WH Blocks CNN from Trump Trip on Air Force One

0:00Every day, animals across the country face abuse and neglect. And every day, the ASPCA shows up to rescue animals in crisis. But they can't do it alone. Visit ASPCA.org slash need. Become a donor today to provide the care and shelter these animals urgently need. And for a limited time, the ASPCA will send you a free gift as a special thank you. Visit ASPCA.org slash need. Good evening, I'm Laura Coates. And just when you thought President Trump's feud with the media was cooling off, he decided to escalate it. The White House is now barring CNN from flying on Air Force One tomorrow. CNN had been scheduled to carry out TV pool duties for the president's trip to Tennessee.

0:50But the network got noticed tonight that it will no longer be allowed to travel with him. Now, let's take a step back, shall we? I want to lay out clearly what is going on because the back and forth can get pretty head spinning, I realize. You'll remember a judge on Thursday temporarily blocked Trump's White House ban against CNN, MSNOW and Politico. He ordered the administration to restore those outlets' hard passes. And that eventually did happen, hours after the judge's ruling. The reporters were ultimately allowed back on the White House grounds, but there were still questions over whether CNN would get to resume pool duties.

1:29And a reminder, the TV pool is a group of five networks that include CNN that provide coverage of presidential events. Now, today, CNN, as part of that pool, was able to cover Trump's views to the National Archives with Chinese President Xi Jinping. So it appeared like the pool was operating normally again, right? Until tonight. The White House hasn't told CNN why it's blocking the network from flying on Air Force One tomorrow. We have reached out for comment, but this is the latest salvo in Trump's media fight. You might be wondering, does the judge's order restoring White House access apply to CNN's pool duties too?

2:11Great question. The attorney representing CNN and the other two outlets originally banned argue, yeah, it does. We believe that is covered by the temporary restraining order. We raise this very issue in our motion. And we asked the judge to issue an order to grant our motion, restoring the access to CNN and its reporters that it had before this ban was imposed. So we think that that restoration of access means back into the pool. With me now, First Amendment lawyer, Conor Fitzpatrick, the chief superizing attorney for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression. All right, Conor, give me your read of this.

2:52Does this move by the White House now, how does it square with the judge's order from the other day? So this move is part of the Trump administration's full court press on the press. It is of the same vein as pulling the press passes from your organization and to others, the same vein as going after ABC and Jimmy Kimmel, and even going after the Des Moines Register and Ann Selzer, another lawsuit that he lost this week. It was very clear in CNN's motion earlier this week that they wanted resumption of what's called the status quo, the way things existed before the Trump administration pulled these press passes.

3:30And that's what Mr. Boutros thinks is being violated here. Well, it's the spirit of the law, the letter of the law, right? we get sort of get cute is in the letter of the law and saying, well, I'm following your order, but if it was intended to restore access, not just the actual pass, but what it actually would get you, that was the point, right? Right. So if we look at the actual text of Judge Kelly's order from about 1.30 yesterday morning, it feels like a lifetime ago now. But if we look at the text of that order, he is ordering just the return of the actual hard passes for the three organizations.

4:06So Mr. Boutros and CNN, I assume, will argue that the spirit of this order was to undo what the Trump administration did. The DOJ will likely argue we are following the judge's order to the letter and we are not going an inch further than that. But let's be very clear here. What is going on here is an affront to the First Amendment. It is the Trump administration trying to wield its power and bully press organizations who report things in a way that it does not like. There's an ongoing case since I think last November with the AP when they refused to call the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America and there were consequences.

4:41And the GOJ in their filing tried to use that case to argue that the president was valid in being able to block access, even, they say, for viewpoint discriminatory reasons. But that case is still pending and it has now greater importance in this litigation, right? It absolutely does. And again, in what seems like a lifetime ago, the Associated Press litigation, where we went through this whole exercise last year, where Donald Trump tried to throw the Associated Press out of the White House and out of the press pool, and they had to sue. So the issue that's pending at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals right now, it was argued last November, just before Thanksgiving, is whether the press pool is something that the president can eject someone for viewpoint discriminatory reasons.

5:26Judge McFadden, the district court judge, held that that violates the First Amendment. And now that issue is pending at the intermediate appellate court. But either way you look at it, this is the Trump administration wielding its authority against media outlets that it doesn't like. The court could have gone further in their order. They chose not to. It's a 14-day long ruling. We'll see what happens in the interim. Connor, thank you so much for being here. Explain it all. I want to turn to my political panel for tonight. CNN Senior Political Commentator Scott Jennings and Democratic Strategist Mike Nellis.

5:55Glad to have both of you here. I'll begin with you, Scott, because even some conservatives took issue with the president's restrictions, and yet that's not sinking in. How could he think this fight is helping him right now with all, frankly, of the other matters that Americans particularly find all the more pressing to their specific everyday lives? Yeah, I mean, it may be that they think fighting with the press is good for generating enthusiasm among his political base. That's something they could be thinking of. my view on this has been that this gambit was unlikely to succeed and it didn't succeed in court.

6:30And it's only leading to him being muted. I mean, I think that when you are interrupting the pool coverage, when you're interrupting the normal operations of the press, you know, giving the president access to speaking to the American people for them to see him, that's a backfire, to be honest with you. This college football trip this weekend, I mean, I would think you'd want as many people as possible to see you going to a college football game. That's a good thing to do. I'm glad he's going, actually. So my concern about this from the beginning has been that this was not going to deliver the intended results.

7:02And I think that's turned out to be true so far. I'm not sure it's a winning issue for him. It's obviously one he feels strongly about, which is obviously why they're pressing the case tonight. I mean, Mike, it's the quintessential cutting off one's nose despite their face, right? The muted aspect of it. But certainly this seems like a knee-jerk reaction rather than one that was strategically thought out. And yet, this is not the first president of the United States to face tough questions from the press, to have an adversarial relationship with the press as well. I mean, we heard from someone who knows what it's like to face the tough press.

7:33The former president, Bill Clinton, also weighed in. Listen. There were lots of times when I wanted to ban the White House press corps. you know and there's a reason we have a constitution because none of us are immune from being pissed off

8:02but i'm glad i never did and i'm glad i couldn't and these people shouldn't Why do you think the president is not exercising the restraint that frankly could serve him well if he were to focus on other issues besides the war with the press? Say, for example, the actual war in Iran or the economic wars or affordability or any number of things that he has talked about in the past. Yeah, well, Donald Trump doesn't know the meaning of the word restraint. and when he's backed up against the wall politically like he is right now, and he's really backed up on the economy, this war, which there's no end in sight to affordability and so many other issues, he falls back on the things that he believes helped him get elected in the first place, and that was having this adversarial relationship with the press that's attacking trans kids and calling every Democrat a communist and all kinds of things like that.

8:58None of that has worked over the course of the last six to eight months of his presidency. In fact, his numbers are declining dramatically, drastically every single day. And so I just think the president is falling back on his old norms and it doesn't work. I think it works when he's the dog that's chasing the car. But right now he's the dog that's driving the car and he's the reason that your life is significantly worse. Everything's more expensive and his party is about to be punished in the midterms because of it. Well, let's talk about the midterm, Scott, because we've got, what, 39 days to go.

9:25You've got a lot of headwind. You've got the approval rating of Trump at historic lows. You've got gas, four dollars, diesel, six dollars. You've got mortgage rates at seven percent. And yes, the economy added 162 ,000 jobs in August. That's great. It doesn't seem to be moving the needle, at least in terms of the projections and what the voter morale seems to look like. Neither, frankly, is, you know, blame Biden as a strategy. So what do you think will be the most effective way for Republicans to try to rally their voting troops in 39 days? Well, look, it's going to be a contrast election. Republicans are going to have to run contrast campaigns and they're going to have to be very unsubtle about what the Democrats left behind when they left office and what the Democrats would do when they come back into office.

10:16And you're talking about a group of very radical Democratic candidates. Many of them have anti-American attitudes. Many of them prefer socialism to capitalism. All of them voted against tax cuts last summer. All of them virtually are promising to repeal the tax cuts if they get back in power. They're all promising to reverse the president's views on immigration, which would have the effect of reopening the border. So there's a real contrast campaign to be run here. Now, no Republican should be under any illusion. It's going to be easy because of the economic conditions that you laid out. I mean, the bottom line is every election is about the economy.

10:50And if people feel like cost of living is too expensive or if economic conditions are not working in their favor, of course, they take those to the ballot box. But the Republicans aren't without arguments. They can make arguments against Democrats. And as you pointed out, they can also make arguments that the country's actually on a better trajectory when it comes to job creation, manufacturing, growth. There's evidence of that out there right now as well. So it's going to have to be a contrast message in a midterm when historically the party out of power ought to have a little bit of an advantage anyway.

11:22You know, it's interesting the idea of some of the things you point out, Scott, and Michael, go to you on this. I mean, Momdani seemed to be the boogeyman representative that many Republicans wanted to point to as what was wrong with the trajectory of Democratic races. And yet you see President Trump, you know, not shying away from cozying up, from, you know, showering some form of praise on him, which I always find very interesting given the greater landscape the Republicans speak about. But he's also going to Oklahoma. He's going to Alabama next month and he's going in district. He won by really big numbers.

11:58And now Politico says he's also going to go to Iowa. He's going to go to Florida, Alaska, and again to Texas. What impact will that be on Democrats? Is it helpful to have Trump in all those spaces? Yeah, I mean, I think it's helpful to have him out there no matter the circumstance. I don't care whether he's in the tundra of Alaska or if he's in Oklahoma or somewhere that he feels safe in Alabama. I mean, I'm happy to have him out there talking about how we're living this golden age of America that he says that we're in right now, which no American except a handful of incredibly wealthy people who are inside Donald Trump's family or his inner circle get to feel.

12:32Having him out there is great. Now the Republicans are gonna try to hide him, but he's too much of a ball hog to actually allow Republicans to carry distance from his unpopular policies. We're starting to see some of these Republicans now who have been supporting this war in Iran for the better part of the last six to eight months going, oh no, I think the war is terrible when we've got to end it. I think the American people are smart enough to know that these folks like Mike Rogers in Michigan and all the other candidates out there, that they're just going to be a rubber stamp for everything that Donald Trump wants.

12:58His inability to allow the Republican Party to have an identity outside of him is what's going to drag them down because they can't get away from him on the economy, can't get away from him on the war, can't get away from him on the corruption. Very few of them are even willing to say that we should investigate his family for the very obvious examples of corruption. Don Jr. taking a bribe in the form of this wedding gift from a Russian oligarch, Jared Kushner, making all of these deals overseas. Allegedly. Allegedly. Thank you. All right, Farrah, I'll grant that. Allegedly. But something I'm concerned about, they won't even call for an investigation in that right now because they're too afraid.

13:29And the American people are keeping an eye on that stuff, and they're sick of this. Well, Scott, let me talk about Mike Rogers, because CNN's K-File laid out how he praised the Iran war, but is now complaining about the impact it had on prices. He now says it needs to end quickly. He's not the only one creating that distance on that. You have Thomas Massey making this assessment. They've got to put space between them and him. And this is the price they're paying. Look, I was the Republican who was speaking out for so long and they were all whatever Trump wants, they were all for it in their primaries.

14:02And now it's they're about to take a shellacking here in the general election. So they're running from him on on this and other issues like the war. I mean, Scott, Republicans had a lot of chances to speak out earlier if they felt this way. and they did not. Do you think voters will view their statements as of now as disingenuous or an evolution of thought? I live in Thomas Massey's district here in Kentucky. In fact, I attended a Republican dinner tonight where lots of Republican candidates were there. And I heard a lot of positive words for the president. And I didn't hear a single person mention Thomas Massey.

14:38That's because he lost his primary and he won't appear on the November ballot and he won't be in office come January. So that's number one. Number two, look, Republican voters support the president. OK, I mean, Republicans elected the president to do some things. Number one, close the border, which he did. Number two, cut taxes. Number three, shrink the government. And number four, make sure that enemies of the United States, like Iran, don't acquire nuclear weapons to threaten us with. I mean, he's doing the things that Republicans elected him to do. Regarding Mike Rogers, I actually was in Michigan this week as well.

15:09I interviewed Mike Rogers. I think his view on the war is very simple. We've achieved our objective. It's time to declare victory. We have oil flowing through the Strait of Hormuz that's approaching pre-war levels. We have a defeated enemy that has no Navy, no Air Force, no Army, no defense industrial complex, and no leader that's ever been seen in public. By any historic measurement, these people are defeated. And I think Mike Rogers, who comes, by the way, from a law enforcement and military background, he knows what a defeated enemy looks like when he sees one. And I think he sees one in Iran.

15:42And I think he's waiting for the president to announce we've beaten these people, which I think we clearly have. He's announced it multiple times over the last several months. And still, there's an ongoing war. And I think many would take issue with the idea that the United States has defeated Iran in light of even the things that Scott is addressing. What is your final take on that yeah i mean we have not defeated iran the straight of four moves is not open if the straight of four moves was open we would be seeing gas prices and diesel prices come down and that would be a relief to the average american you're not seeing that right now there's oil flowing or not greater millions of barrels of oil are flowing through the street let him respond you had a chance to make your case you did mike respond i mean i mean you're in a tough position and you got to sell this stuff but like the straight of four moves is not open i know you're in a tough position.

16:32You got a lot about what's going on. Why am I still hearing you, Scott? Mike, I can't, Mike, I'm sorry. Restart. Scott, I can't hear him. Please stop. Mike, finish your point. Go ahead. Yeah. I mean, look, the point that I want to make is that, you know, Donald Trump and folks like Scott have been promising that an end of this war was coming at any moment. They've said we've defeated Iran militarily and then Iran immediately goes out and attacked. You know, they continue to lie about the state of this war there. By the way, at the time that Donald Trump announced the press ban last week, which captured the media's attention for good reason.

17:00A Washington Post story came out about how they've been lying about the number of U.S. casualties we've experienced in this war, the number of U.S. service members who have been wounded. So they're lying about that. The American people are not buying into it anymore. And more importantly, their lives are significantly worse than they were six to eight months ago. And that's why the Republican parties are in trouble. Well, guess what, voters? You've got 39 days to see which of them is right. Scott, Mike, thank you both. Up next, several days of pageantry and praise for Xi Jinping is now over. But did Trump press him on anything?

17:30And what about the reports that China is helping Iran target Americans? We'll get right into it with the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, Congressman Adam Smith, next.

17:43Hey, I'm Anderson Cooper. On my podcast, All There Is, we explore grief and loss in all its complexities. My guest is Lil Jon. He's a rapper, DJ and producer known for hits like Get Low and Turn Down for What. In February 2026, his 27-year-old son Nathan went missing near Nathan's home in Georgia. Three days later, his body was found in a pond nearby. Lil Jon has a memoir that just came out called I Only Shout So You Can Hear Me. It takes time to heal. And I kept myself busy that I didn't let myself mourn. I needed to laugh again. I needed to be silly and interact with people and feel other people's energy and make people happy too.

18:27We have to share so other people can see that they can get through it too. Talking grief, building community. That's what the podcast is all about. This is all there is. Listen and follow wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Dr. Sanjay Gupta, host of the Chasing Life podcast. You may have noticed gambling doesn't require a casino anymore. You can just open up your phone. It's designed to keep us coming back or maybe never even leaving in the first place. We're going to talk to Dr. Timothy Fong, co-director of UCLA's gambling studies program. You're going to learn what your brain is really chasing when you place a bet.

19:05And also importantly, how to keep the game from playing you. Gambling addiction, gambling disorder is the hidden addiction. You can't smell it. You can't taste it. You can't see it. You can't have a urine drug test. Who are we talking about here, Professor? Who's the most likely demographic to be affected by this? Literally any single human on earth. Listen to Chasing Life. Streaming now, wherever you get your podcasts.

19:54because this was a visit designed to be seen. Like tea time at the White House today, that was seen. What wasn't? The red carpet rollout. The state dinner. All the bells and whistles, the type of stuff Trump wanted on TV, but wasn't because of a fight he started. And one of the biggest headlines to come out of the visit? This Axios report that Trump asked Xi to stop supporting Iran. The other big takeaway, plans for Trump to meet with Xi again this year, twice actually. I want to begin with the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, Congressman Adam Smith. Congressman, welcome back.

20:35What a week. I mean, this administration is treating this request to President Xi over the Iran war as a show of strength. But is Trump acknowledging the outcome of the conflict then might depend on China? Well, look, I think it's more acknowledging weakness if we have to ask China for help in dealing with the war on Iran. And I think your previous panel, you had a pretty good conversation about how the war with Iran is not going in the direction that we wanted it to go. So, no, it's certainly not a show of strength to have to ask China to stop helping Iran. Well, the administration is insisting that China has listened.

21:15That's the word they used and is scaling back its support for Iran. So based on your briefings, I'm wondering, are you seeing any evidence that China is backing off or are they still helping Iran behind the scenes? Well, first of all, the evidence is mixed. It's hard to know exactly what they're doing and not doing. But taking a step back from it, we've got sort of two twin problems that contradict each other in terms of how to deal with China. First of all, beyond any doubt, China wants to weaken us. They want to be the more powerful nation in the world. They see us as a rival. And this happens economically.

21:52This happens in a variety of different ways. So when Trump stupidly stumbled into this war in the Middle East that has bogged us down for seven months, clearly there's an opportunity to weaken us. And they're going to look for subtle ways to do that. And that is part of the overall competition. But the second reality here is China's not going anywhere. We're not going anywhere. So I actually applaud these summits that are happening. We need to have conversations and dialogue with China. I mean, the war with Iran is disastrous. The war between Russia and Ukraine is disastrous. Do we really want a war with China?

22:28Don't we have to figure out some way to peacefully coexist? And that starts with dialogue. You know, we both are doing things that the other side doesn't like. But I'm not looking for a China bashing endless conflict between the two most powerful nations in the world. I don't think that serves anybody's interests. Perhaps that would explain some of the compliments the president provided and gave to President Xi while he was here. But, you know, The Washington Post reports the Pentagon quietly added, without explanation, dozens to a public database of U.S. troops wounded during the Iran war. Who is responsible for this accounting delay?

23:10And are you getting the real numbers in your classified briefings? I know. Look, we struggle just as much as the media does to get accurate information out of this Pentagon. They have not been transparent on just about anything. It's the way Secretary Hegseth runs the Pentagon. It's the way Donald Trump runs his entire administration on casualty numbers, on munitions, on what's actually going on with the war. on, well, gosh, even going back to the girls' school, it was Bob in the first couple of days of the war. They still won't admit to responsibility for that. But the way they have hidden information about how our troops are doing, you saw the story about the eight suicide attempts on U.S.

23:54carrier in the region, not reported, casualties not reported. Transparency is incredibly important so that the American people know what the true cost of this war is. I think the Trump administration knows, well, it's worse. The Trump administration knows that, so they don't want people to know how badly it is going. But the Trump administration also fundamentally doesn't believe in the rules of representative democracy. They don't believe that they have to be accountable to the press or the American people. And we've seen that in a thousand different examples. And that is the most troubling thing of all.

24:29We'll see if the courts agree with you. Congressman Adam Smith, thank you so much. Thanks, Laura. Up next, the Supreme Court ruling that gives Trump a way to track down who is eligible to vote and who is not. The White House says it's a huge deal, but is it really? The Novai Secretary of State who just debunked all of the voter fraud claims in his state, live with me, next. And later, Crystal Mason's 10-year nightmare now over after finally beating back the illegal voting charges that were against her in Texas. And Crystal will join me tonight.

25:11A major Supreme Court decision tonight has Republicans taking a victory lap after the court greenlit a centralized voter citizenship database that will help states search for ineligible voters. Its move Republicans are calling a huge win for election security, but let's do a reality check, shall we? Federal law bans major voter roll purges within 90 days of an election. And in her dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson writes the ruling will likely have very limited impact in the midterms. With me now, Nevada Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar joins us now. Secretary Aguilar, thank you for being here.

25:50You know that Republicans are framing this ruling as an instant transformation of voter rules all across the country, but that's actually not the case. Can you level set what this means and what, if anything, changes for voters tomorrow because of this ruling? Nothing's going to change for the 26th general election. We're going to continue to run elections as we always have. First of all, let me just say Nevada runs some of the safest, most secure and accessible elections in the country. All the states in the United States are working really hard to prepare for November 3rd. The voter roll maintenance has been completed.

26:26We are in the blackout period. No voter is going to be removed because of this decision. And we can continue to ensure that people have access to the ballot box. I want to talk about the accuracy of federal data that Nevada is being pressured to use. You know, just last month, the Department of Homeland Security flagged a list of 185 names on Nevada's voter rolls that DHS claimed were noncitizens. Now, data officials investigated this, and you found that every single person on that list is a lawful U.S. citizen. So tell me, how did the feds get that wrong? And does that raise serious questions about how reliable those federal databases really are?

27:09Right. When we first heard about the 16 ,000 non-citizens on the voter rolls, it was on a primetime speech by the president. But we knew that wasn't true. And we kept asking, what was their philosophy for developing that list? What information did they use? And they hesitated to give us that information. We finally had a call. We met with them. We explained what our concerns were. The following day, we received the list. And when we saw the 185, we were shocked at the lack of information that this spreadsheet contained. It had four columns, and there was really only one major column that was critical, and that was what they called the voter case number, which was supposed to be the voter ID number, but nothing else.

27:48We said, hey, can we have some additional information like name, address, so we can make sure we're really looking at the same voter as you are? And the response was no. And so we were like, okay, we're in a position here where we have to figure out what they're asking based on limited information. So we did analysis best we could. And we found that all 185 were eligible voters to participate in Nevada. If they send us the information we requested, we can do an additional review. But until then, it's, you know, a third grader has to show more work in a math problem than DHS showed in that worksheet and the claim they were making, which is really frustrating.

28:26And it's not fair to the American people. Well, DHS is pushing back again. They call your claims of their list false. And they insist that those 185 names were just a carefully reviewed subset for you to check. In other words, it wasn't a final list. So are you suggesting that they have not provided the more false list and that if they do, you'll check that again? Absolutely. We kept asking, give us the voter's name, give us the address and what you have for that voter. And they said, no, I can't just take a voter ID number and assume it's a specific voter that they're targeting. because what Nevada did prior to the 24 election is we implemented a brand new voter registration election management system, which brought us from a bottom up state to a top down, which meant instead of all 17 counties running their individual systems, we have one single system for the entire state of Nevada.

29:22And when we did that conversion, we reissued voter IDs to everybody across the state of Nevada to ensure there weren't duplicates from one county to another. And I believe the voter ID numbers are using are from the old system and not the new system. So I have to be very careful not to accuse a Nevada voter of being a non-citizen when they are in fact a citizen of the United States. Secretary of State Francisco Aguilar, thank you for joining. Excuse me. Thank you for having me. Honored to be here. You know, the woman who was held up for a decade as the poster child of voter fraud has finally been vindicated.

30:04Crystal Mason maintained her 2016 vote in Texas was an honest mistake. Remember, at the time, she was on supervised release for serving time on a tax fraud case. Mason filed a provisional ballot, which was not permitted for people with convictions under Texas law, but she didn't know that. And she says the poll workers never told her that either. But the Tarrant County prosecutor plowed ahead with the case and Mason was convicted in 2018. Now she appealed. In 2024, she was acquitted by an appeals court essentially, only to have the Tarrant County DA appeal her victory. Mason was staring then at a five-year prison sentence.

30:48She has three kids, including a teenage daughter. In this case, as you know, threatened her family's and her own future. But yesterday, the state's highest criminal appeals court upheld Mason's acquittal, ending her decade-long saga. And Crystal Mason joins me now. Crystal, welcome back. Last time we spoke, you were truly in the thick of all that was going on. And I am really curious, how does this feel to have this acquittal upheld?

31:22well first of all i want to say thank you to god because this was a long journey and when i got that phone call from my attorneys i was so overwhelmed with joy that almost 10 years now i've been fighting for my name of a provisional ballot that never counted you know the i spoke to you years ago about this and just having it hanging over your head was taking such a toll on you personally, on your family. You are a mother. What has your family been through and what do they say now? Well, people see the headline. They really don't see behind closed doors. It's been devastating. It's been sleepless nights, tears, fears for my family, for my children.

32:18And it's been overwhelming. You know, again, like you said, it's almost 10 years and this battle is finally over. Does it feel over to you? I mean, obviously you hear like everyone else does 30 days until the midterms everyone's talking about voting does does this make you want to vote does it make you want to stay home what what goes through your head when you have elections coming up now i just i literally just got back from doing a voter's registration drive at a senior's facility yes and that's what i did i realized that my first words was, I'm never voting again. Oh my God, I can't. And that's exactly what they wanted me to do.

33:04And I refuse. I changed my pain to a purpose. I started an organization, Crystal Mason, the fight against voter suppression. And I tell my story. I share my story to encourage people why it's so important to vote. Got to realize these people are elected officials. The judge, the DA, the prosecutor, they're all elected officials. When you're looking across this country and you're seeing what's happening, including people campaigning for office, right? I mean, I understand that the DA who brought the case against you is running for re-election, to your point. And I understand that his wife knocked on your door as part of a grassroots campaign.

33:47We don't know if she knew that it was you who lived there, but can you just explain what that experience was like?

33:58So I really, you just thought, you know, God is funny. You know, he's got a sense of humor. He has to have it. I was at home because my truck was in the shop. So when I opened up the door, she said, hi, I am Bill Saul's wife. He's running for re-election. and I want to know if, you know, she asked me to vote for him. She gave me literature and everything. I had to hold my breath, my tongue. And only thing I said was okay and took the literature and shut the door. And I was like, oh my God, because, you know, again, you know who's, it's a van list. You know who's a Democrat or who's a Republican.

34:47And so I just felt like it was maybe you wanted to see my reaction. You wanted to see how I was going to handle it. I just it was just overwhelming. You know, then it made me think like, you know, why did she come to my house? What was she trying to intimidate me? Or was she saying that if it's OK, you can vote as long as you vote for my husband? I don't know. So it just left a lot of, you know, yeah, it took me everywhere. I mean, just to be clear, you don't know if she knew who you were in relation to her husband, right? I didn't. I didn't know at all. You're right about God having a sense of humor.

35:30Just knowing everything started. Yes. Well, I want you to have the final word here, Crystal, because I'm really glad you came back to talk to us about this. I mean, November is coming. People are watching you. You've done so much turning your pain into purpose. What do you want people to know? I want everyone to know that this election is very important. If you're not registered, if you're unsure, there's websites, there's organizations. It's stuff on my page, on my website that will tell you if you're eligible, if you're not. It's a lot in Texas that a lot of voters, they're in suspense. They don't know if they're registered, if it's still.

36:15So we have a site that we're checking. And I'm just encouraging everybody, if you're unsure, let's re-register you to make sure that you're registered for this election. And just remember that these are elected officials. and we definitely need to get out and vote. So I share my story to let people know that this could be you. And almost 10 years of my life, I fought for this. And it's just, again, I'm just, I'm just grateful. I'm really just, I'm trying not to cry, but I am grateful. Crystal Mason, thank you. I'm happy for you and your family. Thank you. still ahead if republicans are struggling to campaign in a red state just imagine how hard it is in a place like california but steve hilton remains undeterred and he's live with me on his run for governor next okay so if texas is the white whale for democrats then california might be the white whale for Republicans.

37:23The GOP had high hopes to claw back ground in the Golden State this election cycle. Governor Gavin Newsom hit his term limits and he can't run again. He's unpopular among wide swaths of voters and California's sky high cost of living and taxes seem to be driving families out of the state. But despite all that, Republicans face a climb as steep as the Sierra Nevada mountains. A new poll suggests Republican Steve Hilton is down more than 20 points to Democrat and former CDG Javier Becerra. And Steve Hilton joins me now. Steve, welcome to the program. How do you plan on giving those numbers? How do you plan on turning this race around?

38:06There's no question, Laura, that this is an uphill battle. It always has been. It's 20 years since a Republican won statewide in California. But the numbers aren't quite as daunting as that poll suggests. If you look at other polls that have a different assumption about the turnout, the gap is half that. There was one the other week with an eight point gap, another one last week with an 11 point gap. Look, that's still a gap and there's a long way to go. But the polls that I think are most interesting, that every single one you look at, there's a majority of Californians, to the point you just made about the cost of living and everything else, who want change, who say that the state is going in the wrong direction.

38:44After 16 years of one party rule, they're looking for something different. We got a month, we got a very big debate next week. CNN is hosting. And so I think there is still time to make the case for change and a bit of balance in our politics in California. One of the things that people have been talking about, you've made a big promise to bring down gas prices back to$3 a gallon. And California has the highest price in the country, I understand, more than$6 for regular, more than$8 for diesel. But how can you bring down the prices if the Iran war continues? Well, certainly the Iran war's raised prices in California as it has everywhere else.

39:22But even with that, we're about$2 higher than the rest of the country. So the steps in getting that down, number one, is stop the insane situation right now where even though we have abundant oil reserves in California, as in Bakersfield today, the heart of our oil industry, we're now importing nearly 80 % of what we use, shipping it halfway across the world from countries like Iraq, actually increasing carbon emissions. So we can change that policy and that'll bring costs down. There are some regulations on refining that are very out of date that can bring the cost down. But the big one are the hidden taxes on gas prices in California up to$1.40 from policies, for example, that fund high speed rail, which is really not something that we should continue with.

40:09So a combination of reforms can get those prices down. You have supported Trump's war in Iran ever since it started. And I want to remind you what you said back in July, almost four months into the war.

40:22The president's strategy here, which is to try everything to get peaceful outcomes here and to have a negotiated settlement. But he's not going to be strung along forever. And he's putting the pressure up higher and higher and higher. And at some point, either the regime just collapses or they finally come to their senses and make a really credible deal that lasts. You know, the president has said that higher gas prices are a, quote, very small price to pay for a nuclear free Iran. Do you agree with that sentiment today still? Well, I think that it's very important that we end it as quickly as possible.

41:02And clearly that hasn't happened yet. I agree with, along with most people, that you don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon in terms of the sort of practicalities of concluding this war as quickly as possible. I'm not engaged in that, have no influence on that, but certainly want it to come to an end so that we can get gas prices down. But whatever happens with the Iran war, the gas price uplift in California compared to the rest of the country, we can bring that down here by voting for change in our elections this year. So two dollars of that extra price increase, nothing to do with Trump or the Iran war.

41:37That's in our control in California. I am curious particularly about your pitch to eliminate the state income tax for people earning one hundred fifty thousand dollars or less and imposing a flat eight percent tax rate for everyone else. But wouldn't that mean that Silicon Valley billionaires would pay the same income tax as middle income families? Would that be fair to you? well the the most important thing is that we lift um people out of income tax you've got people earning 70 grand and are also in california paying 9.3 percent state income tax that's higher than the top rate in most countries in most other states in many counties in california the official level for low income is a hundred thousand dollars so it's a desperate situation for many people That's why the priority is that is that lifting up of everyone earning 100 up to 150 grand out of state income tax.

42:32And that's going to be paid for by, for example, cancelling high speed rail. As to the flat tax above that, look, the people, the richest one percent in California already pay 50 percent of the income taxes. So I think we already have a very progressive tax system. The problem is, is driving jobs and opportunity away. We've got the highest unemployment rate of all 50 states, the highest poverty rate of any state tied with Louisiana. Our economy is not in good shape. It's fine for the super rich, but for regular working people, it's not working. We've got to attract jobs and investment and business back to California instead of driving it away with these sky high taxes.

43:14Steve Hilton, thank you so much for joining. I'm eager to tune in to the California governor debate next week, and you can all watch it Wednesday at 9 p.m. Eastern on CNN or stream it live with a CNN all access subscription. Ahead, a huge musical event that I'm thrilled to be a part of.

43:36I'm Adi Kornish. I'm Ari Shapiro, and it's Engagement Party. And we get to talk about what we're obsessed with, what we're engaged with, what we need to process with a friend. Her name is Amy Odell. She is a fashion writer, blogger. But the thing is, she's a journalist who's written about the sacred cows of fashion. And yes, I mean, Gwyneth Paltrow and Anna Wintour. She has done biographies of both. And she is also the sort of rare fashion writer who, at this point, kind of outside the system. And so the question that we're going to try to tackle is... Is fashion terrible now? Well, no, I mean, I would phrase it as how do you develop a personal style in the age of AI slop?

44:14You know, on social media, like creators have to try a whole bunch of different things and see what catches and then they make it over and over and over again. The same thing happens with clothing. So they're sort of seeding the market, seeding the internet with all of these different ideas and then they can see what sells and then they can just make them really fast. Follow Engagement Party. Wherever you get your podcasts.