In short
IHIP News Podcast Episode Summary
Episode Title Lead Epstein Reporter Claims "It's Worse Than I Thought" as More Victims Surface
Episode Description In this episode, journalist Julie K. Brown joins hosts Jennifer Welch and Angie “Pumps” Sullivan to discuss the current status of the Epstein case following significant government developments.
Key Guests
- Julie K. Brown: Investigative journalist known for breaking the Epstein case in 2017 through her reporting in the Miami Herald.
---
Episode Highlights
Introduction of Julie K. Brown
- Julie recounts her pivotal role in unveiling the Epstein scandal with a series of investigative articles.
- The discussion begins with her reactions to a recent redacted drop from the Justice Department.
Monitoring Incident
- Julie shares an incident where her name appeared on a flight itinerary related to a victim she had helped.
- She clarifies that the government was not monitoring her, but rather tracking a victim's travel plans, which highlights the complexities and issues of government surveillance.
Victim Support and Movement
- Julie notes the emergence of a supportive network among victims, creating their own "investigative squad" to share experiences and gather information.
- She expresses concern over the government’s insufficient support for these victims, stating that many feel unsafe in disclosing information due to past betrayals.
Ongoing Investigations
- The episode highlights the importance of victim testimonies in uncovering the truth about Epstein’s operations.
- Julie expresses skepticism regarding the Justice Department’s renewed investigation, suggesting it may be a tactic to withhold crucial information.
Issues with Government Handling
- Discussion on the Justice Department's negligence in properly addressing the case and the victims' needs.
- Julie underscores the lack of serious attention from powerful entities, contributing to a culture of distrust among victims.
Cover-up Allegations
- Julie remarks on the apparent cover-up surrounding the Epstein case, suggesting that powerful individuals may be manipulating the narrative to avoid accountability.
- She argues that the American public is aware of these cover-up attempts and that the truth is being obscured deliberately.
Closing Thoughts
- Julie emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation that prioritizes victim voices and evidence.
- The conversation reiterates the ongoing struggle for justice and the complexities involved in the Epstein case.
---
Key Takeaways
- Government Surveillance: Julie’s experience illustrates the blurred lines between monitoring and protecting journalists and victims.
- Victim Advocacy: The formation of networks among victims represents a significant shift toward empowerment and collective action.
- Distrust in Authorities: Many victims remain skeptical of government intentions following the mishandling of the Epstein investigation.
- Need for Transparency: The hosts and Julie argue for greater transparency and accountability from government entities involved in the case.
- Public Awareness: Growing public sentiment suggests that there is a recognition of potential cover-ups and a demand for justice.
---
Conclusion The episode delivers a gripping account of ongoing challenges related to the Epstein case, underscoring the continued need for investigative journalism, victim advocacy, and governmental accountability. Julie K. Brown's insights provide a critical lens through which to view the complexities of this high-profile case.
For further engagement, the hosts encourage listeners to support victims and to stay informed on developments in this case.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOMonitoring and Misunderstandings
0:46 to 3:31
Julie discusses the revelation of being monitored by the Justice Department and the confusion surrounding it.
“I had somebody point out to me that they saw my names in connection with a plane itinerary, a flight itinerary.”
The Expanding Network of Victims
3:32 to 9:19
Julie shares how the Epstein victims' movement is growing and how victims are connecting with each other.
“but I knew who it was because that was the only person I had ever a victim I had ever bought a flight ticket for.”
Distrust in Government Investigations
9:20 to 12:15
Discussion about the victims' distrust toward government investigations and their treatment by authorities.
“So it's been fits and starts with this whole case.”
The Cover-Up Culture
12:16 to 13:08
Julie elaborates on the perception of a cover-up regarding the Epstein case and the implications for victims.
“You don't need to depose Ghislaine Maxwell or Bill Clinton.”
Betrayal of Victims
13:09 to 14:06
Discussion on the consistent betrayal of victims by various parties involved in the Epstein case.
“There's still people that know out there with the Justice Department that knows.”
Victim Betrayal and Need for Support
14:06 to 17:08
Discussion on how victims of Epstein's abuse were consistently betrayed by various parties and the lack of support they received.
“Did you learn anything from the Epstein drop?”
Epstein's Connections and Allegations
17:09 to 19:00
Exploration of Jeffrey Epstein's possible connections to Israeli intelligence and the impact of his business dealings.
“And I feel like we're still continuing to see that effort.”
Questions Surrounding Epstein's Death
19:01 to 21:08
Examination of the circumstances regarding Epstein's death and the questioning of whether it was a suicide.
“And as I understand it now, I haven't really gotten to the bottom of it yet.”
Acosta's Malpractice and Victim Ignorance
21:09 to 24:27
Critique of former U.S. Attorney Acosta's handling of Epstein's case and his lack of awareness about the number of victims involved.
“Botched or maybe done like that on purpose.”
Commitment to Victims and Future Support
24:28 to 25:38
A commitment to continue supporting victims and providing them a platform to share their stories.
“They were just girls that didn't haven't found their way yet in life and were still struggling in many ways with either their families, you know, some of them were homeless even.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:04Joining us today is Julie Kay Brown, who as everyone knows who's been paying attention broke the Epstein files, Epstein probe wide open in 2017 with a series of articles and investigative journalism. Welcome, Julie. Thanks for being with us. Great to be here. Okay. So I want to start by asking you when this drop came from the Justice Department, which was limited, redacted. But one interesting thing to me was that they were keeping tabs on you. What was that like in that moment? And has there been any follow up with the Justice Department on that? Well, you know, let me back up. I had somebody point out to me that they saw my names in connection with a plane itinerary, a flight itinerary.
0:57So, of course, that sounded very odd. I knew my name would be in there because the whole reason why the Southern District of New York opened the case to begin with was because of my investigative story in the Miami Herald. So, of course, they're mentioning my story throughout. You know, did you see this? Did you look at that? So I knew my name. But when someone called me and said, well, there's a flight itinerary with your name on it. And when they showed me a copy of it, it had my maiden name attached to it. And that's very odd because I don't use my maiden name professionally. So I thought, what is this?
1:31Now, everything is blacked out, of course, except for my name. So all I know when I first looked at it was, this is my name because I have an unusual maiden name. And I don't know why they're doing this because everything's all blacked out. You can't really tell. So it did take me a couple of days to unravel what it was about. And what they are saying is they weren't monitoring me. They were monitoring one of the victims who I had purchased a flight ticket for. And the reason why, and I didn't purchase it, actually, it was the Miami Herald that purchased it. And I used my company credit card, which I guess at the time, this was a long time, this was a while back, had my maiden name attached to my company credit card.
2:20But anyway, what they were trying to say was, look, we weren't monitoring you. Now, keep in mind, my name's the only thing on this page, practically, for me to understand what it was. So then, of course, I look at the itinerary. Then I had to go back in my emails because this was from, you know, eight years ago. It was actually happened also on the itinerary happened to be a flight that I was taking the day before he was arrested. So anyway, we had planned, my videographer Emily Michaud and I, to fly to Arkansas to meet with Maria and Annie Farmer, two victims, and interview them. Annie lived in Texas.
3:06Maria was in Arkansas. So in order to do the interview, we agreed to fly Annie to Arkansas so we could all do the interview in one place. So that was what it was. They were monitoring her itinerary. And because I had purchased the flight, my name was attached to it. So they're saying, we weren't really following you. We were monitoring you. We were really monitoring a victim who they didn't even really name on the record. but I knew who it was because that was the only person I had ever a victim I had ever bought a flight ticket for. So it took a bit, but it's interesting because Annie called me, I was so glad she called me because sometimes you kind of feel like you're, you're in this together with this story.
3:53You know, you're in this club, you don't want to really be in, but you are. And in some ways, of course, she's been through the victims have been through so much, but in some ways, I feel their pain, you know, and I have to understand their pain in order to write what I write. So we're sort of in this club together where we can commiserate sometimes. And this was one of those cases because her, it turned out her husband was also unredacted in one of those itineraries. So her husband's name was out there. I didn't know it was her husband at the time. She told me, she said that they had even gotten a flight itinerary for her husband when she, I guess she was flying with him to someplace and they got his itinerary.
4:42And the whole thing didn't make any sense because the itinerary, think about it, was from 2008, 2019. And Annie was involved with the Epstein-Gelan Maxwell situation when she was young, when she was, you know, did. So it makes sense. They would monitor her flights from back then because they wanted to show that they flew her to the ranch in New Mexico, for example. I'm sure they wanted to know her itinerary then, but why would they be wanting to know her itinerary in 2019? So it's still a little bit squishy, I think, about exactly what they were doing, but I feel pretty confident they really, it was a mistake on their part that they didn't really mean to catch me up in this.
5:35Or at least that's what I'm telling myself. Right. As, as the, as they're prone to do now, rating journalists home. I mean, that's gotta be scary thinking that that's actually happening, being a journalist on such a hot button case. Has that given you pause in any of this? Well, I haven't really flown much since I saw that. So I think when I fly, it really has occurred to me that maybe I better do something with my phone or something. I'm just concerned that I might end up somewhere where I'll be taken aside and someone will want to see what's on my phone. So, you know, I do have to be mindful.
6:17Some of the things I have done recently, I wouldn't want the government to know who I'm talking to. So, yes, it has given me a lot of pause and it is making me more careful. I'm on signal now more than I ever was before. So yes, because I'm still investigating this story and finding out stuff, you know. what um i've heard and seen you talk about this issue with the epstein files not you know they're being redacted so heavily we're missing stuff but that you have seen i'm sorry you've had victims still coming forward contacting you ones that we hadn't even been on the radar before this i mean that just makes me sick to my stomach yeah it is it's astonishing and that's why i i've said this is bigger than I ever thought because, you know, what's basically happened is this movement, the Epstein victims movement has taken flight and all these women have their own little chats together, their own little support mechanisms.
7:28They never had this organized before. So they are talking to each other and comparing notes and saying, oh yeah, I was with that guy. Oh yeah, I was on the ranch then and, and they're, they're sort of their own little investigative squad where they're putting pieces together. And, you know, I am in contact with some of them. So they are telling me what they're hearing and how they're getting, you know, of course, all this is off the record, which makes it very difficult because I can't really report what they're saying. Uh, but I feel like it gives me, you know, the encouragement to keep going because I know that this is bigger and it's, it's more than what most people understand how big it is.
8:13And I'm not sure how I can nail it because a lot of them don't want to talk publicly. And these are some really powerful people that are involved. Has the Justice Department, because we saw that Pam Bondi said, I'm reopening the investigation. Have any of the victims you're in contact with been contacted by the Justice Department, if you can reveal that? No. I thought it was bullshit, too. She's just saying that so she can withhold documents. They don't want to know. They don't want to know. They don't want to know. And to be honest with you, I suspect that this has been the case all along. It's not even just a Trump administration thing.
8:56I really think that they just really didn't take this case as seriously as they should have from the get-go. And while there were points in time, I think they reopened it and looked at it again and tried to do more investigation. I think that then it kind of got quiet and then they moved on to something else and then it came up again. So it's been fits and starts with this whole case. And as a result, if you don't really take it seriously, you're not going to get to the truth. Right. Well, and the people are so powerful that are involved in this. Politicians, rich people. I mean, we don't know how far it goes.
9:40What if you were investigating and you had the power of the Justice Department, where would you be investigating? Which offshoots of this would you pursue? I would talk to these victims. They're the key. That's number one, because if they felt secure, and safe and protected, that would be the first thing I would do as a prosecutor or FBI investigator. I would make sure that they were so protected. And then if you would talk to them like I talked to them, you would be able to put these pieces together. I mean, you would have the evidence. You would put it together. I think a lot of these victims have, besides saying what happened, And I think a lot of them have evidence like photographs, emails, texts, you know, other people that they told about.
10:40I just think you could put this together if you were really dedicated to doing that and you could do it through the victims. At least part of it could be built through the victims. But these victims don't trust the FBI or the government right now. So they're not going to, you know, then I don't think that they want to talk to them because they're too scared. Well, and why wouldn't they be? You see Ghislaine Maxwell, what has been, you know, her being shipped off to the country club prison and dogs everywhere, you know. So what when they saw that when, you know, Ghislaine is now in this posh prison with dogs, how did that impact them?
11:19I mean, that's another piece that makes them feel like they distrust the government. That might even be the biggest sign not to talk to the government for them, because the government in some ways, I mean, look, they haven't talked, you know, Bande hasn't talked to the victims, but yet she sent her second in command to talk to the person that preyed upon them, sexually abused them that traffic them. So think about, you know, what that looks like, you know, that you're giving your, you know, you're giving these, you know, this benefit and the benefit of the doubt and, you know, you're moving her to cushy confines and doing all these things and you won't even talk to the victims.
12:05I mean, it's just a bad look. Well, it looks like so much favoritism. And when all this was starting to boil up, my first thought was, bring in the victims to Congress. You don't need to depose Ghislaine Maxwell or Bill Clinton. Bring in the victims. And I find it interesting that that has never been on the table, even between Democrats or Republicans. They've spoken with the victims, but in private. They don't want to know what the victims have to say. It's a matter of they're trying to cover it up. They don't want the truth, really. They want to cover it up. And that's why they're doing it the way they are doing it.
12:44I mean, and by the way, the American public isn't stupid. They can see through this. They know exactly what's happening here, that it is a cover up. I hear that word more often than I have ever heard it concerning what's going on now. And as the cliche goes, the cover up is almost sometimes worse than the crime. Yeah. You know, because when you're trying to cover it up, you make mistakes. There's still people that know out there with the Justice Department that knows. You know, one would hope that someone would finally come forward and say, look, they're hiding this or they're hiding that. But, you know, we'll see.
13:28I mean, this whole thing is so chaotic the way that they're doing it that I think it's being done this way on purpose. Right. To keep the information from coming out. it. Keep people confused, off guard, you know, just kind of not knowing. I mean, it's hard for me to figure out these files. So if it's hard for someone like me, could you imagine, I mean, just the regular public or, you know, a media influencer who doesn't know the history of the case? It's even more, you know, difficult to find out what's important here. What about, Did you learn anything from the Epstein drop? I mean, I know they were ridiculously limited.
14:11They're not all, you know, not all the pages have been released, but did you have any, did you find out any new information with the drops that were dropped other than that you were being monitored on your flight logs? Well, what I saw was, you know, when I started this whole case way back in 2016, and as I investigated, I could see how these victims were betrayed consistently, not only by Epstein and its lawyers and the private investigators that tailed them and made their life hell, but in some cases, even their own lawyers, in some cases, betrayed them. Their families betrayed them. The prosecutors betrayed them.
14:54The FBI agents who promised them that they were going to arrest him betrayed them. And now what I can see in here is they told me that, okay? There was some evidence of that that I could show in my original reporting, but now I can see it even more. I mean, there is an email in there from the lead prosecutor in Florida, and this really breaks my heart. I hope I don't cry, but there is an email in there where she says to one of her bosses, is we've got to get support for these women. They want closure on this case. I just presented it before the grand jury and I had to take a break and I took a break and I came back in the grand jury room and I overheard a grand juror say, wow, I'm really glad they're presenting this still because I thought they were going to whitewash it, right?
15:50Even the jurors knew that there was a good chance. And then she's saying, I've got to get help for the victims. They want closure. One of them tried committing suicide this past week. Could you imagine you're handling a case and one of your witnesses tries to commit suicide? I mean, if that's not a sign that the Justice Department was not doing its job, it's that. Because these were girls, remember back then. They were 14, 15, 16-year-old girls, and they had virtually no counseling, no victim support. They said that they had gotten a grant to get someone to help them, and the people that were assigned to the case were based in Maryland.
16:43That seems odd. So there was going to be Zoom, or was it just, we can offer this to you that We had to do it back in 2005. This was 2007. So no, I mean, but doesn't this also show that they weren't serious about this case if they're not protecting the victims? You know, they were never serious about this case and or Epstein made it so that they sort of pressured them enough to just sort of let the case go, you know, whitewash it, which is what they did. Which is exactly. And I feel like we're still continuing to see that effort. Did you find anything in your reporting that Jeffrey Epstein was connected to the Israeli intelligence service?
17:30I think I've asked you that before, but I was just. Well, he was very close to Barack, who was a former Israeli prime minister. In fact, in court records, we have seen that he's been accused of being involved with some of these young women and girls. So he has denied it. He has also made it very hard for journalists to report it. He's very on top of whatever is written out there and has his lawyers immediately mount a campaign anytime someone tries to really get close to that piece of the story. But beyond that, he was doing a lot of business with Epstein. And, you know, I think he was involved to some degree.
18:18I don't think that he was a spy per se. I think just like everything else, Epstein said he, you know, did or he knew or, you know, he was very much of a guy who liked to brag about his contacts. And I think that he liked to pretend that he was a spy, but I don't think he, he, that was his, I think he just used it to make money, you know, his connections with foreign intelligence and maybe shared, shared some information that he had. But I mean, we really don't know because we haven't seen those files. Okay. I have two follow, two questions. number one did you see that mark epstein jeffrey epstein's brother which i have such complicated relationship about what i think about him given his breath but anyway that's a whole different story that he is releasing an autopsy that said in february that he procured that epstein was murdered and what are your thoughts on that as i understand it's funny i was just looking into this yesterday.
19:26And as I understand it now, I haven't really gotten to the bottom of it yet. But as I understand it, it sounds like he had some more forensics done on the setup there, you know, at the jail, like, you know, think about I've always, you know, I'm in the position that he did not commit suicide. Okay. So, you know, when you do a crime scene investigation, one of the things that you do do is sort of this forensic examination of the crime scene. So as I understand it, that is what he has. He's had some people do, and that's what they're going to release, I think, in February. So it might be sort of a sort of like a diagram or a reenactment of this to show that he couldn't possibly have committed suicide in the way that they say he committed suicide.
20:20So that's what my understanding so far anyway, I'm still, you know, picking away at it. But that's what I think he did. In other words, he's doing the job that the Bureau of Prisons and or the Justice Department should have done from day one. He's hiring the people that are really looking at the crime scene, which is going to be especially challenging because they never sealed the crime scene. It was contaminated. They let people in there. They didn't take photographs. They never took samples, DNA samples. I don't even think they saved the so-called noose that he used. I don't even think they saved that.
21:05Is that incredible? I mean, really, that is incredible how badly it was botched. Botched or maybe done like that on purpose. You know, it's, you know, they should have treated it like a suspicious death, a potential crime from the very beginning. And they didn't. And they took it was too short amount of time before Barr announced it was a suicide. I mean, you don't do that. It's it's you do an investigation first. You say something like, it looks like a suicide, but we really don't know until we really examine all the evidence and interview everybody. But that's not what they did. It really is.
21:49It defies logic how badly the cover-up has gone on this. Death all the way up. You have Alex Acosta, who is the U.S. attorney in charge of the investigation. Why didn't you read the victim statements? It's like this case was handled, I mean, malpractice across the board on every single stop. Well, let me add one more thing about Acosta, because that's another that was part of the Epstein files that I was really particularly interested in is his testimony before the Office of Professional Responsibility that investigated this after my series happened. And he not only said that he didn't read the victim statement, he admitted in there that he wasn't aware of how many victims there were.
22:38So can you imagine? I mean, there is a big difference if you have three victims, but they had almost 40, almost 40 teenagers. And he said he didn't know that. How could you not know that? You're making a decision whether to prosecute a man who is one of the most prolific pedophiles in history. And by the way, there's a lot of argument over the word pedophile pertaining to him because technically the definition of pedophilia is someone that really goes after children as in under the age of 10 pre-puberty. puberty. But the reason why I am okay with calling it that is because the women, the girls, I'm sorry, the girls that Epstein preyed upon weren't just girls.
23:28They were girls that looked like, right. They were 12, 11, nine. He did not, he didn't like developed girls. He wanted the innocent girls that were scared because that's what he liked. He got off on the fact that they were scared. That's why he didn't go and pay the$300 he was paying these girls to a prostitute because he could have afforded the most high class prostitutes ever. I think the derangement that he had was that he liked the scared little girls. He liked that. I know it's horrible to think about, but it's important for people to understand that because a lot of people think, and including the original Palm Beach state prosecutor who didn't really even want to prosecute him at all, they considered these girls to be prostitutes at the time.
24:26Which is so gross. That in and of itself, it's also when you think about the girls that he preyed upon, it's even worse because they were clearly not prostitutes. They were just girls that didn't haven't found their way yet in life and were still struggling in many ways with either their families, you know, some of them were homeless even. So, you know, it's important to understand, and that's sometimes what's lost in Alex Acosta's list of excuses for not following through with prosecuting him. Yeah, I just don't think there's any excuse for any of this behavior. And please let the victims know that we will continue to support them.
25:17If they want to, you know, have a platform to speak, we would love to have them. Julie, I would love for you to come back. I find every time I have a conversation with you, I learn something and it's interesting. So thank you for being on and I hope you will come back again. Thanks for having me.
25:36Thank you.
From the publisher
We are once again joined by Journalist Julie K Brown to discuss where the Epstein case stands after the governments disgraceful roll out.
Order our new book, join our Substack, shop our merch, and more by clicking here: https://linktr.ee/ivehaditpodcast.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

