Where Do You Hide From an AI Bubble?

0:01This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChachiPT. I'm Carol Masser. Getting hired at SpaceX requires exceptional ability and may include having Elon Musk review a candidate's resume. So writes Bloomberg Businessweek's Lauren Grush. She reports that the company culture is defined by Musk and job candidates must understand that a commitment to SpaceX means adhering to this culture and exhibiting loyalty to Elon Musk. To get hired, candidates must demonstrate their achievements from past jobs, and hands-on experience matters more to recruiters than advanced degrees, with the company looking for people with raw, innate intelligence.

0:39A spokesperson for SpaceX didn't respond to a request for comment on its recruiting and hiring practices, but according to recruiters, advisors, and those who've interviewed for jobs there, it's the space exploration dream that draws people to the company, and Musk invokes that dream regularly to remind workers why they're there. Prospective hires are told that the job will require stamina, including in job ads that candidates, quote, must be willing to work extended hours and weekends as needed. One major perk for all that hard work? Employees' access to equity, either the right to buy shares or payment in the form of restricted stock units that vest over time.

1:16That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChachiPT. Get started at ChachiPT.com. For big business, AI opened up a world of promise, but that world of promise turned into a world of pain. Cost spiraling, data trapped, security and governance risks multiplying, and ROI out of reach. That's why enterprises turned to Boomi to connect data, apps, and AI, helping them operate securely, efficiently, and at scale. Boomi turns a world of AI pain into a world of AI gain. As Boomi says, we got you. Head to Boomi.com. That's B-O-O-M-I dot com. Being a small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling.

2:00Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. Manage all your business finances, from banking to payments to credit cards, all in one place with Chase's digital tools. Plus, access online resources designed to help your business thrive. Learn more at Chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase Mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News. Okay, so just to be absolutely clear on this, in order to justify the cost of the investment going into this, in the sense that to generate what we think or you think is a reasonable return on capital, by 2030, users will have to be spending close to 15 % of US GDP on AI services.

3:01And that seems completely implausible. Absolutely.

3:14Welcome to Marion Talks Money, the podcast in which people who know the markets explain the Markets. I am Maren Somerset-Webb, and this week I am speaking with Chris Clothier, Co-Chief Investment Officer and Co-Manager of CG Asset Management. Chris has recently co-authored a white paper examining the reality of the AI capex boom, something we talk about quite a lot on this podcast, and what its fallout means for the global economy. I wanted to get Chris on today to talk about that, to talk about what has happened since he wrote that white paper, and also to get his views on the general trends in markets and economies.

3:46We also sideswipe the UK fiscal situation and budget, although just to be clear, we are recording this episode on Monday, 26th of October. So before the budget. So we're going to talk about all that. We're going to talk about gold. We're going to talk about silver, a little on the history of inflation. We're going to talk about what risks are worth taking right now and what risks are definitely not worth taking. Chris, welcome. to Maren Talks Money. Hi, Maren. Good morning. Thanks very much for having me. Yeah, pleasure. Looking forward to it. Now, listen, I wanted to start by talking about this white paper that you wrote.

4:20And I know it was a good month ago now, and I know things are moving at the speed of light in AI, or rather in the perception of AI. But I just wanted to ask you to talk a little bit about that paper, and then we can talk about how it is panning out since. Your thought was, and again, as I say, we do talk about this quite a lot on the podcast, but you put some fairly hefty numbers on the extent to which the AI companies have to produce revenues and profits to justify this level of capex, right? Yeah, absolutely. It was quite a simple analysis, really. We said to ourselves, okay, the forecast is that the hyperscalers estimated to spend about$1 trillion a year.

5:00But it's kind of amazing that we just throw numbers like that out without even thinking about it. But anyway, fine. One trillion a year over the next five years. So in five years time, there'll be$5 trillion worth a kit in the ground. What's the expected life of that? Don't know. But I put a number of seven years on it. Frankly, it could be higher, it could be lower. So all this kit is fully depreciated after seven years out of date? Yeah, that seems to me to be a reasonable guess. And that's just because GPUs are developing so quickly, everything is changing so fast, there are better versions.

5:35It doesn't mean that these versions will be unusable. It just means there'll be better versions. I think that's a fair assumption. And particularly given that power is such a large component of the cost base of these things and subsequent GPUs are so much more power efficient than their predecessors, that means that they come out of use relatively quickly. The cost of GPUs is roughly 50 % of a data center, well, sort of GPUs plus the kind of the immediate infrastructure around them. And then everything else, you know, the server racks, the cooling, the HVAC, the power, all the rest of it, that's the other 50%.

6:13So perhaps we might say that, I don't know, four years is a correct appreciation period for the GPUs themselves. Maybe you put 10 on everything else and that gets you back to seven. But the funny thing is that actually, whether it's seven or whether it's 10 doesn't really change the outcome of the analysis that we went into. Not in any meaningful sense. Okay. Got that sorted. Onwards. So what does the analysis tell us? So that means that you've got an annual depreciation bill of about$780,$790 billion per year just for the hyperscalers. if we assume that they've got an EBITDA margin of 55%, and again, we got to that by poking around in the segmental reporting of the hyperscalers themselves, they don't, of course, break it out as neatly as you would want to.

7:01So there's a few assumptions that we've made to get there, but fine, 55 % seems fairly reasonable. Then in order to get yourself back to a 13 % return on invested capital pre-tax, which is admittedly a number that I plucked out of the air, but seems like a reasonable target, especially when you bear in mind that, say, Alphabet's return on equity and return on investor capital is well north of 20 % and has been for the last five years. So 13 is a much, much asset heavier business model. Then in order for that all to make sense, you need revenues of$2.75 trillion a year in 2030. Real money. We're starting to get to real numbers here, right?

7:46But of course, that's just the cost of the compute. So what is the revenues that, as it might be the frontier labs, the anthropics, the open AIs need to be generating? Again, making wild assumptions here, but their gross margins today, OpenAI's are in the sort of 35 to 45 area. Anthropic claims a much, much higher gross margin, but also inevitably it's an adjusted figure. I guess we'll have to wait until we see their S1 before we really know what it's like. But anyway, let's just say for the sake of argument that they can operate better than OpenAI is today. So at a 50 % gross margin, well, that points to$5.5 trillion of revenue.

8:32So putting that into context, GDP in the US today is about$33 trillion. Let's imagine that we roll that forward to 2030. It's probably going to be nominal GDP might be about$39 trillion, let's say. And so, you know, math isn't very difficult ought to do, five and a half trillion is about 14 % of GDP, which to put it in context, is a little bit less than what Americans spend on food today. Okay, so just to be absolutely clear on this, in order to justify the cost of the investment going into this, in the sense that to generate what we think or you think is a reasonable return on capital, by 2030, users will have to be spending close to 15 % of US GDP on AI services.

9:27And that seems completely implausible. Absolutely. Now, why don't we immediately turn to the objections really quickly? So, of course, I'm not quite comparing apples for apples, because I'm saying that all of this spend needs to be serviced, as it were, by American consumers. And of course, as we know, the hyperscalers are global businesses. But then equally, it's also true that there are lots of other people that are investing in AI infrastructure around the world. By the way, there's lots of other ways in which I might be wrong about this. As it happens, Johan Clement, who's an analyst who I respect hugely, he was very reluctant to put a central figure on it.

10:06He bookended it at$2 trillion to$12 trillion. So, you know, we're sort of in the ballpark here. Although he's very much on your side when it comes to this as a bubble, isn't it? because he's very suspicious of the idea that LLMs are going to be the long-term answer in the AI world. And he's a big believer in the rise of SLMs and different types of competition to the what's beginning to look almost old-fashioned data center LLM model. Yeah, absolutely. But in some senses, I don't think that's actually an objection to this. Because the sums of money that Anthropoc and OpenAI are spending, and then in turn that the hyperscalers are spending on their behalf, are so enormous.

10:47And then there is that very interesting question of what if all of this spend gets swiped off at the knees by the SLMs, or indeed the Chinese models, or the lower cost open weight models, and so on and so forth. And that's a whole separate question, which again, I think is really interesting. And admittedly, I'm probably not qualified to talk about. So, Chris, since you wrote this, skepticism has really risen in the market, hasn't it? And we're moving very fast into an era where other people are looking at all the numbers and looking at your numbers and saying, gosh, can they really make this revenue?

11:20And all the hyperscale is beginning to go cash flow negative, which is such a big change from even a couple of years ago. There is a changing perception in the market of how this boom or bubble, whatever you like to think of it is, is going to unfold. Yes, 100%. And the first thing that we have been seeing over the past two to three weeks, which I think is the obvious thing, is, as it were, the winnowing out of the weakest members of the herd. Because the conclusion that we come to is that it's unlikely that all of this spend is likely to be systemic for the hyperscalers themselves. Because one, they start with such pristine balance sheets.

12:00And two, they've got these extraordinary core franchises, the likes of which the world has never seen before. But on the other hand, either the NeoClouds. Define a NeoCloud for us, please. Sorry, yes, I beg your pardon. So the NeoClouds are essentially businesses that do nothing else but provide compute to AI labs. and many of them are repurposed crypto miners. And so the most prominent of these is a business called CoreWeave. And the thing that we've seen over the last couple of weeks is the cost of its bonds falling in price and therefore the cost of its debt rising up to sort of in the region of 15%.

12:41And I think it's highly unlikely that at that cost of capital that it can make any sense for them to continue investing. But these are interesting businesses, the Neoclas, aren't they? They're opportunistic upstarts. They saw an opportunity where there wasn't enough compute. They'd dive in, borrow enough money to do it. I mean, admirable, very admirable, hugely entrepreneurial. Absolutely. And in all investment booms, it's perfectly rational to try and jump on the front of it and see if you can fashion something valuable. I think the other thing that we're starting to see, though, is that more established businesses are showing some signs of stress.

13:18So I think Oracle is probably the kind of the pivot point in all of this. It doesn't have the same kind of core franchise that the hyperscalers have. It has always run its business with a much higher level of indebtedness. And so even that is starting to show signs of a little bit of stress.

13:40This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by Chachi PT. I'm Carol Masser. Getting hired at SpaceX requires exceptional ability. and may include having Elon Musk review a candidate's resume. So writes Bloomberg Businessweek's Lauren Grush. She reports that the company culture is defined by Musk, and job candidates must understand that a commitment to SpaceX means adhering to this culture and exhibiting loyalty to Elon Musk. To get hired, candidates must demonstrate their achievements from past jobs, and hands-on experience matters more to recruiters than advanced degrees, with the company looking for people with raw, innate intelligence.

14:18A spokesperson for SpaceX didn't respond to a request for comment on its recruiting and hiring practices. But according to recruiters, advisors, and those who've interviewed for jobs there, it's the space exploration dream that draws people to the company. And Musk invokes that dream regularly to remind workers why they're there. Prospective hires are told that the job will require stamina, including in job ads that candidates, quote, must be willing to work extended hours and weekends as needed. One major perk for all that hard work? Employees' access to equity, either the right to buy shares or payment in the form of restricted stock units that vest over time.

14:55That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChachiPT. Get started at ChachiPT.com. Most meeting note takers get the easy words right and the important ones wrong. The client's name, the acronym, Whisperflow NoteTaker is built to get the hard words right. It takes notes on any meeting platform, Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, even WhatsApp calls, keeps every meeting searchable, and connects to Claude or Chat GPTs so you can ask, what did we agree to last Tuesday? Free to try on Mac and Windows at whisperflow.ai. That's W-I-S-P-R flow dot A-I. Running a small business takes everything you've got.

15:35But with Chase for Business, you're not alone. They bring together local support and a broad range of resources to more than 7 million customers. With a deep understanding of your day-to-day needs, they provide products and guidance built to help you thrive. Right now, earn$500 when you open a new Chase Business Complete Checking account for new business checking customers with qualifying activities. Offer expires January 21st, 2027. Chase Business Complete Checking has the flexible tools you need to accept payments, make deposits, and manage your finances with confidence. Learn more at chase.com slash podcast biz offer.

16:10Chase, make more of what's yours. Fees may apply to Chase Business Complete Checking Accounts. The$500 offer is available for new business checking accounts with qualifying activities through 1-21-2027. Eligibility and qualification requirements must be met. Additional restrictions may apply. Please speak with a business banker for more information. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC.

16:35so all in it looks like it might end sooner than you thought even when you wrote this piece given the the doubts creeping into the market as a whole do you think that is the case that we might see this boom bubble coming to its end maybe even this year and if it does is there systemic risk in there or is it okay i think it has to be right that there is a chance that this comes to an end And we're seeing all sorts of different elements of that. So partly, it's the political resistance to the build out of these data centers, which may be the thing that causes this whole thing to slow down. And then on the other hand, it's the availability of credit to do this.

17:15And by the way, it is just worth touching on this because the numbers are absolutely wild. So I was talking to a credit trader and we've seen some of the issuance that's been going on in the bond market this year. And so in round numbers, Google and Amazon both came to the UK market and the euro market and issued sort of four to five billion sterling and 10 or 11 billion euros each. He reported that some large fund managers in London were getting sounded out by syndicate desks of investment banks about the prospect of raising 100 billion euros for Meta in a single transaction. And those numbers are just absolutely wild.

18:03And so I think it is possible that if the availability of credit just isn't there, then all of this does slow down. And then actually, I think the fallout at that point, setting aside what might happen to the NeoClouds and perhaps some of the weaker players, I think the fallout would be relatively limited because actually what AI compute has been deployed is actually likely to be pretty valuable because, as we've seen, the demand for this stuff is very high. So whenever you listen to the quarterly earnings reports of Microsoft, of Google, their CFOs are saying, look, we've got these huge backlogs of demand.

18:42And so all of the investment that's going on today is entirely rational. But it's this sort of runway of kind of unlimited investment that strikes me as being kind of economically insane, frankly. Yeah. But with that rising cost of credit, with all the doubts, you have to look at the equity market as well and say that if this comes to a juddering halt, we may also see, because lots of the rises in the AI-related companies and the industries have been based on very sharply rising earnings. And if we say, well, do you know what? Maybe this wasn't a valuation bubble. Maybe this is kind of an earnings bubble.

19:19And then you do begin to see prices fall. And if that happens, there's a massive wealth effect in the US, right? In that people's wealth is more tied up in the equity market. This is a historical high. So if you do start to see an AI and AI adjacent equity-led fall in the stock market, that's going to feed into the economy relatively quickly or not? 100%. And so I think that that's the, perhaps we don't have a financial crisis, but it's entirely possible that we have a nasty recession. And just to put some numbers on that, we tried to come up with an estimate of the profit pool that would arise from this 1 trillion capex spend.

20:00And we came up with a number of about 400 billion because of the fact that particularly the chip companies have such high gross margins. Chip companies' proportion of S &P earnings this year is 10%. and their estimated share of S &P earnings next year is 17%. And so you're absolutely right that any major slowdown as a result of availability of credit would hit them. So the first order impact on S &P earnings would be very great. The second order effect is that so much of the fantastic earnings that we've seen of the banks, for instance, has been wound up in trading revenues and their fixed income origination, their DCM businesses, and so on and so forth.

20:42And as you say, the US economy has never been more tied to the stock market. And also that the savings rate in the US is really very low at the moment. And so we're at this very interesting point where the three major pillars of society are all essentially on a spending splurge. So obviously, the federal government is running a 6 % budget deficit. Corporates, as we've seen, are investing on a scale that we've not seen since, I don't know, perhaps the railway boom. And then the private sector, actually, as it happens, the savings ratio just got written up by the BLS. But depressingly, that's just because it turns out that the rich were even richer than we thought they were.

21:28And obviously, they have a tendency to save. but nevertheless that yes you say that the savings rate is well below its long-term average and so you could entirely see that the savings rate would rise very dramatically if if there were a major earning slowdown in the stock market and i don't see where the kind of classic fiscal stabilizers can come from i can't see that the federal government can start spending even more um and And so, yes, that could be very unpleasant. And would that be very deflationary? I mean, your main worry, isn't it, is inflation. A lot of the portfolio is in index-linked bonds, for example.

22:06So when you think about your major concerns for the future, looking at portfolio anyway, and from our previous conversations, your main worry is always inflation. But this kind of scenario would give us more of a deflationary environment. I think you're absolutely right. That could well be deflationary. I guess, on the other hand, we've got a whole bunch of other inflationary things going on in the economy. So quite how those two things would play out against one another, I don't know. But yes, a sharp slowdown in the AI boom would definitely reduce inflation. Okay, but your core case remains medium, longer term inflation globally?

22:43Yes, I think so. In some senses, it's not a terribly sophisticated piece of analysis. If you go back to the Second World War, since then, every major surge in inflation has come from some combination of an energy price shock or a war. And presently, we've got both of those situations in play. And then there's just the general fact that we're seeing the sort of process of deglobalization starting to take hold. And when you combine that with rising wages in emerging economies, that just makes it very difficult to see the level of goods deflation that we've seen over the past 25 years persisting.

23:29And that's before we start getting into the impacts that war has on the physical destruction of capital and then the realignment of trade flows. And all of that is very inflationary. Yeah. And then I suppose there's what all countries have to do to protect themselves from the consequences of wars and supply chain changes. So obviously there's this conversation in the UK about defence spending, which also has to take in defence from cyber attacks, defence of our cables under the sea, etc. All these things are extremely expensive. Yeah, I guess the point about defense spending is that it is economically nonproductive.

24:06Now, it's clearly desirable, but it doesn't actually do anything useful. It doesn't increase the productive capacity of the economy. And so, yeah, all money that is diverted away towards that and obviously and it consumes resources. So put all of that together and that's an inflationary backdrop. Absolutely.

24:29This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by Chachi PT. I'm Carol Masser. Getting hired at SpaceX requires exceptional ability and may include having Elon Musk review a candidate's resume. So writes Bloomberg Businessweek's Lauren Grush. She reports that the company culture is defined by Musk and job candidates must understand that a commitment to SpaceX means adhering to this culture and exhibiting loyalty to Elon Musk. To get hired, candidates must demonstrate their achievements from past jobs, and hands-on experience matters more to recruiters than advanced degrees, with the company looking for people with raw, innate intelligence.

25:06A spokesperson for SpaceX didn't respond to a request for comment on its recruiting and hiring practices, but according to recruiters, advisors, and those who've interviewed for jobs there, It's the space exploration dream that draws people to the company, and Musk invokes that dream regularly to remind workers why they're there. Prospective hires are told that the job will require stamina, including in job ads that candidates, quote, must be willing to work extended hours and weekends as needed. One major perk for all that hard work? Employees' access to equity, either the right to buy shares or payment in the form of restricted stock units that vest over time.

25:44That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Get started at ChatGPT.com.

26:14Tuesday? Free to try on Mac and Windows at whisperflow.ai. That's W-I-S-P-R flow dot AI. Running a small business takes everything you've got, but with Chase for Business, you're not alone. They bring together local support and a broad range of resources to more than 7 million customers. With a deep understanding of your day-to-day needs, they provide products and guidance built to help you thrive. Right now, earn$500 when you open a new Chase Business Complete Checking account for new business checking customers with qualified activities. Offer expires January 21st, 2027. Chase Business Complete Checking has the flexible tools you need to accept payments, make deposits, and manage your finances with confidence.

26:56Learn more at chase.com slash podcast biz offer. Chase, make more of what's yours. Fees may apply to Chase Business Complete Checking Accounts. The$500 offer is available for new business checking accounts with qualifying activities through 1-21-2027. Eligibility and qualification requirements must be met. Additional restrictions may apply. Please speak with a business banker for more information. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA. Member FDIC.

27:25So if we look at the capital gearing trust, which I think probably quite a lot of our listeners hold, how much of that portfolio is now in assets that are specifically designed to protect from inflation? Just under half. So we've got about 48 % in inflation-linked bonds today that split roughly 50-50, but tilted towards the US into US tips and UK index-linked bonds. By the way, actually, coming back to your point around whether or not it does turn out to be a deeply inflationary environment, the interesting thing about inflation-linked bonds is that they've massively outperformed nominal bonds since they've been in existence.

28:05TIPS came into place in the late 1990s. So since 2000, TIPS, which are Treasury Inflation Protective Securities, US Inflation-linked Bonds, they've outperformed their nominal counterparts by 1.2 % per year. So that's cumulative outperformance of over 90%. So that's been an era when inflation has actually been really well-mannered and under control. And yet even in that environment, they've done so much better. So we don't necessarily even need for it to be this deeply inflationary environment for them to be a sensible place to have some of your money. And what about gold? Is that part of your inflation protection?

28:45So we currently don't own any gold. No gold? No gold at all. Not one coin. Sharp intake of breath from all my listeners, by the way. Absolutely. Now, obviously, as it turns out, we should have owned a lot more gold than we did. On the way into the mini bubble. On the way into the mini bubble, absolutely. But when it got so, and I suppose we sold this probably in about February of this year at about 5 ,100, what we did have, which was a little over 1 % of the portfolio. And the reason we did that was that we saw that gold was starting to behave like a speculative asset. That just felt weird and fundamentally wrong to us.

29:25And so we were happy to take it off the table there. Let's look then at the equity part of the portfolio, which is pretty small, right? We've got under 15 % of the portfolio now in equity related stuff. A lot of it is infrastructure, real estate. You talk us through that. Yeah, absolutely. Essentially, we felt for some time that equity markets were stretched. And obviously, we were concerned recently about the AI boom or bubble or whatever it might be. And so we were looking for, as it were, places to hide. And I guess infrastructure has been, we think, a really good home for us. And so this is some of the listed investment trusts.

30:03So Hickel, IMPP, 3i infrastructure. But essentially, making reasonable assumptions, we think that these things offer nominal returns of the order of 9 % per annum. And they've got pretty good inflation protection. So they're going to deliver something like 5 % to 6 % real. And that feels like a really nice place to be and something that we think our investors would appreciate. So it's been the wrong call for the last few years to have so little in equities across the board, right? I mean, it absolutely has. But the trouble is, of course, is that we have a dual mandate, much like a central bank.

30:45And the first part of our mandate is to avoid losing money. We define that as avoiding losing money over 12 months as being fundamental to what we do. And then the second leg of our mandate is to generate returns above the rate of inflation. Something that's made it weirdly more difficult to own equities for us is that we have increasingly felt, because of our concerns about fiscal pressures, we've been very reluctant to own long duration bonds. And so our portfolio duration is very short today. And that's broadly been borne out over the past six to nine months or so. But of course, what that means is that if you don't think that you can find a good hedge to a portfolio of equities, you need to have commensurately fewer of them if you're trying to avoid losing money.

31:32When do you get to the point where you would be prepared to buy more longer dated bonds? I mean, obviously, yields have gone up a lot, but there's still a sense there might be fiscal crisis ahead in the likes of France, possibly the UK. hey, what's the kind of yield that bring you back in? Or is there, given the appalling fiscal situations of some of these countries, is there no number that would make it okay? There has to be some number where we would start dipping our toe in the water, where the returns were sufficiently attractive. But essentially, we're not interested in owning long-dated bonds until the fiscal zeitgeist changes.

32:07And we think that the only thing that is going to bring about a change in the fiscal zeitgeist is a bond market crisis. And so we're waiting until there is that crisis before we're prepared to go. I mean, sure, absolutely. If there's a slowdown in the economy, I'm sure that yields will come down. But we think we're in a secular bear market for long-dated bonds until this changes. Obviously, there are several poster childs for this kind of fiscal irresponsibility, France being but one. We are talking before the UK budget, but this podcast is going to be released after the UK budget. So I'm almost certain that whatever you say in response to this question will not have happened.

32:51But for the purposes of the conversation, what would have to happen in this budget for you to think to yourself, yeah, all right, then I'll buy those long dated bonds in the UK. That'd be absolutely fine. Those 30 year guilds, I'm all over them. to be honest there's nothing that the chancellor could do that would make me want to own 30-year gilts and the reason for that is that the uk is as as we know a small open economy and increasingly few people need to own long-dated gilts as we know all of the fine benefit pension funds are closed and in healthy surplus and so what that means is that the single biggest thing that drives uk yields is what happens to American yields.

33:31And equally, I'm absolutely sure that if we have a bond market crisis in France, I'd be, well, absolutely sure, I'd be surprised if the UK were seen as a safe haven against that backdrop. And I think, I mean, I'm sure that gilts would outperform, but I think that the risk of rising yields, because these things just trade in such sympathy with one another these days. Okay, so in some ways, the UK isn't really investable. I find the conversations around fiscal matters in the UK incredibly depressing. And obviously, I hope that I'm going to have been proven wrong by what comes in the budget this week.

34:13But I think that's fairly unlikely. There's one thing I wanted to go back to that we were talking about earlier, which is more a comment than a question. But it's an extraordinary situation, isn't it, that we have got ourselves into globally, where there is now suddenly worries about the availability of credit. We've gone through decade after decade after decade where pretty much anyone can have as much money as they want at any point. And we interviewed a while back the author of 1872, 1873, whoops, suddenly lost all my years, when there was this sudden realization as a result of a massive fundraising in France that credit was available.

34:48There was money everywhere. You can have as much money as you wanted to invest in the railways, etc. Of course, that ended in tears. And it slightly feels like we've gone through something similar, a period quite long and then quite short, when you can have as much money as you want for anything. And now suddenly we're talking about governments being crowded out by AI and AI companies not being able to get their hands on the money they want and the cost of credit for Neoclass going up to 14, 15%. I mean, it feels like such an enormous and such a quick change. It does, doesn't it? It's kind of all happening so quickly that I don't know if this is just one of those sort of brief little blips that markets have or if it's a kind of a fundamental realization.

35:29But I think it comes back to that thing that I was saying earlier, which is that we have this strange situation when all branches of society are essentially going on a spending splurge. And so the competition for capital is real. I've just been on. I took my children to Greece for half term last week and I finished. perfect time it was absolutely delightful and i finished the akut ahmed's book um and i'm gonna get it wrong as well is it 1872 or 1873 anyway now we're both confusing ourselves i think 1873 i think so too but i couldn't say for sure i mean it's i think it's an absolutely brilliant book and of course in that sense it's very redolent isn't it because you you had as you say france raising huge sums of money in the bond market to pay an indemnity to germany you had Egypt and Turkey raising money essentially to hand it over to their despotic rulers.

36:21And then you had all of this money being raised to finance the railroads. Now, I guess the thing that was probably different then was that the savings rate in countries like the UK was probably quite high and was, as it were, the source of capital for all of this. And whereas I think the thing that's interesting is that the savings rate, at least across the world as a whole, is pretty low at the moment. And so, yeah, I think this could all come to a shuddering halt. But of course, as ever, it's impossible to predict as to timing. So what risks are worth taking at the moment, do you think? Look at us working ourselves up into this misery of bearishness.

37:02There must be risks worth taking. I do think that real yields in government bond markets are fundamentally very attractive compared to history, compared to long-term growth rates. And so while we are very concerned about a fiscal crisis and what effect that might have on the long end of the yield curve, presumably if there is a fiscal crisis and or if there is the sort of the AI slowdown that you and I have been discussing, is that short-term interest rates will get cut. And so we are very constructive on the yield curve, both nominal and real, going out about as far as five, six years. The reason for that is partly just that here in the UK, we've got, what, four rate hikes penciled in over the next 12 months or so.

37:50Even with the recent elevated inflation print that we got in the UK, I still think that looks overdone. And obviously, there's a limit to how far the yield curve can steepen if short rates are being brought down. So I do think that you can own, say, five-year nominal or index-linked gilts with a huge amount of comfort. And then by the same token, while it's true that credit spreads are very tight at the moment, and I think that there is a reckoning to come in credit markets, of course, if you're buying relatively short-turation credit, the price risk that's involved in that, if spreads widen, is relatively modest.

38:31So that's a perfectly sensible place to be. But yeah, I'm afraid I find it hard to be excited about anything at the moment, if I'm honest. Okay, how about this? I think you can do this. What price would you buy gold again? Three and a half. Three and a half? You think it would go that far? I have absolutely no idea where it'll go. But that's what you'd buy it again. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, you know, the trouble with gold is that, of course, I mean, I just, I hate it as an asset. No income, hard to value, prone to little bubbly things. Yeah, absolutely. But it's good enough for central banks, right?

39:15Absolutely. Absolutely. Liquid Armour's book, 1873, illustrates the danger with these things, which is that silver was, as it were, as good as gold. And then all of a sudden it wasn't. And then it wasn't anymore. And then its price fell by, I can't remember, but it's sort of over the order of 75%. I mean, admittedly, I don't, you know, that's not a prediction that I'm making. I see no reason why central banks will give up on gold, not least because it would have the effect of bankrupting them, I suppose. Okay. What could go right? What could go right? Globally, geopolitics, AI bubble, what could suddenly make you and your colleagues wake up in a month and go, do you know what?

39:57Let's take that equity exposure up to 17%. 20%. Something like that. It's difficult because the things that would make us much more positive about the world are likely to involve short-term pain. So, for instance, if you saw that Western governments really trying to get a grip of their fiscal situation, well, of course, that's going to start with a nasty slowdown. But for me, that's probably the precondition for feeling that we're on a more sustainable footing. I'm sure you're very familiar with the Kolecki equation, which essentially says that large government deficits show up in corporate profits.

40:42So corporate profits are artificially elevated by the fact that essentially we have all of this government spending. Now, of course, that's a situation that has gone on for a very long time, and I've no reason to suppose it won't carry on going for a very long period of time. And yet, if it does come to a crashing halt, then that's very nasty for equity markets. And one day it has to. One day it has to come to a crashing halt. I mean, government spending can't go on forever. Something has to end at some point. I would agree with you. Just when? Absolutely. Absolutely. It's really difficult when you are looking after people's money, as we are, and it's something that, it's a job that we take very seriously.

41:22It's a great responsibility. I wouldn't be able to look, as it might be my mother in the eye, because she has a lot of her money in Capital Gering Trust, and say, well, you know, mother, that I was going on about the fact that these governments were being completely profligate and that I knew that it would come to an end one day, but I couldn't figure out when. So I thought, ha, what the hell? I'll just, you know, I'll just pretend like it's not happening. That's not good enough. I bet your mother's got a sneaky position in a Scottish mortgage.

41:52She's got a secret Hog Ridge Lancet account you don't know about. Fully invested in tech. Do you know what? I've not asked her that question. I will phone her up after this. Ask her, ask her. And I will report back to you, Maren. Absolutely. Chris, just one more thing on inflation. I note that you often make some excellent historical comparisons. And in a webinar you did recently, you talked about the price of sesame seeds in Babylon. Why is that relevant to today? Babylon in 242, by the way. Yes, I have a sneaky suspicion I might have got the date wrong. We're getting all sorts of dates wrong today.

42:27It doesn't matter. We're after the ideas, not the dates. So that was part of the first, at least recorded, inflationary boom. And I suppose is it would definitely be grist to the mill of Milton Friedman, who said that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. Because when Alexander returned to Babylon after his semi-successful military campaigns on the Indian subcontinent, he returned there and of course ultimately died there. And that coincided with this massive rise in the price of sesame seeds, seeds, wheat, and barley. I think sesame seeds, I think they went up a tenfold over a short few years, which presumably was disastrous for the price of people's tahini and yogurt breakfasts.

43:16And I suppose while we don't actually know why that happened, I think we can probably guess that there was just a massive influx of silver into Babylon at that time. And so anyway, yes, that's how that all came to pass. Yeah, it always happens in the same way, doesn't it? It does. It does. Absolutely. Chris, last question. We've just been talking about your Greek holiday and what you've been reading there. What are you reading now or about to read? I just finished Evan Moskovich's memoir. He was the American journalist who was falsely imprisoned in Russia, essentially to provide currency for prisoner exchanges with Putin wanting to get back people who had been doing his dirty work for him in the West.

44:02so I read that which is about the sort of creeping autocracy in Russia so that was fascinating and this morning I have just started a book on Bayesian economics which is something that I've always struggled with there's a book by Tom Chivers which I think will hopefully give me a better sense of how to predict the future and which might be useful okay predicting the future would be so handy wouldn't it absolutely would really work out well for all the wealth Chris thank you so much joining us today. I really appreciate it. It's been fun. Thanks very much, Merrin. Lovely to see you.

44:41Thanks for listening to this week's Merrin Talks Money. If you like our show, rate, review and subscribe wherever you listen to your podcasts. And keep sending questions or comments to merrinmoneyatbloomberg.net. You can also follow me and John on Twitter or X. I'm at Merrin SW and John is John underscore Stepek. This episode was hosted by me, Merrin Somerset Webb. It was produced by Samasadi and Moses Andam, sound design by Blake Maples. A special thanks to Chris Clothier.

45:09If you're a business owner, you need a card that can keep up. With the Delta SkyMiles Reserve Business American Express card, everyday purchases transform into miles you can use towards future travel. So business as usual can lead to a well-deserved getaway. And for a limited time, card members can earn 200 ,000 bonus miles, the highest miles offered this year. Whether you're traveling for business or planning your next adventure, now's a great time to make every purchase go further. Apply today at www.delta.com slash podcast. Offer ends November 4th. Minimum spending requirements and terms apply.

45:45A business gift should do more than check a box. It should reflect your brand and show someone they're appreciated, recognized, and truly seen. 4imprint offers thousands of high-quality, customizable products, like premium apparel, drinkware, tech, and more, making it easy to create a gift that feels meaningful and on-brand. And with 4imprint's expert support and their 360-degree guarantee, you can be 4imprint certain your order will arrive exactly as intended. Explore gifting with confidence at 4imprint.com. 4imprint. 4certain. If you listen to financial news, you know a lot of time to spend thinking about what's next.

46:22The next opportunity. The next investment. the next move. But sometimes what matters most is being ready for what you never saw coming. For more than 75 years, Cincinnati Insurance has worked with independent agents to help protect businesses, homes, valuables, and more. Because planning for the future isn't only about knowing what's next. It's about making sure you're ready for what you can't predict. Let Cincinnati Insurance make your bad day better. Find an independent agent at CINFIN.com. For big business, AI opened up a world of promise, but that world of promise turned into a world of pain.

47:01Cost spiraling, data trapped, security and governance risks multiplying, and ROI out of reach. That's why enterprises turned to Boomi to connect data, apps, and AI, helping them operate securely, efficiently, and at scale. Boomi turns a world of AI pain into a world of AI gain. As Boomi says, we got you. Head to Boomi.com. That's B-O-O-M-I dot com.