ChatGPT doesn’t want you to email your ex

29 Apr 2026 · 48 min · 17 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Rana El-Khalyubi interviews Sinan Eral (MIT Sloan professor, entrepreneur, VC) about “human-centric AI”: augmenting people, not replacing them; risks of AI becoming a boys club; and how AI will reshape work, relationships, creativity, trust, and health.

Key claims

AI investment and hiring can widen women’s wealth gap; humanoid robots may feel “scary” if built without emotional/social intelligence; AI should augment human relationships (relationship-intelligent AI) rather than replace them; nonverbal understanding is the next frontier; guardrails are needed to prevent manipulation; and organizations must redesign processes, accountability, and culture for AI coworkers/agents.

Notable examples

Blue Tulip’s AI chief of staff (“Blue”); humanoid robot Abby by Andromeda (warm, socially capable) vs “folds laundry” robots; relationship/intro tools GoodWord (consumer) and Via AI (sales; warm intros using context); Rana’s ChatGPT dating-coach anecdote where it refused to help send an email to an ex; and her son using Manus AI/NotebookLM for study.

Guests

Sinan Eral—MIT Sloan professor, entrepreneur, VC; previously founded Affectiva (emotion/sensing tech), sold in June 2021. Rana El-Khalyubi is the host.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introduction to the Guest

1:45 to 2:41

Rana introduces the guest and sets the context for the discussion.

“So today we're bringing you something a little different.”

Startup and Investment Perspectives

2:41 to 3:58

Discussion on the experience transitioning from a startup founder to an investor.

“I just want to start with this transition that I think is very cool.”

The Opportunity in AI

3:58 to 5:14

Exploring the potential of AI and the importance of human-centric approaches.

“First of all, I think it's very helpful to be an investor who has walked the shoes of being a founder, being an entrepreneur, being an exited founder.”

The Gender Wealth Gap in AI

5:14 to 8:11

Addressing the risks of AI becoming a boys club and its implications.

“Do you think you could go back and start a company or you think that, what do you think?”

Diversity in AI Design

8:11 to 11:52

The importance of diverse perspectives in AI product development.

“And I recognize that this is not a very popular topic to bring up these days.”

Emotional Intelligence in AI

11:52 to 14:03

Discussing the role of emotional intelligence in AI and its applications.

“Well, I mean, you mentioned warmth as one of the factors.”

AI and Human Relationships

14:03 to 18:48

Explore how AI can enhance human connections and manage relationships.

“I think there's a concern that AI is kind of replacing human connections and human relationships.”

Generational Perspectives on AI

19:27 to 22:28

Discuss the differing attitudes towards AI between the speaker's children.

“Built is the membership that actually rewards you for it.”

AI Integration in Organizations

22:29 to 24:52

Understand the role of AI in organizational structures and workflows.

“But I love that she's doubling down on humans.”

The Future of Communication with AI

24:53 to 28:05

Examine how AI might learn nonverbal communication to enhance interaction.

“It started with one task, patient intake.”
Show all 17 chapters

The Next Frontier in AI Communication

28:05 to 32:03

Explore the challenges and potential of AI in understanding nonverbal communication.

“In fact, all those cliched statistics about how it's like a small part of human communication.”

Navigating AI's Role in Creativity and Relationships

32:28 to 38:48

Discuss the balance between AI innovation, creativity, and emotional connections.

“a man was found stabbed multiple times on a sidewalk in downtown San Francisco.”

AI's Impact on Health and Personalized Medicine

38:48 to 42:05

Investigate how AI can transform health through personalized approaches.

“Very highly recommend rewatching or watching for the first time that movie if you've never if you've never seen it.”

The Role of Founders in Innovation

42:05 to 44:32

Explore what characteristics make a successful founder in the tech space.

“always incorporated into what your doctor knows, but it could very well be incorporated into an AI.”

The Value of Experience in Founding Teams

44:33 to 47:28

Discuss the balance between young founders and experienced entrepreneurs.

“Sometimes I like it when I ask for a deck and the founder says, I've been too busy to write a deck.”

Navigating the Socio-Technical Revolution

47:29 to 49:56

Understand the importance of intangible investments in leveraging AI.

“So one thing as sort of students of the history of technological revolutions we know is that this is not a technical or technological revolution.”

Balancing Hope and Fear in AI's Future

49:57 to 51:13

Reflect on the societal impacts of AI and the hope it brings.

“And that's because of the exponential nature of this change.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Hi, everyone. It's Rana. The future of AI is not built in isolation. It is shaped in rooms where ambitious people challenge each other. Masters of Scale Summit is back October 20th through 22nd in San Francisco, bringing together founders and innovators pushing the edge of what is possible. If you're building what comes next, you should be in this room. Apply now at mastersofscale.com slash pioneers. That's mastersofscale.com slash pioneers.

0:50Explains how the world works using data. Each episode, we break down the numbers driving culture, the economy, and politics. Join the search. Listen to Control-F wherever you get podcasts. On Masters of Scale, iconic leaders reveal how they've beaten the odds. Asking really strong questions is a superpower. You want to show up with something radically different and how they've grown companies to incredible heights. The greatest rewards always come from the greatest risks. That's hit the gas. Airbnb, Zillow, Microsoft, Liquid Death, and more. Hear from the founders who've changed the game. It's anything but business as usual.

1:30Find Masters of Scale on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever else you get podcasts.

1:45Hi, everyone. It's Rana. So today we're bringing you something a little different. Earlier this month, MIT Sloan professor, entrepreneur, and VC, Sinan Eral, interviewed me at MIT's Big AI Conference, which stands for Business Implications of Generative AI. I had an awesome time. I got to talk about my take on the AI startup landscape and how AI is changing the future of work. I also got a bit TMI and shared how I use ChatGPT as my dating coach. It was so much fun. And for today's show, I'm really excited to share this conversation with you. I'm Rana El-Khalyubi, and this is Pioneers of AI, a podcast taking you behind the scenes of the AI revolution.

2:39All right. Yes. Well, welcome. Welcome back. I know you live in Boston. Yeah, I do. But welcome back to campus. I just want to start with this transition that I think is very cool. And I want to check myself on a sort of metaphor that I like to use. Okay. So I'm also a startup founder turned venture capitalist. And the way I like to describe that experience is that when you're building a startup, it's like growing a single tree. Right. You're worried about like, where is it going to get its nutrients? So I got to get these pests away from the tree. I got to make sure it can see the canopy so it can get sunlight and so on.

3:18And then when you transition to being an investor, you're sort of more worried about the forest. So you see lots of different trees and you're like, in this part of the forest, like which of those trees is going to succeed? And how can these trees like complement each other in a way that like shares nutrients or something? Does this metaphor hold like you went from Affectiva, you're now doing Tulip. And so I want to know, I don't really care about the metaphor, but I am interested in whether it relates to your experience. What I want to know is like, how do you see these two different experiences of like founding and investing?

3:57And like, what does each teach the other? Yeah. First of all, I think it's very helpful to be an investor who has walked the shoes of being a founder, being an entrepreneur, being an exited founder. And I find that a lot of founders really appreciate that experience, that I can kind of talk about the challenges in fundraising. I could talk about the challenges of having a team and hiring and firing and all of that. So there's definitely a lot to be said for kind of being an operator turned investor. For me, I sold the company in June of 2021. I could see that this was going to be a tipping point in AI.

4:34You know, I started my PhD back in 2000. So I've been in this space for many, many years, as I know you have been. I started my PhD in 2000 as well. So it's like spot on. Yeah. So I felt like, okay, I've done all this work for this moment in time. And I thought a lot about whether I wanted to go back into building another startup. But I just feel like this is an opportunity to kind of have impact at scale by parallelizing kind of what I do and what I care about and using capital to invest where I think there's potential value and where it aligns with my thesis around AI. Do you think you could go back and start a company or you think that, what do you think?

5:18Do you have the itch every once in a while? So I think I was in love with Affectiva. I have two kids, 22 and 17 now. And I started Affectiva when my daughter was six and my son was a newborn. Like we incorporated the company when my son was born, like within a week of each other. And so I always joke that Affectiva was my third baby. Yeah, sometimes they did compete for my resources. I'm in like one, my kids probably have PTSD or something. Anyway, anyway. And I feel like I have to fall in love with an idea so much again to start a company. And I haven't found that idea yet. So never say never.

6:00But for now, I love investing. I love supporting founders on their journey. There's something magical about this early stage. Yeah. It's energizing, right? To talk to founders and to see the passion that each of them has for their specific project and to support that is kind of a very rewarding experience. Yeah, and be able to kind of shape that journey, whether it's by introductions or by kind of sharing a lived experience. Yeah, so for now, I'm loving being an investor. So Tulip is focused on AI. Blue Tulip. Blue Tulip. Blue Tulip. So it's focused on AI, but it's also focused on trying to specifically invest in more humanizing AI.

6:46Is that appropriate to say? Yeah. Our investment thesis is what we call human-centric AI. So that's AI that unlocks human potential, not necessarily replaces human abilities and augments humans, basically. We can debate that because there are instances where, you know, jobs are going to be automated because of some. We're going to talk about that for sure. And then we also have this thesis that there are big problems in the world and AI presents an opportunity to solve these big problems. And that's kind of what. So we think about it like AI that's good for people, good for the planet and is ethical and responsible.

7:27Yeah, I think that's a reasonable North Star. One thing that I heard you say recently, which was, I think, spot on and something that we've been thinking about and is, I think, a big concern. It's not the only dimension of opportunity that is a concern, but it is a big one, which is that you warned that AI risk becoming a boys club and widening the wealth gap for women. Can you explain why you think that's a risk and where exactly the widening is likely to be seen first? Is it founding? Is it funding? Is it product design, hiring, ownership? Is it just interacting with AI? What do you think? All of the above.

8:13And I recognize that this is not a very popular topic to bring up these days. So I get a daily digest of AI funding news. And one of these is TechCrunch. So TechCrunch does a very interesting thing for how it announces these new funding rounds. There's usually kind of the headline raises like, I don't know, like$100 million at a$5 billion valuation. And then a picture of the founders. And I started noticing a pattern. I was like, it's usually two or three men that are in the headlines. And day after day, I was like, okay, this is interesting. And the reason this concerns me is, if you think about it, AI is creating massive economic opportunity.

8:59And it's not just economic opportunity for the team that is founding these companies. It's actually who's investing. Because ideally, you know, when these companies are successful, the investors are successful too. And actually, the way I think about it too is, who's on my cap table as an investor? It's great to have wealthy, older men on my cap table. Thank you for supporting me. But I also want to ensure that women are on these cap tables too, so that we don't, you know, fast forward five years from now or a decade from now, and we've just exacerbated this economic gap between, you know, the gender kind of wealth gap.

9:36So that's something I care deeply about. And I'm kind of, I don't just invest in women. I actually, I feel very strongly that I have to invest in the winning companies, right? Sure. But I also kind of worry about what type of AIs are we building if we are not, if it's not inclusive in terms of who, you know, AI democratizes access, but we actually need to democratize the building piece of it too. How do you think that could manifest? Let's say that the majority of designers, programmers, leadership at AI companies are men, not women. What do you think that does to the product that comes out of the other side and how it interacts and relates to humanity?

10:23I think there are a lot of examples of that, but I think the one that is most visual maybe, there's a lot of investment going into humanoid robots. Yes. And there is a lot of potential opportunity, again, economic opportunity, but also kind of use cases in this space. I've spent a lot of time, like my entire career has been about how to marry emotional and social intelligence with cognitive intelligence. I think the teams that are building these humanoid robots are obsessed about the IQ and the functionality of the robot. And they're not really thinking about how are these robots going to coexist with us?

10:57So, for example, you know, I won't name the company, but it's like one of their leading humanoid robots. And it is able to fold your laundry and organize your living room. But if you look at it, like, I don't want that robot in my house. It is scary, right? And it's not the only way to build that. I interviewed this young woman, Grace Brown. Her robot is called Abby, is the robot. The company is called Andromeda. And it has social capabilities. She has a kind of an emotional intelligence brain behind the robot. It's very warm. It's accessible. It's relatable. I think we need to balance both. And that's one example where I, you know, I wonder if the teams that are building these kind of leading humanoid robots are diverse, not just women, but diverse perspectives, right?

11:52Yeah. Do you have any thoughts on that? Well, I mean, you mentioned warmth as one of the factors. We did a global AI negotiations competition here at MIT where people submitted prompts for agents that would negotiate over nine different scenarios. So they had to be flexible and negotiating in different scenarios. And it was AI-AI negotiation. So no humans involved. You just set your bot and then they negotiate. And we didn't expect that human emotional dimensions would be as important as they were in succeeding in completely automated negotiations. Warmth was one of the biggest determinants of success in negotiations.

12:41And it was good for claiming value and creating value. And the reason it claimed more value was not because it was aggressively taking value, was because it reached deals more often. And when you only looked at the bots that reached deals, it actually claimed less value. But overall, it claimed more value because it was successful in negotiating and getting to a negotiation conclusion. And so I think that we're missing big swaths of social elements that need to be part of what we put into AI. Yeah, totally. I mean, if you think about it, if you think about human intelligence, right, your IQ matters, but your emotional intelligence matters even more.

13:25In business, I mean, the best managers and leaders have high EQ, the best partners, the best friends, right? And so it makes a lot of sense to me that this would be the case for AI as well, especially AI that is going to collaborate and work alongside us. I mean, if you think about AI co-workers, right, and organizations where I think a lot of our organizations today are already hybrid AI and, you know, AI agents working alongside humans, you need these emotional intelligence skills to build trust. Yeah. Is this what you mean by relationship intelligent AI? Is that sort of the thing? It's a broad bucket.

14:08I think there's a concern that AI is kind of replacing human connections and human relationships. There's obviously some examples of that. But my thesis is you can use AI to augment and amplify human relationships by kind of injecting AI to help kind of help give you kind of, you know, I track my steps. I track my sleep. But there's no current way to really track your relationships and the quality and the health of these relationships, but also have something proactive that can help you organize and cultivate your network and your relationship. The best example I like to give, how many people have watched The Devil Wears Prada?

14:51By the way, movie number two is coming out soon. There's a scene where Meryl Streep is at this gala. I know the scene, yeah. You know what I'm talking about? Yeah. And like this guy and his wife are walking towards her and she's like, oh, my God, I blanked on the guy's name. And then Anne Hathaway is behind her and she kind of, you know, leans in and she's like, he's the ambassador of blah, blah, blah. And I'm like, that's the chief of stuff. That's the AI I want. You need that in the ear, right? Exactly. It can just like kind of just source. You know, it's got computer vision. It's got perception.

15:25It has all your LinkedIn connections. It understands the context of the conversation and can help you be a smarter, more connected, more empathetic human being. Story for another day, but that is the second startup that we founded called Human, H-U-M-I-N. We built this to try to do this for relationships pre-AI, and we sold the business to Tinder in 2016. But they were interested in the relationship aspect. And we were kind of at a point where we were either going to sort of squander a little bit or exit successfully. And so we took a strategic decision. It wasn't exactly sort of what we had envisioned when we started the company.

16:16But, you know, as you know, as a founder and an entrepreneur, there's all sorts of things that can break your stride in different ways. And so that was sort of the goal, but also maybe not the exact end point that we got. Well, I think timing is also really key. And I do believe now with generative AI, you can take all this. Relationships are messy. Like think about where your data, your relationship data sits. For me, it's my emails, my calendars, my WhatsApp, my DMs. It's a mess. LinkedIn, right? Instagram. Live conversations, right? My AI note taker, my own notes. And it's all unstructured data and it's disparate data sources.

16:57So now AI can actually take all of that in and allow you to interrogate it just conversationally. So I'm really excited. We're investors in two companies that are building different pieces in different pieces of this market. One is called GoodWord, and they're doing it for consumers. And the other is Via AI, which is a Boston-based company founded by David Chang, who's a serial entrepreneur in the Boston ecosystem. And he's very focused on the sales application of it. Because if you wanted a warm introduction to somebody at IDE, right? And it can say, oh, well, Rana knows Sinan. And you can ask for a word.

17:34So this is very similar to a very old company called Visible Path. They did this, I don't know, it was like 15 years ago, back when email was the only thing. One thing that we found hard was people to auth all of those, LinkedIn and everything else. So we would get people and then we would really have to work hard to get them to authorize connection to, okay, now connect your LinkedIn, now connect your email. And people were like, I don't know about all that. Yeah, trust is a big thing, right? It's important. Yeah. Share all of your relationship data.

18:16We're going to take a break. More of this conversation in a minute.

18:48Transcription by CastingWords Teams can't move together. Enter Atlassian's teamwork collection. It has planning in Jira, documentation in Confluence, video updates in Loom, and now AI agents in Rovo, which connects the dots across your work so nothing gets lost. It's one AI-powered teamwork platform designed for how modern teams actually build. Learn more at Atlassian.com slash teamchanger. That's A-T-L-A-S-S-I-A-N dot com slash teamchanger Whether you rent or own, your housing payment is probably your biggest bill of the month. So here's something worth noting. Built is the membership that actually rewards you for it.

19:36Every housing payment earns you points that you can redeem toward travel with partners like United, along with stays at Hyatt Hotels, Lyft Rides, Amazon.com purchases, and more. And the Neighborhood Concierge feature can make restaurant reservations, book fitness classes, and find you local spots, all while racking up rewards at 45 ,000-plus merchant partners. So whether you're paying rent or paying a mortgage, Built works for both. Join the membership for where you live at joinbuilt.com slash pioneers of AI. That's J-O-I-N-B-I-L-T dot com slash Pioneers of AI.

20:37Listen to Click Here. We can help you make sense of all the noise. Click Here, wherever you get your podcasts.

20:48So you mentioned your kids, and we were talking earlier about the fact that you're experiencing this amazing bifurcation. Both your kids are super smart, super successful. I'd love for you to talk about them for a minute. But one of them has wholeheartedly embraced AI and the other one is like completely will not touch AI. Is that true? Yes. They're sort of the opposite ends of the spectrum, which I think is a microcosm of kind of the AI debate that we have in our world today. So, yes, my daughter, Jana, is 22. She just graduated from across the river. Yeah. She's a food anthropologist, which I did not know was a thing, but it is.

21:30I think AI is not going to automate her job. And she is all about human connection. She's building a third space in Cambridge where they host kind of real conversations. It's a cultural salon meets cafe. And she will just not use AI. And her argument is like, well, I have a smart brain. I've lived experiences. AI doesn't. And she just not even chat GPT to draft an email. Does she fear eroding her knowledge or does she just think it's not worth the time? She thinks she just doesn't trust it. And she doesn't trust that it will come up with something that's better than what she will do. So I find that fascinating.

22:14My son. She's probably right, by the way. You think? I think so, yeah. Part of me is like, because I believe strongly that AI is not going to go anywhere, obviously. And to be the head of the curve, she needs to embrace the technology and kind of play with it and experiment with it. But I love that she's doubling down on humans. That's what she's betting on. And I love that. My son, on the other hand, yeah, he's 17. He's a junior in high school. And he's literally my AI teacher. I mean, I spend most of my waking hours immersed in the AI ecosystem. And he still is my teacher. He uses Manus AI to do everything, like everything for him.

22:56He uploads his textbooks at school to Notebook LM and it spits back a podcast and that's how he studies. He's been using it to like scan these like Egyptology archives from the 1920s that are in Arabic and he translates them. And he's, it's just like fascinating. He's always trying new things. So he's all in. And it's just so interesting to see both. It's disruptive in your life to adopt AI because you have been doing these things in a certain way. And there's a retooling. Like we tell organizations this, that there's going to need to be a retooling, that you're going to have disruption. You're going to have to redesign processes.

23:40You're going to have to retrain people, reskilling, so on and so forth. It happens at the individual level as well because we had a way of doing something. And now when we're going to say, okay, I'm going to try AI to sort of like augment this or do this differently, we have to kind of adapt ourselves. In terms of organizations, you've also talked about this idea of onboarding AI into the org chart. So can you tell us what that means to you? Which business functions are sort of most ready to do that? And where do you think managers are underestimating the disruption? that that presents. Yeah. One of our investment theses is that, you know, AI is kind of shifting how value is being created.

24:27And one way it's doing that is through this idea of an AI coworker. And the coworker could be a software agentic AI, or it could be a physical AI, could be an actual robot, right? And so if you think about it, and we actually have companies that are, for example, I'm an investor in a company called Synthpop, another Boston-based company, and they are building an AI healthcare administrator. And the way they started is this AI automated a very simple task. It started with one task, patient intake. And then over time, because they're embedded in the workflow, they expanded more and more workflows.

25:02And their goal is to essentially eventually kind of automate the series of tasks that a healthcare administrator does, which means that you maybe perhaps as a health organization won't need as many healthcare administrators as you kind of currently have. I believe you will still need human oversight, but it'll look different. So the task of a human healthcare administrator maybe will become supervising these team of AI agents. But the point is a lot of organizations are now becoming a hybrid of humans and AI working alongside each other. and I keep imagining like, what does this future org chart look like?

25:45Because sometimes you might have a human manager overseeing teams of humans and AI or maybe an AI manager overseeing a team of humans and AI. So I think that's exciting. I also think we are totally underestimated, back to like the human element of it, we're totally underestimating what this looks like in practice. How do you build trust? How do you build accountability? How do you build clarity? Actually, even the question of who do you delegate jobs to? How do you think about what's the framework basically to delegate jobs to AI versus humans? Who gets what? Who gets to do what? And I think we're grappling with that.

26:24And then ultimately, how do you create culture? Like for Affectiva, for example, I'm sure it was the same for your startups. Company culture is so key. Yes, 100%. How do you do that when you've got a bunch of AIs and a bunch of humans? Yeah. And is it that AIs are part of the culture? Is it that AIs are in some way influencing the culture? I never thought about this concept of having an AI manager. That is one that's throwing me for a loop. I'm still sort of like trying to imagine like in my own mind thinking to myself, okay, I'm going to really have to have a conversation with my boss who is an AI about my pay or something.

27:04I wonder if our cultural norms were... So I've been on a few meetings where people... It's not like one-on-one meetings, but maybe where it's a webinar or a larger conversation. And people have been sending their note takers. They're not coming to the meetings anymore. But is it like a physical manifestation or is it... No, no, they just send... Okay. So they're just there to get the TLDR. That's it. Oh, yeah. And I wonder if it'll become normal. That's a little insulting, right? Because you're like spending your actual time. I'm there. But I do. But it made me think like if we will get to a point where this will become culturally acceptable.

Read the full transcript

27:47Yeah. Yeah. Question mark. So affectivity obviously is about human emotions and so on. So I want to ask you about, obviously, language is a big part of how we learn and communicate. But language is not the only part. In fact, all those cliched statistics about how it's like a small part of human communication. And so I'm wondering how you think we're going to unlock AI understanding that other 80 % of communication that isn't the thing that it's trained on. Is that possible? And what are the ways to think about that? I still think this is the next frontier in AI. You're right. Like the majority of how humans communicate is not in the actual choice of words we use.

28:40It's all nonverbal. It's why we're here in person. It's this energy, your facial expressions, your vocal intonations, you're nodding your head now. All of these nonverbals are really powerful and important. But if you think about it, when you are engaging with most AI today, it's completely oblivious to these nonverbal signals. It doesn't have computer vision that runs in real time that can look at your face and kind of discern that you're stressed or you're in a hurry or you're sad. And it can only tell that if you decide to share that in words. And I do believe the next frontier, especially, again, if you think about these AI agents or these AI co-pilots or thought partners working alongside with us, but also being in our homes and helping with our personal lives and whatnot, they will need to have a sense and more context around how are we feeling and kind of integrate that data into its answer.

29:43and I think we'll get there. We're starting to see, for example, meta, like the meta glasses, right? They're starting to build some perceptual and visual intelligence. So we will get there eventually. So I could see this as sort of double-edged sword, obviously. You could imagine that this is going to be great for building better relationships with AI. You can also imagine that this is a test bed for manipulation in a way. The more it understands our feelings, the more it has certain objective functions that may or may not be aligned with us. One thing that a pet peeve of mine is this idea that somehow we haven't gotten more creative in the last 20 years on the business model beyond engagement, right?

30:33So do you worry about engage, sorry, manipulation versus relationship building? How do we navigate that trade-off? Yeah, I worry about manipulation. And to your point, that has been around, right? It's not like it's new. 100%. Right? So when I look at companies, I try to invest in companies that have thought about that and are kind of almost self-regulating. They're implementing their own guardrails around how to prevent misuse of this data to manipulate people into making decisions, right? that they may not do otherwise. At Affectiva, for example, we often got approached to apply our technology in politics, political, you know, kind of political polling and whatnot.

31:23And we felt very strongly that this is really kind of, it could be very easily misused to manipulate people's decisions around who to vote for and et cetera. we got approached by governments to use this in lie detection and surveillance and again we turned millions of dollars of funding and potential revenue down because we felt like there were there are no guardrails today there's no regulation so it's very easy for bad actors to misuse this data and we just felt like we were not going to we're not going to do that yeah After a short break, YChatGBT told me not to send a letter to my ex. Stay with us.

32:27On April 4th, 2023, around two in the morning, a man was found stabbed multiple times on a sidewalk in downtown San Francisco. Hey, who did this to you? What happened next turned the story into a political firestorm. Reports have identified the victim as Bob Lee, the founder of Cash App. From Bloomberg Podcasts, this is Foundry, the killing of Bob Lee, beginning April 16.

32:59So I want to talk about innovation. So one thing that we've been seeing in our results, and I think it's now becoming an established set of research results in the direction of human AI collaboration leading to what's known as diversity collapse, where the outputs of human AI collaboration look more similar to each other than if humans were just doing this work on their own. It's faster. It gets done in a more productive way, output per unit time. but the outputs are more homogenous than what we might expect or want. I think I also heard somebody say, you know, that because AI is trained on prior information, it is challenging for AI to produce a novel idea, something that isn't related to what has ever been said in the past.

33:59And so I'm wondering how you think about that as a problem to solve and to be solved. And what about design can maybe address the novelty innovation of what comes out of the other end of AI? A couple of thoughts. First of all, we talk a lot about AI hallucination, but it's both a feature and a bug depending on the task at hand, right? So if you were trying to kind of do research around the topic where data exists, you don't want the AI model to make up results. And if it does, we call that hallucination. However, if you are in a creative context and you want to create a new logo or a new idea, hallucinating is actually good.

34:47That's like creativity, right? So I think discerning, like being very clear around what is the task at hand and is it okay to hallucinate in particular cases, I think that's important. So I don't think a blanket model or a blanket, yeah, a blanket model makes sense. That's one thought. And then the other, I've been thinking a lot, and one of our advisors actually in the fund is Natalie Monbiot, and she's the expert on the virtual human economy. She thinks a lot about like the division of labor between humans and AI. What makes sense for the human to do? What makes sense for the AI to do? And what does this partnership look like?

35:28And I still think that a lot of our creativity comes from lived experiences. You know, the best novels you read are, right? Like it is rooted in people's lived experiences. And so I think that's great that you kind of, you know, that's maybe where humans are unique. So the way I've been using AI is I'll come up with kind of an idea and then I'll throw it to the AI and it will kind of evolve it a little bit. So I think this back and forth is interesting. And then the other thing I also, we're not there yet, or at least I haven't seen great examples of it. A lot of the way AI works today is one-on-one.

36:12Yeah. And we haven't really seen great examples where you embed an AI in a team. That hasn't, like even at Blue Tulip Ventures, we have, we've implemented an AI chief of staff. We call her Blue.

36:29And it's interesting. It's very productive. I can assign tons of tasks. but it's not really integrated with our other team members yet. And I haven't quite figured that out. I've seen a few examples. And there are companies that are sort of embedding agents in teams and trying to break bottlenecks, trying to create relationships between people that could solve a problem. That, I think, would be extremely useful, especially in large companies where someone may not know that the solution to their problem is someone in the company that they didn't even know existed, but the AI can see that, that might be something that's really, really interesting.

37:14I know that a lot of people are starting to use AI as companions, you know, and thinking about relational AI and thinking about, you know, AI as a companion or a coach or a sounding board. How do we think, and we've heard a lot of the horror stories, obviously, how do we think about mental health? How do we think about the models maybe having dangers of being too flattering or too agreeable or too emotionally persuasive? And maybe focus on the flattery part, the sycophancy part. But like it indulges maybe – it doesn't push back in a moment where a good friend would say, you know what, Rana? I think it's probably not a good idea to go down that road.

38:03Rather, it may indulge in the most dangerous or sort of unproductive thought processes just because it's designed to say, oh, yeah, great idea, Rana. You think that's a concern, and how do you think we should think about that? I do think that's, like zooming way back out, the idea of an AI thought partner I love. The idea of a companion that takes the place of an actual partner or friend, that I feel very uncomfortable. Super creepy, right? Correct. But you also think about the loneliness epidemic that we live in. people are lonely and they want they want to have um yeah there is there is a problem here that needs to be solved and um having a thing that is around 24 7 that is very patient with you that makes you feel like you're awesome all the time there's the value proposition there right yeah i i uh yeah i re-watched the movie her yeah uh yeah it's uh it's how it's we're in it right I couldn't believe that this was 2013, this movie, and Spike Jonze wrote it a couple of years before that, you know, and I was like, wow, this is prescient beyond prescience.

39:24Yeah. Very highly recommend rewatching or watching for the first time that movie if you've never if you've never seen it. I did. Can I can I? Yeah, please. Yeah. Personal example. 100 % I on the kind of the it's always sycophantic I was asking ChatGPT a few days ago I wanted to reach out to my my ex-boyfriend or this is very TMI by the way is this being live stream okay this is great yes and I was like oh you know I saw this like Mel Robbins whatever whatever and you're supposed to like mail an actual letter which I haven't done in like a bazillion years and I was like I drafted a letter I uploaded the letter to ChatGPT and I was like I'm going to send this.

40:07I'm going to mail this today. Do you think this is a good idea? Thinking, of course, it's going to, it's right. By definition, it's going to say amazing. Go for it. It was so, it was the clearest time ever that ChatGPT was like, no way. Do not send this email, this mail. What was the reason? Was it give a reason? Yeah. Oh my God. It was like a whole essay on like why it's a bad idea. So I didn't. I was like, you're supposed to be sycophantic. Like, what? In my mind, I was like, it must be a really, really, really, really bad idea then. If even chat GPT. I'm curious, did it deliver the don't do that advice in a sycophantic way saying, oh, you're better than this.

40:47Like, you should. I will go back, but I don't think so. It was very clear. Anyway, there you go. Along the lines of mental health, like physical health and science is a domain where I think when people ask me, like, what are some of the like moonshot amazing things that might happen? The first thing that jumps to my mind is like in the health space. And so where do you expect AI to have the most meaningful impact in health and science? Is it like diagnosis? Is it drug development? Is it patient engagement, administrative stuff like you were talking about? Is it care delivery or what areas of health?

41:28I'm most excited. I think all of these are really amazing. But I'm most excited around personalized medicine and medicine 3.0. So this idea, what I call the trifecta of sensors, data, and then both predictive and generative AI. You bring all of that together and you allow people to be CEOs of their own health. And I'm really excited for that. Again, I wear all sorts of sensors, but I wish, for example, if anybody here is building a kind of a wearable, continuous hormonal tracker, that would be amazing. So I feel like, and also there's always academic research coming out of medicine that is not always incorporated into what your doctor knows, but it could very well be incorporated into an AI.

42:18if you think about functional medicine which is based in this idea of integrated like your body systems are actually really functioning together it's an it's one integrated system but today's medicine kind of thinks about them in um but not not not not like in an integrated way um so i think there's a big opportunity there i'm i'm super excited i love this concept of being like your own health CEO, your own body's CEO. That's pretty interesting as well. Given your experience as a founder and now as an investor through Blue Tulip, I want to know what you look for in founders because I'm sure you see a lot of deal flow.

43:05Of course, you've got the ideas on one side, but then on the other side, you've got the actual founder and assuming for a minute that this founder is not an AI, what do you look for in a founder that sort of like strike? What's important? Conviction that they really, really care and are passionate about the problem that they're solving because the path is not going to be easy. But if they're committed to this problem, I think that's important. I look for a combination of having, this is specifically our font's thesis. We look for defensible IP, the IP and defensible moats. So whether that's in the algorithm or data or partnerships, like whatever form it takes, I want to see evidence that the founder has the depth, technical depth, but also domain expertise.

44:04So if they're in the health space, even if they don't have the domain expertise themselves, I want to see evidence that they're going to bring that expertise on board. And in this kind of, because things are moving so fast, I look for founders that are coachable. And I also look for founders that are kind of like founder-led sales. They're really immersed in the sales process. They're like very close to the product and very close to the customer. Yeah. But how about you? I'm curious. That's funny you say that. Sometimes I like it when I ask for a deck and the founder says, I've been too busy to write a deck.

44:43I'm actually like building and selling the product. That's something that always resonates with me. obviously moats are key for us. We have a whole hierarchy of different types of moats that we look for, which in this day and age is more important than in any other investing vintage for those investors out there. You know, the horror stories of a feature release destroying entire swaths of startups in one release is probably the most important and easiest sort of first pothole for an investor to know how to avoid. Because, I mean, that will do significant damage to your portfolio if you're not avoiding that at every cost.

45:35Yeah. The longevity of the, you can be defensible today, but how long will that last? Exactly. Exactly. You know, and I think that I like I like a founder that is really willing to go deep into the actual thing that they're building. I kind of appreciate founders that are on the product side, that know the product that they're building rather than just being a CEO and, oh, let me get my product team in to tell you about the product. That is always a bit of a red flag for me. I like that. But there's a lot of different variation in founders. And I think you have to also embrace that not every founder is going to be like the next.

46:24I mean, there's a lot of paths to success, a lot of different personalities that can succeed as founders. I think one of the things that is really fascinating, and we can also take that offline, I'd love your view on it. We're seeing a lot of, especially through MIT, right, through the MIT network, like really young founders with zero business experience who are, you know, wicked smart, but they don't really know how businesses work, right? And so we're kind of trying, you know, versus, you know, folks who are on their third company or their fifth company or whatnot, and they've seen it all. So that's been kind of interesting.

47:04Like how much value do we put on, you know, some of the answers can be naive. They haven't really sold a product before. And we're like, it's not going to work quite that way. Well, that's where the coachability, I think, comes in, especially for those young founders. And I feel like, you know, for every third, you know, time out, 3x founder, that person was also a 1x founder at one point, right? So, like, seeing those people early on and understanding what they might be, I think, is part of our job as investors. So one thing as sort of students of the history of technological revolutions we know is that this is not a technical or technological revolution.

47:47It's a socio-technical, socio-economic revolution. We also know that success in these moments requires for every 1x invested in the technology, there's like a 7 to 10x investment in complements to the technology that are non-technical, that are organizational, that are what we might term intangible investments. So like business process reengineering, training, incentive redesign, performance evaluation redesign, and so on. And I'm wondering, of that type of thing, what advice would you give to CEOs about those types of intangible investments? What should they be focusing on to unlock the value of AI in their organization?

48:36Definitely the mindset matters, right? A mindset, I always tell companies we work with, like, have a mindset of exploration, even playfulness, right? Like try new things, even if they don't work, it's okay. Create a safe space for your teams to embrace these new tools and, yeah, experiment. So I think that's important. An exponential mindset is important, right? Like how to really completely reimagine some of the, you know, some of the ways you do work today. I think that's important. and then a commitment to re-skilling your team. I think that's important too. Yeah, that exponential piece is really hard.

49:23Humans are so bad at nonlinear thinking. And that's something that somehow we're going to have to get really good at because the scale of the nonlinearity of this particular revolution is I think the most challenging part of it. So like, for example, in the past, we've seen labor market disruptions for technological change, but we've had time to redesign our organizations and processes and even reskill folks and re-educate and so on. This is happening so fast that that shortened and compressed opportunity window makes it very challenging to do all of those things. And that's because of the exponential nature of this change.

50:00I think that's a big challenge. All right. I want to end on this last question because we're out of time. When you think about the sort of future as it relates to AI, what's the one thing that scares you the most? What's the one thing that gives you the most hope? And on balance, are you more worried or hopeful? The thing that scares me the most is AI's impact on the fabric of our society and back to human relationships. So I worry about that the most and our mental health, Right. And the thing that excites me the most, I really think there's an opportunity for AI to make us better versions of ourselves.

50:42I really think so. And I'm excited in whatever version and form that takes, whether it's healthier, happier, more connected, more productive. And we are in a biased room. I'm more hopeful than worried because I feel I have agency. I feel I can, by the conversations I have on my podcast and who I have on the podcast and also where I decide to invest, I feel like I have agency. And I think we all have agency in how we shape it. That's a great way to end. Rana El-Khaliubi, thank you very much for a fascinating conversation. Thank you.

51:58Thank you.

From the publisher

The rhetoric around AI tends to swing between doomerism and idealism, but the reality is much more nuanced. In this special live episode, Pioneers of AI turns the tables; MIT Sloan professor Sinan Aral interviews host Rana el Kaliouby and gets her candid perspective on the current state of AI. Dr. el Kaliouby makes the case for  human-centric artificial intelligence that augments humans, rather than replace them. She also speaks frankly on the risks of a male dominated startup landscape, defends why AI needs EQ, and shares a piece of uncharacteristically critical advice she received from ChatGPT. 

Learn more about Pioneers of AI: http://pioneersof.ai/

Follow Pioneers of AI on all channels: https://linktr.ee/pioneersofai

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

More from Pioneers of AI

All 125 episodes
ChatGPT doesn’t want you to email your exPioneers of AI · 48 min
Listen in VO