In short
My First Million - Episode 651: 3 Stories Of People Making Millions In Weird Ways
Podcast Host(s): Sam Parr and Shaan Puri Release Date: Not specified Episode Length: 1:23:38
---
Episode Overview
In this episode of "My First Million," hosts Sam Parr and Shaan Puri discuss unique stories of individuals who made significant profits in unconventional ways. The episode focuses on three main topics:
- The life and career of Martha Stewart.
- The use of Ozempic for sleep.
- The Polymarket whale who made millions betting on the recent election outcomes.
---
Key Discussions & Insights
- The Rise and Fall of Martha Stewart (0:00 - 19:04)
- Background: Martha Stewart's ascent from a model to a successful stockbroker, then transitioning to a culinary and media mogul.
- Career Highlights:
- At 26, Stewart earned $135,000/year (equivalent to ~$1 million today) as a stockbroker.
- She launched a catering business, becoming a millionaire by emphasizing handmade, from-scratch creations.
- Stewart authored a groundbreaking cookbook, "Entertaining," which sold over 650,000 copies, establishing her as an early influencer.
- Business Expansion:
- Partnered with Kmart to launch a home goods line, eventually creating Martha Stewart Omnimedia which went public.
- Became the first self-made female billionaire in the U.S.
- Controversy:
- Involvement in a high-profile insider trading investigation, leading to her imprisonment for lying to investigators rather than insider trading itself.
- Post-incarceration, she made a comeback, changing public perception through comedy and reality TV appearances, such as Justin Bieber's roast.
- Ozempic for Sleep (19:04 - 33:10)
- Discussion Overview: The idea of using Ozempic, a medication typically for weight loss, for sleep enhancement.
- Research Background:
- A blog post by a researcher (Isaak.net) discussing a genetic mutation called "short sleeper syndrome," where individuals require less sleep without health detriment.
- The potential to create a drug analogous to Ozempic for sleep, thus granting additional productive hours to individuals.
- Implications:
- If successful, this drug could add significant quality years to life by allowing people to function well on less sleep.
- The Guts and Brains of Polymarket's Whale (33:10 - 44:55)
- Polymarket Overview: A prediction market platform where users can bet on outcomes, such as election results.
- Whale Story:
- A French trader, referred to as a "whale," placed massive bets on Trump winning the election, utilizing a novel polling method called the "neighbor method" to gauge public sentiment.
- He correctly predicted a Trump landslide based on his custom polling and made an estimated $80 million profit.
- Market Dynamics:
- Discussion on the difference between polls and prediction markets, highlighting how markets can often provide better insights into public sentiment.
- Concerns about market manipulation due to a few whales influencing betting odds.
- Betting vs Gambling (44:55 onward)
- Concept Discussion: Debate on whether platforms like Polymarket are comparable to traditional gambling.
- Vitalik Buterin's Insights:
- The segment draws on a blog post by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, discussing the dual nature of prediction markets—both as betting platforms and sources of actionable insight (info finance).
- Potential applications for decision-making in businesses using prediction markets to gauge future trends and decisions.
---
Key Takeaways
- Martha Stewart: A multifaceted entrepreneur whose story emphasizes the blend of charm, hard work, and a strong personal brand.
- Ozempic for Sleep: Highlights emerging research that could revolutionize how we approach sleep and productivity.
- Prediction Markets: The story of the Polymarket whale underscores the potential of markets to predict outcomes more accurately than traditional polling methods.
---
Useful Links
- [Isaak.net - Sleepless](https://isaak.net/sleepless/)
- [Polymarket](https://polymarket.com/)
- [Chainalysis](http://chainalysis.com)
- [Vitalik Blog](https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/11/09/infofinance.html)
---
Additional Resources from Shaan & Sam
- Shaan's Recommendations:
- [Shepherd](https://bit.ly/SupportShepherd) - Hiring service
- Sam's Resources:
- [Hampton](https://www.joinhampton.com/)
- [Ideation Bootcamp](https://www.ideationbootcamp.co/)
- [Copy That](https://copythat.com)
---
Conclusion
This episode of "My First Million" provides valuable insights into unique entrepreneurial journeys and innovative ideas that challenge conventional thinking about wealth creation. The blend of storytelling and current trends makes it a rich resource for aspiring entrepreneurs and curious listeners alike.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Alright Sean, there's a documentary that Ari and I were texting about. Did you see it? It was called Martha. It was on Netflix. It was about Martha Stewart. I haven't seen it. I actually don't know really anything about her. Great. This is so great. Because Martha Stewart was a beast. I feel like I can rule the world. I know I could be what I want to. I put my all in it like my days off. On the road, let's travel. I really couldn't tell you five things about Martha Stewart. So, like, was she kind of the first influencer? Like, a celebrity influencer who then started launching products? What's the story?
0:35Martha Stewart was a killer. She was a total shark. She was way sharkier. If you only know her as her put-together image of this housewife who cooks, everything I'm going to say is going to blow your mind because she was a total shark. So I'm going to give you a little bit of her background. So basically, she's born and raised up in the East Coast. She goes to Columbia University. While she's going to school, she becomes a model because she was a cute woman when she was young. Yeah. Yeah. Wow. She was fantastic. Yeah. Very pretty woman. Yeah, go Martha. She gets married at a young age, like 19 or 20 years old, but graduates Columbia and her father-in-law helps her get a job as a stockbroker.
1:17And by the way, she studied architectural history or something like that at Columbia. Nothing to do with stocks. And so at the age of like 24, 25, she gets this job. And you're probably wondering, how on earth did Martha Stewart become a stockbroker? Well, I am wondering. when her father-in-law first met her, he was like, you have this it factor. You are so charming. You are so put together because she had this vibe at a very young age in her 20s. She dressed fantastically. She was very charismatic. She was clearly driven and hardworking. And this small 10-person operation that was a stockbroking brokerage, they needed a saleswoman, a salesperson.
1:56And it was all men at the time. I think this was in the 60s. It was all dudes. It was a very male-dominated industry. But she comes into this interview and eventually works there. And they comment on how she's dressed perfectly. So perfectly that you're sort of intimidated when you first meet her because she's perfectly put together. But then she's really charming and warm. And you're like, Oh, I like you. And so she starts as a salesperson, basically, at the stock company, basically working with clients and getting them to trust them and things like that. And she kills it. And so listen to this.
2:30at the age of 26, according to this documentary, she said she was making$135 ,000 a year, which equivalent today is a million dollars a year at the age of 26 as a stockbroker. Pretty crazy that she went from being a model to a stockbroker in that short amount of time. And she kills it. And she does it for like six or seven years. It's like a legitimate career for her. And she suggests that one of her clients buy this stock that was like a dollar, and it went to like 10 bucks. So it killed it. Then they bought a little bit more and it goes something huge to$50. It was this massive stock and it made these clients all this money.
3:03But then the$50 stock goes right back down to$8 or$10. And so technically, her client had still made a bunch of money. But that roller coaster ride of making a little bit of money, then making a ton of money, then losing a ton of money, it left her distraught. And so she bailed because of that journey. And so she quit. And so when she's 30 years old or late 20s, she moves out to actually where I'm living now, Westport, Connecticut. She was like, I want to have a kid. I want to try this housewife life, whatever, and do this thing. And she moves out here. And she sits around for a very short amount of time.
3:36And she's like, all right, I got to do something. I can't just sit here. And so they buy this kind of shitty house. And she totally turns around and redoes the whole thing all by herself. She paints it. She builds this beautiful garden. She learns how to raise goats and chickens and plant her own garden and creates this amazing estate out in Westport, Connecticut, which now it's fancy. Back then, it wasn't particularly fancy. And so eventually, she gets really into this. And she's like, you know, I kind of like this housewife life. What if I start hosting some dinner parties? And she creates these lavish, amazing dinner parties.
4:09And eventually, all these rich guys who come are like, hey, do you want to cater my party? And so that's what she starts doing. And so she builds a business as a caterer that she said made her a millionaire.
4:23and her whole shtick back then for this catering business was she goes i'm gonna make everything by scratch and so westport connecticut we're about an hour and 10 minutes from new york city at this time people start realizing that she could actually operate on like three or four hours of sleep and so she would go to like catering the catering business by the way it's like that's like the hardest thing on earth right you know it's brutal it's a really hard business to pull off. And so she was famous for going to the farmer's markets in New York at 4am, getting all of her produce, and then going in the morning and baking all of her food.
4:53And so her famous saying as her catering business was basically, I make everything from scratch. And not only does she just make stuff from scratch, one time she saw this brochure that was doing a recreation of the pilgrim's Thanksgiving. And there was a basket of fruit that was overflowing. And she was like, that's what I'm going to do. And so she was famous for creating these charcuterie boards of overflowing meats and fruits. And she said something that was actually really inspiring. She was like, I wanted to turn this into experience. And I wanted to make this fruit board. She was like, it sounds trivial, but that was my art.
5:26And I was going to make these baskets of fruit overflow with strawberries to show that this table is where generosity and abundance and all this stuff. And it's a massive hit. She builds us into a big business to the point where a few years in, she goes and she caters a... I think it was Penguin Publishing. or something like that, like one of these publishers' parties, she caters it. And it's a really big deal. She's doing all these museum and art museums in New York. And this is a big deal that she's doing this catering company or this publishing company. And they start talking to her. And they're like, dude, you are amazing.
6:00Do you want to write a cookbook for us? And so she does. And it takes her a few years, like three or four years, because she's super hands-on on writing this book. And they were like, hey, so why don't you do this cookbook? Just put in a bunch of recipes and some black and white photos. And she was a nobody. And she goes, not a chance. We're doing colored photos. And we're actually going to do like 500 photos. And just give me the budget. I'll go ahead and I'm going to hire a photographer friend. And we're going to go and organize all these photos and take all these lavish photos at my house that I made.
6:32Because we're going to make this like the Martha Stewart cookbook, where at the time, typically it had just been recipes. She was like, no, we're going to add in about my lifestyle. We're going to have these photos one of the photos this is like her kitchen look how lavish that is like what do you see the most full kitchen i've ever seen there's literally 9 000 pots and pans hanging up above her and then she's surrounded she's like her kitchen looks like a charcuterie board it looks like an overflowing charcuterie board but she's one of she's like a piece of salami in the middle and that's like the whole her whole shtick uh basically she she says this she's like i'm gonna sell perfection because she was.
7:12She was a perfectionist. She was actually a pain in the ass to work for. And the first book was called Entertaining, and it was about entertaining guests, basically? Yeah, and creating an atmosphere of warmth and things like that. And it was a massive hit. It sold 650 ,000 copies. What do you think? I feel like Nick Gray is the new Martha Stewart. I'm just going to put that out there. What Nick Gray is doing with the two-hour cocktail party, I think he's just a young Martha Stewart right now. Yeah. Well, and she was like one of the early influencers because this was in the 80s. This is when like mass media is really becoming a thing.
7:50And it's a massive hit. And so like these women buy these books because it's not just about cooking. It's about like being better, being aspirational, like perfecting a craft. And she sold the shit out of this lifestyle and it was her lifestyle. And she basically said in the documentary, she was like, I had visions early on of creating this Martha Stewart Media Company all about me because I'm great. Like I am what she's like, she was very confident about that. Opening up the business plan, like, all right, Martha Stewart's media company. It's about me. Next page. Because I'm great. Next page.
8:26But she was, I mean, she was, so like there's a lot of bad stuff that has gone on. Like basically her husband cheats on her. She cheats on her husband. Her daughter's like, dude, she was a cold mom. People complain working for her. they're like, dude, she's just a fucking asshole. And she was. Throughout the documentary, they get her on camera being rude to her employees. And so yeah, she's like a perfectionist. And she was like, I'm not sorry for that. I'm a perfectionist. Wait, so fast forward through the business side. So she does the cookbook. Cookbook's a hit. Massive hit. And eventually, one thing leads to another where Kmart, which was just like Kmart today back then.
9:04It was like lower status store. she partners with them to create a line of betting. And people are shocked. They're like, why would this upscale woman do this? And it turned out to be a great move. It was really cool. And then she partners with Time and she creates a series of magazines. And she's the editor of the magazine. It goes really well. But she's like, I want to own this son of a bitch. And so she raises$85 million and she buys the magazine and three or four years later takes it public. and I show the financials of her business. I think it was called Martha Stewart Omnimedia. Basically, she buys the business and something like three years later takes it public.
9:46In year three, it's doing$130 million a year in 1997. $130 million in revenue. And it's a behemoth of a business. So basically, they've got the TV show. They have tons and tons of magazines. they have um uh merchandising like the kmart deal it just crushes it and it goes public and she becomes the first ever self-made women's uh billionaire in america and just annihilates it but then something really bad happens so basically she's worth like 400 500 600 million at this point uh because the stock was going up and down apparently she calls her stockbroker she's like hey, I want you to sell this one stock.
10:29So she sells this one stock and she made like 30 grand off of it. Turns out a lot of people think that it was insider trading. And so the DOJ interviews her and figures out this whole thing and does this massive investigation. Turns out the charges of insider trading are dropped. They're like, you did not insider trade. However... Sorry, she sold her own stock or she sold a different stock? Oh, sorry. Just a different stock. And only 30K. So why was it a big deal anyway? So it was a big deal because we're just, we're basically, there was like Enron and a bunch of things like this were happening at the time.
11:03And the DOJ was like, any insider trading, any like corruption, we're going to go, we're going like really hard against all of this. And so she like sells some stock. It's suspicious. Turns out that the CEO of the company whose stock she sold, he was in fact corrupt. And they're like, but you knew him. What was going on? You knew that this drug wasn't going to pass. You sold the stock, whatever. The DOJ investigates her and they're like, you actually, that looks clean. It looks like you didn't know anything. However, when we interviewed you, you told us some small fact about how you were on a schedule to sell this stock.
11:36Turns out you weren't on a schedule. And so you lied to us. And so we were going to put you in federal penitentiary for five months for lying. Not for insider trading, but for lying about this somewhat not that big of a deal fact. And so kind of bullshit, kind of not like she did lie, but like she got five months in the federal penitentiary and she's like 50 years old. And at the time when all this trial shit happens, that's when we realized that Martha Stewart, she's, she's kind of bad. She's, she's, she's, she's bad because there's all these stories where the, it comes out, she's a little rude.
12:11So for example, her stockbroker has this assistant who would talk to Martha mostly. And there's examples of the stockbroker's assistant being like, Dude, she was the meanest person ever. For example, one time she called and I had to put her on hold. And I go back to talk to her. She goes, Hey, if you don't change that waiting music, that tacky waiting music, by the next time I call, I'm going to have you fired. And just hung up. There's repeatedly a bunch of stories where she was not very kind to people. and that kind of swayed public opinion of her. She goes to jail for five months, and it sucked.
12:47It sucked for her. It was not good. She gets out of jail, and she ends up doing Justin Bieber's roast, which, again, changed public perception of her because at this point, everyone was like, man, it's kind of fun seeing Martha Stewart kind of downfall because she was a perfect woman. Like, F her. It's kind of nice. It brings me up to see this person go down. Yeah, I knew she wasn't so perfect. Yeah. but she roasts Justin Bieber and she's just like hilarious she talks about how she like uh shanked bitches in prison and how she like made this shank with just like a piece of uh pencil and some bubble gum and you could do one too at home I'll show you how like it like kind of humanized her it was pretty cool but her getting arrested it decimated the stock so she was like on the documentary she was like I think I would have been worth 10 billion dollars but when I got arrested.
13:36My stock went way down. They ended up selling the company for like$300 million. And it was kind of like the... It could have been a great company, but it kind of wasn't. However, throughout this whole thing, this whole documentary, Martha has shown time and time again, she's a bad, bad woman. In all sense of the word. As in, she's brutal. She's smart. She's conniving. Her stock is only going up in your books. That's all I'm hearing. All I'm hearing is that let's just summarize. Good looking lady already off to a good start. Then, goes from model to sales slash stockbroker. All right. Amazing. One interesting thing.
14:19That's cool. Two interesting things. You have my attention. Third interesting thing. Self-made first kind of major trad wife influencer. Does the cookbooks. Does it her way. Is ruthless with the details. has a no-nonsense attitude. She's a stickler. These are all... I mean, these are your safe words, dude. These are all the things that you enjoy. So this is really up your alley. I mean, how do you feel about Martha Stewart right now? Because it sounds like even when she's bad, it just made her more good in your books. Sort of. I mean, she paid the price. So basically, her husband left her, her kids.
14:56She's got a bad relationship with her children because of the way she behaved. And she basically... She's 83 now, by the way. I didn't realize how old she was. And she hasn't had a relationship since her husband and her broke up. So she paid the price. There's a cost to be the boss. And she paid it. But she is, in fact, the boss. So I do have a lot of respect for her. And I also think that there's downsides to achieve what she achieved. But I'm shocked you didn't know that. Did you know any of this? Like how she's like, not really. I knew she had like a cookbook or was on TV. And that she sold like stuff to women.
15:31That's kind of the extent of what I knew about Martha Stewart. Dude, she's great. And so another big takeaway, and I'll wrap up here, is how big of a company you could start and have just off the back of one person. It was the Martha Stewart brand. And she was into that. A lot of people would be fearful of having that burden, having that on your back of literally 1 ,000-plus employees and billions of dollars of value. And she was totally into it. And she loved it. And I love those types of personalities. Right. But it sounds like this company wasn't that good. And your numbers table here, you know, by 2001, it says total revenue, 295 million, net income, 21 million, which is obviously that's good.
16:18That's not nothing, but that's not a$10 billion company to make, you know, 21 million a year of net income. And then it says from 2003 to 2015, which is like three presidents, it says consecutive annual losses every year, except for one year. So was this really a good business or was this actually just a lot of work for nothing? No, it was good. I mean, you have to think of a few things. One, it was making$300 million a year in revenue and a lot of it came from publishing and publishing means subscription magazines. So that's pretty good. But then the internet came and just completely obliterated that industry.
16:53I mean, magazines are probably the worst industry to be in. So yeah, there's a lot of what ifs. and the timing was such that she got arrested and also Amazon was created and the internet was created. So yeah, there's a lot of what-ifs. I feel like if she was... I think she was 30 years too early. I think if she had the internet, she could have become a juggernaut because it sounds like her talent and her ruthlessness, that combination was going to serve her well. And she needed a better medium. if she could have just owned her own Instagram and TikTok channels and built everything off the back of that I mean she I think she would have been the number one sort of like women's or mom influencer she arguably was that anyways of her era but the market 100x yeah yeah I mean and like I think a lot of these like big celebrities I think it was a little bit easier to be a big celebrity uh in the 80s 90s and early 2000s because there was less of them now anyone with the cell phone can become a celebrity in like six or 12 months.
18:00So it's hard to say. But by the way, her businesses still do like a billion a year in sales. Okay. Gotcha. You have something in your notes here. Typical day of 60 year old Martha Stewart. Yeah, read that. It says, she's 60 but she looks a decade younger. She's been up since 4.30am. She answers her email at 5, takes a three mile walk with her trainer at 6. She tours her garden at 7. When she tours her garden, she's thrilled to discover a duck and 13 ducklings in the swimming pool. By 7.30, she's whipping up corn gruel for a visiting waterfowl. I don't even know what any of these words are. Like an animal.
18:34An animal. And building a wooden ramp to help them get in and out of the pool. A duck. Okay. She's doing all this stuff for a duck. Her TV crew arrives at 8, hair and makeup at 8.30, and then she's shooting her TV segment by 9 a.m. Yeah, dude. Same. She's crazy. Dude, I literally woke up like 19 minutes ago, and I rolled out of bed, and I put on this hat, and then I started Eclipse play. I don't think I'm built for this. She's a machine. You know how people say stories of how Trump can only operate on three hours of sleep? That's a real thing, by the way. I forget what the name of it. It's a thing.
19:05She's another person. She's famous for only sleeping three hours a night.
19:12Perfect segue. Can I tell you what my best topic was that I wanted to talk to you about? Yeah. Ozempic for sleep. So there's a guy, his blog is Isaac.net. and he wrote this post about sleeplessness. And he basically says that there's a set of people that are famous who have the short sleeper genes, a set of genes for where, you know, about four to five hours a night is a full night's rest for them. And he says that, you know, Mozart, Thomas Edison, Sigmund Freud, Margaret Thatcher, Obama, and he's like, even my lab mate, this guy's a researcher, he's like, have this thing called short sleeper syndrome.
19:49And people thought that short sleeper syndrome would be you sleep less and maybe you're able to operate that way, but it's got to be bad for you. Sleep, we know, is sort of the best thing for you. It restores the brain and the body and all your function. And so these people must be dying younger and have more disease, right? And it's like, no, actually they don't. These people just simply have the benefit without the cost. They sleep, you know, they need about three hours less sleep than the rest of us, but they don't pay the price in terms of the health consequences of that. And so he goes on this post and he basically outlines that.
20:26Who are these people, by the way, in this photo? So he says, my favorite family is this family called the Johnsons from Utah. And the Johnsons from Utah are a set of researchers. And I think a bunch of them have this short sleeper genetic makeup. And so they've been researching this for a while. And it's about 1 % of people have this thing where you don't need as much sleep and it does not seem detrimental to your health or your productivity. And they've studied why is this? What is it? Is it one gene? Is it not? And they've basically, like, there's four kind of, like, protein changes that they've noticed, you know, variations in the glutamate receptor, GRM1, blah, blah, blah.
21:09So there's these four things. And then they've done some tests in mice and others where they do, like, knockouts. So they'll knock out one of the genes and then they'll see if it, you know, makes the mouse sleep less or sleep more. Can you do that to, like when you say knockout, does that mean like you're a living being or when they reproduce? A living being. That's how the body works? You could just like... Actually, I said that with so much confidence for somebody who has no idea, but I think that you could do that. I'm a bio major. You could check that. That's a fact, Jack. But I don't know if you could do, I don't know if this is done at the embryo or in the living thing.
21:45But the point is, they've tested this in mouse models. Mouse models don't always apply to human models, so there's some question there. But the researcher sort of points out, actually, usually when mouse model, when things that work in mice don't work in humans, it's because they tried it and it worked for the first time in mice. And then it takes a long time to even try it in humans and maybe it won't work. He's like, in this case, we're observing it actually in humans and then we went back to mice and tried to recreate those genetic mutations or those genetic changes. And so this is really exciting.
22:18So what he's talking about is like, in the same way that we found drugs like Ozempic, which could modify your appetite. It could change your need for food in a way that had all these downstream health benefits, right? You change your need for food, you reduce your need for food. Now you eat less, obesity goes down. They've seen that it helps with things like addiction to alcohol. There's like all these other things that people are noticing with these. That's the Ozempic case. This guy's saying you could do the same with sleep. And is this guy Isaac, is he the researcher or is he just blogging on this?
22:52He's a researcher who is blogging about this. Wow, got it. And he's basically saying that potentially we could create something that does the same thing that how Ozempic reduced your need for food, that we could reduce your need for sleep and make you mirror these people who have this already, where they don't suffer the consequences of less sleep. And he's like, you do the math and you're like, if you're saving three or four hours a night of sleep, you basically, it's like the world's best longevity trade. So what most people try to do with longevity is like, oh, if I'm living till 80, can I live till 90?
23:24If I'm living 90, can I live till 100, 100, 110? And they're trying to push off that last marginal decade of poor health where you can't walk as much, you can't see as well, you're in pain, all that stuff. You're trying to push that back as far as you can. This would make it so that you actually just live better. Like the days where you're healthy, you have more days. You're awake for more of the time. And it's the equivalent of an extra 10 years. But you get the 10 years not at the end. You get it sort of all along the way while you're in your best health of your life. And that would be the promise of this.
Read the full transcript
23:56And so how exciting is that? I feel like it's possible that somebody is going to make an ozempic for sleep. And it's going to allow us to, instead of needing eight hours, I can sleep for five and feel just as good as I would on eight. He says, this is like adding 10 more years to your life. An 80-year lifespan, eight hours a day of sleep, compared to 80 years with four hours of sleep. That's 10 years. This is amazing. And on top of that, by the way, there's people who suffer from insomnia and narcolepsy. There's all these actual sleep apnea. There's all these things that affect people's sleep.
24:30Maybe you could alleviate those along the way. If there's thousands of Americans who have those problems, could you also improve those? Okay. First of all, this is amazing. This is a great find. I'm reading his blog. His writing's really great. It doesn't write... That's why I was shocked that he's a researcher because he's... I think there's a quote where he goes, this is crazy. They don't normally say things like that. Yeah. They don't have personalities usually. This has profound implications. By the way, he's 22 years old. He's a PhD student at MIT. exploring brain simulations as an alternative path to beneficial AI.
25:06And in the past, he skipped out of high school in rural Austria to graduate early. In his gap year, he created a$1 million nonprofit and ran the most viral tech conference of the year that had Sam Altman and others come. He's a self-taught Mandarin last year and did his undergrad at Berkeley in two years. Guy's a winner. Doing well. And he owns Isaac.net. great domain name Isaac with a K this guy is great man well what I was going to say was is this I've never I've heard of you know that Gene a little bit that you're discussing but it's just funny that there's just some kid with a 22 year old with a personal blog and this is the first time that I've ever heard about this is this that's what I'm saying it's fascinating but if he if he's just talking about his blog is this like something that actually has, like why is there not more press or press releases on this topic?
26:10Is it actually legitimate? There is now. We just broke it, dude. This was the tipping point. You're going to see other people working on this. You're going to see people talking about this. There's going to be misinformation everywhere. It's going to be great. This story is awesome. Just because I like Isaac and also I would like to not sleep. Would you rather be skinny like Ozempic and eat less or be chubbier or whatever you... No, dude, if I could sleep only five hours instead of eight, I don't give a shit. I would be the fattest man on earth and do that. No, I'm just joking. But that is a way better superpower to need less sleep, to get back three hours of time every day.
26:48That's debatable. I think that people will always prefer to be skinny over less sleep. People are dumb. That's so dumb. If they prefer to be skinny over having extra three hours of life every day, If the average 25-year-old, if you're like, look hot or live to 90 versus 80, they're going to choose hot over sleep any day of the week. Well, this is why we don't ask 25-year-olds questions. The brain is not fully formed yet. This is a great find. His blog, according to SimilarWeb, just shot up to 125 ,000 visitors in October. What did he, like before it was nothing? He published this in November. So that's kind of cool.
27:26So Ben found this and he sent it to our friend. So our friend invested in a company that made a GLP-1 drug and sold for billions of dollars. And so he sent this to him because he's like, oh, you did that early Ozempic thing before Ozempic was a known thing. Seven years before, he invested in this company that was going to work on that. And it paid off in a big way. So he sent it to him. And that guy was like, I don't know how you found this. This is the best thing I've read all year. I'm so excited about what you just sent me. and it was such a great example of Ben being Ben where Ben has on one side a really curated feed where he'll find interesting things like this.
28:05He doesn't follow many people, but he'll be following a guy like this Isaac guy. And then he knows who to route the information to and he's like FedEx. He doesn't touch the package. When I get this, I immediately start doing research. I write notes. I go talk about it. I'm not passing it to somebody smarter. Ben's like he's like a FedEx guy. The package comes off the conveyor belt, he grabs the box, tosses in the truck, drives it to the address, drops it off, and doesn't ask any questions about what's inside. He just knows that's useful for you. I think this is useful for you. And he just does that all day.
28:39I had him add me to all these group chats. He was always texting people, but I said, yo, just add me. I just want to be a part of these. So now I'm in probably 60 group chats where it's me, Ben, and a mutual acquaintance or friend. And he's just doing this all day. He's just routing packets to different people about, I think you're into this kind of thing. That's ridiculous. How is he going to monetize it? Can he ever monetize this? Yeah. Dude, we monetize this phenomenally. This is the secret of Ben. He just tries to be useful. And then he'll be like, hey, yeah, remember that guy you met a year ago who you then didn't talk to ever again?
29:15I'm like, yeah, I think so. I think I remember that guy. He was cool. He's like, yeah, so I've been texting him. We text daily. And he's got this new thing and it's taking off and he wants us to invest. He's not letting anyone else in. And then we invest in it. It's incredible how this karma just comes back tenfold for Ben. And he never asks for anything. He never asks. It's amazing. He texts me a fair bit, just like, solve this thing. You might like it. So I'm the recipient of some of these things. And I hate texting. I hate being at my computer and constantly having to go back and forth with 10 different people, which is how a lot of people's computers look right now where you're like, it's between Slack and messages.
29:55You're just like going back and forth with 15 or 20 people at all times. And you're like, what did I do all day today? I just like, I just shit chatted. And so I don't like doing it. Do you fall into that trap like throughout the day where you're like, dude, I just like texted people all day. Yeah, I like Slack because I like my projects that I'm working on, but I don't text much. I'm a very bad texter. And if anyone's out there who's texting me, I really apologize. I probably have not texted you back. So I'm prolifically bad at it. Ben is prolifically great at it. And that combination has really helped.
30:29The combination has really helped. And now people, they just bypass me altogether. They go to him. And it hurts my feelings sometimes. I'm like, wait, I thought I was friends with this person. But now I understand why. Because he's just a better person. He's a better texter. In fact, he was like, I need to make a shirt called I Reply. He goes, because that's my thing, dude. I Reply. And he's like, it's pretty easy. and I was like you should write like the modern day how to win friends and influence people because that's what he does he wins friends and influences people with the most basic the most basic of things and I was like you couldn't sell a like the thing you do creates like tons of value like tens of millions of dollars in value for us you couldn't even teach people this because you would say what you do out loud and they'd be like that was it I showed up for the seminar for that that's basic it's basic as hell and but that's what he does and it works That's insane.
31:19I think it's funny. By the way, Google Isaac Freeman. Very good-looking, young, stylish black dude. This guy's got it all. This guy's got it all. If he just becomes an astronaut, he's basically the modern-day James Bond. Oh, man. He's got cool glasses and a jawline? Fuck. Yeah. Game over. You said you had a bunch of exciting things. By the way, you know, we don't judge a book by its cover. So like, you know, looks, looks do matter. Let's be clear. We try not to judge people by their looks first. But once we take a look at what you do, we then go take a look at how you look. And it either is like a plus 100 or it's a minus 100.
32:03It's a huge multiplier on my opinion of you and how much I'm going to remember you afterwards. I will never forget this guy. Yeah, like if he were dorky looking, I'd be like, yeah, makes sense. Checks out. And then I see what he looks like and I'm like, aw. Huh?
32:22It's tough to be like looking at. By the way, most people when they have an avatar as their Twitter profile, it's because they're goofy looking and the avatar is better looking than that. He's making me question everything. There's a reason I have a cartoon profile picture. Look at me. If you're on YouTube, look at me. This is why I have a cartoon profile picture. That's the rule. It's like when someone quotes you revenue, they would have said profit if they had it. Right? If somebody talks about users, they would have quoted revenue if they had it. Normally, if somebody's got the looks, they're going to put their face as the profile picture.
32:55This guy defies all convention. I asked someone what the revenue was recently, and they were like, eight figures if you include the.00. And I was like, that's pretty funny. That was pretty good.
33:14hey this episode is brought to you by mercury they're the fintech of choice for over 200 000 companies i myself use it for eight different companies the reason why we all choose it is because it does everything you need under one roof so like my e-commerce company it's super important for us to be able to easily wire transfer pay all our different vendors and suppliers all around the world and the old way with our you know more traditional bank that shall now be named. I try it online. It would say no. It would freeze my account. Then I'd have to go in, book an appointment, speak to a specialist who would try to upsell me on something I didn't need.
33:45And then finally, after 30 minutes there, then they charge me 50 bucks for the pleasure of that terrible interaction. And now with Mercury, I just go online, push two buttons, and I'm done. It's such a seamless experience. It's very intuitive. Everything's under one place. They basically took all the things any company would need for their financial tech, and they made it super easy to use and put it into one platform. So highly, highly recommend it. If you're not using Mercury, I question your judgment. So that's it. You've heard it on My First Million. For more information, check out mercury.com.
34:12Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank. Check show notes for details.
34:19You want to do another thing? Yeah. All right. I got some cool stuff. Oh, you got to do this polymarket whale. Okay. Yeah. All right. So this is the Billy of the Week. Cue the music.
34:34A million dollars isn't cool. You know what's cool? A billion dollars. So you've heard the story, I think, but can I just explain a little bit of the detail here? Amazing. I read about it a little bit. Do we even know who this person is? Yeah. So the election was happening, what, 10 days ago or so. And the big news was sort of, I guess like there's a battle going on. There's Republicans versus Democrats. Great. There's Trump and Kamala, great. They were supposed to be a dead, but there was an undercard to the pay-per-view. And so who was the undercard? Okay, if Trump and Kamala are the main event, then I think the undercard, a lot of it was like mainstream media versus social media, right?
35:12You had like Twitter and blogs versus MSNBC and whatever. And they were giving you different narratives, right? And so Trump and Vance go on Joe Rogan. Kamala goes on Saturday Night Live and The View or 60 Minutes or these traditional media. So that was one battle that was going on. By the way, who would have thought you've seen Theo Vaughn being like a needle mover? Insane, right? I was saying this the other day. I think that going on Theo Vaughn needs to be part of the national standard for an election. I need to know if my president's going to be a good hang or not. And I think Theo is the one who could save us there.
35:50Yeah, that was insane. So under that, then you have the billionaire backers. You got Elon on one side, you got more Cuban on the other. And it's like, they're going around, they're promoting, they're using their money and their voice to do it. What was the other battles? One of the other battles was polls versus crypto prediction markets. So the polls were telling a story at the time, pre-election, the polls were saying, razor thin margin, toss up, these swing states too close to call, it's a 50-50 election right now. Like, we don't, it is too hard to tell who's going to win. And the prediction markets, which were people betting money, were saying something different.
36:26They were saying 65-35, Trump going to win. And they're different things, right? A poll is, you know, you go out and you ask people, who are you going to vote for? A prediction market is who's going to get the most votes. So they do tell different things, but the reality is still the same, which is that if the polls were accurate, that it was a 50-50 toss-up, it's going to be a razor thin margin, then the betting market shouldn't have such a big sprint. There shouldn't be a big favorite versus a big underdog. And what was the poly market spread? I think it was like 75, 25? No, a little less. It was about 63 Trump, but then it got to 65.
37:02And then as the election started, when the news was saying, you know, it's still too early, the odds were just jetting in Trump's direction. They knew earlier than the exit polls or the news was willing to report about how much of a landslide this was going to be for Trump, which it was. Okay, so before it happened, there was a question of like, is the prediction market actually predictive? And there was some legitimate skepticism. So the pro side was... The betting market versus the poll market. The betting, well, it's just like, even just alone. Should we care what polymarket says? And on one hand...
37:37Polymarket being the platform where you could take these bets. Exactly. And so you, the plus side would be to say, well, these are people betting their own money. So skin in the game. And so if you see a lot more action coming in on one side, that means the sort of the wisdom of the crowds and the actual free market believes the odds are this. And that might be better than just the polls where people say, they're just saying what they're going to vote for and it's a small sample, but who knows? Maybe they're lying. Maybe it's just too small of a sample to know. Maybe it's not indicative of, there's no skin in the game there.
38:09So on one hand, you said skin in the game. On the other hand, you would say poly market, never heard of it, banned in the US. So all the betting action was from international. So over$3 billion was bet on the election. None of this was Americans because you can't use Polymarket in America. Then it's also crypto holders, right? Because Polymarket is a crypto betting thing. So you're like, oh, maybe there's a bias. Crypto holders are more libertarian. Maybe they're going to go more right-leaning. And so it's what they want. And Trump's pro-crypto. So it's like maybe they're voting on what they wish for and not what it actually is.
38:43Okay, so there was some question marks. Then there was one more. then the news came out and said, you know, we can't trust Polymarket because it's manipulated. Manipulated how? Well, it's manipulated because a couple of whales are betting heavily on Trump and that's swinging the odds. So it's actually, this is not what the crowds think. It's really a couple of whales that are influencing this. And they saw that. And you can see on Polymarket the size, like, can I see like, oh, someone just put this million dollar bet in? I can go on Polymarket right now and look at the top 10 bettors and what they are bet on, how much volume they've bet this year.
39:17and how much their P &L is. Are they up or down? So Theo4, I think, is the biggest one on the platform, and he has made a profit of$22 million this year. Exactly. So that's one user. But you can go user by user, and you can see, oh, this guy's just betting on everything, or this guy's one huge bet, or whatever, right? So you can go look at anybody, any better's P &L on Polymarket. So what they found was they were like, hey, there's a couple of bets here that were in the tens of millions on Trump. and actually it all came from the same guy. And what they were thinking was that there's four big accounts that bet 28 million.
39:52And actually it turns out now after the fact, the guy came out and said it, he had 11 accounts and he bet 40 something million and he, 40 or 50 million and he had made about$80 million of profit actually. Sorry, I don't know the exact bed amounts, but I know he made$80 million of profit in the end. A French guy, I think. A French guy. So they were like, who is this French whale? And the story behind it's pretty interesting because this guy was a trader. He's taken finance. He lived in the US at one point. But basically, he's like, I'm trying to remain anonymous. By the way, how on earth would a journalist find this person?
40:29That seems really hard. That's a great scoop. So on Polymarket, you can see the bets. So you can go see, wow, this is a huge bet. Then you go look at the account. You try to figure out whose wallet is this. And because crypto is, there's a public ledger, you can actually trace back and try to find it. And there's a company called Chainalysis. Do you know Chainalysis? I've heard of it just like as a headline. They're basically, the government goes to Chainalysis and says, we need to know who owns this wallet. And they can go and do the forensic analysis of every transaction that wallet's done and tries to figure out the root wallet and who owns that wallet.
41:00And so that's, and this is like a$10 billion company, Chainalysis. We have to do a breakdown of this company. This sounds fun. Yeah, they're a fascinating company. And so they came out and they did this analysis and there's like this web of the accounts and like, so take a look at this. This is like all the best stuff. Like crime and crypto stories are the best stories. And so like working at this company would be super exciting. Oh, I know, but you know what I mean. Totally. So they come out and they say, all right, well, dude, how did you know? Why did you make such a massive bet on Trump? And this is where the story gets really interesting.
41:32He says, he's like, I didn't trust the polls, but I trust polling. What do you mean? He goes, I commissioned my own polls. There's a French guy who commissioned polls in America. to inform his own bet. And what he did was he paid a polling company and he said, I want you to go and I want you to ask them, but don't ask them who they vote, who they're going to vote for. Because that's what polls often ask. What do traditional polls ask? Are you likely to vote? If you're going to vote, who are you likely to vote for? Are you certain of that? You know, whatever. Is there anything that's going to change your mind?
42:03Well, and I think they also ask, who do you, I think they ask it in a weird way as well. I think they also ask, who do you think your friend is going to vote for? That's what this guy did. Oh, got it. So what this guy did was called the neighbor method. And what he says is he says, don't ask them who they're going to vote for. I don't want to, people are indirect, people don't want to reveal their own preferences. But if you ask them a specific question, which is who do you expect your neighbor to vote for? They will indirectly reveal their own preferences and what they believe is going to happen.
42:34And he believed that the neighbor method is a more predictive method. And when he did this, he commissioned this poll, he paid a major US pollster to go do these polls for him. just like the DNC and the RNC, they'll pay pollsters to go run their independent polls that they're not reporting to the public. And he wanted them to measure this neighbor effect. And what he found was that the results were, quote, mind-blowing to the favor of Trump. It showed a Trump landslide. And so he thought, now this is mispriced. The media is telling you that this is 50-50 razor thin, but actually my polling is showing that actually this is going to be a major landslide for Trump.
43:14It's overwhelmingly in favor of Trump. So now the bet is mispriced. So he places this huge bet on Trump. And it turns out he's correct. And his final quote was, public opinion would have been better prepared if the latest polls had measured using the neighbor effect. And he specifically didn't just bet on the overall victory. He bet on specific swing states where he thought people think this state is closer than it's actually going to be. It's going to be more in favor of Trump using this neighbor method, which is just insane. And now, of course, the French government is trying to ban the Polly market.
43:44This guy nailed it. Two words. Bonjour, my friend. Fucking A. First of all, what I respect about this is... Everything? I don't respect everything about it. I don't love gambling like this, but people who have conviction on something, like they do their own analysis and they're like, no, this is the answer. Even though all the quote smart people or everyone's, the establishment is saying this, but I did my own research and then he did the big part, which is he bet$30 million or whatever of his own money. I think that is like, those types of people fascinate me because that takes so much conviction.
44:27Yeah, exactly. This is, I mean, the guts that it, the brains and the guts, right? And that's kind of, I think, the theme of the year is like, you see someone like Elon who basically swings the election, who catches a rocket with some chopsticks, is working on self-driving cars, helped co-found OpenAI, which is changing the world. The guy's just firing on all cylinders. And it's like, why? What is different about this guy? And it's the combination of the brain and the balls. There are other people as smart as Elon Musk. There are other people who have the risk-taking guts as Elon Musk. but the combination is rare.
45:08And then you add on top of that, the willingness to, you know, absolutely work to the bone as well, right? And then you add on top of that. Like sacrifice your own life. Yeah, so he's, you know, top 0.1 % in like five things. And then it's like, oh, if you just multiply 0.1 % times, you know, five times over and over again, you end up with like one in 10 billion, which is like, oh, that's actually the ratio. We do have one Elon out of the entire human population. Dude, I thought it was impressive. I was like, Justin Timberlake, you can sing, dance, and act, and you're funny?
45:44You know what I mean? It's super bad. Eli just really stepped it up. That's a great call. Is Polymarket going to sustain after this? Of course not, right? Okay, so I've been a big Polymarket fan. I was using Polymarket before they banned it way back in the day. You're also a little bit of a degen. Yeah, but I think a lot of people are. How much money have you... First, by the way, you called this gambling. I don't believe that this is gambling. I mean, just by definition. Well, for example, you own stock. Do you believe that you're gambling when you buy a stock? I guess... What are you doing when you buy a stock?
46:27Yeah, you are. I guess you'd have to say that it's not as binary, but there's levels. or like it's a scale. So, but yeah, you are. Just like if you buy car shirts. Like you and I, it exists on a spectrum. Yes. So like, you know, with a stock, the old-fashioned way of looking at it is I'm not dabbling. I'm buying a piece of ownership in a company that produces goods and for account. It's like, yeah, all right, cool. Nobody really in practice treats it like that. Meaning you're not sitting there like, you're not sitting there waiting for dividends. You're not trying to own this piece of this company because you think it's going to exit at a later date when it's a public stock already.
47:11You're basically saying, I believe that the future earnings of this company are going to be X, and that's why owning this is good because the share price is going to go up because their earnings are going to go up and they're maybe going to go up at a faster rate than the current price of the stock indicates. That's what you're supposed to buy. You're supposed to buy a stock that you think is going to, appreciate over time. I think that polymarket has the ability to do that in a bunch of interesting ways. So first, there are the other speculation slash betting gambling type of use cases. So speculating on prices of things, speculating on sports outcomes of games, right?
47:53Like sports betting is obviously a huge deal. So there's those use cases. There is an interesting thing. So So I'm guessing you didn't read Vitalik's blog recently about this? That's an accurate guess. Vitalik, who's the creator of Ethereum, wrote a great blog post. Vitalik's one of my favorite entrepreneurs and thinkers on the planet. So the blog post is called, I guess, From Prediction Markets Into Finance? Info Finance. So he's like, you know, I have written a lot and I've supported Polymarket. And many of you who know me might be surprised by this because Vitalik is sort of notoriously like not into the like crypto casino side of life.
48:34Like he's not price based. He's not trying to get rich as like his primary motivation. It's kind of like a prude. He's a purist. And so like, it'd be like, why do you care so much about these like prediction markets as people gambling? Who cares? And he's like, because I don't see it as that. I actually think that there's another category here that's overlooked and it's called info finance, information finance. And he gives some examples. So he's like, polymarket was two things at once. He goes, on one hand, it's a betting site for the few people that want to bet and gamble. But for the rest of us, we could look at how the gamblers are betting.
49:07And that would, for them, it served as a news site. It was like, oh, wow, Trump is doing better. Trump is improving. In the same way that the polls are supposed to be part of the news, the prediction markets were actually better news information. So it was information finance. He's like, that's the first level, which was, even if you're not participating in the betting, trying to make a buck, it is very useful that other people are doing that because it's another source of information. He's like, it should not be the only source of information, but it should be another one. He talks about the elections in Venezuela, how basically he was watching how people were protesting, how it was getting manipulated and blah, blah, blah, how Polymarker was actually a very useful source of information for him in understanding what was going on in Venezuela from an informational point of view.
49:50All right, so that was one. Then he's like, okay, what's the other use case? He's like, so imagine a company. So like, you know, I don't know if you saw like Chipotle or Starbucks. Like Starbucks just hired the Chipotle CEO. Did you see that? Yeah. And he's, the headline is that he's working from home, even though he's making everyone else go back to work, right? Yeah. And he's like private jetting in and out. But like this guy's kind of famous for like, he trims the menu, he cuts costs and he like, he basically improves margins. That's what this guy's known for. And so the amazing thing is that guy, he's that, he's that guy.
50:23And so he's him when it comes to public markets. Because when he switched teams, they paid him a bunch of money. And I was like, wow, what a huge stock package for CEOs, like$100 million or whatever the number was. But the stock jumped like$20 billion or something. I'm making up numbers here because I didn't plan to talk about this. But the stock jumped in a disproportionate way based on just the news that this guy was coming over. And so it was a great trade for them to overpay this guy, this talent, because it immediately improved the overall value of the company, just the news of him joining.
50:56And so Vitalik actually was like, just like today we're looking at these as prediction markets, you could actually use this as a decision market, meaning a company or a group of people could basically, in the way that that guy, Theo, paid for a private poll to get information, you could actually set up a prediction market, a decision market and say, should we hire this CEO? Or what will the... Not should we. What will the share price be in six months if we hire Brian Nichols? And if the share price expectation is really high, it tells you in advance without having to hire him yet, what the market reaction is going to be to making this decision.
51:37Does that make sense? And so you can actually create decision markets and it would be worth basically paying participants to go pick a side and make a bet in order to gather information that will help you make a better decision about what you're going to do. And so he's like, you can actually improve judgment if you were to make this decision. And so I thought that was pretty interesting. And he talks about, he goes through how InfoFinance might affect all these other things. So for example, scientific peer review. So right now in science, you submit a paper and there's something called the replication crisis, which is that famous results that end up going to books and in the news or whatever.
52:19Then they can't be reproduced. that study can't be reproduced. It's like, is it even, like the definition of good science is that it's a reproducible experiment. But that's not happening. And in fact, there's not really a big incentive to go reproduce these because the incentive is come out with a new finding, you get published, you get the glory, you get the funding for your lab. Spending your resources to reproduce somebody else's science, somebody else's big news, it's not really a good use of time. And he talks about how prediction markets could actually create incentives for people to go and try to reproduce these studies.
52:52Because you could have people betting on if this is reproducible or not. And so you'd be able to profit off of knowing that this is going to be reproduced or not. So it's pretty interesting to see how that might be applied in all these other ways. I haven't read this other than what you just told me and skimming it here. First of all, this is like an amazing blog post. I need to go read this. Second, if you go to his blog, if you go to like his other posts, he publishes like an in-depth post like every three days. How amazing is this? That we have access to a genius like this who just shares his thoughts.
53:25And by the way, if you read just the headlines and then click the articles, they are not just half-assed blog. These are in-depth things that he's publishing a shit ton. How special of an era do we have where we can go and just read his thoughts? That you get access to this, yeah. And the beautiful thing about his stuff, which is, I think, hard to... Because I was thinking about this with podcasts. it's amazing now that there's podcasts with you know like when we started this I felt like there was a slight differentiator in the business podcast space because we were not just journalists nor were we like never has been we had like done it we had started many companies or we're in the process and we sold companies we had done real things and so that was kind of like a interesting oh what if you actually had a podcast from from entrepreneurs who are actually like more successful than the average podcast I think you're looking for the term for us, by us.
54:19We foobooed it. Yeah. But now you have all in. You have, now you get to see billionaires, you know, doing this. Reid Hoffman has a podcast. You know, Zuck is going on podcasts. Like, who doesn't have a podcast at this point, right? And I think that's really cool. And the same thing is happening in sports. Athlete, current athletes, past athletes now have sports podcasts. Whereas before, the only sports podcast you get was like, you know, hardcore fan in his mom's basement. ranting about his team or a journalist. And now you have this third thing. And the third thing is somebody who's actually been there and done that, who gives their perspective.
54:55Not to say it's always better, but it's interesting that that's now accessible to us. But the problem with something like, let's say, All In or other podcasts like that, is you have to always parse the agenda. So it's like, wow, this guy's really bearish on nuclear and really pro-solar. Then you go look into Shema's profile and it's like, oh, wow, he's made enormous bets on solar. and he's talking his book in a way. And it's okay. It's okay to talk your book, but you have to constantly do that underwriting yourself as a listener to be like, what's the bias here? The beautiful thing about Vitalik is that the guy is such an uber nerd that you can actually take him at face value.
55:34And it's so nice to have somebody you could take at face value. And other people might disagree. I don't care. I take him at face value and I followed this guy for eight years straight now. And this guy's done nothing to make me think he's just trying to pump his bags. In fact, he actively does things against his bags. Not pumping Ethereum or talking about where it lacks or what's slow about it and under-promising what it's going to be. And I think that that's great that we have access to this guy who is not trying to take something from us in the process. That's a very good speech on this guy.
56:07I don't even think you could subscribe to his blog. There's not even an email form. Dude, his blog... So he publishes on... All right, so listen. October 29th, October 26th, October 23rd, October 20th. He's been writing these posts a lot. And those posts that I just said, I just put them into a word counter. One of them was 6 ,000 words. Now, I don't know how Bitcoin works. The dramatic look you just gave me when you said that. I was supposed to audibly gasp. dude that's so much work I've written a lot of blog posts a 6 ,000 word blog post would take me 40 hours probably right it's so much work when you are this guy and you create Ethereum is it one of the things where like you've created it and you can now walk away or is it like a house and you gotta like maintain it no he's actively working on it I mean it's bigger than just him obviously, but yeah, he's actively dedicated his life to this.
57:14You got to re-roof it every once in a while. I don't know how these things work. Like Ethereum, I don't know. Ethereum was like a 10-year roadmap. And so he's just, it's not even re-roofing it. It's like building a hotel one floor at a time and people are staying in the hotel. But you told them from the beginning, this is a 50-story hotel and I haven't even built all those other things that we're going to need in order for this to work. There's no elevators yet. I know. we're going to make elevators. For now, we take stairs. That's like the transaction fees and all that. The reason I'm asking is how on earth is he writing this much stuff while doing a full-time job?
57:47Because Ethereum doesn't work like that. It's not like he's sitting there coding all day or managing people. It's not a company. It's like a non-profit foundation, open source project, of which he's a steward and a champion, but he's not like he doesn't have 25 direct reports. Does he have a girlfriend or wife yet? I'm not sure. I've seen a bunch of pictures, but it's so hard with him to tell what's a meme and what's reality because he's so memeable that when Ethereum price goes down and then they post pictures of him, they're like, God damn it. It's because he has a girlfriend. By the way, is his girlfriend just going to be like, which way is it going to go?
58:23It's November 13th. We're recording this. Exactly one month ago, I came on this podcast and I said, Tim, can I give you my one minute case for Bitcoin? And you literally rolled your eyes and audibly groaned at me and said, haven't you already done that? Are you talking about why you like Bitcoin again? I just want to say, the price is up 47 % since I did that rant. All right. Well, are you like that French dude? Are you the French guy? Were you smart and ballsy? Go back and listen to it. It's in the episode called Did the Creator of Bitcoin Get Unmasked at the 30-minute mark? No, I'm not debating if you said that.
59:04I'm saying, did you make your own? I'm saying, go listen to the case and say, did I get lucky or was I smart? Did I have a reason? No, that's not what I'm asking. What I'm asking is, did you make the bet? Well, of course. What do you mean? Well, what I'm saying is, did you just say it was going to be good or did you actually invest your own money into it? Oh, dude, I'm Polymarket, bro. I was skinning the game. Does gambling on Polymarket mean you have Bitcoin? Well, it's like Polymarket versus a poll. A poll is just saying what you're going to do. Polymarket is putting your money up saying what you think is going to actually happen.
59:35I put my money up and said what I thought was going to happen. Yeah, I mean, it's had a hell of a run. Almost as good as Palantir. Everything's fucking crazy right now, though. Everything's too crazy.
59:48I don't know anything about anything, but it seems like it'd be a good time to make the opposite prediction. So yeah, you were right. It's just like, how long are you going to be right for right now? Everything is just insane. Yeah, yeah. And of course, these are like, you know, one month fluctuations or nothing. But I guess the thing I, the reason I thought it was bullish was because it was the same reason that the thing is pumping right now. Because there was a whole bunch of like big things, like for example, that the government was going to be pro Bitcoin, which was always the biggest risk of Bitcoin was like, oh, even if it's, even if you're right about the technology being better, the government will never allow this.
1:00:27And I was like, the guy who's going to become president is saying not only will he allow it, he's bought and sold by the crypto donors now. And both sides are. And I don't know if you saw the Congress and the whatever House of Representatives, Senate, all that shit. There's like 140 pro-crypto people now in active government, which is like, that number was zero seven years ago. And I just felt like these things were not priced in properly. Now they're talking about a Bitcoin strategic reserve for the country itself. These things, once you go in, it's almost impossible to unwind these things. And I just thought that when a top two or three risk gets de-risked, that should change your underwriting on the price.
1:01:07And I thought that that wasn't happening. For some reason, the price was flat and people weren't paying attention to that one fact. What a world. So in summary, I was right. Thank you. You were right. You absolutely were right. Everything is insane at the moment. I hope your prediction will be true for many, many, many more months and many more years. But it's definitely making me nervous at the moment. Everything is insane. Is that where we end? That's where we end. It's been a fantastic podcast. To Martha Stewart, to Bitcoin, to the Polymarket Whale. That's called Thank You For Your Service.
1:01:36Hot, hot heat. The hot, hot heat was served. You're welcome. All right, that's it. That's the pod.
1:02:01All right, this episode is brought to you by Mercury. They are the finance platform of choice for over 200 ,000 companies. Shouldn't be surprised because I use it myself for not one, not two, but I have eight different Mercury accounts. I have seven for different companies that I'm a part of, and then I have my own personal account because now they have personal banking, which is a really cool feature. I highly, highly recommend it. Like I said, I use it myself. And the reason why is because the way that Mercury works is beautiful. It's very intuitive. And you could tell that it's actually made by a startup founder.
1:02:28It's an entrepreneur. You could tell it's made by somebody who used other banking products in the past and didn't like all the different rough edges and annoyances and decided to actually fix it himself. And really, any type of entrepreneur you are, let's say you're an agency, well, one of the things every agency has to do is be able to send invoices, easily create them, send them to customers, and stay current on your balances with all your customers. Well, you can do that inside Mercury. And so I think that Mercury is great. Highly recommend you check it out. And thank you for sponsoring the show.
1:02:54For more information, check out Mercury.com. Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank. Check show notes for details.
From the publisher
Episode 651: Sam Parr ( https://x.com/theSamParr ) and Shaan Puri ( https://x.com/ShaanVP ) talk about the Polymarket whale who made millions off the election, Ozempic for sleep and why Martha Stewart would have been our Billy of the Week in 1999.
—
Show Notes:
(0:00) The rise and fall of Martha Stewart
(19:04) Ozempic for sleep
(33:10) The guts and brains of Polymarket's whale
(44:55) Betting vs gambling
—
Links:
• Isaak.net - https://isaak.net/sleepless/
• Polymarket - https://polymarket.com/
• Chainalysis - http://chainalysis.com
• Vitalik blog - https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/11/09/infofinance.html
—
Check Out Shaan's Stuff:
Need to hire? You should use the same service Shaan uses to hire developers, designers, & Virtual Assistants → it’s called Shepherd (tell ‘em Shaan sent you): https://bit.ly/SupportShepherd
—
Check Out Sam's Stuff:
• Hampton - https://www.joinhampton.com/
• Ideation Bootcamp - https://www.ideationbootcamp.co/
• Copy That - https://copythat.com
• Hampton Wealth Survey - https://joinhampton.com/wealth
• Sam’s List - http://samslist.co/
My First Million is a HubSpot Original Podcast // Brought to you by The HubSpot Podcast Network // Production by Arie Desormeaux // Editing by Ezra Bakker Trupiano
