In short
Debate on “suicidal empathy” (Gad Saad’s concept) and whether excessive compassion leads to irrational migration and security policies; discussion also covers UK grooming gangs, Islam vs extremism, and Israel/Iran conflict.
Guests
Gad Saad, evolutionary behavioral scientist and University of Mississippi scholar; author of a new book titled “Suicidal Empathy,” endorsed by Elon Musk. Background: Saad argues empathy must be balanced; he claims Islam’s texts are uniquely misread toward violence and supports controlled immigration.
Key claims
(1) “Suicidal empathy” misdirects protection of children into tolerating harmful groups. (2) Grooming gangs in the UK involved predominantly British Pakistani Muslim men, but focusing only on Muslims is problematic. (3) Extremism should be punished regardless of religion.
Notable examples
Rotherham/Telford grooming gangs; references to Tommy Robinson; comparisons to white-male sex crime and to Jewish pedophiles. Second guest: Dr. Gabor Maté, physician/trauma author; Holocaust survivor (infant) and addiction/trauma expert. Background: Maté argues addiction and many illnesses stem from childhood trauma.
Key claims
Saad’s “survivor” framing is misleading; trauma can be implicit and affect behavior without explicit memories.
Notable examples
Maté’s “Myth of Normal”; references to Israeli historians comparing Gaza to Nazi behavior; Maté’s “genius-level reptile” framing of Elon Musk.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VODebating the Value of Empathy
0:04 to 1:23
Exploration of the futility of debate with differing opinions and the nature of empathy.
“It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks.”
Introducing Gad Satt and Suicidal Empathy
1:23 to 2:26
Gad Satt discusses the concept of suicidal empathy and its implications on society.
“by many notable and opinionated public figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Anderson and Bill Ackman.”
Understanding Empathy in Context
2:26 to 5:14
A deep dive into the concept of empathy and its potential dangers when misapplied.
“That's called cognitive empathy or theory of mind.”
Migration and Cultural Assimilation
5:14 to 8:28
Discussion on immigration, cultural differences and the complexities of assimilation.
“Western governments, to control immigration.”
The Issue of Grooming Gangs
8:28 to 11:09
Insight into the grooming gang issue in the UK, addressing who the perpetrators are.
“And the whole thing, frankly, was a complete disgrace.”
The Broader Implications of Crime and Religion
11:09 to 14:01
Debate surrounding crime in relation to religion and the societal implications of labeling.
“And whether you're an AI doomer or an AI evangelist, you have the same choice to make as everybody else.”
The Misinterpretation of Islam
14:01 to 15:10
Explore the arguments around the misinterpretation of Islamic texts and its implications.
“because we've got 5 million Muslims living in the UK, about 5 % to 6 % of the population, and most of them live perfectly, peacefully, in a law-abiding way, and they're fine.”
Debating Gabor Mate
15:10 to 17:12
Discussion on why one guest prefers not to debate another, highlighting the futility of certain discussions.
“maybe not a quarter of the world's population, but certainly a sizable amount.”
Critique of Gabor Mate's Views
17:12 to 19:19
A detailed critique of Gabor Mate's positions and rhetoric on trauma and addiction.
“Well, thank you for your false flattery.”
Holocaust Survivor Debate
19:19 to 24:22
Delve into the complexities of defining a Holocaust survivor and the implications of personal narratives.
“I say what I mean and I mean what I say.”
Show all 20 chapters
Islam vs. Western Values
24:22 to 26:04
Examine the interpretation of Islamic texts in relation to Western values and the potential for reform.
“So I have the right, I have the memory to talk about my victimhood.”
Iran, Israel, and Middle East Stability
26:04 to 28:01
Discussion surrounding the Iran deal, Israel's actions, and the implications for Middle East stability.
“You really can't do it canonically because in Islam, it is the final, inerrant, unchangeable word of Allah.”
Middle East Stability and Israel's Strategy
28:01 to 29:59
Discussion on Israel's military actions and their implications for regional stability.
“Regarding of what Israel is doing in attacking, are you saying now attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon?”
Evaluating the Outcomes of Military Engagement
30:00 to 31:39
Analysis of the effectiveness of military strategies in impacting Iran's nuclear ambitions.
“Many people think that Donald Trump, for all of his power and strong personhood, somehow loses all of his personal agency and becomes a helpless puppet of Netanyahu when Netanyahu tells him do A or do B.”
Cultural References and Personal Beliefs
31:40 to 33:59
Light-hearted banter about football and personal beliefs regarding Messi and God.
“So I just think I'm really struggling to see where the win is.”
Debate Dynamics and Personal Experiences
34:00 to 37:40
Gabor Mate responds to criticisms and shares insights on trauma and personal history.
“One thing is for sure, Pierce, you're a loyal guy.”
Historical Context of Crime and Violence
37:41 to 42:00
Discussion on the sociological factors behind criminal behavior in immigrant populations.
“When it comes to, when he talks about my work, he's never read my work.”
Debating Personalization and Historical Context
42:00 to 43:34
The discussion revolves around personal attacks in debates and the relevance of historical context in current issues.
“of being like the Nazis, I didn't say that.”
The Nature of Human Beings and Empathy
43:34 to 48:22
Gabor Mate explores the concept of human nature, evolution, and the significance of empathy in society.
“That's as much as I want to say about him.”
Childhood Trauma and Overachievement
48:22 to 52:17
Exploration of childhood trauma's impact on high achievement, exemplified by Elon Musk's life and behavior.
“That's what we need to be asking, not condemning either on religious or racial grounds any one particular people.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome? That's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required, compatibility and availability varies 18+. I think we discussed it last time, the per capita issue. It is incontestable. No, no, I understand the per capita, yeah.
0:32Piers Morgan:Why don't you like doing debates? There is nothing that I could ever share with Dr Mate that would ever alter his opinions, and therefore it's a futile exercise. I mean, just full disclosure, Gabor Mate is listening to this debate. Gabor Mate is a Holocaust survivor in that when he was six months old, he was passed on to another family to be protected. I, too, am a Holocaust survivor, because I was a spermatozoa in my dad's testicles in the 1940s. He's never read my work. He doesn't understand it. So if he says, I got no authority, I got no support, I have no credibility, he just doesn't know what he's talking about.
1:10This is a good reason he doesn't want to debate with me, because he couldn't... He keeps doing this. He talked about... He gave a talk in Tel Aviv, where he mentioned me. He gave a talk in Montreal recently, when he mentioned me. He's got some kind of a fixation.
1:22Piers Morgan:Suicidal empathy is a concept which has been amplified by many notable and opinionated public figures, including Elon Musk, Mark Anderson and Bill Ackman. Loosely speaking, it's the idea that misdirected compassion and moral virtue leads to irrational judgment on matters like mass migration. The suicide part, they argue, applies to nothing less than Western civilisation. The idea is many critics say it sounds a lot like an excuse for not having any compassion when the issues don't align with your own politics. Professor Gad Satt presumably disagrees with that. He came up with the idea, and it's the title of his brand new book.
1:56Piers Morgan:Well, joining me now is indeed an evolutionary behavioural scientist and scholar at the University of Mississippi, Gad Satt. Gad, welcome back to Uncensored. Thank you so much for having me, Pierce. Suicidal empathy, just in simple terms, just lay out what you think the issue is here and why it's such a big problem. Right. So empathy is a wonderful virtue to possess. We are a social species. So for you and I, Pierce, to have a meaningful conversation, I need to put myself in your mind and vice versa. That's called cognitive empathy or theory of mind. So certainly as an evolutionary psychologist, I'm not arguing that empathy is a bad thing.
2:36But like Aristotle explained to us several thousand years ago via his golden mean, too little of something is not good. Too much of something is not good. And much of life is about finding that sweet spot. That exactly applies to empathy. If I have no empathy, I'm likely to be a psychopath. If I have too much empathy, if it hyperfires in the wrong situations toward the wrong targets, you end up with suicidal empathy.
3:02Piers Morgan:So Elon Musk has endorsed your book. He said, Western civilisation is doomed unless the core weakness of suicidal empathy is recognised and actions are taken that are hard but necessary for survival. Gad Sad articulates this well. All Gad's books, including this one, are great. All your books, including this one, are great. So a big fan in Elon Musk. Many people at the same time have viewed Elon's feed feed on his own X platform in the last couple of years as being an almost permanent rally cry against migration and in particular, you know, promoting people like Tommy Robinson, who I know you know and have talked to, the people that many people think are genuinely Islamophobic, who hate Muslims and Islam and are directing all their fury at the two billion or so Muslims on the planet, which is, of course, one in four of the entire global population.
4:03Piers Morgan:What do you say to that? Look, I'm an immigrant. Elon is an immigrant. The fact that we are both immigrants doesn't mean that we are equally likely to assimilate within the Western ethos, irrespective of where we come from. Right. Fido, the cat, the house cat, is a feline. The wild lion is a feline. They're both called feline. That doesn't mean that I will equally cuddle with both of them, despite the fact that they hold the same title of being a feline. So people from Islamic countries come in all varieties. Some are perfectly lovely and peaceful. Others, not so much so. But as we've discussed, you and I previously, Pierce, Islam contains a set of codified ideas that are either congruent or incongruent with the West.
4:53And so in answering that question, we may want to decide how many Muslims to allow into the West.
5:01Piers Morgan:Which is perfectly reasonable to have controlled immigration policies. I think one of the problems you've seen in the UK, for example, and indeed throughout Europe, has been a failure by governments, Western governments, to control immigration. And that has been pretty disastrous, actually. So I don't, for a moment, dispute that. It's just my issue with people like Tommy Robinson, for example, is that his concern is singular to Muslims. It's all he talks about. I mean, you talk about a lot of Muslims are perfectly good, law-abiding, peaceful people, which is obviously true. But you could take the same argument with white Christians, right?
5:40Piers Morgan:There are... The UK is a majority white country. Therefore, the majority of crime is committed by white people. But if you read Tommy Robinson's ex-feed, he never mentions any crime by white people. It's like it doesn't exist. It's like this is a singular issue, that this kind of stuff only happens with Muslims. And that gets amplified by Elon to hundreds of millions of people. And that, I think, is problematic. Look, in evolutionary psychology, there's a principle called assortative mating, which basically argues that if you wish to have a long, successful, happy marriage, you should marry someone with whom you share some of the most foundational values that define your life.
6:25So for example, if I were an acerbic atheist and I marry someone who's very religious, I am putting the statistical odds against me of having a happy marriage. Love does not conquer all. By this exact same logic, there are a set of values that typically come from Islamic societies that are perfectly antithetical to Western values. So on average, someone coming from Denmark and Sweden and trying to settle in Iceland is more likely to assimilate than the same number of people coming from Waziristan and Afghanistan. And that statement should be obvious to the average three-day-old pigeon.
7:08Piers Morgan:But what do we do with people who are not Muslim but commit similar crimes? We punish them like we would anybody else, right? There are Jewish pedophiles that should be punished. No one is contesting that. I'm Jewish. I think they should deserve the exact same punishment as anybody else. That doesn't take away from the fact that when we're looking at the British grooming gangs for the past 30 years, most of them are not named Mordechai Richter. They're named Mohammed Akbar Hussain. That is true that the grooming gangs in places like Rotherham and Telford in the north of England were predominantly British Pakistani Muslim men and they were committing their crimes, horrendous crimes, against many thousands of young white English girls, predominantly.
8:00Piers Morgan:So that was an appalling scandal. It wasn't exposed by Tommy Robinson, as he likes to claim. It was exposed by a journalist at The Times newspaper in a big front-page exposé that started it. I don't dispute and ever have done that Robinson hasn't banged the drum about this quite properly, because he's right. It was a scandal that was then covered up, and it was covered up because people didn't want to confront the reality of who was perpetrating these crimes and against whom they were doing it. And the whole thing, frankly, was a complete disgrace. Now, having said that, it's also true that the vast majority of sexual crime in the UK is committed by white men.
8:40Piers Morgan:And again, I simply say, if everyone's focus is only on sex crimes by Muslim men, and therefore used as a stick to beat Islam with generally, even though the vast majority of two billion Muslims in the world do not commit sex crimes, then there's a problem right there, isn't there? Right. Again, I think we discussed it last time, the per capita issue. It is incontestable. No, no, I understand the per capita, yeah. I understand that. So then that addresses the question. Go ahead, go ahead. Well, not really, not really, because per capita means, yes, if you have more white people, you are more likely, you know, and you have a disproportionate number of a certain ethnicity committing crimes, then you can say there's a per capita thing.
9:27Piers Morgan:The problem with that grooming gang scandal, the problem with sex crimes in the UK generally, particularly involving young people, is there is not really a proper breakdown to assess. So when people keep bringing up this per capita thing, I understand the meaning of it, obviously. But there's not the information available to make that assessment in most of the cases. And that, again, I think is a problem. Right. But to link it back to suicidal empathy, look, the most fundamental instinct that human beings have other than to survive is to protect their children. So imagine that British authorities, whether they be the politicians or the police authorities, said, here are a bunch of children that are being systematically tortured and raped by a particular group of people.
10:18And when we're looking at the competing calculus of either protecting our children or demonstrating who is the culprit in those particular cases, let us say, hey, girls, take one for the team because we don't want to create Islamophobia. That's the suicidal empathy, notwithstanding the fact of what you said, which is, of course, white men also commit rapes. Of course, Jewish men also commit rapes. It doesn't take away from the singular tragedy of the grooming gangs that comes from suicidal empathy.
10:52Piers Morgan:Chances are you've heard a lot of doom and gloom about AI recently, not least in the debates we've had on this show. It's going to take all our jobs, we're told, if not take over the entire world. Well, one thing's for sure, it's a powerful enough tool that most of the world's biggest militaries are putting most of their thinking into how they can wield it for themselves. And whether you're an AI doomer or an AI evangelist, you have the same choice to make as everybody else. Do you sit on the sidelines and wait to see what happens next? Or do you figure out how you can wield the power of AI to help yourself in your everyday life?
11:22Piers Morgan:Outskill is the world's biggest AI education program. They have expert mentors and a wealth of practical resources to help you make the most of it, whether it's simplifying your spreadsheets, creating professional images or building entire bespoke tools, you'll get what you're looking for. So don't get mad, get ready and check out the special access we've arranged for our viewers. There are workshops on Saturday and Sunday from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eastern. If you sign up now, you also get three free bonuses, 50 secret code codes that turn it into a God-tier tool, a full AI prompt library, and a personalized AI toolkit building.
12:00Piers Morgan:Yeah, well, I think it's more that there was, certainly in the UK, a fear running through authority that if they were specific about who had been perpetrating these hideous crimes as part of these grooming rape gangs, then it would cause enormous unrest. when, of course, it's caused a lot more unrest by trying to cover it up. And this happened at all stages of British establishment and authority. And I think, honestly, it was disgraceful. On that, I completely agree with Robinson. But I don't like the leap many take, including Robinson, that the whole problem is purely Muslim, purely Islam. It's a religion issue because I just don't think that is true.
12:47Look, Jeffrey Epstein was Jewish. Harvey Weinstein is Jewish. But they didn't commit those crimes invoking specific tenets of Judaism to justify their debauchery. Many of the Pakistani Muslim men who were grooming and raping those little girls used the pretext of their religion to then argue, look, those girls are nejus. They're impure. If we have at it with them, that is perfectly reasonable within our religion. So a bank robber...
13:24Piers Morgan:But as you know, but hang on, Gad, as you know, I mean, I think that's irrelevant. I'll tell you why. Because, as you know, the vast majority of Muslims do not interpret the Quran to mean that kind of stuff. And so I would say there's no difference. If you're a victim of Harvey Weinstein or Jeffrey Epstein or these appalling grooming gangs in the north of England, you're a victim. And it doesn't matter to me if they've used or invoked their interpretation of religious tracts, which many people of their own religion think the complete opposite. So I just don't like the all-encompassing Islam is the problem because we've got 5 million Muslims living in the UK, about 5 % to 6 % of the population, and most of them live perfectly, peacefully, in a law-abiding way, and they're fine.
14:15Piers Morgan:Why demonise the entire religion? We don't do that with other religions. Okay, there are about 10 ,000 recorded religions. Actually, that's a conservative number. There are even more than 10 ,000. Out of those 10 ,000 religions, there seems to be only one where there seems to always be the misinterpretation of that noble faith in the exact same direction. We never hear about Jainist grooming gangs. We never hear about Shintoist grooming gangs. We never hear about... You know what? You know what? You know the answer? Per capita. Gad, I'm surprised you haven't worked that one out because there are two billion Muslims.
14:55Piers Morgan:It's per capita, my friend. It's your argument. Let me now throw it back at you. It's simply because there are more Muslims. So therefore, per capita, they're going to be committing more of these crimes. Do you agree with that? No, because Hindus also make up roughly, maybe not a quarter of the world's population, but certainly a sizable amount. And I don't have the numbers in front of me, but if we look at per capita, we would find that there's only one group that misinterprets their religious edicts into committing terror attacks, into raping women and so on. There's something unique about how we read Islamic texts that always makes us mistranslate, misinterpret, misunderstand the beautiful noble text in exactly the same direction for the past 1400 years.
15:51It's a real mystery.
15:54Piers Morgan:Well, I think there are extremist Muslims, as there are any religion, and extremism of any kind should be condemned and they should be susceptible to the same law as everybody else. And I've always felt that. Let me just mention something you wrote in your book about Gabor Marte. Now, full disclosure, we wanted you to debate with him. You don't like to do debates. Out of interest, why don't you like doing debates? That's a great question. I'm always happy to debate someone if a priori I feel that both parties could potentially have some means of being swayed away from their anchored position if the appropriate evidence were presented to them, right?
16:42So for example, as an evolutionist, I don't debate young earth creationists, not because I'm an elitist lofty guy who can't be bothered debating, but I know for a fact that there is no amount of evolutionary information that I could offer them to make them say, oh, you know what, Professor Saad, in light of what you just said, I've now changed my opinion. So there is nothing that I could ever share with Dr. Mate that would ever alter his opinions, and therefore it's a futile exercise. That's why I love speaking to you one-on-one because you're such a charismatic guy.
17:17Piers Morgan:Well, thank you for your false flattery. But I mean, just full disclosure, Gabor Mate is listening to this debate, and the reason for that is that you dedicate two pages in your new book to him. Yes, sir. And so we thought we'd talk to him after you. I mean, I'd have preferred to have you chat to each other because you do whack him in the book. You say this, Gabor Marto is a Canadian physician who has built a self-help empire on the back of his supposed empathetic and compassionate handling of patients who suffer from addiction. He argues that at the root of addiction is childhood trauma, but he goes much further by purporting that countless diseases are rooted in this singular explanation.
17:58Piers Morgan:This reminds me of Freudian psychoanalytical quackery, wherein all psychological disorders have their ultimate genesis in sexual repression or the hysteria of the repressed memories movement. And you also go on to say that Dr. Mate, who was raised Jewish in Nazi-occupied Hungary, was a former Zionist who's since become a prominent critic of Israeli policy. You say this, Mate's infinite well of intergenerational empathy does not apply to Jews, though. He knows as a Holocaust survivor, and you put the word survivor in quotation marks, what true trauma is. And he never fails to remind the world that the Palestinians are suffering a genocide at the hands of a Nazi like Israelis.
18:41Piers Morgan:There is nothing noble about the mate duo. Aaron, his son, is also a regular guest on our censor. They are uninformed fools engaging in malignant narcissism, masquerading as infinite compassion. Now, you may not want to debate with him but that's pretty full-on attack against this guy he's listening to this I mean do you stand by the rhetoric you've used there yes I was actually trying to be charitable and nice in that quote that you kindly read look uh really yeah oh yeah oh yeah uh I don't I don't use words uh flippantly right so if if my words are going to be immortalized in my book I say what I mean and I mean what I say.
19:26Gabor Mate is a Holocaust survivor in that when he was six months old, he was passed on to another family to be protected. But to say that you're a survivor when you're a six-month infant is like arguing that I too am a Holocaust survivor because I was a spermatozoa in my dad's testicles in the 1940s. A six-month-old infant is not cognizant of the reality around them. So there is no meaningful way by which he can then argue that because I'm a Holocaust survivor that suffered at the hands of the Nazis, I could tell you that the IDF is infinitely worse than the, it's a rhetorical device that is being used to justify his position.
20:12So it's in that sense. What age, what age?
20:15Piers Morgan:Okay, but what, okay, but what age would he need to be then for you to accept that he's a Holocaust survivor? It will be at the age at which your cognitive development would entitle your memory to have traces. Give me an age. Well, it varies across people, but typically most people, their earliest memory will go typically at around age three or four. So a six month old infant has no knowledge of what happened to him during the Holocaust. And there can be no impact of what happened on somebody of that age, because I would absolutely dispute that. I mean, terrible things happen to people when they're incredibly young babies or one or two or whatever.
20:59Piers Morgan:And of course, it can have a massive material effect on them. Of course, he will have discovered what happened with his family, with the Holocaust, the relatives and so on. You know, so I just don't understand what the upside is for you in diminishing his claim to be a Holocaust survivor, albeit he was extremely young. I mean, why shouldn't he be able to have had massive impact from that? I'm not questioning the fact that he could look back at his life's, his family's history and feel pain at what happened to him. My concern is in using that narrative for nefarious reasons to then justify why you have the authority and imprimatur to say that as a Holocaust survivor, I can tell you that the IDF are no different than the Nazis.
21:51It's in the intent of using that narrative. Pierce, as you know, I went through horrors as an 11-year-old child in Lebanon that, you know, I wouldn't wish on my worst enemies. I do remember all of those incidents. I was 11 years old, but I don't use my victimology narrative, my true victimology narrative, to then espouse certain positions that are rooted in the fact you have to believe me because I'm a childhood war refugee. My position stands... Well, hang on, hang on.
22:23Piers Morgan:In a way, you just have. I mean, in a way, you've just cited that for viewers who may not have been aware of that, and therefore that obviously forms the backdrop to your opinions. I mean, I don't really see a lot of difference. I mean, you've just said that you went through terrible things in Lebanon. Of course, that is going to inform your view of issues in the Middle East. Of course it is, in the same way that what happened to Dr. Marte is going to inform his views. The fact that your views, you know, don't concur with each other. Well, that's what happens in democratic society. You know, and I'm just surprised that you would be so willing to dismiss his right to lean on his background, his experience from his family's perspective, albeit he was very young, just to dismiss it as almost fake.
23:14Piers Morgan:And when you put the word survivor in quotation marks, you're kind of saying it's not real. No. So, again, I don't know if we need to debate Gabor Mate for the whole show, but if that's what you want to do, that's perfectly fine. I'm not questioning his... Well, do you want to talk to him directly? No, I don't. You can talk to him after and he can discuss with you why I'm so wrong. But I don't believe that he doesn't have the right to say whatever he wants. As you said, in a free society, Holocaust deniers should be free to espouse their nonsense. I mean, I'm genuinely a free speech absolutist.
23:47So I'm not questioning his right to espouse anything that he wants. All I'm questioning is the manipulative intent of saying that because I'm a Holocaust survivor, you should listen to me when I tell you that the IDF are indistinguishable from the Nazis. That's the only thing that I'm criticizing here. I wish him well. I implored what happened to his family. So that's I mean, I don't have to justify how horrible the Holocaust is. But what I'm saying is I have memory of the trauma I went through. My parents were kidnapped by Fatah in 1980 when I was 15. So I have the right, I have the memory to talk about my victimhood.
24:30He doesn't cognitively. He was a six-month-old infant. That's all I'm saying.
24:36Piers Morgan:Would you compare the people that did that to your parents, would you compare them to Nazis? i mean no in the sense that at the very least my parents were able to get out of their ordeal so in that sense their kidnappers were a lot more charitable and ultimately kind and empathetic more so than the nazis would have which would have undoubtedly put a bullet in the head by the way the ones who kidnapped them were muslim and they didn't kill them right so again they are very nice Muslims, they are very mean Muslims, they are very nice Jews, they are very mean Jews. What I criticize always, as I think you know by now, is the specific tenets within Islam that may or may not be congruent with Western values.
Read the full transcript
25:23Piers Morgan:Yeah, and my issue with that is it's how you interpret it, you know, and that's my issue. I have a lot of Muslim friends of mine who say the issue is extremist twists the language of the Quran to suit their nefarious intent. And there's a long illustrious history of people doing that with religious people do it with the bible you know we've had christian extremists and nutcases using some of the very violent rhetoric of the bible to justify what they do what's the difference well the difference is that christianity went through the light of reformation regrettably islamic doctrines have not there have been 1400 years of attempts of Muslim scholars trying to incorporate interpretive reformation into Islam.
26:12You really can't do it canonically because in Islam, it is the final, inerrant, unchangeable word of Allah. So the likelihood of having the light of reformation come into Islamic doctrines is simply lesser than in Christianity.
26:30Piers Morgan:Let's just end with two. One slight tangential subject, one completely nothing to do with it. The Iran deal, which may or may not have been signed by the time we air this interview, but regardless, it just seems to most observers that Donald Trump has got himself into something that he just is desperate to get out of. and that he was persuaded about the merits of attacking Iran by Benjamin Netanyahu, who may have been working to a different agenda as the Prime Minister of Israel. What is your view of that? And obviously Israel's been killing a lot of civilians in Lebanon, going after Hezbollah.
27:12Piers Morgan:You grew up in Beirut. You've talked about some of the experiences your family had. What do you view about what Israel has been doing and about where we are with the Iran war? Well, I don't know yet anything about the Iran deal, the specifics. As you said, we don't know what those are. I think in a holistic sense, if we were able, we meaning the West in general or America in particular, if we were able to get rid of the existing regime in Iran, first it would free 90 million Iranians, most of whom are quite modern, most of whom are quite secular, most of whom are quite educated. we'd be freeing them from the shackles of 47 years of theocracy.
27:55So if one had empathy towards the Iranian people, you would say, go, go, go. Let's free this beautiful Persian culture. So that would be my first statement. Regarding of what Israel is doing in attacking, are you saying now attacking Hezbollah in Lebanon? Is that what you're asking?
28:13Piers Morgan:Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you know, I don't know the specific numbers of how many civilians have died in those attacks, but the general idea of getting rid of all of these proxies of Iran will only lead to greater stability in the Middle East. And so, inshallah, hopefully when this regime falls, we will have a much brighter future in the region. Of course, it could play out another way, which is, as we're already seeing evidentially from American intelligence in Gaza, that for all the Hamas terrorists have been killed, five people have gravitated to the ideology because they're so appalled by what's been done in Gaza.
28:53Piers Morgan:if that was to extrapolate across the region with everywhere else that Israel has gone after these terror groups. Because as Donald Trump himself said, you don't need to take down an apartment block to kill a Hezbollah terrorist. And if you keep doing that, you are going to create more enemies potentially. So your hope, your aspiration that all of this bombing is going to lead to Israel being safer and Israelis being safer, I'm not convinced by that at all. I think part of the problem has been the massively disproportionate way that this Israeli government has gone about its business. And I'm genuinely concerned about what that means for the security of Israel, of Israelis and of Jews worldwide.
29:36Piers Morgan:I think we're already seeing the downside of this strategy. So, look, you know, time will tell. History will show us. But do you think that, obviously, if Trump is going to pull out of this, can you see a situation where Netanyahu goes it alone against Iran? I mean, I suppose I could. And I should also mention that I don't know if you hinted at that in your earlier question. Many people think that Donald Trump, for all of his power and strong personhood, somehow loses all of his personal agency and becomes a helpless puppet of Netanyahu when Netanyahu tells him do A or do B. or do be. No, I don't think it was that.
30:22Piers Morgan:I don't think Netanyahu told... I don't think it's that. It's just that everybody knows, from what Antony Blinken and Hillary Clinton and others have now said, that Netanyahu tried to persuade a series of American presidents to do this, and they all said no. And the only one who said yes was Trump. And the New York Times had a big, deep-dive feature on all this, very well sourced, and inside the White House Situation Room. And what is clear is that Donald Trump believed Netanyahu's prediction of what would happen. And the tragedy of all this is it all turned out to be untrue. Had it led to a very speedy overthrowing of a terrible regime with the people uprising and seizing back control of their country and the end of the IRGC and the Strait of Hormuz have been left alone, as Netanyahu said would happen, I think many more people would have been supportive.
31:12Piers Morgan:But actually the opposite has happened. and ended up in a position where the Iranian regime now knows all it has to do is shut up the Strait of Hormuz and fire a few missiles at the Gulf states, and they have the cards. So if you were doing a forensic accounting of the net either success or failure of this war, you would put it as that it's been an abject failure more than a success? Well, I'd certainly say a failure. If the mission was to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons, I don't see how anyone can say with any confidence anything's changed from when Obama got the same wordy guarantees about that issue as Trump is apparently getting in his deal.
31:55Piers Morgan:Plus, if it's true that the Iranian regime is going to get$300 billion to rehabilitate and rebuild itself, well, why would we trust them not to spend all that on all the missiles and weaponry that have been destroyed militarily? So I just think I'm really struggling to see where the win is. And in fact, when it comes to the failure, the failure to understand the importance of a Strait of Hormuz and just how easy it would be for Iran to paralyze the global energy economy market in the way that it has done, I think was an abject failure of intelligence and strategic military planning. And then when you add in the attacks on the Gulf states with just a few drones and the mayhem that caused, then I think that that, again, has been a failure of predicting what may happen and what the response would be if it did.
32:44Piers Morgan:So I'm afraid all I see is the same regime in place, the Ayatollah replaced by his son, who's even more hardline, and saw half his family killed, so will hate everyone even more than his father did. The IRGC still in control. No popular uprising whatsoever. and now the Iranian regime has the Strait of Hormuz as the most effective weapon it could possibly imagine that it didn't know it had, and may start charging a toll to use it, which it wasn't before. If that is a victory, Gad Saad, my friend, then I've got a second-hand card to sell you. I have a slightly different take, but I will defer to your expertise.
33:26Piers Morgan:Gad Saad, it's always good to talk to you. Although, finally, my final point, the World Cup, Apparently, you heard saying on X, I think in response to something I may have said, that Messi might be the proof that God exists. Yeah. Messi's turning me from an atheist to a believer.
33:45Piers Morgan:Listen, Messi, when he scored his brilliant hat trick, and it was a brilliant hat trick, he should have been sent off before he scored any of them for a brutal assault on one of the defenders of the opposition. So I don't know whether God got involved in that, but if he did, it might be time for a review of your beliefs. One thing is for sure, Pierce, you're a loyal guy. Your love for Ronaldo is only beaten by the love of my mother towards yours truly.
34:20Piers Morgan:Gadsen, great to have you on our sensor. Thank you very much. Thank you, sir. Take care. Bye. Well, listening to all that, as I said, was physician, author and trauma expert Dr Gabor Marte, who rejoins me on Uncensored. Dr Marte, thank you very much for coming back on Uncensored. It's a pleasure. Thanks for inviting me back. You were listening there to Gad Saad. Notably, he did not want to engage with you in any kind of debate. What did you think of what he was saying there? Speaking of the World Cup, I don't know if you remember, you're probably too young maybe to remember Wembley Stadium in 1953 when the Hungarian team beat the British team at home 6-3.
35:03So at that time we had the best team in the World Cup. Ferenc Puskas, yeah. Ferenc Puskas. So I'm very much into the football world.
35:11Piers Morgan:I was actually, you know what, I was actually, Gabor, I was in the Ferenc Puskas Stadium in Budapest only two weeks ago for the European Champions League final because my team Arsenal were playing. So I was there. So I remember that 53 game. And Puskas was one of the great players to ever grace the game. So, yes, I'm very familiar. But apart from football pleasantries, there's an expression in Hungarian that says that something is so false that not even the opposite is true. And that's my response to Professor Saad. I'm going to mention three issues, okay? First of all, me as a survivor, if a one-year-old baby is rescued from a house fire, can you not say that he's a survivor of a house fire?
36:04That's the first one. Yeah, of course. So it's ridiculous what he says, number one. Number two, he's absolutely right. I don't have explicit memories. I can't because the part of the brain that codes explicit memory, episodic memory, doesn't develop to two or three years of age. But there's another memory system called the implicit memory system, which he knows nothing about. But you kind of addressed it, that the emotional memories are imprinted in the nervous system, not just from one year on, but even from in the womb. and my emotional memory is of terror and fear and abandonment and so when he says that doesn't live in my memory sure it does and it still shows up decades later in my emotions and my behavior that's the nature of trauma and he's right about one thing the fact that and by the way I've never said that I'm a survivor I've always said I was an infant survivor but that does not make me an expert on the middle east and the fact that i'm an infant survivor of the nazi genocide does not give me any does not make me an authority on israeli politics or palestinian israeli issues there are no authorities there are points of view and there's ideologies and there's way of understanding but you know if there's lots of holocaust survivors who totally support what Israel does, and plenty who don't, but neither can claim that their survivorship gives them authority.
37:41So that I agree with. When it comes to, when he talks about my work, he's never read my work. He doesn't understand it. He mentioned his book, if I may mention mine, The Myth of Normal, Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture, which is a Sunday Times bestseller and a New York Times bestseller published in 45 different countries. That book has been endorsed by scientists and physicians and psychotherapists and many other people. So if he says, I got no authority, I got no support, I have no credibility, he just doesn't know what he's talking about, number one, number two. And so I just make that point.
38:20As regards what he said about my work, about trauma, addiction, diseases, yes, I've made the case based on multiple scientific studies and scientific papers published internationally, and I cite a large number of them that make the case that early experiences do a lot to shape one's physiology, one's psychology, one's brain, and so that early experiences are a huge contributor to pathology later on. That's just a scientific argument. He doesn't know what he's talking about. He hasn't looked at that argument. He hasn't looked at my, the research that I...
39:02Piers Morgan:Well, I know you're right. I know you're right because I've interviewed, I don't know, maybe 3 ,000 or more people in my career in over 40 years. And I'm talking about everybody from, you know, American presidents to Nelson Mandela, to celebrities, to whatever it may be, right? Ordinary members of the public. And the one absolute constant is that stuff that happened in their childhood played a clear formative part in their adult life. Whoever they were and whatever the experience was, you are, I absolutely believe, you're a product of your environment. Yes. Now, there's a couple of specific points that he said.
39:43We talk about Muslim gangsterism and gangs and so on. Has he heard about what used to be called the kosher Nostra, the Jewish gangs in New York in the 1920s and the 30s, people like Bugsy Sewell, Meyer Lansky, Arnold Ronststein, and a whole gang of murderous gangsters. These were Jews.
40:05Piers Morgan:Well, I would go further. I would say the behaviour of people like Ben Gavir and Smodrich in encouraging the aggressive expansion of settlements in the West Bank with the appalling violence that's going on right in front of our eyes in clear contravention of all international law, in its own way, that is just as reprehensible. And yet he doesn't see the need to condemn that. Well, thank you. You're anticipating something I was going to say. But the point I was going to make is, it's not that Jews are by nature gangsters. Let's look at the sociological conditions, the historical conditions, that in the newly immigrant population in New York turned some Jews into criminals.
40:51And so that's a historical, sociological, not a religious question. And the same thing is true of whatever criminality is expressed, manifested by various immigrants from the far flung reaches of the former British Empire. Let's look at it sociologically and historically. Let's not make a racial or religious issue out of it. That's what I would say to Professor Saad. And then to come to the next point, which is what you just raised, if we're going to talk about Allah decreeing certain things that Muslims are allowed to do, who is claiming divine authority for the oppression, mass murder, mass torture, dispossession, the torture of children?
41:43and he talked about children. Who's torturing children in jail? And when he says that I make claims about Israel that I have no authority to make, I don't make any claims at all. I'm simply quoting Israeli historians and authorities. So when he talks about how I talk about the idea of being like the Nazis, I didn't say that. Israeli soldiers have said it. Israeli generals have said it. Israel journalists have said that we're behaving in the West Bank just like the Nazis behave. I didn't say that. I'm just quoting them. So for him to personalize me and to have he's got this bean, this bonnet about myself and my family.
42:26Why does he personalize it to me? Why does he not address the Israeli scholars, the two Hebrew University Jewish scholars of genocide who said. there's no Auschwitz in Gaza, but there's genocide in Gaza. This is Israeli Jewish culture of the Holocaust. Let Professor Sartre go argue with them, not with me. I'm just quoting them. I agree with them, but why does he personalise it to me? That's a good reason he doesn't want to debate with me, because he couldn't.
42:57Piers Morgan:Well, I just think if you are going to attack somebody in your book, and I've told him you're sitting there watching this interview, I think he should debate. he should at least talk to you about what he said about you in the book. And when you duck a debate like that, it's like, okay, then you're almost firing from the rooftops, but don't want to engage in hand-to-hand combat. And I think there's something not as honourable about that. Well, he keeps doing this. He talked about, he gave a talk in Tel Aviv where he mentioned me. He gave a talk in Montreal recently when he mentioned me. He's got some kind of a fixation.
43:32But you know what? That's as much as I want to say about him. Because to me...
43:38Piers Morgan:What do you think, Gabor, about the premise of his book about this idea of suicidal empathy as a concept? Yeah, I'm really happy to discuss that. Actually, in my book, The Myth of Normal, that I just showed you, there is a chapter on what we call human nature. And every society has a kind of conception of human nature, which largely mirrors its own practices, beliefs, and ideologies. So if you actually look at evolution, how do human beings evolve? Human beings have been on Earth for millions of years, some types of human beings, hominins. Our own species, Homo sapiens, we've been here about 150 ,000, 200 ,000 years.
44:27Now, for most of that time, we lived in communal groups, collaborative groups but people looked after each other and caring was the most important dynamic and we thought that we would not have survived so essential nature is to care and now if you look at it from the point of view of neuroscience there's a great neuroscientist unfortunately died before his time Estonian American his name is Dr. Yak Panksepp and he studied the human emotional system in the brain and he found that we share with other mammals seven major emotional systems in the brain that were wired for it by evolution. Professor Selle claims to be an evolutionary psychologist.
45:16I'm not going to question his claims but he doesn't seem to know much about evolutionary psychology because one of the most important circuits in the brain is for caring, caring, and the specific neuro, neurochemicals, hormones, and brain circuits dedicated to caring, because without that, there'd be no human life. So that, um, that's just who we are as creatures. Now, when he talks about suicidal empathy, um, he's kind of, and the West is so suicidal, empathetic, let's, and all these immigrants and so on. Let's look at history. Who was it, the Muslims that came to England to attack England? Or was it England that went into India and into the Arab world and into Africa
46:10and appropriated and actually killed a lot of Muslims in order to appropriate their goods and their resources? Going back a little bit further, talk about immigration. in the American Declaration of Independence, which is being celebrated, the 250th anniversary, in a couple of weeks, it ends with one of the complaints of the colonialists against the British crown. And one of the complaints is that you don't protect us from the merciless and savage natives. So the people that they committed genocide against, the indigenous people of North America, were seen as merciless savages by these immigrants.
46:51So that, when did the history begin? When did the history begin? If you look at all the colonial countries, New Zealand, Canada, the United States, Australia, elsewhere, what you've had is immigrants coming from Western Europe, brutally massacring, expropriating, torturing, raping the local population. And he talks about the West as suicidally empathetic. What on earth is he talking about? So, no, I'm not, all I'm saying is there's history. And it's always a question of what date do you arbitrarily decide that history begins? And you know what? Right now I'm reading the histories of Herodotus about the Persian-Greek war.
47:47This stuff goes back a long time. History did not begin on October the 7th. It didn't begin on any particular date. And so that for professors to look at the present situation and look at these troubled immigrants coming to the West, where are they coming from? They're coming from countries that the West has destroyed. So all I'm asking is let's apply the same standards to everybody. and rather than condemn, let's try to understand what are the forces that make people behave in certain ways and what are the mitigating factors that may make them behave differently. That's what we need to be asking, not condemning either on religious or racial grounds any one particular people.
48:29Jews are no better or worse than anybody else. Muslims are no better or worse than anybody else. The British are no better or worse than anybody else. It's all a matter of historical circumstance.
48:40Piers Morgan:We've just seen Elon Musk become the first ever trillionaire in the history of planet Earth. He's on the record as saying that empathy is a weakness. You've often discussed Musk as a kind of prime example of unresolved childhood trauma. And the question I've got for you about that is, can it work both ways? I mean, does a childhood trauma of any kind, Can it propel you to overachievement, as we've seen with Musk with his businesses, whilst at the same time, you know, he often shows another side to himself, which is more problematic? Well, first of all, it's not a surprise that the world's first trillionaire would endorse a book that speaks against empathy, you know.
49:28But look, yeah, I mean, I don't have to look at Elon Musk. I can look at myself. I used to be a workaholic doctor. I was very successful as a physician. I worked all the time, ignored my own emotional needs, my needs of the family, of my family. And I write about that in my books about how, you know, I was kind of a driven person. So if you asked me, why did you go into medicine? I would have very honestly have told you that because I want to help humanity. And that would have been true. I also would have been told you that I want a profession which secures me a decent standard of living. That would have been true.
50:04But there was a hidden dynamic I didn't recognize, which I see in Trump and I see it in Musk and I see it in so many other people, which is the need to feel important. Now, the need to feel important and to be seen and recognized is essential need of the human child. The message I got from the world, and I'm sure that's the message that Musk got from the world as well, is that you're not wanted, you're not important. and if that's the message that you unconsciously imbibe absorb as a young child i mean my mother gave me to a stranger when i was 11 months of age to save my life well it did save my life it was an act of incredible sacrifice on her part but how do i experience it i experience it i'm not wanted i'm not lovable i'm not important that's the only way i can interpret it and so if you're not wanted you know what you go to you know what you do i've said this often if you don't believe you wanted unconsciously go to medical school then they're going to want you all the time they're going to want you when they're dying when they're being born and every crisis in between so that early trauma can drive achievement but at what cost and uh and i would say the same thing about many other high achievers is that yeah they've done amazing things and musk is obviously a genius of some sort but you know what there's a wonderful american writer joseph children peers who said that well i'm saying a lot here but we have three actually three brains in a certain sense we have the cerebrum up here we have a kind of a nervous system in the heart which is studied by the science of neurocardiology and we have a knowledge in the gut because you have gut feelings that are essential for survival.
51:53So when the three are connected, we're grounded and we're empathetic and we're self-respecting. But as Joseph Chilton Pierce says, when we only are thinking up here, cut off from the heart and cut off from the gut, we're genius-level reptiles. And that's what Musk is, he's a genius-level reptile. And that's because of his childhood trauma. I'm sure. Right.
52:24Piers Morgan:Yeah, I think you may well be right. Listen, you're always welcome on this show, Gabor Marti, that is for sure. Thank you very much indeed for taking the time to talk to me. My great pleasure. Thank you, Piers. Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we ask for only one simple thing. Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain. And we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it without you.
From the publisher
Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent and sponsored by:
Outskill:
👉 Grab your free seat to the 2-Day AI Mastermind: https://links.outskill.com/PIMOJUN4
🔐 100% Discount for the first 1000 people
💥 Dive deep into AI and Learn Automations, Build AI Agents, Make videos & images – all for free!
🎁 Bonuses worth $5100+ if you join and attend
A controversial concept has been gaining traction among some of the world's most influential voices.
"Suicidal Empathy" - a term popularised by public figures including Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen and Bill Ackman — is the idea that excessive or misdirected compassion can lead societies to make decisions that ultimately undermine their own interests.
Its advocates argue that issues such as mass migration, crime and cultural integration are too often viewed through an emotional lens rather than a practical one, with potentially disastrous consequences for Western civilisation.
Critics, however, say the theory is little more than a justification for abandoning compassion when it conflicts with a particular political worldview. They argue that empathy is a strength, not a weakness, and warn that the concept risks dehumanising vulnerable people.
So who is right?
Piers Morgan is joined by Professor Gad Saad, the evolutionary psychologist who coined the term and whose new book, Suicidal Empathy, expands on the argument.
Piers is then joined by Canadian physician and author Gabor Mate, who responds to Saad’s criticism of his work.
00:00 Introduction
01:32 Gad Saad on limiting Islamic immigration to Western countries
07:17 Gad Saad on grooming gangs using religion to excuse their crimes
10:26 AD: Outskill - Grab your free seat to the 2-Day AI Mastermind: https://links.outskill.com/PIMOJUN4
11:17 Gad Saad continues his point regarding the inherent problems with Islam
15:29 Gad Saad on why he slams Gabor Mate in his new book
25:52 Can bombing Iran ever make Israel safer?
33:43 Gabor Mate responds to Gad Saad
37:02 Gabor Mate on Gad Saad: "He doesn't know what he's talking about!"
38:59 Gabor Mate responds to Gad Saad's specific points on Islam's inherent violence
47:56 Gabor Mate on Elon Musk having childhood trauma
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

