In short
Portable mortgages—proposed by the Trump administration/FHFA leadership—to let homeowners keep low mortgage rates (e.g., 2–4%) when moving, potentially reducing “lock-in” and improving housing affordability.
Guest backgrounds
No guests are mentioned; the episode is hosted by Dave Meyer.
Key claims
Portable mortgages are lender features, not borrower rights. The U.S. mortgage system relies on securitization (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac/Ginnie Mae) with standardized, predictable loans and modeled prepayment risk; portability would detach loans from specific collateral and make prepayment/duration harder to price. Lenders have little incentive to port existing low-rate loans because they could re-lend at higher rates unless government subsidizes them. Even if offered, it would likely resemble Canada: shorter fixed terms, prepayment penalties, and/or higher fees/rates.
Notable examples
Canada/UK/NZ portability uses typically 5-year fixed mortgages with large prepayment penalties (sometimes 4–5 figures) and requires requalification/underwriting again.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroduction to Portable Mortgages
0:00 to 0:41
Learn about the concept of portable mortgages and their potential impact on housing.
“Imagine you have a super low mortgage, like 2 % or 3%, which is not only locked in for 30 years, but you can also take it with you when you move to a new house.”
Understanding Portable Mortgages
0:41 to 2:56
Explore how portable mortgages work and their implications for homeowners.
“We're going to be talking about a new concept that's being floated right now to address housing affordability.”
The International Perspective
2:56 to 9:23
Examine how portable mortgages function in countries like Canada and the UK.
“Would the intended impacts come to fruition?”
The International Perspective
10:07 to 10:25
Examine how portable mortgages function in countries like Canada and the UK.
“Past performance does not guarantee future results.”
American Mortgage System Explained
10:30 to 14:00
Delve into the structure of the American mortgage system and its unique features.
“I'm Dave Meyer here talking about portable mortgages.”
Understanding the American Mortgage System
14:00 to 19:46
Learn about the predictability and pricing factors in the American mortgage system.
“So that predictability of the loan product and knowing that those mortgage payments are going to stay the same and not really change is really important.”
Understanding the American Mortgage System
20:27 to 21:42
Learn about the predictability and pricing factors in the American mortgage system.
“When investors start scaling, insurance can't be an afterthought.”
The Future of Portable Mortgages
27:30 to 28:01
Explore the potential for portable mortgages and their implications.
“the form of one, shorter terms, two, prepayment penalties, and three, higher mortgage rates.”
The Reality of Portable Mortgages
28:01 to 29:59
Explore the challenges and limitations of introducing portable mortgages in the housing market.
“And so, yeah, maybe going forward, we will have new portable mortgages, but those mortgages will be underwritten differently.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Imagine you have a super low mortgage, like 2 % or 3%, which is not only locked in for 30 years, but you can also take it with you when you move to a new house. It sounds amazing, right? This is the idea behind portable mortgages, the latest concept to help unlock the housing market and improve housing affordability that's currently being explored by the Trump administration. But will portable mortgages actually work? Is it feasible to implement them in the United States? And if so, who will benefit? Today, we're digging into portable mortgages.
0:41Hey, everyone. Welcome to On The Market. I'm Dave Meyer. Thank you all so much for being here. We've got a fun episode for you today. We're going to be talking about a new concept that's being floated right now to address housing affordability. And housing affordability has really come to national attention in recent weeks. On this show, in our world, as real estate investors and industry leaders, industry service providers, We know affordability in the housing market is a huge issue. And regular Americans know that too. But in just the last month, the Trump administration has really focused on housing affordability.
1:20First, they called for a 50-year mortgage. We released a whole episode about that a week ago if you want to hear my thoughts on that and just get some information on that. But it's been a few weeks since that proposal was floated. And you should know that it didn't get a very warm reception from the industry. It still might happen, but from the research I've done, people I've talked to, even if it does come to fruition, it's probably not going to have that big boost to affordability or unlock the housing market as much as we really need right now. And so the administration has actually put out a new idea, which is portable mortgages.
1:57Just last week, Bill Pulte, the head of the FHFA, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, said that his team is, quote, working on portable mortgages. If you haven't heard of this term before, the idea here is to adopt a type of mortgage that is used in different countries. It's used in Canada, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and homeowners there can take their mortgages with them. So imagine that you get your amazing mortgage, something you locked in during COVID, 2, 3, 4 % mortgage, and now you want to move. You can bring it somewhere new. And this sounds great, right? It's super appealing to homeowners and borrowers because no longer would they have to pay a much higher mortgage rate if they wanted to move.
2:42And therefore, in theory at least, it could potentially break the lock-in effect. It could drive up transaction volume and potentially even help housing affordability. But how would this work? Is there a chance that this can happen? Would the intended impacts come to fruition? Are we on the verge of finally bringing some life back to the housing market? Or is this just noise? Today, we're going to dig into this. First, we'll just go over what a portable mortgage is. Then we'll talk about how they actually work, because there are examples of this. Then we'll talk about why the U.S. doesn't currently have these portable mortgages to make sense of whether or not this can actually happen, which we'll talk about.
3:23And then lastly, I'll give you my opinion on whether I think this is going to work. So let's do it. First up, what is a portable mortgage? It's basically you get out a mortgage, you take out a mortgage to buy a home. After two or three years, maybe you wanna go and sell that home. And instead of having to go pay off this one mortgage with your proceeds from your sale, and then go out and take out another mortgage when you go out and buy a property, you actually get to bring the mortgage with you. The way to think about it is the mortgage travels with you as a person. It is not necessarily attached to the home.
3:57Now, it is not all magic. This doesn't just work, you know, like you could go, say you bought a$300 ,000 home and you have a 3 % interest rate and then you go buy a$500 ,000 home. You don't just get to take that rate. In that scenario, you obviously have to modify your loan a little bit. They do something they call the blend and extend, which is basically, let's just use round numbers. Let's say you had$250 ,000 of debt on that first purchase. you can keep your 3 % interest rate on that 250. But if you have to go out and borrow another 150 grand to buy this new, more expensive home, you're gonna get that at current rates.
4:36But still, there is a benefit to that because you're blending your old rate, which is lower, with this higher rate. And you're still getting a better rate than if you went out and got a new mortgage. The other thing that you should know is that the amortization does usually restart. So you are gonna start paying more interest again as well. So that's kind of the high level picture of what's going on with a portable mortgage. Let's talk a little bit about what it actually looks like in Canada, for example, because it is very different from what we do here in the United States. And I think that's one of the key things to remember throughout this episode is it's not like in Canada they have 30 or fixed rate mortgages that people are porting around.
5:17That is not what is happening in Canada. when you have a portable mortgage, they're usually five-year fixed rate mortgages. So already, just right off the bat, right, we are already seeing that the potential benefit in Canada, in the Canadian system, is not as great as you would want it to be here, right? Because in the United States, what's so valuable about our mortgages is that 30-year fixed rate debt, right? In Canada, they don't really have an example of that ever working. And I'm going to explain why they do it like that in just a minute. In addition to the term being much shorter, five years instead of 30 years in most cases, there are big prepayment penalties, meaning that if you choose to refinance your loan or you sell the property and pay off your mortgage before you intended, you get fined.
6:08And these fines, the penalty that you can pay for prepayment, anyone who's gotten a commercial loan or a DSCR loan probably recognizes prepayment penalties. In the United States, we are lucky. We do not have prepayment penalties for conventional mortgages. But in Canada, if you pay off your mortgage early, you could have to pay four, sometimes five-figure fees to be able to do that. And this is really critically important. This is the way that the lenders protect themselves in this case. To them, a portable mortgage, that is something they can offer borrowers, but they don't want to originate a loan only for them to keep hoarding it around a bunch of times, then paying it off before they really earn enough interest to justify making that loan in the first place.
6:58And so they put in these prepayment penalties to make sure that doesn't happen. So keep that in mind as well. So again, five-year terms instead of 30-year terms, and there are prepayment penalties. Next, what you should know is you do need to requalify for those mortgages. So it's not like you just check a box. You actually need to go and do underwriting again. And then the key feature, really important thing that I feel like everyone who's talking about portable mortgages right now has completely missed. And this is a very, very important piece. Portability is a lender feature. This is not a right that you have.
7:36This is something that lenders can offer borrowers, but do not have to. So when you look at this, whether it's Canada or the UK, you see that it's very different. And it's because these countries designed portability around their loans, which are short-term fixed products with prepayment penalties, which is, again, totally different from the American mortgage system. So why is the American system so different? We're going to talk about that in just a minute, but we do have to take a quick break. We'll be right back. Vacation is expensive. Your empty place doesn't have to be. If you're heading out of town and your home is sitting empty, you could list your space on Airbnb while you're away and turn those unused nights into extra income.
8:21And with Airbnb's co-host network, getting started is more straightforward than most people think. You can hire a vetted local co-host with hosting experience who could create your listing, manage reservations, handle guest communications, and even provide onsite support for guests during their stay. So while you're away spending money, your space could be working in the background, bringing in extra cash. Find a co-host at airbnb.com slash host. Do you ever notice how every passive investment somehow turns into a very active lifestyle? Active spreadsheets, active phone calls, active stress. Here's a better question.
8:56What if you could buy brand new construction homes, 10 % below market value, in the best markets across the country without making real estate your second job? That's exactly what Rent to Retirement does. They're a full-service, turnkey investment company handling everything for you. In some cases, investors get 50 % to 75 % of their down payment back at closing, plus interest rates as low as 3.75%. They've partnered with BiggerPockets for over a decade, helping thousands invest smarter. If you want to do the same, visit biggerpockets.com slash retirement to learn more. Billion-dollar investors don't typically park their cash in high-yield savings accounts.
9:33Instead, they often use one of the premier passive income strategies for institutional investors, private credit. Now, the same passive income strategy is available to investors of all sizes, thanks to the Fundrise Income Fund, which is more than$600 million invested and a 7.97 % distribution rate. With traditional savings yields falling, it's no wonder private credit has grown to be a trillion-dollar asset class in the last few years. Visit fundrise.com slash pockets to invest in the Fundrise Income Fund in just minutes. The fund's total return in 2025 was 8 % and the average annual total return since inception is 7.8%.
10:11Past performance does not guarantee future results. Current distribution rate as of 12-31-2025. Carefully consider the investment material before investing, including objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. This and other information can be found in the Income Fund's Perspectives at fundrise.com slash income. This is a paid advertisement.
10:29Welcome back to On the Market. I'm Dave Meyer here talking about portable mortgages. This is something that has gotten super popular in recent days. I see a lot of people very excited about this. But as I just showed before the break, the examples that we have seen of portable mortgages in other countries look very different than they do in the United States. As I said before the break. It's shorter terms. There are prepayment penalties. And critically, this is not something lenders have to do. It is something they are able to offer. Now, I want to talk a little bit about the American mortgage system and why it is constructed in the way it is and some of the pros and cons of our system.
11:09And by doing that, it will help us understand if portable mortgages could actually work here in the United States. And this might get a little bit technical. I'm sorry, but we have to talk about how the mortgage industry actual works. Most mortgages in the United States, conventional mortgages have to meet certain requirements. Then they are sold to Fannie May or Freddie Mac or Ginnie May. And then they are pooled together into mortgage backed securities, also called MBS. And they are sold off to investors who actually hold onto those mortgages. So most Most of the time when you're getting a mortgage from a broker, that broker or even the bank that you are getting that mortgage from, they're not holding onto your mortgage and servicing your mortgage.
11:53If you've bought a house before, you've probably noticed that you might get your first mortgage payment from one servicer. And then like two months later, they're like, actually, we sold your mortgage. Now so-and-so is your servicer. This happens all the time. This is kind of a feature of the American mortgage system. And the people who go out and buy these mortgages are banks. Yeah, they are holders of mortgage-backed securities, but it's also pension funds, insurance companies. You have family offices. You have hedge funds. You have sovereign wealth funds. They are buying these securitized assets.
12:25And I won't get into all the details of this, but this process of securitization, bundling these loans into mortgage-backed securities, generally is believed to lower mortgage rates. It lowers the risk by pooling them all together, by increasing liquidity in the markets. It is generally believed to lower mortgage rates. And so we don't know because we haven't had this in a long time. But if we broke this securitization of mortgage backed securities, it is likely that lenders would see that as riskier and they would demand higher mortgage rates. So that is one reason we do this in the United States.
13:02There are other reasons, obviously financial reasons for the investors. but it is generally believed that it has a benefit to homeowners and to investors who use these mortgages because it lowers their mortgage rates. Now, this whole system of securitization depends on predictability. That is kind of the whole idea. That is why when you get underwritten for one of these loans that is going to be sold, they ask the same question and they have very rigid underwriting because they need it to fit in this neat little box so it can be sold off to investors. These investors, they don't want exotic mortgages.
13:38They don't want a million different types of loans where you have to go and figure out how risky is this type of loan versus how risky is this type of loan? Or is this person perfectly qualified for this kind of loan? No, they just want one loan product and they want to be able to underwrite that one loan product. That is largely how the mortgage market works in the United States. So that predictability of the loan product and knowing that those mortgage payments are going to stay the same and not really change is really important. The other piece of this that really underpins the American mortgage system is that prepayment of these mortgages are a known variable and they are priced in.
14:20I know that in the United States, you know this too, that most common mortgage is a 30 year fixed rate mortgage. But the lenders who underwrite these or the investors who go out and buy mortgage-backed securities are not counting on holding that loan for 30 years. Americans, generally speaking, stay in their homes or stay in their mortgages, I should say, between seven and 10 years. So they either sell and move or refinance, usually seven to 10 years. There's some variance in that, but that's generally what it is. And that is critical to the interest rates that we get on 30-year fixed-rate mortgages.
14:59If people stayed in their home for 30 years and actually paid off their mortgage to 30 years, our mortgage rates would be higher. I won't get into the super details of this, but just think about this logically. If you were a lender and you wanted to lend to someone for 7 to 10 years, that comes with some risk, right? It's very hard to predict what's going to happen 7 to 10 years from now. But if you were lending for someone for 30 years, that is even more unpredictable, right? So you would want higher interest rates. But because we bundle these loans, because they are so standardized, it is easy for lenders to price in what they're willing to lend at, knowing that for all of these conventional mortgages that are out there, that they will get paid off between seven to 10 years.
15:48That's just how the underwriting and pricing for mortgages works in the United States. If you follow this show, and I always say that mortgage rates are tied to the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury. Why? Because 10 years is the benchmark for how long they are lending to. And so these people who buy mortgage-backed securities are basically saying, do I want to lend to the U.S. government in the form of a 10-year U.S. Treasury? Or do I want to lend to homeowners by buying mortgage-backed securities? That's why these things are so closely correlated. Anyway, this system exists for several reasons.
16:22It provides a lot of liquidity. It does keep U.S. mortgage rates lower. It enables things like a 30-year fixed rate mortgage, which no other countries really have. I've talked about this a lot on the show, but that is a very rare mortgage feature. The U.S. is really built on this 30-year fixed rate mortgage. and without this securitization, without collateralizing our loans, that would be very difficult. So there are definitely benefits to the securitization model, but it also comes with trade-offs. There are constraints here too. When a mortgage is packaged and bundled to be sold in mortgage-backed securities, it is required that the loan is collateralized with a specific property.
17:07If you haven't heard this word collateralized or collateral, it's basically when you take out a mortgage, that loan is backed by the property that it is helping you buy. Meaning that if you default on your mortgage payments, the bank can go after your collateral and they can foreclose on your house basically, right? And that is a key component of the securitization of our loans in the United States is that the collateral is explicitly identified. That's really important. The other thing is that the repayment schedule, what you're paying and when is already established and it doesn't really change.
17:46The probability of that prepayment is already modeled in and the investor yield is priced like they know what they are going to make on that. So this is the tradeoff, right? We get lower mortgage rates because lenders get predictability. And the reason why portability could potentially sort of break the American mortgage model is that lenders would lose that predictability, right? They would not have that same level of assuredness. They would not be able to forecast or predict prepayments or how long people will hold onto these mortgages if they're allowed to just port them and bring them from one house to another.
18:28Because if you detach the mortgage from the home, the collateral that we were just talking about changes whenever you port that mortgage. The duration of how long you are going to hold on to it becomes really unpredictable. The investors may not understand when the prepayment is going to come. What they're willing to pay for these mortgage-backed securities is all of a sudden going to become inaccurate. Basically, portability would be very difficult to work into the American mortgage system as it stands today. Now, could that change? Could the government or could lenders agree to change this? That's an interesting question, and we'll get to that right after this quick break.
19:11Stay with us. Tax season reminder for all the real estate investors listening. If you own rental properties, short-term rentals, commercial buildings, basically anything that's not your primary residence, you need to know about cost segregation. It's an IRS-compliant strategy that lets you accelerate depreciation on your properties, which means you're paying less in taxes this year and keeping more cash in your pocket for your next deal. Cost Segregation Guys is the go-to firm, having done over 12 ,000 of these studies with 500 million in total depreciation identified. Head to costsegregationguys.com slash BP to get a free proposal and see your potential tax savings.
19:52Most investors only think about insurance when something goes wrong. A tenant injury, storm damage, loss of rent. Then suddenly, the cheapest policy doesn't feel like the best one anymore. That's why a lot of BiggerPockets investors use steadily for landlord insurance designed specifically for rental properties. Whether you own one property or a growing portfolio, they make it simple to get covered properly. And BiggerPockets Pro members get an extra 5 % off their landlord insurance premiums. Visit biggerpockets.com slash landlord insurance to get a quote today. You've upgraded how to buy properties, but did your insurance get the memo?
20:29When investors start scaling, insurance can't be an afterthought. Most policies were designed for a single property, not multiple rentals, LLC ownership, short-term stays, or properties mid-rehab. That's where blind spots can creep in. NREG works exclusively with real estate investors. They understand portfolios, how risk compounds as you grow, and why insurance should protect your upside, not just a checkbox. One uncovered claim can undo years of progress. Before your next acquisition, review your insurance. Talk to NREG and get investor-specific coverage from specialists who actually understand real estate at nreg.com slash bppod.
21:02That's n-r-e-i-g dot com slash bppod. New year, clean slate, and maybe a vacancy that needs to get filled fast? That's where Avail comes in. With Avail, rental listings can be published to 24 top rental sites with one click, completely free. That includes places renters are already searching, like Realtor.com, Apartments.com, Redfin, and more. No copying and pasting. No juggling multiple platforms. Just one listing that shows up everywhere. If getting rentals organized and filled fast is on the list this year, start with Avail. Sign up for free at avail.co slash biggerpockets. That's A-V-A-I-L dot C-O slash biggerpockets.
21:42Welcome back to On the Market. I'm Dave Meyer talking about portable mortgages. Before the break, we were talking about why portability doesn't really work with the system that we have for mortgages in the United States, which is securitizing mortgages, selling them as mortgage backed securities. Before the break, though, I did mention like, could that change? And the answer is yes. But I want to ask you, if you were a lender, would you want this to change? Because As I get, portability sounds great for borrowers or as homeowners. I would want to use it as a homeowner or as a borrower. I think everyone would agree that's great for borrowers.
22:19But borrowers are only half of the mortgage market, unfortunately. We also have to put ourselves in the shoes of lenders. And when I see all these takes, people talking about this on social media or even the mainstream media talking about portable mortgages, all these are amazing. It can help the housing market. Yeah, they're putting themselves in the shoes of a homeowner and a buyer. But you have to put yourself in the shoes of a lender to understand if this is really feasible and if it actually would work in the first place. So let's just imagine that you lent money to a homeowner in 2021 and they're paying you a 3 % mortgage rate.
22:56And when you originated that loan, you thought, yeah, they'll probably pay me off in 7 to 10 years. Let's use 7 years as an example. So that was 2021. I'm lending to you at 3%. I'd supposed to pay off in 2028. Now, if someone came to me and said, hey, can I port this mortgage over to a new home and keep that 3 % interest rate? As a lender, you are obviously saying no to that, right? Rates right now are at six, six and a half percent. If you could get them to prepay that mortgage instead and then take out a new loan, you're gonna be doing much better as a lender. I can't speak for everyone who owns mortgage-backed securities, but I imagine they are all very eager to get those 3 % and 4 % interest rates off their books so that they could re-lend that money back out at a higher interest rate.
23:49So in addition to portability sort of breaking the securitization model and really kind of throwing the entire American mortgage system into disarray, there is very little incentive for lenders to want to do this at all. And so when I think about this, I think that portable mortgages for existing mortgages remains very unlikely. I just don't see this happening unless lenders are incentivized to do this. That is the only way this happens, right? They are not going to be willingly extending or porting over loans when they could lend out that same exact money for more money. There's just no way they are going to do that.
24:32And the only way they're going to incentivize that, if you kind of like pull this thread a little bit, is if the government incentivizes them to do that. I don't know what that looks like. I've never seen something like that, but we can imagine, right, maybe the government provides tax incentives or just straight up pays the lenders to make these mortgages portable. And that could work, I guess. But if at that point, if you're just giving away money to make the housing market more affordable, I personally think there are better uses of money to help solve the housing affordability challenges that we have than giving banks money.
25:05And it's probably involves either giving homeowners or borrowers money or using that money to figure out ways to build more affordable housing, to drive down the cost of construction and permitting, to increase the supply of homes. Those are real long-term solutions to affordability rather than just giving money to the bank. So that's my opinion on existing mortgages. I think the idea that people are going to be able to take their low rates from COVID, move them to a new home without massive government intervention is very unlikely. I wouldn't be counting on this, even though I agree that as a homeowner and for borrowers, this would be very appealing.
25:46I just don't think it works. It doesn't gel with the American mortgage system. Now, could we blow up the whole mortgage system? Sure. but I don't think anyone wants that. Any changes to our mortgage system is likely going to increase risk, increase uncertainty for those lenders. And what do they do when there's more risk and there's more uncertainty? Mortgage rates go up. And so even the idea of this is that maybe it would help affordability for people who already have homes. Mortgage rates would probably go up for everyone else. Not to mention if you did this, even if they somehow magically made this work, it would only help existing homeowners.
Read the full transcript
26:27It would not help anyone who's struggling to get into the housing market right now because they'd be paying current rates anyway. So I do not see this as a solution to housing affordability. Yes, in theory, if they magically did it, it could break the lock in effect. It could help increase transaction volume, but I don't see it as a fix for housing market affordability. And overall, I just think for existing mortgages, it remains very unlikely. Now, is it possible going forward that banks will offer portable mortgages? Sure. I think that might come of this. Like maybe a couple of lenders, a couple of banks will say, hey, that's a good idea.
27:08We want to offer this to our borrowers. But I promise you this, there is no such thing as a free launch, especially when you're working with giant banks and lenders. So they will find ways to implement new fees and new costs to compensate for the convenience that they are giving you by allowing portability. That will probably come in the form of one, shorter terms, two, prepayment penalties, and three, higher mortgage rates. Or in other words, it would look like the Canadian mortgage that I was describing to you before, which may have benefits. It may appeal to certain homeowners. But when you look at the Canadian model, I'm not looking at that and saying that's way better than a 30 year fix that we have in the United States where I can choose to refinance at any time.
27:59Frankly, as an investor, I'd rather take the 30 year fix, the thing that we have in the United States right now. And so, yeah, maybe going forward, we will have new portable mortgages, but those mortgages will be underwritten differently. The fee structure will be different. The cost structure will be different. It's not going to be magic. I can tell you that. I don't know exactly what it will look like, but it's not like all of a sudden banks are going to be like, you know what? We're going to make less money lending to people. That has never happened and is not going to happen. And so if it happens at all, it will just be like the current mortgage market is now where there are pros and cons.
28:35There are trade-offs to different loan products and maybe having one more loan product could be good for the housing market, but is not magically going to fix everything. So I know people are talking about this. I know people are excited about this. And trust me, I am not excited to rain on this parade. I don't want to shoot this down. When I first saw it, I was like, hey, that's kind of a good idea. I would like that as a homeowner. But when you think about it, if you really understand the mortgage market, you see that this just isn't going to happen. It is very, very unlikely to work with our system.
29:07And if it did, if they rebuilt the whole system, there are going to be all sorts of negative consequences. Like I said, there just aren't free lunches with this. If there was an easy fix to the housing market, there was an easy fix to home affordability. Someone would have done it already. This is not just something you could snap your fingers and all of a sudden things are going to get fixed. Instead, we need to think about adding more supply to the housing market. We need to bring down the cost of building so more supply can come. We need to focus on reducing inflation and our national debt so that mortgage rates come down naturally.
29:43These are the things that can provide sustainable improvements to housing affordability, which don't get me wrong, I think is a huge problem. We need to restore affordability to the American housing market. But if you're asking me, portable mortgages are not the solution. I would love to know your take. So let me know what you think about portable mortgages in the comments. Thank you all so much for listening to this episode of On the Market. I'm Dave Meyer. I'll see you next time.
30:31up front payment of$45 for three month plan equivalent to$15 per month required intro rate first three months only then full price plan options available taxes and fees extra see full terms at mintmobile.com
From the publisher
This could break the mortgage system as we know it. But, is it worth it?
New “portable mortgages” have been floated by the Trump Administration and FHFA (Federal Housing Finance Agency), allowing homeowners to take their rock-bottom mortgage rates with them when they purchase a new home. The question is: will it work?
We’re breaking down the likelihood of portable mortgages, how they currently work in countries like Canada, and the pros and cons for the average American. Most people are thinking about the upsides of a portable mortgage, but the downsides are equally severe. Would this really make sense in America?
Dave is doing a deep dive into how the U.S. mortgage system works and whether new portable mortgages could break it, leading to the downfall of arguably the greatest home loan on the planet—the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. Plus, how much more could it cost you to take out one of these portable loans?
In This Episode We Cover
Portable mortgages explained and how they actually work in countries like Canada
How portable mortgages could “break” the fragile home loan system in the U.S.
Pros and cons of portable mortgages that could help or hurt many Americans
Increased fees, mortgage rates, and prepayment penalties? Why nobody is talking about the side effects of portable mortgages
Does Dave think this is a good idea? (strong opinion warning)
And So Much More!
Links from the Show
Join the Future of Real Estate Investing with Fundrise
Join BiggerPockets for FREE
Sign Up for the On the Market Newsletter
Find Investor-Friendly Lenders
On the Market 373 - Trump Floats 50-Year Mortgages: Cash Flow Boost or Affordability Illusion?
Dave's BiggerPockets Profile
Grab Dave’s Book, "Real Estate by the Numbers"
Check out more resources from this show on BiggerPockets.com and https://www.biggerpockets.com/blog/on-the-market-376
Interested in learning more about today’s sponsors or becoming a BiggerPockets partner yourself? Email advertise@biggerpockets.com.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices




