"This Is A CLOWN!" Netanyahu 'Ignored' Hamas Warning + UK Sanctions Israeli Settlers

21:00The prime minister lost his brother fighting for the people of Israel. He was shot in a hijacking, rescuing people on a plane. What does that have to do with what I just asked you? We are all involved. I'm trying to explain this. We are all involved in the state of Israel and care about this deeply. That wasn't my question. We are leading the fight against the West. Not my question, Dorit, is it? You are trying to do this to pull me into a personal discretion with a crystal ball that I'm not allowed to convent on instead of talking about the real issue, which is that Iran is out there right now shooting an American ship.

21:30You want to deflate. It's fine. It's fine. Hamas are killing their people. I get it. I get it. You don't want to answer. Hezbollah are killing people. And it's like you're trying to weasel me into a way of speaking about... Actually, all I'm trying to do is get a straight... I'm simply not going to do it.

21:40Piers Morgan:I'm just trying to get a straight answer out of... No, you weren't. You were trying to fish for me. You know, we both want me to keep my job so I can continue coming on your show and answering the allegations that you constantly present against Israel, not against the other side. Actually, they're not allegations from me. They're allegations from Haaretz that have now been confirmed by a number of sources, both in the UAE and Israeli... Well, that was your choice. ..and Israeli mainstream media. Anyway, I look forward... Which Jews you choose to appear on your show, which newspapers, and who you choose to represent your views.

22:07Piers Morgan:OK. Doran Spielman, thank you very much indeed for coming back on the census. I do appreciate that. Thank you very much, Pierce. Well, joining me on the panel is Alan Bakey, who's international law expert for the Jerusalem Centre for Security and Foreign Affairs and the former Israeli ambassador to Canada. The US-Israeli journalist Emily Schrader, Owen Jones, author and host of the Owen Jones podcast, and the Palestinian-American journalist Omar Bader. OK, well, let me start with you, Owen Jones. I mean, it was a bit like getting blood out of a stone there from the official spokesman for the Israeli Prime Minister.

22:36Piers Morgan:We'll come to the Netanyahu Haaretz story a little later. But first of all, this issue of the UK government taking sanctions against specifically the Israeli settlers, you know, I thought it was a highly significant moment when Mike Huckabee, of all people, use the word terrorists about the violent Israeli settlers. And there's a qualitative difference between the ones who commit acts of violence and the ones who don't. But all the expansion of settlements in the West Bank is legal by international law. So whether they're peaceful or not, or committing acts of violence or not, they're all, according to international law, breaking the law.

23:16Piers Morgan:And eventually, something has to give. And Anna Baker, I see you shaking your head. We'll come to you for your view in a moment. But Owen Jones, you know, I'm struggling to get too angry about what my government has done here because eventually something has to give. If a democratic country continues to flout international law as brazenly as this, expand settlements at the aggressive rate the Israeli government's been doing, particularly since October 7th, what else are other countries supposed to do? To sit back and watch it? You know, I was in the West Bank exactly a year ago and I saw the reality of a Palestinian population living under the terror of both the settlers and the Israeli army.

23:56This is the longest belligerent occupation in modern times. And I met a man and his family who are literally... They built all over his actual land. He's encased by settlements, literally. He's got this massive fence surrounding him. He's under constant surveillance by cameras and Israeli settlers. The electric gate for him to go into the village is controlled by the Israeli army. Israeli settlers have attacked him and his children. And, you know, he lives under... I mean, they're trying to evict him. They're trying to drive him from his home. That's just one example. Another Palestinian man, a young man, I met him in London, actually, but when I was in the West Bank, he took me to this bar in Ramallah.

24:37I was staying in Jerusalem. I picked him up in a taxi just on the outskirts of Jerusalem, where he lives. A bit like Croydon in London, if you like. He has never been to Jerusalem, except once when he was a little child. Never. I was walking around Jerusalem freely, and this Palestinian man living on the outskirts of Jerusalem in his late 20s has never been into Jerusalem except as a child who doesn't remember it. Now, what's happened with the British government is the barest of bare minimums. Over three quarters of a million illegal settlers are colonising Palestinian land. They are waging a campaign of terror, which since 7th October has killed 1 ,100 Palestinians in the West Bank, including hundreds and hundreds of children.

25:19Palestinians are being driven violently from their homes. Entire refugee camps have been demolished. Land is being arbitrarily confiscated. It is like living with a vice, which every day gets more and more tighter. And the end game of it is for the West Bank to be rid of Palestinians. I think there was a brilliant Israeli journalist in Haaretz, the Occupy Territories Correspondents of the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, who said that is the end game. No Palestinians between the river and the sea. And the idea is to make life as intolerable as possible so Palestinians are driven from their homes. So, yes, look, many people should rightly say, what the hell was Britain doing having any trade with these illegal settlements in the first place?

26:03Now, I recognise this is... It's limited progress, but it's some progress. It's only happened because people campaigned and protested and voted, I would argue, for the likes of the Green Party, which then meant Keir Starmer got kicked out of office and Andy Burnham came to power and has been forced to listen to concerns which Labour was otherwise completely and utterly ignoring. It is a start, but obviously Britain has not accepted that genocide has been committed as per the consensus of genocide experts. But nonetheless, it's... But I'm saying it is a start. And all I'd say is the overwhelming majority of the British public support it as per the polling, and I'd say this to the supporters of Israel, you've lost.

26:40You've lost Western public opinion. Western governments are now finally being forced to act. you know you're going to lose, and that's why you're spitting so much bitter phlegm and anger and all the rest of it, because you know you are going to lose.

26:54Piers Morgan:OK. Alan Baker, you've been shaking your head quite vigorously there, so what's your response to that? Well, look, you know, unlike the previous gentleman, despite the fact that we both have a northern accent, I don't come from a political, a very clear political viewpoint. And similarly, with respect to the first speaker, Mr. Spewman, who represents the Prime Minister of Israel, I'm an international lawyer and I don't have a political position and I can only answer questions regarding international law. And a few of the statements that have been made here about international law by non-lawyers, including yourself, Piers, are simply wrong, wrong in law.

27:41Piers Morgan:OK, well, explain to me why we're wrong. Well, first of all, you're talking about the fact that settlements are illegal. But that's not true. According to international law, a country which is administering territory, which is not its own sovereign territory, has the prerogative to establish settlements as long as they're not on the private land of local people. And as long as it's temporary pending the outcome of the dispute. False. Firstly, by the way, you've been... I'm afraid you've not honestly portrayed who you are. You're a former adviser to the Israeli Prime Minister, to the Israeli government.

28:22No, no... Just so people are aware... No, no, no, no, just so people are aware... No, you are wrong. Just so people are aware... Just so people are aware of your politics. I'm sorry, sir. Look, if you want to interrupt, I didn't interrupt you despite the fact that you talked a load of rubbish. Did you... Have you acted as a legal adviser to the Israeli government? I'm sorry... Have you acted as a legal adviser to the Israeli government? I grew up in a culture where one allows, in a debate, other people to talk and not interrupt. So kindly restrain yourself and wait until I finish talking. I have been a legal advisor of Israel's foreign ministry for about 30 years, after which I was Israel's ambassador to Canada.

29:04I haven't been the advisor to any prime minister. If a particular prime minister happened to serve as foreign minister, then I was his legal adviser, including Netanyahu and including all previous foreign ministers.

29:18Piers Morgan:So, kindly... All right, but Alan Baker, just to be clear... Alan Baker, let me ask you this. No. Alan Baker, from a minute... No, no. No, kindly stop interrupting and relax. OK, Alan, let me ask you a question from a legal perspective, which is your position, then, is that if the settlers have not taken land that is currently being owned and occupied and lived in by Palestinians, then it doesn't constitute a breach of law. Is that your position? Well, it doesn't constitute a breach of law if it's owned by them. Sorry, the opposite. If they own the land, then Israelis aren't allowed to establish settlements...

29:57Piers Morgan:Right, so any settlements that take Palestinian homes are illegal. You accept that? Well, unless the Palestinian land or homes are purchased for the establishment of settlements, which is the case in many cases. Can I correct? Any settlements that's established in violation of Israeli law and international law are indeed illegal and have to be dismantled. This is Israeli law. OK, good. Well, we're getting somewhere, because we accept that, because obviously we know for a fact that many of these expansions of these settlements have been exactly in that category. You've just detailed, which would be illegal.

30:39Piers Morgan:Omar Baddard... What Alan has said is false. Well, Omar Baddard... What Alan has said is false. Let me bring Omar in. Will you stop interrupting, old boy? Let me bring Omar in. I just need to correct you, because you've just said a load of disinformation. Will you stop interrupting? Well, let me bring Omar in. Omar. But you're wrong. Omar is the only one who has any Palestinian in him on the panel. So why don't we bring Omar in to talk about the reality here? Omar, what is your reaction to what Alan Baker said? We should be absolutely clear about the fact that international... This is a settled question under international law.

31:10You have the UN Security Council repeatedly voting that every bit of settlements that exists on the West Bank and previously in Gaza are illegal under international law. These are resolutions that even the United States... You know, for somebody who just complained about being interrupted, actually jumping down my throat when I'm trying to speak, maybe try to restrain yourself for a change and live by the parameters you're trying to set for other people. Try to abide by them yourself for a moment. So you have the UN Security Council voting repeatedly that the entire settlement enterprise is illegal under international law.

31:42And then you have every major human rights organization in the world saying that settlements are illegal under international law. By the way, not just Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, but even Israeli human rights organizations like Beth Salem. And you have the International court of justice, repeatedly saying that the entire settlement enterprise is also completely and categorically illegal under international law. For somebody like Alan to then show up and say that he's an international law expert, but his view is at odds with the entire international community and that he alone knows that land theft is not really illegal if Israelis do it.

32:13This is not an international law expert. This is a clown. This is a chief propagandist who is unworthy of describing himself by that or even being taken seriously in those terms. Now, I just want to get to a particular moment that is really important over here. We have also settlements, by the way, under international law. If you look at reports by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, there are war crimes under international law. And so you have what you have right now is belatedly the UK government deciding after literally decades of these war crimes being committed at the expense of Palestinians that we're finally not going to participate in those war crimes that enable them.

32:47And that's somehow controversial. It is beyond pathetic that we're treating this as a controversy. When, by the way, and the terrorism that is implemented by Israeli settlers against Palestinians, this is not a new thing. In 1994, at the beginning of the so-called peace process, a settler named Baruch Goldstein went into a Palestinian mosque and murdered 29 Palestinian worshippers there. And he is celebrated by Israeli settlers as some sort of hero. You have a Palestinian baby, Ali Dawabshe, who was burnt to death by Israeli settlers in 2015. Israelis, settlers at weddings were picking up the picture of Ali Da 'ab sheh and stabbing it with a knife in celebration of that murder.

33:24You are dealing with people who are effectively ISIS. And the fact that right now we're treating it as a controversy, whether we're going to continue treating them and coddling them like they're part of normal society, when in fact you're dealing with unspeakable terrorists who, by their very existence as settlers on stolen Palestinian land, are participating in a war crime. This is extremely minimal and way overdue for us to be boycotted. Let me bring Emily Schrader in. No, no, Alan, I'm sorry.

33:49Piers Morgan:I'm sorry, I'm running the panel. I will bring Emily in. She's been waiting very patiently. Emily, welcome back to Uncensored. You know, for me, if even Mike Huckabee is using the words, terrorism, acts of terror, about the actions of some of these settlers, that is a wake-up-and-smell-the-coffee moment for everybody in this debate, because you couldn't think of a more Israel-friendly guy than Mike Huckabee, right? So if we take his word to be what it is, which was based on what he was told by Americans living there, that there are acts of terrorism being committed against the people on the West Bank by Israeli settlers, then why wouldn't any other democratic country, along with the 11 that we have here who've got together on this, stand up and say, enough?

34:40Piers Morgan:I mean, that's what a democratic country should do, isn't it? I think there are a few specifics here that need to be laid out. First of all, as Doron, I think, tried to explain, there's over half a million people who would be classified as settlers, including people who are in parts of Jerusalem, that would be classified as settlers. And it's important to make a distinction. There is an extremist faction. There are, I believe, the last estimate from the security forces were several hundred people who are involved in groups that are violent, that are dangerous, and I, too, would classify them as terrorism.

35:12But it's a huge gap between that and saying that all settlers are terrorists. I don't think all settlers are terrorists.

35:19Piers Morgan:I don't think all settlers are terrorists at all. But if it was 200 people from ISIS committing acts of terrorism, then there would be no limit to what people wanted to do by way of response. These are quite mild sanctions involving relatively small amounts of money. But the bigger picture is the British government standing up and making a political point to the world. we're not going to keep tolerating this if the Israeli government keeps turning a blind eye. Yeah, well, I think that the Israeli government does need to take action. But when it comes to these sanctions, and in general, the policy that we saw Meliband promoting from day one, this is not about what's best for Israelis or Palestinians.

35:57This is about what's best for them electorally. Even Owen Jones just admitted it, that this is about the Greens. And this is about appealing and, frankly, appeasing to a hardline extremist faction of people within the UK that they think that they can salvage. And if you look at the double standards being implemented, for example, we don't see the UK implementing anything of the sort towards, for example, occupied Cyprus by Turkey. We don't see the same standards applied to other people. And I think that's very, very dangerous. Furthermore, this can actually backfire, not just on the UK with the partnership that we see between the UK and Israel, but also in regards to the practical reality on the ground.

36:32What they're doing in implementing these sanctions is actually strengthening the right wing, which the Labour Party is against. And we're right ahead of elections. So already that's a problem. And then when it comes to the Palestinians and the issue in the West Bank and Judea and Samaria, we see that this is a unilateral decision that effectively is rewarding the Palestinian leadership for refusing to negotiate. This isn't about a two-state solution. This isn't about a future Palestinian state. This is about a domestic political issue in the UK. And even the E1 settlements, you're talking about 1 ,200 homes in a 12-square-kilometer area.

37:07Okay, this is a tiny area. This is not something that is going to divide the West Bank. This is not something that's going to take over the West Bank. And it's important that we're specific when we talk about these things. Does that mean that it's OK or not OK? That's a different discussion. But the exaggerated rhetoric. Look at this map. You think that this is going to divide the West Bank? It just isn't logical. Let me just quote. I'll just quote. I don't often quote these. It's very convenient that the fact that the Jordan Valley is not on that map, which Israel basically has kicked all Palestinians out of and does not allow them to basically enter that area.

37:39What does that have to do with dividing the West Bank in half? Twelve square kilometers is not going to divide the West Bank in half. It's not going to divide the West Bank in half. You've got to hand it to you. You've got to hand it to you. You are an extremely effective propagandist for the expansionist Israeli government. But we should be clear about the fact that the West Bank has already been divided. Palestinians going from one town to another within the West Bank cannot do it without going through Israeli border controls and Israeli checkpoints. Israel has effectively already divided the entire West Bank.

38:10It is acknowledged universally the fact that the extent of settlement expansion throughout the Palestinian territories has made the emergence of a contiguous Palestinian state impossible. That is why the peace process failed, by the way, throughout the 1990s. No, it's not. It's because the Palestinian leadership refused to accept any Jewish sovereignty. You have the exact opposite. What you have—Emily, Emily, allow me to finish my sentence, please. What you have here is that we've had a policy throughout the entire 1990s of the entire world effectively coddling the Israeli right, not imposing any sanctions, effectively just begging them to be nice and accept peace and anti-occupation.

38:46And what happened, the exact opposite. Nothing has changed. There is zero accountability for the Palestinian leadership. Do you mind telling her to let me finish my sentence? Yeah, let him finish his sentence. What we have is an entire discourse, an entire international community that has coddled the Israeli right for way too long. They've never imposed any consequences on Israeli settlement expansion. And the result of that was relentless Israeli settlement expansion, Palestinians being thrown out of their homes, including in East Jerusalem, so Israeli settlers can come and take them over. So the method of coddling Israel and the right has clearly not led to anything positive.

39:22So for the first time, we're beginning to say that there should be negative consequences for bad behavior. if Russia had taken over part of the United States illegally and started driving out Americans out of part of the United States and bringing Russian settlers to come and live in those areas, we would not have a dispute about whether we should be boycotting that enterprise or encouraging it and coddling it. That is precisely what we need. All right, let me bring in Owen Jones, who's been unusually patient.

39:45Piers Morgan:I have to give him credit for that. Owen. Just a few basic corrections. I mean, firstly to Alan, the legal advisor to the Israeli government. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention does not say anything at all about whether the settlements are on public land or private land. It's just not true. And what I would note furthermore is the International Court of Justice, which is the highest court on earth, it's the highest UN court, the UN Security Council have all agreed that the occupation and colonisation of the West Bank by the Israeli state is illegal, and that includes Israel's own allies.

40:20The second point in response to Emily, I'll just quote the Israeli finance minister, Bezal Smotchig. I'll just quote what the Israeli government has said. Bezal Smotchig is the de facto governor of the West Bank. And given the extremism of Bezal Smotchig, that should tell everyone more than enough. He said the so-called E1 projects, the building, this settlement, this further illegal settlement, he said the purpose of it was to bury the idea of a Palestinian state. He said it would thwart the idea of a Palestinian state because there was nothing to recognise and no one to recognise. What is so absurd?

40:53I find this so absurd all the way through this horror show, not this show, although, you know, it has its moments. I mean, the horror show that Israel has inflicted on the Palestinian people is we're forced to live by these cheerleaders, by these mad cheerleaders, by the way, in a parallel universe where we just disregard the Israeli state literally coming out and saying what they're doing, literally boasting about their crimes to the whole world. And what they do is they act as though these statements aren't being said or aren't being meant when the Israeli state says they're building the E1 project to block East Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank because they want to bury the idea of a Palestinian state.

41:32Do you know what? Believe them because they mean it.

41:35Piers Morgan:But Owen, the point that Emily, I will come to you, Alan, in a moment. Emily said an interesting point there. Notwithstanding the legal debate and so on. From the politics of this, next month there is a massive election in Israel. This could determine the political future of Benjamin Netanyahu, determine whether he stays in power or is kicked out. And I think Emily has a point. I could easily see this action by the UK government in conjunction with 11 other countries. It could backfire politically. It could... Well, I'm just putting a... I'm putting a supposition. I won't say it's my view, but I can see a potential danger here where rather than damage Netanyahu and his government, it actually fuels support for them because it makes Israelis feel the whole world's got it in for them and they're targeting, you know, 750 ,000 settlers...

42:30Piers Morgan:Crazy how Ben-Pierre and Trich came to power without before these sanctions were put in place. Yeah, yeah, I'm just saying... I'm just saying, though, Owen... I'll respond, I'll respond. Are you concerned about the political fragility of this, potentially? No. What has happened within Israeli society is the so-called moderates, many of whom, by the way, have backed the illegal occupation settlements, but let's just part that to one side, they spent decades saying, if we do this, then the US and the West will turn on us and we will suffer the consequences. And it never happened. And it happened over and over again that the likes of Haaretz, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, said, we will become pariahs, we will suffer the consequences, and it never happened.

43:09And they became the boys who cried wolf. And the Israeli right, quite rationally, said, we've got away with everything. We've wiped Gaza from the face of the earth. We've stolen this land in Palestine, in the West Bank. We've colonised the land. We've murdered however many children. And we have not suffered any meaningful consequences. The whole point, if you compare, for example, what the Serbs did in the 1990s. The Serbs, Serb nationalism and Israel, quite similar, actually, in lots of ways. It's a fusion of victimhood, often based on real things that happened, and a sense of chauvinism. But the Serbs, when they said this is anti-Serb racism, which they did, when Russia says this is Russophobia, which they do if you oppose the invasion of Ukraine, no one takes it seriously.

43:50These people in Israel, the Israeli elites, have impunity. So what's happened over years and years is they said, we can keep pushing, we can keep pushing, we can do what the hell we like, because the West will keep arming us, they'll keep supporting us, and they'll keep aiding us. And until that dynamic changes, like white South Africans who were forced to get rid of apartheid, not because they wanted to, I'm afraid to say they did not, because they concluded we can't go on like this because we are pariahs and the costs are too great. That's the only way this horror show ends.

44:19Piers Morgan:OK, let me bring Alan Baker back in. Alan, your response to that? Well, you know, I don't know where to start because a lot of what Mr Owen and similar terrorist apologists are saying is completely wrong. First of all, take Security Council resolutions and advisory opinions of the international court aren't binding. They don't bind anyone. They're recommendations. So they don't represent international law. Secondly, in apologizing for the Palestinian policies, he seems to forget one or two things. First of all, the Palestinian official administration in what you call the West Bank, which is Judea Samaria, which, by the way, is a term that was coined by the UN General Assembly Resolution 180 in 1947, calling them Samaria and Judea.

45:17Those areas, the Palestinian administration has established official policy of pay for slaves. In other words, they give financial That's just a lie. Who kills Jews or prisoners who are serving prison for killing Jews. That's just a lie. It's not a lie. Does the minister of the United Kingdom make any reference to that? No, it's not. I'm happy to walk you through it, too. Okay, Omar. So, let me address this pay to slay nonsense claim. What you have is a policy by the Palestinian authorities in the West Bank in which they basically, anybody who's killed by Israel or imprisoned by Israel, essentially their family receives compensation.

46:05Convicted murderers. People with blood on their heads. Can you, for heaven's sake, could you please put a cork in it for a second? Let me finish my thought coherently. And then if you don't like anything about it, you can then respond. I listen to your crowd. I let you say it all out. And then I'm responding. Actually, you were interrupting the whole time. Let me finish my thought. and then you can jump in and respond to it. So that's the policy. And the policy, by the way, includes Palestinians who commit acts of violence. There's no question about that. But the idea, and then there's a question, are the people who are convicted in Israeli courts, military courts, by the way, in the case of the West Bank, are they actually guilty of the crimes they're being accused of or not?

46:42It is frankly very difficult to tell because the Israeli military court system in the occupied territories has a 99 % conviction rate. It is understood that people are forced to sign things in Hebrew in a language they don't understand. So there is no real meaningful justice system. What Israel has imposed on Palestinians is extremely unjust system. And so the Palestinian authorities, and so the Palestinian authority does not discriminate, basically, on the reason why somebody is imprisoned by Israel or why somebody was killed by Israel. Their family receives compensation nonetheless. And dishonest people like Emily and like Alan turn around and say there's a pay for slave policy.

47:16It is utterly ridiculous. Show me a single policy or example of somebody who specifically paid for murdering someone. That simply does not exist. And they often exaggerated by saying the more people you kill, the more money you get. It is entirely manufactured fiction. Anti-Palestinian racism invented in order to portray Palestinians as un-survide.

47:35Piers Morgan:We all believe you. All right, before we complete things, I want to just bring Emily in to talk about this story in Haratz about Benjamin Netanyahu. It seems to me very significant, right? because the report, which has now been independently verified by mainstream media in Israel and in the UAE by other journalists. So despite Netanyahu's threats to sue and so on, it seems to be a credible report. And it's very damning. It says that 10 days before October 7th, Sheikh Mohammed from the UAE had a conversation with Benjamin Netanyahu in which he detailed information that Hamas were planning a major attack on Israel and that Netanyahu did nothing about this information.

48:20Piers Morgan:And it would certainly seem that was the case because, of course, when the attack happened, there were no defences to it for a very long period of time. If this is true, as it seems to be, but I will caveat it as if, for the purposes of this debate, if it is true, Emily, that Netanyahu was specifically given that information and didn't act on that information, Surely that makes him unfit to be the leader of Israel. Surely he would have to stand down. And surely, when it comes to an election, he should deserve to be thrown out of office. Well, I can't comment on this specific incident because I don't know all the details.

48:58Based on what's been reported so far, I understand the Prime Minister's office has denied it. They're also claiming they're going to sue about it. It remains to be seen, and I hope that does happen so that we see in discovery what is actually behind it. I will say, not that I'm in favour or against, him. But I will say that there are intelligence briefings and alerts that come in almost every single day. Even the month before, in August, there had been a wave of terrorism.

49:22Piers Morgan:Not from leaders of Gulf states. I mean, this is the leader of the UAE. One of the most powerful men in the Middle East personally calls Netanyahu to pass on this information. This is not just a piece of a tipster, you know, ringing a hotline. Sure, but the prime minister's office is denying that this happened at all in the first place. So I think there's a lot of questions that we just don't have the answers to yet. I think there is reason to be skeptical about it. And I hope that we come to a full conclusion about what actually went on here. But even if there was a phone call, there are alerts, as I mentioned, that happen all of the time within the security system.

49:59So this alone, without the context and the details, it's very difficult to determine. But I do want to just go back really quickly and confirm that even Omar admitted that Palestinian terrorists with blood on their hands are in fact being paid by the Palestinian Authority. In addition to that, we have documentation from multiple NGOs, from multiple organizations and from the textbooks themselves that the Palestinian Authority continues to teach incitement to violence and pro-terror rhetoric in their textbooks. And despite that, the UK government has set aside at least£116 million to go into the Palestinian Authority in the form of support without any caveats, without any enforcement, at least, of what's supposed to be caveats in regards to stopping this incitement to violence.

50:38It is not happening. There is zero accountability. And if we want to hold both sides accountable and push for negotiations, that's something I think that democratic states and the international community could do. That would be a viable position to hold. But what we're seeing from this government and from what the Foreign Secretary Miliband has done is extremely dangerous. and it's playing with an important relationship that saves lives in the UK, an important trade relationship worth about$6 billion a year. And this isn't something that should go quietly. It's not even about anti-Semitism. It's about being strategic and what can actually advance peace.

51:11And this doesn't do that. It does the opposite.

51:13Piers Morgan:OK. We're going to have to leave it there. I appreciate you all joining the debate. Thank you all very much. Peace Morgan, our sense that is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we ask for only one simple thing. Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate and entertain. And we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it without you.