Alternate Investing: Masters in Business with Kristin Olson

12 Nov 2025 · 52 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Masters in Business Podcast Episode Summary: Alternate Investing with Kristin Olson

Episode Overview

  • Host: Barry Ritholtz
  • Guest: Kristin Olson, Global Head of Alternatives for Wealth at Goldman Sachs
  • Release Date: [Date not provided]
  • Episode Focus: Discussing the alternate investing space, long-term allocations, and making alternatives accessible to individual investors.

Key Themes

  1. Kristin Olson's Background
  2. Joined Goldman Sachs straight out of Georgetown University 27 years ago.
  3. Experienced in both investment banking and alternative investments, leading the Alternatives Group for 24 years.
  4. Transitioned from traditional banking to alternatives during the dot-com bubble.
  1. The Growth of Alternative Investments
  2. Goldman Sachs manages over $500 billion in alternative assets, highlighting their robust presence in the space.
  3. Alternatives encompass various sub-sectors including:
  4. Private Equity: Buyout, growth equity, venture capital.
  5. Private Credit: Direct lending, hybrid capital solutions, distressed assets.
  6. Real Assets: Real estate, infrastructure, and innovative sectors like digital infrastructure.
  1. Shifts in Investment Strategy
  2. Discussion on the decline of public companies and the significance of private investments in the economy.
  3. Speculation on future IPO activity and the potential reversal of the public company decline.
  4. The importance of diversifying portfolios to include alternative investments for better risk-adjusted returns.
  1. Strategies for Individual Investors
  2. Suggested allocation for moderate risk clients is approximately 27% in alternatives.
  3. Discussion on evolving from traditional 60/40 portfolios to potentially 60/20/20 (equities, alternatives, fixed income).
  4. Importance of understanding the illiquidity and risk-return profiles of alternative investments.
  1. The Role of Education and Access
  2. Need for better education around alternative investments for both advisors and individual investors.
  3. Insight into how millennials are changing the investment landscape, showing increased interest in alternatives due to their experiences during economic downturns.

Key Discussions

  • Evolution of Alternative Investment Strategies:
  • Transition from institutional focus (pension funds, endowments) to individual investors.
  • Development of products like evergreen and open-ended funds to simplify access to alternatives.
  • Due Diligence and Risk Assessment:
  • Importance of thorough manager selection and portfolio diversification.
  • A dedicated team at Goldman Sachs for external diligence to ensure clients are investing in high-quality managers.
  • Current Trends and Future Opportunities:
  • Growth in sectors like private credit due to low yields in traditional markets.
  • Increased risk appetite for venture and growth investments driven by technological advancements, particularly in AI.

Key Takeaways

  • *Alternatives as a Growth Area:* The conversation underscores the importance of alternative investments in diversifying portfolio risk and accessing unique growth opportunities in private markets.
  • *Focus on Education:* Continuous education is critical for both investors and advisors to fully leverage the potential of alternatives.
  • *Market Trends:* The shift toward alternative investing reflects broader economic changes, particularly the innovation wave driven by technology and private market growth.

Conclusion Kristin Olson's insights provide a comprehensive look into the evolving landscape of alternative investments and highlight the importance of strategic allocation, education, and innovation in this space. Investors are encouraged to adapt their strategies to include alternatives as a means of achieving greater diversification and accessing new growth opportunities.

For more discussions on investing and market trends, listeners are encouraged to check previous episodes of the Masters in Business podcast.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00I'm Hannah Fry, and as we rely more and more on artificial intelligence in every facet of our lives and businesses, I'm on a mission to find out how we can build the internet that AI needs. Learn more later in the podcast. Donald Trump is rewriting the Washington rulebook and reshaping the global economy. If you're trying to connect the dots behind the headlines, Bloomberg's Trumponomics podcast is here to help. I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of government and economics at Bloomberg. Every week, I'll bring you a smart, focused conversation with reporters and experts from Washington, Wall Street and beyond.

0:39Listen to new episodes every Wednesday and follow Trumponomics wherever you listen.

0:47Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. This is Masters in Business with Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg Radio. This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest Kristen Olson is Goldman Sachs Global Head of Alternatives for Wealth. She's a self-described Goldman Sachs lifer. She went to the firm straight out of Georgetown 27 years ago. She's been running the Alts Group for the past 24 years. There aren't many people in the world of either wealth management or alternatives that are as knowledgeable and experienced as Kristen is. I thought this conversation about everything from private equity to private credit to real assets, including real estate and infrastructure investing, was absolutely fascinating.

1:44And I think you will also, with no further ado, my conversation with Kristen Olson. Kristen Olson, welcome to Bloomberg. Thanks for having me, Barry. Well, I've been looking forward to having this conversation. Alts are obviously a super hot topic these days. But before we get into that, let's talk a little bit about your background. You arrived at Goldman Sachs directly from undergraduate at Georgetown. What led you to finance and what led you to Goldman? So I would say, you know, graduating from Georgetown, I actually wasn't sure what I wanted to do. I was interested in corporate finance, but I was particularly drawn to the idea of joining a big analyst class with great training at one of the big investment banks.

2:26And then I'd say I was fortunate enough through the interview process to land at Goldman Sachs. And that turned out to be a fantastic place to start my career in investment banking in the financial institutions group. And you started as an analyst in investment banking. Did you go the whole CFA route, one, two, and three? Nope, just two years. I got my CFA as an analyst at Goldman Sachs. That was my training, two years in FIG. And then how did you end up pivoting to alts? It seems so different to go from transactional banking, especially when you started heading right into 2000. What was the appeal of alts?

3:07Well, it's funny. I didn't go directly into alts, so I took a little segue. So in 2000, as a third-year analyst, I wanted to do something different. It's hard to think way back then. That was the dawn of the internet. and everyone was going to work on different.coms, different startups. And I took a little bit of a safer route and decided to work on the Goldman.com project. Which is what? Which was really - Their own build out of their own website? Exactly. That's how long ago it was. If you think about it, we didn't have an online ability for our clients to access their accounts, to trade stocks, to access information.

3:43As late as 2000, hey, maybe we should get a website? That was the start of it. And also thinking about what kind of business we could evolve around self-directed investors going to Goldman.com versus at that time, E-Trades, Schwab, right, all the online access that was happening. And so I decided to spend my third year focused on that business endeavor. And then that led right to the dot-com bubble bursting, which was, you know, pretty much – I was pretty much done with my third-year analyst program. I had a few more months. That was kind of February, March of one. And so when that happened, they went to the, you know, us poor third year analysts and said, you've got a few more months on your program.

4:27Why don't you move into this investment management division at Goldman Sachs, which I knew nothing about at the time. And you're going to interview with a bunch of people. And it was sort of a group interview. And this is funny, but. Meaning you with a bunch of people or one person with a bunch of. A bunch of people and a bunch of analysts. Wow. And this is a funny story. my mentor and longtime boss, I heard this after the fact, will say, I won Kristen in the analyst lottery, or the analyst draft. He drafted me. And I didn't know anything about alternatives. I didn't know anything about investment management.

5:00I didn't know anything about wealth management. And the seat I got put into at the time was called our special investments group. So that's what we called alternatives back then, special investment. Really interesting. And to be clear, Goldman has long had a reputation as very savvy traders and very savvy participants in public markets and very, very savvy in terms of seeding. Hey, we have this great trader, but he wants to leave and start his own hedge fund. Let's be his prime broker and let's seed them and participate in the upside. So I typically think of Goldman as a big public player. This has been developing for much longer than you've been there.

5:47What's the total assets that Goldman runs in terms of privates? Over$500 billion. That's real money. Yeah. I mean, I think it's one of the things that people don't realize, which is you talk about going back 27 years ago. We've had a private investing business going back well over three decades. Wow. And over$500 billion assets today. we are one of the largest managers of alternative assets. It's something people don't know. So how has this space changed over the 23, 24 years you've been working in alts? Incredibly, right? I mean, I think if you thought about the expansion of the different asset classes that sit under alternatives, right?

6:26So that's a broad word that describes lots of different types of strategies. Break it down for us. What are the key sectors? So you were starting with hedge funds. So that's one sector. But if you actually think about where we focus more, it's much more on the private side than the public alts. So if you think about under that umbrella, it's private equity. But again, under private equity, let's think about the different strategies there. Everything from buyout through growth equity through venture capital. Then the advent of a big private credit asset class within alternatives, right? And even within that, everything from direct lending to hybrid capital solutions to distressed, right?

7:01All of that falls under this private credit bucket. And then you have real assets. real estate, infrastructure. And so the asset class has become much more mature and much broader. And then obviously, we've seen tremendous inflows over the last two, three decades. And it's still a fraction of the size of the public markets. I think that kind of gets lost in all the enthusiasm. Well, it's relatively small compared to stocks, bonds, or any other private debt. Exactly. Yet a lot of the economy is driven by private companies. Right. And so I think that's part of the impetus right now as we see kind of the aperture opening for alternatives to individual investors.

7:43Right. Is how do you tap into other sources of growth in the economy if you're only investing in public markets? Right. So I think there's an imperative for a lot of investors to learn more and start to invest in private markets. So some of the drivers of the growth in the space are obviously privates are the majority of economic activity in the country. At the same time, we've seen the number of public companies shrinking between buybacks and mergers and the limited number of IPOs. The total number of public companies are becoming smaller. As privates get bigger, I'm going to ask you to speculate what might reverse that shrinkage in the number of U.S.

8:25public companies? Well, look, I think high quality, high growth companies are, many of them are still going to revert back to the public markets, right? And hopefully we're starting to see a pickup in IPO activity. I think you'll see some of the marquee growth companies, tech companies, AI companies that need massive amounts of capital to fund themselves. There's no alternative to public. Go back to the IPO markets, right? But you've seen a lot of innovation in the private markets to allow companies to stay private for a lot longer, right? And so I think average time to IPO now is 10 years. But what you're seeing in the interim are secondary funds doing things like continuation vehicles, right, to allow to change the investor base but stay private for a longer period of time.

9:06There's just a lot more liquidity in private markets to allow these companies to maybe not have to ever go public if they don't want to. You know, it felt like in the 90s there was this mad rush to go public, very often with flimsy business models, clicks and eyeballs, stuff like that. And now it seems like we've swung the pendulum completely in the other direction where there is no rush to go. But at a certain point, some of these companies get so large, really, there's no alternative, is there? So at that point, size matters and you have to go public once you're looking for, well, we just sort of take private for$55 billion.

9:44So maybe that IPO line is higher than I imagine. Maybe it's$75 billion. Let's bring this back to alternatives. What was it about the alternative investment world that you found so compelling versus your early experience with public stocks and bonds? Well, I think one of the fortunate things that I had with that pivot into alternatives was it was the intersection of not just alternatives, but alternatives and wealth management, right? Thinking about how we deliver alternative investments to our Goldman Sachs wealth management clients, right? And you think about the industry, it really started alternatives focused on big institutions, pension funds, endowments, sovereign wealth funds.

10:25But actually at Goldman Sachs, we've been investing in alternatives for our wealth clients for over 30 years. So that intersection has been really interesting. And obviously, fast forward to today, the intersection of wealth and alts is a topic that you hear about pretty much every day. Right. When I think about the original institutions, you think of the Yale model and David Swenson. And what was that? The early 1980s, something like that. So that's 40 something years ago. You guys have been doing this for 30 years. Not only has that market changed, but there's been strategy and culture changes over the same period.

11:04Explain what you've observed and how you've helped shape this. Yeah. So look, I think the process of allocating to alternatives for individual investors, we've sort of honed and shaped over the last 25 years. Part of that starts with what do we advocate in terms of how much our clients should have in alternatives, right? So go back to when I started doing this in 2001 for a moderate risk client, we already had at that point a 20 % or so allocation alternatives. Fast forward to today, we would tell a moderate risk client they should have closer to 27 % of their portfolio. I've heard some people say 60-20-20 is the new 60-40.

11:41Is that just a cute line or is there anything to those numbers? No, no, no. I think we're heading in that direction, right? I think for the clients that can withstand the illiquidity, which we should talk about, and understand kind of the risk return of alternatives, the idea of having a 20 % or so allocation to alternatives is something I think we're going to talk about a lot more across all levels of investors. And it sounds like given that even where current rates are, it's still historically relatively low, which means we're not seeing a lot of yield on the fixed income side of the ledger.

12:17If we're talking 60-20-20, it sounds like all or most of the shift into alts are coming from low yielding bonds. So look, I think the 20 % is the part that I I'm convicted on, the alt piece. The question of where you fund it from, I think there's debate around, right? You've heard people say 50-30-20, 60-20-20. I think that depends a little bit on where are you going within alternatives, right? Are you leaning into private credit, to your point, and looking for a high single-digit yield in private credit? Then yes, then maybe you're funding it out of the fixed income bucket. Or if you're leaning more into equity-related strategies, right, then maybe the funding source comes a little more out of equities, right?

12:57So I think the part that I'm focused on is the idea that people should have that 20 % in there. And then I think it's a bespoke conversation about is it 50 or 60 equities? Where is it fund from? And last question about your career. You describe yourself as a Goldman lifer. What's kept you there for almost three decades? So the number one thing is definitely the people, right? I mean, going somewhere for 27 years, which I never thought I would be doing at the same firm. It's all about the quality of the people and the engagement. I think it's high quality people I enjoy working with every day. I think the second part is I think I got lucky falling into a really interesting part of Goldman Sachs where I get to watch the evolution of the alternative investments asset class and the growth of our wealth business.

13:45And I think that dynamism of that has also kept me engaged for that long. Interesting, super fast growing and constantly evolving. I would imagine that no week is the same over the past 23, 24 years running alts. Exactly. And I think the other interesting part about it is when you have a dislocation in the markets, in the world, alternatives is actually a part of the portfolio where you usually go to capitalize on that. Right. So I think that's also really interesting. Right. So you have a dislocation. Well, let's look at, you know, special situations or distress managers. Right. Or, wow, you have incredible innovation happening in technology.

14:22you're going to do private growth equity investing, right? And so I think that that's the dynamism I'm talking about in terms of tapping into dislocations, tapping into innovation. A lot of that happens in the private markets. Really super interesting. Coming up, we continue our conversation with Kristen Olson, Goldman Sachs Global Head of Alternatives for Wealth Clients, describing the Goldman Sachs alternative wealth experience. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

15:06As our use of AI expands, how do we make sure it doesn't end up breaking the internet? I'm Hannah Fry, host of The Exponential Era, a series that explores the real-world impact of future network technology. And I sat down with two experts to discover how we can support the massive connectivity needs of AI. Find out what I learned at Bloomberg.com forward slash Nokia. At Radiolab, we love nothing more than nerding out about science, neuroscience, chemistry. But we do also like to get into other kinds of stories. Stories about policing or politics. Country music. Hockey. Sex. of bugs. Regardless of whether we're looking at science or not science, we bring a rigorous curiosity to get you the answers and hopefully make you see the world anew.

16:01Radiolab, adventures on the edge of what we think we know. Wherever you get your podcasts.

16:09I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest this week is Kristen Olson. She is Goldman's global head of alternatives for Wealth. She's been with the firm for 27 years and she's been running the Alt Capital Markets Group for 24 of those 27 years. So we were talking earlier about 60-20-20 or 50-30-20. How do you think about those allocation ranges? How do you determine what's the best recommendation for an ultra high net worth portfolio, client portfolio, who maybe they're not all that familiar with alternatives, but they want to diversify and have a little bit more of non-correlated returns?

16:56So I think we are blessed at Goldman Sachs to have the benefit of our CIO and our investment strategy group. So that's sort of where we start, right, in a conversation with a client, which is how much of the portfolio should we have in alternatives? And we need to look at a lot of factors in terms of risk tolerance, tolerance for illiquidity, what are they looking to derive from that portion of the portfolio? But sort of as a starting point, we talked a little about this earlier, we would talk to a client who has a moderate risk appetite about having 27 % alternatives. And so we'd have that conversation around, does that feel right?

17:28Is that the number that we want to get to? And then once we're there, then it becomes, how do we get there? Because that's actually the really hard part in alternatives. When you say, how do we get there? How do we over time allocate from some other bucket into the alts bucket. Exactly. And the complication is traditional private alternatives are capital commitments that generally call down capital and make investments over five to 10 years. And so there's a lot of art and science of how do you get to 27 % in alts, right? It's going to take you five, seven, 10 years to get to that target as you sort of ladder into these different commitments that you make.

18:07So we spend a lot of time with clients talking about that process. So I'm very familiar with capital calls, typically from venture capital funds, occasionally for some oversubscribed funds that you do all the docs and then you wait for a window to open up where they'll take your money. I don't usually think of private equity or private credit in those terms, but you have a whole lot more experience in this space than I do. Is that what typically takes place? Someone says, hey, I want to commit up to$10 million to this fund. How long does it take for those capital calls to come in? How long is the client waiting?

18:47And then what are they sitting in while they're waiting? Are they just sitting in treasuries? Yeah, and this is where alternatives are complicated, right? So if you thought – we'll talk a little bit about where alternatives are going, right? We can talk about evergreens and open-ended, which kind of get rid of that capital call dynamic. But if you thought about ultra high net worth clients who historically and continue to really invest in traditional closed end alternatives, you need to be very close to that client and how you build that portfolio year in, year out making commitments. They are going to call capital in private equity, in private traditional private credit funds, in real asset funds.

19:21Generally, it's a 10 year fund and they're making investments over the first five years and trying to harvest those over the second five years. And so our job as advisors to our clients is how do we build that laddered portfolio? How do we commit every single year so that when we get to five to six years in, you hopefully have a self-funding portfolio? And hopefully you have money – your invested capital is getting you to that 27 percent of your portfolio in the ground. But it's hard to get there. And so we spend a lot of time advising clients on how to build those portfolios. So typically, all right, I have$50 million.

19:54I'm going to put$10 million. I'm going to commit$10 to this. How long will it take before? About five years before that's fully? Generally about five years. And then am I sitting in treasuries or money markets? What am I doing in the meantime? No, then you're diluting your return, right? And so this is the other part. You need to be really fully invested other than what you think the short-term capital call needs are. So again, this is where the complexity comes in, which is how do I not have drag and make sure I'm fully invested, but still have liquidity to fund a capital that might come up the next month.

20:23And so that's where our advisors spend a lot of time with clients on making sure that we're not sitting in cash while we're waiting for capital calls. So 10 million over five years sounds like two per year. So in other words, it's not like I'm gonna allocate that money to this. Correct. I just am anticipating a call for each of the next five years for about 2 million. And the money is already invested rather than sitting around waiting for this. Exactly. That's a lot of moving parts. It's a lot of moving parts. By the way, but that's what leads to, when you think about opening up the aperture and trying to make alternatives more accessible.

20:59What you've seen over the last few years is this incredible innovation around different structures that are catering to individual investors. So if you think about evergreen and open-ended alternatives, you take away the complexity of capital calls and distributions and managing liquidity because that all gets done then within the vehicle. And there's trade-offs to that. But that's where you're seeing over the last five years a tremendous amount of growth in alternatives targeted at individual investors. So you might be giving up some performance in exchange for a whole lot more simplicity. Exactly.

21:33So let's shift from the process of allocating and getting calls to the actual alt managers. I'm assuming you have dozens and dozens, if not hundreds, on your platform, some in-house, some outside of the firm. How do you start the process of figuring out, what do we want this spread of managers to look like? Yeah. So that's what I think we've spent a lot of time focused on. I think our North Star is how do we have the best platform of opportunities for our clients? And so one, I think that starts with diversification, right? And across a number of different vectors. So one is we talked about the different strategies under the Alts banner.

22:13We need to have different opportunities in each of those lanes, buyout, growth, venture, private credit, real assets, Right. And then we want to be open architecture for our clients. Right. So meaning not just Goldman, not just Goldman. So we have, as we talked about, a phenomenal alternative capability, over 500 billion dollars in assets under management. We have a 30 plus year track record and we have strategies that span all those various alternative asset classes. So that's one way we implement for clients. The other is open architecture. So we have vehicles where clients can invest in different fund-to-funds, different strategies like our secondaries funds, our co-investment vehicles.

22:55And then lastly, curating direct access to some of the best alts managers out there on a single name basis. And so there's different ways that clients can actually implement their portfolio right across those three different implementation methods. So it's interesting. We're talking about diversification and lack of correlation. And I'm really hearing two distinct types of diversification. One is, hey, these aren't public stocks. They don't follow that cycle. So you should get some sort of non-correlated returns. But within each of the major subgroups of alternatives, and then across those groups, this should be somewhat non-correlated?

23:37Is that somewhat uncorrelated? Yeah, look, I think what clients are looking for in alternatives is diversification. So, different return drivers than what they're getting from public markets, hopefully a lack of correlation to those markets, and alpha to those markets, meaning outperformance relative to what they otherwise would have gotten had they gone in the public markets, right? So when we think about returns and alternatives, some of it is absolute, right? So what type of returns are those managers underwriting to in the portfolio? That's an absolute target. But then there's also a relative target, which is how do we think about the premium you're getting for that illiquidity, right?

24:17So if I'm going to tie my money up in a 10-year private equity fund, I want to be paid for that illiquidity. And so then we think about, am I getting several hundred basis points a year better return than had I put that money in at the same time and taken the money out at the same time from the relevant public market benchmark, right? Then I think I've been rewarded. If I've gotten 300 basis points a year or something in that ballpark better than the public alternative, then maybe you would say it was worth it for that illiquidity. Well, that's the whole idea of the illiquidity premium, right?

24:50That not only are you getting paid for illiquidity, but it becomes a somewhat less efficient market, which means there's greater opportunity for upside. Exactly. I mean, look, the private markets, they have a lot more information than the public markets. Many strategies they have control, right? So they can actually change the outcome at their portfolio companies. They can change management. They can change strategy. A lot of different ways to drive return that are not available in the public markets, right? So given the fact that information is so important and so different than publicly traded stocks and or bonds, how do you start out doing the due diligence?

Read the full transcript

25:30That has to be like a giant lift, especially if you have a few hundred managers on the platform. Yeah. Look, I think most investors need to seek the help of a professional organization that can help them do that diligence. So I think for us, we have a group called our External Investing Group. It's over 400 people globally. It's 250 people doing manager selection and diligence. And so we like to deploy that team to do the fiduciary diligence and all of the outside managers that we're partnered with. And that's a pretty intense process, right? Each manager is going to take a couple months to do the diligence.

26:07It's going to go through an investment committee process, right? And as we know, like you look at a track record from a manager, you really need to dig in and understand kind of what's behind that track record, right? lots of caveats sometimes. And so that's the work that they're doing and going to their investment committees and getting approval. So we work with that team to diligence the managers that we think make sense for our clients. So I'm going to guess there's some analysts, some lawyers, some compliance people, some regulatory specialists. Like this isn't the sort of thing that the average investor can undertake on their own.

26:38You really need a team of professionals to dive in. I think you want to have the advice of professionals. The other part that we've found is we talk about diversification being so important. So when we think about an individual investor, I always think there's a couple of vectors of diversification for them. One is diversification of strategy, which we talked about under the Alt umbrella. Number two, diversification by manager. You want to work with different managers. And then diversification by vintage year. So we think it's very important for clients to be pretty programmatic about making allocations every single year.

27:09Because, again, you don't want to market time. You don't know when the best opportunities are going to be. And actually, it's usually when times feel the worst, it's probably the best time to be allocating, right? Always, right, right. And so, you know, and then when you dial that back, you might be needing to make 10 commitments a year, 15 commitments a year. How can you diligence enough managers to decide that you've picked the best one, right? And so it gets very challenging and very complicated. And that's why you see a lot of individual investors partnering with an advisor or an advisor that has diligence capabilities to help navigate them through who are the best managers in each of those lanes.

27:42So diligence is the first step, and that is all the legal and other paperwork that has to be done. Let's talk about risk assessment. How do you figure out when you're looking at a variety of different investment strategies and managers, hey, how much bang am I getting relative to the risk the client is assuming in this investment? It would seem that's really challenging also. So, yeah, look, I mean, there's things you need to look at. Obviously, you're going to look at the track record over time and you're going to look at the stability of the team. And do they have all the fundamental things that lead to a repeatable investment process?

28:19Right. Which should argue that you could rely on that track record as being hopefully something that you could look at that could be repeatable in the future. Right. I think the other important part is what's the concentration of that strategy? Right. How many investments are they making? Is it highly concentrated? Is it more diversified? So, for example, one thing that our clients have been longtime investors in is secondary private equity. And one of the interesting things about secondaries is underneath one single fund, you may have thousands of companies. So you have a tremendous amount of diversification.

28:52And because secondaries, if you thought about secondary private equity, it's already partially invested. So most traditional private equity funds, it's a blind pool, right? You're committing capital that's going to invest over the next five years. Secondaries allows you to take a look at some of the money that's already in the ground and actually buy that theoretically at a discount to what fair value is, right? So there are two types of secondaries that I'm familiar with, and I want you to comment on this. One of them is, hey, a co-investor in a fund suddenly has a change in their liquidity needs, and hey, we're willing to sell this for 15 % discount from what the last closing date was.

29:30so you get to buy in an earlier vintage at a discount. That's one secondary. Is that something you were talking about? Yeah, so that's an LP secondary, right? It could be a big institution that for whatever reason wants to - We saw that earlier this year. Rebalance their portfolio, big university that has liquidity needs, right? We'll look to go and get liquidity in the secondary market. It could be individuals. So that's sort of a traditional LP secondary. So the other thing I occasionally see is, hey, one of our portfolio companies suddenly is adding this or pivoting in this direction, and we're comfortable with how much us as a fund are putting into this company, and we're going to continue maintaining this investment, but they need additional capital.

30:12Do you want to do a one-off side pocket, or people call it all sorts of different things? How often do you see that sort of thing come up? Yeah. So when you look at the secondary market, you have the LP secondaries, which you just talked about. The other would be GP-led secondaries. So that's not initiated by the LP in the fund. It's actually the manager of the fund, to your point, saying, hey, we have a company that we don't want to sell right now. We want to continue to own, but we need to find new capital to fund it, right? So you might want to take out some of the old investors. The GP might want to roll their capital, roll their incentive fee.

30:43So that's the GP-led secondary, also called a continuation vehicle. Many times you're hearing a lot about this. And so that's another part of what we do within our secondary franchise that our clients have exposure to. Really, really interesting. Coming up, we continue our conversation with Kristen Olson, Goldman's Global Head of Alternatives for Wealth, discussing the state of alternative investing today. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

31:21I'm Carol Masser. And I'm Tim Stenevec, inviting you to join us for the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Now, every day, we are bringing you reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders stay ahead. We've got insight on the people, the companies, and trends that are shaping today's complex economy. That's right, Tim. We're all over global business, finance, tech news, all as it is happening in real time. And we've got complete coverage of the U.S. market close. Gotta say, basically, if it impacts financial markets, if it impacts companies, if it's impacting trends and narratives that are out there, we are on it.

31:51We also have a lot of fun doing it. Bloomberg Business Week also brings you the analysis behind the headlines through conversations with our expert guests. And we are doing this all live each weekday. And then we bring you the best analysis in our daily podcast. Search for Bloomberg Business Week on YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen. Check it out on your way home from work to catch up on the conversations that you miss during the business day. And on the weekend, check it out for a complete wrap-up of your business week. That's the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. I'm Carol Masser.

32:19And I'm Tim Stanovic. Subscribe today wherever you get your podcasts.

32:28I'm Barry Ritholtz. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest is Kristen Olson. Kristen is the global head of alternatives for wealth management clients at Goldman Sachs, a position she's held for 24 of her 27 years at Goldman. So before we get into the state of alternative investing today, I'm fascinated by this big survey you guys do each year, over a thousand clients and other people participate in it. And some of the answers that come along are kind of expected. Some are really kind of surprising. Let's go over a few of these because they're really fascinating.

33:09So first, your survey reveals wealthy individuals adopt alternative investments as their net worth grows. That wasn't a surprise. Not surprising. But some of the specifics, some of the percentages were really like, wow, look at that. Tell us a little bit about the response you get to that survey question. Yeah. So, well, first I would say this is our inaugural survey. This is the first time that we're actually surveying a broad universe. Put me on that list. I want to see that data every year. I'm a junkie for that sort of stuff. And I think part of the impetus for that, too, was just what we've talked about, sort of the incredible interest by individual investors in figuring out, should they invest in alternatives?

33:50How do they invest in alternatives? And so that was sort of the impetus to this opening the door to alternatives survey. that we just did. I think the data that you mentioned is not surprising, obviously, from my seat, starting with ultra high net worth clients. I've been investing in alternatives for 25 plus years. I was surprised by down the wealth spectrum, the fact that there's a fair amount of participation all the way down to the$1 to$5 million clients, right? And I think as it becomes easier for these individuals to invest in alternatives, and as there's more education around it, those numbers are going to continue to go up.

34:27So I'll tell you what surprised me at first blush. And then as I thought about it, made a lot of sense. Millennials are at the forefront of a significant shift in investment behavior towards alts. And as I began to think about it, hey, these are the kids who more or less came of age right into the great financial crisis. They're like, wait, stocks can go down also. So I'm not terribly surprised by that once I thought about it, but still how significant of a shift is this? Look, I think it's one to watch. Obviously, we're just starting to see it and digesting the survey results. But one part I think about as millennials is their interest in accessing innovation, right?

35:08Like this is a digital first generation. No doubt. And so when you think again to earlier comments, how do you access innovation in healthcare, in tech? A lot of that is in the private markets, right? And so I think part of that also might be the reason why you see millennials, you know, being more inclined to alternatives and being sort of kind of this shift in behavior. So let's talk about the percentage of people whose wealth is professionally managed. And obviously the data set that this question goes to is pretty significant, but 59 % of wealth amongst a thousand individuals surveyed were professionally managed.

35:48And I kind of scratched my head about that because my assumption has been amongst the ultra wealthy, it's even higher just as a matter of, hey, I don't have time or interest in this amongst most people. They're running their business. They're continuing to accumulate more wealth. But I'm curious about who is the data set this went to and what do you think of that 59 % number? High, low, somewhere in between? Well, so it went to a thousand investors, million dollars of investable assets plus and 25 years old or older. So not necessarily Goldman Sachs clients. So not necessarily the ultra high net worth.

36:25And frankly, part of the intention was to try to get a better sense for the broader individual market, not just the ultra high net worth market. I think we have a long history in our wealth business. We know the ultra high net worth space very, very well. And I think in that space, if we were to run the survey, I mean, very high percentage. 80, 90 percent. Exactly. Something like that, right. So my guess is that not professionally managed piece are more self-directed at the lower end of the wealth spectrum would be my guess and maybe younger. Right. When you see BlackRock at$12 trillion and Vanguard at$11 trillion, hey, someone's running their own portfolio.

36:58So it would make sense, 41 % or so of people, if not more, are doing it. It's really interesting to think about what is the mass affluent doing? What is the high net worth doing? What is the ultra high net worth and multifamily office doing? I think as you go up that scale, is it safe to say most of them are working with professional advisors? Is that the... That would be my guess, for sure. The other part is, if they're self-directed, and there's some of the other survey data that also shows that, I think, something less than 50 % of advisors have even brought up alternatives with some of the people you surveyed, right?

37:33And so you have the self-directed that probably are not accessing alternatives, because it's very hard to do that without an advisor. And then you only have something less than 50 % of advisors bringing up alternatives. Like, this is where the opportunity is, right, on educating the advisors to feel more comfortable talking to investors about alternatives and obviously then educating the end investors. So one of the questions you ask led to an answer that I adore because I'm constantly saying to not only the people I work with, but other people, your clients aren't telling you the truth. They have money away from you.

38:09Your wallet share is much lower than you realize until you're with the same advisor for five or 10 years and the client is comfortable in shares. But I love this data point. Households with$10 million and up in investable assets typically engage two different advisors compared with one advisor at the mass affluent and high net worth groups. Tell us a little bit about that dual advisor approach. We're not saying two people at the same firm. These could be two completely different firms. I think as people go up the wealth spectrum, They want to have different options, different viewpoints, have some capital at different firms.

38:49A little diversification internally. Exactly. I do think, though, from my experience on the wealth side, ultra high-endware side at Goldman, it does tend to be that over time, though, there is a lead relationship. Right. And I think as you get higher up the wealth spectrum and you have more complexity in your portfolio, a lot of that namely coming from alternatives, it becomes more and more imperative to have somebody that's the quarterback or the driver, you know, in the pole position as opposed to, you know, as opposed to two people both managing parts of the portfolio. You don't want overlap.

39:23You don't want, you know. You don't want overlap. And you also want, you know, we talked about how hard it is to build these alternatives portfolios. Mm-hmm. You know, doing that in two places and how are you managing the liquidity and how are you knowing how you're actually allocated overall? I think you start to see this shift to one advisor really being the lead advisor and the other advisor maybe being a secondary advisor. So as much as I thought that was a fascinating data point, this one kind of terrifies me. Millennials cite social media more often while boomers rely on traditional media outlets for their investing and financial planning information.

40:00Social media? Really? Well, you know, one of the things that I say, and I'm definitely not a millennial, but, you know, if you go on your LinkedIn feed, You see videos on Instagram from major alternative investing firms, right? And so you can see why money is – I don't know what percentage of their time they're spending on social media. But naturally, these ads and these videos are getting served up to them there. So it seems logical to me then that that's where they're going to – Well, LinkedIn is probably the most credible of all the social media outlets. But I think of TikTok and Instagram and Twitter.

40:36a couple of years ago, the IRS put out a list of 40 tax statements that they had culled from various social media that were wrong, some of which would lead to penalties, interest, or jail time if you followed them. And they literally, here are 41 things that we got from social media, do not do any of these things. So that's why I say I get a little nervous when I I see millennials are citing social media. LinkedIn of all the places seem to be the most credible because it's business oriented. Not some wacky guy telling you that if you're on a boat offshore on April 15th, you don't owe any taxes.

41:18That was the one that really stayed out with me. So that's all I have to do is just be out on the water April 15th. Could have saved myself a lot of money. I think it all goes back to the number one thing that I think we're focused on with respect alternatives and individual investors, which is education, right? Absolutely. And so, you know, hopefully they're not getting their education off of TikTok. But, you know, all of us need to think about how do we better educate around the role of alternatives, the risks of alternatives, how you invest in alternatives. And so I think we're spending a lot of time thinking about advisor education and client education.

41:54And by the way, education that we roll out on social media, right? Because if that's where they are. Right. You got to meet them where they are. Absolutely. That's where we're going to have to put the education. So let's bring this back around to alts today. Let's talk about themes. What are you most excited about in private markets? What's new, interesting, and, you know, thrilling? Can I use the word thrilling to talk about alts? Well, look, I think when you say thrilling, I think about all of the innovation that's happening right now in technology. Obviously, how can we have a podcast and not mention AI on any topic?

42:27I'm not familiar with it. Tell me a little bit. I haven't heard enough about that. But look, I think that what we're seeing in terms of the incredible advances in AI is bringing back a lot of risk appetite to invest in venture and in growth and to participate in what they think is going to be, you know, transformational technology advancements, you know, around AI. And that permeates not just the venture tech and growth space, but how AI is going to transform traditional businesses, right? So I think that segment is quite interesting. and then a lot of the other things that we think are interesting are a little more not thrilling which was the word you used.

43:03Maybe that's the wrong word but what's really interesting with great growth potential? Well, look. That's thrilling to me. Yeah, so look, I would say we talked a little about secondaries. We really like secondaries because again, if you think about the primary markets growing, right? More money's going to alternatives. That naturally means the secondary market's going to grow, right? It's a spillover. It's correlated to the growth of the primary markets and alternatives. So there's more opportunity there. And we really like the risk return for clients there in that segment. So I think that's one space that we very much like.

43:36What else would I say? You mentioned real assets. And very often when you talk about real assets, I think that has morphed over the past decade and evolved. I used to think of real assets as timber or coal or whatever. but now it's things like infrastructure and data centers, laboratories and healthcare. Tell us a little bit about what the real assets look like. Yeah, that's where I was going to go. I would say for our clients, I think for a long time, real assets was real estate. Right. I think today, if you wanted to talk about some of the more interesting parts, it's the things you alluded to, which is what's happening in infrastructure.

44:15Infrastructure is one we're spending a lot of time with our clients on because institutions have invested for a long time in infrastructure assets, individuals less so. And so trying to understand the role of infrastructure in a portfolio, which has a lot of unique benefits, right? A lot of times it's not correlated to GDP growth, right? This is a lot of times critical infrastructure, things that we need to do. It has inflation protection benefits, right? Something we didn't need to talk about inflation 10 years ago. But now, how do we think about things that are inflation protected with long-term contracts, with built-in escalators?

44:45And then the other part is educating around it's not your grandfather's infrastructure, right? People tend to think about bridges and toll roads and ports. Exactly. Today, it's the things you talked about. It's digital infrastructure. It's data centers to support AI. It's energy transition. It's a lot of the very, I guess, maybe the more thrilling parts of investing are actually in the infrastructure asset class. And so that is part of the real assets that's grown a lot and where there's a lot of interest. I wish I could remember where I read this somewhat technical piece because we always talk about AI, but you alluded to AI plus another sector.

45:22Of all the different parts of the economy that AI is going to have a big impact, this author had made the claim, I read it like two weeks ago, so it's gone, that AI and genomics, oncology, and healthcare are going to be amazing because what you can do with AI in terms of testing new molecules and new treatment regimes is just a whole nother level. Are you looking at AI plus another sector or is it just all AI all the time? No, definitely plus other sectors. And you're completely on point that life sciences, how's that going to be impacted by AI, healthcare, right? And by the way, every sector in the economy is likely going to be impacted.

46:08So, you know, how do, when you look at, this goes to your diligence question, you look at private equity firms that you're diligencing today, what kind of value creation playbook do they have for their portfolio companies? And how are they thinking about the AI opportunity or threat for their portfolio companies, right? So it's going to infuse really all the different sectors of investing within alternatives. So what other alternative strategies are you seeing the most demand for clients? like I'm enthusiastic about AI and life sciences. Are people asking for real assets or for infrastructure or for, like what are you hearing from the bottom up?

46:46Well, that would be private credit. Really? Yeah. But in response to a relatively low rate environment. What I would say, what we're hearing from clients for the last few years has been a search for yield, a desire for yield. And that's led to a lot of interest from the bottom up in private credit, right? A place where you can be top of the capital structure, so a lot of protection below you, and get yields that are high single digits with quarterly cash flow. That's been an area of pretty broad interest across the wealth spectrum in alternatives. Really, really interesting. So last question before I get to my favorite questions that I ask all my guests.

47:25When it comes to alternatives, what are investors not talking about or thinking about but perhaps should be? What sort of – it could be asset, data point policy. What's important that they might be overlooking? I guess the thing that comes to mind for me right now, and we think about the advent of all these evergreen, open-ended alternatives. Perpetual funds. Perpetual funds. And there's been a lot of enthusiasm, a lot of growth. In some of the sectors, are investors spending a lot – enough time thinking about how big some of these vehicles are getting? And then what does that actually mean in terms of how much origination that they need to have to be able to deploy the capital?

48:07Because in these evergreens, if you have more capital coming in than you can actually invest, you're going to start diluting your returns. You're going to have cash drag. And so are investors spending time and thinking about who they're investing with and do they have enough origination capabilities to be fully invested in high-quality investments? So I think that would be one thing that I would think about. The other thing that I'm interested to see how it evolves is, you know, we're new in this perpetual evergreen alts space, you know, last five years. You know, how do we start to see performance divergence over the next five years, right?

48:41I don't think we've seen a lot yet because we're still in the early innings. And so I'll be curious to see how investors react to performance divergence or negative performance on some of these. And what happens? Do we see redemptions? Or are investors long-term minded? and do they stay the course? Really, really interesting. Let me jump to my favorite questions that I ask all of my guests, starting with something that you hinted at but didn't expand on. Tell us about your mentors who helped shape your career. So I have to mention Eric Lane. So he was the one who won me in the analyst draft. I then worked with him for decades.

49:23and I owe a lot of my success to Eric. And part of it is we sat in like a trading desk type of format when I started. And the benefit of that was just getting to hear him on the phone every day with clients and see how he managed difficult situations, how he explained things. There was an ability to sort of really apprenticeship right next to him. And the other thing that I just really loved about working with Eric, maybe I hated at the time, was he would throw you into situations that you felt ill-prepared for, but he knew you could handle. Deep end of the pool? Exactly. And sort of just forced you to go into those situations that you may have not thought you were ready for.

50:06And that really allowed you to sort of step function, I think, improve in your job and really learn. And then he was always there to support you if it didn't go as well as you would have liked. Really, really super interesting. Let's talk about books. What are some of your favorites? What are you reading right now? So I've really been enjoying the Walter Isaacson biographies. And we talked a little about life sciences and one that I. I was going to say, which one of you. So I have Leonardo sitting on a night table out east waiting for me to attack. I haven't gotten to that one. But it's like it's giant.

50:39So so I actually just finished the one on Elon Musk. But the one that I really liked was Codebreaker about Jennifer Doudna, who discovered CRISPR. This is Caroline Hyde. And I'm Ed Ludlow, inviting you to join us for Bloomberg Tech, a daily podcast focusing exclusively on technology, innovation and the future of business. Every weekday, we bring you the top headlines from the world's biggest tech companies. From finance to defence, AI to entertainment and from startups to the magnificent seven. We highlight the latest stories of the people and companies pushing the tech sector to new frontiers and the politics that shape global tech markets.

51:17We do this all every weekday, then bring you the most important conversations and analysis in our podcast. Search for Bloomberg Tech on YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen. Join us every afternoon on your commute home and stay ahead of the tech news cycle. That's the Bloomberg Tech Podcast. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York. And I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco. Subscribe today, wherever you get your podcasts. All right, next question. what are you streaming these days give us your favorite podcast netflix amazon prime what's keeping you entertained uh i just started watching an old series i'm only two episodes in which is scandal so that's what i'm watching right now little washington dc intrigue um in terms of podcasts of course all the bloomberg podcasts and you don't have to you don't have to do that that that's we but actually if i were to say one that um i listen to from time to time just for some comedy smartless i love that i'm a big fan of just justin baitman uh jason baitman yeah sister justine he always says they always have great guests and they're so funny so i've interviewed michael lewis a million times and after his daughter was killed in a car accident they had him on and it was a few months later and he describes the grief process he's just such an extraordinary human being to listen to someone share that.

52:38It was both amazing and terrible at the same time. But they're always fun and they all seem to torment each other. They're very amusing. Final two questions. What sort of advice would you give to a recent college grad interested in a career in either alternatives or wealth management? Well, I think that the benefit that a recent college grad has is there's so much information at their fingertips to get smart and to get be interested and to learn about the industry before they come into it and to be really well educated. You know, it was a lot harder 27 years ago, right? Now everything's at their fingertips.

53:16So I think be prepared and then don't be scared to network, right? Use your relationships, meet people, reach out. I think that would be the best advice. Really, really good. Final question. What do you know about the world of alternative investing today would have been helpful back in 2000 when you were moving into this space? Well, I think about it a little bit personally, which is, you know, we have evolved a lot in how we advise clients to invest in alts. We've talked about the process, how do you think about sizing and building it out year in, year out. And if I look back to when I started, I definitely didn't have that rigor in my own personal investing in alts and definitely undersized, was not diversified enough.

53:53And so I think I wish all of the rigor we've put into it, I had known back then in terms of how we were building portfolios personally and for our clients. Really super interesting. Kristen, thank you for being so generous with your time. We have been speaking with Kristen Olson. She's Goldman Sachs Global Head of Alternatives for Wealth. If you enjoy this conversation, well, be sure and check out any of the 568 we've done before over the past 11 years. You can find those at Bloomberg, iTunes, Spotify, or here on YouTube or wherever you find your favorite podcasts. And be sure and check out my new book, How Not to Invest, The Ideas, Numbers, and Behaviors That Destroy Wealth and How to Avoid Them, How Not to Invest, at your favorite bookseller.

54:42I would be remiss if I did not thank the crack team that helps with these conversations together each week. Alexis Noriega is my video producer. Anna Luke is my audio producer. Sean Russo is my head of research. Sage Bauman is the head of podcasts here at Bloomberg. I'm Barry Ritholtz. You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

55:25This is Scarlett Fu. And I'm Paul Sweeney, inviting you to join us for the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Every day, we harness the power of Bloomberg Intelligence to bring you deep dives into the companies that are moving markets from publicly traded companies like Apple to those that are privately owned but known by everyone on Earth like OpenAI. Now, I helped to build Bloomberg Intelligence to what it is today, Scarlett. And now our analysts are the best in the world, covering more than 2 ,000 global companies. That is your legacy, Paul. And we speak to those in-house experts every day. They are Bloomberg's go-to authorities on sectors, companies, and legal processes.

55:57And we do it all live each weekday, then bring you the best conversations in our daily podcast. So be sure to search for Bloomberg Intelligence on YouTube, Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen. Listen in the afternoons on your way home from work to catch up on the market news you missed during the business day. That is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. I'm Scarlett Fu. And I'm Paul Sweeney. Subscribe today wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

Barry speaks with Kristin Olson, global head of alternatives for wealth at Goldman Sachs. They discuss the alternate investing space. Kristen and Barry also discuss allocating money long-term and making alternatives more accessible to individual investors.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Masters in Business

All 235 episodes
Alternate Investing: Masters in Business with Kristin OlsonMasters in Business · 52 min
Listen in VO