Summer Movie Wins and Emmy Underdogs

14 Aug 2025 · 39 min · 15 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The hosts discuss (1) summer box-office trends and what Warner Bros.’ original-horror strategy signals for theatrical audiences, (2) Emmy “underdog” nominees worth rooting for as final voting approaches, and (3) listener Oscar/awards questions about campaign momentum and the Best Picture nominee expansion to 10.

Guests

David Canfield, Richard Lawson, Rebecca Ford (Vanity Fair film/TV/awards podcast hosts). No external guests appear in the episode.

Key claims

  • Warner Bros. is succeeding with original, non-remake films; Weapons follows Sinners as a breakout.
  • Weapons blends horror with drama/comedy pacing and multiple character perspectives (Zach Kreger’s “Magnolia” approach).
  • Comedy theatrical performance is improving via smart nostalgia-based casting and marketing (Freakier Friday; Naked Gun).
  • For Emmys, several less obvious nominees could win despite heavy favorites.

Notable examples

  • Weapons: $43.5M weekend; stars Julia Garner, Josh Brolin, Amy Madigan; Amy Madigan’s late performance praised.
  • Freakier Friday: just under $29M; Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan.
  • Naked Gun: Pamela Anderson and Liam Neeson; described as a “big tent” comedy.
  • Emmy picks: Desi Lydic (Daily Show short form), America’s Sweethearts (Dallas Cowboys cheerleaders), Britt Lower (Severance), Dying for Sex on the Mind (writing), Michael Urie (Shrinking), Jeff Hiller (Somebody Somewhere).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Emmy Underdog Nominees

0:15 to 0:35

Discussion of underdog nominees for the upcoming Emmy awards.

“The final round of Emmy voting starts on Monday.”

Summer Movie Updates

0:35 to 1:25

The hosts discuss recent developments in summer movies, focusing on box office successes.

“It was a big week at the box office, particularly for the original movie Weapons, directed by Zach Kreger of Barbarian fame.”

Warner Brothers' Box Office Success

1:25 to 3:10

Analysis of Warner Brothers' recent box office hits and their original films strategy.

“It's nice to have good news this year, I guess.”

Weapons: A Unique Horror Film

3:10 to 6:20

Discussion of the film 'Weapons' and its unique approach to the horror genre.

“I would imagine, hopefully, in a healthy movie economy, any studio would want that movie.”

Freakier Friday and Comedy Trends

6:20 to 10:00

Exploration of the box office performance of 'Freakier Friday' and the state of comedy films.

“How do we feel about Warner Brothers going from this into one battle after another?”

Nostalgia in Film Marketing

10:00 to 14:01

Discussion on the effectiveness of nostalgia in marketing films like 'Naked Gun' and 'Freakier Friday'.

“I'm just trying to be optimistic at this time of year.”

Lindsay Lohan's Career Comeback

14:01 to 15:43

Discussion on Lindsay Lohan's performance and potential in a new film.

“I was like, there's like a five-year age range that's really going to get this.”

Emmy Voting Insights

17:12 to 17:32

Overview of the upcoming Emmy voting and under-the-radar nominees.

“Welcome back to Little Gold Men from Vanity Fair.”

Highlighting Underrated Emmy Contenders

17:32 to 20:06

Discussion of lesser-known Emmy nominees worth advocating for.

“and we've each picked some perhaps lesser-known, less obvious nominees, less likely to win that we'd like to advocate for and go all the way in their respective categories.”

Dying for Sex and Other Notable Nominations

20:06 to 22:40

Exploration of nominations for 'Dying for Sex' and its writing.

“I like that you've picked categories we don't talk about very much because there's so many categories.”
Show all 15 chapters

Best Supporting Actor Predictions

22:40 to 26:42

Discussion about potential winners for Best Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series.

“because I recently talked to Michelle Williams for this podcast, but I would really love it to win in writing.”

Oscar Campaign Strategies

26:42 to 28:03

Analysis of actor campaigns for Oscar nominations, focusing on Paul Meskel.

“And I would say that was not surprising in this case.”

Examining the Oscar Campaign Dynamics

28:03 to 31:26

Explore how specific films gain momentum in Oscar campaigns, comparing 'After Sun' and 'Janet Planet'.

“Yeah, that's the most recent sort of wild campaign journey that I can think of.”

The Impact of Best Picture Nominee Expansion

31:26 to 37:32

Discuss the implications of expanding Best Picture nominations from 5 to 10 on prestige and diversity.

“And as good as Julianne Nicholson has been over a much longer career, and she did have a big TV show, in Mare of Easttown.”

Challenges in Redefining Best Picture

37:32 to 39:26

Consider the difficulties the Academy faces in broadening its definition of Best Picture and the implications for the industry.

“I think it's reached the point where it's proving that it was the right choice.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:04Hello and welcome to Little Gold Men, Vanity Fair's podcast for film, TV, and awards lovers. I'm David Canfield. I'm Richard Lawson. I'm Rebecca Ford. The final round of Emmy voting starts on Monday. So each of us are going to share an underdog nominee that we'd like to highlight that we hope can go all the way, get a little shine, just get them on the Television Academy's radar because there are a lot of big shows out there that are taking up a lot of oxygen. We're also going to answer some more listener questions later on. But first, to start, we wanted to catch up on some summer movie developments.

0:38It was a big week at the box office, particularly for the original movie Weapons, directed by Zach Kreger of Barbarian fame. This movie made$43.5 million at the box office this weekend. it's a huge result for an original horror movie, something that Warner Brothers is getting pretty used to. They had Sinners, of course, earlier this year that similarly outperformed expectations. It stars Julia Garner, Josh Brolin, my personal favorite, Amy Madigan, among others. And it seems to be kind of leading Warner Brothers' successful attempt to inject some originality into the box office, bring some high-profile successes that are not sequels, not remakes.

1:25It's exciting, right, guys? It's nice to have good news this year, I guess. I'm sure Warner Brothers feels the same. They had kind of a rocky start with Mickey 17 and the infamous The Alto Kings, but I feel like they've really... Wasn't it The Alto Knights? Oh, Knights. See, I can't even remember the title. Let me try that again. They were made knights by a king, but it's not about The Alto King. So memorable, I don't even know the title. but yeah I think they've had such a strong streak since Sinners you know Minecraft Superman obviously it's I think they have often or always been one of the best in marketing and I think they've really nailed that this year along with having good movies that you know I mean Sinners held strong for so long that it's just I think it's great and I feel like there's so much discussion about when things fail when it comes to theatrical, but we should be celebrating that it's really working for them this year.

2:23They had a reputation for decades, I feel like, as being like the director's studio. You know, they worked with a lot of auteurs and they would do sort of quote unquote loss leader, you know, sort of prestige projects more than other studios would. And a lot of those loss leaders would actually make a good deal of money. And so, you know, I think when Nolan left the studio, Christopher Nolan left the studio a few years ago after the whole Tenet thing, there was some worry that maybe they'd lost that mojo, but they've built it back, you know, and so they have Michael B. Jordan under, you know, with them.

2:50They have Zach Kragger. They'll have a Paul Thomas Anderson movie next month. Like, yeah, it's exciting to see, and I hope that other studios, to the best of their ability anyway, these days, might follow suit. Even the failure of Mickey 17 is one that you feel, or at least I feel relieved, that a studio like Warner Brothers would get behind. I don't think that movie works either, but it was Bong Joon-ho's follow-up to Parasite. I would imagine, hopefully, in a healthy movie economy, any studio would want that movie. And then, yeah, you have things like Sinners and now Weapons that, you know, they are horror movies, but I just watched Weapons.

3:31We're recording on a Monday. I just watched it yesterday on a Sunday. And I was really struck by how it plays so much like a drama or even a comedy until its final third. And it's very careful in its pacing. It's really focused on the performances. All of the actors get a lot of room to play and create real characters. And if this is the new model for what original filmmaking can be that actually brings people out en masse, it was very hard to get a ticket yesterday, guys. Then I'm thrilled. It seems like there is something that's been unlocked here by Pam Abdi and Michael DeLuca who are running the studio, who at the top of this year were rumored to be on David Zaslav's kill list.

4:13clearly their strategy has worked out. Yeah, and I think maybe one of the lessons there is like, when we say original, it doesn't have to be like, holy, holy original. There are a lot of vampire movies. Sinners just found a really sharp way to be a good vampire movie. I'm not going to spoil what Weapons is ultimately about, and I have some issues with what it is ultimately about, but it's within a known genre, but Kreger is able to kind of stretch himself and do interesting things. He's called this his Magnolia in that it's a lot of different character perspectives. It's kind of this sprawling thing.

4:46And I wonder if in cultivating Kreger a little bit with this movie, and they really gave it the heavy, heavy marketing push, the screening I went to, they were giving out t-shirts, you know, they're showing it in IMAX, all that stuff. You know, maybe they're looking to A24 as they developed Ari Aster, and they're kind of doing the same. And it's like, okay, if you're inching maybe just a little bit, Weapons is still very much a horror movie, but there's other technique and sort of interest in that movie that it's like maybe his third film will be something even further afield of traditional horror and that way you're cultivating a new really interesting auteur director within the confines of a major studio.

5:25While I don't think weapons will be getting off the ground with any kind of Oscar campaign at the level of sinners, I will just throw out there that Amy Madigan is amazing in the movie's last third. I did not know that was Amy Madigan. until the credits rolled because I truly had a total block on this movie and really was not planning on seeing it opening weekend until I just heard all the buzz. So hopefully the chatter around her materializes into something because it's a great story of an actress who was Oscar nominated back in the 80s, who has still been, you know, pretty regularly acting, but certainly not at this profile, coming back and completely stealing a movie in the end.

6:06Yeah, and her longtime partner Ed Harris did Love, Lives, Bleeding a couple years ago, which is another kind of trendy horror-adjacent indie movie. And it's fun to see actors who have had very long careers get a chance to play with these kind of younger, more hip filmmakers. Yes. How do we feel about Warner Brothers going from this into one battle after another? I was struck by the trailer that played at my screening yesterday because it was so different in tone from, I feel like, the earlier trailers, which were much more PTA, arthouse. This felt like a much more commercial sell. There have been, I feel like, endless reports on how much this movie costs and, you know, kind of conflicting reports of budget and panic inside Warner Brothers and what have you.

6:51But at least it feels like it has some sort of cushion based on how the studio's other films have performed this year where it's not going to be, you know, spotlighted as this great failure that's endemic to a studio trying to bank on original films and not succeeding. Clearly they are succeeding even if this one doesn't land as strongly. Yeah, I feel like they're really going to benefit from having had this nice string going to this one because it will be hard to make that amount of money back on this movie. But I think there's still a lot of narratives that can focus on the success of that film if it does well in the way it needs to critically, which I think it will, and sort of pleasing the P.T.

7:30Anderson base. And I think it has that possibility. So I think it could still be a win for them, despite the fact that reporters will have to note how much this movie did cost them. But I think if it plays critically and does fine in the box office, it should be fine. And it feels, it's quite epic in scope, so I feel like it will be another word-of-mouth thing where people are talking about how much they enjoyed it as The Weeknd kicks off and maybe that brings more people out. Yeah, I keep hearing really good things about the movies, so that's encouraging. You know, it's something of a road test for the DiCaprio factor where he's pretty much one of the last reliable, bankable movie stars.

8:11People point to Killers of the Flower Moon as being an example that's like, well, maybe that's kind of stalling out a bit. But I think there was confusion about that movie. Is it on Apple? Am I seeing it in theaters? What's happening? And this one is clearly the way it's been marketed. It's like, no, this is a theatrical event. The trailer is going to play before pretty much every movie because we can tweak it to fit comedy. We can tweak it to fit action. And the word is out there about that movie. And so I think that the DiCaprio of it all, in addition to everything else, P.T. Anderson does have a following to some extent, will help that movie.

8:42And I think the decks are otherwise pretty clear at that point in September. It has a lot of room, I think, to succeed. Barring a pretty spectacular flop, it will also almost assuredly be Paul Thomas Anderson's highest grossing movie ever. He's currently, his record is just over 40 million in this movie. Again, I don't want to curse it, but it should clear that. Even if it does clear that, it could still be labeled a failure. The bar is much higher than that. So there's a headline for box office analysts to write if they're looking for a positive spin. The title's more appealing than Licorice Pizza.

9:14So that's just a little bit. Yeah. Well, coming in second at the box office behind Weapons was Freakier Friday, the sequel starring Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan. Over the course of the weekend, Weapons kept trending upward and Freakier Friday kept trending downward. I think it ended up at just below$29 million. So it's kind of a bummer to not see a big studio release comedy not hit that$30 million benchmark. But still, that's a very good release for a mid-budget live-action comedy that got pretty decent reviews. It's coming off of The Naked Gun, which is holding fairly well and got very good reviews.

9:51Obviously, both of those are working off of established IP, but it's nice to see comedy working a little bit better at the box office. You know, it's mid-August, guys. I'm just trying to be optimistic at this time of year. Yeah, I feel like August is not usually an optimistic time for movies. But yeah, I think the other thing that distinguishes Naked Gun and Freakier Friday is that they really are just straight comedies, Naked Gun especially. Naked Gun especially. Yeah, Freaky Friday has an emotional element to it, nostalgia to it, all that. And Naked Gun has its own nostalgia. But we haven't gotten a ton of that kind of comedy in theaters.

10:29I mean, you look to Happy Gilmore 2 performing like crazy on Netflix, and you're like, yeah, comedy has done okay. Comedy films have done pretty well, depending if Adam Sandler's involved on streaming. but theatrically, it's been really quiet minus a few blips, like One of Them Days or something, which is also a pretty funny movie from this year. So yeah, I'm optimistic. Again, originality would be nice, but maybe this is the way to kind of build the foundation to kind of retrain audiences to like, that it's fun to see big action spectaculars in theaters, but it's also fun to be in a movie theater watching a comedy and laughing with people.

11:04I thought that Barbie would have done a little bit more to stoke that appetite, but maybe it needed another round and here it is. I got to say that both these films ran really smart promotional campaigns. Like Jamie Lee Curtis and Lindsay Lohan, I felt like were everywhere in the last couple of weeks. And obviously Pamela Anderson, Liam Neeson and their, I don't know, relationship became like - It's on the record. Yes, official relationship. They're like became the center of the universe for like at least 24 hours. So it felt like they really promoted these in a way, because they are beloved actors or actors staging a comeback.

11:42And then having that combined with these familiar IP, I felt like really helped these films do well. Even if you maybe weren't a fan of the original, you might want to come to see these two people who are now in love be in a movie together. So I think there are many ways the promotional part really worked for them. The entirety of the Naked Gun campaign is sort of fascinating to me because it's proven to be a pretty big tent comedy for people who I would imagine have very little familiarity even with, you know, the original films. But the way in which you have Pamela Anderson sort of offering a certain kind of nostalgia factor just in her casting, you have Liam Neeson taking that mantle and then seeing them together and being so funny.

12:29The whole thing feels very geared toward of kind of viewer who recognizes these two and recognizes their respective histories on film and TV, but also it just creates a whole new original blend. And I wonder if that's a kind of model for theatrical comedy going forward because it would be very easy to look at the success of Naked Gun, Freak Your Friday, and even Heavy Gilmore 2 on Netflix and just say, well, remakes, sequels work, and that's it in the comedy realm. But I think Naked Gun offers a more interesting lesson in the same way that Barbie did. Yeah, absolutely. And I think that, you know, I was a big fan of the original Naked Gun films when I was a kid.

13:12And I didn't know Leslie Nielsen's past context. I didn't even really know who Priscilla Presley was. Exactly. I just thought they were these funny people in these funny movies. And I think that Liam Neeson and Payment Anderson are really shrewd casting for people who are maybe old enough or pay close attention enough. But otherwise, they're just funny in the movie, you know, and that can work well. I think Freakier Friday relies much more heavily on specific nostalgia. I don't know if that's as reproducible. I don't know what other comedies from 20 something years ago we could really mine and revive.

13:42But the Naked Gun model, which is just cast well, have a great idea of how to execute it and then do that. You know, that movie's not perfect, but it's very, very funny for at least a third. I was almost in awe of the very, very narrowly specific millennial appeal of Freakier Friday. The level of references at times, I was like, there's like a five-year age range that's really going to get this. And I don't know that they care because clearly it landed in a big way with that crowd. And, you know, I'm someone who I guess grew up with that movie in the way that they would hope. And the movie did work for me along those lines.

14:19But I was like, is this even good? I genuinely don't know. I mean, if you had told me even a few years ago that I would be sitting at a critic screening in 2025 and watching Chad Michael Murray get a slow-mo hero shot. And then he was really funny in the movie. I'd have been like, you're insane. But that is a very, very small window of millennial nostalgia indeed. But he's good in the movie. I think Lindsay Lohan's really good in the movie too. This is a bit above the sort of Netflix holiday comedy she's been doing. And it's nice to see that she can find ways to be a little bit more natural than those Netflix films have asked of her.

14:57I would say substantially. I mean, this feels like a real turning point for her, hopefully, and one that she can use to maybe just level up a little bit in the kinds of projects that she gets to work on, getting to show her range a little bit. Lindsay Lohan, you know, is a very good actor. And at one point in time was somebody who I was sure would be an Oscar nominee by like age 35. Like that's kind of what her trajectory felt like to me. And then obviously things did not go that way, but hopefully this reminds people that she is pretty dynamic on screen when she gets the chance to be. Oh my God, I would die if she gets like a gritty, arty, Oscar-y role next.

15:36Can we make that happen? The canyon? Sorry. Yeah, we've got to make that happen. Well, let's take a quick break and when we come back, we'll shift our focus to television as Emmy voting kicks off and pick some under-the-radar contenders worth going all the way. So stay with us.

16:00I may not hold a diamond, but I do hold a few opinions about Bravo. I'm Sarah Galley, certified Bravo-holic and host of Andy's Girls, the only Bravo podcast that takes housewives as seriously as they take themselves. Recorded straight from my closet office, or as I lovingly refer to it, the cloffice, this show offers a psychological deep dive into the drama on and off screen, Not to recap per se, but to understand what's really going on. Think of it as C-SPAN meets Ayanla Fix My Life. A little stream of consciousness, a little emotional autopsy, and a whole lot of nuance. From housewives themselves to culture writers, comedians, and everyday Bravo-holics, I'm joined by rotating guests to explore the psychology behind Bravo's most fascinating personalities.

16:50because when someone storms out of a reunion or rewrites their own history mid-season, we don't just ask what happened, we ask why. So if you're looking for something different than a recap and deeper than a soundbite, you're in the right place. New episodes of Andy's Girls drop every week, streaming from the Clawfist to wherever you get your podcasts. C 'est bon, c 'est bon.

17:29Welcome back to Little Gold Men from Vanity Fair. We are right around the corner from Phase 2 Emmy voting, and we've each picked some perhaps lesser-known, less obvious nominees, less likely to win that we'd like to advocate for and go all the way in their respective categories. There are a lot of them, so obviously this is just skimming the surface, but I think we each picked pretty worthy people. Richard, would you like to start for us? Yeah, of course I cheated and picked two things. Sorry. One of them is Desi Lydic, who is one of the anchors on The Daily Show. And she's nominated in the short form performance category, which is mostly comedies.

18:09I don't think there's a lot of short form drama. And so she does like a web series that's tied to The Daily Show. And I want to just highlight her because there was a lot of understandable ballyhoo about Jon Stewart returning for one day a week. He's the Monday night guy. I guess they've kind of extended that a little bit. He's done more than one day a week in recent months. But anyway, so I think the other Daily Show people get a little overshadowed with all of the Stewart attention. And I think Desi Lydic is my favorite of the other bunch. I think she's really funny and sharp and has her own sort of tone that she brings to the show.

18:39She's not just kind of copying what people have done in the past. So I think she would be a worthy winner in that category. Although I did for a second, Natalie Emanuel is nominated for that Die Hard, the Kevin Hart thing. Oh, wow. And I was like, oh, it would be... I mean, I'm glad she got a nomination, but it would be nice for her to get a win just to maybe wash off the Megalopolis stinks. It's not her fault. You know, I felt watching that movie, I was like, I feel bad for a lot of people involved in this, but like Natalie Emanuel as one of the lesser known people in the movie, I was just like, oh, it's really bad for her.

19:10So, but no, I'm going with Lydic there. So that was that one pick. and then the other briefly, in the unstructured reality competition, we tend to focus on structured, which would be your survivors, your traders, all that. The unstructured is not competition, basically. I would love to see America's Sweethearts, the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader show from Netflix win. Its second season aired a couple months ago. It's a really great show. Yes, it's made in cozy conjunction with the Dallas Cowboys franchise, and maybe there's some icky kind of corporate compromise there. But the women they profile are fascinating.

19:45The second season deals partly with them not unionizing exactly, but advocating for more pay. Famously, not very well paid, despite the franchise being very, very wealthy. Some great people, I guess I could call them characters, kind of passed through the series. And I was just riveted for all eight episodes or whatever it is. So I think that would be a worthy win in that category. These are both good. I like that you've picked categories we don't talk about very much because there's so many categories. I honestly didn't even look at the short form nominees and I am still stuck on the Natalie Emanuella situation because I'm kind of pulling for that to happen because it was a pretty brutal time for her with Megalopolis.

20:26The reviews, from what I recall, were especially unkind to her. So I'm glad she's nominated. Rebecca, would you like to go next? Well, since Richard picked two, I'm going to pick two too. I'm going to go off the cuff here. My first one is a little obvious and I wouldn't say under the radar. but Britt Lauer I think is probably not going to win, unfortunately, in drama actress because she's up against the beloved Kathy Bates. But I wish she would and maybe, I don't know, you know, surprises always happen, but I think the odds have Kathy Bates pretty locked in here for this. But I'm also worried that like none of the actors from Severance are going to win, which is a real possibility and would be a big bummer.

21:06But I think that season of Severance doesn't work without her performance. the little ways she can change her face to change a character, that finale. Like, she is giving a performance that I think so few actors could have pulled off. And it's the only reason that season works, in my opinion, is what she was able to do. And, you know, she's really out there. Like, I think she was on a trade cover recently. Like, she's not under the radar here, but I do think, you know, in another year when there wasn't a Kathy Bates, this would have been an easy win for her. And I think she definitely deserves it.

21:39So she's my big pick, even though it's a little bit of a cop-out since I think she's very much in the running. We'll talk about this more when we get into predicting, but the severance actors question is a big one. Obviously, it's the most nominated show of the year. But you're right, Rebecca, that there is a scenario in which none of them win. You've got Noah Wiley in Best Actor up against Adam Scott. Supporting actor and actress are both, you know, such white lotus-led bloodbaths. But the Brit Lauer one, I think she actually does have a chance. I think the fact that Kathy Bates is the only nominee for Matlock stands in pretty sharp contrast to Brit Lauer being such a breakout star of a show that the Emmys love so much.

22:19So I wouldn't lose hope there just yet. All right. You would both rank Brit higher. Get it? Clicker listening. That's not how you pronounce it, Richard. I know. I realized as I was saying it, I was like, I'd have to come up with a new way to say hi, but I figured it out. And you had one more, Rebecca? Oh, yeah. I have Dying for Sex on the Mind because I recently talked to Michelle Williams for this podcast, but I would really love it to win in writing. It's the pilot episode, the first episode that got the nomination, which I think is called Good Value Diet Soda. But I think the writing on that show is so strong because it really has to manage tone in a way that could have been disastrous if they didn't get it right, you know, because it is so funny, but it's so sad.

23:04And I thought the way Elizabeth Merriweather and Kim Rosenstock were able to walk that tightrope was just so incredible. I think the writing is so strong throughout the series, but I think it's pretty competitive there. And the show, while it did get quite a few nominations, I feel like it's just not a front runner. And when you're looking at something like adolescence, it just feels like there's no stopping that show. So I would love to see that show win something. and I feel like writing especially stood out to me. I agree. I would love to see that happen. But just ask those who went up against Baby Reindeer.

23:39When you've got a juggernaut, it is very easy to just see them win everything. So I'm also going to pick two. I'm going to go with the same category just for simplicity's sake. And that's Best Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series. I suspect Harrison Ford is going to win this race and he really is wonderful and shrinking. So I have no complaint about that. but there's some really exciting new blood here. The first person I will mention is actually Harrison Ford's co-star, Michael Urie, who is such a sneaky highlight of that show and somebody who has been doing such good work on TV for such a long time.

24:17I got to talk to him for a longer story back when the first season aired and his journey just from Ugly Betty to doing a bunch of recurring work on shows like The Good Wife and Younger and The Good Fight. He's always great. And a lot of theater. And a lot of theater. A lot of theater. He's currently in O'Meary, right? Yes. He's somebody who has never really gotten this level of attention for his work, as great as he's always been. And just seeing him nominated is very exciting. He won the Critics' Choice Award earlier this year for his performance on the show. And I don't know. It would be a nice acknowledgement of somebody who's given so much to the medium for, I would say, so little recognition, frankly.

25:02And he's, to me, the kind of sneaky heart of that show in a way. And then the other one is my true passion pick and one I've talked about at length on this podcast, and that's Jeff Hiller for Somebody Somewhere. I would not say Jeff Hiller has had as vibrant a career in TV as Michael Urie, but he's somebody who is, you know, you watch something and he might pop up for five seconds. He might pop up, say, in 30 Rock in two different roles over the course of that show's run. He's that kind of actor. He's a real journeyman. And somebody somewhere from the beginning kind of positioned him as a true star in a way he'd never gotten the opportunity before.

Read the full transcript

25:37And this third and final season, for which he shockingly, delightfully, deservedly was nominated, gave him this really beautiful romantic arc and positioned it against his very deep and complicated friendship with Bridget Everett's character. It allowed him to play so many shades. And he's just really, really, really wonderful. Yeah, I feel like a win there would in some ways be like the Emmys version of Cola Scola winning at the Tonys. Jeff Hiller is like, you know, a sort of alt comedy name. You know, I've been aware of his work for a long time, like from Sketch Stuff and various other things.

26:11And, you know, he's someone that I think a lot of people respect as a performer, and that would be really exciting. But the mountain is a bit steeper to climb at the Emmys than maybe it was at the Tonys. Yeah, and I think generally just the fact that you do have such heavyweights as Harrison Ford and even Eben Musbachrock, who's won this award for two years running for the Bear, it just makes it inevitably harder for somebody like him or even Michael Urie to just gain that level of support, really. I mean, Escola beat George Clooney. Yes, they did. And I would say that was not surprising in this case.

26:47Perhaps miracles may happen. We're going to take a quick break, and when we come back, we'll answer some listener questions. Stay with us.

27:07Welcome back to Little Goldman from Vanity Fair. Over the last few weeks, we've been getting some more great listener questions about film festivals, upcoming releases, things of that nature. so we're going to get into a few right now. Our first question comes from Curry, who asks, how does an actor from A Little Indie That Could build a campaign that leads to serious Oscar contention? Maybe what I'm really asking is, how did Paul Meskel get a nod from the Academy for Aftersun while Julian Nicholson mounting a campaign for Janet Planet felt almost unimaginable? Is it really because he's young and hot?

27:39Or, like Laura Dern in Marriage Story and Kieran Culkin in A Real Pain, was there an added boost from a beloved TV performance that carried over into film. I, too, am forever sad that Julian Nicholson got no campaign for Janet Planet. I'm scanning this question. I don't see the words to Leslie anywhere in it. If we're talking about little indies that could. Yeah, that's the most recent sort of wild campaign journey that I can think of. But I think the problem is, I don't know if you guys agree, but it really depends on the specific year and there are always sort of these odd journeys. I think the Palmesco one is a perfect example of nobody, I think, really saw that coming once that movie came out and I don't think A24 even realized it when it happened and then it just picked up an incredible amount of momentum.

28:34Yes, he is young and hot and yes, he was having sort of a breakout moment after his show but I think for each of these You can go back and explain it after it happens, but it's really hard to spot it while it's happening in the early stages. Yeah, I think that there is a question of timing in that Janet Planet premiered at Telluride and didn't come out until the next year, right? Like it was the next spring or summer or something. Summer, yeah. And whereas Meskel could ride Can Adoration all the way to a fall release. I also think that, you know, On paper, the two films, Janet Planet and After Son, are both about children of kind of inscrutable parents trying to understand the interior lives of these older people, but also tending to their own sort of adolescent or pre-adolescent changes.

29:26So they do seem very similar. But I think that an actual execution, as artful as some of After Son's construction can be, I think its themes are just that much more accessible than Janet Planet. Which isn't to say it's necessarily a more successful film. It's just a different kind of film. And I think that Jane and Planet is so quiet and so withholding with anything resembling plot that it just registers somehow a little bit more artsy. And you combine that with a delayed release schedule and all that. And I think it had some obstacles that After Sun, even though it is, you know, of a piece with Jane and Planet, just didn't have.

30:02Yeah, I think one of two things need to click in this case. One is that the film becomes really beloved on the backs of the performance. and that's exactly what happened with After Sun. To exactly what Richard was saying, the movie itself really took off with movie fans. It was a big thing on Letterboxd. It had a level of visibility that a movie like that that's very small very rarely gets. And I think I wouldn't put too much stock into Meskel's run on Normal People as great as he was on that show. I think for a lot of Academy members, it was a true discovery moment. And that also helped that it was somebody that a lot of them were completely unfamiliar with or had only seen in passing really just showing up in a major way.

30:49And then you also had the dynamics of that category. I believe that final slot for Best Actor was down to him and Tom Cruise for Top Gun Maverick. You know, two extremes. And it was just a relatively thin field. it was a case where I think Adam Sandler had gotten the SAG Award nomination for the Netflix movie, whose name I'm forgetting, Hustle. And so that was not going to translate to an Oscar nomination. So there was a path that was very clear for Meskel. Yeah, I mean, there was a decision made around the time of Normal People when everyone was, you know, stuck at home during the pandemic that he was just going to become a big movie star.

31:26And as good as Julianne Nicholson has been over a much longer career, and she did have a big TV show, in Mare of Easttown. She won an Emmy for it. That decision never seems to have been made about Julia Nicholson for a variety of reasons. And then you look at the fact that both films were distributed by A24, and I don't know what happened internally over there, but any studio that's running or deciding what movies to run campaigns for, they have to do some hard kind of triage math, basically. And I think that After Sun had that cam momentum, like I said, and Jane at Planet was a different sort of release strategy that didn't really entail, I don't think, ever a serious Oscar campaign.

32:03Yeah. I remember when I interviewed Paul Meskel for this podcast, he was talking about how for Aftersun, he did no Oscar promotional stuff because he was in a play at the time. And so it was like the dream experience because he didn't have to be, you know, promoting it all the time, which I think just, again, speaks to what we're talking about, about the momentum of the film and how beloved it was and how he was really treated like this discovery that he didn't even have to do that. that so many of these actors have to do. So really a dream first Oscar nom for him, I think. The other dynamic that can work out in this case is when the acting community rallies around you.

32:44That's the obvious example of Andrea Risborough, a tiny movie that nobody really saw that was not a thing on Letterboxd, but that really had this level of somewhat organic support among her peers that coalesced into something pretty remarkable. I think that would have been the more likely scenario for Julian Nicholson, who is so beloved and such a, you know, longtime great actor who's worked with so many people. And maybe that will happen sometime. I hope it does. I think she's overdue. But in her case, there wasn't that level of groundswell. And so it just kind of left her with nowhere to go for a campaign.

33:17And I think we should acknowledge that Paul Meskel's nomination was itself an anomaly, you know, these days. That felt really like unexpected and cool. And I would love for that kind of thing to happen more often. You could say, oh, well, Fernando Torres, but that movie was nominated for other awards and won something big. And, you know, so those standalone lead performance things, I guess, used to happen a lot more in Best Actress. But yeah, the masculine thing was rare in and of itself. And Curry also references, you know, Laura Dern in Marriage Story and Kieran Culkin in A Real Pain. And I think we all have sort of mentioned how supporting is very different.

33:53Like those are both very showy supporting performances. and every year there's like one supporting actor who I feel like just runs away with it all season. Kieran did that, Divine Joy Randolph did that her year where they just like pick up every award on their way to the Oscar. And it's just sort of this weird thing that happens with at least one category, it feels like, every year. So I'm sure we'll see it with somebody in supporting again this year. And again, Marriage Story was a Best Picture nominee. A Real Pain was very close to being a Best Picture nominee. you could look at somebody like Regina King for If Beale Street Could Talk that movie was not as you know a big of an Oscar hit as people had hoped but similarly it had other nominations and that's often quite key in those cases our next question comes from Steve who asks now that we've had a good deal of time with it how do we feel about the move from 5 to up to 10 Best Picture nominees has it been a success I just want to clarify, we're now at a set 10 Best Picture nominees.

34:54And Steve says, personally, I'd much rather they go back up to five as I feel it ups the prestige of the whole thing. I just think having up to 10 dilutes the water a bit when such an honor should be harder to attain. We talk about this a lot. Yeah, I guess the thinking, you know, initially was that, oh, The Dark Knight didn't get a Best Picture nomination. We need to open this to more commercial films. And that has borne out, you know, you think about Mad Max or Top Gun Maverick or whatever, but also the benefit has been that smaller films like Nickel Boys have snuck in. And so I don't really know.

35:23I sort of have two minds about it. Something we've, or I've mentioned on this podcast that This Had Oscar Buzz, our friend podcast out there in the world, has talked a lot about is that the 10 Best Picture nominee thing has made it so the craft categories are less interesting because people tend to just pick and choose from those set 10, which I do see that there is a trend there. But I don't know. I do think that it means a lot to those filmmakers, even if sort of in the imaginary ranking, they are number 10. And it just brings more people to the party and there's more to talk about. So I don't mind it.

35:57I think there have been some negative effects, but I think the positives outweigh that. When this was first announced, I was pretty against it. I didn't like the idea of letting a bunch of popcorn movies, you know, play ball with a bunch of focus features, Sony Classics movies. But yeah, as you're saying, Richard, that didn't really happen. And if you just look at what the expansion to a full 10 did last year, it really made room for the nominations for The Substance, Nickel Boys, and I'm Still Here. Those are the three movies that I don't know would have made the cut in an even 5 to 10 sliding scale.

36:36With the full 10, those were the three that benefited the most. And I think that's an unqualified win. You know, I think when you look at the Emmys and how many nominees they have, that really does prioritize popular shows over critical darlings like Somebody Somewhere. But I do think the Film Academy has proven to be more discerning and refined, honestly, in their taste. And so while in a perfect world, five nominees is great, I think actually it's not quite as cut and dry quality-based as you might think. I think it has a lot more to do with the campaigns that can muscle their way into that five, the people who know the most people, as we were talking about just with that last question, those things can often play a bigger factor in what ultimately makes the cut.

37:22So yeah, more room has led to a greater diversity and range of the kinds of nominees that we see. And I think that's a good thing. Yeah, I agree. I think it's reached the point where it's proving that it was the right choice. And when you think about the fact that all voters or most voters are going to watch the films that are nominated for Best Picture, it gives more of a chance to films they may have skipped if it didn't make that 10. So I think the good far away is the bad with having 10. And I'm quite happy that it remains that way now. And if I can put on my mean Oscar predictor hat, not my nice everyone deserves recognition hat, I think it makes the heartbreak that much more exciting in a way.

38:07Because if it's just five, you're like, oh, well, like so many other movies didn't get in that were worthy. But when it's 10, if something is the presumed 11th or 12th, you're like, oh, that's pretty dramatic. And maybe that's cruel to those filmmakers. But I think it does add an interesting tension. You would think that it would be the opposite, but I don't know. I don't think that's borne out. I love that drama, yeah. Yeah, I think that's a great point. You didn't have at the end of last season, Gladiator 2 being the movie that just missed out. It was a real pain in Sing Sing, Movies that were smaller with a lot of champions.

38:39You know, on this podcast, we especially loved Sing Sing and were pretty heartbroken to see that it didn't make the cut, but that raises the stakes. It makes it still feel impactful and limited in what can make the cut. I don't think we are at the point where it feels like too big of a tent. It does still feel like the Academy has to make a lot of hard choices. And let's tell people these days to see 10 movies instead of five. You know, any little bit helps. Yeah. Unfortunately, the movie industry is not what it was, and so it probably helps to put the onus on Academy members to see more. Well, yeah, and pertinent to our comedy conversation, if they really wanted to expand, they could add a comedy thing like the Golden Globes, and then we could have 20 or, I don't know, we would incentivize studios to make more comedies.

39:23I will say that the Academy's historic attempts to broaden beyond best picture in that way have not been successful. And so that's something to keep in mind. that when they do try to get outside of the definition of best picture, I don't think the members know what they're voting for. I don't think that the industry knows what they're voting for. It's just a total mess. So let's just keep the Oscars what the Oscars are at minimum. Not to disagree with you, Richard. No, I disagree with myself as I was saying it. I was just throwing it out there. Thanks for tuning in to Little Gold Men. Join us again on Tuesday to hear Rebecca's interview with the Bear star, Iowa Debrie.

40:01She's a double Emmy nominee this year for acting and directing and one for her performance back in season one. Our next Little Gold Men Book Club episode will be on August 28th. We'll be discussing Ballad of a Small Player by Lawrence Osborne, as well as the upcoming film adaptation directed by Edward Berger and starring Colin Farrell. You can send your questions about those books, upcoming films, or anything else at all to littlegoldmen at vf.com. Little Gold Men is produced by Hiba El-Urbani with mixing by Bumi Hidaka. Connie Nass' head of Global Audio is Chris Bannon. And this week's award for the most appropriate reaction to one of Richard's awful puns goes to me.

40:35Is this even good? I genuinely don't know.

From the publisher

This week, David, Richard, and Rebecca take a look at Warner Bros.' hot streak, which continued with the horror hit Weapons. They also each pick a couple Emmy nominees they hope get a little love from voters ahead of final voting next week. Finally, they answer some listener questions, defending the Academy's choice to open up Best Picture to 10 nominees.

Learn about your ad choices: dovetail.prx.org/ad-choices

More from Little Gold Men by Vanity Fair

All 79 episodes
Summer Movie Wins and Emmy UnderdogsLittle Gold Men by Vanity Fair · 39 min
Listen in VO