Legal AF 9/3/2026

27:29Popok:Yeah, let me just read from the reply on the proposed order because it's just so powerful. My favorite part is the recitation or the reproducing the transcript of the exchange between poor Mr. Block and Judge Sullivan. This is a mismatch of epic proportion, by the way. This is a phantom weight against Muhammad Ali. Okay, so here we go.

27:59Popok:Court, Judge Sullivan. The defendant was directed to show cause why the FBI notes about Donald Trump should not be produced. What's the answer? Mr. Block. The answer, Your Honor, is that they are duplicative. The court. Well, that's what the defendant says. The court doesn't know that. Mr. Block. Now they turn to the redaction log. Mr. Block. Again, Your Honor, the redaction log. Now here's where he lies to the court. The redaction log is forthcoming. I don't have anything to say to the court beyond I know it's in the process. Stop right there before I get to the comment by the judge. They weren't in the process of creating a redaction log of 200 ,000 pages.

28:40Popok:They just republished a cover letter that they had already waved around when the judge said it was insufficient the first time. So what is he talking about in terms of the process of creating a redaction log? But my favorite is when he says, I don't have anything to say beyond that. I know it's in the process. So the judge says, I mean, I mean, he says, Christmas is also forthcoming, but let's be realistic. Right.

29:36Popok:for which plaintiff now seeks the underlying notes total 25 pages. The handwritten notes are presumably not much longer. The attorney general commands perhaps the largest law firm in America and can find a way to reliably review 25 pages to ensure victim information is not revealed. What they want is the judge to take these documents in for in-camera review now and direct the defendant to do that thing, which they have refused to do, which is to generate a redaction log. And I got bad news for the government. If the judge orders that, if they think they were complaining in their last filing about, we got to work over the holidays, judge, mistakes could happen when you got to work on Christmas, wait till they have to create from scratch a redaction log for 200 ,000 pages that they haven't done before.

30:29Popok:It's going to take them weeks of round the clock effort. And if I'm the judge, I start fining them a daily fine until they produce that redaction log. And he's someone who has shown himself willing to impose civil contempt in the past, the only person in the circuit, as he put it. And that passage that you read, Michael, you know, the Christmas is forthcoming. I remember that hearing he kept, you know, Judge Sullivan gave the government every opportunity and Mr. Block every opportunity to come up with a timeline, said, I'm willing to work with you. He said that again and again and again. And it's what you said, he is put in place, that Justice Department attorney is put in place to say as little as possible, not commit to anything.

31:20Popok:He's been manufactured in a laboratory in order not to be forthright to a judge. I don't know the answer. You know, he's this week's version of Drew Ensign. Remember Drew Ensign? They used to trot him out for all the immigration, migration, removal cases. Don't know where the plane is, Judge. Don't know who's on it. I don't know if there's children on that plane without due process. I'll have to make some phone calls, Judge. Purposely kept, this is mushrooms, kept in the dark and fed manure so that they can't answer questions posed to them by federal judges. And yes, I remember now that you were in that courtroom.

32:02Popok:We talked about it as soon as you walked out of that courtroom. Did you agree? Brendan Ballou made an observation to our audience when I did the interview. He said there were just these moments when Andrew Block would just stare down at the podium for like interminable periods It's a very uncomfortable silence for everybody in the room. Did you observe that? So that particular hearing was accessible remotely. I was listening in on a phone line. But I will say this. Every now and then, there have been many hearings like this. If Trump cares about the case, they send one of these people who, as you point out, who their job is to not know anything.

32:49That's what happened in the Kilmar Brigo Garcia immigration case. They put people who are government experts to come on the witness stand and disclose nothing. That happened in the Kennedy Center case. Whenever the judge presiding over that case wanted to get a straight answer from the government on a particular issue, there would be dancing around it. There was just a case in point issue with the Kennedy Center litigation. It was a certain thing where they were – oh, man, I'm just sort of blanking on it. There were so many. There were so many. There were so many. But with the Kennedy Center, I – oh, yes.

33:37It was what is the reason that September 8th was the magic date, that they imposed a deadline? What happens on September 8th? And the government lawyer couldn't give a straight answer. Why do they have to move ahead with that? As it turns out, it turned out that it was totally bogus that September 8th was a magic date because when the judge threatened to impose a temporary restraining order, if they didn't move it, lo and behold, it didn't have to happen on September 8th anymore. And they moved the deadline, the self-imposed deadline to October 8th. So, you know, it's a case in point of what you were saying, Michael.

34:17in the cases specifically that Trump cares about. If it's the Kennedy Center, if it's the Epstein files, if it's Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the job of whatever DOJ attorney, usually someone young and from main justice, who's, you know, thrown in there to, is usually thrown in there to say as little as possible, to know as little as possible, and to, you know, slow things down. gum up the works. Yeah.

34:51Popok:It reminds me of that old show on television, Hogan's Heroes, about the prisoners of war during World War II with Sergeant Schultz. I see nothing. I hear nothing. It's like the Sergeant Schultzes are being let in by the Department of Justice, and they just don't care. And that has been the biggest problem with this Department of Justice. They just don't care, and they are telling judges to go F themselves and pound sand in so many different ways. But I'm so pleased to have you here with us, Adam Klaasfeld of All Rise News, for those that are joining late. You're here on the Legal AF YouTube, or sorry, I forgot where I was, the Legal AF podcast.

35:30So many different ways to support what we do at the intersection of law and politics.

35:35Popok:One of them is right here, the podcast. You've got a QR code up there to download audio. You may be a viewer on YouTube, but we have it on audio, and the audio downloads are still one of the big drivers of ratings and keeping us ranked at the top and keeping our content coming to you uninterrupted. So think about becoming a download subscriber of our YouTube channel. You're on the Legal AF and Midas Touch channel, so come over to Legal AF and hit the subscribe button. We're 1.2 million strong. We have a sale going on on Legal AF YouTube and on Legal AF Substack for paid members, 50 % off until the end of Labor Day in honor of Labor Day.

36:18Popok:So become a Substack member, become a Legal AF YouTube member as well. I'll plug Adam Glassfeld, All Rise News, become a subscriber, keep him on the road and in those courtrooms and courthouses. And then we've got our pro-democracy sponsors. Some of them have been with us from the very, very beginning. And we're going to take a break for our sponsors now. Have you ever thought I should really be doing something to protect myself from stalkers, scammers, and hackers, but you're not sure what? Here's what to do. Go to www.joindeliteme.com slash legal AF and enter code legal AF. You'll get 20 % off Delete Me.

37:02Popok:Delete Me removes your personal information that's being sold online. Look, I have an active online presence, so privacy is really important to me. Knowing Delete Me does the hard work of removing my information from hundreds of data broker websites gives me real peace of mind. Take control of your data and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me. Now at a special discount for our listeners get 20 % off your Delete Me plan when you go to joindeliteme.com slash Legal AF and use promo code Legal AF at checkout. The only way to get 20 % off though is to go to www.joindeliteme.com slash Legal AF and enter code Legal AF at checkout.

37:45Popok:Can we talk about the most underrated organ in your body? Your liver. It's doing more than 500 functions every day, filtering unwanted elements, supporting digestion and helping with energy. So giving it daily support, it just makes sense. Dose for your liver is a clinically backed liver health supplement. This isn't just another capsule or powder. Dose is a liquid supplement taken in a daily two ounce shot and it tastes like fresh squeezed orange juice. Dose cleanses the liver of unwanted stressors that's slowing your liver down and promotes daily liver function so your liver can do its job. Zero sugar, zero junk, zero calories.

38:23Popok:Your liver is your body's filter, handling energy production, digestion, fat metabolism, and vitamin storage. When you drink Dose Daily, you're going to reduce sluggishness, get rid of those midday crashes, support your metabolism, and even aid your daily digestion. Plus, it's got real results with two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies showing its positive impact on liver enzyme levels. Ready to give your liver the support it deserves? Head to dosdaily.co.co.legalaf or enter Legal AF to get 35 % off your first subscription. Your body does so much for you. Let's do something for it. That's D-O-S-E-D-A-I-L-Y.co.legalaf for 35 % off your first month subscription.

39:12Popok:Welcome back. You're on Legal AF at the midweek. Michael Popak and sitting in for Karen Freeman, Ignifolo, Adam Klassfeld. We've got some breaking news hot off the presses. A federal judge in Maryland has blocked again as unconstitutional Donald Trump's latest executive order to try to revive his birthright citizenship original executive order that was thrown out by the United States Supreme Court saying that it is more likely than not. It is likely that the plaintiffs, which are the same plaintiffs that had brought the original case, Casa Incorporated, will prevail on proving that Donald Trump's 12 new categories of people who, even though their babies are born here, those babies are not going to be United States citizens, certainly does not comport with the ruling by the United States Supreme Court.

40:08Popok:Look, the United States Supreme Court made a very specific ruling. And it's said effectively, written by John Roberts, that there are small, narrow categories that were in place 100 years ago in the Wong Kim Ark case. And those are the narrow exceptions that we're going to be okay with and really no others. That's not what Donald Trump heard. What Donald Trump heard is I may be able to peel away a couple of votes because Kavanaugh did not agree that it was a constitutional right to birthright citizenship. He thought it was the citizenship statute and therefore Congress could change it. Oh, there's my opening.

40:55Popok:I'm going to make some changes. But that's not even him. And Kavanaugh was talking about Congress could create special exemptions to take away citizenship from a baby born in the United States, not the executive branch. So now why don't you talk about briefly what Judge Boardman, you know, we're getting it into our hands right now, but Judge Boardman apparently has ruled on preliminary injunction. Well, this is just breaking, as you said, Michael. But then so this is a paraphrase. But from what I just read of the ruling, Boardman said that it is almost certainly unconstitutional for the simple reason that the Supreme Court just decided the case in Barbara v.

41:34Trump. And so it doesn't get more clear than that. The Supreme Court just settled this, that this was a finding 5-4. It was way too close. It should not have been that close. It's 6-3 if you count Kavanaugh and the way that you just described, Michael, that Kavanaugh thought it was – that the constitutional right to birthright citizenship was only as strong as a law. Five thought it was as strong as the Constitution and the 14th Amendment citizenship clause. But either way, Kavanaugh was a partial dissent. And the ruling was that the 14th Amendment means what it says. And that's why Trump can't sneak around it with another executive order.

42:22And this is the same sort of tactic we saw with the tariffs ruling when Trump lost on tariffs. But it's even more egregious than that because with tariffs, the Supreme Court struck down the so-called Liberation Day tariffs under the IEPA, Emergency Economic Emergency Powers Act, and Trump tried other statutes. Here, it's even more egregious because the Constitution remains the Constitution. They didn't strike down the legal basis. So I think this was a very easy decision by the judge. Knowing this Trump Justice Department, they're almost certainly going to appeal it again. But because the composition of the court is exactly the same as it was, it's going to be shot down just as quickly.

43:16And it just this entire episode shows the real shamelessness of the Trump administration in trying to litigate dead issues.

43:28Popok:And Judge Boardman has done it before. There were half a dozen federal judges that universally ruled against him on birthright citizenship from coast to coast and everything in between. And now we're heading for another round tripper back to the United States Supreme Court. which part of the 14th Amendment is in the Constitution and you cannot by executive order change it. Did you not understand in our last decision? That's really where we're heading with the United States Supreme Court. And, you know, he's there are times when I think he's lost even John Roberts. Like, well, we can touch on the ballroom in a moment.

44:09Popok:And so I don't think they're going to be pleased with having to having to address this again. First, it's going to be the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals coming out of Maryland, which is a moderate to liberal appellate division. And I think John Roberts sits over that one. And then we're talking about, you know, when probably it took over a year to get the first birthright citizenship case up to the United States Supreme Court. So I don't think that this may be the next term. And we may be talking about at the end of next summer with all of these blocks in place in the meantime. But kudos to Judge Boardman from converting it to a TRO to a preliminary injunction and entering it as a class-wide, nationwide injunction, which he's entitled to do under these, I believe, under these circumstances.

44:59Popok:So that's some good news coming up from Judge Boardman. Why don't you give an update to our audience about what's going on with James Comey, and then we can turn to mail-in ballots. Well, James Comey just filed a stream of new reply briefs on all of his motions to dismiss the case. And the last time we spoke about this, Michael, we were talking about, well, which of these issues is going to kill this case first? Is it the fact that the government doesn't seem to know what a true threat is under First Amendment law? And I found that James Comey's latest legal filing was so on point with this. I'm going to read a passage from it where he says that even if 8647 could somehow mean kill President Trump, it still wouldn't constitute a threat.

45:51A call for others to commit violence can only be incitement, which the indictment does not charge. The government's attempt to prosecute an incitement case through a threats indictment violates settled law. So the government's theory of the case that Comey photographing seashells on a beach spelled out as 8647 means kill President Trump. And somehow people are going to look at that Instagram post and get so fired up. And that's incitement. One is absolutely ridiculous. But even if you accept that, they charge something different. They charge a true threat, meaning that James Comey himself was threatening Trump's life.

46:36So on First Amendment law, he thinks this is something that just can't stand up and shouldn't go to trial. There's another motion on vindictive prosecution and the vindictive prosecution motion, something that caught my eye. They point out that the Secret Service, when they investigated this after this happened, they said there's not really a case here. They filed it as non-referred. And they quote, and they say that the government doesn't dispute that this was legally a bad idea, that the Secret Service said that it was the post was a beachside venture and a political stand. But all of a sudden, Todd Blanche auditioning for the role of attorney general, this case gets revived, even though the Trump DOJ pushed it aside originally, even though the Secret Service said that this isn't something we're going to refer.

47:38It's a beachside venture. It's a political stand. So I think it's a bunch of very strong briefs to get to just nip it in the bud, get it before it goes anywhere near a jury, because this isn't a case that should see a jury.

47:56Popok:I like the comment in there in the briefing, too, about the difference between bottom up and top down prosecution. They said, who better to make those comparisons than the former director of the FBI and someone who was also a U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan. And what the contrast was, hey, for Jan 6th, like Jack Smith, when they did it, they started at the bottom. I was starting to break out into a Drake song. We started at the bottom, now we're here. And here, there was a lot of pushback by the Department of Justice's head at the time, Merrick Garland, about going after Donald Trump.

48:37Popok:Because that's one of the delays. He kept having to be convinced. They were willing to go after the lower level people, you know, who were trying to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power. You know, the fake electors and all that. But like Merrick Garland was not convinced until he was finally convinced about the evidence against the ringleaders up to the apex up to Donald Trump. And so that was a bottom up and led by line prosecutors and having to convince their their authority, their their supervisors in at main justice about it. This is the other way around. This is main justice ordering that the FBI and the Department of Justice prosecutors go after James Comey.

49:27And I've said because of Donald Trump take – what's the word I'm looking for?

49:33Popok:Hijacking his own Department of Justice and effectively serving as his own attorney general, which he said out loud, I am the chief law enforcement officer of – by no more chilling comments has ever been made by a former felon declaring that he's now the chief law enforcement officer. But he did that next to Pam Bondi at a now infamous press conference. And for him, there's such a collapse of the hierarchy. It's such a flat organization where if Donald Trump sneezes, Todd Blanche indicts or Pam Bondi does. So everybody who is a political critic or somebody that Donald Trump sees as the enemy can have the argument that they're being vindictively prosecuted by headquarters.

50:16Right. And part of the reason that they quoted that, the bottom up passage, was that they were actually quoting from the ruling that rejected Donald Trump's claims of vindictive and selective prosecution, where a federal judge, Judge Shutkin, pointed out that there was no indication that Biden ever publicly commented on the case, let alone interfered. And they're contrasting that with everything that happened with James Comey, where Trump is in a apparently failed DM posting on his true social that he wants Matt Bondi to pursue a prosecution. And that was the genesis of the first case. The first case fails.

51:02And he keeps going after Comey. That the entire the entire contrasting of the bottom up prosecution going after the low level January 6 rioters up to the top who inspired the insurrection. That was that was what made that passage so compelling because they're pointing out that when Trump was prosecuted, this is how it was handled. A federal judge heard all of the evidence of Trump's claims that this was a witch hunt, that this was some sort of political plot, and there was no indication. And here, there's this mountain of public record of Trump calling for his enemies to be prosecuted and his former defense attorney, Todd Blanche, saying, yes, sir.

51:55Exactly.

51:56Popok:And Don Lemon effectively doing the same thing in a parallel series of motions about his indictment for being a journalist and a critic, in Donald Trump's mind, of Donald Trump. Very similar, if you put the filings next to each other, very, very similar arguments being raised in both of them. I wanted to take another short break. So many great ways to support what we do here on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal AF. You can become a member of our Legal AF YouTube community, 1.2 million strong, by becoming a subscriber. It's all for free, 12 videos a day. Amazing contributors, including Adam Klassfeld.

52:47Popok:We also have Legal AF Substack help push us in to the top 10 for U.S. news. And I'm running a sale this weekend, 50 % off for new members to become paid members of Legal AF Substack. You're really going to like the content there as well. So those are two major ways. And then we've got our pro-democracy sponsors. And here's a word from them now. Violent threats against executives are growing at an alarming rate. When a company experiences backlash, executives are the first people blamed. When their address and other personal details are sitting online, this backlash can lead right to their front door.

53:25Popok:The team at Ironwall knows this better than anyone. They've protected some of the most targeted executives and individuals on the planet for almost two decades. as a white glove enterprise security service. They protect your people with continuous personal data removal, proactive prevention tools, and human-led emergency support. So when someone goes looking for your executives, Ironwall ensures they hit a dead end. So here's what to do. Go to ironwall.com slash legal AF, fill in the quick form, and request your free risk assessment. Their team will show you just how exposed your executives are and how to lock it down before a threat reaches their front door.

54:05Popok:That's ironwall.com slash legal AF. Learn how to stop online threats before they become real world attacks. The links are in the show notes. Do you snore? Did somebody hand you a CPAP and did you quietly stop using it? The mask that never quite seals, the hose tugging at you every time you roll over and a machine sitting abandoned in a closet. Packing it for a trip and then deciding it's not worth it. Excite OSA works a different way. It treats a root cause instead of managing the noise, and you use it while you are awake. In clinical studies, 90 % of patients saw a reduction in snoring. Thanks to today's sponsor, Spring Sleep.

54:46Popok:Excite OSA is an FDA-cleared prescription-only device for primary snoring and mild obstructive sleep apnea. Go to springsleep.com slash legal AF and unlock 20 % off with the code legal AF. Excite OSA is an FDA-cleared prescription-only device for primary snoring and mild obstructive sleep apnea. Not for everyone. Individual results vary. Risks and benefits at springsleep.com. Wrap it up with mail-in ballots, because as you know from your own comments on your channel and your work, the number one thing that people are concerned about right now as we head into less than 60 days before the midterms, It's a sacred right to vote and making sure the people that want to vote by mail-in ballots are able to and not have the post office play God about or, you know, a Roman emperor who lives and who dies, who gets the mail-in ballot.

55:44Popok:States determine under the Constitution who gets the mail-in ballot. The mail, the post office is supposed to be a ministerial process of delivering the mail, not saying, well, we won't deliver that mail that you've designated to be delivered unless you use a citizenship database that we just created just before lunch with all sorts of bugs and flaws in it. and you need to use a special envelope and a barcode. And if the barcode gets stuck in the reader, we're just going to reject delivering all tens of thousands and hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots. No, this is not okay. And this is in front of Judge Telwani.

56:25Popok:She has a couple of cases that have come together there, one brought by the states, the Democratic Attorneys General, and the other by public interest groups. And she has set herself up because there's another judge down in D.C., Judge Nichols has got a couple of cases that are similar, but she wants to go first. She's been blocking and blocking and temporary restraining and preliminary and next to hopefully tomorrow, preliminary injunction on the post office effing around with our mail in ballots, determining who gets a ballot or not. You know, if I'm waiting around, my state sends me a ballot.

56:56Popok:I don't want my post, my postal worker going, I don't know. I can't read. There's a typo in the name. Let's just throw that in the trash. Anybody out there ever had a typo or something in their ticket at the airport and try to get a boarding pass? Good luck. And this is even worse. So Judge Talwani's got a big hearing on Thursday. And now we got a whistleblower. Talk about the whistleblower and how that came forward through Senator Blumenthal and how it's now front and center in front of Judge Talwani. Well, it doesn't get more scorching than the language in this whistleblower report. I'm just going to read one passage from it that really highlights it.

57:35Potentially millions of American voters may not receive their mail-in ballot this election cycle in a timely manner or at all. Whistleblower's assessment and recitation of the facts around the risky and haphazard development of the project is a compelling warning of catastrophic failure, which could derail the midterm elections. And this is part of a much longer and even more excoriating whistleblower disclosure. I think the words, the phrase catastrophic failure appears at least three or more times during this report in terms of what this whistleblower is warning of. They're saying that if there's a mistake in one, you mentioned the typo problem, if there's a problem scanning one ballot in a batch of, say, 10 ,000, none of them go out.

58:32And so that's why they think millions of ballots might not reach their destination. And the whistleblower also says, and this is of great interest to Judge Tawani, or I expect it will be, the whistleblower says that this system, this IT system that they're creating on this rush timeline, was that there was work going on during the time that they were forbidden from doing any work. that while Taiwanese restraining orders and injunctions were in place. As a matter of fact, they quote the language of one of the restraining orders, and it couldn't be more clear that they are forbidden at USPS from taking, that they should, quote, take no further preparatory steps or implement in any way for elections occurring before or on November 3rd, 2026.

59:30This entire whistleblower disclosure is they were doing just that and they were violating the court's orders. And I can see why people who vote by mail would be very afraid after looking at this whistleblower report. I think that's going to be on Judge Talwani's mind when this comes to court on Thursday. And she's hearing that of the violations of her order and the fact that USPS is moving ahead with creating a system that risks, in the words of this whistleblower, catastrophic failure against the express terms of her order. Right.

1:00:13Popok:And so tomorrow's hearing, and we're moving at warp speed here, Adam. Right. I think she already has the bulk of her order already written. She's read the briefs. There have been such activity in the last two days on the docket for this case, 15 entries on the 31st, another 15 to 20 entries yesterday and a few more today. Everybody wants to get in on it. We have friends of the court who are trying to file briefs to guide the judge, most of them against the Postal Service order. She's let most of them in. I think she's got most of that order already written. Yes, she's going to hold an oral argument and get a couple of her questions answered.

1:00:54Popok:So I would not be shocked given how close we are to the midterms and her desire to get a final decision by the United States Supreme Court that could be helpful for the midterms. I think she's going to work overtime. We might see an order tomorrow night. I think Friday is realistic, Saturday at the latest. Then there's going to be the inevitable appeal. I mean, Trump already tried an appeal, but did it prematurely. They'll now appeal the preliminary injunction that she is 100 percent going to enter off of tomorrow. And that will go up to the First Circuit Court of Appeals sitting also in Boston.

1:01:35Popok:Then a emergency when he loses there and he will three zero or two one. Then an emergency Hail Mary into the United States Supreme Court. For those that are thinking, did the Supreme Court already rule on this? Sort of, but not really. Ten days ago, they ruled. I don't know why you, this is my artist rendering, I don't know why you're so excited, I don't know why you're in court right now. They haven't actually passed the rule yet. You may be injured, we don't know, time will tell. Come back when the rule passes, or the rule is finalized and published. Now, the rule had already been finalized 72 hours before, but they sort of ignored that, that stubborn little fact that the rule for the post office had already been published.

1:02:14Popok:And now quickly through Judge Talwani, these groups, the states and the public interest groups did a new complaint or a new amended complaint. And they said, Judge, the rule is out. It's unconstitutional what they're trying to do. And let's get on a fast track. This is about as fast as you're ever going to see a judge rule on something. So we could be at the Supreme Court with a filing by like Labor Day or the middle of next week, right? Absolutely. And I think you're right. I think that Judge Kalwani is going to act very, very quickly. It went to the First Circuit before, as you noted, and the First Circuit found against Trump.

1:02:57I don't think that this is a close call for anyone there. You know, we know that the Constitution is very explicit, that the President of the United States has no say in the administration of elections, that the Constitution vests the state legislatures, and in some instances, the Congress in the administration of elections. And so I think that her order is likely to look quite similar to all of her previous rulings to date. I think that the First Circuit is going to rule quickly, and I think that the Supreme Court is actually going to have to reach a decision on the merits this time. When the Supreme Court lifted one of the injunctions last time, they did so on ripeness grounds.

1:03:51They said it wasn't ready because the final rule wasn't published at the time. Well, now it's published. Now there isn't that fig leaf, and the Constitution is clear.

1:04:00Popok:I'd like to see the Supreme Court just start playing some hardball in the middle and on the left. Like Ketanji Brown Jackson is the justice for the First Circuit. The emergency application will go to her first. I don't want, here's what I don't want to see. I'm sorry to Justice Jackson. I don't want to see the emergency petition was submitted to Justice Jackson and referred to the entire court for a decision. No, she should deny the emergency application for stay, right, based on the First Circuit, And then let them let the let let the Trump administration try to lob in as they've had in the past to try to get somebody and try to get the four votes that they need to pull up the petition.

1:04:51Popok:But don't do it. I mean, the niceties of, well, you know, such a big issue. We should let the entire court decide F that go back to the old days. One justice makes the decision. And if you don't like it, tough, tough. you know what, and go write a letter and see if you can get four justices. We've got to stop with the niceties at the United States Supreme Court. This is why people like James Clyburn, the South Carolina senator, has come out and said, no, I'm not. Senator, House member, right, Clyburn? Yes. Yeah, Senator, House member. Yeah, he said, yeah, it's time for a baker's dozen. It's time to pack the court with more people on the Supreme Court.

1:05:37Popok:We got to stop with this. I mean, she should use her power to block this and let them deal with it afterwards. Right. You know, if there's any justice that would do that, I think that it's Justice Jackson. She was there with an excoriating dissent the first time. She's one of the ones who kind of forgoes the niceties when the occasion calls for it. And the, you know, entire constitutional order is at stake. Her dissent in the birthright citizenship case was as fiery as it gets. She was the one who wrote a separate dissent when it came to this particular mail-in ballots executive order. And because those are the stakes, this is Donald Trump, someone who has tried to subvert an election in 2020, doing something with elections just months before the midterms that has never been attempted by an American president to turn, as you put it, Michael, a ministerial service, the delivery of the mail into something that could be weaponized by the government for perceived political gains.

1:06:54Now, it might be a political miscalculation. There are lots of people who vote in rural areas that tend to vote Republican and vote by mail. And there's new reporting from the New York Times that some of those post offices can't handle the demands of what's happening. And all of those people might be disenfranchised. But either way, on the core constitutional issue, and you set politics aside, here's a U.S. president months before a midterm that by all accounts he is losing and losing badly trying to make sweeping changes that can disenfranchise millions. Tossing the usual niceties to address that threat within a Supreme Court justice's constitutional power does seem to be the order of the day.

1:07:49Popok:Yeah, I totally agree with you. And thanks for being here and bringing, you know, your seeing things through your lens and how you follow things and your unique commentary. So many different ways to support what we do here on Legal AF. One of them is to become a subscriber on Midas Touch and on Legal AF YouTube channel, 1.2 million strong. We, it's a free to subscribe, but it does help us immensely. The bigger we are, the more your voice is heard. Legal AF Substack, where we post the pleadings and filings and orders like birthright citizenship and everything else. I do a live report every day.

1:08:37Popok:Sometimes Adam Classfield joins me and other people join me. It's a second great way. You can download the audio of this podcast, become a subscriber there. that is very, very helpful as is five-star reviews. These are all the different ways. They're all for free on how to support what we do. If you want to go further and become a paid member of our Legal AF Substack, I am running a Labor Day sale, 50 % off for new members. Comes out to, I don't know, like cents a day. I think it's four cents a day or something like that. But it is very, very helpful over on Legal AF Substack. And then of course we got Adam Klassfeld joining us and you should follow everything that Adam Klassfeld does on All Rise News.

1:09:20Popok:He does his video work with us on Legal AF YouTube channel. Then he's got his sub stack, a very hot sub stack that you're going to want to follow as well. Adam, thanks for being with us here. And I look forward to all of your work and getting together on our sub stacks. Thank you, Michael. Always enjoy our discussions, and I'm looking forward to the next time. And to our listeners, shout out to the Midas Mighty and the Legal AFers.

1:10:14We'll be right back. The crown is yours.

1:10:45Transcription by CastingWords