Trump Caught in the Act by Judge After Destroying Evidence in Pretti Murder

6 Feb 2026 · 13 min · 3 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Legal AF Episode Summary: Trump Caught in the Act by Judge After Destroying Evidence in Pretti Murder

Podcast Overview Podcast Title: Legal AF Hosts: Ben Meiselas, Michael Popok, Karen Friedman Agnifilo Description: Legal AF is a hard-hitting, thought-provoking podcast that examines the intersection of law and politics, hosted by experts with diverse backgrounds in civil rights and law enforcement.

Episode Details Episode Title: Trump Caught in the Act by Judge After Destroying Evidence in Pretti Murder Episode Description: A Trump-appointed judge in Minneapolis concluded that the federal government failed to properly safeguard evidence related to the murder of Alex Pretti and indicated that key evidence may be irretrievably lost, inviting future legal actions from Pretti's representatives.

Key Points Discussed

Judge's Findings

  • Evidence Destruction: The judge noted that it "appears likely" that crucial evidence from the crime scene has been lost, which could impact future lawsuits regarding the case.
  • Lack of Safeguarding: There was a failure on the part of the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension and federal agencies to maintain the integrity of the evidence, particularly regarding Pretti’s firearm.

Legal Implications

  • Invitation for Future Lawsuits: The judge's observations suggest that there is a strong basis for a lawsuit by Pretti's estate, particularly focused on potential civil rights violations under Section 1983.
  • Spoliation of Evidence: The discussion emphasized the concept of spoliation, which pertains to the intentional or unintentional destruction of evidence. This could significantly affect liability defenses for federal agents involved.

Specifics on the Gun

  • Missing Firearm: The judge expressed concerns over the whereabouts of the gun allegedly involved in Pretti's shooting, noting a lack of clarity and proper documentation among federal agents.
  • Inconsistency in Statements: Multiple affidavits from government agents did not provide a clear account of the gun’s handling, leading to questions about the evidence management practices in the case.

Broader Context

  • Civil Damages: The hosts highlighted the potential for civil damages as a method of seeking justice for Pretti's family, which cannot reverse the loss but may provide some form of accountability.
  • Federal Accountability: The episode discussed the need for federal agencies to adhere to standard law enforcement protocols to prevent such evidence mishandling in the future.

Important Quotes

  • The judge stated, “It appears likely that evidence was lost or spoliated... this is something for Alex Pretti’s lawyers to bring as a lawsuit,” indicating a pathway for legal action.
  • “We don’t even know the names of these people at this late date,” referring to the federal agents involved in the shooting, which highlights transparency issues.

Conclusion This episode of Legal AF delves into the significant legal ramifications surrounding the destruction of evidence in the Alex Pretti case. The discussions emphasize the need for accountability in law enforcement practices and the potential for civil litigation to address grievances arising from alleged violations of civil rights. The hosts provide thorough legal analysis while underscoring the importance of preserving evidence in the pursuit of justice.

Additional Resources

  • The Popak Firm: [Visit Here](https://thepopokfirm.com)
  • Subscribe to Legal AF: [Legal AF Podcast](https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af)
  • Join the Conversation: Share insights or ask questions on social media platforms connected to the MidasTouch network.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Judge Tostrid's Order on Evidence Destruction

2:25 to 4:32

Insights into a federal judge's ruling regarding evidence destruction in a high-profile case.

“That is what's within a new order by Judge Tostrad coming out of Minnesota just in the last few hours here on the Midas Touch Network.”

Implications of Evidence Spoliation

4:32 to 7:44

Discussing the consequences of evidence spoliation and future lawsuits.

“He was not MAGA, but he was a Trump appointee in the first term sitting in Minnesota.”

Concerns Over Missing Gun and Evidence Handling

7:44 to 10:40

Examining the issues surrounding the missing gun and evidence preservation.

“He's also concerned, as am I, about the gun.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00MeidasTouch:Kayak gets my flight, hotel, and rental car right, so I can tune out travel advice that's just plain wrong. Bro, Skycoin. Way better than points. Never fly during a Scorpio full moon. Just tell the manager you'll sue. Instant room upgrade. Stop taking bad travel advice. Start comparing hundreds of sites with Kayak and get your trip right. Kayak. Got that right. I'm R.J. Decker, a private investigator uncovering the sunshine state's darkest secrets. Tuesdays, it's the premiere of ABC's hottest new crime show. R.J. freaking Decker as I live and breathe. He's a private eye. It's not a standard murder.

0:43MeidasTouch:It's someone bigger. And a public mess. Trying to get sent back to prison today? You go to prison one time and suddenly it's all the jokes. R.J. Decker, series premiere, Tuesdays on ABC and stream on Hulu.

1:20MeidasTouch:where taste recognizes taste. List now with no selling fees. Payment processing fees and boosting fees still apply. See website for details.

1:28Michael Popok:Rated T for Teen.

1:29MeidasTouch:Hey everyone, it's the best in the world. CM Punk, back to shake up WWE 2K26. This year, the show never stops. You're running the greatest spectacle on earth with the biggest roster we've ever had. Over 400 superstars and legends from every era. Stack the tables, break the rules, burn it all down. And yeah, my very own showcase. telling my story the way it should have been told. Because when the show never stops, anything is possible. Available March 13th. Pre-order now. LinkedIn is pretty amazing at helping you grow your small business. We cannot stop your new clients from emailing you at 3 a.m.

2:07MeidasTouch:We can help you sell, market, and hire in one place. We cannot help you be in three places at once. And while we can't help you organize your calendar, LinkedIn can help you land more clients so you have a calendar to organize. Grow your small business on LinkedIn. Learn more at linkedin.com slash small business.

2:27Michael Popok:A federal judge appointed by Donald Trump in Minnesota believes it's highly likely that evidence at the crime scene of the shooting of Alex Preddy was destroyed, is no longer recoverable, and that in the future, in a lawsuit brought by his estate, they'll be able to use that point to win their case. That is what's within a new order by Judge Tostrad coming out of Minnesota just in the last few hours here on the Midas Touch Network. Now, on the face of it, the judge decided he's not going to continue an injunction, a temporary restraining order that he put in place last week to stop the administration from continuing to destroy evidence, preventing them from destroying evidence.

3:13Michael Popok:He says, whatever's done is done. And if that's already been done, that's something for Alex Preti's lawyers, which he basically invites to bring that lawsuit and make that argument. Particularly, there's focus in the decision, the opinion and order on the gun. No, not the one or two that shot and killed, summarily executed Alex Preti with 10 bullets into his riddled body, but rather his gun, the gun that the defense claims, the government claims, was the reason that he was assassinated. To this day, as I said a week ago, when I saw the government's filings by the Department of Homeland Security and the Border Patrol and the FBI agent, I have no idea where the gun is.

3:56Michael Popok:You know what? The judge doesn't know where the gun is either. And he's questioning why the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension hasn't brought a motion directed right about the gun. But he believes there's so much attention on this case that there's nothing more he can do by way of an injunction. I'll explain to you the difference between an injunction and other types of remedies when a court sits in both law and in equity here on this hot take. I'm Michael Popok. Take a minute, hit the free subscribe button, but then come over to Legal AF YouTube channel and help us continue to grow there and give us the resources we need to meet the moment.

4:33Michael Popok:Let's talk about Judge Tostrid. He was not MAGA, but he was a Trump appointee in the first term sitting in Minnesota. We reported that last week on a temporary emergency injunction, he ordered the federal government not to destroy evidence. This is a case brought by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. All they want to do is do their job. They just want to get access to the evidence. They want it in real time, moments after the shooting, get access to the crime scene that was blocked and denied by the feds. They wanted access to the witnesses. They wanted access to the gun. They wanted access to the shell cases.

5:09Michael Popok:They wanted access and interview the agents who were involved in the shooting. They wanted access to their guns for forensic purposes, you know, like CSI Minneapolis. None of that happened. They ran to court to preserve evidence. The judge did that. The question now was, was he going to continue to have that order out there. But more fundamentally, more importantly, are the observations made by the judge about the crime scene and the future lawsuits, civil lawsuits, brought by Alex Preddy's family. Here's what he says on page 13. It appears likely that evidence was lost or spoliated, that's a fancy word we use for evidence that's destroyed, intentionally or unintentionally, at the scene of Mr.

5:54Michael Popok:Preddy's shooting. What he says about that is, particularly that's an issue. He says on page 15, he said his considerations about continuing the temporary restraining order are dampened because of the continuing, about the continuing existence and integrity of that evidence. He said, Mr. Petty's shooting alone almost certainly triggered defendant's duty to preserve evidence that may be relevant to any excessive force civil suit or proceeding brought on his or his survivor's behalf. And in that proceeding, non-preservation or spoliation would pose significant, perhaps dispositive consequences. Let me translate that.

6:35Michael Popok:He's inviting effectively and knows there's going to be an excessive force lawsuit, excessive force lawsuit brought by Pretti's estate for what happened to him, proving that it's a Section 1983 civil rights violation and the rest. We keep talking about the criminal prosecution against the federal agents. There's also justice to be had on the civil side and for damages, never bringing Alex Pretti or Renee Good back for that matter, but justice nonetheless, an aspect of justice nonetheless. The judge is anticipating there will be such a civil suit and that in that suit, The fact that the feds did not properly secure the crime scene, didn't properly preserve the chain of custody, didn't properly bag evidence and collect it, didn't properly preserve any evidence, seemed to have lost the gun, which I'll talk about in a moment, are all things that the plaintiffs can bring as a motion on spoliation to, for instance, strike any liability defenses of the feds.

7:38Michael Popok:or find against them on liability based on the destruction of the evidence. And therefore, the estate plaintiff's lawyers will be going right to the amount of damages. That's a possibility. He's also concerned, as am I, about the gun. Now, there were three separate affidavits that were filed by government, federal government agents, one for Homeland Security, one for Border Patrol, one for the FBI. For the life of me, I sorted them all out. I laid them all next to each other. I don't know where the gun is for Mr. Preddy. And the judge doesn't either. And what the judge says about that is, on page 13, plaintiffs also identified concerns.

8:17Michael Popok:Remember, the plaintiffs are the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, like the FBI from Minnesota, who are just trying to get access to the crime scene. Plaintiffs also identified concerns regarding defendants' post-incident handling of the firearm allegedly taken from Mr. Preddy. And while I share plaintiff's concerns, they remain undeveloped and nonspecific. Superintendent Evans, who's for the Minnesota side, stateside, explained, it does not appear that the gun was protected according to normal law enforcement processes. And I'm concerned about other evidence not being protected. In his declaration, he also saw he saw images circulating on social media about the alleged gun taken from Mr.

8:59Michael Popok:Pretty. Neither he nor any other witnesses from the feds addressed the firearms ongoing preservation. Where is it? That's what I said. Or disagreed with Superintendent Evans' testimony. They couldn't even get where is the gun right among the three who are supposed to be in charge of the chain of custody. From defendant's silence, the judge says, I infer they failed to safeguard the firearm in compliance with normal law enforcement processes. I mean, there you have it. Yes, the headline is going to be somebody in the Department of Justice bragging about the fact the judge is not continuing to order them not to destroy evidence, but they do so at their own risk.

9:41Michael Popok:I'm more interested in the invitation on the lawsuit about the fact the judge has declared that there was spoliation, there was destruction of the crime scene, and we don't know where the gun is, and the judge concluding that the gun was not properly handled. What about their gun? That begs the question. What about the guns of the five border patrol that jumped on them like a pack of wolves? Where's their guns? Was it one gun firing 10 bullets from an extended magazine? Or was it two weapons? Or was it more? We don't know. We don't even know the names of these people at this late date. So we're going to continue to follow it all right here on the Midas Touch Network and on Legal AF.

10:19Michael Popok:Take a moment, hit the free subscribe button, help us continue to grow Legal AF Substack. I'm running a 35 % sale on annual membership on Legal AF Substack. Come over, become a paid or regular subscriber on Legal AF YouTube. Until my next report, I'm Michael Popak.

10:36MeidasTouch:Hey everybody, Ben Mycelis here from the Midas Touch Network. I wanted to let you know about my podcast partner, Michael Popak's new law firm. It's called the Popak Firm. Michael Popak's pursuing his dream of starting his own law firm, really based on the popular demand by all the Midas, Mighty, and Legal AFers who were approaching Michael Popak with their cases and saying, can you help us? And at that time, Popak was not able to. So he went out on his own. He started the Popak Firm, where he is now handling catastrophic injury cases like car accident cases, trucking cases, malpractice cases, big negligence cases, wrongful death cases.

11:19MeidasTouch:So if you or someone you know have a case like this, the consultation with Popak's firm is free. Give him a call. See if you have a case. It's thepopokfirm.com, thepopokfirm.com, or you can call 877-POPOKAF, P-O-P-O-K-A-F. So 1-877-P-O-P-O-K-A-F. Give Michael Popok a call. And I'm really proud of you, Popok. Thanks for all the hard work you're putting in.

11:58MeidasTouch:take your laundry and hand deliver it to your door expertly cleaned and you can take the time pursuing your passions. Time once spent sorting and waiting, folding and queuing, now spent challenging and innovating and pushing your way to greatness. So pick up the Irish flute or those calligraphy pens or that daunting beef wellington recipe card and leave the laundry to us. Rinse. It's time to be great. Starting a business can seem like a daunting task unless you have a partner like Shopify. They have the tools you need to start and grow your business. From designing a website to marketing to selling and beyond, Shopify can help with everything you need.

12:36MeidasTouch:There's a reason millions of companies like Mattel, Heinz, and Allbirds continue to trust and use them. With Shopify on your side, turn your big business idea into... Sign up for your$1 per month trial at shopify.com slash special offer. From lashes for days with the Viral Liquid Lash Extensions mascara to lift and color from their brilliant eye brightener. Thrive Cosmetics is the go-to for amplifying everyday looks. Plus, every product is 100 % vegan, cruelty-free, and made with clean, skin-loving ingredients that work with your skin. Amplify your everyday. Go to thrivecosmetics.com slash shine26 for an exclusive offer of 20 % off your first order.

13:15MeidasTouch:That's Thrive Cosmetics. C-A-U-S-E-M-E-T-I-C-S dot com slash shine26. Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. The message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop. With Mint, you can get premium wireless for just$15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments, but that's weird. Okay, one judgment. Anyway, give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three-month plan, equivalent to$15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra.

13:50MeidasTouch:See full terms at mintmobile.com.

From the publisher

A Trump appointed Judge in Minneapolis just concluded that the Federal Government “failed to safeguard” Alex Pretti’s firearm according to “normal law enforcement proceedings” and also observed that it “appears likely” that other key evidence was “lost”, inviting future lawyers for Pretti to file motions about the destroyed evidence. Popok reports.

Check out the Popok Firm: https://thepopokfirm.com

Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts:

MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast

Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af

MissTrial: https://meidasnews.com/tag/miss-trial

The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast

Cult Conversations: The Influence Continuum with Dr. Steve Hassan: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan

The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show

Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats

Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54

On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman

Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Legal AF by MeidasTouch

All 660 episodes
Trump Caught in the Act by Judge After Destroying Evidence in Pretti MurderLegal AF by MeidasTouch · 13 min
Listen in VO