Oscar Controversy Comes for Marty Supreme

5 Feb 2026 · 44 min · 24 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Little Gold Men Podcast Episode Notes

Episode Title

Oscar Controversy Comes for Marty Supreme

Hosts

  • John
  • Rebecca
  • Hillary

Overview

In this episode, the hosts discuss an alleged incident on the set of the Safdie Brothers’ film *Good Time* (2017) and its potential implications for *Marty Supreme*'s Oscar nominations. The episode also reflects on past Oscar controversies and how social media has influenced the awards landscape.

---

Key Discussions

  1. Initial Reactions to Recent Events
  2. John shares experiences from the Clive Davis gala and the Grammy Awards, noting the political messages prevalent during the events, particularly Bad Bunny's win.
  3. The hosts express curiosity about whether such political statements will carry over into the upcoming film awards season.
  1. Discussion on *Melania* Documentary
  2. John critiques *Melania*, directed by Brett Ratner, describing it as an ineffective and scripted documentary, more akin to a promotional tool than an enlightening film.
  1. Allegations from *Good Time* Set
  2. A report emerged about a 17-year-old actress cast as a sex worker in *Good Time*, who faced inappropriate behavior from a non-professional actor during filming.
  3. The Safdie Brothers were initially unaware of her age; however, implications suggest that this incident may have impacted their recent success with *Marty Supreme*, which has garnered multiple Oscar nominations.
  1. Whisper Campaigns and Oscar Politics
  2. The hosts delve into the concept of "whisper campaigns," where individuals or groups seek to undermine competitors through gossip or leaked information.
  3. They explore how recent allegations could be perceived as part of such campaigns, particularly given the timing around Oscar nominations.
  1. Historical Context of Oscar Scandals
  2. The hosts reflect on past Oscar controversies, including:
  3. *Amelia Perez*'s downfall due to social media scrutiny of its star.
  4. The case of *Green Book*, which faced backlash due to the portrayal of real-life figures and associated controversies.
  5. The infamous campaign for *Shakespeare in Love*, highlighting the role of underhanded tactics in Oscar campaigning.
  1. Impact on *Marty Supreme*'s Oscar Chances
  2. The hosts speculate on how the allegations may affect the film's nominations:
  3. Timothée Chalamet's Performance: While he has received acclaim, the scandal raises questions about his association with Safdie's direction.
  4. Jennifer Venditti's Casting Nomination: The hosts consider her chances amid the controversy, noting that it may affect her visibility and support.
  5. Josh Safdie's Directing and Screenplay Nominations: They discuss the potential impact on his awards chances, especially given the film's narrative and themes.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Social Media's Role: The discussion highlights how social media can shape public perception and influence awards outcomes, both positively and negatively.
  • Navigating Controversy: The dialogue underscores the need for careful navigation of controversies by filmmakers and actors, as seen through the lens of past and present Oscar races.
  • Future of *Marty Supreme*: The episode leaves listeners pondering the potential fallout from the *Good Time* allegations and how they might redefine *Marty Supreme*'s campaign narrative.

---

Closing Remarks The episode wraps up with a tease for future discussions and interviews, notably an upcoming interview with Best Actor nominee Wagner Moura. The hosts reflect on the ongoing drama and intrigue surrounding the Oscars, suggesting that more surprises could be on the horizon.

Next Episode

  • Scheduled for Tuesday, featuring an interview with Wagner Moura.

---

For more episodes and insights, visit [Little Gold Men by Vanity Fair](https://www.vanityfair.com/podcast/little-gold-men).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Grammys Highlights and Political Speeches

0:45 to 2:20

Discussion on key moments from the Grammys, including Bad Bunny's win and political speeches.

“I mean, I think the Grammys, they really know how to make a show, you know?”

Audience Reactions and Future Awards

2:20 to 3:39

Exploration of audience reactions to political messages at the Grammys and predictions for upcoming awards.

“I'd be looking down at my phone and looking up and she'd be gone.”

Review of 'Melania' Documentary

3:39 to 6:01

Analysis of the Melania documentary and its portrayal of the former first lady.

“I mean, I actually thought his speech was even better than you could have hoped for, the first speech, the second speech too.”

Oscar Scandal Overview

6:01 to 7:44

Introduction to the Oscar scandal involving Josh Safdie's film and its implications.

“that have popped up that are sort of co-signed by the artist.”

Details of the Allegations

7:44 to 12:05

In-depth breakdown of allegations related to Good Time and reactions from Hollywood.

“If that gives you a hint of their kind of sensibility.”

Whisper Campaigns and Industry Response

12:05 to 13:40

Discussion on the potential whisper campaign surrounding Marty Supreme and implications for Oscar nominations.

“oh, was the timing of the story suspect?”

Controversies in Oscar Season

13:40 to 14:03

Examination of broader controversies in the Oscar season and their impact on narratives.

Controversy Surrounds Odessa Zion's Casting

14:03 to 15:30

Discussion on the backlash against Odessa Zion's casting and its implications.

“So there's another thing too, which is Odessa Zion was cast in this Sean Durkin movie where she's supposed to play a character who's half Mexican, half Jewish.”

Oscars Controversies: A Historical Perspective

17:50 to 18:24

Exploration of past controversies surrounding the Oscars and their impacts.

“And sometimes it really does affect the outcome at the Oscars.”

Case Study: Amelia Perez Scandal

18:24 to 19:51

Analysis of the Amelia Perez controversy and its fallout.

“I just say I will never forget that Oscar speech.”
Show all 24 chapters

Understanding the Milkshake Duck Phenomenon

19:51 to 21:13

Discussion of the milkshake duck meme in relation to public figures.

“There were clips that were going viral, yeah.”

Zoe Saldana's Navigational Tactics

21:13 to 22:52

Examination of Zoe Saldana's response to the controversy and its implications.

“Carla is obviously not going to win, but what happens to like Zoe Saldana, who was very much a front runner for supporting actress or some of the other categories it was nominated in?”

AI's Role in Recent Scandals

22:52 to 23:21

Exploration of the AI revelation scandal and its impact on the industry.

“Yeah, you don't need to throw the baby out with the bathwater.”

The Politics of Oscar Campaigning

23:21 to 24:01

Discussion on the competitive nature of Oscar campaigning and its strategies.

“I don't think that he assumed that lay people were going to necessarily read it.”

Green Book: A Case of Controversial Success

24:01 to 27:12

Analysis of the controversies surrounding 'Green Book' and its eventual success.

“And it's not like they changed their words.”

The Legacy of Harvey Weinstein's Campaigning

27:12 to 28:00

Reflections on the influence of Harvey Weinstein on Oscar campaigning.

“I mean, I actually think the Green Book case was an interesting example of its fan base feeling actually emboldened because I think they felt that they were getting a little under attack.”

Oscar Campaigning and Public Sentiment

28:00 to 29:34

Discusses the impact of public sentiment on Oscar campaigns and the historical context of campaigning tactics.

“This was a different case where I think the feeling that people had about it being a feel good movie during the current political climate, people really didn't want to be told that they weren't allowed to like it.”

The Whisper Campaign of Shakespeare in Love

29:34 to 31:25

Explores the infamous whisper campaign surrounding 'Shakespeare in Love' and its implications for Oscar voting.

“Tell us what happened with Shakespeare in Love, though.”

Social Media's Role in Best Actress Nominations

31:25 to 33:15

Analyzes the surprising nomination of Andrea Risborough for 'Two Leslie' and the power of social media in awards campaigning.

“which is Two Leslie, which was the Andrea Risborough...”

Academy Rules and Social Media Influence

33:15 to 35:38

Discusses the Academy's response to social media influence in Oscar nominations and the need for changes in rules.

“There was the director and his wife, who were, you know, people in this industry.”

The Messy Nature of Oscar Voting

35:38 to 37:56

Examines the complexities and motivations behind Oscar voting, challenging the notion of objectivity in the process.

“And by the way, I just want to say, I don't think Frances Fisher had some male will.”

Oscar Chances for Marty Supreme

39:13 to 42:01

Discusses the Oscar nomination prospects for 'Marty Supreme' in light of recent controversies.

“So Marty Supreme is nominated for nine Oscars this year, including Best Picture, Actor for Timothee Chalamet, Director, Original Screenplay, and Casting.”

Oscar Controversies and Their Impact

42:01 to 44:15

Explore how recent controversies may affect award nominations and wins.

“as soon as she put herself in that race, it was clear she was going to win.”

Predictions and Future Events

44:16 to 46:24

Discuss upcoming events and predictions for the Oscars race amid controversies.

“or how much responsibility she had for bringing in these specific actors that had this incident.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28Hello and welcome to Little Gold Men, I went to the legendary Clive Davis gala, which was very cool. And then Sunday, I was at the Grammys with my colleague, Lindsay Underwood, and we were a part of the live blog inside the room. As someone who watched the show from afar, I thought it was pretty great. I mean, I think the Grammys, they really know how to make a show, you know? Like, there are moments you have to tune into, even if you're not following all these musicians all year round, as I don't. But I mean, obviously, I feel like the headline is the Bad Bunny win was such a huge moment. Did you feel like that was the biggest moment of the night?

1:07That and also that there was way more political speeches. I mean, there was way more politics and there was way more ice talk throughout the whole show or people had pins on. We saw a little bit of that in Sundance. So it'll be interesting to see if it carries into film awards season as the next shows come up. I actually would say that my biggest takeaway from the Grammys was I really found, Rebecca, that me and you have a connection in that we will not wait in a line. And we believe that a security guard is more of like a guardrail and less of like an official figure. So Gaga was performing and we had gone to go to the bathroom and like get a drink.

1:58And I saw Gaga was performing. I run back. They had closed the section and I just snuck under the rope and ran like the wind. I heard the security guard behind me be like, sir, sir, you can't do that. And I was like, I'm not going back. I got to see Gaga's performance. And I thought of you because I was like, there would be no way. Rebecca would be under that rope. I'd be looking down at my phone and looking up and she'd be gone. So that's something I learned. I want to go back to what you said about the politics because I feel like this show had the right balance of that. Like people were saying meaningful things when they won awards or even on the carpet, as you're saying, with the pins.

2:42And I think we need to see more of that. I mean, a lot of big devastating things have happened since the last film award show. But we have quite a few coming up, and I really hope that there is more of a genuine intention to talk about it on stage. But I don't know. I kind of think because these actors and filmmakers are still campaigning for the big one till the Oscars, I just don't know if they're going to say things like the SAG Awards or even Indie Spirits in the next month or so. Yeah, you mean they might save it for the big night? Yes, I think because it's sort of like, it's still a risk in some ways to say things so openly, maybe not to this community because everyone's sort of like-minded and how could you not be?

3:26But that's a whole nother thing. But I feel like they're just being so careful when they speak until the votes are closed, you know? I mean, it's really hard with Bad Bunny. Like, how could he not? I mean, there's the whole year, his narrative the whole year about what he's done for Puerto Rico with the residency, the sort of backlash, I guess, if you want to call it that, to him being the Super Bowl headliner, which is crazy because he's like the most popular artist in the world. I mean, I actually thought his speech was even better than you could have hoped for, the first speech, the second speech too.

4:09But he is more inclined, I guess, or his situation is more inclined to really give us that. And musicians are more outspoken in general. So we'll have to see. But I agree. It was nice to hear from our creative community being like, no, this is wrong. Like the audience was eating it up. Well, speaking of politics, I think we should jump back into film. And you saw a little movie this weekend called Melania, which I have not seen. This is the documentary. You don't need to. About the first lady that's directed by Brett Ratner. John, what were your thoughts on the film? It's my one-liner. It's a long, expensive audition tape for Melania to become a real housewife of whatever.

4:58I don't know, Palm Beach. It actually follows, like, all of the real housewives tropes down to a T, like where there's a lot of, like, how much attention she pays to detail. And she's just so busy running her family and her philanthropy and her schedule. It's also not really a documentary because so much of it feels so scripted. I mean, the production value is quite high. And it's sort of overperformed, I guess, at the box office. Yeah, I mean, they spent, it's like the most expensive marketing or one of the most expensive marketing campaigns for a documentary in history. Amazon spent an estimated, I think,$35 million to get people to pay attention to this movie.

5:45So some people did, I guess. Yeah. But it doesn't sound like a good or authentic documentary from what I've heard. I don't think I'll be checking it out. No, it's neither of those things. It's not even in the vein of the recent music docs that have popped up that are sort of co-signed by the artist. that's the closest that I would say this is, but this is even less dynamic and more controlled. I mean, we don't see even a single moment of Melania like under duress or any sort of real. Being a human. Yeah, being a human, really. That's my review. And that wasn't all the news that's happened in the past week.

6:37we've also got our first major scandal of Oscar season.

6:44So today on the show, we're going to be talking about the story that broke last week about an incident on the set of Josh and Benny Safdie's 2017 movie, Good Time, and what we think the story might mean for Marty Supreme's Oscar chances. And of course, scandals popping up around Oscar voting is not a new phenomenon. So we're going to be talking about some other controversies of the recent past. And joining us today is our BFF, Hilary Buses. Hello, Hilary. You can't get away from me. Here I am. Okay, let's get into it, though. We've got a lot to cover. So we should start by laying out the story as we know it.

7:22Rebecca, you have a piece up on VanityFair.com about the allegations. Hilary, you edited it. Can you both break down what we know as it relates to Josh Safdie and his previous films? Yeah, so this story was the cover of the new California Post. The West Coast answer to the New York Post. If that gives you a hint of their kind of sensibility. Yes, and it had some details from on the set of Good Time, which was directed by Josh and Benny Safdie, and alleged that there was a 17-year-old girl who was cast to play a sex worker in the film. And she was in a scene opposite a non-professional actor who allegedly exposed himself and said some pretty horrible things to her during the scene.

8:12And Josh Safdie and Benny Safdie were on set. Now, the article says that at the time, Josh and Benny were not aware of her age, but then Josh did find out that day, and Benny did not find out till a few years later in 2022 and that this became sort of the catalyst for them breaking up and going on to do their own projects more recently. And so some of these details had been reported before in a 2023 Variety article written by the same reporter, Tatiana Siegel. But it was all sort of packaged in this new piece as sort of explaining why the brothers broke up and came, you know, a few days after Oscar nominations, which is a very key time because Marty Supreme had, which Josh Safdie directed, had gotten a lot of nominations and was riding high on all of that.

9:04And Josh Safdie is the individual person nominated for the most Oscars this year. For directing the movie, for writing it, for editing it. Yes. Yeah. Wow. Yeah, as Best Picture. Yeah, there's a lot. Rebecca and Your Story, which is very concise and everyone should read because I think it really lays it out. Very simply, there's what allegedly happened, what people think will be the result of this as it relates to the overall movie's Oscars chances, is the timing suspect, and is it part of an Oscar whisper campaign, which is, I guess, what was originated by Harvey Weinstein, where it's like awards consultants and people behind the scenes are whispering to other people that are whispering to other people, and then it sort of bubbles up and it becomes more widespread.

9:54And that these campaigns are specifically launched by people who have a vested interest in one movie winning an award and another movie not winning an award. Right. Allegedly. Allegedly, yeah. All of this is allegedly. So this story came out last week and I think it had some legs. How are people receiving it in Hollywood? Well, I got to say, I talked to quite a lot of people off the record or on background about this. People who are tied to filmmakers or actors or people involved with Marty Supreme feel strongly that this is some sort of whisper campaign and that the timing is not a coincidence.

10:39And if it is, you know, it's impossible to prove that. Obviously, Tatiana Siegel had been reporting on this story before, so it's not like it just appeared. Which is a point that the California Post made in its strongly worded statement. In a shocking turn of events, the California Post gave me a statement in response to this, which is unusual, I'd say, for a publication to do, denying that that was any part of the equation. Denying that there was any motivation beyond, this is another beat in this story that she has been covering already. Exactly. I mean, the biggest question for me was like, if it was a Whisper campaign, what are we trying to take down here?

11:18I wouldn't say Marty Supreme is the frontrunner for Best Picture or most of the other categories. It's director, you know, Joss Safdie is nominated, but I think we're all pretty sure that's going to Paul Thomas Anderson, but also Ryan Coogler's in there. Like, what is the goal here? Screenplay? I mean, original is a little more wide open, I would say, where Marty Supreme is nominated. But yeah, I mean, it's really interesting because it's so dramatic internally. It's not as crazy as Amelia Perez last year, which we'll talk about, of course. But it does feel like this is creating waves in a bigger way than I thought for a story that has been reported before.

11:57Don't you think, though, am I just crazy? I just think the story came out after the Oscar nominations because that's when people are starting to pay attention. oh, was the timing of the story suspect? I was like, I think it's like more like the machinations of how newsrooms are run. But maybe I'm naive. No, I think it's a combination of things because also the California Post needed a cover for its first issue, which is when that came out. And yeah, that's the thing. I think with a lot of these Oscar scandals we'll talk about is like the movie and the filmmakers have a much higher profile once they get a bunch of nominations.

12:40Like people care more about these movies. If it's just a movie that comes and goes and doesn't get any nominations, no one's talking about it anymore. And then the other little wrinkle in this, the real life Marty Reisman, whose story sort of inspired Marty Supreme, his family has also come out recently saying, you know, basically that this story is not a fair representation of their father and makes him look like a lowlife and all these things. Although the filmmakers have been pretty open. It's like inspired by not a biography. And they also claim that they didn't make money from or were not consulted for the film.

13:19Right, they weren't consulted, which that is a, the true story isn't true. Criticism is a tale as old as time of awards season. So that's not a new thing, but the fact that it's sort of piling on to the same film being criticized in multiple ways by many people kind of adds to this theory. And in the span of just a couple of days, the Daily Mail story came out right before the California Post story. Right. And a few reporters at the trades and other places, I didn't get one directly, were sent this information about Marty Reisman's family being critical directly by some sort of anonymous sender, which also feels a little...

13:57Like deep throat? By Warby Heinstein. Yeah, from an anonymous sender. So there's another thing too, which is Odessa Zion was cast in this Sean Durkin movie where she's supposed to play a character who's half Mexican, half Jewish. They cast her. They make the announcement. There is backlash because she's not Mexican. She drops out. She made a very nice statement on Instagram. This is all happening in the same week. So it's like the way the world works, the Google machine, the algorithm, is like Marty Supreme, Marty Supreme. Like every five seconds on our social media, there's like one Marty. Yeah, yeah, Marty Supreme drama, Marty Supreme drama.

14:43Now, you know, the Odessa thing is completely separate from your story, from any other story, but it is, she's in the movie. I mean, she just got a BAFTA nomination. She was really, she has a SAG nomination. She was considered to be on the bubble for an Oscar nomination. and then she gets into it a little. So like all in all, it's like one of those things where it's like they're having a tough week. Yeah. And when you get hit in that many directions, how do you not feel like something is happening that's not just the full moon? But, you know, I don't know. When it rains, it pours. It feels a little like that, you know?

15:16Like it's like, what else? But we don't exactly know how the story is going to unfold, but later on we'll talk about how we think this might impact Marty Supreme at the Oscars this year. We're going to take a quick break and when we get back, the long history of Oscars scandals.

15:46I'm Shilpa Oskakovich. And I'm Jazzy Sefcek. And we're the hosts of the Bon Appetit Bake Club podcast. Bake Club is Bon Appetit's community of confident, curious bakers. Jessie and I love to bake. Some might even call us obsessive. And we love to talk about all the hows and whys and what didn't work that come with it. Every month, we publish a recipe on bonappetit.com that introduces a baking concept we think you should know. Then you'll bake, send us any questions you have, and we'll get together here on the podcast to talk about the recipe. So consider this your official invitation. Come join the BA Bake Club.

16:20New episodes on the first Tuesday of every month wherever you get your podcasts. Happy baking.

16:54Love and Madness, Die My Love is anchored by a ferocious Golden Globe-nominated performance from Jennifer Lawrence and co-stars Robert Pattinson. Lynn Ramsey marks her eagerly awaited return with this fearless new cinematic vision that charts the complexity of love and how it can change and transform over time. To stream the best of cinema, you can try MUBI free for 30 days at Mubi.com slash LittleGoldMen. That's M-U-B-I dot com slash LittleGoldMen for a whole month of great cinema for free. Hey, LittleGoldMen listeners. We're planning another pre-Oscars mailbag episode, and we want to hear from you.

17:36Are there any races you're watching, frontrunners you're not so sure about? Send us your questions to LittleGoldMen at VF.com. Okay, back to the show.

17:50Welcome back to Little Gold Men. So we already speculated a bit about why the Safdie story may be coming up now, but I got to say it does give me a real sense of deja vu because this is certainly the time of year between when nominations come out and voting starts when controversy tends to bubble up. And sometimes it really does affect the outcome at the Oscars. So let's go back in time. John, Hillary, what are the examples that you feel like we should talk about when these controversies have happened in the past? Amelia, Amelia. I don't know the rest of the song. I just say I will never forget that Oscar speech.

18:33So the Safdie thing, you can make an argument either way for why it may or may not have come from a like an inside source. But last year, the Carla-Sofia-Gascogne controversy around Amelia Perez seemed like a pretty cut-and-dried case of social media detectives working overtime, dredging up some racist and Islamophobic tweets that were written by the star of that film and putting them online. And things really devolving from there. Amelia Perez, what, it got 13 Oscar nominations? It was the frontrunner. It was the frontrunner. It was the frontrunner. Yeah. And then those hopes kind of came crashing down when the scandal broke.

19:16Yeah, that was the craziest downfall maybe since I've been working and covering this business, I think. Because it was like overnight. And it was so messy because Carla Sofia Gascon was originally like responding and defending herself on social media. She dug herself in deeper and deeper, I think. If she had apologized, said, I regret what I said, and then laid low for a couple of weeks, I think that things might have been different. They might have turned out differently for her at least. I don't know. I said might. I think there was two things happening. I think the movie was getting seen by a much broader audience on social media.

19:56There were clips that were going viral, yeah. Yeah, the From Penis to Vagina, the song. And so people were like, what is this film? And then coupled with the star who was sort of positioned as the spokeswoman for the trans story in the film and really the film overall, just taking an absolute nosedive, it was like kaput within a week. Yeah, it was a real case of the milkshake duck. You guys, you know that meme? It was a tweet from many years ago where the first part of it is like, everybody on the internet loves this duck. It's a milkshake duck, a duck who drinks milkshakes. And then the next thing after that is like, we regret to inform you that the milkshake duck is racist.

20:47There will be a main character on the internet that people rally behind. And then if there is something unsavory that is unearthed about that person or bird, then it will immediately cause a backlash. And, you know, then sometimes there's a backlash to the backlash and the whole cycle continues. But this was a very, like, open and shut case of this happening with Carla Sofia. I think what was interesting about that is the question became best pictures out of the picture. Carla is obviously not going to win, but what happens to like Zoe Saldana, who was very much a front runner for supporting actress or some of the other categories it was nominated in?

21:27And I think they did do a good job of navigating that. So Zoe spoke out like immediately about how she doesn't support those sorts of statements. And she ended up obviously winning the Oscar. And I think that part of it survived because it really was about this one individual's choices. I was watching very closely with how they would navigate that, and I think they actually did that part successfully. Yeah, I mean, Zoe Saldana navigated it perfectly, as did Selena Gomez. Yeah, but maybe because it wasn't her first. It wasn't her fault, but also Zoe Saldana has, it's not her first rodeo. Do you remember when she was torn apart by the internet for her Nina Simone movie?

22:10Oh, yeah. Yes. Yeah, that was a rough one. Which was never an Oscar contender, but maybe that's not what she thought when she was making that movie. Yes, which is why I felt actually she did a pretty good job of seeming compassionate to Carla. I mean, Carla did herself no favors. Yes. But so at a certain point, she had to just, you know, break free completely. But in the beginning, she did. It was a very smart and measured approach. But she also was like making sure people understood like, well, this isn't me. You know, this isn't my thoughts. And I performed my performance in this movie before even knowing about this.

22:53Yeah, you don't need to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Yeah. And the other big scandal, the other medium-sized scandal last year was the brutalist AI revelation that the editor did an interview where he mentioned that AI was used. And that's how that came out. So obviously not a smear campaign. Nothing was unearthed. This was a volunteer. An editor just shared the information without realizing. In like a trade, in like an industry magazine. I don't think that he assumed that lay people were going to necessarily read it. Right. And I always have questions about how a story like that becomes so widespread and shared.

23:33And some of that is social media. but I'm not ruling out the fact that there are probably competing awards strategists who are... Oh, so you're conspiracy theorizing that one. I'm a little bit that it was maybe shared and talked about and you'd be in a room with a separate awards strategist and they'd be like, did you hear about that AI thing? You know, so I'm... But that to me is just the competition. It's a political campaign. That's what the Oscar race is. but that I feel like bubbled up for like two weeks and then kind of calmed down I don't know what do you guys how do you guys feel that one played out I read his interview and I thought it was like pretty like yeah people are doing this like this movie is made for a very low budget he said we used a vocal effect to make Adrian Brody's accent And Felicity Jones.

24:32Stronger. And Felicity Jones, sorry. And it's not like they changed their words. It wasn't, I think, invasive. I think it's like a tool that's being used. I think it's a tool that has been used for longer. I just think that AI has become, I mean, three years ago, when you asked people about AI, they were like, what is that? Steven Spielberg movie, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, and now AI is, you know, the hottest issue in the world. So I think that was just kind of a case of, like, people kind of misreading this person's response because it was pretty candid, and I don't think he was, like, making, like, a broad statement being like, and next year, you know, I plan to have AI use edit my entire film.

25:23He just was like, yeah, we used it as a tool, as we all do. But it did maybe, you know, intentionally or not kind of set up this dichotomy between an admittedly low-budget movie that did use a shortcut and then like a Noro where Sean Baker every time he took a stage was talking about how it was handmade and how it was in theaters and how it is this, you know, bespoke piece of art where every single part of it was touched by a human being. And maybe that's more of like a subliminal message than something that was actively, you know, promoted. But I think that that could have been in the back of voters' minds.

25:57I mean, I don't know, but Adrian Brody won. That was actively promoted. You're right about that. When I was reporting out the Marty Supreme piece, another film that came up a lot was the Green Book year. The Green Book film because there were two scandals. There was a social media scandal in which one of the co-writers, Nick Vallelonga, tweets were dug up. Anti-Muslim tweets were dug up. And I remember that being a thing of like, is this movie going down with this? But they did what many publicists do and they sort of pulled him from press and he was never spoken of again. He didn't do the Carlos Sofia where he puts himself on like an Instagram live every day saying, I am being attacked.

26:39Right. Yeah. And then the second scandal was that the family of Don Shirley, who Mahershala Ali played in the film, was pretty outspoken about how the film portrayed his story. I think they called it a symphony of lies, which, as we have mentioned, the true story isn't true scandal comes up a lot this time of year. But that was two pretty big hits on a movie that would end up still winning Best Picture. that year. It won a lot. I mean, I actually think the Green Book case was an interesting example of its fan base feeling actually emboldened because I think they felt that they were getting a little under attack.

27:26I think there's a third thing, which was there was a lot of criticism about the film itself and whether or not it was regressive. And I think that the fans of the film felt a little under attack and they really sort of like bunkered down and really stood with it all the way to the end. And that is an interesting scenario where we don't always see that. Yeah. Yeah. A lot of the times with controversy, it's like the fans abandon you. This was a different case where I think the feeling that people had about it being a feel good movie during the current political climate, people really didn't want to be told that they weren't allowed to like it.

Read the full transcript

28:16And that's an interesting flip side to all of this, which is like sometimes you can put, it can go too hard the other way and people can sort of feel like, well, I liked it and I'm sticking with it. And if there's not a, if there's not another film in the race that has as strong a constituency, then yeah, it can wind up getting best picture. Good segue maybe into talking about kind of the old school, like brass knuckle campaigning of, you know, decades past, famously spearheaded by, yes, Harvey Weinstein. When you guys were looking back at those years, were there any that stood out to you as particularly outrageous or surprising?

29:01Well, I think the interesting thing when we look back at like, I think Shakespeare in Love is the one that's often brought up when I was talking to award strategists about this sort of the scandals of Oscar season and whisper campaigns. I think that's the one that came up the most. But we're talking about a time when there wasn't social media to sort of like report this all out or accuse, make the accusation of whisper campaigns in general. So it's almost like we don't know as much about... Tell us what happened with Shakespeare in Love, though. Oh, God. Basically, in 1998, the Academy was much, much smaller.

29:41It wasn't as international. There weren't people all over. The Academy was like... You got into the Academy after your career, for the most part. It was like a thing that you did, like, kind of when you retired. And they were all living in Los Angeles and New York. So the one-to-one communication, I think, was much, much higher back then. And so the alleged whisper campaign was that they were going around being like, listen, the first scene in Saving Private Ryan is incredible. And that should be rewarded and give Steven Spielberg his Oscar for that. But the rest of the movie isn't so good. And didn't you really love Shakespeare in Love?

30:29Like, that's the movie you loved. Yeah, and Shakespeare in Love, it's about the making of art. And it's got this incredible, you know, star-making performance from Gwyneth Paltrow. And yeah, like, this is like the people's choice. Yes. And it just worked, I guess. You know, there's no other, it ended up working. And afterwards, there was, you know, major concerns from the Saving Private Ryan side that somebody is sort of bad-mouthing your movie and is like, is that okay? Like, is that how we want to do things? And the answer was yes. And it continued going on for a bit. I personally think that has died down quite a bit.

31:14I don't know what... Well, social media users are doing that for stress. People don't have to do it themselves anymore. It's kind of like Stan Wars. True. Good point. Okay, I do want to talk, though, about my favorite one, which is Two Leslie, which was the Andrea Risborough... This is the opposite of a smear campaign. Yeah. Well, this was a fascinating look into, like, how you can get a best actor nom. I mean, in this case, best actress. But so Andrea Risborough was in this very small movie called Two Leslie. Nobody saw it. It wasn't on the radar. About two weeks before Oscar nominations, all of a sudden we start hearing people talking about Too Leslie and it's all over social media.

31:59And then Cate Blanchett in her Critics' Choice Awards speech is like, you know, these awards are great, but we have to shine a light on new, you know, films and everyone should see Andrea Risborough's Too Leslie. And everyone is like, what? They're like, what's this film? Like, what's going on? And we should point out that all these social media posts are coming from famous people who are using the exact same words to describe it every single time they write about it. What was the phrase again? A small film with a giant heart. Oh, yes, that's right. Yes, of course. Okay. And so she gets an Oscar nomination.

32:35People are really shocked. And she gets an Oscar nomination and Daniel Deadweiler and Viola Davis do not. So the lead actress that year is all white actresses. Viola Davis had the woman king, Daniel Deadweiler had Till. They were very much in the conversation. They had gotten a lot and people started to flip out. And what we learned was how powerful social media can be in swaying people. And there is a person, I mean, there's multiple people behind it. There's Jason Weinberg, who was the manager for Andrea. There was the director and his wife, who were, you know, people in this industry. And then this Academy member, Frances Fisher, who is very, very vocal and is very involved.

33:34You know her as Kate Winslet's mom in Titanic. And I spent this weekend, I mean, this has been pulled from the internet, But I spent this weekend finding the Instagram post in which she wrote, to my fellow actors in the Academy, according to Deadline Pete, he's a writer for Deadline Hollywood, Andrea Risborough can secure the Oscar nomination if 218 out of 1 ,302 actors in the Actors Branch nominate her in the first position for Best Actress. See slide five. She's got a bunch of slides. Seems to be that Viola, Michelle, Danielle, and Kate are a lock for their outstanding work. Watch To Leslie on the Academy's screening room app.

34:18This, to me, is, like, so out there. Like, to give, like, the real breakdown of, like, these are the numbers that it's going to take for us to win, and then to also sort of be like, and don't worry, those others will get Oscar nominations, like, without us. that was to me a real scandal that the academy had to respond to. And they did. Which they did. Yeah. Yeah, I remember writing about that because the academy, they announced that her nomination would not be rescinded, but there was concern. Like they used the word concern in their response about the social media outreach. And then, you know, every year the academy tweaks their rules and like the rule tweaks were very clearly in response to things that had happened, you know, about the way Academy members can talk on social media about the competitors or the films.

35:17Specifically, you could not mention other nominees or films in the way that Francis Fisher had been doing. Like there were really significant changes made and they have to be because the Academy's rules were not built for this, the way social media is today. Much like the Constitution. It's a document that should be amended. It needs amendment. And by the way, I just want to say, I don't think Frances Fisher had some male will. I think she really was really passionate about this. I think she's a passionate Oscar voter and she wants to see smaller films get attention. And I think she just, you know, got overzealous.

35:57But reading that number where I was like, like, wait, you only need that number of people to vote number one and you can get an Oscar nomination. It does make you think like, oh, no wonder why campaigns are like this because it is that close. It can't be swayed by a tiny group of people. That to me is like how a Kate Hudson can get in there. Not that she, no, she didn't do any of this. You know, there was no social media. Yeah, Kate Hudson innocent. Listen, but she campaigned very hard. She did a lot of FaceTime with a lot of people. She knows a lot of actors. And the campaigning was targeted, yeah.

36:37Yeah, and I think she was like, hey, I've been working really hard these past couple of years and I worked really hard on this performance. And, you know, I'd love your support. Watch this movie. She sang in Q &As to prove that she really can sing. And you think to yourself, okay, well, you know, if 45 people, like if the numbers are that, small, you can assemble a coalition and get in there. So I just thought that was fascinating at the time. It was so fascinating. I mean, in the end, Michelle Yeohan. Rightfully so. It didn't affect the winners. I mean, being an Oscar nominee is a very significant title and changes your career in small and large ways.

37:22So like the fact that Daniel Deadweiler still has not received that title. I find that frustrating. Well, yeah, whenever you see how the sausage gets made, it does make you take pause and realize, you know, if you're looking at it from the outside, you think like the Film Academy is the subjective body and they are going to reward the films that are the best movies by some merit that exists. Whereas in reality, you know, it's a messy voting body filled with people with different kinds of motivations. And it's not like there's objectivity here, actually. Yeah. Well, we're going to take another break.

37:57And when we get back, what do we think of Marty Supreme's Oscar chances now?

38:12Welcome to Inside the Art House, the go-to destination for cinephiles and the number one place for arthouse cinema and filmmaker conversations. Each week, today's most visionary filmmakers pull back the curtain on the art of cinema, sharing how stories are made and why they matter. Hosted by Greg Lemley of the legendary Lemley Theaters, a family that shaped the movie business for over a century, and Raphael Sparge, actor and award-winning director. Together, they explore the creative process, the struggles and the triumphs behind the camera and the bold ideas shaping film today. From indie debuts, documentaries, to international art house cinema, Inside the Art House dives deep into a world where passion meets craft and where the love of film lives loud.

38:57Inside the Art House, conversations with today's most visionary filmmakers. Listen or watch wherever you get your podcasts.

39:12Welcome back to Little Gold Men. So Marty Supreme is nominated for nine Oscars this year, including Best Picture, Actor for Timothee Chalamet, Director, Original Screenplay, and Casting. Do we think this scandal is going to affect the chances in some or all of these categories? I think some. I think not all. Yeah, I agree. That's my short answer. Let's talk about the big fish. Timmy! Timmy! Yeah. He's opened this movie. He's stood on top of the sphere. Is he flipping out right now. He's won all the things. Yeah, he's won all the things. He even won last night. Didn't he win the London Film Critics?

39:54London Film Critics. No. He won at the Grammys. Very big surprise. Wasn't nominated. You never know. Grammys are, there's thousands. But he won last night the London Film Critics. He's won everything. I mean, he's, he's done better than expected. We thought this was going to be a little bit more of like a Timmy versus Leo versus Michael B. Jordan, but also a little bit Vagnabour, but also actually Ethan Hawke. So like, this is a competitive category. Well, no, but I'm saying this is a competitive category because people really love each of these performances. You know, there are people that think that Ethan Hawke is the best performance of the year, for sure.

40:33I've spoken to people. So it is a competitive category where the winner is going to, I think, win by a narrow-ish margin. So the question is, prior to all this, Timothy has done so much praising of Josh Safdie and his methods and his work and working with this auteur. How closely they made this movie together. How informed this character specifically. And Timothy is a producer on the movie. I mean, that's different for him. So he can't speak to that. We should mention also that Timothy Chalamet has said that the practice of casting non-traditional actors has put him in a situation that also felt, I mean, he played it off as something funny, but that also put him in a position that seemed a little dangerous at one point in the movie too.

41:24Yeah, he said there was an actor who kind of threatened him in a scene where they were supposed to be sort of agitating each other. And talked about how he had been in prison for 30 years. Right. So, yeah, what do we think? I don't think it's going to affect him, actually. Well, I think that it's the Zoe Saldana question. I think that she is a really good precedent for a controversy maybe derailing some parts of a film's campaign, but not the main heart of it. Like, Zoe Saldana seemed kind of undeniable from the beginning, I think, of Oscar season last year. Like, as soon as she put herself in Supporting Actress, which was category fraud, but that's a separate issue, as soon as she put herself in that race, it was clear she was going to win.

42:08And, you know, she has been working forever. There's so much industry goodwill toward her. She's the highest grossing actress in box office history because she keeps making these franchise movies, but is also, you know, showing that she has serious chops. And so I think that, yeah, she came out early with a statement that showed that she did not align herself with the offensive views of her cast member, but she walked that line really well and she ended up winning. And I think that there is a question, I guess, of how Timothee Chalamet kind of responds to the scandal and whether that has an effect on him.

42:39But I think that if he followed the same kind of strategy that Zoe Saldana did last year, that it's not necessarily going to get in his way. There's a difference between one person doing offensive tweets and the... The, like, creative engine of the movie making an unsafe set. Right. An unsafe set is concerning to, like, because we hear about them pretty often, is concerning to lots of people who work in the business. So being able to excuse one person because it was their tweets, not the rest of the cast's problem, but supporting a filmmaker who allegedly is creating these sets that feel dangerous to some of the people working on them is, I feel like, more complicated.

43:27Do you think that it matters that the incident in question happened so many years ago, that it was on a movie set for a film that was released in 2017? Yes, I mean, obviously. If this story was about Marty Supreme, like, yeah, I think that that would kind of be it for Marty Supreme. But I don't even know because maybe not. It's not the actor's fault, but do you want to somehow punish the entire film because it was the director's fault? I don't know. I don't think so. You know, I think everyone still really admires this performance that Timothy gave, and I think he's probably still going to win.

44:02So if it doesn't affect Timothy's chances necessarily, how do you think that it would affect casting director Jennifer Venditti's chances? That's trickier because I don't know how many, you know, casting is new this year as a category. I don't know how many people are aware that she's the Safdie brothers' longtime casting director or how much responsibility she had for bringing in these specific actors that had this incident. So it's trickier for her. I think, I'm not sure she was the front runner. She's not a front runner. So I think it just makes it easier for everyone to vote for either Sinners or One Battle, which I believe are the two front runners in that category.

44:44Yeah. Yeah, the other category that I thought Marty Supreme and Josh Safdie were possibly in contention for is original screenplay because it's a little more open. I mean, Sinners, I would say, is the front runner, but screenplay is often a place where they will reward a film that is maybe not going to win anywhere else for the filmmaker. and so I was curious. Maybe Josh Safdie had a chance there, but I think if there's any race this affects, it might be that one since it is specifically his nomination. Yeah, I think that you're right. Yeah, I think Josh's other major nomination was, of course, for director, but I think it's pretty safe to say that he wasn't ever really going to win that one.

45:35I feel like Paul Thomas Anderson has that one zipped up. personally. I mean, my question is, like, is Josh Safdie still going to be at all these events and doing carpets and promoting things? I would see him maybe not doing, like, red carpet interviews, but still attending. In your article, you talked to some strategists who said that their advice for him, were they his client, would be to Kelly Lo, right? Yes, totally. Yes, send him to a bunker in Joshua Tree. But I still think he'll go to, like, the nominee's luncheon where there's not, you know, he doesn't have to do interviews at many of these events.

46:05I don't think he's going to bow out of those things. Well, we'll be keeping an eye on this story and we'll be sure to talk about any other controversies that may pop up between now and voting or the Oscars. I'm sure that there will probably be some more drama in this Oscars race. I hope. I mean, it's been pretty exciting so far. But I don't know, like a Two Leslie, that's fun. Thanks for tuning in to Little Gold Men. And we'll be back on Tuesday with Rebecca's interview with Best Actor nominee Wagner Mora. This episode of Littical Men was produced by Michelle O 'Brien with mixing by Bumi Hidaka.

46:45We had engineering help today from Pran Bandy. Our executive producer is Stephen Valentino. Thank you for listening.

46:582025 was a great year for TV, movies, and music, and we are highlighting the best of the best, including K-pop demon hunters, sinners, and severance. We're talking about our favorite moments of the year, including some of the best pop culture you might have missed. Listen to Pop Culture Happy Hour wherever you get your podcasts. From PRX.

From the publisher

John, Rebecca, and Hillary discuss last week's California Post story about an alleged incident on the set of Josh and Benny Safdie's Good Time (2017), and debate whether the news will affect Marty Supreme's Oscar chances. They also look back at Oscars scandals and whisper campaigns of the recent past, from Emilia Perez to Shakespeare in Love, and consider how social media has influenced the race over the years.

Read Rebecca's piece about the story on vanityfair.com.

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

More from Little Gold Men by Vanity Fair

All 79 episodes
Oscar Controversy Comes for Marty SupremeLittle Gold Men by Vanity Fair · 44 min
Listen in VO