"It's JARRING!" Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey' DISMANTLED By Victor Davis Hanson & Nerdrotic

15 Jul 2026 · 47 min · 20 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode debates Christopher Nolan’s film The Odyssey and the backlash over “woke” casting and alleged feminist or LGBTQ subversion.

Guests

Victor Davis Hanson (Hoover Institute historian/senior fellow); A.M. Wilson (novelist/biographer/journalist; father of Emily Wilson, whose Odyssey translation is cited); Daniel Mendelsohn (scholar/critic/author; wrote on Odyssey translations); Mark Lamont Hill (BET News host); Will Jordan “The Critical Drinker” (YouTuber); Gary Buechler “Nerdrotic” (YouTuber).

Key claims

Hanson argues race-swapped casting is acceptable if not “jarring” to narrative; he calls the feminist claims overstated and says Homer already features powerful women. Mendelsohn and others argue some translations “de-heroize” Odysseus (e.g., translating a cunning adjective as “liar”) and that the film’s central character should remain multifaceted. Panelists cite examples like Lupita Nyong’o as Helen, Samantha Morton as Circe, and Elliot Page as Sinon, plus comparisons to prior controversies (e.g., whitewashing in older films, Bond casting debates).

Notable examples

“pre-colonial Africa” analogy, Greek open-letter complaint about no Greek actors, and claims Helen appears only ~45 seconds.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The Odyssey: A Modern Take

0:15 to 1:30

Discussion on Christopher Nolan's interpretation of The Odyssey and its implications.

“It's set within a very specific geographical location and time.”

Casting Controversies

1:30 to 2:30

Exploration of the racial casting choices in the film and their significance to the narrative.

“its colourblind casting and its reputedly feminist undertones.”

Cultural Appropriation Debate

2:30 to 4:12

Victor Davis Hanson discusses cultural appropriation and how it relates to the film's characters.

“It's kind of a minor one, I think, that I thought, because that is considered the national epic of the Greek people.”

Feminist Perspectives on The Odyssey

4:12 to 8:41

Discussion on the feminist reinterpretation of The Odyssey and its historical accuracy.

“So I don't think it's going to be, I don't think it will affect the reception of that character.”

Emily Wilson's Translation

8:41 to 11:00

A.M. Wilson discusses the implications of Emily Wilson's feminist translation of The Odyssey.

“Well, let's bring in some of our other guests, A.M.”

Critiques of Modern Adaptations

11:00 to 13:00

Daniel Mendelsohn critiques modern adaptations for removing heroic elements from Odysseus's character.

“So, Daniel, you've been quite critical of the translation for being too keen to strip the heroic and masculine out of the original Odyssey.”

Odysseus as a Complex Character

13:00 to 14:00

Discussion on the complexity of Odysseus’s character and the importance of maintaining his traits in adaptations.

“Because, I mean, I think Emily is enormously charmed by a disuse, just to make that point.”

Exploring Odysseus' Character Flaws

14:00 to 16:20

Discuss the complexities of Odysseus as a character, highlighting his flaws and duality.

“They call him Ulysses, we call him Odysseus if we're Greek.”

The Relationship Between Odysseus and Telemachus

16:20 to 17:00

Examine the emotional bond between Odysseus and his son Telemachus.

“Thank you very much indeed for joining us.”

Critique of Casting in 'The Odyssey' Movie

17:00 to 19:00

Engage in a discussion on the controversies surrounding the casting choices in the recent adaptation of 'The Odyssey'.

“It's being driven in part by the movie fan community on YouTube, which is very vociferous.”
Show all 20 chapters

Debating Historical Accuracy vs. Artistic Freedom

19:00 to 27:20

Challenge the balance between historical representation and creative liberties in film adaptations.

“If it's mythic, if it's fantasy, or if the artist is explicitly saying, hey, we're not playing on historical accuracies precisely because of the fantasy aspect of it, I'm fine with it.”

The Broader Implications of Film Adaptations

27:20 to 28:00

Discuss the relevance of how adaptations represent historical figures and narratives in modern society.

“And we know, you know, we have a sense of what historical characters look like.”

Film Accuracy vs. Spirit of the Original

28:00 to 29:18

Discussion on whether a film can stay true to the spirit of its source material despite inaccuracies.

“You know, everyone's hysterical that the ship isn't accurate, the armor isn't accurate, the costumes aren't accurate.”

Cultural Interpretation and Identity

29:18 to 30:34

Exploration of cultural representation and the expectations around ethnic and racial identities in storytelling.

“Critical Drinker, whose video on the Odyssey has had over 5 million views.”

Contemporary Casting Controversies

30:34 to 32:46

Debate over modern casting choices and their implications for film adaptations, including discussions about LGBTQ representation.

“I mean, the fact that we're still showing the Odyssey, playing the Odyssey, reenacting the Odyssey, rewriting the Odyssey.”

Cultural Wars in Film Adaptation

32:46 to 36:22

Analysis of the intersection of culture wars and film adaptations, focusing on audience reactions to changes in character portrayals.

“So that was inevitable, I guess, from the online stuff, because that's what the online world does.”

Response to Critique of The Odyssey

36:22 to 38:25

Discussion on public reactions to critiques of the new film adaptation of The Odyssey, including a notable online exchange.

“The two minor characters are the two sisters, Kleiner Mestre and Helen in The Odyssey.”

Nolan's Unique Storytelling Style

38:25 to 41:38

Examination of Christopher Nolan's narrative style and its suitability for adapting Homer's Odyssey.

“Now, Elon Musk disagreed, saying Chris Nolan desecrated The Odyssey so that he would be eligible for an Academy Award.”

Box Office Predictions for The Odyssey

41:38 to 42:01

Predictions about the financial success of The Odyssey, comparing it to Nolan's previous films and discussing market implications.

“So, Critical Drinker, is this going to be another Nolan smash hit, do you think?”

Film Predictions and Business Models

42:01 to 43:40

Explore predictions for Nolan's film and the impact of box office success on content creators.

“It's definitely not going to lose money, put it that way.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Piers Morgan:And we're live on Matchday as Doug reaches for a Buffalo wing. He's got it. Oh, and he's gone for a can of Pepsi too. What a finish. There's no doubt about it. It just tastes better. Matchdays deserve Pepsi. The Odyssey is this epic fantasy story, but it's fantasy grounded in the real world. It's set within a very specific geographical location and time. It partakes of a trend that we have seen in recent years to sort of, let's call it, de-heroize Odysseus. The reason I smirked was because there's a long history in Hollywood of white people playing characters that shouldn't be black people. I mean, when, I mean, Charlton Heston is Moses was kind of wild.

0:41We're trying to challenge traditional beliefs. Well, that's something Christopher Nolan doesn't usually do. This is a game he doesn't usually play. To make this national epic, which the Greek people feel is a continuous tradition from the 7th, 8th century, and not have a single Greek, it's kind of jarring when you go out of your way to get other people who would cause controversy and sometimes in a subversive manner.

1:04Piers Morgan:Is it better for your business model that this is a massive turkey or a massive hit? With the notable exception of Top Gun Maverick, there's no longer such a thing as an epic blockbuster with no strings attached. Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey, based on Homer's Sparling Poem, is one of the biggest and most anticipated movies of the year. It's therefore no surprise that its release this week has been marred by furious debate about its historical accuracy, its colourblind casting and its reputedly feminist undertones. Critics say it's Snow White on steroids, a beloved classic shattered by the woke wrecking ball of demonic Hollywood.

1:41Piers Morgan:This time they argue it's gone too far. The victims of the alleged wokewashing are not merely fictional dwarf helpers, but the characters of a foundational text in the grand sweep of Western civilization. But are they missing the point? Isn't Hollywood's role to reflect the changing world around us and not simply parrot the legends of ancient history? We have not one but two epic panels to debate this, beginning with the classics. Daniel Mendelsohn is a scholar, critic and best-selling author of an odyssey, a father, a son, and an epic. His translation of Homer's poem was published this spring in paperback.

2:15Piers Morgan:A.M. Wilson is a novelist, biographer, and journalist. Also the father of Emily Wilson, whose feminist translation of the Odyssey is said to be the basis of Christopher Nolan's new movie. But first, let's talk to the historian and senior fellow at the Hoover Institute, Victor Davis Hanson. Victor, great to see you. Great to have you back on Uncensored. Thank you. What's your beef with the Odyssey? It's kind of a minor one, I think, that I thought, because that is considered the national epic of the Greek people. It might have been magnanimous of Christopher Lloyd to include someone in the tradition of Irene Pappas or Melina McCurry, a great Greek-American actor.

2:50But the whole idea of cultural appropriation is very controversial. I have no problem with a character in a plane, a role that the original author did not really envision, as long as it's symmetrical. And by that I mean if you want to wear dreadlocks and you're white, that's fine. If you want to wear a blonde wig and you're black, that's fine. Just so it's reciprocal. The only problem is when the character is so far off from what the author intended that it affects the narrative. So I don't think it would be wise to make a movie with a white Martin Luther King bio or a black Abraham Lincoln. It would be too jarring.

3:29But I have no problem that he's using an African-American character for Helen and Clytemnestra. They're two characters. They were mythologically sisters, so there's no problem there. Zorba the Greek was played by a Mexican-American actor, Anthony Quinn. He did a brilliant job. It's only when it's so jarring that it deliberately interrupts the narrative in a way that it's almost impossible to follow So if it's a character deviation or, you know, if somebody has one arm and the character has two arms. But the Greeks were very tolerant of, and I don't really think that they had a notion of racial distinctions like we do.

4:11The Ethiopians are described by Homer elsewhere as the most noble of all people. So I don't think it's going to be, I don't think it will affect the reception of that character. and whether Helen and Clytemnestra are well-acted or whether they enhance or detract from the narrative or the film adaptation of it will depend on the quality of the performance.

4:35Piers Morgan:Yeah, I agree with that. I think that what has caught most attention, and I think you have a view about this, is that Lupita Nyong 'o, who plays Helen of Troy, she gave a recent press interview in which she seemed to criticise Homer for the lack of time he gave to women in his original work, instead choosing to tell the story from the masculine side, as she put it. Let's take a look. I'd be like, so, Homer, how do you feel about the screen time given to these women, considering how little you spent with them? Oh! OK. And then do you lean forward and look at him like that? Yes, like, hmm? Remember us?

5:17Piers Morgan:Now, at the premiere of the movie, Samantha Morton, who plays the Greek goddess and sorceress Circe took the opportunity to reinforce the idea that this was a feminist reimagining of the mythical story. Let's take a look at that. In history, women have been vilified, whether you're a midwife, whether you're a herbalist, whether you're a healer, whether you're just in tune with the moon. Women have just been vilified throughout history, and I think that that was my take on it. But also Chris's interpretation of the original text and then like kind of condensing it into this like essential oil of Circe was phenomenal.

5:58And I just worked from the text. It was all there for me.

6:04Piers Morgan:So basically, I think the modern vernacular would be Homer was a bit of a sexist pig. He made it all about men. And this film redresses the balance to make it actually more equal in terms of gender presence? I'm not sure that's accurate. That's my vernacular version. Yeah, Lupita, you know, she admitted that she had never read The Odyssey as an undergraduate or graduate. I don't know how you can do that in today's education in Hampshire and Yale. So if she had read it, I think she... And had thought about it for a long time. It's one of the most pro-feminist works of Greek literature. And it's really the seminal work because Homer is contiguous with the rise of the Greek city-state.

6:47And if you look, there's every aspect of womanhood in that play. There's the loyal, crafty, brilliant Penelope who saves the kingdom while Odysseus is gallivanting around or is enduring all of these perils. She outwits these men. You've got Circe who sort of reifies the idea that men can be pigs by actually turning them into pigs. She's all-powerful. You have Athena, kind of the Parthenos, the virgin goddess, but she's also the goddess of wisdom. She's the most stable of all the Greek gods and in some cases the most powerful. She's the person who allows Odysseus to get home. You've got Calypso who kind of has created her own area where she defines her own sexuality.

7:31Then you've got Helen, the most beautiful woman in the world, and her sort of nefarious sister, Clytemestra. So you've got almost every type of expression, whether it's domestic or single or divine, in that epic. And then you even have the monstrous women, the Scylla, and the Sirens, who are all powerful and kind of evil. So the main character is a male, but most of the males don't end up well. or are not portrayed well, whether it's the 102 suitors or it's the crew of Odysseus that always breaks his advice to be moderate and temperate and not offend the gods, and they all end up dying, or it's the weak-kneed Menelaus, or it's the haughty but not very talented Agamemnon.

8:21So it's, I would say, I would say for that period in the, it was probably composed somewhere orally around 700 to 675, that that was one of the most enlightened works of Western literature in the history of Western literature. So I didn't understand the criticism of the actresses, but I haven't seen the movie yet.

8:42Piers Morgan:Well, let's bring in some of our other guests, A.M. Wilson and Daniel Mendelsohn, to start with. Well, A.M. Wilson, your own daughter, Emily, wrote what people have perceived to be a kind of feminist translation of the Odyssey. A.D. recognised that characterisation? I mean, from what Victor was just saying, it sounds like it didn't particularly need feminising, but what is your view? Well, I wouldn't wish to speak for Emily, whom I adore and admire, but the last speaker, Victor, was bang on right. This is a book very largely about females, and after all, don't forget the whole war broke out, partly because a female semi-divine figure, Helen was abducted and partly because the female deities particularly Pallas Athene but also Hera the sister stroke wife of Zeus the chief god wanted to happen so women are very very powerful figures in this story and they're certainly very dominant figures and also another person I'd like to bring to mind who isn't perhaps very familiar to all the audiences on both sides of the Atlantic is a Victorian scholar and writer called Samuel Butler, who was so filled with the ideas that Victor was just expressing that he believed that Homer was a woman.

10:03Piers Morgan:That's really? That the author of The Odyssey must have been a woman because he was so sympathetic to the female point of view. So I don't think Emily Wilson, who's a great woman and has herself in a recent interview in one of the newspapers, the Financial Times, said she doesn't really hold herself as particularly modern. She thinks of herself as a sort of late Victorian. I think she's following along in this Victorian tradition of realising that the Odyssey is very sympathetic to the feminine. So, just to be clear, I mean, you're not speaking for Emily, but... No, I'm not. She wouldn't like me to speak for...

10:35Piers Morgan:Right, but you know her view about this. I mean, is she a little bit taken aback by this raging online debate about the supposed over-feminising of the movie because that in some way goes against the integrity of the original Odyssey. Well, Emily is a US citizen. She knows what the United States is like and she knows that there are sort of culture wars going on all the time. So she's not taken aback by anything, I don't think. Let me bring in Daniel. So, Daniel, you've been quite critical of the translation for being too keen to strip the heroic and masculine out of the original Odyssey. Is that right?

11:15Piers Morgan:Sorry? Which translation? Well, of Emily's version for the movie. Well, I think, I mean, I don't... My criticism of Emily's translation, I think, has to do with the way that it partakes of a trend that we have seen in recent years to sort of, let's call it, de-heroise Odysseus. So I think, you know, when there's a choice between two alternative possible translations for a word describing Odysseus, she'll use the most pejorative possible words. So, for example, there's an adjective in Greek that most people translate as extremely cunning or extremely clever. She translates it as liar, you know.

12:05And I've seen this in other movie versions. For example, the movie The Return that came out a couple of years ago sort of strips away all of the glamour of Homer's Odyssey. You know, Homer's Odyssey has its protagonist, a character who is brilliant, funny, charming, insinuating, seductive, as well as being, you know, a Bronze Age hero. He's not averse to violence. He's not averse to trickery of a very dastardly kind. But he's an extremely complicated, to use Emily's adjective, character. And I do see in recent both scholarly writing about the Odyssey in this movie, a kind of stripping away of Odysseus, what used to be seen as these sort of glamorous, brilliant, scintillating qualities of the character and making him into this as somebody just on Twitter referred to Odysseus as a mass murderer.

13:06you know uh so i do think that's a problem i think you have to give this character all of his many facets and in my own translation i'm trying to sort of be as scrupulous as possible not in in trying to turn homer into something that fits our ideas of masculinity or whatever but as somebody who reflects the values of a you know a very remote culture in which a certain kind of as we would say performative masculinity was not considered to be a bad thing. OK.

13:40Piers Morgan:Let me bring in... We can talk like this for this. Can I just reply to that? Yeah, I wanted to give you a reply. Because, I mean, I think Emily is enormously charmed by a disuse, just to make that point. And one of the points she makes is that charming men often are extremely dishonest. But, I mean, Virgil, for example, who was Homer's greatest fan and created his Aeneid out of the Trojan story, one of the very first things that the Trojans were wondering whether to bring a wooden horse into Troy, which is what led to its destruction, says, is this really the way that we understood Ulysses' character?

14:18Piers Morgan:They call him Ulysses, we call him Odysseus if we're Greek. But in other words, Odysseus, among many other things, was a notorious liar and he lies and deceives and gives different versions of events throughout the Odyssey. And that's part of the humour. I mean, among other things, it's a very humorous epic. And one of the things that we enjoy about Odysseus, certainly I know Emily because I've known her for over 50 years, she enjoys about his character is that he is dishonest. And I don't think Homer, to give her her old-fashioned Greek word name, I don't think Homer wants to deceive us into thinking that Homer was...

15:01Piers Morgan:Thinking that Odysseus was a very upright film. Has he been unheroed in the way that Daniel just articulated? I don't think so, because he's shown to be very brave. He's shown to be a good dad. Thinking back to your... An earlier guest on the programme in which somebody was sharing the most horrific details with his son about erections and so forth, a man called Brian Johnson. Brian Johnson, yeah. But, I mean, I think there's a very good... Not bromance, but a very good relationship between Telemachus and Odysseus. And they weep together. And also, it's a very... Among other things which we haven't mentioned, Odysseus is sitting with this beautiful woman, Talipso, having what many of us, if we were sad old men, think was rather a wonderful time on her island, having lots of sex and food brought to himself.

15:45Piers Morgan:And he sits weeping, thinking of his wife at home. And she, similarly, in Ithaca, is weeping, thinking of him, even though he's been deceiving her all through the marriage, and she knows that. but nonetheless they love one another. So there's been no deliberate Wilson plot? I don't think there's a Wilson plot. Dear hero. No, very much not. And heroes are not the same as saints. And heroes are full of... Mostly flawed characters. They are flawed characters. Think of Achilles with the other great Homeric poem, The Iliad. He's full of the most terrible flaws. And you've got to leave us. Thank you very much indeed for joining us.

16:22Piers Morgan:We really appreciate it. It's amazing. Thank you so much. Expert family response. And the great thing is that we should always read... I mean, the first speaker, Victor, saying he couldn't understand students going to a university and not reading Homer. And I can understand it, but I do wish they would because it's just the best book in the world and Western literature has just been downhill ever since. Well, well said. They should. And Victor, I think, would absolutely agree. Thank you very much indeed for joining. Thank you, Piers. We're going to sub you out, A.M. Wilson, with a brilliant contribution.

16:52Piers Morgan:We're going to bring in two of our, or three of our, regular guests, actually, to talk about a lot of the more negative reaction to the Odyssey movie. It's being driven in part by the movie fan community on YouTube, which is very vociferous. So we're going to bring in two of the biggest names in that space, Will Jordan, a.k.a. The Critical Drinker, and Gary Buechler, who's the nodrotic, of course. That's rounding off our truly epic panel, host of BET News, Mark Lamont Hill. So welcome to the three of you. And Victor has kindly agreed to stay here. Now, Victor teed this up by saying, at the start, critical drinker.

17:26Piers Morgan:The fuss exclusively about the choice of having Lupita Nyong 'o, a black woman, African-American actress, playing Helen of Troy was, you know, somehow wrong. Because mythology has her, even though she's not a real person, has her as a white woman, this shouldn't have been the case. What is your view? yeah i mean it's worth keeping in mind that something like the odyssey is this epic fantasy story but it's fantasy grounded in the real world it's set within a very specific geographical location and time and like any geographical location and time it has demographics of people that are believable in that time and people who are not and the best way to to contextualize this kind of decision is say you had a movie set in pre-colonial africa and one of the tribal leaders was a random white guy and none of the other characters thought that that was even remotely strange no one reacted to it and there was no explanation for it that's kind of the similar situation to what you have with the odyssey it doesn't really make sense contextually and i think that's what people are reacting to and this is coming off the back of a period within hollywood movie making where there has been a lot of rather bizarre race swaps of characters.

18:46I mean if you go back to you know things like we produced over here in the UK we've had an Asian Sir Isaac Newton we've had a black Anne Boleyn these are real historical characters but we're now supposed to pretend that they're a completely different race and it doesn't make sense.

19:01Piers Morgan:Right Martin Monhill I saw you smirking with derision there I think I think I'm right in identifying the nature of the smirk um but if i said to you look i'm going to be starring as othello next week in a massive broadway version of shakespeare's great play would you feel that would be appropriate given i'm a white guy uh first you you read my my smirk correctly your powers of observation and analysis have really sharpened since i started coming on the show you're welcome um i i think for For me, the question is always, is it historically accurate? Yes. But also, what's the genre? If it's mythic, if it's fantasy, or if the artist is explicitly saying, hey, we're not playing on historical accuracies precisely because of the fantasy aspect of it, I'm fine with it.

19:53But if you're actually not doing that, you're not eyes wide open, you don't show your cards, then it would be a problem. So if you were playing Othello and we had that conversation, I'd be fine with it. The reason I smirked was because there's a long history in Hollywood of white people playing characters. It should be black people. I mean, when I mean, Charlton Heston is Moses was kind of wild. You know what I mean? Was it Lawrence Olivier who played the Mahdi in the 70s film about Mohammed Ahmed and Mahdi in Sudan? I mean, it's fascinating to me to see to see the outrage now, particularly since the characters.

20:26We've got our issues with those pieces of casting as well. Yeah, I was. I think that happened. I'm not sure. I made an entire video about terrible casting choices in Hollywood, and one of them was John Wayne playing Genghis Khan in The Conqueror. I think that's completely absurd as well. So I've got plenty of issues with bad whitewashing casting over the years, but that was 50 or 60 years ago. I can't do anything about that now.

20:49Piers Morgan:Daniel Mendelsohn, one of our other panellists here, penned a column for the New York Times entitled, Does Matt Damon Look Greek? No, so stop complaining about Lupita and Yongo. In it, he asks, so what is Mr Nolan up to? As it turns out, the auteur is using Helen, just as the Greek authors did, to provoke, challenge, and discomfort how we think about beauty and identity, about who we are and how we relate to the world. By that criteria, what's wrong with it? What's wrong with it? What I primarily point out for the film is the hypocrisy from Hollywood. If you're trying to be provocative, then you're being subversive.

21:29You're just coming out and saying, Yes, we're being subversive. We're being provocative with this casting. So it's not the best person for the role. And it's not for authenticity. We're trying to challenge traditional beliefs. Well, that's something Christopher Nolan doesn't usually do. This is a game he doesn't usually play. And let's not forget that these beliefs, these quote-unquote values of diversity and inclusion are baked into the awards rules. So they're baked into the company's rules and the awards rules. and we just had a film that completely flopped Moana, the live action remake that was, you know, touting how authentic it was to that culture.

22:08Well, that's just a fantasy. Why does it matter? And my argument is if it doesn't matter, then why change it? It's the motivation behind the change that people sense. And it also is a red flag for how we're going to treat the source material and how we're going to go through. Like I saw this with the rings of power, The Rings of Power, they changed. They had black dwarves and black elves. And oh, by the way, they completely went off the text. So it's a red flag for something else. Now, Lupita Nyong 'o, if I'm mispronouncing her name, I apologize. But if she's in it for a little bit, like the movie could still be good.

22:46It could absolutely still be good. But it's a red flag and it's subversive casting. So it does rile people up. It's meant to rile people up, just like the casting of Black Snape.

22:58Piers Morgan:OK, Victor, let me bring you back in here, if I may. What's your response to that argument? I think you have to make a good point about subversive. When we talk about people of different races playing characters, the complaint about Hollywood, say, pre-1980, was that white characters, Burt Lancaster, Charles Bronson, Audrey Hepburn, who played Native Americans, and the issue was there were probably Native American actors who would have been more authentic. I don't know if they were as good actors, but there was no effort. But the point I'm making is they tried to look or appear as they were Native Americans.

23:33So when a Mexican-American actor played Zorba the Greek, Anthony Quinn tried to look Greek, and it was enhanced because he looked Greek in some ways. When Laurence Olivier applied to play Othello, he was white, but he tried to look like he was North African. And this is, but I think the other guest was right about trying to be subversive. In the case of Lupita, I mean, it would be kind of absurd in modern sensibilities to have an African-American actress or African-British actress than where, I guess we could use that word white face so she would appear more authentic as far as the actual text of Homer goes.

24:18But it's so it is a subversive act. It's saying that we're going to take somebody who does not appear anywhere near the look of Helen and why it might have been less subversive for Clytemnestra of other characters. After all, Helen is a central character and caused the Trojan War. I have no problem, as the other guest said, about being subversive if that's openly your point, is to draw attention that you're trying to destroy characterization or traditional stereotypes. But it's not being authentic to what the author imagined. It might be your interpretation of what he imagined, but it isn't. And again, I think just to finish, we have a whole tradition of, it is kind of insulting to, you know, it's very unpopular.

25:10There's a lot of controversy in Greece. It would be as if you made, oh, an epic, remade how the West was won, and you didn't have one American actor in it. You all had Europeans or Africans or Asians. So to make this national epic, which the Greek people feel is a continuous tradition from the 7th, 8th century, and not have a single Greek actress or actor, it's kind of jarring when you go out of your way to get other people who would cause controversy and sometimes in a subversive manner.

Read the full transcript

25:41Piers Morgan:Right. Well, I was actually in Greece, coincidentally. I'm going to bring Daniel back in here. I was actually in Greece a few days last week, coincidentally, and I had this anger expressed because there are no Greeks in this movie. An open letter in the Greek city time said, Greek people did not disappear after the age of myth. Greek culture was not frozen in classical marble. Greek language was not extinguished in antiquity. We are still here. Now, if you go back in time, this is not the first time you've had a black actress play Helena Troy. Orson Welles cast Eartha Kitt as his Helena Troy back in 1950, something I didn't discover until this morning.

26:21Piers Morgan:So there is precedent for this, Daniel. It's been done. There wasn't the outcry then, there is now. But if I'm Greek, I'm probably looking at this going, yeah, I would take the view that Victor just articulated, which is, seriously, you're not going to have a single Greek actor in the Odyssey? I mean, first of all, I think it has to be said that all of this is a sort of a tempest in a teacup, because as anyone who has read The Odyssey knows, Helen has the tiniest imaginable role in The Odyssey. And I have seen the film, and I think it's fair to say that she's on screen for maybe 45 seconds, literally.

27:02So that's one thing. I mean, it really seems to be silly to getting everyone's knickers in a twist about a very minor character. Is he trying to be provocative? Yeah, absolutely. I would say that, of course, you're not going to cast a Black person as Abraham Lincoln, because these are historical documents. And we know, you know, we have a sense of what historical characters look like. We have documentary proof. This is a fantasy epic, right? We're all used by now to seeing all kinds of actors from every imaginable extraction on the stage, in movies, operas, playing kinds of people that were, you know, roles that were written originally for white people.

27:46It really doesn't matter to me. I think the real question to be asking about this movie, and I don't know who else among my fellow guests here has seen it. I saw it earlier this last Monday, is does forget about the details. You know, everyone's hysterical that the ship isn't accurate, the armor isn't accurate, the costumes aren't accurate. They speak with American accents because, as everyone knows, the ancient Greeks and Romans spoke with British accents, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. OK, the real question I think we should be focused on here is, does this film convey the spirit of the original?

28:24That's the question to ask in a large sense. I would say like, well, where does it stop if you start saying, well, the army is not accurate, the ships aren't accurate, the casting is not accurate, the accents are not accurate, the dialogue is not accurate. Like, what do you have left? Like, how far are you going to go with this? I don't think that's about, no, I think absolutely you can get the thrust of the story across its main themes. I don't think these incidentals actually matter that much. If it presents Odysseus as the kind of hero he is in the original, if it gets across the crucial themes, homecoming, the meaning of home, the allure of adventure, competing with the desire for the stability of home, all of that stuff, then I'll be happy.

29:15OK, I mean, let me bring in. I want to bring in Mark Lamont Hill here because of something,

29:21Piers Morgan:Critical Drinker, whose video on the Odyssey has had over 5 million views. and Critical Dricker says... Three. Three million. Just three. I'm sorry, you've been promoted. I could hit five. You've been promoted. It's been promoted by one of my team, obviously, who just wants to make you sound even more successful and famous and rich than you already are, which is hard to imagine. So only three million of these. But in it, you say, or you say about it, there's this weird assumption that every other culture, race and ethnic group in the world are entitled to their own unique stories, history and identity and it all has to be carefully fenced off and respected, whereas anything created by white Europeans is treated like some generic all-you-can-eat buffet that everyone's allowed to stick their hands into.

30:05Piers Morgan:Mark Lamont Hill, your response to that? I think that feeling is one that every culture and ethnicity and race has. I mean, we have this conversation every year whenever there's a movie about slaves or enslaved people in the United States and we looked at all the actors aren't black people, they're getting played by Brits, you know, And it's a similar conversation internally within the black community, the African-American community in particular, even about Lupita. And so I think that that feeling is common. But I think when it comes to European culture, European civilization, I don't see any historical record of that.

30:38I mean, the fact that we're still showing the Odyssey, playing the Odyssey, reenacting the Odyssey, rewriting the Odyssey. People make their academic careers just on translations of the Odyssey. We are obsessed with European culture and centering it. And when one film comes out that has an alternate interpretation and a more fantastic, and I mean that in a sense of fantasy, a more fantastic interpretation of it, we act as if, you know, the world is ending. And I don't think we need to do that. I think it's OK to have this type of interpretation. And I think if you were to subject any text or any film to historical scrutiny, if I were to look at any film about the 50s or the 60s, if you look closely enough at the clothes that they're wearing or the music that's playing, there's usually some anachronism there.

31:18It just so happens that we're sort of obsessed with this one. And then finally, in terms of fidelity to the text, most books that are turned into films are not the same as the movie. Go watch The Color Purple. It is absolutely different on screen than what happened in the book. What Spielberg did is very different than what Alice Walker did. That is a normal artistic gesture. And no one is confused about this. And it seems to me that the only people we're worried about, not you guys, but some people are worried about there, is the Lupita one, the smallest character in the film. Again, nobody's Greek.

31:45Like, nobody matches ethnically, nationally, et cetera, culturally with these characters. But the only one that seems so out of step that we can't stand it is the black one. And that's why Eartha Kitt made sense, probably because she's not as dark as Lupita. So it wasn't as jarring to people. But the idea that the black character has to be the one that we put on the outs of this is silly. None of them fit. Well, we're talking about Lupita a lot, but there's Zendaya. There's Elliot Page, which nobody's brought up. I mean, it's a lot of things.

32:17Piers Morgan:I was actually literally about to ask you about that. So let me just ask you that, Neidronic, because Elliot Page, formerly Ellen Page, a trans, well, a woman who became a trans man, is in the role of Sinon, a cunning Greek soldier and the cousin of Odysseus. It's been billed as another cast in controversy, said to be a nod to contemporary LGBTQ, et cetera, politics. And the memes have been relentless. Let's just take a look at some of these. She, her!

32:49Piers Morgan:So that was inevitable, I guess, from the online stuff, because that's what the online world does. But, I mean, should we care about this? Is it a nod to the LGBTQ culture war, or is it just the fact that Elliot Page is a good actor, got picked for the role, and does a good job? I don't know. Oh, I'm sorry. Was that for me? Yeah, I think you need to draw it, yeah. Okay. I don't know if Elliot's a good actor or not. I think it's, you could make an argument that Christopher Nolan likes to work with people he has worked with before, and you can also make an argument that this is absolutely a nod for that.

33:27I think it's a little bit of both. And I don't know why you bring in a character that wasn't even in the original poem from outside it, you know, just for this part. and that those are changes that certainly can be made. And again, if Christopher Nolan's name isn't attached to this film, everybody's gonna think it's a bomb. But Christopher Nolan being attached to this film, he gets a certain amount of respect that he absolutely deserves, the benefit of the doubt, which he absolutely deserves. I don't know how much Elliot is actually in the film as well. It could be a very small part as far as I know.

34:01And it still could be good, but you can't blame people. the context of this is yes there is a culture war there's always a culture war and there's one that's it's it it's an open culture war right now and we are 10 years deep into it and we are seeing the same red flags and signs as we have seen with other films be it historical drama or just known mythological text or just a well-known story that they are changing to be subversive and people are now sensing that, that breaks the spell. That breaks authenticity, and it takes you out of the movie when you know what the motivation is. The motivation should be best person for the job, period.

34:44Piers Morgan:Yeah, Victor, I mean, take, for example, the ongoing thing about James Bond, right, who's obviously a fictitious character, British spy, and I've never had a problem when there were rumours that Idris Elba may be the new Bond of having a black man play James Bond, because I thought fictitious character, Why does that matter? I don't think the racial identity of James Bond is particularly pertinent to the movies. However, I had a big problem when there were rumours circulating it might be a woman. They might change James Bond's sex. So I don't even know if my views are consistent here with any of this debate.

35:21I think they could be rescued. The issue is twofold. Are these... First, the anachronisms, are they within the parameters of the believables? So if you have a ship, does it sort of look like a trireme or does it look like a U.S. destroyer to be extreme? So the same thing with the characters. Do they approximate the image that you want to convey that this is happening in early Greece? And the same thing, I think, with race. If you have a very if you have an Ian Fleming's novel and it's very male centric and Masculine in the 1950s or 40 cents and you have a black actor You can you can say well race is incidental not essential to who James Bond was because he's a man of action But when you bring a woman in then that's a bridge too far because it violates the entire ethos or atmosphere of who James Bond is.

36:23And I think Daniel made a good point. The two minor characters are the two sisters, Kleiner Mestre and Helen in The Odyssey. They almost have no, they don't have very many lines at all. So if you want to bring in an African American and work within the boundaries, but if you were to cast her as Penelope, that's a central character and that would bring attention so that her race would be essentialized rather than incidental to the character. And I think what he's doing is, and I haven't seen the movie, but I think he's working around the periphery. He's using trans actors or black actors in roles that you're usually not accustomed to see them in, but not tampering with the essential Odysseus.

37:07This argument would be raging if Odysseus was black or Asian, as it would be with other works. If you had a Martin Luther King novel and the person was white, that would be jarring. Even if it was fiction, nobody would want to do that. But if you had an advisor who was black and you changed that advisor to a white person for ecumenicalism or diversity, nobody would really object. So the question I have is, is he doing this because these are great actors and they will enhance even these minor roles or maybe even to stretch it a little bit, is he doing it to open people's sensibilities or is he just doing it as has been suggested to be subversive or even for to please the people who produce the movies and distribute them and award them?

37:59Piers Morgan:Well, there is another theory and I'm going to bring this to Daniel because there was a very entertaining spat online on X between the historian Tom Holland and Elon Musk and And it began when Holland posted lots of people telling me The Odyssey is a terrible film on the basis of not having seen it. I've now watched it twice and it is by some way the best cinematic adaptation of a Greek myth I've ever seen. It honours Homer while simultaneously making something new of him. Now, Elon Musk disagreed, saying Chris Nolan desecrated The Odyssey so that he would be eligible for an Academy Award. Now, he then called Holland a cuck, which is, we believe, because he got the wrong Tom Holland.

38:41Piers Morgan:He thought it was the actor who plays Spider-Man, who he thinks is in the thrall of his actress girlfriend and now wife, we believe. In response, the actual Tom Holland, the historian, responded, very happy to say it again. The Odyssey is an amazing film. I'm missing out on seeing it because you think it's woke or whatever is cutting off your nose to spite your face, your loss. So, Daniel, you have seen it. Would you concur with Tom Holland? Well, here in the States, there's a very strict embargo on reviews. So I can't say too much about it. But I do think it does bring across some of the big moments, you know, the moments we know and love, the cyclops, the incredible shipwrecks, you know, the storms at sea, uh Scylla the six-headed dragon that eats his men and and the great whirlpool Charybdis uh I will uh peers I'm gonna have to answer your question obliquely by repeating what I said before I think and I'm I'm responding to something uh Victor that you were saying you really the main criterion has to be the central character whether he comes across the way that Homer paints him which is as It's multifaceted, brilliant, slightly arrogant, violent when he needs to be, but also charming.

40:12He's a bit of a James Bond himself, actually, come to think of it. And that, to me, was the big question. I just filed my own very long review of the movie. But I do think that's the question, actually, that should be raised. But, you know, I'm a fan of Christopher Nolan. when it was announced that he was going to be doing this. I was very enthusiastic, partly because, you know, one of the things about the Odyssey that I think needs, people need to think about in evaluating how this adaptation works is not the details, but, you know, Homer has a very complicated way of telling this story. It does not unfold chronologically.

40:53There's incredible looping back in time, stories within stories, conversations within conversations. It's a very kind of knotted way of storytelling. And that is something I think Chris Nolan is, I'm sure many of you have seen his movies. This is something he loves playing with. His own plots, his own movies often are very complicatedly narrated, moving back and forth between past and future and through time. So I thought this is the right guy for the job. And that's one of the things that I appreciated about the way he handled Homer was not the substance, let's call it, but the style, which seemed very Chris Nolan-ish.

41:37Piers Morgan:Well, I'm a massive Nolan fan. I think he's a cinematic genius. but let me go to our two movie gurus here and just get a prediction for how it's going to do because early numbers suggest the Odyssey's on track for a massive domestic opening in the United States of 80 to 100 million dollars. So, Critical Drinker, is this going to be another Nolan smash hit, do you think? It's definitely not going to lose money, put it that way. I don't know if it's going to reach the same heights as something like Oppenheimer because there's not quite the same immediate cultural attachment to it as you did with something like Oppenheimer, which is still within living memory, and we're still living with the fallout of that, for lack of a better word.

42:22And it doesn't have the Barbenheimer effect, which really pushed both of those movies to much greater heights than they would have had individually anyway. So I think something in the region of 700 to 800 million would be a reasonable number for this film. I think I could see it reaching that pretty easily.

42:37Piers Morgan:OK, and Adrodic, finally a difficult question for you. I could have put it to either of you, but I picked on you mercilessly. Is it better for your business model that this is a massive turkey or a massive hit? Believe it or not, it doesn't matter. Really? Same result either way. I have gotten, if we're talking, if we want to break down the financials, when I praise a movie, when it gets the same amount of money as when I don't. The best thing for my business model is being honest. Yeah. So if I love this movie, I'm going to tell you I love this movie. And you know what? The race swaps didn't matter.

43:18This thing was a masterpiece, and I'm a fan of Nolan. But the most important thing to any content creator should be being honest.

43:25Piers Morgan:I 100 % agree with that. Authenticity. I think it's why young people are gravitating more and more to channels like yours. and this one and others, you've just got to be authentic. And people will love you, they'll hate you, but they can't deny you are being true to yourself. And that's the most powerful weapon a human being has. What a fascinating debate. What a great panel. Thank you all very much indeed. I appreciate it. Thank you. Cheers. Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we ask for only one simple thing. Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.

44:03Piers Morgan:And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain. And we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it without you.

From the publisher

Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey has arrived as one of the year's biggest blockbuster release - but instead of universal excitement, the film has ignited a fierce cultural and political debate.

Critics have accused the Homer adaptation of prioritizing modern identity politics over historical authenticity, pointing to its colorblind casting and alleged feminist themes. Some have even labeled it "Snow White on steroids," arguing that Hollywood has once again reshaped a beloved classic to fit a contemporary agenda.

Supporters, however, argue that great storytelling evolves with its audience and that adapting ancient myths for modern viewers is exactly what cinema should do.

The controversy surrounding The Odyssey raises broader questions about historical accuracy, artistic freedom, and whether Hollywood should preserve the past or reinterpret it for the present.

Piers Morgan is joined by two expert panels to debate the controversy from opposing perspectives, beginning with the historical and classical context before examining the wider cultural arguments surrounding one of the year's most anticipated films.

Joining Piers are historian and Hoover Institution senior fellow Victor Davis Hanson, essayist and author A.N. Wilson, author and critic Daniel Mendelsohn, BET News host Marc Lamont Hill, YouTuber Gary Buechler (Nerdrotic), and YouTuber Will Jordan (The Critical Drinker).
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Piers Morgan Uncensored

All 333 episodes
"It's JARRING!" Christopher Nolan's 'The Odyssey' DISMANTLED By Victor Davis Hanson & NerdroticPiers Morgan Uncensored · 47 min
Listen in VO