1106: 2026's Biggest Questions

11 Jan 2026 · 1 h 7 min · 24 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

```markdown

Pod Save America Episode Summary

1106 - 2026's Biggest Questions

Episode Overview In this episode of *Pod Save America*, hosts Jon Favreau and Alex Wagner discuss major political questions and uncertainties facing America as it enters 2026. They examine the implications of the Supreme Court on the Voting Rights Act, the upcoming midterm elections, and the potential investigations into the current administration should the Democrats regain control.

Key Themes and Questions Explored

  1. Supreme Court and Voting Rights Act:
  2. Discussion on whether the Supreme Court will dismantle what remains of the Voting Rights Act.
  3. Potential implications of a decision against the Act, particularly concerning minority representation.
  1. Influence of America's 250th Anniversary:
  2. The hosts contemplate how America's 250th anniversary might energize midterm elections.
  3. Anticipated jingoism and the establishment of narratives around what it means to celebrate America.
  1. Democratic Investigations:
  2. Speculation on which White House officials could be investigated if the Democrats regain the House.
  3. Considerations of the strategies that might be employed to handle subpoenas and compliance.
  1. Midterm Elections and Economic Sentiment:
  2. The hosts discuss the importance of economic sentiment heading into the elections, particularly concerning undecided voters.
  3. The potential impact of economic conditions on voting behavior and turnout.
  1. The Role of Tariffs and the Economy:
  2. Examination of Trump's tariffs and their potential legal challenges.
  3. Insight into how economic policy and public sentiment could shape the political landscape.
  1. Stephen Miller's Immigration Stance:
  2. Inquiry into the extent of Miller's domestic immigration policies and their impacts on American citizens.
  3. Debates surrounding denaturalization and the treatment of undocumented immigrants.
  1. Media Landscape Changes:
  2. Discussion of how the Trump administration's influence on media shapes public opinion.
  3. The hosts highlight the challenges facing independent journalism and the potential for biased narratives.
  1. Future of Representative Democracy:
  2. Reflection on whether the structures of representative government can withstand the current political climate.
  3. Concerns about the implications of potential Supreme Court decisions on civil rights.
  1. Gavin Newsom's Prospects:
  2. Speculation on California Governor Gavin Newsom as a potential presidential candidate.
  3. Considerations of how his California identity might play in national politics.

Conclusion and Takeaways

  • The episode emphasizes the uncertainty and complexity of the political landscape as America navigates significant upcoming events.
  • The hosts stress the importance of accountability, economic conditions, and the role of media in shaping the future of American democracy.
  • Listeners are encouraged to engage with these pressing questions as the year unfolds.

Additional Notes

  • The discussion is punctuated with humor and personal anecdotes, reflecting the hosts' deep-seated passion for political analysis and engagement.
  • The episode serves as a reminder of the interconnectedness of various political issues and the need for vigilance in the face of potential deterioration of democratic institutions.

---

For more content, subscribe to *Pod Save America* for new episodes and exclusive insights. ```

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Reflections on a Chaotic Start to 2026

2:45 to 4:50

The hosts discuss the turbulent political landscape as 2026 begins.

“So there should be 200 extra episodes of Pod Save America.”

Analyzing Political Questions for the Year Ahead

4:50 to 5:48

The hosts outline key political questions shaping 2026.

“I thought, America, you look great for 250.”

Investigative Powers and Accountability in Congress

5:48 to 11:10

Discussion on potential House investigations and political accountability.

“Though it seems that's like literally become quite a business now, the prediction business.”

Economic Factors Influencing Midterm Voters

11:10 to 14:01

The hosts assess how economic perceptions may affect voter behavior in upcoming elections.

“I think it is essential to the work of democracy to hold people accountable who occupy positions of power, if not for this generation, then for the next.”

Understanding the Midterm Electorate

14:01 to 15:28

Explore the dynamics of the midterm electorate and the challenges for Democrats.

“But I wonder I wonder how meaningful that traditional period of decision making is, given how bad things are going to be for the rest of the year.”

Supreme Court Decisions and Tariffs

15:29 to 17:27

Discuss the implications of upcoming Supreme Court decisions on tariffs and the economy.

“We're recording this Thursday afternoon, everyone.”

Impact of Federal Reserve Decisions

17:28 to 19:57

Delve into the potential impacts of new Federal Reserve leadership on the economy.

“Number two, he was just saying to the New York Times in that interview that he wants to try licensing fees.”

Political Chaos and Its Consequences

19:58 to 22:39

Analyze how political chaos and governmental actions resonate with the public.

“I think that the ideal political scenario for the Trump White House, and this is not all necessarily things that they want.”

Stephen Miller's Immigration Policies

25:47 to 28:00

Examine the implications of Stephen Miller's immigration policies and their impact on citizenship.

“Well, that's a good segue to my next question, which is how far will Stephen Miller take his domestic war against people who don't look like him or believe what he believes?”

The Shifting Standards of Denaturalization Under Trump

28:00 to 30:00

This segment discusses the evolving criteria for deportation and denaturalization under the Trump administration, highlighting legal complexities and the growing fears surrounding immigration policies.

“Talk to Tish James about how much fraud you actually need to commit to be found in the crosshairs of Trump's.”
Show all 24 chapters

Rising Concerns Over Deportation Policies

30:00 to 32:00

The conversation shifts to the implications of current deportation policies, focusing on the motivations behind ICE actions and public reactions to them.

“I will also say this court has been a gross enabler of the worst, most racist impulses of this court, right?”

The Impact of the Right-Wing Media Landscape

32:00 to 34:10

This segment examines the influence of right-wing media on public discourse and its potential effects on news gathering and journalism.

“And I think I worry a lot about this for this year because there's no reason for the administration to stop doing it because they don't give a shit what the courts say.”

The Role of CBS and Impact on News Quality

34:10 to 36:20

The hosts discuss CBS's changing landscape, the hiring of controversial figures, and the implications for the quality of news reporting.

“Well, yeah, and I didn't put this in as a question, but they are all doing everything in their power to, you know, consolidate the media landscape and the information landscape to suit their own ends, right?”

The Future of News Gathering in a Hostile Environment

36:20 to 40:00

The segment contemplates the challenges facing news gathering in the current political climate and its sustainability amid rising opinion-driven content.

“You know, she ran a very successful independent news organization, not as successful as the money they paid her for it.”

The State of Democracy and Voting Rights

42:40 to 45:01

Discussion on the health of democracy and impending Supreme Court decisions affecting the Voting Rights Act.

“I do wonder if we still have our representative democracy by the end of this year.”

The Challenge to J.D. Vance's 2028 Nomination

45:02 to 47:36

Speculation on potential challengers to J.D. Vance in the Republican nomination process.

“Vance's chance at the Republican nomination in 2028?”

The Uncertain Future of Medication Abortion

47:37 to 49:59

Discussion on the legal status of medication abortion and its implications.

“Vance and Marco Rubio beg and scrape that much harder.”

Gavin Newsom's Political Future

54:01 to 56:01

Exploration of Gavin Newsom's potential candidacy and its impact on the Democratic Party.

“Is Gavin Newsom still the front runner at this time next year?”

Gavin Newsom's Political Viability

56:01 to 56:56

Discussion on Gavin Newsom's actions and appeal as a Democratic candidate.

“And I really appreciate like what he has been doing to fight not just in California, but nationally.”

Controversial California Laws

56:57 to 58:09

Exploration of California laws and their implications on Newsom's candidacy.

“that must have the makers of Republican attack ads salivating with anticipation.”

Potential Democratic Candidates

58:10 to 59:43

A look at other potential Democratic candidates for the upcoming elections.

“And yet we're like, don't you dare get married by a mystic.”

Reconstruction of the White House

59:44 to 1:01:19

Discussion on the planned renovations of the White House under Trump.

“I mean, I think it's going to be a pretty big field.”

America's 250th Anniversary

1:01:20 to 1:03:03

Analysis of how the 250th anniversary of America may be politically leveraged.

“and I would not be surprised if he just puts the fucking name.”

Supreme Court Speculations

1:03:04 to 1:05:14

Speculation on potential Supreme Court retirements and their implications.

“and I do wonder how much the birthday, the anniversary is going to matter in 2026 because they are going to go all out for that.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Pod Save America is brought to you by OneSkin. Can we talk about New Year's resolutions for a sec? January used to be about totally reinventing yourself. Now it's more like doing an honest audit of what's actually working and doubling down on that. Are you in the middle of that honest audit? Get your green visor on, buddy? I am. I am. For me, it means taking my skin health seriously, which you know that I'm doing. Yeah. And this is just doubling down on that. That's right. You think about one person who takes their skin health seriously. Think about me. That's right. And that means using one skin.

0:31With OneSkin, you know you're supporting your long-term skin health at the cellular level. At their core is their patented OS1 peptide, the first ingredient proven to target senescent cells, the root cause of wrinkles, crepiness, and loss of elasticity. All key signs of skin aging, know what that is. And these results have been validated in five different clinical studies. Certified safe for sensitive skin, OneSkin products are free from over 1 ,500 harsh or irritating ingredients. dermatologists tested have been awarded the uh the national eczema association seal of acceptance they got an itchy they won the itchy the coveted by the nea delivering powerful results without irritation customers consistently rave about how their skin is smoother firmer and healthier looking with results that get better over time improving both the appearance and the overall health of their skin no wonder one skin's products have over what 10 000 five star reviews you know i started using OneSkin and better than just soap and water.

1:30Yeah, beat soap and water. That's me doubling down on my skin health. Gotta have a nighttime skin routine. Yeah, now I know what all these words mean. Born from over 10 years of longevity research, OneSkin's OS1 peptide has proven to target the cells that cause the visible signs of aging, helping you unlock your healthiest skin now and as you age. And for a limited time, OneSkin is making it even easier to stay consistent with up to 30 % off your first three subscription orders when you use code crooked at oneskin.co slash crooked. That's up to 30 % off with code crooked after you purchase. They'll ask where you heard about them.

2:02Please support our show and tell them we sent you.

2:26Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Jon Favreau. And I'm Alex Wagner. I love saying that when I'm here with you. It makes it even better. This is our first Sunday show of the year. You guys asked for more Pod Save America and you got it. There's going to be a new episode in your feed every Sunday of 2026. Oh my God. How exciting is that? And this year has been 200 years long already. So there should be 200 extra episodes of Pod Save America. We're all going to take turns hosting, including our newest host, but longtime pal, Alex Wagner. Right here in studio. How lucky am I? Listen, you got to kick the year off right.

3:01When the world is melting, you get to a hot place. You get a California. And I'm so thrilled to be here. I come more often. The snack selection's gotten a lot better since I was last here, I got to say. I don't know whether that's related to my contract or what. We tried to ask for some healthier snacks. Well, I don't know that I'd say that that's what happened. There's just more of them. Well, we tried to get, we didn't want to take away the unhealthy snacks. We just wanted a little bit more of a balance. Yeah, I knew it was more candy. But anyway, I guess we're all blind to, I mean, I'm blind to the healthy snacks.

3:28There just seemed a bounty, and I was grateful. I'm biased, of course, but I'm a huge fan of your new show, Runaway Country, the newest addition to the Crooked Network. Oh, it is such a good. How's it been going? Well, it's great because you're on it this week. That's why you might be biased. That's why it was so good this week. That's why it was such a good episode. Particularly excellent episode, if I do say so myself. Yeah, I got to say, flu-ridden Ben Rhodes is the best Ben Rhodes? Yeah. Hot. Hot on the mic this week. Everyone was hot. I mean, we came back to a motherfucker of a year, really.

4:00I mean, what a series of events to bear witness to. And Runaway Country this week focused on Venezuela. We talked to some Venezuelans about their opinions of all of this, which is interesting and not exactly what you think. And then we got hot, spicy hot takes from Jon Favreau and Ben Rhodes. It's always great being a guest on a show like that because I'm more measured as a host. You let it rip. As a moderating. Yeah, you let it rip. And that I didn't have any, you know. You saw that train with no brakes and you said you throttled it up. No fucks. As you mentioned, you know, the first week of 2026 felt like several lifetimes.

4:40None of which I would enjoy living again. But somehow we have a huge year ahead of us. Yeah. It's America's 250th birthday. That's what I've been thinking. That's what I thought. New Year's Day, man. I thought, America, you look great for 250. 250, the country is being run by an aging autocrat who is engaged in mind-boggling corruption and hemispheric domination. He's got an army of masked agents on the streets. One just killed an unarmed American citizen. But in November, this November, he will face for one of the very last times in his life an electorate. Make it so. An electorate that has never been this angry with him over how he's handling the economy.

5:29And their votes will decide just how much of a lame duck Trump is and what the race will look like to finally replace him. So chill year ahead. Chill. What could go wrong? And as everyone knows here at Pod Save America, we're still not in the prediction business. Though it seems that's like literally become quite a business now, the prediction business. I mean, people want any kind of map to be done certain times. Now we're just betting. Now we're making bets. Yeah, we're polymarket. But I thought what could be useful is, we're not going to do predictions, but we could talk about the biggest political questions on our minds for the year ahead.

6:07what we think will be the most consequential, what we'll be paying closest attention to, what we think will tell us the most about where we're headed, that kind of thing. So we're each going to do six questions for 2026. Maybe six and a half. Unless we have more. Right. And aren't too tied for the six to 26 bit. Oh, good. Then it's just chaos. That's right. We can do what we want. We'll call it six for 26. We'll call it eight for 26. Dude, it's the era of Trump. Everybody can do whatever. We can do whatever we want. But I thought it'd be fun to do some questions. So why don't we – you can start us off.

6:38Oh, my God. Okay. What's the first question you have for 2026? Well, I do think the Dems are going to take back the House, right? So my first question involves the interregnum period in and around lame duck. Oh, gosh. We're already there. We're already at the end of the year. We're going to rewind to other parts of the year. But I think in terms of like sort of pressing issues, when the Democrats take back the House, I'm interested to know which White House official becomes the subject of the first House investigation. And I specifically am interested in whether it's Pete Hegseth for the boat murders, Kash Patel for the FBI purges and what he's done to the department, or maybe Pam Bondi for Epstein.

7:11I mean, there's a lot to choose from. There is. And I do think that there's going to be an enormous amount of interest in terms of how to House Democrats organize themselves. And I'd like to know how they sort of process the air and think about which villain to sort of investigate and haul before Congress first. That's such a good question. and it raises a number of other questions in my mind, which is, do the officials comply? Yep. Do they decide that it's Congress and - Fuck Congress? Yep. You can send your subpoenas and we can ignore them and then what are you going to do? Get the Justice Department?

7:48And what do Democrats do if that happens? And what do Democrats do? Because isn't there some kind of a congressional sergeant or someone can do something there? Yes, I think, well, they can be held in contempt of Congress, right? Well, there's that. Steve Bannon. I mean, there's— At some point, though, it probably does have to go to the Justice Department, which is Donald Trump's Justice Department. Yes, it's true, which is ironic because we might be investigating Department of Justice officials and potentially the head of the Justice Department. I did look into, like, the strength of a preemptive presidential pardon.

8:16And as it intersects with a congressional investigation, it doesn't matter. They're separate branches of the government. You know, I think the question of accountability is going to be a big one. if we lose any of Trump's murderer's row of idiots. That's such a weird combination of metaphors. Like if Pete Hegseth leaves or is fired, if Kash Patel leaves or is fired, if Pambani leaves or is fired, do they get pardons on their way out the door? I would assume so. Like if there are departures this year, I think it'll be interesting to see what Trump's strategy is for this administration has absolutely committed crimes.

8:50And this could be a good test year to see what the end of the Trump administration might look like in terms of that. So the other option, aside from them just saying we're going to defy the subpoenas, is what they have been doing this year when they were before Congress, which is they just go and they treat it as a way to perform for Donald Trump and the Fox audience and right-wing audience beyond that and just say whatever they want to say. The value to me in the subpoena power is less about who you get and then the documents you get. The documents. And that I wonder about because there's a lot of documents that you can get from the administration.

9:31That is the substance. That is the meat, as it were, John. And that stuff really matters. And that's not something they can prevent from coming out. And then there's the question that they're going to have to wrestle with. You're going to start hearing. Because Democrats will run on affordability. And let's say we win. Right. Then it's going to be like, well, did you win the House? And now all you're going to do is just investigations. And then there's the whole impeachment question. Well, right. That is that was like a secondary concern because that's obviously front of mind with regards to Trump.

10:03He's already talked about it in front of the House Republicans who gathered at the Trump Kennedy Center earlier this year. He's terrified of being impeached for a third time. And it's going to be I mean, I do think that there is it is without question a better thing for the health of our democracy to have an opposition party in charge of one branch of government and specifically the Democrats. and if they control at least the lower chamber, there's going to be, I think, it'll be a shot in the arm for democratic organization. And I think the movement right now has proven really robust at the grassroots level, right?

10:37The citizen engagement in our politics is undeniable, but you do need a tip of the spear that has investigatory power, subpoena power, and just is in government. So it will be helpful to have Democrats up there in control of the lower chamber, but there are going to be a lot of questions about how aggressively the party looks backward to this year and to the year before in terms of what Trump has done and manages that question of accountability and whether that's something they want to tackle, which increasingly seems like an academic exercise, even though I don't think it is. I think it is essential to the work of democracy to hold people accountable who occupy positions of power, if not for this generation, then for the next.

11:19especially after this last year that we've had and especially what we learned from the administration between the two trump administrations you know as merrick garland and the justice department well right i mean we learned nothing right all right here's my first question yeah yeah man how do most midterm voters feel about the economy this summer because to me there's a lot of political science research around this that impressions harden about two to three months before the election maybe a little before that there's always exceptions of course but that's usually when it happens and i do think how voters feel about the economy is highly highly correlated with how they feel about donald trump um and will be highly correlated to how they vote whether they vote for Republicans or Democrats in the midterm, and particularly the voters who have not made up their minds.

12:18Who are those voters? My God. But anyway, yes. And they could make up their – not just should I vote for a Republican or should I vote for a Democrat, but should I vote at all? Should I even come out to vote? Yeah. And those people will make up their minds most likely on economic issues. Well, we're going to be awash in Venezuelan oil this summer, so – So, yeah. Travel is going to be super cheap. And I, you know, bully for Trump. I think, you know, it'll be interesting. I kind of wonder whether that old thinking holds true for a year like this just because we've been the American public has been so both naturally interested in affordability because they're broke.

13:00and there's a sort of the economic pain has been so ongoing, right? Like January is a month of premium insurance, insurance premium hikes. And that's an affordability issue as much as it is a question about health insurance and ethics. And I feel like there's gonna be a collective burden in terms of the economy that is with the American public in a way that maybe in other more economically healthy years, there necessarily hasn't been. So you know what I mean? I think the summer is going to matter, as it always does. We have the attention span of a gnat. But I do think it's the question of economic health and the sense that Americans can not afford to live the lives they led even two years ago, I think is pronounced and is emotionally resonant through the other months of the year in a way that it isn't necessarily in other years.

13:58So, yeah, I'm not trying to refute your question. No, no. But I wonder I wonder how meaningful that traditional period of decision making is, given how bad things are going to be for the rest of the year. Wow. That was a really fucking long way. No, no. I've been thinking about this because here's the challenge is that, like, I don't know, for 80, 90 percent of the midterm electorate elections probably already baked. Yeah, totally. Right. Already decided. So the people were talking about and for for Democrats in the House, it's not going to take many seats, obviously. But to get, you know, the number of seats that would feel like blue wave territory, which is obviously going to be smaller than it would be even in 18 just because there are fewer competitive seats because of gerrymandering.

14:40But that means the Democrats are going to have to win districts that Trump won, where a Republican is sitting in the House district right now. And Democrats needs to win. Donald Trump won in 2024 and beat Kamala Harris by five, six points. Right. Not just like one or two. Yeah. So then you have to find people who voted for Donald Trump in 2024 who were like, fuck this. This is not what I voted for. And again, we're like, what do you what did you think you were voting for? But maybe they were like, I thought he was crazy. I didn't like him. I think he's an asshole, but I thought he was going to manage the economy.

15:13So you need those people. And the question is, how many of those people do you get? And I think the another answer to that question depends on a couple of things. The Supreme Court is going to decide. That's my question number two. I know. And also, we're recording this, everyone. I know. It could be tomorrow. It could be tomorrow. We're recording this Thursday afternoon, everyone. Are we peeking behind the curtain? If you hear something. No, that's fine. We can just. People know what we're doing here. They know that we're not living for podcasting. You might be listening to this and then maybe after this conversation, maybe there's some kind of an extra interview.

15:47Bonus. I'm going to let you behind the curtain. If we get a tariff decision tomorrow. It's huge. We might do something extra on this. I mean, that was my second question, which folds directly into yours, which is what happens with the Supreme Court and Trump's tariffs. Because by every indication, first of all, Trump's already giving the money away, right? He's already saying, like, we're going to cut checks to the American public from all this. How much did he say we have? $600 billion, he said. Yeah,$600 billion we have taken in and will soon be receiving more than$600 billion in tariffs. That's what he said this week.

16:16Just a word to the wise. I think I believe the official number is 1 ,000 companies have already preemptively sued the federal government to get their money back once the Supreme Court rules that the tariffs are not constitutional. That includes companies like Costco, Reebok, Dole, Xerox, Revlon, and Goodyear. You may have heard of them. They're not upstarts. Unfortunately, they're not in our ad role this season. These are massive companies that have had to fork over lots of money if they haven't passed it on to the consumer and are like, give us our fucking money back. This was illegal. So, you know, it's one thing for Trump to be promising the money.

16:55First of all, it's one thing for Trump to think the tariffs are going to stay in place. It's another thing for him to be promising the money. And it's a third for him to actually give it away. The question is, like, if he does give it away, if he does cut checks or if he does earmark it, like, what happens if it needs to be returned? Does the Supreme Court let the tariffs that were already in place stand? I mean, there's so many questions. And also what we hear from inside the White House is, like, they're going to figure an end run around these tariffs no matter fucking what. Yes. Which is, like, how do you do that?

17:22And so Skoda's decision, whatever it may be, big deal for sure. But some of the tariffs aren't subject to that decision, number one. Number two, he was just saying to the New York Times in that interview that he wants to try licensing fees. It's like Trump's stakes. Yeah, if that doesn't work. And of course, some of the tariffs have already been lifted. He's already backed off some of the tariffs. So it's muddled there. I do think, and you alluded to this, he also told the New York Times that he does want to send$2 ,000 tariff checks. Yes. And he thinks he can do it without Congress. Yeah. And for timing, he said towards the end of the year.

17:59Oh, I wonder when. I know. I know. So I am wondering if they're going to like in October just decide we're going to send out fucking checks. Go ahead, sue us and see if you be the people that say we're going to take back$2 ,000 checks for the public. Yeah, yeah. So I do. I have a little concern about that. I'm just trying to think of what could change about the economy, because I think right now, if the election was held right now, we would see some of the results we saw in 2025. And I keep I keep wondering, like, how could the what levers does the administration have to change the economy and what exigent circumstances are out there that could change the economy?

18:34Jerome Powell. At least change how people. Yes. So he's going to appoint a new Fed chair. So you could get a new Fed chair that, I don't know, feels pressured to lower rates, obviously, if it's Fed chair. You don't even need to say, I don't know. I think expressly will be forced. Like literally, he'll have to wear a T-shirt to the interview that says, I will lower interest rates. Please give me the job. And then the question is, there's another Supreme Court decision on whether the president can just fire Fed chairs for no reason or just federal reserve members for no reason. And if Trump just gets the Fed chair, which he already is going to have, then the rest of the Fed can say, well, I don't care.

19:08Trump's a crazy new Fed chair. I'm just going to vote how I want to vote. But if he's now able to fire people and he puts a whole new Fed in, then we're in fucking uncharted territory. I don't know if that's actually going to improve the economy or destroy the economy, but that's a big one out there. Well, I mean, what it does to independent agencies and the balance of power is fucking shocking. We actually, this was a subject of runaway country before we went left for a break. We talked to the plaintiff. She is one of the lead plaintiffs in the cases going to the Supreme Court that will determine whether or not Trump can just fire, you know, the independent heads of these agencies.

19:43And it has repercussions, of course, for the Fed and for the American economy. But it's for a fucking any agency that serves in an oversight capacity to make sure that the American public are not is not getting fucked over by the federal government and political appointees. And if the Supreme Court says, yeah, go for it, I mean, that basically guts any real oversight of this particular administration and any fucking administration. It's really, really, really bad. I mean, at the risk of becoming a watered down, very, very poor imitation of strict scrutiny, like what is happening at the Supreme Court in the course of the next six months is going to be hugely determinative, not just for this year, but for the immediate future of our democracy.

20:26Yeah. I think that the ideal political scenario for the Trump White House, and this is not all necessarily things that they want. They just don't know what's good for them. But the ideal political scenario economically for the Trump White House is the Supreme Court strikes down the tariffs. the ACA subsidies deal goes through. They get some kind of compromise. The tax cuts, even though they are somewhat meager for lower and middle income people, are felt in the spring. And then maybe the job market, it's sort of - Wums up. Even if it doesn't get worse, right? Like maybe it just sort of putzes along.

21:06Sure. And then the AI boom, the AI bubble doesn't pop, doesn't crash. I mean, that's like that. It doesn't seem that far. That's right. That's what I'm saying. And then like if people feel even a little bit better than they do now, then I would I would have some concern heading into. Yeah, but don't forget Trump's ability to royally fuck. I mean, he's on a streak right now. And we say this in the week of Venezuela and the ice shooting of an unarmed American citizen in her Honda where he can he doesn't give a shit. Actually, I mean, he cares about not getting impeached. Right. That's that's his main interest in midterms.

21:41But he's in this sort of late stage autocrat. But he's running the late stage autocrat ego playbook where it's just about like big guns, being cruel, owning the libs, politics be damned. So even if, I mean, I don't know, you'd think that we've been here before and people voted back into office. Even if the economy is like, eh, OK, the fact that there could be National Guard troops, the fact that in a city near you, the fact that American citizens are getting assassinated by ICE agents in masks, the fact that there are immigration dragnets that are fucking up just communities and labor forces. Because, you know, all of this contributes and the fact that we may be invading Greenland, all of this contributes to a feel of chaos, lawlessness and insanity that I don't know.

22:26It'll be interesting to see how American I mean, that stuff is, I think, tangible in a way that talking about, you know, fascism as a sort of academic thesis, as as it was perhaps in the 2024 election. I think that stuff, because it's unfolding on videos and on streets and in cities all over the country, it resonates in a way and is therefore maybe more meaningful than, you know, the discussion about Trump's autocratic tendencies was in the Biden years.

23:03Pod Save America is brought to you by ZipRecruiter. If you're hiring for your company, this is a busy time of year for you because you've got new 2026 goals, which means finding the right people to accomplish them. Unfortunately, you also have a new hiring challenge for 2026, like filling specialized roles or identifying qualified candidates from a huge pool of applicants. Thankfully, there's a place you can go that can help you conquer these challenges and achieve your hiring goals, ZipRecruiter. And right now you can try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked. ZipRecruiter's matching technology works fast to find top talent so you don't waste time or money.

23:32You can find out right away how many job seekers in your area are qualified for your role. With ZipRecruiter's advanced resume database, you can instantly unlock top candidates' contact info. No wonder ZipRecruiter is the number one rated hiring site based on G2. Let ZipRecruiter help you find the best people for all of your roles. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. See for yourself, just go to this exclusive web address right now to try ZipRecruiter for free. ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked. Again, that's ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked.

24:03ZipRecruiter, the smartest way to hire. Pots of America is brought to you by Sundays. Out with the old, in with the new. It's that time of year, right? Question for you, how old is that giant bag of kibble you bought for your dog that you're still serving to them? I bet you don't even know, and that's a problem. The solution, Sundays. Sundays was founded by a veterinarian and mom, Dr. Tori Waxman, who got tired of seeing so-called premium dog food full of fillers and synthetics. So she designed Sundays, air dry real food made in a human grade kitchen using the same ingredients and care you'd use to cook for yourself and for your family.

Read the full transcript

24:36Every bite of Sundays is clean and made for 100 % meat and superfoods with no kibble. That means no weird ingredients you can't pronounce and no fillers. Compared to kibble or other brands out there, Sundays invest 50 times more in its ingredients to ensure premium quality. Because your dog deserves food made with care, not in the interest of cost-cutting. And the best part, you just scoop and serve. There's no freezer, no thawing, no prep, no mess. Just nutrient-rich, clean food that fuels their happiest, healthiest days so you get more of them to share together. Look, we all love our dogs like they are family.

25:04They might as well be sons or daughters or some other relative. Why wouldn't you give your pup the kind of food you would want to give to someone in your family? Especially when you know it gives them more energy, puts them in a better mood, makes them more calm or focused, less itchy, no more eye boogers, better poops, all the good stuff. Take care of your dog. Show your dog some love. Make the switch to Sundays. Go right now to sundaysfordogs.com slash crooked30 and get 30 % off your first three orders. Or you can use code crooked30 at checkout. What causes eye boogers? I don't even know. I don't even know either.

25:36That's 30 % off your first three orders at sundaysfordogs.com slash crooked30, sundaysfordogs.com slash crooked30, or use code crooked30 at checkout.

25:47Well, that's a good segue to my next question, which is how far will Stephen Miller take his domestic war against people who don't look like him or believe what he believes? Do you think I will be a resident of the United States of America by the end of the year? I mean, I certainly don't look the way he thinks Americans should look. Did you catch the Atlantic profile on Stephen Miller? I caught the first two paragraphs of it, John. Brutal. Steve Bannon calls him this prime minister, which I think is the prime minister of the government, which I think is apt. Yeah. There was a an anecdote from 2024 debate prep.

26:26And I've heard that I've heard the Trump side of this before. I hadn't heard the Miller side of this one before. I don't know if it's new or not, but Miller was going back and forth with someone who was a little more moderate on immigration with him during debate prep. And Trump was frustrated and interrupted the two men and said, Stephen, if you had it your way, everyone would look exactly like you. Someone familiar with the exchange told The Atlantic. And then Miller responded, that's correct, before turning back to continue sparring. So I do wonder, we are, you know, again, we have seen this week sort of the chaos of Miller's vision becoming realized of a mass deportation force rounding people up.

27:05And I wonder what the country looks like if they've come very close to defying the courts. In fact, you could say they have defied the courts here and there, but outright defiance of a Supreme Court. You know, you've made your decision. John Roberts now enforce it kind of thing. We haven't seen that yet. Yeah. Will we? Yeah. Birthright citizenship. Speaking of Supreme Court decisions is out there. Trump said to The New York Times this week that they he confirmed that they're taking steps to strip Americans of citizenship. Denaturalization. He said Somali of Somali descent. But he said others, if they deserve it.

27:43Yeah. Well, if you get it on his wrong side, fuck you. You have to get out of here. Now, denaturalization is a difficult standard to meet legally. You have to basically have lied or committed fraud on your citizenship application process. Right. Talk to Tish James about how much fraud you actually need to commit to be found in the crosshairs of Trump's. I heard Tom Emmer a couple weeks ago be like, oh, all these Somali Americans who committed, who were caught in the fraud ring, they should be denaturalized. That's not what the law says, that if you are a naturalized citizen and you commit a crime, then you can be denaturalized.

28:24That's not what it – but if you lied somehow. But like, you know, they asked for – I believe Stephen Miller and DHS have asked for like 100 to – like they asked for a certain minimum number of denaturalization cases every month. That should send a chill down everybody's spine. And actually, my question five was how many migrants have been, well, killed and how many American citizens deported by the end of the year because that's the collateral damage of all of this. You, everybody, like the problem with the Trump administration, it's like it is the frog boiling slowly. Remember when he was just going to get the criminals out?

28:58And now it's everybody's accepted that if you came here without papers, you're a criminal and therefore subject to deportation. Like that was not the litmus test. Even like I'm old enough to remember last year, I should say, like in 2024, when that wasn't going to be the criteria by which these dragnets were going to operate. You're going to have to be a violent criminal, not supposed to be here. And then they were going to take you out. Not that I agreed with that. But all of a sudden the standard is just if you came here and you didn't have your papers, then we're going to tear you from your family even if you are in court to try and follow the process.

29:29We are going to find you. We may take family members who are here legally and also deport them. I mean, and so when the Trump administration or when the law says you have to have committed some crime or fraud, like everything is fungible. Everything is movable. The goalposts are not stationary on any of this. And so while denaturalization may be legally complicated, it's a fool's errand to believe in the adverb legally with this administration, right? They change the game all the time. And if they decide they want to take naturalized citizens and rip their fucking passports and their papers away from them, then they will.

30:05And like the courts be damned. I will also say this court has been a gross enabler of the worst, most racist impulses of this court, right? The Kavanaugh stops. You can now just stop someone on the street because they're brown. Like that's the world in which we live. And it is very difficult for me to imagine at the end of 2026, I almost forgot what year it is, that this is not a whiter country than it is as we sit here today in early January. A whiter country and I worry just more state-sponsored violence. Totally. And chaos in the streets, because I do think there is a and, you know, this this is the issue that I fear the most is what keeps me up at night.

30:46But there is a temptation. I felt the temptation over the last couple of months before this week where it's like, OK, the the Chicago, the Midway Blitz wound down the the ice raids here in Los Angeles sort of it went like city by city for a while. And then we saw that they lost on the National Guard in court. And so they announced they were taking the National Guard out of a lot of these cities. But they're still like, you know, then they sent them to Minneapolis. And now we're dealing with this in Minneapolis. And now they're going to go to other cities. And what they want is a reaction. Yep.

31:21They absolutely want a reaction. They want to provoke reaction. Yep. You hear J.D. Vance in an interview this week saying like, oh, well, we got to – J.D. Vance and Stephen Miller think they have done poorly on deportations. They think that they are getting heat. They're not listening to the people who are upset about this. on the left or the center. No, they're listening to people on the right. Or the center right. They're listening to the far, far right who's like, you have not deported enough people. You have not rounded up enough people. And there are too many people who still have citizenship who shouldn't have citizenship here.

31:48And J.D. Vance is like, well, once now we get the system in place and the money's coming from the funding and the big, beautiful bill for ICE, now we're going to start going door to door, he said on Fox. And I think I worry a lot about this for this year because there's no reason for the administration to stop doing it because they don't give a shit what the courts say. They don't give a shit about public opinion on it. Public opinion has turned hard against them on deportations. They enjoy the violence and the cruelty. Yes. Right? That's why you see when they kill an American citizen on videotape, the reaction is not even let's let the investigation play out.

32:29The reaction is let's smear her memory, let's degrade her humanity, and let's suggest that her death was warranted. I mean, whoa, right? Like that's where we're at. I will just say by the numbers, according to the DHS in December of last year, in President Trump's first year back in office, more than 2.5 million illegal aliens, their term, not mine, have left the US, including an estimated 1.9 million self-deportations and 622 ,000 deportations. I would love to - Hard to trust those numbers. Very hard to trust those numbers, But also that's not – Especially in the self-deportations. Exactly. Is that people that like went to go see family and then just couldn't get back in the country?

33:09It's hard to know what that actually means. Also, 622 ,000 deportations is a fuckton of deportations. How many of them were actually people who had papers to be here? But also that's not the number that they wanted. Yeah. So like that should send it – they are very interested in meeting their targeted numbers and they will stop at nothing to reach them. So the fact that 622 ,000 isn't even close to what they wanted should scare us all. And the other shoe that hasn't really dropped yet is, if you remember after Charlie Kirk's assassination, there was like we're going to go after Antifa and all the left wing groups and really cracked down on opposition.

33:44Yeah. And it was a lot of like sound and furor and not much came of it. And now this week we've seen, you know, it's like kicking back up again because after they have decided to kill an unarmed American citizen. And, you know, J.D. Vance at the White House briefing today was like, we're going to find the people who fund this. And, you know, I still don't know how much of it is bullshit to scare people or how much of it is like suddenly subpoenas are going out and, you know, people are getting sued and dragged to court. And that worries me, too. Well, yeah, and I didn't put this in as a question, but they are all doing everything in their power to, you know, consolidate the media landscape and the information landscape to suit their own ends, right?

34:30That's going to be my next question. Okay, you go. Take it away, boss. I didn't put it on. I didn't know I was going to put it on my list. Our segues are so natural now, so we don't even have to go like next question. It's like we work at the same office. It was like what kind of impact will the Trump MAGA war on independent objective media have? And that, you know, there's a couple of dimensions to that, right? That now, again, to the boiling frog thing, like after a year, they – so TikTok is back, right? You know, the Chinese gave us TikTok and now there's some consortium, right? So there's some Trump allies that are in there.

35:09Elon's still got X. Yeah, and Grok. Right, and Grok. And the AI overlords have kissed Donald Trump's ass. You know what happens when you kiss ass, John. You just get ass. You guys have to listen to, who don't know that reference, you have to listen to Runaway Country. It's a deep cut. Yeah, it's a deep cut. So they are, he's got them on the team. He's got the Ellisons who now have CBS and are looking to also take Warner Brothers and CNN or maybe just CNN. Who knows? And right wing propaganda network. That's bigger than ever. And I guess my question is, like it's happening. How much of an impact does it have this year?

35:56And when does it start? When do you start, and maybe we'll never know, but when do you start seeing it having an influence on public opinion? Yeah. I mean, I think the CBS stuff is a great test case for that, right? Because that's the most insidious right there. You have Legacy Brand. You have someone installed, Barry Weiss, who is clearly doing the handiwork of the Trump administration. And in the most, I suppose we can call it skillful because Barry Weiss is smart. She's very articulate. You know, she ran a very successful independent news organization, not as successful as the money they paid her for it.

36:32But, you know, she's not she ain't Sean Spicer. Right. And so in that way, it's much more malignant, I think. And Tony DiCoppo is not a malignant actor necessarily. But the language he's using, the stories he's covering, the favor he's currying with the administration is incredibly detrimental. Marco Rubio, we salute you. I know. I mean, right. I mean, I actually I'm giving it. Yeah. This has surprised me and like you can call me naive. It wasn't necessarily as naive, but I'm just like Barry Weiss, whatever. Like first of all, is it really going to be that blatant? What's going to happen? The Tony DeCobble stuff in this last week is like, are you fucking kidding me?

37:12The Margaret Rubio stuff is so – I mean it's just – I don't think that's effective first of all, but I also think it's just like so embarrassing. It's so embarrassing. I think the great hope is that, and I say this as someone who worked at CBS and, you know, took pride in working at CBS for a while, that the evening news has become so utterly irrelevant that they can't actually change. It's more of kind of watching a car slowly crash. That's sort of where my lack of intense concern was coming from. Not that I didn't think they would try, but I was like, who's really watching the evening news? Well, I just – Enough people.

37:39I don't think it's bad that it gets poisoned on the way down, though. You know, like that. I don't think it's bad to have news gathering organizations, you know, and the poisoning of it, the irrelevance of it. It's just all fucking bad for information health in our democracy. And that part is really distressing to me. You know, destroying CBS, even if it doesn't have an immediate and practical impact on the, you know, the sort of citizenry. It's just not a good thing for democracy. And to get away with it is, you know, that's just another way of destroying the fourth estate is to just make it so fucking unwatchable and so gross that it doesn't matter anymore.

38:20And that's a model for, you know, linear cable, which is increasingly irrelevant. Just like map that on to CNN, right? And then like destroy that shit and you're done. Like it's what happened in Hungary. They chose to close these newsrooms, right, which is more aggressive than what the Trump administration is doing. But by installing talentless hacks that nobody believes in and in a medium that's increasingly irrelevant, well, then you get rid of like institutional media in a pretty adept way. Yeah, I mean, there's the question of, you know, the sort of right-wing media conglomerate propaganda network out there versus opinion that is more left-leaning, analysis that's more left-leaning.

39:00And we obviously think about that a lot here. But my big question is, how many people are out there paying for news gathering? Totally. How much news gathering is going on and how much of it will be able to continue that is not tainted by fear of Trump or just, you know, opinionated to sort of match MAGA preferences. Totally. And, you know, we're sitting here in the week that I think the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette is closing down. Shuttering because two psychopaths who own it are trying to own the libs that work for the paper, basically. And I do wonder, like, just from a news gathering perspective, if we're going to be all takes and opinion and then AI slop and, you know, creators who, God bless them, but like are people getting, you know, like I just, I worry about actual news gathering.

39:56Where does that leave us? And who's going to pay? It's just me interviewing some people on Runaway Country. That's not new to the guy. That's just me interviewing people.

40:12Pod Save America is brought to you by Helix. I love my Helix mattress. I have a Dawn Lux. It's the best. And in this colder season, you end up maybe you want to, you know, get cozy and stay comfortable with your Helix mattress. And the Helix offers a variety of mattresses designed to fit your sleep needs. How will you know which Helix mattress works best for you and your body? Take the Helix Sleep Quiz. It matches you with the perfect mattress based on your personal preferences. making it easy to find a mattress that suits your sleep needs. Helix will deliver your mattress right to your door with free shipping in the U.S.

40:41The Happy with Helix guarantee offers a risk-free customer-first experience designed to ensure you're completely satisfied with your new mattress. You can rest easy with seamless returns and exchanges. They even have a 120-night sleep trial and limited lifetime warranty. Go to helixsleep.com slash crooked for 27 % off-site wide. This offer is exclusive to Pod Save America listeners. That's helixsleep.com slash crooked for 27 % off-site wide. Make sure you enter our show name after checkout so they know we sent you helixsleep.com slash crooked. Posse of America is brought to you by Z-Biotics. Let's face it, after a night with drinks, I do not bounce back the next day like I used to.

41:16I have to make a choice. I can either have a great night or a great next day. That is until I found pre-alcohol. Z-Biotics pre-alcohol probiotic drink is the world's first genetically engineered probiotic. It was invented by PhD scientists to tackle rough mornings after drinking. Here's how it works. When you drink, alcohol gets converted into a toxic byproduct in the gut. It's a buildup of this byproduct, not dehydration, that's to blame for rough days after drinking. Pre-alcohol produces an enzyme to break this byproduct down. Just remember to make pre-alcohol your first drink of the night. Drink responsibly, and you'll feel your best tomorrow.

41:48You guys know I'm an evangelist for Z-Biotics. I've been using it for years. I basically won't have a drink without taking one before. I always notice a difference, especially if it's like the holiday season. you have that one extra drink that you normally wouldn't have, but you're out with friends, you're having a good time, you don't want to call it a night. Z-Biotics is a life changer for me in those circumstances. Here's the thing. I know you might be skeptical. Try it once. What do you have to lose? Get one pack. Just try it one time. If you don't like it, whatever, but you're going to love it.

42:16Ready to try it? Go to zbiotics.com slash crooked. Go now. You'll get 15 % off your first order when you use crooked at checkout. Plus it's backed by 100 % money back guarantee. so there's no risk. Subscriptions are also available for maximum consistency. Remember to head to zbiotics.com slash crooked and use the code crooked at checkout for 15 % off.

42:38All right, Ken, well, I mean, speaking of the health of our democracy, I do wonder if we still have our representative democracy by the end of this year. I hate to go back to the Supreme Court, but I do think Louisiana versus Calais, where they're looking at Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which is like probably the end of the Voting Rights Act as we know it, something that Chief Justice John Roberts has wanted to make real since he was a staffer in Ed Meese's Department of Justice under Ronald Reagan. The conservatives have hated the Voting Rights Act for a long time. And now you have a bunch of white people basically suing and saying it's reverse racism to have districts that prioritize minority voices and voters and give them representation in Congress.

43:21That's where we're at. And I just think you do away with that. And well, first of all, the South is gone. And one of the most important sort of reparative mechanisms for our long and checkered institutional racism disappears. And at this moment, when we no longer have affirmative action, we have like an administration that says that any kind of civil rights gains are wokeism that need to be reversed, whether they happened in World War II or yesterday. It's a dangerous time. It's a dangerous time for people of color. It's a dangerous time for people who believe in a more inclusive society. And I think the Supreme Court decision could have profoundly traumatic after effects on American society.

44:09Yes. And I don't think it will go well. And I mean, from oral arguments, at least. And I do think the only optimistic part is that I think it's going to be tough for whatever decision they make to be implemented before these midterms. Yes. But that's cold comfort for, you know, generations to come. I also think, and we've seen that this year with redistricting, that what's going to happen then is sort of a gerrymandering race to the bottom where if we lose another 10, 15, whatever seats in the South because of this decision, then the blue states again are going to go back and be like, all right, we're going to just wipe out all the Republicans in our district.

44:55And then you're going to just have this country that is. Completely split. Yeah. Bad. What could go wrong? Yeah. All right. I have, will a challenger emerge who seriously threatens J.D. Vance's chance at the Republican nomination in 2028? Oh, I love this question. It's so juicy. Isn't it Viceroy Rubio that's going to be the challenger? Or is he the running mate? I think he's the running mate. I think he's the running mate. Wait, say more. Okay, who else do you think could be that person? So I think one of the reasons that J.D. Vance is just the biggest asshole you've ever seen in public. That's saying something.

45:37Right. That's saying something. I think his running theory is no enemies to your right because that's where the challenge would come from. Right. Got it. And he is not as charismatic as his boss, Donald Trump. He is not as charismatic as many of the figures on the right. He can't order donuts, John. Right. He's like the least charismatic human being in America. But like he needs to, you know, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, right? Like all of the, and I'm not even saying they're, who knows, maybe. But like he needs those people to like him. To not just like him, but to love him. Or at the very least, not to challenge him or not to find challengers for him.

46:14And so you have a J.D. Vance who is, in some ways, his political fortunes are tethered to Donald Trump as are Marco Rubio's. And so if, you know, Trump's popular or middling, then like maybe they're fine. But if Trump gets even worse, it gets even less popular than than J.D. Vance's ambitions are fucked and he can't break from Donald Trump. Right. And so he has to be as extreme as possible. And I think he happens to believe most of it, too. But even if he didn't, he would have to be if he wants to be president. and I think that someone on the right could say if the Trump administration, if Donald Trump's sitting at like in the 30s by the end of the year, by the end of next year, there's gonna be people on the right who are like, that's J.D.

46:58Vance that is saddled with that. Not me. Not me. And he's a fucking pud who is,

47:09can't excite a crowd, awkward. He is no, I mean, here, say this about Trump. Many things can be said. He is incredibly authentic. And J.D. Vance does not have an authentic bone in his body. The other thing we're discounting is the sickness of Trump. He is going to enjoy the sort of hunger games of the inheritance, much like he does with his children, very succession vibes. He will love playing Rubio and Vance off of each other. And I would guess if there is a challenger from the right, he will entertain that person at Mar-a-Lago just to make J.D. Vance and Marco Rubio beg and scrape that much harder.

47:45I mean, they will be sick and twisted. Delicious. Lovett and I did John Heileman's podcast right before. I was going to say, you did a show with him or two. Yeah. Right before the break. and he was down on Vance as a nominee, but was like, what about, he thinks like Don Jr. What do you think about Don Jr.? I, maybe, I think they kind, it's interesting, right? I think that's tough too. I think they like making money. I mean, like, I really think they like being rich, right? I really think they like being rich. Although he seems a little drunk on power. I would not be surprised. It will be Sophie's choice for Donald Trump because I don't think he actually likes his children, you know?

48:25And I think that's a, I think it's a, I think the Vance Don Jr. thing is hard to like tease out because I don't think Trump Jr. goes after Vance. And I don't think Trump sort of allows that kind of thing. I really do think it if there's a challenger to Vance, which I think is very possible, it is an outsider. It is a Tucker. It is a. TC? Megan. No. Let me tell you. No way. She likes that podcasting studio. They all like it. But wouldn't you like a, you know. She likes being Charlie of Charlie's Angels. She likes being the voice in the box. I can't see that. T.C. T.C. from the barn to the barnstorm.

48:59I can see it. I can see that. Austin just held up a picture of Marjorie Taylor Greene. MTG. Flash in the pan. I feel like she's going to come back to me at the end of the year when she's a fucking nominee. I just feel like she can't get. She's done the thing. She's come out too early against Trump. I just think that that's just a very hard road to hoe. And I saw her yesterday on TV. Not in real life. And I made that show. I was just talking to her yesterday. She's like, eh, I'm not into it. Nicola of Ultras, the local bar. And she just, she's already, I feel like a discomfort there that is going to get even more pronounced the more real her bid becomes.

49:34But you know what? I should shut the fuck up because I also didn't think Donald Trump was necessarily going to win in 2015. What do you got? I got one that is just a complete fucking downer, but it's real relevant. Will medication abortion still be legal by the end of the year? Oh, gosh. Sorry, I know. We were talking MTG, but this is fucking so real because this is a week in which psychopath bear killer, like, creatine monster Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has changed the sort of vaccine recommendations for children, getting rid of—what did he get rid of? Flu, RSV, rotavirus, hepatitis A, and meningitis.

50:08Who needs to be vaccinated against those things? He has done everything he said he wouldn't do in his Senate confirmation. and he never said he wouldn't get rid of Mifepristone. And under the head of the FDA, Marty Makari, they have, you know, they pledged to conduct a full review of Mifepristone's safety. This is a gimme to the hard right. Kennedy has proven himself absolutely fucking shameless when pandering to the political right and has totally politicized the FDA and HHS and the CDC. And I could absolutely see a world in which they get rid of mifepristone, which is the drug used in most medication abortions, which account for, as of 2023, 63 % of all abortions.

50:54We don't talk about abortion. And I think there are a lot of reasons for that, not least among them, because it didn't win Democrats 2024. But that doesn't mean the issue isn't insanely urgent. And it is a matter of national health concern. And it is just as urgent as vaccine schedules and mRNA research and everything else he's doing to fuck with American bodies over at his cabinet agency. So I'm curious to know whether that's something that, you know, people can choose by the end of the year. You know, as you started that answer, I thought, okay, I could see it happening. If I were to bet, I would bet against it only because Donald Trump has seemed skittish and going too hard right on that issue for purely political reasons and a bunch of republicans in more competitive areas feel the same way for either real reasons or political reasons um but to our whatever question we asked a couple before this on the uh the gerrymandering race to the bottom as the country gets more polarized and there are and it's like oh there are a bunch of republicans in blue states that we're worried about now?

52:04Probably less. Certainly less. And you start to worry that like wouldn't the right who have now outlawed abortion in most red states love to stick it to the blue states. You can't get pregnant and have a miscarriage in a red state. Right. Right? Like that's where we're at. So the idea that they would make it, if not illegal, very difficult to access medication abortion seems very possible. It would be a stupid fucking thing to do in a midterm year. Yes. I will say. It could happen in, you know, December. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Or in early January. Yeah. I bet Susie Wiles and Trump himself are like, hey, we want to win the midterms.

52:42Let's cool it. Simmer down. Let's wait. Let's just make sure kids can die of polio. Right. Yeah. That we're OK with. Yeah. Cool. But who knows? Who knows?

52:58pod save america is brought to you by strawberry.me you know that feeling when a new year starts and you tell yourself okay this is the year work is going to be great and then two weeks later you're already burned out again yeah we've been there are you there tommy i've been there i've been there i hope not right now no no i'm good right now if work left you drain last year today's sponsor strawberry.me can help you change that. Strawberry is career coaching that gets to the real source of your burnout, whether it's too much on your plate, no boundaries, a tough manager, or just feeling totally disconnected from the work you do.

53:27Or maybe I'm just a manager with high standards. A coach helps you figure out what's draining you, build habits that protect your energy, redesign your day-to-day so it feels sustainable and create a plan so burnout doesn't come back by March. It's not therapy, but honestly, it's like therapy for your career. And here's the good part. You can get matched with a coach who fits your personality and goals in just a few minutes. Sessions are flexible, private, and made for real people with real jobs. Not the fantasy version of you that always has it together. If you're listening and thinking, yep, I'm burned out, then this may be your new year reset.

53:55Go to strawberry.me slash crooked and try your first coaching session for 50 % off. That's strawberry.me slash crooked.

54:06Is Gavin Newsom still the front runner at this time next year? That's a big question. How was his podcast? You were just up there. I was just up there. You didn't tell me about this. How was it? He gave me a full tour of the Governor's Mansion. For people who are art, people who like street art, there is a rotating series of art exhibits in the Governor's Mansion, including a collection of Barry McGee surfboards. If you know who Barry McGee, a.k.a. Twist, is a former graffiti writer who now is part of the collection at LACMA, he's amazing. And I walked in and I was like, this is fucking awesome.

54:37And he was like, you know who Barry McGee is? And I was like, you know who Barry McGee is? And then I was like, you are never going to get elected president. Like, you cannot know who Barry McGee is and get elected president. That's too fucking street smart. Gavin Newsom is a delightful interviewer. I will say we had a great time. He's really good at it. He is very good. Surprisingly good because most people who are politicians are completely self-involved. And he, I think, surprisingly, like deeply curious. And he's a chatter, you know. I think he has a lot of passion for the job. I think there's going to be just a massive question about the California of it all, right?

55:16It's the biggest one for me. It's the biggest one. I have long thought that you need someone that is as memeable as Donald or can drive the meme machine the way that Trump does and has the Zero Fox, Yosemite Sam style arsenal. And he's that dude. He's establishing himself early as by far the most joyful warrior in the pack. I just wonder if it is off-putting to the very earnest Democratic Party that looks at the stakes and it's just like – it's hard to know. I mean it's very hard for me to understand how he plays to a party that right now is largely oriented against Trump and has definitely not declared what it is for and how it wants to be for those things.

55:58Do you know? Yes. So I'm not answering your question. No, but I mean – But I mean – I've been thinking about this for a while because I, again, the more I watch Gavin Newsom, get to know Gavin Newsom, like talk to, you know, interview him, be interviewed on his, the more I like him. Yeah. And I really appreciate like what he has been doing to fight not just in California, but nationally. Yeah. For the party. As we get closer to an actual Democratic primary. Yeah. I do. There's part of me that always thinks like, oh, this is a California governor. Yeah. This California. Yeah. So California. And it's not about him necessarily.

56:32It's just about like. Although I did think like should I suggest he wears hair differently? Like if he wants a better shot. That's something. That is something. Cut it shorter? But like did you read the Atlantic profile on him? I did. I started to. But I was literally going to meet the man and I just had like a heavy dose of Gavin Newsom that day. And I much respect Governor. I just was a lot of you. It's just there's a couple of things. They talked about the California of it all. And they were like you know another reason for hesitation might be that California has other laws that must have the makers of Republican attack ads salivating with anticipation.

57:03In 2020, the state passed SB 132, allowing male criminals to self-identify into women's prisons. One of those transferred, Tremaine Carroll, is awaiting trial on charges of raping two female inmates. It's like, okay. There you go. Again, this is just like when I first— This is Kamala Harris. I know. And again, when I first heard that story, I was like, well, that seems— and you look it up and you're like, okay, well, there's a law and you get it. And you're like, OK, well, if you're going to provide everyone medical care and then you're going to say that transition care is medical, you know, like one thing leads to another and it makes sense in context.

57:39But then when you see it, you're like, oh, OK, that's going to be a challenge. Yeah. And he's just very like he's he's very California. Yeah. Like he fits the bill of a you know, it was like they talked about his wedding to to his his his current wife. and it was like, you know, the ceremony was conducted by Carol Simone, a modern day mystic, whose website describes her as a medium and astrology. Just like, it was just the most California shit ever. Right, and like we elected a serial philanderer and like he has been married a trillion times and had affairs with porn stars. And yet we're like, don't you dare get married by a mystic.

58:16Donald Trump is a good code switcher in that like he is, you know, Manhattan. He's not Manhattan. He's out of rural and he's rich, but he's sort of like he's got a chip on his shoulder about being rich. So he's sort of, you know, so there's he's got that Barack Obama had his feet in 10 different worlds. Yeah. Like Bill Clinton, Oxford, Arkansas. Right. Like the Joe Biden. Right. Like the people who succeed in politics nationally can identify with the other part of the country, if not by resume and identity, then by just some experience in their life. some feel. Yeah. And maybe he has that. Maybe he can do that.

58:59Well, you know, we haven't seen, I mean, we haven't seen this sort of talking tour yet. He is going to have a memoir come out in February. Yeah. He will be on tour for that and it will be an interesting case study in his, what is it, press the flesh skills. Yeah. But who else? Who else do you think for the book? Listen, I had a conversation with, you know, Big Dem over the break and she was saying J.B. Pritzker is who she liked. Okay. Okay. She thought she had been taking regular doses of Mount Jaro in preparation for that. Oof. Her word's not mine. Okay. I think they're going to see some governors.

59:34Josh Piro's going to be up in the mix. Maybe Gretchen Whitmer raises her hand. I think Wes Moore is absolutely going to be on people's dance cards. Yeah. I mean, it's a – I think it's going to – Maybe Gallego is out there. Maybe. Maybe. Maybe. I mean, I think it's going to be a pretty big field. Hopefully not, like, so big as to be unwieldy. but listen no one's no one's no one's popping out for me ahead of the pack right now well I mean that's why it's just Gavin Newsom and his tote bags with Kid Rock and the laying of the hands I think that that is the greatest meme I've ever fucking seen it's really funny if you're listening to us Gavin Newsom's social media team please make that into a tote bag people will buy it alright I got my is this my sixth?

1:00:15yeah I don't even know which number I was on I'm gonna this is my well this is my sixth but I can continue to ask questions What will the White House actually look like? Okay, so here's the news. Here's the news, John, today. Actually, this is news of the week, but there's always news about the White House. The ballroom is going to be now as tall as the main mansion itself. Oh, yes. Which means we also have to add on to the West Wing. Well, exactly. So they're considering a one-story addition to the West Wing's colonnade in an effort to create symmetry with the two-story colonnade that would lead from the White House to the ballroom.

1:00:51And then there's going to be maybe an office suite for the first lady, which would be nice since they destroyed any office she once had in a reconstructed White House movie theater. Well, thank God they can screen more Sly Stallone films, I guess, in full 4K HD or whatever the fuck it is. Point is, he is completely rebuilding the White House. Yeah. It is not going to resemble itself by whatever, whenever construction is complete. It's shocking. It's going to look like another Trump Tower. and I would not be surprised if he just puts the fucking name. Trump and gold. I made this joke to Dan on Thursday's Friday's podcast.

1:01:30Recycle it, it's okay. Yeah, it's the, we did this for the 2011 Correspondents' Dinner. We had a big slide up, big picture of, oh God, if Donald Trump did run for president, this is what the White House would look like. And it's, we should put it up on the screen. Cassandra, you were Cassandra. It looks very close to - You were in the predictions business. Yeah, right. to what it's, where it's headed. Well, he's got to remember who lives there, right? Isn't that what they're saying is the reason that everything's labeled right now in the White House with this hideous gold lettering that really looks like the kind of lettering you'd see on a restroom door is because he's so addled and so forgetful and his brain isn't working right that he needs reminders about like, this is the Oval Office, this is the Situation Room, and this is the White House where Trump lives.

1:02:14This is where you live, sir. But the, you know, I mean, it's no surprise that architects keep resigning from this project. It's so fucking controversial. And without being like the worst downer in America, it's also symbolic of the work it's going to take to rebuild our fucking country after this person is out of office. Right. Like he is fundamentally changing institutions. He's he's rebuilding our democracy. I don't want to say rebuilding because he's destroying the democracy, but he's rebuilding American society in a very. In his image. In his image. And it's going to take time, just like undoing his hideous renovation of the White House is going to take, I don't know, how long is that going to take?

1:02:50Who's going to do that and who's going to do it with what money? You know, it's a metaphor for everything else he's doing. So I'm curious to see what it looks like in December. Well, it made me think, too, sort of my last, it was like a smaller question, but I started the episode by mentioning this, like the 250th birthday for America. and I do wonder how much the birthday, the anniversary is going to matter in 2026 because they are going to go all out for that. And I think that in an election year and in a year where people are starting to think about 2028, there is, and this happens in America when there are centennials, bicentennials, like there is going to be a debate over the meaning of America, the meaning of what it is to celebrate America's 250th anniversary.

1:03:37Donald Trump is going to be in control of that, unfortunately. He's got the White House thing. They're going to do fireworks. Military parade. This is going to be a big thing. Jingoism run amok. It's going to be a big thing in the summer. And they're going to want to bait, you know, they're going to, you know, America hating libs. And they talk down. And so we're going to have to have a good response to that about the America that we love. Well, and also nobody owns the flag. Nobody owns the flag. Yeah. Nobody owned the White House either. Well, I know. I don't see how that went. You know, I wonder if there's a drug that will induce a Rip Van Winkle-like state for all of us so we can just fucking wake up at the end of the year instead of living through all of it.

1:04:14Like, if this is the first week, stop this train. I want to get off. I look forward to our end-of-the-year Pod Save America episode where you're going to have to come for that. And we can talk about you and I doing these questions. We need to run it back. We're going to have plenty of clips. MTG will be running the official nominee. We're going to have so many clips to play. Oh, fuck. If we miss any good questions also and you're listening, let us know. Please. I mean, if we, we definitely, definitely miss any good questions. There was one that I wanted to, not to freak everyone out, but I mean, maybe it won't.

1:04:43You'll know that the Republicans are legitimately worried about losing the Senate and not just the House. Yeah. If we start getting retirement announcement from our friends Sam Alito and or Clarence Thomas. Oh, fuck. They are definitely going to do that. They are definitely going to – let me just say they are going to – at the end of this term, there will be two vacancies in the Supreme Court. No question. I think that's almost without question. But it's interesting because if they lose the Senate, they can't do it. But if they announce their retirements in June, they can get confirmation started in September.

1:05:17And you know. But it's a gauge a little bit of how confident they are that they'll keep the Senate. I think they're – I think they're – Because they could do it in the lame duck even if they lose the Senate. but that's also imagine Sam Alito and or and or Thomas announcing their retirement in like November and then they suddenly get I guess they could yeah I think they're gonna do it at the end of the term the problem is like will the conservative zygote that is going to replace them be fully hatched because they're gonna nominate someone in utero it's just gonna be like an AI chatbot like a right wing AI chatbot that's been like trained on fucking Alex Jones live forever that's it live forever anyway on that note happy 2022 2026.

1:05:56Oh, boy. Alex, this was fun. Was it? Thanks. I had a good time. I did. I did. I did. Thank you for having me, buddy. Thanks, everyone, for listening. We'll be back in your feed with a new episode of Pod Save America on Tuesday. If you want to listen to Pod Save America ad-free and get access to exclusive podcasts, go to crooked.com slash friends to subscribe on Supercast, Substack, YouTube, or Apple Podcasts. Also, please consider leaving us a review. That helps boost this episode and everything we do here at Crooked. Pod Save America is a Krugged Media production. Our producers are David Toledo, Emma Illich Frank, and Saul Rubin.

1:06:30Our associate producer is Farrah Safari. Austin Fisher is our senior producer. Reid Churlin is our executive editor. Adrian Hill is our head of news and politics. The show is mixed and edited by Andrew Chadwick. Jordan Cantor is our sound engineer, with audio support from Kyle Seglin and Charlotte Landis. Matt DeGroat is our head of production. Naomi Sengel is our executive assistant. Thanks to our digital team, Elijah Cohn, Hayley Jones, Ben Hefcoat, Mia Kelman, Carol Pellaviv, David Tolles, and Ryan Young. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

From the publisher

Will the Supreme Court destroy what remains of the Voting Rights Act? How much influence will America's 250th anniversary have on the midterm elections? If the Democrats win those elections, who in the administration will they investigate first? Jon Favreau and Alex Wagner share their biggest questions for year two of Trump 2.0 in search of some hope for the year ahead.

For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@crooked.com and include the name of the podcast.

 

More from Pod Save America

All 187 episodes
1106: 2026's Biggest QuestionsPod Save America · 1 h 7 min
Listen in VO