In short
The hosts review Shrinking season 3’s hour-long premiere, debating its tone, stakes, and character dynamics, plus a long mailbag covering TV recommendations and other media talk.
Guests
No guest interviewees. The episode features the Pilot Plus hosts: Boyd, James, and Steph (Kay is mentioned as a friend who loves the show but isn’t present).
Guest backgrounds (mentioned)
Kay is described as obsessed with Shrinking and having watched many episodes; Steph is described as having seen only a few episodes; Boyd and James discuss their limited prior viewing and rewatching.
Key claims
Steph says the show’s “bright” LA setting masks ongoing character discontent and coping; Boyd argues stakes feel low when jumping into season 3; James defends the show’s emotional craft and points to resolved season-2 jeopardy.
Notable examples
the season 3 premiere’s wedding speech, a football/college subplot, Harrison Ford’s grumpy-therapist vibe, and a cameo/guest star (not named).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOInitial Thoughts on Shrinking
0:45 to 2:24
Host shares personal history with the show and initial impressions.
The Commitment to Watch
2:24 to 3:21
Discussion on binge-watching the series and its engaging nature.
“So I'm exhausted because Saturday rolled around and I was like, oh, we're doing Pilot Plus on shrinking.”
Plot Setup of Shrinking
3:21 to 4:34
Overview of the main character's journey through grief and therapy.
“And I was like, listen, Gracie, go and do some colouring because this is important stuff.”
Character Dynamics and Themes
4:34 to 6:06
Exploration of character arcs and underlying themes of grief.
“What he decides to do, so we arrive kind of at the end of this year, he goes into work and he kind of thinks, I've got to do something.”
Comparisons and Critiques
6:06 to 8:15
Comparison to shows like Ted Lasso and critiques of character stakes.
“I did not get annoyed at the hour-long length of this opening episode of season three.”
Dysfunctional Characters and Relatability
8:15 to 10:13
Discussion on character relatability and their struggles.
“and I don't care about it, what's really what's going on, It kind of drew me in.”
Emotional Stakes and Viewing Experience
10:13 to 14:03
Debate on emotional stakes and viewer's experience with the show.
Debating the Stakes in 'Shrinking'
14:03 to 17:44
Exploration of character stakes and emotional depth in the show 'Shrinking'.
“Because neither of you have watched the finales of season one and season two, Boyd, for those of you listening, Boyd has done a classic roll of his eye at me.”
Post Bag Introduction
17:44 to 18:20
Introduction to the post-bag section of the podcast.
Listener Recommendations and Comedy Talk
18:20 to 20:20
Listeners share their favorite comedies and engage in recommendations.
“I'd recommend the season 2 episode Parent Trapped I can't even remember the A plot but the B plot sees Stiller given control of a pretzel store for a week and it's hilarious.”
Show all 24 chapters
Celebrating Patton Oswalt and True Crime
20:20 to 21:00
Discussion about comedian Patton Oswalt and his late wife’s true crime book.
“And I'm just going to give you a great fact also about Patton Oswalt because yes, I agree.”
Exploring 'His and Hers' Criticism
21:00 to 22:41
Critique of the show 'His and Hers' and its reception among critics.
“Okay, question here from John Armstrong.”
Discussion on Ratings and Reviews
22:41 to 28:00
A heated debate over the meaning of ratings on sites like Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes.
“I have had a lot of communications from people pointing out, like, for example, let me quote, Mikey C said, did Boyd Tilton really say on Pilot TV pod that the population of the Earth was 2 billion?”
The Corridor Debate: TV Show Comparisons
28:00 to 28:50
Discussion on the use of corridors in 'The Last of Us' and 'Severance'.
“I've also recently started Severance based on many recommendations, including yours.”
Examining the Corridor Critique
28:50 to 30:44
Exploration of why corridors in different shows evoke varied reactions.
“Because as a diehard Doctor Who apologist, I'd imagine if people were endlessly running up and down them, he'd be ecstatic.”
Cultural Significance of Corridors
30:44 to 32:00
Discussion on the role of corridors in design and narrative.
“And we've already established that your favourite genre is plane films and plane shows, and that's basically a flying corridor.”
Tired Tropes in TV Drama
33:00 to 34:16
Discussion about tired narrative tropes in TV shows.
Consequences in Fictional Murders
34:16 to 36:24
Debate on the portrayal of consequences for murder in television.
Interchangeable Presenters and Historical Context
36:24 to 37:10
Discussion about the show's presenters and a humorous historical anecdote.
Viewer Recommendations for Historical Shows
37:10 to 42:00
Listeners share their favorite historical shows and films.
“Ellen, apparently, and she says, Campbell Town Picture House, situated on the border of the Bell End, Kintyre.”
Exploring Historical Dramas
42:00 to 44:23
Discussing various historical dramas and their appeal.
“who's telling the story, looking back on, you know, his younger self.”
The Traitors Spoiler Chat Introduction
44:23 to 45:47
Transitioning to a spoiler discussion about The Traitors.
“I was like, oh, you know, I was wanting it.”
Analysis of The Traitors Finale
45:47 to 49:55
Analyzing the finale of The Traitors and its dramatic elements.
“That was in The Masked Singer, by the way, listeners.”
Future Expectations for The Traitors
49:55 to 52:09
Discussing future seasons and potential cast members.
“So the only tension was, would he particularly stick to the pact and not suddenly double-cross Rachel in the end.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:08Kay Ribeiro:Welcome to Pilot Plus, your extended guide to every show that matters. And today we are, I guess, addressing some kind of injustice, though, in typical pilot fashion in an incredibly cack-handed and inappropriate way. Because finally, yes, finally, I am watching Shrinking. Why? Because we're going to review the third season on this particular podcast. But is Kay here? Is she fucked? No, she's not here to witness her triumph, as I've seen her. finally watch shrinking in steph in steph in steph stead is here spoonerism seems to be coming a regular occurrence on pilot plus have you noticed this yes from you yeah yeah from you yeah in steph stead is here and she is instead going to she is in steph sorry going to witness me talking about shrinking but look let's get into this refusal to watch it i don't understand so so this is a show that kay has been obsessed with for a very long time she absolutely adores it now i watched the beginning of season one because we reviewed it we may have done the same with season two i genuinely can't remember but i've never pressed on with it because i found it to be fine but it didn't really seize me so i never really got on with shrinking but she her whole thing was like if she has one thing she wants of me it's for me to watch shrinking so i was like all right fine it's been on the sofa list for a while to go back to but no instead i've jumped in as you know the intended and the intended created i'm still doing it i may be having a stroke the creators intended did i jumped in at the beginning of season three obviously as they would want me to do uh and picked up the story there and so that's what but but so one of my criticisms of this show was going to be this feels like a show that should be half an hour i don't understand why it was an hour long and then steph just before this started you dropped a bombshell by mentioning it is a half an hour show it's just the first episode that is an hour long everyone knows that oh god james so many things wrong because it outstayed its welcome i'm not gonna laugh okay okay hold on right i am exhausted and do you know why i'm exhausted boyd it's me isn't it um i think i do know why is it to do with the apple screeners no boys well yes it is that which i only got the screener yesterday at 6 p.m but i'm exhausted because brimey no tears you've had the whole like you know 14 hours or whatever okay i'm just gonna keep going and try and ignore Both of you who I hate.
2:23Yeah. Okay. So I'm exhausted because Saturday rolled around and I was like, oh, we're doing Pilot Plus on shrinking. I still haven't got the screener, but you know what? People pay for this episode and I'm not going to do them a disservice. I'm going to start, because I didn't watch it, I'm going to start watching it. And in 48 hours - Oh, from the beginning. Oh, Boyd, in 48 hours, I have watched 22, not counting this one, 22 episodes of Shrinking. Yeah. Okay.
2:57Kay Ribeiro:Can I just say, that kind of commitment is something that we just never got from Kay. No, not true. Not true. But I tell you this now, I know why Kay loves this, Kay being one of my best friends, because it's absolutely sensational. I, yes, I did watch 22 episodes. Big words. Yes, I did watch my two episodes, but I loved every minute of it. I was like walking around with my headphones, holding my phone while my six-year-old was telling me that screen time was bad for the brain, right? And I was like, listen, Gracie, go and do some colouring because this is important stuff. I, oh my God. Before I go into why it's so incredibly brilliant in every sense.
3:40Kay Ribeiro:Before you do, for those of people who don't watch Shrinking, give us a brief setup of what the show's about. shrinking so a father who has recently lost his wife um in a car accident is in the midst of insurmountable grief which he is remedying with um hookers and drugs let's just say that okay he has a nosy neighbor liz who has whilst he's had a year of insurmountable grief the grieving process, been helping to raise his daughter, Alice, his teenage daughter, Alice. Around him are a group of people who want to help, but haven't been able to help. But the cherry on the top of the cake is him himself, placed by the wonderful Jason Segel, character named Jimmy, is actually a therapist.
4:32So there you are, set the scene. What he decides to do, so we arrive kind of at the end of this year, he goes into work and he kind of thinks, I've got to do something. I've got to kind of like get myself back in the game. Something's got to happen. And he starts giving advice to his patients, which let's just say is a bit off book. Okay. And I don't want to spoil this because it's such an incredible delight, but what happens next just makes the show incessantly watchable and you cannot and i am proof of that stop watching it for the 22 episodes that happen in the first two seasons and then the hour-long episode our james long episode
5:13Kay Ribeiro:which is the season premiere of season three wow so so because this this to me certainly on paper let's let's assume that for argument's sake i completely forgotten everything about the first episode that i saw but uh it has a bit of an afterlife he set up doesn't it like that grief in Ricky Gervais' case makes him a bellend and in this it just makes him a very very honest no nonsense therapist he kind of cuts to the heart of things as broadly the set up at the beginning no he's a bellend he's an absolute bellend oh okay he's also a bellend so he's basically after life he's basically he has he's tapped out of raising his daughter because he is unable to deal with the loss of his wife he's in the first episode he's got strippers in the pool and his daughter's home but now now now as now everything everyone's settled down and everyone's kind of in a you know how can i put it um every like he does care about his teenage daughter and yeah um or everyone's kind of living quite a good life it's an unconventional trajectory of grief isn't it this is it that's what it is well you see my issue is too strong a word my um explanation perhaps of why i don't find this quite as compelling as you and Kay.
6:29I really like it. Let me make this absolutely clear. I really enjoyed watching it. I did not get annoyed at the hour-long length of this opening episode of season three. But having said that, like James, I have gone back and re-watched the early episodes to fill me in on what's going on. Because quite quickly, they quite quickly let you catch up with how all the characters are going in this quite cunningly structured opening episode. So you catch up with all of them, all of the ensemble. It's quite a big ensemble now. And it's fine. It's quite gentle, or seemingly gentle, anyway. Borderline schmaltzy, which is quite interesting because the characters tell each other they're being schmaltzy in the show, particularly Harrison Ford's character, who, you know, his entire raison d 'etre is to be Mr.
7:17Grumpy, right? And that's quite a funny idea for a therapist, et cetera. but everyone's kind of living a pretty good life now. So the stakes, it's quite low stakes. It's will my teenage daughter be able to go play football well enough to get into the college and be a football player, et cetera, which is quite involving. But what I'm trying to say, I guess, is that it's a bit like Ted Lasso in the sense that, of course, it has some creative links with Ted Lasso in that it's a really pleasant place to be. And I like hanging out with these people. And it's all in a very, very kind of LA, kind of, you know, bright, sunny.
8:01It's always sunny. It's always bright. Everyone's lit. You know, like they're perfect. Everyone looks great. But it feels a little bit low, let's say low stakes. And then, but then just before, well, quick, let me quickly say, just before you think it's completely pointless and I don't care about it, what's really what's going on, It kind of drew me in. And so by the end of the hour-long, controversially hour-long, first episode of this season, this new season, I was kind of in. I'm in, you know, and I would like to carry on watching it. So it's quite cunning. It treads a really fine line between being really schmaltzy, not funny enough, et cetera, and being just – and then right at the end, they kind of give you something quite funny.
8:42You know, there was a speech at the wedding that happened in this episode that I thought was funny and, you know, all the shenanigans. end up kind of just about working, I think. It's quite borderline. It's quite subtle, the way the show is put together and the tone of it. And I think in the end, I found it quite winning. And I think people do. I get why you and Kay is my point, finally. I get why you and Kay, and it's millions of fans around the world, really dig this show, if I can use that phrase.
9:09Kay Ribeiro:And just to clarify, Boyle, just before you jump in there, Steph, how many episodes have you seen in total of the show? I would say probably not more than half a dozen. So just like a few of each season, essentially. Right. Steph, unleash the hounds. I think you're both, you have this show, you've both got it completely wrong. I think what is so great about this show is that actually every single character, and I find the unpredictable dynamic of the characters incredibly watchable. every single character has this simmering discontentment and it's and it's and it's always just another service so while you have asserted that everybody is really happy and it's joyful I think like the juxtaposition of this Pasadena this incredibly you're right yeah everything is bright even when like people are having you know off the cuff therapy sessions they're sitting on a bench all looks wonderful people are eating sweets it's great but actually I think the crux of the show is that everybody is still at a level unhappy and they're just they're just coping they're just coping with this and and it's and it's not actually that they're all having a great time and definitely in season two you really see there's a lot of development in season two which we won't go into because it's spoilers but I think it's how to it's a great it's a great watch and how to how to build your tribe around you but make my mistake this is a tribe of dysfunctional individuals who all have very real problems and I think it's so relatable on so many levels I mean I think yeah maybe I hate to say this maybe it leans more towards a female watcher because it's so empathetic and you you I see so many I see so many people I know in these people and I enjoyed immensely being in their company and I found it very comforting because the characters are so well drawn and they're so well drawn because they're incredibly believable I don't think any of them are overplayed they're just all very sort of normal people trying to navigate themselves through their own grief and whether that's actual literal grief or the grief of the loss of something in their life um it i don't i don't think you've watched enough of these episodes either of you well this was this was what i was going to say i do wonder whether for me certainly jumping in at season three was the worst possible thing i could do because i think to boyd's point i think by the time you get to the beginning of season three the stakes do feel quite low because there's not a lot going on like everyone's just kind of okay and living a fairly normal life over an hour and five minutes and uh and and i was just like i i found it not really very funny there was what there was a mr rogers joke that genuinely made me laugh that was that was probably funny but most of it's like it's it's gently amusing without being funny funny some of the characters certainly some of the line deliveries i found a little stiff and a little bit overplayed and again not to point two fingers but krista miller who plays liz the neighbor her character just felt a little bit too caricatured for me to really kind of believe her as a human being i don't think any of this would matter if i've been through 22 episodes previously because i would have a relationship with these characters and i'd have been through all the travails and the emotional hardship with them and so i think i'd feel much warmer towards them and i think the ted lasso point is is very valid because if you were to jump in at the what was the final season of ted lasso which is now not the final season of ted lasso you'd be like what is why do i care about the show because again it didn't really feel that cohesive at that point but if you've been through it from the beginning you're already really invested in these characters and you're quite interested in the small minutiae of their lives i think it's probably true here as well whereas i couldn't bring myself to care that much about whether or not she qualifies for a football team i was like yeah do you know i mean it's fine like i'm not super bored but i'm not particularly great liz is a great example because you because you haven't watched it you don't understand her character arc and the whole point of her character being just liz the neighbor um And that's what's really clever about this is that actually everybody does have an incredibly interesting arc.
13:16And I mean, I just, as another point, I really enjoyed because a lot of these are directed by Zach Braff and I was a massive Scrubs fan. And he brings people in for Scrubs and obviously like Liz's character, she's from Scrubs and there's several other characters that are, you know, Scrub alumni. And it's those -
13:31Kay Ribeiro:The Bill Lawrence tribe. Exactly. And that for me, and again, maybe that's because that was very much my era. I watched all of Scrubs. I found that warming and comforting as well because it felt familiar. I just think Jason Segel leads this cast so impeccably. I have literally no notes. And I'm really utterly disappointed that you two don't think this is incredible. Do you agree on this third episode maybe isn't a showcase for this show? Third episode, third season. Sorry, third season. I meant third season. Because neither of you have watched the finales of season one and season two, Boyd, for those of you listening, Boyd has done a classic roll of his eye at me.
14:15Right. Okay.
14:16Kay Ribeiro:You got the Boydy eye roll. You're not understanding the jeopardy of the situations they're in. So in the end of the second season, there's a massive amount of emotional jeopardy, which you don't understand is being resolved in this hour-long episode. Okay. Okay, that's fair. Listen. I will. Of course, you're right. But you seem to have been listening to what I said. I really, really liked it in the end. I think it's, I'm kind of, of course you're right. I haven't watched anyone who has only watched half a dozen episodes of a thing that's now how many? Twenty. Thirty-two. Thirty-three episodes is not going to understand the story arcs, et cetera, of the characters as much as someone who has watched them, all like you and Kay.
14:59I totally acknowledge that, absolutely, 100%. You know, even the thing that's happening to Harrison Ford, which is a serious thing and it's moving and it's, you know, it's an emotional thing for the characters to deal with. Even that, if he's got Parkinson's, even that is dealt with within the kind of general tone of the show. Do you know what I mean? In a kind of classic comedy drama mode. and I'm not criticizing that at all and this is to illustrate exactly what I'm trying to say, it's by the end of this hour long first episode, just to reiterate I did really appreciate the skill and the craft that goes on in the show and the subtleties of its tone and the fact that in the end, even though my point is, when you arrive at this series, it feels like everyone's stakes are low even though I'm sure they are just in the whole tone of the show is keeping things on an even keel nothing's too messy and i'm not criticizing that i just feel it has got that tone to it but when you get to the final scene which i thought was very effective and i didn't see coming i was like oh that's really moving and it got me so i'm i'm pro i'm pro shrinking don't get don't put me in the anti-shrinking camp i think it is a really good show that's the bottom line i would also just say that if you have been committed and watched 22 episodes This first episode Delivers a guest star Which you feel like It really gets you It gets you an emotion It really does
16:32Kay Ribeiro:Guest star slash cameo Which is good Well he's not playing himself though Is he interesting? No he isn't No Yeah But it's sensation I can't stop saying sensation Is that a spoiler that he's in it? I've seen that all over the place Well yeah Let's not say who it is Just for people who don't know I mean that is A bit shimmyweb Spoity Steady I'm very much sitting on the shrinking fence unfortunately like this has not made me want to start watching the show unfortunately I'm not like I didn't hate it I thought it was fine which is much reaction I had to the first episode of the first season I just it hasn't seized me I'm sorry I think you really should continue because I think this show has an emotional depth that you should reach weirdly I quite I like the idea year of that and uh and but i can't remember exactly what i thought of the first episode of the first season because i should go back and listen to the review that we gave of it uh but yeah well yeah we'll see it remains as it was on the sofa i feel like k and i should do a spoiler special on season three of shrinking um and just by all means just like you know all right until the next time we uh we we tackle the shrinking challenge that was shrinking which returns for its thursdays not apple tv plus on what day boyd minster well it's out it was out yesterday wednesday so it's all there now and not all there sorry the first first the first episode is there the feature then the feature of hour long episode is there now that's what i'm trying to say i stand by it i think i think this definitely lends itself to a half hour format i'm not sure it lends itself to an hour format yeah it is so that works out quite well your prayers have been answered it's half an hour well 33 to 37 minutes fabulous right let's move on to the post bag
18:20Kay Ribeiro:triage it's the post fact and our first message this week comes from rachel and rachel says in her subject comedies for mel and she says hi gang really enjoyed your list of comedies and have added a few to my list even the dramas from james thank you very much uh my method of finding new comedies starts with taskmaster i just watch everything that's been made by those people i see in taskmaster and i've not been let down yet they're always a perfect length too there you go one on comedy we have another one on comedy here this one comes from Chris Chris Downey and Chris says just wanted to add to the email about 30 minute comedies Steph you're going to like this I want to go to bat for King of Queens is it the King of Comedies?
19:04Kay Ribeiro:no but there's some fantastic stuff in there it was where I discovered the comedian Patton Oswalt who for me is pound for pound the best comedian in the world working today and his back and forth with Jerry Stiller is exceptional any fans of Seinfeld really should check out this show purely for Jerry Stiller it's obviously leagues below Seinfeld but if like me Frank Ostanza was one of your favourite parts of Seinfeld then this is a real treat. I'd recommend the season 2 episode Parent Trapped I can't even remember the A plot but the B plot sees Stiller given control of a pretzel store for a week and it's hilarious.
19:35Kay Ribeiro:Here in Scotland Still Game is a national treasure following the lives of two widower pensioners navigating life in Glasgow. It's a very broad sitcom but it's very very funny at its height pubs would empty on a Friday night to watch it a proper institution in Scotland I think it's been doing great numbers on Netflix so I guess it's made an impact outside of Scotland as well and if sketch shows count Limmy's show is the most brilliantly surreal insanity also he continues let me vote for Ghosts not much more to say about Ghosts it's one of the best British comedies for the past 20 years and then finally it goes without saying that the first 9 or 10 years of The Simpsons is probably the greatest comedy ever created nothing can compete with those early years.
20:17Kay Ribeiro:Anyway, those are my two cents. Love the pod and welcome to Steph. Do you know what? I love you. And I'm just going to give you a great fact also about Patton Oswalt because yes, I agree. He's an absolutely fantastic comedian. And for those who don't know, so Patton Oswalt was married to a lady called Michelle McNamara, who sadly passed away. Michelle McNamara wrote an incredible book called Gone in the Night, which was about her, the hunt for the Golden State Killer, which is one of the most prolific serial killers in America. and it's sensational if you haven't read it and there's a documentary about it.
20:48So yes, yes, yes to all your suggestions and also want to big up Patton Oswalt. Thrown a bit of true crime in there for two to sleep. Yeah, because when else am I going to get to talk about Michelle McNamara and Patton Oswalt?
20:59Kay Ribeiro:There you go. Well, that's fair. That is fair. Okay, question here from John Armstrong. John says, following on from the revelations about James's home life from today's podcast, no longer trimming trees but working out to be battle fit. The question needs to be asked, is he actually Bruce Wayne? We've talked a lot about Boyd's luxurious lifestyle, but I think we've been looking the wrong way. James clearly has grounds. I don't have grounds. Does he also have staff? I do not have staff. Does he have a butler called Alfred Pennyweather? Only if you count Steph. And in questions that might upset him, does he know his beloved and mine West Wing cast have so often been in Law & Order SVU?
21:36Kay Ribeiro:Bradley Whitford and Josh Molina have both played paedophiles. Upsetting! Oh my God, don't tell me things like that. That really is upsetting. would welcome a spoiler special on him and her. Is it him and her or his and hers? I always get this confused. His and hers. His and hers. There we go. Well, him and her. He is his and hers. Him and her is the brilliant British comedy with Russell Tovey and Sarah Soleimani. I'm wondering which one he's referring to, but I think he's referring to his and hers because he said, welcome spoiler special on his and hers and the banana crackers denouement. Oh, yeah.
22:06Kay Ribeiro:So I assume he means his and hers. Not, in fact, him and her. No. Okay, well, you're in luck there, John, because while we will not necessarily be doing a spoiler special we will be reviewing that show on monday's podcast which it turns out is going to be a weird retro kind of catch-up episode the pilot tv podcast on account of there being fuck all on actual television by the way so we're going to cover some of the shows we've missed by the way this is on our admin but we could there is a possibility we could do an itv drama called betray betrayal which is on the sunday in our week actually i've just realized so we could steph i imagine has already watched the shows i have watched the i can't okay okay we're not we're not shifting no we're not shifting okay yes thank you john so yes tune in on monday for some his and hers not him and her action message now here from philip wallace and philip says dear current mailbag incumbent that's part of aggressive uh it has long been alluded to that boyd is slightly older than the rest of the pilot tv crew but i didn't realize how much older until he proclaimed about the world's population being two billion people as this was the population in 1928 when he can only have been a young lad he must have a much better memory than he gets credit for for balance i feel i should also query a pronunciation issue from james that troll rhymes with roll but his trolling doesn't rhyme with rolling i really think it should and for part-time departed k we should suspend her disbelief when watching hard sci-fi rather than suspending her belief, as she says.
23:36Kay Ribeiro:As for Steph, 10 out of 10, no notes. Not yet. You're my favorite. I have had a lot of communications from people pointing out, like, for example, let me quote, Mikey C said, did Boyd Tilton really say on Pilot TV pod that the population of the Earth was 2 billion? Maybe when Trump has finished, it will be, but it's currently more than 8 billion. Oh, is that when you were giving the Netflix facts? Yeah, yeah. So 8 billion. I was only out by, you know. Six billion. It was fine. Oh, elderly boy. Question here from Amar. And Amar says, Hey gang, listening to the pod this week, I have to question James' statement that his and hers has been, quote unquote, annihilated by critics.
24:21Kay Ribeiro:I think initially he mentioned he looked it up on Metacritic where it's 50 % from only 20 critics. And it's 67 % on Rotten Tomatoes from 48 critics. Thank you, Wikipedia. does this really qualify as critical annihilation i saw the show thought it was a classic netflix binge it's nothing game-changing but it is entertaining a good cast and doesn't overstay its welcome and like steph other people i have spoken to really liked it something to help january go by now off to leave you a bad review just kidding five stars as always cheers amal now can i just say that um i'm fully behind him there because you have this habit james and it really is irritating i have to say one of your more irritating habits is to come in and on when a film or tv show has been out for like half a minute and you go everyone hates it it's everyone says it's terrible i'm like and then you actually sit down and look at the facts and you find like immediately i have three four star reviews you know the guardian and the independent or whatever and you know and what what that basically means is james thinks it's terrible and you know some occasionally there are some people that agree with him you're you're a massive case of the defense your honor i i i I stand by the annihilated, I will grant you, might have been at ever so slightly strong term.
25:32Kay Ribeiro:However, it is currently showing us 53 on a weighted average on Metacritic. 53, which is pretty dire. Well, that's above, well, hold on, that's above halfway. That's, yeah, 53. Except that's not quite how the averages work, is it? Because they're either rated out of 5 or out of 10. And if they're rated out of 5, then, like, what's the half at 2.5 stars? Which is a negative review, let's be honest. So it doesn't quite work out. So I would say, realistically, anything below 60 is kind of negative on Metacritic. And to be good, to be really good, it's got to be above 80. But to be even watchable, you're really thinking, what, 70, 75?
26:05Kay Ribeiro:Okay, James, you know what? The people have spoken. And the people love his and hers. So it's over, okay? The people on the ground. Well, look, we'll get into it on Monday's show. I have watched some of his and hers now. So I could already comment, but we're going to save it for Monday's podcast. But on the Rotten Tomatoes thing, I will stand extra. I will double down again on this because I have no truck whatsoever with Rotten Tomatoes. I've said this many, many times because their maths doesn't make sense because 65 % is not a weighted average of Rotten Tomatoes. It just means, or here, 67%.
26:35Kay Ribeiro:It means 67 % of critics gave it a quote unquote positive review, which I believe is like three stars or more. So if something could be 100 % fresh on Rotten Tomatoes, but still be crucially a three star film. So it's utterly meaningless. So we don't listen to Rotten Tomatoes. There have been way too many numbers in the last 10 minutes. Okay, way too many. Yeah. But I think what happens is sometimes you stumble upon an actual review, forgetting even these aggregator sites, which are full of shit. I agree. They're completely annoying. I'm talking about independently, you will see like one two-star review.
27:09And I'll decide that it's been panned by everyone.
27:11Kay Ribeiro:Yeah, this is what everyone thinks of this film. That's entirely possible. You don't really fancy it, let's be honest. I'm a bit like a dog. I remember the last thing I've seen in the last five seconds, and beyond that, I've no idea. Yeah, that's true. And often, by the way, you'll conveniently brush over the fact that, for example, the last Avatar film, that did get genuinely annihilated by the critics. And I'm guaranteeing you won't acknowledge that fact. So, yeah. James, you're a terrible person. I mean, I am. That's an arguably true. Avatar, Fire and Ash reviews. Metacritic. Green, 61 % does not count as annihilated.
27:43Kay Ribeiro:Sorry, Boydie, the facts are against you. I mean, that's not much more than the 53 % we add for the... Ah, but crucially, it is above the 60 % which rates it green. I'm not going to say that it's been critically acclaimed it hasn't, but it has not been annihilated I'm sorry, you are now just as guilty as I am Oh my god, I'm calling it on the numbers chat this is not a maths lesson Moving on Well, I will not come for Boydie I will instead leave that to Ian Robertson whose message starts The Corridor Debate Part 100 Hello pilot peeps I've recently re-watched season 2 of The Last of Us and fully agree with James I'm going to put that on a t-shirt that it's a masterpiece.
28:20Kay Ribeiro:I've also recently started Severance based on many recommendations, including yours. Still getting into it, but it's definitely intriguing. But I wonder if you can clear something up for me. One of these, namely The Last of Us, has very few scenes set in corridors. I wasn't keeping count, but I'd say there's maybe half a dozen throughout the course of the season. The other show features many, many, many corridors, huge amounts of corridors. Literally half the show is people talking in corridors. So why did one trigger Boyd's corridor alarm and not the other. Also, is it just people walking and talking in corridors he objects to?
28:53Kay Ribeiro:Because as a diehard Doctor Who apologist, I'd imagine if people were endlessly running up and down them, he'd be ecstatic. Also, in the same vein as James' West Wing ban, how about a ban on Boydie mentioning Seinfeld and Curve for the duration of 2026? Oh, yes. Finally, just in case Boyd feels this email is singling him out, James, you are still wrong about Lower Decks. It's amazing and far less silly than Strange New Worlds. You can't say you like your Star Trek series and then endlessly talk about how great the K-pop Klingons are in Star Trek Strange New Worlds. That's fair. Okay, I'm just going to say, I'm really glad I came out of that unscathed, right?
29:28Because that was an assault. Yeah, that was a bloodbath. Yeah, it really was. I just, Boyd is, Boyd, you can't get Boyd to stop talking about Seinfeld and Larry David. You just can't, because we've tried. And it doesn't work. No, you can't. I don't think you've even tried. No, I wouldn't, because I love Seinfeld and Curb, and I love, you know, I wouldn't ever get you to stop talking about that.
29:48Kay Ribeiro:No, I would never remove a source of joy for Boydie. No. Because I'm good that way. You're a delight. You really are. Wow. Jesus Christ. Okay, so what's the deal with the corridor thing then, Boyd? What's the problem? The corridor thing. Do you know what it was? I think it was, there was a few scenes in The Lost of Us where people are tracking each other down corridors and it's like you get in video games, you know, kind of first person shooter, as I believe they could be. That's what it reminded me of. the corridor-based scenes in those kind of games, and I felt they were a bit repetitive. But I completely acknowledge that, of course, Severance almost is entirely set within ultra-white corridors and is quite claustrophobic, to be fair.
30:28Yeah, and deliberately so, of course. But yeah, I mean, including, of course, the finale of the last season was entirely set in the various corridors of the Lumen Industries base. So, yes. But it's a different type of corridor, I think, to what I was thinking of in The Last of Us is the only explanation I could make.
30:43Kay Ribeiro:Ah, that is the type of corridor. And we've already established that your favourite genre is plane films and plane shows, and that's basically a flying corridor. Exactly. Yeah. I feel like it's a weird thing for you to have taken against. I spend a lot of time in corridors with you because we walk and talk sometimes when we're going to go and get tea, and I feel like our kitchen is corridor, isn't it? What I call the local kitchen. We're very corridor chatty. It's a little bit of a corridor. I don't think it's – not compared to what you get in The Last of Us or in The Seven. Not like a lengthy corridor.
31:13Okay. No. Well, you're not being pursued by, like, fungal infected.
Read the full transcript
31:17Kay Ribeiro:I guess that's probably the distinction. No, exactly. That's true. And in fact, actually, now you've come to mention this, Steph, the design of our office is quite a very open plan and kind of anti-corridor, I would say. Impressively so in some ways. Yeah, actually, maybe. I think corridors can be quite cramped and quite kind of, I think that absolutely, it's literally why they're designed like that on Severance to underline the corporate kind of, you know, element of the show. it's suffocating in those fucking white corridors Severance would not work if it was a massive open plan 100 % maybe I should write the book on corridors in popular culture I think you should I'll have a think message here from Simon and Simon says thank you Simon we love you Simon I hadn't even realised I said that uh in response i bet he never gets that at all uh in response to the recent emailer who wanted to use the sofa app only to discover that it's iphone only he could do a lot worse than try sholey i find it a really good way to keep tabs on my watch list you can even create custom lists for further organization for instance i haven't currently watching this to remind me of all the shows i have started because as we all know there's too much tv and it's hard to keep up there you go that's from simon who i can only assume is the developer of sholey i think that's a very very thoughtful recommendation simon thank you okay this is a message from philip philip says i posted this to reddit earlier we should say to people the subreddit does exist so do feel free to check out the subreddit if you want some tv chat there's also an official discord i should mention this in a regular pod uh that harry set up there's an empire discord and there is a pilot's channel on the empire discord which is i would say sadly underrepresented at the moment so if you want to go and watch out do you find the pilot reddit now what are they saying are they on the reddit okay right so so according to philip he posted this on the reddit but he thought it might be interesting for the mailbag as well i've been noticing a trend in various series over the last year that is beginning to get tedious where the main character either gets away with literal murder or covers it up because it's committed by a spouse child or friend i'm guessing the screenwriters think they're acting uh they're adding edgy depth to their protagonist with this morality flaw but it's so common now that it's no longer even a twist or out of the ordinary what makes it even lazier is that it's nearly always quote-unquote justified by the i do anything to protect my child slash spouse trope or the even worse it's okay because it's revenge for them murdering my child slash spouse trope just to be clear i'm not talking about clearly ott things like john wick or kill bill where murderous revenge is the whole plot but grounded drama thrillers where this is added as a shortcut to character depth off the top of my head these shows have all used this device spoiler klaxon the last frontier run away untamed land of sin bracket synden i'm sure there are three or more recent ones i'm forgetting too this shouldn't be a controversial tape but bring back the consequences for murder interested to hear your thoughts phil okay phil so phil's basically saying that like the spouse murdering such blah blah blah is basically the new i woke up and it was all a dream that's what he's essentially saying isn't he because that used to be i think he's saying there should be consequences for murderizing people in drama I don't know about that I think there's something really juicy about people getting away with it because people get away with murder all the time do you know what I mean and you'd not see I'm not yeah you'd know you are the expert I think that what he's actually saying here is not like criminals getting away with it he's saying when the protagonists murder people sorry not to talk over you but I'm thinking of a really good example which I watched which was amazing and I don't want to give a spoiler but did you watch Presumed Innocent Jake Gyllenhaal yes okay I would say that's a classic one of those yeah yeah yeah i agree and oh i think what he's getting at it is i think it isn't a much overused kind of plot um resolution device being that and i've said this one of the best i'm not going to name it because it's a massive spoiler and people will find it but there's a show that was one of the best um one-off um serials crime serials of the last few years whose ending really kind of disappointed me because it was such a version of the trope whereby the person who committed the murder is essentially a child right and they're covered and and the parent takes responsibility and that is a really common solution to crime to crimes on tv and i find it you just so you've got to stop we've had enough of that now it's almost like any crime involving children in any way we're not not you know it doesn't even have to necessarily be the victim but if children are involved in the milieu of the show then it's almost it's quite likely that a child will be the one who did killing although occasionally that trait is magnificent and i'm not going to name the show but all i'm going to say is doll's house teeth and anyone who knows the show 100 know what i'm talking about but yeah but genuinely and people people who who've seen that show will know exactly what i'm referring to but that yeah makes the show hit so much harder because of that revelation yeah i agree which i think is is very smart yeah that's a brilliant example there's another show there's a Sandra Bullock film which is also I know it's a film but also uses that trope which but you should still watch it I can't say what it is because I don't want to give away spoiler we mentioned when we reviewed Stranger Things that this was an issue and this isn't a plot spoiler but the amount of people those kids murder in the final season of Stranger Things is not even funny like it's ridiculous like Nancy alone has a body count in double digits and there are apparently no consequences whatsoever but James mildly traumatised no murders in sci-fi don't count everyone knows that apparently not even when it's humans you just kill whoever you want it's absolutely fine I mean Eleven's a fugitive so the fact that she's killed a whole bunch of people you're like oh well fine she's wanted anyway but the fact that Nancy's like yeah I'm just gonna go to college it's all good it doesn't matter I'm like a multiple spree killer it's fine that's a good point bring back consequences for murder indeed thank you Philip okay we have a question here from Ellen Ellen says hello Boyd James and Kay slash Steph for you are indeed interchangeable my words not hers living in Kintyre I enjoy the legend of the Mull of Kintyre rule according to said legend the BBFC used the Mull of Kintyre as a guideline to decide if a peen could be shown if the member was in such a state that made its angle higher than Kintyre it was not allowed that is great she goes on to say I think the BBFC have denied this was ever the case but it's a nice story.
37:46Kay Ribeiro:Ellen, apparently, and she says, Campbell Town Picture House, situated on the border of the Bell End, Kintyre. Wow. So I guess that's where she works, which is genuinely amazing. And when I was doing my research on the BBFC thing, the rule of the Mull of Kintyre was referenced a couple of times, but I didn't understand what it meant because it wasn't explained. This has explained it, and it is better than I ever thought it would be. Yeah, I have heard that before. That's a brilliant, brilliant thing, yeah. Especially if you actually live there as well. I know. That's so good. It's like, oh, no, the angle.
38:17Kay Ribeiro:No, no. It's like how one is judging arousal by the gradient of the Mulligan tyre is genuinely one thought. I think the BBC should reinstate this rule because it sounds fabulous. I don't think Paul McCartney was thinking of that when he sang the song when he sang Mulligan tyre. No, no. I don't think he was either. He was thinking, no, it's kind of half-masked. It's not really. Okay. This is from Rebecca and it has nothing to do with penis angulation. Dear Pilot TV crew, in response to the question, why did I say that? brackets quotes facial prosthesis many or even most people would say facial prosthetics but prosthetic is an adjective prosthesis is the noun prostheses is the plural so tip of the hat to for being closer than most although if memory serves it was me that said it quote unquote wrong but yes i love i love people when they're good at grammar it's so refreshing it actually is we We talked about competence porn, didn't we?
39:13Kay Ribeiro:I find grammar competency porn extraordinary. I love it. Yeah, it's great. Okay, well done you, Boyd. Yes, thank you very much for that, Rebecca. Thank you, yeah. One from Ali Barlow here. Subject, shrinking. Yes. I am hoping it will be Kay who reads this out. I'm so sorry, Ali. You are to be disappointed. Currently doing a rewatch of Shrinking before the new series drops. I absolutely adore this programme. It's heartwarming, funny, wholesome, and will make you laugh and cry within seconds in the same scene. I still can't believe that James and Boyd refused to watch it. I actually think it's right up their street and really hope they get around to it soon.
39:47Kay Ribeiro:Fingers crossed, Ali, who I can only assume did not enjoy this episode of the podcast. Hold on, Ali will have enjoyed, because no, Ali, I'm with you. You're absolutely right, and James, no, sorry, Boyd said he did like it. James is completely wrong, and he should be locked in a room and made to watch it until he comes out and says that he absolutely adores it as much as we do. I'm with you. That might happen, to be fair. I can't rule that out. We should force James to walk around town naked while we throw rotten fruit at him. For shame. Like in Gabriel Thrones. Like ringing a bell. For shame. Yeah, that seems reasonable.
40:21Kay Ribeiro:Ben Hystead says, afternoon team, I'm a history teacher and love dipping into historical shows and films to illustrate a particular period of history. My favourite film, though, unbelievably inaccurate, is Braveheart. Bonkers history, but amazing action and a stirring emotional rollercoaster from Big Mel when he was far less problematic. I grew up in the 90s and got a love of history from reading Bernard Cornwell. My gateway drug was sharp. I rewatched it recently and it still holds up. Sean Bean at his barnstorming best. Watched the Waterloo episode for a pretty decent representation of what it might have been like.
40:54Kay Ribeiro:You spoke about Mark Strong recently and he pops up in one episode as a bad guy and he even has hair. No, that's just upsetting. My favourite book of all time was The Winter King by Bernard Cornwell and was disappointed by the ITV production. my question is what historical TV shows do you love and would happily go back to time and time again I can I just say Ben I am I really love historical documentaries I mean as I'd spoken about Lucy Worsley before and I I would say to anyone anyone who has any interest in anything to do with history watch every series she's made because she's incredible trying to think what historical Boyd?
41:37You know what? A good, often forgotten historical drama is Russell T. Davis' version of Casanova, which he made for the BBC. It's one of his, I think it was the last project he did before Doctor Who, before he took the reins on Doctor Who. And it starred David Tennant, a then unknown David Tennant, as Casanova. And amazingly, Peter O'Toole, in one of his last roles as the kind of aging Casanova who's telling the story, looking back on, you know, his younger self. And it's so modern for its time. So, Russell G. Davis did the thing where, you know, people don't really – they're talking kind of like, you know, fairly modern language and vocabulary and phraseology, and it's got a very Russell G.
42:20Davis kind of sensibility to it. But it's a really great – I think it's a classic example of how period drama can be really exciting, historical drama. I mean, The Crown, does that count? Yeah, for sure. Yeah, I mean, that's probably... God, this is a good question.
42:37Kay Ribeiro:I've never finished The Crown. Oh, really? I watched the first two episodes of the first season and got a bit bored. And then I watched the first of a few others as we variously reviewed them. But I never pressed on with it. It just didn't seize me. Oh, I love The Crown. I guess I'm not really a monarchist. Well, the season, the Charles and Dice season is absolutely amazing viewing. I mean, that is the opposite. You're not going to get bored by that because it's so entertaining. Well, yeah, to be fair, and I quite enjoyed... When Elizabeth Debicki came in, I found that all fascinating. and Josh O 'Connor was fantastic as Charles.
43:04How do you feel, James, about like Bridgerton and Downton Abbey?
43:08Kay Ribeiro:I love Downton Abbey. I've watched every episode of it and the films. Bridgerton, I have only ever watched like two episodes of, like the first of season two when I want to say the first of season three. So I've not seen a lot of that. I really do not understand you sometimes. Like that doesn't make any sense to me. Listen, his likes and dislikes are so full of anomalies. it's not really worth the Downton thing is always misdefying I love Downton as well so I'm fully behind it but it is weird how can you love Downton so much so you watch every single episode and all the films yeah he hates comedy he hates comedy and he has favourite show he's friends and wants to bang on about it it's completely yeah you just have to accept the madness it's like you are honestly like you're like a character in Shrinking you really really are thank you in a complimentary way I don't I can't I don't want to say historical shows i go back to i say i don't really go back to them i very much enjoyed vikings until i didn't because vikings it ran out of steam honestly when travis fimmel wasn't in it more when ragnar lothbrok kind of left i was like it got boring and i pressed on till the end just out sheer bloody mindedness but i was very bored by that point is i'm sorry i'm going to say something that's going to hurt your feelings vikings was so one note like i watched vikings because you know I was like, oh, you know, I was wanting it.
44:28Again, I'm always seeking some Game of Thrones-ness. And I was like, oh, this has got something. No, it's one note. It's just, it's just no, no. What was that noise?
44:38Kay Ribeiro:What was that? It was a pirate noise. It was my classic Viking noise. I think The Last Kingdom was a lot better. I enjoyed The Last Kingdom an awful lot, which I believe is based on Bernard Cormier's books, is it not? Yeah, that's right, yeah. Yeah, so like it's the Wessex saga. Didn't Sophie Petzl, friend of the show, work on that? Yeah, she wrote at least one episode of that. But yeah, The Last Kingdom, I much preferred to Vikings. I thought that was great. So that would probably qualify, I would say, Ben. Right, final question. It's from Rachel. And it simply says, subject, traitors, content, spoiler chat.
45:12Please, James, come on.
45:14Kay Ribeiro:It's what the people want, Rachel. Now, Rachel, Rachel, Rachel, Rachel. I don't watch The Traitors. And Steph, who, let's be honest, has always been my favourite, also doesn't watch The Traitors. so we're now going to turn to Boyd to do a solo spoiler of the traitors finale if you haven't watched the traitors and don't care either turn off or keep listening if you have watched the traitors this is going to be a spoiler if you I don't know what I'm even saying here at this point because I plan to just catch up on my emails but Boydy take it away oh it's a real shame because yeah sorry to your who was the listener's name um Rachel and Kay loves traitors as well I'm sorry I'm so sorry I'm such a shame that you two losers who refuse to engage in popular culture don't watch Traitors hold on I would just you know what okay I'm going to say this now the next season of Traitors I'm definitely going to watch okay I feel don't feel you have to I feel terrible no you should you have to but frankly I'm very I'm deeply involved in Anton Dubeck being unmasked as Arctic Fox oh that was brilliant I watched that as well okay so it's not that I I don't know what I'm saying I'm just saying sorry, okay?
46:20Boyd, take it away. That was in The Masked Singer, by the way, listeners. Anton Dubek played, or was it? Arctic Fox. Arctic Fox within a skirt. I don't know if any of these things are spoilers, by the way.
46:29Kay Ribeiro:So I'm just going to assume that everyone doesn't mind whatever you're saying. It happened on Saturday, it's fine. And it's all over the news. Okay. It's fine. It's everywhere, yeah. Anyway, back to the Tracers. What was interesting for me about the final episodes and the final itself was that I would say that most people would have assumed that the two traitors won in the end, Rachel and Stephen, who'd formed this bond, the Torben Alliance, very early on when they were both made traitors, and they promised they would not betray each other and go for all of the money. So in the end, so the way it works is, if the traitors versus faithful, if the faithful get all the traitors out successfully, they win the prize money, which this ended up being like$95 ,000 or something, quite a lot of money, high stakes.
47:13If the traitors manage to win, then they take all the money for themselves. And that was what happened in the end. And Rachel and Stephen shared this£96 ,000 or whatever it was. But all the way through, you're thinking, will they both stick to that pact they made? Or will the temptation of, you know, basically the difference between£96 ,000 and£40 ,000, you do the math, basically, is huge. And so really, I would say most people who are watching the whole series would have assumed that they were going to probably win the traitors. Rachel in particular was brilliant at being a traitor. She was fantastic.
47:46And can I just mention about Rachel, which has come out? Because I know news about the traitors, even though I don't watch it. She's credited the fact that the last 10 years she's been writing a crime novel and she's deeply entrenched in the FBI world. That's why she says she's white. Oh, no, she famously said she'd been trained by the FBI in the series. It turned out it'd been like half an hour. She'd read some booklet for half an hour or something. That's trained. Yeah, that's trained. Anyway, so I would say there wasn't much jeopardy and much tension in this finale. And I think if you compare it to other series, which have been incredibly dramatic, and you genuinely haven't known who's going to win, and there's often a twist, and who you most expect to win doesn't, and the least expect.
48:31And this has happened with Alan Cole winning the celebrity one. The celebrity one was much more tense and twisty than this season, in the end. This is still a brilliant season. The fact is that Format is so incredibly powerful, and it reduces people so quickly to gibbering wrecks, and it really exposes human frailties and how people join. All the psychology behind people joining in a gang, and one people can suggest one thing, and then suddenly eight of them are all in agreeance with that thing. That happened a lot. It was very interesting to watch Jade, who was kind of like the Gen Z person in it, the youngest person in it.
49:10She was furious at being accused of being a traitor. But traitors don't do anything intrinsically bad ever. You know, they've just been assigned to the role of being a traitor, literally by Claudia. They have no say in the matter. It's up to them what then happens. So, you know, being accused of being a traitor isn't like an impingement of your personality. It's literally the game. Yeah, it's not reflecting on their character. No, but she completely misunderstood this. It was infuriating. I mean, she's a traitorous lovely person, but she would be in tears sobbing. How dare you accuse me of being a traitor?
49:40It's fine. Anyone could be a traitor. It's the game. So she misunderstood the whole idea of the thing for me, like, you know, to an extraordinary extent. But anyway, back to the final. Everyone, I think most fans of the show assumed that Rachel Steen would win, and sure enough, they did. So the only tension was, would he particularly stick to the pact and not suddenly double-cross Rachel in the end. And I never thought, they got him to say in his one-on-ones to camera a couple of times in the lead up to the final scene, oh, I still don't know what I'm going to do. You know, I'm still thinking about maybe taking all the money.
50:16You're like, no, no, no, no, no. He would never in a million years have portrayed like that because in real life, she could have rightly been absolutely fucking furious with him for taking half the money of the show, right? And he just hasn't got it in him to be that manipulative. He's a jumpsuit guy. He's a jumpsuit guy. He's a jumpsuit guy. Yeah. He's a lovely guy. You know, he's just not, he was like practically collapsing with the stress of being a traitor all the way through. He was constantly worried he was going to be exposed, blah, blah, blah. And he was fine. But he was never going to take the money.
50:45So in the end, it felt like the finale felt a little bit less thrilling than previous ones, I would say. But the format is so brilliant. You know, Claudia is so incredible. by the way my punditry my talking head on Claudia in the Channel 5 documentary is available to watch on Channel 5 online in which I've got a bad cold and I'm sounding very nasal on that show apologies such a trooper anyway yeah my tribute to Claudia is in that she's so brilliant it's incredibly fantastically and it's the highest rating series so far including the celebrity version it just gets more and more of a phenomenon and maybe even one day James will have to engage with it properly James James should we watch the next series together not together like in each other's houses because that's not happening but like should be and the next series the next series is Celebrity Season 2 and you may get some people on that James who you really like so I think that's the way James well let's see let's see who gets selected if Patrick Stewart's in it then you will watch it I'm in if Patrick Stewart's in I'm in at the moment it's rumoured right now it's rumoured that Tom Hiddleston's doing it you love Tom Hiddleston that's tempting the Hiddleston Loki alright we'll see oh my god James let's watch it let's just watch it
51:57Kay Ribeiro:we'll see well let's wait for the casting let's wait for the casting so if you are one of the producers on the traitors there's a lot riding on this if you want to get me to watch it pick someone I like make the right choice the whole cast of Sea for example I don't know yeah fantastic okay that was the end of Boyd's little traitors spoiler chat if you have yet many many people subscribe to this podcast if you have yet to write in it is pilot tv at empire magazine dot com we want your thoughts we want your questions we want your poems whatever you like send them in we'll read them out on pilot plus on the regular podcast next week as I have alluded to or indeed referenced or just you know said we are going to be covering some of the stuff that we have missed in the year to date we're going to be covering his and hers which came out in january which we weren't able to review we're going to be covering waiting for the out which we also weren't able to cover and we're going to be covering for whatever reason silent witness which we missed when it started 30 years ago uh until monday pilot out
52:56For more information, visit www.fema.gov
From the publisher
Dare we say it but the triage system may have finally hit its stride this week, as we explore Boyd’s previously unrevealed immortality, quite what constitutes a critical “annihilation” and why a certain Scottish mountain is terribly rude. Boyd also manages some solo Traitors finale spoiler chat, plus James manages to finally grant Kay’s wish of actually watching Shrinking’s third season, but on a week when she’s not on the show. Typical.




