Jared Bernstein on the Next Stage of Bidenomics

0:00You're being sold an AI future where you're obsolete or irrelevant. That vision is wrong. At Palantir, they're building AI that helps workers and unlocks their full potential. American workers are our nation's greatest strength. AI shouldn't eliminate them. It should elevate them. Palantir is here to tell their stories. From factories to hospitals, AI is freeing people from drudgery, letting them do what humans do best. Create. Solve. Build. Palantir, making Americans irreplaceable.

1:01of the supplier lifecycle, helping you deepen merchant relationships. Start fast, grow strategically, and scale at your pace with a modular toolkit you can flexibly deploy. Discover how at mastercard.com slash commercial acceptance.

1:27Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Joe Weisenthal. And I'm Tracy Allaway. Tracy, so we're recording this Friday, June 30th. It really felt like this week, a bunch of people kind of like declared victory on the economy or suddenly like there's been like something in the water, you know, like they put LSD in the water or something. People are feeling good. There's a good mood vibe. Yeah. If last year we were all worried about the vibe session, so the idea that all these survey-based measures were turning down even while activity was still relatively robust, what are we going to call this one?

2:02What's the vibe expansion? I don't know. Vibe expansion. We need to get Kyla Scanlon to come up with a term. But yes, the vibes shifted somehow this week. Yeah. And it's interesting because a lot of the trends that we saw last year, you know, very low unemployment, you know, still some inflationary pressures, housing market relatively robust. Those have just continued this year. So not a lot has changed, but it definitely feels like people are more optimistic. Yeah, right. Exactly. A bunch of people declaring that all the recession calls are null and void. The vibe session is over. Noah Smith had a blog saying that.

2:40And I think most notably, the White House sort of chose this week as a week to stamp out the success of what they're calling Bidenomics. And they're basically – we had the president and they're sort of saying, yes, this is the economy that the White House has planned for and designed and envisioned. And so I think that's a sign they're kind of like in a position where they want to brag a little bit. Yeah. They want to talk about it. Yeah. And it is interesting in and of itself that the White House feels comfortable enough to choose this moment to kind of put a timestamp on the idea of Bidenomics and declare it an early success.

3:15Yeah. And so, I mean, obviously, we know like it's a big component of it. And there are these really sort of extraordinary like, you know, industrial policy like strategies, the CHIPS Act, which we talk a lot about on the show, the Inflation Reduction Act, the reshoring, domestic investment, all of these things sort of like sort of ongoing fiscal support for the economy, putting money in the hands of workers, etc. etc. And, you know, again, the numbers today seem solid. And so then I guess the question is like, OK, what is the big coherent thought? And like, where's going from next? Because we're getting the investments.

3:48We see the factory announcements all the time. But then like, what's next for all that's being built? Why now? And what's next? Well, to learn more about what is biodynamics and what is next, we are going to be speaking with Jared Bernstein. He is the head of the White House Council of Economic Advisors. Jared Bernstein, thank you so much for coming on Odd Lots today. Huge week. Wait a second. Am I the perfect guest or not? We have the perfect guest. Thank you. That's what I want to be here. Yeah. Someone told us recently how devastated they would be if they got intro'd without the perfect guest mentioned.

4:24You are the perfect guest. Once you start saying that, it sort of it becomes like, wow. Yeah, we have to say it every time. I didn't get it. When we don't say it, it's never intentional. It's not that important. Huge week, obviously. Why now? You know, the economy is hot and it's been hot for a while. Inflation has elevated labor market tightness. Why was this the week that President Biden and the White House chose to sort of sort of declare that Bidenomics is working? Well, I think the simple answer is that there's a lot of evidence that it is. And in terms of the broader economy, you know, I think that there's headwinds and there's tailwinds.

5:04And I think one of the things that I know I listen to you guys all the time and I really enjoy what you do, but I think all of us here in this business get very focused on the news of the day, the news of the minute, the news of the week, you know, the market asset that's in trouble or the market asset that's soaring, the supply chain that's broken, the dwell time in some port somewhere. All of that's critically important to all of us. And you two do a great job reporting on that. But, you know, Bidenomics takes both a near-term and a very long-term view. So when we're talking about the bipartisan infrastructure law, the inflation reduction at the CHIPS Act, and I know you've done shows on all of those, We're talking about a long-term play here where if we get the implementation and the public-private aspects of those investments right, we have the potential to transform the economy very much in the spirit of Bidenomics bottom-up, middle-out growth.

6:03A complete reversal from the trickle-down, top-down approach that I think decades of evidence fails to support. So I do think there is a longer-term view here that gets away from the headwinds and tailwinds of the day. So I'm glad you mentioned this because this sort of feeds into one of the criticisms that you sometimes hear about a more active industrial policy or, you know, Bidenomics where investment, long term investment does take a more central role. And that criticism is that potentially you are pulling a lot of investment forward. So you're sort of front loading CapEx. And that maybe, you know, in the next downturn, which hopefully will be a long time from now, that maybe you won't have as much ammunition for this type of spending again.

6:52How would you respond to that? Well, I think one of the very positive attributes of the Bidenomics investment that we're seeing right now is the extent to which public investment, which does have a longer term spend out, it's much smoother, is pulling in private investment, which, as you suggest, can be kind of lumpy. Part of that is because of the actual building, the sunk initial costs that take place when we are standing up a domestic semiconductor industry, when we're standing up a domestic electric vehicle, electric battery industry, when we're making these longer term investments in clean energy.

7:29So here's a way to think about that. If you look at the record on the prior administration of domestic spending on manufacturing facilities, so the construction of manufacturing plants, it flatlined for many years. I think it grew 2 % real in the prior administration. That's up 100 % since the president took office. So that's a hockey stick kind of a figure. And the Treasury Department put out a nice blog on that, if you want to just post the figure on that. And what the Treasury folks did in their blog was they looked at where those manufacturing facilities, what sectors is that construction taking place?

8:07And it very clearly relates to the investments that are incentivized by the legislation that we've been talking about. So, of course, you're going to see a big initial spend. But I think over the longer term, that smooths out. And if we if we do it right, it keeps delivering in terms of domestic production and high quality jobs for American workers. Tracy, I want to comment on something you said. You guys talk a lot about industrial strategy policy. I'm not sure that this point has been made clearly enough, though, you know, if it has, I'm repeating it, which is that, yes, we certainly have a very clear, conscious, visible, elevated agenda in that space.

8:49Nobody's trying to be cute or hide any balls. But I also think that you cannot find a time in our economic history when there wasn't an industrial policy of some sort or another. And, you know, obviously you can go back to the beginnings of our country and see a very clearly articulated industrial policy, Hamilton's manufacturing initiatives. But what I'm talking about is something much less positive than that. What I'm talking about is an industrial policy that is a function of who has the best connected lobbyist to get the tax code that they want. And what you end up with, what you end up in that kind of industrial policy is the deepest pocketed, best connected, in many cases, most divorced from actual economic productivity initiatives are the ones that get the breaks, the funding, the tax credits, the attention.

9:44one thing you'd expect to have in that scenario is an outsized role for finance and what I call the shampoo cycle, bubble, bust, repeat. And we've seen a lot of that. So I think that it's wrong to think that we sort of fell out of the sky with industrial strategy and more correct to view this as a very intentional and I hope very thoughtful one. I want to ask about, you mentioned the investment in structures. And it is a hockey stick. And we see the battery announcements almost every other day and the chip announcements almost every other day. What is next? And by next, I'm specifically, what can you and the administration and the rest of the administration do to focus that what happens inside the plants actually happens in a cost competitive way, that good cutting edge batteries are made, that they compete globally, that good cutting edge chips are being made.

10:37What's next in terms of basically, yeah, guaranteeing that what's built inside these structures sort of delivers on the outside? Well, the thing with capitalism is that there's no guarantees. The idea of, you know, the government sort of getting in there and saying, you know, don't use this widget, use that widget sounds kind of unappealing to me. I think the best thing for our industrial strategy, and certainly the way I believe the president thinks about this, is that we create the environment and the conditions, both in terms of capital investment, in terms of worker quality, and in terms of the ancillary functions, which I'll explain, that workers need to make this all work.

11:17So the first thing is there are deep market failures where private investors, because of risk-reward ratios being what they are, will underinvest in critical sectors, such as climate, such as batteries, such as more resilient supply chains here. And so our financing structures, and again, you had lots of good conversations, you've had folks from the government on to talk about this, our financing structures have to tweak those risk rewards so that we can get the investment we need. That's, you know, a pretty 30 ,000 feet up versus, you know, how can you get into the factory and make sure the chips are coming out the right way.

11:55But that's important. And then secondly, we have to make sure that the workforce is empowered and educated. And that happens to be pillar two of Bidenomics, by the way, empowering and educating the workforce. And I think one somewhat underappreciated part of CHIPS is the very significant resources in that bill to provide training for workers to come into these places, places which, by the way, and this might even be an odd lot show someday, places that are being stood up all across the country. This is my favorite aspects of Bidenomics and the investment agenda. They're showing up in the Southwest, in upstate New York, in Ohio, in Tennessee, in Oklahoma, in blue places, in red places.

12:35You know, the president has a joke, I'll see you at the ribbon cutting for people who didn't vote for the legislation, but show up to cut the ribbons. And I think that's great. I mean, I think that's the way to have the most productive economy. But where's it going? The third part of your question? Well, look, Our care agenda is really important. This may sound divorced from what we're talking about, but it's not. Just like we announced earlier one of these weeks, they all mushed together for me, we're going to make sure that if you live in rural America, you have affordable high-speed broadband.

13:06That is economic oxygen to people in those places. You can't participate without it. I'd say the same thing about accessible and affordable child care. That's something we have to work on going forward. It's in our budget. I think that's a great tool for us to work on, both in the context of helping people's personal budgets in their economies, their household economies, but also in this context to make sure people have access to the job market and to these good jobs. Well, Joe and I would be more than happy to do a Studs Terkel version of the show where we go on the road and talk to workers in new types of jobs.

13:42But just on that note, you know, Joe asked you about being cost competitive. How do you thread the needle between creating, for instance, a semiconductor factory and also a semiconductor factory that's able to compete on a global basis with empowering workers and making sure that workers are getting a fair deal? And the reason I ask that is because I think we just saw a headline that came out saying that there are some semiconductor firms that are talking about importing migrant labor rather than hiring locally in order to keep costs down. And we know that, for example, the autoworkers are concerned about wages and pay at some of the battery factories replacing the ice factories.

14:26I think this is very much a walk and chew gum kind of question. I think when it comes to the cost of production, we have a very conscious agenda to lower cost curves. And I think we're seeing some success there. We're seeing cost curves come down, particularly in renewable energy, where the president, I believe, said this in his speech in Chicago the other day, that some of the price points around renewable energy, given the increase in capacity in those sectors, have come down to be quite competitive with traditional sources. I think we could say the same thing with chips. if our plans are able to be realized with the pace that they're on now.

15:04And that's just a very simple aggregate supply demand chart, where by increasing capacity, increasing supply, you help on the price side. And then, you know, the other part is the job market. Look, we've had an unemployment rate that's below 4 % for 18 months, a year and a half. We've had, when you do that, you start seeing workers get a bit more bargaining clout. And that shows up in pay. And in fact, we're finally starting to see real wage gains as inflation begins to ease and the job market remains strong. We've now seen a year-over-year wage gain in the last job support, real wage gain. I should say year-over-year real wage gain in the last job support.

15:47We now have real wages up a percent since last June. If you look for production non-supervisory workers, so blue-collar workers, non-managers, That's 80 % of the workforce. Their pay is up 1.5 % since last June. So interestingly, it's up 50 bps more than the overall. That's a bargaining power story. We have a blog on the CEA website showing gains for black workers, even closing some of the black-white gap a little bit because of the importance of that bargaining power. We have an economy that can do both of the above. That's the answer to Tracy's question, that can do both of the above, that can invest in productive capacity to bend cost curves while we run a tight enough labor market that workers are getting their fair share of the growth that they're helping to create.

16:35And by the way, one of the ways that happens mechanically or arithmetically is by a labor share of income getting back to, you know, some of its historical averages. It's been pretty depressed lately. And that's actually a non-inflationary way of paying for a higher real pay is through a higher labor share.

17:08Silicon Valley is selling you a future where you're obsolete, or worse, identical. At Palantir, they're witnessing something different and revolutionary, from re-industrializing the nation's defense base, to shipyard workers building faster, and frontline workers boosting productivity, AI is transforming work across the nation. AI is not replacing American workers or flattening them into conformity. It's unleashing what makes each one irreplaceable, their judgment, their craft, their creativity. When American workers become more powerfully themselves, they own the future. Palantir, making Americans irreplaceable.

17:49Support for the show comes from public.com. You're thoughtful about where your money goes. You've got your core holdings, some recurring crypto buys, maybe even a few strategic option plays on the side. The point is you're engaged with your investments and public gets that. That's why they built an investing platform for those who take it seriously. On public, you can put together a multi-asset portfolio for the long haul. Stocks, bonds, options, crypto, it's all there. Plus an industry leading 3.6 % APY, high yield cash account. Switch to the platform built for those who take investing seriously.

18:22Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Paid for by Public Investing. All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal. Brokerage services for U.S.-listed registered securities, options, and bonds in a self-directed account are offered by Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA, and SIPC. Crypto trading provided by ZeroHash. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. Can you talk about international trade under the Bidenomics framework? And I'm thinking specifically about some of the frustrations from our friends and allies in Europe about some of the rules that were put in place with the Inflation Reduction Act and how you think about that relationship and what is the Bidenomics stance on how we relate to our trading partners?

19:09Yeah. One of the things I get to do as chair of the CEA is I chair something called the Economic Policy Committee of the OECD. And we recently had a meeting over there and I was talking to folks in my position in many different, you know, many other countries. And it was a very good, robust discussion about this point. I think there's actually a lot more commonality, a lot more agreement that we're all engaged. Many of these economies we're talking about, if you look at their policy agendas, we're all doing some version of the same thing. And it's exactly what we've been talking about in our investment discussion.

19:46And in fact, in many cases, Europe's been doing this for a lot longer than we have. You know, industrial strategy was not a bad couple of words over there, I would say, longer than has been the case here. And the idea is to, I think, promote more spillovers than sort of head-to-head competition. If we can help lower the cost curve for producing the components of clean energy economy, components of electric vehicles. Yes, of course, there's going to be competition, but there's also going to be, I think, some cooperation and some benefits from the increased capacity that we have here. Let me give a concrete example.

20:22If you're making a battery here, you're making it here, and if you follow the president's plans, you're creating good union jobs for folks to do that here. But nature, in her wisdom, put the components of electric batteries under the Earths of many different countries. And most of them aren't this one. I think there's some some of that up in Alaska. But there's there's just you're going to be getting those intermediate inputs from other countries. So I think one mistake that's been made in this discussion is somehow assuming that our international trade policy is leaning towards autarky and far less in terms of trade flows.

21:02That is demonstrably false if you look at the trade flows themselves, which have been quite robust. I mean, I try to point people, just do a couple clicks and you'll see. We engage in robust trade, but I would say what really frames our thinking about this differently is we don't look, under Bidenomics, we don't look at Americans as consumers 100 % full stop. We recognize that they and their communities are also working people, workers who depend on domestic production, getting good jobs here. If all you thought about was consumer spending, you'd say, let me import everything to try to increase the supply and lower the price.

21:44If you thought about consumers, people are consumers, but they're also workers, you'd think about both. And you'd say, yes, we want robust trade flows. Yes, we want to work with our partners to lower the costs of goods that are so critical for our future. But we also want to have good jobs here, and we don't want to hollow out our communities. So I think that's really the way to think about the package. Just going back to the investment side of Bidenomics and I guess differentiating between bad industrial policy versus smarter industrial policy. You mentioned the idea of, you know, potentially money or power being concentrated in the hands of a few firms.

22:24And I know that anti-monopoly measures are of interest and a big plank of the Bidenomics agenda. So does this type of ramped up public investment, does that need to go hand in hand with stronger anti-monopoly measures? And what are you thinking on that front? I think it does. And I think that's and that happens to be pillar three of Bidenomics, by the way, which is promoting competition both to lower costs and to give smaller businesses a seat at the table, a chance to leap over some of those anti -competitive barriers that you were just kind of alluding to. In terms of what it means, it's really everything from some very granular stuff to getting some competitive cops back on the beat.

23:12So on the granular side, you've seen a president who's come out strong against junk fees, who has implemented anti-overdraft initiatives. I was talking to the president about this the other day, and he reminded me about a famous case. I know Aaron Klein at Brookings talks about this, of this banker who had a boat that was called overdraft. He had a yacht and he named it overdraft. You know, that was something that does not sit well with President Biden. And so he took an action that's saving consumers five and a half billion dollars a year on overdraft fees, you know, non-competes, which I think you've probably talked about.

23:48I'm sure you know what I'm talking about. The idea that workers are come out from these really non-competitive, non-compete clauses to allow them to get jobs in the same or similar industries where they were in a way that doesn't do anything to hurt company disclosures or anything like that. So that's the granular side of that equation. I think the other side, which there are other people who could talk about it more thoroughly than me, is just having the FTC back on the beat. And you've seen lots of action there. I think it's fair to say they're an independent regulator, just like the Fed, so we don't like to get up in their knitting.

24:22But I think it's fair to say that they have taken this kind of view very seriously. The idea that when too many of your industries, retail, health care, technology are so concentrated, that's non or anti competitive. They've taken that seriously and they're actively working to fix the damage in a way that I think is impressive. We just have about a minute or two left with you. You know, obviously, for the remainder of this particular term, Republicans control Congress, so legislative window probably not particularly wide open. I'm just curious, like what active is there that you're working on specifically, whether it's still trying to push through legislation or on the sort of administrative regulatory side that we should be watching for?

25:06Well, I think that so first of all, we have to do both. And I'm not going to talk about student debt because we're going to let the president talk about that first. but that remains something he's been committed to since the campaign, helping people there. And we have a lot of plans in that space, some of which are not as well known as they should be. In fact, I'd like to nudge you to do a show, not necessarily with me. We appreciate all the show suggestions, by the way. Yeah, I should be one of your editors. On our new income-driven repayment plan, that is something people really need to learn a lot about.

25:39I'd love you guys to dig into that. It's a great plan. We have people here who can help explain it to the audience in a way that I'm sure people would find compelling. So, you know, there are things we can do on the admin side, the rule side. But I think the more fulsome answer to your question is to look at our budget. Our budget is where we put the ideas, the policy agenda that the president believes is most important. And while people always say, oh, the president budget isn't going anywhere. In fact, the truth is that the history of presidential administrations, they always pull ideas out of their budget.

26:10And, you know, if they're good and President Biden has shown that he's better than good when it comes to getting tough things over legislative goal lines, that's the place to look. Now, the carriage that we talked about earlier, child care, elder care, that's in there. We have a really important housing agenda. We have a housing supply structural, not cyclical, structural housing supply shortfall for affordable housing in this country. We have really great ideas, many of which, by the way, people on sort of both sides, both builders and people who want to be homeowners would appreciate. So look at our housing agenda.