“He’s VENGEFUL!” Diana Butler SLAMS Earl Spencer And Defends King As Piers Morgan Plans To Sue

23 Sep 2026 · 49 min · 21 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Debate over Earl Spencer’s book about Princess Diana, focusing on claims that King Charles (then Prince Charles) was “giddy” when Diana died, accusations about media conduct, and Spencer’s credibility as a “historian.” The show also covers Diana’s legacy, alleged family estrangement, and Piers Morgan’s plan to sue Spencer/publishers over alleged false claims and a rushed apology.

Guests and backgrounds

Paul Burrell, Diana’s long-time butler, gives his first interview since the book’s publication. Studio panel: John Sopel (News Agents host; former Conservative MP), Louise Mench (former MP), Katie Nicholl (Royals Uncensored host).

Key claims

Spencer’s “last five years” details are said to be vague/incorrect; Charles was allegedly devastated in Paris; Spencer is portrayed as vengeful and motivated by narrative control. Morgan says Spencer falsely accused him of publishing Diana’s gym photos; Morgan says he wasn’t Mirror editor then and that Penguin may print a corrected edition.

Notable examples

Morgan’s diary account of Earl Spencer calling to uninvite him from Diana’s funeral; the Mirror Group’s alleged £1m settlement; Burrell’s account of Charles crying in Paris; discussion of Diana’s alleged paparazzi concerns and a later paparazzi-buying ban.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Earl Spencer's Book Controversy

0:00 to 0:11

Discussion on the allegations made by Earl Spencer about Diana's death.

“I know holiday magic starts at home and Wayfair makes it easy.”

Earl Spencer's Book Controversy

0:13 to 0:55

Discussion on the allegations made by Earl Spencer about Diana's death.

“I think this book, Piers, is more about Earl Spencer than it is about his sister Diana.”

Legal Action Against Earl Spencer

0:55 to 1:53

Piers Morgan outlines his legal battle against Earl Spencer.

“about the false allegations he makes about me in his book and to his publishers, Penguin.”

Refuting Spencer's Claims

1:53 to 3:45

Morgan argues against Spencer's narrative and defends King Charles.

“than every copy sold is a repetition of a damning allegation which he and the publishers now know and have admitted to be false.”

Reaction from Paul Burrell

3:45 to 5:31

Paul Burrell shares his insights on Earl Spencer's book and its inaccuracies.

“Earl Spencer apologises to Mr Morgan for this error.”

Burrell's Memories of Diana

5:31 to 7:49

Burrell reflects on his memories of Princess Diana and her relationship with Earl Spencer.

“for his exclusive first interview since Earl Spencer's book was published.”

Final Thoughts on Family Dynamics

7:49 to 14:03

Discussion on the fractured relationship between Diana and her family, particularly Earl Spencer.

“And I just think that he has deliberately targeted people to settle scores in a way that it's impossible in a way to disprove it.”

Diana's Relationship with the Spencer Family

14:03 to 17:05

The discussion dives into Diana's strained relationships with her family, particularly Earl Spencer, and the impact of their jealousy on her life.

“were pretty fractured in the last few years.”

Paul's Perspective on Historical Accuracy

17:05 to 17:45

Paul expresses doubt about Earl Spencer's credibility as a historian regarding Diana's life.

“I'm going to bring in a panel in a minute to discuss this and you're going to stay with us and continue talking about this.”

Panel Discussion on Diana's Legacy

18:26 to 20:40

The panel discusses various perspectives on Diana's life and the authenticity of Spencer's narrative.

“former Conservative MP Louise Mench, and Katie Nicholl, host of the Royals Uncensored.”
Show all 21 chapters

Controversies Surrounding Earl Spencer

20:40 to 25:01

A heated debate unfolds regarding Earl Spencer’s portrayal of family dynamics and his historical accounts.

“And Louise, you know, I've had a long check in history with Spence.”

Credibility and Accountability in History

25:01 to 28:00

The conversation explores the implications of factual inaccuracies in historical narratives and the accountability of public figures.

“Lord Spencer complained about you to the PCC and it was upheld.”

Accountability in Earl Spencer's Claims

28:00 to 28:36

The discussion revolves around Earl Spencer's motivations and the implications of his claims against King Charles.

“And would I have put them in quotation marks?”

Diana's Perspective on Family and Charles

28:36 to 30:46

Reflections on what Princess Diana might have thought about her brother's actions and the public narrative surrounding her.

“Look, I know he's a member of the aristocracy.”

The Legacy of Diana's Life and Relationships

30:46 to 33:20

The segment highlights the complexities of Diana's relationships and her enduring love for Charles amidst controversies.

“She got somebody to call me at the News of the World and said, that's completely untrue.”

Reflections on the Impact of Spencer's Book

33:31 to 36:20

Discussion on the motivations behind Earl Spencer's book and the implications for the royal family.

“For worry-free hosting, Wayfair delivers.”

Public Reactions and International Perspectives

36:20 to 41:00

Analyzing how different audiences perceive the ongoing royal drama and the implications for public figures.

“is really about paying tribute to Diana?”

The Complex Legacy of Princess Diana

41:00 to 42:00

Recalling Diana's life, her relationship with the media, and her lasting impact on public consciousness.

“if the king is seen to have been that uncompassionate, to not have that empathy, it doesn't matter that it's 30 years on.”

Princess Diana's Paparazzi Experience

42:00 to 43:36

Discover the complexities of Princess Diana's relationship with the media.

“She said, I could go to Iceland and be in an igloo, and an Eskimo would say, you're Princess Diana.”

Reflections on Harry and William

43:36 to 45:50

Explore the dynamics between Harry, William, and their mother’s legacy.

“She taught him exactly what to do and how to do it and his job was to be William's wingman and he's forgotten it.”

Piers' Perspective and Audience Engagement

45:50 to 46:55

Learn about the importance of audience engagement in discussing royal matters.

“Dropping of Royals Uncensored, the fastest-growing royal show in the world.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Kelly Clarkson here with Wayfair. I know holiday magic starts at home and Wayfair makes it easy. They have everything from Christmas trees and mantle decor to outdoor lighting and inflatables that I'll use year after year. Head to Wayfair.com today. I think this book, Piers, is more about Earl Spencer than it is about his sister Diana. Quite frankly, I didn't recognize some of it. He talks about the king being giddy with excitement when Diana died. Well, Piers, I was in Paris. I saw the king. He was a broken man. The last five years of her life are pretty vague in the book because he knows nothing about them.

0:37She said, my family only want me when they want the best seats in the best restaurants in town or want to sit in the Royal Box at Wimbledon. They were jealous.

0:48Piers Morgan:It's official. My legal case against Earl Spencer is going ahead. I've instructed lawyers and they've written formally to Earl Spencer about the false allegations he makes about me in his book and to his publishers, Penguin. As I revealed here on Monday, Spencer directly accused me of publishing the notorious gym photographs of Princess Diana in the Mirror back in the 90s. It was an infamous and egregious invasion of her privacy, a moment which resulted in an expensive legal settlement amid global acrimony. In fact, in the end, the Mirror Group paid over£1 million to Diana, which is the highest amount of money that's ever been paid to a member of the royal family by a media organisation in history.

1:25Piers Morgan:But as Earl Spencer has now confessed, this all happened two years before I ever worked for the Mirror Group, and this book still remains on sale with the defamatory lie, notwithstanding his admission that it's completely untrue and his public apology to me. The publisher, Penguin, is reportedly rushing to print a new edition without the defamatory lie, but copies of the defamatory claims are, as we speak, on shelves being sold all around the world, than every copy sold is a repetition of a damning allegation which he and the publishers now know and have admitted to be false. That's why, in my opinion, it must be withdrawn from sale and the publishers should postpone any new edition until every so-called fact in this book has been interrogated as it should have been before it ever went to print.

2:13Piers Morgan:Well, Spencer was asked about this on the UK's ITV with Lorraine Kelly earlier today. What about the allegations from Piers Morgan? he's going to pursue legal action because there were some inaccuracies. Well, there was one. Will you've apologised for it? And it's going to be changed? Absolutely. I mean, unlike some journalists who we know of, I'm very happy to acknowledge I made a small error and I've apologised and it will be put right in the second edition. But that's it. What he said is, though, if you get that wrong, it's given people an opportunity to have another go at you, to say, well, if you got that wrong, what about other inaccuracies in the book?

2:54What would you say to them? Well, I stand by the book.

2:57Piers Morgan:Well, Spencer's apology didn't come personally to me or to my lawyers. He hadn't even received our legal letter at the time. It was issued by a spokesman to the media with extraordinary haste and actually was buried beneath the repetition of another bogus claim in which he says, Earl Spencer's account of his conversation with Piers Morgan, this is in the book, is accurate. Mr Morgan was surly and annoyed when Earl Spencer called personally to tell him he was not welcome at his sister's funeral. The book then recalls Earl Spencer's assumption that Mr Morgan's response was because he was editor of the Mirror when the Mirror group had published the highly intrusive photographs of Princess Diana at the gym.

3:31Piers Morgan:The photographs were published by the Sunday Mirror on 7th of November 1993. Mr Morgan pointed out he didn't join the Daily Mirror until October 1995. As an historian, accuracy is important to Earl Spencer. He therefore wishes to clarify that his assumption was incorrect. Earl Spencer apologises to Mr Morgan for this error. Well, as a former national newspaper editor and a broadcaster of many decades standing, accuracy is important to me too. I remember that phone call very well, and why wouldn't I? Let's face it, it's not every day that Princess Diana's brother calls you to uninvite you from her funeral.

4:05Piers Morgan:I wrote it all down in my own contemporaneous diaries, which were then published in a book 20 years ago. This is what I said in my book, published in 2005. At 2pm, Earl Spencer called me. Hello, Mr Morgan. I'm ringing on behalf of my mother to ask all tabloid editors not to attend the funeral service. He was polite but firm. I could sense the rage simmering in his voice. OK, I said, but when can I just say that when I received the invitation for Lord Chamberlain yesterday, I specifically said I would only accept if it had been expressly approved by you and your family, and I was assured it had been and that the invitation was from the family.

4:38Piers Morgan:I don't wish to be rude, Mr Morgan, he replied, but it would just be preferred if you showed our request respect. Basic human decency, I wrote, dictates that you don't argue with someone who's just lost their sister. It goes without saying that we will respect your wishes, I replied and wrote in the book. Could you please pass my personal condolences to your mother as we've always got on well. Thank you. I will, he replied. Thank you. Well, given that the king himself has varying recollections of his phone calls with Earl Spencer in that very same week, I would argue there's a clear pattern emerging.

5:11Piers Morgan:Earl Spencer will sell a lot of books and make a lot of money from his books, and that's why I'm demanding a payment to charity, the King's Trust charity, which is King Charles' charity. King Charles has already been judged... Sorry, Charles Spencer has already been judged in the Court of Public Opinion. Depending on what he does next, a court of law may have to determine the rest. Joining me now is Paul Burrell, Princess Diana's long-time butler, for his exclusive first interview since Earl Spencer's book was published. Paul, great to have you on Uncensored. Thank you, Biers. First of all, your reaction to this book in its totality.

5:45Piers Morgan:You've obviously seen all the serialisation and seen all the reports about it. What is your overview of this book? I think this book is more about old Spencer than it is about his sister Diana. I read this rather spiteful, revengeful, aristocratic point of view that he's penned, and quite frankly, I didn't recognise some of it. He talks about the king being giddy with excitement when Diana died. Well, Piers, I was in Paris. I saw the king on the day he came to Paris. He walked down the corridor towards me. He was a broken man. He was devastated. And he went into the room with Diana's sisters for 10 minutes and came out.

6:31Clearly, he'd been crying. His eyes were bloodshot. And honestly, I've never seen him like that ever. He was pale and he was scared. And really, I thought to myself, you're here for the boys because you are the boys' father and this is their mother. And he was paying respect to Princess Diana. So I don't recognise what Earl Spencer says about Prince Charles. It isn't his language.

7:02Piers Morgan:No, and it didn't ring true with me at the time. I just thought, what man? What human being? in the hours after Diana was killed in that car crash, when you're the father of her two boys, would say that to her brother. None of it makes any sense. But it made more sense to me when I saw his account of my phone call with him that week, which was completely disingenuously twisted to make me look bad. And as I just recounted in the monologue, if you actually go back and read my own diary entry... And look, my book was a massive best-selling book. It was number one for many weeks on the Sunday Times list.

7:36Piers Morgan:It sold hundreds of thousands of copies. It was serialised like his in the Daily Mail. You couldn't have missed it. And no-one in the next 21 years since it was published has ever questioned the veracity of the entries about him, right? Least of all him. And I just think that he has deliberately targeted people to settle scores in a way that it's impossible in a way to disprove it. The big mistake he made with me was to genuinely get a material fact so badly wrong that he has no choice but to apologise. But in terms of recollections of phone calls, it's Charles' word against his, it's my word against his, and he's flying in the belief that he can probably just, you know, rough this out.

8:18He's vengeful. He is calling the king to account, because there's always been a war between the Spencers and the Walesers. You know that started in Westminster Abbey, when he stood up and gave his eulogy. I sat there facing our queen in Westminster Abbey in front of Diana's coffin when he said those words. Of course, the royal family did not applaud when the nation applauded. What Charles Spencer did, he got the public feeling, the narrative right. And what he said in Westminster Abbey is what the people were thinking, but the picture behind closed doors was a very different one. I remember watching Our Queen, and I remember her being berated in Westminster Abbey in a house of God by her godson for doing something terribly wrong.

9:08And I could not accept that. I couldn't accept it. He should have had more respect to our Queen at that time. And then we went to Orthra. We went and stood by the graveside. And I was the last man standing, Piers, the very last one. The rest of them left the island. Mrs Shankit said to the boys, come on, boys, Paul wants to say his goodbyes. And I stood there looking down into the hole, and I could see the coffin there, and I thought to myself, why are you here? Why are you buried in a pet cemetery on an island surrounded by water with no marker? Why? And it's because the Spencers claimed the narrative.

9:49They wanted Diana back. And I looked down thinking at the plate, the plate on the coffin read Diana, Princess of Wales, and the dates. And I thought, even in death, Your Majesty, why did you not give her back her Royal Highness title? Because when that title was taken away from her peers, she cried. She said, what will people say and what will people think? They've demoted me. William said to her, don't worry, Mummy. When I'm king, I will give it back to you. But now I learn that the queen, our late queen, did offer to give back Princess Diana's title. Why didn't the Spencer family have some respect for the mother of a future king, for the Princess of Wales?

10:36She would have been so proud to have had that title back. Well, I think the argument...

10:40Piers Morgan:You know what, I think, to be fair to Spencer on that point, the offer was made after Diana died. You know, if I was in his shoes and it got offered after her death, as he pointed out, it was no good to her now, I kind of got that. Just as I actually agreed with him... It's not like I disagree with everything he's written. I actually agreed with him about how wrong it was that the two boys were made to walk for two miles through huge crowds of very over-emotional people. They were very young, these kids. And I've got three sons myself. I would have hated to put them through something like that.

11:13Piers Morgan:And I'm sure it has had mental scars to this day. So it's not like everything he says here that I've read, I disagree with. It's just I'm not sure what I can believe. You know, the stuff that involves me purely goes to his credibility. and I also watched him today on Lorraine and he was trying to make out his only motivation was a love for his sister. This is a tribute to his sister. It flows through every page. It was never my intention, he said with a straight face, to attack the king. Really? Really? And yet day one, as this book explodes into public consciousness, the main story in the headlines is you claiming the king when he was Prince Charles, hours after his ex-wife had died, was giddy with excitement, like a lottery winner.

11:58Piers Morgan:It has really stuck with me, that image. Imagine someone who's won the lottery, the jubilation they're feeling. Hands aloft, I've won. Does anybody genuinely think that is what Prince Charles was behaving like in the time? You've given a very powerful and eloquent insight into what he was really feeling when you saw him in Paris, and that was certainly all the impression I was getting. Paul, I just want to ask you about, you know, when I had a lunch with Diana at Kensington Palace, you know that as well as I do, because you were there serving the lunch. And it was an amazing experience. William was about 13 and a half.

12:36Piers Morgan:I recounted all this in my diaries years after she died, obviously. But it was fascinating because, A, she was so incredibly open in that lunch about everything, all the scandals, all the men, all the stories. And William was obviously hearing all this and obviously was aware of it all too. and she said to me, I have to tell him because he reads about this stuff, which I completely understood. And there were lots of takeaways. One, she was mesmerising in terms of company. She was really fun, obviously very beautiful. Really, I just found it great to just be around and to have a lunch with. But she also made certain sort of pleas to me.

13:15Piers Morgan:And one of them was very specific, that paparazzi were constantly intimidating and harassing her. And these were rogue, like foreign paparazzi mainly, following her around, trying to upset her so she would cry or gesticulate, and they would then get pictures they could sell. And I understood this, and I went back and we actually announced we were no longer going to buy these. This is about a year before she died. We're no longer going to buy them, and we stopped buying them, and other papers followed suit, and then accelerated a sort of complete ban on this stuff after she died, of all paparazzi pictures of that kind, which was the right thing to do.

13:49Piers Morgan:But, you know, when I listened to Earl Spencer positioning himself as the great standard-bearer for her legacy and history, I'm just very curious what you think about that, because I got the impression things between her and her brother were pretty fractured in the last few years. He wasn't there. Piers, he wasn't there. By his own hand, Diana showed me a letter, and in it he said, I've long considered that I'm on the periphery of your life. and for the last five years of Diana's life, they barely spoke. I can tell you on one hand the times that he came to Kensington Palace for lunch. He was not a regular visitor.

14:29They were not in regular contact. I did send the occasional fax to South Africa, to his estate there, whenever Diana wanted him to know something, but he was not part of her world. And I would think that those five years, the last five years of her life, are pretty vague in the book. because he knows nothing about them.

14:49Piers Morgan:What did she think of him in the last few years of her life, do you think? Well, I can tell you what she thought about her family. She said, my family only want me when they want the best seats in the best restaurants in town or want to sit in the Royal Box at Wimbledon. They didn't care about Diana. I'm telling you this, Piers, because Diana achieved so much in her short lifetime, much more than the entire Spencer family put together. And I basically think they were jealous. They were jealous of her success and the love that she had from people around the world. And when it came to that final moment of them taking her back, I was incensed because the Spencer family came to apartments eight and nine and Mrs Shunkhead particularly, and I wrote about this, she sat and she destroyed half of Diana's correspondence between her friends, between people that she cared about, probably a letter from you in there, and letters from Her Majesty the Queen and the members of the royal family.

15:49I was so incensed, I asked to see the Queen. I said, Your Majesty, I need to speak to you. She granted me an audience, a private audience of Buckingham Palace, which lasted up to two hours. We stood in her sitting room. I told her everything that was happening and she understood. That's what led me into a very difficult position, Piers, when I was accused of stealing items from the princess, but I had a moral obligation to protect that small corner of her world, which she could no longer protect herself. Who would do that for you? You do that for your friend. You do that for a colleague whom you love too.

16:25I did it for her. And the Queen stood there and she listened to all of this and she said, you know what happens, Paul, when people die, families claim their dead ones back. And that's what the Spencers have done. They've claimed her back. Personally, I do not feel she should be on that island. She should be buried in a public place where people from all walks of life can actually pay their respects to her and not pay an entrance fee to Althorp to see the house and stare at the island where there's no marker. I think it's shocking the way that she's been claimed back by the Spencers in death and they were not there for her in life.

17:04Piers Morgan:Fascinating stuff. I'm going to bring in a panel in a minute to discuss this and you're going to stay with us and continue talking about this. But just finally, before I go to the panel, in light of all you've said, do you trust him to be an accurate historian of Diana's life? No, I don't. I don't, because this is his narrative. Very much like Harry and his truth, this is Spencer's truth. But the truth is a much bigger picture than Spencer has painted. And I think this serves him well. It doesn't serve Diana well. It certainly doesn't serve William and Harry well, because now Harry's fallen into the Spencer camp and William is firmly in the Windsor camp.

17:44This is a battle of two aristocratic families who are now at war in public.

17:53Piers Morgan:Yeah, it really is. Well, stay with us, Paul. Who says Halloween only lasts one day? With Wayfair, one night of Halloween becomes a whole season at home. From larger-than-life yard decor and moody lighting to festive accents for every room in the house, Wayfair has what you need to make Halloween feel like magic all in one place. Because the best Halloween memories aren't made in just one night. They're made all season long. Shop Halloween decor now at Wayfair.com. That's W-A-Y-F-A-I-R dot com. Wayfair, every style, every home. Joining us in the studio, John Sopel, host of the News Agents, former Conservative MP Louise Mench, and Katie Nicholl, host of the Royals Uncensored.

18:33Piers Morgan:Welcome to all of you. Katie, let me start with you. You're obviously getting a new episode dropping tomorrow. It's going to be huge, obviously, given the enormity of this. You know, a strange thing to find myself at the centre of all this suddenly. By default, really. I mean, literally, I just said to the team, is there anything about me in the book? They found the extracts, and when I read them, I realised it was completely untrue. I had nothing to do with it. And I was genuinely angry about that. And it's blown up as a debate about his credibility. I've got to say, I found what Paul just said very powerful.

19:02Piers Morgan:Very powerful. Particularly the insight into how Charles was in the immediate aftermath when he flew to Paris. A broken man. A broken man. And that really just struck me because he saw the king. Back to this whole giddily excited, like a lottery winner. And I agree with you, I don't see that. I think it's one of the most defensive things, honestly, I've ever read about a public figure. When someone is in a moment of grief or trauma and shock, people do react differently. But everyone I've spoken... And it's fascinating speaking to Paul, and we'd love him to come on our show as well. He's fantastic.

19:39But every former aide and current aide I've spoken to, and there have been many, have said this is not something that they would recognise of Charles. And I suppose, back to the point that you're making about what Spencer's written about you and his recollection being so different to what actually happened. The recollection of Burrell's interpretation of Charles and his grief. It does just beg that question. What else? What else is he wrong about? No, there are certain people that Spencer writes about, including Robert Fellows, the King's then private secretary, married to one of Diana's sisters, who, and Paul raised this point, offered to reinstate Diana's HRH.

20:20Well, the thing is, Robert Fellows isn't here to say exactly what happened, whether the Queen really did think what he'd said in that eulogy was powerful and he had every right. And that is the problem. And as Burrell has said, we are only hearing one side. It is Spencer's truth. The problem with this story is the other person, of course, Diana, is no longer here to say it. Well, that's it. And Louise, you know, I've had a long check in history with Spence.

20:45Piers Morgan:It's had moments of levity. I remember I used to do a monthly lunch at the Mirror, for example. I'd invite celebrities, business tycoons, media figures and stuff. They were always great fun. We'd have about 20 people and we'd lay it on. We'd have a good time. He came to one of them in the early 2000s and he sat opposite me. He was very charming and we got on very well. That was the last time I saw him, but certainly there was no bad feeling right there. And yet I pick up the book and his only references to me are dig, dig, dig, dig, dig. It was fine. He's perfectly entitled to. but he shows a slightly mercurial mind that he would come and sup with the devil and then whack the devil in the book.

21:20Piers Morgan:The problem here is, it seems to me, we're in this era of my truth. And I thought Paul touched on this really well about Harry as well, that people can get absolutely laser-focused on what they think their truth is, and they forget about facts. And the reason it matters more, actually, with him than Harry is that he's come off saying, I'm a historian, right? You can trust me and believe me because I am a historian. He's written some good history books. But when you're a historian and you're making basic factual errors of the kind you've made with me, which are not small mistakes, by the way, they're not.

21:53Piers Morgan:Accusing me of the worst invasion of world privacy ever and having to pay Diana a million pounds, I don't take that lightly. It's not a small mistake. But it's the way he responded. I assumed he was the editor. That's not the language of a historian. Can you defend this? I can't defend the factual error. And he's already admitted it's a factual error. There's no question about it. There's no two ways about it. You were not the editor of The Mirror at the time, period, the end. But I think it is fair to say that there's a much bigger case to be able to defend his account of the conversation. I went back through your excellent book, The Insider, which I've had for years, I've read for years.

22:27To say that you don't like Charles Spencer, according to that book, is to call the Taj Mahal a grave. I looked it up. He called you up after doing a sort of Wagatha Christie thing where he was trying to get which person was leaking to the newspapers. He called you a bastard. You called him bonkers. You called him among other things.

Read the full transcript

22:45Piers Morgan:I didn't call him bonkers to his face. No, but what you do say... Just to be clear about what you're talking about, when I was editor of the News of the World, again, an interesting insight to how he used to operate, he always saw himself as a journalist and media figure. I was editor of the News of the World, he thought one of his friends was leaking stories to us. He was right. Which he was, yeah. But what he did was he set the friend up with a fake story about him quitting Britain, quitting his wife and children, going to live and work in America. and he allowed us to run the story in the first edition.

23:12Piers Morgan:Then he called me to say, I've got you now, right? And all I remember thinking is, and we just turned the story around immediately and said, Earl Spencer's cruel con of News of the World readers, right? Yeah. All I could think of doing. But the interesting thing, he was happy for that story to appear. He could have called me before publication and once we went to him for confirmation and said, I've got you, right? Now I know who... He could have done that without the story ever appearing. There will still be people in Cornwall and Wales who are labouring under the massive misapprehension that in 1995, Earl Spencer quit his wife and kids to go and live in America because he allowed the fake story to actually be published.

23:50Piers Morgan:So, you know, it's complicated. But, but, let's just get this right. You called him, and I quote, a lying toe rag. Don't make me apologise to that prick. That's a quote. You said, this will probably have to be bleeped out, but you said, that'll teach Earl Spencer to fuck with us. When you praised, you did praise his eulogy, but you said, I don't like the guy with this. Now, you also say in your account of the conversation, he was seething with rage. In his account of the conversation, he doesn't say he was angry, but obviously you saw him as seething with rage. I said simmering. I could feel it in his voice.

24:24OK, I could sense the rage simmering in his voice. So I wrote it down. He wouldn't describe himself as angry. You saw him as angry. That's how you took the conversation. He saw you as resentful because, unsurprisingly, when you're invited by the Lord Chamberlain to go to the funeral, you're like, really? You know, this seems a bit weird. Did the Spencer family approve? And when he disinvited you, you said, you explained yourself, look, can I just say that this was when the Lord Chamberlain invited us? Yeah, but I did that very respectfully. He took, I don't doubt it, but he took it clearly as arguing the toss.

24:54I am not saying that you were arguing the toss, but he took it that way, and I think that is reasonable. I will also say, and I'm taking my life with my hands here, that although you did clearly not publish the intrusive photographs of Princess Diana, what you did do as the editor of the News of the World is publish very intrusive photographs of then-Councy Spencer at a clinic where she was getting treatment for bulimia and alcohol. Lord Spencer complained about you to the PCC and it was upheld. Hence you saying, I'll apologise to Countess Spencer, don't make me apologise to that prick. So although you didn't publish one set of intrusive photos, You did publish another, and you yourself say in the book, to be fair, Piers, you yourself say it was a mistake and I shouldn't have done it.

25:38Piers Morgan:As I've been saying all week, I'm not professing to be the Mother Teresa of Fleet Street, and I haven't been an editor for 20 years. I did make mistakes, bad ones, and I was rightly punished for them and admonished for them, and I also publicly apologised for them, and so on. So I was held to account for those things. My issue here is that he has rushed out an apology, and I didn't like him at the time, then he came to lunch and we got on very well, right? So this happens in our game, right? You and I. Exactly. In fact, you came out with some false claims about me from my book and you had to apologise.

26:11Piers Morgan:So if we're in the game of making public apologies for mistakes around books, you had to do that. 100%. So we all have our little cross to bear. And I don't dispute anything you've said. It's not really that. Let me bring John in here. It's not about that to me. It's about the credibility of him as a historian. and the moment you make a mistake of this nature and the scale of it, in my opinion, is pretty significant, it does call into question your credibility as an historian. No. I would love to say that there is nothing more important in the whole world than Piers Morgan and his relationship with Al Spencer.

26:48Piers Morgan:But I would be telling a lie. Yeah. The fact of the matter is that what this book is about is about his relationship with the king. You're able to answer back. you're able to say page by page, line by line, this is factually incorrect. The king is not in a position to be able to do that. He was able to issue a pre-bottle before the book came out saying, in general terms, you know, a sibling's grief, you know, memories may get clouded. That's all he could do. And so I don't want to feel sorry for the king when he's all-powerful, but what can he do when you have got a book like this coming out with the most egregious claims about his behaviour in the wake of the death of his ex-wife and in Earl Spencer's sister.

27:35Piers Morgan:And he can't fight back. He can't answer back. And I think there are some really fundamental questions. Yours are really important. But the fundamental questions seem to me about this is, can it be trusted that this is a fair account? He wasn't keeping a diary, as we understand it. He told friends. It's 29 years later. I mean, do I remember every conversation I had from 29 years ago? Not really. And would I have put them in quotation marks? I probably wouldn't. So that... You said you would never seek to make money out of your sister. I mean, you've said that if you win this libel action, any money is going to the King's Trust.

28:14Piers Morgan:Do we know what's going to happen to the money that is coming in? The millions that are going to come in. The millions that are going to come in. Yeah. No, we don't. And he was on camera, I will never profit from my sister. Exactly. And he castigated all those who did. So I think that there are really fundamental questions. Yeah. I mean, he's done some interviews. I think there are still some pretty searching questions for Earl Spencer to answer. Look, I know he's a member of the aristocracy. I know he lives in this fantastic mansion. You know, all through. It's stunning, I'm sure. But he is a bloke who's publishing a book with some very contentious claims.

28:51Piers Morgan:And if you're doing an interview with him, you've surely got to do an accountability interview where you say, I'm sorry, we've got to put this to you. What about the money? Why are you doing this 29 years after she died? How can the king possibly respond to these claims when he's sitting on the throne? How can you, with a straight face, say, I didn't want to attack the king, when the main headline that preempts the serialisation is you launching the most vicious attack on the king imaginable? Piers, you said it yourself, that he badges himself as a historian, yeah? He also badges himself as a journalist.

29:22Piers Morgan:And if you write something down and you've got a journalist sense, you know what the headline is. And we haven't even got to his little lunch with Diana where she says, I've got to get divorced because Charles is in love with his valet, right? Just drops this in. Now, we in Fleet Street all knew about this rumour. I think it was a ridiculous, untrue rumour about Charles' supposed relationship with this valet. We know who the valet was. I won't repeat it here. But I know all about this. But he just casually puts this in, again, as an historian, and then says, well, I don't know if it's true or not.

29:53Piers Morgan:Well, a genuine historian wouldn't just fly a rumour suggesting that King Charles is secretly gay and having an affair with his valet without actually thinking, maybe as a historian, I shouldn't put that in. Also, you and I have both written books. We know when serialisation is up... Of course! ..what bits are going to be taken out for serial. And did he complain, by the way, when that line was the main headline? Or did he say to the Daily Mail, no, you shouldn't have this... Or did he ring the publishers and say, print more copies? Right? Let me bring Paul Burrell back in here. Paul, you know the thing I'm really thinking about is, what would Diana have thought about this if she was still alive?

30:34Piers Morgan:And obviously it doesn't quite work that way because a lot of what he's talking about is post her death. But I can't imagine that Diana would have wanted her brother to launch such a vicious attack on Charles. You know, I had some moments with Dinah about Charles, and I always remember this one, that when the Dimbleby, Jonathan Dimbleby book came out about Charles, the authorised biography, and there was a remarkable line in there, which they were told they couldn't use as a headline, but it said that in the book it becomes clear that Charles was never really in love with Dinah. She got somebody to call me at the News of the World and said, that's completely untrue.

31:13Piers Morgan:you have photographs of our secret second honeymoon in your safe, which we asked you not to run at the time, and the News of the World didn't. You now have my permission to run them. And there were pictures of them in the ocean, very loving, kissing, cuddling and everything else in the ocean. We ran them over a number of pages with the headline, the proof that Charles did love Diana, and she loved it. And that showed to me, here was a young woman who married very young to a much older guy, who was in love with somebody else, couldn't be with her. It's like a Shakespearean tragedy in a way. But it really meant a lot to Diana that she loved him.

31:53Piers Morgan:And towards the very end, and you would be the best person to ask, towards the very end, they had some quite poignant, happy times together, fleeting, right? They did. And I remember the time when he came to the door and he wrote the doorbell and answered the doorbell and he stood there. And he said, is the princess in? I said, she's upstairs, Your Old Highness. I said, well, can I see her? So I said, well, this way. He says, I know the way. So he barged past me and up the staircase into her room, and she wasn't there. And I nipped down to the dressing room and said, you'd never guess who's here.

32:23He's come to see you. What's he doing here? He hasn't come to take away more furniture, has he? He said, I don't know what he wants. She said, what does my hair look like? I'm like, do I look all right? Do I look? I said, you look great. Go on, go on. Kill him. So she went across the corridor and, Charles, how lovely to see you. oh, it's been so long. This was a couple who had matured in years and accepted each other's positions in life. She'd accepted the fact that Camilla was the love of his life. She always loved him, always. Until the very end, she loved him. She was the mother of his children.

33:02She loved him. And whatever love is, his famous quote, in his world, he couldn't quite quantify what love was between Camilla and Diana. They were two very different loves, but he did love her in his own way.

33:18Piers Morgan:So what do, just back to my question. You're not worried about hosting for the holidays? Oh, Wayfair's got me covered with holiday decor, extra dining chairs, and guest bedding, all with tons of five-star reviews, so there's no surprises. Unless Uncle Matt brings his dogs again. For worry-free hosting, Wayfair delivers. What do you think she would have made of this book coming out now with what it's doing? It would never have happened. Or I would hope it would never have happened. She would say, think about my boys, Charles. Think about the rest of my family and the troubles they're going through at the moment.

33:51This is not going to help them. It's not going to help William. He's on his path to becoming king. It's not going to help Harry, who's in a mess at the moment. So she would ask him not to write it. I think that would be the best path forward. Interestingly, when you... Interestingly, I thought about Robert Fellows, today, because I thought if Robert Fellows was alive today, that book would not have been written, because he would have stood up in the Queen's Corner.

34:17Piers Morgan:And, you know, I'm reminded, Paul, as you're talking, that in Harry's memoir, Spare, he described how he believed you were milking her death for money when he wrote your book, A Royal Duty, adding it made my blood boil. I mean, again, the brass neck. The brass neck to do that. I had to go to the highest court in the land. I had to suffer two weeks of prosecution and never have a defence and I was set free by Her Majesty the Queen herself. You were. Never before. When you see Harry and now Spencer both doing the opposite of what they said they would ever do, both making money out of Diana. We now hear that Harry's working on some documentary about it for the 30th anniversary.

35:00Piers Morgan:He's cleared the path for Harry now. He's set the stage for Harry. Now having written his book, the stage is clear now for Harry to do his documentary. And that's why I feel that Harry has fallen into the Spencer camp. Katie, you know, we've covered the royals for a long time, right? I don't dispute that Spencer has a right to write the book. I do think it's important to remember what he said in 1998. Can you imagine anybody making a profit at their brother or sister's death? It's so low, it's inconceivable. I don't know anyone who would. I will never profit from Diana's death. How does that square with this?

35:38How does that square with Harry and William both saying on the 20th anniversary, this is the last time we're going to speak about our mother and now we know that Harry is going to be working on a documentary ahead of the 30th anniversary? It's... I have to say, I think Paul hits it absolutely on the head when he says this is about them. You know, even in death 30 years on, sort of squabbling over who is going to reclaim this narrative, who is going to be the closest, the one to be able to tell her story. And it really just does come across, I think, as very unedifying when all they said they wanted was for Diana to rest in peace.

36:15Well, that's the very last thing that's happening.

36:18Piers Morgan:I mean, Louise, do you believe that his motivation is really about paying tribute to Diana? How does that square with these stories about the lottery winning, you know, giddiness and so on? I mean, no-one writes that if your motivation is to say what a lovely person Diana is. You're doing it because you want to get maximum damaging headlines against her ex-husband, who's now the king. Look, obviously, Lord Spencer is extremely angry with the royal family and blames Prince Charles immensely, as he then was, for what he did with Camilla and feels that his sister was betrayed and he cares very much about it.

36:52Piers Morgan:I mean, Diana had loads of affairs too. She did indeed. I mean, loads of affairs. Indeed. There are some that I know about that no-one knows about. Including with Julia Carling, Will Carling, who at the time, his wife, the then-wife, was my constituent. James Hewitt, Oliver Hall, I mean... Absolutely. Look, none of us are perfect, including members of the royal family, including Princess Diana, including Charles Spencer, including you and me, right? That's absolutely true. But he did actually mention, when he said part of his motivation for writing this book was that he'd been asked by his nephew, asked by a nephew, to contribute to a forthcoming documentary, and he didn't want other people to be able to frame it.

37:29He wanted to be able to put his recollections of his history in his own way. Is he making money? Yes, he is. But he's also just sold a small part of Althorpe's estate for 60 million quid. So I really don't think that money is the primary motivation here. I think it's been 30 years. He's bottled it up. He's written, most recently, a book about the abusive school that he went to as a young boy. Which was powerful. It was powerful. I think he's partly doing this for his own mental health to get his version of it out, as you would say, uncensored, what he believes and what he has. And as far as their estrangement, let's not forget that Diana did say in her will that she left Spencer, if anything happened to Charles, as the guardian of her children.

38:09So that estrangement cannot have been that much. She didn't leave her two sisters the guardians of her children, she left just her brother. So sometimes we all have fights in our families, lots of your viewers are going to have fights in their families. The fundamental love was still there, and I think that's what we should remember. at this time when we're going backwards and forwards about who said what to whom?

38:27Piers Morgan:Yeah, John, you know, there's going to be a lot of fallout from this, obviously. I guess the question is how damaging ultimately it may be to King Charles or otherwise. I think public opinion is siding a lot more with him, actually, over all this than it is with Spencer at the moment. You know, Charles, King Charles, not a perfect man. He's committed to many failings and faults. Earl Spencer is not a perfect person. It is a family here, albeit one that lives in the biggest soap opera bubble of them all. What do you feel about the sort of consequences of this book? Yeah, that's a really interesting question, because I think the consequences are different in different geographical territories.

39:06Piers Morgan:I mean, I was always struck when I was based in America, in Washington, how even the most sophisticated Washingtonians who were part of, you know, the political circles and foreign policy elite would say, what do you think about the way Charles treated Diana? I was thinking, hang on, that was 20 years ago. What do you mean? we're not talking about that in Britain anymore. He's married Camilla, she's, you know, etc, etc. We've moved on. I suspect in America this will play very powerfully of what Charles Spencer has said. I think in Britain, I think you're absolutely right, the sympathy will be with the king as yet another drama is played out in public.

39:42And I can't just help kind of thinking about the irony

39:45Piers Morgan:that you've got people talking about the invasion of privacy and that these people are not allowed to live their lives and their privacy is invaded by a terrible press and, let's face it, the press have been terrible at times. But isn't this an invasion of the privacy? Aren't these books that are authored by the key players? Nobody has invaded royal privacy more than Harry did with his book. Nobody. Or the Oprah Winfrey interview, whatever. That was the biggest inside hatchet job we've ever seen. You know, the newspapers and stuff would rely on sources and tips and so on. but you're on the outside peering in over the palace gate walls, right?

40:23Piers Morgan:In Harry's case, he's the insider, spray-gunning them all. I mean, the thing that always lived with me was the way that he revealed in his book private conversations that took place at Prince Philip's funeral between him, William and Charles. Think about that. More intrusive. Spencer's done exactly the same. Yeah. He has done exactly the same. And to the point you're making, because I write for Vanity Fair, I see the impact on an international audience. This isn't a constitutional crisis. I'm not saying that. But the fact that we're all here talking, the fact that, Piers, you're making headlines around the world, shows the power of Diana 30 years on.

40:58Yes. And the damage that can be done if the king is seen to have been that uncompassionate, to not have that empathy, it doesn't matter that it's 30 years on. It still has a huge impact.

41:11Piers Morgan:And here's the key point. And he knows it. He knows it. He knows it. As a journalist and historian, he knew the power of what he was saying and that's why he put it in the book. And Penguin knew it, which is why they were very happy for this to be the lead headlines that came out of it. Paul, let me come back to you. I mean, the other line, of course, which got huge attention was Charles supposedly saying, we'll forget about her soon. That was 1997. That was never going to happen. We're still talking about Diana. We will be for centuries to come. She was a completely mesmerising, mercurial, complex, but extraordinary figure.

41:46Piers Morgan:I mean, the biggest celebrity I've ever seen in my lifetime, with the possible exception of Donald Trump now. But she was. She was a global superstar. I said to her once, did you ever wish you could just be anonymous again? She went, where would I go? She said, I could go to Iceland and be in an igloo, and an Eskimo would say, you're Princess Diana. And it really struck me that, you know? And the other thing I remember, she took me to the window and she said, look, there's the National Enquirer motorbike. She went through all the paparazzi and the mainly American crews, actually, that used to hang around and follow her.

42:21Piers Morgan:And she said, every time I go out... As you know, loads of ways to get out of the palace. And every time I leave, you know, we're in a chase. And I went, you could give them a slip if you wanted to. And she was a police-trained driver. She was a brilliant driver, got police-trained. and she gave me the distinct impression she liked running around London with these guys because it cheered up a boring wet Wednesday. So part of her was like torn between hating them and thinking, well, actually, this could be a bit of fun on a Wednesday. But she knew what the game was, Pierce. She knew how to play it.

42:56And that's why she invited you to Kensington Palace because she wanted to hear what you thought and she wanted to tell you personally what she felt. and so the two of you could come together and give something good. And that was unprecedented back in the day. And what you have to think is you now have to look through the eyes of those times, the 80s. That was a very different time to now. And we all are in the danger of looking through today's eyes at this subject. Go back and see how she struggled, see how she fought it. and Harry should have known better to do what he did because he was taught by the best tutor you could ever have, his mummy.

43:40She taught him exactly what to do and how to do it and his job was to be William's wingman and he's forgotten it.

43:48Piers Morgan:And you know who's behaving with incredible dignity right now? Prince William. William, yes. I mean, I take my hat off to the provocation he must be under to respond. William and Catherine are exceptional. I totally agree. I want to end on a purely selfish personal note, Paul, for you to clear something up that was published in the Daily Mail's diary today, the gossip column, from the former chef, Darren Brady, who was the chef who I think prepared our meal that day. Yes, and he would know everything, wouldn't he? Well, this is what I want to ask you, because apparently, according to the Mail, he quotes Diana as saying that I was a jerk after lunch.

44:24Piers Morgan:Is that your recollection? Because I thought lunch went really well. That is not my recollection. Piers, stop it. that he should behave himself too, because that is not my recollection. No, you know it's not. You know you won her over, and you know that. Thank you, Paul Burrell. You see, you're the kind of historian that I think we should hear more from. That's the truth! That was my recollection, because we did get on great. You did, like a house on fire. And we spoke a lot, you know, and it was... You did. Again, a part of it, I slightly resent what he's trying to position himself as the great, you know, protector against the all-powerful, nasty, vile media.

45:06Piers Morgan:She had a very similar relationship with Richard Kay, another journalist that she respected and got on with. You know, I never claimed to be a friend of hers, but we were friendly. And we worked out a way of working together where... I don't want to blow smoke in your direction, but she liked you. You know what? Thank you, Paul. That's better than hearing she thought I was a jerk. And by the way, Darren McGrady, the food wasn't great. LAUGHTER I'm just saying. Did you have baked beans? I've got to say, the butler service was fantastic. And the lunch companions were great. You and your cooking can do one.

45:42Piers Morgan:If anything, ironically, I would have preferred a nice slab of jerk chicken. Thank you to my panel. Really appreciate it. It's a fascinating story. It's going to roll and roll. We have a new episode, Katie, tomorrow. Dropping of Royals Uncensored, the fastest-growing royal show in the world. Huge numbers you guys are getting. Very proud of you. Keep it up. And, you know, if you can't do numbers when this is all going, you never will. It's extraordinary, isn't it? Just when we think the royals are calming down, people are losing interest. Bang. Here we are. Front page news all over the world. Paul, thank you in particular.

46:14Piers Morgan:You're welcome. Really appreciate you giving me the first interview. I've been really fascinated to hear what you had to say about all this. And you haven't disappointed. I kept quiet until you came along. Yeah. Well, thank you. I appreciate it. And I found all of what you said very powerful, particularly about Charles' state of mind in the aftermath of the death. So, really important contribution to the debate. Thank you very much. Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we ask for only one simple thing. Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

46:50Piers Morgan:And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain. and we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it without you.

47:07You're not worried about hosting for the holidays? Oh, Wayfair's got me covered with holiday decor, extra dining chairs and guest bedding, all with tons of five-star reviews, so there's no surprises. Unless Uncle Matt brings his dogs again. For worry-free hosting, Wayfair delivers.

From the publisher

The current biggest story in the UK media is Piers Morgan threatening legal action against Earl Spencer over false allegations he made about him in his new book about his sister, the late Princess Diana.

And, although Spencer has since issued a statement apologizing and admitting he hadn’t checked his facts properly, Piers has instructed his lawyers to still get in touch.

Earl Spencer will make a lot of money from this book, which is why Piers is demanding a payment to Charles’ charity The  King’s Trust.

He’s already being judged in the court of public opinion -  and depending on what he does next, a court of law may have to determine the rest.

Joining Piers to discuss the ongoing story is Princess Diana’s former butler Paul Burrell, The Royals Uncensored host Katie Nicholl, The News Agents host Jon Sopel and former Conservative MP Louise Mensch.

(00:00:00) Introduction

(00:05:16) Paul Burrell on ‘vengeful’ Earl Spencer

(00:13:50) Diana’s relationship with her brother

(00:17:40) Jon Sopel, Louise Mensch and Katie Nicholl 

(00:21:22) Louise Mensch defends Earl Spencer

(00:25:56) “Egregious” accusations against the King 

(00:30:20) What would Diana make of Swan Song?

(00:34:38) Upcoming Prince Harry documentary on Diana

(00:38:00) How will the book be received in America?

(00:41:54) Paul Burrell on Diana ‘playing the game’
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Piers Morgan Uncensored

All 333 episodes
“He’s VENGEFUL!” Diana Butler SLAMS Earl Spencer And Defends King As Piers Morgan Plans To SuePiers Morgan Uncensored · 49 min
Listen in VO