PLUS Brothers

23 Sep 2026 · 58 min · 30 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Pilot Plus reviews Apple TV+ comedy Brothers, starring fictionalized versions of Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson as best friends who discover they may be brothers in real-life rumor lore within the show. The hosts debate whether the “celebrity selves” premise works, how much is improvised, and whether the show’s Texas governor subplot provides a satisfying narrative spine.

Guest backgrounds

No guests are interviewed. The episode features hosts Steph, James, Boyd, and additional callers/writers in the “postbag” segment (e.g., Chris, John, Gary, Lukash), plus discussion of Holland Taylor and Sarah Paulson as a related aside.

Key claims

Steph loves the premise and charm; others find it mildly amusing but self-indulgent, with unclear stakes and limited comedic punch. The show’s realism/fidelity to their friendship is praised but seen as a missed opportunity for sharper satire. A DNA test is joked about as something the show avoids for dramatic/comedic reasons.

Notable examples

Episode 1 includes Matthew trying to write a speech while Woody brings his family; Matthew’s “stand-up laptop apparatus” in his backyard; Woody’s caricatured surfer persona; Matthew’s governor-of-Texas storyline.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Overview of Brothers Series

0:45 to 2:18

Discussion about the premise of 'Brothers' starring McConaughey and Harrelson.

“And it turns out they might actually be brothers in real life.”

Exploring the Rumor

2:18 to 4:36

Analysis of the rumor that McConaughey and Harrelson might be brothers.

“So, the thing about this is you'd think, right, why don't they just do a bloody DNA test and put this to rest?”

Character Dynamics and Themes

4:36 to 6:46

Examining the complexities of portraying oneself in a fictionalized setting.

“For me, I really enjoyed it because I love Matthew McConaughey for me, just as Matthew McConaughey, is an incredibly interesting human being and character.”

Personal Reactions to the Show

6:46 to 8:52

Hosts share their personal feelings about the show's approach and humor.

“Seinfeld is a character, whereas Curb, he's playing all the things that Larry David's done in real life are in the Curb universe, if you see what I mean.”

Comparisons to Other Shows

8:52 to 10:31

Comparison of 'Brothers' to shows like 'Curb Your Enthusiasm' and 'Seinfeld'.

“to a show where they can have a load of fun bouncing off each other.”

Mixed Feelings on Humor

10:31 to 12:15

Discussion on the effectiveness of humor in the show and self-indulgence.

“Your question is like he comes from Harrelson.”

Concluding Thoughts on 'Brothers'

12:15 to 14:01

Final thoughts on the show's premise and execution.

“You probably, then I imagine you could crawl it into Harrelson.”

Initial Reactions to 'Brothers'

14:01 to 19:10

The hosts discuss their first impressions of the show 'Brothers,' focusing on the self-indulgent nature of the narrative and character portrayals.

“I had massive reservations about the show because it is the most self-indulgent thing imaginable.”

Show Release Details

19:11 to 19:22

A brief mention of the release schedule for 'Brothers' on Apple TV, including the first two episodes and their weekly release format.

“I think it started on the Wednesday, September the 23rd, so the date yesterday.”

Listener Corrections on French Pronunciation

19:22 to 21:02

The hosts read and discuss a listener's correction regarding the pronunciation of a French term, highlighting the nuances of French grammar.

“You might say zay instead of zay, but pronouncing the T would effectively break the gender noun agreement.”
Show all 30 chapters

Discussion on Nursery Graduations

21:02 to 22:32

The hosts engage in a lighthearted debate about nursery graduations, sharing anecdotes and listener contributions about children in caps and gowns.

“I reckon they do it at high schools now.”

Debate on Multiverse Theory

22:32 to 26:35

A deep dive into the multiverse concept in television and film, addressing listener opinions and clarifying misconceptions about time travel and its implications.

“I too have been inundated with lots of little people in their caps and gowns.”

Clarifying Marvel's Use of Multiverse

26:35 to 28:01

The hosts discuss the specific instances of multiverse references in Marvel films, aiming to clarify the debate around its introduction and implications.

“I am not objecting to the use of the multiverse idea, merely stating when it started to be used, but I am also making the point that it reduces the emotional stakes.”

Explaining the Time Stone and Multiverse Theory

28:01 to 28:51

Learn about the Time Stone's role in creating alternate timelines and the multiverse.

“And she's talking about the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.”

Emotional Stakes in Multiverse Narratives

28:52 to 29:32

Explore how the introduction of multiverses can diminish emotional stakes in storytelling.

“Remember I said I watched it again the other weekend.”

Plot Armor and Tension in Superhero Stories

29:33 to 30:37

Discuss the concept of plot armor and its impact on drama in superhero narratives.

“But obviously he's not killed outside the ship, because there's a whole Star Trek series.”

Investing Emotionally in Film Endings

30:38 to 32:50

Delve into the emotional investment in film endings and audience reactions to character fates.

“But I was so emotionally invested in that.”

Celebrating 'Band of Brothers' and Its Impact

32:51 to 34:22

Reflect on the significance of 'Band of Brothers' as a pivotal WWII drama and its portrayal of camaraderie.

“Before we dabble in all things Reacher, let's talk about the war.”

Personal Connections to WWII Narratives

34:23 to 36:36

Examine personal anecdotes related to WWII and how they shape perceptions of historical narratives.

“Firstly, I fucking love Band of Brothers, okay?”

Authenticity in 'Band of Brothers' vs. 'The Pacific'

36:37 to 38:00

Compare the authenticity and emotional resonance of 'Band of Brothers' with 'The Pacific'.

“It's an incredibly powerful watchers going through that and watching them, because obviously they're paratroopers, aren't they?”

The Legacy of 'Band of Brothers' and Its Reception

38:01 to 40:12

Discuss the legacy of 'Band of Brothers' and why it may not receive the recognition it deserves today.

“it really, because the authenticity is so great because we know it's a true story.”

Listener Feedback and Podcast Dynamics

40:13 to 42:08

Share a listener's perspective on the podcast's dynamics and their enjoyment of the show.

“But I think it does, there are definitely, I've seen polls where, I think it's more, I think it's more of an American phenomenon.”

Listener Feedback on Spoilers

42:09 to 44:22

The hosts discuss listener feedback regarding spoiler issues in their reviews.

“But this comes from, forgive me if I have mispronounced your name.”

Debating Spoilers and Reviews

44:22 to 46:38

The hosts debate the ethics of discussing spoilers based on promotional material.

“I actually agree with this because I think releasing that information before airing the show was fucking deranged.”

Reviewing Expectations and Series Structure

46:38 to 49:51

The hosts explore the challenges of reviewing series with different release structures and viewer expectations.

“Then you might get the wrong idea about, I'll give like, this isn't an Apple show, but Furious is an example of like, we all only watched one episode of that.”

Transitioning to Reacher Discussions

49:51 to 50:10

The hosts transition to discussing the latest series of Reacher after addressing listener concerns.

“You know, for Lukash, I'm sorry that Boyd and James have spoiled your viewing, but you know, like they did it to me as well.”

Listener Opinions on Reacher

50:10 to 55:24

The hosts read and respond to listener opinions about the latest Reacher season and its quality.

“I don't even know what order in which to address these things.”

Discussion on Adaptation Choices

55:24 to 56:05

The hosts discuss the adaptation choices for the Reacher series and their implications.

“And when it comes to which book to adapt and which...”

Discussion on Reacher and Neely

56:05 to 57:06

The hosts discuss the recent season of Reacher and their viewing habits.

“James, you're upsetting a lot of people.”

Pilot Plus Closing Remarks

57:07 to 57:55

The hosts wrap up the episode and preview upcoming content.

“it's on this right that is it for this week's post pack if you would like to write in about something other than Jack Reacher, then please do so.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:07Welcome to Pilot Plus, your extended guide to every show that matters. And we are here today by popular demand of, well, Steph. So we are reviewing Brothers on the Apple TV Plus or the Apple TV, as it is now known, because Steph really wanted to watch it. So that is the reason we're reviewing it. Also, we do a TV podcast, which is a happy coincidence. But anyway, this is a half-hour comedy series starring Matthew McConaughey as Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson as Woody Harrelson. And they are fictionalised versions of themselves who are best friends in real life. But in this show, they are kind of exaggerated version of themselves.

0:43And they get together in the first episode and a truth bomb drops. And it turns out they might actually be brothers in real life. And when we say real life, we mean real life within the show, not real life in real life. because they are fictionalised versions of themselves, even though they are, in fact, playing themselves. Clear? Excellent. Steph, you wanted to watch this. Talk about it. Okay. Yes, I did want to watch this because I love, in equal parts, Woody, Harsen and Matthew McConaughey. So, you know, maybe like me, you're a massive True Detective fan. If you're tuning in to get anything like that, you're going to be very disappointed because this is nothing like that.

1:18So, yeah, Woody Harsen and Matthew McConaughey, ever since they did True Detective have been really close friends okay they just get on really well and everybody like loves him I very much leaned into that celebrity friendship okay and then came Woody Harsen's podcast if you know anything about Woody Harsen he had a podcast because his dad was a criminal right so he had a podcast about his dad being a hit man which if you haven't listened to is absolutely brilliant now then came a brilliant rumor supposedly from Matthew McConaughey's mum when she revealed to Woody well actually I knew your dad and when I was on a bit of a break from Matthew's Matthew's dad you know we knew each other so this rumor kind of swirled around Hollywood and everyone sort of talked.

2:14And the idea that there was potentially the paternal problem that maybe Woody Harrelson's dad was actually Matthew McConaughey's dad, right? So, the thing about this is you'd think, right, why don't they just do a bloody DNA test and put this to rest? Answer one, because they've made a fantastic TV show out of it. And answer two, Matthew McConaughey had a very intense and, you know, in some ways, complicated relationship with his father. And he has spoken about it and said he would then have to deal with a range of emotions that meant that the person that he has thought for his whole life that was his father isn't his father.

2:58But there is no doubt that this is a great rumor that there are physical similarities and it does make for a fantastic TV show, in my opinion. Now, what I would say is there is the inherent kind of problem when you're playing yourself but playing a sort of caricature of yourself and you've got the same names and the family that is depicted within the show is also your family and looks very much like the actual families of Woody Harrelson and Matthew McConaughey but then isn't played by their real life partners or real life children so they themselves are playing themselves. Their families are representative exactly of who their families are.

3:42Camilla Alves, you know, is Camilla Alves, but played by somebody else. So that's slightly hard to get your head around. Because yeah, you know, Woody's family has got the two girls. And even like Levi, Matthew McConaughey's eldest son, they're all the same people, but they're not the same people. But Matthew and Woody are playing themselves, but they're not playing themselves. Would this just have been better as kind of a reality, something they would never have done, which is open up their homes, these two actors, open up their homes to have a reality show. So what we've got is somewhere in something in the middle, which is they're playing themselves.

4:19They've got their own names. This is a true rumor. And everything around them is kind of fictionalized events surrounding that for comedic effect. Now, you are either going to, I believe, you're either going to really love this and lean into the whole idea of it or you're going to hate it. For me, I really enjoyed it because I love Matthew McConaughey for me, just as Matthew McConaughey, is an incredibly interesting human being and character. So I think he's just a dramatic person in his normal life, which I really enjoy about him. And I just love listening to his voice. And Woody Harrelson and I feel the same about.

5:00So, if you want to spend time in their company and see them navigate in a comedic way this true rumour, but with kind of fictionalised stories around it, then it's great. But you have to give in to it, is what I'd say. And I think for some viewers that might be quite difficult. So, you know, in the first episode, Matthew McConaughey's trying to write a speech and Woody Harrelson turns up with his family because he's trying to get away from all the women in his house, but he brings his whole family. It's a comedy about a true rumour, about a fictionalised situation with a family with two people who are really real.

5:39And that, I think, is going to be either the hit or the miss of it. For me, big hit. I loved it. I loved it. But I am so interested to see what you two think. First of all, Holland Taylor is a fascinating figure because you recognise her from The Morning Show, particularly. And she's 83 years old and her partner is Sarah Paulson, who is in her midriff. Her name is Sarah Paulson. Exactly. They're such a great couple as well. I'm obsessed with them too. What an absolutely brilliant couple. So there's that. I would quite like to see a reality comedy thing about those two, but that's another matter.

6:15She's kind of the star of the show anyway in this. The model for it is, of course, I have to say, Kirby Enthusiasm, because Larry David plays himself in Curb, but everyone else in it is playing, so his family members, etc. It's not just Curbium Fusers, like Seinfeld, there have been quite a lot of these. Yeah, well Seinfeld is an example of it. But anyway. Is it not? He plays a fictionalised version of himself, does he not? I mean, his name in the show is Chex Notes, Jerry Seinfeld. Yeah, I guess it's not. Yeah, all right. It's different somehow. Wow, yeah, I don't know why. Okay. Anyway. I know what you mean.

6:56It is kind of different. It is. Because it's not depicted. Seinfeld is a character, whereas Curb, he's playing all the things that Larry David's done in real life are in the Curb universe, if you see what I mean. So he created Seinfeld, confusingly, in Curb, whereas Seinfeld's not creating, well, he does create a sitcom. Anyway. This is very confusing. It's very confusing. Anyway, back to Brothers. I was really looking forward to this because I'm a huge fan of both of them. I love True Detective. That first series is brilliant. Obviously, nothing came close in the True Detective canon until Jodie in the Alaskan.

7:33Friend of the pod. Friend of the pod, exactly. So I was really looking forward to it, and I liked them both as people, Woody Harrelson. I like the podcast as well. So I'm slightly disappointed in the actual finished article. I think, I don't hate it. I think James will hate it, I'm guessing. I don't know, I was just guessing that he'll hate it. But I like the premise, and I like watching two of them bouncing off each other, particularly when they're getting angry with each other as they do. When they're getting angry is brilliant, yeah. Yeah, that's kind of fun. But there's almost a slight kind of assumption that they're both interesting and funny enough to pull off an entire series about their friendship and this idea that they might be brothers, which I'm not even that bothered about.

8:28Like, it doesn't... That element of it is almost like the least important and convincing element of it because, as you said, they just find out. And why is it so... The impact that it has is just weirdly doesn't make much sense to me, you know, what happens with that idea. Whereas, really, the whole thing is just an excuse for the two of them to revel in their real-life friendship and bring some of that DNA to the show, to a show where they can have a load of fun bouncing off each other. And I worry that a lot of it's improvised. I hope it's not. I mean, obviously, Kirby's improvised, but under the aegis of Larry ruling over it with a rod of iron, this feels slightly indulgent.

9:07I mean, it's kind of almost inevitably indulgent because the whole premise is quite indulgent if you think about it. But I did enjoy, I enjoyed it. I enjoy hanging out with them, but I didn't feel a great sense of, I need to carry on watching this at the end of the first episode. I watched the second episode kind of more out of duty than something that I really wanted to do, which surprised me, which I was surprised about. I was expecting to really love this, I think. And I quite like it, at least as far as I'd go. And I think it probably could have done with a little bit more of a discipline about it, because there just seems to be able to go on too long, you know.

9:43And I'll tell you what I was fascinated by is Matthew McConaughey's stand-up laptop apparatus. Oh, my God. I was going to talk about that. Right? Oh, my God. I was like, I need one. I need one of those. Yeah. So I've never seen that before. And it's funny in itself because he can wander around in his backyard throwing with a bit of paper at the side where he's trying to write the speech in honour of his dad, his late dad. and he's kind of wandering around his backyard with this contraption trying to write this speech. And it's quite an eye-catching visual. And we have in our office, we have some kind of stand-up contraptions.

10:23You always book that stand-up desk. I know, I booked it by mistake. You booked it again this week. Yeah, sorry. I was like, why is he booking it? You're never going to stand up at that desk. Anyway, that's a very niche discussion. Thanks, Steph, for the listeners. I have a stand-up desk here. I'm sitting at a stand-up desk. It's not currently in stand-up configuration, but yes that is that is the most you think of is it i have a stand-up desk that i'm sitting at because you refuse to let the desk define you yeah but do you stand up i haven't for a while but yes i also have a treadmill that i can wheel out and put under it so i can actually i could be doing the podcast while i'm like getting in my steps such a yeah like you're pretending to be a character in an american sitcom yeah oh my god you're like those awful people that have peloton bikes and then they put their laptop on their peloton bike and you're like oh fuck off i could have a headset and be like go for james yeah it's just too it's just people who do that like they're too it's too much high achieving it's just do one thing at a fucking time yes i agree with that i agree with that um so yeah this is so i i i didn't mind it i quite liked it but i can't go much further i don't i think it's a slight it's an opportunity slightly missed i think the whole idea of getting the two of them real life friends to bounce off each other in a comedy is a good one but i don't think they've quite pulled it off i do you know what i know i know what you're saying because i think there is there is an element to they've gone well i'm mackie mcconaughey and i'll woody harson so this will just work because we're i have to stage an intervention at this point i know what you're gonna say what the hell are you calling him who is woody harrelson woody harrelson what how do you pronounce it it's woody harrelson I've always called him Woody Harrelson.

12:00I mean, sure. And I'm sure he's all about that. Your question is like he comes from Harrelson. Yeah. Woody Harrelson. Woody Harrelson. Is that what I said? Woody Harrelson. So as I said, Woody Harrelson. If you're from Texas, like you go, Woody Harrelson. You probably, then I imagine you could crawl it into Harrelson. I think it's fine. I think, I wonder why I say that. Is it just stupidity? I'm not sure. I don't know. I think, let's not forget, he was Woody in Cheers. So, obviously, I've known him for a very long time. Yeah. Oh my gosh, yeah, of course. Did I tell you guys, sorry, just a slight digress, that basically, one of my pilot friend's brothers, right, is called James Boyd.

12:45Did I tell you this? And I was like, what are you talking about? It was quite triggering. Their name is James Boyd. Anyway, I know what you mean. I'm just going to call him Woody from now on. Right, So, yeah, so there is kind of like, they were like, oh, you know, we're Woody and Matthew, everyone will love it, whatever. So, I think what you're sort of saying, correct me if I'm wrong, is that maybe they didn't try as hard as they would have if they weren't Woody and Matthew? Absolutely, yeah. Yeah, I mean, it's got people working on it. Like, they've co-created with David Westreed, who worked on Schitt's Creek, and Lee Eisenberg, who worked on that Stephen Merchant HBO show, which was really good.

13:23So, they've got kind of good quality comedy chops, those people. but I think the Matthew and Woody kind of contribution to it means it isn't, yeah, they're not that intrinsically funny. It's part of the problem, I think. Oh, do you not think? See, I do think they're both funny. I think they're mildly amusing, but I don't think they're that funny. I think they're gently amusing in that if they are both guests on Jimmy Fallon, you'd have a really good show. However, I don't think they are sufficiently funny to base an ongoing sitcom around because the lols are there, but they're not exactly, you know, a laugh a minute.

14:01I had massive reservations about the show because it is the most self-indulgent thing imaginable. Like, it really is. But that's not necessarily the worst thing. And by Kirby Enthusiasm, it's also massively self-indulgent on paper, but it works in execution. I think this is a really odd thing to exist in that you've got two guys who've been quite open about this, But to air this particular bit of dirty laundry so publicly and dramatically for comedy effect is genuinely wild. And to be so invested in it that you would make a show, but not invested enough to have the DNA test is such a strange thing.

14:39And when you're watching this, you're not sure how much of it is fact and how much of it is fiction. That line is just nowhere to be seen. it's really really unclear except for the fact that obviously you know woody harrelson's wife here is played by britney isha bashi and uh natalie martinez plays matthew mcconaughey's wife like that's and you know their kids are not their kids um and and then you've got this whole other plot where matthew mcconaughey is running for governor of texas which just kind of drops in as that's going to become the spine of the ongoing series i guess so like they're going to be dealing with their relationship and he's running for office um which is certainly a move um it's i mean yeah i hate to say i feel exactly the same way boy did i didn't hate it it's nowhere near as bad as i feared you know they're very charming company um woody harrelson is maybe a little bit caricatured at times because like there's a there's a bit with a phone and you can see it coming a mile away what's going to happen like it's not it's not what i would call there aren't much in the way of kind of big narrative twists and turns it's not what i would say uh superbly well written i think they've gone for naturalism and fidelity to their actual real life dynamic over what is the grammar of makes great comedy they're just like no no people love us and they will love us together and that will make it funny uh and it does to an extent but but only i think to an extent so in the same way a lot i have nothing against it i thought it was actually pretty good i will never watch it again but uh but you know it was decent and also if you if like if you love these two actors if you genuinely love them you'll enjoy tons more because it kind of is them so i think you know how much you love them as people will probably heavily influence your enjoyment of the show and if you're indifferent then yeah i think that's my point about it is that i am like individually obsessed with them both.

16:30So I think that really just made me love it much more than you two did. And I'm not saying you don't love them as much as I do, but I'm just saying I was like, I fully invested, hence me saying, can we do brothers? Because I love them both so much. But yeah, I can, I do, I can appreciate and understand both of your lukewarm responses to this fantastic show about two people I adore. I really, really, really like them. Really, really, really, really, really like them. There's a lot of reallys. Yeah. Do you know what I slightly think about it is that Matthew McConaughey, I think part of the problem is Matthew McConaughey, I was expecting the thing they take the piss out of him for, if you like, because it's supposed to be exaggerated comedic versions themselves.

17:09For me, my vision of Matthew McConaughey is that he's like a bit of a new agey, you know, wellnessy kind of self-helpy kind of guy. You know, he's written a book. There's a line in the first episode that references books, you know, selling millions or whatever. but he's quite a kind of sincere figure. Do you know what I mean? In the world of acting and celebrity, he's not your normal run of the mill actor. He's quite, he's got a persona that is in itself borderline quite funny to me. Right. And I don't think they tap into that enough. And so instead they give him this storyline that he's going to stand for governor or governor almost because that's quite a funny idea.

17:50But yeah, do you know what I mean? I think, I think that there's stuff to take the piss him, piss out of him for, which they don't really go there. At least not yet. I've only watched two episodes, so maybe there's more of him. Whereas I think Woody's character, right from the start, he's the, you know, joint toking surfer dude, kind of that persona, which we all know him for. And they absolutely take the piss out of him for that. But do you know what I mean? I slightly feel they're not taking the piss out of Matthew McConaughey that much. I know what you mean. Lest we forget, you know, Matthew McConaughey in real life was arrested for smoking weed and naked bongo playing.

18:23So I think, you know, he is that person. And also, I don't know if you, did you ever watch his guest appearance in Sex and the City? Yes. Right, so his guest appearance in Sex and the City, he is ultra, you know, Matthew McConaughey. She goes to LA because they're pitching something and he gets down and he's like, me, you, woman, you know, man, woman. And that is, I think that's what you were alluding to. That kind of like, you know, version of him. So this version, that version is funnier than this version, which isn't that funny. He's not doing that much funny stuff in this, as my opinion. He's late to the school celebration thing.

18:59But, yeah, that's part of my problem with it. Okay. Yeah, but I'm still enjoying it. All right. Brothers, then, on Apple TV? Yes. It just started. I think it started on the Wednesday, September the 23rd, so the date yesterday. So it's all there. Well, the first two episodes are there now. The first two episodes, and then the rest are weekly. okay it is time to bust open the post bag and it's been a busy one this week

19:36we begin with a message from chris and chris says strap in oh god hello esteemed podcasters bilingual french speaker here and frequent writing yes it is a chris not a steve but a chris le crusade is pronounced la crusade the cru part is not pronounced crew because uh sounds more like ah the ending ze sounds like z minus the d indeed because it's a masculine noun meaning the crucible the t is silent if the noun was feminine i.e la crusette then you would pronounce the t sound like in baguette when anglifying french nouns it is common to soften the r's less throaty and elongate the vowel sounds.

20:18You might say zay instead of zay, but pronouncing the T would effectively break the gender noun agreement. I've added a voice note for your listening pleasure. Okay. Oh, yes. Are you ready? I'm going to attempt to do this and not fuck it up. Le cruiset. Le cruiset. Yeah, le cruiset. Chris was not the only person to write in and correct us on that particular point. I said correct us. I mean, of course, correct you. But he was the only one who provided you know visual cues and you know the and he's the only one who referenced he can kind of gender noun agreement so okay so sorry sorry as you were just saying just correcting correcting me what while we're correcting people just a quick one james i just and i'm not i'm certainly not saying there should be a jingle or anything about the times when you have you ridiculed me do we need to bust out the steph is correct fanfare Steph is correct Steph is correct

21:18Steph is correct Steph is correct Steph is correct Well it's just that when you when you said when I said well I think nurseries when you were talking about youth and you said you said at school they don't do the cats That is true I said you know what James I think I think they do do them like at nurseries and you were like what with like miniature caps and gowns and i was like yeah i think i think they do i have been inundated inundated with people sending me gorgeous pictures of these teeny tiny little people with their little caps and gowns yeah so are you saying are you saying that little tiny little kids have caps and gown things they graduate and then there's a massive gap and then I'm saying I think they all do and James is completely wrong.

22:10I reckon they do it at high schools now. I reckon they do it everywhere. But specifically, James was ridiculing the fact that I believed that they would make teeny tiny little cats and gals for little miniature humans. And I'm telling you, it's like the piloteers that get in contact with me. It's like, I'm not saying they're against you, James, but they just want you to be correct at all times. So I'm just letting you know. It does seem that that is not entirely inaccurate. I too have been inundated with lots of little people in their caps and gowns. We've got one here from Jack's dad. And Jack's dad says, and this is a picture of Jack graduating from nursery in a little yellow cap and gown.

22:46Concerning, and obviously the subject of this is Steph is right again. Concerning James and Boyd's disbelief at the creeping Americanization of British education, please see attached. When our boy Jack finished nursery, we're invited to a full graduation ceremony complete with fancy gowns, little paper scroll diplomas, and admittedly cardboard. graduation mortarboards. We were as surprised as anyone, but it's very definitely, block capitals, a thing. It's so cute. I cannot tell you how cute. Some of these pictures are just adorable. Absolutely adorable. It's so sweet. So anyway, like I'm saying, I'm not saying there should be a jingle, but I'm just saying that these things are happening regularly.

23:25There is literally a jingle. This is like an item on this morning. Is it? It is, isn't it? Yeah, it really is. I might recommend it. A message here from Ewan, which also covers this and includes a picture of Ewan's four-year-old daughter, Olivia, graduating in gown and cap from nursery. Oh, God. But apparently, he said, in fairness, the nursery had just one outfit and must have spent the entire day putting all the kids in it to take pictures. Which is genuinely funny. The logistics of that is mad. That's hilarious. But one of the reasons he has written in is to say that while I'm here, Olivia and now her little brother Finley are bluey obsessives, which means that my wife and I are also bluey obsessives.

24:10For what it's worth, I 100 % vouch for Steph's recommendation of cricket and fairy tale. But I would also add Sleepy Time about kids growing up. That is season two, episode nine. Bin Night, which is about fathers and daughters. That is season two, episode 32. Flat Pack, which is about evolution. season two episode 21 granddad about relationships with parents season two episode 29 and rain which is just plain beautiful season one episode 18 rain is just there's no it there's no words in rain it's just music and it's it is utterly beautiful piece of animation it is so nice but yeah i would also i mean i've watched every single episode about 17 times so yeah those are all great recommendations i would also say i think i said this before stick bird is a fantastic episode as well if you haven't seen that.

24:57Boyd Ewan has suggested that you and I watch all of those episodes. Okay, yeah. All I've asked, and I've been asking for weeks, is I just want you to watch like a couple and just report back. That's all I want you to do. All right. I'm not promising, but we'll see. Look, we have been dealing with my wrongness, so I feel like we have to continue that trend a little bit. John has come back. Hello, John. With more multiversal wranglings for me to deal with. This is never going to go this right. Here we go. All right, John, let's have it. Hi, all. Steph is still always right. This is not an auspicious start, John.

25:34I'm not going to lie to you. Good TV is not always prestige. I am not, as Boyd put it, John from Scotland, but I am a John from Scotland. There are more than one of us. Dear God, as an effort to end the correspondence we get, one of the longest diatribes ever, and he blames me. And the content cannot be left unopposed. Buckle up, non-nerds. By your own lecture, the writers of Endgame were conflicted about how time travel would work, but they nonetheless maintained it was time travel that allowed them to go back in time to obtain some of the stones. There is an argument that things were altered in that timeline, but that does not mean that that constitutes a separate universe.

26:15While we're on the subject, when your beloved Thanos calls the snap, does that happen in all universes, or just the one he's in? My point remains, the first definitive use of the multiverse is the second Doctor Strange film, and yes, I see that Marvel needs to use it to introduce the X-Men and Fantastic Four, otherwise everyone has to go back to year one, and then even Tom Holland would not look young enough to do that, so you would have to recast. I am not objecting to the use of the multiverse idea, merely stating when it started to be used, but I am also making the point that it reduces the emotional stakes.

26:44To get back to TV. James is also wrong about the latest Reacher being like a network show. in episode two, he kills a henchman by ramming a chopstick in his eye. In the final episode, he beheads a guy using a lift. You do not get that on Law & Order SVU. Love the pod. John Armstrong. John, what a great man. Basically, John agrees with me. This who is this legend. Yeah, he does agree with you. We're going to address the reacherness here because there are too many other people who have weighed in on this subject and we will get to them first. But, John, John, John, John, my friend, John, my old mucker, John.

27:20I hate to be that guy. I think he doesn't. I think he doesn't hate to be that guy. He loves to be that guy. He loves to be that guy. It's true. I'm afraid you are mistaken. Because you are right, of course, as you have said. Boyd and I have both got our heads in our hands. You literally do. We both have our head in our hands. Yes, it is true that the Russos and Marcus and Feely did not have the same ideas about time travel versus the multiverse. That is absolutely true. But the multiverse definitely does play a part in Avengers Endgame. To wit, the conversation that Bruce Banner has with the Ancient One on the top of that New York building when they're talking about the Time Stone.

28:03And she's talking about the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. But I will grant you in a very specific way. So she draws a little magic diagram and she explains that the flow of time is created by the Infinity Stones. And then she mentions the splinter effect, which is that if you remove an Infinity Stone from its native time period, that flow splits, creating a dark and kind of vulnerable, divergent, alternate timeline. To wit, the multiverse, and it lacks its primary defence, which is the Infinity Stone that was there. So Banner counters by proposing that if they return the stones to the exact chronological moment they were taken, those sort of alternate timelines will be erased and prevented from spinning into chaos so then thereby stopping the fracturing the branching of the universe and the creation of multiple worlds so yes it is not the traditional many worlds theory but the multiverse is still introduced by the ancient one in that conversation thank you so much that is the end of my TED talk Jay um boy did you did you could we get a top line on that one James if we could just I'm a tedious pedant that is that that is the summary of that particular conversation okay I have seen that film but it sounds like a really clunky scene.

29:09Boyd, you have to. No, no, it is amazing, that film. It is amazing. Remember I said I watched it again the other weekend. Right, but back to the point about the emotional stakes. Where are we on that one? Oh, that part's been forgotten. Okay, because Boyd's whole point about this is that the emotional stakes are kind of non-existent when you introduce multiverses. That's your point, isn't it, Boyd? Yeah, or at least they're certainly diminished. Diminished, okay. and we're ignoring that as John from Scotland agreed with yeah yeah so are we just ignoring that part the thing is it kind of takes you back to that that aspect when we talk about prequels and things like that where or even superhero shows generally because superheroes never really die they always come back is that if you know that someone's not going to die for because they're wreathed in plot armor does that inherently remove tension because I was watching an episode wreathed in plot armor I know he's he's so with the words today it's fantastic But generally, so I was watching an episode of Star Trek Strange New Worlds, and Spock is, quote unquote, killed outside the ship.

Read the full transcript

30:10But obviously he's not killed outside the ship, because there's a whole Star Trek series. Like, he doesn't die. We know he doesn't die. So to a certain extent, there is no threat there. There is no jeopardy. There is no drama. But that'll make it any less exciting, because you know they're not going to kill off one of the main characters, regardless of whether it's a prequel. so i think to a certain extent we all have to kind of suspend that disbelief and just go with you know the emotional currents of whatever it is that you're watching you have to kind of buy into the emotional jeopardy even though you know full well that it's not going to go in a negative direction yeah but it's all about the extent to which the skill with which the extent to which they they can get us to suspend yeah if they if they fumble the emotional beats i would say that weirdly is more likely to sap the drama than you know having a be in a multiverse yeah i've had a long-standing just like i don't get why specifically i know you your reaction to the avengers film that ended with them all dissipating you know half the planet being uh i was people people go on about how stunningly moving that was and how i'm like that's me i was like that every every fucking knows there's another film coming up in six months time and we'll come back whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa at the time no i've got to disagree when i first saw that i was exactly i was like this is stunning this is absolutely i was so emotionally invested and when people were started disappearing into like ash i was like oh my god no that was fantastic you can't you can't you cannot end a movie experience like that a cinema experience like i saw that and i think i saw that i saw that somewhere in the west end and it was like on a massive screen and i was like oh oh my God, they've got a big TV.

31:54But I was so emotionally invested in that. And I left the cinema going, oh my God, that was fucking brilliant. So I wasn't thinking, yeah, it was good, but in six months' time, we'll find out that they will come back. You cannot, you've got to invest. Otherwise, what's the point? I believe at the time, they'd already shot the next Spider-Man. Yeah, exactly. But none of that bothered me in the slightest. And I don't think any of that took away from the impact of that ending. because it's such an unconventional way to end a major blockbuster by killing almost all of your heroes and leaving the bad guy triumphant.

32:27Empire Strikes Back does it to an extent, but even that isn't close to what Infinity War did. And I don't think, none of us really believed that they were going to kill everyone. Like, we didn't. But you go with it, and I think you're so swept up in the emotions of the moment. That is devastating. Absolutely devastating. There was a part of me, I think, did believe they were going to, like, some of them weren't going to come back. I really did. I was that invested. Well, that's just insane. Anyway, we... It's turned into a film podcast, yes. The Empire podcast, yeah. Okay, right. I wonder if we do...

32:57Do you know what? Before we dabble in all things Reacher, let's talk about the war. So this comes from Gary, and Gary says, I'm a subscriber of Pilot Plus, and I came to last year's live show, so was there for the inception of the butterfly joke from RTD. I'm a long-time listener of the pod. This is my first time writing in. Band of Brothers turned 25 this week. Aside from being my favourite TV show, it is rated in the top five best rated TV shows of all time on IMDb. At the time of filming, it was the most expensive TV show ever produced, costing around$130 million. It aired two days before 9-11, so it didn't make as big an impact straight away as it should have, but it became a massive hit over time.

33:35It is incredibly well produced by legends Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg. It has early performances from Damien Lewis, Tom Hardy, James McAvoy, Michael Fassbender, Andrew Scott and Simon Pegg, just to name a few. Despite its impressive credentials, it doesn't seem to get any love from the pilot team. James has mentioned it a few times, but in passing, it is an intense watch as it follows easy company through some of the main events of World War II from D-Day to the end of the war. Hard to believe it's a true story. It's a brilliant study of the bond between soldiers. As someone who has served, I can testify to its portrayal of camaraderie in the harshest of environments and situations.

34:11I have a feeling that James and Boyd have seen it. But if I can get Steph to watch it, if she hasn't already, then I would consider it a win. Would love to hear your thoughts on it. Thanks for all you do to entertain us weekly. Gary. Gary. Firstly, I fucking love Band of Brothers, okay? Saving Private Ryan is one of my absolute favourite films, right? And I have not only watched Band of Brothers once, I've watched it twice. It is very big in my house. I agree with everything you said. I love Damon Lewis in it. I couldn't love Band of Brothers more I know what you mean and it's really interesting because I you know saying about when it came out two days before 9-11 I don't think I recall that that's when it came because I didn't watch it when it was first out I think I watched started watching it about a year after it went out because Liam was watching it but I absolutely agree with you it doesn't get enough love I think it's probably it doesn't generally appear in a lot when people are talking about the best TV of all time, but it certainly is.

35:10I think it has what I love, which is kind of a contemporary kind of like Christopher Nolan, Dunkirk. It feels like that level of authenticity, which is absolutely outstanding. And also, as an aside, you know that my favorite thing to do is watch military people, servicemen be reunited with their dogs. So on that level, yeah, I'm all in. I'm all in. No, I absolutely love it. So job done. I couldn't, yeah we should talk about it more maybe we'll do a re-watch and talk about how brilliant it is we probably should have on it for its anniversary so gary i'm with you thank you for your service i hope that at some point you were reunited with a dog and you took a video of it and if you did please can you send it to me did you two as gary suspects what's the brothers or indeed like me watch it twice so much more to the point it had a premiere i believe on a beach but definitely in normandy and i there was a point where i was going to drive from my house to normandy for the premiere of band of brothers oh my god why didn't you go you are so extra yeah but the point was like because it was back in the early days when i just started empire and they were like oh yeah we should be able if we go there we'll be able to get interviews with tom hanks and steven spielberg and i was like great because i wasn't i wasn't not to watch it i was going to go and like do the red carpet lineup so i used to cover premieres at empire that was my thing when i started oh my god i totally forgot all of them but i was going to drive to normandy to cover the premiere of band of brothers but they wouldn't give me accreditation so i didn't do it um but yeah that i very nearly did that but yeah band of brothers was an incredible watch and i watched it week by week and you know that intercutting of the easy company action with the testimony of the ex-service of the people who served in world war ii and i think world war ii narratives there's something like world war ii narratives weirdly occupy a similar space in my brain to science fiction sometimes because it doesn't seem real there's something about world war ii in particular more than any other you know historical conflicts that just seems fantastical it seems so it seems like an alternate timeline just to bring the multiverse back into this podcast again it doesn't seem and i'm almost i have this weird fascination with this alternate reality that is this war and And watching that show, there's something quite visceral and just like, it is so powerful.

37:21It's an incredibly powerful watchers going through that and watching them, because obviously they're paratroopers, aren't they? Like they're behind enemy lines during all of this. And as I recall, it's been a long time since seeing it, like the rhythm of that show, like the tone of those episodes, it varies quite a lot depending on what's happening week by week. It's not like they're in a battle every week. Sometimes they're just walking through hedgerows, you know, it's like a, yeah, it's an incredible show. I should go back to it. I never had the same reaction to The Pacific, though. I don't know if you guys did.

37:49Oh, I didn't watch that. I didn't watch that. No. So I don't know. Maybe I should. I think the thing about Band of Brothers is, aside from having, as Gary points out, these absolutely outstanding actors very early on in their career, it really, because the authenticity is so great because we know it's a true story. And I think, even now, if you watch, I think if you watch, it hasn't, this sounds like a strange thing to say, but it hasn't aged in terms of like, if you watch it now, I think I caught one the other day and I think it still looks absolutely pristine and it could be released now and you'd be like, oh, this is a new show.

38:27It's absolutely fantastic. You're making me want to start a rewatch. You genuinely are. Honestly, James, we should. It's so fantastic. We really should. But yeah, it is about, as it says, Band of Brothers, it is about their relationships and that's what makes it so special to watch. Like you say, not every episode is something major happening. It's just a walk through the existence within this insane time. And I think we always, World War II is actually incredibly recent history. And I think that's what is hard to kind of qualify in your mind that, wow, this really did only happen. My granddad was in the Navy and my nana was moved out to the countryside.

39:11I always want to say that excavated. Evacuated. What is the word? Evacuated. She was not excavated. My nana was evacuated. I grew up with those kinds of stories. It is crazy. I know what you mean about it seeming like a multiverse because you almost can't believe that the horror exists in that time and obviously we're still living in a time of war and it's horrendous but yeah I think it's an interesting point yeah go on there was also Masters of the Air wasn't there a couple of years ago yeah which feels like it feels like a piece with those but again nowhere near as powerful nowhere near as powerful but I think it is I'm looking at the question of why we don't mention it that much I mean I think it is often listed in when they do polls of the best shows of all time do you think I feel like it isn't no you think it is okay in fairness it was like 25 years ago.

39:58So I think that's probably a part of it. So it was The Sopranos and Sopranos. That is true. But, and it's funny, like, because you're right in, given the time period it came out and given how good it was, it doesn't get uttered in the same breaths as The Sopranos, The Wire, and those kind of peak TV vanguard shows. Always. But I think it does, there are definitely, I've seen polls where, I think it's more, I think it's more of an American phenomenon. I'm not sure it really, I'm trying to remember what channel it was on here. Was it on channel four here? I think it was. I want to say Sky. I want to say Sky.

40:28Yeah, maybe it was Sky. Yeah, that makes sense. But, yeah, for some reason, I think in American discussions of the greatest TV of all time, it is mentioned, but not that much necessarily for – but, I mean, the cast, every single person and every, like, youngish British actor almost is in it. And, yeah, it was a brilliant piece of work. It was fantastic. But, I mean, I think I'm probably myself guilty of not remembering it when I do, not that we're doing the list of best shows every other day, but when, you know, when asked to talk about the best TV ever, yeah, it must be. We should do a best TV episode.

41:05That's a can of worms. I mean, we can attempt it. I'm sure people would be furious with us no matter what we did, but we'll put it on the back burner for now, I think. Right. Okay. I feel like we have to deal with this. Number one, the expanse. I mean, obviously. Number two, foundation. Nobody's already got the results. We don't need to do it. There we go. Yeah, that's correct. Right. the Reacher situation. I'm going to suggest, because we've had so many of them, we address this now, finally, and then we don't discuss it again, brackets, until the Reacher spoiler special that I'm doing on the Empire Podcast.

41:35Can I just say one thing before you dive into Reacher for anyone who has not started watching what James would call Neely and everybody else would call Neely, which is the Reacher spin-off. Please watch. It's so good, okay? I've continued watching it and it's absolutely fantastic. Now, James, please continue. But before we do the Reacher thing, I've forgotten this. Before we do the Reacher thing, I feel obliged to read out a complaint of someone who doesn't normally write in, but felt compelled to write in and yell at us. So I feel like I have to do this. Is it something I've done? It actually isn't.

42:12It feels like it is. But this comes from, forgive me if I have mispronounced your name. It's a Polish name. I believe it is. It's L-U-K-A-S-Z. I'm going to say Lukash. It's either Lukash or Lukach. I'm going to say Lukash. But anyway, Lukash says, Hey, pod legends. Good start. Long time listener. First time writer. Love the podcast for a very long time. Banter, silly one-upmanship and friendly backstabbing are absolute gold. Steph is a brilliant addition to the team. Her passion is contagious. I'm a long time plus subscriber and will be until you stop recording. I didn't complain about Boyd's political rants.

42:49I listen to Pilot to escape that shitty reality. but I guess other people felt the same and voiced their opinion. I didn't complain about constant spoilers. I just listened to your reviews after watching the mentioned episodes, shows that I'm sure I want to see, because I'm truly interested in your opinions and your takes. That's aimed at you, boy. Absolutely. Unfortunately, your Slow Horses review takes the cake, and not in a good Pat Val way. I've waited to listen to the pod until after watching the first episode, which is the only one available at the time of him writing in. just to be safe because you watched the whole series months ago and did not re-watch the first step before recording you don't seem to remember what happens in which episode and you started spoiling plot points and characters from later episodes or the last 10 minutes of the first how many non-tv journalist people read apple's press release about returning characters maybe in the third episode even though you didn't remember which episode why would you mention plot points from later episodes.

43:48After spoiling a lot in the first four minutes of your review, I had to stop listening. And I won't be back until I finish the series. I'm sorry. But just from that very first minute, I heard the review felt lazy and inconsiderate. You love slow horses, just like almost everyone else, so why would you spoil the fun for the rest of us? In the immortal words of Scepter Unela, shame! Shame! I know it's a long rant, probably too long for the postbag. Turns out not. Plus, I'm not dropping my subscription so no need to cater to me but please do take it under consideration p.s love the yellowstone roch come on dutton branch there we go yes um oh my god we're on a time out we're on the naughty step what have you got to say for yourself shut up well in boyd's defense he did say at the beginning when i said when you said about olivia coleman and i was like definitely not olivia coleman but carry on That would be a spoiler.

44:43What did you say? We mentioned Olivia Cooke. So Olivia Cooke's character. Olivia Cooke, sorry. I actually agree with this because I think releasing that information before airing the show was fucking deranged. And I get that they're trying to capitalise on her profile post-game, you know, with House of the Dragon having recently aired and stuff. But it is a massive spoiler and it is a massive turn. And yes, it was in the books, but people haven't necessarily read them. And actually, when I watched it, it floored me. But, and I will say this, she's in the trailer. She's in the pictures. She's in the trailer.

45:10it's been so heavily publicized yeah and by the way i watched i was watching live tv last night funnily enough and there was a trailer for yeah she's in that and she's in that trailer extensively so i'm sorry it's not case it's not a case of the press release that is bad you know i agree with lukash though that that it is that that is a spoiler and it shouldn't be out there but i think we as reviewers what we try to use as a guideline when we do stuff maybe it's wrong but this is what we try to do is if the studio if the network if the if the people putting the show together if they have put information out there then that generally speaking is something that we use at the foundation of what we talk about from a plot synopsis point of view like and if they haven't put information out then and oftentimes they give us a list of things we shouldn't mention then we don't talk about it and while i agree that i think it is better to watch it not knowing that i guess we kind of assumed that everyone interested in slow horses would know that your point that not everyone watches the trailers and stuff like that to avoid this kind of thing is is fair and we had the same conversation on empire magazine because the person who wrote the print review also mentioned that character and a number of other things in there and there was a great big hoo-ha in the office about should we include it and in the end it stayed in for the reasons i've outlined i'm now 100 not sure or not 100 sure i should say that we made the right decision in either case because maybe we should actually have overridden apple's marketing department said you know what they shouldn't have put this out it was a stupid thing to do and maybe we shouldn't perpetuate this just for people who don't know i don't know i think you know you may be onto something but it's a gray area i i think also a part of the problem just in general reviewing things is okay sometimes you guys will get the whole of a series of something right because especially with apple you'll get the whole series blah blah right and then if it's something that you enjoy blah blah and you you watch it in its entirety and then when we come to review it you you know obviously you're giving kind of a real holistic view of the the series without trying but it's really hard to just remember what happened in the first episode the flip side of that is that sometimes what happens and we have we've been guilty of this is if you don't watch something it's like you don't watch the whole series you don't watch four or five where you're obviously going to find out things that you people who are just going to watch it especially specifically with Apple where it's week by week, right?

47:28Then you might get the wrong idea about, I'll give like, this isn't an Apple show, but Furious is an example of like, we all only watched one episode of that. Okay. So we gave our opinion on it and actually that opinion was wrong and everybody's now come back and we've reversed for it and we all really liked it. Okay. So it's really, it's like a really hard line. Yeah. Well, if you watch one and you're like, well, the first one was a bit, it was not very good. So we're not going to watch it. And then it's like, oh no, you should really commit to watching all of it but then you fall into the well then you watch all when you watch all of it and it's really hard to kind of extrapolate just like the first few things that happen without like engaging in the passion of what else oh you're going to watch this series because so many brilliant things happen so but i yeah it's really really tricky and so where what how much do you watch what do you watch and what do you reveal is also i don't think it's that tricky i don't think it's that tricky i'm sorry if if apple tv are going to put prominently in their trailer not i'm not so this isn't the case of people cranking up a trailer months in advance to see to see what it's like you know and and to discuss it with their mates and people deliberately avoiding trailers it's they put that trailer out on live television on nine o 'clock on a sunday evening so you literally you would have to have like known that a trailer was coming up to ignore the if you're a so horses fan to see this character shown in the trailer if something is shown in the trailer it's not our fault i'm sorry it's quite simple it's not our fault we have to be able to take our cue from the originators of the show the producers of the show the people who commission an era program and if they decide that something is is they want that information out there then we have to take our cue from them we can you know people can complain to us about it that's fine and i of course i'm famous for spoiling things but that's an aside but this particular issue about this particular character coming back in slow horses i'm sorry we are not it's not apple i on the one hand i agree with boyd that technically we are not at fault because this was apple's choice But in retrospect, I regret leaving that in because I think my enjoyment of that show would have been lessened had I known that spoiler going in.

49:30And while that is Apple's fault, really, not our fault, I kind of wish we'd cut it out. Well, I only watched one episode. So when you revealed that to me and you spoiled my experiences, I actually kind of took the view of, and maybe this is just my inherent optimism. I was like, oh, now I'm really excited. Now I know that person's coming back. But yeah, I get the point that, you know, sometimes you just want to, you know, be in it and discover it all for yourself and you don't want, you know, people to tell you stuff. So, I don't know. So, it's hard. I'm sorry. You know, for Lukash, I'm sorry that Boyd and James have spoiled your viewing, but you know, like they did it to me as well.

50:08You're in the same boat. All right, let's do this Reacher thing. I don't even know what order in which to address these things. So, we're just going to do it ever slightly randomly. We'll start with Alan's. Hello, Alan. The pod seems to be going from strength to strength, other, of course, than the fact that James is so, so wrong about the latest series of Reacher, which is the best since the first season. Honestly, is blood coming out of my ears? It feels like blood might be coming out of my ears. And we have another one here from Guy. And Guy says, hello, Piloteers. Does James know and love the character of Reacher too much to be able to enjoy it?

50:40Could he ever enjoy it unless he was appointed showrunner? As I type, I've seen everything except the last episode of the current Reacher series. Having just done a rewatch, I think it might be the best one yet. I've never read the books, but the grin has not left my face and I have often roared with laughter. Encore, say aye. There we go. James, can I just give you a little bit of an anecdotal thing from yesterday? So I was out with some of my university friends yesterday and two of them are like, they don't watch loads of TV. And they both, I was like, what are you watching at the moment? And they were like, both of them are a couple.

51:12And they were like, oh, we don't really watch TV. but the only thing that they watch, right, is Reacher, and they are loving this series. And they said to me, they said to me it was the best yet, and I was like, you need to watch Neagly because you'll love Neagly, but they also said to me, this is the best it's ever been. This is so upsetting. However, I turn now to, you know, and I think it's fair to say, the best pilot listener, you know, the best of all the pilot listeners, and that is Greg. And Greg says, Hi Pod, I thoroughly enjoy how trashy Reacher is, and don't hold it to the same standards as most other TV shows.

51:44However, the final episode of season four was truly terrible. Lots of close-ups of Reacher delivering a not-so-zingy put-down, terrible music over heartfelt character closure, and a fight scene where Reacher basically becomes a Terminator. There was zero plot. I know Reacher isn't known for its plot, and it all felt very, very cheap. I will, however, still watch the next season. Greg. Are any of those things that Greg's just said spoilers? What, that it's terrible? No. Also, it's aired, so you're fine. Okay, fine. But no, it's, yeah. Look, I love the character of Reacher, but let's continue. This comes from Asif, and Asif says, Just getting in touch about Neegli.

52:27First, I have to say, James is absolutely wrong about Reacher. Thank you, Boyd, for fighting back on this point. This season was the best yet. Will people please stop saying that? And that ending was properly gnarly. I also wanted to commend Steph for championing the importance of Neagly's backstory, especially why she doesn't want to be touched. I thought that thread was beautifully handled and adds real weight to the story and the finale. And I hope we get a season two. Yeah, it's really good. Okay, we have one more. One more. This comes from Kenny. I just listened to Pilot Plus, the Neagly edition, and I was hoping to chip in.

52:59I've just watched the first episode of Neagly, and I agree with what you said about the format and quality of the show being similar to the Reach and Reacher series. though hopefully the quality didn't continue to deteriorate like Reacher. I am starting to like Kenny Moore already. Can I suggest a couple of things you may have overlooked, especially given your blind adoration of Mr. Richardson and your expressed opinion of some of the adapted books? In the first season of Reacher, Alan Richardson seemed ideal casting. Big, muscular, does a good job of seeming cleverer than everyone else when he has the dialogue.

53:29But as a six foot five, 250 pound guy myself though more fat than muscle in my old age i felt he went too crazy with the bodybuilding and it made him look freakish rather than how he is described in the books frozen chicken fists aside and when he doesn't have snappy dialogue to show his intellect i think he has a tendency to look constipated rather than intense is he a good enough actor and were good looks more important than acting talent when choosing him or is he a let down by the script and asked to do more than he is capable of i was entirely happy with him in season one and i think that stems from the choice of book to adapt.

54:02I felt like the earlier books were significantly superior and would have loved it if they'd made better choices in subsequent series. The Visitor, Tripwire, or The Enemy would have been my choices after Killing Floor, and one shot has been done on the big screen. I have trouble remembering the plots for many of them, mainly because they were less high concept, and that applied to Gone Tomorrow after the opening scene. And the fight scenes also seem overly complicated, given the effect a scything elbow or cigarette punch should have to end those situations quickly. The way Macquarie translated the fights in the first movie could surely have been emulated, like the prison fights in season one.

54:37I agree with that entirely. By contrast, though, I think giving Maria Sten her own series is an excellent idea, and I think she improved Reacher significantly when she appeared. She shows she is much more believable as an action star, in my opinion, right from the start. Also, I'm surprised you didn't comment on the cult leader from the sizzle reel. I had to check, but he is indeed the same actor who played charles manson in mindhunter and once upon a time in hollywood yes he is sorry for going on a bit but your problem with the recent series has been jarring with me whenever you mention it and not taking into account the lead actor who must have significant clout by now and the book choices as integral reasons for the drop in quality seems unfair keep up the good work kenny boyd brackets no relation yes no it's kenny boyd and kenny boyd's brother is james boyd oh my god wow i know so we love this whole subset of steph this follows a whole like under it's like a underground kind of cult listen they're my buds they're my buddies but of course it's interesting alan richard said really very recently that he they wanted to adapt um die trying which has a white supremacist story and they decided not to when donald trump was re-elected it's a shame because that's a really good book that's the second book yeah it's a brilliant book it's a Brilliant book.

55:52Yeah. So that's very interesting. And when it comes to which book to adapt and which... I mean, look, I don't... Not being one to obviously double down, but I'm going to say, I think the first season of Reacher was purely Child. And I would say the most recent season of Reacher is pure Andrew Child. And I'm just going to leave it there. I'm just going to leave that there. That's not fair. You can't just leave that there. That's not fair. That's not right. James, you're upsetting a lot of people. Weirdly, I feel qualified to say, that because I started reading the sentinel this weekend literally this weekend that's just passed I was reading the sentinel and that is the first lee child and andrew child reach I'd never read one when lee child stopped writing them I stopped reading them and I've only just it's the first time I've dipped my toe in that and let me just say it had big reach of season four energy oh god unbelievable wow so annoying okay um can I just ask have you carried on watching neagly or sorry have you carried on watching neely oh you should please do it's great i may i may i may i may continue i look i hate watch reacher even though it's terrible so there's every chance i will watch this as well it's not terrible you absolute monster okay it won't be a hate watch either and neely neely it won't trust me it really really won't okay it's on the list it's on this right that is it for this week's post pack if you would like to write in about something other than Jack Reacher, then please do so.

57:15Do you know what I find so funny? This is like, it's like the Lestat Lash, but it's just fun, your one, isn't it? That address, of course, is postbag at pilottvpod.com. We hope you've enjoyed this Pilot Plus. On next week's regular podcast, we will be reviewing the new series of Blue Lights on the BBC. We'll be doing Break Claws on Channel 4 and War. What is it good for? Possibly absolutely nothing. We will find out because it's on Sky and we'll be reviewing that on Monday's show. Plus, we will have our interview with Sian Brooke from Blue Lights when she came into the studio and you will get to meet her lovely dog, Ziggy Stardust.

57:51Exciting. Right. We'll see you on Monday. Pilot out.

From the publisher

Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson (who may or may not be actual brothers) play two fictionalised versions of themselves (who may or may not be actual brothers) in Apple TV series Brothers. Steph was extremely excited about this one, so the question is: does it live up to the Steph hype? Plus, the postbag divulges an assortment of thoughts and questions, from our treatment of Slow Horses to multiversal pedantry and the final (promise) word on the new season of Reacher.

Want your messages read out as part of The Postbag? Email us at postbag@pilottvpod.com

More from Pilot TV+

All 149 episodes
PLUS BrothersPilot TV+ · 58 min
Listen in VO