In short
Dave Smith and Robbie “the Fire” Bernstein discuss Candace Owens vs. Andrew Wilson’s high-profile debate moderated by Patrick David, arguing about who “won,” debate tactics, and whether there’s “overwhelming evidence” that Tyler Robinson was the shooter (and whether Robinson could be a patsy).
Guest backgrounds
No guests appear in this episode. The hosts are Dave Smith and Robbie Bernstein.
Key claims
- The hosts say Candace won the debate and Andrew lost, despite some agreeing Andrew may be smart and has a strong career.
- They argue Andrew used tactics (appeals to authority, gotcha-style pressure, and shifting away from his own burden of proof) rather than clearly stating his case.
- A central moment: Andrew allegedly couldn’t correctly name the charges; Candace listed seven charges, including “aggravated murder,” “felony discharge of a weapon,” two “obstruction of justice” charges, two “witness tampering” charges, and “violent in front of a minor.”
- They also claim Andrew’s “overwhelming evidence” framing wasn’t supported with specifics during the debate.
Notable examples
- Candace mocking “overwhelming evidence” claims and questioning Andrew’s certainty.
- The hosts compare debate tactics to other debates (e.g., Austin Peterson vs. Clint Russell) and to their own experiences with debate/clip timing.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOComedy Tour Updates
0:45 to 1:57
Hosts share details about their upcoming comedy shows and tours.
“And then I'm doing a comedy club in White Plains on Sunday, which you can find on my website, robburnstoncomedy.com.”
Upcoming Debate Discussion
1:57 to 2:35
Hosts prepare to dive into the Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson debate.
Analysis of the Debate
2:35 to 4:28
Hosts analyze the recent debate between Candace Owens and Andrew Wilson.
“And it has been one of the it's got to be one of the biggest debates in, you know, in history.”
Diving Deeper into the Debate
4:28 to 10:50
Hosts discuss key moments and tactics used during the debate.
“But I disclaimer, I like and respect everybody involved here.”
Reflections on Debate Dynamics
10:58 to 14:00
Hosts continue their analysis, reflecting on the dynamics and strategies of the debate.
“All right, let's get back into the show.”
Debate Analysis: Evidence and Arguments
14:00 to 26:50
The hosts analyze a debate where Andrew struggles to substantiate his claims against Candace's assertions.
“And 75 percent is like I was shocked Candace didn't jump on it right away because then she says zero and that created a crazy contrast.”
Debate Dynamics: Analyzing Tactics
28:10 to 28:45
Discussion on the debate tactics used by Candace and Andrew.
The Importance of Knowledge in Debate
28:45 to 29:39
Exploring the implications of not knowing charges in a debate.
“And look, I'll break this down in a second here, but you can't not count this as points against you like in a debate.”
Candace's Risky Strategy
29:39 to 30:25
Examining Candace's decision to challenge her opponent's knowledge.
“A perspective is that you don't actually care about this case.”
The Stakes of Knowledge in a High-Profile Debate
30:25 to 31:34
Discussing the consequences of unpreparedness in a high-stakes debate.
“these type of debate tactics go for her to say, Hey, look, like this is a really point blank call out.”
Show all 29 chapters
Understanding the Charges
31:34 to 32:55
A detailed look at the charges against Tyler Robinson in the debate.
“If you're saying the evidence is overwhelming, my God, I am assuming you know the charges of this case.”
Fallout from Tactical Missteps
32:55 to 33:58
Analyzing the fallout from failed debate tactics and their impact.
“And it's not that he didn't get the qualifier.”
The Risks of Challenging Opponents
33:58 to 34:46
Delving into the risks associated with questioning an opponent's knowledge.
“But this was also a really unwise one because why in the world would you?”
Debate Performance and Expectations
34:46 to 36:24
Exploring expectations of knowledge and performance in debates.
“He's bombing, bombing in the show and starts getting heckled.”
The Result of Poor Debate Strategies
36:24 to 37:38
Discussing how poor strategies can lead to losing a debate.
“And so just for people, no, don't, I don't have to do it in a time limit.”
Listing the Charges: A Critical Moment
37:38 to 38:51
Analyzing the moment when all charges are listed in the debate.
“You're just going to recognize that your strategy of thinking that people are intimidated when you try to put a time constraint doesn't work and you'll be better the next time you debate someone.”
The Impact of Missteps in High Stakes Debates
38:51 to 39:45
Reviewing how mistakes in debates can alter perceptions and outcomes.
Evaluating Debate Techniques
39:45 to 41:08
Evaluating the techniques used by both participants during the debate.
“So I just you know, I cringe re-watching this.”
Debate Dynamics and Missed Opportunities
42:00 to 44:12
Explore the missed opportunities and strategies in a debate involving Candace Owens.
“And if I had, I think he might have been in a position of just be like, I'm sorry, dude.”
Debate Dynamics and Missed Opportunities
44:17 to 45:23
Explore the missed opportunities and strategies in a debate involving Candace Owens.
“I am a proud owner of a Ridge wallet and I have been for many years.”
Unpacking the Case and Public Perception
45:33 to 54:39
Discussion on the evidence and public narratives surrounding a controversial case.
“And I think Andrew, for some reason, feels that what she's doing is inappropriate.”
Ethics of Discussing Sensitive Cases
54:39 to 56:00
Examine the ethical implications of discussing sensitive topics in public forums.
“I do think that there was a point in the debate that Candace and I think she could have maybe perhaps even made this point stronger.”
Exploring the Controversy Surrounding Candace Owens
56:00 to 1:02:55
The hosts discuss the implications of statements made by Candace Owens regarding a contentious case and the broader conspiracy theories surrounding it.
“And then his widow is out in leather pants holding a Republican National Convention, groping the vice president.”
Exploring the Controversy Surrounding Candace Owens
1:03:02 to 1:04:09
The hosts discuss the implications of statements made by Candace Owens regarding a contentious case and the broader conspiracy theories surrounding it.
“diet works at the cellular level to reset and rejuvenate you from the inside out supporting sustained fat loss, lean muscle, metabolism, slower aging, and even glowing skin.”
Exploring the Controversy Surrounding Candace Owens
1:04:13 to 1:04:24
The hosts discuss the implications of statements made by Candace Owens regarding a contentious case and the broader conspiracy theories surrounding it.
The Fallout from the Debate and Candace's Success
1:04:24 to 1:10:09
The hosts analyze the outcomes of a recent debate featuring Candace Owens and its implications on her public perception and success.
“All right, let's get back into the show.”
Analyzing Alex Jones and His Impact
1:10:09 to 1:10:43
Discussion on Alex Jones' controversial views and their implications.
“Like, even if that's the case, I still just don't find that to be something that that is worthy of like, you know, again, like I said, Alex Jones has a track record of getting a million things wrong.”
Personal Connections in Media Narratives
1:10:43 to 1:12:05
Exploration of personal stakes in media narratives, focusing on the case's impact.
“She showcased that there wasn't a coherent enough story for this guy definitely did it.”
Debate Tactics and Coherence
1:12:05 to 1:12:38
Reflection on debate strategies and the coherence of arguments presented.
“I just thought that didn't help the case at all.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:07What's up, what's up everybody welcome to a brand new episode of part of the problem I am Dave Smith and of course he is Robbie the fire Bernstein. How are you sir. Oh I had a magical porch the other day and we had a fun time out in Appleton Wisconsin. We sure did the club not the town I still stand by last year's remarks. Great people great people great comedy. audiences, not much to do in Appleton, Wisconsin. And I got more shows this weekend. I've got a small porch in Philly that's going to sell out, so grab tickets. I think I only got room for about 20 people. Then I got Doylestown, PA. Then on Saturday, if you can make the trip, I'm at the original porch in Myersville, Maryland.
0:48Private bar. I'm staying there that night. It's a party night. Come on out. And then I'm doing a comedy club in White Plains on Sunday, which you can find on my website, robburnstoncomedy.com. Porch tour dates at porch tour.com. And then you and I actually know you're out at the mothership. I got the comedy mothership. That is my next my next stop, guys. It's August 28th through 30th. The shows are here. Last I checked, I think they're like half sold out. So if you want to get tickets now is the time. You can do that over at the comedy mothership dot com or comic Dave Smith dot com. We'll take you over to that ticket link, too.
1:24And then after that, we got Louville and you, Rob Louville. in September. And then back to the hyenas in Fort Worth and Dallas, which I'm really looking forward to. Those are always fun, fun shows, man. Always have a good time out there. So doing Austin and Dallas in the next couple months is fun for me. I always love my Texas comedy gigs. I don't know why. They always want me out there in the summer. But Texas is... It is awfully hot. Anyway, okay, so let's get into some stuff. Yeah, we should do those as winter gigs. yeah no it's never i don't uh they have to think my entire summer schedule every single year rob every single year they're always like okay so in in august we're gonna send you to fort lauderdale and austin and tampa and and you're like why do you hate me and get salt lake city back for february that ruled oh i know you got some good skiing out there at one time all right well listen let's let's uh discuss a bit i feel like uh it's a almost a thing that we have to talk about so many people have asked my opinion on this thing and it's kind of rare i guess that there's you know there's there's a lot of debates and there's a lot of podcasts it's rare that there's one that's so big that people want you to comment on it even when you weren't directly involved in it of course i'm referring to candace owens and andrew wilson debating on candace's show They got Patrick David to be the moderator of the thing.
2:54And it has been one of the it's got to be one of the biggest debates in, you know, in history. I mean, it's like the thing is, I don't know. I do. I got to say, I find it very fascinating on a lot of different levels, which is part of why I wanted to talk to you about it. But the debate itself, I just saw it's got like it's got millions of I mean, this thing has almost five million views just on Candace's channel. And it was streamed on Patrick David's channel. So it was streamed on another huge channel too. And then I don't know the numbers on, you know, I'm sure on Twitter, on Spotify and all that.
3:29I mean, this is, you know, like, I don't know, but like how many people actually saw like the Lincoln Douglas debates? You know what I mean? I guess it was like the audience there, you know, like I don't, these, it's crazy that we live in a world where these things happen. Then, of course, obviously, it's about a very sensitive subject that people are very understandably emotional about. Anyway, it was a big spectacle, and I did think it was kind of interesting. Perhaps, Rob, I have a little bit different of a perspective on this thing because I'm uniquely interested in politics and debating. I love it.
4:11I know all three people involved and I've done some pretty high profile debates myself. So I, you know, I kind of see these things and maybe a little bit different of a way. But yeah, let's let's get into a bunch of it. I guess I should just come out and say up top and then we can we can get into all the details. But I disclaimer, I like and respect everybody involved here. I don't have a horse in the race in that sense. And in fact, I probably overall probably agree with Andrew on a lot of the points that he made. But I just see no way around the fact that this was a big win for Candace. And it was a loss for Andrew.
4:56Now, I think some people are making way too much of that. I've saw people out there saying, like, his career's over. I don't think that's true. Andrew's a very smart guy. He's a very talented debater. He's had a big, a very big year. He was on Rogan a couple of times. He's done huge shows. I think Andrew's going to have a great career and go on to do more stuff. And, and I like and respect Andrew. I think he's got a lot of good points to make. Um, look, we can get into a lot of the details, which I guess we'll, we'll do that now, but I'll, I'll just start by saying this and then you can give your general thoughts.
5:31i really felt this way actually i guess maybe like a couple days before the debate when i was thinking about it because i kind of couldn't believe it actually came to fruition but i was like you know and i think this kind of played out the tactic that andrew used to get this debate where he made a big spectacle and he raised a ton of money or he spent money i don't know but he gave her like 300 grand I think to do this debate and he called her out on Rogan and he got this that tactic works so well while you're selling it when you're on Rogan and you have a little clip where you go dude I'm gonna give you 300 ,000 dollars to debate me but like that works very well because it's like wow dude you're raising so much money because you're that confident that you're gonna just like eviscerate this person like you're gonna go there and you're going to damage that's why you're willing to give them this money even though you think they're doing something really bad you're going to reward them with a huge sum of money because the payoff is going to be so worth it that you're going to and as you approach the actual debate once it's accepted that now becomes a burden it's a big onus on you that you kind of got to destroy this person and when you see patrick but dave look the the the consensus seems to be that she won there was a poll with uh like 150 000 people candace took like the super majority of it took like 70 of it and i had a poll that i put up after didn't have that many but like 60 000 people and same thing she took the super majority and it's just like on some level you kind of can't get past that you get when you pay this much money to make a debate happen you have to win the consensus has to be that you won and that's not the consensus so just on that alone you kind of take an l but whatever i'm curious what your thoughts are rob i'm we can we can start general and then kind of get into specifics all right well i'm going to take a slightly different approach here i'm going to say that i don't know any of the individuals involved and i just don't like andrew wilson and you know i'm working with uh overwhelming evidence which is just my personal feelings of seeing this guy on occasion and just going i don't like him and if i will clarify what i'm working off of when i say i don't like him which i'll repeat again to make it clear and really blow up relationships of yours you have no ownership of this i'm a different person I like it.
7:59I like Andrew. But no, I think from what I've seen of Andrew, it's less of a pursuit of finding truth as much as it is the sportsmanship of debating, which doesn't does not personally appeal to me. I'm not actually interested in debating, and I find it more engaging. Like, debates can be engaging. The way that he's going about it and his pursuit of it does not really, I don't find interesting or rewarding. Why I particularly think he lost this debate is kind of what I was mocking him for up front, is that he's very demanding of that everything's got to be perfectly thought out and well-reasoned, And he basically just folded when he came in and said, my personal feelings are that it's overwhelming evidence.
8:46And he never actually stated a case for it. And so the reason why he's the big loser to me is, I mean, you've got to hear this again because I already said it to you. If you give me a debate with Fauci during COVID where I could give Fauci, let's say,$10 million so he actually would have sat down with me, he would have walked out ruined. Because I would have had the questions to ask him. I don't need to litigate it here because I've done it a hundred times, but there are common sense questions I could have asked him. He would not have had an answer to, and you would have gone, how does a comedian take down supposedly the world's biggest scientist?
9:18He would have been ruined. Andrew was the challenger. He came in there to go, I'm going to ruin you. He never actually stated a case for why he thought there was overwhelming evidence, demanded an intellectual honesty from her that he was not applying to himself. And more than anything, I think if nobody knew anything about this trial whatsoever and decided to watch that debate, they walked away thinking there's something screwy here. Now, that's not to say that there aren't some gaps in Candace's conclusions, but I think you'd be more open to Candace's outlook of the incident than, hey, this kid is definitely the shooter.
9:53All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Goldback, a great company, an amazing product. If you haven't watched, I interviewed their CEO, Jeremy Corden. Go check that out if you haven't already. It was a great conversation. We talked a bunch about inflation. As you guys know, it measured in gold, the dollar has lost 99.6 % of its value since the Federal Reserve was created. And you don't need a chart to see it. You feel it at the grocery store every week. Now, because of high prices, of course, a lot of people are turning to gold as they typically do during times of inflation.
10:24But for daily purchases, you're still stuck using dollars. Well, that's the problem that Goldback solves. They're real 24-karat gold that you can spend like cash. They're one of the most affordable ways to own fractional gold, and they've already become the leading non-crypto alternative currency that's out there. So there's no accounts, there's no fees, no data tracking, just person-to-person transactions, an actual currency that is on a gold standard. So stop relying on a broken system and head over to goldback.com slash Dave to learn more. That's goldback.com slash Dave. All right, let's get back into the show.
10:59Let me say, okay, let me say a few things about all of this. Number one, because I look, listen, I want to, I understand you don't like Andrew. And also I think even Andrew would probably acknowledge he's not, he's not the most likable person and he doesn't make any attempt to be more likable. Like he doesn't mind, you know, bothering people. And that's fine. And look, I will say this. Andrew's a very talented debater. He is a very good debater. He also uses a lot of tactics. And personally, I feel like he doesn't need them for the most part, but they didn't work in this debate and for reasons.
11:40But I'll say this. I also did feel and, you know, I could be wrong about this, but I felt like he was a little bit tight. Like he was a little bit nervous in the debate and that didn't help. Um, also it's, it's a really big moment. That's a big, big moment. It's a little bit different. Uh, you know, it's, it's like there is more pressure and there is, and there was, and he put a lot of pressure on himself in this debate to your point. Number one, I, and I understand people could say, maybe I'm like, um, this is just optics or something, but you know, the point of these pursuits is to move the audience.
12:15I mean, that's the goal here. And so that does matter. It's not just your argument. It's also, I, and I gotta say, I was really, I was surprised by a few things. Number one, I was really surprised. I just expected, I expected Andrew to come in with a mastery of the case. Like I've got this thing and I did not get that from him. And there were several points in where it was just like, oh, that did not. And I, you know, I thought reading his opening was a huge mistake. Like, dude, this is the biggest show of your life. This is the biggest debate in the country. We're all watching. This is like you've you created this moment that now got millions and millions of people to watch it.
12:59You got memorize your opening, man. Remember the arguments. And if you're going, it becomes so not human when you're very closely sitting to Candace and and Patrick, but David, and you're reading off your phone, you're opening argument while you're making like these declarative statements about her and how she's ruining the conservative movement, but you're not like looking at her. You're reading it off of your foot. So I thought that was very bad. And, and I got to say, it was almost like just, I thought there was a way he could have gone at her that would have been much more successful, but the way of like, by the time you got through this, him reading his opening, And then the first round of like back and forth, he's already in his opening defined overwhelming evidence as evidence that convinces me, which is like, that's really bad.
13:52Appeal to your own authority. Yes, it's like and then Candace needled him with that throughout the debate. She goes, oh, I guess it came to me in a dream, you know, mocking how that's really no more of a standard than it came to me in a dream, which is like a fair point. Right. And and so and then so first he says that then had asked them the question and he goes 75 percent, which this is look, certainly that sounds a whole lot less confidence than some of the statements Andrew had been making before that. And 75 percent is like I was shocked Candace didn't jump on it right away because then she says zero and that created a crazy contrast.
14:30But 75 percent is like, oh, that's acquittal. You know, I understand the trial hasn't started yet, but 75 percent is we got to acquit. Right. I mean, I don't know exactly what percentage you put beyond a reasonable doubt, but that's way over 75. You don't convict people for 75 percent. So like I thought that was kind of why I thought 75 % is a number that justifies Candace's entire pursuit. And and so then it was the point again, this is all very early on in the debate. Then she started asking if you remember, Rob, at one point about. So essentially she she brings up a tweet of his where he goes, there's overwhelming evidence coming here, man.
15:11And it lists off these things. It goes, dude, there's four different pictures of him on the video camera. There's his gun with the DNA evidence. There's this, there's that, right? Like he has this tweet where look, dude, the evidence is overwhelming. And then as she grills him about this, he kind of doesn't really have a thing to be like, like, like she essentially goes, she goes, well, look at all these photos. I've seen this, but you can't tell a single one of them is Tyler Robinson. and then instead of just conceding that that's not really good he tries to do the game of like well no it's evidence because it's in context and it's supported by other evidence and then she's like but what's the other but you're like no but what's you just lost you lost that man if you don't have a response to the fact that i can't tell like again i'm somebody who has not i'm not a criminologist i don't know detective work and forensics and any of this so speak to me like i'm really stupid but what was the response to that oh well then that evidence is gone so the first thing you mentioned is gone now because you don't have a defense then she makes her argument there were lots of arguments there where i thought maybe there was an opening for because there must be more evidence than just hearsay right and there that maybe there is an answer to why fingerprints would be degraded even if that doesn't represent the chronological order of event you know i'm saying here rob i don't know anything about that but andrew didn't offer i was almost waiting even for him to go like, well, this doesn't prove anything.
16:34Maybe he wiped the gun or like, I don't know. I don't know the answer, but he didn't seem to know. So essentially what I thought had happened is that by the time that opening period was over, he had essentially like, I think in his mind, he was almost like, I'm going to fight her even on that first one. And then I'm going to destroy her in the second half. But he actually lost the first half. And I don't think he ever recovered from that deficit because by the end of it, it just became a thing that it was like, okay, so like you're saying it's overwhelming that he did it. She's saying it's overwhelming that he, he didn't neither one of you can really back up the claim that it's overwhelming.
17:13And it just became a thing of like, you're both going in this direction, but there was never really the moment like where Andrew really connected the dots. Like I thought he was going to set up for some type of at least attempted home run swing at the end, but he never really went. He never really gave us a why of why this whole thing needed to happen. Like you've been doing this, Candace, like what is your working theory on the case? Hold her to that. Demonstrate that she doesn't really have a theory and then go, OK, you've you've been doing this for a year and you still don't have a theory. And here's why that's so horrible that you did that.
17:56You know what I'm saying? Like, Like there's, but it never really connected like that. And then there were just kind of moments throughout it where she just seemed to know the case better than him. So I don't know. Did I leave there convinced of any of Candace's theories? No. But did I, did I leave there feeling that Andrew Wilson had really demonstrated anything? No. And so you just kind of had two people going back and forth, one of whom seemed to know the case a little bit more. And I got to say that the debate was, well, I could get into it more, but as I said, it was riddled with little tactics that Andrew used that just backfired on him in this one.
18:36It just didn't work. I didn't. Okay. I think he never proved that she was kind of being negligent or misleading in terms of trying to question what is going on here. And so in the first half, he essentially just folded. He never once gave a pitch for here's why I actually think Tyler Robinson did it. He just appealed to his own authority and said, I find it over. But he never explained. Here's why I think it's overwhelming, or at least I maybe said between the confession and this. And but then every time he was asked on any particular piece of evidence, he didn't want to defend it. And then he just said it's the totality of the evidence while also turning it to Candace and not letting her go.
19:18It's everything together and pinning her to it's a gap between this one single instance. So once again, kind of applying an intellectual standard to her that he wasn't going to keep to. But he just kind of folded on the first half. He never gave a pitch for, here's why I think it's overwhelming that he did it. And I felt that it was essentially a dishonest tactic of that he wanted to go in there and try and just say, here's why Candace is not credible. And then even in the second half, he didn't quite prosecute the claim of whether or not there's overwhelming evidence of him being a patsy. Instead, he kind of mostly pursued a storyline of here's some crazy things that you've said in regards to Erica Kirk or other claims, but that wasn't actually in line with the debate topic of whether or not there's overwhelming evidence of a patsy.
20:06So I don't know. He kind of just went in with a dishonest play of here's how I'm going to be able to play some gotcha clips and hold your feet to the fire. But I think she just demonstrated that there's enough, there's enough screwy in this case that it's reasonable to have a podcast and ask these questions and have theories about what might have taken place here. Well, I mean, look, I'll tell you this. It's, I guess, perhaps my feeling on all of this is that I understand, like, if people want to criticize Candace's methodology, or they want to say, quite frankly, that she's gone down some goofy trails that just turned out to be wrong or whatever.
20:44Like, I mean, I'm not, I think, okay, you know, make your argument then. You know, and maybe that's right. but there is this kind of like almost implicit thing that look andrew obviously he's there to ruin her that's the goal you know he's not mincing words about that you're there to ruin her you're you're putting up this money so that you can destroy her you're all claiming that like she's doing something so wrong and i just kind of sit here and i go wait like do you guys all hate alex Jones? Like, you know, like, what's really going on here? Like, you know, and don't get me wrong, like, I know, like, Fuentes and Candace, they have a personal thing, like, and whatever.
21:28And I certainly, you know, like I've said publicly before, I think it was wrong the way Candace and Tucker went at him. And, and I know that after they did their podcast together, they, you know, he felt wrong by the way she handled it or whatever. But like, do you hate Alex Jones guts? or are you like are you cool with him too because like alex jones literally was on record telling me that the the he made a whole documentary about how the ruling elite were going to exterminate the human species and reduce us down to 300 000 people and that was their whole plan and that was a pretty catastrophic thing to be wrong about like it's quite a claim you know and there's a whole bunch more like that he just i mean half of his loose change claims don't hold so like oh are you actually like is that the rule that you're not allowed to be a conspiracy theorist and you're not allowed to ever get some wrong or whatever i i don't know it just seems like but you got to connect though you got to explain why this is wrong why this is worth it and i never got anything even approaching that um and then there were just there were like a lot of moments where she you know he would just when you have i think just like like pierce morgan is a different environment than joe rogan and the whatever podcast is a different environment than sitting down for three hours with patrick david and candace owens and when she would do things where like candace was very good at like when he would try to badger her with questions which is a thing he does in debates a lot and i don't and he does it while someone's saying something like like can't be in the middle of going like well no i'm not arguing that there's overwhelming evidence that he's a patsy my claim is that there's and she's like so what's the evidence what's the evidence what's the what's and you're like dude she just she's in the middle of trying to clarify her claim and she would just stop and go no i'm not going to fall into this debate tactic i will you know what i mean and then of course the ultimate one which i'm you know look i'm sorry man and i understand i making this episode i just think it's something that is important enough to talk about enough people have asked me about this and I'm not I'm in the business of telling people my opinion on these things and so I'm not going to not do that but I don't wish to like you know pick any fights here over this I know there's it's kind of unavoidable but you know I see that people out there are kind of going like oh well all these polls are bullshit because Candace just has a bigger audience and but you're like yeah but this is a cope man it doesn't matter but it doesn't look look i've been trying to debate ben shapiro for years right i couldn't go debate ben shapiro and then if 70 of the audience thinks he won go well i mean he had a better you know he has a bigger audience than me so whatever it's still no i lose that like that's it you gotta win over the audience that's the whole job of this thing and look i understand where people are gonna it makes people and maybe after we get through with the debate we can just talk about charlie kirk a little bit and kind of the the whole situation i know i understand why people get very upset about the why they're very emotional about the issue and i understand that people are like no but she didn't have an argument she didn't have a tight argument for this theory or that theory i get it and i understand that the seven listing the seven charges is isn't like actually an argument about a point of any of these theories but i'm sorry man like that was a huge that was a bad, bad moment for Andrew in that debate.
24:59And I do actually think, even though this might hurt to see that Kanda said, which was very, she played that well when she goes, oh, here, no, this will help you in future debates to know that this tactic doesn't work. I do think that he made a, it was like a, I don't know what to say. It was a gigantic, catastrophic, forced error in own goal at the end of this debate that you had put up such a huge price tag for and then kind of like I think failed to win. And then so at the end of it then to just have this moment. I'm sorry. That's a disaster, dude. And it's it's we could get into it. We can play the clip in a second, but go ahead.
25:39Any thoughts you have, bro? All right. I apologize because you have personal relationships that I do not have. No, you can give your opinion on a debate. It's not like we're not. Listen, go ahead. It's fine. But to me, that moment really demonstrated the pursuit of debate tactics over honesty. And when he's there and he's trying to pivot away from the fact that he does not actually know what they are, and he's trying to pull every move of, oh, no, let's just pull it up. Oh, OK, now you list them. List them. One, two, three. And to me, it's just demonstrating this is not really an honest conversation.
26:14It's not a pursuit over truth. It's a display of tactics. and that's listen i'll tell you i i think just from my perspective before i think andrew is a very good debater when he's debating but i do think you're right that he uses those tricks too and i think he'd be better off not using them because as we're about to see here they can backfire there's a reason why you don't want to use some of these tricks um i think to me it goes further than that that it demonstrates that even when it's working it's not really a pursuit of truth. And he gave to me just kind of showcase that he was giving away his cards of not being honest.
26:50All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is CrowdHealth. This summer, enjoy real freedom and health care that actually works for you. Now, you've heard me talk about CrowdHealth for many years, but now they've made it even better with the Black Swan membership. This is the no BS alternative for people who want control over their care, their costs, and their lives. For just$85 a month, you get a dedicated team of expert bill negotiators fighting for you, access to low-cost prescriptions and lab testing, plus a hand-curated network of high-quality, affordable doctors vetted by CrowdHealth.
27:27So there's no insurance companies. There's no restrictive doctor networks telling you who you can and can't see. There's no bureaucrats deciding what you can and can't do. It's just you in charge. And if a real black swan event happens, you're responsible for the first$15 ,000 and the crowd steps up to help cover the rest. It's like the health care we used to have before Obamacare ruined everything. So this summer, stop renting your health from the system. Take your power back and enjoy the season with real peace of mind. If you're ready to make the switch, head over to joincrowdhealth.com and use the promo code POTP and you'll get your first three months for less than$85.
28:03dollars that's join crowd health.com and the promo code is p o t p all right let's get back into the show listen i get i get your point here let's let's play uh this this portion of the uh of the debate here thanks natalie yeah yeah so i think what i think is that um tyler robinson shot charlie kirk yeah but of the seven charges that he's he's being charged yeah can we list them real quick i'll tell you exactly which ones we'll pull them up well do you know any of the charges these up for right now yeah of course but i want to make sure that we have them listed yeah but just pause it real quick because my my general so now listen just to be clear here um candace is the one who first engages in the gotcha thing here right like she's going like wait hold on can you name a single one of the charges that he's being charged with now the okay look the real problem here is that as you see andrew responds yeah of course he lets her know yeah of course now he again listen this was a i don't think candace should have done that tactic it's a risky tactic all he has to do is name one and then you look really bad so like it's a risky thing i don't know what people think like if you just stop in the middle of debate and start quizzing your opponent the The thing about doing that is they got to fail the quiz.
29:26Otherwise, it really does backfire. And look, I'll break this down in a second here, but you can't not count this as points against you like in a debate. But so here's how Andrew handles this by being asked. First, he's asking to bring them up. Then Candace challenges him. Can you name one of them? He goes, yeah, of course. And then responds with this. Let's keep playing. A perspective is that you don't actually care about this case. you're not following that is that's the that's the question you're just not following it enough it seems pretty like if you're going to engage and you're going to say the evidence is overwhelming that tyler robinson is guilty i just think that you should all right can you tell me one then let's do pause it right there yeah no this is a great now look i don't look i've been in in debates with people before where i really feel like they don't know the subject matter um and i just asking it point blank like this, I think is a risky move on Candace's part, but you do got to admit as far as these type of debate tactics go for her to say, Hey, look, like this is a really point blank call out.
30:32And this is a crazy thing to say to someone in the middle of a debate that like, you don't know the topic, you know, this is, this is like on the level of, of saying you've never read about this. You don't know anything about that. I mean, I do remember one time, um, Austin Peterson was debating Clint Russell about Israel, Gaza, and he didn't know what the Nakba was. Clint brought it up and he thought, he goes, oh, you're referring to the Balfour Declaration? He goes, the Balfour Declaration? Like, what? No. And he didn't know. And then Clint just moved on to like his next point. And I called Clint after and I go, dude, you had to like pounce on that more.
31:09You know, like he still won the debate. It was clear. But like, I was like, dude, when someone's that right, you got to go, dude, then you have no business debating this subject if you don't know that. But anyway, Candace goes here. She goes, I don't think you really know this. And if you're going to say the evidence is overwhelming, shouldn't you be able to list one of the charges? Now, I'm sorry. That is reasonable, Rob. Like, that's a reasonable thing to say, right? If you're saying the evidence is overwhelming, my God, I am assuming you know the charges of this case. Like, I'm assuming you know the case very well.
31:42And you're paying 300K to a debate on the case. I just assume you're going to show up with a mastery of this thing. I've never paid 300K for a debate before, but I've also never debated anything. I didn't feel like I had somewhat of a mastery of the topic. But anyway, she says, can you name one of the charges? He's already said, of course I can. But now he takes this opportunity to double down. And here's the, here, let's play the rest of it. One, because my general perspective is that you don't actually care about this case. You're not following the case. that's the that's the question you're just not following it enough it seems pretty like if you're going to engage and you're going to say the evidence is overwhelming that tyler robinson is guilty i just think that you should all right can you tell me one then let's do the counter you can really hang out this is a great no no you just got to ask me play clips out of context put me in the hot seat so please just answer the question here name all seven since you've been following the case okay sure you name you name one yeah you named all seven i'm happy to do that but can you name one?
32:40I think he's been charged with murder. That's actually incorrect. Okay, great. So just pause it real quick. So pause it real quick. Now, this is, I'm sorry, guys. I don't know how you say this any other way. This was a, it's already devastating. It's already devastating at this point. And it's not that he didn't get the qualifier. It's not that he didn't get aggravated murder and just said murder or whatever the charge is. It's that he went in that moment, I think he's been charged with murder. you go wait a minute dude not only do you not know the charges against him you weren't clear like you weren't 100 on what the top one was you just said of course i know and then what you like you lost that dude then when you went you went to i think why is the word think coming out of your mouth this is not like a subjective you either know it or you don't know it so you pretended did you knew it, but you didn't.
33:35And now, I mean, this is like, by the way, I could have, I thought this going in, I couldn't believe he, because this next attempt now to double down on this Rob is, this is just not, first of all, I agree with your kind of like, it's not good faith. It's not a real pursuit of the truth. It's gotcha tricks. But this was also a really unwise one because why in the world would you? So I think I've told this story before, Rob. I know I've told this to you, but I will tell this on the show right now, right? But it was a story of a comedian, really bad comedian when he was first starting. He was really bad at standup.
Read the full transcript
34:14And this is what's crazy to me because Andrew Wilson is not bad at debating. He's excellent at debating. But anyway, this guy was a bad standup comedian. And I don't know if you ever heard the old thing. It's like an old comedian thing. I've never done this. I've never actually seen anyone else do this, but it's a thing where there was a thing where a comedian would go, oh, you think might like you get a heckler and you go, oh, you think my job's so easy? Why don't you try it? Why don't you get up here? And they get, bring them up and give them the microphone. And the idea is that like standup comedy is hard.
34:39So they're probably not going to do very good at it. And then you show what, you know, you take it back, get out of here, buddy. You know what? Now this kid, I saw that this is like 15 years ago. He's bombing, bombing in the show and starts getting heckled. And then he tries to do that. He tries to give the guy the microphone and go, oh yeah, you think my job's And I remember when I first thought saw that being like, wow, talk about not getting comedy. Like, just talk about your instincts being so bad, because, dude, obviously, Rob, that move is supposed to that works when you're killing with the crowd.
35:11The crowd loves you. One guy's heckling you and you go, come on, dude. Now he's got the whole crowd against him. He'd fuck it. They already like you. And what are the odds when you're already killing that he's going to come out with something that kills? but but when you're bombing the whole time and then you hand it over to this guy all he's got to do is say one mildly funny thing and then he devastates you you know like what are you doing and in the same i couldn't so in this moment andrew decides to put it in on name all seven because i'm going to prove that you don't know what you're talking about already though rob starting from a starting point of as you said he doesn't hold the same standards to himself He didn't know one, but now she's got to name seven.
35:56It already doesn't make sense that he's expecting her to have such a higher burden. But Rob, I mean, I guess my point is, dude, you're in the biggest debate of your life. This is millions of people watching. It's a huge thing. And you just challenged, like, aren't you a little bit concerned with the off chance that maybe Candace knows the charges? I mean, whether you think her theories are off or not, she's clearly been living and breathing this case for a year. so i like to put all of this thing and i'm sorry but when you do that when you when you stop a debate to go i'm gonna demonstrate that you don't know shit you can't name the seven things and then they do you were trying to make them look terrible and ruin them and so all of that has to be put back on you now now you now you just look terrible for attempting this smear job and failing at it you were not sure whether he was charged with murder and she goes on to list all of them and not only does she list them all but she calls him out on his tactic the whole i mean look let's keep playing this this just gets worse and worse let's keep playing and and and i can you name all seven i i can't do it sure you don't have to do it no do it i'll count them go ahead you don't have to put your fingers up okay i'll name them yeah sure name them uh the first charge is aggravated murder because that's what carries a death sentence.
37:21So murder? No, that's not. That is literally not murder. Okay. And so just for people, no, don't, I don't have to do it in a time limit. There's nothing going on. And just to explain to people the difference of why that really matters and shows that he doesn't actually care about this at all is because aggravated murder, it's narrowly defined and because it carries a death sentence. I'm not, I'm going to answer the question. Okay, I'm waiting. You're just going to recognize that your strategy of thinking that people are intimidated when you try to put a time constraint doesn't work and you'll be better the next time you debate someone.
37:45I got it, I got it. Give me the other ones. the more you cut me off, the longer I'll take. Do you want to just wait for me to finish of why that's a big difference? So that people don't walk away. No, I just want you to list the charges. Yeah, I'm going to do that. You just don't get to pretend that there's a time constraint for me to do that. Well, how long does it take you to list seven charges? Because I'm speaking, you just got to - It sounds like you're just delaying it because you don't know them. I know all seven of them. And I'm going to say again, because you're going to get embarrassed.
38:07You don't have to rush this. I'm also showing an example of a very flawed debate strategy. I actually want to know time constraint. I got one. Great. The second charge is the felony discharge of a weapon. The next two charges are for obstruction of justice. Okay. The next two charges are for witness tampering. And what's the specific charges, though? That is them. Obstruction of justice, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness tampering. Okay. And there's no other specifics to them. Well, I can tell you why he's being charged with it. No, no, no. Just the charges and then seven? Yeah.
38:41See, the bad thing is when you try to be an a-hole and it doesn't work. What's the seventh? the last charge is uh violent in front of a minor okay got it so then he's being charged with murder you just say aggravated murder that's the distinction you just want to it's a massive we're just supposed to pretend that she didn't just rattle off all seven now we just move it's like i that's the tactic that just i'm sorry dude when that backfires it'll lose you a debate because you're trying and then you just we're just to pretend that like because otherwise dude like the whole debate can just be you quizzing and if they get everything right then what it's a tie it's like no you stop the record to when you do that in a debate you're stopping the record to pause to go no no no my opponent's a fraud this whole thing is bullshit it's a move when that doesn't work it reflects poorly on you and she named all the charges dude i mean i don't know i don't know how anybody um can can look at this and not think that like yeah that's a bad moment in a debate.
39:43I'm sorry. It's just cope to say it's not. So I just you know, I cringe re-watching this. I find it just overwhelmingly exhausting to watch someone play a confidence game of what I will call controlling the call and just very arrogantly pretending like they're still in control and then constantly pivoting. It's just not an honest pursuit towards truth. It's sportsmanship of debate and I don't appreciate this rare art form. And so to me, this is just gross and exhausting. And showcases that even in other times where people don't realize that's what's happening, this is the way he's engaging with you.
40:25It's not a conversation I could even partake in because I couldn't sit there as calmly as Candace in these kind of environments. I will never debate, not that it's offered, I couldn't sit there and engage in that conversation. It would just be too annoying to me. But it's just dishonest. And it's showing his hand of that. This is sportsmanship and it's dishonest. Well, I mean, it's then I mean, whatever. We don't have to play anymore. But then he accuses her of getting the information fed to her from the phone. And so she passes her phone off to Patrick, David. And I'm just saying it's like, dude, when you again, you you paid her 300 grand.
41:06You know, she's seven months pregnant. You come in with this written, you know, like prepared thing. You got all these clips prepared that you're going to go after her on and all of this. But then you're going after this stuff and just missing these like wild swings and just missing. This just doesn't this is precious time that you were supposed to be using, like eviscerating her claims. And I also got to say, you know, and sometimes these things are, you know, as you know, Rob, like you've done a lot of like live shows and like Rob will do like on the porch tour sometimes. like you'll do like a whole presentation and a whole thing with and it's it's hard sometimes to plan out like how a a presentation is gonna go along with the punch line and the timing and and as you know from you know I've talked to you about some of your shows where you're like oh it really all came together perfect on this one and then you were like add this one it was a little bit off and then it wasn't add an account for this but then you know what I mean and like so there's it also just unfortunately for Andrew his team pulling up videos in the back and feeding him to Pat and then them waiting for the like it just didn't click and work you know I had the the moment that every was everybody's big like takeaway moment of my debate with Cuomo was the thing where he kept saying he never said this about Ivermectin mocking Joe Rogan and then the team had the clip pulled right up there but that was out of my hands the team I didn't like come with a clip and go he's gonna lie about this guys have this ready i got lucky that someone on pat's team is good and pulled that thing up and then had it ready to go right away so it's like the stars kind of aligned there were a few moments there where it was like dead air because they're waiting for the next clip and i gotta say it it ended up coming off like you said rob as more gotcha like I don't think Andrew was best served going into that debate going let me pull the the seven most outrageous clips of Candace Owens because it does then it does seem like it's like oh this is just gotcha stuff I think he would have been that much better off if he had been okay Candace if he had said okay Candace it's been a year what's your working theory you know you've done all these big shows on it you've had a huge successful run you you know what i mean like what do you got because after all this like what do you really got is your theory okay here's why i think it's tyler robinson like let's compare your theory to mine and then really had a mastery of like why dude the evidence here is pretty overwhelming and and he he should have been prepared for her things like oh like i don't know rob what's the answer why are his fingertips degraded more so than the other ones of his family well i i gotta guess here there's an answer to that right Or there's at least an answer that the prosecution is going to present at trial.
43:51I didn't hear that. And if I had, I think he might have been in a position of just be like, I'm sorry, dude. Like we're comparing overwhelming versus overwhelming. I got DNA evidence, eyewitnesses and a confession. You got nothing. You know, like there was, but he never really had that moment. And instead he chased kind of gotcha wins the whole time. That was kind of how I felt. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Ridge. I love this company. I am a proud owner of a Ridge wallet and I have been for many years. They're great. I don't know if you're, if you still hang on to the traditional wallet, but you don't need to have a big leather brick in your back pocket.
44:27You can just get the Ridge wallet. It's cool. It's got everything you need. It's a minimalist wallet, but it's, it holds your cash and your cards, everything you need. And they're real cool. They have a unique, slim, modern design, and they're all made with premium materials like aluminum, titanium, and carbon fiber. They have over 50 colors and styles to choose from. And I'm telling you, they're very, very cool you should definitely check them out they have over 100 000 five star reviews for a reason and they have the rfid blocking technology they also have the ridge air tag attachment so you always know exactly where your wallet is you don't ever have to worry about losing it again and they don't just do the wallets they make premium everyday carry essentials key cases suitcases rings all built with the same sleek durable design and no matter what you pick ridge has free shipping and a 99-day risk-free trial plus a lifetime warranty on all of their products.
45:18So there's no risk to you. And for a limited time, our listeners can get 10 % off at Ridge by using the promo code POTP10. Just go over to ridge.com and use that promo code POTP10 for 10 % off. All right, let's get back into the show. uh listen all right you've made your feelings clear uh i have not followed the case to the same extent as candace has had nor have i watched all of candace's programming which is uh quite robust on this um and there are claims that uh i probably would not want to have to argue or try to validate uh but i do think that she has a right to explore them, some of which might be more offensive than others.
46:08And I think Andrew, for some reason, feels that what she's doing is inappropriate. And I don't think he demonstrated, hey, there is incredible evidence of the fact that this guy's the shooter. And so this is ridiculous that you're exploring it and that you're trying to potentially pin blame on other people's. I think she demonstrated that there's a lot of open-ended things in the case. I mean, to give you guys the short, just what is the evidence at the moment that he did it outside of the note that was left and the text message he sent, which was basically a guy who seemingly doesn't want to be convicted of a crime going, hey, I committed this.
46:44And so we supposedly have a reference to a confession to his parent and a cop, but we haven't actually heard them say that. So it could be a kid who thought, was nervous that he was going to get in trouble and so decided to turn himself in and the family said your best move is to turn himself in. The evidence is supposedly that, you know, they don't have video of him pulling the trigger. The best evidence that they have is a guy who looks like him moving around on a campus. There's nothing like just spectacular from what I've seen that's been presented outside of, oh, there's this confession note, which, you know, maybe he is a patsy and he didn't write that note.
47:22And on the same note, it is rather odd that evidence was given back to the Kirk family and that the site was instantly paved over, that that camera that was taken down behind, I don't think that was ever turned over. There are weird elements here that create a question. And I certainly think exploring whether or not our government engages, I mean, it probably happened with JFK, probably also happened with Martin Luther King Jr. I think it's very fair to explore if there's certain forces that rise up in the general culture that are so big and mighty that the government wants them out of the way and that they're taking people out.
48:00And I think that's a fair thing to explore. Well, I think if I were Candace in the debate, and again, I'm not like taking Candace's position, but if I was Candace in that debate, I mean, I would have really focused on Joe Kent and the comments that he made and really tried to drive home that just kind of look and look, this is kind of where I am with the charlie kirk thing in general it's like well first of all as i've said all along from a year ago this is a goddamn like personally speaking this is a very strange topic um this is like a real person who i knew who you know got murdered in the most horrific violent way publicly um um i i said immediately after charlie kirk was killed and took a lot of shit for this rob if you remember you know this actually really bugs me because i've seen like a few people give me shit for not talking about charlie kirk more over the last year um and you know they go oh dave's a coward or something like that because he won't touch this issue like yes that's me i just avoid radioactive issues and i'm uncomfortable taking a public stand like okay whatever it's like no actually what happened was i um i pretty publicly took a stand early on in it if you remember rob there's i don't know that there's been three times since we've been doing this show where there was a damn near revolt from the audience against me and this was one of them because I was publicly saying, and I haven't changed my mind on that.
49:39I go, I thought it was crazy that people were saying Israel did it, even speculating. Some outright saying Israel did it, others speculating. Some people who I respect, who I like, were doing that. I called them out for doing that. I stand by that. I think it was like, you know, whatever. I think it, I'm not for goofy conspiracies and I don't like presenting wild ones that, or I shouldn't say, when I say goofy theories, nothing wrong with a good conspiracy they happen all the time but some theories are right and some theories are not and like i've kind of maintained basically the whole way through look i know i i did a couple shows on it after charlie kirk uh died one where i read his text messages and i've explained that several times because i thought it was the right thing to do all things being you know considered um these these episodes were enormously successful they're some of our most downloaded episodes ever and then i stopped talking about it even though i knew this was a topic that you'll blow up you're gonna have a huge because it's like look dude honestly there's a few things here number one this isn't my strength i know people get confused about this sometimes but it's like i don't know it's like it's like if we there was a bomb that was about to go off and you go dave defuse the bomb okay i don't know how to defuse a bomb and you'd be like but i heard you do a great rant on Israel Gaza on Joe Rogan.
51:00So defuse a bomb. Like those are two different skills. I'm like, I'm, I understand arguments about economics and I know the history of military conflicts or whatever, but like, I don't know anything about detective work and forensics and all of this stuff. So it's just not really my strength. I will say one of the big holes in the Candace Owens, he's a patsy theory to me seems to be that he's alive and about to face trial. The kid's going to stay on trial. They're going to present a defense. We're going to get to learn some more stuff. So like, I don't know what, okay. So like all of that, I'm not jumping out on theories.
51:38I'm not just trying to chase clicks. I want to respect the fact that this was an actual person who I knew, who I respected, who has children, you know, like, I don't know. But Rob, Joe Kent, the director of counterterrorism came out and said the investigation had been suppressed and that he had major questions. He said this on the biggest news show in America when he resigned. The highest authority in the land came down to comment on this and he didn't admonish Candace Owens, who had had her investigation going on at this point, Rob, for months, right? He didn't say, oh, this is crazy. He goes, hey, the only person trying to shut down the war in Iran who had Trump's ear was publicly executed.
52:23And there were leads we should have followed up on that were stifled by the FBI. That's what he said. At that point, how am I supposed to sit here and be furious? It's like after I know that they lied us into Iraq, I'm supposed to be furious at the people that are like 9-11 truthers. Even if I'm not a 9-11 truther? I'm supposed to be mad at them? I think I'm actually more mad at the regime who just took us into war. So again, none of this really makes any sense to me. It's like, that's essentially where I'm at. I don't know. There's some things that seem weird. The story between what was going on with Charlie and the Israel lobby is really fascinating.
53:07They definitely all lied through their teeth about that. The big set, I don't really have a theory other than that. very interested in the trial. I don't know, Rob, is that unreasonable? Is that an unreasonable position to take? Because I don't think it is. No. And I just feel like after what we went through with COVID, anyone that wants to question official narratives, I don't ever want to, I just, I'm never going to take the side of, but there's an official narrative from the state here. Now, listen, I don't watch all of Candace's show, so I don't know to what extent these claims are taking place.
53:41I don't know. I do think that without great evidence, um, I, listen, I'm just not on the side of censorship ever. People should do what they want to do with their shows. I think that, uh, uh, accusing Erica Kirk in a public format without great evidence, it does maybe borderline inappropriate because like it's kind of similar territory to Sandy Hook where I totally respect people being concerned about false flags, but getting that aspect wrong does just become a little bit more inappropriate. But I mean, the idea of exploring the case and going, hey, I don't think this official narrative is true.
54:20And was there a government motive here? The idea that you're going to criticize anybody for doing that or wanting to do a gotcha, ruin them show. I just I don't know. I feel like you're on the side of state censorship. I you know there was one point in the debate where Candace says you're here to argue the state's case and Andrew seemed to get offended by that but then it is like I mean that is what you're doing like you are that doesn't make it wrong but like that is what you're doing. I do think that there was a point in the debate that Candace and I think she could have maybe perhaps even made this point stronger.
54:55But she had said that, like, well, look, she goes, Benjamin Netanyahu immediately started lying. And that's what brought Israel into this conversation. And I do think there's something to be said as I've sat back and kind of watched all of this happen. I get your point very much, right? Like, you know, in fact, I've made this point. In fact, I made this point to a guy who was a Sandy Hook truther back in that time. This is the guy who used to host a podcast with Mike Cannon back in the day. But I remember he was saying and I just thought all of it was dumb. He had no argument. And he sent me stuff.
55:31You got to watch this. And watch. It was just terrible. But I remember saying to him about the Sandy Hook thing. I go, hey, dude, let's say 95 percent. You're right. Sandy Hook was a false flag or whatever. No one died. That's what you're trying to tell me. Okay. Let's say there's just a 5 % chance you're wrong about that. Okay. If you're wrong, then you're publicly mocking the parents of people who just lost their kindergartner. Like I'd, I'd be very concerned if there was a 5 % chance I was doing that. You know what I mean? Cause like, even if it's only 5%, you're like, oh, there's a 5 % chance that I'm being like the worst, most despicable human being imaginable right now you know and so like yes you get into that territory anytime you start talking about a wife or that that being said it's not wrong if the wife actually is guilty but it is a like hey man you take a swing at the at that you better not miss type type of deal right but i will say too and i think this was the point at least i think this was part of what candace was getting at um in fact i'd be interested to talk to her a bit more about this but um maybe i will soon um But she was kind of going, no, look, that's what brought Israel into this.
56:45And I will say that with the Charlie Kirk case, I could see under some normal rule of honor or something like that being like, you shouldn't mention Israel and you shouldn't mention his wife unless you really got some hardcore evidence, you know, to point in that direction. The thing is that when immediately when the body's still warm and I got the Israeli prime minister lying through his fucking teeth about what Charlie believed, like really, really trying to manipulate the situation in his favor, along with the entire Israel lobby, who he was openly calling out and like kind of maybe turning on and then to watch them all lie about it.
57:28And then his widow is out in leather pants holding a Republican National Convention, groping the vice president. I do feel like, Rob, to some degree, that changes that calculation of whatever is you were saying is inappropriate or whatever the honor code bound thing you would have to do. It's like you can't really say these things are off limits to talk about when they are so egregiously shoving themselves, inserting themselves into the conversation. And so I got to say, if people don't like the conspiracy industry that's arisen out of this, like, don't you kind of got to look at that behavior, too, and go, Jesus, guys, I mean, this was the worst way to handle it.
58:07They essentially gave permission to, like, start talking about this stuff because, look, it's so weird and it's so right in front of your face. And just just for the sake of transparency and calling myself out for being a hypocrite, I do have a joke in my act that maybe insinuates Mossad's involvement in the Kirk case. And I also did have a conversation on my podcast at some point with the guest about whether or not Erica Kirk could be MKUltra. Both of those I thought were valid because I think it is I think it's I'm open to exploring the idea that MKUltra is involved in these kind of actions.
58:43I'm not saying that that's what took place here. I also don't quite know what takes place on Candace's show. This is why I kind of hate debates is that it brings you into like the pure evidence place, which almost removes the poetry of exploring ideas and trying to find truth. But I just kind of lean towards, you know, well, if you're criticizing the official narrative, I don't think you're instantly just like wrong or everyone needs to go shame, shame on you. yeah listen um i look i agree i agree with you it's it's look when i debate and you see this i i like to debate the war that's going on right now or economic policy or just something where it's like look it's very clear what we're arguing about here um and and not you know it's a little bit of a of an awkward thing to to try to like win a debate in devastating fashion that you you did a conspiracy that wasn't true.
59:39You know, it's, it's a little bit of a tough thing to, to sell. And there was at least one point. And again, I don't really, I don't know enough about the details to know this stuff, but there was one point where Candace did walk away from a thing. She said, she goes, Oh yeah, I got that wrong. You know? And it's like, and that kind of takes all the power away from it. Cause it's like, well, I mean, she's allowed to hunt down theories. Right. And like, she can admit she got one wrong. Anyway, I think that, um, like i always i always saw it this way that it's like there it's not my job i don't know it's not it's not my job to be the whole monitor of the dissonance i mean like again you know there's probably a lot of there's a lot of things that i think people who listen to the show ought to be able to figure out about my views even things that i don't talk about that much right because like rob if you were to go where does dave stand on building seven i never talk about tower seven right but almost that almost tells you where i stand on it right it's like i'm not a 9-11 truther and people know that and i don't know you know and like it you would just go how has that never come up if i believe that it would have come up one of these times you know what i mean i've talked about this stuff so many times on such big platforms you would have heard me say that like where do I stand on chemtrails well like I don't believe in them right because I never talk about them you would have heard me talk about them once if I thought this was like a major thing that was going on again that doesn't mean I have to run around and like to every dissident go oh you got out over your skis here or you were a little bit too racist in your criticism of the war or something like that it's like I don't know we got you know we have a government that lies to us about everything, commits enormous crimes against us.
1:01:34You know, it's like here you have a guy who was who was an open advocate against a war that we fought jointly with the Israelis. And he was clearly in the president's ear, had a huge mobilization, like outreach, you know, organization. He's the biggest political organizer of young people in the right wing in America. That's a big deal. And he was against this war. Also, that government's known for their targeted assassination campaigns and stuff. So like all I'm saying, I'm not saying none of that is evidence that Israel did anything because I don't have any evidence that Israel did anything. But it is fertile ground for conspiracies to bloom.
1:02:15And it's almost undeniable that they're going to happen. I don't think like, you know, to me, it's always been clear that like my job is to tell the truth and to focus on the evil people in power who are doing the worst thing. Focus on the major crisis, the major problem. I don't think like, you know, when you're going after people for being, you know, if you're going after Alex Jones for being Alex Jones, you have to really demonstrate why it's so bad. you know which there is an argument to it yet you're discrediting the entire movement that's against this thing but like you got to really connect those dots all right guys let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show which is prolon by el neutro long work weeks and busy weekends can leave you feeling and looking depleted but prolongs five-day fasting mimicking diet works at the cellular level to reset and rejuvenate you from the inside out supporting sustained fat loss, lean muscle, metabolism, slower aging, and even glowing skin.
1:03:19Prolon is a plant-based nutrition program that features soups, snacks, and beverages designed to nourish the body while keeping it in a fasting state, triggering cellular rejuvenation and renewal. This is real science. It was developed over decades with USC's Longevity Institute. It's backed by top U.S. medical centers, Prolon has been shown to support biological age reduction, metabolic health, skin appearance, fat loss with muscle protection, energy, and a healthier relationship with food. Essentially, the diet tricks your cells into thinking that you're fasting. So you get all the benefits of fasting without having to give up food.
1:03:56So if you're ready for your own reset for a limited time, Prolon is offering part of the problem listeners 15 % off site-wide plus a$40 bonus gift when you subscribe to their five-day program. Just visit prolonlife.com slash P-O-T-P. That's P-R-O-L-O-N-L-I-F-E.com slash P-O-T-P to claim your 15 % discount and your bonus gift. Prolonlife.com slash P-O-T-P. All right, let's get back into the show. So yeah, I don't know what to say other than that on the topic. That's kind of where I am. um i'm open to this i know i know i got some friends who have really gone down the rabbit hole i know clint russell has and he really thinks it's shady as shit um i'm kind of open to that i think we're gonna probably learn more at this trial so let's see what comes out of all this you know like i i don't it's not um it's it's it's not like like i almost in this i guess This is where what I said, right?
1:04:58I think Clint, I saw part of his stream the other day. We talked on the phone briefly while I was watching the debate. But I saw part of his stream and even he had said, I mean, Candace has it at zero. I'd probably be way higher than that. You know, like so he was going like he I think I probably am. And this is what's kind of ironic, I guess, that I thought Andrew lost the debate despite the fact that I don't know that I necessarily disagree with his opinion. I think I disagree with a few things he said, but but if you said 75 percent and I say this with like real ignorance, Rob, like not as someone following this, that's kind of about where I'm at.
1:05:36Right. I go probably like odds are that this kid did shoot him. Right. I mean, if they got a gun and they got I don't know, that's kind of where I am. I don't know. But that's not that like that number isn't that high. That number leaves a whole huge percentage that maybe there's something else here that we don't know about. I'm not against people digging for that if they think that's the case. Figure it out. And I'm not for, you know, somebody playing the role of being like, oh, I'll call you out if your theory doesn't add up. It's okay. Not quite sure why it needs to be the number one debate, though.
1:06:14Right? Like, it just seems like, I don't know, guys, like there's a war going on. He put$300 ,000 on the line with the I'm going to ruin you and you're much bigger than I am. There's no reason for you to have me on the show for the opportunity to ruin you. And people like stakes. You know what I mean? That's like watching Evil Knievel jump the Grand Canyon. You're like, someone's going to fail today. And so when you put up$300 ,000 of I'm going to ruin someone, you're like, oh, man, is someone about to get ruined? Or is someone about to lose$300 ,000 on a failed attempt? Well, that's right. And it does look, don't get me wrong, because to some degree, these things are all intermarried, right?
1:06:53because there is like like in theory rob right you could win a debate you could really win the argument but the crowd could just disagree with you like 90 of the crowd could think you lost even though you're like wait i had way better arguments but then in some other sense that's a loss because you're the goal of doing the thing is to get the people to be on your side and so i just it's it's hard to go like how can you look at a situation just even if you're on andrew's side and even if you think he won the debate and even if you can overlook moments like that in the debate that didn't really go very well for him candace owens collected three hundred thousand dollars and didn't lose a fan over this like if the goal was to expose her or to stop this or to anything it just made her look good everything all of the optics even even the fact is that andrew seemed a bit nervous that he was twitching his leg the whole time that she that he wrote this whole opening thing and she just cracked her knuckles and came out and went like, okay, let's do it.
1:07:55And was calm the whole time. And just, it's just, it's hard. How do you look at that and not go, this was a win for her. This was a big win. Um, that I don't know. Seems clear to me. That's my honest opinion on it. I knew there were a lot of people who were like, Oh, I saw a few people on Twitter who were like, I'll be very interested to see how Dave's going to handle this or whatever. You're like, but I handle it by telling you what I think is true. There's like how I always do. And, um, you know, I don't, I also, you know, I, I guess maybe more broadly, I would say, Hey, you know, kind of like an in defense of Candace Owens that, yeah, it's like, look, somebody said to me the other day, uh, when I was shitting on Hassan Piker, someone said to me, they go, um, well, Dave, you don't want to be doing the CIA's bidding, you know, like you, they're trying to ruin this guy.
1:08:47Cause he's anti-war. Now you're going after him. And I'm like, yeah, but everything within reason, like there's a line and you know, the guy is openly pushing like Maoism or something like that. And it's like, yeah, okay. I actually think that's bad. And I also just find him reprehensible on a lot of different levels and whatever. But like, there is something to like, where people go, Oh, Candace Owens collected money. She made all this money off talking about Charlie Kirk for the last year. It's like, Candace was going to make a lot of money in the last year talking about whatever she wanted to talk about.
1:09:17Okay. Candace Owens has been humongous for a very long time. Candace Owens got fired from the Daily Wire and they kept her YouTube channel. So she had to start a whole new one from scratch. And she had millions of subscribers the first day. She was the chick who told she became in many ways the face or one of the faces of the anti-israel movement you know and and because she was at under ben shapiro's company it just it made the opt the dynamics of it so much crazier and more interesting and compelling and then she went on to have like huge huge huge success so she was going to be huge no matter what you know and like i don't know i do think that people are going after her in a way that doesn't make sense, even if she was wrong about all of these theories.
1:10:10Like, even if that's the case, I still just don't find that to be something that that is worthy of like, you know, again, like I said, Alex Jones has a track record of getting a million things wrong. I still don't look at Alex Jones as like this awful evil person because essentially he was against the awful evil people as they were in power doing terrible things. He just thought they were communicating with aliens. You know, like, I don't know. It's just I don't I just don't it doesn't do it for me. So it doesn't seem right. I also think she validated if you thought she needed, she validated the pursuit.
1:10:43She showcased that there wasn't a coherent enough story for this guy definitely did it. Why are you looking into this? And I think she definitely spoke to the fact that this one's personal for her because, you know, Charlie was a friend and that's why she's digging in. And I, you know. Can I just say one more thing, by the way, that I just forgot to say, the final note. I agree with you completely. That I also thought what backfired, weirdly, was him reading a new text message from Charlie Kirk that Turning Point had given him. I mean, that just like, look, it made Turning Point look terrible, which doesn't help Andrew ever as he is in some way here de facto, de facto their representative.
1:11:25Not technically, I guess, but I don't know. You worked with them and now you're doing this and they're feeding you information. But so now you're telling me, wait a minute. So you're telling me that first of all, this completely contradicts what Erica Kirk publicly said when she attacked Candace Owens and said that this is untrue. It's completely made up that Charlie ever said anything about how he feared for his life. And I have his phone. So I know for a fact this isn't true. Now we're going to completely 180 on that. And we're going, oh, no, no, no. He was afraid, but of the left. And we have kept this quiet all this time only to reveal it now in an attempt to own Candace Owens.
1:12:03That I don't know. I just thought that didn't help the case at all. and like I don't know what else do you got and then when he said he's going to reveal the more stuff on his show kind of I think trying to needle her for doing the same but so now you're doing the same thing that she did but you're very upset at her it just none of this was coherent to me I don't know you know look I know something about getting these big debate moments you got to go win the debates I don't know what else to say okay we're going to wrap up there catch you guys next time big episode tomorrow. Catch you then. Peace.
From the publisher
Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave and Robbie "the Fire" Bernstein discuss Candace Owens' debate with Andrew Wilson, how each of them performed, what the impact is, and more.
Support Our Sponsors:
CrowdHealth - https://www.joincrowdhealth.com/promos/potp
Goldback - https://www.goldback.com/dave/
Ridge - https://ridge.com/potp10
Prolon - https://prolonlife.com/potp
Part Of The Problem is available for early pre-release at https://partoftheproblem.com as well as an exclusive episode on Thursday!
PORCH TOUR DATES HERE:
https://robbernsteincomedy.com/events
Find Run Your Mouth here:
YouTube - http://youtube.com/@RunYourMouth
iTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/run-your-mouth-podcast/id1211469807
Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4ka50RAKTxFTxbtyPP8AHm
Follow the show on social media:
X:
http://x.com/ComicDaveSmith
http://x.com/RobbieTheFire
Instagram:
http://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmith
http://instagram.com/robbiethefire
#libertarian
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.




