In short
Legal AF Podcast Notes
Episode Title
Trump Admin Instantly Blocked from Unleashing Disaster
Date
[Insert Date of Episode]
Hosts
- Ben Meiselas (Civil Rights Lawyer)
- Michael Popok (National Trial Lawyer Strategist)
- Karen Friedman Agnifilo (Former Chief Assistant District Attorney)
---
Episode Summary In this episode of Legal AF, the hosts discuss a significant legal ruling where a federal judge has blocked the Trump Administration and RFK Jr.'s anti-vaccine policies. The ruling prevents the removal of essential vaccines for children, highlighting the importance of scientific expertise in public health decision-making.
---
Key Discussions
Federal Judge Ruling
- Judge Murphy's Decision: A Massachusetts federal judge issued a preliminary injunction against RFK Jr. and his anti-vaccine committee.
- Background: RFK Jr. attempted to replace a 17-member expert panel with individuals lacking relevant expertise.
- Vaccine Impact: The judge ruled that removing vaccines for diseases such as meningitis, hepatitis, and COVID-19 could jeopardize public health.
Implications of the Ruling
- Importance of Expertise: The ruling emphasizes the necessity of having qualified medical professionals involved in vaccine recommendations.
- Historical Context: The judge referenced the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), created by Congress in 1964, underscoring its importance in public health strategy.
Legal Framework
- Chevron Doctrine: Discussed the implications of a Supreme Court decision that limits agency discretion, moving towards allowing judicial review of public health policies.
- The previous administration’s reliance on expansive agency discretion is scrutinized.
RFK Jr.'s Controversy
- Criticism of RFK Jr.: The episode highlights RFK Jr.'s lack of scientific credibility and his controversial leadership within the public health sphere.
- Expertise of the New Panel: The judge criticized the qualifications of the new members of the ACIP, noting that many lacked adequate experience in vaccines.
---
Key Takeaways
- Public Health Over Politics: The episode advocates for prioritizing scientific integrity in public health policies over political agendas.
- Judicial Oversight: The ruling reinforces the role of the judicial system in reviewing and ensuring that health policies are based on sound science and expert opinion.
- Potential Supreme Court Appeal: The case may escalate to the First Circuit Court of Appeals and could reach the Supreme Court, testing the balance between agency discretion and judicial oversight.
---
Conclusion The episode concludes with a strong affirmation of the need for scientifically grounded public health policies, especially concerning vaccinations for children. The hosts plan to follow the developments of this case closely, indicating its significance in the ongoing discourse around public health and legal oversight.
---
Subscribe & Additional Resources
- Podcast Subscription: [Legal AF on MeidasTouch Network](https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af)
- Additional Podcasts: Explore more content from the MeidasTouch Network including MeidasTouch, MissTrial, and others.
For a deeper dive into legal analysis, subscribe to the Legal AF Substack for updates and discussions related to the judicial system and ongoing cases.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOJudge Murphy's Ruling on RFK Jr.
3:59 to 5:32
Discussion on Judge Murphy's ruling against RFK Jr. and vaccine safety.
“We've got a federal judge, Judge Murphy, in Massachusetts, who has put up the big stop sign against RFK Jr.”
Critique of RFK Jr.'s Vaccine Oversight
5:32 to 6:53
Analyzing RFK Jr.'s controversial vaccine committee and its implications.
“Let me read to you from Judge Murphy's order and get down to it here on the Midas Touch Network while you're here.”
Hearing Exchanges on Vaccines
6:53 to 8:01
Reviewing the exchanges during the oversight committee hearings involving RFK Jr.
“In fact, let me play back-to-back clips.”
The Importance of Scientific Integrity
8:01 to 9:22
Emphasizing the significance of scientific integrity in public health.
“Every conversation I had with her, there were witnesses.”
Judicial Oversight and Discretion
9:22 to 11:29
Exploring the judicial oversight of agency actions and the Chevron doctrine.
“Now, here's what Judge Murphy, a Biden appointee, had to say in a case brought by, thank God, the American Academy of Pediatrics against RFK Jr.”
The Role of Courts in Health Policy
11:29 to 14:02
Understanding the role of courts in evaluating health policies and agency discretion.
“that the Trump administration always begins all of its motions with, that judges have no role in providing any oversight, even when you're talking about something simple like statutory interpretation.”
Judicial Review vs. Agency Discretion
14:02 to 16:40
Explore the tension between judicial review and agency discretion in public health regulations.
“So environmental protection, you're better at it than judges.”
Critique of the ACIP Panel's Composition
16:41 to 18:59
Analyze the qualifications of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the implications for vaccine recommendations.
“Practices, the ACIP committee, which is at the heart of immunization recommendations.”
Impact of Court Rulings on Public Health
19:00 to 21:00
Discuss potential outcomes of court rulings on health policy and public safety.
“Now, this is going to go up on appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Massachusetts and Boston.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This episode is brought to you by Cologuard. Do you know what's really scary? Not screening for colon cancer when you turn 45. The Cologuard test is non-invasive, requires no special prep or time off work, and ships right to your door. In just three simple steps, Cologuard takes the scare out of colon cancer screening. If you're 45 or older and at average risk, ask your healthcare provider about the Cologuard test. Cologuard is available by prescription only. Learn more or request a prescription today at Cologuard.com slash screen. Fox News is now streaming live on Fox One. When news breaks, we don't just report it.
0:37We go beyond the headlines to get the full story. Get live coverage, in-depth analysis and perspectives from the voices you trust, all in one place. Whether you're at home or on the go, stay connected to the stories shaping our world. Stream Fox News on Fox One. Download today. So you're running out of closet space. The good news? You don't need to stop shopping. You just need to start selling with The RealReal. The RealReal is the world's largest and most trusted resource for authenticated luxury resale. Whether it's that mini bag that can't even fit your phone or those boots you never fully broke in, The RealReal handles everything from photography and copywriting to shipping and pricing.
1:21so you can just sit back, get paid, and make room for things that actually feel like you. And with 10 ,000-plus new arrivals every single day from top designers like Prada, Celine, Louis Vuitton, and Loewe, all for up to 90 % off retail, you're bound to find something perfectly on-brand to fill that extra closet space with. Plus, right now, you can get an extra$100 to shop when you sell for the first time. Make room for what feels like you. Go to therealreal.com to start selling and get your extra$100 to keep shopping at therealreal.com. That's therealreal.com. Terms apply. This podcast is sponsored by Talkspace.
2:01Last year, I went through many different life changes. I needed to take a pause and examine how I was feeling in the inside to better show up for the ones who need me to be my best version of myself. When you're navigating life's changes, Talkspace can help. Talkspace is the number one rated online therapy, bringing you professional support from licensed therapists and psychiatry providers that you can access anytime, anywhere. Living a busy life, navigating a long distance relationship, becoming a first stepfather. Talkspace made all of those journeys possible. I could speak with my therapist in the office.
2:37I could speak with my therapist in the comfort of my home. I was never alone. Talkspace works with most major insurers, and most insured members have a$0 copay. No insurance, no problem. Now get$80 off your first month with promo code SPACE80 when you go to Talkspace.com. Match with a licensed therapist today at Talkspace.com. Save$80 with code SPACE80 at Talkspace.com. This podcast is sponsored by IQ Bar. I've got good news and bad news. Here's the bad news. Most protein bars are packed with sugar and unpronounceable ingredients. The good news? There's a better option. I'm Will, and I created IQ Bar Plant Protein Bars to empower doers like you with clean, delicious, low-sugar brain and body fuel.
3:19IQ Bars are packed with 12 grams of protein, brain nutrients like magnesium and lion's mane, and zero weird stuff. And right now, you can get 20 % off all IQ Bar products, plus free shipping. Try our delicious IQ Bar sampler pack with 7 plant protein bars, 4 hydration mixes, and 4 enhanced coffee sticks. Clean ingredients, amazing taste, and you'll love how you feel. Refuel smarter, hydrate harder, caffeinate larger with IQ Bar. Go to eatiqbar.com and enter code BAR20 to get 20 % off all IQ Bar products plus free shipping. Again, go to eatiqbar.com and enter code BAR20.
3:58Michael Popok:We got some breaking news in favor of American and children not dying. We've got a federal judge, Judge Murphy, in Massachusetts, who has put up the big stop sign against RFK Jr. and his whole band of merry anti-vaxxers, which make up his committee related to advisory opinions about which vaccines children should take. Judge Murphy has said, no, you're not going to fire 17 experts on vaccines and immunology. replace them with a whole group of people who have no background or expertise in that particular science, and then tell American doctors and pediatricians to remove at least six vaccines from the recommended list, including meningitis, vaccines against rotavirus, influenza, hepatitis A and B, and COVID-19.
4:52Michael Popok:It's a good day when we're not allowing children to get meningitis. And what Judge Murphy found is that RFK Jr., that notorious anti-vaxxer, that non-scientist, he's barely a lawyer, an environmental lawyer at that. He doesn't get to undermine public health. Even the White House is concerned about RFK Jr. They're trying to rein him in. Remember, at the start of the administration, Donald Trump effectively turned over all of public health over to RFK Jr. and said he could run wild. Well, how's that going? Not great with the largest measles outbreak in the country. Let me read to you from Judge Murphy's order and get down to it here on the Midas Touch Network while you're here.
5:38Michael Popok:Take a minute. Come over to Legal AF YouTube channel, won't you? And hit the free subscribe button. Following this case very closely, since it was filed back in the summer of 2025 and updated in September of 2025, just in January of this year, after he fired the entirety of the 17-member panel, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and don't be fooled by the advisory part, It is a congressional statutory mandated stakeholder in the decision making about children's health. And to RFK Jr., it was just an unnecessary guardrail around his crazy anti-vax theories. And so he fired them all and replaced them with many people, while don't be fooled by the doctor in their title, are not doctors related to anything concerning vaccines or immunology or anything like that.
6:34Michael Popok:And that was called out by Judge Murphy as well. Who can forget when the gravelly-voiced RFK Jr. during one of his many oversight committee hearings had this exchange about his advisory committee and other lies. In fact, let me play back-to-back clips. Simply trying to say that the people that you have put on that panel after firing the entire... You're fading the question. No, I'm asking the questions here, Mr. Kennedy. You're evading that question. I'm asking the questions, Mr. Kennedy. I ask your question. I'm asking the questions for Mr. Kennedy on behalf of parents and schools and teachers all over the United States of America who deserve so much better than your leadership.
7:23That's what this conversation is about, Mr. Chairman. Senator, they deserve the truth, and that's what we're going to give them for the first time. in the history of that agency. Can you tell the head of the CDC that if she refused to sign off on your changes to the childhood vaccine schedule that she had to resign? No, I told her that she had to resign because I asked her, are you a trustworthy person? And she said no. So I'm sorry, but this is not what she has said publicly. She has said... Well, I'm not surprised about that. So you're saying she's lying? Yes. Every conversation I had with her, there were witnesses.
8:05And let me get this straight. This is the same person that less than a month earlier, you stood next to her and described her as unimpeachable, and you had full confidence in her, and that you had full confidence in her scientific credentials. And in a month, she became a liar? Yeah, you should ask her what changed. And by the way, a month ago you were voting against her. Oh, because you thought she was either incompetent, ineligible, or unsuited to the task. I went against her because I was afraid she was going to bend the knee to you and Donald Trump. And it looks like she didn't bend the knee, so you fired her.
8:46Are you telling us that the former head of CDC went to you, you asked her, are you a trustworthy person, and she said, no, I am not a trustworthy person? She didn't say, no, I'm not a trustworthy person. She said, no. Wow. I'm having a quote. And you're also repeating now that she is a liar, correct? What you wrote in the Wall Street Journal. She wrote that I fired her because she refused to sign on in advance for the ACIP committee. No, that's not accurate. All right. You're calling her a liar. And I look forward to her coming before the HELP committee, maybe this committee as well.
9:24Michael Popok:Now, here's what Judge Murphy, a Biden appointee, had to say in a case brought by, thank God, the American Academy of Pediatrics against RFK Jr. and the Department of Health and Human Services. Like I said at the start of the hot take, I thought he was going to start with She Blinded Me With Science by Thomas Dolby. But he started with Carl Sagan. First line of his order, science is far from a perfect instrument of knowledge. History is littered with once universal truths that now come under scrutiny, and nevertheless, science is still the best we have. And that's his starting point for his order.
10:03Michael Popok:He talks about the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices formed by Congress in 1964. 4. Congress has recognized the importance of and value of having such independent experts, the judge writes on page 2, involved in setting our national public health agenda by cementing the committee's role in the Center for Disease Control's issuance of immunization schedules, determining which vaccines are available. Unfortunately, the judge says on page 3, the government has disregarded those methods and undermined the integrity of its actions. the government has removed all duly appointed members of the committee and replaced them without undertaking any of the rigorous screening that had been the hallmark of selection for decades and they've abandoned technical knowledge and expertise embodied by the committee the judge pointed it out by an exchange that he was particularly struck by during a hearing in which the lawyer for the Department of Health and Human Services said this in response to a question from the judge.
11:13Michael Popok:Their main argument was, it's all discretion, and judges can't provide any oversight over what the agency does about what they think is healthy or not healthy, what they think should or shouldn't be a vaccine for a child. It's all unreviewable. See, that's the little dirty lie that the Trump administration always begins all of its motions with, that judges have no role in providing any oversight, even when you're talking about something simple like statutory interpretation. See, you have a statute which is created by Congress, the executive branch, in this case, the Department of Health and Human Services needs to execute on that statute.
11:52Michael Popok:And according to the government, if there is a gap or a variance between what the statute says and what the agency action is, well, that's just too bad. It's just discretionary. I'm Michael Popok, and I got some big news for our audience. Most of you know me as the co-founder of Midas Touches Legal AF and the Legal AF YouTube channel, or as a 35-year national trial lawyer. Now building a what we started together on Legal AF, I've launched a new law firm, the Popok Firm, dedicated to obtaining justice through compassionate and zealous legal representation. At the Popok Firm, we are focused on obtaining justice for those who have been injured or damaged by a life-altering event by securing the highest dollar recoveries.
12:37Michael Popok:I've been tirelessly fighting for justice for the last 35 years, so my own law firm organically building on my legal AF work just feels right. And I've handpicked a team of top-tier trial fighters and settlement experts throughout all 50 states known as big auto injury attorneys who have the know-how to beat heartless insurance companies, corporations, government entities, and their attorneys. Big Auto's attorneys working with my firm are rock stars in their respective states and collectively responsible for billions of dollars in recoveries. So if you or a loved one have been on the wrong side of a catastrophic auto, motor vehicle, rideshare, or truck accident, suffered a personal injury, or been the victim of medical malpractice, employment harassment, or discrimination, or suffered a violation of your civil and constitutional rights, then contact the Popak firm today at 1-877-POPOC-AF or by visiting my website at www.thepopocfirm.com and fill out a free case evaluation form.
13:38Michael Popok:And if we determine that you have a case and you sign with us, we don't get paid unless you do. The Popoc Firm, fighting for your justice every step of the way. Which is, by the way, it is completely against a United States Supreme Court decision that the Trump administration promoted in which they struck down the Chevron doctrine. See, Chevron was a doctrine back in the 70s in which they gave to the agencies a lot of discretion when it came to their own expertise, saying that they were better suited than judges to make decisions about these narrow areas of science or technology. So environmental protection, you're better at it than judges.
14:21Michael Popok:You figure out what's good for clean air and clean water. While the Supreme Court and John Roberts, the chief justice in particular said, no, that's abdicating the responsibility of the judicial branch. It is the judicial branch, they said in the ruling which overturned Chevron. It is the judicial branch that must interpret even highly technical statutes. Okay, then why is the government still taking the position that agency action and discretion is unreviewable by courts? It's against the law, literally. So the judge says, let me test this theory of yours that it's unreviewable, because that's what judges do.
14:58Michael Popok:We look at statutes and see if the executive branch is compliant with those statutes in promoting or effectuating the goals of the statutes or not. That's the judicial branch in our three tripartite branches of government, right? Our system of government. The court says this struck him on page 19. Let's say that instead of revising the vaccine schedule, that the Center for Disease Control said, we think measles are good for you. You should have measles lunches. We should schedule measles lunches all in every city. And we're pro-communicable disease. That would seem to go right up against the goal of preventing those diseases in the statute.
15:40Michael Popok:Would it not, sir? Would such a policy by the CDC be judicially reviewable? Could a court make a declaration about it? And I love the commitment here to the position, even in the face of having to answer the question this way. The lawyer for the Center for Disease Control said, I think it's agency discretion, Your Honor. And the court said, so even if what the agency is saying is we like communicable diseases, we think we should have more of them. That's not judicially reviewable. No. Suffice it to say, the court said, the court disagrees and would be unlikely to find much difficulty, for example, in assessing whether the secretary's theoretical endorsement of getting a communicable disease like measles could be reasonably calculated to, quote, advance the prevention and suppression of communicable diseases under the statute.
16:31Michael Popok:That's what judges do. They interpret the statute. Then he took on the qualifications, and I use that term lightly, of the new members of the panel, this Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the ACIP committee, which is at the heart of immunization recommendations. And this new committee, after the 17 experts got fired by RFK Jr., how convenient, he put in a bunch of people, many of which are anti-vaxxers like him, who don't believe in many of the vaccines. They say, well, we consulted with Germany and Japan and best practices in other countries. We're supposed to be one of the leading countries on health care.
17:15Michael Popok:We know we're not. But we're one of the leading, especially on immunology, starting in the 60s. And we're now consulting with other countries. I thought other countries were bad. I thought America first, but not apparently when it comes to health care. This is probably one of the reasons that the Trump administration is trying to reel back in JFK, RFK Jr. So this panel that eliminated hepatitis A and B, influenza, rotavirus, and meningitis and COVID from the list of recommended vaccines is comprised of the following. Here's what they say. Here's what the judge says on page 29. Of the 15 members of the panel, I guess he couldn't find 17, even under the most generous readings, only six appeared to have any meaningful experience in vaccines.
18:03Michael Popok:So nine out of the 15 are just quacks when it comes to vaccines. You know, he says, and that's the very focus of the committee. He said the statute requires that they have the expertise in vaccines. He says six of the ACIP members, Dr. Hillary Blackburn, Dr. Griffin, Dr. Hillbeln, Dr. Milbone, Dr. Pagano, Dr. Pollack, lack any expertise or professional qualifications related to vaccines or immunization. An additional three, Dr. Levy, Dr. Malone, and Dr. Stein, although they have this information, he's effectively saying they're effectively anti-vaxxers. So no, the judge rules on preliminary injunction that they're more likely to prevail, that the public health issue and the impact of public health is so great and the likelihood of success on the case so great that he's going to block it.
19:02Michael Popok:Now, this is going to go up on appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Massachusetts and Boston. It's going to end up at the United States Supreme Court. This is going to be an interesting test for the Supreme Court, as I said earlier, because in one of their decisions where they overturned this agency discretion standard, they said it's for judges to review, not for the agency's expertise to be completely deferred to, to be given agency discretion, it's called. So I think right there, the court says we can review. Now, the question is whether on this particular health topic, they're going to defer to the non-scientist anti-vaxxer RFK Jr.
19:44Michael Popok:and his merry band of anti-vaxxers on the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or they're going to let a judge determine that no, things that were done here in the execution of the law were improper and illegal. Sometimes they side with Donald Trump when it comes to immigration, migration, war powers, and the like. Sometimes they don't when it comes to aspects of the economy, like tariffs. They side with Trump when he's protecting Christian values or rights. They don't side with him when it comes to other things that have to do with due process, you know, constitutional due process issues.
20:29Michael Popok:So we'll have to see where this one falls. I would hope it would fall in favor of protecting America and that these issues are too important. The protection of our children, the most fragile group in our society, is too important to leave it to the crass politics and insane ramblings of RFK Jr., but we'll have to see. We'll continue to follow it. They may take that case up this year before they're done on an emergency application or otherwise, and we will cover it on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal AF. In the meantime, I'm Michael Popak. Until my next report. Can't get your fill of Legal AF?
21:05Michael Popok:Me neither. That's why we formed the Legal AF Substack. Every time we mention something in a hot take, whether it's a court filing or a oral argument, come over to the Substack. You'll find the court filing and the oral argument there, including a daily roundup that I do called, wait for it, Morning AF. What else? All the other contributors from Legal AF are there as well. We got some new reporting. We got interviews. We got ad-free versions of the podcast and hot takes. Where? Legal AF on Substack. Come over now to free subscribe.
21:41Tired of your car insurance rate going up, even with a clean driving record? You're not alone. That's why there's Jerry, your proactive insurance assistant. Jerry compares rates side-by-side from over 50 top insurers and helps you switch with ease. Jerry even tracks market rates and alerts you when it's best to shop. No spam calls, no hidden fees. Drivers who save with Jerry could save over$1 ,300 a year. Switch with confidence. Download the Jerry app or visit jerry.ai.libsyn today. That's j-e-r-r-y dot a-i slash l-i-b-s-y-n.
From the publisher
In breaking news, a federal judge has blocked the Trump Administration and RFK Jr’s anti-vax policies, allowing children and babies to go without Hepatitis, meningitis, COVID19, influenza, and Rotavirus vaccines based on the policy set by a band of anti-vaxxers RFK Jr. brought in to the Center for Disease Control and the Congressionally-required vaccine committee. Popok reports on how a Supreme Court decision that Trump once supported may lead to Trump losing again on trying to destroy public health.
Subscribe: @LegalAFMTN
Visit https://meidasplus.com for more!
Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts:
MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast
Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af
MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial
The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast
Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan
The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show
The Ken Harbaugh Show: https://meidasnews.com/tag/the-ken-harbaugh-show
Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54
On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman
Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
