It’s SpaceX IPO Day!

12 Jun 2026 · 41 min · 12 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

SpaceX IPO Day explained as a massive liquidity event for retail investors and private shareholders, plus market-wide implications and how big holders may handle their stakes; then Adobe’s selloff after earnings and management turnover; ends with “either/or” stock picks and Apple WWDC takeaways.

Guests

Lou Whiteman (Motley Fool Hidden Gems host; discusses IPO mechanics, Alphabet’s stake behavior, and owns Adobe and Walmart) and Jon Quast (focuses on IPO scale/liquidity and Adobe valuation/management questions; later highlights Form Factor).

Key claims

SpaceX is the biggest IPO ever; likely $75B raise and potentially up to four trillion-dollar companies (SpaceX, Anthropic, OpenAI, SK Hynix) clustering in 2026. IPO liquidity could pull money from other stocks; Fed cites ~$8T in money-market “sidelines.” Venture capitalists want “sell high,” but institutional holders may distribute shares to LPs rather than sell. Alphabet likely won’t rush to sell; historical pattern from GV investments (Uber/Lyft/Robinhood). Adobe: numbers were strong and AI recurring revenue tripled, but C-suite turmoil (CEO and CFO Dan Dern leaving/uncertainty) and delayed pricing initiatives hurt sentiment; valuation ~8x forward earnings. Apple WWDC was “dud,” but “local AI” on-device compute may be key.

Notable examples

Saudi Aramco’s ~$25B IPO vs SpaceX’s projected ~$75B; Alphabet’s ~$100B SpaceX stake; Alphabet’s past holding periods for Uber/Lyft/Robinhood; Microsoft’s Meta stake example; Form Factor probe cards used for AI chip testing (largest customer SK Hynix ~30% revenue; NVIDIA ~10%).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Understanding IPOs

0:46 to 1:30

Explaining what an IPO is and its significance for investors.

“So an IPO, initial public offering, is the process through which a private company becomes a publicly traded company.”

The Significance of SpaceX's IPO

1:31 to 2:58

Discussing why SpaceX's IPO is remarkable and its potential impact.

“We'll get to that selling piece in just a moment.”

Market Reactions and Liquidity Events

2:59 to 4:34

Examining liquidity events and the implications for the market.

“And you're going to be doing some content on the Motley Fool today and over the next few weeks or so about this.”

Alphabet's Stake in SpaceX

4:35 to 7:30

Analyzing Alphabet's potential actions regarding its SpaceX shares.

“You know, I follow a lot of venture capitalists on Twitter and places like that.”

Adobe's Market Performance

7:31 to 11:07

Reviewing Adobe's recent performance amidst leadership changes.

“Now, this is an IPO that I don't plan on buying.”

Adobe's Challenges and Future Outlook

12:16 to 14:00

Discussing Adobe's recent struggles and their implications for its future.

“Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.”

Analyzing Corporate Leadership Changes

14:00 to 20:35

Explore the implications of CEO and CFO turnover at Adobe and Marvell in the current market context.

“The SaaS apocalypse could be right around the corner.”

Comparing Stocks: SpaceX, Tesla, and Adobe

20:54 to 28:00

Discussion on stock preferences between SpaceX, Tesla, and Adobe, including valuation insights.

“Welcome back to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems Investing.”

Big Tech Earnings Insights

28:00 to 29:50

The discussion explores the current valuations and outlook for Microsoft and Alphabet.

“There's people there buying stuff and that's what the business is all about.”

Retail Stock Comparisons

29:50 to 32:20

An analysis of Walmart and Target's earnings and stock performance, including future outlooks.

“The retail battle that I think is fascinating for investors.”
Show all 12 chapters

Apple's WWDC Review

33:24 to 37:06

A critical look at the latest WWDC event and Apple's current position in the tech market.

“This used to be one of those huge events from Apple.”

Stocks on the Radar

37:06 to 40:36

Discussion of Casey's General Stores and Form Factor as potential investment opportunities.

“So that's starting to impact products like that.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01Travis Hoium:It's SpaceX IPO day and Motley Fool Hidden Gems investing starts now.

0:09Travis Hoium:Welcome to Motley Fool Hidden Gems investing. I'm Travis Hoium joined today by Lou Whiteman and Jon Quast and we have to start with the news of the day. That is the SpaceX IPO. This has been coming for a while. It's been a huge topic. Retail investors who are who are the people that we talk to are going to be a huge, huge piece of this. So I want to go through kind of an overview and get all the way down to when are some of these big owners going to sell? But Lou, let's start here for investors who are maybe new to this IPO process, who've never bought an IPO or a stock that has started their initial trading like SpaceX is going to do today.

0:45Travis Hoium:What is an IPO and why is it important?

0:48Lou Whiteman:So an IPO, initial public offering, is the process through which a private company becomes a publicly traded company. All companies have shares, private or public. But before the IPO, SpaceX shares were held by investors who had invested early on, venture capitalists, insiders, not easily traded on the open market. So what SpaceX is doing is they're selling a small sliver of themselves, some percentage of their shares. In this case, you know, I think under 10 percent over time, all of the shares will become tradable. This allows both retail investors like us, non-venture capitalists to get in.

1:26Lou Whiteman:It also allows for big holders to get out. So it's just the process of becoming more easily tradable or as we call it, public.

1:35Travis Hoium:We'll get to that selling piece in just a moment. But John, why is this IPO in particular such a big deal? Because it's the biggest IPO of all time and it's not even close. So 2019, Saudi Aramco went public in its IPO. It raised about$25 billion. SpaceX is looking to raise$75 billion, so three times the size of the last biggest IPO. So this is absolutely enormous. And when you think about the timing here, I know we're going to get into this more, but when you look at Anthropic, OpenAI also looking to go public in the near future, you look at even a company. We shouldn't forget about SK Hynix from South Korea looking to go public here in the U.S.

2:20It's already publicly traded in Korea, but publicly traded here in the U.S. at maybe a trillion dollar valuation as well. So we have a cluster of four potentially trillion dollar companies going public at the same time, maybe 200, 250 billion raised in IPO proceeds all at once. That's I don't know. We haven't seen that before.

2:41Travis Hoium:Lou, this does seem like a unique moment. And we had a little bit of this during the pandemic. There was a lot of those SPACs, SPAC mania. That was very different companies that it seems like we have today. A SpaceX is a very real company doing very real things. We've done shows. If you want some deep dives, we have some of those in the back catalog for Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. And you're going to be doing some content on the Motley Fool today and over the next few weeks or so about this. But this is a moment where you're going to see potentially three trillion dollar companies coming to public markets in 2026.

3:20Travis Hoium:The scale of that is just something we've never seen.

3:22Lou Whiteman:Yeah, this is not what the IPO market was made for, if we're honest. And some of these things were all this talk about, well, they're bending these rules. They're changing these rules. I'm sympathetic to that. But also the rules never envisioned companies this size. It's important to say, yes, a lot of money is coming on. There's a lot of questions. And I don't think any of us really know the answer to what this will do for the market because it should pull money away from elsewhere. By the St. Louis Fed, there is$8 trillion on the sidelines, as they call it. That's money and money markets. Not all of that is looking to get in, but there is a buffer there.

3:56Lou Whiteman:I'm trying to do the back of the envelope. If all three go public, what we're thinking, maybe five to six percent of total market capitalization of the of the U.S. markets. So not that's a huge number, but it's not a relatively massive number. I think over time the market can handle this. But I do think that, yeah, we could be in even if you have no desire to get in on this offering and just want to watch it from the sidelines between your index funds and just what it does, the the pulls on other stocks. Almost everybody invested in U.S. markets is going to feel this somehow, at least in the short term.

4:33Travis Hoium:Yeah, John, let's be honest about what this is for a lot of investors. This is liquidity, a liquidity event. This is an exit for them. You know, I follow a lot of venture capitalists on Twitter and places like that. They're looking at this as a huge day because this is when they get their money out. So talk to me about exactly what that means and what the IPO means. If you're Elon Musk or if you're investors in SpaceX, you don't typically want to do this in a down market. You want to do it in a market like we have today where, hey, what's a trillion dollars here or there when you're talking about valuation?

5:07Yeah, absolutely. And I think that that is the clearest of all signals for why are potentially four trillion dollar companies coming public at the same time? it's because that the getting is good and you've got to get when the getting is good. You've heard of sell high and buy low. Well, these companies and these venture capitalists who own shares of these privately held companies, they want to sell high. And this is an opportunity. The market is quite hot right now. I believe that we could even say it's overvalued right now. And I think some of our listeners just heard me say the market is going to crash.

5:42I didn't say that. I said the market is overvalued right now. This is a good time to be a seller if you want to raise some money. And that goes for the companies themselves. But as you point out, the venture capitalists, right? I love the Warren Buffett quote, the only reason to put money into a company is so you can have more money later. These venture capitalists, they want to have a way to have liquidity, get their returns on investment that they've had so far. So they need this.

6:10Lou Whiteman:Just one thing on that liquidity in terms of how it affects the market, because that is sort of my focus right now. What we know is, is that venture capitalists over time will be freed to do something with their shares. We don't know what they're going to do. A lot of these institutional owners, what they'll do is distribute, not sell. They will give it back to their limited partners in the form of shares and let the limited partners decide what to do with it.

6:34Travis Hoium:It depends on this would be who are those limited partners. Let's get to that a little bit, because this is not just rich people. This is actually a lot of people who are listening to the show probably have some exposure through something like a pension fund.

6:45Lou Whiteman:Pension funds, endowments, definitely rich people too, a lot of people, but yeah, no. And look, there is no one size fit all answers. There will be liquidations, there will be partial liquidations, but there will be some that say, I believe in SpaceX, I want to own these shares. So this is, and I hate to be, I know you're here for answers, but there is just no way of knowing. There will definitely be an impact here. There will definitely be people seeking liquidity. That also creates new opportunities because if there's a lot of cash created, then that's money that could be spent to buy other companies.

7:21Lou Whiteman:If you're selling SpaceX, there's going to be a lot of near term just movement, how it all nets out. I don't think any of us really know. I think the market can digest it over time. But look, indigestion happens, even if it's short term and we could get indigestion here.

7:36Travis Hoium:Now, this is an IPO that I don't plan on buying. So I'm just put that out of the way. Do you guys fall in the same boat? Yeah. Yes. So, but I do have exposure to this. And this is something that I think we should touch on is a company like Alphabet is a big holder of SpaceX. Invested$10 billion or so, what, over a decade ago at this point. They have about$100 billion stake, Lou. That's money that if they sell that$100 billion stake, they could just turn around and pour that into artificial intelligence. We talked this week about they are raising$80 billion in equity because they don't want to take on a whole bunch of debt to do this AI build out.

8:16Travis Hoium:What do you think a publicly traded company like Alphabet is going to do with their shares of SpaceX?

8:24Lou Whiteman:So we'll get to that in a second. The first thing, though, I think we should say is that as retail investors, we should not take this as a signal. We always talk about we don't give individual financial advice because everyone's situation is different. Alphabet's situation is different than yours, right? Right. And I you're going to hear it like, well, if Alphabet thinks it's worth holding, then it's worth holding for me, too. And read it that way. That is the wrong answer here. But it's a great question because it's a lot of money. Right. There are a lot of ways that they could hedge their economic exposure or even monetize that stake without selling.

8:58Lou Whiteman:So even if we see it stay on the books, that doesn't mean they aren't finding ways to put it at work to work. I would assume that over time it's not core, but I would also assume they're not going to be in any hurry. They still own a huge, huge portion of ASTS just kind of for the same reason. They could monetize that at a huge gain. My guess would be that they will hold tight with it for now, at least on the surface from what we can see. Again, there are ways to monetize it or put it to work elsewhere. I guess they'd be more inclined to do some of that than they would just to sell this in the near term.

9:33Travis Hoium:Yeah, John, historically, what do we know about what a company like Alphabet will do with their shares? Yeah, I mean, it might be surprising to our listeners that Alphabet owns shares of a company, but it's actually not unusual at all with its Google Ventures in the past. I think it's just called GV now, but it's invested pre-IPO in companies such as Uber, Lyft, and Robinhood. And when those companies went public, it didn't sell right away. Now, it did afterwards sell, but Robinhood, it waited a couple of years. Uber and Lyft, it waited longer than that. It did eventually sell, but it patiently held those stakes even as they increased in value early on.

10:08And I think that that would point to probably Alphabet, if it is going to be a seller, probably wouldn't be a very quick seller here, would probably hold on to the stake just using history as a guide. That said, back when it held those stakes in the other companies, it wasn't looking at potential negative free cash flow like it is right now. So I mean, it is different circumstances this time than in the past. So take it with a grain of salt, but the historical pattern is hold. Yeah.

10:35Travis Hoium:The other thing that I think is interesting, especially with a lot of these tech companies, when one of these big tech companies invests in a company that could potentially disrupt them or, you know, they could play a big role in the market and they sell, that's usually the wrong time to sell. You know, Microsoft had a huge stake in Meta, for example, or Facebook back then. And so, you know, sometimes if they just hold on to these stakes, that's the right thing to do. SpaceX, obviously different for a million different reasons, partly because it's almost a$2 trillion valuation as it goes public.

11:07Travis Hoium:When we come back, we're going to get to another publicly traded company that is not going in the right direction. That's Adobe. You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Invested.

11:16Lou Whiteman:They say leadership isn't just about where you're going. It's about the conviction it takes to get there. For those who demand the world and possess the drive to claim it, there's a vehicle of equal distinction. Dynamic by design and engineered for pure impact, the Range Rover Sport rises to meet you the moment you take the lead. This is the most advanced Range Rover Sport yet, a master class in uncompromised performance and unbridled agility. Inside, the innovation is seamless. You'll find an elegant 13.1-inch touchscreen that puts total control of the vehicle's systems right at your fingertips.

11:50Lou Whiteman:but it's the refinement that sets it apart. Sculpted 22-way heated seating with built-in massage function ensures every journey is defined by peerless comfort. Whether it's through unique interior finishes or custom wheel options, the ways to personalize your Range Rover sport are nearly unlimited. Command attention and experience ultimate luxury in motion. Exclusive offers are available now. Explore further at RangeRover.com.

12:16Travis Hoium:Welcome back to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing. Shares of Adobe are down over 8 % in trading on Friday. That's after falling yesterday, even before they announced earnings. That came out after the market closed yesterday. Lou, there's a lot going on with Adobe. This is seen as one of the companies that could potentially be an AI loser. And yet their numbers look fine. So what in the world is going on?

12:40Lou Whiteman:Yeah, down eight and a half percent this morning after what looks like a great earnings report to me. And this one frustrates me because I am on the camp that thinks they are not going to be wiped out by the AI software invasion. So I own this one. So not enjoying this. But look, the numbers were really solid. They were they were great. They beat on the top and bottom line. They raised revenue and earnings guidance for the year. They're seeing good traction with their AI products. I think AI related recurring revenue was tripled. But there is C-suite turmoil, and this is not a good time for that.

13:13Lou Whiteman:The CEO who's been with the company since 2007, not retiring until a replacement is found. I didn't find that particularly scandalous. It's not great timing. But look, you know, this is retirement. He's earned a gold watch. The latest news is CFO Dan Dern will report. To me, it will leave. Sorry, not report. To me, this is more of a sign that Dern was not going to get the job. There are internal candidates here. There is a process. If I'm Dern and I am not on the short list to get the CEO job, maybe I move on. Again, I don't think this is red flags, but it adds to the turmoil. There are some things that we can get into it.

13:53Lou Whiteman:I don't think the quarter was perfect, but I think this is just like, I don't know. It's hard to just ignore all the noise and look at the numbers because the numbers could change. The SaaS apocalypse could be right around the corner. But I just refuse to think these businesses are going to be destroyed until I actually see it in the numbers. I think absent just the natural CEO lifestyle cycle playing out, I kind of think the market would be happier today.

14:19Travis Hoium:Yeah, John, the odd thing looking at this is as I look through the numbers, I didn't see any major red flags. I need to dive a little bit deeper. But you do look at that C-suite turnover and it has you scratching your head a little bit. the CEO leaving like Lucid, been there forever. But the CFO, you know, then you look at his history and where he's going. Look, Marvell going from a company that's going, a stock that's going down to a stock that's going up in a hot segment of the market, probably got a great offer. I don't know. I go, maybe this is just about getting a bigger paycheck elsewhere.

14:54Yeah, it is possible that Adobe was passing Dern over for the CEO role. He feels slighted and is going outside the company now. That's possible, but let's not kid ourselves here. This is a promotion in many ways. It's a better career opportunity for Dern in my view because as you point out, Marvell much bigger and growing faster. It just seems a way brighter outlook for the company as opposed to Adobe right now. So if I'm Dern, I think I take this as well regardless of what's going on at Adobe because everything looks so great at Marvell. you know you look at this you you asked Travis before the show at what point is is Adobe worth buying or something like that because you know it's trading at eight times forward earnings right now the numbers did look good and I'll concede that point so at what point do we start to believe this and here's the question for me I think that the struggle to believe Adobe right now is what is the plan and who is bringing the plan?

15:56Because the CEO and the CEO FO are now both out, so they're not bringing the plan. And the plan that they are presenting, there may be some question marks there.

16:07Travis Hoium:Yeah, Lou, this gets to, we talk a lot about management. It's sometimes really hard to judge management. This is where the board of directors earns their paycheck because the job of the board of directors is to set the vision for the company and then hire the people that are at the top. when you have to hire a new CEO, especially at this moment, when there could potentially be disruption, you talked about the SaaSpocalypse, this almost seems like a time where you're either going to go in the wrong direction. It's like a binary outcome. If you have a company trading for eight times forward earnings, you're either going to go in the wrong direction and we're going to look back on this and go, and look, the market saw this coming a mile away, or you're going to do a turnaround and it's maybe not Steve Jobs coming back to Apple, but somebody comes in with a new plan and says, hey, I have the ability now that the stock is down now that we're kind of unloved by the market to come in and shake things up and say, this is where we need to go.

17:02Lou Whiteman:Yeah, I mean, if I could ask anything of Shanta Nunez and the CEO, like why now? You've had a good run, can't you stay on a little longer? Because to John's point, you're right. This is a terrible time to be saying we don't have, you know, long-term certainty. They don't have a credible plan right now because whoever, whatever they come up with, it's not going to be around to implement it. So they need a new CEO to just say exactly that. I do think that, as you say, this is a great opportunity for someone to come in and do it. I think messaging can be improved from here. But yeah, look, they are, I mean, the quarter wasn't all great.

17:42Lou Whiteman:They are delaying pricing initiatives. that lower their outlook for recurring revenue. They are trading growth for active users right now, just trying. I think the idea is, the thought is, is let's make sure the foundation is great for the next person. But again, it is just a crummy time to be waiting. Wait and see, we're gonna get someone in here who will know what to do, is not a message the market wants to hear right now. So yeah, maybe it's just stay on another two years or something, I don't know.

18:10Travis Hoium:Yeah, John, is this just one of those instances where it seems like we fall into this with something like PayPal, too, where, gosh, it does look cheap, but that doesn't mean the stock's going up for a while. That's absolutely right. And why do stocks go up over the long term? They go up when they are able to grow their businesses and become a better profit machine. There are some legitimate question marks there. It wasn't screaming red flags. It wasn't a terrible quarter, but there are questions. And so to Lou's point, you know, kind of chasing user acquisition more, the CEO saying we're going to chase lifetime value with more freemium offerings.

18:49So chasing those free tier products. But you're going to have to spend to advertise to get those users there. And so a little data point here. First half of fiscal 2026, sales and marketing up 15 percent, revenue only up 12 percent. That's just a minor little thing that we need to be watching here, especially with questions about the long-term vision.

Read the full transcript

19:11Travis Hoium:Definitely some questions, but the valuation is very compelling. So one I'm going to be digging more into. When we come back, I'm going to get some thoughts on some valuations and which stocks John and Lou like. You're listening to Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing.

19:28Lou Whiteman:Summer always changes how I get dressed. I want pieces that feel lighter and more breathable, things that are easy but still put together. That's why I keep coming back to Quintz. They focus on high-quality essentials that feel and look amazing. Think breathable linen and soft organic cotton. Well-made basics, but without the luxury markup. It's that rare balance where everything feels elevated but still effortless. Quintz European linen pants and shirts are perfect warm-weather upgrades to add to your rotation, starting at just$34. Their tees are soft and easy to wear, and their lightweight cotton sweaters are perfect for cooler summer nights.

20:04Lou Whiteman:Everything at Quince is priced 50-80 % less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen, so you're paying for quality, not brand markup. Quince goes way beyond clothing. Custom upholstered sofas, ceramic cookware, premium bedding. It's the kind of brand you'll end up recommending to everyone for everything. As the summer is heating up, I'm really loving my Flow Knit Breeze Performance Tees and my ProTech Golf Pants. My son is a huge fan of the kids' organic cotton ankle socks. Elevate your summer wardrobe. Go to quince.com slash motley for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.

20:41Lou Whiteman:Now available in Canada, too. That's quince.com slash motley for free shipping and 365-day returns. quince.com slash motley.

20:54Travis Hoium:Welcome back to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems Investing. In this segment, we like to have a little bit of fun with stocks that we follow. So I wanted to play either or neither. And I'm going to give John and Lou two stocks. I'm going to say, which one do you like better? But I do give you the option to say, you know what? I don't like either of these. So we've talked about SpaceX. But let's talk about the other Elon Musk company. Crazy that somebody is going to be the CEO of two multi-trillion, two trillion dollar companies. I guess now multi-trillion and potentially be a trillionaire himself. Lou, Tesla or SpaceX stock or neither?

21:29Lou Whiteman:Which one do you like here? You know, I mean, I want to be that guy here and say, I mean, in six months, they're going to be one company. So you don't have to choose. But no, I'd probably I do think they'll merge. I don't think it's that soon. I would probably go with SpaceX just because I do think it's the newer, fresher story without dents. My honest answer is neither, though. I mean, valuation, I can't really get my head around either. John? I think I would take Tesla and mostly because I see multiple ways for it to win. You just have to have a very long time horizon when it comes to Tesla, because one thing is for sure, whatever it's saying it's going to do, it will not be on time.

22:10So, you know, just take that with a grain of salt. But I mean, battery technology, I think that that is an increasing potential avenue for, I mean, I just think it's a huge area of growth in our world, battery technology. You do look at the robotics that it's working on. Yeah, not on schedule, but very interesting work that's happening. And you do look at the robo-taxi efforts. I mean, definitely the rollout was supposed to be a billion times bigger by now, but I think it is going to happen. And I do think that that is accretive to the business. So I see many ways for Tesla to win. SpaceX, on the other hand, I'm uncertain with how much capital expenditures it's pledging into AI.

22:53The economics -

22:54Travis Hoium:You're not worried about Tesla's increasing. I think the 25 billion that they're putting into AI compute, that one doesn't worry you as much? Well, I think it's even higher with SpaceX. And then on top of that, you have rockets that you need to build that are also expensive. So yeah, I see better economics for Tesla. All right, let's get to the other company that we talked about, Adobe. Another one that I'm looking at that sort of falls into this business of value or a value trap, Intuit. John, you're up first. Do you like either of those or neither? Well, my honest answer would be neither. I wouldn't be investing in either of these companies right now on a personal level.

23:29However, if you did make me choose, I think I would choose Adobe over Intuit. And the reason why is that Intuit does more of its business. It does have a large enterprise customer base, but the consumer base is much larger of a percentage of the business. And that kind of worries me. I think that consumers are curious about other tools right now. Adobe, I think there is a little bit more stickiness with its enterprise revenue base. I do think that that is a little bit more sticky. I think that enterprises in particular are looking for a company such as Adobe to come in and help me do AI, not how do we replace Adobe with AI.

24:05So I think that Adobe has a little bit more staying power.

24:08Travis Hoium:Lou, I'm going to give you a couple of numbers here. Forward price earnings multiple for Adobe is eight. We talked about that earlier. For Intuit, it's 16. But is John right that the potential for disruption of just, I don't know, sticking your tax information in ChatGPT, is that the disruption? I've never thought of paying$100 or$200 to TurboTax to do my taxes for me, essentially, is all that big a deal. So like that's a pretty valuable service.

24:36Lou Whiteman:I don't think the consumer tax side of it is the part that we're really worried about here. There's a lot of just, you know, back end small business number flows that maybe I think that's a bigger risk. And I do think that sort of application where it's just, you know, kind of zero creativity, zero judgment, shall we say, is more ripe for disruption. I mean, I've already told you my bias. I own one of these. It's Adobe. Part of it is I just don't like Intuit. it i i think it do it is done you know that they've they've played games with the tax code to kind of that's definitely true so so so that's just a personal bias here but i do think of the two if either is disrupted it's going to be the one that is basically just a spreadsheet jockey and not not not a creative or a human judgment type of business all right i kind of buy that

25:27Travis Hoium:argument guys you're talking me out of into it let's get to the home improvement side home depot shares trade for 23 times trailing earnings, not growing all that much, just 3 % a year over the past three years. Lowe's trading for 19 times earnings, actually down in terms of revenue over the past three years. Lou, do you like either of these or neither?

25:50Lou Whiteman:So Home Depot has always been the stock to own. It's always been the better of the two really good companies, not for growth, but because they generate cash and they use that cash to buy back shares. So it is a total return story. They, and to a lesser extent, Lowe's, have changed focus of late. They're spending a lot of money on acquisitions, trying to build other sides of the business. That is going to slow, at least in the near term, returns to shareholders because they have a lot of debt to pay off. I actually think if I had to buy one of these today, I would buy Lowe's. And I think it's the first time in my investing career I felt that way.

26:24Lou Whiteman:I just think they are operating a little better, a little more focused, and you do get a little bit of a better deal. Look, the real striking thing to me about this is that everybody knows these are great businesses for that reason. They have not fallen as much as home builders in some of these other areas with interest rates up and with the home builder. I don't know where you even start on the home issues. I think those, you're not getting as good of a sale. So maybe I'm less inclined to jump in right now, but these are quality businesses. There have been times in the past where I felt like Lowe's was clearly the better value and clearly had opportunities to improve its business.

27:05I totally agree. Yes. To have that relative outperformance. And I wouldn't say that right now. I feel like they're kind of both in the same place right now, same outlook, more or less in that scenario. And with a higher dividend yield, I would take the historically stronger business and that's Home Depot. and nearly a 3 % dividend yield. That's pretty good compared to Lowe's just too. But I don't think you go wrong with either company here if it's just a set and forget it kind of investment.

27:36Travis Hoium:It's one of those businesses that I think is a really good learning lesson if you just look back through their history because Home Depot has been the outperformer. And I don't know what the magic sauce is there because I go to Lowe's stores. I actually like the stores better. I don't know if the lighting's a little bit brighter or something, but there's never anybody there. Maybe that's a regional thing where we are here, but you kind of see it in the numbers too. They just don't do the same volume that Home Depot does. Home Depot is just always busy. There's people there buying stuff and that's what the business is all about.

28:07Travis Hoium:All right, let's go back to big tech. Microsoft trading for 23 times trailing earnings, about 20 times forward earnings estimates. Alphabet trading for 27 times trailing earnings. A year ago, this was completely backwards, but Alphabet has been on absolute tear and 27 times forward estimates. John, do you like either of these stocks or neither? Yeah, I love Alphabet. I think that this is just a great business all around. I mean, yeah, I wish I would have bought it a year ago but I don't think it's a bad investment today. Are you worried about the money that they're putting into AI and potentially diluted, you know, 2 % dilution with their $80 billion raise?

28:48Travis Hoium:You know, uncertain if there's going to be ROI on that. And I think that's what the market's starting to think about. I mean, fair point. But of all the companies out there doing it, I think that Alphabet is the one that is going to get the ROI. If other companies aren't going to, Alphabet will. And that is because of how Alphabet can monetize it throughout its entire ecosystem. And so I think that's a really important distinguisher.

29:12Lou Whiteman:Yeah, if anyone's going to win, they just have so many ways to win here. That's the important thing. I mean, look, just just to play the game, I will say Microsoft because it is a slightly better deal right now. But the truth is, is that investors aren't playing a game. You can buy both. And in this case, you're fine by these are two excellent companies. Both have I mean, even among the mag seven, these are the two companies that just have the most ways to win the most irons and different fires, the most different customer bases to deal with. these are the cream of the crop and you really shouldn't choose one or the other.

29:49Travis Hoium:All right, let's end on this. The retail battle that I think is fascinating for investors. Walmart currently trading for over 40 times earnings. So you can get Microsoft for about half of the price to earnings multiple as Walmart. Just kind of wild where we are with the market today. Against Target now, even after a really nice run, still only trading for 18 times trailing earnings, 16 times forward earnings. Lou, if you've got to pick one of those, which one do you like or is it neither?

30:22Lou Whiteman:So I own Walmart here, so I guess I can't say neither. I will say it really depends on timeframe right now. If you're talking short term, I think Target will outperform Walmart over the next six, 12, maybe 18 months. A lot of that is regression to the mean in both ways. Target was really beaten down and they are actually showing signs that they have a pulse and they're not going the way of JCPenney's, that's good. And that is causing a value re-rate there. Walmart, on the other hand, has been on an incredible run and not a sustainable run the way they're going. And so the stock is coming down to earth a little.

30:56Lou Whiteman:I think that's probably going to continue. Longer term, I love the way Walmart is positioned. I still don't know what Target wants to be when they grow up. I don't know what like urgent need they fill that you can't do elsewhere, which is a tough place to be in retail. I think they have to answer that question for me. So long term, I'm sticking with Walmart, but near term, I would expect Target will outperform. Chuck? Yeah. I mean, you look at both of these businesses, I don't think the growth outlook is anything to write home about for either company right now. And that is important when it comes to investing.

31:29How much can this business grow? That said, you know, when you don't have the growth, you do look at, OK, what is the margin opportunity here and hats off to Walmart. It's doing really well on the profit margin front right now. And that is part of the reason why investors have been so excited about it. Does that keep getting better? Oh, man, it's already pretty good. Target, on the other hand, has opportunities to turn around and to lose point. They show that they have a pulse. They are starting to show that maybe a little bit of this opportunity that we have to do our business better is starting to pay off.

32:02But that still has a long way to go if it is indeed the early stages of a turnaround. So I would take target here of the two.

32:10Travis Hoium:Interesting thoughts on companies across the market. We see that the valuations are just wildly different depending on where you're looking at stocks today. We'll see how this plays out long term. When we come back, I want Lou and John's thoughts on the latest from Apple. You're listening to Motley Fool, Hidden Gems Investing.

32:30Lou Whiteman:This Father's Day, do more with dad and spend less with low prices guaranteed at The Home Depot. Get him fired up with a new grill and accessories, like the Nex Grill 5 burner for just$299, so you can spend more time together while he becomes the grill master he was always meant to be. Or build memories with savings on top brand power tools so you can tackle projects side by side. Gift more and do more together this Father's Day with help from The Home Depot. Exclusions apply. See homedepot.com slash price match for details.

33:02Travis Hoium:As always, people on the program may have interest in the stocks they talk about, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations for or against, so don't buy or sell stocks based solely on what you hear. All personal finance content follows The Motley Fool's editorial standards and is not approved by advertisers. Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. To see our full advertising disclosure, please check out our show notes. Guys, I wanted to touch on WWDC. This used to be one of those huge events from Apple. They had a couple events every year that in the late aughts, early 2010s, these were some of the biggest moves for the market because this is when new products came out, when new software came out.

33:42Travis Hoium:But WWC was, I would say, a little bit of a dud this year. Just not a lot happening. There's a lot of under the surface things that are going on. Siri is apparently what they promised a couple of years ago. and they talked a lot about parental controls. If you're a parent, maybe this is going to be really helpful. I'm kind of excited about some of those features. But Lou, when you look at something like WWDC, is Apple just kind of moving out of the spotlight? They're not spending a bunch of money on AI. You know, there's not really a huge AI story, but maybe from an investor standpoint, that means they're not burning a bunch of cash and maybe that's okay.

34:18Lou Whiteman:Yeah, I think they're fine on AI. We've talked about this, but using someone else's stuff and getting it out over your massive customer base, That's the way to go. That's a lot better than reinventing the wheel. But look, Apple has replaced Microsoft as the most boring big tech company. Whoever thought this company could be so boring? And I mean that as a compliment. The good news is this is a well-protected franchise that makes money and should be able to do that well into the foreseeable future. This is a massive profitable business. The bad news is there's no sign that the next big thing will ever arrive.

34:50Lou Whiteman:Maybe that'll change with new management. They got a product guy coming in. but it is just the expectations game is now slowly turning in Apple's favor. We are just all accepting like, all right, this is what it is. And fortunately, what it is, is a fantastic generator of revenue and profits. Yeah. I mean, you point out the parental controls there, Travis. I mean, that is not innovation. That's just a business doing business. And that's what WWDC was.

35:15Travis Hoium:It was just a lot of the things that they introduced. I thought they had that we had the capability of doing as parents, to be honest. and that's exactly right there is no big thing here and i think it's okay and actually as i've if i look at where we are now i i don't think this was true of every company but the way that apple played this entire ai super cycle i think it played it perfectly because to lose point it's having other people do all the expensive stuff in creating the ai models and it's like okay, I'll pay for that and use that. Now I'll integrate that into what I offer. But I'll just focus in on the hardware.

35:53And that's actually been where the money has been right now. And I think that's where the money could continue to be for Apple. There's a trend that's going to emerge. I'm calling it now. It's called local AI. This is basically, I'm going to start moving some of my AI compute to where I am. And actually, Apple devices are incredibly proficient at handling that because of how they're made. They're more energy efficient because of the ARM-based architecture. They are the high bandwidth memory. They can get a lot done. So I think that Apple's going to lean into the hardware angle and that could be where the more money is made.

36:30Yeah.

36:31Travis Hoium:To that point, they did not introduce a new Mac Studio. That's the product. I'm actually waiting to get the next generation Mac Studio because their chips were a little bit goofy in the last generation. But that has been delayed theoretically into the fall because of the massive demand that they have for chips. And this AI shortage for chips is now starting to hit Apple in that way. So it is interesting where they sit. I think you're right, John. They have a very strong position with their products. The downside is they're now behind companies like NVIDIA when you go to TSMC. Who gets their chips first?

37:04Travis Hoium:Apple's no longer running the show over there. So that's starting to impact products like that. But it definitely seems like if we do more on-device compute, they're sitting in a pretty good spot. We like to end the show with stocks on our radar and we bring in Dan Boyd from behind the glass for his thoughts. Lou, you're up first. What's on your radar?

37:23Lou Whiteman:So Dan, this week I am going to Casey's General Stores, ticker C-A-S-Y. This is one of the biggest gas station chains in the Midwest, but also oh so much more, Dan. Would it surprise you to hear that Casey's is also the fifth largest pizza chain in the U.S.? And unlike a lot of other fast casual restaurants that have taken on a gen of late, Casey's is thriving. The company beat on the top and bottom line thanks to strong gas sales and, yes, pizza. Inside same store sales, so excluding gas, were up 5.5 percent. Margins increased 120 120 basis points. They have all sorts of pricing power with their pizza either.

38:03Lou Whiteman:Casey's is forecasting 8 to 10 percent full year EBITDA growth next year, likely to open more than 100 new locations. It also just raised its dividend by 14 percent. A lot to like here, not just a pizza. Dan, what do you think about gas and pizza?

38:18Travis Hoium:Well, I mean, what are we doing here, gang? pizza from the gas station. Come on. We can do better Midwest. We can do better Southern United States.

38:30Lou Whiteman:Let's do a road trip. Let's go eat the pizza. I'm dying to try it.

38:33Travis Hoium:I think we should do that. We can do a show from the road. The other thing John made this point before the show, but in a lot of places, Casey's is kind of the local place to grab a pizza if you want. If you're driving through, you know, I live in Minnesota. If you're driving through a small town in Minnesota, Casey's is the only place to stop. All right, John, what's on your list this week? Yeah, this week I'm highlighting a company called Form Factor that is ticker symbol FORM, about a$10 billion company. So let me set this up. Nearly every AI chip in the world passes through a probe card before it ships out.

39:05So basically a chip can have problems and you don't want to package up broken ones. And so the probe cards basically check the chips for electrical problems. Most people have never heard of Form Factor, but it's actually one of the world's leading companies in making these probe cards, doing over$800 million in trailing 12-month revenue. Here's what's really interesting to me. Its largest customer is South Korean memory giant SK Hynix at nearly 30 % of revenue. Now, last week, NVIDIA and SK Hynix signed a multi-year partnership to create more memory products. And so more memory means more probe cards.

39:41That should also mean more business for Form Factor. And I I should also mention that NVIDIA itself is a 10 % customer for this company as well. So there are risks. Trades at over 25 times, 20, 30 earnings targets, according to management. So it's not cheap. But this isn't a bet on which model will win. This is a bet on that there will be more chips and that they will need to get more complex. And so that's more business for form factor.

40:04Travis Hoium:Dan, what do you think of form factor? Brother, I've barely understood a single word he said in any of that. But you know what I do understand, even though I was poo-pooing it just a moment ago, is gas stations and delicious pizza. So I think I'm going to go with Casey's this time around. Props to John. I brought him with pizza. Props to John for bringing a new stock to my attention. So I appreciate that. But yes, I appreciate Casey's business maybe a little bit more. That's all the time we have for today. Thanks to Lou and John and Dan behind the glass. I'm Travis William. We'll see you here tomorrow.

From the publisher

SpaceX is officially public and we explain not only why that matters, but also how it may benefit companies like Alphabet long-term. We also explore what’s wrong at Adobe, why Apple has become boring, and the stocks on our radar.

Travis Hoium, Lou Whiteman, and Jon Quast discuss:

- SpaceX IPO

- Who Will Sell SpaceX Stock?

- What’s Wrong At Adobe?

- Either or Neither

- Is Apple All Right

- Stocks On Our Radar

Companies discussed: SpaceX (SPCX), Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG), FormFactor (FORM), Casey’s General Stores (CASY), Target (TGT), Walmart (WMT), Microsoft (MSFT), Adobe (ADBE), Intuit (INTU), Tesla (TSLA).

Host: Travis Hoium

Guests: Lou Whiteman, Jon Quast

Engineer: Dan Boyd

Disclosure: Advertisements are sponsored content and provided for informational purposes only. The Motley Fool and its affiliates (collectively, “TMF”) do not endorse, recommend, or verify the accuracy or completeness of the statements made within advertisements. TMF is not involved in the offer, sale, or solicitation of any securities advertised herein and makes no representations regarding the suitability, or risks associated with any investment opportunity presented. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with legal, tax, and financial advisors before making any investment decisions. TMF assumes no responsibility for any losses or damages arising from this advertisement.

We’re committed to transparency: All personal opinions in advertisements from Fools are their own. The product advertised in this episode was loaned to TMF and was returned after a test period or the product advertised in this episode was purchased by TMF. Advertiser has paid for the sponsorship of this episode.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠megaphone.fm/adchoices
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

More from Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing

All 453 episodes
It’s SpaceX IPO Day!Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing · 41 min
Listen in VO