very strong connection between Les Wexner, who again is the CEO of Victoria's Secret and Jeffrey Epstein.

9:25Yeah, I think I've always wondered about how he got his money, because it's so sketchy. The story about it is so incredibly sketchy about his ascent. Now, it's either like you said, it's love, or there's, you know, compromising information that Jeffrey Epstein had on Les Wexner, and he was blackmailing him and bribing him, you know, something really, really nefarious. It's one of those two things. And so I think it's very interesting. I also thought of note of the, to go back to the Massey comment about, I was happy and pleased to see that there is a Republican, even though I don't like MAGA, you guys, that somebody is standing up to Pam Bondi and standing up to the DOJ because it is so important.

10:14And all of these fiscal conservatives, the country club Republicans that voted for Donald Trump that know better, but they did because they're greedy and they didn't want to pay as much in taxes. When you erode the justice system and you erode the court system, you erode the economy. And this is incredibly important. And it's amazing to me how all of these things are kind of Venn diagramming, are kind of like intersecting and at the epicenter of this entire story. So thank you so much for curating this episode pumps, because this Epstein stuff, I think the coverup started the day in January when the Trump administration invited all of the MAGA influencers and gave them the binders.

10:59They gave them the exact information that had already been out. Remember? And like, It's that girl that's stupid. Yeah. TikTok. And, you know, they invite all these fucking fleabag morons. And they thought, oh, because it shows you how stupid they think their base is by the way they've treated Epstein stuff. You know, it's really the treatment of the Epstein stuff is not only protection of elites, but also the condescending nature that they have towards the people who vote for them. No, I completely agree. So we will keep you updated. We're following this very closely. Please like this video and subscribe to our channel.

From the publisher

Despite Trump's White House trying to burn the country down to stop it, the Epstein case and investigations into Trump are continuing to move forward.


Order our new book, join our Substack, shop our merch, and more by clicking here: https://linktr.ee/ivehaditpodcast.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

More from IHIP News

All 1,257 episodes
Epstein's Brother Orders Bombshell Autopsy That "Will Prove Jeffrey Was Murdered"IHIP News · 12 min
Listen in VO