Naming expert shares the process behind creating billion-dollar brand names like Azure, Vercel, Windsurf, Sonos, Blackberry, and Impossible Burger | David Placek (Lexicon Branding)

29 Jun 2025 · 1 h 23 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: Naming Expert Shares the Process Behind Creating Billion-Dollar Brand Names | David Placek

Podcast Overview

  • Title: Lenny's Podcast: Product | Growth | Career
  • Description: Interviews with world-class product leaders and growth experts to provide actionable advice for building and growing products.
  • Episode Title: David Placek on Creating Iconic Brand Names
  • Guest: David Placek, Founder of Lexicon Branding

Episode Highlights David Placek discusses the intricate process of creating successful brand names, sharing insights drawn from his extensive experience at Lexicon Branding. His firm has developed names for over 4,000 brands, including notable names like Sonos, Azure, and Impossible Burger.

Key Takeaways

  1. The Importance of Brand Names
  2. A brand name is a critical asset, often used more than any other marketing tool.
  3. Names should resonate beyond comfort; they should evoke strong reactions.
  1. The Three-Step Naming Process: Identify, Invent, Implement
  2. Identify: Understand client behavior and future aspirations.
  3. Invent: Generate creative name options through structured brainstorming.
  4. Implement: Develop strategies to present names effectively to stakeholders.
  1. Psychology of Naming
  2. Clients often believe they will "know it when they see it," but this is rarely the case.
  3. Polarization in opinions about a name can indicate its strength.
  1. Linguistic Elements in Branding
  2. Each letter has unique psychological vibrations; understanding these can strengthen brand identity.
  3. Effective names often combine sound symbolism with semantic meaning.
  1. Challenges of Naming in the Age of AI
  2. Naming conventions are evolving, and domain names are less critical than before.
  3. Names must stand out in an increasingly crowded market.

Noteworthy Examples

  • Sonos: Initially rejected for not sounding "entertainment-like," ultimately became a successful name due to its unique qualities and market understanding.
  • Microsoft Azure: Initially criticized but grew into a billion-dollar brand, illustrating the value of bold branding strategies.
  • Windsurf: Named to evoke the experience of flow, demonstrating the importance of conceptual depth in name selection.

Naming Framework

  • Diamond Framework: A tool for founders to align on what winning looks like:
  • Top Tip: Define what winning means.
  • Right Side: Identify what the company currently has to win.
  • Bottom Tip: Determine what the company needs to win.
  • Left Side: Articulate the message or experience the name should convey.

Final Thoughts

  • Naming is not merely about words; it's about creating experiences.
  • Founders should allow for exploration and creativity in the naming process, focusing on potential rather than immediate comfort.

Conclusion David Placek's insights on naming underscore the complexity and significance of brand identities in today's market. By applying a structured yet creative approach, businesses can discover names that resonate deeply, encapsulate their values, and stand out amidst competition.

For a deeper understanding and further tips, listeners are encouraged to explore the episode and consider David's offer of assistance through office hours for those in need of guidance on naming strategies.

---

Additional Resources

  • David Placek's LinkedIn: [LinkedIn Profile](https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-placek-05a82/)
  • Lexicon Branding Website: [Lexicon Branding](https://www.lexiconbranding.com)
  • Lenny's Newsletter: [Lenny's Newsletter](https://www.lennysnewsletter.com)

---

This summary encapsulates the core themes and discussions from the podcast episode featuring David Placek, aiming to equip readers with actionable insights into the art and science of naming.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00your brand name, nothing's going to be used more often or for longer than that name. Design will change, message will change, products will change, but that name is there. What's a name that you came up with? You have to fight super hard for it, that the client just hated. When we presented Sonos, it was rejected because it's not entertainment -like. We argued about that because I said this is outside looking in, but I don't see you as an entertainment company. Humans do like to be comfortable. Part of our job here is to help people to give the confidence going bigger and being uncomfortable. There's a quote that I found of yours, if your team is comfortable with the name chances are you don't have the name yet.

0:37We look for polarization. We look for attention in a team arguing about these things. Polarization is a sign of strength in the word. Most clients, they come to a naming project absolutely believing with full confidence that they're going to know it when they see it. And the truth is, it almost never happens. Most people, as any of this, are founders, a lot of PMs on product teams. Let's say they have a couple weeks. Gotta come up with the name. What should they do? Today, my guest is David Placik. David is the founder of Lexicon Branding, which pioneered the field of brand naming. An invented a few names that you may have heard of, including PowerBook, Pentium, Blackberry, Swiffer, the Impossible Burger, also Versel, and Windsurf and CapCut and Azure.

1:22In our conversation, David opens up about the very specific process that he and his team go through to find winning names, including a simple exercise that you can do with you and your team to help you find the right name in just a few weeks. We also talk about why a great name is worth spending your time on. Why you won't know a great name when you see it, and why you need to feel uncomfortable about the name first. Also, why big team brainstorms don't ever lead to great names. The stories behind names like Pentium and Sonos and Versel and Windsurf. Also, such interesting insights about the feeling and energy of every letter of the alphabet.

1:55And so much more, this episode is designed for anyone trying to figure out a name for their product or company, and also just for anyone that's interested in hearing the stories of how some of the most iconic names came to be. If you enjoy this podcast, don't forget to subscribe and follow it in your favorite podcasting app or YouTube. And if you become a paid subscriber of my newsletter, you get a year free of a bunch of amazing products, including Bolt, Linear, Superhuman, Notion, Proplexity, Grenola, and more, check it out at Lenny's newsletter .com and click bundle. With that, I bring you David Plastic.

2:27This episode is brought to you by Work OS. If you're building a SaaS app, at some point your customers will start asking for enterprise features like Samo authentication and skin provisioning. That's where Work OS comes in, making a fast and painless to add enterprise features to your app. Their APIs are easy to understand so that you can ship quickly and get back to building other features. Today, hundreds of companies are already powered by Work OS, including ones you probably know, like Versel, Webflow, and Loom. Work OS also recently acquired Warned, the Fine grain authorization service. Warned's product is based on a groundbreaking authorization system called Zanzibar, which was originally designed for Google to power Google Docs and YouTube.

3:13This enables fast authorization checks at enormous scale while maintaining a flexible model that can be adapted to even the most complex use cases. If you're currently looking to build role -based access control or other enterprise features like single sign -on, scam, or user management, you should consider Work OS. It's a drop -in replacement for Auth0 and supports up to 1 million monthly active users for free. Check it out at WorkOS .com to learn more. That's WorkOS .com. Last year, 1 .3 % of the global GDP flowed through Stripe. That's over 1 .4 trillion dollars, and driving that huge number are the millions of businesses growing more rapidly with Stripe.

3:59For industry leaders like Forbes, Atlassian, OpenAI, and Toyota, Stripe isn't just financial software. It's a powerful partner that simplifies how they move money, making it as seamless and borderless as the internet itself. For example, Hertz boosted its online payment authorization rates by 4 % after migrating to Stripe. And imagining a 23 % lift in revenue, like Forbes did just six months after switching to Stripe for subscription management. Stripe has been leveraging AI for the last decade to make its product better, a growing revenue for all businesses, from smarter checkouts to fraud prevention and beyond.

4:36Join the ranks of over half of the Fortune 100 companies that trust Stripe to drive change. Learn more at Stripe .com.

4:48David, thank you so much for being here and welcome to the podcast. Well, thank you. I'm excited about today and looking forward to the conversation. Me too. These are actually my favorite kinds of conversations because this topic is so outside of my wheelhouse. And I know I'm just going to learn a ton. Also, this is just something that every founder and product builder has to think about at some point and they have no idea what they're doing. And then their name becomes so core to their identity. It's thoroughly the word they say more than any other word. And I feel like I've never heard advice on how to do this well.

5:23So, I'm really excited for this conversation. I'm going to just dive into a question. And the question is just what's the name that you came up with and your team came up with? It's a fight super hard for that the client just hated and you ended up winning. And now it's just such an obviously awesome name that everyone loves. The story I like to tell is a story of Sonos. One a great client team. I worked with all the founders. But at the time, they were stuck on being in a brand name that put them in the entertainment business. And so when we presented Sonos, which has many qualities to it, it was rejected because it doesn't have enough sort of emotion to it.

6:12It's not entertainment -like. And we argued about that because I said, I don't, this is outside looking in, but I don't see you as an entertainment company. You make speakers that allow for the flow of entertainment through these things. And Sonos is about sound. But it had a particular quality. It's called a palindrome. So, which really means that you can flip it. And it means the same thing. In the case of Sonos, you could all also turn it upside down. And it was essentially the same. And so that got them thinking about this. But they were still has. So I left that meeting. They were in Santa Barbara.

6:55And I came back and they were still struggling with it. And I went, I got on a plane. It didn't even build them for this. Went back down to Santa Barbara and met with them again. And said, I really believe in this name. And I think it's the right for you. And at a certain point, one of the founders, Bob McFarlane, who is just a wonderful client, I could see him thinking. And he said, you know, we're trying to name this for ourselves. And what we really should be doing is naming it for the marketplace and the customers. And I think Sonos now is the right name. And I felt really good about that.

7:35And he later wrote me a note about how I helped with to do that. And we use it sometimes in credentials presentations, because it's such a nice note. But Sonos is something I'm so glad that I had this internal energy to I got to go down there and make a bid for this. I don't do that often, by the way, but I felt very strongly about Sonos. I love Sonos. I love the name. I have many Sonos products. How often does this happen where the client is just now? This is not the name. We have this bigger vision. We have a whole other idea of it. And then you convince them. Well, it happens all the time. And it's a little bit bidirectional, right?

8:12Right? We, you know, there's most clients, and I can understand this, right? They come to a naming project. Absolutely believing with full confidence that they're going to know it when they see it. And the truth is it almost never happens. I have now, I think this year we'll hit 4 ,000 projects that we've completed. And it's interesting. You know, we'll tell people in a very polite way. You're not going to know only see it, but I know they don't believe me. And even when I, you could see them thinking that, you know what? He was right. I really have to think about this. I have to process it. And part of that, part of why clients don't like the bolder names, the more imaginative names that we present, is they are looking for comfort.

9:05And that's the opposite that what you want to do. And part of our job here is to help people to give the confidence that going bolder and bigger is and being uncomfortable. There's, I use the expression, there is no power in comfort, not in the marketplace. Wow, there's so much here already. Okay, so this idea of you're not going to know it when you see it is something that people come in with thinking. Like once I see it, it'll be obvious. Just why, why is it that never, almost never the case? Is it because my name has to be something that is uncomfortable? There's a lot of psychology to this, which ironically, I never even took a psychology class in college or graduate school.

9:52But the first element is humans do like to be comfortable. And one of the mechanisms of comfort is if something's been successful before, then I feel like I can approve it or select it. This is why, you know, movies like Harry Potter or even novels like Jack London's Call of the Wild get rejected so many times. I think Harry Potter was rejected 16 or 18 times and Jack London's book even more than that. I mean, think about it. He's pitching a book and he say, what are you talking about here? You're saying a dog becomes a wolf? I've never heard of anything like that. So, so we really do have to help people think about it's not about the past.

10:40You're actually creating the future. And we really talk to people and emphasize the idea, this, this isn't a name you're creating. This, we're creating an experience for you. We're going to work together. And we really, our conversations always start with, talk to us about how you behave now and how you want to behave in the future. As opposed to tell me about your positioning, tell me about your values, tell me about your mission, that's really kind of old thinking. It's very traditional. And that did work, you know, 25 or 30 years ago. But this is a far more complex and interconnected world, a digital world now that that that stuff just doesn't create.

11:26It doesn't create names like Sonos or, you know, some of our other credentials that we would probably will talk about today. Yeah, we're going to talk about just the process you guys go through. So stay tuned for that. But before we get to that, is there's another story you can share that kind of shows this idea of being bold? I'll talk about Microsoft's Azure. So when Microsoft came to us, they were pretty much stuck and Marcus Ruff does. And in many ways, it to their credit. A lot of things don't need to be named. They don't need trademarks. They don't need brand names. They need descriptors.

12:04And so they came to us to develop a name that started or ended with cloud. Nade sense to them because it was a cloud service. And our reaction was, if you do that, you're going to be in an ocean of other cloud this cloud that. And you have an opportunity as Microsoft here to really emerge as a leader in this. And so, you know, there was a discussion about, okay, we'll take a look at those, but we'd like to see some cloud names. Okay. Which is easy to do, by the way. And so we did that. And we along the way, we came up with this word Azure, which is another word for blue. And so there was a link to clouds, blue sky clouds, things like that.

12:58But we really presented it based on its linguistic qualities. It's a noisy word that that Z in there starts with an A, you know, and it ends in a nice smooth flow. So we really strive to do create names that are balanced. And in a very busy competitive world, having some a strong signal, which is generated by noise is a good thing. The reaction wasn't wasn't good. You know, one of the clients said, that's just a dumb idea. And I, you know, this remarks like that at this point after these four decades, it sort of rolls off my back like a water op of ducks is what my grandmother would say. But I think along the way, as we talked about it, they began to warm up to this.

13:55And now, of course, it's, I don't know, $100 billion brand or something like that. But that's an example of, I haven't seen that before, I'm very comfortable with cloud. Cloud is what it is. That's the, you know, we're describing it. But that's a statement. And I think that, yeah, well, I don't think I know that's what I said in one of the presentations is you don't want to make a statement here. You want to, you want to start a story, right? And an Azure is going to behave differently in the marketplace than, you know, cloud Pro, which is, I think one of the names that we presented to them on the other side at their request.

14:34I'm going to go ahead and win with Azure. Let me actually ask this question. I know you're biased, but just how important is a great name? Like, if you had a better name than a product that was better than you, does that make a big difference? Does anything you can share there to help people see, this is the power of a great name? Let's look just at the, at the reality of this, your brand name, what is a product name or company name? Nothing's going to be used more often or for longer than that name. Design will change, messing will change, products will change, right? But that name is there. So I like to talk about this idea of cumulative advantage, right?

15:10Over time, as people buy more more of the product, they see it more often, they, that they're bond between you and that brand, or them in the brand, I should say, becomes stronger and stronger. So you want that name to, to stick in their mind to be distinctive, because distinctiveness is what creates that cumulative advantage. The second thing is this notion of what I call asymmetric advantage. It makes perfect sense and most people, most clients agree with this when we, when we say this, is that even before you launch this brand, why not start with an advantage in the marketplace? And you won't get an advantage if you're descriptive.

15:55If you are Cloud Pro and there's 10 other cloud services, you're not going to stand out in the marketplace. You won't have the ability to create that, necessarily, that cumulative advantage in the marketplace. So those are my two reasons why names are, I think, you know, done right. And we do, we do talk about our mission is not creating good names. A lot of people can do that. Our mission is to create the right name for clients. And, and because the right name does deliver asymmetric advantage and cumulative advantage for you. And that for us has almost unlimited value. This is a great answer, essentially, what you're saying is, it's not going to like necessarily make or break you, but it gives you an advantage.

16:47A great name gives you an advantage, especially if you're just getting started. The like you need every advantage you can get exactly. And this is maybe a little bit off, off tangent. But one of the best books on marketing, I've ever read, which is not a book on marketing. It's, and you may have read it along the way. In college, if you study unique, reaker, you know, classics, it's called the million dialogues. And it's a dialogue. It's, we'll take anybody listening to this, maybe 25 minutes to read it, between the Athenians and the government of Milos and the Athenians had decided that they needed that island.

17:31And they went and approached them very nice way, but that we want to take over the island. Nothing will change. You'll be taxed a little bit, but we'll protect you. And the Athenians had thought every aspect about how to take that island before. So they, by the time they got there, they had created a symmetric advantage in terms of ships and men and all this stuff. It's just, by the way, in the book, there's no mention of marketing or brand strategy or any of these things. But if you read it, you begin to see that it's marketing really is about a symmetric advantage. And so why not start from the very beginning with an advantage?

18:11That's the value of an name. Let's dive into the actual process you guys go through. And I want to read a quote that Guillermo Roush shared when asked him about what it was like working with you is the CEO and co -founder of Versel, which he has worked with. I definitely want to hear that story, by the way. So he said, before David, the ability to name something was like charisma. You either have it or you don't. It was so surreal to watch this team just still add down to a science. So let me just ask you, what does that science look like? What are the steps to coming up with an amazing name for your product or company that you guys go through?

18:42That's very nice of Guillermo. He is very impressive innovator in this category. And we greatly enjoyed working with him. Well, our process is really I break it down in three steps. At first, we have to identify, then we invent, and then we implement. So it's just three things. It's not rocket science, but it does. It's a combination of creativity and discipline, right? And obviously talented people and experience in these things. So let's just kind of go through those things. In the first section of Identify, it's really trying to find out from the client. Let's talk about behavior. So how are you behaving now?

19:27And how do you want to behave in the future? That behavior is bidirectional. In other words, the marketplace behaves towards a verse. That's the name we created for Guillermo. And they behave towards the marketplace. And that's an important point because everything buildings are bidirectional. Even the look at a building you behave differently towards a temple than you or a church versus a holiday in in terms of how that architecture states. So we focus on that. Behavior is closely aligned for us with experience. How do you want this brand to the experience of this brand? Now, when we listen to those things, we begin to think about, you know, rhythm of the name.

20:17So something like Dessani has a lot of rhythm to it, right? It's kind of calming, right? And so we'll begin to extract things from that discussion on experience. We will then also, as part of this first phase, look at the competition. We call that developing the landscape. And we're looking for what are the words, you know, the, what are the brand names first? And then what language are they using in this space? So because we want to be, we have to be distinctive. If a brand name isn't distinctive, you lose, right? Then you're imitating. And that's the form of suicide. I think, you know, that's a famous quote from some, I think the president of PNG, you know, 50 years ago or something like that.

21:03So, so that's that first phase, which allows us to create what we call a creative framework. And we don't even use the word objectives here, because that gets too logical. We actually framework for us as a metaphor for a window for us and our teams and our linguists to travel through. So it kind of opened things up so that we're not coming back with a narrow list of names. We're coming back with names that have depth and breadth and have different experiences and personalities to them. And clients will sign off on that. And then we get going. So now we're moved to the invent stage. And in the invent stage, we do really two things.

21:47You can look at this as, you know, two layers of our process. And I think the second layer is probably what makes us quite unique in the marketplace. And it's the result of millions of dollars of R &D on our part. So the first thing is no surprise to anyone. We work with, you know, creative individuals. And we don't use this, this will be contrary. And we don't use large brainstorming sections. I did when I first started the company, I used freelancers, I used brains, large brainstorming groups. And along the way through some analysis, we really discovered that that was not really working for us.

22:28That actually the names were coming from employees and from small groups. And so we moved our process to at least two or three small teams of two people. And each of those teams, so let's say we, you know, on significant projects, we always use three teams. And each team gets a different briefing. One team knows everything about the project. But the other teams don't. We'll replace if we're working for Microsoft. The second team thinks they're working for Apple. I mean, they know which disguise. We're not keeping this from anyone. And then the third team, we take it out of computers. And, you know, they might be naming a bicycle or a car or something like that.

23:08What we're trying to do is open up the coffers of creativity for this. And so when people are working on what they know is not the real assignment, they are now free to make all kinds of mistakes. And so most of our names have come out of the second or third team. Because they're, yeah, I think the process at some point, I will hopefully write either a good article on this or maybe even a book. But this process would work for I think a lot of things. I know, I know all right. Now, what's that second layer that I talked about? Well, we have made significant investments in this area of linguistics and cognitive science.

23:55And it's in two ways. One, building proprietary knowledge. So we know through and through research that we funded an extensive amount about an area in language called linguistics called the sound symbolism. So what are the sounds of the 26 letters of the alphabet? And what do they do? How do they evoke things? Well, it turns out that that each of those letters sends out a signal that creates a certain sort of vibration, if you will, or experience. Now, there's been research on that over the years, but there were some gaps, and we decided to to fill this. And we, you know, over the years, we've got a very good relationship with Stanford University with their department of linguistics, which, you know, we've hired the linguists from MIT, from Berkeley.

24:49We have a linguistic internship here. I actually just ran this number preparing for this discussion. We have employed over four decades now, 253 linguists, most of them PhDs, some of them contract, some of them are actual employees. Well, that's a lot of intellectual knowledge. So we, we really have what I call a linguistic engine here. And then we now have an operating network of, I just checked on this figure yesterday, we have 108 linguists in 76 countries that help us. Some of them do creative work. Others will do just the analysis of names for us. So now we have that creative framework. We have creative teams working on this.

25:39Now we're tapping into databases that have, you know, over 18 ,000 small word units, technically called morphines. And so we also can tap in from a sound standpoint. You know, what are the, what are the sounds of reliability? What are the sounds of aliveness? And so with Sonos, by the way, we wanted, you know, things that are somewhat noisy, right? And so S is a noisy letter, like, like a Z or even a V. And so you begin to set priorities about what letters we're going to use. And that work from that, we call it, you know, an engineering layer sort of floats up into the creative teams. And so it's a mixture of things that are certain point all right.

26:27Now what happens to all that it at a certain point, usually three to four weeks into this, we might have two or three thousand ideas. I say ideas because they're not all solutions. They're not all workable. They may be just beginning ideas concepts. And we sift rows. And now one of the major challenges that we face and certainly our clients face is the need to clear a trademark for it to be not in conflict with a marketplace that is, you know, we're almost reaching a tipping point in terms of difficulty of clearing names here. And so we have the paralegals here and we have a trademark attorney and we'll analyze those names.

27:12That gets us to a smaller, much smaller set. And then we'll do our linguistic work with our linguists. And we end up with a set of names to show our clients. We'll do this twice with our with most assignments. Sometimes we'll do just one time depending on timing and budget. But we really try to get two cycles here partly because humans love to compare, right? Well, you don't, if you're looking for a house, you don't just look at the first house and say, okay, let's sign us up. You look and you learn that we don't need a swimming pool, but we do need a view. It's the same with names. And so we get feedback from our clients.

27:51And sometimes that's a co -creative process where a client will come up with a word or solution and we'll then run that through our screening mechanisms for them. And that's really the process. And the final phase is implementing. Well, it's actually a pause at that because I so much I want to talk about it with the second step. And but we'll get to the step three. There's just this is just blowing my mind. All the things you guys do here. This is incredible. There's so many things here that are so unlike what I expected. First of all, the creative folks that are actually coming up with these names.

Read the full transcript

28:26What are what's kind of like the background of these people? What are these? Where are these people? Yeah. So the fundamental quality is they're going to be curious and they're going to be hard working. This is and hopefully and this is hard to screen for, but you know, lower egos. This is unlike the advertising business which I came from. So I've six years at a large agency where a creative person or a copywriter can think about something and come in with three or four alternatives, right? In terms of a headline or body copy. And that might be refined a little bit and maybe sent back to the drawing boards altogether.

29:10But it's a relatively simple process, right? And no disrespect intended there. Here, I can't just sit down and say, okay, well, we're you know, we're naming a new car here. And so I'm going to I'm going to generate 100 names and you generate 100 names and something will fall out. That just that won't those names will not there's not enough in that list to clear through our screens of legal screens or linguistic screens. And remember, we start with a creative framework and in criteria that the names need to meet. So we're looking for people who can turn out a lot of work. And when that's rejected, they just keep going.

30:01So we look for tenacious people, right? Now we have and we'll probably get to this later, but we have software here that helps people generate names not really maybe five years down the road. It'll actually spit out solutions. But now it's helping us to generate ideas and directions and what I you know, you know, sound symbolism ideas, word unit, prefixes, suffixes, things like that. So so it's relatively easy for anyone that works here to develop a list of two or three hundred names over a three or four day period. Where do we find these people? More who are writers from, you know, newspaper reporters because they have to work fast.

30:50Their stories get rejected. People who might have written a novel. We have hired people from agencies over over the years. They work a little less effectively than others who have a speech writer from in I wrote speeches in Washington DC. Those people have to work hard, crank out a lot of material get rejected. Candidate says I don't like this. Start over. Those are more resilient people. That's where they come from. It's not it's not easy to find these people. It really is. I'm let me just throw out here. I'm going to ask you after we go through this process what people that don't have the resource and time to do this, what they should do to come up with a good name.

31:33I'm just going to let people know is they're listening because because I imagine many people are wondering but let's not go there yet. Okay. How long does this process usually take? What's like the ideal length that company should expect when they want to come up with an amazing name? For us, the ideal length is pretty short. It's eight weeks for larger corporate projects where you have boards and a little more politicking to do and a few more presentations. It's a three months turn and sometimes by the time they approve things and clear it's a four months process. Okay. Cool. So eight weeks, mostly if you're a big company with a lot of red tape you have to work through them longer.

32:11Okay. This point you made about three different teams with different in almost context is so interesting. So say let's use Windsor as an example, which is an amazing name, Kill In It that you guys helped come up with. So is the idea there? Okay. Here's we're naming this ID, AI ID. One of the teams has told, no, you're building a bicycle but here's all the here's all the same brief bits of bicycle and then another team's building a, I don't know, lap like I don't know something non technical essentially. Yes. Like a cup. Same more about that because that is amazing because in your finding that most of the best names come from the groups that aren't built.

32:51Let's name an amazing I, AI ID. This is a good example. So in technology, there are some things that if someone hands you a new phone and you look at it and it's tangible and it's got a shape and color things like that. Easier to name but you know the name of Windsor before it was Windsor was Codium. Right. And so it's all about a type of code or a process for coding. That's intangible. And even though we do an awful lot of technology work, it is still hard for us to kind of really get a hold of what that is. Right. So so our rule here is if there's something that is intangible like that, we have to make it tangible.

33:33And sometimes we do that not by not by giving a team. And sometimes it's an individual the assignment to create ideas for the brand itself, but to just dive into a particular context. And in this case with Windsor, it was this this is about sort of flow about giving people that are coding something much more of a flow process, you know, a smoother process, a more dynamic process. So in that case, one team was just given the task of we want to look at a list of all the things that can communicate either in a real word like flow or metaphorically or in a sport about that kind of dynamics, that kind of movement.

34:28And there was Windsor sitting on a list. I mean, it's sometimes this is just it really just that simple. Of course, you have to have the right framework and you have to give the right sort of directions to someone. And Windsor for us, particularly for me, you know, it checks all the boxes. It's a wonderful image. It's an experience, literally a physical experience. It's a compound, right? Two words put together. We know from the research we've invested in that compounds like PowerBook or Facebook are multipliers of of associations because there's wind and there's circles around that, you know, and then there's surf images around that.

35:13So one plus one equals three, right? It's interesting that when we present compounds to clients, we often get the comment, well, it's a little bit long and it's a compound. I'd rather have a shorter single word. And then that's why we actually did research on just how effective our compounds. So we could pass that information along. We pass that along to the team at that time, Codium. By the way, could not have been a more intelligent, nicer, more respectful team that we've worked with. I'm so glad for their success. But we explained to them about the multiply effect of compounds. We showed them imagery that they could use, right?

35:58I mean, it's simple to execute on something like that. And so that's how that, that's how that came about. I'll stop there and see if you need more information or not. I mean, actually, if all this thread real quick, it's going to be kind of a tangent. You guys have been working with AI companies more and more recently, which is so interesting, is what's different about naming AI products from traditional products, not AI, I guess. First off, we are working mostly with engineers and engineers who haven't delved into the world of kind of creativity and necessarily marketing. And that's their strength.

36:39And what we have to do is we have to sort of balance their strength with our strength. So there's a little bit of a challenge there, but I think we we deal pretty well with that. Secondly, this is the fastest moving, progressing category I have ever experienced. And I have that perspective, right? I went through the early days of the internet, right? And and the worldwide web. And that was moving pretty fast, but the internet compared to this looks like a daycare school or something like that. I mean, so so we're we're challenged by just keeping up with with developments. Right? Third thing, and this is the creative challenge here is that engineers come to us wanting more sophisticated names, right?

37:35Where they likely to end up with another codium or an anteroo or an anthropic. And we when when we saw this trend of that AI is going to take off and it was an intuitive feeling on my part, you know, I just, you know, I could have been wrong. I said, let's let's find out what's going on here. So so both not only like who's developing the products, but how do people think about AI? And we did a series of research, you know, I probably invested $20 ,000 or so. And we interviewed consumers in Europe, South Korea, just picked out one country in Asia and in America. And developers in those three. And they really have different technologies.

38:22Developers are all totally positive on it. Okay. They see the future. They see a big future, not too concerned. Some are, but most aren't consumers are skeptical. Worried about it. Worried about their jobs. See the hope in it at those types of things, but haven't got the handling. So codium is an example where we said, we think what you're doing needs to be much more tangible and something that people can grab on to and much more natural as opposed to a codium. And they listened to us. It was simple as that. And in this case, we were right. And by the way, there's also I have to say there's some luck to this.

39:05Wind surf happened to be available. And they they sought right away, not not exactly right away, but it took about a week going back and forth to to to select it. So let me stop there and see if if that's answers your question. Absolutely. And it feels like most AI companies end up having a different name for their product than their company. I've noticed this funny trend cursor was any sphere bold with stack, stacklets, wind surf with codium, basically everyone. When does it make sense to change your name? Wind surf just officially changed their entire company name to wind surf from codium. It was just a product.

39:44So let me just ask you that when does it make sense? It feels like a huge deal and a very challenging thing to do. It is challenging. And the larger you are and the more customer base you have it, it becomes a significant project. So the first thing is you have to you have to make an argument that it's worth the change, right? That we're going to be better off by changing our name. So there's a couple situations where you want to change your name. First one is let's focus first on startups. Startups get going early that you know they they get into Y -combinator or something like that. They're raising money and they just need a name.

40:25And although they know what they're doing and that may change by 10 or 15 degrees, it's almost like we just got to have a name. And that is the absolute expression I hear from when a startup calls and says we want to change your name. You know we started off a year and a half ago. We just needed a name for the documents and so we chose X, right? And it's not a very good name. So that's that's example number one. Number two is the company actually has you know pivoted, right? And so the name that they have no longer really reflects who they are or who they're becoming and which makes that name ineffective.

41:12And the third is that a company has merged and it's time now to to create a new start and reflect to the marketplace that we're we're new now maybe bigger. We have but certainly we have more capabilities and we want you to know about it. And because of that we're changing our name to blank which reflects those capabilities. It's some some level. I'm excited to have Andrew Lueau joining us today. Andrew is CEO of one schema, one of our long time podcast sponsors, welcome Andrew. Thanks for having me Lenny. Great to be here. So what is new with one schema? I know that you work with some of my favorite companies like Ramp and Vanta and Watershed.

41:53I heard you guys launched a new data intake product that automates the hours of manual work that team spent importing and mapping and integrating CSV and Excel files. Yes, so we just launched the 2 .0 of one schema file feeds. We've rebuilt it from the ground up with AI. We saw so many customers coming to us with teams of data engineers that struggled with the manual work required to clean messy spreadsheets. File feeds 2 .0 allows non technical teams to automate the process of transforming CSV and Excel files with just a simple prompt. We support all the trickiest file integrations, SFTP, S3 and even email.

42:29I can tell you that if my team had to build integrations like this, how nice would it be to take this off our roadmap and instead use something like one schema? Absolutely Lenny. We've heard so many horror stories of outages from even just a single bad record. In transactions, employee files, purchase orders, you name it. Debugging these issues is often like finding a needle in a haystack. One schema stops any bad data from entering your system and automatically validates your files, generating error reports with the exact issues in all bad files. I know that importing incorrect data can cause all kinds of pain for your customers and quickly lose their trust.

43:03Andrew, thank you so much for joining me. If you want to learn more, head on over to oncegeema .co. That's oncegeema .co. I want to come back to this linguist piece, which I know is really unique to the way you guys operate and it's so interesting. So you employed, you've said over 250 linguists over the course of your business career, this linguist step. The way you described it is they're not coming up with names, they're more kind of like a filter for here's all the names we've come up with, here's the ones that are good linguistically. Is that right? Or is that team also suggesting names? Yeah, some of the people there, depending on the assignment will actually help us create names for sure.

43:44Right. So we have linguists here and then we have in the network, we have linguists and those linguists are contracts to us, not full -time employees. So there's a little bit of both, but the preponderance of their work in our linguistic network is to evaluate names. Not only just, does it mean something negative or positive, but are there cultural implications to it, political implications or even things that a natural disaster that would have happened somewhere that no one here would know about, even if we had, if this was in Italy and there was a bridge or a flood that killed a lot of people, someone that speaks Italian very well here, say at Berkeley University, but has lived here for 20 years, wouldn't know about that.

44:34And we don't want anything linguistically that would slow our clients down. And so that's why we've invested in building this network. We have a woman that runs the network for it. So it's not an insignificant facet of our business that we have to run and manage. Is there an aim you love that didn't pass the linguistic filter that ended up being like, oh, that's a really bad name in this culture? Well, it happens frequently where we will find something that isn't really terrible, but it's worrisome to us. It's interesting, you know, cultures like Australian or in people on a sort of, they have a lot of interesting expressions, right?

45:26And so we do find things that, you know, this sounds like it's a certain kind of, you know, shrimp and things like that. And we eliminate those things. And then we find things that have sort of sexual connotations where we eliminate those. I would say it happens, you know, every third or fourth project, we will find something that we will eliminate and never show the client. And something you love that you're like, okay, I guess we can show that one. That's true. That happens. It does. It does. You also said this really interesting thing about how every letter of the alphabet has a vibrance and an experience.

46:01Can you give a few examples of that? I know you're not the person doing that work specifically, but just what are some letter feelings? Well, yeah, the work is from the linguist, but at this point, I'm pretty adept in it. So, you know, let's look at, I'll start with the letter V because it is so illustrative of what this is about. V from our research that we've done is the most alive and vibrant sound in the English alphabet. And that's whether you were born in Rome or in, you know, Sosolito, California. So if you know that, if you know that as you go around the world, there are going to be some exceptions to it.

46:50It's going to have that vibrancy. So, look at Corvette. I mean, they probably didn't know about V, but it's a perfect name for a car that's fast and has a big engine that roars. Think about Viagra. Same idea. And there's been surprises to us. B, the sound of the letter B is one of the most reliable sounds in the English alphabet. That was one of our rationales, by the way, for Blackberry, right? Because that's another example of a client who thought we were, I mean, the founder actually said, I thought the people at the time were crazy when they presented Blackberry. And we said, well, let's stop and look at some of the assets here.

47:32First off, you know, Black colors technology. Yes, not everybody knows the word berry, but we have those two Bs. We talked about the nature of a compound. And all of a sudden, people at least lean forward to consider it as opposed to rejecting it too fast.

47:54So, that's noisy letter X is fast and crisp as a sound. And of course, there's semantic value to all these letters. Sue X is about innovation from from aircraft to computers. And so you have to look at the semantics of it and the sound symbol of it. This is so fascinating. I could listen to this stuff all day. Just thinking about Versel with the V, the very lines with what they're trying to do, just like very strong opinionated. Yes, yes, working. And Guillermo, he feels like a V person. He is. And there's an example of a group that had a lot of confidence. Right. And what the product is is very innovative.

48:41And so we had permission there to create something new. Because Versel is a coin solution, right? But notice that we put some very simple easy to process things together. There are ver, ver, you know, in this case. So we have, you know, in Dino Veritas, right? Truth and wine, things like that. You have Verde, green. So very familiar. And then their cell like accelerate something, which is really what they do. They accelerate a client's performance. So that was a relatively easy name for us to present. And for we were excited about and for them to sort of grasp. By the way, that's, that's known as processing fluency, which is when you, when you think about how the brain processes information, we're told by a number of cognitive science that our brains are a little bit on the lazy side.

49:44We don't like complex things. And so we really strive to make all of our solutions relatively easy for the brain to process. So it wants to, it leans in towards them as opposed to, I'm too busy. I'm walking past that. And so names that are complicated are, it's a liability. And we really avoid that. But for cell, perfect fluency. Okay, let's go back actually to the three steps. So we covered two. I went, it took us on a long tangent to dive into a lot of the stuff you shared with the, the second step, which you call invent. So it's essentially the three steps are, was it create? Well, which, yeah, identify and identify.

50:29And I use the word invent with intention because it's more than creative, right? And then the final thing is implement. Now for us, we're not a design firm. We're really focused on brand names and the nomenclature that supports the name. But so for us, implement is helping the client team. If they choose, for us to help them with the presentations as it goes up the chain, right? As it to help them sort of write a longer rationale for why this, these names, if they're presenting three names to the president of their company or or the CMO, why these names make a lot of sense? And to help them, we develop what we call prototypes.

51:17So we'll, we'll put the name on a baseball cap on a t -shirt. We'll put the name in the mock -up ad in the Wall Street Journal. Something's very positive. Like because of, you know, because of productoring, Gamble's new blank product, PNG shares, you know, gain 10 % this year. So that executive can see that the lift that that name can have. That's our implementation phase for them. And we also do consumer research or customer research at that stage. And we do that probably about 50 % of the time on our projects where we're going out and we're really talking to their customers and putting the names in a series of drills.

52:02Drills that make them not the marketing person for the day, but we're really, we're really making these customers feel that this is a new brand. And then we're asking about expectations, right? Or we're seeing how these names fire their imagination. And that's the most important thing in research. Not is the name popular? Are they comfortable with it? Does it fit to concept? If you're asking people, is this fit to concept, you are inevitably always going to get a descriptive name. You make such a point about how you need to arm the people working with you with ammo to win over other folks internally because the person working with you is on board.

52:42Then the name is bold and not an obvious winner. I could see it being important to be like, here's what you will show them to help them see the story and the mock -ups on all that. Yes. And what's really important is to help their management see this in the context of the marketplace and their customers. This is a very human thing, but people want their boss to be happy, right? They want to be okay with their boss. And so they're thinking about, I don't know if my boss would like this. He's more conservative or she's more conservative. We try in a very diplomatic way to say this has nothing really in the end to do with your boss.

53:25It has to do with the marketplace. Well, that's easy for me to say because I'm not working at a PNG or an Intel, right? But we really try to give that advice for it because it is about being successful in the marketplace, right? And so we, first of all, we try to separate the clients that we work with. We really want to work with clients that play to win, that want to win, that not just want to not lose in a marketplace. And so we try to encourage our direct clients to sort of lead the process to really say, hey, if a manager or a CMO or a president says, look, we're the team that's going to execute on this.

54:11And we believe in this, we can make this where they usually rally around it, right? They usually do. But if you're just taking names up to a manager and saying, what do you think? There's a different outcome, offer. So we like to be in that implementation base because we have so much experience and usually credibility with people. And you said that you come up with three to four thousand names. That's the top of the phone. Yeah. And just to be, you know, clarify that it's it's ideas, directions, it's not complete ready to ship names. Yeah, not ready to ship names. Yeah, it's there's a bit, this is a very inefficient process and a little chaotic.

54:58So in that list of three thousand names is probably 250 potential diamonds that have to be sort of, you know, fractured and examined. I really want to see just like a documentary of this process at some point, this is the closer we're going to get for now. But this is so interesting. I want to ask about how you would approach this if you're just a startup that doesn't have the time of research to this. But before I do that, is there anything else around the process that you guys go through with clients that you think is important to share or they think might surprise people? I think we've covered it.

55:31I do. Okay. Yeah. Awesome. Okay. So most people is hitting this. There's a lot of founders, a lot of PMs on product teams that work out on new feature. They're about to launch a product. They got accepted into YC and they're about to like launch a product that may have, I don't know, let's say they have a couple weeks. I've got to come up with the name. What should they do? So the first thing I do is to say, okay, let's forget about developing the name for right now. And I will have them. And I think this is a good exercise for anybody. We do it here internally when we think about our, our business.

56:05So I say just because most of this now because of COVID is on video, I'll say just draw a shape of a diamond on a piece of paper in front of you. And I said on the top of that diamond, put the word win. Right. You know, how do you define winning is really that? I said now on that other next corner of the diamond, what do you have to win? Write that down. On the bottom, what do you need to win? And then on that final angle on the left hand side, what do you have to say to win? Okay. And then I said, yeah, let's go all the way to that final thing. And what do you have to say to win? And that's where you just kept people thinking about, well, you know, what we really have here is, and we're better than this.

56:56And, and then I'll just say, okay, now what you want to take that, because this is really should be about experience and how do you want to behave in the marketplace? And how do you want the marketplace to behave towards you? And what kind of experience are you creating? Because, and then they'll start, you know, talking a little bit. I'll say, now you just need to probe on that. You need to keep going. You need to look at metaphors, because this is about experience. And I'll just give them some of our examples that we've talked about, blackberry. It, it, it, it, it says to the marketplace, they're not like the other guys.

57:36I mean, think of something like Google versus InfoSeek, right? Google is an experience. Google says, I don't know what these guys are going to do, but it's not this practical mundane InfoSeek, right? And that's what attracts people. And so I'll do a little coaching like that. And then that, that usually kind of sets them free. And they're now thinking about it, not as a word, which has maybe limited value, but as creating an experience, which has the potential for unlimited value. Okay, so let me try to reflect this back for folks. So they, so the advice is create draw triangle. So you're coming up with a name, draw triangle at the top, win.

58:21Yes. At the bottom left, was it how do you win? Yeah, what, what, you, so the diamond is, you know, a diamond. Okay, I should try and triangle my mind. Okay, I got a diamond. Yeah. And so on that next angle there, on the, the right side is what do you have to win already? Right? Because they, they wouldn't be, you know, either in a Y -combinator or getting some seed money if they didn't have something to win. And so, and that's, and, and often people start up, don't appreciate how much they actually do have to win because they're so busy and so stressed on what they're doing. And then what, what do they need to win?

59:00And then finally, what do you need to say? And, and, and, and then back up to, you know, defining what is winning to us? Which by the way, if we, you know, we start with that question, usually on a, on a assignment that we've been awarded. And if we're in a room with five people, all five people have a different, you know, definition of what, their definition of that company winning. And that's good to kind of sort that out because we can move down different, different avenues from a creative standpoint. Okay, let's just make sure people have these phrases because this is awesome. And I imagine many people are going to be taking notes and like, cool, I'm going to do this.

59:37I hope so. Say the four points of the diamond again, just so folks can write it all down. At the top of the diamond is just the word win. And underneath that is how do we define winning for us as a company, right? And, and that that can start off being simple like, you know, we want to be the dominant player here, but you really have to work at that. What does that really mean? Right? It's the second, on that right hand tip there of the diamond is what do we have to win? What are we doing now that makes us a winner? Then we go down to the final, the bottom of the diamond. And it's what do we need to win?

1:00:16There could be technical things. There could be a people talk about talent and resources. Often there they'll say, you know, we need a good name. We always correct that. It's not the good name. It's the right name. And then finally is what do we need to say? And that's where I say, that's where you want to spend some time in really thinking about all the things you need to say that you can say or you even like to say, which maybe right now you can't say, but you want a name that actually is going to have the flexibility as to when you can say that, it still works. And that gets them into behavior and experience.

1:00:53And that usually launches a really good, a good discussion with founders internally. And so in the content, when you say have to win the what you're thinking about there is what is it that you have that will help you win? And then what is it you need to have in all companies are in that same situation. They have a bunch of stuff, but they need you know, a PNG might say, well, we need a good distributor. Okay, all right. Well, that's that put that on the list. Right. Then you might say, well, we need an witness guest to what do we have to say? We have to say the right things so that a distributor is interested in us.

1:01:31And then that then you go down sort of an avenue there. Well, what is that right? And it all it should if you work at it, it's not this is not a one hour exercise. It may be an exercise repeated over the next four or five days. Okay, so you have this diamond. And then the idea is just sit and put names down in a Google doc. Let's say, yeah, and then you start, but, but, there is this, and maybe it's not even today. I guess that's probably the best word for this is that because I do hear this all the time, hey, we, you know, we've worked at this. We got a list of 200 names and, you know, they, but they don't, we don't think there's something there.

1:02:19And I'll say, well, 200 names is not enough, right? Get to 1 ,500 names and directions. Don't evaluate them. Just just generate names and directions and ideas. And then have a meeting and don't evaluate, but speculate, you know, what could we do with this name? What's the potential here?

1:02:46There's a lot of over evaluation in our industry, right? It's, it's make sense. It's, you know, we survive as humans because we figure out what's wrong with this picture, right? If I want to cross the street, is it safe to cross the street? What's going on? Those kinds of things. You have to counter that. You have to say, let's just suspend judgment for a while and, and let's, let's do an exercise here where we take these 10 names that we think might work. And what are we going to do with it? Because it's how you execute, you know, going back to Windsurf, if as we showed them pictures of people windsurfing and waves and things, if they said, ah, you know, that just doesn't work for us at all.

1:03:31I'm very uncomfortable with it. Well, then it's not their name, right? But they leaned into it. Okay, I can see this. It's easy for us to execute as dynamic as different. So, so that's why we build these prototypes for people. And that's what, I think the best advice I can give to whether it's a startup or someone starting a new cookie company is, it's not a list of 200 names. And it's thinking about what do we have to say here? What behavior? How do we want people to feel in the marketplace about us? I imagine with Google, people felt relief that it wasn't a descriptive name. You know, that there was something new out there in the marketplace.

1:04:20Yeah, infoseek. That's such a descriptive name now that I think about it. Yes. Okay. So one more question along these lines. So, say you have a list of, let's say 2000 or 1000 names. There's this tension between choosing something like as a person that is doing them themselves, your advice is to choose something bold, not something descriptive. You won't know when you see it. Very hard to do, obviously, when you're doing it by yourself. And you just advise for not, you know, not losing side of that piece and just throwing out things that feel too scary, finding a name that's actually bold as you suggest.

1:04:55First off, we, we, this pure human psychology, we really humans only pay attention to what is new or what is different, I should say, right? So if you're looking at shoes and they're all black, black, black, black, and then the next pair of shoes is red, that's the first thing you focus on. And so that usually gives people permission, you know, they'll say, okay, I get that. So, so look for what is really different between the names that you have on your list, but also what's different from what's out in the marketplace, right? Well, you know, then you get a client like Microsoft saying, well, Azure is different.

1:05:37There's going to be a lot of cloud stuff and there's a relevant point there as your is blue. And so there's a slight logical connection that I think gave them more permission to move forward with it frankly. But it listen, this this is not an easy task. I mean, that's that's why we're in this business and why I felt we should be specialized because if you start doing design and or advertising or, you know, other things, you can't have the intellectual engine. You can't acquire the intellectual engine that that we have. So I know it's difficult, but it can be done and you just have to give yourself some time, but stop evaluating, suspend judgment and speculate that that's that's my number one advice to people trying to do this on their own.

1:06:36Now, how can you get help? You can you can talk to your employees, but it's not so much what do you think of this name? It's what do you think this name could do for us? That's a much better question, right? If you go out and talk to friends who don't work for your company, there's a there's a fun drill that I suggest. I said, listen, go out to them and say, they'll know what you're doing and say, you know what, we just have a new competitor and their name is blank. What do you think about that? What happens there is you're not asking them to give you an opinion of to evaluate a name. You're asking them then, what does that name do for you?

1:07:19The information you're getting is that that name. They're telling you what that name does for them. How it helps them to imagine, which is a fundamental role of any name. So, slight tangent, but I'm going to go to arc kind of research. We do mostly quantitative research now, but for years we did qualitative work and we still do, but what we found in we were always looking for the offset this way, we were always looking for this answer from consumers. If a consumer said, well, I don't really know much about that new product, but I know that they're not like the other guys. That's when we knew we had a good name.

1:08:06Because they were now what happened there, I mean, the technical term that we use is we've created that name will create a predisposition to consider this product because they're not like the other guys. As opposed to I already have something like that. I know I'm busy. I don't need another one of those things. I need something new and different and hopefully better. That's awesome. That's a good reminder. There's a quote that I found of yours that's exactly along these lines. If your team is comfortable with the name chances are you don't have the name yet. Yes. Yeah. And by the way, the opposite of that is we look for polarization.

1:08:44We look for attention in a team about arguing about these things. Because we think that polarization is a sign of strength in the word. Interesting story. The person who taught me that honestly was Andy Grove over the Pentium name. Because, and I learned a lot from him, I always say this. I just was very fortunate to work with him on Pentium and Cion and a few other things. But when we went to an executive committee to present Pentium, and by the way, internally one of the names that makes sense here, descriptive, bunch of engineers, pro -chip. Hey, it's professional, it's premium, and it's chip.

1:09:41So it should be pro -chip. So Andy had to be give a presentation about the strengths of this thing. And he said, he said, now let me tell you why I think this is the right name. He said, because I see the polarization here and it amongst people. There's this pro -chip over here. There's the Pentium thing. He said, that tells me there's energy for Pentium here. And he said, that's why I think we should go with it. And I've never forgotten that. And so we do look for that. And when we tell that story, people say, you know, you're right, there is, I mean, we are arguing about this. And there is an intensity with the name.

1:10:22And that's what you want. You don't want to go out into the marketplace. This very competitive marketplace, regardless of the category, with something that doesn't have a level of boldness or intensity. That was an amazing story. Just again, so kind of a tip here is if half your team or I don't know, some percentage of your team hates it, some percentage of your team loves it. That's a good sign. Yeah, it is. It is. Look for that polarization. That's what we look for. I also love this tip of asking people if our hair competitor just launched, they're called Windsurf, how your team reacts if they're just like, oh, wow, that's a great name.

1:10:56I'm interested in that product. That's that's what you want to look for. Yes, exactly. Yeah. How important is the dot com for the name you come up with? I imagine it's really hard to get these days. Just what do you think about domain name when you think about naming? I am so glad you asked this question because it is at this point, it doesn't really matter at all. The dot com or URL address has become an area code. And where you're in 415 or 615, it doesn't really matter to people. And now with AI, you know, search, SEO is going to be less important. Right. And so I just think the principle play here is you got to get the right name first.

1:11:41And then if you can get the dot com, sure, go ahead. But if you can't, there's ways around that. You know, you can put a prefix in front of it or a little word in front of it or after it, or you go to dot AI or something like that. But the principle in play is let's get the right name first. For those who really, and there are people who really get hung up on the dot com and they tend to be sort of older, by the way, and have in their mind sort of the hotness of the internet and having the dot com, which did did make a difference 25 years ago. But it's 25 years now, or 30, right. The good news is because they're less valuable, you can typically buy a URL if you negotiate the right way and have time for 15, 20, 25, 30 ,000 dollars.

1:12:36And you know, we say, hey, if you can do that, have fun. I'd put the 30 ,000 dollars into marketing. Awesome. That's a reassuring. I imagine many founders just like, I'm a, there's none of them available anymore. Let me zoom out and just ask you this question as a maybe a closing thoughts to our conversation. So you were just in an elevator ride with someone and I'm sure this happens to you or just like, hey, David, I got to come over that name. What's your biggest tip for coming up with a great name? What would your answer be? I'd go back to think about, forget about the word, think about behavior and experience.

1:13:11And then the second thing from just a creative help, I'm a big believer in synchronicity. And we try to sort of force synchronicity here and I'll give you a couple examples of that. But this is this idea of connecting sort of dots, you know, two unrelated ideas together. And so I'll say, look, if someone says, well, you know, we're, we make, we make sailboats. And I'm, I'm trying to, I'm here in Sausley, don't I guess that's why I thought about that. But and I'm trying to create a new, a new name for my company that builds sailboats. I would say, forget about sailboats. I would go and pick out some magazines about hunting or flight flight flying magazines.

1:14:00And I would just look through those, get a note pad out and and put out words that you like, things, expressions that you like. So you're, you're, and then that synchronicity, I said, I would bet you five dollars that out of those two magazines, you will get a word that you never would have thought of. But somehow it would relate to sailing. That's, that connects very much to your story of how you have these different teams and the teams that end up coming up with a winning name or the ones thinking about a very different version of that product. Yes. So interesting. Okay. David, this was everything I was hoping it'd be.

1:14:39I feel like we're going to help so many people. Is there anything that we haven't covered or that you want to leave listeners with as a final nugget or piece of advice or story before we get to our very exciting lightning round? I'm going to emphasize one point, I think, which is that I really would like the listeners to really begin to think about how, how valuable a brand name can be. That is, you're not just looking for a word, you're looking for this experience, right? And, and if you get it right, not just a good name, but the right name, the value is almost unlimited. And so give yourself some time, give yourself a budget, give yourself the right resources to do that.

1:15:23Second thing is, you know, we try to really be helpful here. And so I am always happy to talk to people about where they are in a process and if we can help or just give them a little bit of advice. And we, we schedule, you know, we call them office hours here.

1:15:45We're open to that. It's just plain long -term game. So I'd like to leave that with viewers also. We're about to book out your office hours. I love that offer. I think a lot of people are going to take advantage of that. That is super cool. David, with that, we've reached our very exciting lightning round. I've got five questions for you. Are you ready? Yes, I'm ready. Here we go. What are two or three books that you find yourself recommending most to other people? There's a book called Resilience, which I was written by a former Navy SEAL that, and it's not about combat, and it's just a tiny bit about being at a SEAL.

1:16:20But it is about overcoming things, right? And it's about tenacity. And I think, you know, everybody in the world, we all have challenges and things. And I do recommend that to people. Second book is Andrew Roberts' latest book on Winston Churchill. Winston Churchill is really one of my heroes. He was one of the most unusual provocative statesman, politicians of the 20th century. And here's another person that talked about tenacity and ups and downs and stick with it. And so I do like to recommend that. Some people just kind of, you know, tip their head and said, I don't know. It seems like maybe a boring book.

1:17:00But those are two books that I would say that Churchill's story is boring. That's absurd. I agree. It's absurd, yes. Yeah, he's so fascinating. There's a recent documentary, I think, that really showed me the character. Yeah, incredible. Okay, what's a recent movie or TV show you've really enjoyed? For me, is the Yellowstone series. We have, we're very fortunate as family. We have some property in Montana. Wow. You're living a life. I'm, yeah, very, listen, I can't tell you how fortunate I am. And I bought this property 28 years ago. So it was a lot cheaper than in a snow storm and it just felt right.

1:17:42But I think particularly the 1883 that the precursor to you. I was going to ask if you saw that because I was incredible. Yes. And then the after one, 1923, which is the post -war 1883 really gives people a sense of what it took by those early Americans to build a life in a place like a beautiful place, but a hard, tough place like Montana. And it's just phenomenal. The person, you know, producing and writing those things is incredibly talented. Taylor shared it and I think it's, yeah. I love that like in the story, Montana was the easy route almost from the journey they went on. That's right.

1:18:24It's very true. Yeah. Oh, man. Yeah. I like, you almost don't even need to watch the Yellowstone Yellowstone just starting with 1883 as door works. In fact, I recommend people, I say there's three, but if you really want the truth about the American West is 1883. Yeah. I suggested that on this podcast a bunch actually. So I love that. That's where you went. Next question. Do you have a favorite product that you have recently discovered that you really love? Maybe one you named? Maybe not? Well, I didn't name it. Although it's got a very good name to it. We are a whole family. I have two daughters and my wife.

1:18:58We're all fly fishermen. Last summer, I really, but I bought this for myself, but I gave it to my wife. But it was one of those things that was present for her, but I knew I was going to use it more. And it's a, yet it's a hearty. It's an old British fly rod, but it's a beautiful rod. It's just perfect for the big rivers of Montana. So that's my favorite purchase. That's the first fly fishing rod of the podcast. Excellent choice. Next question. Do you have a favorite life motto that you often find yourself coming back to you, sharing with friends or family? I do. I do. And it's a little longer.

1:19:33So I wrote it. I haven't written here somewhere, but it's the quote from T .E. Lawrence, Lawrence of Arabia, Arabia here, and if I can find it, I should, should be. Yeah. I think it's a wonderful quote. So I think hopefully your viewers like this. Here's what he said. He said that all men dream, but not equally, those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds, wake in the day to find that it was vanity. But the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may not, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes to make them possible. I just, I read that years ago and it just, it hit me, pretty hard.

1:20:19So yeah. That is an amazing quote. It makes me think about the quote about the man in the arena. Yes. Yeah. It's the same idea. It's just a little different. And I also think Lawrence of Arabia is a fascinating person to take what he did. So inspiring in some ways. Yeah. I'm amazing movie. Okay. Final question. Let me just try this. Is there a name that you didn't name that you just like, wow, that was an amazing name? I wish I hadn't come up with that name. I'll tell you there is one name. And it's Dreamworks. I think it's a wonderful name. And it's somewhat ironic that the entertainment industry in general has pretty mundane names.

1:21:05So you have all these talented people. And yet when you look at the names of production studios, movie houses, you know, Comcast, things like that is just, very mundane. But here's Dreamworks. Just like Sonus. Check all the boxes. Compound, dream, you know, you expect something great from Dreamworks. They've created an experience, the experience of dreaming in a movie. I think it's a wonderful name. I wish I'd done it. That's such a cool answer. David, thank you so much for doing this. This is incredible. I learned a ton as I imagined. I feel like a lot of people are going to have a much easier time thinking about approaching this topic.

1:21:49Well, I certainly hope so. I do. I spend very, very enjoyable, very thoughtful. And I have nothing but respect for the way you do this and the talent that you have. So very fortunate that we've come together and we live in the same place. So maybe we can get together for a cup of coffee or something. No other California for the win. Thank you so much for being here. You're very welcome. Hi, everyone. Take care. Thank you so much for listening. If you found this valuable, you can subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. Also, please consider giving us a rating or leaving a review as that really helps other listeners find the podcast.

1:22:33You can find all past episodes or learn more about the show at Lenny's Podcast dot com. See you in the next episode.

From the publisher

David Placek is the founder of Lexicon Branding, a company that focuses exclusively on the development of brand names for competitive advantage. Lexicon is behind iconic names such as Sonos, Microsoft’s Azure, Windsurf, Vercel, Impossible Foods, BlackBerry, Intel’s Pentium, Apple’s PowerBook, and Swiffer. Over 40 years, David’s team has named nearly 4,000 brands and companies, employing over 250 linguists and pioneering naming innovation.

What you’ll learn:

1. The three-step process that generated names like Windsurf and Vercel

2. How a name can give you the edge that no marketing budget can buy

3. Why you won’t “know it when you see it”

4. Why Microsoft called Azure “a dumb name” before it became their billion-dollar cloud platform

5. Why polarizing opinions are the strongest signal that you’ve found the right name

6. How every letter of the alphabet creates a specific psychological vibration

7. The diamond framework: a 4-step process any founder can use to find their perfect name

8. Why domain names don’t matter anymore in the age of AI

—

Brought to you by:

WorkOS—Modern identity platform for B2B SaaS, free up to 1 million MAUs

Stripe—Helping companies of all sizes grow revenue

OneSchema—Import CSV data 10x faster

—

Where to find David Placek:

• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/david-placek-05a82/

• Website: https://www.lexiconbranding.com

—

Where to find Lenny:

• Newsletter: https://www.lennysnewsletter.com

• X: https://twitter.com/lennysan

• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/lennyrachitsky/

—

In this episode, we cover:

(00:00) Introduction to David and Lexicon Branding

(04:44) The story of Sonos

(09:27) The psychology of naming

(11:33) The initial resistance to Microsoft's Azure

(14:35) The importance of a great brand name

(18:11) The three steps of naming: create, invent, implement

(28:23) Qualities of great brand name creators

(31:24) How long the naming process takes

(32:12) The Windsurf case study

(36:10) Naming in the AI era

(39:37) When to change your name

(43:10) The role of linguists

(45:54) The power of letters in branding

(48:15) The Vercel case study

(50:12) The implementation phase

(52:52) Client management and market success

(55:16) The diamond exercise

(01:04:23) Suspending judgment

(01:07:31) Polarization and boldness

(01:11:01) Domain names

(01:12:48) Final thoughts and lightning round

—

Referenced:

• PowerBook: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerBook

• Pentium: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium

• BlackBerry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry

• Swiffer: https://www.swiffer.com/

• Impossible Burger: https://impossiblefoods.com/

• Vercel: https://vercel.com/

• Windsurf: https://windsurf.com/

• CapCut: https://www.capcut.com/

• Azure: https://azure.microsoft.com/

• Sonos: https://www.sonos.com/

• John MacFarlane on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-macfarlane-08a8aa20/

• Harry Potter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_(film_series)

• The Call of the Wild: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Call_of_the_Wild

• Everyone’s an engineer now: Inside v0’s mission to create a hundred million builders | Guillermo Rauch (founder and CEO of Vercel, creators of v0 and Next.js): https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/everyones-an-engineer-now-guillermo-rauch

• Sound symbolism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_symbolism

• Anduril: https://www.anduril.com/

• Anthropic: https://www.anthropic.com/

• Inside Bolt: From near-death to ~$40m ARR in 5 months—one of the fastest-growing products in history | Eric Simons (founder and CEO of StackBlitz): https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/inside-bolt-eric-simons

• The rise of Cursor: The $300M ARR AI tool that engineers can’t stop using | Michael Truell (co-founder and CEO): https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/the-rise-of-cursor-michael-truell

• Building a magical AI code editor used by over 1 million developers in four months: The untold story of Windsurf | Varun Mohan (co-founder and CEO): https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/the-untold-story-of-windsurf-varun-mohan

• Y Combinator: https://www.ycombinator.com/

• Chevrolet Corvette: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Corvette

• Viagra: https://www.viagra.com/

• In vino veritas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vino_veritas

• Infoseek: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infoseek

• Andy Grove: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Grove

• Churchill at War on Netflix: https://www.netflix.com/title/81609374

• Yellowstone on Prime Video: https://www.amazon.com/Yellowstone-Season-1/dp/B07D7FBB8Z

• 1883 on Prime Video: https://www.amazon.com/1883-Season-1/dp/B0B8JTS8QW

• 1923 on Paramount+: https://www.paramountplus.com/shows/1923/

• Taylor Sheridan on X: https://x.com/taylorSheridan

• Hardy fly rods: https://www.hardyfishing.com/collections/fly-rods

• T.E. Lawrence quote: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/11340-all-men-dream-but-not-equally-those-who-dream-by

• Lawrence of Arabia: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056172/

• DreamWorks: https://www.dreamworks.com/

—

Recommended books:

• Thucydides’ Melian Dialogue: Commentary, Text, and Vocabulary: https://www.amazon.com/Thucydides-Melian-Dialogue-Commentary-Vocabulary/dp/0692772367

• Resilience: Hard-Won Wisdom for Living a Better Life: https://www.amazon.com/Resilience-Hard-Won-Wisdom-Living-Better/dp/054432398X/

• Churchill: Walking with Destiny: https://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Walking-Destiny-Andrew-Roberts/dp/1101980990

—

Production and marketing by https://penname.co/. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email podcast@lennyrachitsky.com.

—

Lenny may be an investor in the companies discussed.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.lennysnewsletter.com/subscribe

More from Lenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth

All 287 episodes
Naming expert shares the process behind creating billion-dollar brand names like Azure, Vercel, Windsurf, Sonos, Blackberry, and Impossible BurgerLenny's Podcast: Product | Career | Growth · 1 h 23 min
Listen in VO