In short
Debate and fallout after Diddy’s federal conviction, focusing on whether prosecutors overreached with RICO/sex-trafficking charges, how consent and trauma bonding should be understood, and whether Cassie Ventura should face similar prostitution liability.
Key claims
Tony Buzbee expects a 2–4 year sentence (not 20), says consent can’t be assumed “for life,” and argues the jury rejected the RICO theory. DJ Vlad argues the case hinged on interstate commerce and that Cassie’s role in booking/paying escorts makes her liable; he claims other alleged victims weren’t used because interstate trafficking wasn’t proven. Elisabeth Overson (Karen Steffens) claims she was “gifted” to Diddy in 2001, says Diddy feared her book Confessions of a Video Vixen, and alleges drug-fueled, transactional treatment; she denies sex with Diddy “to my knowledge” but now questions it.
Notable examples
Overson describes security at Diddy’s home and a New Year’s Eve conversation warning her boyfriend she might have “video.” Vlad cites Cassie’s $30M immunity and letters opposing bail; Busby cites “Punisher” testimony that Cassie drove events over two years.
Guests (backgrounds)
Elisabeth Overson/“Karen Steffens,” author of Video Vixens; Tony Buzbee, attorney representing Diddy victims in civil suits; DJ Vlad, VladTV commentator/host; Esther Krakow, podcast contributor.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding the Diddy Trial
0:31 to 1:25
Discussion on the implications of the Diddy trial regarding sex trafficking.
“The trial was about RICO, the trial was about sex trafficking, the trial was about prostitution.”
Introduction to Elisabeth Oveson
1:28 to 2:00
Elisabeth Oveson shares her background and relationship with Diddy.
“but his sentence is likely to be much shorter than that.”
Elisabeth's Experience with Diddy
2:04 to 4:36
Elisabeth recounts her experiences with Diddy, from pleasant beginnings to conflicts over her book.
“author of Video Vixens, who claims she was gifted to Diddy in 2001 by a music executive.”
Reflections on Fear and Trust
4:39 to 8:25
Elisabeth reflects on Diddy's fear during their interactions and the implications of their relationship.
“But just about, I think, his sexual proclivities and what we saw in hanging out with him, the kind of clubs he took us to, even conversations he and I had, one in particular where he, I didn't understand it at the time.”
Questioning the Nature of Their Relationship
11:48 to 14:00
Elisabeth discusses the ambiguity of her relationship with Diddy and reflections on her past.
“Did you actually ever have any kind of sexual relationship at all with him?”
Confusion Over Past Relationships
14:00 to 19:50
Exploration of the complexities and confusions surrounding past relationships with Diddy.
“At that point, we had had, I thought, just a friendly, platonic night together.”
Cultural Issues in the Industry
19:50 to 21:28
Discussion on the systemic issues within the entertainment industry related to abuse and power dynamics.
“Well, to debate all this, I'm joined by Tony Busby, the attorney representing Diddy victims in civil suits, DJ Vlad, commentator and host of Vlad TV, and our very own unsensored contributor, Esther Krakow.”
Legal and Ethical Implications
21:28 to 24:54
Examination of the legal complexities surrounding the trial and the role of consent.
“I feel sorry for Cassie because I do think the prosecutors misled her.”
Implications of the Verdict
25:32 to 28:00
Analysis of the potential outcomes for Diddy and the implications for victims seeking justice.
“Expecting two to four years, I would expect.”
Discussion on Diddy's Legal Case
28:00 to 30:29
Exploring the nuances of Diddy's legal situation and implications of consent.
“And, you know, sometimes juries do things that we don't expect.”
Show all 14 chapters
Me Too Movement and Cultural Impact
30:30 to 33:38
Analyzing the effects of the Me Too movement on contemporary legal cases.
“They gave her immunity early on and that's the horse they rode with.”
Violence in Relationships: A Deeper Look
33:39 to 35:36
Discussing the dynamics of violence in relationships and societal perceptions.
“Well, that she accepted the violence and was prepared to stay in the relationship because she enjoyed everything else.”
Civil Lawsuits and Credibility of Accusations
35:37 to 37:57
Debating the credibility of accusations and the nature of civil lawsuits.
“Therefore, there's only two people that were actually used.”
Reflecting on Victimhood and Agency
37:58 to 40:26
Examining the balance between victimhood and agency in complex relationships.
“lawsuits more lawsuits than any here in the united states so here jay-z how many lawsuits have you None of them went to trial, Knucklehead.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Piers Morgan:What if you can see what's happening inside your body? PreNuvo's whole body scan screens for hundreds of conditions, including many solid tumors, as early as stage 1, all in under an hour. And now, you can go beyond imaging with 80-plus blood biomarkers that help complete the picture. This Labor Day, save$300 off your scan when you book at PreNuvo.com. That's P-R-E-N-U-V-O dot com. Save$300 now through September 8th at PreNuvo.com. Terms and conditions apply. This is not what the trial was about. The trial was about RICO, the trial was about sex trafficking, the trial was about prostitution. In fact, the only reason that he got convicted was because it was interstate commerce.
0:41All the other male escorts that I've talked to, like for example, I talked to Don the dealer who also had multiple sessions with Cassie. She said she was loving it. She was into it. She was setting the direction. This is really about the domestic violence, but the domestic violence goes back past the statute of limitations.
0:56Piers Morgan:You just made this grand conclusion that, oh, the U.S. attorney talked to a few of these folks and decided they had no credibility. You were flat out wrong in that respect. How am I wrong if none of them were used? What's the actual evidence of it? Have you won a single lawsuit with any of these people you've represented? A single lawsuit? Literally 30 days ago for$640 million, pal. So don't be telling me about winning lawsuits. How many lawsuits have you won against Diddy and Jay-Z? None have went to trial yet, knucklehead. First came the verdict, now the fallout. Diddy could still face up to 20 years in a federal prison, but his sentence is likely to be much shorter than that.
1:34Piers Morgan:The defence is asking for less than two years. Federal prosecutors are facing criticism that they overreach with charges of sex trafficking and racketeering in a RICO case that never looks strong enough. That's competing claims. Victim shaming. And that the Diddy trial is a definitive end for the Me Too era. So what went wrong? What happens next? and how will the hip-hop world be reshaped by a case that gripped the world? Just a moment, we'll hear from DJ Vlad, Tony Busby and Esther Kraku, but first I'm joined by Elizabeth Overson, known to many by her pseudonym of Karen Steffens, author of Video Vixens, who claims she was gifted to Diddy in 2001 by a music executive.
2:13Piers Morgan:Well, welcome to Uncensored, Elizabeth. Thank you very much indeed for joining me. Thank you for having me. A lot of people are kind of aware of your history with Diddy, but for those who know nothing about it, how would you categorise your time with him?
2:37My time with Sean was honestly pleasant in the beginning. To my recollection, the first time we met, we spent the night together, but he was a consummate gentleman with me in that evening, again to my recollection. And every other time I saw him after that was in a group setting, so it was fine. The last time I saw him, however, things had taken a bit of a turn. It was after Confessions of a Video Vixen, my first book had been published. and he was seething when he saw me at Prince had a party at his house and we were there you know of course before Prince died and he was scowling at me the whole night and I just I found it I found it amusing but he was obviously very angry with me by that point in our relationship.
3:37Piers Morgan:Why was he so angry with you?
3:41Well, four months before Confessions was published in 2005, we got a call from Sean's attorney, my attorney did, and Sean's attorney wanted to see the book before the book came out. Confessions of a Video Vixen was an embargoed book, so no one could see it. No one would even get it until the day, the publication date, which is June 5th of that year. And so my attorney told his attorney that he could not get the book and that they would have to wait until the book came out like everyone else. And if they saw a problem in the book, that they were free to reach back out to us, sue us, whatever they felt was necessary.
4:19We knew that wouldn't happen because Harper Collins is the publisher of that book, as you know, is a News Corp entity. And those attorneys made sure it was vetted to the fullest so Sean could never sue. He could never raise any objection to it and I think he always um hated me after that because I left enough I raised I posed questions in that book that um that I think sent certain people down the direction that leads us to where we are now just just explain that a little more what were the questions you think that you're talking about
5:05Well, honestly, I'm just now getting context on a lot of the questions that I had then after the trial. The trial gave me way more context. But just about, I think, his sexual proclivities and what we saw in hanging out with him, the kind of clubs he took us to, even conversations he and I had, one in particular where he, I didn't understand it at the time. And honestly, Pierce, I'm getting new understanding about this line of questioning. I wrote about this in Confessions, where my boyfriend and I at the time had gone to his home for New Year's Eve, you know, Christmas, New Year's Eve kind of festivities.
5:46And he pulled me to the side and was just like we're friends right you know we're friends and I was like yeah yeah we're friends and like we're good and I'm like yeah we're good and I couldn't figure out what he meant and I wrote about this where I just I didn't know what he was talking about and he just kind of went on to say you know I have kids I have a mom and if anything got out it would really hurt them and I honestly at that point in stage did not know or remember what he was talking about and so we just kind of laughed it off like what is what's going on with him you know and things he said to my boyfriend like don't trust her you know she might have her on video with you know in you know precarious positions and and this is back before cell phone cameras so I was just like what video I didn't understand any of it now after the trial and the things that have come out from the trial.
6:45This gives these conversations a lot more context. But at the time when confessions came out, it did make us all wonder, what was he so afraid of? I didn't even know what I had seen or didn't see, or if there's something happened that I didn't remember from our time together. But he was very afraid that I would say something in the book. And honestly, I don't think, I think he never contacted us back because what he thought I was going to say, I did not say, possibly because I didn't remember it.
7:13Piers Morgan:What do you think he was fearful of you saying?
7:18I have to be honest, Piers, you know, in booking this time with you today and your producer asked me to kind of send over some pages from the book, I hadn't read Confessions since I wrote it. And I read it for the audio version. And that was 2005. It's been 20 years since I've read this book. and in reading what I sent over, which is what I just described to you right now, I wonder if, I wonder a lot of things. He was so afraid that I knew something and I was confused because the only time that we had had together prior to this conversation was alone time at his home wherein I felt it was that we had a good time.
8:01I didn't know, So, you know, we had never, he didn't come on to me. He was, he just seemed very, he was just, it was very platonic, I thought. So I was confused as to why, what, you know, what was it? And so I have to admit my mind kind of races now that I have more context of his proclivities and what he's capable of, of what he was so afraid of, what he thought I knew or what he thought I remembered.
8:28Piers Morgan:I mean, in the book, you talk about the first time you met Diddy in a nightclub at 3am. You say, right there in front of me, Diddy and Gotti, who was the murder records boss of Gotti, made arrangements to send me to Diddy's house in one hour. It was four in the morning. I turned up to Diddy's home in my SUV. There were security guards in the driveway, all dressed in dark suits with their hands in front of them. They had been expecting me. The things that went on when Gossie and I were together are almost unimaginable to me now. But in the haze of drugs and liquor, it all seemed all right. I was being used over and over again, man after man, all friends and acquaintances of Gotti's.
9:09Piers Morgan:I quickly became Gotti's showpiece. He would turn other people in the industry on to me. I was his party favour. Whenever there was anyone Gotti wanted to impress, he would send them to me and I'd take care of them. I mean, could it be that what Sean Combs is worried about was that he facilitated this very transactional relationship that you had with Irv Gotti? Is that part of this? I don't think that was it. And honestly, I think it was more insidious than that. The fear, the fright that he had during that conversation at his Miami home, you know, back in whatever year that was, he seemed terrified that I had known something.
9:56And I just don't know what he thought I knew or remembered. The transactional nature of how we met, and which is why, you know, I said in various interviews before that I was gifted to him, it was because no one asked me if I wanted to go. No one asked me. They talked about me as if I wasn't there. I was property to cart around. And that's what they did. If they would have asked me, I still would have gone. So I didn't hold any objection at the time because I would have still done it. Being 21 and it's ditty and we're having fun and it's just a Saturday night out in L.A.
10:34Piers Morgan:Everybody knows how much I enjoy my tea. And I'm very happy to say that today's show is sponsored by Peaks Pure Fermented Teas. These are not your average brews. They're sourced from 250-year-old wild trees in the Himalayan foothills, which are untouched by modern farming. No pesticides, no fertilizers, just nature at its best. Pure delivers a full spectrum of prebiotics, probiotics and postbiotics, just like the fermented foods found in longevity hotspots. It comes in crystal form. so there's no messing around. Just dissolve, sip, and feel the difference. It's trusted by health experts, including Casey Means and Dr.
11:12Piers Morgan:Mark Hyman. There's teas for all occasions, and they all support your gut health, metabolism, and cellular renewal. The next time you put the kettle on, ask yourself, is my tea working as hard as me? Peaks Pure Fermented Teas for the gut of a Brit and the longevity of a Himalayan monk get 20 % off for life, plus a free frother and glass beaker with the Pure Bundle. Visit peaklife.com slash peers. That's peak, P-I-Q-U-E, life.com slash peers. Did you actually ever have any kind of sexual relationship at all with him? I'm sorry, what was that? Did you actually have any kind of sexual relationship with Diddy at all?
11:59No, Diddy and I did not. Well, not to my knowledge.
12:06Piers Morgan:So what do you mean by that? Not to my knowledge. I don't... Honestly, I'm questioning a lot of things right now. So not to my knowledge. I have... No, I don't think anything right now. Just not to my knowledge because honestly... That's a very strange response, though, to not remember whether you did or not. Yeah, isn't it? Mm. It is. Yeah, it is. Because honestly, Pierce, before now, again, before I went through my text, again, I hadn't read Confessions in 20 years. I wrote it. It was painful to write. So I never wanted to re-traumatize myself and go through those years again. And think about this.
12:49I'm a middle-aged woman at this point. I don't want to go back into my 20s and see what happened. But in gathering information for this interview here, reading that passage again for the first time in 20 years, I questioned a lot of things like, well, why was he so afraid? And why did he try to, you know, make my boyfriend feel as if I wasn't trustworthy?
13:13Piers Morgan:Do you think he took advantage of you when you were under the influence of alcohol and drugs? I don't know. Honestly, I don't know. And I never thought that before. Do you fear that's the case now from everything you've read? Honestly, yes. Given the context, now that I know, because, again, I never knew any of these things about him before. So the things that I learned in the trial, I did not know. I never saw that side of him. I did not know. I never understood. And, again, in 2005, when I published Confessions, it says I didn't understand why he was so fearful of me because our time together was pleasant.
13:54And I was like, wait, what is he so afraid of? What does he not want me to tell? I didn't see anything at that point. At that point, I hadn't seen anything. At that point, we had had, I thought, just a friendly, platonic night together. So I was confused then. And 20 years later, I'm confused now. So to my knowledge, I've never had sex with Sean Combs. We never had that kind of relationship.
14:18Piers Morgan:But you can't be sure. Given what we know now, I can't be sure. And how does that make you feel? And that saddens me. Yeah, I was going to ask you. It saddens me, honestly. Yeah, because honestly, during this entire process, I've been shying away from publicity and just letting the trial unfold. You know, I knew things from just being around and people talking, but I didn't know what was going to come out. there's a few things that I saw that without context were strange to me, but I didn't understand them until the trial. And so I've been quiet this whole time and I disappeared off of social.
15:02I just disappeared for the past year waiting for this thing to unfold. In the unfolding of what I believe to be facts and definitely the testimonies of Cassie and Jane and even some of the men. and then looking back at the text, I'm like, wait a minute. Okay, when he said, if anything got out, and I'm like, and I remember at the time being so confused, like anything like what got out? Like we, nothing happened. We hung out. We, you were, you were kind. At some point I went to sleep. I don't know when, but I woke up and then we had breakfast and you were kind and I left. Nothing happened. I don't know, Pierce.
15:44It just, I feel, just in the last 24 hours, I question what I thought I knew about my time with him.
15:55Piers Morgan:You detail in your books romantic relationships with a lot of famous people from that world. Jay-Z, DMX, Van Diesel, Lil Wayne, Method Man, even Bill Maher, LL Cool J, Mr. Carl and others. You had a lot of famous guys you dated. and who knows what the nature of what happened with Diddy was about. But do you feel that this whole world has now changed irrevocably as a result of what happened to Diddy? No. No, because nothing has happened to Diddy. Nothing has happened to Sean at all. What has happened here is that here's the deal. It's not a Diddy issue. Like, Diddy is a problem, but he's not the problem, okay?
16:41He's not the problem. from Cosby to Combs, Weinstein to Epstein, and everything in between, they're all different tentacles of the same beast. And this is a story as old as time, the abuses of men, men in power, especially men with money. And I think it only increases over time as women become more free and more liberated, being able to make our own money, being able to buy our own homes, being able to start our own businesses, I think it only enrages the men who hold power that they're losing power. And so I felt that over time, you know, in my experience over the last 20-something years that I've been in this town, that the men are increasingly more aggressive and more so wanting to keep women under control and in power because they are losing power, even legally so.
17:32So I don't think that the Dini trial has changed anything other than it probably fuels this issue more than anything, because here's the deal. Two of the toughest charges have been dropped. He's facing up to 20 with time served. Yeah, he's denied bail, but how much time is he really going to get? Probably maybe, what, three years? Might be out on probation. Might have to wear an ankle bracelet like Martha Stewart. and everything's going to be fine. And then what happens is that no one's paying attention to the fact that there are a lot of men who aren't saying anything, who are very quiet, as well as men who are, men especially and women, who are supporting him.
18:16And I fear, even with everything that we've heard, let's say none of that was true. We saw something, however, that tells us something about this person. We saw a videotaped of him brutalizing Cassie And that tells me everything I need to know about this person's character. So even if nothing else was true, that alone is enough reason for him to be canceled indefinitely. But I fear that's not what's going to happen. I think this is just emboldening more men to do the same thing, because guess what they're going to do? They're going to get away with it. There are men in this industry who have left this country, who are now living on islands and in different countries, you know, to escape persecution from things like this.
19:01There are men that I know personally who are involved in this, who have done things similar to this, who have parties like this. Diddy's not the only one. This is not a Sean Combs problem. This is not, this is a societal community issue here in this town. And it's not just the artists. It's also their attorneys, their publicists. It's the hotels. I was brutalized in a hotel. And guess what happened? That tape disappeared. When I went to get my police report from the police station, it was destroyed. all within 48 hours to protect the person who had brutalized me. It is systemic. So it doesn't matter, you know, if Diddy gets off or not in the sense that it won't stop anything.
19:44I think, if anything, it makes it all worse.
19:47Piers Morgan:Well, that is a sobering way to end. But thank you very much indeed, Elizabeth Overson. I appreciate it. Thank you so much. Well, to debate all this, I'm joined by Tony Busby, the attorney representing Diddy victims in civil suits, DJ Vlad, commentator and host of Vlad TV, and our very own unsensored contributor, Esther Krakow. Esther, as we listened to that, what were you thinking? I think, I mean, what she said at the end there was very poignant. This is not a Diddy problem. This is an industry problem. I do find it quite telling that she said she was brutalised as well in a similar fashion that Cassie was, and then within 48 hours, the tape vanished.
20:22And I think a lot of the fault has to be laid at the nature of the system. We used to say that all you need is consent, whether it's signed consent or, yes, we're good to go. But actually, when you contextualize it, these women that, okay, yes, they are drawn in by the glamour of being with someone like P. Diddy or a high-profile person, you can choose the names, they are drawn into the system, but nothing means that they deserve to be beaten up and treated like ragdolls in the way that Cassie and I'll give you this lady said. And so we need to be looking at the cultural issue as well. That's the fundamental issue.
20:52It's not just about you sign a piece of paper and you can make an NDA keep you quiet or whatever. The culture is telling women that actually you can be treated this way because you happen to be in this space and all that keeps everything above board is the legality. And unfortunately, the culture is our problem. It's not the problem of the federal prosecutors. It's the problem of us as a society. The PAs, the people that are handling their press releases, the lawyers, everyone, they are part of the culture, that culture of subservience and allowing these people to do things that are legally above board but are horrible and just quite vile.
21:28I feel sorry for Cassie because I do think the prosecutors misled her. The case was very, very shoddy on many levels. You can't have a conspiracy with just one person. That's not a conspiracy, that's a thought. And so I think in many ways that case was always going to fall through. But I do think that these girls have been let down by a culture that has boiled down appropriate behaviour to just, you know, legality and consent.
21:50Piers Morgan:OK, DJ Vlad, you posted on X after the verdicts came in, Cassie is guilty of the same prostitution charges Diddy was just convicted of. I interviewed three of the male escorts. All three of them said the same thing. Cassie picked them, contacted them for free coughs, enjoyed the experiences and paid them. Meanwhile, she's sitting on$30 million and writing letters to the judge, asking him not to give Diddy bail. So pretty clear what your view is of Cassie Ventura there. What do you think should happen to her? I mean, personally, I think she should be charged with the same thing that Diddy was charged with.
22:25Ultimately, he was convicted of prostitution. She was involved in the prostitution. Every male escort that I talked to said that she was the one picking the actual male prostitutes. She would book them. She enjoyed every experience. She was sort of guiding the whole thing while they were together, and she was the one that actually paid them. Ultimately, this is a domestic violence case that's ballooned into a RICO and sex trafficking and so forth. What Diddy did to Cassie in that hallway was absolutely horrible, but that is not what the trial was about. It was about RICO. It was about sex trafficking, neither of which made sense in this particular trial.
Read the full transcript
23:00And if you want to actually convict him for prostitution, Cassie is just as liable for that same prostitution that Diddy got convicted of, but she was given immunity in the whole situation. So I just feel it's really just a messed up situation. That's a completely ridiculous stance, because you know what the consequences of her... You know what the consequences of her not booking those prostitutes? We saw it in that hallway in the hotel, in an international chain hotel, that were happy to take$50 ,000 to wipe it off the face of the earth. Those are the consequences. If she hadn't done that, it is very likely she would have been manhandled in that way, even in the street, and someone would have been able to wipe the footage of that.
23:34I appreciate the fact that she... That is a domestic violence case, which has nothing to do with a different case. I appreciate the fact that she was in the face of this. You're talking about a totally different situation. I guess the question...
23:44Piers Morgan:Vlad, I guess the question that Esther's posing there, really, is did she go along so apparently consensually with all the freak-off stuff, with all these escorts, because she... You've admitted to that. Well, hang on, my question is, did she go along with it in the apparently consensual way because she was in fear of retribution from Diddy in a way we saw with the beating? No, I don't think so. At the end of the day, this was an artist that had one hit song 20-something years ago. She had the ability to leave at any point. She was signed to a label, but labels leave artists that don't react constantly.
24:20She could have went. She stayed because she wanted to be in that particular situation. Now, people are going to argue with me and so forth, but at the end of the day, she stayed because there was no one else that was offering her a record deal. There was no one else that was spending millions of dollars on it. There was no one else that was showering her with gifts. So she decided to stay, and ultimately, at the end of the day, when the money ran out, when she married a broke fitness trainer and had to go move back in with her parents, and the money completely ran out, then it's like, okay, let's sue Diddy and let's get$20 million out of him.
24:50That is my take on it. That's always been my take. That always will be my take.
24:53Piers Morgan:Okay, Tony Buzz, we need to bring you in here. Just first off, what do we think is going to happen to Diddy here? What sentence are you anticipating? What if you can see what's happening inside your body? Pre-Nuvo's whole body scan screens for hundreds of conditions, including many solid tumors as early as stage one, all in under an hour. And now you can go beyond imaging with 80 plus blood biomarkers that help complete the picture. This Labor Day, save$300 off your scan when you book at prenuvo.com. That's P-R-E-N-U-V-O dot com. Save$300 now through September 8th at prenuvo.com. Terms and conditions apply.
25:33Piers Morgan:Expecting two to four years, I would expect. He's not going to get 20 years, obviously. He already has time served. There's going to be some mitigating factors. He doesn't have a prior record. However, there are some issues within the case that might be reasons for the judge to go a little bit higher than perhaps normal. But I would expect two to four years. What is your feeling? You've obviously represented many giddy victims in civil actions. You had over 100 people come to you with various allegations. What impact does this verdict have on the suits that you want to proceed with? Zero. I mean, I was listening to Vlad there for a minute, and I'm sure that same kind of argument took place in the jury room.
26:20Piers Morgan:I mean, people have a hard time putting their head around a situation where somebody might consent one day and not consent the next. And there are people in this world that believe, well, you've consented once, so therefore you're consenting for life. That is not what the law says. And I can understand why there may have been people on that jury that had the same point of view. And I'm not criticizing. I'm just saying that that there's a lot of psychological issues here that people really don't understand about trauma bonding and how somebody might feel compelled to do something that they really don't want to do.
26:51Piers Morgan:But even if they said no one time, that is not consent. And I think in this trial and we didn't have the benefit, or at least I didn't have the benefit of watching it day to day and seeing each witness and hearing hearing how they said the things they said. All I was able to see was the transcript that I would receive on a daily basis. Obviously, the jury thought that the RICO situation was complete baloney. They thought apparently that this was not a RICO situation. There was no conspiracy and they were trying to put a round peg into a square hole or vice versa. I did think that given the testimony that I saw that there were instances where Cassie and Jane were forced to do things, either through financial pressure or through extortion-type pressure or through force, things that they did not want to do.
27:41Piers Morgan:But the interesting thing on that, Tony, is that the jury clearly did not believe either woman when it came to any issue about consensuality. They just didn't believe any of it. I think pretty much across the board, it was clear they had not bought in to the suggestion that any of this was non-consensual? No question. I mean, I think you're right. And, you know, sometimes juries do things that we don't expect. You know, I go back to whether, you know, each instance that this happened, did he have consent each time? Now, I see Blythe's point. There were times when it looked like that Cassie was involved in setting some of these events up.
28:21Piers Morgan:Well, there's no question of that. I interviewed the Punisher, you know, the guy who gave evidence. He gave very powerful, eloquent evidence. And I've interviewed him several times. He's a very good talker and he had no real kind of skin in the game. In fact, he was brought from the prosecution to give evidence, but actually ended up being a pretty powerful witness for the defence, it turned out, because what he said was everything was done through Cassie Ventura and seemed very consensual. Went on for over two years, you know, a dozen or so encounters in hotels where Diddy just sat in the corner saying nothing.
28:55Piers Morgan:She booked him, she paid him, she organised it. Everything was different by her. She seemed to have a good time. Everyone was happy. I thought that was very powerful evidence, actually, for Diddy, because it seemed to contradict everything that they were trying to position it as, which was this was all coercion. Let me offer this up. You know, the government settled in on using two alleged victims. They used Cassie and they used Jane. Early on, when this all started, we were contacted by the U.S. attorney and they asked us, Can we speak to some of your clients? So we went to eat and they told us these are the ones we want to speak to.
29:34Piers Morgan:We made those people available. They talked to a couple of those people. But I think by that point they had decided their team had decided that they had what they needed. They had the goods, if you will, to proceed with Jane and with Cassie. I think that was a mistake. I will say, as I watched the trial, at least learned about the trial daily as it went on, I thought the government was doing what they needed to do to get a conviction. Obviously, that wasn't the case. Obviously, they did not believe that they believe that Diddy had consent and they didn't believe there was a conspiracy. And obviously, the transportation to commit prostitution, that was pretty cut and dried.
30:11Piers Morgan:And I think everybody, no matter which side you fall out on, believed that there would be a conviction there. But there is a point, isn't there, which Vlad made, I thought, pretty compellingly, that if you're going to convict Diddy and you don't believe that it was non-consensual and Cassie did all the booking, why is she not being charged? And could it be that the reason that she turned on Diddy was to preempt potentially some legal exposure herself? Who knows? We'll never know that. They gave her immunity early on and that's the horse they rode with. And we see what happened. Well, I don't think it's that cut and dry.
30:47I think consent without fear of consequences is not actually consent. So if you were going against Cassie, for example, and you're going to try her, all she has to do is show you that video and just say, look at what happens if I didn't do that. Now, I don't think it reached the threshold for the jury for Rico, which I completely understand. Like I said, a conspiracy that involves one is a thought. But this is why I say this is not a problem for the courts. It's a problem for culture and society. Cassie met P. Diddy when she was 17 years old. She signed a 10-album deal with P. Diddy by the age of, like, 20 or 21, which is virtually unheard of in this industry.
31:19I mean, I'm sorry, she wasn't Beethoven. She didn't have the kind of talent that would warrant that kind of record deal. She was clearly groomed. Now, amongst all of that, could you say she could have got up and left? OK, arguably, yes. She was with him 10 years. Yes, but the thing is, he has so many...
31:31Piers Morgan:She was with him 10 years, and the Punisher was very clear. Yes, but he paid her rent. She did not give any impression to him of being anything but a very enthusiastic and willing participant. Yeah, but it's nuanced. Look at what happened when she tried to break up with him and date, what's his name, the rapper who had his car blown up. I mean, it's not that cut and dry. This, I feel like... But Esther, we have lots of chats through the Me Too era and stuff, and obviously one of the things people are saying about this is that, in a way, it signals the beginning of the end of that Me Too movement, because for a long time, everyone was encouraged to believe women accusers, the moment they made allegations, they had to be believed.
32:10Piers Morgan:That was always, to me, a very dangerous proposition. It should always be they should be taken seriously, the allegations should be investigated properly, and then decisions should be made about whether there had been a crime. Very dangerous to believe accusers before you actually know whether they're telling the truth. But here we've got a situation, I think, where if he'd been in this case three, four years ago, he would have gone down. I don't think that's the case. The jury, I suspect, has moved with the times. I think the whole Me Too issue was a separate kind of beast. P Diddy and the environment that he exists in, the hip-hop industry, is a completely different kind of sleaze.
32:52And also, it was very cut and dry from that video. Is it, though? Is it any different to Harvey Weinstein,
32:57Piers Morgan:who claimed that a lot of his stuff was transactional? I mean, he was convicted of rape and sexual abuse and so on, so obviously, again, juries didn't agree. But he painted a picture of a lot of kind of transactional relationships with people, right, where he believed this was all part of the sort of casting couch deal. That, again, has been, you know, that's dinosaur stuff and was outrageous and wrong and everything else. And it turned out to be criminal as well. But I don't think there's much difference in the attitude. There is a difference. I think hip hop has always come under fire for being quite sleazy.
33:31I mean, you can't listen to a hip hop track from 20 years ago without hearing the N word or bitch. it's always been quite sleazy they've always been quite actually vocal about the fact that they treat women like pieces of meat and the women a lot of the time are happy to be treated that way because they get a lot from it
33:45Piers Morgan:So that's interesting isn't it Vlad because that is part of that hip hop culture there's no doubt a lot of women have embraced that kind of very misogynist language, the lyrics and so on and so on Is your feeling about what happened here with Cassie Ventura and Diddy that she was, notwithstanding the violence which would erupt, more than once, we know there were other occasions when he was violent to her, that she enjoyed her life around this superstar rapper, notwithstanding that? I don't understand the question. Well, that she accepted the violence and was prepared to stay in the relationship because she enjoyed everything else.
34:30I think there was a very violent relationship. I think it was a drug-fueled relationship. I think there was lots of money and fame and jet-setting involved. At the end of the day, I think what happened to her was horrible. I think that tape showed just how bad the domestic violence was. But at the end of the day, this is not what the trial was about. The trial was about RICO. The trial was about sex trafficking. The trial was about prostitution. In fact, the only reason that he got convicted was because it was interstate commerce. All the other male escorts that I've talked to, like, for example, I talked to Don the dealer who also had multiple sessions with Cassie, she said she was loving it.
35:04She was into it. She was setting the direction. At the end of the day, you could stay in a bad relationship, but you decide to stay in that bad relationship. This is really about the domestic violence, but the domestic violence goes back past the statute of limitations. So if you think about it, in this whole case, all the escorts I talked to were not, you know, sent to a different state or a different country. They were all local. Like Don the Deal was in Miami. Punisher was in New York. If all these guys didn't travel across state lines, there would be no case at all. None whatsoever. And Tony Busby, at the end of the day, like he said, that the feds talked to multiple people that he's representing that were suing, but they decided not to use any of them, which makes me think that there wasn't any real credible, real evidence that they actually did anything wrong in the whole situation.
35:59Therefore, there's only two people that were actually used. The only person that was actually, that filed a lawsuit that was used in this case was Cassie. And there's over 100 lawsuits. So what does that say? That says the lawsuits are all nonsense.
36:14Piers Morgan:You know, I listen to you. Which of your clients was used in this case? Let's be clear about something. Listen very carefully. If the alleged assault happened in L.A., there was nobody flown in, there was nobody coerced and trafficked across state lines, they wouldn't use the client, obviously. These cases that we have filed in New York are filed under a New York statute for sexual assault and sexual abuse. That's completely different than transportation for prostitution or for sexual trafficking and certainly has nothing to do with RICO. So you just made this grand conclusion that, oh, the U.S.
36:54Piers Morgan:attorney talked to a few of these folks and decided they had no credibility. You were flat out wrong in that respect. I'm wrong. None of them were used. None of them were used. What they may have decided is that there was nothing that happened across state lines and there was no sexual trafficking, which is what the case was all about. So it has nothing to do with whether these people were credible or not. Their case is a civil case alleging state law claims of assault after being drugged. That was not the case that was brought by the U.S. attorney. And frankly, that's not a case that could be brought by the U.S.
37:28Piers Morgan:attorney. And which is the point that you're going to be making. Your own client accused Jay-Z and Diddy of raping her when she was 13 and we all saw it was all nonsense. It was absolutely false. It was absolutely false. She said good Charlotte was there. They weren't there. She was 13 years old. Her old father said it was all nonsense. Jay-Z sued you over that. Come on. like you're like a little bit of information a long history all these broad history don't even know what you're talking about you want a single lawsuit with any of these people you've represented a single lawsuit literally 30 days ago for 640 million pals so don't be telling me about winning lawsuits more lawsuits than any here in the united states so here jay-z how many lawsuits have you None of them went to trial, Knucklehead.
38:15Piers Morgan:None of them went to trial yet, Knucklehead. Think about it. They don't just... You file a case, go to trial. Wait and see. You've won nothing. Okay, let me just jump... All right, look. You're a Knucklehead. The reality is we're going to find out. We're going to find out, Vlad. We're going to find out, Vlad, whether any of these civil cases do end up... None of them will be wanted. Maybe one or two will be settled because of their headaches. Well, there was 100 people there. The one thing I do think is... The one thing I do find very distasteful is there are reports that Diddy got a standing ovation in prison when he returned from this verdict because...
38:54Piers Morgan:People are glad. Because his lawyer said that they love the idea of him beating the feds. And, you know, when you watch that video, when you watch the video of him beating up Cassie Ventura, the idea that guy becomes any kind of hero, I think, would stick in all our gut. Can we agree on that? He's not exactly in a esteemed company. He's in a prison. But he shouldn't be treated as a hero. Of course not. And in some of the comments you've been reading online, I do think the prosecution failed Cassie in a way, because now we're having a debate about her motivations. Was she actually just in on all of this and just trying to get away?
39:29Piers Morgan:You know what, Esther, when I interviewed the Punisher, I really did change my view about this whole case. She was nine months pregnant testifying about the most grotesque things. I know, I know. But she also had taken a massive payout before. Which she deserved. She deserved it. OK, but according to the Punisher, over two years, it was all driven by her, all consensual, and she was completely happy. And when he said that under oath, and then repeated it all to me, and I've got to be honest with you, I slightly changed my view about the whole case based on his testimony. I thought that if that was indicative of what was really going on, then how much of a victim was she?
40:06Piers Morgan:She was a victim of domestic violence, but as Vlad said, that was not what Diddy was on trial for. Anyway, look, it's a fascinating case. I've got to leave it there. Thank you all very much. I shall await the civil actions with great interest, Tony Busby, and probably not as great an interest as DJ Vlad is going to await them, but we shall see. Thank you all very much. Piers Morgan on Sensor is proudly independent. The only boss around here is me. If you enjoy our show, we ask for only one simple thing. hit subscribe on YouTube, and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
40:42Piers Morgan:And in return, we will continue our mission to inform, irritate, and entertain, and we'll do it all for free. Independent, uncensored media has never been more critical, and we couldn't do it without you.
40:57Piers Morgan:Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. Now, I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back. So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months, $90 for six months, or$180 for 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. See terms.
From the publisher
Diddy could still face up to 20 years in a federal prison - but his sentence is likely to be much shorter than that, with the defense asking for less than two years.
Federal prosecutors are facing criticism that they overreached with charges of sex trafficking and racketeering in a RICO case that never looked strong enough. There’s competing claims of victim-shaming - and that the Diddy trial is a definitive end for the MeToo era.
So, what went wrong - and what happens next?
Piers Morgan speaks to Elisabeth Ovesen, formerly known as Karrine Steffans and the author of ‘Confessions of a Video Vixen', who claims she was gifted to Diddy in 2001.
Uncensored is then joined by hip hop commentator DJ Vlad and lawyer Tony Buzbee, who is representing alleged Diddy victims in civil suits.
Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent and supported by:
Pique: Get 20% off your order plus a FREE frother & glass beaker with this exclusive link: https://piquelife.com/PIERS
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices


