“VINDICATED!” Prince Harry LOSES Court Case Against Media | Accused Journalist Speaks OUT

22:18Piers Morgan:There's pots of jam all over America. How do you know they're struggling for cash? From what I read... We had two years where we were being told about how they were going to fail in their contract. How much of her jam have you bought? None. Do you know what? I haven't bought any of her jam. I can tell you what, them feeding their children is not relying on me buying their jam. I'm sure she's doing very well. The point I'm making is we make these sweeping statements about them, about their finances, about their work. For two years, I've been reading about how Netflix have been just so upset and unhappy and wish they could have got out of their contract.

22:57And then, of course, we see... Where's Meet Me at the Lake? Where's the wedding date? And then, of course, we saw the wonderful pictures of Meghan Pictures are pictures. They never execute. Where's Mimi at the Lake? We know why I love most of all, Paula.

23:12Piers Morgan:Paula, Paula, look, you're a family lawyer, right? Yes. And a very good one. Thank you. Do you see an issue, even you, for your guilt-edged, rose-tinted spectacles about these two? When they lecture the world, as they did in a speech, about the need to protect children online, and then a day later post photographs, of their young children onto Instagram. Do you see a problem? Can you see the children's faces in those photographs? Actually, they're getting more and more where you can, yeah. But do you see a problem? My question was... Do you see a problem in using your children to promote yourself the day after you lecture the world...

23:51Their faces. ..about protecting your kids online? You can't see their faces. Or when you write an article about you can't see their faces. But even if you can't see their faces, so what? You can't see their faces. A, you could see more and more of them. She's edging more and more. But can I say, in terms of protecting our children online, and to answer your question, to be fair to you, to answer your question, are you saying that you should not post your children online at all? They are. Or are you saying that actually the corporate entities that control social media should take steps to ensure that children who are posted online are protected?

24:28Piers Morgan:I think if you're going to be centre stage in giving public speeches, lecturing the world about the importance of protecting kids online, and then you go out... And you should hide your children until that happens. Absolutely. OK. Don't be a flaming hypocrite. My problem with these two has always been the hypocrisy. Everybody who posts their children online and having their children in danger. Are you saying that everybody... I think if you genuinely want to protect kids online, don't put your young kids on Instagram. It's that the hypocrisy goes beyond that within the last 24 hours. Harry photographed with his little photography buddy weeks after writing the anti-Semitism in the UK article.

25:05Then he's pictured next to this man who's had to resign from his charity because of accusations of anti-Semitism. The hypocrisy is the only thing that is consistent about these two. Otherwise, they are not consistent. They do not execute. They announce things. You know, we talked about Netflix. Where's Meet Me at the Lake? Where are all of these projects that they announced? The reason we feel like they are in desperate need of money is because Meghan was coming back here after she made such a stink, saying that this place hated her, she hated them, and it was racist. That was an admission of defeat.

25:39That was an admission of...

25:40Piers Morgan:Do you reckon we'll see them this week? I don't think... I'll tell you what my money would be on. A trip to Althrop. I think that's a good bet. To Diana's burial plot. I reckon it'll be the full-on, you know... Self-filmed. Will she appear with him? It'll be the most cynical thing you've ever seen. Will she appear with him in Birmingham? That's the first time. Tom, how much money have you made from your books on the royal family? Oh, very little. In fact, I have to pay to get them published. My point is... Well, what's the point? He's an author. My point is, if you cannot go out like Prince Harry has done, like Meghan has done, and earn money, make your Netflix show, let them make their Netflix show.

26:20Let them make that. I don't think anyone has a problem. I think people had a problem with how they left the royal family. I don't think anyone has a problem with them now being financially free from it and making money. I certainly don't. Go and make as many Netflix documentaries as you want. What I have a problem with is coming over here and trying to dovetail, essentially, a family holiday with public work. It doesn't work. Had they brought the kids over here on a private trip without telling anyone, Charles would have laid out the red carpet, he'd have opened up Buckingham Palace and the gardens, they could have helicoptered in, and no one would have been any the wiser.

26:55that would have been the sensible things to do. And by the way, they'd have had the security. Harry has issued a statement as you're talking. OK, well, let's hear it.

27:02Piers Morgan:It's a complete and obvious whitewash, but sadly not altogether unexpected. Another establishment stitch up there. We came to court seeking justice and accountability, but we've received neither. The most predictable statement in history. So another establishment stitch up. In other words, because the judge didn't find for him, it's all a whitewash. The British establishment trying to stiff him again. I mean, I have to say I don't agree with him. The reality is, in terms of this case, what has and who has won is time, the calendar won, not the truth as far as Harry, Baroness Lawrence, Elton John.

27:37That's what's happened here. What's happened? In terms of the statute of limitations, their time... Elton John had nothing to do with the statute of limitations. Their time frame expired for Harry, OK? No, it didn't. That's not true at all. That's just not true. And what the judge said was, in terms of the evidence, there simply wasn't... I think he used the word anchorage. There wasn't the evidence... Right! ..that the judge could anchor to the allegations. That's not true. That's not true. So, suspicion... Well, you can say that. Suspicion wasn't enough. You can say that. I did. Suspicion wasn't enough.

28:08And Katie's right. Suspicion wasn't enough. So it wasn't about, as you said, Piers, at the beginning, that this person was lying or that person was lying. What happens was there simply wasn't the evidence there to support the allegations. Harry says,

28:21Piers Morgan:when the court says there is not sufficient evidence of wrongdoing, despite the document showing otherwise, then one does wonder how justice was ever going to be done. I mean, it's just bullshit. It's worse than that. It's worse than that. Here's the fifth in line of succession, challenging his king's court. Yes. And the king's judge. Yes. And in the end, this is actually why I said to you what's going to happen during this week, because Harry now is kicking out, the same as when he lost the Ravik thing and did that interview. He cannot accept, actually, democracy, the truth, and the way the system works.

28:51If it's not to his liking, then it's appalling. And that is really why I said to you what's going to happen during this week. Because actually, he and Meghan now, in my view, have reached the end of a chapter. They're now into a serious problem of survival.

29:07Piers Morgan:Yeah. Because they've been judged to be unreliable, untrustworthy by the king and by the judge. And what are they going to do for their income from now on if they're not going to trash the family anymore? I mean, look, it's a really interesting question because it is a law of diminishing returns, right? They've realised the more they trashed the family, the more despised they became, particularly in this country. They have also realised, because the A-listers ran a mile, because A-listers aren't stupid, they want to be with the king and the next king. They want to be with Charles, William and Catherine.

29:38Taylor Swift is hanging out with William and Catherine, right?

29:40Piers Morgan:Right, that's who the A-listers want to be with. They don't want to be with the renegades trashing their family that everyone hates, right? So they've had to pivot into, oh, nicey-nicey jam-making. and nobody wants to buy it, right? So what have they done? They've come back here to get featured with the king. Exactly. And I think the king knows that and his people definitely know that because I've talked to them and they've been very wary of being used as a PR tool to reconnect them back to the A-list royals, which gives them a currency they can then manipulate and sell back in America. And I don't think the royal family will let them do it.

30:12Piers Morgan:So then the question becomes, well, what happens? How can he, with all the attention this defeat will bring, not misstanding his weaselly words, as you say, challenging a judge's verdict. I mean, it's pretty serious, actually. You've got to be careful he doesn't get into contempt here. But, you know, how can he legitimately bring his family to this country, given he's attracted all this huge attention on him, which will mean the media will be absolutely obsessing over where he is and what he's doing, far more than they would have done otherwise. You know, and at the backdrop of this, let's try and be balanced.

30:46The Invictus Games is a great thing, right? no-one disputes that. That's got nothing to do with this. When he's talking about that, he has me. I'm with him 100%.

30:55Piers Morgan:And there's no comparison to Andrew. But the interesting thing about... I mean, Andrew, to me, by not being, you know, properly interviewed under caution in America and here, until he does that, I've got no time for it. It's like, you deserve all you have on the thing. But he was stripped of his titles. And I've said... But he still had funded security. Well, it's more complex, because if you actually look at the way they apportion the armed security is what Harry wants, right? The proper armed security. That is the sticking point. Anne doesn't get it. Edward doesn't get it. I mean, hardly any of them get it.

31:29They don't need it. We don't have guns in this country. Well, to be fair, I don't think Princess Anne has had the type of... Girl was almost abducted! I don't think Princess Anne has had the type of commentary online, for example. But she literally was almost abducted. I don't know if Prince Azan has suffered from the racist attacks. It's all self-inflicted. You may well think it's self-inflicted, but what does that have to do? What does that have to do with whether he needs a... Well, actually, it matters a lot, actually. In what way? Well, for example, if you're going to boast in your book

32:03Piers Morgan:for millions of pounds that you killed 25 Taliban and how good it all felt, then you may piss off the Taliban, right? So then if the Taliban make threats, Whose fault is that? But when he did that, the years ago that he did that, I understood that we were proud of him. What? For boasting about killing Taliban? The press were not suggesting, for example, that he should be hidden away and that he should hide away. But now I'm hearing... No soldier, I can tell you... Now I'm hearing that that's a problem. My brother, having been an army colonel, I can tell you, no soldier publicly boasts in that crude manner about killing the enemy in the way that he did.

32:46Piers Morgan:I'm not suggesting it wasn't vulgar. I'm not suggesting that it should never have been done, Piers. The point I'm making is, when I see people challenging what Prince Harry does, which is literally every time he opens his mouth, every time he breathes, it's hard not to then contrast that with how they have treated other members of the royal family, some of whom... Well, they've banished Andrew completely. How long did that take? Well, they've banished him completely. I don't think we can say all right, because it isn't all right. We can see, using that as an example in terms of the security funding, how differently Prince Andrew was treated to Prince Harry.

33:25But we do respect what he's done with Invictus, and I do think we listen, and we understand that he knows exactly where these people are mental health-wise, physically, and that this is something that he's passionate about. The problem is it gets buried in the circus. It gets buried in the chaos. If he truly would have focused on Invictus this trip, then we wouldn't be sitting here around this panel talking about each other. Back to my point, why convolute it with a family visit that complicates everything? So tell me something.

33:53Piers Morgan:What do you think is going to happen this week, Katie? Honestly, Piers, I don't know. I'm still just trying to digest the enormity of today. I mean, I think you're probably right. I think there will be time spent with the Spencers. You know, the King has been beyond magnanimous. He did extend that olive branch. Maybe Harry has just made it impossible for that meeting to happen, but I hope there is a way that he can meet with his grandchildren and see his son, because right now I imagine Harry needs a bit of support. Yeah, and let's not forget Thomas Markle in all this, who lives 60 miles away and has never met either the man who married his daughter, who he brought up on his own for many years, let's not forget that, or either of his grandchildren.

34:36And we know one of the reasons why. These are the two that put empathy and compassion at the centre of their work. Piers, we know one of the reasons why that happened. There may be many more, but we know one of the reasons why that happened. Are you sympathetic to Prince Harry? As a family lawyer, you support ostracising her father from his grandchildren? I absolutely do not. And I think that the institution and I think that anybody who can support all of them in mediating an outcome that is going to mean that this family finds peace, that there must be the right outcome. So I asked the question from the journalists here.

35:16Piers Morgan:Yeah. Why do you then, if there is this negativity, that's so much negativity that is garnered around Prince Harry, why do you print it? Because for simple reasons. I wouldn't know about it. As a member of the public, I wouldn't know. Well, the question is, why do they keep on appearing on Netflix, Apple, Winfrey, Apple? Because they're earning money. Because they're earning money at other people's expense. But they have royal titles bestowed on them by our royal family of monarchy. And they're exploiting it. And they're exploiting them for personal gain only. What else do you expect them to do?

35:50Do some bloody duties. Fine. Fantastic. Come back and do your job. I agree with you. OK. Wonderful. Let's welcome them back. When are we going to see them on a Wednesday and stunk at a flower show? Never. Never. Let's welcome them back with open arms. Never. Tom, let me ask you. Is this marriage going to survive? Yes, because they need each other. I've never believed a divorce story. But the whole point about this bringing them back is no-one trusts them. It was Meghan who lied about the whole marriage, about the whole way in which she was treated. It was her absolute dishonesty and always her intention to go back to Hollywood and capitalise.

36:27Piers Morgan:What were the two things that never appeared in his book? Racism allegation. Racism and the suicide stuff, right? Yeah. Which were the two things I challenged in real time on Good Morning Britain, and I had to leave for disbelieving it. They never appeared in his book. It was like it never got said. She was so suicidal that apparently she went to a senior person at the palace who said she couldn't get any help. Human resources. Even though he was the head of a mental health character. It was obviously horseshit. You're right, but it's much, much worse than that, because all her interviews, all her stuff has been to destroy the very thing that Paula says, we should now welcome her back.

37:06The last thing we should do is welcome Meghan back. The thing they should do... They made their bed in Montecito. Get on with it. But if I was... I mean, Katie, should the title... We've seen with Angie, you can remove the titles. It can be done. This idea before was, well, you can't do it. Well, actually, you can. We literally just did it. And Angie's not being convicted of any crime, right? But he's lost everything. And he fends for himself now. Why don't we just do that with these two? Say, look, OK, fine. You want to have a rival royal family? The thing that gets my go most when they go on these royal tours, like they're still members of the family doing the royal duties.

37:42They're not. They're doing even personal gain. The outcome of the Sandringham Agreement was that they would keep their titles, but they were not allowed to commercialise them. But they do. And I would argue that they do. Yes. And I suspect that if it was William on the throne, they would have lost their titles. You have to remember that the king is 77. He's living with cancer. He wants to be reconciled with his estranged son and he wants to see his grandchildren. He does not want to create or extend, not create, but extend this rift between the united royal family. He is trying his best. I think William would be far more severe when it came to the Sussexes and I suspect when it is his time on the throne he will be.

38:26I think the Sussexes need to be very careful, but it will be interesting to see what the next steps are. Will they get that much-anticipated family reunion with the king? It was handed to them on a plate, and as I said, on the Royals Uncensored, Harry has made a pig's ear.

38:41Piers Morgan:You know who's going to be desperate, Kinsey, for that royal photo op now? Harry. He needs to change the mood music from... He just lost a£50 million battle with a newspaper. He needs to change the mood music and she is highly manipulative, we know that, and they'll be scheming and plotting about what they can do this week to change the mood music and a picture with the king. This is why I'd be very wary if I was the king, and particularly the people around him whose job it is to protect him. They're going to get used. They're going to get used. But they're not going to allow themselves to be used, that's the point.

39:17That's why they detailed the whole story about Buckingham Palace, and that is why, in the end, he wasn't allowed in. It was incredible we got told all the loadout. But that's because the Palisades, I was told, and the king, had their head in their hands because this Project Thor that had been months in the creation was suddenly literally just being imploded by Harry and Meghan. But I think you've probably witnessed the redirection of Prince Harry over the last six to 12 months. He wants to be seen as a serious person. I mean, 14 mentions are something of Todger in his book. He's trying to redirect the conversation.

39:52Ukraine, talking, you know, challenging Putin, challenging Trump. That article he wrote in the News Statesman about anti-Semitism. He wants to be taken as a serious person. And this loss jeopardises his credibility. It jeopardises his authority. And I think it jeopardises his future when it comes to making money. You know, I do think he wanted to be a speaker and go on the circuit. And who's going to sit back and take him seriously when it appears that he is a dishonest person?

40:19Piers Morgan:Paula, do you think it's right that they go off on these royal tours as if they're still active working members of the royal family, putting a shift in, which is part of the deal for why we bestow these titles on them and let them live in palaces? Do you think it's right they do that? So, as I understand it, they're not royal tours. As I understand... What do you mean, as you understand it? As I understand it... You surely watch what we watch on TV. As I understand it, they are invited to countries. They are invited to attend either to give... Why do you think they're invited? They're invited to attend either to give speeches...

40:52Why are they invited? ..or in terms of their charitable... Why are they invited, Paul? ..in terms of their charitable work, peers. Why are they invited? In terms of their charitable work, peers, because, of course... You think that's why they're invited? ..you do know that Harry and Medan undertake... You think they're invited for their charitable work? Yes, I do. You don't think they're invited because they're called the Duke and Duchess of Sussex? And so, on that basis... Paula. Paula. Are you saying, Piers... Paula. Are you saying that they're not invited to talk... They're not invited. ..in relation to their charitable work?

41:18For example, in regards to... As you know, it's a pure excuse. I mean, you can say that they use them as an excuse. I can advise the charitable work all the time. Most of it I can't, I haven't got time to do. Is it an excuse for you, Piers? You know what? Of course it isn't. You go because you want to support the charity. You know why they do these tours, and I know why they do them. No, what I know is... What I know is why they're invited. And that's the question that you asked. You know it's just an excuse for... The fact is, do I think... Sorry, Tom, do I think, to conclude my answer, do I think that we're at a loss in terms of what they could offer the royal family?

41:54Far too late. Absolutely. Far too late. That ship is gone. Absolutely, I think that is a loss for us. The last thing we need is the Meghan and Harry back in England. Just think how many more books you could sell, Tom. No, I don't want them here. They have done enough damage. The royal family has a really difficult task now to rebuild respect and popularity. I agree. The last thing they need is Harry and Meghan here.

42:15Piers Morgan:The good news is that since she's got healthy again, Catherine in particular, I'm saying really now... Yes. In fact, both of them. I mean, I saw William's podcast with the Kelsey brothers. They were great. Yeah. He was great. That was a really cool thing to do. And she was good on the peaks. And she was great up in the peaks, right? Exactly. Amazing achievement and great pitches. Exactly. And they should just keep doing their thing. Exactly. And they are. And I think as they continue to do their thing, as brilliant as they do, they feel more and more detached from the Sussex show or circus or whatever you want to call it.

42:50Because increasingly, I think you look at Meghan and Harry and you see them as celebrities, far more than you see them as royals, and actually that works to William and Catherine's favour.

42:59Piers Morgan:Well, I want to end this by, A, pointing out that Royals Uncensored, which is doing gangbuster viewing numbers, so congratulations, Katie, and to the others involved, will be back on Thursday with a new episode. Yeah, we're going to have a cracking episode. It's going to be must-watch, obviously. I mean, I think there's plenty to talk about. Well, we have one of the most talked-about journalists in the world. Kinsey, you're joining us, I think. I am. I really. Which is great. I'm going to end how we started, by just reminding people what the judge said about our Royal's Uncensored host. I found Miss Nicoll to be a credible and impressive witness.

43:30Piers Morgan:I accept her evidence as honest. So after all the trashing you got, a complete and utter vindication of you and your journalism. So congratulations. Thank you. I said you were not going to make me cry on this show. You are not going to make me cry on this show. I'm just so glad we've got you on Royals Uncensored. Thank you. You're the most famous and credible and honest and impressive royal correspondent in the world right now because a judge has said so. Thank you. I really appreciate you coming on, doing the show for us, doing Royals Uncensored. I know what you've been through. I know how difficult it's been.

44:08Piers Morgan:I know how emotional it's been for you. Big win. Thank you. Congratulations. And thank you to all of my panel. Great to see you. Even you, Paul, defending the indefensible. Thank God somebody does. We'll be agreeing. Great to see you all. Thank you very much. Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we ask only one simple thing. Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. And in return, we will continue our mission to inform irritate and entertain. And we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical and we couldn't do it without you.

45:09Chevy Silverado can haul the biggest loads on the toughest roads. It's a true workhorse. Now's the perfect time to check out Chevy's current offers, service specials, and to schedule a test drive at your Chicagoland and Northwest Indiana Chevy dealers. Chevy Drives Chicago.