The Bank of England's Megan Greene on Monetary Policy in a World of Supply Shocks

19:35Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. That's why they make business growth their priority. The Chase team takes the time to understand your mission, where you are now and where you want to go. Their broad range of solutions is designed with you in mind so you can bring your ideas to life. From banking to payment acceptance to credit cards, you can conveniently manage all your business finances all in one place with their digital tools. Looking for tips and advice? Their online resources are always available to give you the solutions you need to help your business thrive.

20:09See how your business can get stronger and go farther with Chase for Business. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. So with people clearly caring about higher inflation more than they care about deflation, being more attuned to higher inflation and with companies more willing to reset prices in the face of higher inflation. And to what degree does the BOE try to get ahead of higher inflation versus wait for it to actually emerge?

20:50Yeah. So the way that we think about these kinds of shocks propagating through the economy, it's sort of in three different phases. The first phase is kind of direct effects. So when you have an energy shock, that automatically makes energy prices higher for everyone. In the UK, we actually have a price cap for households, the off-gen price cap. And so households have been shielded from that bit until July, and then they'll see energy costs go up. So this could happen in stages. But in any case, monetary policy doesn't kick in for 18 to 24 months, so it kicks in with a lag. So if we were to respond to that right now, by the time it hits the economy, it's just too late, and we could risk suppressing activity unnecessarily.

21:30So mostly you look through direct energy effects. Then you think about indirect energy effects. So firms that are using energy pass it on. For example, food production is a great example. It's pretty energy intensive, both through fertilizer, but also transport. And so you see food prices start to go up, which I think we probably will see. And so those are indirect effects. And the jury's out a little bit amongst the central banking community on whether you should try to lean against indirect effects or not. Generally, you should try to lean against some of them, but not all of them. again, because of lags in monetary policy.

22:04The real kicker is second round effects. And that's when actually all these price increases start changing wage and price setting behavior so that you get individuals and households saying, well, I can't, my money's just not going as far anymore. You're going to have to pay me more. And then firms might say, fine, we'll pay you more, but now our costs are higher. So we're going to pass that through in higher prices. And that can turn into a bit of a spiral. We've looked at past supply shocks in the UK, and every single one of them has had second round effects, but to very differing degrees, depending on the state of the economy at the time.

22:41So in 2008, 2011, 2014, 2022, you had second round effects in all of these situations, but the economy was very different in these different periods. We tend to look at 2022 because it's the most recent one. And I think for a lot of people, kind of the most scarring one when you had energy costs go up so much. And in 2022, of course, it's worth remembering we had just reopened after COVID. So you did have pretty strong demand. And also the labor market was pretty tight. That's not the case now. Actually, we have much weaker demand in the UK economy, and we have a much weaker labor market, and it's continuing to weaken.

23:18So we have slack in the labor market. So that suggests that we shouldn't get the same degree of second round effects now that we did in 2022. I think that's of little comfort, actually. Those were pretty extreme second round effects. I also look at 2011, when the labor market was actually much weaker than it is now. You had unemployment of 8 % in the UK, and you had some second round effects then. So right now, the economy is somewhere in between those two. So we will get some second round effects. It's impossible to calibrate them exactly in advance. The trick for us also is that You know, we kind of know how to measure direct and indirect effects.

23:56We can do that pretty easily. The second round effects are pretty difficult to measure. But of course, if we wait until we have real concrete evidence of them, we're too late in responding. So we're going to have to make a judgment, a proactive judgment in advance about the size of the second round effects that we're going to want to lean against so that we can lean against them in time.

24:17Tracy Alloway:You know, Kirsten, I have a theoretical question. I've been meaning to ask someone about this. When the inflation started to explode in the immediate wake of the pandemic really globally, one of the stories that people like to tell was that monetary policy would have weaker teeth or be less effective in the U.S., in part because so many American households are on 30-year fixed mortgages, unlike in much of the other Western world or the Anglosphere world where a lot of people's mortgages reset regularly. Did that actually play out in practice? Did BOE decisions transmit quicker to the real economy because fewer households see their mortgage bill reset on a regular basis?

25:02Yeah. So we've done a lot of looking into the monetary transmission mechanism to see how the change in the structure of the UK mortgage market has affected things. Because to your point, in the UK, we weren't always all on two and five year fixed mortgages. In fact, you used to have longer term fixes. you've had periods with variable mortgages.

25:19Tracy Alloway:But today it's dominated by two and five years. Mostly it's two and five year with I think an increasing number of variable mortgages. And so what you find is that it does transmit a bit more quickly. But it's also very different in the US. In the UK you can port your mortgage with you. Whereas in the US you can't. So there's an entire supply problem in the US that we don't face. We face supply problems in real estate in the UK but for completely different reasons. So that's a difference that's worth taking into account as well. But it's also meant, even though it's a shorter fix that we have here, it does mean that, you know, over the course of this hiking and cutting cycle, even though rates have been coming down for a while now, consumers haven't really been spending.

26:01And I think one of the reasons for that is that even though rates are coming down, as people come off a five year fixed mortgage, their own debt servicing costs are jumping massively from where they were when they first took out the mortgage. And so even though rates are coming down, people's debt servicing costs continue to go up. And so as you're in a rate cutting cycle, you would expect consumers to spend a bit more. We're not finding that so much. So this is one potential explanation for why consumers aren't spending more. It could also be scarring from previous bouts of inflation as well.

26:33But that's going to feed into the current conjuncture because one of the concerns, of course, I'm worried about inflation. I think that's paramount. And I think the risks to inflation are on the upside. But of course, you have to offset that with the risk of weaker demand. And if consumers aren't spending in the UK because they're scarred from previous experiences, then they're looking at this energy shock and probably thinking, well, no way I'm going to spend now. I'd better save for a rainy day, which, by the way, could be now. And so there is a chance that consumption and therefore growth could be even weaker than we've been expecting as well.

27:06So you have to offset that with concerns about greater inflation. Since we're talking about the consumer, I mean, it feels like one of the few potential deflationary forces out there, but still potentially a very big one is AI. Right. And this idea that, well, if there are fewer jobs because of AI, then obviously people are going to be earning less and spending less. And that's going to exert deflationary pressure on many different economies. What have you seen so far in terms of the impact of AI on the job market? And how are you thinking about this, you know, kind of very new still development?

27:41Yeah, so the bank has done some research on how AI is affecting the labor market in particular. And there's some nascent evidence that maybe those industries that are more exposed to AI are seeing fewer job openings than industries that are less exposed, which you can imagine. Use unemployment is particularly high in the UK. So I think it's quite easy to jump to a conclusion that suggests that, you know, it's very difficult to get a job if you're just coming out of uni. And maybe that's an AI effect. But I think there's actually very little evidence to directly make that link. And so there isn't much evidence of that.

28:16It's not just the labor market, of course, though. As I mentioned already, I'm worried about the supply side of the UK economy. So most of the supply shocks we've seen over the past couple of years have been negative supply shocks. AI represents the one potential positive supply shock that we might see coming down the pike. And so that could be possible. We look at the supply side of the economy all the time now at the Bank of England. When I first started, we only looked at it once a year because it's not supposed to move around that much. But we've learned actually. What does that mean once a year?

28:44Did you have like supply side week or something where you all got together and thought about it? I find this very interesting. It's not that we didn't ever talk about it in the intro. We did like a real deep dive on the supply side of the economy to try to measure productivity growth, total factor productivity. I mean, really deep dive. And it really was a once a year event. And now we do it all the time because obviously the supply side moves more than we had expected. We keep getting hit by supply shocks. But, you know, when we look at the supply side of the economy, there is no judgment that we've put in on the supply side to do with AI.

29:17So possibly it's in our assumptions about productivity growth just through some assumption about investment. But generally, we haven't made a judgment that over the next three years, AI will meaningfully impact productivity. And I'm not sure that that's right. I think the timing of this is the hardest part.

29:34Tracy Alloway:Well, actually, when I think about the term supply side or supply side shocks, I think there are sort of two things, right? There's a supply side shock. You can't do anything. suddenly the price of electricity goes up everywhere and we call that a supply side shock. And it's not great when that happens. And then there is also the sort of like core productive capacity of a country and how productive industries are and what type of investment is there and so forth. Even setting aside the shocks, the trend seems to be negative in the UK in terms of business investment. You hear about the last steel mill or whatever that's closing.

30:14Tracy Alloway:Or I read something recently, the UK might be importing salt for the first time or whatever. In your, whether it's formerly annual, but now regular studies of the supply side of the UK economy, do you have a diagnosis or do you have an assessment about what is driving this sort of long-term deterioration? I mean, we do insofar as you can say, There hasn't been a whole lot of investment in the UK, starting with the global financial crisis. I think most people pin that on Brexit and Brexit didn't really help, but it predates Brexit. And so that has been a long term drag on potential growth, productivity growth.

30:51We assume that productivity growth in particular will rebound to its long term trend. And I'm not sure that that's right. I think my own view is that the risk to that is entirely on the downside. But, you know, a lack of investment is part of it. And then on top of that, I mean, I understand how you're splitting these out. But if you keep getting negative supply shocks, then eventually that does feed through into potential growth. Yeah. And so I think that's a concern. And the way that central bankers have approached negative supply shocks has always been you just look through them. They're temporary.

31:25You know, Bank of England can't do anything about the Strait of Hormuz, for example. Can't actually address it. We have.

31:32Tracy Alloway:Can't reverse Brexit. No, we have tools that are uniquely designed for demand side problems. They can't really address supply side problems. And so we've always learned to just look through them and consider a sort of underlying inflation, underlying growth. And I think that when you keep having negative supply shocks and you consider that households and businesses are more attentive to inflation, that, you know, they're setting prices more often, that some kinds of inflation are more salient for households and businesses and other, particularly food and energy inflation, and we keep having increases in both of those things, then that eventually gets embedded into people's expectations and then their wage and price setting.

32:12And so that creates the kind of inflation persistence that I've been worried about even before this invasion of Iran. But now I continue to be worried about it.

32:35Support for the show comes from Public. Lately, it feels like there are two types of investing platforms. Some are traditional brokerages that haven't changed much in decades, and others feel less like investing and more like a game. Public is positioned differently. It's an investing platform for people who are serious about building their wealth. On Public, you can build a portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto, without all the bugs or the confetti. Retirement accounts, yep. High-yield cash, yes again. They even have direct indexing. Public has modern design, powerful tools, and customer support that actually helps.

33:10Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market. Add paid for by Public Holdings. Brokered services by Public Investing, member FINRA SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, SEC Registered Advisor. Crypto services by ZeroHash. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth. With a widespread presence in communities across the country, Chase for Business supports small business owners at a local level.

33:47That makes it possible for you to connect, learn from each other, and grow together. There's a real commitment to seeing small businesses succeed. The Chase for Business team has knowledge and expertise that span a wide range of financial areas. They can help you make more informed decisions as you navigate the complexities of running your business. They'll help your business grow with individual guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place. With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn more at chase.com slash business.

34:21Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase Mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. Everyone has been there. Your team's feedback is scattered across emails, chats, and sticky notes. It's a mess. But PDF Spaces and Adobe Acrobat gives you one collaborative workspace to streamline every file and comment. So if you need six departments to finally agree on a proposal, do that with Acrobat. Need to turn a mountain of feedback into one plan of action? Do that with Acrobat.

35:00Want to stop searching for files and finally get everyone on the same page? Do that. Do that. Do that with Acrobat. Learn more at adobe.com slash do that with Acrobat. I'm going to ask another sort of background American visiting London. and haven't been here for many years kind of question. But when people talk about the UK's high -

35:22Tracy Alloway:You were here last year. Oh, yeah. I haven't lived here for many years. When people talk about the UK's high exposure to energy volatility, why is that? Because the other thing people talk about in relation to the UK is like, it does actually have North Sea oil. It does have kind of its own supply. Like, what exactly is that vulnerability in this economy? So it has some supply, not massive amounts. And I think part of the trick is it's also very exposed to gas prices, which, you know, were what went up so dramatically when Russia invaded Ukraine. And then in the UK, electricity prices are keyed off of gas prices.

36:02So then electricity is particularly vulnerable as well. So unfortunately, I mean, the US has kind of energy independence at the moment. The UK is nowhere close to that position.

36:12Tracy Alloway:I know in the US, there is an entire art to asking a monetary policy setter a question about fiscal policy, because you have to do it very delicately. Otherwise, they might faint over in their chair if they're presented with something outside their remit. I don't know what exactly the norms are here about how we're supposed to phrase such questions to elicit some sort of answer. But with all that out of the way, when you think about upward pressure on inflation and why you're so concerned about inflation, And we've talked about energy and all that. How much does the seeming inability of government after government to engage in fiscal consolidation, how much is that a factor when you think about the future trajectory of inflation?

37:02Yeah. So, I mean, I'll say what any rate setter will tell you. So thank you for that. Yeah, I've done all the throat clearing for you. Yeah. But I mean, the way that we think about fiscal policy is we take exactly what's legislated when we put that into our models. Okay, so we stipulate that it doesn't seem like

37:19Tracy Alloway:there is any real impulse at fiscal consolidation or capacity right now. So what does that mean? Well, so I mean, actually, the government has legislated some consolidation given fiscal rules. And so that is exactly what we put into our forecasts. And so that's just one of the conditioning assumptions is what's legislated, we assume will happen. And then we base our forecasts off the back of that. But so just to push further, some of these fiscal choices, like the inviolability of, say, the triple lock, which again, I'm not asking you whether these are good or bad policies, et cetera, but are these contributors to the persistence of upside inflation risks?

38:01So I think it contributes to government borrowing costs. So we're sitting in the UK a day after long-term rates went up. Some of that is to do with the Strait of Hormuz. Some of that is to do with true social posts. Some of that may be because there are local elections coming up. And I think there's just a whole bunch of positioning around that in a guilt market, which is pretty niche and fairly small relative to the US Treasury market in particular. So I think that's all worth considering as well. And that all feeds through into financial conditions. You mentioned guilt yields. Now that you've gone from sort of finance Twitter to, you know, hardcore economic practitioner, monetary policy practitioner.

38:41She did have real jobs. I know, I know, but not like, not on a central bank. Come on. I'm complimenting the current role, not denigrating the previous ones. That's my intent. I'll always be economist Meg to you. That's right. But like, how do you think about bond vigilantes? Do you have nightmares or, have you gone from tweeting about bond vigilantes to thinking about them relentlessly as you watch UK guilt yields go up? No. So I neither have nightmares about them, nor do I wish I could tweet about them. I think markets are sometimes efficient and sometimes get things totally wrong. And so we have an entire function at the bank that talks to investors to get a sense of kind of what's behind their positioning, what they think.

39:32Often it's what do they think about us? What do they think we should be doing? What do they think we will do? And I think that's all worth understanding because like I said, sometimes they get things right. Certainly not always.

39:43Tracy Alloway:Well, let me ask you a mechanical question about the bond market, which is, are the coupon payments as we see yields rise? And this is a question for all developing economies and it certainly leads a little bit of an anxiety in the US as well. As we see those coupon payments rise. Are we anywhere near where those interest payments themselves are creating an inflationary impulse in the UK, which economists would call fiscal dominance? Yeah. I mean, I mostly look at this through financial conditions. And so if you get bond yields rising, then that's tightening financial conditions and that feeds through into the economy.

40:20And then there's a judgment to be made about what monetary policy should do about it.

40:24Tracy Alloway:But that's a fiscal expenditure, that coupon payment. And so the question is, is it of a size such that that fiscal expenditure, which the screens tell us is rising when we see the rates rising, is that large enough or is there a delta there such that that actually itself creates an inflationary impulse? So no, that's not a significant impulse that we're looking at. Mostly we're just looking at it through financial conditions. So we talked earlier about spillover from U.S. monetary policy, and it is thinkable that the U.S. could be raising rates sooner than it might be lowering rates. How would you anticipate the feed through from a tightening of U.S.

41:07monetary conditions to the U.K. at this current moment? Yeah, so as I mentioned, there's significant read through from the US Treasury market into the UK guilt market, rightly or wrongly. So if you look at economic indicators that come out and how they influence our financial conditions in the UK, the indicator, if it surprises that influences conditions here the most is UK inflation, thank goodness. Secondly is US inflation. I think third might be nonfarm payrolls in the US. It's not at all clear why these things should actually be influencing financial conditions in the UK, right? But I think part of that is an implicit assumption that the Fed is the world's biggest economy, Central Bank.

41:49And so when the Fed does something, everybody kind of has to. I don't think that's right, actually, but you can't ignore these spillovers. So if financial conditions were to tighten in the US, that would feed through to the UK. And financial conditions, I mean, of course, the reason matters. But, you know, if it's because of rate hikes in the U.S., it could mean that our financial conditions tighten as well. And then that feeds through into kind of our view of how restrictive our monetary policy stance is and how we manage inflation towards our 2 % target.

42:21Tracy Alloway:Can I go back to something you said at the very beginning when I asked you about what is the remit or the objective of the central bank? And you said one thing is to support the government. And that is not like formally, I don't think that's part of the Fed. But I know that that's why the Bank of England was founded, was to be the government's bank and to facilitate financing of the government. Does that functionally change anything? Does that mean something substantively different in terms of the conduct of monetary policy within the BOE versus, say, another central bank when that's sort of like part of your founding charter?

42:58Yeah. So to be clear, our mandate really is 2 % inflation sustainably in the medium term, subject to that. Yeah. to support the goals of the government. And they've changed. And this is a mandate that the Treasury sets every November. So it's once a year they look at it. And what fits in that has changed over the past couple of years on the margin.

43:19Tracy Alloway:There was an incident a few years ago in which the bank and the government, the bank helped out the government a little bit. But that had nothing to do with the mandate, yeah, for what it's worth. So in my time at the Bank of England, we've only hit our inflation target for one or two months maybe. And so while I've been at the Bank of England, and I think generally it's the case, really 2 % inflation is the target. And we're working tirelessly to hit that. So the secondary part of the mandate, which is subject to that, we haven't achieved that yet. So that is the primary focus. Can you talk a bit more about just the decision making process on the MPC?

43:57Because again, here, I'm going to emphasize Megan's many other jobs. You've been in academia, you've been in business settings, and now you're at a central bank. What are the sort of differences that you observe between how the decision-making process works at those types of institutions versus a central bank? This is just a long way of me asking you what the discussions are actually like.

44:19Tracy Alloway:I think as vigorous as Prime Minister's questions, which is our only exposure to what policymaking looks like in the UK. Yeah, so we meet every six weeks and every other time we produce a forecast. So when you produce a forecast, it's a more involved process. This last round was particularly interesting because we didn't produce a forecast. We said, you know what? Things are so uncertain. We're just going to produce three scenarios. We're not going to give you weights on them. Who knows what's happening with energy prices? But we produced three different scenarios. And they were based on kind of what energy futures curves might look like, how energy prices might evolve, and then also second round effects off the back of that.

44:58And so as you can imagine, in the good old days, not good old days, in the old days, when we only produced a central forecast, that was a less involved process, I would say, than now producing a bunch of scenarios to think about risk and uncertainty. And now I think we're facing kind of 90 and uncertainty, so radical unpredictability and uncertainty. So it's an incredibly involved process to produce these scenarios, to think about different states of the world, to try to identify where we might be in these scenarios. And then most importantly, to try to figure out how we would respond if we were in any parts of these worlds.

45:36And so to figure out our reaction function, we look at the market curve, but we also look at a whole bunch of policy rules. They're all different. And in figuring out where we forecast from, we have to figure out where we are. We've used a whole bunch of different models, get loads of updates and research notes from our fantastic staff to help inform us of where we're starting from, because that's always really important. So, you know, in a forecast round, it's about three weeks of intensive discussions and research and notes. And then figuring out how to communicate that to the outside world, I think is really important too.

46:13So it is a really involved process. And I would say that the model where we have externals and internals and where dissent is totally normal does work in that we certainly don't agree on everything. In fact, often we don't agree on important things and that comes out in our votes. But I think that's how you make sure that you're making the strongest decisions.

46:35Tracy Alloway:This might be sort of like an abstract question. You can take it however you want it. A prior guest we've had on the podcast a bunch of times, Hyun Sung Shin, recently became the head of Korea Central Bank. And I read his opening speech, which I thought was really interesting. And he said, you know, central bankers like to talk about theory and putting it into practice. And you have theories like independence is good and so forth. These ideas you put in practice. He said, in reality, the practice happens. So then you sort of form a theory around it. and that we're in a moment of historical change for central banks for many reasons.

47:07Tracy Alloway:Perhaps the right populism, politics is changing, that might change the nature of central banks. AI, the extreme uncertainty of AI and how that's going to affect the economy, that's a source of change. And therefore, central banks, period, are going to be in a new period of the old ways. Does it feel like, whether at the BOE or general, that we're going to be entering a new era of central banking per se. Yeah, I think we already have in fairness. So I've spoken to some of my predecessors, Kristen Forbes, I saw recently, for example, and she said, you're so lucky my entire time on the MPC, I never voted to change interest rates at all.

47:45Oh, my God. That's right. And now I've seen inconceivable now. That's right. And so I've seen a hiking cycle, a holding cycle and a cutting cycle. And who knows what comes next off the back of this shock. And so I do think that that has changed. But also, you know, I think getting hit by successive shocks is just here to stay. And I think you can identify some already. So if economic statecraft is how major world powers are going to operate using economic tools for foreign policy goals, those just represent negative supply shocks for someone. And so, you know, I think we will continue to have negative supply shocks, whether it's tariffs or export controls or investment controls, all of these things.

48:27And then climate change, whether it's physical risk or transition risk, if it crystallizes, that represents a negative supply shock as well. So we're no longer at a point where we can kind of say, well, one day we might have some of these things happen. I think we're already there. And so this old adage that you should just look through negative supply shocks because you can't address them directly, I don't think it works when you keep having them wave after wave. And I also think there's just a ton of uncertainty now. A lot of economists feel like they had a framework for understanding how the global economy worked and it doesn't work anymore, but no one's quite identified the new one.

49:04And so in an age when you have this much uncertainty, you need to stop thinking about your very specific forecast where you do get out whether inflation's 0.2 percentage points higher or lower in year three of your forecast, it's kind of neither here nor there. It's much more about kind of scenario analysis and risk management when you're making decisions about interest rates. So figuring out if we thought we were in this state of the world and it turns out we're in a different one, how bad could we mess that up and how do we minimize some of those costs? And that's a different way of thinking, I think, about central banking than what we had in the past.

49:40I mean, other than scenario analysis is there anything else that central bankers should do in order to deal with supply shocks because this was a theme post covid in the u.s this idea that the fed only has an interest rate and interest rate is not a particularly adept tool at dealing with the supply side as you said earlier central bankers are often you know they're very much trained and focused on dealing with the demand side not necessarily the supply side of the equation and part of that is because they don't necessarily have the right tools. Yeah, we don't really have the right tools. So we've got what we've got.

50:14Could you get tools is what I'm asking. Yeah, it's a good question. I think probably if if you're making decisions about the supply side of the economy, often that comes down to questions about choosing winners and losers. And that's not what central independent central banks are here for. That's what elected politicians are there for. So I think some of these solutions have to come from elected officials and not from central banks at all. But understanding that it's the multiplicative effects of multiple supply shocks rather than just looking at them in concert is important. And also, you know, we look at decompositions of inflation over the past, and you can't explain them all using standard channels.

50:53There's just kind of a wedge. And sometimes that's a judgment that we've made. And sometimes it's just an unknown. But being a bit more curious about these wedges. Why haven't things panned out in a way that we can perfectly explain? Maybe there's something else going on because of these supply shocks. I think there's a lot of work to be done in that area, too. You also mentioned communicating how the central bank, how the BOE is thinking to the market and I guess to households as well. We might have a new Fed governor very, very soon in the form of Kevin Warsh. And he is, as far as I can tell, not a fan of forward guidance.

51:31I think that's fair to say. Someone pedantic is going to point out that the Fed may already have abandoned forward guidance of the bond market based off of what happened in 2022. But if we got a more formalized abandonment of forward guidance, does that make your job at the BOE a lot more difficult if you're trying to judge the spillover effects from U.S. bonds? So I think we don't understand the spillovers just from what the Fed is saying about them. We're also looking at the U.S. economy and the fundamentals. So forward guidance has its place, I think. You don't need it all the time. I don't think that means we won't understand what's happening in the U.S.

52:09economy and therefore how that might spill over into the U.K. economy. I think there are just different approaches on this stuff. So if I look over the whole of this conversation, you're talking a lot about being wary of inflationary risks. And we talked about maybe the public and companies being more primed towards inflationary risks than they were previously. Why did you vote to hold rates last week? Yeah. Yeah. You know, I think given that it will take too long to get evidence for second round effects to actually address them, I think that's a fair question. You know, if you don't hike now, then when are you going to?

52:47To my mind, a big contribution was that we are going to get some news over the next six weeks or so, but, you know, over the next couple of months. And a lot of that news will not be definitive evidence of second round effects, but it will be evidence about energy prices, which are a big feed into what's going on with the economy and with inflation. So is there a state of the world in which restrictiveness that we already have in our monetary policy stance, because we are restrictive, I think, just not hugely so, but is there a state of the world in which actually if the war ended tomorrow, the Strait of Hormuz opened up completely, whether that restrictiveness could squeeze out the second round effects that have already been kicked off by this crisis.

53:29I think it's defensible to think that possibly there are. In my view, the risk is entirely on the upside, though. There's kind of a ratchet here. I think the risk to energy prices and also second round effects are probably on the upside rather than the downside. But I do think that it's worth waiting for a little while to see kind of what happens with the progression of this war and therefore see what we can infer about how it will propagate through the economy before we make a move. Megan, it was so great to catch up with you. Congrats on the new role. I know we're a little bit late to it, but it was really great to be able to actually ask you all the questions about what you're doing right now.

54:06Yeah, thanks for having me. It's great to see you.

54:08Tracy Alloway:Yeah, thank you so much. That was great.

54:22Joe, that was really fun. It was great. I have to say, I'm a little bit jealous that Megan probably has a really nice office at the Bank of England building. I know.

54:31Tracy Alloway:The Bank of England, Bank of England. I know. That would be a pretty sweet job. I think I'm going to go through my entire career without ever having my own office in a building. I know, me too. I love my job. And I'm going to leave it at that. It would be nice to one day just like have an office with a door and all that stuff. But there are a bunch of interesting things to pick out of that conversation. I mean, I thought her point about the emphasis of central banks and economics in general on the demand side historically versus the supply side kind of captures a lot of the struggle that policymakers have had with the post-COVID economy.

55:11Right. Like all of economics is very much focused on the idea of like, well, you need a healthy consumer who's spending. Right. And going out and buying stuff versus like thinking about those supply side shocks.

55:23Tracy Alloway:I think she made a really good point, which is it does seem at least theoretically possible to truly have one supply shock after another. And they really are just independent supply shocks, right? At least it's conceivably possible. A pandemic is not the same thing as a war here, as a war there, and so forth. They could be discrete events. The sort of money line for me when she said was the rise of economic statecraft. And if once governments start using economic tools as foreign policy, and once that cycle gets going, then there begin to be reasons to think that these discrete one-off supply shocks are not just going to be things that are one and done, but that are part of a sustained new part of the world that consistent.

56:12Tracy Alloway:And you see this. Obviously, I mean, the tariffs are one part of it, but all of the moves that we talked to about reshoring and strategic domestic investments for backup capacity, et cetera, this is like what constitutes a sustained trend. And so I thought it was really just overall very interesting to hear someone like really wrestle with the reality of conducting monetary policy in a period of sustained supply side degradation, shocks, what have you. And then the question, of course, is if the central bank is not the right entity to deal with these supply side shocks, like should it, given its existing tools, which we touched on, like should it have new tools?

56:56I mean, a lot of people would say no, because that's veering into fiscal and you want governments to decide that and democratically elected governments to decide that. But on the other hand, like if it keeps happening, it also feels somehow unsatisfactory to just say like, well, we're going to have to deal with this with like the existing toolkit.

57:17Tracy Alloway:Yeah. And also, again, but it really does cut straight to the core of what we want in a democratic society. You could say, you know what, part of the reason we have declining productivity is because regulations on setting up a new factory are burdensome. Do we want non-elected officials deciding, oh, you know what, we're going to change environmental regulations. We're going to change the minimum wage. We're going to change the protected habitat speed. Most people would be very uncomfortable with the, we're going to change household zoning so that there could be more construction in London. Most people would get really uncomfortable about what it would mean for the central bank to have the capacity to address supply side problems.

58:00But I think the other point is maybe there are more creative ways of doing it that we haven't even thought of yet. So for instance, could you do monetary policy on a weekly basis versus a monthly decision? No, seriously, if like if the entire world is changing on a week to week basis, maybe you need to start like making these decisions and like, yeah, I don't know. My point is like there may be creative solutions out there that we haven't even thought about.

58:27Tracy Alloway:Let's get on that. Let's get on that. All right. Shall we leave it there? Let's leave it there. This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Allaway. You can follow me at Tracy Allaway. And I'm Jill Weisenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart. Follow our producers, Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen, Armand Daschle Bennett at Dashbot, Kel Brooks at Kel Brooks, and Kevin Lozano at Kevin Lloyd Lozano. And for more OddLots content, go to Bloomberg.com slash OddLots, where we have a daily newsletter on all of our episodes. And you can chat about all these topics 24-7 in our Discord, discord.gg slash OddLots.

59:00And if you enjoy OddLots, if you like it when we talk to central bankers, then please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad-free. All you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.

59:48If you follow markets, you know the value of long-term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. For more than 75 years, Cincinnati Insurance has helped individuals and businesses navigate tough moments with expertise, personal attention, and independent agents who focus on relationships, not transactions. The Cincinnati Insurance Companies. Let them make your bad day better. Find an agent at c-i-n-f-i-n dot com. Coffee genius here. Most people see a busy cafe, but I see precision at every step. Thanks to Genius from Global Payments.

1:00:33Transactions, instant inventory precise operations in sync absolutely genius from sold-out crowds worldwide to managing the morning rush genius keeps operations running smoothly one portato flawless pour perfectly timed just beautiful big league reliability for any business that's genius from

1:00:55Tracy Alloway:coast to coast unlock adventure at red lion hotels by sinesta where restful sleep friendly service and trusted local knowledge are part of every stay. Red Lion makes it easy to feel welcomed, comfortable, and connected wherever the road takes you. Whether you're traveling for business or pleasure, you can spend less and make more of every trip. When you sign up for Sinesta Travel Pass, you'll get their best rates instantly. Go to Sinesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sinesta Travel Pass. Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sinesta.com. Terms and conditions apply.