"There Were NO Talks!" Trump Calls Off Iran Deadline on Strait of Hormuz

22:16Piers Morgan:What is happening here? I mean, from a defence perspective, what is going on? Yeah, good afternoon, Piers. Shall I start with the UK side? Does that make sense? I think what's happening is that the belief in government is this is a really needless, counterproductive and harmful war that is destroying the global economy and will result in Iran perhaps emerging more ideological, more radical and more of a threat than it did before. But of course, they can't say that because they also, quite understandably, like any prime minister, have the relationship with the United States to manage. And the United States is the most important ally of the UK, whoever it's led by.

22:55It's absolutely critical to our defence capabilities, our intelligence cooperation, not to mention our nuclear deterrent. And so you've got to manage that relationship. And so whilst they think it's a terrible war and a terrible idea and that bombing Iranian forces, even along the Persian Gulf coastline, will not open the Strait of Hormuz, only a end to the conflict will reopen Hormuz. They nonetheless have to be seen to be cooperative. And that's why I think you have Mark Rutter, the secretary general of NATO, insisting Europeans are in support of this when he knows, of course, they aren't. This is very simple.

23:28You might call it cynical diplomacy, but equally you could argue that it's fairly pragmatic management of an alliance.

23:33Piers Morgan:And in terms of the way that the American and Israeli combined military have gone about this, do you think they really underestimated the way that the Iranians would respond so adeptly in terms of strangling the global economy by using the Strait of Hormuz as a weapon in the way that they had by effectively closing it to all but a little bit of oil? But secondly, by attacking the Gulf state neighbors in the way that they have, including attacking refineries, including attacking tourist spots and so on. Do you think they just dropped the ball a bit here, the intelligence from America and Israel in terms of what was going to come back at them?

24:16Piers Morgan:Because it does seem that they've been taken extraordinarily by surprise, if that is the case. Yeah, first of all, I think anyone competent in the U.S. intelligence community would have fully recognized the risk of Iran, both striking Gulf states and also closing Hormuz in the event that this was a war of regime change, of killing Ayatollah Khamenei, killing the leadership, bombing infrastructure. infrastructure. That's not like the previous wars, of course. That's not like Operation Midnight Hammer last year, where only Iranian nuclear sites were struck. And so in a more dangerous situation, the regime would be desperate and would respond in a desperate and quite effective fashion.

24:52But I think actually, Piers, it's even more canny from the Iranians than you've said, because not only have they succeeded in closing off most of the traffic to Hormuz, what they've also done in a way that I think many experts even didn't anticipate is allowing foremost to be used for their own tankers. They've managed to get their own tankers out. I mean, don't forget, just nearly 100 tankers have left the Persian Gulf since February 28th, including tankers of oil being sold to the Chinese and to the Indians. And so they've, in a way, got the best of both worlds, shutting off this flow, causing turmoil in global energy markets, whilst also applying pressure and continuing to get revenue for themselves.

25:32So I think there's been an enormous failure here of statecraft. And I think that's really why you're seeing Donald Trump try to scramble around for means to try to reopen Hormuz by military ways. That is sending Marines to the region by trying to look at the potential occupation of Haag Island. But ultimately realizing, as you've seen, I think, in the last 12 hours, that there is a diplomatic way that will be much easier and quicker and frankly, much more viable in getting himself out of this rather difficult situation he's got himself in.

26:02Piers Morgan:Right. I mean, I suspect looking at Donald Trump's behavior and his rhetoric that he's urgently looking for some kind of off ramp, but isn't entirely sure what one would look like, which gives him a plausible victory or one indeed that the Iranians would allow to happen. I mean, what do you think is the most realistic way this all ends? Well, you know, you're absolutely right. I think part of that is an off ramp of the Hormuz. That is, if this war ends now with Iran successfully in control of Hormuz, I think that looks like a defeat for Donald Trump. So part one of any off ramp has to be some kind of settlement in which Trump is seen to have reopened Hormuz by diplomacy.

26:43And of course, the Iranians will only do that in exchange for some kind of concessions. concessions, for example, about not being attacked again, concessions about the future of their nuclear program, concessions, I think, most of all, which may appeal to Donald Trump, on sanctions relief, on future Iranian sanctions. But the other thing here appears is the reason America launched this war, ostensibly, or so it says, is Iran's nuclear program. There is still, as you know, 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium sitting under the rubble in Fordow, as well as Isfahan and something called the Uranium Conversion Facility and in the tanks.

27:18As long as that material is sat there, if Donald Trump ends the war with Iran in control of that material, which is enough for about 10 nuclear bombs, again, that will look like a very odd sort of victory. And so any deal, any off-ramp must also cater for that nuclear material. But Iran will demand a price. And I'm not sure whether Donald Trump is ready to pay that price, which is why I think the odds of an end to this now are still no better than 50-50.

27:44Piers Morgan:And it's already the biggest seismic shock to global energy we've ever seen. And the after effects of that could reverberate for many months. I mean, I'm told that once you close the Strait of Hormuz in the way that's been closed for a few weeks, it can take months for that to properly play out in world food supplies and so on. So we could see real big spikes in food prices, in inflation and so on coming in the next few months. But if this was to escalate or just continue in the way that it is for, say, two, three, four more months, how bad will this get for the global economy? Well, if it goes on for several more weeks, you'll see oil at$150 a barrel.

28:26But it's not just oil. I think, as you very sensibly point out, it's about all the other commodities flowing through the Strait of Hormuz. And that includes things like fertilizer products. It includes aluminium products. It includes certain types of critical minerals used in manufacturing and the semiconductor industry as well. So there will be knock on effect, perhaps not at the same level as those we saw in the supply chain shock of covid, but approaching that level. And what really interests me and, you know, I'm not a political expert by any stretch of the imagination, but the downstream political impact of all of this, including in the United States, where petrol prices have gone up.

29:02Donald Trump, of course, as you know, is six months away from midterm elections. We know that the American electorate is always sensitive to input prices of petrol, gasoline, as they call it. And whilst they enjoy considerably lower costs than we do here in Europe, they are still very conscious of how this affects their checkbook. And poor Americans, as you know, drive much, much more than poor Europeans. So they are hit relatively harder by the impact of these shocks. With the midterms approaching, I think a lot of people around Donald Trump will be saying you are already in a difficult position going into the midterms in your prospect of holding on to the House and the Senate.

29:40What does this do to those prospects? And for that reason, while I'm not confident on an end to this conflict in the next week, I do think it's very unlikely this goes on beyond the end of April because the costs to Donald Trump economically and politically. Forget about those to us here in Europe and to those in Asia. Pakistan is running out of LNG, for example. are very high.

30:00Piers Morgan:Yeah. Shuzhen Joshi, thank you very much indeed for joining me. I appreciate it. Thank you. Let's go back to the panel. Ansi Scaramucci, you did one of the shortest but probably most famous tenures speaking for Donald Trump from the press podium. How do you spin your way out of this? I mean, what is, given how potentially cataclysmic it is politically, never mind anything else, what would you be advising him right now? First of all, I just want to point out on Friday night, Hogan said I was there for 10 days. But Pierce, I was actually there for 11 days. I remember that. Don't let Hogan get away with that on this part.

30:39Piers Morgan:He diminished your standing in a shocking manner. I think it was generally unfair of Hogan to do that to me. But if I were with the president and I would say, listen, get it down to three things that in your mind makes this a success. What are those three things? And then when we get to those three things, I would declare victory as quickly as possible. But as your prior guest pointed out, it's complicated because they're controlling that straight. And so what I'm worried about, because I understand the president's personality, you've got forty four hundred Marines in the Marine Expeditionary Forces, two different groups heading for the area.

31:25And I know he's been briefed on this, that, you know, one of the ways to clear out that strait is to put ground forces, U.S. ground forces in the area, try to clean up the situation. And so I'm praying that that doesn't happen because I think that's an escalation trap for the United States. But again, for me, I would tell the president, pick one or two things, pin your hat on that and let's go home. What's the best thing he could pin it on? Well, I think the best the best thing is that you you they're not if you thought they were a threat. I know Joe Kent said that they weren't, but the president obviously thought that they were.

32:04But do you now not think that they are a threat? Have they been sufficiently degraded? And if that that answer is yes, then I think it's time to go home and then we can begin the process of diplomatic negotiation. You know, listen, there's there's one avenue here that I really would love the president to pursue because he is a dealmaker. One avenue would be and it's a more nuanced avenue. But to go to the Iranians and say, OK, we've got you degraded. Let's open the straight together. Let's get your oil back on the market, which would be very good for the global economy. I don't think the Israelis are going to like that one.

32:40But I do think that that's an avenue, given his deal-making, chaps, peers, that's an avenue I would like to see him pursue.

32:49Piers Morgan:Hogan, we keep an eye on the prediction markets, and Polymarket has been asking, will the traffic in the Strait of Hormuz return to normal by the end of April? And there's currently a 36 % chance, they think, from the money that's come in, that that will happen. Do you think that's realistic? I mean, if you listen to the experts, the longer this straight up almost remains effectively closed, the more damaging everything gets for the global, never mind just American economy. Do you think that will be a priority of President Trump to just get it open, come what may? Yeah, of course. Listen, a couple of things that have happened in the last 10 minutes I do want to address here.

33:30Joe Kent being against this, sure, but he was for it before. So it's kind of a Mitt Romney I was for before I was against it thing with him. Second is your journalist you just talked to, Pierce, made the point that some people think this military operation is going to make Iran more radical and more angry. That's insanity. They already want to kill everyone that isn't of their belief. They already want global domination and destruction. It would be like when you and I were in that bunker and World War II was happening and you were saying, we don't want to really fight Germany because after all, they'll hate Jews more.

34:09Like they're already killing them. That's insanity. They're the world's largest global sponsor of terrorism. And everyone from Hillary Clinton to Kamala Harris to Joe Biden to Barack Obama all have said that Iran can't get a nuclear weapon. Donald Trump's the only one really doing something to prevent that from happening. And at the same time, the journalist you just brought on said, but they have all this nuclear material in these different locations. OK, are we going to do something about that? Was he advocating that we should just allow them to keep it? When that regime was in power, we know the death and destruction they caused all over the globe, whether through proxies or whether through their own capabilities.

34:46Diminishing that is important. But here at home, understand, cost is what matters to the American people. And while the American left will say it's all about affordability, I kind of find that a fake term because what's affordable to you, Piers Morgan, as wealthy as you are, not probably affordable to me. But is the cost up or is the cost coming down? That's what matters. And if Donald Trump's military operation here brings down the cost of oil, brings down the cost of gasoline here in this country and around the globe, that's the victory. in addition of course to preventing them from getting a nuclear weapon and causing terrorist threats all over the world in chaos bringing that you know rational responsible strategic use and flow of oil through those through that strait is what's going to matter here eventually i think to the american electorate and how they decide well it is but of course the damage the

35:42Piers Morgan:damage may well have been done and it will have been done by donald trump's decision to attack Iran in the first place, which led to it closing. So, you know, people aren't that stupid. I mean, they're going to think, well, you know, if in the end it's a messy ending to this, where really any plausible victory is kind of laughed at, not least by the Iranians, if they're all still in power there, then, you know, it's hard to see how you can spin rising inflation, rising cost of living prices, rising gas pump prices in weeks and months of pain to the American electorate. I don't know quite how you square that with, well, now they've come down again.

36:20Piers Morgan:Therefore, I'm the hero. Well, they were at record highs under the previous administration, under Joe Biden, of course, and Donald Trump brought them down. This, as your journalist just mentioned, would make prices spike$150 per barrel or more. They predicted that as well. Now they're way less than that. Of course, these experts are typically wrong. The question, though, is even if the costs come down, how do the Americans feel about it? And that's something that's very difficult to quantify. So, you know, if the price spikes by$2 and then you bring it down$1.50, it's still 50 cents higher than it was before, but still way lower than it ever was under Joe Biden.

37:00Then it's a whole messaging conversation and messaging war moving into the midterms. And it's a tough one to have. Don't underestimate it.

37:07Piers Morgan:Okay, Brian, I mean, you know, I'm just wondering how the average Trump Trump supporter. I think in the polls, the MAGA crowd will always go with Trump. It's almost got religious further to it. But Brian, when you look at the overarching thing that I look at, which is this is a guy, Donald Trump, who I've known in 20 years. We're friends. I make no defense of that. I've always got on well with him and a few blips, but I like him personally. But it's interesting to me that he would campaign so vociferously after four years out of office on no more taking America into wars in the Middle East because they're so ruinous economically and on human life and a focus on America first and the American economy boosting the American economy.

37:57Piers Morgan:And yet here in one fell swoop at the end of February, he launches the biggest war imaginable in the Middle East. And it's caused the kind of ruinous economic meltdown that many predicted would obviously happen if America and or Israel did that. So I just I really struggle to understand why he would do that now and expect people to come out in November and vote for a Trump-led Republican Party. I think it gives reference to the power of the AIPAC, American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee and the great existence of Israeli influence. And Trump is very much susceptible to that. And I think they have the Greater Israel Project.

38:47They have everything. They've been wanting America to attack Iran for years. They've said Iran has been two weeks away from nuclear bombs for 30 years. And so they finally got Trump to do that, to capitulate. And they've greatly weakened Iran. And this is a win for Israel. But this narrative is so hard to be on this panel. I know it's an economic panel, but it's just not thinking about the many victims of the Gaza genocide and all the attacks Israel is doing against Lebanon and all the surrounding area. And I understand the plight of the Iranians and their struggles, but Iran has been under severe sanctions for years, for decades.

39:33And that's greatly contributed to the suffering of the Iranians. I see you shaking your head, but I don't think militarism by America is going to help the social issues. Iran can help themselves. I respect you in being that you are from Iran. But this is obviously not the time for American militarism to intervene and destroy the infrastructure, affect the global economy, and make this action. The Iranians are a sovereign nation, and Israel's record of destruction in that region has to be pronounced. And I can't tolerate all this conversation just discussing Trump's exit ramp and how it will best suit him.

40:15There's so much death, and there's so much accountability that must be had. So I really hope that—I demand accountability. We have to. Trump has backstepped on his campaign promises. He's just he's throwing us into a war. And I do have concerns about nuclear, a nuclear threat. And we do have to deescalate this. And I hope that Trump's negotiations continue positively.

40:40Piers Morgan:OK, Goldie, you were shaking your head there. Your response to that? First of all, there's so much craziness that I just heard. I don't even know where to begin. But where were you when two months ago, in the beginning of January, the Islamic regime slaughtered over 40 ,000 innocent, unarmed protesters just because they wanted to live in a free and democratic society? Where were you? Where were you when on Friday, on don't interrupt me when I'm speaking. Do not interrupt me when I'm speaking. I let you speak. Do not interrupt me when I'm speaking. Do not interrupt me. Where were you when the Islamic regime gang raped two nurses because they were helping Iranian protesters?

41:23They took them, they gang raped them. One of them was gang raped so hard that they had to remove her uterus. Where were you for that? Where were you when on Friday the Islamic regime executed five innocent young Iranian men? Young innocent Iranian men. Where were you? Nowhere. So don't bring your Israeli conspiracy theories here. No one's buying it. No one cares for it. This is something that the Iranian people have wanted for a very, very long time. It's called Responsibility to Protect. It is a UN doctrine. Do not interrupt me when I'm speaking. You are insulting the Iranian people's right to self-determination by claiming that this is some sort of Israeli project.

42:07What Iranian people are saying inside of occupied Iran is that we are grateful for American and U.S. interventionalism. And you would know that except the Islamic regime has shut down the Internet for the last 24 days. The Internet has been cut off. 90 million Iranians in occupied Iran do not have a voice. And what you, sir, are hearing is Islamic regime propaganda. So I would suggest you take a step back, open up your, you know, open your mind a little bit more and maybe ask yourself, why did the Islamic regime shut down the Internet? Why is the Islamic regime cut off the Internet, silencing the voices of 90 million people?

42:47So please, sir, do not interrupt. Do not insult Iranians. Do not interrupt me when I'm speaking. Have some respect. OK, Brian, you can now respond. that was that they were they are defending themselves and i i'm sorry for that those atrocities and it's 90 million people there's going to be atrocities happening like that and i'm sorry for that i don't condone any of that but militarism is not going to fix that sanctions by america is just contributing to the suffering of iran all the and america's

43:17Piers Morgan:and so well let him speak gilder you didn't like him interrupting you so let him speak And so my sympathies for those who are suffering in this world. But the militarism is not going to help this. Adding more pain and suffering is not going to help this. Destroying our infrastructures for the globe is not going to help this. And so this is a big money move that is just sacrificing American lives. If Israel truly wants to get rid of Iran as a threat, why don't they contribute their soldiers? But they're too busy proliferating their land in Lebanon, which they've never held tight to their ceasefire.

43:52Israel has a horrible record of not delivering on any ceasefires. They continue to kill the people in Gaza. They're annexing the West Bank. I've been to West Bank myself. I've experienced the cruel, brutal behaviors of the Israeli settlers. What you should be talking about is the Israeli settlers in the West Bank, their horrid actions. They are the true terrorists.

44:18Piers Morgan:Well, there's certainly been some disgusting scenes coming out of the West Bank in the last few days. And I think that is extremely clear. And they're being committed by, in the main, Israeli settlers attacking Palestinians. And it's been appalling. Anthony Scaramucci, just what's interesting to me, looking at this from the politics again, is there's been very little sign of J.D. Vance, for example, in all this. What does it mean for life post-Trump? You know, there's a lot of jostling for position about who the heir apparent will be. How impactful would the Iran war be, do you think, in determining who that is?

45:01Piers Morgan:And is one of the reasons for Vance's relative silence that he wants to keep his name out of this? Well, listen, I mean, it's been reported, you know, he leaked that to CBS News. They didn't want anything to do with it. And him and Tulsi Gabbard, Joe Kent, others were put in a separate situation room away from Mar-a-Lago, the people that were dissenting from the military action. So, you know, I know this is a contrary statement to make, but it's not clear to me that Vance is going to run, Pierce. His wife's pregnant. He does not have the support of the pope. And I know people say, what does that mean?

45:41He just he just converted to Catholicism, as you guys know. And the pope has really diverged from the president and from the president's policies and has been critical. And there are 80 million Catholics in this country. He's not going to be able to win the presidency without that level of support. So there's a good chance here he doesn't run, which would make Marco Rubio the apparent. And then you just have to tell me what the outcome of this is. If there's a positive outcome, it'll help. Marco Rubio. But if it's a quagmire, this will be a disaster for the Republicans come 2028.

46:19Piers Morgan:Hogan, there's a lot going on every minute, even while we've been talking, there's a lot going on. Donald Trump said earlier today there have been very strong talks between Washington and Tehran in the last 24, 36 hours. It was clear Iran wanted to make a deal. But the Iranian parliament speaker, Mohamed Baga Galibaf, has reiterated that no such talks, as far as they're concerned, have taken place. He posted to X, no negotiations have been held with the US, and fake news is used to manipulate the financial and oil markets and escape the quagmire in which the US and Israel are trapped. Now, this is one of the people that we're supposed to believe the Americans have been talking to, and, you know, someone that can be they can do business with.

47:03Piers Morgan:Absolutely rubbishing. any suggestion that there have been talks to try and end this and saying it's all just a scam by the Americans or the administration to stop the markets crashing. OK, I mean, the same people who said that they lied about their ballistic missile capability into hitting Europe. I mean, these these people are proven terrorists. They're lying all the time, of course. And to sympathize with them and their, quote unquote, struggle is absolutely ridiculous. when you consider all the death and destruction that they've paid for, committed themselves all over this globe. People on the right and left here in America have been furious at Iran for so long, and only Donald Trump did something about it.

47:46Now, how this ends up, of course, matters, and that's going to effectuate voting tendencies for the midterms, of course. But the fact is, there are people in Iran right now who have been oppressed by this regime for decades. This is not something Donald Trump did because Israel told him to do it. The only people Donald Trump is he's beholden to are the American people. That's it. And if it helps our interests around the globe and quite frankly, with our partners and allies, including the only democracy in the region, Israel. Sure. Then maybe we might do something. The America First agenda is designed to effectuate change and support and offer protection for the American people first.

48:30But it's not always America alone. He did this in the first term. And while the naysayers did what they did and said anything he does in the region is going to make it break out into utter chaos and we're going to see destruction in the streets. Instead, he got peace deals that no one thought was possible, several of them, in just a few short years. This is on track to do something monumental yet again, because all the people on the left who complain about these atrocities to women, who complain about atrocities to those who voice their own opinions, have been utterly silent. And oftentimes in my political debates, Pierce, what I think of is who supports what I support, who's against what I'm against.

49:11The only real groups against Donald Trump going in to Iran with this military action is Russia, China and the Democrats. They're all in league together. Everyone else sees this as a global good. Donald Trump's the leader who's doing it.

49:26Piers Morgan:Out of interest, I mean, given that Russia and China and North Korea all oppress their people in various ways, it's pretty awful being a woman in North Korea. and they all have weapons of mass destruction, would it not be logical then that the United States would also want to attack those countries and neutralize their ability to perpetrate evil? Or is it just one rule for Iran and one rule for the others? Well, look, I went to North Korea with the president in the first administration. He was able to talk to and have conversations with that particular leader. Iran is a completely different issue.

50:05Really?

50:07Piers Morgan:You think the Iranian regime is any different to the North Korean regime? I mean, can you point to any of the last terrorist activity around the globe that North Korea has paid for or committed themselves? I suspect the North Koreans are up to all sorts of stuff. Yeah, I mean, didn't they send 10 ,000 troops to help Putin? You can suspect it. What I'm saying is that they're doing something. Iran is actively doing it. Well, they sent 10 ,000 troops to Ukraine to fight Putin's illegal war on a European sovereign democratic country, for one. That was one of their recent actions. Sure. But if you're going to pretend as though all of the despots and dictators all over the globe are the same, they're just not.

50:45Piers Morgan:But I'm just saying the reason why no one's attacked Iran in the past is because it's so big and the regime is so well armed and it has control over the global oil supply that there was always a risk of exactly what has now happened happening. That's what's deterred people. In the same way that you wouldn't you wouldn't want to start, even though America has the biggest military in the world, they wouldn't want to start a shooting match with Putin or with Xi or with Kim Jong Un. I mean, similar arguments. But the argument appears to have collapsed with Iran. And many people are very concerned, understandably, that, you know, what we're now seeing is the repercussion of a reckless decision, which is a tinderbox off.

51:30No, I would disagree, obviously, with the characterization of a reckless decision. But let's be clear. Joe Biden actually said it would be fine if Russia had a minor incursion into Ukraine. And what did the world do? Rallied around Ukraine, led by the United States of America. How come this administration in or excuse me, this this terrorist organization in Iran has nuclear weapons? Everyone agrees they shouldn't have them. Everyone hates them and says they're a terrorist entity that causes death and destruction all over the globe. And yet they're holding back and not helping their major ally, the United States, in this.

52:05Now, I think they're going to come forward and actually start helping because they realize how difficult it's going to be for them in the future. But regardless, these – listen, again, having worked in this White House – I worked in a White House with Donald Trump, understanding the global issues that this country faces. They are very nuanced. They are very difficult. They are rarely cut and dry. However, when you see a regime doing what it does to its people, what it does to the American people since the 70s and paying for other entities to cause death, to cause casualties. We just had several terrorist attacks here in this country alone by Iranian nationals.

52:45And not one single mosque, not one imam came out and said, no, this is bad. We're the religion of peace. We're not going to support this. If a Christian came out, a supposed Christian came out and threw bombs at Mondami's house and said, I do this in the name of Christianity and Jesus, every pastor on the planet would come out and say, that is not Christianity. We disavow that. These people have come out in the name of Islam to destroy and kill and maim. And no single mosque, no imam in this country comes out and says, no, that's not what we're about. That to me is quite telling. And again, a global issue here that the world faces.

53:28America's taking the leadership, of course, working with our partners and allies. But we're the ones capable of doing this. What happens on the backside, again, matters to the American people and to the electorate. But right now, he's doing what needs to be done to keep this world a safer place. OK, well, I hope you're right. Here's quick clarification on just a very small thing. The acts of terrorism were not committed by Iranian nationals. They were committed by people hired by the Islamic regime. One of them was Pakistani, one of them from Senegal. So not Iranian nationals.

53:58Piers Morgan:No, that's an important clarification. Yeah, that's correct. OK, I've got to leave it there. A very interesting discussion. Thank you all very much indeed. You to be on. Thanks. As I said a little earlier, Iran's parliament speaker is one of the senior Iranians reported to have been negotiating with the U.S. through Steve Wyckoff and Jared Kushner. He's now denied that any talks have taken place. Joining me from Iran with his verdict is Professor Mohamed Miranda from Tehran University. Professor Miranda, thank you for coming back on Uncensored.

54:46They come from places like NVIDIA, Microsoft, Amazon, and plenty more. So if you want to be smart with your wallet, your career choices, in meetings with your colleagues and at dinner parties, listen to Big Technology Podcasts wherever you get your podcasts.

54:59Piers Morgan:Donald Trump posted this this morning. I'm pleased to report that the United States of America and the country of Iran have had over the last two days very good and productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East. Based on the tenor and tone of these in-depth, detailed and constructive conversations, which will continue throughout the week, I've instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five-day period, subject to the success of the ongoing meetings and discussions.

55:34Piers Morgan:Donald J. Trump, what is your response to that? Because all the official responses have been that there have been no discussions whatsoever. Is that your understanding? Yes, there have not been any talks. The reason it is believed here that Trump made this statement was because he was worried about the markets. And he made the statement, I think, an hour before the markets opened on Monday. And of course, these five days would end after the markets close on Friday. I think he's also deeply concerned about the fact that Iran said that it will retaliate with great force if these crimes against humanity are carried out.

56:20because obviously targeting vital infrastructure that ordinary people use is a crime against humanity. But of course, as usual, there's no outcry in the West because for the West, we live in the jungle.

56:37Piers Morgan:Well, I mean, my response to that would be that I think that there's always been an understood red line that you don't go after each other's energy plants. And that line was crossed. I think it was crossed by Israel attacking one of the Iranian power plants. Iran responded in kind, attacking a refinery in Qatar and threatening to do more of that. And we now get to a place where Donald Trump threatened to blow up huge amounts of the Iranian power plants and now appears to have backed down from that, claiming to have had discussion. So this red line is an important one, isn't it? Because it's in nobody's interest in this conflict that Iranians power plants get destroyed and they respond by taking out all of the neighboring Gulf states power plants.

57:29Piers Morgan:That would be energy Armageddon. so uh here's you condemn donald trump for threatening to take out iran's critical infrastructure as vital infrastructure that is uh targeting 92 million iranians yes good yeah i agree on something i didn't agree with what israel did in attacking the refinery I wouldn't agree if America decided to attack more of the power plants. I think in particular you have an issue with the Gulf states, with the desalination plants, both in Iran, but also obviously in all the Gulf states, its neighboring states there, where having spent a lot of time in the Middle East, I know that if you took out the desalination plants, then the ability of the populations of these Gulf states to drink water would very rapidly disappear.

58:26Piers Morgan:And you would potentially have millions of people unable to get to access water, which would be devastating. That's why it's always been a red line. But many red lines have been ripped up, it seems to me, in this war so far. How do you think this ends? Well, all the red lines were, of course, crossed by the United States. An unprovoked war, murdering 168 little girls on day one in the first strike. murdering the leader, denying that they carried out the strike against the girls, pretending that it was the Iranians. In other words, pretending it was the victims. But of course, this is the 47-year-old history of Iran in the United States.

59:10The United States carries out aggression, and it always blames the victim, and the victim is somehow the problem. But I think the war will end in a strategic defeat for Trump. The Iranians are not going to let go until the facts on the ground change and Iran feels assured that this will never happen again, they're going to continue because we already went through this once. We were negotiating and Trump was secretly conspiring to attack Iran with Netanyahu eight, nine months ago. Then again, this time around, as we were negotiating, he did the same thing. So we're not going to allow him to walk away, rearm himself, prepare himself, and then launch another attack six months from now, a year from now, or two years from now.

59:59Piers Morgan:Okay, but the argument, of course, we come back exactly the same to Iran. And many people will laugh, you know, wryly at your description of Iran as any kind of victim, given its activities in supporting terrorist organizations all over the Middle East for decades, given the repression of its own people and the 47 years this regime has been intact. And you and I have debated that ad infinitum. You're never going to give an inch about any of it. I'm not going to waste more time trying to get you to now. But in relation to a settlement, the Americans and the Israelis will want exactly the same from Iran.

1:00:36They will say the whole point of why they waged this attack.

1:00:40Piers Morgan:And look, I don't know what they know, but they say that there was legitimate evidence that Iran had been very rapidly rebuilding its nuclear capability, enriching the uranium to a point where it could create a nuclear bomb, and they could not allow that to happen. And that was against undertakings that Iran had given, the international community. So they want the same thing from you that you have just asked for from them. So I ask simply, how does it get resolved? No, there's no moral equivalence between an evil empire and its victims. There never was a moral equivalence. Iran does not have terrorist organizations in the region.

1:01:22Hezbollah, which you call a terrorist organization, was created as a result of the Israeli regime's invasion of Lebanon and the occupation of the capital of the country. It was born to expel this regime that had occupied its country. And in Palestine, all of the resistance organizations were created, every single one, were created as a result of occupation, ethnic cleansing, something that you know quite well, but you want to see otherwise. Or the resistance in Iraq or Afghanistan. You deny the people of these countries agency when a foreign power controls their fate. And then you want to blame Iran for everything that happens.

1:02:07instead of invading countries and occupying countries and murdering people, the empire should just go home and have normal relations with each country, and then we wouldn't have this sort of conflict.

1:02:20Piers Morgan:So do you concede quite happily then that the Iranian regime has supported, both with money and with arms, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and Hamas? Are you proud of that? Yes, why not? They are liberation organizations. Without Hezbollah, the U.S. regime, the Israeli regime, would still be occupying Lebanon. They would still be controlling Lebanon. The same is true in Palestine. By now, they would have ethnically cleansed the entire land of Palestine. Right now, as we speak, you know this as well as I, they are carrying out ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, and the West is silent. not a single West for the embassy protests.

1:03:10Why? Because all of the West believes unofficially the same thing that the U.S. ambassador does in occupied Palestine. What does he believe? He believes that the Israeli regime has the most moral army in the world, like in Gaza with the genocide, and that if it takes over the entire region, that's fine. This is the unofficial policy of the United States and its European partners. The official policy is something else. So without a doubt, it is the Palestinians who are the victims. It is the Lebanese who are the victims. It is the Yemenis who are victims. And it is the Iraqis who have been victims.

1:03:52And now it's the Iranians who are victims. Your countries, you want to portray them as victims, but they go and kidnap presidents in Latin America. They strangle people in Cuba. They destroy Libya and allow slave markets to emerge. And somehow you're always this innocent bystander and we are the bad guys. Well, just to be clear, I've never described,

1:04:18Piers Morgan:I've never used the word victim about either the United States or Israel. I don't believe them to be victims, but I understand their arguments for why they do what they do. I don't always agree with them, but I understand their arguments in the same way I listen to your arguments. My question for you, you asked me to condemn the notion of America attacking big power plants in Iran. And I happily did that. I think it would be a terrible mistake because I think Iran would immediately do the same thing to all the neighboring Gulf states. And it would be, as I said, an energy armageddon. Would you condemn the terror attacks committed by 3000 Hamas terrorists on October the 7th, for example, in return?

1:05:00We went through that the first time I was on your show and I said I would condemn them if I were to condemn the French resistance against the Nazis. OK, so you don't condemn it, just to be clear.

1:05:10Piers Morgan:You're equivocating, but you don't condemn it. OK, so, look, viewers can make their own minds up. If you can't condemn 3 ,000 people coming over a border and attacking innocent people who are at a music festival or in their kibbutz or wherever it may be, killing elderly people, young people, kidnapping a baby, kidnapping Holocaust survivors. If you can't find it in yourself to condemn the actions that day by Hamas, people will judge you accordingly. You can be as judgmental as you want against the United States and Israel. And some of the points you make, I may agree with. But whereas I'm happy to condemn what would be a grotesque miscalculation if the Americans did attack your power plants, you can't even condemn the murder of 1 ,200 people and the kidnapping of another 250.

1:06:04Piers Morgan:And that says a lot about you, Professor Morandi. No, actually, I think it says a lot about you because you know better than to say this. but you have to say this. That's how you keep your job. Why? Who do you think I'm answerable to? Oh, well, the resistance. Who? I own my own business. I own my own channel. I'm answerable to nobody. Who am I answerable to? The people who keep your show on air. Who? Who? Hang on, who? The people who keep your show on air. Who do you think keeps me on air? Oh, well, you know much better. Well, split it up. Say, give me a name. you don't want me to respond to you.

1:06:44The people that own the media industry. Who are you talking about? Who do you think puts me on air? You know quite well who they are. Give me a name. You don't want me to answer your question. No, no, I do. Give me a name. Please give me a name. Give me a name. Look, Piers, the first time you invited me, you allowed me to talk. One name of somebody who controls me or tells me what to put on out. And ever since then, you prevent me from speaking. Just give me a name. You know whenever I speak, you have no answer. Give me a name. If you don't know who owns the media outlet that your company works and provides services for, go and look it up.

1:07:30Sorry, you don't seem to understand what my company is. My company is owned by me. Yes. In any case, you're a company that is owned by you. uses this format, this platform to speak to me and prevent me from speaking. And you've talked over me the whole time. When have I prevented you from speaking?

1:07:48Piers Morgan:I've got you on multiple times in the last few years. You never let me talk. I never prevent you from speaking. You say that I'm under control by people, but you won't name them. Again, viewers can make their own calculations. Look it up. Look it up. Give me your name. Look them up. I'll send it to you after the show. No, no, just spit it out, man. And I'll give you the names of people who you work with. We're uncensored. I'll look it up after the show and give you the name. If you think I'm being censored, give me a name. Why do you invite me if you're afraid of me talking? Because you are a spokesman for the Iranian regime in Tehran, and therefore your opinions in the middle of a war in Iran against America and Israel are permanent and relevant.

1:08:29You're talking nonsense because I'm not a spokesman for anyone, but this is how you like to discredit me. I'm an academic, and I teach at the University of Tehran, and I don't get paid for doing this work. I risked my life. Did you know that a verified account on Twitter that has paid partnership is gathering money, a million dollars, in order to get that? Yeah, I saw that.

1:08:56Piers Morgan:I thought it was disgusting. Yes. Do you condemn? I condemn it, yeah. Yeah, do you condemn the owner of Twitter? Elon Musk. You mean Elon Musk? I think Elon Musk should not allow that to be done on his platform. I saw it. I think it's terrible, yes. You condemn it? Yes. Okay. I find it easy to condemn terrible things. You don't. But people like you who dishonestly say I'm a spokesperson, even though if I were a spokesman, that would not legitimize what they do. But by creating this aura that is dishonest, you create an environment where they can get away with these crimes. Right. Well, just to be clear, once again, now all of my loved ones, once again, all of my loved ones are deeply afraid because of the things that you say and the actions that they take.

1:09:54fine you've asked me several times you've asked me you've asked me several times if i condemn

1:10:01Piers Morgan:various things and i have immediately condemned them i asked you to condemn one thing and it was the hamas attacks attacks and you chose not to and liken them to the french resistance and people like i say as they do with all our interviews they will judge you according to what you say you don't want me to answer the question you don't answer i'll answer hamas is a resistance organization listen for a moment the people who live in gaza come from palestine they are refugees that were pushed into i asked you if you condemned it and you said no end you answer the question listen listen i've got to leave it there professor mirandy listen you chose not to condemn it and you chose not to tell me who you think controls my show you don't want to make their own minds up about your answers but you cannot say i don't give you a platform because i regularly do and we don't censor anything you say but i condemn things when i think they're wrong you don't you You don't think they're wrong.

1:11:12Piers Morgan:You think what the past did was perfectly justified. I've got to leave it there. The head of Press TV has said that you can have a live debate with me in Iran on Press TV. A live debate, whatever you like. So come to Iran. No, no, I'm not coming to Iran. You can visit the country and see how awful it is. You come to London and sit in this studio and we'll do it. Done. Deal. I've been to London. I've been to London. I'll leave it there for now. I've been to London. You've never been to Iran. I appreciate you coming on Uncensored. If you want to come and have the balls to fly over here and sit right here opposite me, you do it.

1:11:50Piers Morgan:You're afraid. Uncensored. Thank you very much. Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we ask for only one simple thing. Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain. And we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it without you.

1:12:26Jackson Hewitt has a great tax prep deal,$149 or less. Missing out is like ignoring the check engine light in your car. You'll regret it. Seriously, the price is only$149 or less, no matter how complicated. So don't wait. Like when you get a password expires today alert or you're shopping online and there's only one item left. It's like your taxes are in the cart. Just complete the purchase. Hurry. This deal for$149 or less is like your phone at 1%. It's about to power down. Limited time offer for new clients on federal returns. Participating locations only. Terms at jacksonnewitt.com slash 149.