Congress Strikes Back as Trump Rushes $1.8 Billion Scam

18 May 2026 · 15 min · 4 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode discusses a fast-moving federal court fight in Miami over a Trump-related IRS case, framed as “Trump versus Trump” because Trump allegedly controls both the IRS and the Department of Justice. The host claims Trump is trying to avoid required jurisdictional briefing and to settle a “phony” collusive suit to create a $1.776 billion “slush fund” he controls. Key guest-related content: a new filing by 93 House Democrats led by Jamie Raskin and Joe Negusi (plus others) asks Judge Williams to reject the settlement and hold a hearing, arguing DOJ lacks authority, the Judgment Fund statute (31 U.S.C. 1304) doesn’t permit this, and the Domestic Emoluments Clause would be violated.

Notable examples

a separate Miami case involving a Trump library/casino/convention center receiving a $300 million property deal from Miami-Dade College.

Guests

none named as interview guests in the transcript; the episode references attorneys Jamie Raskin/Joe Negusi and local counsel Andre Rivero, plus future plaintiffs like Norm Eisen and Matt Plack.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Breaking News: Trump and IRS Case

1:01 to 2:24

Discussion on Trump's lawsuit against the IRS and implications.

“A new filing by 93 members of the House, including and led by Jamie Raskin, Joe Nekusi, and others, with a federal judge in Miami to convince her that she's been had.”

Legal Challenges and Jurisdiction

2:26 to 4:14

Exploration of legal challenges surrounding Trump's case.

“I don't see how there are adversarial parties here.”

Democrats' Amicus Brief and Legal Arguments

4:18 to 6:08

Analysis of the Democrats' amicus brief and its implications.

“They're asking that their amicus brief be accepted.”

Emoluments Clause Violations

7:38 to 11:01

Discussion on potential violations of the Emoluments Clause.

“and it's a fraud is because it would violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the Constitution, which applies to the president.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This is a Monday.com ad. TheSameMonday.com helping people worldwide getting work done faster and better. TheSameMonday.com designed for every team and every industry. TheSameMonday.com with built-in AI, scaling your work from day one. TheSameMonday.com that your team will actually love using. TheSameMonday.com with an easy and intuitive setup. Go to Monday.com and try it for free. Yes, TheSameMonday.com. Hey, Chicagoland. Wayfair's Memorial Day Sale is on at the Wayfair Store at Edens Plaza in Wilmette. From May 11th through 26th, you can score huge deals on everything home in person. Like up to 70 % off area rugs, up to 50 % off outdoor furniture, and up to 50 % off mattresses.

0:47Plus, you can take home the small stuff that day and get the big stuff shipped fast and free right to your door. Shop Wayfair's Memorial Day Sale, May 11th through 26th at the Wayfair Store at Edens Plaza in Wilmette. Way fair, every style, every home.

1:00Michael Popok:Corruption unparalleled. A fraud on the court. A fraud on the American people. That's in breaking news. A new filing by 93 members of the House, including and led by Jamie Raskin, Joe Nekusi, and others, with a federal judge in Miami to convince her that she's been had. That the federal court has been used as a pawn by Donald Trump in his phony manufactured suit against his own internal revenue service and then attempts to use that suit to settle in a fraudulent way something that his Department of Justice, which he also controls, does not have the power to settle because that power lies only with Congress.

1:44Michael Popok:I'm Michael Popak. We got a fast-moving docket down in Florida in the Trump versus Internal Revenue Service, basically Trump versus Trump, where he controls the Internal Revenue Service. He controls the Department of Justice all to set up this slush fund for himself for$1.776 billion. And now standing between that and it happening is one Judge Williams, who I know well in Miami. At the moment that we said coming off the weekend from Legal AF that Trump would try to avoid having to file the required jurisdictional brief with the judge. because the judge basically said, I don't see how there are adversarial parties here.

2:29Michael Popok:I see this as Trump versus Trump in effect, one dominating over the other and required a brief or two from the IRS, from Donald Trump. No, they've been working overtime internally at the Internal Revenue Service to try to settle the case. But how do you settle a phony case? That's always been the problem. I pointed that out on Legal AF for the last month without a legitimate good faith lawsuit. Donald Trump has nothing to trade in consideration for the settlement. And therefore he'd have to find another statute or he'd just be robbing the treasury of money to set up a slush fund that he controls through a phony commission.

3:09Michael Popok:And he's involved his own department of justice, which he also controls as the chief legal officer. And they're in on the conspiracy as well. That's the premise of the briefing by the 93 members of the House who are Democrats led by Jamie Raskin and filed by a friend of mine as local counsel, Andre Rivero from Rivero Mestre. Let's get to these filings. Trump files first a notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41. He says he doesn't need the court's permission and she can't take any other action. I'm not so sure about that. because if you fraudulently file in order to fraudulently settle, I think the federal judge has inherent authority to not be used, to administer justice, to bring the lawyers like Alejandro Brito representing Donald Trump, the Department of Justice, the Internal Revenue Service, the parties before her, out in order to show cause to determine whether she's been had or not.

4:08Michael Popok:See, she should not be used this way, and there should be a hearing over it, And that's what the new motion filed by the 93 Democrats is asking her to do. They're asking that their amicus brief be accepted. And in their amicus brief, they say the following on pages 12 and 13 and 14. That's really the heart of the matter. they say there in section two this is now the democrats writing to judge uh williams the doj lacks authority to settle this collusive suit once establishing that the suit is collusive if this court determines that this is a collusive suit meaning there's no true adversarial parties here they're all in cahoots then the then the doj would lack authority legal authority to settle it on behalf of the defendant agencies or the United States for two reasons.

5:07Michael Popok:First, they say there are particular statutes that are implicated and they don't apply nor give the power that Trump wants. There's the Judgment Fund Statute 31-USC-1304, which has specific constraints that foreclose a corrupt settlement, particularly if it's a compromised settlement, which is what this would appear to be, then the attorney general cannot compromise a settlement unless there is a legitimate obligation or liability or imminent litigation that he's settling. But if it's been withdrawn already and it's phony from the start, then it cannot be the basis of a compromised settlement.

5:50Michael Popok:So the argument goes. They say on the bottom half of page 13, a feigned or collusive suit over which the court has no jurisdiction and one that has been voluntarily dismissed already on Monday is not fact, is not actual or imminent litigation. This episode is brought to you by IQ Bar, our exclusive snack, hydration, and coffee sponsor. IQ Bar protein bars, IQ Mix hydration mixes, IQ Joe mushroom coffees are the delicious, low sugar brain and body fuel you need to win your day. The ultimate sampler pack. It's a great way to try all IQ bar products and flavors. You get nine IQ bars, eight IQ mix sticks and four IQ Joe sticks.

6:34Michael Popok:All IQ bar products are clean labels certified and entirely free from gluten, dairy, soy, GMOs and artificial ingredients. IQ bars, plant protein bars are the smarter snack choice with plenty of plant protein, tons of fiber and no added sugar. With over 20 ,000 five-star reviews and counting, more people than ever are fueling their busy lifestyles with IQ Bar's brain and body boosting bars, hydration mixes, and mushroom coffees. Their Ultimate Sampler Pack includes all three. IQ Bar has become part of my daily routine, whether it's starting my morning with IQ Joe or grabbing an IQ Bar when I need a quick, clean snack.

7:12Michael Popok:And right now, IQ Bar is offering our special podcast listeners 20 % off all IQ Bar products, including the Ultimate Sampler Pack, plus free shipping. To get your 20 % off, text LEGALAF to 64000. Text LEGALAF to 64000. That's LEGALAF to 64000. Message and data rates may apply. See terms for details. They then say, look, the second reason it can't be settled and it's a fraud is because it would violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the Constitution, which applies to the president. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 7 says that other than his paycheck, that a president cannot receive any other emolument.

7:58Michael Popok:When you hear emolument, think benefit, profit, gift, reward, anything of value from the United States or any of them other than his paycheck. And they're saying that this violates this$1.7 billion slush fund creation, gives him benefits, right, to benefit his cronies, political benefits, other benefits, both monetary and non-monetary, that he is not entitled to and that violates the emolument clause. This is going to be, and we're going to be reporting on the next wave of lawsuits, this will be the template for them. This was a brief, but there's going to be a lawsuit. The lawsuit's brought by maybe the very same people, democracy defenders and Norm Eisen and Matt Plack and former New York, New Jersey attorney general and others, will be bringing suits.

8:49Michael Popok:And they'll argue that this is a violation of the emoluments clause. It will be the second one in a week. There's a case in Miami as well, brought by local residents in Miami against the Trump Library, Casino, Convention Center, whatever it's supposed to be, in Miami as also a violation because they got a$300 million piece of property for free, for free from Miami-Dade College, whose entire endowment is the same value of what they gave up through Ron DeSantis in order for him to build a 50-story building. That's a violation of the emoluments clause, don't you think? And that case is in Miami as well, which we're following very, very closely.

9:30I like this filing and the way it is

9:35Michael Popok:argued about the fraudulent and conspiratorial nature and improper purpose of all of it. They say at the top of their filing, and it's very well researched, here's how they start. The Amici Curi are 93 members of the United States House of Representatives. They are interested in this case because they took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. The president is attempting to undermine the Constitution by bringing this collusive suit against the federal government, contrary to the requirement that federal courts may only hear cases or controversies. The Department of Justice is entrusted with defending the United States against claims under these laws and ensuring that the statutory requirements are met before money is paid.

10:23Michael Popok:However, the DOJ has colluded with President Trump and his allies and in doing so abdicated these responsibilities. Should this lawsuit achieve plaintiff's desired ends, it would result in the improper and unconstitutional transfer of taxpayer dollars into the pockets of the president, his family, and his allies. Having taken oath to uphold and defend the Constitution, the movements cannot stand by and let the Constitution's provisions go ignored. We agree. Glad you're here on Midas Touch on Legal AF. I'm in Miami. I'm going to follow this case closely. I know the lawyer is involved. I'll try to get him on here to do some exclusive briefing of League on Legal AF and the Midas Touch Network.

11:07Michael Popok:So until my next report, I'm Michael Popak.

11:29Michael Popok:All the other contributors from Legal AF are there as well. We got some new reporting. We got interviews. We got ad-free versions of the podcast. And hot takes, wear Legal AF on Substack. Come over now to free subscribe.

11:59assistance switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three-month plan equivalent to$15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. Default terms at mintmobile.com.

From the publisher

Moments after Trump filed to dismiss his bad faith suit against the IRS to obtain a gift for himself and his cronies of $1.776 billion dollar slush fund, 93 House Democrats fired back and filed a motion to encourage Judge Williams to put a stop to a “fraudulent” and “collusive” settlement in violation of Federal law and the Constitution’s Presidential Emoluments Clause. Popok, who has been following the story in his backyard since day 1, comments on whether Judge Williams will use her inherent authority to ensure she wasn’t used from the start and how the new filing will be used for lawsuits that will be filed throughout the week to stop the settlement.

IQBar: Text LEGALAF to 64000 to get 20% off all IQBAR products, plus FREE shipping. Message and data rates may apply.

Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts:
MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast
Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af
MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial
The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast
Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan
The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show
The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show
Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54
On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman
Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Legal AF by MeidasTouch

All 658 episodes
Congress Strikes Back as Trump Rushes $1.8 Billion ScamLegal AF by MeidasTouch · 15 min
Listen in VO