In short
Legal AF discusses (1) the release of “Epstein files” and a recent transcript involving Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging a coordinated effort to rehabilitate her ahead of a potential pardon, and (2) broader claims of vindictive prosecution and procedural retaliation in immigration/human-smuggling cases, plus (3) Alina Habba’s refusal to leave office in New Jersey and how it allegedly disrupts court operations.
Guests
No named guests appear in the provided transcript excerpt. The host repeatedly references other people (e.g., “Adam Klassfeld,” “Ben,” “Ron Filipkowski,” “Sean Hecker,” “Alina Habba”), but they are discussed rather than introduced as guests.
Guest backgrounds (mentioned)
Adam Klassfeld is described as having been in court for Maxwell’s testimony. Ron Filipkowski is described as editor-in-chief of Legal AF. Sean Hecker is described as filing a vindictive prosecution motion. Alina Habba is described as a Trump-linked attorney.
Key claims
Maxwell’s transcript is portrayed as scripted, with leading questions and DOJ “benefits” tied to her cooperation; most released Epstein documents are said to be recycled court records. The episode alleges Maxwell’s transfer to minimum security and alleged prison management reflect preferential treatment. It also claims Trump-era prosecutors pursue vindictive prosecution in Abrego Garcia’s case (human smuggling vs trafficking) and that Habba’s continued presence affects New Jersey cases.
Notable examples
Maxwell denying “lists/black books,” claiming Trump was “cordial,” and disputing victim testimony (e.g., “Jane” age). The episode cites Maxwell’s alleged movement from Tallahassee to Camp Bryan, Texas. It references Abrego Garcia’s alleged transfer to Uganda and ongoing motions to dismiss. It cites Habba’s sanctions/fines and losses in Trump-related litigation (including E. Jean Carroll matters).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOGhislaine Maxwell's Legal Maneuvers
0:31 to 1:40
Discussion on Ghislaine Maxwell's attempts to lessen her sentence.
“And so we finally, we've been asking for the Epstein files, said release the Epstein files.”
Document Dump and Public Perception
1:41 to 3:00
Analysis of the Epstein files release and its implications.
“John Bolton tried to make that the story and saying, John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor, was hiding classified documents.”
Ghislaine's Minimum Security Facility
3:01 to 4:20
Details about Maxwell's relocation and prison dynamics.
“Here's some of the audio we've got from this ridiculous interview where Ghislaine Maxwell says, as far as I'm concerned, Donald Trump is always a very cordial, very cordial man, very cordial.”
Maxwell's Interview Insights
4:21 to 5:40
Review of Ghislaine Maxwell's statements about Trump and Epstein.
“I never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.”
Denials and Defense Strategies
5:41 to 7:40
Maxwell's remarks on her relationship with Epstein and allegations.
“Epstein, and even in the 2000s when you were around less frequently, you never observed or you never saw any sort of list or black book or a list of individuals who linked to certain masseuses or anything like that?”
Timing of Transcript Release
7:41 to 9:10
Examining the strategy behind the release of interview transcripts.
“They're trying to step on the fact that the oversight committee is about to release and has started to release documents.”
Controversial Claims in the Interview
9:11 to 12:00
Discussion of Maxwell's claims about her and Epstein's actions.
“And I always think it's ironic that when we do stories about her, we always throw that photo up of her.”
Choreographed Rehabilitation
12:01 to 14:01
Analysis of the narrative crafted by Maxwell's legal team.
“Because when he got the wrong scripted response, he then moved her back to the script.”
Ghislaine Maxwell's Testimony Analysis
14:01 to 25:07
An in-depth analysis of Ghislaine Maxwell's testimony and its implications.
“She could have, I mean, I doubt the jury would have believed her, but in her telling, she is the victim.”
Ghislaine Maxwell's Testimony Analysis
25:17 to 26:19
An in-depth analysis of Ghislaine Maxwell's testimony and its implications.
“We'll be right back with more when we come back.”
Show all 32 chapters
Abrego Garcia's Background and Legal Struggles
28:32 to 29:18
An overview of Abrego Garcia's life, legal status, and challenges faced during his detention.
“The federal judge in Tennessee said he should be released.”
Charges Against Abrego Garcia
29:19 to 30:38
A review of the charges against Garcia, including human trafficking allegations and their implications.
“The Trump regime accidentally, you know, or as part of their initial sweep of migrants, sends him to the concentration camp in El Salvador.”
The Emotional Reunion
30:39 to 31:30
Details of Abrego Garcia's emotional reunion with his family after his release.
“There was a hearing about whether he should be held or not held.”
Government's Treatment of Abrego Garcia
31:31 to 32:50
Discussion on the government's actions towards Garcia, including the proposed deportation to Uganda.
“It's this incredible moment after he's He's been like literally tortured by the government, Nazi style, tortured by the government and see caught and harassed and all these things.”
Legal Analysis of Vindictive Prosecution
32:51 to 36:06
Analysis of the legal grounds for vindictive prosecution in Garcia's case and its broader implications.
“And don't just talk about that one, but the vindictive prosecution motions now that are being filed in courts across the country.”
Recent Developments in Garcia's Case
36:07 to 37:16
Discussion of the latest developments in Abrego Garcia's case and his upcoming court appearances.
“So they had to file a supplemental evidence to their motion just yesterday in which they said, okay, we got a call after Judge Holmes because I have to add another piece here.”
Government's Retaliation and Proposed Deals
37:17 to 39:46
Examination of the government's retaliatory tactics and proposed deals offered to Garcia.
“then tortured upon arrival in El Salvador by a proxy of America.”
Reflections on Resistance to Oppression
39:47 to 42:01
Discussion on the broader implications of standing up against oppressive regimes, including personal anecdotes.
“So, according to the papers, the retaliation vindictiveness campaign continued.”
The Relentless Nature of Power and Resistance
42:01 to 43:50
Discussion on the oppressive nature of the Trump regime and the importance of standing together against it.
“No, you know, fascism, these people are relentless because they're sociopaths.”
Alina Habba's Controversial Tenure
43:50 to 44:59
Analysis of Alina Habba's refusal to leave her position and its implications on legal cases in New Jersey.
“But more significantly, how her refusal to leave is now impacting all of the cases in New Jersey because she's a rogue, unlawful United States attorney.”
Alina Habba's Controversial Tenure
45:38 to 47:36
Analysis of Alina Habba's refusal to leave her position and its implications on legal cases in New Jersey.
“Did you know four companies control over 80 % of the U.S.”
The Dilemma of Legitimacy in Law
47:55 to 49:52
Discussion on the challenges lawyers face in maintaining legitimacy within the current political climate.
“When you're a lawyer, Popak, and you've been interviewed, have you ever had to say, I'm a legitimate lawyer?”
Alina Habba's Legal Struggles
49:52 to 55:51
In-depth look at Alina Habba's failures and controversies as a lawyer under Trump.
“But Popak, talk to us about this ruling that came from a judge from Pennsylvania sitting in designation.”
Legal Proceedings Against Alina Habba
56:00 to 1:00:00
Discussion about the motion to disqualify Alina Habba and the judges' rulings.
“Gerard, in which he filed a motion to disqualify Alina Habba.”
Judicial Chaos in the U.S. Attorney's Office
1:00:00 to 1:04:00
Examination of the implications and chaos following the disqualification of Alina Habba.
“got quoted this week as reminding everybody that he is the chief law enforcement officer because, you know, about the raid, you know, the raid, the raid of John Bolton.”
Fraudulent Practices by Donald Trump
1:04:00 to 1:08:00
Analysis of the findings against Donald Trump regarding persistent fraud.
“That's what we're talking about that Alina Haba actually was involved with.”
Court Decisions and Legal Ramifications
1:08:00 to 1:10:01
Overview of court decisions regarding the fraud case and implications for Trump.
“well, but for the purposes of an appeal, we'll certify fraud.”
Understanding Trump's Legal Challenges
1:10:01 to 1:11:00
Explore the complexities of Donald Trump's ongoing legal battles and appeals.
“against excessive fines under the Constitution.”
Supreme Court's Controversial Funding Rulings
1:11:01 to 1:13:28
Delve into the Supreme Court's rulings affecting funding and grants related to medical research.
“And then if you can, Popak, NIH decision.”
Justice Jackson's Dissent and Corruption Claims
1:13:29 to 1:15:55
Discuss Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent highlighting the perceived corruption within the Supreme Court.
“This is what happens when you are a Supreme Court that's reverse engineering to reach a conclusion to help the Trump administration.”
Audience Engagement and Call to Action
1:15:56 to 1:16:43
Encourage audience involvement and share how they can seek legal assistance.
“This is not a moment where you can mince words.”
Audience Engagement and Call to Action
1:16:46 to 1:17:35
Encourage audience involvement and share how they can seek legal assistance.
“A real live human being picks up the call and will ask you about what your case is.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills, but it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. So how do you buy your way out of a maximum security facility after you have been convicted of sex trafficking and sentenced for over 20 years, essentially the rest of your life?
0:42Well, if your name is Ghislaine Maxwell and you were one of Donald Trump's best friends for about two and a half to three decades, you approach the Department of Justice and you say, Donald Trump, I barely knew him, but when I knew him, he was a great guy, very cordial, very nice, always respectful, nothing to see here, folks. And so we finally, we've been asking for the Epstein files, said release the Epstein files. The Department of Justice is like, you want us to release Ghislaine? No, no, no, don't release Ghislaine. Release the Epstein files. And so what they did, Michael Popak, and we'll discuss it, they did a document dump of like tens of thousands of Epstein files.
1:26But what we're learning is 98 % of it is just the old recycled court files, nothing new at all. And then in the new stuff, the 2%, it's nothing of substance at all. We'll talk about that. But then what do you do the same day? Well, you raid your former national security advisor's home. John Bolton tried to make that the story and saying, John Bolton, Trump's former national security advisor, was hiding classified documents. Focus on this, everybody. And then at the same time as part of the coordinated plan, you release the transcript of that interview between Donald Trump's former criminal defense attorney, Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell, that happened like a month ago or so in Tallahassee, which shortly after that took place, seemed that Ghislaine understood the assignment, she was moved from a maximum security facility in Tallahassee to a minimum security facility in Camp Bryan, Texas.
2:24Not only that, she now owns this prison in Camp Bryan, Texas. If you're there, minimum security prisoner, you're there, you're serving a short sentence, and you speak negatively about her like one lady did to the press, You get kicked out and guess where you go? Where Ghislaine was. They're kicking out the minimum security inmates who talk negative about Ghislaine and they're putting them where the sex traffickers go while they bring the sex traffickers into or they bring Ghislaine into the minimum security facility. So Michael Popak, this is how you earn your spot into a minimum security facility and probably a pardon right here.
3:02Here's some of the audio we've got from this ridiculous interview where Ghislaine Maxwell says, as far as I'm concerned, Donald Trump is always a very cordial, very cordial man, very cordial. Here, play this clip. What did you observe as far as President Trump and his relationship with you or Mr. Epstein? Well, I just want to say for my relationship with President Trump, relationship's a big word, but I just want to say that I met him or I believe I may have because of my father in the 90s and as far as i'm concerned um president trump was always very cordial and very kind to me and i just want to say that i find i admire his extraordinary achievement in becoming the president now and i like him and i've always liked him so that is the sum substance of my entire relationship with him i'm mary pop i'm mary poppins i barely knew him when And I've seen him.
4:01I would not say, I would, Popak, I would not say that there was a relationship at all. There was just more of like a little, we would show up. We would have tea. Let me just show you a few more of these clips. Before you go on, I just want to say something. I just want to, I've never heard you do. It's a combination of Rupric from Dirty Rotten Scoundrels and Ricky Gervais. It's perfect. It's pitch perfect, that accent. Mrs. Doubtfire is more of a reason. Mrs. Doubtfire. Here's Ghislaine Maxwell. think oh he was never inappropriate with anybody he's just a gentleman i'm going let me be the more character reference for him i'm a convicted she's a convicted sex trafficker um i want to break the role there for a second i'm going to break the fourth wall here play this clip i don't recall ever seeing him in his house for instance i actually never saw the president in any type of the massage setting.
4:55I never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way. The president was never inappropriate with anybody. In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects. Gentlemen in all respects. Were you ever told that Epstein was getting any money from any intelligence agencies like the Mossad? Were you ever told, you ever think that Mr. Epstein was getting any money from any intelligence agency, including Mossad? I don't believe so, but I wouldn't know. I mean, I would be very surprised if he did. I don't think so. No. But about the list? Is there an Epstein list? Is there a black book?
5:34Is there a call log? Anything like that, Ghislaine? During the time that you were with Mr. Epstein, and even in the 2000s when you were around less frequently, you never observed or you never saw any sort of list or black book or a list of individuals who linked to certain masseuses or anything like that? Absolutely no. There is no list. First off, the way the question was posed to you, You never, ever saw anything. Did you never see anything, Ghislaine? You've never seen? No, I've never seen such a thing. And then the one other thing, and I'll just toss it to you and give you the biggest softball of, I think, our time together to let it rip.
6:26She also says in the interview that Epstein was actually not a pervert, not creepy. She goes, the reason that he liked the younger girls, always age appropriate, she said, though. The reason that he liked the younger women is because they helped him with musical selections, Popak. You know, it kept him young so he could find out what the younger generation was listening to in terms of music. It was pre-Spotify. It was pre-iPad. It was, you know, just one, that's what they were doing. When Donald Trump and Epstein invited 30 girls of indeterminate age to Mar-a-Lago together and said that there was going to be modeling VIP agencies there, what they were really doing, Popak, because we're not the stupidest people ever.
7:11What they were really doing is they were just making mixtapes of Vanilla Ice and MC Hammer. That's what they were doing in the early 90s. Popak, come on, man. Come on. So everybody woke up this morning to a exquisitely, exquisitely timed dump of the 300 pages of this transcript. Let me remind everybody, this interview was three weeks ago. They've had the transcripts the night of the interviews. So they've had them for three weeks. So why now? And it's exactly what, Ben, what you let off with is they're trying to step on various stories, right? They're trying to step on the fact that the oversight committee is about to release and has started to release documents.
7:51They did it on a Friday night when nobody was looking except for Legal AF and the Midas Dutch network. And we jumped on a story within an hour of their arrival. You and I know how to read deposition transcripts, especially mini scripts, pretty quickly. And we got to the heart of it very, very quickly. And so the timing of it is all based on, as you said, let's do a raid of John Bolton, because I've been trying to pay him back since 2020 when he wrote a book called In the Room Where It Happens. And I didn't like that. And he got me that time. But I'm going to get him this time. And they must have a giant electronic board.
8:28I'm serious. At the White House. About bad events that they know and news stories and news cycles that they want to step on. and then things they have on the shelf that they can use to block or divert or to use a smokescreen. I'm telling you, they got it lined up. You know, the way we do programming on Legal Life and YouTube and on Midas Dutch, like which video should we put up next? They have, okay, what do we got? Oh, no, no, we don't need Epstein yet. Not the Ghislaine Maxwell transcripts. No, no, we'll save that for some other really big time. And then they drop it. But then it did not help them.
9:01It only helped them if they believe that the American people, which they do, are stupid and are not going to put things in the proper context. I mean, if you were just to read the transcript, not knowing anything about it. And I always think it's ironic that when we do stories about her, we always throw that photo up of her. That's her most wanted poster of when she was on the run and we were looking for Ghislaine Maxwell. And we had to find her after the fifth safe house that she went to. That picture with her canoodling with Epstein, the other child sex trafficker, that's where that comes from.
9:36So, but if you just read it, she not only denies her involvement in a child sex trafficking ring that had sex abuse at the heart of it, that she was convicted of, 12-0, beyond a reasonable doubt, that even she doesn't think she didn't get a fair trial because that's not the nature of her appeal. She was convicted of this, including sex abuse. I just did a live on Substack for Legal AF with Adam Klassfeld. All Rise News is with us now on Legal AF. And he was in the courtroom for every day of the testimony. And he gave the testimony of Jane and a number of other people that put her in sex abuse evidence on the witness stand.
10:22But if you just read it, Epstein was a normal guy that got five to seven massages a day, not a week, a day, for which she was paid$35 million over the course of just a couple of years, in which he was not weird until he started, this is her testimony, until he started to take testosterone. testosterone. And then he got a little bit weird. And there were photos around of naked or scantily clad young girls, including in his bedroom. But she didn't think anything of it. And she only recruited women, not girls, from legitimate spas and massage parlors in West Palm Beach. There aren't that many, by the way, in West Palm Beach.
11:11And she never recruited from Mar-a-Lago. So she completely exonerates Epstein. She says there was no child sex trafficking. She was not a part of any child sex trafficking. At best, she was his mistress girlfriend who got cheated on. But then she slips up because in the second day, she says out loud about Jane, who was an anonymized victim who testified, one of several who testified at the trial. She said, oh, and that person is completely false. I'm so glad you asked me. Completely false testimony. And she said, well, Blanche, how is it false? She said, she wasn't 14. She might've been 16. I was like, stop.
11:53So he raped a 16 year old instead of a 14 year old. Well, in my country, 16. And then Blanche cuts her off. Well, let's not go there. Right. Because when he got the wrong scripted response, he then moved her back to the script. Because this was all scripted. This was all choreographed. When we show a transcript like we just did as practicing lawyers, or at least me, as people that have been in court, and you see a paragraph or two question, that is called a leading question where you just want to not signal, you're telling the person exactly the answer that you want. And when she deviated from that with Todd Blanche, who was not acting as a prosecutor, but was acting as a defense lawyer for Donald Trump, which is what he is at base, right?
12:40He never challenged her because he can't challenge her. He had no desire to challenge her about anything. And he used the phrases and the terminology of a defense lawyer. I know because I am one. Allegations. They're not allegations against her and Epstein. It's certainly not against her. They are facts that were proven in a court of law beyond the reasonable doubt. We're beyond allegations, Todd. We're into, you're talking to a convicted child sex abuser and trafficker proven in a court of law by the Department of Justice. And so we knew we were in trouble from the very beginning when he started off with in the questioning, were you ever interviewed by the FBI?
13:22No, I never got to tell my story. I go, oh, here we go. There's a reason the FBI never talked to her. There's a reason she wasn't quote unquote interviewed. It's because she was on the run. That's one. They didn't need her. She was a target of the investigation, not a witness. And they had enough evidence, obviously, to convict her at trial. They didn't have a hole in the evidence that needed to be filled by the testimony of Maxwell in the Epstein matter. And Epstein died. So they didn't need to ever talk to her. They had their airtight case against her. So she's like, thank you for giving me the opportunity to finally tell my story.
13:59She had an opportunity. She passed on it with the Fifth Amendment at trial. She could have, I mean, I doubt the jury would have believed her, but in her telling, she is the victim. What we were watching is the choreographed rehabilitation campaign of Ghislaine Maxwell, which was coordinated by her lawyer, David Oscar Marcus, who's a good friend with Todd Blanche. And before they even got in the room, Todd Blanche knew exactly the answers he was gonna get. And she knew the questions that she was going to get because that's the nature of an attorney proffer. And that I am sure, betting dollars to donuts that David Oscar Marcus said, hypothetically, when you interview my, he's American, I don't know why I'm doing an English accent.
14:46When you interview my client, this is what she is going to say. She's going to exonerate Donald Trump. She's going to tell you this about the leather bound birthday book, which is at the heart of your defamation case with the Wall Street Journal. She's going to say this about Prince Prince Edward. She's going to say that. Sorry, Prince Andrew. She's going to say this. This he knew going in. So he crafted his questions to get to the five point checklist that he had. And his goal was rehabilitate her so that she has renewed credibility to vouch for Donald Trump, because she's a convicted child sex trafficker.
15:23Have I mentioned that? Vouching for Donald Trump and then rehabilitate her in the eyes of the public so that when Donald Trump pardons her, that's all we're watching is slow motion pardon. He can say, well, I've seen the 300 pages. There's good people on both sides of this child sex trafficking. And she's one of them. And it's a confusing case. She says she's innocent. And I believe her. She said nice things about me. And she's got the Supreme Court case that's up there. So pardon. That is what we are watching. and the more you read the transcript and it's up on Legal AF Substack for everybody to read, the more you will come away with the conclusion that she would say anything to save her ass.
16:07And the other reason, by the way, they didn't talk to her and the FBI didn't talk to her is because they had her up on perjury charges. They dropped them at the time of the trial, but they had her up on perjury charges because they believe she lied in the civil cases brought by the victims. And the other thing I'll leave it on this, Ben, that was so twisted and so depraved, I literally had to take a shower after I read these transcripts, is how much time she spent bashing the victims, including Virginia Joffrey, in which she said, this is the part that got me. Virginia Joffrey is not here to defend herself because she took her own life in April.
16:44That's how devastated and traumatized she was by being this public victim at 17 of Epstein. And I think she was 40 when she took her own life. She said, oh, and Virginia Joffrey, you know, and they redacted it, but they left in enough names that you knew it was her. She basically portrayed her as a prostitute who had the talents to seduce men that was taught to her by, that she put in the name of the person, and basically that Epstein was the victim of Virginia Joffrey. Okay. In her biography, she says she was sex trafficked by this one guy. Okay. That she was abused and sex trafficked by him.
17:34I don't think she's the Lolita chasing after Epstein. And then on Jane, who, according to Adam, who was in the courtroom for the testimony, was probably the thing that put the jury over the top. It was so compelling about meeting Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at 14 at a camp in Michigan. And that started the grooming and the predator behavior by Epstein. He finally, according to her, raped her at 14 and 15, to which Ghislaine Maxwell said it was 16. as to Joffrey, which doesn't help, as to Joffrey and Prince Andrew, she says, oh, I have a defense for him too. It couldn't possibly have happened.
18:17And Todd Blanchett said, why? Knowing the answer already. Oh, because my bathroom that she says it happened in was too small after a remodeling. I'm like, this is where I literally had to get up and go for a walk and come back and do the reading. But this is what, when you have a depraved, immoral president who's been a judge to sex abuser, who has women who have testified under oath about him sexually abusing them, more than just one. When you have that in office, you are going to get a Todd Blanche's criminal defense lawyer doing this fabricated display in order to bail out the boss. I want to know how many times Todd Blanche and David Oscar Marcus, the lawyer for Ghislaine, spoke to each other before that meeting.
19:08That's what I would ask next time Todd Blanche comes before Congress. I'd want to know where those conversations took place, by phone, by cell phone, in person, how many times, by email. What I believe likely happened is they probably met somewhere in person or at a social gathering where they knew they would be together, and then they had a conversation where they pulled each other aside. That's generally how things like that would go down, but that's what I'd want to ask. Our editor-in-chief Ron Filipkowski wrote the following. The issue isn't that Maxwell lied throughout her entire proffer.
19:42She's been lying, deceiving, manipulating people her entire life. I mean, she is a despicable, vile human being. I expect it from her. The issue is that the United States Department of Justice gave her very tangible benefits already for those lies with more to come. There's a point in the transcript where she says certain things about Donald Trump. And then there's a break. Todd Blanche says, let's go on a break. If I was a betting person at that moment, Todd Blanche called Donald Trump and said, we're good. And then David Oscar, Marcus and Blanche probably talk sometime right in that lunch break as well.
20:26She's doing good. Keep it up and we'll be great. 1 ,000%. And for our audience, that doesn't happen in a normal deposition, but it certainly happened here. The rules, the normal rules of courtroom procedure were non-existent. We were operating in another planet with another environment and another gravitational pull. I am sure at breaks, they were talking to each other on both sides. They were feeding each other answers and questions. You saw her lawyer jump in and answer a number of questions. And whenever Blanche, because he was there with his goals, right? He was an exonerate Donald Trump. That was about a page and a half out of 300 pages.
21:07And the hundred names of people that we were like, oh, is that the list? No, they were just people that were in business with Epstein. She basically exonerated everybody. Nobody had sex with Epstein because there was no illicit sex to be had. There was no blackmail. And then he had to go down the maggot rabbit trail of Mossad. Was he in the Mossad? No. Good. Got that one. What about the what about the album the birthday album well i made it but i can't remember any pages in it okay that's a that's a push okay let's keep going uh let's go back to let's go back to donald trump and the sex you know and then clinton got exonerated so that was good at least one thing good came out of this here's at the end of the day here's what we want but the reality is that i don't if clinton's in there let it be if who's ever in there let it be i could care less who just release the files.
21:57Okay. It's very, very simple. If people are in there, they're in there. The public can be able to discern if your name is in there simply because you lived in Palm Springs and he happened to know you once versus being long-term friends like he was with Donald Trump. And the thing I want everybody to remember about this is exactly what you said. She had a trial. She could have testified at said trial. She was convicted by a jury. The prosecutors from that trial have been fired. Those were the people who would almost always, not always, not almost, always be at a meeting like that before any immunity discussion was given.
22:44You would never give someone like Ghislaine immunity after the trial. And it's not an insignificant point because Ghislaine is arguing that some of these charges, or all of them, need to be dismissed by the Supreme Court because of a non-prosecution agreement. The statute of limitations on sex trafficking have no statute of limitations, really. So by giving her immunity for talking about these things. She's arguing that as Epstein's co-conspirator, she should be entitled to the benefits of a non-prosecution agreement that he entered with Trump's former labor secretary, who was the United States attorney at the time.
23:28But what if there was now facts that showed that she wasn't just a co-conspirator, but she was actually directly someone who was involved in X, Y, and Z conduct? Well, now you're giving her immunity so you can't charge her. So you basically, the Trump regime right now just did a better sweetheart deal with her than Epstein got in 2007, and it happened in plain view. This whole thing is gross. It's dangerous. But Donald Trump's a sexual predator. He's a criminal. He's a felon separately based on fraud. So he was found civilly liable for sexual assault. So for someone who is a sexual predator like Donald Trump, someone who engages in criminal conduct when it comes to business-related dealings, like he was found liable on 34 felony counts in New York.
24:16This is how they behave. It's not a shot. Oh my God, the gangster's acting like a gangster? Really? Of course he's a gangster. That's what he does. He's a bad guy. Bad guy's bad. We'll be right back. I want to talk about more. Reminder, Michael Popak's law firm, you all wanted him to start the Popak Law Firm. So if you have any case auto accident, trucking accident. If you are the victim of an accident and you've suffered serious injuries, call the Popak firm. The consultation is free. If you're a victim of sexual assault, sexual harassment, medical malpractice, negligence, if you know people who have been injured as well or victims of wrongful death, reach out to the Popak firm right now.
25:01Throw that graphic up one more time there just so everybody can see it one more time. Reach out to the Popak firm, 877-POPOC-AF or go to thepopocfirm.com. 877-POPOC-AF or go to thepopocfirm.com. Also a reminder, subscribe to Michael Popoc's YouTube channel, Legal AF, and subscribe to his sub stack, the Legal AF sub stack. Let's take a quick break. We'll be right back with more when we come back. You know, as much time as I spend prepping, reading, and recording for Legal AF, I didn't realize how much sitting all day was dragging me down physically and mentally. By the end of the day, I felt stiff, foggy, and worn out.
25:39That's why I started using this episode's sponsor, Uplift Desk. Total game changer. It's not just about standing. It's about moving more, improving posture, and keeping my energy up throughout the day. I'm sharper, more focused, and honestly happier at my desk. Uplift Desk builds premium ergonomic furniture designed to keep you moving, feeling good, and doing your best work. You can customize your setup with over 200 ,000 desk combinations to fit your style and workflow. My personal favorite, their wire management system. No more tangled cords, just clean, focused space. Your workday doesn't have to leave you feeling worn out.
26:19Go to upliftdesk.com slash legal AF and use our code legal AF to get four free accessories, free same-day shipping, free returns, and an industry-leading 15-year warranty that covers your entire desk, plus an extra discount off your entire order. That's UPLIFTDESK.com slash Legal AF for this exclusive offer only available through our link. Summer is still here. You know what that means. Long days, vacation planning, staying hydrated, making sure your sunscreen game is strong, all the little things that let you enjoy a carefree season. But to really get the most out of life, you also have to be prepared in ways most people don't think about it.
27:01A will alone doesn't cover everything when it comes to estate planning. That's where Trust and Will comes in. They help make sure your loved ones are covered for important decisions, medical care, power of attorney, and more. Go to trustandwill.com slash legal AF to get 20 % off their simple, secure, and expert-backed estate planning services. I recently had a big life change, you know, the birth of my daughter, and it made me think seriously about my estate planning. Using trust and will was surprisingly simple. The website is easy to navigate and the whole process was straightforward. There's nothing better than the peace of mind knowing your assets and wishes are secure.
27:37For me, being able to clearly outline care wishes and power of attorney was a huge relief. Estate planning can feel overwhelming, but trust and will makes it easy. Every will or trust is state-specific, legally valid, and customized to your needs. Your documents are stored securely with bank level encryption and thousands of families trust their service every day. Plus they have excellent trust pilot ratings, thousands of five-star reviews. We can't control everything, but Trust and Will can help you take control of protecting your family's future. Go to trustandwill.com slash legal AF for 20 % off.
28:12That's 20 % off at trustandwill.com slash legal AF. Welcome back to Legal AF. Great ad reads there, Michael Popok. The discount codes are in the description below. So Abrego Garcia gets released, which is the good news. He gets released after his great legal team continued to push forward. The federal judge in Tennessee said he should be released. The federal judge in Maryland said he should be released. Everybody remembers the Abrego Garcia story, right? He was in Maryland. He's got three kids. His wife's American. He was here with legal status. He would check in. He could have, if the government wanted to deport him to any place other than El Salvador, they could have done that based on the way his immigration order was structured.
Read the full transcript
29:10But he'd be allowed, he was viewed as a nonviolent guy, a hard worker. He's part of a union in Maryland. So he would just check in with, you know, the the Border Patrol, check in with Homeland Security once a year or whatever it was. Let him know I'm OK. Here I am. They let him go. All right. Go back to work. You're a productive member of society. The Trump regime accidentally, you know, or as part of their initial sweep of migrants, sends him to the concentration camp in El Salvador. door. He was ordered to be returned by the Supreme Court. The Trump regime said there's no way that could happen.
29:47Everybody, all the lawyers are about to basically be held in criminal contempt. They fly him back. They arrest him in Tennessee for human trafficking and smuggling. Just go think about our prior segment that we did where a actual convicted sex trafficker is getting all of these benefits. But they charged the Brago not with sex trafficking, but human trafficking, that he was driving a vehicle back in 2022 that had other migrants and they were driving to another work site. So they said, Abrego, you are a human trafficker. And then they tried to make him seem like he was like the leader of every single gang out there, which he absolutely wasn't.
30:26They made those claims and Bondi and all those people made claims that he's like this gang leader and murderer and just horrible things in public. But the underlying indictment said nothing It talked about a traffic stop in 2022. The evidence was weak. There was a hearing about whether he should be held or not held. Grego was just worried, though, that if he was released, that ICE was going to basically send him back to the concentration camp or hurt him. So while there was the Tennessee federal proceedings, there was the Maryland federal proceedings, which dealt with returning him from the concentration camp in El Salvador.
31:01So you had these like quasi-civil proceedings in Maryland, the criminal proceedings taking place in Tennessee. And basically what the order in Maryland was is, you know, release him, but give us notice if you're going to do anything with this guy so that the judge Zinnis could protect, you know, his rights. And then sure enough, and I'll throw it to you, Popak, we now got a letter from one of the top lawyers at ICE to Abrego's lawyer. So Abrego sees his family, hugs him. It's this incredible moment after he's He's been like literally tortured by the government, Nazi style, tortured by the government and see caught and harassed and all these things.
31:40He hugs his family. And then the Trump regime sends him a letter and says, we're sending you to Uganda in three days. And even the people in Uganda are like, why are you sending him to Uganda for? What are you doing? Why Uganda? So they picked a place just to just to F with him, just to mess with him. Like they think this is funny, right? You can see Stephen Miller and these people in the room together. Maybe it was when they were in Union Station earlier this week where they were talking about, we're going to go after the 90-year-old white hippies. We're sending ICE to go after the 90-year-old white hippies in D.C.
32:18Literally was a scene. military, Stephen Miller, Pete Hegsitt, the Secretary of Defense, our military, as though they were in freaking Fallujah. I did a video, Popak, where I showed speeches of actual commanders on battlefields. We're going in and you're going to do this. This is going to be the fight of your life. Stephen Miller was doing that in Union Station about sending the National Guard on Americans. So maybe that's where they were like, oh, let's send them to Uganda. That'll be funny. let's send them to Uganda. So that's where we're at now. Popak, what's going on here? And don't just talk about that one, but the vindictive prosecution motions now that are being filed in courts across the country.
32:58Yeah, I'll put it all together. So we've got two major developments in Tennessee that happened Friday over till now. We have a federal judge, district court judge named Crenshaw, who sits over the Tennessee indictment this manufactured indictment. It actually isn't for human trafficking. It's for human smuggling because Judge Holmes, the magistrate judge, made a point of saying in her hearing and in her filings that there's a big difference because trafficking, even though that's what they call him in press conferences and social media posts, trafficking suggests coercion and a victim. Smuggling is a consensual agreement between two people to get somebody over a border.
33:43It's different. It's different when it comes to sentencing, but it's not different to this vindictive Department of Justice that wants to call him, as they did today and yesterday, a human trafficker, a child predator, and I'll tell you where that came from, which is really nowhere, a wife beater, an MS-13 gang leader, in order to attack the judges, like Zinnis, who I'll talk about, and attack him and convicted in the court of public opinion. Fortunately, that's not where convictions happen. They happen in the court of law. And this federal judge, Crenshaw, he's sitting on right now a motion to dismiss the indictment for vindictive prosecution and selective prosecution, which will be the blueprint along with the one that Representative LaMonica McIver also filed in New Jersey, the first two that have been filed, two of hundreds that will be filed against the Trump administration before all is said and done.
34:40And I've been involved with the law for 35 years, and I've been involved with two vindictive prosecution cases in my entire career. They're very hard to get granted, but the government under Donald Trump provides the evidence for it every day, every day, including today. And so when they filed it, which was filed by a friend of mine, Sean Hecker, at a law firm in New York, I'm trying to get Sean to come on legal laugh and talk to us about it. In it, he laid out all the evidence to show prosecutorial animus and vindictiveness up to Bondi, Kristi Noem, Donald Trump, about going after Abrego Garcia and attacking him personally in a vindictive way and showing that that's the reason the indictment came out.
35:31As you said, in March, he was whisked away to El Salvador. He then in, he wasn't brought back for several months despite United States Supreme Court ruling 9-0 in favor of Judge Zinnis. They then under, for a cover story, they then indicted him when a prosecutor, an investigator, got the file from three years ago about a traffic stop where He didn't even get a ticket. And he looked at the file for two weeks and out came, boom, an indictment before Judge Crenshaw. So the vindictive motion, which is now going to be set for final briefing the first September 9th with an argument before the judge, final argument before the judge.
36:14And I think it's 70-30, if not better, that he is going to dismiss that indictment for human smuggling because of how the Trump administration has given the proof, the very proof of the vindictiveness of the prosecution every and every time, including in the last day. So they had to file a supplemental evidence to their motion just yesterday in which they said, okay, we got a call after Judge Holmes because I have to add another piece here. So there's a magistrate judge that's responsible for the terms of release or conditions of release, and she's the one that would not detain him pre-trial, finding that the case was very weak and there were no proper factors in place to keep Abrego Garcia in a Tennessee federal detention center.
37:08Now, he stayed in that detention center to protect him from ICE and Pam Bondi and Donald Trump. So they stashed him away for weeks while he was under the jurisdiction of the Tennessee court to give time for the Maryland judge, Judge Zinnis, who presides over the constitutional abuse of him, the fact that he was sent and then tortured upon arrival in El Salvador by a proxy of America. So he was tortured by the Trump administration. That's the only way to put it. So she's got jurisdiction. She got, they finally got around, she got around to issuing an order that when he's released from Tennessee custody, he is to be remanded immediately to Maryland, where he's from, under her jurisdiction about release.
37:57And so that happened. Holmes, the magistrate judge, had one last thing to decide, and she decided it on Friday, which was, is he going to stay in jail at all based on all of these factors? And she issued her order that he is to be released, that he is to be sent to Maryland, that he is to report not immediately, but on Monday at 10 a.m., giving him time with his family, report to ICE in Baltimore, Maryland on Monday. Now, this is a tremendous slap in the face of Donald Trump and his Department of Justice, who vowed to the American people when they taunted the American people and Judge Zetas and Abrego's family that he would never walk as a free man.
38:43He would never see the light of day. He would be left in dark, dank prisons here or in El Salvador. He would just be removed and deported somewhere else and he would never see his family again. Well, that didn't happen. He's with his family right now under the custody of his brother who was the custodian that was appointed. He reports on Monday And now he's under the jurisdiction of Zinus. So all of these, he's going to be sent to Uganda over Zinus' dead body because she's responsible for him now as she had been before. Now, what happened in the interim, this new evidence that got created, is because after Holmes let him out for two days, according to the filing that Sean Hecker just made, the Department of Justice contacted the lawyers for Abrego Garcia and said, here's our deal.
39:31Okay, what is it? We're all ears. Plead guilty to the two counts in Tennessee. They're like, okay. And for that, we'll send you to Costa Rica where you'll be given immunity and you can live as a free person and they promise not to torture you. You know, some version of that. And they were like, no. So, according to the papers, the retaliation vindictiveness campaign continued. And now you've got the Pam Bondi and the rest, Christine Ome and the rest saying he's a child of predator. He's a wife beater. He's a human trafficker. And this is who judges like Judge Zinnis and Judge Holmes want to have on the streets of America.
40:15So they use that as new evidence for the for the vindictive prosecution. And now on top of it, you've got the well, you didn't take Costa Rica. Well, we're going to send you to Uganda. And again, I repeat, Judge Zinnes is now in charge of the conditions of his release. And they're not going to be deporting him or removing him without her involvement. Michael Popak, a lot going on there. And it goes to the transactional nature also of Trump regime saying, look, just admit you did it. I need a win. So just tell the public, Abrego, that you love Donald Trump and that he's always right. And then we'll let you go to Costa Rica and you can live your life.
40:58It's a hostage video. That's it. And then Abrego says, am I going to do that? So then the Trump regime says, OK, well, you're not going to do that. Well, Uganda is where you go. And but but here's the thing. Abrego showing it. E. Jean Carroll showed it. Governor Newsom is showing it. There's a lot of examples. Nicole Collier, the state representative from Texas, who was literally held hostage in the Texas statehouse because she wouldn't sign a form saying that she would be kept under 24-7 surveillance. If you stand up to this regime and you stand up and you fight, there's a path to winning. When we come back, we're going to talk about Alina Habba refusing to leave the office, refusing to walk out when the judges in New Jersey said, you're gone.
41:58Bye-bye. Your term is over. She, Trump, this whole regime, they're so she bad. She goes, no, I'm staying. No, you know, fascism, these people are relentless because they're sociopaths. They crave the power and they get off on the suffering of the other. That's what they, you know how you wake up every day and you're like, man, I hope my family's doing good. I hope that maybe I'll go for a walk today, read a good book, have a hobby, just try to exist. to be keep to myself. You know, I don't know, go to a ball game, right? I mean, just think about the things that you think about in a day. Although I know with the Trump regime making things far less affordable and people living paycheck to paycheck, it's harder not to think about all these things.
42:50But the Trump regime goes, how do we make people suffer? How do we hurt? What can I do to them? And if you stand up to these people, they're going to come back again. They're going to come back again. They're going to come back again. But you can win because they're weak and they're stupid and they're evil. But if you band together with people, you can beat this. And when we see law firms stand up to them, the law firms win. When we see companies stand up to them, the companies win. When we see countries stand up to them, like Canada, the countries win. Just think about it. Of all of the countries across the world, Canada has the best, think about this, The best trade deal with the United States is Canada right now, which is no deal, which is no deal because Canada's standing up and they didn't bend the knee to Donald Trump.
43:39So that's what you got to do. And I think that's what Abrego shows as well. When we come back, I want to talk about Alina Habba and her refusal to leave, despite the fact that she needs to leave. But more significantly, how her refusal to leave is now impacting all of the cases in New Jersey because she's a rogue, unlawful United States attorney. So all of those cases are being deemed basically as inappropriate. Talk about that. Some other topics. We'll take our last quick break. A reminder, subscribe to Michael Popak's YouTube channel. Legal AF. It's crushing it. They're on their way to a million subscribers.
44:16I'd love to see that hit a million subscribers soon. So go and check that out. Subscribe to his sub stack, the Legal AF sub stack, one of the top five sub stacks of all sub stacks out there. You're getting a lot of great content, a lot of great legal scholars who are on the YouTube channel also writing with you. And you go live a lot on that sub stack. So everybody check that out. And if you have your own legal case, if you've been injured in a car accident, trucking accident, whatever, if you've been a victim of a sexual assault, sexual harassment, if you know somebody who's been the victim of any of those things, if you know someone who's been the victim of wrongful death, please, the consultation is free.
44:55877-POPOC-AF, thepopocfirm.com. So call 877-POPOC-AF or go to thepopocfirm.com. Reach out. Popak's got lawyers across the country who he works with who can help you. Don't be shy. If you're a whistleblower, if you've got any type of case, call Popak. Usually it's cases that involve real serious damages and injuries that they're able to take, but don't be shy. Reach out. They have a team that vets the case. Give a call. Again, consultation is free, so do that when you have a case. Let's take our last quick break, and then we'll go lightning round a lot to discuss. This episode of Legal AF is brought to you by Moinkbox.
45:38Did you know four companies control over 80 % of the U.S. meat industry and that the largest share of U.S. pork is now controlled by China? These meat giants use mobster-like tactics to crush American family farms, flooding our food supply with sketchy additives and low-quality meat. So what can you do about it? Here's where Moink comes in. Featured on Shark Tank, Moink is standing up for family farms and your food security. Their meat comes from animals raised outdoors, like nature intended. Their farmers get an honest day's pay. And Moink delivers straight to your doorstep at a price you can actually afford.
46:14This is real American meat born, raised, and harvested right here in the USA. Moink is helping save rural America. I love it, and you will too. Join the Moink movement today. Support American family farms and join the, wait for it, Moink movement today at moinkbox.com slash legal AF. right now and get free bacon for a year. That's one year of the best bacon you'll ever taste, but only for a limited time. Spelled M-O-I-N-K, box.com slash legal AF. That's moinkbox.com slash legal AF. You ever get so into doing laundry that you actually look forward to it? Yeah, me neither. Until I tried laundry sauce.
46:55I'm not kidding. This stuff is next level. I popped in their Mojave peach pods, mandarin, cinnamon, juicy peach, A smooth sandalwood finish and suddenly my laundry smelled like a luxury cologne. Way better than my old detergent. The scent lasts too. I'm getting compliments all day long on my shirts, jackets, even towels. Plus these pods. Pre-measured. Super easy. No mess, no guesswork. And a Mojave peach isn't your vibe. Try Italian bergamot. It's citrusy and clean. Or Indonesian patchouli. It's basically a vacation in a pod. Can't decide? Take their scent quiz for a personalized pick. Here's the deal.
47:29For a limited time, our listeners get 20 % off your entire order at LaundrySauce.com with code LEGALAF20. That's 20 % off at LaundrySauce.com with promo code LEGALAF20. Support the show and tell them we sent you. Let's make Laundry Day the best day of the week. Welcome back to Legal AF. Special thanks to our sponsors right there. Discount codes are in the description below. Michael Popak, I want to... Okay. When you're a lawyer, Popak, and you've been interviewed, have you ever had to say, I'm a legitimate lawyer? Just want to let you know. I'm not crazy. I'm not a hack. I'm one of those legit lawyers.
48:12Usually legit lawyers don't need to go around saying, I'm not a hack. Well, here's Alina Habba. Let's play this video of her. I'm not a political hack. I'm an attorney licensed in four states. I've been licensed by the Supreme Court of the United States. And I have practiced law for the better of 20 years and run law firms for most of 15 that have been extremely successful, despite what the Twitter trolls would like to say. I mean, so-called, there's so-called hack, so-called name calling is kind of beneath me, to be honest. I would, I frankly would never despise somebody I've never even spoken to, but I assume he thinks he knows who I am.
48:53I'm a really accomplished attorney. Nate, I'm a really accomplished attorney. That's how I start all my interviews. Name calling is beneath me. Name calling. She does. She lives. Clearly beneath. Name calling in the Trump regime. I've never, I've never. But that's also why California Governor Gavin Newsom's strategy is so effective when he shines a mirror on what they're doing. And they're like, why are you calling me names? The moment you go on the offense against these people, they're all like that, right? They're all like, what are you doing? Name-calling? Come on here. But somewhere along the line, as an overall society, and I'm not saying our viewers are fighters, but at some point, we let these losers take control.
49:40And it's like, why? Why have we been accepting of their behavior? It's because Donald Trump was on The Apprentice. It's the craziest thing to me. But Popak, talk to us about this ruling that came from a judge from Pennsylvania sitting in designation. And it's important because the fact that she's remained on, despite her term being expired and her term not getting extended by the federal judges in New Jersey, which she then name calls them, oh, they're leftist. She literally like name calls them. It's now having an impact on the ability of law and order to actually be conducted. Let's talk about that.
50:22Then let's go to the Supreme Court NIH decision. All right. Sounds great. Back to our audience for fighters. I caught something in social media where one of our followers fought back against being abused by a neighbor. She's an older audience member of ours and posted the video clip under the line, thanks, Popok. I guess we talk about stop taking crap and start fighting back. And I don't mean physically, I mean emotionally and using your First Amendment rights. So that I thought was funny. For Alina Habba, let's just talk about Alina Habba for one moment, please. She was a little-known three-person law office runner in a small town, not a major business center in New Jersey called Bedminster.
51:17The only business it has is the Trump golf course. And she and her husband ran a very small law firm, which they did what I call door law. Anything that walks in the door, she did, including parking lot and parking garage representation, which can be very lucrative. You know, people get, you know, scrapes on their cars. They leave them, you know, three extra days. They don't have the money to pay for them. But this is not what I would call consequential national nationwide litigation of the highest order. Nobody ever heard of her. And I'm from New Jersey. And I had an office in New York for years.
51:58And so there's that. Her biggest success in her life, her only true success in her life, is that she made a beeline for Donald Trump on purpose at the Bedminster golf course, joined the golf club, and then try to ingratiate herself with him and rub elbows with him and try to handle some cases for him, including some that she's been accused of doing unethical things. No shock. That got her on his radar screen, including a couple of settlements. And then he started just dragging her along in her various cases. To say that for her to have to say to bowling, exclamation mark, whoever that is, some podcaster, that she's an accomplished lawyer, she's not even an accomplished lawyer for Donald Trump.
52:46She got fined a million dollars along with Donald Trump by Judge Middlebrooks for the case that she filed a couple of years ago in federal court. She got fined and sanctioned for discovery abuse in the New York fraud case, which we'll talk about later, in which she lost a$463 million judgment. We'll talk about that in a minute in New York. She lost not one, but two E. Jean Carroll cases. And E. Jean Carroll is now sitting on$100 million worth of judgments. She was involved with the team that lost the 34 felony count conviction of Donald Trump. So where are the accomplishments? Even for Trump, she's not accomplished.
53:26She's been failing up ever since. He tried to stash her at his pack. And when that didn't work, then he decided to bring her in as a White House counselor, like she was some sort of Kellyanne Conway. And when that didn't work, he kicked her upstairs or across the river to put her in Jersey. And then rather than just be a temperate, professional, mature, accomplished lawyer, as she says she is, during her tryout period, because there was a period where she was given the acting job, which was probably a mistake by Donald Trump. He probably should have stashed her away, nominated her. But no, he stuck her in the job.
54:01So she got a tryout. And while she did during the tryout, back to her, Philip Kowski called it the six lies in one sentence. One of the lies were that she's not a political hack. That's all she did was hack away. So first thing she does on a podcast as soon as she gets the job is, I'm going to turn the blue state of New Jersey red. Then she goes after and targets criminally the governor of the state, Democrat, the attorney general of the state, Democrat, the mayor of the largest city, Democrat, And Representative LaMonica MacGyver, who's a congresswoman from New Jersey. And she got reprimanded by a federal judge, federal magistrate judge, for having brought charges originally against Mayor Baraka.
54:49That is in 120 days. Okay? That's like the old joke about, you know, talking to Mrs. Lincoln, and she gives you the whole story about what happened, and somebody says, great, but how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln? Right. That was 120 effing days. And so was there any shock when her 120 days was up by statute? She then asked, pretty please, can I stay in the job longer? And the 21 federal judges in New Jersey all uniformly said no. and they, under the statute, appointed somebody who was qualified, the number two in the office, a career prosecutor, and she had the job for less than 24 hours because Donald Trump started this whole, you know, 16 steps to try to keep his office wife in the job.
55:37You know, well, I'm going to make her her own assistant. Then I'm going to elevate her after I fire the person that the court put in. And then, well, that didn't work. Well, then I'll make her a special attorney under the Constitution with all the powers, but not all the powers, but most of the powers of being the U.S. attorney for New Jersey. That didn't work. Oh. And so finally, one of many criminal defense lawyers in New Jersey filed a motion in his criminal defense case for a gun and drug case called Gerard, in which he filed a motion to disqualify Alina Habba. And that's what we're talking about.
56:12It was brought by a criminal defendant. Now, because the 21 federal judges all ruled against her and voted against her, they were all effectively disqualified from hearing this motion, the motion to disqualify her, dismiss indictments, right? Call her invalidly appointed and all of that. And we all looked at it and was like, you and I were like eating popcorn, like, is this going to work? Because I had known about some case law and some arguments about something that happened similarly. And I'm thinking, eh, it's about 50-50, but I'm in it. Whatever you're laying down, I'm picking up. Let's go.
56:47So it gets assigned because there's no judge in Jersey. It goes up to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals chief judge who appoints somebody from within the circuit, but outside of Jersey. So it lands on Chief Judge Brand of the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Okay, he was an Obama appointee, but he's pretty middle of the road. You would not called Judge Brand in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, a firebrand, no pun intended, liberal, okay? He gets it. He goes through all the pleadings and he says, yeah, of the motions. He goes, yeah. She was unlawfully appointed because he laid it out quite succinctly.
57:21This is what you get to do as president. You get to nominate somebody. You got 120 days to get them confirmed by the Senate. If they don't get confirmed by the Senate and their term doesn't get extended by the court, then that person is out and can't be put back in as acting interim whatever, while you go get somebody else. And the person that stays in the job until you can get somebody nominated and confirmed is going to be picked by the judges. That's it. That's the Federal Vacancy Act. That's the statute related to judge, to U.S. attorney filling. And that's the Constitution. And that's it.
57:57And all this other stuff that you did, where she's the special attorney, but she doesn't have all the powers of a U.S. attorney, but she does have all the powers, none of that's going to fly here. And I disqualify her. I disqualify everybody working under her. I disqualify anybody that tries to do an end run around this order. They're disqualified. And good day. Now there's complete chaos in the fifth largest federal district in America with judges like Judge Salas just yesterday said, in response to a motion by a completely unrelated defendant, to say, why am I getting sentenced by an unlawful U.S.
58:36attorney? I questioned, by the way, during that interview with Bowling, what office she was sitting in. It looked a lot like an office in Newark that the U.S. attorney would sit in. So she's still sitting there as the acting whatever. And the sentencing, and the lawyer said, postpone the sentencing. There is no U.S. attorney proper. And Judge Salas, Esther Salas, said, I agree. And the Department of Justice rushed in with, but no, there's other deputies and assistants. And she says, no, I'm not buying that. Go work this out. You don't have a U.S. attorney. I'm not sentencing. Laws have been postponed.
59:09Sentencings have been postponed. And now what I've read and what I've heard is that they actually have to have Todd Blanche, who was her co-counsel when they were criminal defense lawyers for Donald Trump, Take time out of being the number two in the Department of Justice in Washington to sign motions and pleadings and indictments, even down to the misdemeanor level. So like criminal littering or whatever in Jersey, he's got it now. She needs a cosigner. He now has to cosign for her to avoid any more arguments in court by other defendants that this is invalid and dismiss my indictment. Apparently he has nothing better to do anyway, which is actually there's a silver lining to this.
59:57The more time he spends going on interviews of convicted sex predators and having to sign misdemeanors in New Jersey, it's the less time he has to really focus on his job properly and do all of the terrible things that Donald Trump, who got quoted this week as reminding everybody that he is the chief law enforcement officer because, you know, about the raid, you know, the raid, the raid of John Bolton. Well, I am the chief law enforcement officer. You know, Pam Bondi again shrinks again, confirming there is no independent Department of Justice. This is what all federal judges have observed. There is no independent FBI.
1:00:35And Todd Blanche is busy trying like the boy at the dike, trying to put his hand in with all of these holes that spring up. And he's not doing a very good job. But that's how bad things have gotten. As Alina Habba goes on, it's not an apology tour, the victim tour. I saw one with Hannity. I don't know if we have the clip of it. I saw one with Hannity where she said, this is just another, you know, leftist activist judge that nobody voted for. I'm supported by the president of the United States, Ampan Bondi. He got 100 million votes. I'm barely, I'm barely announcing this. I got he got 100 million votes and we always win.
1:01:18This is what she said. F and then legal. We always win. Just like in New York. I was like, time to insert vomit here. Well, here's the here's the thing. Do they always win? I don't think. No, they don't. But here's the this shouldn't be a Democrat Republican thing. The interim United States attorney who should be in that place is a lifelong Republican, competent, qualified person who can do the job. But that's who they've now fired and pushed out so Alina Habba can engage in these shenanigans. We're all less safe as a result of all this stuff. Of all this performative stuff, the FBI and DOJ, they're not investigating the terrorism cases like they used to and the sex trafficking cases and the real threats to our homeland are being foregone so that they can arrest migrants in parking lots of the Home Depots and things like that.
1:02:15But here's the thing. Alina Hobb, the bar is so low with this Trump regime that if Alina Hobb had just went in there and conducted herself just as a professional for that period, just went in there and just prosecuted the bad guys, people would have been like, whoa, and she would have been able to stay on. But to your point, she goes in there and just behaves like a maniac because she is. I mean, Donald Trump behaves like a sexual predator, a fraud, you know, a felon and all of these because he is like and these people, they get into these positions. It was like what Obama said. You know, when you get into the presidency, it amplifies who you are and exposes it even more.
1:03:01It doesn't tamp it down. So all these people get these positions and they remind us why they don't have the temperament, moral character, decision making skills to hold these positions. OK, super quick lightning round, Popak. I'm going to ask you to merge it. We're going to put these two cases together for this lightning round because there's some misconceptions about what the holdings ultimately were. So and I know you've covered it in hot takes, so I don't want to be redundant. So quickly, tell us about what the New York Court of Appeals did and then merge that with the NIH Supreme Court decision.
1:03:36Both some confusion about it. Got it. Well, we're going to clean it. That's the common denominator. There's confusion. So we've been waiting for a year for the first department appellate division, which is the first level appeal court over Manhattan, to make a ruling about the appeal of the$463 million running with interest civil fraud judgment obtained by New York Attorney General Letitia James. Okay, now we're all on the same page. That's what we're talking about that Alina Haba actually was involved with. And in that case, after a 12-week trial with mountains of evidence, tons of Trump organization people testifying and others, including experts, Judge N.
1:04:14Goran from the bench made a ruling, 30, 40 pages, in which he found that she had proven the case for the state of New York that Donald Trump and those around him in the organization, including his children, except for Ivanka and Tiffany, had committed what's called persistent fraud in the operation of the Trump organization for 10 years. And fundamentally, the basis of that was his inflating, cooking the books on his personal net worth, his personal financial statements, pumping them up several billion with a B dollars in order to obtain favorable terms from banks, in order to run around and get projects that he wasn't probably entitled to because he didn't have as much money as he said.
1:05:04And he did it, you know, the old fashioned way with whiteout and a pencil eraser. I'm not kidding. And so he, He, in response to that, the judge did two things. He calculated the amount of what we call ill-gotten gains. That's the amount of money that he calculated that Trump and his family were obtained through fraudulent means or artifice and put in their pockets. And he calculated it project by project by project by transaction, from the triplex apartment in New York to a golf course to Mar-a-Lago and everything else. And he came up with a number. He came up with a$363 million number plus$100 million in interest.
1:05:43And it's all broken down in his 40, if you want to read it, it's all broken down in his 40 pages. And then he added on to that disgorgement, which has been referred to in the papers as a fine. He's added on an injunction, which has been sitting there for the last two years. That's how long that case has been going on, which is that there's an actual monitor, court-appointed monitor. It's former federal judge Barbara Jones, who sits on top of the Trump organization to this day, peering in and watching all of the transactions and making reports on them. She redid the compliance department. There wasn't one.
1:06:18She redid the accounting department. There really wasn't one. And she keeps an eye on everything. So those were the two major things that came out of a finding. And then a, yes, a finding of liability, of fraud by Donald Trump. That went up on appeal. And there's five justices that get randomly assigned. In this case, the five justices were Moulton, Renwick, Rosado, Higgett, and Friedman. Friedman was always the weird duck because he's the guy that kept granting stays for Donald Trump and is the only Republican on that panel. And he asked some really weird questions during the oral argument. Then we get the order.
1:06:58We get the decision, but there's no decision. There's five of them. And it's a split decision. there were three written opinions. No one written opinion even got a majority. So two people joined in on the decision, on the opinion written by Judge Moulton. Two joined in with the opinion written by Higgins. And Friedman wrote his own. So there's no there there. In 333 pages, there's very little agreement except for the following. There appears to be, at least for the purposes of the appeal to the next level, which in New York is the Court of Appeals. There's four justices that think there's at least an argument that fraud was proven by Donald Trump.
1:07:45That's why Tish James came out with, well, court said fraud, sort of. Two judges, justices definitely said fraud was proven, Moulton and Redwick. Two judges said, we think we'd send it back for another trial, well, but for the purposes of an appeal, we'll certify fraud. You know, kind of a compromise came up out of that. Okay, that's four to get it to an appeal. Both, there's four people that also bailed out Letitia James, because remember, she's been attacked, and there's a prosecution going on right now, led by a combination of Ed Martin and John Sarkoni for Pam Bondi and Donald Trump to go after his political rival and enemy, Letitia James, and her office, the New York Attorney General.
1:08:30There's a criminal probe right now about whether Donald Trump's or a probe, whether his civil rights were violated by this case. So four justices, in their opinion, said Letitia James had the power. She didn't abuse her power. She had the right. In fact, they said it would have been a dereliction of duty if she not brought the case based on. here we go, bringing it back to Midas, based on what Michael Cohen had testified in federal proceedings to about his boss cooking the books, how could she have ignored that and not brought, it would have been a dereliction of duty if she had not brought the case.
1:09:06So that was certainly calculated. They wrote this or rewrote it after seeing what's happened in the last two weeks against Letitia James, back to vindictive prosecution world again. And then on the other extreme is Friedman saying, why are we here? There's no fraud. She's vindictive. There's no money here. Why is the number so big? Now, the number is the thing that's also been struck because two of the justices are like, the injunction's fine. Actually, four justices think the injunction is okay to keep the monitor in place, but that's all that ever should have been granted. As to the money, it's almost like they were rewarding the bankrupt, for the size of the theft.
1:09:51They said, well, the number is just so big, the 463 million, that it is automatically excessive and a violation of the Eighth Amendment against excessive fines under the Constitution. I'm like, it's because he's dealing with billions and billions and billions of dollars. So$300 million is not really that large. And why is that a defense to a to a clawback or a disgorgement? The number is too big. But this is now what's going to show. That's why the reporting was like Donald Trump. Some some reported, including Trump. I won. I've been vindicated, but I still got to take an appeal. Right. You have to take an appeal to the Court of Appeals because Tish James is going to be asking for the reinstatement of the$463 million and a final real judgment by a real court, not these people, who say that Donald Trump committed fraud.
1:10:46He's going to try to make sure that he's vindicated on the fraud at the Court of Appeals and that zero dollars are awarded and that the monitor is removed. So that's what, I hope that helped everybody for 333 pages. Absolutely. And then if you can, Popak, NIH decision. I think that went there. NIH decision, people confused there as well. All right. That's because Amy Coney Barrett was a swing vote on two different majority decisions. The Supreme Court, let me give the headline. The MAGA Supreme Court just validated RFK Jr., who I now call the most terrible Kennedy ever, in his purge of science and technology and medicine from our public health.
1:11:34And so in the middle of firing everybody, he fired not only the people at the National Institute of Health, but he defunded them by getting rid of$850 million worth of in-progress research. So shut the door on medical breakthroughs, close your lab books, shut down the lab in the middle of the experiment because we're not going to be getting anywhere medical breakthroughs because it's now been defunded under DEI and MAGA Supreme Court is okay with it. But it was weird. Why was it weird? Because there were two major issues that came out of the judge's ruling, Judge Young up in Massachusetts. One was that the guidelines that the National Institute of Health used to defund were arbitrary and capricious, that there was no reason determination, that it violated the Administrative Procedures Act.
1:12:26They got that. Then he made a ruling and the grants that were cut, the funding that was cut was done improperly and I blocked them. Okay, in the summer, earlier in the summer, there was a case involving the Department of Education that you and I covered called the Department of Education versus California. And in that one paragraph emergency ruling, again, we're trying to like divine whatever, There was a ruling that the ruling said if it deals with funds and grants, it goes to the federal court of claims, not to a regular Article III judge. And apparently the MAGA think that that applies to every grant cut, every defunding by Donald Trump.
1:13:10And so they, five to four, with Amy Coney Barrett making up the five with Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas, ruled that Young did not have jurisdiction over the funding part of it, and it should have gone and it will go to the federal court of claims. On another five to four within the same case, Roberts moved over with Amy Coney Barrett and said, no, he had jurisdiction over the guidelines, but he didn't have jurisdiction over the funding. I mean, it's a real cluster F. This is what happens when you are a Supreme Court that's reverse engineering to reach a conclusion to help the Trump administration.
1:13:54Or this is one of my favorite lines ever by Ketanji Brown Jackson. We do a lot of reporting on the Supreme Court by saying, and in dissent, Ketanji Brown Jackson said the following. Because she's speaking to law students. She's speaking to the history books. She's speaking to the future, and she's speaking to fair-minded people like our audience when she writes her dissents. They are important. And what she said is, she looked around and she said, my brethren, my majority here are playing Calvin ball from Calvin and Hobbes, except they added a new rule. First rule, there are no fixed rules. Second rule, the Trump administration always wins.
1:14:35I mean, she's calling. I mean, we've now dispensed with. Thank you. Or as this reporter said, the breathtakingly full of shit. Right. So so the fact that she's now had to to to grab on to Calvin and Hobbes to call out. She also said, I did not understand. This is a Supreme Court justice being honest. I did not understand how terrible a decision the Department of Education decision was until I see it now being applied in this case. I thought it was bad that it was unmoored from any constitutional principles or any principles whatsoever. But now I see it's being used as a bludgeon by the MAGA on any funding decision.
1:15:15And that's not right. And so that's that's this weird five to four that happened about jurisdiction and about the Administrative Procedures Act. Popak, you actually have a Supreme Court justice in the minority becoming a whistleblower essentially right now. I mean, you literally have a whistleblower Supreme Court justice, the most qualified of all of the justices out there by far, saying we this this court right now is the most corrupt institution imaginable. That that that's where that's where we are. And she's right. And you go back to what I said earlier. This is not a moment where you can mince words.
1:16:00And I think this episode just goes to show you when we highlight people who are fighting back, why we need to fight back, what we can all do, what the legal AFers can do. And so actually one of my favorite episodes that we've done on Legal AF, at least in a long time, great audience, great seeing everybody here. I want to remind everybody, if you have a case of your own, if you've been injured in a car accident or if you were injured in a trucking accident or if you were the victim of somebody else's negligence and you have a case, you've all said, Michael Popak, why don't you start your own law firm?
1:16:39He did. He did it. So reach out to the Popak firm. Go to thepopakfirm.com. You can fill out the form about your case or call 877-POPOC-AF. A real live human being picks up the call and will ask you about what your case is. Michael Popok has lawyers across the entire country who can help you out. The consultation is free, so don't worry about paying for things. Reach out to the Popok firm and they'll let you know if you have a case or if someone you know in your life was the victim of wrongful death, sexual harassment, sexual assault. you know, these horrible things that do happen. That's why you all said Popak start the firm.
1:17:19And he did. And we're getting, you know, dozens and dozens of cases now at the Popak firm and on a basically a weekly basis. So don't be shy. Lots of people are calling and he's representing hundreds of people now who are from the Legal AF audience. So reach out to him there. Also, subscribe to Michael Popak's YouTube channel, the Legal AF YouTube channel. Subscribe to the Legal AF Substack. Of course, subscribe to the Midas Touch YouTube channel. Thank you all so much, everybody. It's been a great episode. It's been great spending this time with you. Shout out to the Midas Mighty and shout out Legal AFers.
1:17:53Have a good one.
From the publisher
Did the convicted child sex trafficker and abuser Ghislaine Maxwell earn her “Trump pardon” with her scripted lies about Trump and Epstein—lies in which she re-victimized the victims and denied any child sex abuse while giving Trump a pass? Will Trump try to defy yet another federal judge and ship Abrego Garcia off to Uganda early next week in violation of Judge Xinis’ orders—and what will she do to stop him? Why won’t Alina Habba just take the hint and go away as the NJ U.S. Attorney? Why is Trump appealing a ruling on his $463 million civil fraud judgment if he actually “won” the appeal as he claims? And has Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in effect, become a whistleblower about the depravity of the MAGA majority in her recent dissents? Ben Meiselas and Popok break down all of this and more on the top-rated Legal AF podcast.
Support Our Sponsors:
Uplift: Elevate your workspace and energize your year with Uplift Desk. Go to https://upliftdesk.com/legalaf for a special offer exclusive to our audience.
Laundry Sauce: For 20% off your order head to https://LaundrySauce.com/LEGALAF20 and use code LEGALAF20
Moink: Keep American farming going by signing up at https://MoinkBox.com/LEGALAF RIGHT NOW and listeners of this show get FREE WINGS for LIFE!
Trust & Will: Get 10% off plus free shipping of your estate plan documents by visiting https://trustandwill.com/LEGALAF
Check Out The Popok Firm: https://thepopokfirm.com/
Subscribe to the NEW Legal AF Substack: https://substack.com/@legalaf
Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts:
MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast
Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af
MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial
The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast
Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan
Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen
The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show
Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats
Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54
Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown
On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman
Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
