Iran’s currency hits an all-time low against the US dollar

23 Aug 2026 · 37 min · 13 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode is a BBC NewsHour roundup focused mainly on Iran’s economic crisis amid US pressure. Topic: Iran’s rial hits an all-time low; US President Trump announces “Economic D-Day” after failed military efforts; Iran’s president dismisses it as bullying.

Key claims

sanctions and a blockade are worsening inflation, unemployment, and industrial input shortages; food is expected to remain largely self-sufficient, but industrial supply chains are vulnerable; Iran is resilient via currency depreciation, foreign exchange, and cash transfers, though “unknown territory” remains.

Notable examples

war-damaged steel and petrochemicals; possible 1 million additional jobless; inflation making monthly budgeting unreliable.

Guest

Professor Javad Salehi Isfahani, Iranian economist at Virginia Tech. Other segments (briefly included): Syria-Israel talks (Abdul Rahman Dawood, freelance journalist in Kamishli); Ukraine elections debate (Mikhailo Fedorov, former defense minister); ICC sanctions (Judge Kimberley Prost, Canadian ICC judge).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

US Economic Pressure on Iran

0:45 to 1:46

Discussion on the US's increased economic pressure and Iran's response.

“After failing to defeat Iran militarily, the US is turning to increased economic pressure.”

Iran's Economic Struggles

1:46 to 3:16

Exploration of Iran's financial struggles exacerbated by war and sanctions.

“but today its currency, the rial, hit an all-time low against the US dollar.”

Impact of Sanctions and Blockade

3:16 to 6:06

Insight into the current sanctions and their effects on Iran's economy.

“What are the sanctions at the moment and how much worse can they get?”

Public Sentiment in Iran

6:06 to 9:14

Analysis of the Iranian public's perspective on their government's resilience.

“It's a difficult bind, but they have managed so far.”

IndyCar Race in Washington

9:14 to 13:24

Live report from the IndyCar race event in Washington and its significance.

“That was Iranian economist Javad Salehi Isfahani.”

Israeli Attacks on Syria

13:24 to 14:00

Discussion on recent Israeli attacks in Syria and their implications.

“This is the BBC World Service and NewsHour.”

Israeli Attacks and Syrian Response

14:00 to 17:58

Learn about the significance of recent Israeli military actions in Syria and their implications for regional stability.

“which is a city in the northeast of Syria.”

Natural History Museum Exhibition

17:58 to 22:25

Discover the reopening of a historic gallery at the Natural History Museum and its focus on humanity's relationship with nature.

“the Natural History Museum here in London, is to reopen for the first time since the Second World War.”

Ukrainian Politics and Military Strategy

23:08 to 28:00

Examine the challenges facing Ukraine’s leadership amid conflict and calls for elections, featuring insights from former defense minister Mikhailo Fedorov.

“This is NewsHour from the BBC World Service.”

Ukraine's Military and Political Landscape

28:00 to 29:37

Discussion on the current state of Ukraine's military and political challenges.

“simplifying the bureaucracy and procuring more stuff produced in Ukraine.”
Show all 13 chapters

US Sanctions on the ICC

29:37 to 30:44

Exploration of recent US sanctions against the International Criminal Court.

“more from him in terms of using Starlink to launch longer range attacks on Russia.”

Impact of Sanctions on Judge Kimberley Prost

30:44 to 37:40

Judge Kimberley Prost shares her personal experience with US sanctions.

“Last week, the US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, announced sanctions against the president and a senior lawyer of the International Criminal Court, or ICC.”

US State Department's Response

37:40 to 38:20

The US State Department's stance on ICC jurisdiction and sanctions.

“Ms Prost and two of her colleagues have brought legal action in New York challenging the Trump executive order.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK.

0:30Listen to The Global Story on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.

0:40Hello, welcome to the programme. This is NewsHour from the BBC World Service. I'm Paul Henley and we're coming to you live from London. After failing to defeat Iran militarily, the US is turning to increased economic pressure. The American Treasury Secretary, Scott Besant, is due to hold a news conference tomorrow, on Monday, after President Trump announced what he called Economic D-Day, as he put it, the most crushing economic operation ever taken against any country. Tehran has dismissed this as bullying behaviour. This was the Iranian president, Masoud Pazeshkian.

1:19The perception from the US was that Iran would become Venezuela. Not only has this not happened, but Iran has become a power that's astonished the world with its display of resistance, solidarity and integrity. We are in an all-out military, economic and security war in the face of the most devastating set of sanctions. But we're standing firm to secure the future of our people. Well, Iran was struggling financially even before the US and Israel launched the war nearly six months ago. but today its currency, the rial, hit an all-time low against the US dollar. The government's acknowledged Iranians are facing many problems, including hyperinflation and widespread unemployment.

2:04Professor Javad Salehi Isfahani is an Iranian economist at the Virginia Tech University in the US. He told me everyday lives in Iran were affected by the war and by sanctions already in place. It's a country that's at war. It has suffered a lot of damage from aerial bombardment. And some of that bombardment has put a lot of people out of work because some important industries like steel, petrochemicals have been damaged so they can't supply inputs to the other industries. People estimate that maybe an additional 1 million people are out of work. Prices are rising very fast. And maybe the larger problem is that the rate at which prices increase is changing.

2:54So people who last month knew how to spend money the first week of the month, so they would have enough for food for the last week of the month. They're not sure if the same applies to this month. So inflation rates can change from one month to another. And that uncertainty is more than anything is putting pressure on low income families. What are the sanctions at the moment and how much worse can they get? The then Vice President Biden said in 2012 that US sanctions on Iran were the most crippling ones in the history of sanctions, period. Yes, that's the trouble with those announcements. They don't leave much room for later increasing or making people think that they're ratcheting up the sanctions.

3:39I don't really know what they're talking about in terms of the D-Day and finishing off the regime. Iran has borders with at least six countries that can supply food to it. And if you just focus on that, Iran is mostly self-sufficient for its food. They were planning to import about a billion dollars worth of wheat, which can probably come easily from the northern borders. And I don't see a food shortage or hunger becoming an issue. But industrial inputs, yes, a lot of those come through the Persian Gulf, through the sea. And I think the blockade is causing a lot of damage that sanctions never did.

4:25Iran learned how to get Iran sanctions and for the most part, it was paying maybe 20-30 % extra for everything, but it was able to import 50-60 billion dollars a year. With the blockade, we don't know what's going to happen to industrial input. How economically resilient is the government in Tehran proving? I don't know what you mean by resilience of the government. The government is resilient because it has the means. It has the foreign exchange, it can print money. And what it has been doing in the last several years is to allow the currency to depreciate. That's an important mechanism for the adjustment.

5:04So import prices go up, for example, and people are discouraged to spend their money on imports, so they turn to domestic goods. That has kept sectors like manufacturing actually expanding some over the years as people shifted from imported goods to domestically produced goods. Now, the problem with letting prices rise is that some people may be left out of the market altogether. Those are the poor. So they've been using cash transfers, which are enough for staving off hunger, but they don't really prevent people from becoming poor. That cash transfer is the main mechanism by which the government tries to compensate people for rising prices.

5:48And they use it judiciously. They can't put too much money in people's accounts because they don't have a source of revenue for it. And if they have to print money, then as they put the cash in people's accounts, prices rise. So it's like it gives us and it takes us back. It's a difficult bind, but they have managed so far. But again, we don't know with the blockade what they are facing. So Iran is getting into a bit of unknown territory. Sanctions is something they have dealt with. The most useful thing, of course, for the Iranian economy would be peace. Is there a peace process? Is there one alive at the moment?

6:27Talks with Pakistani mediators, we're told, as we've been told often before, are imminent more talks. Not that we know of. I think the way President Trump has been talking is that he doesn't want to talk. He wants to get this sanction so ratcheted up that Iranians come begging for a solution, maybe surrender. I think he's dreaming. I don't think Iranians are anywhere near that. I was in Iran a couple of months ago. Life was going on. It's difficult, but it's not the stage at which either they want to come out to revolt against their own government, nor is it that they're going to be suffering from hunger.

7:05So it would take several months, maybe even a couple of years, to get to a place where Iranians will be willing to make huge concessions. It's important to recognize that Iranians have a real problem, which is how to dissuade two nuclear-powered countries, Israel and the U.S., to attack it anytime they want. That's the guarantee they want that the Americans and Israelis are not able to offer. So they got a bind. I don't think Americans quite recognise what it is like to have superior military powers who can come and bomb your country anytime they want. That is the real issue. Peace will come only when Iranians are assured that a deal, a ceasefire is going to last, not for just a few months, but for several years.

7:50I know you're in touch with a lot of people in Iran and you've come and gone recently. What are Iranians, what are Iranian citizens saying about the situation at the moment? Can you give us a feeling, a sample? Well, it depends who you talk to. The interesting conversations I had was with people who were previously anti-regime. A year ago, they might have been complaining a lot and saying they're corrupt, they're mismanaging the economy. This time, they were talking with some pride and surprise that they didn't think that the Revolutionary Guards would be able to hold the line and prevent U.S.

8:25and Israel from actually entering the country to land and then control the government. They were very proud that what happened in Venezuela is not happening to Iran. I think there is that on one side, and then there is these pressures of daily life, the economic misery that we were talking about earlier. And And these two are kind of two very different emotions that Iranians are dealing with every day. The desire to defend this long, several millennia old civilization against these forces that don't seem to really appreciate the country and just want it to surrender. And also they find their government, so sections of the government is playing very hard line and maybe is not allowing some decent, respectable peace from prevailing.

9:14That was Iranian economist Javad Salehi Isfahani.

9:27This afternoon in Washington DC the streets have been sounding a bit noisier than usual.

9:38Racing cars have been speeding around a 250 mile long course about 400 kilometres which goes past the US Congress the Washington Monument and other landmarks in the nation's capital. Hundreds of thousands of spectators turned out to see the IndyCar 250 Freedom Race, which was made part of the nation's anniversary celebrations by President Trump, who nominated himself to wave the starting flag and who's been present throughout the races ongoing as we speak. Let's go live to Washington to our correspondent, Helena Humphrey. Helena, I gather you've even had a go in one of these cars. Tell us about that and the atmosphere there now.

10:19Well, it was an absolutely exhilarating experience, as you might imagine. We were starting to nudge up towards 200 miles per hour. But I do just have to tell you that as we come on air, the chequered flag has been waved and the Floridian Kyle Kirkwood has taken that chequered flag from the Andretti Global team, winning here in Washington, D.C. I have to say at the finish line, he was out of breath. This was a long race. It was 147 laps. It had been extended to reach 250 miles for America's 250th birthday party. And it was a hard race. There were people spinning out. Malucas, one of the young American drivers, was out.

11:02The favourite going into this, the Spaniard. Palo also had a nightmare of a race. As for Kirkwood and what kind of champion he is, you know, pretty self-deprecating sense of humour. I have to say he was previously asked about a lack of success on permanent road courses. And he said, oh, are you saying that I suck at road courses? But of course, today he didn't. And it was an American victory for America's 250th birthday. And aside from the sport, Helena, President Trump has very much made this event his own. How has that gone down, the politicisation of it? he has indeed and this has been a high speed finale for the freedom 250 celebrations here in washington dc we've had things like military parades of course we had that ufc cage fight on the lawn of the white house this was this kind of noisy finale president trump dropped the green flag and then those 25 drivers were off racing through the capital past the capitol building the Washington Monument, his beast, his presidential motorcade also did something of a victory lap, I think it's fair to say, before the race even started.

12:17And in the run-up to this race, there are a lot of questions being asked as to whether this was truly a bipartisan celebration. Was this somehow a MAGA-coded event? Now, I have to say, the people that I've been speaking to here, by very dint of the fact that they're at an IndyCar race, were enthusiastic for this celebration, you know, of all political stripes. Many of them had won lottery tickets to come here free of charge. And they just thought that it was a chance to witness, they said, history in the making. The first time that we've ever seen a racetrack constructed on the streets of Washington, D.C.

12:52Many people saying that it probably will be the last time. Again, though, in the run up to it, some grumblings. We had road closures, hundreds of manholes, of course, which you can imagine had to be sealed over for this race. The National Gallery of Art, close to where I am on this racetrack, also had to have these studies conducted to make sure that those priceless pieces of art could withstand the roar of the engines as those Indy cars raced past. But overall today, a festive atmosphere. Helena Humphrey in Washington, live from Washington, D.C. Many thanks. This is the BBC World Service and NewsHour.

13:35I'm Paul Henley with NewsHour, live from the BBC in London. Syria's foreign minister says he expects peace talks with Israel to resume soon. The hope is to strike a deal to end ongoing hostilities, including recent Israeli attacks on a Syrian military airport and the continuing Israeli occupation of Syrian land near the border between the two countries. Abdul Rahman Dawood is a freelance journalist based in Kamishli, which is a city in the northeast of Syria. I asked him how significant the recent Israeli attacks had been. It is a very significant situation that's happening and escalation from the Israeli side since they are not doing the normal patrols as they are used to do in the south of the country of Syria.

14:22This time they are going very deep inside Syrian territory. They are targeting specific location, air base, targeting the military power of the country of Syria And at the same time, it's a message not just to Syria, but to Ankara and the existence of Turkish forces based on their allegations inside Syria. So it is very significant as it is expecting more escalation also in the future. Israel's been occupying parts of the southwest of Syria since the fall of Bashar al-Assad. How does it justify what is essentially a violation of its neighbour's territory? It is kind of violation because when you are talking the sovereignty of a neighbouring country without any agreement and you don't respect the criteria of the agreement since you signed in 1974, it is unjustified.

15:18But Israel, from their side, also justify this movement in the Syrian territory. They are saying that we want to protect our national security, especially now they are in war with Iran, and they don't want any faction to be activated within Syria, especially in this sensitive time. Since I can give you some statistics about the number of people who were arrested by Israel, like it's 47 till now of the Syrian civilian arrested by the Israeli troops in the Syrian territory. At the same time, they attacked nine military bases, military air bases inside Syria. Four of them are out of the Bakardon, which was established since 74 in the last century.

16:02So it is a big development and it's kind of unaccepted by the Syrian government in their statement. Al-Shibani was emphasising it's violating the sovereignty of Syria, but they avoid even though any escalation with Israel or to have any military option. Given all this recent animosity, are you surprised by the announcement from the Syrian Foreign Ministry that peace talks are resuming? Actually, Al-Shibani from the beginning was signing that he doesn't want any confrontation with Israel. But the surprising point is towards Turkey, because all the time Syria was inside of Turkey and Ankara policy in the region.

16:43This time he's tried to avoid any possible military action in Syria. So when he's saying like he met with intelligence and high officials in Israel, and all these declarations kind of showing the Syrian people that Syria is trying to play a neutral role in this equation. This is the difficulty and challenge of the Syrian politician to be neutral in this equation. But is Israel going to negotiate in good faith? This is a difficult question that we have to double think when we are answering. Like, Israel doesn't consider any other side. They try just to avoid any consideration of the other partners.

17:26So Israel may escalate more in the region if there's no American pressure. We have to be frank of mentioning the balance of power in the region. Americans put pressure on Israel and on Turkey not to escalate and not to do anything on the region. So in this point, we can say that it is possible to come down at this specific period. Freelance journalist in northeastern Syria, Abdul Rahman Dawood.

17:57Now, a gallery at one of the UK's biggest tourist attractions, the Natural History Museum here in London, is to reopen for the first time since the Second World War. It's been hidden from public view since 1943. It will feature objects which show our evolving relationship with the natural world. Among those objects, a miniature model of a Crystal Palace dinosaur, London's Crystal Palace Park, having been home to a series of sculptures of dinosaurs. Here they are being restored back in 1959. From the gardens of tomorrow to the gardens of yesterday, prehistoric times, in fact, when in place of lizards and snails, our ancestors had these monsters to contend with.

18:39However, you'll be happy to know that these are merely stone and cement models of the creatures that roamed Earth millions of years ago, the only collection found in a natural setting in England. The location is London's Crystal Palace, and reason for our visit, a super-scale spring clean. After all, they have been there for well over 100 years now. That from British Pathé News. Now, the Natural History Museum's new exhibition called Nature and Us is part of a project aiming to open a new or revamped part of the museum every year until the museum's 150th anniversary in 2031. Let's talk live to the director of the Natural History Museum, who is Doug Gurr.

19:19welcome mr garr is there a lot of the natural history museum that's hidden behind the scenes clearly well thank you very much indeed for having me on i mean the short answer is yes i mean as you know museums are all about the collections and uh and our collection is very large so if you have the opportunity to visit the extraordinary museum in south kensington there are around 27 and a half thousand specimens on display but the full collection is over 80 million so for every one thing you see we have 3 000 behind the scenes and uh over the over many many years those collections which we keep both for public display but also for scientific research they've tended to crowd out the public space so uh what you've got here is an incredibly exciting opportunity as you said for the first time since 1943 for the first time in over 80 years uh we will be able to bring back one of those incredible spaces and use it as an opportunity to show more to artist is is it cupboard size hall size how significant is it and what will be so um for i mean not all of your listeners i'm sure will know the building but if you think about it we have this very long facade that runs east west on the sort of cromwell road you know it's in what you're talking about is a gallery which in total is something like 100 meters long so it's absolutely stunning it's huge it's one of the most beautiful spaces i think people are one of those beautiful places i've ever seen i can't tell you how excited i am that as i say for the first time in over 80 years we'll be able to throw it open to the general public and it'll be open in the middle of September.

20:46We open on the 16th and we very much hope people will come and see. Given the Natural History Museum is often the most popular tourist attraction in this country, I'm sure a lot of people will know the type of building you're talking about, made famous in many films, of course. Absolutely. And there will be interest from a lot of the public just in getting behind into new corners, won't there, for that reason? Absolutely. I mean, look, it's a stunning building. You know, it was first opened through open its doors in 1881. We had something like 250 ,000 visitors that year. Last year, we had over 7 million visitors, which made us, you know, the UK's number one visitor attraction and I think the second most visited museum in the world.

21:27So enormous numbers of visitors. This particular space, I promise you to everybody who comes, it is stunning. It's absolutely beautiful. It's just one of those amazing spaces. I think some of those beautiful spaces, certainly in London, arguably in the country, maybe in the world. As I say, I think, you know, people will be wowed, I hope, as much as we are when they just walk in and look at that space. But I also very much hope that they'll enjoy what we're trying to do with the space. And as you mentioned in your introduction, this is a gallery we call Nature in Us. And it's very much about how do we understand humanity's interaction with nature over time and space?

22:00How has that changed? You mentioned the extraordinary Crystal Palace dinosaurs. my predecessor Richard Owen the first director in South Kensington was the academic consultant if you like on the design of those dinosaurs but actually our relationship with nature has changed a lot and actually people will be able to come here We only have a few seconds left I'm so sorry to interrupt Of course, not at all Thank you very much Doug Gur who is the director of London's Natural History Museum which undergoes a slight expansion in the course of the next few weeks This is NewsHour

22:37Has Prince Harry and Meghan's American dream failed? I'm Asma Khaled, and I host the Global Story podcast from the BBC. The Sussexes are intending to return to the UK, six years after moving to California and striking multi-million dollar brand partnerships. Just last year, Harry told the BBC he couldn't see a world in which his family would return. So what's changed? Find out on The Global Story on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts. This is NewsHour from the BBC World Service. I'm Paul Henley. In Ukraine, President Zelensky has dismissed calls to hold elections soon as too dangerous, saying they'd risk splitting the country apart while it fights the Russian invasion.

23:23The demand has been made by Ukraine's former defence minister, Mikhailo Fedorov, whom the president sacked last month. And even though elections during a time of martial law are banned under Ukraine's constitution, Mr Fedorov used an interview with the BBC to reiterate his call for a vote. He'd already said democracy must not be held hostage by Russia. The BBC's Dan Johnson talked to him in Kiev, and by way of introduction to that interview, I asked Dan for a bit more background on his interviewee. This is Mikhailo Fedorov. He's been the man of the moment in Ukraine this week. He was the popular former defence minister, 35 years old, credited with transforming Ukraine's armed forces, bringing in his army of drones to replace manpower on the battlefield.

24:11He's credited with saving lives, but also with taking the fight increasingly to Russia with that technology enabling Ukraine to launch longer-range strikes. So there was disappointment when he was sacked. there were protests on the streets of Kiev calling for him to be reinstated because he was seen to be such a positive influence, a reformer who was bringing about real success. But that hasn't happened. Earlier this week, his replacement was confirmed in the role. And the night before, Mr Fedorov released a video statement that went way beyond just calling for his job back. He described a crisis of governance.

24:46He talked about the levels of corruption in Ukrainian government and the impact that was having in terms of hampering the war effort and denying the front line the sort of equipment that was needed. He called for elections even though they are not allowed under martial law during wartime. He said that the practicalities of that needed to be confronted. Now that largely fell flat. Even those who were supporting him recognise the threats that Russia would pose to that election, the difficulties of organizing a free and fair vote that incorporates all the different elements of Ukrainian society at such a difficult time, and the divisions that that would open up in society here at a time when the thought is that Ukrainians need to be united.

25:31But when I sat down with Mikhailo Fedorov yesterday, he told me he still believed it was right to talk about elections during wartime. A huge number of people started talking and supporting the idea of coming back to the democratic cycle. And I believe that neither Putin nor the president of any other country can speak about our own democracy. We are the only ones who will decide what we do going forward. That's what democracy is all about. If I cannot share my ideas and be open about them, then what are we fighting for? You really believe an election would be in the interests of Ukraine and not in your personal interests?

26:17It's definitely in my vested interests because I want this war to be over and Ukraine to become a successful country. So yeah, this is in my interest for sure. But of course, it's also in the interest of all Ukrainians. But if you're asking whether it will be useful for my political future, If I were thinking about this, I would not have made the statement. What do you believe is the president's awareness of corruption? I think that probably you better ask the president about this. Do an interview with him, have a conversation with him in front of the world. Do you think he has questions to answer?

27:01I believe that he is ready. Why not? That's his responsibility to explain whether he was aware of all that or not. I don't want to make any assumptions. Do you think he may be a corrupt politician?

Read the full transcript

27:17Look, in all the time that I worked with him, not a single time I received from him any task that would go against the law. I can talk only about my personal experience. If you get the election you've called for, will you run for president? I cannot even think or talk about this right now. I will be ready to discuss it only when the elections take place in this country. Because if I think about running for president, I won't be able to stay unbiased. Is there more the United Kingdom could do to provide better support to Ukraine? I would like to thank the United Kingdom for your constant support, for your involvement in the Coalition of the Willing.

27:59I believe in delivering faster what was already announced, simplifying the bureaucracy and procuring more stuff produced in Ukraine. Governments are lagging behind and the reality on the ground. And this is the question not just for the UK. We don't need just announcements. We are better off with less, but better quality and faster. We need exactly what we need in this historical stage of our development. We don't need repairs of tanks when we no longer use tanks. Unfortunately, our losses, our blood, our military experience is beneficial to all of you. So we are not only fighting for our freedom and democracy, we are also fighting for your safety so you can build your own security system, which will guarantee your protection in any future wars to come.

28:45Mikhailo Fedorov talking there to the BBC's Dan Johnson. And Dan, there have been protests, as you mentioned, in Kiev in favour of this former minister. How much of a threat do you think he is to the government and specifically to the president at the moment? Well, he was seen as someone who had popular support and may be able to mobilise that, if not to get his old job back, then to hold some sort of other influence. But it seems like he perhaps overread that level of support and overstepped the mark, because those protests, it's been announced, will end now that he is not going to get his defence minister job back.

29:26So that leaves the question open of what Mikhail Ofedorov's future is going to be. He told me that he still wants to play a role, that he still wants to promote technological alternatives to help Ukraine's effort in this war. He'll be going to America next week and hopes to meet Elon Musk there to try to get more from him in terms of using Starlink to launch longer range attacks on Russia. but in terms of the threat to President Zelensky, he never directly criticised the President, he never accused him of personal corruption, but still it's clear that they are not going to be working together in the near future and the sort of statements that have been coming out of the President's office in response to the interview and the lines that Mr Fedorov has given make it clear that that relationship now appears to have broken down even though Mr Fedorov says he still wants to support the government and help in Ukraine's war effort.

30:18he may now find himself in the wilderness. He didn't explicitly say he will run for president if and when there are elections, but he left the question open, saying, well, when the time comes, if I'm in the right position and people think I can be trusted with that role, perhaps it's something I'll consider. So we may not have heard the last of Mikhail Ovedrov. That was the BBC's Ukraine correspondent, Dan Johnson. I'm Paul Henley, and this is NewsHour, live from the BBC World Service. Last week, the US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, announced sanctions against the president and a senior lawyer of the International Criminal Court, or ICC.

30:54The move is the Trump administration's latest escalation in a campaign to dismantle the court, which is empowered by more than 120 member countries to investigate war crimes. The latest offence in the eyes of the government in Washington was engaging in the ICC's efforts to prosecute officials whose governments hadn't consented to ICC jurisdiction. The court called the sanctions a flagrant attack on an independent, impartial judicial institution. So what is it like to be a judge on the International Criminal Court and to be living under US sanctions? Canadian judge Kimberley Prost was sanctioned by a Trump executive order in August last year after ruling to authorise the ICC's investigation into alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity by US personnel in Afghanistan.

31:44Dan. My colleague Julian Warwicker spoke to Judge Prost, who told him what impact the sanctions had had on her life. Well, I was sanctioned, it's literally a year ago yesterday, under the executive order. And that has had a significant effect on my personal life in the sense that it's quite crippling, as it has impact on various aspects of your daily life. I have no credit cards, booking hotels, ordering an Uber, buying tickets for the Paris subway, even ordering on your e-reader. All of these things become extremely challenging, if not impossible. Your financial services are also otherwise quite limited.

32:29Even banks outside of the United States, non-American banks, will have the ability to simply say they don't want your business any longer because of their concerns about American interests. Travel is extremely difficult. And then you're also facing all of the problems of the technology companies and other related services that are American-based because of perhaps their dominance in those fields. Amazon cancelled all my accounts immediately. Alexa refused to speak to me. Things like your emails can be affected, your ability to use the phone. So these are just to give you a sense of the sort of the daily kinds of issues you face.

33:11I mean, the scale of that list will, I think, surprise people. You worked on the UN sanctions program before you joined the ICC. So you knew all about sanctions. But has the scale of the impact surprised you? Yes. I mean, it is somewhat ironic, but I have to acknowledge that unless you're actually facing it yourself, you don't really appreciate the scope and the reach of these sanctions. So daily life impacted. What about your role on the ICC? How much is that impacted by these? Well, that's a point that I always wish to emphasise. This is very painful and annoying personally, and it's very difficult having worked my life, my entire career pretty well, and my colleagues as well in the field of justice to see yourself on a list with those purported to be involved in terrorism or organized crime.

34:05But be assured this is being done to try and influence our work as judges and prosecutors of this court. And I can assure you it has no impact in that respect. We continue to carry out our functions independently and objectively. We will not be intimidated by these coercive measures. So you are clear in your mind, are you, as to why you're subjected to these sanctions? Their view is that they are applying these sanctions in order to pressure us as judges to not do our jobs or to decide cases in the manner which is acceptable to them. Some of the sanctions have been so blatant as to state these judges are being sanctioned, two of my colleagues, because they failed to decide a case in the manner in which they should have.

34:54So for me, it is crystal clear the intent is to try and pressure judges to decide cases or not to do their jobs. And that's a fundamental violation of the independence of the judiciary. Can I put to you the American argument here? They would always point, wouldn't they, to the fact that the United States was not among the 125 signatories of the Rome Statute, the Treaty of 1998 that gave rise to the court in the first place. So they say, look, we never wanted this court. Why should we be subjected to its findings? Yes, I've certainly heard the position advanced by the United States. What is important to clarify here is that there is no involvement of this court in any situation unless a state party to the Rome statute is implicated in the situation.

35:44Wherever you go, if you are in the Netherlands, for example, I'm in the Netherlands as a Canadian, I know that I'm subject to Dutch law. And also, because the Netherlands is a part of the Rome Statute, the Rome Statute and the court have jurisdiction in this country. So I see no validity to that argument because it is the application of the statute and the work of the court is being applied in accordance with the statute and in accordance with international law. Where does this leave the ICC? We've had comments from Tomoko Akane, the president of the International Criminal Court, talking about these most recent US sanctions against her, saying that it was important that they don't become the beginning of the demise of the international rule of law.

36:30Is that where we are heading in your view? Certainly it is not my view. It's a very difficult concept to entrench the idea of individual accountability for atrocity crimes. So it was bound to have challenges. But I am fully confident that the Rome Statute and not just the court itself, what's important to understand is we are a court of last resort. We fully support that the main work in ensuring that these cases are investigated and prosecuted should be done by states. That's the whole point of the Rome Statute. We only intervene if no state is willing and able to deal with allegations of atrocity crime.

37:13So these attacks are not going to, in my view, bring down a system which is all about states and the court and the international community generally working to end impunity, bring accountability and justice for victims of atrocity crime. We simply must stand firm in the face of these current attacks. Julian Warwicker was speaking to Canadian Judge Kimberley Prost. Ms Prost and two of her colleagues have brought legal action in New York challenging the Trump executive order. We approached the State Department for a response and a spokesperson sent us this. As the president's executive order makes clear, we unequivocally oppose and expect our allies to oppose any ICC actions against the US or our allies that haven't consented to ICC jurisdiction.

38:03The ICC has asserted its jurisdiction over US personnel without a legitimate basis. This sets, says the spokesperson, a dangerous precedent, threatens to infringe on our sovereignty and undermines our critical national security and foreign policy work. That was a statement from the US State Department. Thanks for listening to this edition of NewsHour. From the whole team, bye-bye.

38:41Is the West Bank reaching a tipping point? I'm Asma Khaled, and I host the Global Story podcast from the BBC. For more than a week, homes in the village of Qusra have been under siege, including one of a Palestinian-American man from Ohio. It's just the latest to draw attention to the rise of settler violence in the West Bank, which the U.N. says is higher than at any point in the last 20 years. For more, listen to The Global Story on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

Iran’s currency, the rial, has hit a record low, trading at over 2 million rials to the dollar on unofficial markets. The devaluation comes a day before the United States is due to impose what US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant described as “the toughest sanctions in history” on Tehran. Iran was struggling financially even before the start of its ongoing conflict with the US and Israel, nearly six months ago.

Also in the programme: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky warns against holding wartime elections, following repeated calls from his sacked defence minister to hold a nationwide vote; Syria’s foreign minister says he expects peace talks with Israel to resume soon; and we hear from the director of London’s Natural History Museum, where a gallery which has remained hidden from view since World War Two is about to reopen.

(Photo: Iranian woman buys vegetables at a street market in Tehran, Iran, 22 August 2026. Credit: Abedin Taherkenareh/EPA/Shutterstock)

More from Newshour

All 220 episodes
Iran’s currency hits an all-time low against the US dollarNewshour · 37 min
Listen in VO