In short
Review/discussion of Netflix dramedy Vladimir, with heavy debate about its “Fleabag-style” fourth-wall narration, pacing, and plausibility; plus a long Postbag covering other TV/comedy debates and listener emails.
Guests
Boyd Hilton, James (co-host), and Steph (co-host). Backgrounds mentioned in-transcript: Boyd and James are podcast hosts and comedy/TV commentators; Steph is a long-time TV writer/editor (Heat magazine is referenced) and a frequent contributor to the show’s discussions.
Key claims
Vladimir’s framing device opens with Vladimir seemingly chained/tied up, then backtracks; the lead character (Rachel Weisz, credited as “M”) repeatedly addresses the camera and uses on-screen text, which hosts argue is irritating, slows storytelling, and isn’t as sharp as Fleabag’s meta execution. Others note uneven/“distractingly” British actors doing American accents. Overall verdict ranges from “unwatchable” to “mid/slog,” with the story described as psychologically nonsensical.
Notable examples
the “treadmill incline” gym scene; a pool-party slow-motion “glistening” Leo Woodall moment compared to Mad About the Boy/Bridget Jones; Fleabag’s uniquely clever meta moments are contrasted.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOHosts' Personal Updates
0:45 to 3:31
The hosts share personal anecdotes and updates on their lives.
“Eva Mendes has been giving it a real big promotion.”
Discussion on 'Vladimir'
3:31 to 6:12
An introduction to the show 'Vladimir' and its premise.
“She is her husband, played by John Slattery of Mad Men.”
Breaking the Fourth Wall in 'Vladimir'
6:12 to 9:36
Critique of the show's use of breaking the fourth wall and narration.
“And I came away with, I've watched pretty much up to the last episode, actually, I just haven't yet watched the final episode.”
Comparisons to Fleabag
9:36 to 14:03
The hosts compare 'Vladimir' to 'Fleabag' and discuss its shortcomings.
“So I guess once they started to do it, they couldn't go back.”
Character Accents and Performance Quality
14:03 to 16:51
Discussion on the challenges of performance and accents in the show.
“Like moments like that, and you're just like, you're like, this is so clever.”
Storytelling and Plot Critique
16:52 to 17:50
Critique of the show's plot and storytelling devices, highlighting irrational character behavior.
“And like I said, I like to think that I'm very open to anything.”
Binge-Watching vs. Weekly Episodes
17:51 to 20:00
Exploration of the show's format and the experience of binge-watching it.
“I was about to say, I love Steph's description of, you know, the slow, on the walker gym thing.”
Postbag: Listener Feedback and Corrections
20:01 to 22:21
Engagement with listener feedback, including a grammar correction and humorous exchanges.
“But, well, now you've just fucked that because you've just mentioned it.”
Debate on AI and Creativity
22:22 to 26:48
Discussion on the role of AI in creative industries and its implications.
“said, oh, we'll do it for a bazillion dollars.”
Debating Great Comedy Since 2000
26:49 to 28:00
Argument over the presence of significant comedy shows since 2000.
“Did you watch, sorry not to get away from the question, but I just got to say this.”
Show all 21 chapters
The Great Comedy Debate
28:00 to 29:22
Exploring the existence of great comedy shows post-2000.
“And Adam says, Dear Boyd James and Steph, my friend Phil and I were recently having a friendly debate about whether there had been any great comedy TV shows since the 2000s.”
Iconic Comedies Since 2010
29:22 to 32:25
Discussion on notable comedies that emerged after 2010.
“It feels like, you know, because we talk about Seinfeld, we talk about Friends, we talk about all of these shows that definitely started prior to that.”
The Influence of Ted Lasso and Others
32:25 to 34:21
Examining the cultural significance of shows like Ted Lasso.
“And I'm just thinking of some more along that line.”
Sandra Bullock TV Trivia
34:21 to 36:41
A humorous exploration of Sandra Bullock's lesser-known TV roles.
“But, Re, your recent discussion of how Sandra Bullock would never, ever cross over to TV, who could forget her reprising Melanie Griffith's role in the TV adaptation of Working Girl from 1990?”
Upcoming Show: Sunny Nights
36:41 to 39:59
Introducing the new show Sunny Nights and its unique premise.
“because I think it's from when we said, listeners, if you were indeed listening, Boyd and I have a bet that she's not going to do any TV within the year.”
Meta References in TV
39:59 to 42:00
Discussion on how TV shows reference each other and classic films.
“It's even more fun when references go both ways in a kind of Mobius strip.”
Industry vs. Succession: Themes and Tone
42:00 to 43:19
Explore the thematic and tonal differences between 'Industry' and 'Succession'.
“While watching Industry, I'm constantly reminded of The Wire's underlying message, that our systems are broken and that the game is rigged from the start.”
Comedy in Drama: Is Succession a Comedy?
43:20 to 45:09
Discuss whether 'Succession' can be classified as a comedy or if it remains a drama with comedic elements.
“Would you then, Boyd, say that Succession qualifies for the previous question about comedies?”
Listener Questions: Virgin River Review?
45:10 to 46:13
Respond to a listener's email about reviewing 'Virgin River' and previous discussions on the show.
“I'm currently catching up on Virgin River before the seventh season drops on March the 12th.”
The Future of Short-Form Content
46:14 to 48:26
Debate the impact of short-form content on traditional media and the evolution of storytelling.
“It's already happening, but like every new medium, there is resistance from the old guard, migration, and a mixing of talent and then acceptance.”
Short-Form vs. Long-Form: Coexistence in Media
48:27 to 53:11
Discuss the coexistence of short-form and long-form content in modern media consumption.
“What do you think about short-form TikTok?”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:07Welcome to Pilot Plus, your extended guide to every show that matters. uh steph boyd good morning how are we both that wasn't supposed to be a stumper okay i was waiting for boy i just tried not to interrupt boyd because he's kind of looked like he was like he looked like he had a story he was thinking oh we're gonna delve in here i was just surprised by that james intro james doesn't usually ask how we're doing it's just kind isn't it i'm just i'm showing a little bit of pastoral care i just want to make sure you're okay you know that you're all right you're not too traumatized it's not too early in the morning it's 9 22 yeah are you are you are you boyd i've been uh as i follow you on instagram closely i was having a look at your instagram and you've been doing some really fun things but maybe you want to talk about those on the main pod um well it's just about going to arsenal stuff yeah i probably wouldn't even talk about it on the on the oh okay but you know yeah i've been hanging out with um Arsenal players yeah there you go so you're very good I am very good yeah that's true good I'm glad we've established that Boyd is fine yeah I wanted to see that Project Hail Mary did you see that last night James I did not get to Project Hail Mary but obviously it is a film therefore we are banned from discussing it but I've heard it's fabulous no you asked me about my general welfare and I'm just telling you I know your general welfare is not embargoed oh yeah okay social media reaction this is a social media reaction I see it is really good there you go yeah and I tell you who's been really promoting.
1:32Eva Mendes has been giving it a real big promotion. I can't imagine why. Well, yeah, she would. She would. The best scene is the karaoke scene. Oh, wow. You're just running roughshod over the embargo now. We're just going to review the whole film. Should we do that? Should we review the film this week, Pornie? Welcome to the Empire Podcast. This is a social media post. Anyway, all right, carry on. But crucially, James, how are you? Oh, I'm fine. I'm delighted to be here. Okay, how's your back? My back is fine. thank you yes i injured my back last week which meant that when i was supposed to go jousting on friday for a night of the seven kingdoms yes actual on on horses jousting and i was really looking forward to it and then hilariously at the i sort of had a gym injury uh which is fine now but uh i thought probably best not to get on a horse while i was slightly injured yeah because he was lifting weights yeah i sprained i sprained a muscle in my back by trying to do looks up exercise and it turns out that that's just bad for your health.
2:29You shouldn't do it. Don't do exercise kids. Just be like me and Boyd and just don't do exercise. But more importantly you were going to go jousting? Yes, I was going to go jousting and I was going to talk about it on the podcast and unfortunately I now can't because I did not get to joust. Some people I know were at the jousting thing some friends of mine and it looks like they had a whale of a time which obviously I was delighted by. Is this jousting arranged by HBO to celebrate the... Oh my god. Yes, it is. A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms themed jousting. We were entering the list, charging down, doing an actual joust against a resident knight.
3:01I could have been the little egg guy. You could have been the little egg. Yeah, yeah. I could have been that wily girl who got her hand. No, I won't spoil it. Anyway. Yeah, okay. God, that's great. What a terrible life you lead, James. I know, but I didn't get to do it. It didn't happen. Well, yeah, I've thought though. I mean, yes, that is my own fault. if you will insist on trying to exercise yeah exactly i know it was not ideal but you know what are you going to do but that is not what we're here to discuss we are not here to discuss films boydy we are not here to discuss jousting james we are here to discuss vladimir on the netflix and this is a new tv comedy drama dramedy if you will starring rachel vice and leo woodall is adapted from the julia may jonas book of the same name and it's about a young man called Vladimir and a teacher who shall we say starts making goo goo eyes at said attractive young man played by Leo Woodall who has in no way been typecast as the attractive young man in yet another show now Boyd you will recall mentioned this uh slightly on the show last week Boyd who runs roughshod like a jouster if you will over embargoes uh now you described this I think along the lines of shit fleabag so I didn't say that my question is my question is do you stand by that description shit bag um uh i don't know if i i don't know if i went that far did i i don't remember going that far it sounds like something you'd say shit yeah i don't know shit is is harsh is a too strong a word for it it's it's not it's not that it is is why have they chosen to do this fleabag they've done a fleabag so we should explain basically um the story is that rachel writes this character who is not named by the way for reasons no she's credited as just m yeah but in the actual show referred to no no one refers to a bit like the characters in fleabag like stepmother who don't actually get names that's right yeah that's a good point actually and indeed fleabag herself who does not get a name very good point um and so she's known as she's she's a professor of uh of literature at a fictional one of those fictional but idyllic looking campuses, Liberal Arts College is how they're referred to in America.
5:17She is her husband, played by John Slattery of Mad Men. He is having myriad affairs or alleged to have had myriad affairs, inappropriate affairs with his students, undergraduates and graduates both. They're in a kind of open marriage in theory, although he seems to be having all the openness and she doesn't seem to be having much openness at all. And then Leo Woodall's character, Vladimir, comes along, the titular character, who is a hunky new professor at the college whose wife is also a professor at the college and they have kind of interesting marital issues as well but yeah the whole thing they've done a full-on fleabag in the sense that this is adapted from a novel as you said as james said by julia may jones it's in the first person the novel so that's the explanation but of why they've got done a fleabag and rachel vice's character the unnamed professor addresses the camera addresses the viewers, breaks the forethought, all of that throughout relentlessly, a la Fleabag.
6:14And I came away with, I've watched pretty much up to the last episode, actually, I just haven't yet watched the final episode. It does, of course, open with the signature device of our time in which there's an extreme situation. Basically, the first scene is she seems to have Leo Woodall's character chained up, tied up, in her house somewhere. and then it flashes back 10 days, weeks, something, something or other, and the story all unfolds from there. So it's all about how do we get to the point where she's seemingly, he's seemingly tied up and in a vulnerable position in the very first scene.
6:53But she's constantly narrating and telling us what's going on and telling us her thoughts in Fleabag style. And what it reminded me of was brilliance of Fleabag was in the writing of her character. Obviously, it started out as a monologue, didn't it? Yeah, that one-woman show. One-woman show. And all you've got in a one-woman show, obviously, is her doing all the characters, doing her own character, Fleabag, and the brilliant, brilliant wit and kind of seemingly effortless naturalism of her chats to camera. Her chats to camera was so kind of brilliant, and the performance was so superb, but she clearly honed through the one-woman show.
7:32I think the reason why we refer to the moments where people talk to Cameron, which there are loads of them, you know, in history, before and after Fleabag. But the reason why Fleabag has become the byword for doing this thing is because it was done so well, so beautifully and seemingly effortlessly. And it wasn't just the character explaining what was going on that we were watching anyway. It wasn't just a device to tell us, you know, the narrative, to explore the narrative. it was about her character and her tone was perfect this the problem with this is it's kind of just a bit irritating and rachel white's character is just a bit annoying the way she addresses the camera and it and she does explain what's going on and her thoughts and she does kind of narrate stuff that either we've just seen or about to see and it just is a completely different it just doesn't work anywhere near as well which is why i think people you might apparently over to his shift lead back but the annoying thing about it is I can imagine a version of this show where there isn't the breaking of the fourth wall where she doesn't talk to camera and it will be perfectly fine I think the set up that what goes on on this campus of this university and the fact that he is under investigation they've got a daughter who's kind of quite has her own issues and And they're interesting characters, and Leo Woodall were effortlessly charming.
8:59As James said, he is the, like, anque du jour. He's the guy people go to for a lust object for women and men. And they're all great, you know, John Sattridge's gay, but it's just weighed down more than anything by the use of this device. It's a real shame, because I just think, I just want to see the version of this show where it plays out in front of us, and we're not told what's going on every five minutes, every five seconds. And the bottom line is, her monologue to us is not that funny or interesting. And the most funny or interesting things that happen are in spite of the relentless monologue, the relentless talking to camera.
9:35So I do think it's a weird... So I guess once they started to do it, they couldn't go back. But it's just a weird creative choice that in the end hasn't worked. I'm so sorry. I could not agree more with every single thing you said, Boyd. as you said, this show employs a couple of narrative devices. And I will hold my hands up and say, my most despised device is breaking the fourth wall. I am going to put Fleabag aside because I think Fleabag does something that no other show does. And it's incredibly unique, which is why it absolutely deserves all the credit that it gets and all the plaudits that it gets.
10:13The other device which I find so jarring is text speech on screen. I absolutely cannot abide it when they over-explain using one of those devices. And in this, they use both of them. I want to like this show because I love John Slattery and I love Rachel Weisz. I hate to say it, but I find her American accent incredibly jarring as well. she is she comes across as a character who you should like but she isn't likable she's irritating she's she's just so annoying deeply annoying and like you say I think when she turns to camera breaking the fourth wall it does nothing to serve the storyline it doesn't advance anything apart from cutting a scene and just completely and you're like what what was the point of that you don't need to it's not a good ps it's like a shit ps that you absolutely is completely unnecessary um i could um i watched the first episode and i thought right okay we often get into these situations where we watch the first episode of something and then we go we should have watched the second episode because i did enjoy the beginning the the opening scene where you've got leo wood when you kind of just go all right i want to know why he he's tied up he's chained up in her you know but as soon as she kind of walked out and broke the fourth wall immediately I was like oh no so then I watched the second episode and in truth I hated it even more than I hated the first episode to be honest I just it's relentless the over explanation I wondered whether this was part of the whole I mean I will say again I have not read the novel so I don't know the novel.
12:05I can't speak to how closely this script is to the original novel. And I don't know how beloved this novel is, but I'm assuming it is beloved because why would they have made this adaptation of it? But God, it's just laborious trying to get through it. It was for me and I want to like it because it's got some great actors in. Yeah, Leo Woodall's lovely and he's very handsome but he's he's very little else in this and it and it seems a waste of good actors and i completely agree with you is there a is there a version of this that could be good yeah i think there is but there's they've tried to throw so many things at it that it it's just they've over spiced it they've over they've overdone everything and it in it's i'm gonna i'm gonna go as far as saying i think this is unwatchable and i do i think it's unwatchable because you know what happens to me if I can I sometimes end up watching loads of the stuff we've watched okay and I really because I get into the momentum this has no momentum nothing about it apart from do you know what I'd be satisfied if someone just tells me at the end while he was chained up that's great I don't need to see any more but I don't know I want I want to like it because I really like the actors but it's just terrible it's terrible I feel like that maybe is a little harsh but I I do agree broadly with everything both of you have said i don't think it's terrible i think it's very mid and it just feels a bit for all the reasons that you've said i think you know if you're going to in a post fleabag world use that device but not just use breaking the fourth wall because deadpool does it and does it a very different way and it's fine you know and it's been used to to great effect in a number of different things when you have an unreliable first person perspective i actually think it can work quite well but i think if you're going to have wry quote-unquote comedy to camera moments and you're going to do it so often and so relentlessly then you need to make sure it's really funny and you need to make sure the script is tight and you need to make sure that it adds something to the show and i'm not sure this does i know what you mean it made her a little irritating it didn't bother me too much but i was just like i was like i get what you're doing but it slows the storytelling down quite a lot because it doesn't really entertain and it doesn't really bring you any information and so i kind of i did i did struggle with it a little bit I think, you know, we're going to use the Fleabag comparison a lot, but it did so many clever things, like the moments in Fleabag in season two where they had that incredibly meta within meta moment where the priest notices her talking to the camera.
14:36Like moments like that, and you're just like, you're like, this is so clever. And it's so perfectly executed. And yeah, I think, boy, you're right. I think Phoebe Waller-Bridge, having honed it over many, many nights doing her show, that performance was absolutely polished within an inch of its life. I think this one isn't. and it's not because I think Rachel Weisz is bad. She isn't. I do, however, think her American accent, Steph, is all over the place. Leo Woodall's I struggled with as well. There's a lot of Brits playing American in this show, and I think in those particular cases, I did find those quite distractingly, I'm going to say uneven rather than bad, but I did find it took me out of it a little bit.
15:12I'll tell you what mystified me about. I could go along with her being American, but what was the point of making Leo's character right? He's a professor of literature. It could certainly have been English. It made absolute sense. American universities are populated by British professors, you know. Believe me. And it's just weird choice to have two British, as you say, two British people being the two leads doing dodgy American accents, and one of whom is narrating our fucking show as well in her American accent. It added to the, I think, Steph's sense of exhaustion. I don't think it was terrible either, but yeah, it's a slog.
15:50It's a slog way as it should have been. You slogged quite a long way through this. Well, yeah. Do you know what? I did want to know how it got to that point in the opening. And let me tell you, it is preposterous. I mean, I will, you know, apart from anything else, above and beyond the device, the use of the device, the Fleabag device is sure forever known. None of it makes any sense. I mean, none of it makes sense. It's one of those shows where people do behave in such ridiculous ways to advance the story, to get us to this point where we are in that first scene. And it's just – so on top of everything, it doesn't make any sense.
16:30Psychologically, the way people – what people do and how they act and decisions they're making, it's all a load of nonsense. So, yeah. It feels so – the storyline feels completely unnatural. And I know you both think I'm being harsh, but in a world where we're telling people how to spend their precious entertainment time, this is not it. This is not it. Agreed. Yeah, it's just not. I'm sorry. And like I said, I like to think that I'm very open to anything. And if it's good, it's good, regardless of genre. And I should like this because I like all the actors and I like the kind of idea behind it.
17:10But yeah, it's nonsensical in so many ways. I mean there's one scene and this isn't a spoiler there's a scene where uh Rachel Ross's character is confronting someone that she's had a liaison with and it's set in a gym and a device they use to kind of up the up the stakes of this is um how how high they're elevating their their walker the step of the gym thing you know and I was like this is just stupid this is it just and they focus in so much on that and even the parts that where they where she's having a moment where she's kind of meant to be feeling aroused, they're stupid. They're not, they're not, it's not well-crafted.
17:49It's, it's just, it's just not good. Well, James is our expert on the gym thing. Did you believe that? I was about to say, I love Steph's description of, you know, the slow, on the walker gym thing. It's like, this is someone who definitely does not exercise. The gym thing, you know, the thing in the gym. What is it called? I can't remember. I'm assuming it's a treadmill. The treadmill, yeah, the treadmill. Sorry, the incline on the treadmill, should I say. The incline on the treadmill, yes, indeed. What also is funny is that once the whole thing's been set up and you kind of know where it's heading, it takes an inordinate amount of time, which, again, once I sat through like three or four episodes, I was like, well, I might as well have to, you know, I've invested all this time, so I kind of carried on.
18:26But it's funny because in this world of, you know, the pressure on all of these shows now is that, which is the reason why all the shows open with a moment, an extreme scene, and then it goes back to what's going on, is because the pressure from the streamers to make everything instantly gripping and instantly interesting so they are planting all of their all of the key sequences at the beginning of shows but in this case it underlines the fact it just takes an eternity to get to the point it needs to get to and all the obstacles it throws in the way just don't make any sense and the other thing I think I mentioned this in the original discussion my original mention of this show it's extraordinary how Leo Woodall is not only the lust object in these shows now.
19:10But there's the scene in this show where there's a pool party and he goes into the pool and there's a slow motion thing as he gets out of the pool, glistening, wet, with watery, muscular visions of Leodold. Exactly the same scene happens in the Bridget Jones movie where he dives into the pool at the pool party. Mad about the boy. Mad about the boy. So it's weird. I was thinking, when your agent says, do I have to do this role in which I do exactly the same thing as I did in that film I've just made? What do you think? And the editor goes, yeah, might as well go for it. I mean, it's weird that there's literally the same scene revolving around him being the last subject.
19:49Shitbag then, which airs on the Netflix on Thursday today, in fact. Yes, Vladimir, which is on Netflix. You know, watch it, see for yourself. Let's know what you think. Time now for this week's Postbag.
20:09triage it's the post bag we must begin with a correction and the correction comes from Stuart Allen and Stuart says after all the chat on this James just opening with and joining myself and Boyd Hilton rather than and joining me and Boyd Hilton all I'm saying is it's unforgivable sadly with James in charge of the post bag I'm not sure messages like this have the same chance of being read versus when Kay was in charge well Stuart how little you know me um yes what's funny about that is when I was going through the podcast doing the video I immediately clocked it was like oh shit but at that point I was like I can't cut it out and I can't re-record it because I'm not in the studio and it won't sound the same it'd be like one of those dubs on tv you know when they used to dub in like a like an Eddie Murphy film and you'd have someone who sounded nothing like eddie murphy like changing like all the words from fuck to flip and things like that it was ridiculous it would have sounded like that so i was just i just had to suck it up and leave it in and i knew i knew there would be messages like this one i'm surprised you it's the only one love it when the grammar police get involved i do love a grammar police email that's great i mean i do too but i think i deserve some kind of uh credit for not jumping in steph earlier when you said that uh fleabag was so unique when of course something cannot be so unique it can be unique or not unique because it's a binary state.
21:32But, well, now you've just fucked that because you've just mentioned it. So, yes. Yeah. On board. Ironic, isn't it? It's like when people say 150 % and you're like, no, no, no, can't be that. Oh, well. I know. I'm surprised at yourself, James. I really am. Thank you, Roy. Okay. This comes from Phil. And Phil says, I read this morning that open AI is going to be used to triage intelligence for the US military. Maybe it can help triage the boast bag. Thank you, Philip, you wag. Well, there was a big controversy, wasn't there? Because it was supposed to be that idiot's – no, he's not an idiot – but that one company was supposed to be handling the AI for the American military, and they actually refused to go along with the insane demands of the administration.
22:20And so then other tech companies, literally that night, I believe, said, oh, we'll do it for a bazillion dollars. This was anthropic, yes. There was a whole thing going on there. But yes, I was seeing now that Claude has been freed up by Anthropic, we'll see if it can take over the postbag. Perhaps that will happen. I should mention, since we're talking about AI, there was quite a backlash when I was talking about replacing Boyd with a robot on the podcast the other week. One reader in particular got very, very upset and said they cancelled their subscription because I was endorsing the use of AI.
22:49I should point out, when I said I was going to replace Boyd with a robot, that was a joke. Like, you know, I'm not actually doing it. I mean, yeah. Yeah. Boyd Bot 2000 is a work in progress. Soon, Boyd. Soon it will take over. You wait. You wait and see. That seems very strange. So they've cancelled their subscription because you said you're going to turn Boyd into a robot. To be fair, I've been talking about this AI course that I'm doing through work and the stuff that I was doing when I was trying to get it to do that column in Heat magazine, you know, to see if it would work. But I should also point out that one of the points of doing that was to kind of prove that it couldn't which was in fact the case so there was reason for it i'm not training an ai to replace actual creatives which is what he thought i was doing well i would also say i have been on projects um that have tried to see if ai can replace people on various things such as podcasts for example such as podcasts and i will you know I would just say they come.
23:49Yeah, because you did a completely AI-generated podcast, didn't you? Which was narrated entirely by AI. Do you want to admit this in public? It was in things out there. It was, I mean, look, whatever you think about AI, my personal views about AI, I will share them now in terms of being creative. You love it and you hope it gets rid of all those jobs. I do not believe, I do not believe that, can it be of assistance in some ways? Yes. Can it replace journalists? No, of course it can't. Can it replace podcast narrations? Well, I think I've proven beyond a doubt that that can't happen. Should we now take the opportunity to reveal that Steph is not actually a real person?
24:30All along, she is an AI construct that we've got in to replace Kate. But really interestingly, one of the things that we found when we were doing this was that actually there's this whole idea that ai can do everything but we've had basically just had to feed everything we did we wrote all the scripts and it was just a voice in the end the only ai was just a voice reading it out and that was it so you know boyd you definitely can't be you're you know you're irreplaceable anyway as we know i do not believe people can be replaced with ai and that is what as i pointed out to our listeners if you really want to replicate me i mean literally just you know what i do and how i write so it's very hard because none of my stuff is on the internet very very little of it as i that's and i had a few messages actually from this saying is that really true i was like yeah you know 20 25 years 27 years now of working at heat and the vast majority of my my uh writing for that publication is not online anywhere no and you shouldn't don't put it on there because then it'll go into the ai and then someone will make a boyd bot yeah it's too late the boyd part has replaced you boydy i'm so sorry fair enough uh something here from darren not that darren sorry darren uh this is from darren matthews and darren matthews says i'm in australia and as such i'm lucky enough to have hbo max and the pits i've been watching one episode a night on my way home from work but yesterday my train was delayed and i watched three episodes and i finished this and was absolutely drained from stress tears feelings all the feelings So my question is, how could James and Boyd have binged a whole season while on a plane where emotions are so heightened?
26:08This listener clearly doesn't listen enough because you two are both devoid of emotions. Wow. Hold on. I'm joking. No, I mean, obviously that's James. Yeah, I'm not devoid of emotions. No, I know. I will absolutely admit to the fact that I was sobbing in various moments in public on an airplane. Luckily, I was in some kind of, you know, pod scenario. Oh yes, Boyd travels in first class, so it's absolutely fine. Boyd, the thought of you weeping alone in a first class pod makes me actually a little sad. No, don't be sad. It's brilliant. That's how emotionally devastating the show is. Did the tears ruin your champagne?
26:46A little bit, yeah. I had to get a new glass. Can I just say, do you know what? I had a cry this morning. Did you watch, sorry not to get away from the question, but I just got to say this. Have you watched Harrison Ford's acceptance speech on SAG after his lifetime? Oh, my God. I was bawling my eyes out this morning just before I came on this. Anyway, I digress. Back to the pit. How did you cope, James, being devoid of emotion? I mean, it is. It is. But that's part of the joy, isn't it? I think the pit actually lends itself very well to binge watching. I'm sure it's very, very engaging on a week-to-week basis.
27:19But it does because it is so heightened and it's so relentless. It really, really sort of drags you in. but that's part of it because it's set in real time it's like that whole idea that when you know when 24 came out you'd watch it each week and everyone would talk about it but there was a real delight in re-watching 24 and just hammering through it almost doing it in real time as it is set because you feel like you're inhabiting it and it feels like a very different experience i think the pit is the same way because it is in real time it almost feels designed to be binge watched so you experience that 15 hour shift in 15 hours and on a plane you can't go anywhere either so you're just there locked into it oh yeah i could not have the discipline to watch one a week at all no it's i mean i i i it was a genuine delight for me to be watching that on the plane and just another one another one another one and i couldn't go anywhere i couldn't do anything else and i just locked into it uh it was wonderful but yes it's it's intense and sometimes it's quite brutal and occasionally i did have to stop and get a little packet of peanuts and eat before going on to the next one.
28:20Okay, question here from Adam. And Adam says, Dear Boyd James and Steph, my friend Phil and I were recently having a friendly debate about whether there had been any great comedy TV shows since the 2000s. My friend argued that there were none at all. They had to have started post-2010. So this is the criteria. But I argued there are loads. Ghosts, Colin from Accounts. Here we go, to name but a few. He also said there wasn't anything that had the same cultural impact, but shows like Fleabag would suggest otherwise. Please help me settle this debate and tell my friend why he is wrong. And there have been lots of great comedies since 2010.
28:55Side note, he said comedies are not sitcoms, which if he'd specified just sitcoms, he may have had more of a point as there are fewer out and out sitcoms, but loads of what are broadly considered comedies in my opinion. Kind regards, Adam. Now, obviously, as the world's leading expert on comedy and funny things, I should immediately take this question. I would say, and I think you probably agree, Boyd, the iconic sitcoms do feel that they are slightly further away than that. It feels like, you know, because we talk about Seinfeld, we talk about Friends, we talk about all of these shows that definitely started prior to that.
29:28You know, in the UK, Spaced, something like that, 30 Rock, all of these things were before that time. But I don't know that we're completely wrong. Things like Catastrophe, obviously, was very funny. We loved that. Feel Good, we really loved as well. I'm going to make a play for King Gary which I thought was absolutely shockingly amazing like so good I love big Tom Davis and he came to our podcast, he's a delightful man I detested King Gary with every fiber of my being and I know this because we reviewed it on this podcast and I remember just wringing my hands but it is very not my sense of humour That show is so hilarious you could not be more wrong if you were living in a wrong house on the wrong street okay i i i'm so for you to say i can't talk to be fair you do support king of queens so you know okay which is also a fantastic show i'm gonna move on and just say i think what happens as well with a lot of comedies is with the passing of time we look back at them and we go oh amazing i and probably while we were really enjoying them in in like the 2000s we weren't going this is the best comedy ever because i think even now like i love frazier but i love it even more now do you know i mean because i suppose maybe that is maybe that's the point you've seen the reboot and you've realized how good the original was by comparison no i all yeah well um as as a boyd often says they absolutely fuck that but the thing is i suppose there were we were almost i also love will and grace which i'm sure james you hate and i think Like at that time, there was such an abundance of those types of comedies that you kind of didn't go, oh, this one's really good.
31:07This one's really good because they were all good and they don't really make those anymore. So, yeah, it's a really good point. Boyd, can you think of any? What was the criteria again? It has to have been made or started from 2010 onwards, so from the teens onwards. Things like Community Society in 2009 wouldn't qualify. The Office US wouldn't qualify. all this stuff that started in the noughties, that stuff is ruled out. Yeah, like Parks and Rec, that's 2009, which is an amazing comedy. Veep wouldn't qualify. That's 2012. Veep was brilliant. Oh, Veep. Absolutely. Yeah, Veep's fantastic. Schitt's Creek, of course.
31:43Yes. The very, very popular. The Good Place. Yes, The Good Place is a good show. I think it's one of these things where lots of people loved it at the time and talked about it. It feels like The Good Place hasn't had the cultural impact over time. It feels like it's not really talked about as much now, which is a shame because I thought it was really good. But in terms of absolute iconic comedies, Fleabag is definitely one of them. There aren't that many of those. I mean, Atlanta is a great show. I'm not sure I'd call it, you know, iconic in the same way. I don't, you know what? It doesn't, I love Atlanta.
32:20It really doesn't get, it doesn't get enough credit, that show. It's brilliant, actually. And I'm just thinking of some more along that line. Do you know what I think a lot of people would would stand for Brooklyn Nine-Nine? Because Brooklyn Nine-Nine I think has had that impact. And I think also it's been cross-generational in a way that, you know, kind of Friends kind of is where lots of people rediscovered it on Netflix. And I think everyone watches or has watched Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Brooklyn Nine-Nine you can watch at any time of the day and it's great. I love Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Andy Samberg is a genius.
32:48Do you know what else I'm going to punt for? Issa Rae's Insecure. I think that's a brilliant show. I love her. Let's not forget Derry Girls. Yes, absolutely. I was going to say that. Derry Girls. And Derry Girls, certainly from a British point of view, really is an iconic show. Big Boys. Big Boys, another one, yeah. That's another good shout. In fact, right now, I would say Small Profits. Yeah, going on right now. Steph, I know, doesn't like it very much, but you know. As we know, my absolute show of the year. I have had people messaging me saying, it is the best thing they've ever watched. They absolutely love it.
33:25You're extremes today. Yes, you are. This is the worst show I've ever seen. This is the best thing I've ever seen. Listen, I'm not about Shades of Grey. I'm about, listen, watch it or don't watch it. That's it. You're all about the extremes. Ride or die. Ride or die. Ride or die TV. If Beth were here, she is not, but if she were here, if Beth were here, she would, I'm sure, stump for the marvellous Mrs Maisel. Does that count? She loves it. Absolutely loved it. That's a dravity, though, isn't it? I mean it's about stand-up comics I'm saying it's I'm saying it's comedy Yeah but it's not like I think this is about half hour You think Okay Would you Would you stump for Only Murders in the Building Um I'm a huge Only Murders in the Building fan so I would Yeah A bit Not wholeheartedly I think we'll look back on Only Murders in the Building and people will say Yeah I think Wow that was a fantastic show I think it's got to become a bit of a formula is the only problem with it It doesn't feel like must see now because I think they milked it to an inch within an inch of its life but um I still yeah no I think it should be up there yeah it's brilliantly enjoyable uh Steph has not mentioned shrinking I'm not sure that I should oh god we haven't mentioned Ted Ted Lasso well Ted Lasso being the obvious one yeah I was going to say Ted Lasso I think is one of these things which has become absolutely iconic and part of the cultural conversation but then that I think is partly because of when it came out during the pandemic I think it was exactly what we needed when we needed it and then you could also argue that while it begins as a half-hour sitcom it becomes a 45 minute almost drama so it does move beyond the formula that birthed it but it's yeah that that i think is one uh we don't talk about this a lot on this podcast but a lot of people would say what we do in the shadows uh which i've seen a couple of episodes of is genuinely funny it's not quite my sense of humor but it is very good but there's a lot of i think what we've established is there are a lot of comedies out there but are there any that have the same cultural impact as some of the ones from the noughties from the 90s um maybe one or two fleabag probably the main one okay this is one i think aimed at steph who swore blind swore blind insisted was adamant sandra bullock would never ever ever jane i've got jane to go on television ever steve however and steve is not the only one we had a couple of these apologies if you also wrote in to point out Steph's extreme wrongness.
35:46But, Re, your recent discussion of how Sandra Bullock would never, ever cross over to TV, who could forget her reprising Melanie Griffith's role in the TV adaptation of Working Girl from 1990? Everyone, apparently, only got a single season. They only aired eight of the 12 episodes before it got cancelled. Most people have never heard of it, but she has indeed done a TV show. I am so embarrassed. I feel ashamed. When I worked at heat um sorry i still work at heat oh well i used to have you were fired when you first said that on this podcast i think i had used to have a whole wall which i called the wall of bullock this is how much i love her a wall of which just had pictures of sandra bullock on and on my desk i had a picture of sandra bullock with two dogs and the fact that i didn't know she had done that tv show i just feel like i'm not worthy thank you and i'm obviously now going to have to try and dig that out and watch that but that also uh boy that does not mean that you're getting 20 because I think it's from when we said, listeners, if you were indeed listening, Boyd and I have a bet that she's not going to do any TV within the year.
36:53I said ever, which I'm going to stand by. It's hard to resolve that bet, isn't it, really? I know. But luckily I have got a meeting with her agent soon, so we'll discuss. Oh, you. Oh, God. I feel sick. Yeah, yeah. Your love of Sandra Bullock has limits. it seems Listeners honestly you cannot exaggerate the extent to which Stefan's obsessive Sandra Bullock yeah didn't you stalk her once didn't you go to a premiere film premiere I remember Okay right so not only I did and I when I finally met her and it was a little bit disappointing because some people weren't very nice but however I love her so much that I don't know if I've said this before but my daughter is called Gracie and I named her after Gracie Lou Freebush which is Sandra Bullock's character in Miss Congeniality one of the best films of all time Wow wow yes that's how much i love sandra bullock i interviewed sandra bullock uh for miss congeniality the first one uh at a press conference it wasn't a one-on-one interview but i asked her a question about falling down and i said i said you know when you're watching this film you've got to think nobody falls down quite like sandra bullock and i talked to her about physical comedy and then that evening at the premiere she absolutely stacked it and fell arse over tit and so as a result that quote that she gave me was the front page of every newspaper the next day where she talks about i fall down well and i fall down a lot i can't remember the exact quote was but it was yeah it was very funny i am so jealous of you right now i can't actually i'm just so jealous yeah me and sandy we're very close yeah it's good it's good anyway anyway moving on from steph's wrongness let's see where we are here so this isn't this isn't uh an unexpected one so this comes from steve parkinson and steve says he's just produced a tv show which is going to drop on it even it even a couple of months uh and he thought we might be interested in it because it's directed by trent o'donnell off colin from accounts uh it's on hulu in the u.s dropping on march the 11th uh and he was mentioning because it's an acquisition show he's not sure if itv we're going to be doing much press it's called uh sunny nights and i was like all right fine and i kind of in my head i was like yeah okay we probably don't normally do this sort of thing from the postcard but i watched the trailer it looks really good so now i really want to see it so i'm going to say that Sunny Nights is coming soon on ITV and I very much want to see it.
Read the full transcript
39:11It's got Will Forte in it and Darcy Carden from The Good Place. And yeah, it looks a lot of fun. Boyd, have you heard of this? No, I haven't heard of it at all, no. I'm just looking it up now. It involves fake tans and blackmail, but the trailer was a lot of fun. No, I saw this. Is it a couple who go to Australia to set up a tanning business? Yes. Yes, I saw something like this. It looks brilliant. It looks really good. well we'll have to review that when it's uh when it comes around no that looks great steve yeah good for you there you go an unexpected bit of pr on pilot plus we don't normally get those kind of emails in the post bag those normally come to us directly what is steve's contribution what does he do he's a producer i believe and a pilot plus subscriber okay here is another one and this comes from amy and amy says hello pod on the subject of tv shows referencing other tv shows It's even more fun when references go both ways in a kind of Mobius strip.
40:08For example, a character on Doctor Who mentioned watching Call the Midwife, and characters on Call the Midwife were shown watching Doctor Who. And there was a crossover charity sketch once. Speaking of Doctor Who, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. had some lovely subtle Who-related Easter eggs, as well as direct references, such as a character answering a TARDIS when asked what she would like to have with her on a desert island. But my favourite one connects a TV show with a movie. sorry uh when legends of tomorrow went full meta they released an episode titled guest starring john noble in which the legends realized that the villain of the season voiced by john noble sounded a lot like the actor john noble and traveled back in time to the set of lord of the rings to get john noble to impersonate the villain which sounds absolutely batshit i've never watched legends of tomorrow i never really got sucked into the arrow verse all those sort of cwdc shows but yeah that sounds mad and I have heard that Legends of Tomorrow was was completely insane but that's that's incredible that actually has hurt my head it's like that is it Oceans 12 isn't it where they decide that uh the character of Tess played by Julia Roberts looks a lot like Julia Roberts yeah and that becomes a plot point in the film uh which is strange someone also mentioned if we're talking meta cross-referential stuff your beloved shrinking Steph that Harrison Ford was humming the theme tune to Indiana Jones in one episode and they thought that was wonderful so oh such a good show such a good show russell has questions and russell's questions involve industry russell says first of all thanks for all the hard work you put into the show you're very welcome it's the only podcast i pay for and the obvious passion the team has for tv really makes it stand out from the crowd thank you much i have seen industry referred to as the british succession in various places but feel the comparison is quite misleading yes i get that both shows revolve around rich unhappy people but for me the key difference is that succession is a black comedy which exaggerates the bellendry of its characters to brilliantly satirical and often absurd effect industry on the other hand is not a comedy although the characters often act like bellends for me one of the central themes of the show is to ask whether it is possible to both succeed and be a good person in a world which is designed to reward extreme narcissism i actually find the wire more interesting comparison point for industry both series start in season one with a tight focus on a single workplace, only to expand their scope over time to explore the wider structures of capitalism.
42:28While watching Industry, I'm constantly reminded of The Wire's underlying message, that our systems are broken and that the game is rigged from the start. On a lighter note, if there's a series with a better selection of needle drops than Industry, then I am yet to see it. Does Boyd agree? From Ross. Yes. What a fantastic email. Yeah, I agree. Totally, yeah. Industry definitely is more drama than comedy and is more dramatically driven. I think succession trends the line, doesn't it? But I think because I think Jesse Armstrong and his team's kind of natural genre in which they operate is kind of comedic, inherently comedic.
43:05So even though succession is, you know, an hour long, dramatic, often very dramatic show, which, you know, has incredibly poignant moments and is driven by huge amounts of drama. I think there's a different tonally. They're very different. Yeah, they're very different. so they cover a lot of the same kind of subject matter in a way you know the the capitalist system meets you know um exploitation of individuals and um how things are rigged all of that as the as um was mentioned in that email but it definitely has its own its own vibe shall we say and and absolutely driven by brilliant need to drop the music is phenomenal in industry everything about it is brilliant and it was it was the as we as we recall this now the finale was last night and it was incredibly powerful and brilliant.
43:53I love it. Would you then, Boyd, say that Succession qualifies for the previous question about comedies? No, it's not a comedy. I think I would put it that it's comedic in many ways, and the minds that create it are very funny, and they know how to write funny dialogue. And often, you know, Brian Cox's dialogue was brilliantly delivered funny stuff, but it's not trying to be funny throughout. They haven't jokes, are they, as such. So it's very different from Veep, for example. So Veep, which has got similar origins, similar kind of teamwork. Armando Iannucci's gang worked on it. That's much more an out-and-out comedy.
44:31That is a half-hour comedy set in the upper echelons of American politics. I think Succession has pockets of comedy that are instilled within the characters. So like Kieran Culkin's character, he delivers a lot of comedic moments, but I would never, ever call that a comedy. I don't even know. Yeah, it's a drama with comedy rooted in it. But it's certainly much more comedic than industry, though, for example. Yes. It can be dick. Dick. It's a worrying emphasis on the word dick there. But sure. If you've seen industry, you'll know it's fully justified. Putting the dick in comedic industry. Yeah.
45:09Okay. One here from John. And John says, Hi, Pilots. Long-time listener. Pilot Plus subscriber. First-time emailer. I'm currently catching up on Virgin River before the seventh season drops on March the 12th. Any chance the pod will review the latest effort pending the dreaded embargoes? I don't think the show has ever been reviewed on the pod and would appreciate your takes on what is now amazingly Netflix's longest running scripted series. Now, I am almost certain that you three reviewed Virgin River on this podcast on a week that I was off. I am absolutely convinced that is the case. I haven't watched it, but what I do know is Kay is a massive fan of Virgin River.
45:51So we didn't review it because I don't remember. No, I think she definitely mentioned it. Yeah, quite a lot at one period. I think I did try and watch an episode. You tried to watch an episode. Did it not go well? No, no, no. It was fine. Yeah, but I couldn't eke out the time to watch much more. There's certainly not the seven seasons, however many there have been. But yeah, Kay is a fan for sure. we have a very very very long email here from cam cam i'm not going to be able to read this all out because it will take me many many days so i'm going to skip through this and just pull out the highlights as i see them so apologies if i misrepresent what you're saying i will try not to anyway cam says i just wanted to follow up on the email from richard in the lord of the flies post bag about short form drama slash comedy being here to stay and to screening our way through life I believe short-form storytelling on apps like TikTok is where some people will end up.
46:41It's already happening, but like every new medium, there is resistance from the old guard, migration, and a mixing of talent and then acceptance. With the move to longer videos on TikTok, we're already seeing dramas and comedies being made by comedians and writers in short one - to five-minute episodes that weave together into a patchwork story and playlist on people's feeds over days, weeks, and months. With traditional broadcasters killing off their talent feeder programming like daytime soaps and long-running lower-budget dramas where people would learn and perfect their trade this talent is having to find ways to make their own things and tiktok is currently the place you can go seriously viral which has made it easier for someone to get noticed if you want to be you just have to fund it yourself write it yourself shoot it yourself wrangle tired friends into being background actors on their weekends and have absolutely no guarantee it will be seen more by more than 300 people never mind if any industry gatekeepers will see or the creator fund will pay you back ridicule to acceptance happened with reality tv youtube and now it's happening with tiktok talent is being migrated to the mainstream and acceptance of short-form script content along with it before anyone scoffs about youtube it's worth pointing out nielsen has recorded youtube was the highest percentage watched media company in the world over the last year and its share of on tv viewers is only growing as it's the clear winner with gen z and alpha in terms of go-to apps on televisions and then he says i also want to say that this two screen watching is a self-fulfilling prophecy networks fear it so they ask creators to consider that when making it therefore the program is dumbed down and subtext is spoken so people don't need to watch they aren't being stimulated and challenged therefore we pick up our phones then networks complain about people to screening etc etc etc great lean forward tv is out there and should be championed but it's becoming rarer and rarer so two thoughts there i do i completely agree that the whole self-fulfilling prophecy around dual screening that people do it so now they're making tv that accommodates it which then encourages people to do it more uh whereas if you make tv like david simon did and like a lot of other people do where you don't allow people to stop then they'll have to stop doing it because they need to pay attention yeah because it's so enticing you couldn't possibly look at your phone and go on shopping sites or whatever people do What do you think about the vertical stuff?
48:49What do you think about short-form TikTok? Do you think people are going to migrate there? Do you think Gen Alpha is going to abandon their streaming subscriptions and just go full TikTok for all their entertainment? No, I think it's just another thing, another outlet for creativity, man. What I was going to say is, obviously they alluded a lot to YouTube. I mean, for a long time, creators have started out with putting their comedy out on YouTube in the hopes of getting a network deal. I mean, I know we mentioned before Issa Rae's Insecure and she launched really with her Awkward Black Girl series on a YouTube channel.
49:26And then she pitched Insecure and it's not uncommon for people to have done that. So maybe this is just another vehicle for creatives now to do short form. And then I would hope to then get a bigger network deal and get their creatives out to what maybe now isn't a wider audience, I suppose. So I know what comes, it's a bit of a chicken and egg thing, isn't it? Like you were saying, what comes first? The big TV show and then you go to TikTok and you do things or is it to get yourself seen on the big small screen? I don't know. For those of you that commute and if you commute on a train, I mean, everyone's heads down, aren't they?
50:09Everyone's tech neck. They're all sitting down. They're watching things. They want to see everyone's time poor. It works for people who are on a 30-minute, 40-minute commute. And if you have people's attention span for such a short period of time and you are desperately trying to get your work out there, then this is a great medium for that. But sorry, go on, Boyd. I agree with all of that. I just don't think any of that vertical short-form stuff is going to take the place of, you know, I don't think suddenly young people are going to stop watching epic films in cinemas or, you know, on TV. Stranger Things, you know, I always use the example of Stranger Things, right, is a massively complex, multi-series, endlessly, you know, huge phenomenon among young people in particular.
50:59And, you know, this idea that young people have got short attention spans and are only interested in watching some two-minute thing on TikTok or a two-minute vertical thing diced up from a film is ludicrous. that if you bring people an incredibly compelling, wonderful, beautifully made thing that demands to be watched on TV and goes on for eight years or whatever, then that will never go, in my opinion. That will never disappear. That will never be replaced. No, I agree. And I actually think it's an absolute misnomer that young people have short attention spans. Yeah, it's bullshit. I'm talking about, I think I have a short attention span in many ways because I feel quite time poor.
51:38I think young people, I'm not saying all you young people, but lots of young people have like endless reams of time to consume incredible series. Like this is the time, this is the time to watch those kinds of things. But I just like, yeah, to your point, it feels like an addition to, and we know that because there are these made for series. So, yeah, it doesn't feel to me like it's going to advance to now people only watch things on TikTok. because, yeah, you'll never, I just can't see that happening at all. But who knows? It's the nature of all online discourse, isn't it? Where it's like, you're either this or you're that.
52:17You're either doing this or you're doing that. Whereas actually all these things can coexist, I think, quite happily. I think, you know, short form content is a new pipeline for talent to be discovered. A lot of standup comedians now do these little sort of 67 snippet skits that they'll put out on social media and it works really well and it gets them attention, it gets them recognition. Ultimately, if someone said, do you want to keep doing that or would you like a you know a 90 minute netflix special they probably offer the latter um but i think yes we'll probably get dramas they won't necessarily be like the you know the wrong boyfriend's lover or what was that show that we watched i can't even remember the wrong boyfriend the wrong brother that was it um kissing the wrong brother um you know it's not all going to be like that and i think there is a place in the world for short form video content absolutely just as there's a place for lean forward incredibly in-depth david simon dramas just as there's a place for half-hour sitcoms.
53:06I think, you know, we can enjoy all of these things in all different mediums. I don't think one needs to replace the others. What a beautiful message there from our leader, James. Thank you, boy. I take it back. You're so emotional. And I think probably what a great place to end, since I really need to go and do some work. We really need to have some champagne and probably take a first-class flight somewhere, so yeah, fair enough. Okay, that's it for Pilot Plus. We're done. You can find us, frankly, in short form on TikTok and Instagram if you want to consume the podcast that way. Harry puts together little clips each week.
53:37So do enjoy us in a short form video format. We will be back in your ears on Monday when we will be reviewing Gone on the ITV, Rooster, which is on Sky Comedy, and the latest series of The Capture, which Boyd talked about last week. Again, running roughshod over embargoes, spoilers, and really everything. But it's very exciting to have it back. So we're going to talk about that on Monday as well. Until then, pilot out.
54:05uly 2-I Do It
From the publisher
Boyd coins a rather unflattering new nickname for Netflix’s new comedy drama, which sees Rachel Weisz as a college professor lusting after Leo Woodall’s titular hunky colleague. But it’s not all sexy times on campus as we also take another trip into the dark morass that is the Pilot TV postbag, fielding grammatical complaints, Virgin River advocates and an extended screed on the subject of short-form entertainment.
Want your messages read out as part of The Postbag? Email us at pilottv@empiremagazine.com




