EU backs plan for Canada to become 'associate member'

16 Sep 2026 · 47 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Canada and the EU discuss making Canada the first “associate member” of the EU, amid uncertainty about CETA ratification, US-Canada tensions, and questions about what associate status would practically change (e.g., labour mobility, digital cooperation, regulatory alignment).

Guest backgrounds

Javier Moreno-Sanchez is a Spanish Socialist Party MEP and leads the European Parliament’s Canada delegation; he argues the idea is feasible despite no treaty precedent and points to concrete steps like digital agreements, Erasmus Plus participation, and Horizon funding. Kate Harrison is a Canadian conservative activist and partner at Summa Strategies; she questions what associate membership would add beyond existing trade/defence/security cooperation and worries about regulatory and labour-mobility implications.

Key claims

Moreno-Sanchez says start with symbolism but move to action; associate membership could advance energy, defence, and digital cooperation while not excluding the US. Harrison says benefits aren’t clear, CETA should be prioritized, and EU integration could trigger GDPR-like regulatory impacts.

Notable examples

Trump’s criticisms of Canada (March 2025); CETA still awaiting ratification by 10 EU countries; mentions of Erasmus Plus, Horizon, and a proposed doctors/professors mobility convention.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Canada's Proposal for EU Membership

0:39 to 2:21

Discussion on Canada's proposal to deepen ties with the EU and become an associate member.

“Hello and welcome to NewsHour from the BBC World Service.”

Trump's Critique of Canada

2:21 to 4:23

Exploration of President Trump's past comments regarding Canada's economic independence.

“a distance prized open by repeated jibes from President Trump, like this one from March 2025.”

MEP's Perspective on Relationship with Canada

4:23 to 6:41

Insights from Javier Moreno-Sanchez on the potential membership and relationship dynamics.

“in your mind though what sort of relationship does it look like i mean what's likely to be the substance?”

Conservative Concerns on Associate Membership

6:41 to 11:15

Kate Harrison discusses conservative worries regarding the implications of Canada becoming an associate EU member.

“or is this more about symbolism, do you think?”

Geopolitical Context of Canada-EU Relations

11:15 to 13:04

Debate on the geopolitical implications of Canada's ties with the EU amidst US relations.

“or at least the Commission may be thinking there's more in it for us than there is for Canada?”

Teaser for Upcoming Segments

13:04 to 14:00

Preview of upcoming stories including Ed Sheeran's tour and the US Federal Reserve's actions.

“Kate Harrison, an activist in Canada's conservative movement.”

US Federal Reserve Raises Interest Rates

14:00 to 18:10

Learn about the recent interest rate hike by the US Federal Reserve and its implications.

“And it's blown up in its face in the worst way.”

The Best Pizzeria in the World

18:10 to 23:22

Discover the story behind Napoli on the Road, named the best pizzeria worldwide.

“Well, we all have our local favourites, but the jury, or rather a jury, has voted and the results are in.”

Ebola Outbreak and Vaccine Development

23:22 to 27:28

Explore the challenges of developing a vaccine for the Ebola outbreak in the DRC.

“Michele Pascarella, whose pizzeria has just been named the best in the world.”

AI Development and Regulation Debates

27:28 to 28:00

Understand the ongoing discussions around AI regulation and existential risks.

“You're listening to NewsHour and I'm James Menendez.”
Show all 17 chapters

AI Safety and Regulation Perspectives

28:00 to 29:16

Learn about the contrasting opinions on AI safety and the need for regulation.

“Some, though, are dismissive of that kind of talk.”

The Role of International Cooperation in AI Regulation

29:16 to 31:04

Understand the importance of international collaboration to regulate AI effectively.

“Certainly there should be third party audits.”

Challenges of US AI Regulation

31:04 to 33:43

Explore the obstacles faced by Congress in regulating AI and the urgency involved.

“the American firms are still far ahead, aren't they?”

AI Fears as a Distraction

33:43 to 34:38

Investigate the argument that fears about AI are strategically used as a distraction.

“This Trump administration has completely abdicated its responsibility, as has the Republican leadership.”

Dissecting the AI Doomsday Narrative

34:38 to 36:50

Learn about the skepticism surrounding the AI doomsday narrative and its implications.

“She argues that stirring up fears about AI is a deliberate distraction ploy by the tech firms.”

Company Incompetence vs. AI Threats

36:50 to 39:20

Understand the argument that AI risks stem from corporate incompetence rather than technology itself.

“There are much bigger things to worry about, which is this fictional machine god killing all of us.”

Artists and Political Stances

42:04 to 48:02

Discussion on the implications of artists taking political stands, centered around Ed Sheeran and Macklemore.

“because I think ultimately, you know, culture has to reflect the way that the world is.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.

0:30forward slash subscribe to find out more.

0:39Hello and welcome to NewsHour from the BBC World Service. We're coming to you live from London. I'm James Menendez. And coming up a little later, we'll be getting reaction from New York to the decision by the US Federal Reserve to raise interest rates, the first time it's done so in more than three years. That's in about 15 minutes. But we are going to begin today with an idea, a proposal that perhaps could only have emerged at a time when the world seems to be in a state of upheaval. A pitch by Canada to deepen ties with the European Union, several thousand kilometres away across the North Atlantic, and deepen them to the extent that both Ottawa and Brussels are talking about Canada becoming an associate member of the bloc.

1:21Here's the president of the European Commission, that's the EU's executive arm, Ursula von der Leyen, giving her Sarah sent to the idea at a meeting of the European Parliament today with the Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney looking on. This is not a partnership against anyone else, but for our common strength. In short, we want to bring the relationship with Canada to the highest level possible. And dear Mark, I said we must urgently re-imagine our partnerships. So I would like to work with you on opening the door for Canada to being the first associate member of the European Union. She also said the EU and Canada saw the world with the same eyes.

2:12You don't have to read too far between the lines to see an acknowledgement of the growing distance between Canada and its neighbour and biggest trading partner by far, the United States. a distance prized open by repeated jibes from President Trump, like this one from March 2025. You know, the United States can't subsidise a country for$200 billion a year. We don't need their cars. We don't need their energy. We don't need their lumber. We don't need anything that they that they get. We do it because we want to be helpful. But it comes a point when you just can't do that. You have to run your own country.

2:50And to be honest with you, Canada only works as a state. It doesn't. We don't need anything they have as a state. It would be one of the great states anyway. This would be the most incredible country visually. If you look at a map, they drew an artificial line right through it between Canada and the U.S. Just a straight artificial line. Somebody did it a long time ago, many, many decades ago, and makes no sense. It's so perfect as a great and cherished state. So what would associate membership of the EU look like? There is no precedent for it in the EU statutes, and the details at the moment are pretty vague.

3:32I've been speaking to Javier Moreno-Sanchez, member of the European Parliament for Spain's Governing Socialist Party, who leads the Parliament's Canada delegation. I think it's a positive step. As I always say, Canadians are the more European people outside Europe. We have to work with like-minded countries as Canada. We have to shape. We have to shape this alliance for the future. She calls for Canada to be the first associate member. It doesn't exist in the reality but it's up to us and the canadian together to to shape that it's very important and some people say that but it's not in the treaties it doesn't exist and i remind these people that the euro was not in the treaties schengen was not in the treaties the pandemic with the covid health is not a european competence but when there is the political willingness we can do it yeah well in your mind though what sort of relationship does it look like i mean what's likely to be the substance?

4:33Is it just going to be an expanded trading relationship, do you think? I don't think so, because now we have to finalise, to ratify the CETA. We have this relationship. We have just to ratify, because there are still 10 countries we have to ratify. Yeah, just to be clear for our listeners, that's the EU-Canada trade deal, that still hasn't been ratified by 10 countries, has it? Yes, exactly, exactly. So that's the first step we have to do. And as a member of the European Parliament, we have to convince our counterparts in the national parliaments in order to do that. But I think we have a lot of challenge together on energy, on defence, on digital sector.

5:13So, I mean, some countries are reported to be worried that this new relationship will antagonise the US president and antagonise that president unnecessarily. I mean, I'm suspecting that that's not Spain's position, but it may well be other countries' position. Yes, but as you know, as always in the European Union, there are countries who are more scared, other less. But I think it's the moment to show and to show the Trump administration that we want to work together. And it doesn't mean that we will cut the relationship with the US. No, no. But it's something different and it's not exclusive.

5:52We can work with the US, but also with Canada, with UK, with all the countries who want to work with us. What would you say, though, to those countries that haven't ratified the existing trade agreement, who say, look, we don't want an even close economic relationship because we're worried about our own markets and our own manufacturers and so on? But, you know, there is 10 different cases. And sometimes there are objections because of internal politics, like in France, for example. And, for example, in Greece, the petachis is the problem. There are 10 different cases. But I think that in these countries, we have to show that it's the momentum.

6:30It's the moment to do that because we are in a very complex and difficult geopolitical and geoeconomic world. So we have to work together. Right. So is it going to be a relationship of substance or is this more about symbolism, do you think? We start with symbolism. My way is to start with assemblies and to finish with action, really concrete things. Because I often travel to Canada. They want to have a closer cooperation and to be working more with us. Here in the Union, some people say, oh, Canada, Canada. Now everybody speaks about Canada. Here in the Parliament, we have Prime Minister Carney today and tomorrow.

7:10Canada is the star at this moment. But OK, now it's the symbol, it's the world, and we have to go now to action. One of the concrete things is, as I said, the digital agreement. But, you know, there is a convention for the architects who has just been ratified and will be entering into force now. And what I ask, for example, is to do that for doctors, professors, in order to have this mobility. And because it's positive, Canada, they want to participate in Erasmus Plus. And they will participate also with money on the program Horizon also. So we have to make very concrete steps. Yeah. Can I just ask you one final question?

7:51I mean, you did mention the UK at the beginning. I just wonder, I mean, when the Commission talks about a unique alliance with Canada, I mean, I don't know how that's going to go down in London, but wouldn't it be better just to try and improve the relationship after Brexit with Britain, given that Britain is next door? No. I mean, Canada's several thousand miles away. Really, I hope that they will boost the relationship with UK. This kind of thing, they will boost. They say, okay, we will do it also with UK. And there is another option. UK has the open door to come back. Right. It's my personal vision.

8:33For me, it's easy. I know for UK, it's more difficult. But for me, it's easy. Come back and we start working as in the past. Javier Moreno-Sanchez, MEP for Spain's Governing Socialist Party, who leads the Parliament's Canada delegation. Well, Kate Harrison is an activist in Canada's conservative movement. She's a partner with the public affairs company Summa Strategies. What does she think about Canada potentially becoming an associate member of the EU? Well, I think it's hard for a lot of conservatives right now to know what to think about it. obviously associate member status is a concept that's really only come to the fore in Canada over the last few days.

9:16And our prime minister had suggested that that would not be something that we would be pursuing. Obviously, Ms. von der Leyen, when she stood up today, said otherwise. And so I think that there's some discussion about what it may or may not mean. And the frustration from the Conservative side is not from deeper integration and coordination with Europe, far from it, but it's what that membership may entail or not. Does this have an impact on things like labour mobility and regulatory impacts? And really, a lot of Canadians would like to hear from our Prime Minister about these things in Canada, rather than waiting for his speech tomorrow.

9:55Yeah, maybe it is, certainly at this stage, just a bit of symbolism, given the hostility from across the border in the United States. Is it so bad that Canada's looking for new, perhaps more reliable partners? I don't think that it is a bad thing, and many Conservatives would agree to diversify and to find those partnerships. But I would question what about an associate membership status with the EU would yield in terms of new cooperation that doesn't already exist. We already have significant trade dealings with Europe. We are collaborative on items related to defence and security. So what is it in particular that this would yield?

10:33The things that have come up as examples have to do with things like labour mobility. Well, does that mean that there would be an impact on jobs here in Canada? So this is not about an inability or a lack of desire to diversify, because, of course, the situation with the United States has forced that question very bluntly for many Canadians. but what is it about the membership that would be any different than what we have today? And perhaps we should be focusing our efforts on deepening and strengthening the trade agreements. We do have CETA remains unratified by many of the member countries in the EU and so perhaps that would be a better focus of our government's efforts as opposed to chasing associate member status.

11:14So essentially you're worried that the EU may be thinking or at least the Commission may be thinking there's more in it for us than there is for Canada? Well, I mean, the benefits to Canadians from our perspective and my perspective have not been made clear. You know, when we talk about things like regulatory harmonisation, the nature of our relationship and proximity to the United States, of course, most of our regulatory environment is meant to mimic what is happening with whom we do a significant bulk of our trade, 80 % of our trade. Would an associate membership status require a look at, for example, GDPR, which is something that Canada has steadfastly avoided, largely because of the nature of our relationship with the United States and the integration there?

12:01So I think that the benefits are not clear. I think for some Canadians, it means the ability to travel more freely to places like Brits and Italy, et cetera. But there are many more Canadians for whom those benefits are not immediately known. Yeah. And just in the last minute, I mean, is there a geopolitical advantage to this closer relationship, given the way the US has, in many people's eyes, undermined NATO, for example? Well, I think that we should be pursuing two tracks. We should be pursuing a stable relationship with the United States with whom we do the majority of our trade. And obviously, as your listeners know, we're in a protracted trade battle with the United States that is proposing significant economic harm here.

12:45But I don't think that deeper integration to Europe should be a knee-jerk reaction to what is transpiring right now with Donald Trump and the White House. And certainly the longevity of a partnership with the EU and integration with European countries really should look beyond the immediacy of who is currently in the White House. So I think for a lot of Canadians to buy into this, we should be looking at two tracks here and pursuing stability with both countries and diversification, rather than just having what happens with the EU be a reaction to the United States. Kate Harrison, an activist in Canada's conservative movement.

13:23You're listening to NewsHour from the BBC World Service.

13:35Still to come on the programme, what now for Ed Sheeran's North American tour after all his support acts pull out after one of them was dropped for making pro-Palestinian comments? We'll ask the singer Billy Bragg, no stranger to political statements himself, what he makes of the situation. I think you have to ask yourself about Ed Sheeran's motives. I mean, he can't have not known that Macklemore was going to say free Palestine on his tour. And I think by putting Macklemore on the bill, he was hoping to get a bit of the kudos that goes with edgy music without actually committing to it himself.

14:07And it's blown up in its face in the worst way. Also this hour, the US Federal Reserve's raised interest rates for the first time in more than three years to combat inflation, despite pressure from President Trump for a cut. More on that in just a moment. And the World Health Organization says there are signs that the Ebola outbreak in Central Africa is improving, with transmission declining in the province where it began.

14:36This is James Menendez with NewsHour live from the BBC. Well, as we've been hearing, the US Federal Reserve, the country's central bank, has put up interest rates for the first time in more than three years. So why? A question for the BBC's Samira Hussain, who's in New York. Well, the Federal Reserve has cited inflation as being the primary driver for why it increased the rate of borrowing by a quarter percentage point. Now, although the Federal Reserve sees the U.S. economy still going at a pretty healthy clip that the economic growth is strong, some of the fundamentals remain strong, it is geopolitical factors that are really driving up inflation.

15:16And without saying so, perhaps, or presumably rather, hinting towards the war in Iran. And if you look at the rate of inflation in the United States, it sits at 3.4%. But the reading before February, before the war, was hovering around 2.4 % to 2.6%. So you can see that that increase has been quite dramatic in terms of inflation. And so now the Federal Reserve is saying, OK, we're going to try and tackle that. How is President Trump likely to react? Presumably he's not going to be pleased. I mean, he kind of wanted Kevin Walsh, the new Fed chairman. He wanted him in that job because he thought he might cut rates, didn't he?

15:57Right, and that, I think, is really interesting. And I think a lot of people are waiting to hear from the White House. And it's because the Federal Reserve chair that preceded Mr Walsh, that is Jerome Powell, faced a host of criticisms from President Trump for not cutting interest rates. President Trump firmly believed that he needed to cut rates that the U.S. economy could withstand it. And of course, the president wants to do that because cutting rates will, in his mind, will spur economic growth. And so he handpicked Kevin Warsh to lead America's Central Bank in the hopes that he'd get what he wanted.

16:36And so what this really shows is that the Federal Reserve, and in particular Mr. Warsh, has a really delicate balance to sort of walk here between doing what the president wants, but also doing right by the US economy. And so what will the effect be on people? I mean, clearly, inflation and the rising cost of living is a concern for consumers. But I mean, it's going to mean higher borrowing costs, isn't it? It is going to mean higher borrowing costs. But when you hear Kevin Warsh speaking about it, he says that the biggest impact will be on lower income individuals who are paying so much more.

17:16Look, if you look at in terms of how much it costs to borrow money right now, the Federal Reserve rate really is more about talking banks to banks. And there does have an impact on interest rates for the consumer. But that sort of comes a little bit further down the line. What really has been driving these high rates has been the bond yields, which have hit two decade highs. And that's really been driving the cost for getting out mortgages or car loans. Those you've seen has really been spiking. And so that's been a real big concern. And bond markets have really been reacting to the high rate of inflation.

17:56And now that the Federal Reserve has acted, that might bring some confidence back to those. The BBC's Samira Hussain joining us from New York.

18:09Now, here's something that's bound to provoke some arguments. What's the best kind of pizza? Neapolitan, Roman, New York, Chicago? And who makes the best pizza? Well, we all have our local favourites, but the jury, or rather a jury, has voted and the results are in. This year's best pizzeria, as decided by 50 Top Pizza World 2026, an annual online guide from Italy, is not there, but here in London. It's called Napoli on the Road, and its three branches, as the name suggests, serve classic Neapolitan pizza with its charred doughy crust. We sent news hours Adriana Urbano, who is herself Italian, along to our nearby branch of Napoli on the Road, to sample it.

18:53So I'm now in central London at Napoli on the road in Soho. Its sister branch has been crowned best pizzeria in the world and I'm here to eat the pizza that helped them get there. So here they are, two Napoli-style pizzas with their thick borders and a nice thin base that I have been assured will not flop. The first one I will be trying is a classic margarita, but I've also ordered a ricordo d 'infanzia. It's a pizza whose name means childhood memory. It's got ragù, parmigiano fondue, and a lot of extra parmigiano shaving on top. The margarita first. Now, I have lived 21 years of my life in Italy, and this is a very good, tasty pizza.

19:42The buffalo mozzarella is very stringy. It's got a lovely texture in the dough, and there's a nice, thick border. and now Ricordo d 'Infanzia, the award-winning pizza. It's got a lovely thick ragu base, just like the kind of ragu Italians would eat up and down the country as part of many Sunday meals. I have to say, I can see where the hype is coming from. Well, the restaurants are the passion project of Michele Pascarella, who learned his trade as a boy in Campania, the Italian region that's home to Naples, before moving to London. So how's he feeling about the award? Still can't believe it's just happened.

20:23I'm very, very happy. And of course, I'm very, very proud also about the team. We got like 90 people that work with us. So we are very proud of what we achieved, actually, yes. And what was it like receiving the award in Naples? For many people, the home of pizza. I was like singing the song, it's finally coming home. We won Best Pizzeria in Europe for three years in a row. So best pizzeria in Europe, but outside Italy. But this time we won best pizzeria in the world, including Italy. So it was very, very, very beautiful. Why are you the best pizzeria in the world? What is it that makes your pizza so good?

21:03We are like always trying to evolve our product. We focus on really high quality ingredients. We change our menu every three months. And, you know, lots of restaurants and pizzeria. just think about pizza is a fast food, but pizza is like a serious thing. And we will love and I think we did very good to explain to our customers that we are doing something different on the pizza. My colleague Adriana has been down to one of your pizzerias and she brought back, I think the pizza that won the best pizza last year in the world, which is called Memories of Childhood. Just tell us about this one. It's got a sort of ragu sauce, hasn't it?

21:42As you say, it's like childhood memories, because when I was working till late in Naples, I was always waking up so late on Sunday morning with my brothers. We were going to the kitchen and we were dipping bread inside the ragu as a breakfast. I'm talking about childhood. I mean, you started very young. I mean, you were, what, 11 when you started making pizzas? Yeah, I would say, unfortunately, yes. I was curious about the job and also I was a little bit on a necessity because I wanted to be always independent. and after school I was going to the pizzeria. At the age of 13, I was already making like 300, 400 pizzas per day.

22:19Wow. I mean, did you feel like you missed out on a bit of your childhood because you were working or was this just, this was a passion for you? Yeah, it became a passion then, but I feel like I lose a lot of my childhood memories actually. I never stopped working then, even after the school. Then when I was 18, I moved to London, but I never actually had time for myself to enjoy that part of life. In a way, it was good because I grew up a little bit faster than my friends and achieved a lot of things, but it's half and half, yeah. I need to ask you a provocative question. Pineapple on a pizza, yes or no?

22:58No, of course. No, of course, no hesitation on this. You know, I really hate people. they just open a tin of fresh pineapple and just slap on a pizza honestly. So what next? World domination or are you going to keep it small? No, we're going to keep it small because I don't want to lose the quality. But for sure, we're going to do lots of collabs around the world, but not any more pizzeria. Michele Pascarella, whose pizzeria has just been named the best in the world. You're listening to NewsHour. Do stay with us. Lots more coming up.

23:35Get more with BBC Podcasts wherever you listen. Be the first to listen to your favourite shows like Evil Genius, Good Bad Billionaire and You're Dead to Me with a subscription to BBC Podcasts Premium on Apple Podcasts. You can also enjoy a range of our podcasts ad-free with an Amazon Music subscription.

23:57You're listening to News Hour. Let's get an update now on the ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which has claimed more than 3 ,400 lives and infected thousands of other people. Today, the World Health Organization suggested that a corner had been turned in efforts to curb the rate of infection. And that's before a vaccine for the latest strain has been approved for use. Leanna Byrne has been looking at what it takes to develop a vaccine and who pays for it. This outbreak is caused by the Bundy Bugio virus for which there is no approved vaccine or specific treatment but developing one is not only a scientific challenge someone has to pay A Bundy Bugio vaccine would not have a predictable annual market It may sit in a stockpile waiting for an outbreak That makes it a difficult business proposition Rachel Glenister is president of the Centre for Global Development These vaccines are incredibly valuable to society but not very profitable for companies.

24:58First, most people who will benefit from the Ebola vaccine will never actually take it. So think of all the people in communities and countries that it doesn't spread to because of the vaccine. There's no way that firms can charge them because they never take the vaccine. The first widely used Ebola vaccine shows how public money can help create that market. Eribo was developed by Canadian scientists. Gavi works with both the public and private sector. It's committed$7 million for 70 ,000 Eribo doses in the DRC and is offering up to$40 million for Bundybogio-specific vaccines. David Kinder is Gavi's Director of Development Finance.

Read the full transcript

25:40We have over 20 vaccines against different diseases that we help protect children around the world for. And those costs actually range from as little as just over a dollar a dose up to$100 a dose for some of the most expensive vaccines, which are often the new, the novel ones, or the ones against rare diseases such as Ebola. But the dose is only one part of the bill. Dr. Alhassan Touré is the World Health Organization's research lead in Bunia, an eastern DRC. We need trained researchers, vaccination teams, like I said, laboratories, specimen transportation, vehicles, culture, infrastructure, data system, safety monitoring, participant follow-up and quality assurance.

26:21And those things require a lot of money. And that capacity must exist before an outbreak. Dr. Toure points to Uganda's experience during outbreaks of another Ebola virus. Uganda team doing good. We established a platform, trial platform that took us 11 weeks to be established. And when they had a new sudden Ebola outbreak in 2025, it was not prepared to be spoke. It was activating the existing platform. And it took us only three days to activate a high standard drug trial platform. So this is the way forward. So funding vaccines means paying for capacity before a crisis. Otherwise, researchers, manufacturers and health workers are racing a virus that already has a head start.

27:10The money buys vaccines, but just as importantly, it buys time. And that was Leanna Byrne reporting that.

27:27This is the BBC in London. You're listening to NewsHour and I'm James Menendez. The debate over the development of AI has built up a real head of steam in the past few weeks, to use a 19th century metaphor, from tests that saw AI models unexpectedly running amok to warnings last week that the technology may soon pose an existential threat to humanity. It's now all fueling demands for greater regulation of the industry, including from some of those leading the multi-billion dollar giants at the vanguard of innovation, or even a global pause in development before anything really bad can happen. Some, though, are dismissive of that kind of talk.

28:04President Trump this week called AI safety fears a hoax. And here's his vice president, J.D. Vance, dismissing calls for regulation. Speaking at an AI summit in Los Angeles, he had this to say to the giants of AI. Why is it that the people who are at the frontier of the AI economy are throwing up their hands and saying, well, we've built Frankenstein, and the solution to Frankenstein apparently is to create a one-world governance structure for artificial intelligence. What I would say to those people, if you're building Frankenstein, stop. Or maybe build, you know, if the cat is out of the bag, then build the defensive mechanism against Frankenstein.

28:46Well, in a few minutes, we're going to hear from someone who also thinks that the existential angst over AI is overblown. In fact, that it's a deliberate distraction on the part of the firms. But first, let's hear from a politician whose constituency includes Silicon Valley, where those companies are based. Democrat Sam Liccardo represents California's 16th district. He told me it was necessary to regulate AI companies. I asked him what that might look like. Well, reasonable minds can disagree about exactly what the regulation should resemble. But at a bare minimum, there ought to be mandates for transparency around model testing and evaluation.

29:24Certainly there should be third party audits. Even the industry agrees to that. Pre-release review of frontier models, a host of different measures. But I think two things are essential. One is we need to begin the conversations internationally and particularly with China, because a great impediment to any regulation is the argument that, well, we can do everything in the world to tie our own hands. But we, in fact, need to ensure that everybody is abiding by the same rules or we are all subject to even greater risk. On that, working with China and other countries to try and assess the risks and deal with them and mitigate them.

30:06I mean, how realistic is that? I mean, President Trump's view is that it's a winner-takes-all situation and the US has to win that battle with China. In a race to superintelligence in which human beings lose control of artificial intelligence, no human wins. I believe the Chinese know that based on certainly the interactions that I am hearing from the top labs, the top universities and think tanks. And I know Americans believe that as well. So we need to get to the table. And at the very least, we need to start to agree on methods of verification, on setting standards and protocols for testing and evaluation and metrics so that we can set the table for a fruitful negotiation, ultimately by the political leaders.

30:55There's nothing in it, though, for the big American AI firms to cooperate with China, given that they are, I mean, pretty much by China's own admission, the American firms are still far ahead, aren't they? Certainly, American firms are ahead, but there is great incentive for everyone to ensure that their model is not causing massive disruption globally to a financial system, for example, with cybersecurity risk or to the safety of human beings through biological weapons or chemical weapons. The leadership in many of the American companies acknowledges these risks. Some have expressed scepticism about the big AI firms like Anthropic and OpenAI coming out partly with these warnings about what AI might be able to do, that it might pose an existential threat, and their apparent willingness to start talking about regulation.

31:52Are you sceptical about their motives or do you think they are genuine in their concerns? There's plenty of reason to be sceptical about the motives of any company that is pursuing profit. But in this case, what they are saying today is what leading scientists, leading universities and think tanks have been saying for years. And it is time for us to heed the call of those who understand best about the challenges and perils, as well as the opportunities of this very important technology. Look, I represent Silicon Valley. I believe in the importance of continuing to develop artificial intelligence for all the good it can do.

32:30But we have to do so carefully. But is that part of the problem that the profit motive is so tied up with the development of the technology? Because, as you say, you need these huge sums in order to make these things work, that you're never going to be able to disconnect the two. And those companies, in order to make money, are still going to be having to push forward at the fastest rate possible. Well, that is exactly why ultimately congressional regulation and global regulation is going to only be successful if we're able to reorient the incentives of the industry toward development of technology that will improve safety rather than just development of technology that will expand capability.

33:15And Congress needs to get to work now. Is this something that keeps you awake at night? Absolutely. And we need to get to work. And the problem is we have a Congress that is unserious about this work, at least the Republican leadership and this Trump administration. And for that reason, I led a letter with 107 of my colleagues urging this Congress to get to work and get a bill to the floor for us to vote on to start the work on regulating AI in a meaningful way. This Trump administration has completely abdicated its responsibility, as has the Republican leadership. And right now, we are now hearing from the leadership literally in the last hour that they're going to plan on going on vacation for the next seven weeks.

34:00Essentially, the speaker, the head of the legislature, is fiddling. And at least Nero had the decency to stay in town while Rome was burning. But in fact, the speaker is heading out of town to go back and campaign. The Democratic Congressman Sam Liccardo there. But what if those fears about the destructive power of AI are entirely misplaced? I've been speaking to Timnit Gebru, founder of the Distributed AI Research Institute, set up, in its words, to counter big tech's pervasive influence on the research, development and deployment of AI. Timnit's a computer scientist who once worked for Google.

34:38She argues that stirring up fears about AI is a deliberate distraction ploy by the tech firms. So why and distraction from what? Well, the first thing I want to tell you is that this cycle has been happening for at least 15 years. In 2013-2014, Elon Musk said that AI was summoning the demon and Peter Thiel said that AI was a higher existential risk to humanity than climate change. And he said he didn't understand why so many people were talking about climate change, but not speaking about AI. And then in 2015, the same institute that's talking about pausing AI right now had a letter asking us to pause AI and saying that it might bring utopia or apocalypse.

35:22And all of these billionaires signed it while they were investing heavily in AI companies. So they were also the ones investing the most heavily in AI companies like DeepMind and even started OpenAI. So the first question I think all of us should ask is, why are the people who are profiting from these building these systems and investing heavily on AI constantly telling us every two, three years that it's an existential threat to humanity? And the distraction piece of it, a really good example of this is just a couple of years ago in the U.S., Sam Altman went to Congress and he was like, oh, my God, please regulate us.

36:03I'm so afraid. And then when the EU AI Act came out, just a few days after he said that, he threatened to pull out of the EU because of that regulation. So the distraction is in the sense, A, speaking to their investors, trying to convince everybody that they have a super powerful machine god. So as an investor, you want your hands on that machine god. B, speaking to governments saying that they are the ones who want this machine god in their hands and not their adversaries. So it's, again, a marketing mechanism. And C, speaking to governments saying that they shouldn't be regulated because for pesky things, little things like pollution or worker exploitation or discrimination.

36:49Because guess what? There are much bigger things to worry about, which is this fictional machine god killing all of us. And if you regulate them for these other little things, your adversaries are going to have their hands on this machine devil. And you don't want that. Right. Do you believe, though, that it is possible that AI in the coming years may develop to the extent that it could turn on its creators and kill us all? I just I always ask people to walk me through this scenario. You know, how does this happen? How does this happen when the floods can destroy data centers and fires and I can unplug the power?

37:29And I just want to tell you that I literally asked this question to Elon Musk in 2015 when he said that he was so scared of AI and that it was going to be an existential risk that was higher than climate change. And I asked him why he says this. And he told me that climate change is not going to kill every single human being. It might cause problems, but it's not going to kill everyone. But that AI could kill every single one of us. And I asked them, just can you give me that scenario, how that would happen? And I just want to tell you that they have these calculations really pulling numbers out of their behinds.

38:06And one of their predictions was that this singularity, which is when, you know, we would get dystopia or, I mean, utopia or apocalypse was going to happen in 2025. Yeah. Let me ask you this. I mean, a lot of this assumes that we're still in control of the tech. What if we lose control of that? And there seems to be, as a layman, some suggestion that these models are developing some autonomy. What if in 10 years that they're not? Right. OK. Let me just tell you as an expert, they're not. And also, people should be speaking to cybersecurity experts when they talk about cybersecurity incidents like the OpenAI hugging face hacking incidents.

38:51If you speak to cybersecurity experts, they'll tell you this is a lot more about company incompetence, which is, for instance, OpenAI researchers thinking that they had what's called an air-gapped environment to test their models, which means that this environment should never have access to the internet, and in fact, not having an air-gapped environment. And this is company, gross company incompetence and negligence that would have landed someone being fired or on the news for that reason in normal times. And they did not follow established security protocols that are extremely well known and established within the security industry for decades.

39:34And if you really speak to cybersecurity experts, like and there are so many people like Heidi Klopp is one cybersecurity firms, not, you know, so-called alignment firms like Meter, this is what they would tell you. And I was speaking there to Timnit Gebru, computer scientist and founder of the Distributed AI Research Institute. Much more on this story, the debate about the development of AI and some of the warnings in recent days on our website, bbc.com forward slash news, where you can also find updates on all our top stories updated throughout the day. You're listening to NewsHour. Do stay with us, though.

40:10Still more to come on this edition.

40:27This is James Menendez with NewsHour live from the BBC. Now, Ed Sheeran's one of the most successful singer-songwriters of all time. He sold more than 120 million records and toured the world over. Australia, India, Japan, his home country, Britain. Now he's currently performing in North America. But it is politics in the Middle East which have derailed his current tour, raising a bigger question about whether the pop star should be more political. Well, it all began when the rapper Macklemore appeared on stage ahead of Sheeran at the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey 12 days ago. He shared a clip of it on social media.

41:02One of the reasons why I wanted to come on this tour was because I wanted to stand up here on stages and stadiums across America and say two words that are very near and dear to my heart. Free Palestine. Well, those comments led to a petition from the Israeli-American Council demanding his removal from the tour, which then happened. Well, Dorian Linsky is a British cultural historian and journalist and Billy Bragg's a singer, songwriter and activist. NewsHour's Rajini Vaidyanathan asked Billy Bragg, first of all, what he makes of the situation. Well, I think it's been a terrible own goal for the owner of the stadium.

41:47Initially decided that McLemore wouldn't come and play in his stadium because instead of McLemore saying free Palestine to maybe 20 ,000 people in the stadium, he's now said it to the entire world and he's created this huge debate. So in that sense, I think it's been terribly self-defeating. But on another level, it's great to see young artists standing up in solidarity with Macklemore, because I think ultimately, you know, culture has to reflect the way that the world is. And that's what Macklemore was trying to do, what we all try to do. And I don't think he should be punished for that. Dorian, in Ed Sheeran's statement, he says he's appalled by the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

42:29and he says the suffering and pain caused on both sides is a human tragedy. But on the other hand, he then continues by saying, there is a reason I do not use my professional platform for politics. What did you make of his statement and the message that he's sending out? I think that he is trying to maintain a relatively apolitical and neutral position. And that's fine. I think that's probably why we notice protest songs. we notice political musicians because that's not everybody. Here, he's got himself into this situation where, you know, he has booked, basically everybody who booked on his tour has sort of pro-Palestine sympathies.

43:11And yet, for whatever reason, that did not seem to sort of occur to him what might happen. It's almost somebody with a mindset from perhaps a different era collided with this reality. What do you make of that, Billy? because, of course, it does call into a wider question about the pressures artists face about how much they do get political or not. And you're someone who gets very political. I think you have to ask yourself about Ed Sheeran's motives. I mean, he can't have not known that Macklemore was going to say Free Palestine on his tour. And I think by putting Macklemore on the boo, he was hoping to get a bit of the kudos that goes with edgy music without actually committing to it himself.

43:49And it's blown up in its face in the worst way. Dorian, do you think it's blown up? And who do you think is going to come out better from all of this? Ed Sheeran or McLemore and the other artists? I don't. I mean, Ed Sheeran, who, you know, who I who I've interviewed and who I like liked as a person is obviously coming out of this very badly. You know, I do think that obviously, if we don't know all the details of what it would have meant to to stand up to craft, what that means to the tour, other alternative venues available, what were the costs of that? But I mean, undoubtedly, what has happened is that everybody else on the bill has taken a stand for free speech.

44:30And, you know, and let's say that McLemore said nothing out of line here. It was a very simple free Palestine message. and Sheeran has ended up in this position where he seems that he does not support free speech and that he does not support the Palestinian cause, which, you know, I don't know whether that's entirely fair, but it's pretty much a disaster for him. And Billy, do you have some sympathy for Ed Sheeran? Because in a way, he was almost forced into this decision. He had no choice, he might argue. I mean, yeah, he has been forced into this decision, but I think he may be being blindsided by the other acts on the bill.

45:09With all due respect to Macklemore, he's a big artist, but these guys, you know, this was a really big opportunity for them, a big, big platform for them. The Tour America in stadiums opening for an artist as big as Sheeran. But the fact that they've taken a stand, I hope, will be inspirational to other young artists. Do you think, Billy, it could actually cost them in terms of their careers? Because, of course, getting on the line-up with Ed Sheeran can be career changing, can't it? Of course it can, it can. But my experience over the years has been, for those of us who do want to talk about issues, there is always going to be people who are interested in that or connect with it.

45:47They might be in a minority, but they're still out there. And if you can find that audience, then they will sustain your career, whether you're playing with Ed Sheeran or not. I mean, Dorian, what do you think about all of this? I mean, in particular, this is, of course, relating to the Israel-Gaza war, which we've seen other incidents, for example, in Glastonbury, where there have been debates around free speech and what you can say on the conflict. I think that's why this does seem so shocking. If you look at what McLemore said, there was nothing outrageous in that. And I think what Kraft, the stadium owner, has misjudged, and what I think a lot of people are misjudging, is just how the sort of public mood has changed because of what has happened to Gaza.

46:29And Billy, I mean, all of this sort of in some ways came about after the Israeli-American Council launched a petition demanding that McLemore was removed from the tour. As an artist yourself, I mean, I'm sure you faced pressures from different groups in terms of being able to raise a political point. You do get pressure. You do get people. I mean, sometimes it's as banal as people saying that you shouldn't mix politics and music. You know, I had some arguments with Pete Watterson, Kylie Minogue's producer in the 1980s, who didn't think pop should be political. But really, you know, particularly in the 20th century, pop music was the only social medium that young people had, and as such it had to reflect everything that was going on in the world.

47:11I mean, it's not so much that now, but I think this issue shows that pop music does still have teeth and it still can cause outrage. Can I ask you both what you think the audience will make of all of this, the people who will be turning up to Ed Sheeran's shows? I mean just fan bases when you're that big fan bases are so large you know like when when you two tour and Bono will make a particular statement against you know very critical of you know the American government or whatever and people are absolutely fuming in the audience and then he stops saying that and then he goes into another song and then they kind of go oh well we're back to this now it would be interesting to see how the tour unfolds because it's a bit suddenly it's kind of like a cursed tour, you know, and the scrutiny on anything he says or any protests in the audience is going to be enormous.

48:01Dorian Linsky and Billy Bragg talking there to News Hour's Ruchini Fahdi and Arthur. And that's it for this edition of News Hour. Thanks so much for listening. Until the next time. Bye bye.

48:22Evil Genius, Good Bad Billionaire and You're Dead to Me with a subscription to BBC Podcasts Premium on Apple Podcasts. You can also enjoy a range of our podcasts ad-free with an Amazon Music subscription.

From the publisher

The European Commission president has announced proposals for Canada to become an associate EU member as the country's rift with the United States deepens.

Also on the programme: The US federal reserve's just put up interest rates for the first time in three years; are the warnings about AI posing an existential threat a deliberate distraction?

And we'll confront the really big issues with the owner of the pizzeria just voted the best in the world.

(Photo: European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen and European Parliament President, Roberta Matsola welcome Prime Minister of Canada, Mark Carney at the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France. Credit; EPA/Shutterstock).

More from Newshour

All 220 episodes
EU backs plan for Canada to become 'associate member'Newshour · 47 min
Listen in VO