In short
Odyssey CEO Oliver Cameron explains “world models” as AI trained on visual/video observations to simulate reality (physics, dynamics, cause/effect, human behavior), arguing they’re the next frontier beyond language models. He claims world models will enable more capable physical AI for robotics, driverless cars, education, healthcare, gaming, defense, and energy, with a “trillion-dollar” TAM. He cites $3B+ venture investment in world model startups in H1 2026 and rising research mentions in 2025–2026.
Key claims
language is lossy/bias; world models learn the “language of the world” (lighting/materials/physics) and need fewer task examples (e.g., 10 vs 1,000 coffee-cup pickups). For driving, he contrasts training on thousands of hours vs humans learning from ~30 hours, proposing ~10 hours of demonstrations.
Notable examples
counterfactual data (avoid GTA driving videos), driverless cars, and education “Einstein in your pocket” that adapts to body language.
Guests
Oliver Cameron, co-founder and CEO of Odyssey (ex–Voyage; previously at Udacity; Voyage sold to Cruise).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroduction to World Models
1:00 to 2:34
Discussion on the evolution of AI with a focus on world models.
“and the bottom line, how they navigate uncertainty, pressure, and high-stakes moments.”
Interview with Oliver Cameron
2:34 to 4:04
Oliver Cameron discusses his company Odyssey and the significance of world models.
“Oliver and I are diving into the trillion-dollar opportunity behind world models, why it's the next frontier of AI, and some of the applications that world models unlock.”
Exploring World Models' Potential
4:04 to 6:00
Understanding how world models can simulate reality beyond language models.
“So a few years ago, the chat GPT moment, right?”
World Models vs AGI
6:00 to 8:08
The relationship and differences between world models and artificial general intelligence.
“And so that model to me is effectively learning about reality.”
Investment Trends in World Models
8:08 to 11:28
Discussing the surge in investment and research surrounding world models.
“just in the first half of 2026 alone, venture investors have invested over$3 billion into world model startups.”
The Role of World Models in Robotics
11:28 to 14:00
How world models can enhance robotic capabilities and learning efficiency.
“or it doesn't understand that with the lighting that's going on here, that this is plastic, not glass or a mug.”
The Potential of World Models
14:00 to 17:11
Explore how world models enhance interaction with the physical world and their applications.
“And we believe that world models can accomplish something similar, where instead of self-driving models, we throw hundreds of thousands of hours.”
The Journey to Voyage
17:11 to 20:16
Learn about the speaker's transition from education to the self-driving car industry.
“Find Masters of Scale on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever else you get podcasts.”
Founding Odyssey
20:16 to 22:16
Understand the conception of Odyssey and its foundational technology insights.
“I love the advice, do the hardest thing first.”
Applications of World Models
22:16 to 24:45
Discover the potential applications of world models across various industries.
“and we met to go for a ride in a cruise vehicle around San Francisco, fully driverless at the time.”
Show all 17 chapters
Prioritizing Industries for Exploration
24:45 to 26:17
Learn how the company approaches industry exploration for world models.
“and it's continuously generating simulations that are responding to your body language.”
The Future of World Models
26:17 to 27:58
Discuss the anticipated breakthrough moment for world models and their capabilities.
“I've heard you say that we are in the equivalent of the GPT-2 moment in world models.”
Building a World Model
27:58 to 28:12
Gain insights into the components required to build an effective world model.
Building World Models: Components and Data Sources
28:12 to 32:11
Learn about the essential components of building world models and the types of data required.
“This is the part of the interview that I'm actually most excited about.”
The Role of Compute in World Models
32:11 to 35:15
Discover why access to compute is a key competitive advantage in developing world models.
“These models are autoregressive like a language model.”
Guardrails and Safeguards in AI
35:15 to 40:14
Understand the importance of guardrails in world models and how they can be implemented.
“Because that is your thesis actually is that access to compute is a key competitive advantage as you're building these world models.”
Future Impact of World Models
40:14 to 41:27
Explore the potential breakthroughs and applications of world models in various fields.
“And we're investigating, exploring both.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hey, folks, Jeff Berman here, co-host of Masters of Scale. I am thrilled to share some of the new names who will be joining us at this year's Masters of Scale Summit. They are the leaders driving the most pressing conversations in AI. Replit founder and CEO Amjad Massad, Cloudflare's Matthew Prince, Signal president Meredith Whitaker, and many, many more who will take the stage this October 20th through 22nd in San Francisco. We want you there with us, too. Join us at mastersofscale.com slash pioneers. That's mastersofscale.com slash pioneers.
1:00and the bottom line, how they navigate uncertainty, pressure, and high-stakes moments. I'm Bob Safian, former editor-in-chief of Fast Company, and I'll be your host as each episode breaks down what you need to know right now. You can find Rapid Response wherever you get your podcasts.
1:31Gaming data, in particular for world models, really includes so much interesting interactions that these models can learn effectively from. Companies are paying people to play games. Don't tell my son that. If you think about driving, you can have lots of actual dash cam videos of people driving real cars, but you can also have video game examples. And we don't want the model to learn from people driving a GTA, right? In World Models, I think the company that will win is the company that's most willing to explore all the applications. Driverless cars, as much as robotics, as much as gaming, as defense, as healthcare, all these other industries.
2:13Even energy. In the first half of 2026, investors have poured over$3 billion into the next frontier of AI. World Models. Companies like Google DeepMind, NVIDIA, Fei-Fei Li's World Labs, Yanma Kun's Ami Labs, and Odyssey are all building in this space. Today, I'm speaking with Oliver Cameron, a co-founder and CEO of Odyssey, on why world models are so hot right now. Oliver and I are diving into the trillion-dollar opportunity behind world models, why it's the next frontier of AI, and some of the applications that world models unlock. Everything from robotics to education and healthcare. I'm Rana El-Khalyubi, and this is Pioneers of AI, a podcast taking you behind the scenes of the AI revolution.
3:11Oliver, welcome to Pioneers of AI. I'm so excited to have you on the show. Thank you for having me. It's great to be here. I have to ask you, the name of the company is in the news right now. because of the movie, Odyssey. Did you take the whole team out to see the movie? We did. We rented a theater, yes. Oh my God, that's awesome. We actually named the company originally after 2001, A Space Odyssey. And this sort of pioneering movie of sci-fi, the future, new technologies. And so it's cool, I guess, to see sort of another version of that. Yeah, yeah. So before we dive in, I want to disclose that I'm an investor in your company, Odyssey, through my fund, Blue Tulip Ventures.
3:56And in June, you raised$310 million for your Series B round at a$1.45 billion valuation, which is amazing. Congratulations. Thank you so much. Yeah, amazing. So I want to set the stage. So a few years ago, the chat GPT moment, right? We saw large language models become mainstream and ubiquitous. And it's this idea that you can synthesize large amounts of text, images, maybe voice, even video to generate stuff. Right. And that is kind of what is really magical about large language models. But there's been an evolution in this frontier. And the next frontier of AI is world models. I would love your definition of world models and also like why now and why should we care?
4:40Absolutely. I think you nailed it with language models. They really ingest so much language that they deeply understand language and then can simulate language. But importantly, language is a representation of the world that is lossy and is biased. Right. We've written down things for thousands of years. It's our opinions, our thoughts. and there is so much information that is lost when we are transcribing our thoughts or our observations into text. And so although language models are these incredible intelligences, we think we can go further. And to go further, really what we want to train a model to do is to understand and simulate the world.
5:28And how do you do that? Well, instead of training it on lots of text. We instead train it on lots of visual observations of the world. Everything that you could possibly ever imagine happening in the world is represented as a video that the model is learning from. And that model, after it watches enough videos, deeply understands physics, dynamics, cause and effect, humans, our behaviors, how we work together, and all of these things that you just don't really necessarily synthesize in text. And so that model to me is effectively learning about reality. And so I feel that model will just be more powerful and will be this leap of intelligence that is difficult to comprehend.
6:16Yeah. You know, I'm actually more excited about the idea of world models and all of the applications that it can unlock. I'm more passionate about that than the vision or the mission of getting to artificial general intelligence. I'm curious, how do you think about AGI versus world models? And are they the same in your brain or are they different? I think it's likely that world models play a key role in enabling a superintelligence. And here's how I think this plays out. One of the applications who are very excited about world models is as learning environments for other AIs. Because, I mean, just to use our own analogy, we live in this world, we live in this universe, and we have all these agents, all these humans existing within it.
7:05And the world is constantly trying to kill us, right? Or has done since we became human. And we adapt, right? We learn not to die, and we learn to improve our world, to make it safer, to make it better, to make it more plentiful. I think that the analogy for a world model is that you have these worlds that a world model can provide, these infinite simulations of all these different worlds. Agents can exist and learn within those worlds. And they learn things by being exposed to that world. And interestingly, also, they also push the world itself to be better. And so I think to answer your question about superintelligence, it's very likely that a superintelligence is learning inside a world model.
7:54The world model itself may or may not be a superintelligence, but I think it will play a key role in enabling an intelligence to exist. Yeah. So world models are very hot right now. Well, just in the first half of 2026 alone, venture investors have invested over$3 billion into world model startups. And I'll just give a few examples. Obviously, Odyssey raised$310 million. Ami Labs, Suyan LeCun's company raised a billion dollars. Fei Fei Li, World Labs raised a billion dollars. And even Runway, which is a generative AI video startup, they've kind of just pivoted to build a world model. Why is there an urgency to build and invest in world models right now?
8:38I think it's two parts. So the first part is that it just presents something that feels distinct and really encouraging beyond language models. We could, I guess, just, or in the venture community decide language models are it, funnel every dollar into that industry. I don't think the venture industry works that way, right? Thankfully, it basically says there's other possible intelligences, other approaches. Let's also fund them and world models, I believe, are there. So that's one aspect. I think the second aspect is you just have to look at where the talent is headed. I posted a chart to our Slack today, actually, of the frequency of mention of the term world model in published papers.
9:28And you see this incredibly steep rise in 2025 and 2026 of just the number of mentions of world models across publications. And that shows you that researchers are just increasingly spending their time on this thing, world models. And so I think the money is following the talent. I also think it dovetails nicely with the excitement in robotics. We're seeing, of course, just so much maturation in robotics hardware and... More generalized robots, I guess. Exactly. Humanoids of all different types and different new types of robots. And it then becomes quite clear that those robots need to become intelligent.
10:13And thus, how do you do that will model presenter a very interesting path. Can you clarify for us, like why does physical AI, for example, a humanoid robot need a world model as opposed to just operate on a large language model? Yes. Let's imagine we're a robot here. So I've got a coffee cup here and we need to grasp the coffee cup, pick up the coffee cup, place the coffee cup somewhere else. And all of those things can be described in text, right? You can type in, pick up the coffee cup and all sorts of different things. But there is just a translation that occurs between the language model and the physical actuation that goes on.
10:57And that translation in some cases is fine. Like it just works and it works fine. You'd never notice. But our belief is that in lots of cases, it doesn't And it won't because there is just a loss of information that happens between the language model thinking in text and then actually interacting with the physical world. And that can result in task success not being great, meaning it drops the cup. It doesn't understand from looking at the cup that there is no top on the cup and that it should be more careful about picking up the cup. or it doesn't understand that with the lighting that's going on here, that this is plastic, not glass or a mug.
11:41And so a world model you can think of as effectively learning the language of the world. It doesn't speak English. It speaks physics. It speaks dynamics. It speaks lighting and all of these different things. And so it will just theoretically still today, we're having to prove this, but still we believe will be a better performant version of this. Other evidence that points to this is that we hear this all the time that we need data. Like robotics is bottlenecked on data. So you want your robot to pick up coffee cups all the time. You need to show it lots of examples of coffee cups being picked up.
12:22And if you think about trying to make a general purpose robot where you need to show tons of examples of a thing doing a thing, that really doesn't feel that scalable, right? You're having to collect lots of examples, do it here, here, here. You hear from this user, okay, now more here. Then all of a sudden you're just scurrying around collecting all these tasks. And there's been evidence that shows a world model can adapt to a task with dramatically fewer examples necessary. Meaning you don't need to show it a thousand coffee cup pickups. You just need to show it 10. Because it understands like the physics involved in doing this action.
12:57Another example of this that is something we've been working on at Odyssey, which is near and dear to our hearts, is driverless cars. So that was my beginning. I spent eight years building driverless cars. And the paradigm of driverless cars still today was that you train models on thousands, maybe even tens of thousands of hours of driving. You show lots of examples of cars moving, and it thus learns to drive. and this is very different than how humans learn right when we go to learn at maybe the age of 17 we get behind the wheel for the first time we don't sit in front of a television and watch thousands of hours of people driving what we do is instead say i've watched my parents drive for a long time i know which side of the road to drive on i know that crashing a car is a really bad thing.
13:50I know I should be cautious. And so we get to learn to drive very quickly. It takes us less than 30 hours of training to actually be behind the wheel of a two-ton tank, effectively. And we believe that world models can accomplish something similar, where instead of self-driving models, we throw hundreds of thousands of hours. You can instead just show 10 hours of driving demonstrations to a general world model. And it's already learned all of these concepts of physics and not to bump into things and what side of the road to drive on. And it just applies that knowledge. And so, long story short, world models should be more adept at interacting with the world.
14:27Amazing. So, actually, I do want to go to your origin story a bit. So, you and I overlapped a little bit in the automotive industry. When I was running Affectiva, we were building machine learning models that understand human behavior. And one of the applications, it turns out, was in the automotive industry to understand, initially, driver distraction and drowsiness. But then eventually we expanded that to in-cabin monitoring, and the application was semi-autonomous and fully autonomous vehicles where you want to understand what's happening inside the vehicle. Before Odyssey, you started a company called Voyage that was building self-driving cars, and you sold that to Cruise.
15:02I would love to hear a little bit about your experience doing that. Like what got you into self-driving in the first place? Especially that before that you were at Udacity and you were in the education space. So what's the arc here? Exactly. So really, it's one guy that I got to work with, a guy called Sebastian Thrun. He was the founder of Udacity, and Udacity taught online concepts like machine learning, robotics, self-driving cars, all these crazy things that were locked up in academia could now be suddenly taught to everyone on the planet. You know, I did a computer vision class for Udacity, which was awesome.
15:39I do remember that, yes. Yeah. And so one day we decided, hey, wouldn't it be cool if we taught people how to build a self-driving car? That seems fun. That seems futuristic. Let's build a class. And this was early 2015. And so we built this class and we actually built a open source self-driving car at the time because we wanted people to have this space to build on. And in fact, we had wanted students to be able to run code on a car in the real world, which was crazy to think about. Ambitious. It was the safety concerns, let's say, but we solved those and it was great. And that to me felt like after working in machine learning for lots of different things, it felt like the most magical form of machine learning I'd seen.
16:23that we could have machines, save lives, interact in the most complex places on the planet. And that felt incredible. And so in 2016, started Voyage, my self-driving car startup. And our goal really was to build state-of-the-art driverless vehicles and to find places where the state-of-the-art worked already and to have an impact. And so we focused on deployments in places like retirement communities, military bases, These sorts of slower walks of life where you can go from A to B without the crazy traffic of San Francisco. We built that company up over five years. It's an incredible experience.
17:04And then ultimately sold that company to Cruise. Spent two and a half years there scaling driverless systems. I'll be back with more of my conversation with Oliver after this break.
17:53We'll see you next time. who've changed the game. It's anything but business as usual. Find Masters of Scale on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, or wherever else you get podcasts.
18:11One of my key learnings from starting Affectiva was the importance of getting the timing right. We were so early, like when we were building like emotion recognition technology and emotion AI, it was like, before smartphones existed. And now there's a lot more companies building in this space. When you started Voyage, did you expect that we would now be like all in driverless cars? Did you get the timing right? I think both yes and no. So on the first question, I did think it would proliferate faster. but I can go outside my house today, call a Waymo, travel 50 miles north fully autonomously, get back home.
18:59It's amazing. And so I think the question of Voyage being too early or not, I think my reflection was that the self-driving industry isn't one where you can start a company very easily. And so that just hasn't even definitely today, that just isn't many, if any, self-driving car startups started, right? So it's kind of hard to say, like, did we pick the right time or not? I think my lesson learned from Voyage was that in artificial intelligence, I think it's counter to most intuition for other companies, which is you need to simply do the hardest thing first. I think mostly in company building, you try and find a relatively simple thing to do first, and then you build upon that and build upon that all the way to the most complex thing.
19:48And I think my lesson learned was that the companies that were solving San Francisco and self-driving like Cruise, they were in fact going to get to driverless anywhere faster because they focused initially on San Francisco, not slower. And that was really our whole thesis. And so that took, you know, a lot of courage to admit, but it really felt like that at the tail end. And so I do carry that over into Odyssey. I love the advice, do the hardest thing first. How did your experience at Voyage and Cruise kind of inform your decision to start Odyssey? And I just like as a kind of a former entrepreneur, I guess, I'm always curious, did the idea come about while you were at Cruise?
20:37Or did you take a sabbatical and then the idea came about? Like, how did that all transpire? Absolutely. So the technological insight in self-driving, the paradigm was that you had these different models to do different tasks. So you had a perception model to perceive the world. You had a planning model to plan the path through the world. And then you had what we call prediction models. Sounds very generic, I know. But really what a prediction model did was say, I have a visual observation of the world, the camera. I'm going to predict what the world looks like in five, maybe seven seconds. And I was always in.
21:18Like if it saw like somebody walking across the street, it's going to predict that this person's going to get in front of the car in the next few seconds. Something like that. Exactly that. Yes. And that goes for cars turning, merging into your lane. basically what behaviors are they exhibiting that you can use to predict what they might do next and I always felt that this was magic the idea that we're time traveling into the future albeit five seconds and that these models tend to be right that they tend to predict correctly what is going to happen and I felt that was magic and so really the origin of Odyssey was was that it was that if you can predict a possible future of the world, that seems really powerful.
22:06That should apply to lots of different industries, enable new applications. Let's go build general, what we now call world models. So that was the origin. And how it came about really was I was at Cruise and met someone that was the first researcher at Wave, another self-driving car company. and we met to go for a ride in a cruise vehicle around San Francisco, fully driverless at the time. And we just threw around different ideas and that was the one that we both came to and a few months went by, we started throwing around more details of the idea and then we decided to start a company. Yeah, that's amazing.
22:46World models have tons of applications. What is the total addressable market? What's a TAM for world models? Yeah, so I think it's, easily in the trillions. And I think what you have to do to believe that is to basically say that they are going to be integral to robotics. And at some point in the next 10 years, we're going to see upwards of hundreds of millions, maybe a billion robots that start to be in our daily lives in many different ways. And that world models will play a key role in that. I also believe that you can see world models playing more fundamental roles in science and will discover things that will lead to whether it's drug discovery or material science and that world models should take a piece of those discoveries.
23:41And then industries like education, gaming, healthcare. Can you kind of give us examples? Like what could the application of a world model look like in the education space? So in education, my belief is that there's no reason every kid and adult shouldn't have Einstein in their pocket that is a natural teacher of whatever that person wants to learn. And you might ask, well, can't language models do this today? And the truth is they can produce text that sort of resembles Einstein. But a great teacher, from my perspective, is one that's looking you in the eye that is able to understand if you're getting the concept that they're teaching.
24:27If you're not getting it based on your body language, they change what they're saying and then your body language changes and then hopefully you get the concept, right? That is so near and dear to my heart, as you would expect, because I spent years, right? Like looking at these emotion signals. Yeah. And a world model could do that, right? Precisely. Like a world model can have an input of video and that video is you as you currently are. and it's continuously generating simulations that are responding to your body language. And it just simply has the knowledge of body language and pre-training to better react to it and to become a better teacher.
25:07Because world models can unlock so many applications, how are you prioritizing what industries to go after? Yeah, we have a somewhat unique take on this, I think. So So in world models, I think the company that will win is the company that's most willing to explore all the applications. And I think, again, that kind of goes counter to what lots of early stage companies do, which is to focus, focus, focus on one thing, two things maybe. And we're quite intentional about saying, no, we're going to go very uncomfortably broad. We're going to explore driverless cars as much as robotics, as much as gaming, as defense, as healthcare, as all these other industries.
25:44even energy. And so that necessitates, I think, building both a culture, but also a team that is capable of doing that breadth of exploration. And so that's quite intentional. And I think it all leads back to this is a foundation model. Ultimately, it's a model that can help all these different industries, do more. And we need to be the company that has explored the best, most interesting applications. I've heard you say that we are in the equivalent of the GPT-2 moment in world models. When do you think we're going to kind of see the chat GPT moment, right, of world models? And where are we on the spectrum of doing basic research to actually getting closer to commercialization?
26:36You know, my mind has changed on this. So I think this chat GBT moment will look like one world model that can drive a car, fly a drone, control a robot, generate a game, teach your kids the ABCs. If one world model can do all of those tasks, then that is a hugely monumental moment i feel and that is a gbt3-esque moment and so that's what we're running towards and it may not feel like the chap gbt moment i think also that's difficult it's like trying to you know sort of replicate the iphone moment uh in some ways right it's just a relatively unique time but i think in terms of its uh importance i think what I described that one model to do all those things, that would be more than equivalent at that moment.
27:31And do you think we're close? I'm not going to hold you to a time. I do. I really think it's very close. And I think in some part, it is even closer than I thought. I'll be right back. But first, a quick break.
28:12This is the part of the interview that I'm actually most excited about. I would love for you to take us behind the scenes and help us unpack what does it take to build a world model. And in my mind, the way I think about it, if you're building any type of AI, there's three components. There's the data, there's the algorithm, and there's the compute. So let's start with data. What type of data is needed to train a world model? So there are a few sources of data. We can think of this as a big pyramid. At the very base of the pyramid is internet video. On the internet, there is boundless volumes of video that describe everything you could possibly imagine about the world.
28:55And it's growing faster than text on the internet, for example, and it's evergreen. It's just continuously updating every day. And so that to us is the bitter lesson, this term that's thrown around a lot in artificial intelligence, where simply go to the best, most fast-growing data source you can for the task that you want. And internet video is the base of the pyramid. Can I ask you a question on that? Sure. Because you've got YouTube videos of people driving cars and whatnot, but you've also got TikTok videos of people on vacation saying, hey, this is me and like whatever. Are these all useful videos or are you looking for specific types of videos?
Read the full transcript
29:38I think it's hard for me or a human to say what's useful to these models. We think of this as a science challenge, meaning you've got this very large set of data that you could train with. What filtering should you put in place to then ultimately decide in your final data set? And yes, what we learn from and find interesting is totally different to a model. For example, if you think about the task of driving, you can have lots of actual dash cam videos of people driving real cars, but you can also have GTA or Forza and video game examples. And we don't want the model in the task of driving a real car to learn from people driving a GTA, right?
30:19But we do want it to learn from people driving safely on the highways or whatever. And so a way to think of this is the model needs both the thing, the task it's going to do, but it also needs counterfactuals. It needs to know what not to do. And so we simply have to treat it as a science problem, make sure the data set is balanced, make sure it's got every exposure we need to these things. And then we simply measure the model that results to see if it's accomplishing the tasks we want better and better, find more of that data and so on. And so base layer, lots of internet video. And then we go up a layer and we think of this then as expert data, things that we're going to acquire from different data companies.
31:03So one layer of that is robotics data. We need manipulation data. We need lots of different form factors of robots, things like that. Then the next layer up is gaming data. We very much believe that gaming data encodes lots of interesting human behaviors and human interactions. And then at the very, very top of that might look like literal video that is incredibly targeted at the specific application. Maybe, I don't know, I'm making this up right now, but you need a doctor talking about a specific topic. So you'd literally go and find a company that will go pay a doctor to go say those things on camera.
31:38And then that goes at the very top of your pyramid. You now have this data set that really, if you were to lay out somehow and zoom out, you would say everything about the world is included here. Every observation you would ever want to know about how physics work, about how the world works, it's just right there in front of you. And then you train the model on that data set. And it was a good time to talk about the architecture. So these models today, the state of the art, they're what's known as autoregressive diffusion transformers, or ARDITs. These models are autoregressive like a language model.
32:19They can't see the future. All they can see is the past and the current state to then predict the next state. And it turns out diffusion is this extraordinary way of doing that to represent really realistic pixels. And then transformers are just this very general learner, right? They can represent concepts at incredible depth and just learn from data of many types. So you bunch all of that together. You have an ARDIT, an autoregressive diffusion transformer. You train it through multiple steps of training or phases of training. Yeah. I am seeing kind of a pattern where world models and physical AI is spurring a whole economy where literally like companies are strapping cameras on hotel workers and like, right?
33:03Like if you want to train a robot to fold laundry, then you want lots of examples of a human, you know, lots of examples of a human doing that. So are you partnered with companies doing that? Do you have a team like going around like with cameras collecting data? Like how are you doing this? You mentioned this topic earlier, how do you know if you're too early? And I think this is a great example of where it feels like we're in the right time, right place, because there is this series of tailwinds that is moving as faster. I mentioned at the very beginning, the volume of world model research is spiking like this.
33:40Internet video growing faster and faster is another. And then this is another, which is that there are so many marketplaces now that have sprung up in the last 12 months that will find you and sell you any data that you could possibly imagine. And they'll do it really fast. Give us examples. I mean, you mentioned some of the best ones. The idea that we could have literal insight into factory lines in lots of countries around the world of humans putting things together, disassembling things, assembling things. And that we could have data sets that represent just that is incredible. And it goes to cleaning tasks or it goes to stocking shelves or stacking shelves, things like that.
34:29There's just tons of examples of these marketplaces solving data gaps that exist. Another that I think has become increasingly prominent is gaming. It just so turns out that gaming data, in particular for world models, really includes so much interesting interactions that these models can learn effectively from. And so what you have really now are companies that are paying people to play games. Don't tell my son that. It will become an industry. It already has. And so I think if those companies weren't to exist and we had to do all of that ourselves, that is a major investment we'd have to make that now we don't.
35:13Fascinating. Okay, let's talk about compute. Yes. Because that is your thesis actually is that access to compute is a key competitive advantage as you're building these world models. Say more about that. Yes, this is also where my mind has shifted over time. I think if you were to go back six months ago, the availability of compute was there and the alarm bells weren't ringing. There were still shortages, but like if you knew where to go, you could get your hands on it. And world models are obviously very compute intensive, right? Right. Both in training and inference. Exactly. Yes. In particular inference today, at least much more intensive.
35:52And I think then a thing happened, which was OpenAI raised$120 billion and Anthropic raised probably very similar amounts in aggregate. And then all of a sudden the alarm bells started ringing that these companies were simply buying up every possible amount of compute that they could from every provider and deals that could be done are now not happening. And so, in fact, during our fundraise, we treated this as the problem to solve. And so in this fundraise, we welcomed AMD and Amazon as investors and we welcomed NVIDIA. And we signed pretty significant compute deals as a part of this fundraise to ensure that we're not held back by any means on compute.
36:38But I think of it absolutely as a strategic advantage to have access to the compute that we do. And it's important we don't rest on that. Absolutely. Yeah. I would love for you to comment, like with all these other world model companies building in the space, how is Odyssey's approach different? Yes. So I see our main competitor base as almost all doing different things. And I think maybe over time we'll converge as an industry to a singular approach, but not right now. Our belief is that the biggest company that emerges from this field will have truly built a foundation world model. It is a model that can solve all of these different tasks, all of these different applications across a vast variety of industries.
37:31And so So what you learn, meaning the data set, how the model works and what it can output, are going to influence that substantially. And I don't see any other approach that is as foundational as our approach in that it's going to enable all these markets, all of these applications. How do you build the most foundational technology, the most powerful technology? And we believe our approach is the path to that. Yeah, back to like the doing the hard things first. It sounds like you're just doing the hard thing. Yes. So I want to talk a bit about guardrails. There's a lot of lessons learned from the large language model space around hallucination and how can we guard against all of that.
38:14Is there a similar kind of framework for thinking about guardrails in the world model space? There is. I think it's less mature, but this is absolutely essential because these systems are going to be operating in the physical world and that just demands much more rigor. The guardrails are tough to get right because of the real-time nature of these models. These are models that are operating in real time. And so language models have the benefit of extra latency if need be. Well, models don't get that benefit. when you've got 50 milliseconds to simulate forward in time, these safeguards become a real research challenge.
38:57And so it is an open problem. We've made some really great progress on many different topics that exist within safeguarding. One of the things I'm seeing, I would say the most encouraging progress on is harnesses of world models. This has obviously become a real performance improvement in language models. What do you mean by that? For example, in language models, the harness is clawed code and the model is clawed and the harness really sort of gives the model focus. It says, do this thing. Here's my loop to make you do this thing. And it turns out that when you give a little bit of a sense of rules to the model, it can perform better in those applications.
39:37And for example, in world models, a harness might be for driverless cars. And that harness might say, okay, world model, you're driving a car, you need to adhere to the road rules. Here's the side of the road to drive on. And hey, I'm going to also help you through different events that you might see. And hey, don't hallucinate, right? Just make sure you simply deal with the world as it is, all these kinds of things. And so I think safeguarding will happen in multiple ways, one of which is at the harness, the other is at the model layer itself. And we're investigating, exploring both. Very cool.
40:22All right, my last question. What are you most excited about for the next kind of milestone at Odyssey? And I don't know, like, what do you envision world models will unlock over the next five years? So the most exciting thing internally at Odyssey today is that single world model that can do many of those virtual and physical tasks. If a world model can drive a car, control a robot, fly a drone, generate a game, even play a game, I think that is a landmark moment and something that demonstrates the power of these models very viscerally. Very excited about that. Over the longer term, I very much believe that a model that is learning physics to the depth that these models are learning will uncover things about reality that we cannot comprehend today.
41:08It just doesn't seem unreasonable to me that a model that is observing physics and reality at the incredible extent that they are will make scientific breakthroughs. Amazing. And that those breakthroughs will lead to amazing things. And so that on the longer time horizon is what I'm very excited about too. Very cool. That's a great way to end our conversation, Oliver. Thank you so much for joining us on Pioneers of AI. Thank you, Ron. This is great. We've covered a lot of ground in this conversation, but two things resonated with me in particular. One, I love Oliver's approach to doing the hard things first.
41:48In this case, it is their ambition at Odyssey to build a foundational world model that has applicability across many industries and use cases, everything from robotics to education to healthcare. That is really cool. I'm also excited to see the equivalent of the chat GPT moment for world models and what that will look like. Thank you so much for listening. We'll be back next week with a new episode.
42:20Pioneers of AI is a Wait What original. Our executive producer is Eve Trow. This episode was produced by Megan Tan. Video editing by Eric Purcell Our senior talent executive is Stephanie Stern Mixing and mastering by Brian Pugh Original music by Ryan Holiday Our head of podcasts is Lital Moolad You can join the conversation on LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and X Just search for at Pioneers of AI
43:00Thank you.
From the publisher
In the first half of 2026 alone, investors poured $3 billion into the next frontier of AI: World Models. Google DeepMind, Fei-Fei Li’s World Labs, Yann LeCunn’s AMI labs, and Odyssey are all building in this space. In this episode, host Rana el Kaliouby speaks with the co-founder and CEO of Odyssey Oliver Cameron. They dive into the trillion dollar opportunity behind world models, why they are the next frontier of AI, and how they will be applied to a range of industries, from education to healthcare.
Learn more about Pioneers of AI: http://pioneersof.ai/
Follow Pioneers of AI on all channels: https://linktr.ee/pioneersofai
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.


