In short
Little Gold Men Vanity Fair book club discusses Hamnet (Maggie O’Farrell), its grief-centered themes, and the upcoming film adaptation by Chloe Zhao premiering at the Toronto Film Festival.
Guests
Hosts David Canfield, Richard Lawson, Rebecca Ford, and Hillary Busis (book club host). Maggie O’Farrell joins near the end as author and co-screenwriter. (The episode also mentions cast: Jesse Buckley, Paul Meskel, Joe Alwyn, Emily Watson, and Hamnet actor Jacoby Joop.)
Guest backgrounds
O’Farrell is the novelist/memoirist who co-wrote the screenplay for Zhao’s film. The hosts are film/TV/awards journalists; Hillary is specifically the book-club participant.
Key claims
The novel’s grief feels “timeless and timely,” especially resonant during COVID-era fear of contagion. Agnes is reframed from historical footnote/“wise woman” into a full protagonist. The ending—Agnes seeing Hamlet—recasts Shakespeare’s art as channeled grief.
Notable examples
the flea/plague timeline; Agnes as medicine/household figure in Stratford; the “fate/timing” near-miss details; filming highlight: Agnes arriving at Henley Street amid a tense standoff.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroduction to Hamnet
0:45 to 1:15
Discussion about the book Hamnet by Maggie O'Farrell and its film adaptation.
“We have inferred on this podcast, based on the language of that premiere, that it is also maybe going to Telluride, So a big rollout for that movie soon to come.”
Exploring Grief and Love
1:15 to 3:08
Hosts discuss the themes of grief, love, and the unique storytelling in Hamnet.
“But it also kind of has multiple timelines.”
Historical Context and Research
3:08 to 4:53
A deep dive into the historical context and research behind the characters in Hamnet.
“I think timed obviously to the release of the movie in the fall.”
Agnes as a Protagonist
4:53 to 6:57
Analyzing the character of Agnes and her significance in the narrative.
“and there were plagues and all that stuff.”
Theme of Death in Hamnet
6:57 to 11:24
Discussion on the book's heavy themes, especially death and its representation.
“And they assumed that she was some bitter older woman who ensnared Shakespeare.”
Impactful Endings
11:24 to 13:13
Hosts reflect on the emotional impact of the book's ending and its cinematic potential.
“And so when talking about this book and recommending this book, it is a heavy book.”
Anticipation for Hamnet's Film Adaptation
14:00 to 24:04
The hosts discuss their excitement for the film adaptation of Hamnet and its creative team.
“at the Toronto Film Festival and maybe another festival.”
Maggie O'Farrell Joins the Discussion
24:04 to 28:00
Maggie O'Farrell discusses her writing process and the significance of Agnes Shakespeare as a protagonist.
“of the screenplay maggie thanks for joining us thank you so much for having me we are thrilled to have you here.”
Exploring the Connection Between Hamnet and Hamlet
28:00 to 29:00
Discover the intriguing parallels between Shakespeare's life and his works.
“And I didn't understand why nobody else was really struck by the similarity.”
Personal Reflections on the Pandemic's Impact
29:00 to 30:28
Reflect on how the pandemic reshaped perceptions of death and grief.
“this fascinating and very moving reframing of the Shakespeare story, it's a very visceral portrait of life in a pandemic and the sense of mass danger, death kind of outside of the home's walls.”
Show all 16 chapters
The Journey to Adaptation: From Book to Film
30:28 to 32:28
Learn about the initial discussions that led to the film adaptation of Hamnet.
“there was an outbreak of plague in Stratford-pon-Avon.”
Collaborating on the Screenplay with Chloe Zhao
32:28 to 34:05
Understand the creative process of co-writing the screenplay for Hamnet.
“But I immediately really liked Liza and I trusted the way she was talking about the book and what she envisioned for it.”
Transforming Novel to Film: The Creative Process
34:05 to 36:54
Explore the differences between writing a novel and a screenplay and the adaptation challenges.
“Chloe's a very persuasive person, but I was really, really thrilled.”
Casting Choices: Finding the Right Actors
36:54 to 39:34
Delve into the casting process for the film and the selection of key actors.
“that she's actually really beautiful at dealing with interiority on screen.”
Experiencing Filming: The Set Dynamics
39:34 to 42:01
Hear about the unique experience of being on a film set as a novelist.
“Because, I mean, you know, for me, I've never really been on a big film set like this.”
Emotional Impact of the Film
42:01 to 43:12
Hear about the profound emotional experience of viewing the film adaptation.
“Hopefully in the next month or so, we'll get to.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:03Hello and welcome to Little Gold Men Vanity Fair's podcast for film, TV, and awards lovers. I'm David Canfield. I'm Richard Lawson. I'm Rebecca Ford. And I'm Hillary Busis. Hillary is back because we're doing another book club episode and when we read, Hillary's here. I'm going to take that as a compliment. Not like, this is the nerd episode, so here's that dork Hillary who likes books. Maybe it's both. We're all dorks today. We are discussing Hamnet, the novel by Maggie O 'Farrell. Maggie also co-wrote the screenplay for the upcoming film, directed by Chloe Zhao, and she'll be joining us later on in the episode, too.
0:43The film is going to the Toronto Film Festival. We have inferred on this podcast, based on the language of that premiere, that it is also maybe going to Telluride, So a big rollout for that movie soon to come. The film adaptation stars Jesse Buckley as Agnes Shakespeare and Paul Meskel as William Shakespeare. We'll talk more about that later. But first, let's dive into the book, which was published a few years ago. And a friendly reminder for those who did not listen to our previous Book Club episode or who have not yet read this book, we will be discussing it in detail through to the ending. So that is your spoiler warning.
1:17and full disclosure this was one of my favorite books of 2020 the year it was published I reread it for this episode and it remains in my view pretty special so who wants to start and summarize the book a little bit for us yeah as you mentioned it is about William Shakespeare and his wife Agnes most commonly known as Anne yes although William is never named in the book we infer from context clues who were kind of following for part of the story but it's about essentially the death of their son, Hamnet, who O 'Farrell posits was the somewhat inspiration for Hamlet. But it also kind of has multiple timelines.
1:53There's one weird journey following a flea's trajectory from a Venetian boat all the way to England and thus spreading the plague. And it's really interior and poetic as it looks at grief and love and to some extent art. I love it so much. Yeah, I loved it too. I cried so hard quite often while reading this book. I think the way she captures grief is so beautiful. Her writing is just so gorgeous and empathetic, and it really, really makes you feel. I was a big fan of her memoir that I read a while ago, but I had actually never read Hamnid, and I just found it really, really affected me. I really loved it.
2:36Yeah, I don't want to be this person, Rebecca. I don't know. You might agree with me, but I feel like as a parent, it probably does kind of hit different. Yeah. I know. I'm often that person on this podcast. And yeah, I felt this. I mean, sometimes I had to like put it down and take a break. It's too much. Yeah. Just imagining what that must be like is a really tough mind space to put yourself in. Well, as a former playwright, I related to it too. So, okay. As a glove maker. Yeah, exactly. I have to recommend listening to Jessie Buckley read it to you, which is what I did. Oh, wow. She recorded a new version of the book.
3:14I think timed obviously to the release of the movie in the fall. And she does it beautifully. And I think the poetry of O 'Farrell's writing, she really makes that sing. And all of the granular detail about life, you know, in the late 16th century and all of the imagination she pours into, you know, pretty much sketchily known history. I mean, we don't really know anything about these people in real life, but she just imagines so much for them. And Buckley really brings that to life. And it seems plausible. I'm not an Elizabethan scholar or anything, but reading this, it does seem like this could have been what happened.
3:49I think it's very meticulously researched, you know, to the degree that it can be, while also leaving the kind of room for imagination and character that is just sort of essential to any great work of fiction. I do remember first reading this book in the summer of 2020. The resonance was kind of overwhelming. I'm curious what you guys made of that part of the story now. Now, this is a story about grief resulting from a pandemic. This is about a really intimate view of what it is like to experience that. And I still found myself really shaken by that, even a few years out of it, just kind of bringing me back to that time of reading this book and feeling so unnerved by it, even though obviously it's sent many centuries ago.
4:38Yeah, I think it's something like back in those days, is like one in four children didn't survive to adulthood or something because of disease and things like that. And I think thinking about the past and it was brutal and they were executing people left and right and children were dying and there were plagues and all that stuff. You kind of become desensitized to individual humanity. But then you read Shakespeare's plays and there's so much of it. There's so much grief. There's so much love. I think people are by and large the same, at least emotionally now as they were back then. And I think this book really, you know, makes that argument very powerfully, where we tend to sort of safely put the past at a really far removed and imagine them as wholly different beings almost.
5:22And I think O 'Farrell insisting the humanity into these people with relatable emotion goes a long way toward sort of further emboldening Shakespeare's plays, for example. Yeah, that and also just the fact that, you know, this is something that could not be prevented. And illness is still, despite all of the advances of science, there are still things that, you know, if you have the wrong luck, it can go this way. And just, you know, reading the chapter where they're laying out the body and washing it and trying to prevent the plague from infecting everybody else as they're also trying to pay their last respects to Hamnet.
5:58Like, they have to have all of these considerations in their minds at the same time. and like that felt very modern. Like that felt like that has always been the way that it is. But yeah, you do kind of lose sight of the context when you just read the statistics. Yeah, I think that touching on fate, I think is something I really thought about when I'm reading this. You know, Maggie does this amazing thing where she describes like if he had just been, you know, five minutes earlier or turned this way, he would have seen someone when he was looking for help. And I think about that a lot because it's all about, you know, luck and bad luck and fate and timing.
6:33And the way she describes that just, I think it really pulls you in there. Her writing is just so gorgeous. But it's also beautiful because there's like an intentionality in his death, right? Because he's taking the sickness from his sister and there's like kind of a magical quality to it there where like he's a hero in that way. And I don't know, she gets to make him into this heroic figure by, it's not just that he gets sick and dies, it's that he's making a conscious choice in order to save his twin. And in terms of the other unknowns, You know, there was a lot of, I guess, scholarship from for many, many years that looked at the very few records there are of Agnes Hathaway and Hathaway and saw that she was 26 and pregnant when she got married to an 18 year old William Shakespeare.
7:15And they assumed that she was some bitter older woman who ensnared Shakespeare. And he he lived in London and just, you know, had this annoying attachment back in Stratford. And, you know, and there's been some rethinking of that history. now. There's a book called Shakespeare's Wife that came out a number of years ago that kind of imagined a different history. And now O 'Farrell is doing this in fictional form. And I really appreciate the way that Agnes kind of is brought to the fore, is given a full complicated humanity, a full complicated relationship with her husband. It begins very much as a loving, hot and bothered kind of relationship.
7:49And then obviously changes over time as things happen. And I just really appreciate any kind of historical fiction that, I don't know, it gives body to lives that we sort of only imagine in the faintest of sketches or only know the faintest bit about. And she doesn't do it in a way that I think is maybe overreaching or too, you know, anachronistic or anything like that. It feels very true to the time period while also affording people the full breadth of humanity. Yeah, for sure. It's funny, like in Stratford, Agnes is the celebrity. Like she's the wise woman. She's the medicine woman. She's like who people go to for help.
8:25and Shakespeare's off doing his thing in London. None of them have ever seen his plays. Yeah, I was going to say, we should talk about Agnes just as a protagonist, that there's also intention there in addition to Hamnet previously being a footnote in the Shakespeare's lives. Agnes is not typically the main character of stories about Shakespeare. How does she, in your guys' view, function as the protagonist of the story and kind of reframing such a revered, iconic figure? Have you guys seen Ann Juliet on Broadway? No, it's coming to LA in a couple weeks, I think. It's going to be in LA. So it's a Max Martin jukebox musical.
9:04Right. The songs are all like NSYNC and Backstreet Boys and Britney Spears, but the narrators of the story are Shakespeare and his wife, who in the play goes by Anne Hathaway, mostly so they can make a joke that's like, there'll only ever be one Anne Hathaway. But it's funny. It's also, it's kind of doing a similar reclaiming project in a much less literary way. But yeah, like it's the parallels between the two kind of struck me on looking at the book again. There's a whole like joke about the second best bed in the play as well, which comes up in this. And there's an actual plausible explanation for why Shakespeare may have left his wife the second best bed.
9:44And it might have been a nice thing rather than a diss in his will. Yeah, I think when the Agnes character, and again, it's two different timelines. One when she's older and has kids and the other where she's kind of courting with William and getting married to him. When the younger version of her was first described, I was a little bit worried that it was going to be too much like, well, she's not like the other girls. She talks to the spirits of the forest and all that stuff. And there is a little bit of that but O 'Farrell's writing is so dense and beautiful and kind in a way and that sort of trope, I think she just kind of narrowly avoided it.
10:20I did see some criticism online on Reddit and whatever. I don't know why I was bothering to look there, but like where people were just saying that she was basically like an Elizabethan sort of magical Mary Sue. I don't agree with that. That's not fair. No, it's not fair. That's ungenerous. Yeah, it's just a really interesting kind of rendering of someone we know so little about. And I don't know, I kind of bought it, at least in the world of this story. Yeah, I thought it was great. And there's so much to grab onto with her. You know, there's so many different layers to her. And I really started to love her as the story went on.
10:55And I think she's such an interesting character. The other element of this book that I want to talk about before we shift to some movie speculation is the theme of death. And Rebecca, you mentioned her great memoir, I Am, I Am, I Am, which is entirely about her brushes with death, which range from very extraordinary and strange to very banal and basic and things that we've probably all experienced. It's something she writes about and has written about really uniquely. And so when talking about this book and recommending this book, it is a heavy book. It is a very emotional book. But I think she has a really kind of singular ability to bring something beautiful and hopeful out of it in a way that is, I found the first time I read this and even the most recent time, entirely unexpected.
11:43Yeah, the sequence when Agnes actually sees Hamlet and sees the immortality. Oh my God. Yeah, her son has. That is the book for me. It's just incredible. It's so moving. And she really sells it. I mean, it's not like Agnes is not going to still be grieving her son, but she kind of understands that her husband has channeled his own grief into this incredible work of art that will keep his name or a version of his name, you know, being said. Yeah, it just, it really blew me away. I think anything that gives that kind of new resonance to a kind of sacred old text like that just always works on me.
12:22It's funny, maybe it was subconscious, but I recently rewatched My Beloved Shakespeare in Love, which is such a lovely idea of how Romeo and Juliet and then later Twelfth Night came to be. One of the best endings in movie history, I think. But then in hindsight, it's like, well, that motherfucker. Carrying on in London. When our Agnes is trying to keep things together. And Susanna and Judith, all our friends. Exactly. I don't know that Hamlet needs that extra padding or whatever, but it's certainly welcome because it's really, really persuasive. And for a book that is, you know, let's say slower in pace, it's a lot of detail, but not a ton happens, you know, up until Hamlet's death.
13:03It's just sort of slowly building up to that. And really, in some ways, the whole book hangs on those final moments of her seeing the play, and it delivers. I mean, that's a risky kind of structural choice to make on a writer's part, but it works. Yeah, it's such a knockout ending that it made me so excited for the film because I think if they get that right feeling that like emotion right at the end and that hope, I think what you need sort of after going through this whole journey with them. It's just it's just so gorgeous. Speaking of on film, let's take a quick break. And when we come back, we will discuss the upcoming film adaptation directed by Chloe Zhao.
13:40Stay with us.
13:54Welcome back to Little Goldman from Vanity Fair. So Hamnet the film is set to premiere at the Toronto Film Festival and maybe another festival. Before that, that remains a mystery. The movie is directed by Chloe Zhao. She wrote the screenplay with Maggie O 'Farrell. It stars Jesse Buckley and Paul Meskel in the lead roles. It also has Joe Alwyn, Emily Watson, as Richard noted many months ago on this podcast, another Joop, Jacoby Joop, who's playing Hamnet. I looked to the sky and said, no, there is another. You did, you did. For us all to hear. First of all, I think I'd said way back on that episode just how excited I was about this film.
14:36It seems like the anticipation was justified. The rollout indicates this is a movie that Focus Features is excited about. Yeah, I mean, hearing Jesse Buckley read the story, I was like, God, she's good. And it made me all the more excited to see her in the role. I am concerned about how interior the book is and how it's a lot of stream of consciousness. It's a lot of deep personal thought. I don't quite know how you make that filmic maybe voiceover. I don't know. And Nomadland style, I guess. Yeah, yeah. I think it's going to be pretty impressionistic would be my guess, partly because it's not that plot driven anyway.
15:13But there's a great creative team behind it, which has me, you know, optimistic. Hilary, Rebecca, what are you guys looking out for with this movie? I mean, we were just talking about the ending. I do think that if you stick that, like Rebecca was saying, it's going to be really remarkable to see, but I don't know how quite you can manage that if you're just looking at Jesse Buckley, watch a production of Hamlet, if you can't really understand what she's thinking in the moment. I don't know. She's a great actress, so if anybody could communicate all of that with just her face, then, you know, maybe it's her.
15:45But yeah, I think that that's the part that I will really be kind of waiting for. Yeah, I think if you look at Chloe's pre-Eternals work, you know, I love... I'm sorry. If we ignore the Eternals completely. What movie? What Eternals? Doesn't mean anything to me. I mean, the writer I thought was such a beautifully done film and a lot of that is like a protagonist who is hard to read or you're, you know, doesn't say as much as he probably is thinking. And I think she'll have to do something similar to that. And I feel like she's the right filmmaker to sort of take that on. I do wonder how long they're going to wait for Hamnet's death.
16:24Because as Richard mentioned, there's a lot in the book before that happens. And so much of it is just internal. And how does that work in the film? Well, we get Agnes in Shakespeare's courtship. Yes, that's true. So I'm sure that there will be a lot of that. I think it's going to be a cold open like Scream style. Where they hold Hammett up from Pride Rock. Yeah. I mean, as tricky as it might be to put all of the internal stuff in the book on screen, I think Zhao has an ace up her sleeve in that Max Richter wrote the score. And if anyone knows like sad and elegeic and cinematic, it's him. And I feel like that could go a long way to maybe patching over some stuff that's harder to translate.
17:10I can't wait for some close-ups on some mortars and pestles. We're going to see a lot of grinding of herbs. Not since that Juliette Binoche cooking movie will we have so much lovely period detail. Yeah, Max Richter, one of my favorite scores of his was for The Leftovers, a similar show about the inexplicability of death and loss. I was surprised on my reread how much of a fit Chloe seemed for this material because before when I had the book more as a distant memory, it felt like it would be a real departure for her. It's a period piece. It's dealing in, I think, more concrete plot points than her previous non-Eternals narrative features.
17:54The Eternals was very grounded. Yes, indeed. I can't even make a joke about it because I remember so little about it. But in this movie's case, in the story's case, It's internal in a way where the way she uses the camera feels like a natural fit. It's an understanding of the way people move through the world that is often wordless, often driven by a really naturalistic exploration of the world and the elements. You think about Nomadland and just how spare that screenplay was. So it's obviously kind of an important movie for her because as we've been touching on, Eternals was not the smash success that Marvel hoped it would be.
18:39It was not the sort of, you know, next leveling up for her that some people thought it might be. This is what is expected to be a return to the kind of filmmaking that made her an Oscar-winning filmmaker. Well, and on paper, it's so much more Oscar-y than Nomadland. Yes. Yeah. And when Nomadland was made, I mean, the writer was an extraordinary movie, but it was seen by like 15 people. It was a Gotham Awards, Spirit Awards movie. Nomadland, I think we forget how quickly she skyrocketed off of that movie because even though it was still a Chloe Zhao movie, the amount of eyeballs on it was just, it was so much greater.
19:22How do we feel about the Paul Meskel casting? I mean, he's obviously a great actor. In the more present tense, when, you know, him, it's death time, he is kind of age appropriate, but Paul Meskell is not really going to pass as an 18-year-old, you know, Besot in Shakespeare when they first meet. But I also think there's something sort of, I don't know, more Bartholomew-y about Paul Meskell than there is William Shakespeare-y. I kind of almost think they might have found someone a little readier, a little bit, I don't know, sort of more writerly or something like that. But I mean, I'm sure he'll be great.
19:55But it's just that's not who I had in my head when I was listening to Buckley read the book. And I can totally buy her as Agnes. Well, do you see like a continuity between like sad dad after son Paul Mascow? No, that's true. Yeah, that's very true. He is good at that, definitely. And also in history of sound. Sad Kentucky boy history of sound. Yeah, he's good at sad-eyed stuff. Paul Mascow, hero of Little Gold Men Book Club. That's right. I fell down the rabbit hole looking at, because I noticed that producers on this include Sam Mendes and Steven Spielberg. And I was like, how does that happen?
20:30And I guess Sam Mendes was supposed to direct a version of this with Tom Holland attached a few years ago, which I feel like would have been a different movie altogether. Oh, wow. I guess he stayed on as a producer. But yeah, I assume Holland was going to be the William Shakespeare role. There wasn't a woman attached to play Agnes yet. Zendaya. Yeah. I don't know how true this is. I had heard sort of that once Chloe Zhao started circling it, everything kind of seeded over that direction, you know? And people said, oh, let her go with it. Maybe she just had the better take or whatever. But yeah, I mean, I think the interest from Spielberg and Mendes goes to what you were saying, Hillary, about on paper.
21:09It is a very Oscar-y movie. Maybe a more traditional Oscar movie than we've had in recent years. That's fair. It's like a 90s Oscar movie, like Shakespeare in Love. But if you marry Chloe Zhao's more contemporary style with that, maybe that's the perfect combination. To say nothing of Jessie Buckley as an actor, to your point, Richard, she's so alive. She was, in my opinion, very cruelly snubbed for women talking. I feel like she elevates everything she's in, and she's often in great things to begin with. And we haven't seen her in a while. I was looking at her, you know, resume. She obviously did Cabaret in the West End.
21:40That took up some time. But it's been a few years since we've gotten to see her in a movie, which I'm excited about. This seems like a very good marriage of actor and role. Yeah. She has that earthy kind of quality to her that I think the character has in spades. I want to know who's playing Joan. Oh, yeah. Me and Joan, Agnes' stepmother. That's not listed on IMDb or Wikipedia or anything. Ellen Watson is playing Mary, William's mother, but I think that could be a juicy little role for whoever has it. One other element I would love to talk about is Lucas Joll being the cinematographer. If only because he's a very singular cinematographer, He did The Zone of Interest, which was basically shot like Big Brother with a bunch of hidden cameras in a house.
22:26But he's also done really painterly, beautiful movies like Ida and Cold War. I don't know what he's going to bring to this one, but he always surprises. It also feels like a walk in the park to Best Cinematography nom. I mean, he got nominated for both Ida and Cold War, which I feel like were sort of tougher journeys to get that nomination. So I can't wait to see what he does with this. I also love Joe Alwyn showing up in a supporting role. He's really good at that. He'll work with cool directors. It doesn't matter how big the part is. Maybe they're going to kind of, Bartholomew will be a bigger figure in the movie.
23:00But yeah, maybe that just speaks to the quality of the filmmaking team, that someone of Alwyn's stature is like, no, I'll take a side role. That's fine. I just want to be part of it no matter what. Feels like a good movie to do that for. It was like a good one to be a part of. Yeah, you get that Hetzag ensemble nomination. and you get to confuse people on Instagram I was searching for production photos and someone posted one of Alwyn and Buckley hugging and all the commenters were like they play lovers and it was like guys no that's not that's a brotherly sisterly hug that's not what's happening in this movie it's not that kind of movie no certainly not well we will leave our discussion there and after the break we'll bring in Maggie O 'Farrell to join me and Rebecca to discuss the process of collaborating with Chloe Zhao and bringing Hamnet to the screen stay with us
23:59welcome back to little gold men from vanity fair we've been discussing hamnet on today's book club episode and now rebecca and i are joined by maggie o 'farrell the author of the novel and co-writer of the screenplay maggie thanks for joining us thank you so much for having me we are thrilled to have you here. We're going to talk both about the book and ask some preliminary questions about the movie. You don't have to give away anything, don't worry. But really, we just had a discussion among the hosts about how much we love this book. And I suppose we should start really with your choice of protagonist here.
24:31And I'm curious what compelled you about Agnes Shakespeare as a protagonist and what the challenge was in framing this story around her. It was a book that I'd wanted to write for a really long time and I had circled around it several times and I think I had swerved away from the idea three times and I'd written three other books but in between writing these other books I would acquire more and more books about Shakespeare and his life and biographies and I would read around it and I would make a few notes and I would come back and back to this sort of a few sort of thousand ten thousand words of a manuscript that I have and every time I just think, no, no, I can't.
25:12Who writes a novel about Shakespeare? That's an insane idea. And then I think I finished writing a memoir and I kind of gave myself a talking to. I sort of looked myself in the eye and said, you know, you either have to write this book or you have to just forget about it. You can't keep on, you know, circling around it. And so I looked at what I'd written and I realized that I'd started it in the wrong place. You know, one of the most important decisions you have to make when you're beginning a novel is where the chronological threads, of the novel, you step into it. And I realized I stepped in at the wrong moment.
Read the full transcript
25:45I stepped in at the end. And also, I started with him, with Shakespeare, which does throw you off as a writer because, you know, it's almost impossible to sit at a desk and write a sentence like, William Shakespeare came down the stairs and had breakfast, because instantly I just think, what am I talking about? This is ridiculous. And so I realized that actually, the story that I wanted to tell wasn't necessarily about him. It was about the shadows behind him, the people that we don't really talk about or know much about. You know, the engine for me always behind the book was to ask readers to forget everything they think they know about Shakespeare and open themselves up to this new interpretation that actually his family, who've been sidelined, his children and his wife, who've been sidelined so much by literary criticism and literary biographers, they were actually much more important and more central to him than we really realized.
26:38So, and that was my way in. As soon as I thought, actually, the story is about his children and it's about his wife. It was like a key turning in a lock and I suddenly could write the book and I could see it all before me. I'm curious about where you actually started writing because I read this article you wrote called How to Write a Book. And I'm going to quote you back to yourself, but you wrote, what I wish someone had told me when I was starting out is that you don't have to begin at the beginning. The most important thing is to plunge and it doesn't matter where. So with Hamnet, where did you plunge it?
27:10Well, like I said, I had plunged it at the wrong bit and I had tried to set up my stall right at the end of the story in a sense. Because if you think of the kind of chronological flow of a book a bit like a river, some novels will start at the source and move forward chronologically until we get to the end of it. Some will plunge in right at the sea and swim upstream right back to the beginning. And, you know, I had begun it right at the end and I was trying to swim upstream, which is, as we all know, is very hard. So this is a very strange metaphor now. But I realized that I'd started in the wrong place and I needed to put the boy, Hamnet, front and center, that his voice was the most important in the book because that was the reason why.
27:47I was always really shocked. I studied literature at university and I was always amazed that nobody, not many people really knew that Shakespeare had a son who'd been called Hamnet and that he died four or five years before William went on to write Hamlet. And I didn't understand why nobody else was really struck by the similarity. Well, you know, the very, these names, which were, you know, pretty much the same, because spelling, of course, in the 16th century was a lot less stable. So it was quite common for names to be spelled. There were about six examples of Shakespeare's signature. And in each one, he spells Shakespeare differently.
28:24So it wasn't unusual to have different spellings of your name. But I was always really struck by the idea that nobody really knew much about this boy and nobody had asked the question, you know, what's the link between this child dying and this play being written? And so I thought I have to start with the boy. And so I did write the sentence, you know, a boy coming down the stairs. And that was the right bit to go into the story. So I needed, I realized very late in the day that I needed to start with Hamlet. I remember reading this book in 2020, which was a very intense experience because in addition to this fascinating and very moving reframing of the Shakespeare story, it's a very visceral portrait of life in a pandemic and the sense of mass danger, death kind of outside of the home's walls.
29:18I'm wondering for you, just how your relationship to this book and story has evolved over time. You obviously wrote it before the pandemic. You had to talk about it at the height of the pandemic. And you've since worked on the film with it a little bit more, at least, in the rear view. Yes. I mean, it was a really, it was a very strange coincidence. But when I was researching the book, I do remember thinking myself and asking myself, especially, you know, as I reached the middle of the book, which, I mean, it's not a spoiler to say, which focuses on the death of Hamnet. Yes. I remember sitting at my desk, swinging in my office chair and thinking, what must it be like to be living in a world where you know that there is this terrible virulent disease that could kill you within 24 hours?
30:10I mean, it could kill a healthy young person in their teens or 20s in 24 hours. It's so fast and so gruelant. And it spread. And I think I was trying to think myself into the mindset of a population who knew that that was a real and present danger. You know, the summer that William Shakespeare was born, there was an outbreak of plague in Stratford-pon-Avon. And there was a family two doors down from the Shakespeare's on Henley Street, all of whom died. and I just kept thinking about Mary Shakespeare, William's mother, thinking what must that have been like? She'd already had two children who died in infancy and she had this tiny baby boy and she was in this house and knowing that two doors down an entire family had died.
30:53You know, to put it in context, the deaths of COVID, not to minimize that at all, were a tiny percentage compared to outbreaks of the Black Death or the plague or whatever you wish to call it, the pestilence, as they called it themselves. But even still, it gave us all a new insight, I think, didn't it? Because now we do understand the idea and the fear of contagion. I was amazed watching my children go through it. My youngest daughter had just started school at the point at which all the schools shut. And so she didn't go to school for upwards of two years, actually. And when she was asked to go back to school, she was totally shocked because she'd sort of forgotten what school meant.
31:32You know, she didn't even really know where it was. and she still now gets stressed in crowds. And I observed that in her and I think that will always be a part of her. Yeah, I had a baby in 2020. So I often think about what they'll be like and how they'll be different as they grow up. And I really think this book hit an interesting chord with that. When did the conversation start about perhaps a film adaptation and how open were you to that? Well, a producer called Liza Marshall got in touch with me during the pandemic and we had a chat on Zoom about making it into a film, which does, I mean, it's a conversation that often happens with novels.
32:09And usually the trajectory is you have this conversation and people are really excited and they say, great, great, we'll be in touch. And then you never hear from them again. And that's often what happens. But actually this wasn't the case with Hamnet. But it is, you know, it's quite a long road, certainly from that initial conversation that I had with Liza. But I immediately really liked Liza and I trusted the way she was talking about the book and what she envisioned for it. But to be honest, even at the point, I mean, it was being filmed a year ago and I was on set and, you know, watching it all happen.
32:44And my family kept saying, aren't you excited? And I kept saying, well, I don't know, we'll see. We'll see. My husband was standing with me on set and he said, I think you have to, you know, admit to yourself that it is actually happening now. so it was it's a very strange and very surreal experience but it's been a very long conversation but I can't really quite believe that it's about to you know come out and people are going to see I'm really excited about other people seeing it I can't wait for everyone to see the end result and in this case you worked on the screenplay with the film's director Chloe Zhao correct?
33:19that's right yes so I had about I mean a year or maybe even two years after I had the initial conversation with Liza Liza and the other producer people got in touch and said um you know Chloe Chow is interested in making an adaptation of the film which was um you know I was bowled over by because I'd love and I'd love the writer and they said but she wants you to co-write the screenplay and will you have a chat with her and I went on to the zoom call and I was going to say Chloe you know I think you'll be fantastic I think you're a brilliant fit for this novel but either you You know, there's adaptation, but I don't think I want to write the screenplay because I'm busy doing other things and I've moved on to other books.
33:58But anyway, by the end of the conversation, I had totally agreed to go write the screenplay. Chloe's a very persuasive person, but I was really, really thrilled. I felt, even before I'd spoken to her, actually, just from knowing her work and talking to her, that she was a perfect fit for the story. I knew that she wasn't going to make a kind of antiseptic period drama where everybody looked really clean and shiny with perfect dentition. And I also knew that she was not going to focus on William, that she was going to make it about Agnes and about the children. And that, for me, was a really strong deciding factor.
34:43So how did the co-writing actually work between you and Chloe? Was it a passing back and forth thing, a lot of conversations? What was your process with her? It was really fascinating because, obviously, writing for screen is completely different from writing for the page. And she had a very clear vision of the chronology of the book that she, because obviously, there's a lot that you have to take out of a novel, because a novel, you know, the novel is whatever it is, 350 pages long or whatever, and it would take, I don't know, somebody maybe 16, 20 hours to read. and obviously to make a film, you have to distill it down.
35:17You've got to really, really edit it down. And the chronology in a book can, as it does in the novel, flip back and forth, but that's not always perfect on screen. So I did a first pass and she did a pass and we passed it back and forth. Chloe is a very great voice note person. Obviously, because at that time she was in the States and I was here in Scotland and I would often wake up and there'd be a kind of 10-minute voice note off. my phone from her saying, I think this and I think that and I see it like this and this works and that way it works. So it was great. We had very good WhatsApp voice notes going back and forth.
35:54And then I think the process for me was fascinating because you have to distill and distill and distill and you've got to squeeze out all the juice and you've got to, everything that's internal in a book has to be external. Audiences have got to understand what somebody is thinking and feeling. And so you need to have that in a screenplay. And so, you know, it was this kind of process of going from something that was very, very detailed to something that was very, very, you know, you've got to kind of squeeze a novel from 350 pages into, I don't know, 100 pages of a screenplay. And then what was really fascinating is seeing Chloe when she was, you know, not screenwriting when she was in the director's chair, was building it up again.
36:34So it was this very interesting sort of shape from something wide. It was just like a sort of hourglass, something enormous like a novel, right, right down to a screenplay and then widening out again into a film. It's funny, we were talking amongst ourselves about this being a Chloe Zhao film. And initially I thought to myself, oh, period movie, this is going to be new territory for her. But I think your reaction is just right that she's actually really beautiful at dealing with interiority on screen. And I think she has a really natural feel in many ways for the way that you write and how that would translate to the screen?
37:07I think what's fascinating about seeing her version of Hamnet, and I know you guys haven't seen it yet, but it's that, you know, Nomadland and The Rider, to an extent, were about people who almost their emotions are kind of sublimated, and the landscapes that they're in or the environment that they're in are often a kind of objective correlative for how they are feeling. And in a sense, I think Hamnet is a huge stride forward for Chloe creatively as a director because Agnes and William and the children are feeling things. Now, obviously, there is, you know, Chloe's done this beautiful rendering of landscape and the world building in the film is astonishing.
37:46You know, the craft team that she had that produced these costumes and these houses and the props. I mean, it's all just so beautiful. But seeing her, it's been fascinating watching her taking strides in her creativity from stories that are about people who are suppressing their emotions or sublimating them into people who are really, really going for it. And seeing Paul Meskel and Jesse Buckley, who are just absolutely stunning, they give the most jaw-dropping performances. But seeing them going through, obviously, the loss of Hamnet, and that, I think, for Chloe, has been a huge stride forward for her.
38:26Speaking of Paul Meskel and Jesse Buckley, how involved were you in casting and were you concerned it'd be hard to find the right Agnes? It was Chloe who said that she wanted Jessie and as soon as she saw her, I thought that's a brilliant idea because she's got an incredible kind of stillness but at the same time, emotion can play across her face. And yeah, she's an absolutely brilliant Agnes. She just embodies the whole thing. And I remember going to a costume fitting and walking in the door and seeing her in... the dress and the wig, and I had this really odd moment. It was sort of like meeting...
39:05It's a strange thing, because obviously, you know, I mean, Agnes Schlechter was a real person, clearly, but the person in my book is a fictional character based on the tiny, tiny information that we have about her. And then seeing her, and she was kind of backlit, so she was almost this kind of silhouette in the costume-fitting room, and it was like sort of meeting someone from my past. It was really bizarre. And I thought, oh, there she is. it's Agnes it's not Jesse it's Agnes already Was there any element of the book that you felt particularly even just a scene from the book that you felt particularly excited to see put on screen another way of asking that question is a scene that you vividly remember writing that maybe would have to take on a different shape I think I mean being on set was a really peculiar experience I mean wonderful experience but a peculiar experience as well.
39:57Because, I mean, you know, for me, I've never really been on a big film set like this. And, you know, the life of a novelist is pretty solitary. I mean, I like it, but it is quite a solitary job. And by contrast, you have this experience where you walk onto a set where there are, I don't know, 800, maybe even 1 ,000 people all doing their jobs. You know, this is everyone, you know, from technical lighting, costume, you know, photography, extras, everybody. just doing their thing. And I would sit in this tent and I'd watch people coming on the screen. And I'd think, oh, this is really interesting.
40:32And then I would have the headphones on and I'd see the screen and I'd see someone say something. And I'd think, oh, wow. I wrote that. That's really weird. That's really weird. I think the scene that I really enjoyed most filming is actually quite a small scene, but it was the scene where Agnes arrives at Henley Street. and she's been thrown out of her house by her stepmother because she's pregnant. And there's this very, very tense standoff between Agnes' brother Bartholomew and William's father. And I could see that technically it's a very complicated scene because there's a lot of actors, a lot of angles, cameras, and there's a lot going on.
41:14You know, there's tension and there's a fight and they need to resolve it. And Agnes and William want one thing and the parents and the brother want another. So everybody's kind of bristling and angry. And that was, I mean, partly it was amazing because there was a room full of absolutely brilliant actors, including Emily Watson. And Emily Watson is absolutely stellar in that scene. She's so good, you can't really take your eyes off her. And watching Chloe kind of bring everybody together and navigate this quite complicated emotional scene. I mean, it's not a very dramatic scene. It's not, and visually, it's not one of the most stunning things in the film.
41:50But just in terms of seeing all these moving parts suddenly come together and working beautifully was really fascinating. I'm going to sneak in one last question. As you mentioned, David and I haven't seen the film yet. Hopefully in the next month or so, we'll get to. But what was it like for you the first time you saw a close to finished or finished version of the movie? I mean, I'd seen all the dailies, you know, so I'd seen it kind of, but it's very different seeing it all together. And I went into a screening room in Soho with the other producers, Sam Mendes was there and Liza and Pippa were there.
42:25And it was really strange. And I was quite shocked because halfway through, I suddenly realized that I was crying. Because it is very, very emotional and very moving. And I thought, I can't believe, you know, I've written this book however many, five years ago, six years ago now. You know, and I've edited, I've written the screenplay, I've co-written the screenplay. I've been over and over and over this. I've seen this all being filmed. And I can't believe that I'm crying again about this. So it's very, very beautiful. And I'm really looking forward to other people seeing it. I cried so hard at the book, I can't even imagine what's going to happen to me in the movie.
43:07I'm looking forward to that experience. Take some tissues. That's all I'm saying. We can't wait. Maggie O 'Farrell, thank you so, so much for joining us. It's my pleasure. Thanks for having me.
43:20Thanks for tuning in to Little Gold Men. Join us again on Tuesday, August 12th to hear Rebecca's interview with the Emmy-nominated star of Dying for Sex, Michelle Williams. Our next Book Club episode will be on August 28th, and we're reading Ballad of a Small Player by Lawrence Osborne. We hope you'll read along with us and send us some questions about the book or the adaptation directed by Edward Berger and starring Colin Farrell. You can always send us an email about that or anything else to littlegoldmen at vf.com. Little Gold Men is produced by Hiba El-Urbani with mixing by Bumi Hidaka. Special thanks to Pran Bandi for studio engineering.
43:56Connie Nast's head of global audio is Chris Bannon. And this week's award for the best reason why we keep having Hilary Bussis join us on the show goes to Richard Lawson. Well, she's not like the other girls and she talks to the spirits of the forest.
From the publisher
In the second installment of this summer's Little Gold Men book club series, David, Richard, and Rebecca are joined by VF's Hillary Busis to discuss Maggie O'Farrell's Hamnet, which explores grief and hope from the perspective of William Shakespeare's wife. At the end of the episode, O'Farrell herself joins David and Rebecca to talk about Chloe Zhao's movie adaptation starring Jessie Buckley and Paul Mescal.
Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices
