The War Sold On Lies

13 Aug 2026 · 1 h 9 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode argues that an Iran-related war was “sold on lies” by neoconservative/Republican figures, and that John Podhoretz’s public rationalizations after failing to achieve victory show cognitive dissonance. The hosts claim the war’s “victory” criteria were moving targets (e.g., Strait of Hormuz control), and that critics were right about escalation, lack of preparedness, and likely outcomes.

Guests

No guests appear in the transcript. The hosts are Dave Smith and Robbie “Fire” Bernstein. They discuss John Podhoretz (a commentator/podcaster) and reference other commentators (e.g., Will Chamberlain, Abu El-Sayed, Tallarico, Habib Reddig Gore, Stephen Crowder, Scott Horton), but they are not interviewed here.

Key claims

Podhoretz admits (or implies) polls and war outcomes are unpopular among Republicans; he argues the U.S. is “on the path to victory” even while later conceding “loss” by his own definition. The hosts say the war was unwinnable under Trump, lacked escalation dominance, and that “we didn’t want it like this” is a cop-out.

Notable examples

Podhoretz comparing Iran strikes to WWII (Hitler bunker timing); claims about decapitating leadership; assertions that the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz was working while ships still moved; and the hosts’ “coin flip” analogy for risking U.S. fate without preparation.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Critique of Neoconservatism

0:40 to 5:20

Hosts discuss John Podhoretz's views and the failures of neoconservative foreign policy.

“The summer's almost over, Rob, but man, we can only pray this war is almost over as well.”

Public Sentiment on War

5:20 to 10:13

Analysis of public opinion regarding the ongoing war and its implications for governance.

“As that realization is coming, here is John Podhoretz's particular brand of cope.”

Public Sentiment on War

10:17 to 12:01

Analysis of public opinion regarding the ongoing war and its implications for governance.

“like me, but I love grilling in the summer.”

Consequences of War

12:12 to 14:00

Discussion on the potential outcomes and public perception if the war had succeeded.

“All right, let's get back into the show.”

The Cost of Losing the War

14:00 to 15:49

The discussion explores the implications of losing a military engagement and its political consequences.

“they attempt to actually say anything, you know, bomb the island, smash the thing, do the, you know, they don't actually have a plan, but it's all just, had we won, what was the possible path toward victory here.”

Political Landscape and Predictions

15:49 to 19:14

Analyzing the upcoming elections and the potential shift in power influenced by war outcomes.

“was a huge and epic mistake that puts Trump and those who advocated for this war at fault for, you know, potentially flipping the Senate towards the Democrats.”

Risk Assessment in War Decisions

19:14 to 22:28

A critique of the decision-making processes leading to military actions and their outcomes.

“In In Texas, the race in Iowa is a three-point race one way or the other.”

The Neoconservative Debate

22:28 to 28:00

An exploration of the neoconservative perspective on military interventions and their failures.

“You guys knew all of this and you supported it.”

The Illusion of Neocon Success

28:00 to 32:50

Discussion on the repeated failures of neocon-led wars and the irrationality of their optimism.

“That's what neocon means at this point, like, but to like, in the discourse for reasons.”

The Illusion of Neocon Success

32:56 to 34:14

Discussion on the repeated failures of neocon-led wars and the irrationality of their optimism.

“And now they have the sleep pouches out, the Ultra Sleep Pouches.”
Show all 19 chapters

Critique of War Justifications

34:26 to 42:05

Analysis of the justifications behind the Iran conflict and their implications for geopolitics.

“Obviously, reaching the guy in the bunker is what you do systematically after years of fighting.”

Critique of War Narratives

42:05 to 45:45

Exploring the contradictions in justifications for the war and the shift in narrative.

“You have to rub the thing that's infuriating about it.”

Military Strategies and Misconceptions

45:45 to 52:28

Discussing the misconceptions surrounding military strategies and their implications.

“be, you know, you can't be the citizenry can't be gaslit anymore about what's going on.”

Further Discussion on War Commentary

53:49 to 56:00

Analyzing commentary from political figures regarding the war and its aftermath.

“Let's see if this guy even gave him a little bit of something on that podcast.”

Discussion on War and Loss

56:00 to 56:44

Exploring the futility of cheerleading for a disastrous war.

“Sounds like a man who, who knew we were going to lose.”

Criticism of Abe Greenwald's Tweet

56:44 to 58:08

Analyzing a controversial tweet by Abe Greenwald about the war's supposed victory.

“How neocon delusiony are we talking here?”

Neoconservative Arguments and Their Failures

58:08 to 1:00:54

A critique of neoconservative rhetoric and its historical failures.

“Where's that victory you were talking about?”

The Dynamics of Neoconservative Strategies

1:00:54 to 1:03:24

Unpacking the three phases of neoconservative military strategies and their implications.

“we approach everything with like a khaki pants flavor, but it's not.”

Mark Levin's Inconsistencies

1:03:24 to 1:08:19

Highlighting the contradictions in Mark Levin's calls for military action.

“I got to say again, just, you know, I, I like Matt.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Speaker 4 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 What's up? What's up everybody. Welcome to a brand new episode of part of the problem. I am Dave Smith and he is Robbie, the fire Bernstein. How are you sir? I'm doing well, excited to get out for the weekend, Chicago, tomorrow night. And then you and I in Appleton and then I got Madison on Sunday, so stacked weekend. Ooh, hell yeah. I am looking forward to getting back to Appleton, Wisconsin. We had some fun, fun shows there last year. I'm looking forward to, to doing that again. Comicdavesmith.com for all those tickets. And then porch tour.com for all the, of Rob's dates, of course.

0:39And yeah, things are the summer. The summer's almost over, Rob, but man, we can only pray this war is almost over as well. What is, what does seem to be over should be the credibility of some of these people pushing it. We got, this is kind of a fun one that we got today. I don't, well, let's get right into it, Rob. Look, it's so weird to me at all that John Podhoretz even has a podcast. I don't know what it's called. It seems to only exist for the clips to circulate for people like us. It's, um, it's, there's just still, I guess for people who have done like the deep reading about the neocons, there's something about the fact that he is norman podhorets's kid and he was really an institution at commentary magazine and just kind of in and that the neoconservatives had so much influence on our foreign policy and have for for a quarter century and in some way he represents how the true like the origin the nucleus of this whole policy how those people feel about it now um i don't know what's the, what's the name of his show, Rob?

1:50I think it's fetching. I'm not sure. That'd be a perfect name if it wasn't. But I tell you, have I told the story? I'd met him once at Fox news and we kind of got along like fine for the moment. And I got to say, I met him. It was years ago. It must be like 15 years ago, but I had already read a bunch of, I read two of his dad's books and I read a lot of, you know, I read all the neocon stuff by that point. And I was almost in awe a little bit, you know, this, I was like, Oh shit, that is John Pud Horitz. And we like talked for a little bit and he was a reasonably, you know, he's him exactly what you'd think.

2:28Uh, but man, then he really turned on me. We followed each other on social media, but he really turned on me hard when he, uh, Thomas Massey said after October 7th, that we're going broke. So we can't fund Israel's war in Gaza. And he called him anti-Semitic scum for saying that and I was like dude that's insane you know he blocked me anyway been interesting to watch his takes uh over the course of this war which Rob uh last I checked in isn't going great I think that's a fair way to put it um so let's start this was the clip that's been going around um of him the other day this is pretty interesting I I've been seeing a little bit of some of the cracks in the armor.

3:16You know, I guess if we were talking about it broadly, do you remember, Rob, it wasn't that long ago when this war was launched. I mean, it was, you know, almost six months ago, but around the beginning of the war, do you remember when we were taking on the argument people were making that turns out the lesson of this is that Tucker Carlson doesn't matter? You know, it was like, turns out the lesson of this is that now we find ourselves here with the Democratic socialists having all of the wind at their back in this absolute nightmare. Turns out it did matter that Donald Trump lost his whole coalition.

3:54But what you're seeing now is kind of people come to terms with this, you know, starting to cope with what we're going to be looking at after this. Like even I think a lot of so, for example, Rob, when I would debate Will Chamberlain, I know I've beat him up several times, but it makes sense that I bring this up several times on the podcast. It's now been, I think, over three months since Will Chamberlain guaranteed that the Iranian regime wouldn't be standing in another month, you know. But back then, Rob, three months ago, when people like Will Chamberlain would say, we're going to get the enriched uranium, we're going to get the regime for total surrender, we're going to control the Strait of Hormuz, like all these things.

4:47I think some of them, I mean, I don't know how much Will is just lying through his teeth or just how much he's naive, but I feel like some of them probably wanted to believe that, maybe convince themselves of it. Me and you were saying, look, you're just not reading the cards on the ground here. None of this is going to happen. They're starting to come to terms with that. Now you see a lot of this going on. They're starting to realize like those guys, they don't believe that anymore. They're looking at this situation more and more and going like, probably whatever the result of this is, it's not going to be what they were claiming.

5:22As that realization is coming, here is John Podhoretz's particular brand of cope. His poll numbers stink. The war's poll numbers stink. The war's poll numbers are starting to stink among Republicans. This is the major commitment of his first term, and it's failing. and so he and the republicans are going into the midterm election just pause it already that way is it not just rob i i don't know dude you're on this ride with me i don't know if anybody else can quite answer this like you can isn't it the feeling of it just over and over years and years and years where it's like we just say shit on this podcast it's a very controversial opinion to have add that plus time then all of a sudden you have like is that not exactly what and sometimes it just like it just makes you want to bang your head against well this is exactly what we've been saying no this is exactly what we've been just starting off the right there but go look man i mean his poll numbers are terrible it's unpopular it's unwinnable we're like who could have predicted this?

6:37His poll, his poll numbers kept dipping after the start of the war. And the thing just got more and more unpopular, Rob, who could have possibly predicted this? We, we got bored saying it. It's been the biggest challenge of the last six months doing this show. It's just how many times can I say over and over again, that this is going to destroy Trump's presidency. And when you launch this war, you tie your entire presidency to it. And it's already unpopular. And he's unpopular. And it's going to get less popular and less popular as they fail and fail. Sorry, already. Just something. Let's keep playing.

7:16Oh, positive case to be made about the last two years of governance, aside from the passage of the one big, beautiful bill, which doesn't seem to have much in the way of electoral legs, since you don't hear anybody on the campaign trail talking about the greatness of the one big, beautiful bill. And the tariffs are in question. The ballroom has been frozen. The, you know, ice is now sort of quieted down. It's, you know, public raids. His numbers on immigration are bad. His numbers everywhere are bad. and in the end this is all going to be the fault of refusing to do the right things to win the war because winning the war would have all sorts of ancillary benefits you can't entirely guess at but surge of national pride a sense that you know a country's monstrous regime has been ended and that the people there have been liberated from its horrible yoke even if you don't quite know what's going to come next.

8:27Just pause it for a second here, because Rob, I mean, geez. Whoa. So, I mean, the thing about how out of touch a guy like John Podhoretz is, is that he's still almost speaking about this as if this was the first of our Middle Eastern interventions in the 1990s or something like that. And we went, look, had it worked out, it would have been good, but it didn't end up working out. It's like, dude, it's a lot more than that when it's the seventh disaster in a row and none of them have worked out. And you got to be a goddamn idiot to think this thing would have worked out well. Like you have to be the absolute dumbest, literally a caricature of Einsteinian definitions of insanity to have thought this was going to work out well.

9:22But like, leave that aside, how out of touch he is where America is that he goes, dude, people are upset about all this different stuff. Everything here is failing. He's not popular across the board on any of these issues. People don't like his handling of the economy, his handling of immigration, his handling of all these things. But if we had just toppled the regime, there would have been a surge in national pride and maybe something good for the Iranian people could have come of that. And that would have made us feel all very good. Dude, Rob, I don't know. I think you are so removed from where America is right now to think that if like we were a bit harder off, but you said, but look, we made the Iranian people better.

10:03That would be like a wildly popular thing when you ran on explicitly the opposite of that. What do you, right? All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Hexclad. I don't know if you guys are anything like me, but I love grilling in the summer. It's my favorite thing. I'm trying to enjoy the rest of the season as much as I can. And I've stepped up my game with Hexclad's barbecue collection this year. For those of you guys who do grilling, you know, when you move beyond burgers and steaks, things can get frustrating. Food sticks, vegetables disappear through the grates, fish falls apart when you try to flip it, and somehow cleanup takes longer than the actual meal.

10:42Well, now Hexclad is bringing its hybrid technology outdoors with products specifically designed to make grilling easier, especially when you're cooking foods that normally don't cooperate on a traditional grill. The Hexclad barbecue grill pan combines the searing power of stainless steel, the durability of cast iron, and the convenience of nonstick all-in-one versatile grill pan. They've also launched their new barbecue grill topper, which gives you even more control when cooking delicate foods, veggies, seafood, and multiple portions at once. And if you're looking for the complete setup, Hexclad offers the barbecue bundle featuring the grill pan, hybrid cutting board, and carving set so you have everything you need to grill, prep, carve, and serve without constantly running back and forth to the kitchen.

11:27There is a reason that Gordon Ramsay uses Hexclad at home as well as in his restaurants, and he's the toughest critic on the planet. Every Hexclad product comes with a lifetime warranty, So it's quite literally the last set of cookware and grill gear you'll ever need to buy. So if you're planning on spending time behind the grill this summer, don't make it harder than it needs to be. Stop losing food through the grates and upgrade your backyard cooking setup with Hexclad's barbecue collection. And for a limited time only, our listeners can get 10 % off your order with our exclusive link. Just head over to hexclad.com slash problem.

12:04That's H E X C L a D.com slash problem to get 10 % off your order. All right, let's get back into the show. Well, we're getting to the point that really made my blood boil. But I guess it kind of decided on this point, it kind of depends on both sides of the equation. If we had won the war, but let's just say gas prices went up to$10 a gallon. there might have been enough public outrage over price increases which by the way he does not mention on his list of things that people are upset about um people go hey it's not worth it um if you know i guess only went up one dollar and we won this thing within four months maybe he's right that people would think wow america kicks some ass and we're awesome so i think uh i don't think it's true or not true it's it kind of just depends on how it would have played out But of course it did not play out that way.

12:57And we don't have a victory. And it's just so it's such a cop out. I mean, it's every bit. You remember the one that we loved so much when, when Thomas Massey was grilling Pete Buttigieg and he's like, he's like, we have an initiative to make all cars, you know, you know, whatever the thing was like net neutral. Yeah. Electric. Well, I think it was a carbon neutral or whatever by, you know, 2028 or whatever. and he was like what so they're all going to be electric cars so like where are they going to charge and he goes well at electric stations he's like but that just goes into the power grid he goes the power they just it's like a game of numbers like it can't it can't support that and then he's like that's why we need a new power grid and you're like oh so you have nothing so you have no he's like that's why we have to imagine a new thing then you have essentially in the same sense if you just go but imagine we had won the war like that really is not that is nothing.

13:51That is nothing. It's not, it's not even like he's going to sit here and all of them, I mean, when they attempt to, it's so like, it really is embarrassingly like juvenile whenever they attempt to actually say anything, you know, bomb the island, smash the thing, do the, you know, they don't actually have a plan, but it's all just, had we won, what was the possible path toward victory here. There's nothing. Anyway, all right, here, let's keep playing.

14:24Restructuring of the Middle East so that we are less beholden to or in bed with forces like gutter that are doing domestic damage to the United States in terms of their propaganda campaigns. I don't know what, but losing is the end of everything. I literally don't know what he goes and tells the American people or that Republicans go and tell the American people that they should be brought back into the control of the Senate and hold the House, except that the Democrats are crazy socialists who are evil. and indeed Abu El Sayed is evil and many of the people who are running are extremists who are bad for America.

15:22Yeah, yeah. So in other words, if you were America first and you thought that the socialist Democrats were the mortal enemy at the gates that we really have to keep out of government, maybe you don't want to risk your entire presidency on an Iran war. And maybe if you are going to engage in that and know that you have to win it, you'd really do your homework to see that it was winnable. And so I guess we can all agree that risking his presidency on this war, as clearly we did not win it, was a huge and epic mistake that puts Trump and those who advocated for this war at fault for, you know, potentially flipping the Senate towards the Democrats.

15:58It's always amazing when they kind of, the people who will admit, because obviously, you know, for different reasons, they admit it, right? So like people like, Like I remember when I debated Stephen Crowder, this was kind of one of the themes. But say like the reason why John Podhoretz has to say this is a lot different than Stephen Crowder, but he has to hate the new left. See, the thing is that like if the new left was just Hillary Clinton, it doesn't matter how socially whatever they were. They could be pushing trans children shit. John Podhoretz would be comfortable to just go become a Democrat.

16:33The problem he has is that the new ascendant insurgency in the Democratic Party hates Israel's guts. So there's no home there. You know what I mean? So that's why he's kind of sad. They weren't lamenting the destruction of the Republican Party in this way when Trump went up. A bunch of them just became Democrats or just worked against Trump. But anyway, so the so he's got an issue where he has to kind of hate those people there. And so he's saying to you, Rob, right, as was Crowder for different reasons, that essentially, look, these guys are socialist, jihadist, insane people who represent the absolute destruction of our country and our daughters and our daughters' daughters being raped by Muslims and with open communist courts that, you know, throw us in the gulags or whatever in the future.

17:22like that this is the end of America if this gets left in. And then they're also going to have to concede here that losing the war hands the country to those people. And so you just sit there and you go, so you're telling me that now this war was that you what? Flipped a coin on the United States of America over whether we could what? Pull out a win in a regime change war in the Middle East. so that's what you were on board for you flip rob i'm sorry just i want you to answer this question i wasn't a philosophy major i've read some philosophy books in my day and really enjoyed them and gotten something out of them but i don't know i'm not the smartest guy okay if you were to flip a coin and just for no reason you didn't have to but you were to flip a coin that risked the future of the united states of america would you consider that policy to be uh conservative would that be a um a policy a conservative ought to embark in i you know it's like this is even by their own admission here it's just like oh we lost well man it's too bad we lost oh there goes everything well it was worth it to attempt it for israel to risk the united states of america or something like that what is the actual answer here rob um let's continue because we're coming up on the thing that really set me off.

18:49Yeah, let's go. But that's not a case for the Republicans. And right now, the Democratic candidate for Senate in Texas is in the lead. Multiple polls. He has a small but measurable lead outside the margin of error. Who could have predicted, Rob? It's Tallarico. In In Texas, the race in Iowa is a three-point race one way or the other. Not clear. Texas and Iowa lose. Republicans lose in Texas and Iowa. Abu El-Said can lose in Michigan to a Republican, and with enough other dominoes falling, Democrats can still take the Senate. this war ends with iran with the acceptance that iran has some sway or control over the strait of hormuz the war we lost the war point in one way or another before and i think it applies to all of us i'm sure if you had said you know people say oh well the neocons got what they wanted they got the one no none of us wanted this if you would come to me and any of us i'm sure in late January and said, Hey, we're going to go into, uh, Iran.

20:16What do you think? I go, great. And they'd say, but we only have, um, enough defensive missiles, enough, enough defense batteries, and, and maybe enough long, long range missiles, missiles for like an honest month of fighting. And then we're out. I'd say, no, no, don't do it can we pause build up yeah i'm yeah no i mean rob this is this is good you can go this is truly remarkable here you go ahead so this is the part that just drove me absolutely insane because and i was thinking about this today that imagine the biggest spaceship you could ever think of came from a foreign planet like the size of space balls and there's a room of 10 government officials and they're deciding what they want to do they get an invite from the spaceship to go up there and talk and half the room goes you know what we got to do we got a surprise attack and nuke these guys and the other half the room goes well why don't we at least hear them out first maybe that's going to tick them off they got here they have better technology than us we don't want to pick the fight they flip one six decide no we got a surprise nuke these guys they go up there with the nuke they set off the nuke the aliens instantly neutralize the nuke and then broadcast a message to all of earth we were here to send health care and to help the human race but after you guys tried to kill us we're now going to annihilate you and they're sitting in the room and those six people go well that's not what we wanted right yeah right the way that decisions are held responsible the way that decisions are made is you make a risk assessment and more often than not when a government policy fails it's because they got it wrong and they did not pay attention to the people that were calling out the unintended consequences and you guys pitched this war you supported this war with the variables that donald trump was running the war that was the risk assessment if you had said hey we would love an iran war but we don't think donald trump is smart enough to pull it off and so we don't want to do with this administration then you could not own this war and turn around and go we didn't support this war because we think trump is bad that's not what you guys said all of the variables were on the table you could have done enough homework to see how prepared our military was the fact that donald trump was seemingly unaware are unconcerned with the straights.

22:29You guys knew all of this and you supported it. So the point is you got it wrong. This is actually the war that you wanted. You just don't like the results. Speaker 3 0. That's exactly right. Look, man, it is such an unbelievable cop out to just go like, I wanted it. I don't know. You told someone it's a stupid fight to pick. You go and get killed in the fight. And then you go, well, I didn't want to do it. If we were going to get killed, I didn't want to do it. If we weren't prepared for the fight. And it's like, yeah, dude, well, that's the whole game there now, isn't it? I mean, maybe not the entire thing.

23:02You know, you want to think about whether it's a noble and just war or not, which this one clearly is not. But in addition to that, whether you're going to get creamed. Yeah, that's that's a like that's not a thing like, oh, we didn't know. Well, you better make sure you know that before you support a war. And, you know, I mean, look, even going into it, it is I'm sorry. It's a shocking thing that me and you have such a more sophisticated analysis of this stuff than people who were like professionals. And this is what they've done their entire lives. I mean, I guess, you know, we've done this for a while now, too, but it's still kind of strange.

23:38But look, man, he think about this, Rob. But Horowitz says before he throws it to his friend there who says we didn't want it like this. he says that well look if they still control the Strait of Hormuz in any way then that's that's a loss that's how he defined the loss but Rob this is the reality that the Trump administration and all of them are coming to number one that's right and number two there's no way to ever stop them the only way is to have a regime in place and make a deal with that regime. That's why they've been trying to make a deal this whole time. That's the reason Trump hasn't just walked away or destroyed the place already.

24:26Because, fuck, look, you look at it like this, right? When he's saying victory, like he almost in the beginning was defining it like, we overthrew the regime. And he said, well, now the future of the Iranian people may be in doubt, we don't know, but maybe there's hope. You know, we just overthrew this terrible regime. Maybe they have a good... But the regime falls, Rob, by the most modest estimate, you know, like 10 percent of the country is is loyal to the regime. But by the I mean, literally the most fucking came out of a Mossad laboratory numbers are that 10 percent are dedicated to them. OK, 10 percent of 90 million is nine million.

25:05That's a healthy pool for an insurgency. This is assuming those numbers don't go up at all after, you know, everything that's happened, which is kind of ridiculous to think that there aren't other factions that maybe didn't love the Ayatollah, but at the same time don't really love the Americans who just overthrew their government or whatever. But I mean, you're talking about millions and millions of people. And Rob, as you know, they've been using 10,$20 ,000 drones to harass boats on the Strait of Hormuz. How do you possibly? So in other words. right now right in the same sense it's another neocon war by his own logic it's as soon as we bring feminism to afghanistan that's when we've won that like you could look at that already just on paper rob and you would just go it's almost this this is almost like on the level of like a 10th grade class if someone just like came up and thought they saw like you put a problem on the board and they go, I think I solved it.

26:03You go, Nope. See, that doesn't work right back. Like it's just, sorry, that doesn't work then. How do you win that war? 0.5 M.: And I, this is why this is so disingenuous. So you go back to the initial strike on Iran. And what was the, what was the argument between the non-interventionalists and the war Hawks is you're going to end up with a quagmire and they were trying to go, no, there won't be a quagmire. We can just do targeted strikes. Then they start a war and they go, we can do a quick war. we can win this thing easily and then what does it turn out we can't and we're right back to what we've been complaining about iraq and afghanistan that you've started some new ongoing thing that's going to cost us a ton of money and won't actually get you anywhere and these were the people who were trying to pitch you on the idea of no we can engage in warfare and we can win it and it doesn't have to be a big old mess and then you end up six months later where it's a big old mess and they go well that's not what we wanted yet exactly what we were telling you at the outset is that we are not good at this and it does not work you guys were the ones who were saying no we can pull it off it will work and if you weren't smart enough to go oh well donald trump's the leader it won't work under him then you needed to say that at the time or acknowledge that you were wrong which you were yep and again again you know like the term the term neoconservative you guys you sit i'm just saying you sit in the dynamics of the context of the time that you were speaking you are two people who are identifying with the word neoconservative, right?

27:30The guy next to him actually says, oh, people say the neocons wanted this war. No, this isn't what we wanted. Like we are the neocons. You understand you were at a time the most influential foreign policy group in the country. You are, nobody even identifies with the word anymore. People are, it's purely a pejorative that in common parlance means the people who advocate for wars that always become disasters and don't work out the way they said they were going to. That's what neocon means at this point, like, but to like, in the discourse for reasons. And so you're talking about yet another catastrophic war and, and not even go, not even like the sense of just kind of like, I mean, it didn't work, you know, Oh, almost with a tone of just kind of like, it was a 50, 50 thing.

28:24You could have been right. We could have been right who knows you tend ended up being right but like had we been right this would have been better that's the way you that's the way neocons think about launching wars of aggression nah six in a row we're bad huh let's do this seventh oh disaster too well you know you win some you lose some like when do we win some uh is there more is there more to this clip natalie or did we finish that one i think that was pretty much the meat of it here you play the last few seconds if there's anything worth. I did it in the change in direction, but don't do it the wrong way.

28:59That's going to be a disaster. I just think that's axiomatic. I mean, you're insane to support a war that you're not prepared, that you don't have the preparedness to fight. So you mean what you supported? So in other words, you were insane. Well, I just think your point is axiomatic is another way of saying that there was no point in me. There was no point. In other words, there was no point. Of course you, you can't be for starting a war that you're not prepared to fight. And therefore that's already baked into the price of whether you're for a war or not. And therefore, after you were for a war, you can't go, oh, that doesn't count because we weren't prepared to fight.

29:56That was one more thing. The onus was on you to know that at the time. Rob, do you remember how much the Hawks used to mock me for talking about escalation dominance all the time? Okay. Now the line is that, oh, we didn't know we couldn't handle it, so it doesn't count that you were right. Yeah, that's the whole point. This was the whole point the entire time. They're going to sit here and pretend like I don't know, dude, like this is you could just rewind the tape years and hear, you know, us talking about that, like our and I don't mean us, mean our whole side. Scott Horton's been breaking this down forever and a bunch of great people have as well.

30:40But just that, like, yeah, they can touch us. They can hit. They can shoot missiles off. This is going to be a tough regime to overthrow because it's a very difficult country to conquer. And you're going to have a tough time overthrowing the regime from the skies. They can close off the Strait of Hormuz. They can pretend these are new factors that we didn't need to be considered at the onset. It's ridiculous. And it's also, I suppose, Rob, because they opened themselves up a little bit to the wrath of the fire. And so if they're going to say, well, hey, you're blaming the neocons for this policy now, but this isn't what we wanted.

31:14Not like this. Rob dug in a little bit to like what some of them were saying as the war was going on. And what was that exactly? Well, I pulled up a whole bunch of clips. Here's the thing. I'm not actually familiar with these guys outside of the last time you brought up hot arts on the show. but I've just seen enough times where people ignore the unintended consequences that somebody was pointing out at the outset of a policy decision. And then exactly what the critics were saying comes true and all the unintended consequences are what result from the policy. And then people turn around and go, well, that's not what we wanted.

31:48And I'm like, yeah, that's the point is that you guys are bad at making these decisions. You lied when you pitched it, your best case scenario didn't come true. And now you're trying to keep your job and credibility when you shouldn't have any. I mean, you just heard it from the guy when he goes, oh, supporting this would have been insane. So then the next time you pitch a war, we can all go, oh, you're not good at making a decision about whether or not we're in a situation to fight a war because you pitched the Iran war. So I wanted to dig in and find out to what extent these guys were going, we're winning this war or this war is a good idea or we should be fighting this war.

32:22And if at any point in time they had said, this war is not a good idea because the country's not prepared or we don't trust Donald Trump's administration to do it well and so i went through a fair amount of uh transcripts of the show you know i used the ais to try and point me in the right direction and i think i uh located some clips that uh directly contradict what they're trying to put forward here which is that they were against this war from the outset because they didn't trust this administration to do it or they didn't think that we had the supplies for it all right guys let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is Ultra Pouches, the ultimate guilt-free, nicotine-free, caffeine-free pouch.

33:02And now they have the sleep pouches out, the Ultra Sleep Pouches. So if you have trouble sleeping, if you wish you could fall asleep faster, sleep deeper, and wake up without grogginess, well, you got to check out the new Ultra Sleep Pouches. The idea behind this is genius. Everyone uses pouches for increased focus and energy, but Ultra took that idea and flipped it. Now they have the pouches that help you wind down, fall asleep, and stay asleep. And the great thing is that they just use six clean research-backed ingredients. There's one milligram of melatonin, L-theanine, magnesium, chamomile passionflower, and lemon balm extract.

Read the full transcript

33:41So it's all stuff that's good for you, that supports sleep maintenance, that's going to make you feel better. It's not going to leave you groggy. You're not putting anything you don't want to into your system. And because these are pouches, it's the easiest thing in the world to use. You just place a pouch in your mouth before bed, and you'll be ready to sleep within 10 to 20 minutes. So just like their other pouches, they're guilt-free, they're tobacco-free, they're nicotine-free. It's just good stuff, and these ones are going to help you sleep. The Ultra Sleep Pouches deliver better, deeper sleep with properly dosed and natural ingredients, and new customers can use the promo code PROBLEM to get 15 % off at TakeUltra.com.

34:19That's TakeUltra.com, promo code PROBLEM for 15 % off. All right, let's get back into the show. Well, let's see. Let's go to the first clip. Pretty good. I mean, things are looking pretty good. I mean, the decapitation of the malocracy, if not the removal of the regime happening within hours of the wars beginning is almost unprecedented, I think, in the history of warfare and sets this on a very new kind of course. Obviously, reaching the guy in the bunker is what you do systematically after years of fighting. Hitler's in the bunker in 45, not in 39 or 41. And so who knows what the knock-on effects of that are going to be and the systematic ability, given the apparently amazing intelligence penetration, that we not only know where he was and where those leaders were on Saturday morning, but that we also know who's in the secondary tertiary levels of the leadership to eliminate them as well.

35:47and cut off their control, command, and communications capabilities so that they can't really systematically respond. You know, say it appears what they're doing is kind of spraying missiles around the Gulf and toward Israel, but there doesn't seem to be much rhyme or reason to it, And that's seems to be the result of the ability to make it impossible for them to make a plan and stick to it. So, you know, it's just just already or if you just if you just pause it here for a second, just already, man, they just like like again, just compare that to like what we were saying when the war first launched.

36:34And think about what's aged better, where he's come all the way around to what our position originally was. Well, he was this dumb to think that this was an indication that we had charted some new course. It wasn't a new course. Spoiler. It was the exact same course. And yeah, I'm sorry. Go ahead, Rob. Well, actually, what he's speaking to here is making negotiations tougher because you took out the head of the leadership and then you had diverging factions that you have to try and meet with. And the fact that they didn't actually need to have one cohesive government because they could give instructions to different people and just take the straight.

37:10So it's just kind of showcasing. This is him at the beginning of the war going, Hey, we're off to a great trajectory here. And overlooking, you know, the closing of the straights or any of the other risk factors and making it harder to get a deal when you took out the probably most moderate person to actually negotiate with about whether or not I ran should have nukes. Speaker 3 0 0 0 0 Yeah. And even like when he goes, look, man, like Hitler didn't get taken out in 1939 at the beginning of the war rob hitler got taken out in 1945 after the bloodiest war in human history and this didn't take nothing like that you know it's like well yeah it's almost like the enemy was nothing comparable like right there's there's another way to look at this like um but yeah uh yeah but just the the entire tone of it like no and no um if you notice with these guys with all of the neocons like dude even if you uh even if you're pro-war even if you're for a war you know you launch a war you don't have any kind of like you know there's no feeling of the weight of the risk of man this is the you never want to do this but you have to and there's always this huge risk of human suffering and but and uh you know there's probably this this might have been within hours of like 170 little girls getting blown up or little kids whatever maybe now they said it wasn't just a girl's school whatever but all these these little kids dying it's like that's happening as you're sitting here going looks good to me and and what's his comment it is this iranian response man it looks really disorganized looks like they really can't touch too much around here yeah that aged well oh shit we ran out of missiles firing them at all of their missiles okay um i believe that this this is from five months ago so it's either from uh march or april because uh youtube didn't give me oh it's from march 2nd 2026 um and now we're going to jump ahead because he's so sure that this war is going to work out even talks about how this is going to um spook china and we're going to be thwarting china with the success that we're having in the iran war so uh natalie we're going to jump ahead to the second time stamp in this video don i'm five years older than you so i make many more mistakes than you do jesus i want to zoom out to what habib reddig gore did today in his ask of eve anything podcast which is look at the great game the grand strategy so there's a chessboard over here at the middle east it's been turned over and we'll see what happens but over here there's china the united States, Russia, and Israel.

39:50And it looks like China is the big loser this week. What do you think of that? I think that's true. And oddly enough, you see this weird, the world of people who are resistant to the idea of this war saying, we're somehow being distracted from China, or we are, you know, we're playing into their hands because we're getting tied up in Iran. China and Iran are very closely allied when Operation Midnight Hammer destroyed not only the nuclear program or most of the nuclear program, but the ballistic missile capabilities of Iran in the summer. Where did Iran turn to start rebuilding, which it chose to do.

40:34It didn't have to do, right? It turned to Iran to get more equipment to start reconstituting its ballistic missile threat. So taking out Iran not only takes out a customer for China, but it restricts China's projection of its own power beyond its borders to an ally in the Middle East. All right, let's pause it. Let's pause it there for a second, because I'd have to pose a question to John Putthard, who obviously is much smarter than any of us. I mean, he's a professional. We're just a couple of comics. Right. But I'd pose a question to him. You should be like, well, if if winning this war and taking out Iran, as you say, would have degraded China, then what is losing the war and transitioning China into a global power do?

41:25I mean, look, at this point, he would have to admit, right, that losing the war didn't hurt China, right? That that hurt America right now that he says we lost. so again rob like also apply your whole thing to geopolitics i guess you can't do that either i mean i don't know what to say you're sitting here going look at how clear cut is this he goes the detractors of the war are saying this will degrade us and and help china but i'm saying no they're wrong this will eliminate iran and degrade china now you're saying we lost okay so you were wrong again. And the critics of the war were right. Like, I don't know.

42:09You have to rub the thing that's infuriating about it. Right. The thing before that guy is that that's the conclusion, not, Oh, we didn't want this. We wanted the war, but with winning, like, no, the conclusion is you shouldn't have fought the thing. Cause you couldn't win it. All right. So now let's jump to the next clip where he more directly makes the pitch for that we're winning. And this is from April. and we got two clips where he pitches the fact that we're winning. It's a very important and interesting piece that obviously reflects the reality on the ground, which is the United States has, is, and will likely secure what is an astounding military victory over the regime in Iran that the regime in Iran simply will not acknowledge as a profound victory over it?

43:02And what does that mean, really? Does it matter whether they do? Does it matter whether they say we lost? Will we know that we won if they refuse to say that they lost? And I think actually the events of this week and a lot of things that have happened this week are increasingly making it clear that we are on the path to victory without question, but not a victory that is going to be universally acknowledged as such. We have on the side, which is what we should get to first, seemingly on the side. He just paused seemingly having been. So this is from April 17th. Does this sound like he was against this war?

43:46I mean, dude, this wasn't the war that he wanted. It is crazy, right, dude, that like, let's just say, I mean, honestly, like, I want to try to run this thought experiment for a second here. I want you to try to imagine that I'm going to come on the podcast right now and I'm going to say we won the war. Like, let's say this is the conclusion of the war and I'm going to go, wow, that worked out well. We won. That worked out well. I'm glad we did that. Like, let's just say that was my take on the show and I'm not going to acknowledge that I was wrong. I'm just going to come on the show say that worked out great was a great decision glad we did it we won and we're going to move on and I'm not going to like I don't know I just I don't know I cannot wrap my head around this and likewise Rob and I had not seen this until literally this moment you I mean I saw you had sent the list of here's let's look at their stuff but I had not seen this clip he literally was just saying that it's a it's clear we're on the path to victory and now he's saying we lost and he's not there's not an in-between part there where he goes I got it wrong you know like even when he was talking about I mean there's like implicit that like well it's because we didn't know that the stockpiles were low but regardless even it's if it's because of something you didn't know then that means you got it wrong because it's something you didn't know you're sitting here once again sitting here and and again as i've said many times this war it was just another it was another neocon classic it's it's just like a neocon war it had all the earmarks you know it was sold the same way it was conducted the same way the only difference is it was hypercharged it's been super fast it fell apart quicker than than most of them did but in the same way they always like even watching this through the whole thing they just bullshit you man until it's too beyond the point where no one can see anything except like catastrophe.

45:44And it cannot be, you know, you can't be the citizenry can't be gaslit anymore about what's going on. But up until that point, dude, the Afghan army that we're training up is awesome, man. They're going to hold down that country. No problem. No problem for years to come. This will be, you know, it's just the whole time. And now let's, let's jump ahead to the next timestamp so we can cover all this but this is where he says we're minutes away from victory and the blockade is working and that's the uh second time stamp on the sheet picture about whether or not whether or not trump is engaged in some kind of a weird gavotte with iran over over the strait that involves pakistan and china Okay, you know this way better than I do.

46:36It looks to me like the closure of the strait that is really the opening of the strait, that we call the blockade of the strait, that isn't the blockade of the strait, is working. has worked for the last 48 hours in the sense that the Iranians are getting nothing out, but other traffic is moving through the strait. So explain to me, if you can, why Trump wouldn't look at that and say, or I think Abe is actually asking that question also. They're on the ropes. Like we're, we're, we're, we're like, we're, we're, we're minutes away from crushing their hopes and dreams and leaving them a tattered husk of a, of a fourth rate power that can't even close the straight of hormones.

47:33I love the optimism. You can stop it there, but I just almost even one second. Cause I I'm sorry. Yeah. Yeah. You can stop it there. It's fine. I'm sorry. But there's something about I want to hear what that guy says in response, because he went, hey, you're more of the expert in this than I am. But like I could so easily have just answered those questions just from paying attention and happy. I know exactly where he is now. He's in the time period right after the blockade of the blockade. He's saying, oh, look, he's going, look, Iran's not getting anything out and ships are getting through. Why isn't Donald Trump looking at this and saying, hey, we're crushing them.

48:07They don't have time. And it's like the obvious reason we knew this at the time is because, yes, ships were getting through in the Vegas sense of the term. But the number of ships getting through actually bottomed down to their lowest. So at first, even in the first Iran immediately, you know, close the Strait of Hormuz, meaning they were demanding permission and fees for people to enter. OK, but the people who were getting permission and fees were still able to come through. So a certain amount of oil is still getting through. I forget the exact numbers, but there was really good reporting on this.

48:41In the Wall Street Journal, DropSite was all over this. So there was a certain amount getting through with Iranian permission. So it was down from the amount of oil that usually gets through the Strait of Hormuz, but a certain amount was still getting through. Then the U.S. came in and blockaded the blockade. And so they said, none of those ships are getting through with just Iranian permission. You can only get through with U.S. permission. and that number that was getting through nosedived. It was the lowest number going through the entire time was when we put the blockade of the blockade. So number one, it wasn't an opening.

49:13It didn't solve the problem. It actually squeezed the problem worse, which was the global economy. And number two, why didn't Donald Trump, it was blockading a lot of Iranian ships from getting out now, but why didn't Donald Trump think, well, ha ha, I'm blockading your ships. You're about to collapse. You can't outlast us. Well, because all of the intelligence said that they could. We were covering this at the time on the show, Rob, like the actual reports from the Pentagon said they could survive it. And guess what, Rob? We now know that is the case. We ran the experiment. The reason why Donald Trump wasn't thinking that, as we were saying at the time, was because that wasn't the case.

49:48They weren't about to collapse. But I'm sorry, you say what you want to say, but I do want to hear what this expert at the time said because he really should know. And the first thing he did say was, well, that's optimistic. well which is the detail the detail i'm picking up on and you can correct me if i'm wrong here uh but i believe we blockaded the straits while we were negotiating with them the first time that we are uh that this predates the mou and you would think if you were against this war because uh we didn't have the proper stockpiles for this war you would criticize donald trump for escalating the warfare environment and you would go well donald trump just blocked the straits but i know that this is a mistake because their missile capabilities are not reduced as much as what's being reported.

50:30And I've looked at the numbers of how many interceptors we've used. And so actually, I think we need to be stopping this war because we don't have the supplies to win the war, but he's not saying that is he? No, he's not. No, look, Rob, they're not even claiming that we knew that we didn't have the supplies. They're going, we were for the war, but we wouldn't have been for the war. Had we known this and somehow it's not our responsibility that we didn't know or something like that. But as you sit here and you listen to what they were saying throughout the whole war, it is just, this is why I said this whole thing.

51:02And look, Rob, the reason we're even doing this as a show, nobody really cares about John Podhoretz, but there is something just truly remarkable about all of this. It's remarkable that anyone is capable of this level of like cognitive dissonance or compartmentalization or something like that, but where you could just be getting it so wrong up to supporting a war and then every step of it through the whole thing, getting it wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, come to the conclusion that obviously it was all wrong and not have any, I don't know, even any type of process. I mean, my gosh, Rob, Like this war has been at the center of a massive political fight.

51:53You know, he's calling the people who oppose it evil. You know, I mean, he's like, and you got the whole thing wrong. And man, that doesn't give you any pause. It's something these people really are. And I'm not even saying like in his personal life, I don't know who John Podharts is. I've heard some stories that are disturbing. but you're like, it's amazing. Like this is sociopathic to be this type of political commentator. It's like, I don't know. It's something to say. All right, guys, let's take a moment and thank our sponsor for today's show, which is CrowdHealth. I love this company and we've been promoting them for many years.

52:34You gotta check out CrowdHealth. It is the alternative to the broken health insurance system. And now they're introducing the Black Swan membership, the healthcare alternative for those who want autonomy over their care, their costs, and their lifestyles. For just$75 a month, you get a team of expert bill negotiators, access to low-cost prescriptions and lab testing, and a curated database of high-quality, low-cost doctors vetted by CrowdHealth. There's no insurance middleman and no networks dictating your care. It's you in the driver's seat. And what many of you are wondering is what happens if there's a major black swan event?

53:13Well, you cover the first$15 ,000 and the crowd steps up to help fund the rest. It's like the freedom we used to have before Obamacare turned healthcare into a bureaucratic nightmare. So get your healthcare on your terms. Use the promo code POTP at joincrowdhealth.com and you'll get your first three months for less than$80. CrowdHealth is not insurance. Opt out. Take your power back. This is how we win. Visit join crowd health dot com and use the promo code P O T P today. All right. Let's get back into the show. What do you think, Rob? Is there what should we go to? I mean, if you want to watch the response, we can.

53:51Oh, yeah, that's right. I wanted to watch this guy's here. Let's see. Let's see if this guy even gave him a little bit of something on that podcast. I love the optimism and it's probably actually not really a bad frame for this at all. I think Trump is trying to get out. And he wants to get out clean, right? And he's concerned about the regime fighting back and deciding that it wants to draw in American troops and American vessels. Wow, so he just, okay, so you just post that. I mean, it's just, again, you can post it there. It's just these hacks who they bring on. This is the expert that they have.

54:32You have more expertise than you do in me. Just, I mean, basic keeping up with what was going on. This was easy to see. He didn't point out any of the things. I love your optimism. And yeah, that's not a bad framework. Sure. We're crushing them. The straight is opened by our blockade. Okay. And then this is the last one from put our, it's, and then we're going to jump to the other guy and we've got even more damning stuff from him. But this is an article from February 28th, 2026. The title is first thoughts on the new Iran war. And I think the last two paragraphs are what's worth reading.

55:06Okay. Okay, so let's see these two paragraphs here. Okay, but regime change, war or not, I think my questions now have pretty clear answers. The six-week campaign of diplomatic dithering following the Iranian slaughter were in fact simply temporizing. We got our ducks in a row and presumably gave Israel time to help us locate the necessary targets inside Iran to strike the bad guys while leaving the general population largely unmolested. Today, February 28th, 2026, may be the most important day of the 21st century so far. May God bless our fighting force as they place themselves in harm's way to protect, defend, and save the West.

55:50And may we triumph over this remorseless, conscious-less, and evil enemy that has been at war with the great Satan for nearly half a century. Yeah. Truly against this war. Sounds like a man who, who knew we were going to lose. Yeah, it is something, man. You could cheerlead a goddamn war, have it be a disaster and not even feel like, I mean, we did not get a my bad. You don't even get that. And now let's let's move to Abe Greenwald and you know what, let's start with the tweet before the video. This is the co-host in the, in the video. There's Abe Greenwald. And when you see this, when you see this quote, oh my God.

56:44Oh, one second. We'll have it up. It is. All right. I'm bracing myself. How neocon delusiony are we talking here? I'd give this an 11. Okay. Wow. An 11. Ooh. Okay. Yeah. If, okay. This is a tweet from Abe Greenwald. Let me see the date here. April 7th. Okay. All right. If the U.S. were to walk away from this war at this very instant, it would still be the greatest American victory we've seen in decades. If we go further, there's no telling the extent of our triumph. I'm merely thankful for the obvious success that's been achieved thus far. Anything else is gravy. Jesus Christ, Abe. Yeah, dude.

57:33Oh, so this is the guy who starts by saying, oh, and people say the neocons wanted the war. No, no, this isn't the war we wanted. You motherfucking liar. Dude, the ability of neocons to lie you into war. What is it about you people with lying and war? Did no one ever tell you that they're both bad? Jesus, that's unbelievable. Oh, absolutely. This is the war you wanted in the war you got. You already said it's a victory. Anything else is gravy. Okay. So you didn't get the gravy. Where's that victory you were talking about? Oh, Jesus Christ. I mean, that is, wow. That is damning Rob. Okay. So he straight out said that it had already been won, that he had already been proven right.

58:23And now he's got to say, I mean, and, and even think about it, right? Just how childish. And he says even there that the victory is obvious. You know what I mean? At the very least, if you were just not such a liar, you'd go, the victory may not be obvious, but here's what you know what I mean? He's like, oh, it's obvious. Yeah, it's totally obvious, dude. Some kids died and hundreds of billions of dollars was squandered and were in the exact same place with Iran having more control. what wow rob what can you say about that dude and uh i got one you were right 11. yeah and then i got one last clip from uh abe greenwald which is uh along the same lines and theme i mean is any of this going to happen probably not um but that's what the iranians are saying this seems like oh if you thought from a neoconservative uh perspective that the iraq war was a very difficult thing to argue against to sort of propagate your ideas about foreign policy.

59:29Trump looks like he's in a place to make it even worse by saying, well, we got kind of nothing out of this. The regime stays in place. You know, if, like, if we say, okay, we're going to keep the straits open, but under these very onerous conditions, like, what do we win from this beyond the very short-term thing that people don't think about, by the way, of the degradation of missiles, of killing how many members of the RGC, those are all victories those are all very positive things if you hate the iranian regime but in the long run i don't know is this kind of damaging to god i'm sorry just pause it for a second i'm sorry i shouldn't say it about him but the we the fifth guys are just so painful dude just the way they just sit there and go like oh but you know it's a little some could say that your seventh catastrophic war in a row could perhaps hurt your credibility with the general public who literally might lynch you if you were to walk into a mob of them right now who already hate you so much that they like you better pray anyway i don't know they just sit there hmm do you think maybe that would be inappropriate maybe that could go bad if we launched as well i mean it really is so good that we killed some bad people there if you overlook all the innocent people we killed so okay that's a victory that like what talks about launching the most disgusting fucking Pearl Harbor style sneak attack started war of aggression and choice this way.

1:00:52Like I know they have something where they think like they're being the grownups in the room because we approach everything with like a khaki pants flavor, but it's not. It's just like moral cowardice, whatever. Sorry. Anyway, here we can get to the part you wanted to play. Foreign policy that should be reflected in the kind of neoconservative way? uh i don't think so at all actually uh i mean and you know i should say off the bat one of the things about neoconservatism is that it's it is not a sort of code of of beliefs you know there's always been a great deal of disagreement among neoconservatives it's a it's a kind of an of an impulse her up and you know today it's arguable that there is no such thing as neoconservatism that it's sort of elements in conservatism.

1:01:40But setting all that aside, I think the achievements that the U.S. and Israel have been able to carry out in this unbelievably short period of time speak for themselves. I don't, without a, an anti-war media, an anti-war movement, it's not much of a movement, but a sort of social media mob, no one objectively would look at what has gone on in Iran for six weeks at the hands of the U.S. and Israel and say, oh, this, this, this was a, this was a bad move for the U S and Israel. And this is, this is great for Iran. I mean, you talked about, wait, pause. You mean you right now? Oh, nobody would possibly say that flash forward six months later.

1:02:45Oh man. I would never have agreed to this war. I mean, it's just again, Rob, like I said before, how many times dude, have we watched this happen? Isn't it just, isn't it wacky? How many times dude? Have we watched this happen with different topics, different things? Nobody serious thinks this. Oh, these are just such clowns. Few months later, saying exactly the thing that was obvious at the time. It's like, all you got to do is like have a room temperature IQ, fucking pay attention and tell the truth. I don't know. It's really not that. It's not rocket science, man. But it is. I got to say again, just, you know, I, I like Matt.

1:03:28Like I, I don't know him. I've never known him super well, but I always liked him enough. I always thought he was a nice guy and I don't know the other guy Moynihan well, other than us, like responding to him one time. And I think I'm just being unimpressed with it, but it's just like, there is something about, I just always kind of can't believe those guys where they do this show where they just sit there and just let this neocon bullshit them with the dumbest most insane shit ever and go huh yeah hmm well that's a good point yeah are there the the success is obvious at what point in this thing was the success obvious and this is just so i mean it's so unbelievable that like you know it's like their whole goddamn thing it's like they have like uh they have like three modes okay here's the neoconservative modes.

1:04:17It's like, um, they, some poor third world country over there that doesn't have an air force capable of, you know, touching your continent, doesn't have a Navy capable of blockading their own, you know, country doesn't have, you know, an army that could invade their neighbor is working on weapons of mass destruction. They're a huge threat to the world. That's okay. That's one phase. There's three phases of neocon. Okay. One phase is this, this puny third world country that just happens to be an enemy of Israel located in the middle East happens to be a threat to world conquest. And they're working on weapons of mass destruction, which they never end up being that, that part never ends up being true.

1:05:03That's one phase. Number two is, um, just like permanent mission accomplished, you know, just like the mission an accomplished banner of George W. Bush, but just forever in all of this form that we just watched. And number three is the clip we started with. Well, that was a big fat failure. Not our fault. Moving on. Hey, I think Turkey's the new Iran, you know, whatever the next, whatever the next one is. That's literally it. Those are the phases. It is unbelievable. It really is unbelievable to see people who have a track record like that. Rob final thought to you. Well, and it's fun with AI because you can track it down.

1:05:44Actually, I think you should say as a closing statement, that hilarious Mark Levin tweet that you shared. Oh, oh yeah. Natalie, can you pull this up? I sent it to the group here. Yeah, why not pull it up? Because the visual of it might be fun too. Oh yeah. How about it? It really is just as, you know, as I was saying, these guys are just, there's something. It truly is remarkable to watch this arc. it goes all the way back I've been uh um yeah follow me on social I've been posting some of my old uh COVID jokes that have come very true uh and luckily also with AI it's easier to like clip things up but in my first uh end of year recap I was working on at the time but I was talking about that we need to create like almost baseball style scorecards for people so that you could see how many things they've gotten wrong in the past and uh I wasn't I've tried twice I wasn't able to get it off the ground but it is kind of uh interesting that with AI it is a lot easier to actually, I could not have found these moments a year ago.

1:06:42And it's not that it didn't take me time and I didn't have to read through things, but like I could not have found all these moments. And it's going to be interesting to see if people have to start being more honest moving forward or actually can't get, can't get like away from their terrible track records. Cause when you see it laid out like this, or this Mark Levin tweet that we're about to see these people just don't know really how to contend with the reality in which they have to actually be responsible for what they said a week or even just a few days earlier. Yep. You're making claims with certainty about what's happening or what's going to happen or what policy is wise.

1:07:15And yeah, you should be held responsible. So here, let's pull up the Mark Levin tweet. This is real. Mark Levin, which quote neocons are calling for ground troops in Iran? I heard it mentioned again last evening, and it's thrown around by the woke Reich isolationists. It must be a long list. So let's see it and man if this isn't a great community note mark levin seems to have forgotten he personally called for ground troops in iran and a link to the article yeah and now open the article it's worth just seeing the headline mark levin calls for troops in iran it was the night that donald trump plugged his show it was the night donald trump plugged his show he said what look out for a big Mark Levin show tonight.

1:08:05That night, Mark Levin said we should send troops to Iran. We all thought it was a tactic to try to scare the Iranians to be like, oh, it's a signal he's going to send troops in. Now, Mark Levin, I mean, it's just it's amazing that these guys can get away with this shit. War after war after war. All right. We got to wrap on that. Chicago, come see Rob. And then, of course, Appleton, Wisconsin will be there all weekend. Come on out and then Austin, Texas porch, tour.com comic, Dave Smith.com. Any other dates that I missed of yours, Rob? Now I'll plug next week's gigs next week. There you go. Port store.com comic, Dave Smith.com part of the problem.com catch you next time.

1:08:46Peace.

1:09:00that makes sense

From the publisher

Dave Smith brings you the latest in politics! On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave and Robbie "the Fire" Bernstein discuss John Podhoretz's recent comments about losing the war in Iran, several public comments he's made in the past 6 months that contradict his recent ones, and more.

Original air date: 8.11.26


Support Our Sponsors:

CrowdHealth - https://www.joincrowdhealth.com/promos/potp


Hexclad - Find your forever cookware @hexclad and get

10% off at https://hexclad.com/PROBLEM! #hexcladpartner


Ultra - Don’t sleep on Ultra Pouches. New customers get 15% Off with code PROBLEM at https://takeultra.com!



Part Of The Problem is available for early pre-release at https://partoftheproblem.com as well as an exclusive episode on Thursday!


PORCH TOUR DATES HERE:

https://robbernsteincomedy.com/events



Find Run Your Mouth here:

YouTube - http://youtube.com/@RunYourMouth

iTunes - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/run-your-mouth-podcast/id1211469807

Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/4ka50RAKTxFTxbtyPP8AHm


Follow the show on social media:

X:

http://x.com/ComicDaveSmith

http://x.com/RobbieTheFire


Instagram:

http://instagram.com/theproblemdavesmith

http://instagram.com/robbiethefire


#libertarian


00:00 Introductions

01:31 John Podhoretz "Didn't Want This War"

31:25 Podhoretz's History of Championing the War

53:53 "Optimism" on the War

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

More from Part Of The Problem

All 64 episodes
The War Sold On LiesPart Of The Problem · 1 h 9 min
Listen in VO