Steve Eisman on Banks, AI and His Next Big Bet

16 Jun 2023 · 52 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Odd Lots Podcast Summary Episode Title: Steve Eisman on Banks, AI and His Next Big Bet Episode Recorded At: Bloomberg Invest Summit Hosts: Joe Weisenthal and Tracy Alloway Guest: Steve Eisman, Senior Portfolio Manager at Neuberger Berman

---

Episode Overview In this live episode, Steve Eisman, renowned for his short position against the housing market prior to the 2008 financial crisis, shares insights on the current banking landscape, the rise of AI technologies, and investment opportunities in U.S. manufacturing and infrastructure. Eisman reflects on recent banking turmoil, notably the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and discusses the implications for the banking sector and broader economy.

---

Key Topics Discussed

Banking Crisis Analysis

  • Crisis Scope: Eisman asserts that the current issues in banking should not be viewed as a full-blown crisis but rather as a crisis affecting specific banks.
  • *Crisis Nature*: He emphasizes that it's a crisis of correlation among depositors rather than credit quality or capital adequacy.
  • SVB's Collapse:
  • SVB's business model relied heavily on deposits from venture capitalists, leading to liquidity issues as interest rates rose.
  • Eisman notes that once panic ensued, depositors rushed to withdraw funds, exacerbating the bank's liquidity crisis.
  • Future of Banking:
  • He believes the crisis is largely contained and does not foresee further significant bank failures. He warns, however, that banks will face earnings challenges.

Federal Reserve and Interest Rates

  • Interest Rate Impact: Eisman discusses the potential consequences of further rate hikes by the Federal Reserve, particularly on lending practices and regional banks.
  • Market Reactions: The recent banking crisis has prompted investors to shift funds to money market accounts offering higher yields, which may squeeze regional banks further.

AI and Technological Investment

  • AI Boom: Eisman discusses the explosion of interest in AI, indicating it as a major investment theme.
  • He points out that while AI technologies are gaining traction, the availability of effective applications is still developing.
  • NVIDIA and AI Stocks:
  • Eisman notes NVIDIA as a leading player in AI hardware but warns that the market for applications is still limited and speculative.

Infrastructure Investment

  • U.S. Infrastructure Needs: Eisman emphasizes the dilapidated state of U.S. infrastructure, citing the need for significant investment.
  • Electric Grid: He highlights the electrical grid as a crucial area for investment, predicting it will be a long-term trend with substantial financial backing.
  • Reshoring: While reshoring manufacturing is a hot topic, he cautions that it will take time to see meaningful changes in production dynamics.

Moral Hazard and Deposit Insurance

  • Regulatory Responses: Eisman critiques regulators for their approach during the SVB crisis, suggesting that a failure with guaranteed deposits could mitigate moral hazard concerns.
  • Future Deposit Insurance: He expresses skepticism about expanding deposit insurance and the implications of doing so.

---

Additional Insights

  • Consumer Spending Trends: Eisman shares observations on consumer behavior amidst economic uncertainty, noting that while spending remains robust, there are signs of cautiousness.
  • Commercial Real Estate (CRE): He outlines challenges facing the CRE market, particularly in office spaces, and warns of potential refinancing issues as debt matures.
  • Future Investment Strategies: Eisman advocates for a diversified portfolio approach, highlighting the potential for risk-adjusted returns in a changing interest rate environment.

---

Conclusion This episode provides a comprehensive overview of critical financial topics from a seasoned investor's perspective, particularly in light of ongoing economic challenges and opportunities in the tech and infrastructure sectors.

---

Episode Links

  • Follow the podcast on [Bloomberg](https://www.bloomberg.com)
  • Listen to the full episode on [Apple Podcasts](https://podcasts.apple.com) or your favorite podcast platform.
  • Engage with the Odd Lots community on [Discord](discord.gg/oddlots).

---

Hosts Social Media

  • Joe Weisenthal: [@TheStalwart](https://twitter.com/TheStalwart)
  • Tracy Alloway: [@TracyAlloway](https://twitter.com/TracyAlloway)

Guest Social Media

  • Steve Eisman: [@EismanSteven](https://twitter.com/EismanSteven)

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00You're being sold an AI future where you're obsolete or irrelevant. That vision is wrong. At Palantir, they're building AI that helps workers and unlocks their full potential. American workers are our nation's greatest strength. AI shouldn't eliminate them. It should elevate them. Palantir is here to tell their stories. From factories to hospitals, AI is freeing people from drudgery, letting them do what humans do best. Create. Solve. Build. Palantir, making Americans irreplaceable.

0:38So you're telling me that the AI that's meant to make everyone's job easier to manage just adds more to manage on top of the thousands of apps the IT department already manages. Funny how that works. Any business can add AI. IBM helps you scale and manage AI to change how you do business. Let's create smarter business, IBM.

1:15Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. And I'm Joe Weisenthal. So Joe, this is a very special live recording. I'm really excited about this one. Always enjoy live recordings. We talked to our guest recently a few months ago and a lot has happened since then. Really? Let's just jump right into it. Yeah. You've given it away, Steve, but we're going to be speaking with Steve Eisman. He is, of course, a senior portfolio manager over at Neuberger Berman. So thank you so much for coming back on the show, Steve. Thank you very much. So let's see. The last time we spoke to you, you seemed okay about the banks and you also thought - I don't know if I would say okay.

1:55Okay. Well, all right. Let's talk about what happened since then. What did we just see in the financial system? So if I could sum it up in like a sentence, because it's always pretty good to try and sum it up in a sentence, I'd say we're not having a banking crisis, we're having a crisis of certain banks. That's like a really good freaking line, so pay attention. So I mean, the saying goes, the generals always fight the last war. The last war was credit quality and capital, which that problem was solved. The problem with Silicon Valley was that the correlation between all their depositors was essentially one.

2:42In other words, they were all the same. It would be as if you had one depositors with$150 billion in the bank. And what happened was Silicon Valley had a very simple business model. They just took in deposits from VC and they bought bonds. That was it. They made very few loans and gave great service. And so when rates were at the bottom, they bought long-term bonds at subterranean rates. The Fed starts raising rates, who knew? And all of a sudden they have massive mark-to-market losses in their portfolio, which essentially wiped out their equity. But that's not enough because you always hold the bonds to maturity unless you got to sell the bonds so if you remember last year the stocks that were down the most were the companies that had high revenue growth and negative earnings they were down anywhere from 75 to 90 percent that if that that characteristic is the same thing as venture capital companies so venture capital couldn't raise any more money the venture capital companies had to pull their deposits out of the bank Eventually, Silicon Valley ran out of liquidity.

3:51They sold their bonds. And the rest is history. You know, thank you, Peter Thiel, for causing a panic. And the next morning, they were done. That was essentially the story. So after that, everybody, you know, basically started shorting every single bank that had the same characteristics as Silicon Valley. Signature, which went that same weekend, First Republic, PacWest, Western Alliance. Obviously, First Republic is gone. you know, probably this part of this crisis is largely over. There's a problem with the earnings of the banks, but I don't think it's unlikely, I think, at this point that anybody else is going to go under.

4:30Well, you mentioned and, you know, the generals always fight the last war. And so people weren't paying very close attention to depositor correlation, it would seem. The supervisors apparently not. And then, of course, you know, people were not concerned. They're like, oh, credit risk is solved, and then maybe they weren't so aware of the rate risk lurking on the bill. The problem was they don't read the research. If they read the research that's out there, they would have known the losses to the dollar. But in my experience, regulators don't read Wall Street research, and they try and find it out on their own.

5:04It's a lot easier just to read the research. Trust me. So from your perspective, though, it was out. Oh, there's no question. There's absolutely no question that the investment community knew what the losses were on Silicon Valley's portfolio to the dollar. Well, can I ask, I mean, let's say we have a Fed meeting coming up, obviously, and, you know, there's a lot of debate over whether they're going to pause or hike again. But if they hike again, how problematic would that be for the banking system now? Well, I mean, what happened during the pandemic was the banks were flooded with liquidity. And so what's happening now is people are, but what were you going to do?

5:49Earn 25 basis points of money market funds is sort of pointless. So now, I don't know if any of you noticed, but if you want to buy a three-month treasury, you make 5.4%. That's not bad. So people are taking their money out of the bank and putting it to money market funds. So what's happening is the regional banks are really pulling in their horns in terms of lending. Do I think that if the Fed keeps raising rates, that will accelerate? Maybe. But a lot of it's happened already. Just to stick on the banking system for another minute, you know, like obviously there's another cliche that's out there is like the Fed keeps raising until something breaks.

6:29And then when SVB happened, like, well, there was the break that happened, except it turned out that wasn't the end of the hiking cycle. That would have been like, you know, if you're writing history, you could have imagined a version where SVB is the end of the hiking cycle. It broke. It's not big enough. It just wasn't big enough. Not big enough. You know, as I said a long time ago, when J.P. Morgan goes down, planet Earth burns. When Silicon Valley goes down, it's a match. You don't like a match, you know. Well, okay. One more. Maybe more than a match. Maybe a match book. One of those automatic wider things.

7:10One more banking question. I might have one more banking question. Full disclosure. You mentioned profitability there. Are financials a good buy in an environment where maybe they have to compete for deposits a little more and rates are going up and net interest margins are getting compressed? There's always a trade. The banks are very, very cheap on a price to book. They're very, very cheap on earnings. You know, the problem is that because of the money leaving the banks into money market funds, it's more likely than not an estimates are too high. You know, longer term, you know, if big, if we go into recession, we'll have a credit cycle.

7:51And I mean, the joke in amongst the people, you know, that what I call the financial services mafia is the banks have collapsed and we haven't even had a credit cycle yet. So, you know, if you financial services mafia i'm not going to tell you okay but there is a there is but but they they are they are known okay okay i know almost all okay you know these are the people who traffic in largely you know the financials for 20 years okay and you know it's not like we go on vacation together but we know each other in fact we don't go on vacation together okay Well, just, you know, when after SVB collapsed, one other element of this was like, do we really need so many banks in this country?

8:35And the people look up north in Canada and they're like, they only have like six or seven banks here. And we have, I don't know, 15 ,000 or something like that. More like 5 ,000. More like 5 ,000. Are we going to have, you know, in 10 years, will we be down to 1 ,000? Like how much consolidation is coming? No way. First of all, the regulators will not allow. J.P. Morgan buying First Republic is a one-off. The regulators do not want the large banks to get any bigger through M &A. You know, could there be mergers between regional banks? Sure. But to go down to from 5 ,000 to 1 ,000, I mean, that's a lot of work.

9:12You know, it's choose your poison. In Canada, the banks are safer because they're oligopolies. But they can charge much higher fees for their customers. Here, there's a lot more competition, but because there's a lot more competition, prices are lower, but then you have problems with credit and just stability. Sorry, you just reminded me of one more banking question. So apologies in advance, but you're an expert in moral hazard, basically, based off of your - I don't know if it's an expert, but okay. You have experience with moral hazard. What do you think about deposit insurance in the aftermath of SVB?

9:51I mean, the depositor's got a full bailout. There's now discussion about, well, why not just have universal deposit insurance? What would that mean?

10:01Well, if it had been up to me, and believe me, it was not up to me, and nobody called me over that weekend, but if it had been up to me, I would have let Silicon Valley fail. And then I would have guaranteed all the deposits. And that would have solved your moral hazard problem. I mean, it's not like they guaranteed Silicon Valley and they guaranteed all the deposits and people didn't pull their deposits out of these banks. So you would have been in the same situation, but you would have solved your moral hazard problem. I actually don't know technically if the regulators even have the authority to raise the deposit insurance level unless it's an emergency.

10:41I think it would require some sort of act of Congress. But regardless. Well, good luck with that. Right. Right. Setting aside whether it's even doable. Right. There is this question that a lot of people felt after SVB when they saw all these depositors immediately made whole at 100 cents on the dollar. Why is banking like a private for-profit enterprise as a thing if this sort of like key aspect of it? No, I agree with that. I mean, the problem is whenever these things happen, it seems like the regulators adopt the attitude that if we don't do this, we're going to have the system's going to burn.

11:14You know what? System's not going to burn. You know, in 2008, that was true. You know, with Silicon Valley really wasn't true, but on some reason, the regulators felt it was true. And that's why they acted the way they did. I don't think, you know, for what it's worth, that I think that deposit insurance is going to be guaranteeing everything within after the first 12 months. Was there anything in the recent banking drama that reminded you of 2008? Or was it just completely different? Totally different. You The problem with what you're hearing about, you're hearing about the regulators raising capital requirements by 10%, 20%.

11:54That's useless because this wasn't a capital problem. This was a liquidity problem. And by the way, no matter how much liquidity you might have, you don't have enough if there's a run on the bank. So this is more of a, I think, an examination issue rather than a liquidity issue and a capital issue. By examination, you mean the examiners of... The San Francisco examiners should have been all over Silicon Valley. You know, I think what the press said was that they went in and they suggested nicely that Silicon Valley start looking into its issues. You know, a regulator should not be asking nicely.

12:36They should be telling meanly. But for some reason that wasn't done. Well, what responsibility do you think tech has in this whole saga? Because I mean, the last time we spoke to you, we were talking about the stunning continued resilience of a lot of tech growth stocks. And it feels like that wave of money is alive and well, but kind of more flighty than it used to be. And in this instance, it basically infected the financial system. I'm not following you. What do you mean infected the financial system? Well, it got into the banking system as tech and VCs kind of pulled their money away from SVB.

13:17I mean, that's true. I mean, part of the issue is that it's so easy to move money today electronically. I think it was a very big mistake by the regulators to allow basically every single VC fund and every single VC company to bank with one bank. That was, you know, reminds me a little bit of the sub, you know, as people used to say in terms of subprime mortgages, is that you got diversification. And so the affair was a low correlation. It turned out it was a correlation of one. This was more obvious that it was a correlation of one. In the finance industry mafia, is this something that comes up and were people aware of this?

13:53Or was this like, oh, where did this come from? No, they were aware of it. They were aware of that. They were aware of signature, First Republic. I mean, it's just math. In terms of risks in the financial system now, do you think there's a strong case that we should be looking more at deposit concentration. And also maybe, I don't even know how you would measure this or enforce it, but like social media risk, the idea that people all start talking about like, oh, Credit Suisse is in trouble, SVB is in trouble, First Republic's in trouble. Well, you know what? Credit Suisse was in trouble, SVB was in trouble, First Republic was in trouble.

14:26Well, this is why it would be hard to enforce. No, but they were actually in trouble. It didn't matter what was being said on social media. So I don't put a lot of stock in that. Okay, I keep saying like last banking question, but how much did the experience of, you know, 2008, 2009, the reforms, Dodd-Frank, etc., put the regulators in a position, like had something like SVB happened in a different era, would it have been worse? How much did the sort of post-crisis changes make it such that you can have a pretty substantial regional bank fail without much spillover? Well, what I think the regulators learned was that you have to be fast.

15:08So the fact that they guaranteed deposits over a weekend and seized two banks was very important. So they did learn that lesson, but they weren't looking for liquidity, you know, duration problems. Should we talk markets? Wider markets? Oh my God, God forbid. Yeah. You know what? We should just throw out some single stocks and just have you a pint on them. Buy, sell, hold, new. Yeah. But why don't we start? Price target. NVIDIA, because I think that's like the figurehead for a lot of what's going on. I'm not going to do buy, sell, hold. Sure. No, that's fine. Because my firm would shoot me. We'll do word association.

15:41Word association. Yes. And I mean literally shoot me, okay? Tomorrow morning. So what do I think of NVIDIA? Let me tell you what I think about the whole chat, GPT, AI situation. So, I mean, as everybody knows, the market's been very narrow this year. If you take out the eight big tech stocks, the market is maybe of 1 % or 2%. You know, in terms of what's happened so far, you know, NVIDIA is selling a lot of chips because everybody wants to get into the act. So they're sort of stocking chips. But what we don't have yet is really too many apps. And so I love the story that was in the papers about the lawyer who had a case.

16:26He had to write a brief. and so he asked ChatGPT to write the brief and all the citations didn't exist. That guy's going to be disbarred, okay? Thank you, ChatGPT. So the apps aren't there yet. So right now, you know, this story is just in a few data centers. You know, at some point in the next six months or so, it'll probably get rolled out into all the data centers in the country. but so the beneficiaries are the people who sell the hardware the chips and everything connected to the chips the obvious companies that have the data and then after that we really don't know you know does this benefit into it or not benefit into it does this help Accenture or hurt Accenture it's unknown and we don't know yet who's going to be creating good apps that's going to do very well so right now the story is very narrow in terms of investing.

17:36Silicon Valley is selling you a future where you're obsolete, or worse, identical. At Palantir, they're witnessing something different and revolutionary, from re-industrializing the nation's defense base, to shipyard workers building faster and frontline workers boosting productivity, AI is transforming work across the nation. AI is not replacing American workers or flattening them into conformity. It's unleashing what makes each one irreplaceable, their judgment, their craft, their creativity. When American workers become more powerfully themselves, they own the future. Palantir, making Americans irreplaceable.

18:46This is Jason Timp from Hoops Tonight. Toyota today. Toyota, let's go places. But the market seems to, I believe, the market seems to be of the view that the incumbents, those eight companies, however many there are, Meta, Alphabet, NVIDIA, Microsoft, that they are going to accrue the big financial gains from AI in general will somehow accrue to them. And do you think, how confident would you say, Like, is the market right? Is the market overly confident? I mean, you know, I'm not a fortune teller, although some people think I was a fortune teller. But I mean, that's the obvious case. I don't have any reason not to believe that.

19:29You know, but we'll see in a year or two years what's going to happen. This is this is this is not going to happen overnight. Well, how should investors think about, you know, there have been many instances at this point of people coming out with revolutionary technology of one sort or another. often packaged under a very exciting name like generative AI. How should investors think about that? Let me give you an example of a group that used to be hot and it is not. The payment space. PayPal, Square, etc. By the way, I've done payments for a very long time. I will tell you that every five years somebody comes in and says, I got this thing that's going to completely disintermediate Visa and MasterCard.

20:18I swear to God, every five years, like clockwork. And two years later, they come back and they say, no. So other than Visa and MasterCard, who has long-term staying power and payments is never obvious. But the space used to be really, really hot, especially the companies that, you know, again, big revenue growth, negative earnings. And what's happened over the last several years is so much capital has gone into this space that they're basically killing each other. And it's not hot anymore. And people are exiting. Is that going to happen to ChatGPT? Less likely because you've got real behemoths that are going to be spending a lot of money.

21:00But around the app part, We'll see what happens. But it seemed there's a good chance that maybe outside the behemoths, a lot of money will be spent from companies that just kill each other and drive each other into the ground. That's possible. So obviously, you know, when you see a company like NVIDIA trading at over 30x revenue. In fact, it's actually not trading at 30x revenue. It was trading, you know, after the most recent, you know, the stock went up 26%, but the earnings doubled. I think, you know, the P.E. got cut in half. So I don't remember where the P.E. is right now, but it's not insane anymore.

21:40It's actually lower than it was before they reported. So when you see that, like, obviously, and it seems sort of lazy and people are like, oh, dot com. This is Cisco. This is loose, you know, Sun Microsystems. Just these, like, completely unreal. When you look at these numbers, they don't look like unreal. They don't look like some of those numbers. Well, I mean, look, NVIDIA is the pure play. Yeah. Then there's AMD. We'll see how well their new chip is going to do. How much is this going to add to the earnings of Microsoft and Google and Meta? Well, it's not going to be as much as NVIDIA, obviously.

22:13But how much it accelerates the growth rate? I mean, we're really not going to know this for a couple of years because, like I said, it's going to take time to really develop something that's not going to have somebody write a brief where all the citations are wrong. I go back to this over and over again. It's stunning to me. Tracy has seen all of my... That a lawyer would not read the citation. I used to be a lawyer. That a lawyer would submit a brief where he does not read the citations and the brief is astonishing. I think there's someone actually suing ChatGPT for defamation now because of some of the stuff it spat out from that incident.

22:44Tracy has seen many of my attempts to use ChatGPT for work and so is well aware of... Let's just say it's not Michigan critical. It's not mission ready. It's not ready for prime time. I do think it's very sweet that Joe is always very, very polite to chat GPT just in case the robots eventually take over the earth, hedging your bets. That's right. I always say please and thank you. That's good life advice. Okay. Well, just on the broader market, I mean, the last time we had you on the podcast, you were talking about a new paradigm for markets. And you were very careful to emphasize that this doesn't happen in a straight line.

23:23You know, there are fits and starts. People hold on to the old way of thinking, you know, for as long as they can sometimes. When you look at what's happening with some of the tech and growth stocks right now, does that support the thesis? Is this the last gasp of growth? Well, I mean, for example, let's go back to the high revenue growth negative earnings companies. So they're up a lot this year on a percentage basis. But when you go from 200 to 10 and you're at 14, yeah, it's up 40 percent. But so what? You know, the large cap mega companies, I think, are investable for a very long time. But after that, it's unclear.

24:00And I think, I mean, if anybody gave me their money today, for example, I wouldn't be so overweight tech. I'd be much more diversified. I'd have some, God forbid, bonds. There's plenty of other stories other than tech, such as, for example, has anybody ever noticed that the electrical grid in the United States is pathetic? You've noticed. I don't know if everybody saw there's this new rule that came out from the governor that says every single new building in New York State has to have an electric oven. Well, if we could snap our fingers and just do that, there'd be a blackout immediately. so you know there are companies that are involved with the electrical grid there's reshoring there's greenification although you know the solar companies sell it insane multiples but there are other ways to play it and the other concept that i think is going to come back is what i'd call risk adjusted returns you know risk adjusted returns have been out of favor because everybody just wants to invest in tech i think the world's going to be you know with if rates stay high, I think that's going to, that is going to happen because I think Volcker, it's Freudian slip.

25:11I think that Powell is petrified of doing what Volcker did, which was stop raising rates, cut them a little bit, inflation soars, and he has to go to 17%. So many different direct, actually, what do you mean when you talk about risk-adjusted returns coming into Vogue? What does that mean specifically? Risk-adjusted returns means how much return are you generating given every unit of risk? There's mathematical ways to figure that out. I thought all investors. Are you kidding? People haven't focused on that in the last 10 years. You have been paid to take as much risk as possible. So that concept, which was invoked for a very long time, people have just stopped paying attention to it.

25:52It sounds a lot like value investing, right? No, it's not value investing. It's how much volatility is in your portfolio, how diversified are you? You don't want to be too diversified. What's the beta versus alpha in your portfolio? Those are the concepts that I think are going to start to come back. Just as an example, my partners and I, we run separately managed accounts. Everybody's got a different risk profile. So I'll just give you one extreme example. I got a cold call from a woman who saved about a million dollars by killing herself, basically. and she gave money, I won't say the name of the very large bank, to manage her money, and they obliterated her.

26:38I never saw a portfolio like this. Every single security she had had a loss. So she comes to me basically with PTSD, and I promised her I would hold her hand, and so I've only invested a few, you know, in a few stocks, and otherwise I put her in bonds and treasuries. And I figure after about a year, maybe she'll have the emotional ability to invest in stocks. So look, I think you really, what's also going to come back is catering to everybody's individual risk profile, as opposed to just putting 50 % of your money in tech. As we're, since we're talking about paradigm shifts and, you know, you mentioned Powell's fear of, you know, having to go into the teens to fight inflation.

27:23I'm curious, like we have, the market does seem to be like go through these phases of like, oh, no, this is as far as it's going to go. So we're going to go to three and a half percent. So we're going to go to four. OK, we stopped SVB. That must have been the top. Oh, no, we're going to like pause in June. But it looks like we're going to hike in July. Does this process, in your view, have further to go? I think people have lived with low rates for so long that it is unimaginable to them that the Fed's going to keep rates high. They just can't imagine it. You know, they were like, oh, the Fed will cut rates in the second half of this year.

Read the full transcript

27:59That was never my position, but that obviously was the position of the market. And that now seems to be going away. So, but like I said, you know, people, I like to say, you don't think about your paradigm, you inhabit it. And one of the paradigms is that we're all entitled to live in a zero rate world. That's gone. It's just everybody hasn't woken up to that fact. Well, just on this note, can you talk a little bit about what's going on in consumer discretionary? Because those stocks have been doing really well. And yet there is this or there seems to be this big question mark over the strength of the American consumer.

28:34So if you look at the surveys, I mean, a lot of people seem to think we're basically back in the depths of 2008. We definitely aren't. If you look at the hard data, the spending continues. So how are you thinking about that? I've heard from some companies, you know, very large banks that really have the best data, that consumer spending has really slowed in the last couple of months. The consumer is still relatively healthy because everybody's employed. So, you know, you're not going to see like a real deterioration in consumer credit or anything like that until people start losing their jobs.

29:08You know, is that going to happen? I don't know. I think it's probably more likely than not. But until we start to see unemployment go up, you're not going to see a problem with credit. That doesn't mean the consumer is not going to pull in their horns. I mean, you're starting to see that in a lot of different retail companies. I mean, I think everybody saw Dollar General, how much that went down because spending at the lower end is slowing. People are starting to trade down. So it's happening behind the scenes, but it's a little glacial because everybody is employed. But on this theme of sectors that stay buoyant because people have jobs, housing, big surprise over the last year, homebuilders continuing to do very well.

29:47Maybe they're a little bit off their highs. Home prices not far off their highs, only modestly. I know we talked about this in March, but it seems like home prices are back on the rise again. Like, is there any - They are. It's actually very, I mean, the first to admit I was wrong about this. You heard it here first. I'm surprised that the home builders have done so well with rates so high. But there is a shortage of housing. I do think that existing home sales are still fairly low because with everybody employed, and if you have a 3 % mortgage, it's hard to sell your house and buy something else if you want to trade up and get a 7 % mortgage.

30:27But the home builders have been very good at cutting some of their prices, their costs, incentivizing people for their internal mortgage companies. I'm actually very impressed by what they've done. We talked a little bit about residential real estate the last time we had you on. We didn't get to commercial real estate, I don't think. And I'm kind of, I'm jumping the gun. I would have remembered. I'm jumping the gun a little bit because we have had some audience questions on this topic. But how are you thinking about CRE risks at the moment? Well, I mean, there's a lot of different categories of CRE.

30:59Well, let's talk about cap rates first. Leave aside fundamentals. You bought something when rates were nothing and you paid a 3 % debt and your cap rate was, let's say, 3 % or 4%. And now if you wanted to borrow, you're going to pay 7 % or 8%. The value of your real estate went down, period. The area that is the most problematic is obviously office. The areas that are probably the worst are San Francisco and New York. I'll just give you a shocking statistic. I've looked at it the other day. I was stunned. Do you know what the market cap of Vernado is? Two billion. You should let me guess. I was going to say three billion, but maybe it's got a blue.

31:39Maybe it's 2.2. That's unbelievable when you think about it. So, you know, the market has really repriced the public entities, but the private entities really haven't marked down their portfolios there because nothing is trading. There's about$175 billion of office debt coming due this year and about$150 billion of office debt coming due next year. If you took out a loan, let's say three, four years ago to buy something and the LTV was 60%, today it's probably 100. So I mean, the issue is the refinancing and I think it's going to be tough. So you mentioned the market isn't trading. Is this one of those situations where maybe illiquidity can be your friend if you don't have to mark it down because you know and as long as you don't have to sell anything right well the problem for you is that when your debt comes due then you got a problem until then you could as we like to say extend and pretend at some point could there be a do you think about a point where you can bid on the public equity or public aspect of syria i mean three billion it does seem like oh We're talking about like the end of sort of like New York work as we know it.

32:54I haven't done enough work on this. But people that have say it's very problematic because, I mean, I'm sure some of you have seen, you know, Blackstone and Brookfield. I mean, these are not small companies have given back the keys for some of their pretty good buildings because, you know, they know that that's going to come due in a few years. They know what the cash flow is going to be and they can't support the cash flow. So they're giving the keys back. So if Blackstone and Brookfield are giving back buildings, you know, how's everybody else going to be? Now, there are what I'd call AAA properties in New York City.

33:29I don't know San Francisco as well, like, you know, one Vanderbilt. But after that, you know, after a couple of buildings that are like that, I think the rest are problematic.

33:54This is Jason Timp from Hoops Tonight. Toyota is moving toward a more sustainable future by giving you the freedom to choose from an incredible lineup of trucks, now available in both gas and hybrid models, including the legendary Tacoma and powerful Tundra, Both available with the iForce Max Hybrid Powertrain and backed by Toyota's legendary reputation for reliability and value. In fact, for 2025, Toyota is the best resale value brand for the fifth year in a row, according to Kelly Blue Book's KBB.com. With Tacoma ranked number one, holding the highest projected retained value of any vehicle.

34:32Choosing Toyota means having more options and less compromise. So visit buyatoyota.com for a great deal on an efficient Toyota today. Vehicle's projected resale value is specific to the 2025 model year. For more information, visit kellybluebookskbb.com. Toyota, let's go places. Hey, Ryan Reynolds here. Wishing you a very happy half-off holiday because right now Mint Mobile is offering you the gift of 50 % off unlimited. To be clear, that's half price, not half the service. And Mint is still premium, unlimited wireless for a great price. So that means a half day. Give it a try at MintMobile.com slash switch.

35:15A front payment of$45 for a three-month plan equivalent to$15 per month required. New customer offer for first three months only. Speed slow after 35 gigabytes of network's busy. Taxes and fees extra. See MintMobile.com. Since you mentioned interest rate costs, it feels like people have been predicting, I think we touched on this earlier as well, but people have been predicting a turn in the credit cycle for years now. and it has yet to happen. We've seen maybe some idiosyncratic bankruptcies, but nothing sort of en masse or systemic. What would be the catalyst for that actually happening and how likely is it?

35:44I actually don't think there's going to be, I think there will be, I mean, look, if we go into some kind of recession, I think there will be a normalization of consumer credit. I don't think the consumer is over levered. There's really no subprime mortgage lending in the United States at all. There's very little subprime credit card lending. There's some subprime auto lending. But whatever problems happen is not going to be, I think, in the consumer area. Like I said, there'll be normalization. You know, loan loss provisions in the banks will go up. It's not a calamity. You know, what's going to happen in high yield, office, et cetera?

36:18But those problems will be, you know, for example, the office will be concentrated in CMBS and in certain regional banks. So it's going to be more concentrated as opposed to systemic issues. I have a career question or maybe a career advice question. Very knowledgeable on banks, obviously, real estate, knowing specific buildings, thinking about understanding payments, et cetera. How do you allocate your time? Because I don't know this stuff in depth. What do I do all day? Is that what you're asking? Yeah. How do you allocate your time to have a solid feel for multiple sectors? Yeah. I have a cup of coffee, black, iced.

36:55Okay. We're on the same page until this far. I get into the office. I start to read all my emails. I log into Bloomberg. Oh, thank you. And there are companies that come into Neuberger. I go to the meetings. I do some research on individual companies. Trading day ends. There might be some more to do when I go home. That's my day. What piques your interest, though? How do you make decisions about whether or not to get really into a sector or a company? Look, it depends. I mean, I'll just give you one stock, which hopefully Neuberger won't shoot me tomorrow about. So we've owned a company for a while called Quanta.

37:36We have it in most of our portfolios. So Quanta is a company, you know, utilities don't do anything. You know, somebody has to build the utility. Someone has to manage the wires. Somebody has to bury the wires. So, you know, Quanta, prior to all this grid stuff, used to sell at 10, 11, 12 times earnings. But because all the stuff about evolving infrastructure, the opportunities for the company have been enormous. So the stock has been revalued. How often does that happen? Not that often. But when you have the potential to do something like that, you go all in. But it requires a lot of work. But this was something that as you saw infrastructure coming and because you were familiar.

38:16I'll give you an example of what we saw. So, you know, the utility in California, I think it's PCG, you know, there's a strict liability rule in California that basically says if PCG causes a fire and is only partially responsible, they're completely responsible. So the old CEOs of PCG weren't too good. The new CEO was superb. And so she's embarked on this plan to basically bury all the wires of the company. Think about what that means. This is not Rhode Island. This is California. That's a lot of wires. Who's doing that? Quanta. That's going to take years to do. Stuff like that, the infrastructure stuff in the United States is pretty pathetic.

39:04I remember years ago, I had a conference in Hong Kong. I fly in, the airport's completely new, you can literally eat off the floor, you get into a car, you get onto a highway, it looks like the highway was just built yesterday. You go over a bridge, you go, did they just finish this yesterday? And then, you know, you go to this wonderful hotel and then you come back to the United States and you go to JFK and you're embarrassed. Like this is the United States of America. Like it's unbelievable. Then you get on the Van Wick and the Grand Central Parkway and it's, I mean, it's just unbelievable. By the way, have you noticed that when you're driving to JFK where the Grand Central meets the Van Wick, there's this construction there.

39:45You know how long that construction's been going on? 12 years. Like, 12 years? I could have done it myself faster. Like, what's going on with that? LaGuardia isn't even connected to a subway. But that's better than the Van Wick. It is true. I went to the Seychelles recently, and I will say, like, a tropical island in the middle of the Indian Ocean has better roads than coming back from the airport from JFK and fewer potholes, which is rather amazing. We could listen to Steve rant about U.S. infrastructure for a while. Provide insightful commentary on U.S. infrastructure for a few more minutes.

40:21But we do have a lot of audience questions. Shall we take some? Yeah. All right. From Tim Linton asking, what is the trigger for higher unemployment? The problem with making a big case for higher unemployment is if there's a shortage of labor. This is a little bit of the revenge of the middle class. So, you know, the 2008 crisis destroyed the lower middle class in the middle class. Here, the layoffs are in tech and Wall Street. The middle class is actually doing quite well. I mean, what would cause a real uptick in unemployment? Look, if the Fed keeps raising rates and the economy really starts to slow down, there'll be some layoffs.

40:59Do I think they're going to be very high? I don't, because the labor shortages are still so important. People may want to warehouse their employees. Here's a question. Since you mentioned your knowledge of the payments industry, Casey 1221 asked, what about Apple? In terms of a company with just incredible moat in some way, there's always talking about becoming a bank or cards or whatever. Could they make further inroads in payments and become an entity that takes share or profits from someone else? I mean, they certainly could. I mean, it's so easy to pay stuff with Apple. So I do think Apple's already making inroads.

41:35You know, how much farther they want to go, I don't know. You know, there's the Apple credit card that's run by Goldman Sachs. I don't think Apple's ever going to really make a bigger inroad in the credit card business. The payments business, probably. Another question from AB1 asks, what are your thoughts on private credit? Will direct lending replace commercial bank lending long term? Well, that's an excellent question. You know, given, let's assume the regulators do raise the capital requirements for all the banks. It's going to force the banks really to, at least the regionals, to really narrow some of their lending because they're only going to want to make loans where the risk weight is low.

42:20And I know that the private credit lenders are literally salivating over this happening because, you know, Dodd-Frank, under Tarullo, who was the vice chair of financial supervision, not only did he lower their leverage by like, he cut it basically in half, but he narrowed the scope of what lending they could do. And that really opened up for the private credit lenders. Assuming that happens again, the private credit lenders will have even more room to play. Another question, the reshoring boom. People talk about reshoring, friendshoring. As you talk about this new paradigm, partly maybe kicked off by a lot of the public investment being made for IRA and chips, etc.

43:02How are you thinking about that? What is like what do you see as sort of maybe the medium term of some of these trends and different ways it could shake out? Well, I think general reshoring is going to take time. Yeah. You know, factories aren't built overnight. I still think there's probably a reluctance by companies to bring all of their shoring back to the United States because they're so used to cheap labor. But I do think, you know, part of the story, given all the legislation that's come back, is something of a re-industrialization of America. How long that's going to take, I don't know.

43:41I think, like I said before, the biggest story is going to be the grid. The grid is absolutely crucial. I mean, the estimates of improving the grid in the United States are, you know, everybody's got a different estimate, but it's like 200 billion, 300 billion. I mean, it's unbelievable numbers. That's going to think going to be the biggest theme. Actually, I'm going to ask my own question based on that answer. But why do you think the U.S. seems to, at least in recent years, be quite bad at infrastructure? Well, we haven't spent money on it in generations. Have I noticed, you know, when was the last time, let me put you this way.

44:17In the New York metropolitan area every highway every every parkway every bridge every park was built by robert moses you should all read the book by robert carl robert moses superb that's the 30s 40s 50s and early 60s that was the last time the united states really spent a ton of money on infrastructure Our infrastructure is just very, very old. But why? I mean, I guess my question is why? Yeah, why? Can it change? We issue all this debt? I mean, I'm not president of the United States. Go ask the last several presidents why they didn't spend money on this. But they didn't. Well, current and former presidents of the United States have an open invitation for all thoughts.

45:00Absolutely. Well, speaking of infrastructure, I don't know if you have a view on this. It's not particularly. Commodities, people talk about copper. I have no opinion. No opinion. There are enough ways for me to lose money without going into commodities. OK, here's another question. U.S. consumer restart of student loan. Is that something on your radar or is that not a big enough deal? He's ruling it for people who are listening. I mean, look, I will just tell you, you know, putting on my lawyer hat, Supreme Court's probably going to rule that what the Biden administration did is not kosher. But I actually think that the people who are suing literally have no standing to sue.

45:38but given the composition of this court, they're basically not going to care. So I think the case is going to go against the Biden administration, even though it shouldn't. The court should just throw it out, but they won't. A question from Nathan Tankus. He asks, it's an interesting one. Is there an index which you would prefer that more properly weights tech relative to the S &P? No comment. all right i have another question that was put in there from nathan it was regarding svb you said that the way that they ought to have dealt with it is let the uh let the bank fail and then guarantee let the bank fail but how does that solve moral hazard because then everyone because everybody would know that if the next bank you know eventually will take away the deposit insurance yeah and if your bank fails we won't guarantee you maybe we put another the guarantee of all the deposits.

46:34So basically the guarantee of deposits. You got to be diversified. I mean, I'll give you an example. Okay. So I have a friend who runs a VC company and the Thursday of Silicon Valley in the afternoon, he freaks out. He goes online and he pulls all his money. And then he wakes up Friday morning and his money's still in the bank. So he runs to the branch. He's 50th in line. I didn't know that there were really people got in line. Oh, no, they got in line. there are 50 alpha males with tens of millions of dollars in the bank i used to be an alpha male i'm not i'm a beta and um don't ask how i got there and um they're all waiting in line and a woman comes out who's probably like a teller i mean literally and she comes out and she says um i know you're all here to get your money but unfortunately uh the bank has just been seized by the federal government and we can't give money to anybody.

47:31So the first guy in line starts screaming and he says, I'll clean it up. He goes, I want my effing 50 effing freaking million dollars. And she says, she says, sir, I just lost my job. And he starts screaming, I want my 50 effing freaking effing million dollars. And that guy could have learned a lesson about diversification because if he had, he wouldn't have been there. The teller needs to give the It's a Wonderful Life speech and say it's in Teal's portfolio. You shouldn't say that because most of the people in this audience don't ever saw the movie. Resistance. People have seen it. It's in that chat GPT.

48:15I have, well, I mean, we can keep going, but one more question. Keep going. I got nothing to do. All right. People are asking for free portfolio advice at this point. If you want portfolio advice, I'll give you my card, you can come invest with me. Which sectors slash stocks are at most risk for a short squeeze in the next 12 months? That's from Georgina. No comment. No comment. All right. My friend would just kill me. Here's a question. I think it actually ties back to a bunch of these things. Someone asked your thoughts on American exceptionalism. And I think it sort of ties to this. No, it ties to like, can we actually setting aside the money?

48:56Like, because there is a lot of money, like build, we know that there's money going into factories or structures booming. But then there's the question of like, OK, are we going to like do a good job of it? And with a lot of this green spending, with a lot of this resource, like, are you confident that with the money there that like it'll actually turn into something productive or is it like, I mean, some of it will be productive. The issue really, the issue really is at this point that to actually do something with the federal government money takes a long time. Now, whether they can shorten the time, that's very important.

49:28But it's more of a time issue, I think, at this point than a competence issue. Well, on the grid thing, which it sounds like is sort of two questions. Like you said it's like the big thing. How many years? And then does more need to happen on the sort of regulatory side? Because this came up in the recent debt ceiling negotiations, permitting. Like, can you actually like put up the wires, et cetera? Are you watching for more action on the regulatory side for this thesis to really play out? I mean, I am. I mean, the problem is that, and I don't say this pejoratively at all, but people who have a very environmental bent, not bet, bent, don't want any non-solar to be built.

50:15But the problem is that to get from here to there, you're going to need a bridge. so they fight any permitting you know but the problem is you can't wave a magic wand and electrify every single car in the united states so that's a real problem i don't know how to solve that other than you know this administration has to really push through you know shorter permitting i know we can keep going yeah but maybe we should leave it there and encourage the audience members how could you not ask a question about crypto come on oh you know it's funny so there wasn't Come on. No, that's great. That's great.

50:50Someone put a question in there about crypto. I was like, oh, do we really? OK, but please, what is the, give us a take on crypto. OK, so there. This is so good. I'm glad you did. So as I'd like to say, not that I feel that strongly about it. So there are two issues about crypto. Is it actually a currency? And number two, what's it good for? So personally, I have my doubts that it's even a currency. But let's push that aside. What's it good for? so one thing we know for certain what it's good for is money laundering that we know for certain is it good for anything else other than money laundering so at this point it is certainly not good for transactions in the real world because the cost of it is just way too high now the people who argue that one day you know one day it'll be cheap enough to do I have my doubts because do you know how much money goes over the rails of Visa and MasterCard per year?

51:49It's like two trillion. You know how much Visa and MasterCard charge per transaction? Ten basis points. So I think assuming that these coins really exist in terms of the real world, it's going to take a very, very long time for there to be enough volume for there to be cost efficient. Until then, it's mostly going to be about money laundering. So what else is it good for? So people keep coming up with new theories. So obviously it's not good for transactions. So then the thesis was that it's a way to hedge against the debasement of fear currency. So the problem with that thesis was, and still is, that if that's the case, then Bitcoin should go up when everybody's freaking out about the stock market and freaking out about inflation and nasdaq is down and people are freaking out about the stock market and that's not how bitcoin acts it goes up the car i actually calculated it's the correlation over the last several years of bitcoin and nasdaq is anywhere from 40 to 65 depending upon what time period you're talking about so that thesis can't be true so bitcoin in that sense is just another warm form of speculation the latest thesis that i heard because, you know, people don't give up, is it's a form of, what's the word?

53:15Store of value. I knew it would come to me about it. I was having a data retrieval problem. A store of value. I heard this from a bunch of people. It's a great store of value. And my response to that is really... Oh, this is the anti-bank thing. And I go, really? Is it really a store of value? How could it be a store of value when it goes up and down like a yo-yo every single year? you know currencies don't do that you know people who trade currency you know a 10 move in a currency like the dollar in a year is extraordinary so people who trade currency the only way you can make money generally is to lever yourself enormously you can't have a currency that's a store of value that goes from 20 000 to 50 000 to 20 000 to 25 000 you know in between you're going to the bathroom and coming back.

54:06So I don't understand. Honestly, somebody should tell me because I just don't understand the social utility of Bitcoin. Again, other than money laundering. But that, it's excellent. I'm guessing you're about to get swarmed by at least a few crypto proponents who might be in the hole. Yeah, yeah, you know, come on. We'll have a nice fist fight. It's okay. Great. All right. Well, on that happy note, shall we leave it there, Joe? Let's leave it there. All right. This has been another episode of All Thoughts.

54:46Well, that was our live episode with Steve Eisman, recorded as part of the Bloomberg Invest Conference. I'm Traci Allaway. You can follow me on Twitter at Traci Allaway. And I'm Joe Weisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter at The Stalwart. Follow our guest Steve Eisman on Twitter. I didn't even realize he had been on there. He's at Eisman Steven. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Arman and Dashiell Bennett at Dashbot. And check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under the handle at Podcasts. And for more OddLots content, go to Bloomberg.com slash OddLots, where we post transcripts.

55:21We have a blog and a weekly newsletter. And you can chat with fellow listeners 24-7 in our Discord, discord.gg slash OddLots. It's a lot of fun. Go there and check it out. Thanks for listening.

56:05Wells Fargo has awarded$138 million in grants to nonprofits, supporting military and veterans with housing, small business, career transition, and more over the last 10 years. It's one of the many ways Wells Fargo seeks broad impact in communities. Wells Fargo, the bank of doing. Learn more at wellsfargo.com. slash say do. Support includes contributions from Wells Fargo and Company and the Wells Fargo Foundation. Sometimes you just need to be comfortable, you know, but that doesn't mean you don't want to look good too. Well, Old Navy, the kings of cozy have done it again with bounce fleece. It's soft, stylish, and comes in elevated colors that look good anywhere.

56:47Basically, it's fleece reimagined for real life, made for moments when you want to be cozy, but still need to look good. Call it airport chic. Call it errand elegance. Either way, Bounce Fleece nails it. Find Bounce Fleece and other holiday goodies now at OldNavy.com.

From the publisher

Steve Eisman is known for having bet against the housing market prior to the Great Financial Crisis in a trade immortalized by Michael Lewis in The Big Short. So what is he betting on now? In a special live episode of Odd Lots, recorded at the Bloomberg Invest summit, the Neuberger Berman portfolio manager discusses the recent banking turmoil (he thinks it's contained), the boom in anything related to AI, and his current bets on US manufacturing and infrastructure. He also talks about investing in rewiring the nation's electricity grid and why he thinks this theme has years left to play out.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from Odd Lots

All 682 episodes
Steve Eisman on Banks, AI and His Next Big BetOdd Lots · 52 min
Listen in VO