1125: Will Trump Bomb State of the Union/Iran?

24 Feb 2026 · 1 h 29 min · 34 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Pod Save America - Episode 1125: Will Trump Bomb State of the Union/Iran?

Episode Overview In this episode of Pod Save America, hosts Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett, and Tommy Vietor discuss President Trump's upcoming State of the Union address, the possibility of military action against Iran, and various political developments. They also feature a conversation with Simone Sanders-Townsend and Eugene Daniels about future Democratic candidates and the Texas primary.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. State of the Union Address
  2. Anticipation builds around Trump's address, especially in light of his controversial approval ratings and recent Supreme Court decisions that affect his tariffs.
  3. The hosts express skepticism about Trump's ability to deliver a coherent message amidst declining popularity and looming military decisions regarding Iran.
  4. Predictions include a long-winded speech filled with inaccuracies, particularly about the economy and tariffs.
  1. Potential Military Action Against Iran
  2. Reports suggest that Trump may be considering airstrikes against Iran as negotiations falter.
  3. Discussion centers around the implications of military action, including risks to American lives and potential retaliation from Iran.
  4. Concerns are raised about the lack of a clear strategy and the secrecy surrounding the proposed military actions.
  1. Democratic Responses to Trump's Address
  2. Various Democratic representatives plan to respond to Trump's speech in a manner reflecting their political affiliations and strategies.
  3. Lovett discusses the differing approaches to engagement from Democrats, contrasting traditional responses with more disruptive tactics.
  4. The show highlights the importance of visuals and narratives in political responses, especially during high-profile events like the State of the Union.
  1. Interview with Simone Sanders-Townsend and Eugene Daniels
  2. The guests discuss their new podcast "Clock It" and provide insights into Democratic contenders for the 2028 election.
  3. Focus on the Texas primary race featuring candidates Jasmine Crockett and James Tallarico, encapsulating the ideological divides within the party.
  4. The conversation touches on race, electability, and the significance of a diverse voter base in shaping electoral outcomes.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump's State of the Union: Expected to be filled with exaggerations about his policies and achievements while downplaying significant challenges facing Americans.
  • Military Strategy: The potential for military action against Iran remains contentious and unwelcome among the public, with unclear objectives from the Trump administration.
  • Democratic Engagement: The variety of responses to Trump's address reflects a broader strategy of the Democratic Party to engage with voters through both traditional and modern methods.
  • 2028 Candidates: As the field for the next presidential election begins to take shape, the panel emphasizes the need for candidates to resonate with a diverse voter base, especially in pivotal states like Texas.

Closing Remarks The episode concludes with a reminder for listeners to subscribe for more in-depth political analysis and discussions, particularly about the unfolding State of the Union and its implications for the upcoming elections.

Related Links

  • [Pod Save America on YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/c/PodSaveAmerica)
  • [Subscribe to Friends of the Pod](http://crooked.com/friends)
  • [Simone and Eugene's Podcast: Clock It](#)

By dissecting the events leading up to the State of the Union and exploring the current political landscape, this episode of Pod Save America keeps listeners informed on crucial political developments and strategies as the 2024 elections approach.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

State of the Union Preview

2:27 to 3:18

Discussion on the upcoming State of the Union address and Trump's mindset.

“You'll get our new extra episode of Pod Save America called Pod Save America Only Friends.”

Potential War with Iran

3:18 to 9:10

Analysis of Trump's considerations regarding military action against Iran.

“So naturally, he's in a great headspace as he prepares for the biggest audience he'll get before the midterms.”

Understanding Trump's Strategy

9:10 to 14:02

Exploration of Trump's motivations and possible outcomes of his actions in Iran.

“But the reasons for it and the scope of it are not only not being debated, but they are secret from us.”

Trump's Military Strategy and Political Maneuvering

14:02 to 14:48

Explore Trump's motivations behind military actions and their political implications.

“leader, you are like, you know, the greatest president in history.”

Risks of Military Operations and Casualties

14:49 to 15:17

Understand the potential dangers and costs involved in U.S. military operations.

“Like that to me is like, honestly, it's a hopeful direction.”

Congress and War Powers: A Failed Resolution

15:18 to 16:45

Examine Congress's role and failures in authorizing military action against Iran.

“No one was killed in the Venezuela operation, but a guy got shot in the leg, one of the helicopter pilots, and then nearly went down.”

Historical Context of Military Authorizations

16:46 to 18:47

Learn about past military authorizations and their implications for current policy.

“who not only said they're opposed, but put out a ridiculous statement claiming it was the Ayatollah Enabler Act.”

Human Cost of Military Engagements

18:48 to 19:45

Discuss the human impact of extended military deployments and conditions.

“in the region and what's Trump going to decide?”

Tucker Carlson Interviews Mike Huckabee: A Critical Analysis

22:26 to 26:48

Analyze the tensions in the interview between Tucker Carlson and Mike Huckabee regarding Israel and Iran.

“splitting MAGA world for various reasons.”

The Broader Context of MAGA Politics on War and Israel

26:49 to 28:00

Explore the intersection of anti-war sentiments and Israeli policies within MAGA politics.

“Israel has taken territory in Syria and Lebanon recently since October 7th.”
Show all 34 chapters

Tucker Carlson and the Epstein Files

28:00 to 29:40

Discussion on Tucker Carlson's remarks related to Israel and the Epstein files.

“and making decisions on behalf of Israel.”

The Complexities of Iran and MAGA

29:40 to 31:04

Exploring the intersection of Iran, anti-war sentiments, and MAGA factions.

“I still think when you're talking about electeds and media types, the hawkish traditional neocons are still like the majority.”

Trump's Tax Moves and Tariffs

31:04 to 33:18

Analyzing Trump's response to the Supreme Court ruling on tariffs and tax implications.

“Now, I know everyone's accusing Trump of not focusing enough on the struggles of everyday Americans, but that's clearly not true.”

Democrats and the Tariff Refund Proposal

33:18 to 35:36

Discussion on the political implications of Trump's tariff policies and refund proposals.

“And also it's like they're all one-upping each other.”

Cash Patel's Olympics Controversy

40:39 to 42:00

Discussion on Cash Patel's trip to the Olympics and its implications.

“By now, you've probably seen the leaked video of Kash Patel partying with the gold medalists, who he calls his good friends in a way that's totally believable.”

FBI Director's Embarrassing Work Trips

42:00 to 45:00

Discussion about the FBI director's questionable travel behavior and its implications.

“So the embarrassing thing of desperately trying to hang with the boys was interesting.”

The State of the Union Expectations

45:00 to 48:10

Analysis of the upcoming State of the Union address and the different responses from Democrats.

“He took it to a weekend vacation at a place called, I shit you not, the Boondoggle Ranch owned by a big Republican donor.”

Disruption Tactics in Politics

48:10 to 50:50

Exploration of strategies that politicians might use to disrupt speeches and gain attention.

“You know, President, the expectation setting for him has been just on point, telling us it's going to be very long, which is what America craves.”

Trump's Potential Moves During the Address

50:50 to 54:00

Speculation on how Trump might react or what he might announce during the State of the Union.

“Like if you if you tend to follow those people, then you're going to follow them on this maybe.”

Upcoming Interviews and Podcast Plans

54:00 to 55:57

Preview of upcoming interviews and discussions related to the State of the Union.

“are that he denounces the Supreme Court justices in a way that maybe gets some like scattered murmurs and boos, right?”

The Importance of Coaching in Careers

56:00 to 57:08

Learn why having a coach is essential for professional success.

“You think LeBron, Patrick Mahomes, or Serena got to the GOAT status by guessing?”

Expectations for the State of the Union

57:21 to 59:00

Discussion on what to anticipate from Trump's upcoming address.

“You want to talk about the BAFTAs and the N-word?”

Democrats’ Response Strategies

59:01 to 1:02:12

Explore how Democrats plan to respond during the State of the Union.

“Everybody, but probably Alito, who stopped going years ago.”

The Debate on the Epstein Victims' Presence

1:02:13 to 1:05:46

Analyzing the implications of inviting Epstein victims to the address.

“Don't tamp down a good disruption is what I think should be happening.”

The Controversy Over the Autopsy Report

1:05:47 to 1:10:01

Discussing the significance of the DNC's secret autopsy report.

“not talk about something else that could be a distraction.”

Strategy and Frustration in Politics

1:10:01 to 1:11:01

Discusses the political strategy and frustrations of party apparatus related to Trump's actions.

“just released it we would have forgotten about it of course all the things that Donald Trump are is doing every day like if we release it and then we would have bombed Iran and then everybody would have moved on, right?”

The Disconnect in Campaign Funding

1:11:02 to 1:12:24

Explores the disconnect between campaign spending and grassroots outreach efforts.

“And I just think I agree with y 'all ripped a bandaid off.”

Gavin Newsom's Presidential Prospects

1:12:25 to 1:13:35

Analyzes Gavin Newsom's comments on running for president and public perception.

“He had these comments over the weekend about his son not wanting him to run for president, but obviously he's running.”

Electability and Political Identity

1:13:36 to 1:15:56

Discusses the concept of electability in relation to identity politics in the Democratic Party.

“And he's trying to explain that he's just like one of the folks.”

Impact of Demographics on Primary Elections

1:15:57 to 1:19:50

Examines how demographics and historical context affect the upcoming Democratic primaries.

“And so they're attacking who they, quote unquote, think is the frontrunner.”

Electability Debate in Texas Politics

1:19:51 to 1:24:02

Explores the ongoing debate over electability between candidates in Texas and their strategies.

“But what black and Latino and women and AAPI Pacific Islander and everybody that's not a straight white man want and need, that is very much so in inside the Democratic Party apparatus.”

Electability and Campaign Strategies in Texas Politics

1:24:02 to 1:26:19

Explore the dynamics of Jasmine Crockett's campaign and the electability conversation surrounding her.

“So like, now we're going to vote for her.”

Republican Support and Candidate Journeys

1:26:20 to 1:26:50

Discuss the perceptions of support from Republicans for Jasmine Crockett and candidate evolution in campaigns.

“So this idea that she can't win, Republicans won't vote for her isn't right, which was also a tone shift for Jasmine Crockett, who started her election talking about, we don't need the Reds.”

Reflections on Black History Month and Ongoing Struggles

1:26:51 to 1:27:38

A passionate discussion on the significance of Black History Month and ongoing racial issues.

“He said, you know what campaigns reveal?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Tommy Vietor:Today's presenting sponsor is SimpliSafe Home Security. No one wants to imagine their home getting broken into, but the scary statistic is that every 26 seconds in the U.S., a family experiences a break-in. Scary? Yes, but that's why SimpliSafe has worked to make home security accessible to more American families. I've set up a SimpliSafe. It's very easy to do. The customer support was great. Gives you peace of mind. Plus, the app is really easy to use and works great. Had a great experience. Traditionally, security systems only take action after someone has already broken in. That's too late.

0:26Tommy Vietor:SimpliSafe's Active Guard Outdoor Protection can help prevent break-ins before they break-in. they happen. AI-powered cameras backed by live professional monitoring agents. Monitor your property and detect suspicious activity. If someone is lurking around or acting suspiciously, those agents can see and talk to them in real time, activate spotlights, and even contact the police all before they ever have a chance to get inside your home. No long-term contracts or cancellation fees. Monitoring plans start affordably at around$1 per day. 60-day satisfaction guarantee or your money back. Name best home security systems by U.S.

0:52Tommy Vietor:News & World Report five years in a row. Ranked number one in customer service among home security providers by both Newsweek and USA Today. And right now, our listeners can get 50 % off their new SimpliSafe system with professional monitoring in their first month free at simplisafe.com slash crooked. That's simplisafe.com slash crooked. There's no safe like SimpliSafe.

1:30Symone Sanders:Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Jon Favreau.

1:32Tommy Vietor:I'm Jon Lovett. And Tommy Vitor.

1:33Symone Sanders:On today's show, we're going to talk about Kash Patel's make-a-wish trip to pound beers with the U.S. men's hockey team. Donald Trump saying he's suffering for all of us while raising our taxes and potentially launching a war with Iran, which maybe he'll try making the case for during tonight's State of the Union, which he promises will be long. That's just a thing. What a preview. you uh we'll also talk about what to expect from the big speech and all the different ways democrats are planning to respond and pre-spawned pre-butt post-butt uh then our pals simone sanders-townsend and eugene daniels of ms now stopped by to talk with love it about their new podcast clock it the upcoming texas senate primary and more and a reminder if you want even more pod save america more politics more laughs with all your favorite crooked hosts and i guess some of your least favorite too.

2:22Symone Sanders:There's got to be some least favorites. Please consider becoming a friend of the pod subscriber. You'll get our new extra episode of Pod Save America called Pod Save America Only Friends. Other subscriber only shows like Polar Coaster with Dan Pfeiffer. Access to all of our excellent sub stack newsletters like Pod Save America Open Tabs. Ad free episodes of all your favorite crooked pods. And you get to feel good about supporting an independent pro-democracy media outlet that doesn't take orders from Donald Trump or the Ellison's. There we go. Yeah.

2:52Tommy Vietor:And once you get done subscribing to the bulwark, come over here.

2:58Jon Favreau:Crooked.com slash friends. Travel, uh, Cash Patel's Travelog. That could be a show. Oh, yeah. That's behind the paywall. We could do that. Oh, yeah.

3:04Symone Sanders:Yeah. Cash Patel's

3:06Tommy Vietor:Some Reservations. Pam Bondy's

3:08Symone Sanders:Things You Should Care About. That's good. That's good. There you go. Put it behind the paywall. I love that. Now you can listen unless you subscribe. Crooked.com slash friends. Alright, let's get to the news. The president heads into his State of the Union address on the verge of a war with Iran that very few Americans want, an equally unpopular tariff regime that has been struck down by the Supreme Court, and an approval rating that just hit January 6th lows in new polls from The Washington Post and CNN. So naturally, he's in a great headspace as he prepares for the biggest audience he'll get before the midterms.

3:40Symone Sanders:Here he is at a White House event on Monday.

3:42Tommy Vietor:Polls are tough. You know, when you get a fake poll, I get them today. I saw one today that I'm at 40%. 40%. I'm not at 40%. I'm at much higher than that. It just amazes me that there's not more support out there. It's just we actually have a silent support. I think it's silent. I suffer for the country.

4:04Symone Sanders:He suffers silently. Do you guys think he'll be able to deliver the State of the Union with that cross on his back the whole time? I hope so. He is

4:14Tommy Vietor:going into this thing. The amount of so he's going to be in the room. There's going to be all these Epstein people will get to it. He's going to have the Supreme Court in front of them. He's going to have these poll numbers in his head. He will have been told who he shouldn't be talking to and it's going to take every, like he's going to be shaking with his desire to break the script and go after that. I think it's going to go all at Roberts in the Supreme Court. All the energy, all the anger, all of it. That's my feeling right now.

4:41Symone Sanders:You don't think Susie Wiles will have the shock collar like sort of amped up.

4:47Jon Favreau:She would like to, but I could also imagine a scenario where Cash Patel comes out in full hockey pads, who shotguns a beer, personally arrests a bunch of the Supreme Court justices and then frog marches them out. That's, that's, that's, it would be content.

5:01Tommy Vietor:I don't, yeah, Cash Patel, I don't know if they make the, I guess you'd get the teen size.

5:05Jon Favreau:Yes. They have the, yeah, they make kids jerseys. Yeah, the only, Washington Post had them at 60 % disapproval. CNN has approval at 36%, 26 % with independence. That feels bad. Marist University - Hotest president in the world. Marist University, 57 % of respondents said the State of the Union is not very strong or not strong at all. I guess those are all fake.

5:25Symone Sanders:32 % says he has the right priorities in the CNN poll. 68 % says he hasn't paid enough attention to the country's most important problems. He is crushing it. Let's go to war with Iran then.

5:36Tommy Vietor:Everyone's in while he references the actual poll numbers and he has a sort of sad quality to him. And I actually prefer when he just makes up the numbers. Me too.

5:45Symone Sanders:I feel like he wasn't getting any information that was real for at least the first year. I feel like some real information has been getting through to him. I don't know who's delivering it, but -

5:55Tommy Vietor:Who's slipping it there?

5:56Symone Sanders:Yeah, yeah. Because he seemed genuinely like, why isn't there more support? I don't understand. We're doing amazing stuff. There was some thought that Trump might take questions at that event about the war he's reportedly ready to launch against Iran. You're mentioning the State of the Union. It would be so funny if you just took some cues. I mean, that's a good, we should talk about that later, but that is a good strategy. Prime Minister question time. Just turning into question time.

6:17Tommy Vietor:It would be better.

6:18Symone Sanders:Yeah, instead of just like interrupting him, just keep asking the question. Do it. Anyway. But yeah, but people thought that maybe he would take questions at that event. He did in the White House on Monday. Maybe questions about the war. He's reportedly ready to launch against Iran. But the White House seems to believe that's none of our business. The latest on potential military action as of this recording Monday evening is that the U.S. and Iranian negotiators are scheduled to meet in Geneva on Thursday for one last-ditch attempt at diplomacy. But Trump advisors are telling The Times that the president is considering an initial strike against Iran in the coming days to pressure them into some kind of a deal and may go for the full regime change operation later in the year.

6:57Symone Sanders:You're going to want to save that for later. It's all very confusing, including these comments over the weekend from Trump's top diplomat, real estate buddy Steve Whitcoff, about an Iranian nuclear program that the Trump administration previously had assured us was, quote, obliterated.

7:13Tommy Vietor:You know, they say that it's all about their about their civil program, and yet they've been enriching well beyond the number that you need for for civil nuclear. It's it's up to 60 percent. They're probably a week away from having industrial industrial grade bomb making material. and that's really dangerous.

7:39Symone Sanders:What do you think, Tommy? Were they lying before, lying now, or I guess you don't have to choose. They could be lying in both situations.

7:48Jon Favreau:So I actually reached out to a couple like genuine experts on Iran just to be like, what do you guys think he meant? And none of them were sure. They just genuinely did not know. I think the most charitable reading is he might be saying that Iran is a week away from being able to enrich their existing uranium stockpile to weapons grade. But that's supposedly, that that material is supposed to be buried under a mountain with all the centrifuges, right? Because of the last airstrike. So I don't know, maybe Wyckoff doesn't know what he's saying, but it's super triggering because that framing that like they're a week away or two weeks away is what we heard from Netanyahu for decades, what we heard from Trump the last time we bombed Iran.

8:22Jon Favreau:And then afterwards, as you guys recall, we were told the nuclear infrastructure was completely and totally obliterated. That's what he kept saying over and over again. He even fired intelligence analysts who said otherwise. And now here we are, not even a year later, doing this all again. And I think Witkoff's comments speak to this broader problem, which is why? Like, why is this urgent? Why are we doing this right now? Like, what is the thing? Right? And it's also, what is the goal? Is it pressure them into making a diplomatic deal? Is it adopting the Israeli position that a deal has to deal with the nukes, ballistic missiles, proxy groups like the Hezbollah and the Houthis?

8:57Jon Favreau:Is it retaliation for killing protesters? Remember, He said he was going to bomb them for that. Is it full on regime change? We have no fucking idea. And it's not clear that Trump knows or has decided. We also don't know how Iran will retaliate. And so it just feels like we're about to go to war. But the reasons for it and the scope of it are not only not being debated, but they are secret from us. And that is very weird.

9:18Symone Sanders:I also feel like we should probably talk a little bit about more about the, you mentioned retaliation, potential retaliation here, because it does not seem like this is without great risks to American interests and American lives. I saw that New York Times piece about how like Iran, I'm sure you guys have been talking about this, Tommy, but like how Iran may direct its proxies to attack American interests in Europe, American troops. There could be energy disruptions right throughout the Middle East that could really shake our economy. I mean, this is not a cost free. Let's lob in a few missiles or if he is just going to lob in a few missiles, then it doesn't seem like that's going to do anything.

9:59Yeah.

10:00Tommy Vietor:And just all the more sort of dangerous when the people in charge of telling you what the policy is are in some measure incomprehensible or incoherent. They have industrial grade nuclear fissile material, like as opposed to the farm to table stuff. Like, of course it's confusing to the experts. These people are in over their heads. Meanwhile, like you see the stories about Trump having these sort of two phases in his mind, like a really alarming because he's amassing, what is it like a huge proportion of our military around Iran. Clearly he wants to do something. I am sure behind the scenes, they are telling members of Congress and others, like this is about creating pressure to get a deal.

10:44Tommy Vietor:but we don't know what kind of deal they're trying to get. And then he says, actually, I may do a small war, a small set of strikes, and the big one will be later, right? Because what is the, he took the lesson, the lesson he took, right? He took the lesson from the first strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities as a huge success for him politically and without the negative consequences that many feared. So he took that as a kind of win. So he imagines he could do that again, get all the plaudits, right? And like Trump is not a guy that like delays gratification. He has put all of this military force in position.

11:23Tommy Vietor:He's just going to withdraw. That isn't the tough boy, Donnie, you know, the guy that's like so strong and so tough for America and for Israel that we've come to expect. So I just like the whole thing is set up for us to be at the very least doing some kind of a military strike against Iran with zero real debate in Congress and zero understanding of the strategy at all.

11:43Jon Favreau:It's shocking. And remember, last time Iran responded, they basically fired, what, like a dozen missiles at a base. They warned us in advance. They knew we'd shoot them down. They wanted to de-escalate through that escalation. There's a lot of experts who now think Iran will decide that they need to raise the costs for the U.S. or else they're just going to get bombed over and over and over again every 6, 10, whatever, 12 months. And so they could respond with a giant salvo of ballistic missiles. They could hit U.S. bases in the Gulf. They could hit energy infrastructure. Like they could hit a Saudi oil depot and send up prices.

12:13Jon Favreau:They could hit Tel Aviv, the Israeli targets. Like all it takes is one or two missiles to get through and something really bad happens and you're on this escalation ladder. And then also, I mean, they have like pretty advanced cyber capabilities. They could go after the U.S. electric grid or, you know, DHS, meanwhile, is like getting rid of all of its cyber defense. So it's just like, look, maybe there's a scenario where these guys have been decimated and they will not get a single missile off the ground because we are just so much better than them. And that's what happened in Venezuela. but it's like a, it's a pretty big bet.

Read the full transcript

12:41Tommy Vietor:There was a line in the Times story that the Ayatollah has instructed senior leaders to make sure the assassination attempts don't work. It's like, yeah, man. Smart move. Yeah, that's a good idea. Make sure they don't work for you. That's right.

12:55Symone Sanders:Not that we can ever know what's going on in Donald Trump's adult mind but I genuinely don't have any idea why he's doing this because like Venezuela, sort of kooky but you could kind of see like, okay it was a Stephen Miller thing. It was a Rubio thing. He likes getting the oil, right? You think Greenland, even that, you know, it looks big on the map. He wants to take that. Like the Iran thing now at this moment with this much firepower in the region is just baffling to me because it's like, I don't know, like Lindsey Graham's pushing him to do it, right? But like who else is really jonesing for a war with Iran in his orbit?

13:34Tommy Vietor:Lindsey Graham's like a pagan Shiite.

13:38Jon Favreau:I think I can imagine a couple arguments. One is another oil based argument, right? Suddenly the U.S. controls like all the energy in the world if we're controlling the Iranian oil infrastructure somehow and Venezuela and our own. It doesn't totally make sense, but sure. There's an argument that's like Trump no longer cares about politics. He just wants to be viewed as a historic figure. And he's got Lindsey Graham in his ear being like, sir, if you take up Maduro and the Supreme leader, you are like, you know, the greatest president in history. And maybe he's listening to that. I like pure appeal to vanity.

14:08Jon Favreau:Yeah. And like, look, there's a lot of long-term risks doing that too. We're genuinely low on munitions, especially like air interceptor missiles for the Patriot missile batteries, things like that. The Israelis are too after the 12 day war. And so like the, the Chinese are sitting there watching this being like, yes, fucking unload the clip. Have at it boys. Like, you know, we'll just sit here quietly and see what happens. It's, it's nuts, but politically it's crazy.

14:29Tommy Vietor:Yeah. The only other part of it to make sense of it is he wants to undo anything Obama did and do better than anything Obama did. And so he is applying pressure in order to get some kind of a deal. Like the timing only makes sense, the aggressive timing in the context of trying to get some kind of a deal, whatever that would be. And he wants to go out there and say, Obama sold out the country. I got the real deal. I fixed it. And I stopped yet another war, right? Like that to me is like, honestly, it's a hopeful direction.

15:01Symone Sanders:Yeah. Well, I do think that, you know, Venezuela, like we know that it was a pretty close call for the special forces. Like he has sort of danced through the raindrops with a lot of these military strikes.

15:14Tommy Vietor:And one would say he's done that his entire fucking life. Right. Of course.

15:17Symone Sanders:But it's like at some point, you know, Americans get killed in this. These things can go south really fast.

15:23Jon Favreau:No one was killed in the Venezuela operation, but a guy got shot in the leg, one of the helicopter pilots, and then nearly went down. And that was in part because clearly the U.S., we know this from leaks that we had someone on the inside that, you know, turned on Maduro and set him up to get taken. And I do think there is this sense that the post-Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts have been largely cost-free and that we can just bomb stuff with drones or B-2 bombers and call it a day. Like, you know, the Cosm Solomani operation in the first term when Trump assassinated the then head of the IRGC, they responded with a ballistic missile barrage.

15:53Jon Favreau:Only by the grace of God was no one killed. Like 100 service members got traumatic brain injuries. And that sort of ended the escalation. But if, you know, one guy dies there, it's up and up and up. Yep.

16:02Symone Sanders:So you mentioned the politics. here's the way a University of Maryland poll from a few weeks ago asked the question, do you favor or oppose the United States initiating an attack on Iran under the current circumstances? Oppose 49%, don't know 30%, and support gets 21%. And yet the War Powers resolution from Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey, which would simply require Congress to authorize any kind of military action against Iran, as it is laid out in the Constitution and the War Powers Act itself, doesn't have the votes to pass, at least as of this moment. Why do you think that is?

16:37Tommy Vietor:Well, look, the Venezuela resolution failed in the House 215 to 215. That was with democratic unanimity. We've already lost Josh Gottheimer and Jared Moskowitz, who not only said they're opposed, but put out a ridiculous statement claiming it was the Ayatollah Enabler Act. Protection Act. Protection Act, which is just pretty insulting to your colleagues and like such a kind of like glib minimization of the role of Congress in approving military force. But losing those means that even if you had basically every Democrat in favor of a war powers vote, you would still lose because Marjorie Taylor Greene is now gone and Thomas Massey is not very persuasive with his caucus.

17:20Symone Sanders:I think it's so embarrassing for any Democrat, really Republican too. I mean, I just don't expect as much from them to it's not to just say like, yes, I think we should let's debate it. And I think Congress should vote to give the president authorization to like just give up your own power before there's even a debate. Just get to Donald Trump of all people like Josh Gottham or Jared Moskowitz. You trust Donald Trump. That's that's that's who you're deciding to give your power that the Constitution has authorized you with a way to to Donald Trump because you trust him to do war the right way.

17:55Tommy Vietor:it's crazy they're not they're not proposing an actual vote to authorize the use of military force they're just standing in the way yes that's what i'm saying of having a vote and then the

18:03Symone Sanders:excuses uh when you get further into that crazy statement this resolution would restrict the flexibility needed to respond to real and evolving threats and risks signaling weakness at a dangerous moment that is such fucking also like george w bush era republican bullshit that was it that was

18:19Tommy Vietor:that was a lot of the justification people used for voting in favor of the iraq war uh author autorization because they claimed it was merely to give George W. Bush leverage to prevent the war in the first place, which obviously is not what came to pass.

18:33Jon Favreau:Yeah, I just I feel like the the debate is even worse than 2003 somehow. Yeah. At least then there was there was a conversation about the underlying reason why we may or may not go to war, which is this false claim of WMDs that literally isn't happening. It's just like, hey, look, we've amassed a ton of military assets in the region and what's Trump going to decide? Like, here's some leaks about the menu of options before him. Is he going to just have an appetizer? Is he going to go with the full, like, you know, it's just like a fucking video game. It's crazy. And like, meanwhile, like there, there's like a real human cost here.

19:04Jon Favreau:Like the USS Gerald Ford has now one of the aircraft carriers. They've had their deployment extended twice. So they've been out for eight months. They will possibly be out for 11 months. These are sailors with, you know, families, little kids, wives, husbands. They can only have sporadic contact with their family for OPSEC reasons. like they'll go into quote unquote ghost mode for weeks at a time where you just like can't contact people and also the fucking toilets are broken on the ship. I saw that. And like to fix them full you have to dock so there's 45 minute lines for a toilet on an aircraft carrier.

19:32Jon Favreau:Like imagine the nightmare for these guys.

19:34Tommy Vietor:It's like right before we record the pod.

19:48Jon Favreau:Pod Save America is brought to you by Helix. As you guys know, it is February is the darkest, gloomiest days of winter, which means you're probably spending a little more time inside. You are probably lingering in your bed a little longer, maybe watching some Netflix from the comfort of your bedroom, which is why you need the most comfortable mattress money can buy. That's where Helix comes in. Helix is the most awarded mattress brand. Tested and reviewed by experts like Forbes and Wired, Helix offers a variety of mattresses designed to fit your sleep needs. How you know which Helix mattress works best for you and your body, you can take the Helix Sleep Quiz.

20:22Jon Favreau:It matches you with the perfect mattress based on your personal preferences, making it easy to find a mattress that suits your sleep needs. And it's won a bunch of awards. Helix is the most awarded mattress brand. Helix will deliver your mattress right to your door with free shipping in the US. The Happy With Helix guarantee offers a risk-free customer-first experience designed to ensure you're completely satisfied with your new mattress. You can rest easy with seamless returns and exchanges that even have a 120-night sleep trial in limited lifetime warranty. Go to helixsleep.com slash crooked for 27 % off site-wide.

20:53Jon Favreau:That's helixsleep.com slash crooked for 27 % off site-wide. This offer is exclusive to PodSafe America listeners. Make sure you enter our show name after checkout so they know we sent you. helixsleep.com slash crooked.

21:07Tommy Vietor:PodSafe America is brought to you by HIMSS. ED is more common than you think and simpler to treat than ever. Through HIMSS, all things are possible. Well, you can connect online with a licensed provider to access personalized treatment options discreetly and on your terms. Through HIMSS, you can access personalized prescription treatment options for ED if prescribed. HIMSS offers access to ED treatment options ranging from personalized products to trusted generics that cost 95 % less than brand names if prescribed. You shouldn't have to go out of your way to feel like yourself. HIMSS brings expert care straight to you with 100 % online access to personalized treatments that put your goals first.

21:35Tommy Vietor:This isn't one size fits all, Tommy.

21:38Jon Lovett:That's what she said.

21:39Tommy Vietor:Oh boy. Your health and goals come first with real medical providers making sure you get what you need to get results. Think of HIMSS as your digital front door that gets you back to your old self with simple 100 % online access to trusted treatments for ED. That's erectile dysfunction. And more all in one place. To get simple online access to personalized affordable care for ED, weight loss, and more, visit HIMSS.com slash crooked. That's HIMSS.com slash crooked for your free online visit. HIMSS.com slash crooked. Featured products include compounded drug products, which the FDA does not approve or verify for safety effectiveness or quality.

22:13Tommy Vietor:Prescriptions required. See website for details, restrictions, and important safety information. Actual price will depend on product and subscription plan.

22:24Symone Sanders:It's also yet another issue splitting MAGA world for various reasons. We just saw the debate play out during Tucker Carlson's recent interview with U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, which produced this viral clip about Israel's role in the Middle East that the administration has also been trying to walk back. Let's listen. I just read Genesis 15, as I have many times. And that land, I think it says from the Nile to the Euphrates, which is once again, basically the entire Middle East. So God gave that land to his people, the Jews, or he didn't. You're saying he did. What does that mean? Does Israel have the right to that land?

23:02Symone Sanders:Because you're appealing to Genesis. You're saying that's the original deed. it would be fine if they took it all but i don't think that's what we're talking about here today what would be fine what's exactly what we're talking about today but here's what i i don't think you think it would be fine if the state of israel took over all i don't want to take it over they're not asking to take it over that's true i will say uh beyond those comments huckabee's case for war with iran it seemed to have quite a few holes in it uh then what did you guys make of uh of that interview and the in the broader intra-maga uh debate over around uh

23:39Tommy Vietor:first of all huckabee just does such a terrible job in this interview it's really sort of hard to watch tucker just ask some hard questions and just he can't defend the position he just can't defend the position he can't defend the civilian casualties in gaza uh he can't defend israel's conduct of the war uh and tucker really makes a meal of it at the same time tucker uh is somebody who has had sort of a slavish conversation with Nick Fuentes. He's had Holocaust deniers on. And so like you see Tucker give Huckabee a really hard time. And he is a Tucker is a very smart, very sophisticated interviewer.

24:20Tommy Vietor:And it is, I think, notable that he turns it on in this conversation, but doesn't turn it on in some of those other interactions. Right. And so it's hard. You watch you're like, yeah, I'm glad to see Huckabee face these tough questions in this sort of very sort of tense way. But then you think this is sort of Tucker with an agenda of his own. And Tucker actually starts, he watched the beginning where he talks like 20 minutes about the circumstances of the interview in a kind of vaguely conspiratorial way and the ways in which it was clear Huckabee really didn't want to have the debate and they wouldn't let them leave the airport.

24:50Tommy Vietor:The whole thing was very strange. So I came away like kind of glad to see Huckabee put on the spot, but then like a little bit uncomfortable with the kind of the fact that it had to come from Tucker Carlson of all places.

25:03Jon Favreau:Yeah, I mean, Tucker's got some questionable motives, I think it's fair to say. That's right. Just in terms of like pure performance, like taking out the two individuals. I mean, it's a fascinating interview because Tucker comes in with a plan and he lays a trap, which is he knows he wants to ask, why does Israel have a right to exist and do all countries have a right? This is a universal principle. And he knows that Huckabee will cite both international law and theology. theology, right? He'll say that, as he said there, that the divine right that comes from Genesis 15. And Tucker is pushing on this because he knows that those two arguments are fundamentally irreconcilable.

25:34Jon Favreau:And it culminates in Huckabee saying, yes, a literal reading would say Israel should control the entire Middle East and quote, it would be fine if they took it all, which is absolutely crazy thing for him to say. Obviously, like it was not his intention, right? But it led to this massive backlash. There were statements from Oman, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, OIC, the League of Arab States, like every country in the region. You don't think they like that? They were not thrilled.

26:02Tommy Vietor:It simply would not be fine if they took it off. It would not be fine. It would be a real problem.

26:05Jon Favreau:But they're not asking for it, so.

26:07Tommy Vietor:It would be fine if they did. Yeah. But that's not what they want. That's not what they want.

26:10Jon Favreau:Yes. And it highlights actually like how much of an extremist Huckabee is on all the policy areas he oversees because he says he opposed a two-state solution. He supports Israel annexing the West Bank. He says there is no West Bank. There's only Judea and Samaria. He says there's no such thing as a Palestinian. And so like Tucker is being a troll. We question his motives. But there's also like, I think, from the countries that responded, again, a lot of reasons they lash out at Israel. Some of it's anti-Semitism, some of it's bias. But some of it is genuine anger about Israel's territorial expansion, and that dates back to 1967 and the Six-Day War.

26:46Jon Favreau:But also like settlement construction, the slow motion annexation of the West Bank. Israel has taken territory in Syria and Lebanon recently since October 7th. So it was a riveting interview between two pretty flawed people.

27:00Symone Sanders:Yeah, I also think it, you know, the situation with Iran sort of combines the anti-war strain in the MAGA world with the anti-Israel, especially anti-Israeli government strain in MAGA world too. And at one point, you know, Tucker goes in on, well, you know, Bibi Netanyahu has been to the White House seven times. He's like, what other foreign leader has had a meeting with Trump seven times in the last year? And where has the debate been with the American people over whether we launch another war? And you could see a lot of like the anti-war stuff that Tucker's doing. You could see like gain a lot of traction, not just with because it is how most Americans feel about war, especially war with Iran, that no one has told us why we're waging or may wage.

27:45Symone Sanders:but with Republicans.

27:46Tommy Vietor:He also does this dual loyalty stuff with Tucker and Huckabee. He does kind of, he goes into sort of DNA and who has the right to the land. And then he does sort of America being sort of controlled by Israel and making decisions on behalf of Israel. And so, yeah, there is this, I would say like the alignment is between sort of anti-war, America first types and some of the sort of the virulent anti-Semitism, anti-Israel. Oh, that's the other thing he does. He had to apologize. He actually apologized for it, but he made reference to the president of Israel, Herzog, being in the Epstein files. And Herzog sent up a long letter basically saying like, this is false and like complete fabrication.

28:28Tommy Vietor:And Tucker clearly, I guess, in a way that sounds like someone who's worried about defamation kind of came out and said, I didn't know anything beyond what I read. I don't have any reason to believe it is true. If you defame, if you malign somebody, you should correct it. So he corrects it. But clearly like he is swimming in the kind of like conspiratorial waters.

28:44Symone Sanders:He goes off on the Epstein files too. And Huckabee's like, well, I'm the ambassador to Israel. So I don't, you know. And he's like, you haven't read the Epstein files? He's like, you don't know what's going on in the Epstein files? You're trying to tell me. It's so funny. Like Tucker really does the, I'm so confused. I'm not mad. I'm just confused.

28:59Tommy Vietor:Yes, I don't understand. I don't understand. This sort of like babe in the woods thing.

29:03Jon Favreau:Yes. The interview starts quite hot. It's Jonathan Pollard, who is a guy who spied on the US on behalf of Israel. who Huckabee met with for some reason at the embassy. Then I think it's into Epstein, or then it goes into some Israeli official who is accused of blessing kids. It's just kind of weird stuff. But on the kind of inter-MAGA Iran split, there are some genuine Iran splits. It is very hard to deduplicate at times the anti-Israel, anti-Semitism from the anti-war stuff. And that is a troubling piece of this. I do think I would divide it into elite opinion into voter opinion. on the elites.

29:41Jon Favreau:I still think when you're talking about electeds and media types, the hawkish traditional neocons are still like the majority. It's like the Wall Street Journal, editorial page, Lindsey Graham. Like those are the people I think in Trump's ear the most, although Tucker, I think the Murdoch empire. Yeah. Tucker was at the white house today, right? Wasn't there a tweet about that? Um, but unlike Iraq in 2003, you now have this far right faction of people like Tucker or Nick Fuentes, similar, like Candace overlap, Candace. Um, And then some folks who are very hardcore anti-war. And then there's some folks in, I think, like the podcaster, Manosphere ecosystem who are more just kind of like, why are we doing this?

30:15Jon Favreau:And then you have the people in the traditional kind of more MAGA suck-uppy space who are just like, Trump hasn't made the case yet. They're like where we are right now. It's just like, why? Why does he want us to do that? And then there's voters who are like, what the fuck are you doing? Like, I care about tariffs. I care about inflation or whatever. And I think ultimately some of these arguments are a good faith, like, hey, Iraq was bad. Why are we doing this again? Shouldn't we spend money elsewhere? Some of it's kind of weird. I think ultimately if Trump does like another, what, one or two day bombing raid like he did last time, like they just won't care and they'll move on.

30:50Tommy Vietor:That's what he's counting on too. Yeah.

30:51Jon Favreau:But if it's protracted, like it's a whole different story, especially if, you know, the Iranians like blow something up in the Strait of Hormuz and oil prices go through the roof and then there's real economic fallout.

31:01Symone Sanders:Yeah. Yeah, well, the one thing about wars, you can always predict what's going to happen. Yeah, and they end fast. Now, I know everyone's accusing Trump of not focusing enough on the struggles of everyday Americans, but that's clearly not true. He's passionate about making them worse by raising taxes again. After the Supreme Court declared his tariffs illegal on Friday in a 6-3 decision, Trump almost immediately announced a new 10 % tariff on all foreign goods, which he then quickly raised to 15 % on Saturday. Outbid himself. The president has been bitching about the court since Friday. this morning he posted that from now on he'll be spelling supreme court with lowercase letters based on a complete lack of respect got him got him i thought i thought me too i'm gonna be doing

31:41Tommy Vietor:the same thing because he had been reading a lot of ee cummings i also have a lack of respect

31:45Symone Sanders:the supreme court so i'm gonna do that give him the lowercase letter treatment i love those sort

31:49Tommy Vietor:of like the news over the last like a couple of days it's like in a historic blow to trump's agenda the supreme court has removed his tariffs the tariffs are back

31:59Symone Sanders:Trump officials are also out there expressing confidence that they'll be able to use other authorities to keep most of the tariff rates where they were before the Supreme Court decision. And they won't be taking any action to refund the illegal taxes we've all been paying since Liberation Day. According to Politico, this commitment to fighting for tax hikes in an election year has Democrats, quote, frothing at the mouth. For starters, Senate Democrats released a refund proposal on Monday. Governor J.B. Pritzker trolled the administration by sending a letter publicly demanding a refund check for every Illinois family.

32:30Symone Sanders:Newsom said pretty much the same thing on CNN over the weekend. Let's play a clip. He needs to return that money, he needs to refund that money with interest. He can do that in a nanosecond. The problem is, for families, it's been about$1 ,701 a year. That's a different requirement than I think he has to pay the American people back. I saw Besant out there, almost gleeful. He was gleeful that, no, we won't be doing it. This is dumb and dumber, Trump and Bessie.

32:56Tommy Vietor:What? Is he doing this in a gallery? Isn't that Gustav Klimt behind him? Was that the kiss? I couldn't tell if that was...

33:02Symone Sanders:Oh, he was in Nashville. So he was somewhere in Nashville for his book event. Oh, okay. I only know that because I think Dana Bash said I talked to him in Nashville. Got it. So I assume that's the only... That was weird.

33:10Tommy Vietor:Has postmodernism reached Nashville? Okay. I love saying he could do that in a nanosecond. Nanoseconds, very fast. It was very fast.

33:19Symone Sanders:And also it's like they're all one-upping each other. It's like, with interest. J.B. Pritzker says refund. I'm saying refund with interest. So we've talked about the Supreme Court decision a bunch from Friday over the weekend. Everyone should check out our YouTube for that. But what do you guys make of Trump doubling down? And are your mouths as frothy as other Democrats?

33:38Tommy Vietor:I love the refund proposal. I think we should just be hammering the refund proposal. Everybody's entitled to$1 ,700. Where's my$1 ,700? Get me my$1 ,700. I think that that is great. The other part of this is the leverage Trump clearly is afraid he's losing because of this ruling because he's posting these unhinged things about how I have license to destroy other countries be careful what you wish for And so he's sort of like I think worried about what this will mean for his sort of effort to kind of continuously have news cycle after news cycle about how he's sort of pummeling our Trading partners around the world which he views this are good for him.

34:10Tommy Vietor:I don't know. Yes I think we should be hammering this all the time He's fighting to keep taxes high and cost high for Americans and by the way, he's keeping your money It feels like a no brainer to me.

34:19Jon Favreau:Yeah, I'm frothing. I'm a walking bubble bath over here. I'm a cappuccino. This just occurred to me though. I was going to go more with the rabies. Rabies, your rabid raccoon. So I feel like, you know, at one point I was worried that he would give everyone like a tariff stipend. Me too. Right, like a tariff stimulus. Shh, don't tell him. Now, if we, are we not worried that that would, this just occurred to me, like what if he did write everyone a$1 ,700 check as J.B. Pritzker said, would framing it as a refund, I guess defang the political values at the hope or the hope is that he would just never do it because you feel like it would be under duress.

34:52Symone Sanders:I know. I didn't think about that. And then I heard Jesse Waters be like, Democrats have stepped into a trap. Now he's going to do a refund right before the election. But I was like, I mean, that would be the smart political thing to do, but it doesn't seem like, first of all, I mean, they would, he would have to just do it illegally. Like he does everything else. Cause it would never pass Congress because they don't want to, this is, they keep floating this in Congress and Republicans keep knocking it down. Thune, all of them, They're just like, no, we're not doing a refund check. We have a deficit and everything's too expensive and blah, blah, blah.

35:19Symone Sanders:So there's that. But they also they also don't have the money. I mean, I guess I guess they could do it, but they feel like that's maybe giving up. Maybe that's maybe I don't know. Well, I think I would because I think this is I'm also frothing. I think this is this is incredible that they that he is just going forward with this.

35:36Tommy Vietor:I think there's no there's no downside for Democrats saying every American deserves a check from the illegally. this is basically money that was stolen from you, from our country, we pay the tariffs, we're educating people about it as we go. Like you're all paying these fucking tariffs. Look, we're educating you. But like, but it means they were having to do it. We're like people will come. No, I agree. And you will get, and if you don't get the money, it's because Trump pocketed your money. He cut taxes for corporations. He's cut taxes for his wealthy friends. He, but they can't afford to give you the$1 ,700 they took from you illegally.

36:07Tommy Vietor:And then if he does it, great. Trump caves to Democrats and gives Americans money. I think we could make that argument or he doesn't. And that's something we can keep running on and hammering through November. So I don't see the downside to pushing really hard.

36:18Jon Favreau:You know, I agree on the messaging. I just wonder, like, what happens if we catch the car? It would be an interesting situation. And like, but before I mean, before this ruling, Fox News had a poll where they found 63 percent of registered voters disapproved of Trump's handling of the tariff. So basically, he's just drawing more attention to a wildly unpopular policy to begin with. It looks weak. He looks angry. It looks chaotic. Like and voters are just like it's not going to solve the problem, which is voters are mad about costs and nothing he's doing is going to fix it. It's going to make it worse.

36:45Symone Sanders:No more illegal taxes to pay for the president's illegal wars. Just run around saying that for the next nine months and the illegal taxes. They used to just be taxes. Now they're illegal taxes. When is the last time either party has proudly run on raising taxes on like most middle class Americans, working class Americans, poor Americans like that? Like, not try to say we're not actually raising taxes, even though it might be true or this. No, just out there being like, no, no, no. We are fighting hard to keep this tax increase in effect. And by the way. We want to keep your taxes high. And what are we using it for?

37:23Symone Sanders:Vote for Republicans.

37:23Tommy Vietor:And what are we using it for? We're going to use it to buy a plane. We're going to use it to send Kash Patel on a whirlwind vacation.

37:31Symone Sanders:Noam and Lewandowski are getting their fuck cabin in the back of the.

37:34Tommy Vietor:They're in the Mile High Club. And by the way, a bunch of wars never approved by Congress, never voted on, never debated. Terrific.

37:44Symone Sanders:Oh, and we're terrorizing various American communities that didn't vote for the president by rounding people up and throwing them in jail and sometimes killing them.

37:52Tommy Vietor:Money's gone to that, too.

37:53Symone Sanders:Yeah. So it doesn't seem popular. It doesn't seem popular, but we'll see.

38:05Tommy Vietor:Positive America is brought to you by Rocket Money. I had a moment when I had realized I had to get my finances under control. It was when I was in what I call my lost year. And I realized that I had a lot of mail and it was collecting in a garbage bag and that there was some stuff from the IRS in there. But the cool thing was the first letter said I owed them money. The second letter said they were going to take it out of my account. And the third letter said I was all good. Well, sounds like you could use Rocket Money. And probably some therapy at the time.

38:34Jon Favreau:Yeah, well, it's a personal finance app that helps you find and cancel your unwanted subscriptions, monitors your spending, and helps you lower your bills so you can grow your savings. Rocket Money allows you to track subscriptions and cancel them within the app when there's a few taps, saving you time and helping you avoid charges. You can even categorize automatic transactions across your accounts and customize categories with tags to help shed light on your spending patterns. Set budgets and goals, get personalized insights and regular reports on your spending habits. You can even receive real-time alerts for large transactions, upcoming bills, refunds, and low balances.

39:03Jon Favreau:The Rocket Money app can even consolidate your checking savings, loans, and investment accounts into a single dashboard to give you a clear picture of your finances. Let Rocket Money help you reach your financial goals faster. Join at rocketmoney.com slash crooked. That's rocketmoney.com slash crooked. Rocketmoney.com slash crooked.

39:20Tommy Vietor:Pod Save America is brought to you by Quince. A well-built wardrobe is about clothes that work together and hold up over time. That's what Quince does best. Premium materials, thoughtful design, and everyday staples that feel easy to wear and easy to rely on even as the weather shifts. Quince has everyday essentials. I love with quality that lasts. Organic cotton sweaters. Polos for every occasion. Lighter jackets that keep you warm in the changing seasons. The list goes on. We're going to Australia and New Zealand. I don't have a pack for that. It seems to be both summer and at times cold. It's very hot in some parts of it.

39:51Tommy Vietor:There's mountains.

39:52Jon Favreau:Truly daunting.

39:53Tommy Vietor:I have a lot of Quince stuff that I'm bringing. Quince works directly with top factories and cut out the middlemen so you're not paying for brand markup, just quality clothing. Everything is built to hold up to daily wear. and still look good season after season. Plus they only partner with factories that meet rigorous safety standards for craftsmanship and ethical production. Huge fan of Quince. Have a bunch of stuff from there, not just clothes, some sheets, a bag. They have great stuff. You should just go there and check it out because they have a range of stuff that compares to more expensive brands.

40:18Tommy Vietor:So you should just kind of make it a habit to check to see if there's a better option there. Refresh your wardrobe with Quince. Go to quince.com slash crooked for a free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. Now available in Canada too. That's quince.com slash crooked. free shipping and 365 day returns. Quinn's.com slash crooked.

40:39Symone Sanders:You may be upset that Trump's taxes on all the shit you buy aren't going away, but at least that money is going to a good cause, which is flying the FBI director to Milan so he could pound beers in the locker room with the U.S. men's hockey team. By now, you've probably seen the leaked video of Kash Patel partying with the gold medalists, who he calls his good friends in a way that's totally believable. I'm sure they're buddies. You may also have seen the vigorous denials from Patel's spokesperson that the point of Patel's trip was to go to the Olympics. He obviously had mission critical official FBI meetings that just happened to be in Milan at the exact same time as the gold medal game, which unfortunately had to take the FBI director away from lesser duties like keeping Americans safe or figuring out how another guy with a gun got past the security perimeter at Mar-a-Lago.

41:20Symone Sanders:So Tommy and I ranted about this on YouTube on Monday. Love it. Did you happen to have any thoughts on this one?

41:25Tommy Vietor:Yeah, two points I'd want to make. One, I think the most pathetic part of the whole thing is how often cash patel refers to the hockey team as the boys the boys he calls

41:33Jon Favreau:them the boys it's a very hockey thing to they're his they're his friends they're they're oh i'm

41:37Tommy Vietor:hanging with the boys uh you're you're not one of the boys you've never been i think your whole life is a story of a man desperate to be one of the boys will never be one of the boys you look out of place in every every every there's never been an outfit cash patel is worn that doesn't look like it doesn't belong on him he just always looks out of place and uncomfortable They're all a little too big. Too big, too small, too stiff, whatever it is. So the embarrassing thing of desperately trying to hang with the boys was interesting. And the other is a lot of pressing work in the Dolomites. A lot of important investigations going on in the mountainous region of the Italian Alps for the FBI director.

42:20Tommy Vietor:Look, we've all, look, everybody out there who's traveled for work knows that you can play some games and have a work trip that also is fun. We just went to Melbourne, Sydney, and Auckland. You know, we can, but we're not the FBI director. Brisbane Erasure. And Brisbane, of course.

42:37Symone Sanders:We don't have quite the same remit as Cash Patil.

42:39Tommy Vietor:Of course, but the idea that like, you think people can't see through this, that you created some silly cover meetings to justify calling it a work trip. Nobody - It's a fucking joke.

42:50Symone Sanders:Well, and again, it's like if you're if you're in the administration, obviously everyone's jockeying to see who gets to go to the Winter Olympics. And there's always a delegation that they send. And so you're like, oh, maybe Marco wants to go or maybe J.D. Vance wants to go. Who when or whatever else. But it's like on rare occasions, meaning never, is the FBI director one of the people jockeying for that.

43:12Jon Favreau:They should have shit to do.

43:13Tommy Vietor:And they're not and they're not they're not part of this. Like we in our system. Diplomats, ambassadors. The head of state and the head of our government is the same function. And so a lot of them have to perform that function. And we can say it's silly and maybe not worth their time and not worth the money. But we send.

43:29Symone Sanders:Jamie Vance doesn't have anything better to do. Good for him for going.

43:32Tommy Vietor:Dignitaries. That guy doesn't have a job. And by the way, like it is the Olympics and they do represent America. And these people are our elected leaders and I don't care for it. But that you can make sense of that. That's fine. But like he is the head of the FBI. He is a law enforcement official. Right now. But he's pounding beers in the fucking locker room. It's all so embarrassing.

43:49Jon Favreau:At least$75 ,000 on our tab, at least. It's way more. I guarantee it's more. Because the FBI director is required by law to fly on a Gulfstream G550 airplane. It's a private jet because they need security and secure comms. So the cost of just the gas alone has got to be like$5 ,000,$10 ,000 an hour. It's an 18-hour trip. Then there's the staff. So I got to steal the oil from Venezuela. They got to steal the oil. There's security. There's accommodations. There's God knows what else. And so Patel, like, he'll pay back a fraction of that. But someone in Congress just, I know we can't, but like, it would be so great to subpoena the actual cost of this because I bet it's a lot of money.

44:20Jon Favreau:Great thing to promise for when we win the House. Yes. But it also, it misses the bigger opportunity cost of having this industrial strength douchebag as their FBI director. More industrial strength. Not doing serious stuff. He's not qualified for the job and he doesn't spend any of his time actually doing it. He's been to ultimate fighting events in Miami and Las Vegas. He went to a hockey game with Wayne Gretzky in New York. I'd love to do that, but he should have better shit to do. During the manhunt for Charlie Kirk's killer, Cash Mattel was tweeting out inaccurate information from some exclusive restaurant in New York City.

44:51Jon Favreau:He goes on trips to visit his girlfriend. He went to see her sing the national anthem at a low rent wrestling match at Penn State. He took the FBI PJ to Scotland for a golf weekend with the boys. The boys again. He took it to a weekend vacation at a place called, I shit you not, the Boondoggle Ranch owned by a big Republican donor. Like, again, this guy is a fucking clown and he's making a mockery of everyone who voted for him.

45:14Tommy Vietor:Apparently there's a lot of like outrage inside the FBI about this. I mean, that's why we've gotten all these leaks, the leaks of him sort of putting on his little coat and doing a performance of FBI director. So much of what he thinks the job is, it's just sort of a performance. It's what's public facing. It's the headlines. It's the stories.

45:31Symone Sanders:Tweet out information mid-investigation that turns out not to be true. Loves to do that. You can do that anywhere, you know.

45:37Jon Favreau:We got him. JK. Yeah, I who knows what Trump will do or like if he'll fire him, he doesn't fire anyone. He probably doesn't want to go through another confirmation process. I guarantee you he's seen these stories. I guarantee you he is pissed about it. We know there's been reporting that he was pissed about the travel and the PJ to visit the girlfriend. This will get onto his radar screen and in part because it's not just libs like us. They're talking about this. It is right winger. There's this guy, Kyle Serafin, who's a former FBI guy who's on Infowars all the time, who goes after Kash Patel all day, every day.

46:08Jon Favreau:his tweet about this stuff had millions of views last night like this will get to trump this is the kind of thing that if you're suzy wiles the chief of staff and you're watching this cabinet full of morons create bad headlines for you this will piss you off and you will be like rain it the fuck in

46:22Symone Sanders:not one of them has made trump look better like not like the cabinet is doing such a bad job even if you're like yeah maybe doug he's like on the better end of this and on a fucking labor

46:33Tommy Vietor:secretary she's got shit going on with the husband i thought you know what junior they're like they're

46:39Symone Sanders:like they're they're shaking up they're shaking up hhs uh they're they're taking away rfk staffers because they're like hey we're done with we're done with the anti-vaccine stuff let's just have them go talk about uh raw milk and being healthy or whatever and by the way on their like the white

46:52Tommy Vietor:house had to uh get the get uh uh rfk junior to reverse a decision about a moderna vaccine that they weren't even going to allow uh luttnick's on epstein island gnomes fucking in the back of the plane tell you sean duppy former real work contestant he's the best fucking one he really

47:07Jon Favreau:is he's doing fine he's the remember the planes were crashing at the beginning though yeah they

47:10Tommy Vietor:were yeah the planes were touching and that was a huge problem in this a lot of the planes are

47:14Symone Sanders:touching they were going fast and touching they were touching bad for planes they're not supposed

47:18Tommy Vietor:to touch but he can't it's not his fault they still use floppy disks scott besson's out there

47:22Jon Favreau:like fucking richie rich just yeah he's just getting so mean to him he's just you know farming and soybeans.

47:29Symone Sanders:Hank says fucking drunks blowing up boats. It just be.

47:33Jon Favreau:Really? He's just posting photos of himself benching.

47:35Tommy Vietor:Benching. The benching. The benching photo. Was it, they claimed it was like 315 pounds or something like that? No. That seems like a lot. It's a solid max. And what is benching, what does that prove, do you think?

47:47Symone Sanders:That you have male pectorals

47:49Tommy Vietor:and triceps. Strong pecs for the other boys. Yeah, yeah.

47:51Symone Sanders:You know what? He could strangle the mullahs with his bare hands. I'll tell you something. I'll tell you something.

47:55Tommy Vietor:Men bench press for other men. Men do Pilates. for women. That's what I'll tell you. Okay. That's what I'll say.

48:02Symone Sanders:Okay. Sure. Anyway, where were we? All right. Before we get to Lovett's interview with Simone and Eugene, let's talk a little bit more about the State of the Union. You know, President, the expectation setting for him has been just on point, telling us it's going to be very long, which is what America craves. Democrats are preparing to respond in all different kinds of ways, as we are wont to do. If you're looking for a more traditional reaction, you can tune in to watch Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger give the official Democratic response. If you're in the market for something a bit more ideological, Congresswoman Summer Lee is giving the progressive response.

48:39Symone Sanders:If you want to watch what's going to make Megyn Kelly angry, you can catch the Spanish language response from Senator Alex Padilla. I thought you were going to say all of the above. There's a State of the Union pre-bottle from Congresswoman LaMonica MacIver and a post-speech rally on the National Mall called the People State of the Union. Some Democrats intend to skip the speech. Others have said they plan to go. And still others have said they plan to defy Hakeem Jeffrey's instructions to avoid disrupting the speech. What do you think? Anything else we're missing? Anything else they should throw in here?

49:09Tommy Vietor:The one thing I would just add is just that the guess that they're bringing is that Schumer and others are bringing victims or people that have been impacted by Epstein. I think that is an interesting way to respond to kind of put that in Trump's space. They're bringing Trump.

49:24Symone Sanders:He's already going to be there. Well, yeah, well, right.

49:25Tommy Vietor:For sure. But like, I think that at least is using the moment to kind of force Trump to confront something, or at least the image will force Trump to confront something or not confront something, which I think is interesting. I would just say, if I were a member of Congress and you told me I could patriotically skip the State of the Union, it would be a me-shaped hole in the side of that fucking Capitol. Oh, you mean for my country, I can skip this fucking long speech? Okay, I'll do it for America.

49:48Jon Favreau:Yeah, what about you? Yeah, on the pre-bottle things, like if a so-toe pre-buttals streamed on the mall, does it even make a sound? I don't care. The idea of an official response was always kind of dumb. It never worked and never got covered. I think in this media age, it's even sillier. And so it's fine that there's 25 of them. Who cares? There's no coordinating message. Everyone's just out there doing their thing. I think I would skip two. What's the upside for going?

50:16Symone Sanders:The upside for going - You show respect. Or the upside for going is to, I mean, everything is a game for attention, right? All of these are going to compete for attention in a way that is probably most are not going to be successful. Because like you said, you know, maybe people who still have the TV on catch the official response after the State of the Union is done. If they get up to go to the bathroom and they haven't shut the city, you know, like so there's maybe some of that. But like the people who are going to tune into the people State of the Union or to the pre-bottle or this or that, it's basically like your own audience, right?

50:50Symone Sanders:Like if you if you tend to follow those people, then you're going to follow them on this maybe. So it's not like you're breaking through. And so the only other option is to try to create attention in some way at the State of the Union. So if you're going to go and either disrupt the speech, you know, try to turn it into question time, have a guest that somehow Trump notices or the media notices and ask questions about. And then that becomes a little story. So it's just like the only case for going is to somehow create an attentional moment. Yeah. Otherwise, like, why bother?

51:19Tommy Vietor:I just think where we're at now, and I talked about this bit with Eugene and Simone, but like the idea that we should, that it, yes, it does seem disjointed, but that's fine, who cares? And really, yes, most people will be performing for their own audiences, but you take that many shots on goal, you will end up with something, hopefully that can get beyond the bubble and like some clips are -

51:39Symone Sanders:Something that you can celebrate with cash.

51:41Tommy Vietor:Right, exactly, yeah. Afterwards, with beer. Yeah, on the flight home, perhaps. But yeah, like I just think you can get like some viral moments that come out of this. I don't know who knows what they are, but like that I think, I don't know. Well, because like, Al Green stood up last time and you couldn't quite understand him in the, like he stood up and he was saying something and kind of found out later what it was. Let's just say guys,

52:04Symone Sanders:did anyone remember that Al Green was escorted out last time until you read about it today? Because I didn't.

52:10Jon Favreau:I did not remember until I was reminded of it today for sure. I remembered it just now with my memory. I didn't research this part very much because I think it's fine. What was he yelling? You're like, you have no mandate to cut social security or something like that. It was something along those lines. Who's to know? Look, there is a huge incentive to be disruptive, get carried out in some way, make that all about the speech. And you could make an argument that I wouldn't really agree with, that it's beneficial. It's kind of, I don't know. I think people, who cares?

52:38Symone Sanders:They could all paint a different letter of release the files on their chests. They could all put a mask on. They could put a mask on. They could -

52:45Tommy Vietor:Non-COVID edition.

52:47Symone Sanders:It just says ice.

52:49Tommy Vietor:We're anti-mask, mask protests, not pro-mask, mass protests, just to be clear. In this case.

52:55Symone Sanders:It's also hard whenever, whatever party is facing the president giving a speech, it's like asymmetric warfare, right? Like the president's got a, he's got the microphone. The people in the chamber do not have the microphone. So they're all gonna sound, you're always gonna sound like you're yelling and you're interrupting. The president's gonna be able to just like do what he wants there, right? So there's a little.

53:14Tommy Vietor:The other side of it though, is this is a president uniquely disposed towards reacting in ways that rebound poorly for him, right? Like he has the ability, like if you can interrupt him and get into some kind of a, if he gets mad, all of a sudden he's sort of, he's, you know, he'll break restraints and he'll start saying all the crazy shit. Like he's on a, he's going into this thing on a hair trigger anyway.

53:40Symone Sanders:I mean, the other side of that is at, you know, 35, 39 % approval, he's going to ruin the speech himself. Exactly. Yeah. Like he could give that speech and not a single Democrat could be heard from for the rest of the night and people would still be like, that sucked. Yeah.

53:55Jon Favreau:If we were doing like a Super Bowl party squares kind of betting thing, I think like the odds on thing to happen are that he denounces the Supreme Court justices in a way that maybe gets some like scattered murmurs and boos, right? And like leads to some like civility freak out. There is another version of it where he uses a speech to announce that like on my order, Tonight we have commenced the bombing of Iran and like goes for the big dramatic thing. And I could see him doing that again for, just cause he like is a drama queen and like likes attention, but it would be the least popular thing you could possibly do with the biggest megaphone.

54:29Symone Sanders:You don't think that was a stop in the affordability tour?

54:32Tommy Vietor:He's just, he's gonna, he's gonna, there's some line in there that's meant to assuage him. That's gonna be something about like the shameful decision on tariffs. And then it's, it is shameful. It was very, you know, he's gonna start talking. Like he just, the, you know, the fence around him is fragile when he's up there.

54:51Symone Sanders:If I had to bet it would be just lots of stories of dead Americans killed by immigrants, just hauling all that out again. Yeah, Lincoln Riley Act. They like to do a lot of stories of like very sympathetic Americans who were somehow, I mean, they're, I don't want to say they're good at that, but they are at least adept at trying to find those stories. I'm sure Stephen Miller's all over that. Those are going to be all the guests. They're going to have random fucking people who are helped by Trump's policies because you can't really find them in the polls anywhere. So they'll bring him to the State of the Union.

55:19Tommy Vietor:He's already done the longest day of the Union history, right? Was that him? I'm sure. Hour 40. It sounds like he wants to beat it. And I think he's going to want to beat it. So it's going to be a long night. Fuck.

55:28Symone Sanders:Well, we'll be doing the crooked media official response.

55:31Tommy Vietor:We will.

55:32Symone Sanders:Yeah.

55:32Tommy Vietor:We'll be doing, we'll have a pod out about it after. And we're going to be on Jimmy Kimmel. We're going to be on Jimmy Kimmel.

55:37Symone Sanders:That's three of us and Dan. It's going to be late. It's going to be late. Yeah, so anyway. When we come back, you'll hear Lovett's interview with Simone Sanders Townsend and Eugene Daniels about State of the Union and much more.

55:57Jon Favreau:This podcast is sponsored by strawberry.me. Let me ask you something. You think LeBron, Patrick Mahomes, or Serena got to the GOAT status by guessing? No, they had coaching. Every pro athlete has a specialized coach watching their form, calling the plays, and finding the blind spot they can't see themselves. That is exactly how they win championships. Yeah, like a little coach named Bill Belichick who's just snubbed. What the hell? By the NFL Hall of Fame. If he's not a first ballot Hall of Famer, literally no one is. He should work for StrawberryDotMe and help out other people. So why are you trying to win in your career without a coach?

56:29Jon Favreau:You're grinding away. You're hoping for a promotion, trying to guess the right moves. That is amateur hour. You need a strategist. You need StrawberryDotMe. I don't care if you're Tom Brady, you need your Bill Belichick. Strawberry.me matches you with a professional career coach who breaks down your game film. They help you negotiate that raise, navigate the politics, and execute a game plan that actually works. If you're wondering about the cost, think about it. One raise, one promotion, and this coaching pays for itself 10 times over. That is the best ROI in the game. Stop riding the bench in your own life.

56:55Jon Favreau:Go to strawberry.me slash crooked. Go today and get 50 % off your first coaching session. Strawberry.me, because pros don't guess, they get coached to win.

57:08Tommy Vietor:Joining me today is MS Now's Simone Sanders Townsend and Eugene Daniels, who are the hosts of the brand new podcast, Clock It. Simone, Eugene, welcome back to the pod. Greetings. Thanks for having us. So, hi to you both. What are we clocking today?

57:24Jon Lovett:Well, there's a long list. You want to talk about the BAFTAs and the N-word? You want to talk about the disrespect? Tony Gonzalez. Can I? Okay. Or do you just want to go with the State of the Union? I mean, we can go.

57:35Tommy Vietor:I let's not forget to touch on the BAFTAs before we leave, because I actually you brought it up and I am interested in the topic of the BAFTAs. I saw a Stead Herndon, a journalist, was saying it feels like a test on some kind of woke exam. So, all right, but we got it. Let's focus on the news. State of the Union is tonight for our dear listeners. Trump says the speech will be very long. Are you excited about that? And what are you both going to be watching for? Simone, why don't you kick it off?

58:07Jon Lovett:Well, I guess I'm excited about the length because Eugene and I will be watching the State of the Union on YouTube, on MS.Now's YouTube channel, along with everybody else who wants to tune in with us. So if it's long, the longer we'll sit there and watch and have our commentary. What I am watching for is actually how many times the president veers off script, okay? because obviously he is known to not stick to the teleprompter. His last address to Congress went, I think it was over about an hour and 39 minutes. That was the longest ever. Maybe he's trying to beat his own record. You know, he loves a fake trophy child.

58:42Jon Lovett:So I'll be watching for how long he goes. And then the lies he tells about the economy. I don't have to caveat it. They're going to be lies. He's going to say everything is great. Meanwhile, it's like Hunger Games in the grocery store. I want to know how far he's going to go tonight.

58:56Tommy Vietor:Eugene, what about you?

58:58Jon Lovett:All of those things. But also, I think the Supreme Court just struck down his tariffs and they're going to be standing sitting right in front of him. Everybody, but probably Alito, who stopped going years ago. So how does he engage with them? Right. He last time he shook their hands and thanked Justice Roberts, which was very awkward for everybody, how he's going to talk about the economy. Like Simone says about the lies. But in his last joint address to Congress, what he said was basically telling people, like, give us some time. It's going to be painful. So, like, is that the message you want going into midterms?

59:33Jon Lovett:Is that what they're going to go with? Because that's what they've been going with so far. But I think how he interacts and talks about the tariffs, because it is the center point of how he thinks about the economy and his economic agenda. And so how he engages with them is really interesting to me.

59:49Tommy Vietor:Yeah, it's worth worth noting that the reason Alito stopped going is because of a very mild comment about Citizens United by President Barack Obama. Did you write that? I don't think I did.

1:00:00Jon Lovett:Are you the reason Alito no longer attends the State of the Union?

1:00:03Tommy Vietor:Man, but it's like Alito, if you keep talking like this, I, Samuel Alito, will stop coming to your events. It's like you're threatening us with a good time here. But it is I am interested in what Trump is going to say directly to them. He's already in the past week said he's he's said more vicious things about the Supreme Court than any president in living memory. Now on to there's another group of people that will be there. They're called Democrats. They plan to respond in a lot of different ways. Some are attending in what Hakeem Jeffries calls silent defiance. Democrats have also invited victims of Jeffrey Epstein to the State of the Union as guests.

1:00:42Tommy Vietor:Other Democrats will be boycotting and attending competing events. If I were a member of Congress and I could skip because I'm a patriot, I probably would. But what do you think?

1:00:52Jon Lovett:Look, I have a piece up on MS.NOW right now about this very thing. I understand leadership's position. I want to note that. The leadership of the Democratic caucus, particularly in the House, Hakeem Jeffries has said, we're not going to Trump's house. Trump is coming to our house and you don't let somebody run you off your block, which is like, okay, I'm feeling the Brooklynness of it all. I get it. I get it. You know, I'm not mad about that. And I don't think that leadership should be encouraging, like, you know, people to rush the podium. Right. That's not leadership's position. But I don't think that the leadership of the Democratic caucus writ large, not just Jeffrey's, like the entirety of the leadership and even the former leadership.

1:01:29Jon Lovett:OK, clock that should tamp down the ability for this for protest or disruption or understanding the moment. I know that when Congressman Al Green stood up in the middle of Trump's last address to Congress, he was not it was not taken well, frankly, by Democrats in Washington. He was censured. There were members of his own Democratic caucus that voted to censure him. But you know who understood the moment and who appreciated what happened? the people outside of Washington, D.C., outside of the Beltway, that moment broke through. And that moment preceded many more inflection points of civil disobedience and people coming together in groups and protesting.

1:02:11Jon Lovett:And so I think, you know, never let a good crisis go to waste. Don't tamp down a good disruption is what I think should be happening. And if I was a member of Congress, I would not be attending. I would be on one of the live streams. I would be coming to watch it with Eugene and I on YouTube.

1:02:25Tommy Vietor:Oh, yeah. Members of Congress for live stream, they'll skip the State of the Union to do the live stream. I support that. I support that. Yeah, Eugene, I think part of the challenge here is it's always hard to figure out how to compete with the State of the Union. It's a classic dilemma long before Trump. You have the national stage. You have the podium. You have the pomp and circumstance. The responses are often they often feel flat in comparison. protests can they can get attention my problem if i remember when when al green stood up it wasn't totally clear what he was protesting about i think we had to find that out then we have to find that out later so there's like there are challenges uh in trying to kind of take the microphone from trump but but what do you make of the decision to to bring uh people connected to affected by jeffrey epstein to the state of the union i think that's a great move right like i think it is

1:03:19Jon Lovett:something substantive that they have Democrats have been fighting for making sure that there is a real release of the Epstein file something that Republicans used to be leading on they don't anymore shocker but it is it is also like part of when you're talking about that the the pompous circumstance of the State of the Union and what do you do to counter that this is one of those things right because we're going to be we as journalists are going to be trying to interview those women before. We're definitely going to interview them after. Now the White House and the administration have to figure out, Donald Trump have to figure out, how do we, or if at all, engage with these women?

1:03:58Jon Lovett:Do we talk about Epstein? Do we say anything about the women in there? He's probably not, you guys, just to be very clear. He's going to say he's been exonerated. Correct. He's up and through them files all over the place. He's probably not going to say anything, but it helps to create a dilemma. And I think when you are on the outside looking in, as Democrats hats are when it comes to power in D.C., trying to force people to make a move and getting them off the game is very interesting. Like, you know, Donald Trump watches a lot of TV, so it's very possible he has seen, you know, Jess Michaels, for example, before.

1:04:29Jon Lovett:So locking guys with her, what does that do? It could create something. And if it doesn't, there's a substantive aspect of this where the DOJ has been holding back files. They redacted more than members of Congress are comfortable with. And so it gives them a lot to talk about. I will add just to folks not going, I was talking with someone this weekend and they said that what they should do is be there and be silent. I don't know if that's helpful, but all the Democrats be there and be silent and then talk about it after. Because you could appear looking disjointed doing all these different things.

1:05:06Jon Lovett:And this is one of the things the Hakeem Drafts was so worried about, because now you have this, you know, this, I think it was like the We the People State of the Union rally that's happening with Chris Van Hollen and et al. And then you have the people that are going to go there, the people that are just going to skip completely. So it's kind of all over the place. So it could appear to the American people as disjointed when they want a Democratic Party that feels more unified. Can I just say one other point about that? Because in talking to some folks in leadership, people out of leadership and some strategists, one of the things that they have all said is that, look, we are on offense here.

1:05:38Jon Lovett:Republicans are on defense. And so we don't want to do anything that will potentially knock us off our own game. And and we want they said Donald Trump is going to lie. And we want people to hear the lies, not talk about something else that could be a distraction. And and I just think that that like the American people are smart. We can Donald Trump lies every day sitting in the chamber silently while he lies about the economy and then hoping to get a cable news hit afterwards or going live on your Instagram. I just I don't think that that that meets the moment. Now, I don't think I think that some people going and some people not.

1:06:11Jon Lovett:It will seem to spare it. I will also know there's a weather issue here in the northeastern part of the United States, the DMV area. So some people might just not be there because the flight won't make it, child.

1:06:21Tommy Vietor:And has anyone let the District of Columbia know about the technology of snow plows? Or is that something that is still are still. No, we're still trying to figure that one out. We're waiting until we're a state to be able to do that.

1:06:33Jon Lovett:Has seen the remnants of the last situation. And, you know, my street was quite clear today. So kudos.

1:06:39Tommy Vietor:Axios reported today that this hidden autopsy report that the DNC has done, that one of the lessons, one of the findings is that Gaza and the administration's position on Israel and Gaza cost Kamala Harris votes in 2024. What did you make of that news? And why is this better?

1:07:08Jon Lovett:Welcome, welcome, welcome. Did they need a freaking autopsy? Welcome.

1:07:12Tommy Vietor:Is it better to get the information? Why don't they just release the fucking report? It's silly.

1:07:17Jon Lovett:This part is very silly. Do y 'all want the tea? Yeah, sure. Yes, they do. The tea is the report is not being released allegedly, according to people familiar that I have talked to. And I want to caveat with this. I have not seen the report myself, but I have heard all about it. It's not being released because they believe that it will be a distraction. And it's a distraction that is not wanted by folks on the house side, the Senate side, Democrats writ large across the country in terms of like the, the alphabet committees, as I like to say, the D triple C, the DNC, the DSCC. They don't want that out before the midterms.

1:07:49Jon Lovett:I think that we will see the autopsy, but we'll see the autopsy in like December of 2026. But I, because I think more eyes have started to get on it. That's how some of these things are are leaking out. One could argue you should have just ripped a bandaid off this summer. And we were last summer, like last fall, frankly, and we wouldn't even be talking about it later. But that's how the ball bounces. I don't necessarily agree, but I'm just telling you that's the tea.

1:08:16Tommy Vietor:It's still February of 2026, still eight months until the midterm elections. I just find it hard to believe that what's inside of this document is so controversial that it'll be felt in an election eight months from now. Especially when we're getting the outcome of it. We're getting the information.

1:08:33Jon Lovett:I mean, the same reason why Democrats are like, Hakeem Jeffries is like, either stay home or go and sit silently is the same reason why they're not releasing this autopsy. Democrats feel like they're on offense and they do not want unforced errors. And they feel like releasing this will be an unforced error. I think not releasing it is an unforced error. And I think we probably all agree because you have, one, they promised to release it. So that's what's most important is that when you were running, right? Ken Martin, who's now the chair of the DNC, said he was going to release it. Of course he would release it.

1:09:02Jon Lovett:Then they made a different decision. So that just reiterates to voters within the Democratic Party that people who are elected, whether they are actually in office or whether that one of these alphabet committees, they don't follow through with what they say they're going to do when they actually get the job. So that is one concern. two is that we are going to find out what's in here right like holly otter by the axios is not the only reporter sniffing around we all are and so she found this one someone else will find another thing we'll find out you know race we'll find out gender we'll find out you know what was the ground game what was the digital game like all of it is going to come out and so the ripping off the band-aid should have happened because at this point it's just going to be like drip drip drip drip and then in October maybe something huge happens and now you're really embarrassed before voters go and vote in November and so I think at the end of the day the the party may have made a misstep here and there are a lot of people especially the younger folks that work within the party apparatus who are frustrated with this that I've talked to who are like we should have just released it we would have forgotten about it of course all the things that Donald Trump are is doing every day like if we release it and then we would have bombed Iran and then everybody would have moved on, right?

1:10:15Jon Lovett:Like, it's like, that is how you have to think nowadays. And I don't know why. I know they want to be on offense, but, you know, I played college sports. I know that's confusing for people, but I played college football. You have to play offense and defense. You have to do both to win the game. Did you have a heated rivalry? I wish. I really wish. I really wish. That's like my only regret. Because there were a couple moments where I feel like I could have, but I was too scared. Yeah. My biggest regret.

1:10:44Tommy Vietor:Yeah, on the autopsy, it's like, first of all, I want to know what we got for buying that sphere. And then the other part of it is, what did we get for the sphere? It's a waste of money.

1:10:54Jon Lovett:I'm sorry, but you can't have, as people would say during that time, more money than God, because that's what people in the campaign would say they had. And you're advertising on the sphere, but organizers in Phoenix and Nevada, specifically Las Vegas, can't get money to do their GOTV outreach efforts. There's a disconnect. And I just think I agree with y 'all ripped a bandaid off. I mean, to be very clear, the voters in the streets that are going to decide who the next Democratic nominee is, they actually don't necessarily care much about the autopsy. I think we care about the autopsy, understandably so, for various reasons.

1:11:29Jon Lovett:And and we're not going to stop caring about the autopsy. So release the tapes.

1:11:34Tommy Vietor:Yeah. I would say, like, you know, release the Martin files. But the the sorry, I don't know if that's now.

1:11:41Jon Lovett:Can I just say, I have heard that it is not Ken Martin himself that is independently saying, I'm not releasing it. There are lots of people that don't want to release. But Ken Martin, I mean, he's the DNC chair, so he's the face of it.

1:11:53Tommy Vietor:I understand why what I just said is terribly unfair in a variety of ways. But the other, it's also like it is being released. We're going to get the information. Just you're not releasing it on your terms. You're putting it in the hands of feckless reporters. sort of, you know, people like Eugene. People like Eugene trying to get their hands on it. Who only want this. Dirty, grimy little hands. They don't give a fuck what happens. They want the scoop. Correct.

1:12:17Jon Lovett:Yeah, release the information to the people. This just feels so, so nasty. It is. Like, what is this? Nasty it is. It's very sinister. It's me getting the tapes. I love how we made them tapes. They are. It is probably a word document. They're papers. They are papers, yes. It's a PDF. Yeah.

1:12:34Tommy Vietor:So Gavin Newsom, I want to cover him.

1:12:38Jon Lovett:Eugene has thoughts. I do have thoughts.

1:12:41Tommy Vietor:He had these comments over the weekend about his son not wanting him to run for president, but obviously he's running. He's sort of the front runner to be the front runner right now. He's been trying to kind of, I think people have been impressed by his kind of ability to kind of break through and get attention and going after Trump. Eugene, what do you think?

1:13:01Jon Lovett:No, I think that's right. I think people are like, especially the online people. And this is where the you have to live in like Twitter is not real life. But like the folks online who are watching him, they're they're excited about seeing someone fight back. Right. That's what Democratic voters want. They want someone who's caught fighting. And that's something he's done. He's done it in court. He's done it on TV. He's done it in this book. He's on this tour now. But I also think that when you're a politician, you got to be careful about how you're talking about things. He was up there in Atlanta talking to the mayor, and he's doing his interview about his book.

1:13:36Jon Lovett:And he's trying to explain that he's just like one of the folks. But what he's saying, what he ends up saying, yeah, I'm just like you. I get what he's saying. And I think a lot of people understand what he's saying. But you're trying to run for president, like being like, I have a 960 SAT. I can't read. Just like you. and it's like, wait a damn second, sir. We can read, right? So it's like, it's about being careful. It's important to note that he said it before. He said it in the interview he did with Charlie Kirk on his podcast. But in that room that he was in with Andre Dickens, the mayor of Atlanta, okay?

1:14:12Jon Lovett:In that black room he was in, it didn't land well, okay? Even the mayor, if you just watched the clip, the mayor didn't laugh at first. He was kind of like, ah, ah, ah. Like, it didn't land well. And I just think it's those kind of things that we're going to see a lot more of from a lot of different people because this is going to be 2020 on steroids. Everybody and their mama wants to be the Democratic nominee.

1:14:32Tommy Vietor:There's a there's sort of like and the response has been blown up by kind of right wing Republicans and right wing accounts. And I don't know how to there needs to be some sort of a name for it, which is Republicans doing the kind of doing their impression, their kind of trolly impression of circa 2020 Democrats to try to kind of like troll Democrats because they're the ones that really care about racism. and then and then I saw I also saw Tim Scott post it in this sort of like sort of uh like how dare you kind of a way when like he just had two weeks ago to say the the the monkey video was the most

1:15:14Jon Lovett:racist thing he's seen out of the White House which means he's seen other racist things out of the White House so I don't know the first racist this is the only racist this is the most racist thing yet okay so let's be very clear let's serve like this is not this does not touch what you've seen come out of the White House. But they're going after him because they do see, I mean, just think about it. I just want to, I mean, you work for Obama. Do I even need to tell you this? Like, at this time prior to the 2008 election, people didn't think it was Barack Obama. They thought it was Secretary Clinton.

1:15:44Jon Lovett:They were like, she's the front runner, da-da-da-da-da. There were other people that maybe also wanted to be president. Joe Biden was about to be on his second run for president yet again. Like, maybe that was his third, I can't recall. So he, there were lots of people, But no one would have said at this point in time prior to the 2008 election that Barack Obama was definitely going to be the Democratic nominee, that he was the frontrunner. And so they're attacking who they, quote unquote, think is the frontrunner. But I will just tell people the things that are going to make the difference or who actually shakes out to the top in this Democratic primary when it finally gets underway.

1:16:16Jon Lovett:And to be clear, we're in the early, early, as Lovett said, we're in the early days. But post midterms, baby, we are kicking off. It's going to be the map. What is the map? how does the map shake out for the primary because the map is going to tell a lot okay the map can take some people out or it can bore you some people till the end and it's going to be the the reliable black voters choose the democratic nominee in this party but you know what black voters do not make their do not make their decision in a vacuum they want to know what some of the white voters are going to do they want to know what some of the latino voters are going to do they might say damn these white voters these latino voters this is what the black voters want the map though helps color that the primaries help color that how people stand up in the bright lights how they fail on the debate stage um let's be clear vice president Kamala Harris then Senator Harris she did very well on the Senate um confirmations in the judiciary hearings when she got on the debate stage you know it was a little bit of a different story in that 2020 primary so the things that we see out here in the wild don't always translate when the primary gets underway.

1:17:20Jon Lovett:So watch this space, as Rachel Maddow was saying.

1:17:23Tommy Vietor:What do you think of Biden? There's a story in Axios that South Carolina is enlisting Joe Biden to try to keep South Carolina early in the process. I'm not sure what that even means. I understand why.

1:17:36Jon Lovett:Yes, because I understand why they would ask him because, you know, he has no current dog in the fight. He just he loves South Carolina. South Carolina kept him afloat. I mean, the map mattered for him. So I understand why. I believe and know for sure he's not the only person that they have enlisted. I don't think South Carolina is losing its place in the top first five contests, I would say. But I highly doubt that they'll end up being first. I will say this. I think the idea, Joe Biden is a good choice to help push South Carolina across the finish line. I get having that idea. Y 'all some haters.

1:18:13Jon Lovett:No, I just think The current setup of the Democratic Party is like, that's not going to be the push to keep South Carolina. I think that obviously, and I imagine, Mr. Clyburn is one of those folks that is at the top of that list, who actually does have some still pull and lots of respect within the Democratic Party and the Democratic Party apparatus, most importantly, to get that done. I think that people are still raw about, to say the least, about Simone's former boss. which one well the first one the old white man which one the second old white man to be clear and so I think the folks want they desperately want that pull to still be there that Joe Biden had I think he doesn't have there's still a lot of respect within the party but I think like give it a give it some time I will just say this as a former DNC member I think the respect within the actual party apparatus is what matters.

1:19:15Jon Lovett:It is the people within the party apparatus that are going to make the decision about the map. Given the recent events of the death of Reverend Jesse Jackson, the changes that Reverend Jackson pushed for to make sure that black people had viable chances, frankly, within the party to even become the nominee. Those kind of changes, the proportional representation, the map, those came out of 1988 Jesse Jackson, child. So if you think black people are about to let their cachet slip away within the Democratic Party apparatus, you got another thing coming. DEI might be out, but out everywhere else. At Target.

1:19:52Jon Lovett:DEI might be out at Target, child. But what black and Latino and women and AAPI Pacific Islander and everybody that's not a straight white man want and need, that is very much so in inside the Democratic Party apparatus.

1:20:05Tommy Vietor:Sometimes I do think, though, that like I agree how early things come have been important. But I remember from 2008 that once we got into the primary, it was less about the sequence and more about the kind of the makeup of the state's electorate. Like there was the momentum was less important than the fundamental qualities of what was happening in the state because we were bouncing back and forth. You know, Hillary was winning in the places she was expected to win. And that was happening deep into the process.

1:20:31Jon Lovett:To be clear, had Barack Obama not done well in Iowa, we would not be having a conversation. So the demographics of the state did, in fact, matter. No, no. Sequencing of the state's mad.

1:20:41Tommy Vietor:I think both really are important. But then with Joe Biden, right, he he you know, people are telling him to drop out, but he's saying wait for South Carolina. And he was right about that. So it was, you know, I think it's like it's a absolute, absolutely, absolutely. And I was going to I was going to say doesn't have a dog in the fight because the Kristi Noem killed that dog. But so.

1:21:00Jon Lovett:Oh, doesn't even make sense.

1:21:03Tommy Vietor:I want to I want to land on the back. I do want to ask about what's happening in Texas. Just last last sort of serious question, which is. We have this battle between Jasmine Crockett and James Tallarico. You know, it seems to be about what it means to be electable in 2026 in Texas. And I'm curious what you make of the back and forth between the campaigns.

1:21:27Jon Lovett:The fight is less ideological in the Democratic Party now. And it is about do you fight and how you fight? And I think like those two people show you kind of the different ways in which folks are going to be doing that throughout the year. Right. As we head through the primary season. I think that the when certain people say electability, it is a dog whistle and it's very clear what they mean. Right. Like we know we all know what that actually means. We know what it meant when people said that about Barack Obama. We know what it means when they said it about Kamala Harris. We know what it means when they said it about Jasmine Crockett.

1:22:06Jon Lovett:But in Texas, and it's very unclear how this is going to shake out, but if you look at both of them were in Lubbock, Texas, I think, over the weekend. And if you look at their crowds, the crowds are vastly different in the same city. And you have her crowd, which is super diverse, younger people, older people, lots of black and brown people. His not so much. Now, Texas is a very diverse state. I don't know if that bodes well for him. Who knows? We'll see. But I do not think the Stephen Colbert of it all is going to change a lot of voters' minds. I don't think that there are a lot of Texas voters who are like, oh, he didn't get to do his interview, didn't get to air on Stephen Colbert.

1:22:49Jon Lovett:So then I got to vote for him. Like, I don't think that's how voters are thinking. And as a as a person who graduated high school in Texas, I don't think I have a Texas tattoo. It's very crazy. It's really insane. It is. We don't want to ask a follow up question about. No, don't do that.

1:23:04Tommy Vietor:Everything's bigger in Texas, they say. It's true.

1:23:08Jon Lovett:I do not want to address that comment. What I will say, what I will say is this. I think that at the end of the, I agree with what Eugene said about electability. Like basically, are they electable in Texas? We're asking, will white people vote for Jasmine Crockett, right? Right. Will, will, will, will black voters vote for James Salarico? But the question is, will black, will white people vote for Jasmine Crockett? Will Latinos vote for Jasmine Crockett? Given some of the things that she has, in a general election, giving some of the things she has said about Latino, Hispanic voters, literally in print and on national television.

1:23:38Jon Lovett:It's insane. That being said, the way you win a primary is still a ground game. Early vote in Texas is happening right now. If you talk to folks within the Texas Democratic Party, they will tell you they are encouraged by the numbers that they're seeing. Early vote is, by Democrats, it's outpacing Republicans. There is energy in this race. We don't know who those voters are, though. And I think that the people that don't like the electability conversation, that feel like it's a, they're trying to hang an elbow, they're trying to put a, I don't want to use that term, but they're trying to weigh Jasmine Crockett down and trying to take her out of the race with the electability conversation, maybe who might not have really felt strongly about her initially, but like feel strongly about the fact that they're trying to take her out.

1:24:21Jon Lovett:So like, now we're going to vote for her. Maybe there are enough of those voters, but I just think the kind of campaign that has been run, she didn't run a traditional campaign. So if she is able to eke out in this Democratic primary, It won't be because she ran a stellar campaign. I want to be really clear. It'll be because I believe that she had great name ID. She had a good message and she was the kind of fighter that Democrats in Texas want to go into their general election. Not because the ground game was just so great. And that's that's OK to say because it's the truth.

1:24:52Tommy Vietor:And it's also I think we're saying that that Tal Rico has not been, I think, attacking Jasmine Crockett on the stump that he has been saying. he's been sort of I think above board right you agree with that?

1:25:04Jon Lovett:I think he's been overly above board

1:25:06Tommy Vietor:yes agree

1:25:07Jon Lovett:the former operative in me is like I'm not saying you gotta attack her and I wouldn't have advised that of him but I mean he has been practically out there saying and to be clear if she wins I'm gonna support her even at his fundraisers he's like and I think you all should too I'm gonna campaign fire just shut up you wanna win or not just shut up and when they ask you on a debate stage about the racism then you defend her. But Jesus Christ, win the race. But, you know, I think this overly nice, these niceties, the Democrats are still scarred from like their, you know, Democrats don't actually like infighting unless it's a presidential primary situation.

1:25:42Jon Lovett:But Democratic voters, they really don't like that. Like they really just, they don't want people attacking people. They just want to talk about the issues until they don't. So, I think Toleroy has done the right situation.

1:25:52Tommy Vietor:But that's to get at the moderates you would need, the kind of less partisans that you would need that the argument would be, Crockett will have a tougher time with, right? Like that, That would be why he's sort of running it in this sort of positive way.

1:26:02Jon Lovett:I think that, but I also think it's what he believes, to be very clear. And I think it's what he thinks will work for him. I think if you, I've asked Jasmine Crocker, we had her on our show like two weeks ago, and I asked her straight up, like, you know, do you think white people will vote for you, essentially? And Michael Steele asked as well. And she said that she has Republicans in her phone right now who have told her that if she wins, they will support her. So this idea that she can't win, Republicans won't vote for her isn't right, which was also a tone shift for Jasmine Crockett, who started her election talking about, we don't need the Reds.

1:26:34Jon Lovett:We just need all the blues. And I think, as my colleague Michael Steele would say, the former RNC chairman, which is crazy because now Democrats are like, we need Michael to run the party. I'm like, Michael is the reason we are here. Y 'all just, this man has been branded well. Pay attention. Y 'all need to clock that, okay? Y 'all need to read that bio. He said, you know what campaigns reveal? that they reveal candidates go on a journey in a campaign. And what he said when he heard those comments from Congressman McCrockett, he said she has obviously been on a journey in this campaign and has arrived to the place where she needs to be to try to win.

1:27:08Tommy Vietor:Well, we have to leave. I promise people the BAFTAs, but I don't... We're going to talk about the BAFTAs on our... You're talking on your show.

1:27:18Jon Lovett:It's insane. We're talking about it on ours. It's insane. I want to redo a Black History Month is what I damn want. Too much. it's too much every Black History Month they trying us Eugene every Black History Month and it's just 28 damn days can we just get 28 days he did not go to the mat to get Negro History Week it turned into Black History Month for us to talk about this disrespect and racism during Black History Month not today it's too bad

1:27:42Tommy Vietor:Eugene Daniels Simone Sanders Townsend what a joy new podcast Clock It they were doing a live stream during the State of the Union you know join us join them

1:27:59Symone Sanders:That's our show for today. Thanks to Simone and Eugene for coming on. We'll be back in your feed tomorrow morning with a bonus episode reacting to the State of the Union. Everybody hang in there. If you want to listen to Pod Save America ad-free and get access to exclusive podcasts, go to crooked.com slash friends to subscribe on Supercast, Substack, YouTube, or Apple Podcasts. Also, please consider leaving us a review. That helps boost this episode and everything we do here at Crooked.

1:28:52Symone Sanders:Cheryl Pellaviv, David Toles, and Ryan Young. Our production staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

From the publisher
The State of the Union has arrived. Will war with Iran come with it? Jon, Tommy, and Lovett react to reports that Trump is considering launching air strikes against Iran in the coming days and then jump into the rest of the news, including the President's decision to impose a new fifteen percent global tariff—after the Supreme Court ruled his existing ones were illegal—Kash Patel's taxpayer-funded trip to party with the U.S. men's hockey team, and the various ways Congressional Democrats are planning to respond to tonight's State of the Union address. Then, Lovett chats with MS NOW's Symone Sanders-Townsend and Eugene Daniels about the Democratic Party's 2028 frontrunners, the Crockett-Talarico Texas primary, and their new podcast, "MS NOW Presents: Clock It."

More from Pod Save America

All 187 episodes
1125: Will Trump Bomb State of the Union/Iran?Pod Save America · 1 h 29 min
Listen in VO