How LA Is Quietly Becoming America's New Industrial Tech Hub

21 Sep 2026 · 36 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Re-industrialization in Southern California/L.A., arguing that America’s manufacturing decline is a shift from industrial capacity to finance, and that “industrial tech” requires trust, mass production, and software-driven autonomy. The episode also connects manufacturing to national security and AI scale, and discusses tradeoffs in tariffs and vertical integration.

Guests (backgrounds)

  • Chris Power, founder of Hadrian, building “a new generation of factories.”
  • Tom Mueller, founder of Impulse Space; first employee of SpaceX (left in 2020/2021).

Key claims

  • Industrial capacity underpins reserve-currency power; elites “trade spreadsheet returns” and lose production competence.
  • Robotics autonomy depends mostly on software integration and closed-loop control, not humanoid robots.
  • L.A./SoCal is becoming an industrial tech hub via dense aerospace/defense/space talent and ex-SpaceX hiring.
  • Vertical integration is useful for prototypes and “trust-critical” components; scale should be external.

Notable examples

  • Impulse Space: precision maneuvering satellites (two came within ~200 meters), “Helios” propellant/engine concept, and producing components including ~30% of a Virginia-class submarine.
  • Hadrian: building factories as a service (digital twin/process design).
  • SpaceX examples: Starship landing on chopsticks; Mueller’s claims about rapid U.S. rocket/satellite achievements.
  • Trade policy: tariffs must “ring-fence” supply chains; China subsidizes inputs (energy/labor/CapEx) to undercut costs.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The State of U.S. Manufacturing

0:00 to 0:26

Exploration of the decline in U.S. manufacturing and its implications.

“Did you ever notice how you spend hours shopping online only to pause a checkout because you wonder if you trusted enough to hit buy now?”

The State of U.S. Manufacturing

2:23 to 3:06

Exploration of the decline in U.S. manufacturing and its implications.

“Yeah, so we hear about re-industrialization efforts in America all the time, but what does it actually take to try to do that?”

Historical Context of U.S. Industrial Power

3:07 to 4:28

Discussion of historical patterns in industrial power and currency.

“Well, thank you so much for coming on All Thoughts.”

Interviews with Industry Innovators

4:29 to 9:01

Guests share insights on their companies, Hadrian and Impulse Space.

“and the British Empire ceded power to the American Empire and in each moment of industrial power being retraded by financial power, you switch the reserve currency of the world.”

Autonomous Manufacturing Explained

9:02 to 13:03

Discussion on the future of autonomous manufacturing and its challenges.

“Think of it as like the container ship coming into a port, the port being a certain orbit.”

Autonomous Manufacturing Explained

14:01 to 14:26

Discussion on the future of autonomous manufacturing and its challenges.

“So even as the way people shop changes, the moment that matters most still feels familiar and deeply dependable.”

Autonomous Manufacturing Explained

14:35 to 15:39

Discussion on the future of autonomous manufacturing and its challenges.

“AI is creating a new path for musical stardom.”

Autonomous Manufacturing Explained

16:04 to 16:20

Discussion on the future of autonomous manufacturing and its challenges.

“Connect with senior decision makers, gain actionable insights, and be part of the conversations driving business forward.”

Manufacturing Ecosystems in Southern California

16:20 to 18:18

Explore how companies in Southern California are collaborating to innovate.

“That's bloomberglive.com slash Canadian Finance.”

Vertical Integration vs Outsourcing

18:18 to 23:01

Understand the trade-offs between vertical integration and outsourcing in manufacturing.

“All kinds of new tech happening in the area.”
Show all 20 chapters

The Implications of Robotics in Warfare

23:01 to 27:25

Discuss the future of robotics in warfare and its implications for society.

“culture of the country instead of fighting for survival out of a famine.”

The Implications of Robotics in Warfare

27:30 to 28:00

Discuss the future of robotics in warfare and its implications for society.

“AI is creating a new path for musical stardom.”

Suno's AI Music Revolution

28:00 to 28:34

Explore how Suno aims to change music creation through AI.

“like taking the text from a crazy night out and making it a gospel song.”

Consequential Phase of AI

29:20 to 31:05

Discuss the critical status of AI and its implications for the future.

“Because when you say these things, everything is couched in these existential terms like war and death.”

Elon's Vision and Reality

31:05 to 31:48

Analyze Elon Musk's ambitious projects and their feasibility.

“You know, when I asked that question about the Robot Olympics, I was really hoping your answer was going to be something like, yeah, that's just show we're really not that far behind.”

Challenges in Rocket Engineering

31:48 to 33:51

Understand the obstacles faced in rocket engineering and innovation.

“And we always say, oh, you can't build in America.”

Trade Policy Impacts on Manufacturing

33:51 to 35:55

Examine the complexities of trade policies affecting US manufacturing.

“And anything that's secondary structure, like landing legs, we need to get rid of it.”

Navigating Tariffs and Industrial Policy

35:55 to 40:35

Delve into the nuances of tariffs and their effects on American industry.

“There's energy, there's labor, there's CapEx, financing costs, and there's export tariffs.”

Revolutionizing Healthcare with Optum

42:17 to 42:36

Discover how Optum is changing the healthcare landscape with technology.

“They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else.”

Understanding Bloomberg Money

42:40 to 43:06

Learn about Bloomberg Money and its focus on financial decision-making.

“And on Fridays, we help you make sense of what it all means for your money.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Tracy Alloway:Did you ever notice how you spend hours shopping online only to pause a checkout because you wonder if you trusted enough to hit buy now? Agentic Commerce is testing that moment more than ever. That's where PayPal comes in. With 25 years of checkouts, 400 million consumer accounts globally, and the benefit of fraud protection. So no matter where a purchase starts, it ends with trust. Built for payments, growth in Agentic. PayPal Open. Built for all business. Visit paypalopen.com. So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need.

0:39Tracy Alloway:Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM. Healthcare doesn't always work great. If you've ever waited on a refill or couldn't schedule an appointment, you get it. That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like?

1:16Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get and care that looks at the whole person. How you need it. Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Learn more at business.optum.com.

1:28Tracy Alloway:Hey, Odd Lots listeners, the Odd Lots tour continues and our next stop is in Chicago. That's right. Joe and I will be at the City Winery Chicago on October 15th for a live Odd Lots recording. Tickets are on sale now at Bloomberg.com forward slash Odd Lots. And of course, a special thank you to Barclays for supporting Odd Lots Live. So that's October 15th at City Winery in Chicago. Get your tickets now.

1:56Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts. Radio. News.

2:11Tracy Alloway:Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal. And I'm Tracy Alloway. So we're doing our live show here at the Vermont Theater in Hollywood. And one of the things that I know very little about, but that I'm very excited to learn more about, is the attempts to turn this part of the country into a booming part of our industrial tech ecosystem. Yeah, so we hear about re-industrialization efforts in America all the time, but what does it actually take to try to do that? And what are the companies actually doing in this space right now? We have two very interesting ones for you.

2:47Tracy Alloway:Yes, I'm very excited. You're going to be hearing our chat with Chris Power. He is the founder of Hadrian, which is trying to build a new generation of factories, as well as Tom Mueller, founder of Impulse Space, also the first employee of SpaceX. We're going to learn about these attempts to re-industrialize Southern California. Take a listen. All right. Well, thank you so much for coming on All Thoughts. Truly the perfect guest. I'm going to start with, I guess, the question I alluded to at the beginning, which is, what is your narrative for the hollowing out, to use a cliche, of U.S. manufacturing?

3:24Why does it seem that we lost some sort of edge? Chris, do you want to start? I do. And I think the first question is, do you want the accurate answer that's going to take three minutes or the political one? How long does the political one take? Can't you do both? So here's what happened. But it happens in context. So every great power of all time does four very simple things. They have some generative population function. They have the best industrial capacity. and then they win or prevent a war and then they get incredibly lazy and they end up with a financial industry and they offshore what made them successful in the first place.

4:18And by the way, this function is represented in the trade of the reserve currency of the world. So the last three times this happened, the Netherlands ceded power to the British Empire and the British Empire ceded power to the American Empire and in each moment of industrial power being retraded by financial power, you switch the reserve currency of the world. And the mistake that everyone makes, because you have four or five generations of softness, is that just because you have the reserve currency means you rule the world and you forget the fact that the only reason you have the reserve currency is because you had the best shipbuilding capacity or manufacturing capacity.

5:02So this is also the founding story of Hadrian, which is if you track these things, roughly every 150 years, the reserve currency of the world changes. And the reason is because you think you're Mike Tyson in your prime, and the other guy or gal thinks you're Mike Tyson before the Buster Douglas fight. And the pattern remains the same. So the founding story of Hadrian and the answer to your question is the reason why it's important is because you've ultimately traded spreadsheet returns from a high-effect and luxury of belief society, and you've forgotten that the world is real, and eventually that comes back to bite you.

5:46Tracy Alloway:We just did an episode with Francis Fukuyama, and so we're very well acquainted with this fantasy that the world comes... You're in the fourth turning. Okay. Wait, wait, wait, wait. Just out of curiosity, before we go to Tom on that question, how often do you think about the roman empire i'm assuming a lot uh a lot in the sense that i think that um america was so everyone knows like what a weeaboo is yeah a what there's a lot of laughs so america was founded by a lot of romaboos which is like obsessive roman So a lot of the fundamental infrastructure of the Fourth Estate and Congress was Roman.

6:32The flaw that happened with Rome is eventually the elites lost the capacity to connect with reality. So in a sense, what you outsource when you have the reserve currency is reality, and then you get bitten in the ass. and yeah. Tom, what's your version of the decline of U.S. manufacturing story and do you also think about the Roman Empire? Well, first of all, I'm gonna put on my glasses to try and be as smart as this guy.

7:05My take on that was, you know, being a founding employee at SpaceX, we, you know, I still say we because I still feel like I'm still at SpaceX even when I left there five years ago. We launched 165 rockets last year, more than any other country. And we put 10 ,000 satellites in orbit, three times everybody else's number of satellites. So tell me again why we can't build in the U.S.? Okay.

7:35Tracy Alloway:Great answer. Optimistic. All right. I'm going to ask you, I promise this will be the most cynical question that I ask tonight. I promise. And I'll ask it to both of you. We all love the sound of, quote, re-industrialization. It makes us feel really good. There's a lot of imagery associated with re-industrialization that we like. We like the image of factories and all these things. There's this very cynical part of me that when I hear, say, like VCs and founders talk about all of this stuff, that really what they want to do is they want to go on podcasts and give their theory about the decline of empires and that they're actually no offense that was it and i believe you but that and then i'm like yeah but where's the thing that you've built so why don't we start with you and both of you and maybe give me why don't you tell me what you're doing and tell me why i should believe it's real rather than creating good footage for a 90 second tweet so my company is impulse space.

8:39I started it within six or eight months after I left SpaceX in 2020 or 2021. Sorry. And we do in space transportation. So we still use SpaceX and other rockets to get to space.

8:53Tracy Alloway:Okay. Everything I build operates in space. So we take over where launch vehicles leave off. So think of a launch vehicle, especially like Starship, a gigantic launch vehicle that can take 100 tons to orbit. Think of it as like the container ship coming into a port, the port being a certain orbit. And all that cargo needs to go to different places. So we provide the sprinter vans and the trucks to move that cargo to other places. So we have two products. We have one that's a very precision maneuvering satellite that has a lot of propulsion. It can move very very closely we just had we had we have three of these on our right now two of them just came within 200 meters of each other 200 or two football fields which is really close in space actually yeah and then we have another product called Helios which is basically a rocket on a rocket it's a it's a giant tank of propellant with a very high energy engine they can take you way out it can escape Earth's gravity it can improve the payload of a Falcon 9 to the moon or to Mars by about a factor of five so those are the two main products and then There's other ones I can't talk about.

10:06And what are you actually building? So we build design-agnostic autonomous factories, which means manufacturing is hard. We will take any design and build factories as a service with our software platform and our technician base that we train from scratch, where we are an automated contract manufacturer. Got it. what we actually produce is everything from spaceflight components for the products that Tom said to an entire missile to 30 % of a Virginia-class submarine. So our job is to use technology to do process designs into a digital twin, run that into factories as a service where we build software-powered factories combined with the workforce where we can operate lights out 24-7 so we are incredibly more efficient and competent.

11:09But we are like Foxconn to Apple. We are Foxconn to every defense prime. When you say autonomous manufacturing, how autonomous are we talking about here? Could I, for instance, run one of your machines? And then also one of the things I always wonder is when we talk about autonomous machinery, what are the humans who are actually running them doing? Just like pressing the button that says go and stop? So the first thing that people get wrong is if you look at a factory and you see a bunch of humans moving things, you think it's a humanoid robot problem. Actually what's happening in advanced manufacturing is there's an incredible amount of smart humans either at a desktop doing digital engineering or they're at the factory floor driving an incredibly dumb computer.

12:00And that's 90 % of advanced manufacturing. This is why we're a software company, because it looks like to any robotics person that, like, if you could optimize a technician not loading the part on the machine or the assembly into the robot, that's going to save you money. It's not. It's actually all massive amounts of software engineering to tie everything together and make it autonomous. The reason why a welder or a machinist has to stand in front of a machine is because it's not closed loop. They're genuinely doing trigonometry in their head, being like, oh, I think the tool's about to break, and therefore I have to stand in front of it.

12:36That's all actually a software problem. So we build software power factories to make sure that you can do a physical task, which is very hard for any robot to do, which is high judgment, set up something very fiddly and then load it into a robotics and CNC or welding system and say, go, it's done, walk away. And the power of the software is that you're able to walk away without being really scared that you're going to accidentally make a code change and crash a$3 million machine. I think the trigonometry point was a polite way of saying that, no, I could not, in fact, run one of these machines, which is fair.

13:12It's fair. I think fundamentally what humans do in our factories is they have high judgment, they have control over what they are going to do, and they do very high dexterity tasks. Most of the load is on the software.

13:42Tracy Alloway:Did you ever notice how you spend hours shopping online, only to pause right before you hit buy now? That tiny hesitation, the one where you wonder if it is trustworthy, can make or break the sale. Now, with AI changing the way consumers discover and compare things, that split-second trust question matters more than ever. That's where PayPal comes in. For more than 25 years, PayPal has been a leader in online payments, and now they're at the forefront of agentic commerce, making it work for businesses, letting them maintain control of their brand and their customer relationships. So even as the way people shop changes, the moment that matters most still feels familiar and deeply dependable.

14:21Tracy Alloway:Built for payments, growth, and agentic. PayPal Open, built for all business. Visit paypalopen.com to get started. This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Now with ChatGPT work, I'm Carol Masser. AI is creating a new path for musical stardom. As Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw and Ashley Carman report, Suno, an AI-generated music company, lets users generate a song in any style based on a text prompt. People can upload their own lyrics or start from scratch, record their own voices, or rely on ones provided by Suno. While most of the songs generated on the service go unheard of by the masses, a few have taken off, including a recent TikTok trend that involves users uploading text messages to Suno and turning them into musical performances, like taking the text from a crazy night out and making it a gospel song.

15:14Suno's pitch to investors is that it'll democratize music creation, leading to a more than$5 billion valuation for the company. The music industry, it's watching, as its biggest concern about AI is whether record labels, rights holders, and artists will be compensated for the work they claim built the training models for companies like Suno. Another question, will these AI bangers have any staying power or just be one-hit wonders? That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at ChatGPT.com today by selecting Work Mode, available on Plus and Pro plans.

15:54Join Bloomberg for the Canadian Finance Conference, proudly sponsored by National Bank of Canada Capital Markets on September 29th in New York. Hear from influential corporate and government leaders as they discuss the strategies shaping Canada's economic future. Connect with senior decision makers, gain actionable insights, and be part of the conversations driving business forward. Register at bloomberglive.com slash Canadian Finance. That's bloomberglive.com slash Canadian Finance.

16:24Tracy Alloway:So I was in Shenzhen earlier this year. and one of the things that people always talk about the Chinese manufacturing success is the ecosystem, right? You need some part or something like that that's custom fit. There's someone a mile away and they can make it for you that afternoon and then you have it there. And what's interesting or intriguing or why we wanted to have this part of the conversation is I know that there's actually quite a number of companies in the Southern California area building stuff. And I'm curious, like, is it becoming rich in the sense that you're complementing each other and sort of like building on each other's successes and each one of you is increasing the odds of you that the other succeed in some way?

17:11I think it's both. We're stealing talent from each other, certainly, and we're competing for talent, for sure. There are so many companies that a lot of founders that were ex-SpaceX like me, and a lot of my employees are ex-SpaceX. Right across the street from me is Northrop Grumman, which was TRW. I worked there for 15 years. It's literally across the street from me. I look out of my office window, and I was in that building. We steal a lot of people from them. We steal from Boeing. It's just there's only so much talent in the area and there's so many companies growing so fast. We're bringing it back.

17:50I was talking in the green room about this chart that I used to love that showed aerospace jobs in the South Bay like this. And SpaceX started in 2002. It took maybe three or four years and it started going up and it's just going like that. And you think about all the other startups are not necessarily all space startups. There's nuclear companies. There's drone companies. There's defense companies. There's 3D printing companies. All kinds of new tech happening in the area. And if you go even further, like not just South Bay, but like Anduril, down in Orange County and the general area. I always say that software is done in Silicon Valley.

18:38Hardware is done in L.A. Wait, can both of you say a little bit more about how you think about producing stuff in-house versus sourcing it externally? Because you think about SpaceX, and one of the famous things about SpaceX is vertical integration, right? The idea that there weren't enough space manufacturers making vital components, so they brought everything in-house in order to do it to the speed at which Elon desires, to put it politely or mildly. How do you think about that trade-off? I mean, that's a great discussion to have because Chris and I, you know, it involves both of us because we're very vertically integrated at Impulse just like we were at SpaceX.

19:17But also, we buy a lot of parts from outside. Like, I think it's really important to, like, you make your first development engine or spacecraft, you build it yourself, and you learn all of the problems that you're going to have assembling it, machining it. if I gave a development thing to a machine shop and they had all these problems with the drawing and making the part and then we get it and we can't assemble it. You learn it on your prototypes. And once you get that tight, then you send it out. I know Chris is getting ready to make Raptor parts. So even SpaceX is sending parts out. We get to the point where you get into production.

19:55That's when you don't need to grow your facility to handle high production. Maybe you'll keep some of the really super secret parts in your house, but you'll send the easier to machine or stuff that his shop can make really great out. That's my take on that. I agree. I think every company should have 10 % to 15 % in-house. There's no amount of software or service in the world that, like, you've got a hot pot. You need the one genius guy to make it in an hour to hit flight. but scale has to happen externally. For us as a contract manufacturer, for some customers we make parts, for some customers we make the entire missile and for submarines we make somewhere in halfway.

20:44Even for us, what I trade off is I think in manufacturing you sell and buy trust. So our vertical integration strategy is we want to outsource everything possible to every re-industrialized startup, every small business that we possibly can because we have so many programs to run. But we vertically integrate where we just don't believe you're going to get the job done. And it's not a financial trade. It's like, I'll put a$2 million piece of CapEx in the ground and hire a team to do it because I would rather spend more money making sure we're on schedule than taking the risk that outsourcing it to a legacy casting facility that's been late for the last 30 years on every submarine program.

21:30For me, it's all about trust. It's not economics. It's not anything. It's just I need it to be on time, and most of America is incompetent in terms of trust and schedule. Is that fair? A manufacturing machine shop or a manufacturing house that you can trust is gold.

21:46Tracy Alloway:You know, we actually did an interview yesterday with the guy who's heading the LA 2028 Olympics, But I recently saw the Robot Olympics in China and all the humanoid Olympics, and they were, like, running. It was, like, really impressive. Let's be honest. In future Olympics, will Americans ever medal in the humanoid robotic Olympics? Not yet, but I'd take a roided-up Midwesterner versus a communist robot every day of the week.

22:20Tracy Alloway:I would, too. That's a good answer. But this is a serious question, because future warfare could be... No, it is. It is. And I would not want to put up a roided-up Midwesterner against a robot that, like... Well, I was glad to know that you're full of clankers, but... But no, seriously, like, how anxious should we be about the robot gas? So, in terms of... So, let me go back a step. Netherlands, British Empire, American Republic the next trade is the CCP versus America. America has a lot of flaws. We like to debate because we are so rich that we get to debate the culture of the country instead of fighting for survival out of a famine.

23:04Ultimately hard power wins politics because at some point you don't want to be polite and you can just be like well f*** you I have 2 ,000 warships. We have our current missile inventory in any war game we expand everything in the warehouse and we run out in seven days. China produced 2 ,600 ships and we produced six, etc, etc, etc. And the thing that you need to realize is in Germany versus America, which is the proxy of World War II, we actually sucked at engineering. The German engineers destroyed us. We just McDonald's the f*** out of them. We were China in World War II. No, no, No, no, it's not a laughing matter.

23:49We were China in World War II. We just outproduced them. We had better logistics. We made more stuff because we weren't rich, but we're the industrial superpower, and we became rich because of Bretton Woods. You're in the same situation. So it's incredibly serious because you're in the fourth turning where you are, like, we spent the last 10 years in COVID trading cat pictures on JPEGs on the internet, and we've forgotten why we're successful in the first place, which ultimately was we were the largest industrial superpower in the world. So the reason why it's serious is you can have the best engineering in the world, like you've got the best Raytheon missile, but if you literally can't just make mass, which is ultimately a production issue, there's no choice.

24:39So we are so far behind and no one realizes this It's purely because you're in a cultural time where America currently is IBM. And you go to the board of IBM and you say, hey, guys, would you like to invent Claude Code? And the board and the CEO says, yes, sir. And you look back at your 500 ,000 employees and you go, we're f***ing. And the good thing is America's got a lot of dynamism. America's got people like Tom Mueller and Elon and the nuclear stuff. It's possible to correct, but we are so far behind that ultimately robotics is how good are we as software, but ultimately most of software, especially AI, is now determined on what is the velocity of your training data, which means physical world deployment, which means mass manufacturing.

25:29So it's a real civilizational fight. And it's not this like fun game between American companies where like, hey, if Tesla ships more optimists versus Google, the consumer is going to end up in a better product. No, no, no, no. No, they're going to kill you. And people are not tracking this at all. And Tom, I know you're much more of a space guy than defense guy, but I'd love your opinion on this. Well, I have a pretty – I've been thinking about robots a lot lately. And I think that the resources of the moon are going to be needed. to do what we want to do in space and How do you do that like having people on the moon like a lot like an army of people working on the moon?

26:12It's just not sustainable. It's too dangerous. It's too expensive. It's just it's not a good environment for humans maybe a few but you want an army of robots to build on the moon and eventually Mars and What do you need to make a really good robot? I think you need three things you need dexterity, you need a human hand basically and people are working on that. You need great vision which is already pretty much solved and you need a brain, AI. Once those pieces all come together you have the capability of a human plus superhuman. Of course that can be used in war also but for me I always think about what you can do in space because it's such a harsh environment.

Read the full transcript

26:54Humans should not have to be there. We should choose to go there, but to try and work and build there is a losing game, I think. And we don't need to do it because robots are on the cusp of being ready.

27:25This is the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Now with ChatGPT work. I'm Carol Masser. AI is creating a new path for musical stardom. As Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw and Ashley Carman report, Suno, an AI-generated music company, lets users generate a song in any style based on a text prompt. People can upload their own lyrics or start from scratch, record their own voices, or rely on ones provided by Suno. While most of the songs generated on the service go unheard of by the masses, a few have taken off, including a recent TikTok trend that involves users uploading text messages to Suno and turning them into musical performances.

28:05like taking the text from a crazy night out and making it a gospel song. Suno's pitch to investors is that it'll democratize music creation, leading to a more than$5 billion valuation for the company. The music industry, it's watching, as its biggest concern about AI is whether record labels, rights holders, and artists will be compensated for the work they claim built the training models for companies like Suno. Another question? Will these AI bangers have any staying power or just be one-hit wonders? That's the Bloomberg Tech Minute brought to you by ChatGPT. Put ChatGPT to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects.

28:41Get started at ChatGPT.com today by selecting Work Mode. Available on Plus and Pro plans. AI is entering its most consequential phase where scale, safety and sovereignty will determine who leads and who lags. Join Bloomberg Tech in London on November 2nd and 3rd as global leaders across business, finance and policy examine the defining tradeoffs shaping the future of AI. Thank you to our presenting sponsor, Salesforce and supporting sponsors, IDA Ireland and Schneider Electric. Learn more at BloombergLive.com slash Tech London.

29:20What is the actual key constraint to your respective businesses then? Because when you say these things, everything is couched in these existential terms like war and death. And I'm sure we all want to survive. So why aren't we cracking this particular problem? I've seen your respective valuations, so it's probably not a question of money. But is it a question of labor or materials or what's going on here? you go you know the last two weeks I think the discussion has been will the AI just kill us outright before we even get to war right yeah technology is a great thing it's a super dangerous thing I think there's been no greater example of that than AI and I read Super Intelligence by Ben Bostrom.

30:15When was that? Came out like 10, 15 years ago. And Elon read it too. And we were scared. It was just like, that book was so comprehensive. And it's like, well, at least the futurists think this is like 2045, 2050, this is going to happen. Because of LLMs. Nobody knew that an LLM, if you just study human language and do these neural networks, how much could be in there, right? We still understand. So it happened much sooner than we thought, and we're not ready for it. And here we are. We can't slow down too much. I think we're ahead of China so we can slow down, but we can't slow down too much and let them get ahead because whoever has the super-intelligent AI could possibly rule the world.

31:02I think that's probably true. So we're at a really important place in history right now.

31:09Tracy Alloway:You know, when I asked that question about the Robot Olympics, I was really hoping your answer was going to be something like, yeah, that's just show we're really not that far behind. Like, I was trying to set you up for, like, an optimistic spin. I thought, oh, no, don't get fooled by, like, those videos you see of robots. But everything since then has been, unfortunately, I thought you were going, by the way, I understand we're a nicotine-fueled empire. Or I heard that great powers are fueled by nicotine. Every great company or empire is fueled by one drug. Stripe was an Adderall company. Everyone in manufacturing is a nicotine, alcohol, fuel, fire.

31:46Yes. So... Caffeine.

31:47Tracy Alloway:So, Tommy, you said something really important, actually, at the beginning, which is, you know, you mentioned the number of rockets that we've launched. And we always say, oh, you can't build in America. But it is evidently, provably false, because there was this one individual who actually built the biggest car company in the world and has built the biggest rocket company and the biggest satellite company, etc., which they're not multiple of him, but it was clearly in retrospect possible to build big things. And he was about to build the biggest data server company in the world. Right. So I don't know, you know, what is, as SpaceX employee number one, what was it, how would you characterize to a broad public what Elon was capable of doing, which so many people presume cannot or could not have been done in the U.S.

32:41in the first half of the first two decades of the century. I mean, you know, I went through, I couldn't hire, when we first started, there was like four of us. And I couldn't, all the people I worked with at TRW, all of them like rolled their eyes and would not come work with me. All the Rocketdyne guys, Rocketdyne did all the engines that got us to the moon back in the 60s. None of them, like only governments and big money can build a rocket that can get to orbit. So we had at every step people saying you can't do it. Like you can't build an engine that can do this. You can't, a pump-fed engine.

33:21You can't get to orbit. Okay, you can get to orbit with a little single engine rocket. You can't get to orbit with a nine engine, you know, Falcon 9 orbit. We did that. You can't get a space capsule to work. We did that you can't go fly humans to the space station dragon right now is the only in the western world The only way to get to our space station is a SpaceX dragon capsule. We did that and so Did the biggest rocket in the world is Starship? No way can you do that? It's flying It's about ready about ready to become aircraft-like operational so when Elon's People still call it hype and I don't because I've been through it for 24 almost 25 years it's not hype he's going to build it it's if it's I believe if it's possible it will be solved and um it might take longer than Elon thinks but he will solve it and what's the most surprising thing you ever saw Elon do I've talked about this I think the one thing I was in the meeting when they presented the landing legs for Starship and they were super heavy and it's just you know Starship is stainless steel.

34:30It's a heavy machine. And anything that's secondary structure, like landing legs, we need to get rid of it. He says, we're going to get rid of the landing legs. We're going to catch it in the air on chopsticks, like catching a fly with chopsticks. And we all just rolled our eyes like, this is crazy. There's just no way. Did you all see it? Starship, the biggest rocket in the world, came in and landed on the chopsticks. and none of us, I wouldn't say none of us, but some of us did not believe it could be done and it was done. And it's like, if it's possible, it's solvable.

35:06Tracy Alloway:I have a sort of a nuts and bolts question, maybe I guess literally, but trade policy. So obviously there is a view, okay, like one way to accelerate demand for American production is tariffs and so forth. I have also heard, however, from talking to other people in the industrial space, that it cuts both ways because there are certain components that must be imported and therefore raises the cost of certain input goods into this. And I'm curious what you've seen in your own world, the degree to which some of these policies can perhaps cut in both directions. So this is a very nuanced answer and both administrations have gotten it slightly wrong.

35:49Okay. So let me set the macro, which most people don't understand. So fundamentally, there's four inputs to manufacturing. There's energy, there's labor, there's CapEx, financing costs, and there's export tariffs. In most circumstances, and I've done this exercise, if you dial our factory down to 0 % labor cost, 0 % energy, whatever, Chinese imports are still three. I can make a component for a customer. I can buy the raw material in the United States, and it's three times the cost of the component imported from China for some of our commercial customers. If I dial my business model down to zero.

36:40So fundamentally what the Tariffs Mentor event is, first principles, the CCP is subsidizing energy, labor, capital, and export tariffs to draw competency out, again, to the fourth turning comment, to generate industrial power subsidized by the American consumer. Same with drones. The reason why we are bad at drones is not because DGI is the best software drone company, but those things cost$60 and they sell them to American consumers for$20. This is an explicit understanding that China has always treated industrial policy like national security. And since 85, America has treated industrial policy like financial spreadsheet returns for hedge funds.

37:31That's point number one. the intent of every Biden or Trump subsidy or economic policy was to give Americans an even playing field against a country that is operating their industrial base like national security. That's point number one. In terms of tariffs, it's complicated. The reason why it's complicated is for two reasons. One is you have to ring fence everything around China. And in practice, what happens is if you only ban China but you don't ban Singapore, some Chinese company will ship something to Singapore, they'll call it Singapore, and it's the same impact on the American workforce or industrial policy.

38:13The third thing is that there's a definition issue here. So as an example, raw materials from China, they're on the tariffs. If you have a little bit of human labor in it, it's an assembly, and that's negative against American businesses that are trying to import assemblies from Mexico. So there are trade-offs all over the place. The principle was correct, which is provide Americans an even playing field against a company that has a fake balance sheet and projects 6 % GDP growth and draws American capital and American consumer capital in. That has to get solved. It's not Americans suck at manufacturing or software engineers are not good at manufacturing autonomy, you're subsidizing from 30 % to 60%.

38:59Every implementation is, like, really tough to do in terms of the nuance. Sure. The correct thing to do, in my opinion, is what we just did with drones and robots, which is it's a terrible idea that every American police drone or military drone can have any Chinese circuit board in it because obviously you can then turn them into like, if we go to war, you're going to zap the guy in the head. Same thing with robots. I would like a$10 ,000 laundry folding robot, but industrial policy means that you're going to buy a$30 ,000 laundry folding robot, because otherwise it's going to kill you eventually, and that's bad leverage for the country.

39:42No, I'm serious. Because they don't actually make them for$10 ,000. They make them for$30 ,000, but the national policy says, I would much rather have every laundering folding robot in America cost$10 ,000 because the American consumer is the largest capital allocators in the world, much bigger than Blackstone and Blackrock. So the banning of components and assemblies to say you've got to buy American-American allies and let the market correct for cost is correct. Tariffs are an imperfect way to do that, but the core principle for any administration of leveling the playing field is correct. But each side has gotten this materially wrong because it's complicated.

40:28And there's many ways to commit fraud inside any regulatory system. Chris and Tom, oh. Oh, I was going to say, we could go on for a long time, but we're going to have to leave it there because we've run out of time. But Chris and Tom, thank you so much for coming on OddLots. Really appreciate it.

40:59That was our conversation with Chris Power and Tom Miller, recorded live here in LA. I'm Tracy Allaway. You can follow me at Tracy Allaway.

41:07Tracy Alloway:And I'm Jill Weisenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Armand, Dashiell Bennett at Dashpot, Kale Brooks at Kale Brooks, and Kevin Lozano at Kevin Lloyd Lozano. And for more Odd Lots content, you should check out our daily newsletter. You can find that at Bloomberg.com forward slash Odd Lots. And you can chat about all these topics 24-7 in our Discord, discord.gg slash Odd Lots. And if you enjoyed this conversation, then please like the video or leave a comment or better yet, subscribe. Thanks for watching and listening.

41:49Thank you.

42:16That's the kind of stuff Optum is changing. They're using data and technology to integrate patient care, pharmacy, and everything else. So healthcare is connected, not complicated. What's that look like? Cheaper prescriptions that are easier to get and care that looks at the whole person. How you need it. Optum is helping make healthcare work as one for everyone. Learn more at business.optum.com. Here at Bloomberg, we spend all week talking about markets and the economy. And on Fridays, we help you make sense of what it all means for your money. Bloomberg Money is our weekly look at the forces shaping your financial life.

42:52We explore personal finance, investing and retirement with leading economists, strategists and wealth managers. Join me, Scarlett Foo. And me, Tom Keen, for smart conversations that help you make better financial decisions. Subscribe to Bloomberg Money on Apple, Spotify or wherever you listen.

From the publisher

The story you hear nowadays is that America is struggling to make things and can't compete with China when it comes to advanced manufacturing. But of course, there's tons of high-tech stuff being produced in the US, and more and more companies are doing it out of Southern California, with factories sprouting up around Los Angeles to build things like precision metal parts and jet engines. Two founders who are actively engaged in building things in LA are Tom Mueller, founder of Impulse Space (and Employee No. 1 at SpaceX), as well as Hadrian founder Chris Power. Impulse Space is building in-space transport vehicles while Hadrian is creating autonomous factories. This episode, which was recorded live at the Vermont Hollywood, is from our first ever Odd Lots live show in LA . We talk to Chris and Tom about how the US lost its manufacturing edge and why LA is becoming a destination for people who want to make and build hardware.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Odd Lots

All 682 episodes
How LA Is Quietly Becoming America's New Industrial Tech HubOdd Lots · 36 min
Listen in VO