1047: Trump Goes Bananas

21:55Jon Favreau:Well, no, because they also said the meeting was canceled and then it turned out it actually just happened. Canceled at his house. Canceled at his house, yes. Well, he said he's like, It was never supposed to be a meeting at my house. Never. That was never the case without saying the truth. We also learned this week that in Ghislaine Maxwell's nine hours of testimony to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former defense lawyer, she reportedly said that Trump never did anything with Epstein in her presence that concerned her. Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted child sex trafficker, whose word you can always trust.

22:29Perjurer. And surely those comments had nothing to do with the Trump administration's decision to relocate her from a federal prison in Florida to a minimum security facility in Texas nicknamed Club Fed, a move that shocked even Bureau of Prisons employees. On Tuesday, Trump finally faced some real journalists and got a question about this from CNN's Caitlin Collins. And here's how he answered. Two questions for you. One, did you were you aware of and did you personally approve the prison transfer for Ghislaine Maxwell that your Justice Department? I didn't know about it at all. No, I read about it just like you did.

23:03Do you believe that she's credible to be listening to? Your deputy attorney general sat down with her recently. Well, he's, let me tell you, he's a very talented man. His name is Todd Blanche. He's a very legitimate person, very high, just a very highly thought of person, respected by everybody.

23:21Jon Favreau:That seemed right to you, Dan? Didn't really seem to answer the question there, at least the second part of the question. He did say at one point, like, oh, that's normal. That happens. That's a thing that happens. No, it's not a thing that happens. You don't move convicted sex offenders to minimum security facilities that are known as club fed. That just doesn't happen. No. No. No explanation. I mean, when you read through the things that have happened this week, the fact that there is some sort of potential assumed quid pro quo between the Trump administration and Glenn Maxwell for testimony that is favorable to Trump, that there is a meeting of the people in charge of the investigation to plot political strategy for one of the close associates of the child sex trafficker at the heart of this investigation.

24:10Loretta Lynch said hi to Bill Clinton on a tarmac.

24:14Jon Favreau:Yeah, we had a special counsel out of it who gave us Trump. Great. An entire fucking roadblocked coverage on Fox News. Straight news reporters, pundits, the whole thing. And mainstream outlets, too. It was the biggest scandal of those couple months. Bill Clinton saying hi to Loretta Lynch on a tarmac. I am going to keep screaming into the void about this, but we have lost all capacity as a society to put what Trump does into like a larger context. Like, I'm just going to use these sentences to describe what is happening here and just take Trump out of it. Take the words Jeffrey Epstein out of it.

24:55Jon Favreau:Just think about how the political world would react to it. The president of the United States was a longtime friend with America's most notorious child sex trafficker. It is discovered that the president is mentioned many times in the files that came from the investigation into that child sex trafficker. And now the entire federal government, including the Department of Justice, is working to do everything they possibly can to prevent the public, the media, and Congress from learning about the nature of the president's relationship with America's most notorious child sex trafficker. Including launching a criminal investigation into the president's predecessor and his administration based on absolutely nothing.

25:45Congress had to go home because they couldn't answer questions about it.

25:51Jon Favreau:Because they were so afraid to take a vote that would force disclosure of files that may once again disclose information on the president's long-term relationship with America's most notorious child sex trafficker. And now the president's personal defense attorney is potentially granting special favors to the co-conspirator of America's most notorious child sex trafficker in order to generate favorable testimony to protect the president. Who, along with the vice president, who hosted the meeting with the attorney general and the FBI director and everyone else spent the campaign that they just won voluntarily promising to release the Epstein files.

26:33Jon Favreau:Right. This is where we fall into the trap is that people want to make this about hypocrisy and broken campaign promises. It is about child sex trafficking. That's what it is. And this is a scandal. And people are going to think this is hyperbolic and nuts. I've said this a couple of times now. This is a scandal as big as Watergate and Iran-Contra. At its outset, the fundamental proposition here is a massive government conspiracy tied to covering up information about child sex trafficking. That is what is happening. Seems like a big deal to me. I mean, you know, Trump said he was worried this week about the people who might be mentioned.

27:13I'm sure he is. But aren't involved and who could be hurt by something that would be very, very unfortunate, very unfair to a lot of people. again you know let's let's take donald trump at his word here and none of those people uh that he's worried including himself about everyone else finding out about in these files uh broke any laws right so the cover-up is just trying not to embarrass a bunch of really rich and famous people including the president yes and there's a workaround still a pretty big still a pretty big scandal.

27:49Jon Favreau:And there's a workaround to that too, which is just release the mentions of Trump's name and redact other people, if that was really your concern. Also, as a note, according to reporting from ABC News, Todd Blanche asked Maxwell about 100 different people in the meeting. So I'm pretty sure if they release the transcript, they will not be redacting those names. So they're not that concerned about it. It's not that it is a speed bump on the way to trying to protect Donald Trump from any sort of political fallout from this relationship. Well, Dan, they don't have to redact all hundred names. They only have to redact the names of the people who are Donald Trump and Donald Trump's closest friends and associates.

28:26Of course. If you're a Democrat, they don't have to redact your name. I'm sure they won't. If you're just some famous person who might seem like a Democrat or maybe is a rhino Republican, they don't have to redact your name. It's just Donald Trump's name they have to redact. So our old buddy Norm Eisen has foiled records relating to the transfer decision on Ghislaine Maxwell through his group Democracy Defenders. Any chance we ever learn more about the mechanics of this?

28:50Jon Favreau:I think there's a chance we'll learn more, although I'm not sure it's through FOIA because I just don't trust that the administration that's driving a Mack truck through the first, fourth, and 14th Amendment is going to adhere to the letter of the law when it comes to the Freedom of Information Act. That seems... But there aren't like... That's where the... There's sticklers there. It does seem that a lot of people had to be involved with this decision and people seem deeply uncomfortable with it. There are quotes from Bureau of Prisons employees to reporters off the record or on background suggesting how strange this is.

29:23Jon Favreau:So I think we may discover what happened here, hopefully sooner rather than later. So the House Oversight Committee, they're getting involved too, the James Comer. He subpoenaed testimony from a bunch of high-profile Democrats and Trump detractors, including Bill and Hillary Clinton, Robert Mueller, Jeff Sessions, Eric Holder. Anyone missing from the list there who might be able to shed some light on maybe past secret deals that Jeffrey Epstein received from government officials? I mean, one person I would just mention, which I'm sure this was an oversight, is Alex Acosta, who was Trump's labor secretary, who was the U.S.

30:00Jon Favreau:attorney, who cut the very specific deal that allowed Epstein to leave prison six of the seven days a week because he was on some sort of strange work release program and served almost no time for sex offenses, child sex offenses. Well, he is very busy now on the board of Newsmax, the right-wing television station that has leaned the hardest in the direction of maybe Ghislaine Maxwell is actually good. But he also said – like there was reporting around the decision and things he said that really deserve more explanation about how it was said that he was really connected, had high up friends, which is why this deal – he was told to cut this deal.

30:45Jon Favreau:He claims he made a reference to him being connected to – like it is comments from Acosta that are the heart of the idea that Epstein was somehow connected to intelligence. Like he suggested that at some point. Israeli intelligence. Yes. And so it's like he'd be the first person on the list if you really wanted to get some answers, because had he not cut this deal, imagine all the people who would have been spared what Epstein and Maxwell did. Because it was another decade before, more than a decade before he was actually brought to justice or arrested before dying in prison. So you wrote a message box about all this Epstein stuff Thursday, about sort of why it's important to make sure that Trump doesn't distract us and move on to another, move on to the next scandal or whatever he wants to move on to.

31:39How do you think we should go about that, making sure that he doesn't distract us from this?

31:43Jon Favreau:I think we have limited, for all the reasons we said in our long diatribe about the broken media ecosystem. But I think we should just have to continue to keep the pressure up. I think when Congress comes back, that Democrats have to, at every opportunity, demand a vote, right? Use every platform they have to do it. And I think it really gets back to just focusing on the core proposition about what is happening here. And it is just – like help people understand why this is a big deal and just keep hammering at it, keep hammering at it, keep putting pressure on the press to do it. Like you can – like there is still great reporting happening on this a lot.

32:18Jon Favreau:All the things we mentioned are CNN, ABC. But you can kind of feel the – like the investigative press is working. The political press is starting to get their August wandering eye to other stories because what is really interesting to the political press – because they're not the ones like digging deep into the Bureau of Prisons to find who signed the transfer order. It was two things. One is Congress, right, with like what's happening in Congress? Like how does this affect this? They can talk to the members about it. They're out of town. But the other one is tension in the Republican base. And that tension still exists.

32:52Jon Favreau:The polling shows it still matters with voters. But some of the most prominent voices have been brought to heel by Trump. And so that takes away from the political press. But I think we need to keep making this a political story, keep talking about it, just keep putting pressure on people as much as we possibly can. Because I really do believe, and maybe I sound crazy, I think this is a massive, important scandal, that at least we need to pull every thread to get to the bottom of. like if we get through this presidency and we never know what the epstein file said about trump that would stink yeah it's just it's like it it would be a massive failure of civil society i i at least want to know before america ends you know it's like what's gonna what's gonna it's gonna happen first the end of the republic or uh releasing the epstein file it's like when a tv show gets canceled before they can bring the story to to close that's what i'm saying That's what I'm saying.

33:42I want to get to the finale. So there continues to be real-world evidence that the Epstein thing actually matters to real people. Nebraska Congressman Mike Flood made the audacious and, for a Republican, increasingly rare decision to hold an actual town hall in his district this week. Here's what it sounded like when the subject of accountability for Epstein came up. Why are you covering up the Epstein files?

34:07Jon Favreau:I am for the release of those records. All right. All right. Mike Flood, we love that. Reporters who were there said that everyone in the room, even the Republicans, were cheering for more transparency on Epstein. But on basically every other subject, things didn't go so great for Flood. Let's listen. Next slide, please. Tax on rich! Tax on rich! No taxes on overtime. Tax on rich! Tax on rich! And more than anything, I truly believe this bill protects Medicaid for the future.

34:49Jon Favreau:I can tell you we're going to see an influx of money into Nebraska hospitals. Sounds like a good time. What do you think they were chanting there at the beginning? Wasn't it tax the rich? Tax the rich. Thank you. Thank you, Austin. Thank you, Dan. I couldn't. I couldn't hear. getting old. So put on your strategist hat for a second. What were your first thoughts seeing that town hall? I think it does highlight what I believe to be probably the most under discussed story of the first seven months of Trump's presidency is that despite like obvious dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party, high disapproval ratings, polls that show that we want new leaders, that despite all of that, the grassroots anti-Trump movement is as fired up as it has been since the beginning of the Trump era in politics.

35:40Jon Favreau:So you saw this with the No Kings rally. We've seen this in other town halls have happened. People are much more fired up. The resistance was a big story in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. The press doesn't cover anymore. It doesn't get attention, but it does exist. It is real, and people are fired up about what is happening. And just pretty fired up about the Republican budget bill and the cuts to Medicaid and the tax cuts for the rich. And I think that can drive a lot of good political outcomes in 2026. And to be clear, the people I was talking about earlier who are turning away, it's not the resistance, it's the normies, right?

36:19And I think that you're going to need to bring in some of the normies into the anti-Trump resistance movement, who we didn't have before just because the level of danger right now is so much higher than it ever has been that I think you're going to need a bigger movement than we've ever had before. But you're absolutely right that I think the energy and again, we're not hearing about this energy as much. We're not seeing it as much because all of our information channels are broken. But it's it was good to know that it's certainly there because, you know, they're like, oh, it's Democrats that showed up.

36:51Like, great. I don't care who shows up. It's a random guy in Lincoln, Nebraska. A random congressman decides to hold a town hall and it gets packed like line, Annie Carney of the New York Times was there. So like lines out the door around the building, like it was a presidential campaign of people trying to get in. So whether that's, you know, democratic energy, anti-resistance energy, anti-Trump energy from, you know, former Republicans, whatever, it's great to see. And, you know, just a reminder, if you want to help out folks that are going to these town halls, If you want to make sure the Democrats take back the House in 2026, then just go to Vote Save America.

37:29Our friends at Vote Save America are ready to help you do something about it that can tell you ways to donate your time, donate your energy, donate your money to really make a difference. So very important. Go check out votesaveamerica.com.

37:49Pods of America is brought to you by strawberry.me. The clock is ticking. The days are rolling by, turning into weeks, months, years. We spend nearly a third of our waking hours at work, but the unfortunate truth is that for many of us, that's time languishing away in a job we've outgrown or one we never wanted in the first place, but we stick with it. And say things like, I've already put years into this place, crooked media. What if the next move is even worse? I went to the Daily Wire. I can't afford to take a wrong step. Oh, no, I'm co-hosting a show with Benny Johnson. And isn't everyone kind of miserable at work?

38:20Alex Jones seems happy. Don't fool yourself. You'd never be able to coast with Benny. No. There's a difference between reasons for staying and excuses for not leaving. It's time to get unstuck. And that's exactly what today's sponsor, Strawberry.me, can help you do. They match you with a career coach who helps you go from where you are to where you actually want to be. InfoWars. Your coach helps you get clear on your goals, create a plan, build your confidence, and keeps you accountable along the way. So don't leave your career to chance. Everything's a conspiracy, John. There's still plenty of time to take action, time to own your future with a professional coach in your corner.

38:55The reasons to do so totally outweigh the excuses not to. Head to strawberry.me slash crooked to claim a special offer. That's strawberry.me slash crooked. Stop settling. Start building the career you actually want. John Lovett, he did, and he's not here anymore. Where'd he go? No, sorry. Is that a word for Tucker? It's my dream job. Hey, so listen, whether you're in the States, across the pond, or somewhere on the other side of the world, we love that you tune in to Crooked for US News. But did you know we also have a UK news show? Yes, that's right. It's called Pod Save the UK. Pod Save the UK is a no-bullshit, unabashedly progressive conversation about politics, focused on the issues that matter most to the people of Britain.

39:38With all the changes in our government, including the fun revolving door of Prime Ministers we have here, there's always lots to talk about. And there's lots of fabulous guests to talk to. Journalists, politicians, experts, comedians and activists. We've had great comedians on as well, like Rosie Jones, Stuart Lee, Aisling B. We've also had Tommy Vitor on, who may be our boss. We still don't know. We're not quite clear on who our boss is. I thought it might be Tommy Vitor. I thought it might be Jon Favreau. I don't know if it's John Lovett. It's hard to say. It's not clear to us who our bosses are.

40:10Some of our listeners call us irreverent but not stupid. I object to that. I'm deeply stupid. It doesn't sound too bad. So look, come check us out. Come join us. Pod Save the UK every Thursday, wherever you get your podcasts.

40:27So Republicans are responding to angry voters showing up at town halls by trying to pick better voters. Trump and the rest of the MAGA establishment are hard at work trying to lock in a permanent Republican majority by rigging the congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterms. Trump thinks this is the least we can do for him, as he said on CNBC this week. We have an opportunity in Texas to pick up five seats. We have a really good governor and we have good people in Texas. And I won Texas. I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know. And we are entitled to five more seats.

41:02They're just he's entitled. The entitlement apparently extends way beyond Texas to any state with a Republican majority. Conversations are happening in Missouri, South Carolina, Florida, Ohio and Indiana, where J.D. Vance visited on Thursday to pressure the state's Republican governor, Mike Braun. Politico reports that Republicans think they can get 10 or more House seats just by redrawing the maps. As we've talked about, Democratic states are threatening to counter with California in the lead, but it's not clear which other states can make it happen or when or how many seats there are left to squeeze out of those maps for Democrats.

41:35And in response to Texas Democratic legislators making the completely legal decision that has precedent to leave the state and deny Republicans a quorum to redraw the maps there, Texas Senator John Cornyn asked the FBI to hunt them down and drag them back home. And apparently the FBI said, sure, no problem. So that's where we are. Now we're using federal law enforcement to scour the country for Texas Democratic state legislators so that you can forcibly bring them back to the state legislature so that the Republican governor can redraw maps to hand Donald Trump five more seats so that he can keep control of Congress.

42:15Sounds very Democratic, doesn't it?

42:17Jon Favreau:Yeah, just it's what the founders had in mind. Thriving, thriving democracy. Everything is completely normal. What do you make of all this insanity? It's quite concerning, I'd say. I mean, look, Republicans know the Democrats are favored in the midterms. Right. The map is harder than I think a lot of Democrats think. But given how Democrats turn out in midterm elections, given Trump's approval rating, just given the general thermostatic reaction where the country reacts to a new president and they go the other side, there's always there was always a segment of the electorate, even if they voted for Trump, who wants a check on power.

42:50Jon Favreau:And so you would imagine that we're favored. So what are they doing about it? And the polls are bearing this out. Yeah. And not only bearing this out, but the margin, the Democratic margin on the generic ballot in polls has gotten larger over the last couple of months. And it's not where it was in 2018, but it's certainly well within a place where you would expect the Democrats to have the majority. Yeah. So Republicans had some options here, right? They could, Trump could try to do more popular things. Trump could try to stop blowing up the economy. Republicans could distance themselves from the unpopular president to try to improve their brand.

43:22Jon Favreau:They're going to do none of those things, right? What they're basically trying to do is to rig the election, to take this very extraordinary step of mid-decade redistricting to draw new maps to benefit them. And they've given up all pretense of coming up with even a reason for why they're doing it. It's just that Texas Republicans are doing it because Trump said to do it and Trump's doing it because Trump thinks they deserve it. even if it means you fundamentally do not understand math to think that you deserve it, because that's not what the election results show in Texas or elsewhere. You know, you get this a lot from people.

43:53Jon Favreau:Like every time I write a message box that is like, that is how something could hurt Republicans in the midterms, the response you get from a lot of people on our side is, well, the problems will just cancel the midterms. And it's hard to imagine how they like, how you actually cancel elections in a country where elections are run by states. is that's like kind of hard to fathom, but this, you don't have to do that. You can just pick the voters for the election in a way that helps you maintain power. And that's what they're doing. And it's brazen and aggressive, and it's quite dangerous. What do you think about the potential for widespread public blowback to these moves?

44:29Because, you know, we've process arguments, they're hard to make. They are, you know, process arguments about democracy and elections. You know, We've been down this road before. They're important to make. They're hard to make. They are hard to break through. For people who are not paying as close attention to politics, they're sort of hard to understand. I bet if you polled people on like, you know, do you think politicians should get to choose their voters, they would say no. But what do you think about – what do you think people know about the extent of what's going on?

45:02Jon Favreau:I think they know very little about the extent of what's going on. I think Democrats can use it as a data point in a larger argument. How about Republicans have become representatives of the broken political system where politicians only care about power for themselves? I think you can use that. The argument, like I support the Democratic states responding because I think brute force is the only viable response here. But it is, it does make the message more murky. Because again, say, well, Democrats do it, Republicans do it. This is all just. They're all doing it. No one's going to look into who started it.

45:31Jon Favreau:And I don't like we'd have a cleaner message if California wasn't doing it, but we'd also have fewer seats. And so I would pick the latter. I would pick having the seats rather than the cleaner message. Yeah, I don't think this is something to campaign on. I think this is like an inside fight that we just have to fight. You know, it doesn't seem realistic to expect any Republican controlled state to resist Trump on this. I don't know if you disagree. And what's your current tally on who comes out ahead here? Oh, the Republicans almost certainly come out ahead. It's not even I don't even think it's close because California has to go through extraordinary measures themselves just to do this.

46:05Jon Favreau:New York, like as you guys talked about on Tuesday, Governor Hochul is talking a strong game, but it is very hard. Just experts do not believe they can get this done before the 26 midterms. Illinois was is already a state where it's very hard to get more seats out of without putting more Democrats at risk. Maryland can get one seat. right you can get several you can get a couple seats out of missouri you get five seats out of texas florida is looking at possibly getting five seats if they push forward in response to california uh indiana can get a seat so i think republicans would come out ahead yeah it seems like california can neutralize texas but then you know that's why jd vance went to indiana and that's why missouri is thinking of moving ahead so i mean i guess if california neutralizes texas it seems most likely that then they come out a few seats ahead uh it's you know we've talked about this before but florida has some challenges in redistricting um in time for the midterms and some of the other states but it seems it seems like the most doable for them are uh indiana and missouri yeah and ohio ohio right yes ohio is another one so that sucks but like like they currently what do they have a currently uh two-seat majority or whatever like it is like Every seat is going to matter in this situation.

47:19But as we've said before, and I brought up your point here on Tuesday's pod, even when they, in Texas, if they, you know, gerrymander new seats that they think are, you know, Trump plus 10 or Trump plus 15 from the 2024 results, that's not necessarily the case in 2026 when Latino voters are already shifting away from Donald Trump by pretty significant margins.

47:43Jon Favreau:And I think in Texas, the long term, the medium to long term is even more likely devastating to them than just the short term. Because they had the opportunity in Texas, they had the opportunity to draw these districts in 2021. They specifically chose not to because they didn't want to dilute the Republican electorate across too many districts. They were like building it. They were basically didn't come in protection because they saw changing demographics. The changing demographics were not entirely Latino related. They're also suburban, you know, growing suburbs, growing exurbs and those becoming more democratic.

48:11Jon Favreau:But there I mean, there is risk in this Republicans in the right year. The the wave washes over the dams they build. Yeah. Adding to the chaos, Donald Trump's announcement on Truth Social Thursday morning that he's ordering the Commerce Department to conduct a new census and that, quote, people who are in our country illegally will not be counted. If this sounds familiar, it's because Trump tried to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census and a five four Supreme Court majority said no. So blatant violation of the Constitution to do this, which says that all persons should be counted.

48:46Supreme Court ruled against him six years ago on this. What's he doing here?

48:51Jon Favreau:He's going to try again and try. He's got a slightly different court this time. So, you know, will that matter? Oh, I guess because it was Roberts and the four liberal. I guess because it was Ruth Bader Ginsburg. So could he get a 6-3 out of this or 5-4 in the other direction? Maybe. I will say if he somehow gets away with not counting, you know, violating the Constitution and not counting undocumented immigrants in the census, you know, places like Texas, Florida probably lose seats as well as California or New York or whatever his target is. So it's not clear that not counting undocumented immigrants absolutely benefits Trump.

49:26It does completely, by the way, fuck up social services. That's the bigger deal here.

49:31Jon Favreau:There's been some studies of this which show that it would have, over the course of time, a very limited change in how House seats and electoral votes are allocated. But the bigger thing is, is it would just radically screw over people, screw over states and communities who have high undocumented populations. Yes. And not, by the way, not just the undocumented populations. No, no, the schools. Like, your school funding is based on the population in your community. if you cut out a bunch of - Citizens on Medicaid. Yes. Yeah. It's bad. It's bad. It's not bad. It's bad for everyone, but particularly American citizens in states and communities that happen to have a decent number of undocumented people in that community.

50:14One last thing on district maps. The Supreme Court is considering a challenge to Louisiana's congressional maps and asked for a briefing on so-called majority minority districts, a longstanding practice under the Voting Rights Act. Can you explain for people what's at issue here and what the consequences would be?

50:30Jon Favreau:Yeah, this is a five alarm fire. Because section two of the Voting Rights Act says you cannot deny someone or dilute political power based on race. In its most aferrous way, in the past, they would draw the districts in a way to dilute the black vote to the point that it was like spread out so thin over every district that there was no political power. And the way that this was remedied when people sued these maps for violations of the Voting Rights Act was you would create a majority minority district, which is why in these southern states like Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Arkansas, that are very Republican but have large black populations, their Democrats have a couple of seats because they've drawn these majority minority districts.

51:18Jon Favreau:Like Alabama has two Democratic seats. Mississippi has one Democratic seat. Just to give you, like, I don't think people realize how large a part of the population these Southern states, Black people are, one in four people in Alabama is Black. One in three people in Mississippi are Black. And so if they strike down, if they say that majority and minority districts are a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, then we will lose seats, almost every Democratic seat in the Deep South, because they will just divide the Black vote up in a way that suggests that there will be no representation for the Black community, no representation for Democrats from these.

51:52Jon Favreau:It is a huge, huge deal. And it would be the complete fall of the Voting Rights Act. It's like the last thing remaining is the Roberts court has chipped away at it year after year after year. If they take this down, that will be the end of it. Yeah. I guess the only potential reason for hope is that they have looked at Voting Rights Act stuff before. And as they chipped away at the whole Voting Rights Act, they have not touched this yet. But again, maybe, I don't know if we've seen a case with this court, with this composition yet on this, so who knows? But it's quite concerning, is what I'd say.

52:26So Trump isn't just trying to stop counting immigrants. He's, of course, also trying to deport as many as possible. Here in L.A., ICE agents are now jumping out of the back of Penske rental trucks at Home Depots to arrest any brown people they suspect of not having papers, which Mayor Karen Bass says is violating a court order prohibiting the government from racially profiling. The Trump administration has now asked the Supreme Court to take a look at that temporary restraining order so that they can go about racially profiling all that they'd like. So stay tuned on that one. In Texas, the new Fort Bliss detention camp is about to start holding at least 1 ,000 people in tent-like facilities and will ultimately hold up to 5 ,000, making it the largest detention camp in the country.

53:09Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has also approved the use of military bases in Indiana and New Jersey for the same thing. The Trump administration is also bringing back their family separation policy by telling parents they have a choice. They can either be detained and deported without their kids or leave the country with them. The New York Times has found at least nine cases where families have been separated. The administration's also now targeting pro bono immigration lawyers for the first time. DOJ is currently trying to sanction Joshua Schroeder for the crime of challenging the deportation of his client in court.

53:44So now they're sending a message not just to the big law firms, but to lawyers who are doing pro bono work for immigrants. And Ice Barbie herself, Kristi Noem, announced this week that there's no age limit, no more age limit or college degree required if you want to mask up and join Stephen Miller's secret police force. The Department of Homeland Security actually tweeted, quote, serve your country, defend your culture. No undergraduate degree required. One person who signed up to defend his culture? Actor Dean Cain, last seen playing Superman on a series that ended in 1997, he said he'll be signing up to serve ICE.

54:25So Dean Cain, newest ICE agent. Dan, are you ready to defend your culture?

54:30Jon Favreau:Amidst the freak out of the Sidney Sweeney ad where everyone was talking about the Nazi eugenics, the use of the term culture here is, that is not coded language. That is as explicit as you can possibly be about what we're talking about. I thought we were talking about crime. I thought the whole thing was we want to protect our borders. We want to keep Americans safe. Or maybe we want to make sure that, you know, if you're further to the right on immigration, you want to make sure that these undocumented immigrants aren't taking jobs from American citizens or benefits from American citizens. That was an argument at one point.

55:08Now we're just straight to culture. What culture do we defend it? What culture do they think we're defending?

55:12Jon Favreau:Yeah, there's a real, it's a very interesting follow-up question here for the people who tweeted this out and the people who believe this. Yeah, please, please, please describe the culture that you think we're defending. Is it a, is it Stephen Miller's culture? Is it, is it Donald Trump's culture? I guess it's like the culture of just making a bunch of money off your public office. Is that the culture? It's the culture of white Christian people. That's what it means. White Christian people. That's what it means. That is when. Billionaires, is that the culture? People who, people who can take as much as they can possibly get?

55:42based on how much power they have?

55:44Jon Favreau:I mean, this is just, it is a very common phrase used by people pushing neo-Nazi, white supremacist, eugenics-based ideas. Like, that is what they are saying. It's like, it's not even, like, we used to do a lot of like, oh, he's winking to the Proud Boys. And it's like, that's not even that. Like, the people, they're not winking. Like, this is what they believe. This is not like some clever political signal to get the Proud Boys to support Trump. This is just the people in charge now believe this. Like it doesn't even occur to them to not use this language. Like it is what they – there's no subtlety here.

56:18I know. And it's not like a random Republican politician is tweeting this. It's not even like some White House staffer. This is the Department of Homeland Security. The name Homeland Security. It's supposed to be about keeping America safe, not about defending your culture. A culture that, if anything, is about a place where anyone can become a citizen and where a multiracial, multiethnic country of 300 million people. I thought that was our culture. Apparently, Stephen Miller thinks no. I'm going to preview of my conversation with Pete Buttigieg this weekend on the Sunday show. I showed him a clip a very disturbing clip of a J.D.

57:02Vance speech that he gave at the Claremont Institute over the July 4th holiday where J.D. Vance actually says that the Declaration of Independence and the ideals in the Declaration of Independence are over-inclusive over-inclusive and America should not just be thought of as a creedal nation based on an idea based on a belief because if you believe in the Declaration of Independence and what it says in there that could mean a billion foreign citizens trying to come into America just because they believe in the ideals of America. And we can't have that. It's fucking wild, man. It is not. It's there.

57:36Jon Favreau:There's a longer conversation to be had about J.D. Vance because... I know. I know. There's a lot going on there. I started to have it with Pete, but I could have a much longer conversation about J.D. Vance because... Also this week, by the way, Trump said he is the most likely heir apparent to the MAGA movement, though then he made sure he got in a Marco Rubio mention because he likes to play reality TV host there and he's setting up the competition for 28. But he did say he's the most likely heir. Unfortunately, J.D. Vance will be around for a while. Hard to believe, but we've saved what's potentially the most dangerous news of the week for last.

58:10Secretary Brainworms Jr. announced that Health and Human Services Department will be pulling the plug on federal research into mRNA vaccines that are currently being developed for the flu, COVID, cancer, and other conditions. Kennedy claimed that mRNA vaccines aren't effective against upper respiratory infections, despite the fact that they saved millions of lives during a pandemic that was about an upper respiratory infection. Donald Trump used to take credit for mRNA as one of his signature accomplishments. Here's how he responded. We're reminded of that this week.

58:41Jon Favreau:You were the driving force behind Operation Warp Speed, these mRNA vaccines that are the gold standard. Now your health secretary is pulling back all the funding for research. He's saying that the risks outweigh the benefits, which puts him at odds with the entire medical community and with you. What is going on? Research on what? Into mRNA vaccines. Well, we're going to look at that. We're talking about it. And they're doing a very good job. And, you know, that is a past with Operation Warp Speed was whether you're Republican or Democrat, considered one of the most incredible things ever done in this country.

59:18But, you know, that was now a long time ago. And we're on to other things. So one of the many, many experts sounding the alarm about this reversal, that includes Trump's first Surgeon General, was tweeting about it this week as well. But one of the other experts is Dr. Michael Osterholm, the director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota and the author of the upcoming book, The Big One, How We Must Prepare for Future Deadly Pandemics. He spoke with Dan just before we recorded. Here's that interview.

59:53Jon Favreau:Mike Osterholm, welcome to Pod Save America. Thanks. Appreciate being here. So earlier this week, the Trump administration canceled$500 million in grants for the development of mRNA vaccines. You called this one of the most dangerous public health decisions you've in your career, how will this set us back? Well, it actually sets us back in several ways, but let me just land on the most important and one of real significance. And that is that today, we are really poorly prepared globally for an influenza pandemic. If we were to have a really, truly big one like 1918, it would exceed anything we saw with COVID.

1:00:33And there is a way to get better prepared, and that is to have vaccines that you could quickly make and deploy. Right now, globally, our capability of making flu vaccine is at about 2 billion doses in 15 to 18 months. And what I mean by doses, I'm talking about two vaccinations per person. So basically, three quarters of the world would not have vaccine in the first 18 months, and some of them would never see it. That's just because we have this very outdated 1950s technology for making flu vaccine and chicken eggs. Well, along comes RNA. And the mRNA right now that we see is a perfect candidate for making flu vaccine.

1:01:16And some of the early research surely supports that. If we had that vaccine available at the time of the next pandemic, we could probably make enough for the world within 12 months, which would fundamentally change the whole game around an influenza pandemic. That now has pretty much been thrown out the window with this new change, as the US government will not be basically supporting overall mRNA vaccine work. And more importantly, they continue to support a type of research that has been going on since the 1950s. Salk himself was involved with it. And it's really unfortunate because we just don't see a lot of upside on this particular vaccine, but that's what they're now counting on at NIH.

1:02:01Jon Favreau:Yeah, I guess that's my question, right? The critics of RNA vaccines or mRNA vaccines say that they don't catch mutations, that there's questions about them, and they want to go back to whole virus vaccines the way we used to do it. One, how do you respond to the questioning of the efficacy or safety of mRNA vaccines? And what are the downsides of going back to the old way of doing it? Well, first, the old way of doing it was no longer used because it didn't work all that well. Actually, believe it or not, a split cell vaccine, which we have now is where we break the virus up a bit, actually provides more contact with different parts of the virus that would otherwise be protected as a whole virus that gives you a better immune response.

1:02:44So we abandoned HOSEL 40 years ago because it was not providing us good results. Somehow, I think there are some that now believe that just because it's in the hands of the current leadership at the NIH, it's suddenly going to change and be different. We don't know how. Our center actually is responsible for tracking all influenza vaccine work in the world. And we have a website that's maintained that actually today you can go on it and find out exactly every product that's out there, where it's at in terms of its research, what phases it in, what it's dealing with. And so we really have some expertise in flu vaccine evaluation.

1:03:24And I can tell you that the virus from the NIH at this point does not even rank anywhere near of interest to most researchers at all.

1:03:35Jon Favreau:You know, obviously,$500 million is a lot of money. Can the private sector step in here? Are the pharmaceutical companies continue to develop these vaccines? Or do they need government support to do it? Well, this is where it gets more complicated. And I say that because number one is that there was about$500 million already put in by industry. And that, I think, is going to evaporate quickly because the handwriting is on the wall. Why invest in something for which the U.S. government is not going to support or move forward? And so if anything, we've lost a lot more than$500 million in terms of research dollars.

1:04:15The second thing is it's just going to have a dampening effect, I think, on a number of biotech sides in the United States because they see this uncertainty. You know, we've heard people talk about the business impact of the terrorists. It's about the uncertainty. Well, now there's even more uncertainty about what this administration will do, not based on science, but largely based on ideology. What will they do? And so I think you're going to see a lot of companies that would otherwise be in this business actually getting out or moving to a country outside the United States.

1:04:50Jon Favreau:And so you've brought up influenza several times here. We are right now watching very carefully bird flu in this country with obviously fears that it could be communicable to humans. I assume this affects our efforts to prepare for that as well. It does. And it's really important when we talk about influenza, we're talking about all the viruses, whether it be bird flu or seasonal flu, whatever that goes on and causes the pandemic. But let me also remind people, as much as they don't want to hear this, and they surely don't find it necessarily moving because they just don't believe it. But one of the concerns that we've had is that the kind of coronavirus that we had with COVID was not the worst of the worst of the viruses.

1:05:35This particular virus actually was highly infectious, but actually killed at about a rate of about 1 to 1.5 % of the population that it infected. If you look at SARS and MERS, two other coronaviruses, SARS hitting in 2003 in China, spreading around the world somewhat and brought it under control. MERS taking off 2012. You know, we saw it too. Those viruses killed between 20 and 35 % of the people. but they weren't that infectious. And so we were able to contain them. It wasn't like dealing, it was like dealing with a wildfire. It wasn't like dealing with the wind. Well, in the last few months, we've now identified a new coronavirus in a bat in China that actually has the characteristics of transmission like COVID and has the ability to kill like SARS and MERS.

1:06:26So it's got the two worst things you'd want to see in one virus. That virus could be the cause of a pandemic tomorrow, which imagine instead of having 1.5 % of the population dying, you're now talking about 20%, 25%. That is not just scary talk. That is real. You know, nobody wanted to believe the COVID pandemic was going to occur. Look what it did. And now I'm telling you, we need to be better prepared just for what could be a much worse kind of pandemic.

1:06:56Jon Favreau:And is it that this taken up, like, would you start developing a vaccine for that now or it's just when that possibly became a pandemic, the capacity to quickly spin up a vaccine goes down because we are not supporting the development of these vaccines? The answer is yes and yes. What I mean by that is that our goal with both influenza and coronavirus vaccines is to get ones that are more universal. They would cover a broad brush of them, and that's actually part of this work that we've been doing with the vaccine roadmaps. And so wouldn't it be ideal if you had a vaccine that you could take and eight years later, suddenly a pandemic breaks out with a totally different virus, but you still have protection.

1:07:35So we're working on that very thing. In the meantime, if you can't get that, at least what you want to have is the capability of making an effective vaccine against the virus that emerged, and you can make it in such quantity quickly enough that you can actually have an impact around the world. You know, we say often, and it may sound trite, but it's really critical. Vaccines are important, but not that important until they become a vaccination. And so the key feature is going to be, can we get people to take it? Which was actually the third point I was going to make about Mr. Kennedy's comments.

1:08:07He, again, created fear in the minds of many people by what he said. These vaccines aren't safe. The benefits do not outweigh the risk. You leave people with statements like that that are just factually not true. Of course, that's going to diminish interest in the vaccines.

1:08:27Jon Favreau:If there are people out there who are, you know, we now have the federal government of the United States spreading anti-vaccine conspiracy theories, anti-vaccine misinformation. If people are, have questions, you know, concerns, like where should they go to get good information about vaccines right now? Well, this is one of the challenges. The federal government agencies used to be one of the most reliable sources, NIH and CDC. You can't trust them now. You can't. There's some very incredibly qualified people who still work there. Not everybody's gone. But the problem is that the leadership in both cases are now ones of people who are inserting into whatever they put out, ideological information, not scientific information.

1:09:14And so that's a challenge. I think it's going to be places, and I surely don't want to sound self-serving here, but Our center, for example, has a major website presence where we have news every day. It's current every hour. And so there's places you can go get that. The information is linked, not just what's on our site, but whatever credible information is out there. So we kind of do the actual evaluation of should this information be linked. So there are places like that. There's centers at Brown. There's a center at Johns Hopkins. There's our center that are providing, I think, the information that people can count on and use.

1:09:52Jon Favreau:Well, Dr. Osterholm, I would say when I heard this announcement, I thought it was bad. But now after talking to you, I realize it's really, really bad, and I'm quite concerned. But thank you very much for this information. It's important for our listeners to know the consequences of these decisions coming out of HHS. Thanks, Dan.

1:10:14We're going to go to a quick break, but one reminder before we do that. But if you need an outlet for all the rage you're feeling processing the news, highly recommend Hysteria's YouTube series, This Fucking Guy. Every month, Hysteria hosts Aaron Ryan and Alyssa Mastromonaco take a deep dive into the worst people in politics. This is the copy they told me to read. Uh-oh, haven't read it yet. Think of it like a true crime series where the crime is always someone who sucks having too much power and influence. That's awesome. Great copy. The show has covered Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Stephen Miller, my buddy, and lots more.

1:10:44but the new episode of this fucking guy is all about DHS secretary, ice agent cosplayer, and noted dog killer, Christy Gnome. Wow. Exciting. Also, check out this week's South Park. Great, great Christy Gnome content, which we covered on our YouTube channel, the Pod Save America YouTube channel. You should check it out. Subscribe to the Pod Save America YouTube channel because, you know, when people are searching for Sidney Sweeney discourse, we don't want Megyn Kelly's show to come up. we want Pod Save America to come up, right? That's the genius behind your Twitter fight.

1:11:27Pod Save America is brought to you by Rocket Money. A lot of people aren't aware of how much they spend each month. Do you know how many subscriptions you pay for? No. What about how much you spend on takeout or delivery? I don't want to know that. It's probably more than you think, but there's an app designed to help you manage your money better.

1:11:43Jon Favreau:rocket money rocket money is a personal finance app that helps find and cancel your unwanted subscriptions monitors your spending and helps lower your bills so you can grow your savings their dashboard lays out your total financial picture including bill due dates and paydays and in a way that's easy to digest you can even automatically create custom budgets based on your past spending rocket money will even try to negotiate lower bills for you the app automatically scans your bills to find opportunities to save and then goes back to work to get you better deals they even talk to customer service so you don't have to get alerts if your bills increase in price if there's unusual activity in your account, if you're close to going over budget, and even when you're doing a good job.

1:12:19Jon Favreau:Rocket Money's 5 million members have saved a total of 500 million in canceled subscriptions, with members saving up to$740 a year when they use all of the app's premium features. Cancel your unwanted subscriptions and reach your financial goals faster with Rocket Money. Go to rocketmoney.com slash crooked. Go today. That's rocketmoney.com slash crooked. Rocketmoney.com slash crooked. Hey, so listen, whether you're in the States, across the pond or somewhere on the other side of the world. We love that you tune into Crooked for US News. But did you know we also have a UK news show? Yes, that's right.

1:12:52It's called Pod Save the UK. Pod Save the UK is a no bullshit, unabashedly progressive conversation about politics focused on the issues that matter most to the people of Britain. With all the changes in our government, including the fun revolving door of prime ministers we have here, there's always lots to talk about. And there's lots of fabulous guests to talk to. journalists, politicians, experts, comedians and activists. We've had great comedians on as well, like Rosie Jones, Stuart Lee, Aisling B. We've also had Tommy Vitor on, who may be our boss. We still don't know. We're not quite clear on who our boss is.

1:13:24I thought it might be Tommy Vitor. I thought it might be Jon Favreau. I don't know if it's Jon Lovett. It's hard to say. It's not clear to us who our bosses are. Some of our listeners call us irreverent, but not stupid. I object to that. I'm deeply stupid. It doesn't sound too bad. So look, come check us out. Come join us. Pod Save the UK every Thursday, wherever you get your podcasts.

1:13:48All right, a few hopefully lighter items before we go. Starting with a quick check-in on what those zany Cuomo brothers are up to. So there's Andrew, who's refusing to take no for an answer from the voters of New York in his quesotic mission to run for mayor as an independent. And we learned this week that he may get some help in that mission, from another New Yorker who doesn't take no for an answer when he loses, Donald Trump. The New York Times reports that Trump is considering getting more involved in the mayor's race and that he and Cuomo spoke by phone after the primary. Cuomo, who's trying to sell himself as the hard-boiled vet who can take on Trump, also told business leaders this week that he actually doesn't want to fight with Trump and he thinks they'll basically see eye to eye.

1:14:34So Dan, I'm no political expert here. Is Donald Trump's endorsement the one you're looking for when you're trying to win over the voters of New York City? Is that a helpful endorsement in New York?

1:14:47Jon Favreau:Donald Trump made gains in New York City in 2024, but he still got his ass kicked. And so it's sort of a crazy thing. It just speaks to the absolute cynicism of Andrew Cuomo, which is his path to victory is essentially being the Republican nominee who then gets a slice of the Democratic electorate. And so that's why he doesn't want to fight Trump anymore. He's trying to get Curtis Sliwa's votes and some of Eric Adams' votes. That's his goal. There is no path for him as the candidate of independence in some Democrats. He knows he can't win with Democrats. And so he's completely changing his stripes.

1:15:19Jon Favreau:He ran as the guy, the one guy who was tough enough to take on Trump. But now that the voters said no way, he's changing entirely who he is, is in a last ditch, pitifully desperate attempt to win election. How excited do you think Zoran Mamdani is about Trump potentially getting involved in this election? He did a little press avail about this and the excitement seemed palpable, I would say. Their campaign must be like, yes, more. Please come campaign for Andrew Cuomo or Eric Adams or both or neither. Just come to New York. Say nice things about him. So unfortunately, that wasn't the only Cuomo in the news this week.

1:15:56Andrew's equally brilliant brother, Chris, former CNN anchor. now News Nation anchor, he attacked AOC on Twitter this week over a video of a speech she gave on the House floor about the Sydney Sweeney jeans ad. The only problem? The video was a deepfake, clearly identified as such, and only sounded like a real speech if you're an absolute fucking moron. Here's a sample. Sydney Sweeney looks like an Aryan goddess, and the American Eagle Jeans campaign is blatant Nazi propaganda. I mean, fuck. watching that sultry little temptress squeeze into a Canadian tuxedo, three sizes too small, with her bouncy little fun bags on the screen staring at you, piercing through the core of your soul with those ocean blue eyes

1:16:46Jon Favreau:that could resurrect the Fuhrer from his grave in Argentina.

1:16:52Honestly, it gets better, worse, better, funnier. So the younger Cuomo posted an outraged reaction, reading nothing about Hamas? What? Or people burning Jews' cars? But Sweeney Jean's ad? Deserve time on floor of Congress? What happened to this party? I'm speaking like this because the spellings were all over the place. Lots of typos. Fight for small business, not for small culture wars. He really unloaded a lot in one tweet. After being mocked by the entire internet, not often the entire internet comes together for something anymore, but they did for this. Called out by AOC herself, Cuomo replied with a sort of apology, not really, reading in part, quote, you are correct.

1:17:37That was a deep fake, but it really does sound like you. No, it doesn't. Before doubling down on the Hamas thing, demanding that she send him a video of her demanding that Hamas surrender immediately. So that's it. We just all got to everyone send your videos of you calling on Hamas to surrender to Chris Cuomo by EOD. Thank you.

1:18:03Jon Favreau:So I'm embarrassed to admit this, but I watched a three minute clip of Chris Cuomo from his show addressing this controversy. Yes. Now I watched it on the internet because I would not know how to find. You're a real sicko. If you told me that the winning lottery numbers for tomorrow's Powerball were going to be a broadcast on News Nation tonight, I would not be able to get that. I would not be any richer. but I watched it and I would say I know Chris Cuomo a little bit because I used to do political commentary never invited me to the gym I was not a spotter for him but I used to do CNN like I was a CNN political commentator for a few years and like the America's centrist Jim bro shtick is a lot but I actually really thought he would just like genuinely apologize and just say like I fucked up like that is something I think in the past he might have done before he was fired from his job for advising his brother on his brother's scandals while he was at CNN.

1:18:59Jon Favreau:But it's in here or there. But he didn't. The three-minute clip is basically that tweet. He says, I messed up. It was a deep fake. It was AI. But it sounded like her. And then he went on a tirade about how she has not demanded that Hamas surrender, which is the one thing Hamas has said they're waiting for. I'm telling you, they are in the tunnels. Yes. And they are like, if enough people on social media, libs especially, call for us to surrender, we're coming out of those tunnels with our hands up. That's it. The war could be over. Yeah. Un-fucking-real. Speaking of the Sidney Sweeney controversy.

1:19:42Oh, yes. We here at Pod Save America, We found ourselves in the middle of a right-wing discourse on it this week. My fault. I started it. Yeah, it is your fault. Please enjoy the following clip of Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk appraising our merits.

1:20:02Jon Favreau:My own thought on it is, having engaged in a back-and-forth at length with one of the Pod Save America guys last night, again, who remains a mystery to me, the only one I know is that Tommy guy. I don't know the other ones. And this guy seemed genuinely hurt that I didn't know who he was after arguing with him. And then even one of the other guys. I don't know. Tommy Vitter or something, I think. Maybe one of these days you'll solo a show and then I'll learn your name. But until then, you're just one of the Pod Save America guys. Sorry. Not everybody can do it. It's just such a low testosterone group of complainers and whiners.

1:20:35But please continue, Megan. I don't know. Where do you want to begin there? I mean, I don't know why I didn't ask him this day, but Tommy, what's going on?

1:20:45Jon Favreau:Yeah, I mean, I asked Tommy. What's the backstory? He refuses to disclose why. Oh, does he? Yeah. And the way she said Tommy, it was very loving in an otherwise pretty tough couple seconds for Megan. It was like, except Tommy, I know Tommy. Yeah, it's very strange. I would also say, what I'm most, am I outraged by the low testosterone thing? No. No, I don't. What I'm outraged by is that she does not know about the fucking hit podcast Offline with Jon Favreau, a solo podcast with your goddamn name in it. Also, this isn't a big thing either, but we're using solo as a verb now? We're soloing? Yeah, I think that's a verb.

1:21:21Jon Favreau:I think when you are in music and podcasting, I think you solo. She's soloing? Okay, I'll give her that then. I will say her bit to me about not knowing me, I don't give a fuck if Megyn Kelly ever knows me or I talk to her or whatever. It just doesn't matter. But the bit just seems really weird and forced to me. Like she spent a good part of her day responding to me on Twitter, a person she has followed on Twitter for years and has replied to before. And the reason she knows my name is because it's right there in the Twitter account that she was replying to for several hours. I mean, that was a wild use of your time.

1:22:03Well, you know what? I don't get into Twitter fights anymore that I don't think I can win. And this one was so fucking ridiculous because it started with Megyn Kelly lashing out at Beyonce in a Levi's ad. And the people who told us for a couple weeks that the left was losing their mind over Sydney Sweeney and jeans and how fucking crazy she decided to then go crazy over Beyonce in a Levi's ad called her fake, called her fame, fake, called her success, fake Beyonce, who has just like one of the most talented, successful people in the world. And it's like, you can, you can not like our music if you don't want, but what, what are you doing?

1:22:44And my only response to Megan, which wasn't really a response to her, but I was like, here's the thing. You take a poll of the country and I don't know, 80, 90 % of people would be like, I like the Sydney Sweeney ad. I like the Beyonce ad. I like both of them. Or at the very least, I don't dislike either of them because most people are fucking normal. And Megyn Kelly is not. As are all the people fighting about this online.

1:23:11Jon Favreau:I sent you some polling that buttressed your argument with Megyn Kelly. Did you use that? Did you reply with that? No, because then I saw the New York Times story did a whole, they did a analysis of social media about this that just a Times story just ran. And my whole contention was this isn't a real fight. This is a couple people on the left posted TikToks and tweets about this. The right then saw those lefties. I don't even know if they were lefties. The people who complained about the Sidney Sweeney ads who were saying it was, you know, eugenics or Nazi or whatever. And then the right found those.

1:23:45And then they decided to do a couple of weeks of roadblocked coverage of this quote unquote scandal. A bunch of media outlets wrote about the scandal. They did not necessarily criticize Sidney Sweeney. I believe that in terms of media outlets, it was like one MSNBC op-ed on their page and like one Washington Post story. That's about it. And then everyone else wrote about the controversy. So the New York Times said, in fact, by the time right-wing users were in an uproar, only a few thousand posts on X mentioned Ms. Sweeney, according to data by TweetBinder, a social media analytics company. Fewer than 10 % of those expressed clear criticism of the actress or ad, according to the analysis by the Times, which used AI to help flag posts for review.

1:24:28Lovely. Overall, there were three times as many posts supportive of the campaign and Ms. Sweeney on X as there were posts critical of them in the days after the campaign began, an analysis by the time showed. Nearly three quarters of posts that were critical of Ms. Sweeney or the ad had fewer than 500 views.

1:24:47Jon Favreau:Here's my question to you. Why are you telling me this? Why are you telling your listeners this? I want everyone to know this. Why aren't you telling Megyn Kelly this? Well, I call her Laura Ingram now. Actually, today I called her Ann Coulter because I'm just going to do that now. And so I did post the screenshots from the piece in my last exchange with Megan right before I came in here. So you don't know if she's been replying to you? I don't know. I don't know. That's exciting. Jane Kostner, our What A Day host, came into my office yesterday and said, Please stop arguing with Meg and Kelly.

1:25:20And I promised Jane I would. But then the time story came and it was too good not to post. And also, I wasn't going to talk about this. And then Megan did what Elijah predicted she would do and decided to talk about the whole Twitter controversy on her show with Charlie Kirk. Left me no choice.

1:25:38Jon Favreau:Yeah, that's fair. I just would like to remind our listeners that every year we do our New Year's resolutions. And we all had different things we were planning to do. Mine was related to my physical and mental health. I think Love It One to read more books. I can't even imagine what earnest thing Tommy had. And yours was to post more. And you, for the first time, are crushing it. I've never made a New Year's resolution that I have kept more than this one. Well, which is a great bounce back from your, I'm going to volunteer more from last year. It's like giving up broccoli for Lent, you know? You're just like, lean into it.

1:26:16Jon Favreau:Next year will be, drink more. It's perfect. That's our show for today. Thanks to Dr. Michael Osterholm for coming on. I'll be back on the feed on Sunday talking with Pete Buttigieg and answering some of your questions. Be sure to check it out. Have a great weekend. If you want to listen to Pod Save America ad-free or get access to our subscriber Discord and exclusive podcasts, consider joining our Friends of the Pod community at crooked.com slash friends or subscribe on Apple Podcasts directly from the Pod Save America feed. Also, please consider leaving us a review to help boost this episode and everything we do here at Crooked.

1:26:49Pod Save America is a Kricket Media production. Our producers are David Toledo, Emma Illick-Frank, and Saul Rubin. Our associate producer is Farrah Safari. Austin Fisher is our senior producer. Reid Churlin is our executive editor. Adrian Hill is our head of news and politics. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Matt DeGroat is our head of production. Naomi Sengel is our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Hayley Jones, Ben Hefcoat, Mia Kelman, Carol Pellaviv, David Tolles, and Ryan Young.

1:27:22Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

1:27:38Hey, so listen, whether you're in the States, across the pond, or somewhere on the other side of the world. We love that you tune into Crooked for US News. But did you know we also have a UK news show? Yes, that's right. It's called Pod Save the UK. Pod Save the UK is a no bullshit, unabashedly progressive conversation about politics focused on the issues that matter most to the people of Britain. With all the changes in our government, including the fun revolving door of prime ministers we have here, there's always lots to talk about. And there's lots of fabulous guests to talk to. Journalists, politicians, experts, comedians and activist.

1:28:12Yeah, we've had great comedians on as well, like Rosie Jones, Stuart Lee, Aisling B. We've also had Tommy Vitor on, who may be our boss. We still don't know. We're not quite clear on who our boss is. I thought it might be Tommy Vitor. I thought it might be Jon Favreau. I don't know if it's Jon Lovett. It's hard to say. It's not clear to us who our bosses are. Some of our listeners call us irreverent, but not stupid. I object to that. I'm deeply stupid. It doesn't sound too bad. So look, come check us out. Come join us Pod Save the UK every Thursday wherever you get your podcasts.