Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America

24 Jul 2026 · 1 h 11 min · 25 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The episode argues that Trump’s “forever wars” (especially escalating conflict with Iran and broad trade/tariff wars) are bankrupting the country and hurting his party, while Democrats gain in polling. It also covers Trump’s deal to let Saudi Arabia pursue a civilian nuclear program, the politics of the 2028 Democratic presidential primary calendar, and voter backlash against data centers and Trump’s D.C. self-memorial spending.

Guests

Jennifer Palmieri (former Obama White House communications director; Emmy-nominated host/creator of Long Play; co-produced Crooked series on Southern politics). She discusses a new six-part series on how Democrats win back power in the South.

Key claims

U.S. intelligence says more bombing won’t change Iran’s negotiating position; MAGA voters increasingly view the Iran war as not worth economic costs. Saudi nuclear deal is portrayed as undermining nonproliferation logic and as politically unpopular. Data centers are framed as a “sleeper” bipartisan affordability/environment issue that Trump is on the wrong side of. Polling shows Democrats leading on the generic ballot and trusting Democrats more on affordability/income inequality.

Notable examples

Dover Air Force Base dignified transfer; Politico/MAGA polling shifts; YouGov flash poll on Saudi nuclear; Gallup data-center opposition (70%); Washington Post poll on Trump D.C. renovations (67% unhappy); DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee debate over 2028 early states (South Carolina/Nevada/New Hampshire/Michigan).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Trump's Forever Wars Impact

0:45 to 1:30

Discussion on how Trump's wars are affecting polling among voters.

“Then Dan talks to our pal and former Obama colleague, Jennifer Palmieri, who's out with a new series co-produced by your friends here at Crooked about the politics of the South.”

Trump's War with Iran

1:30 to 3:00

Analysis of Trump's aggressive stance towards Iran and its implications.

“And Trump had to go to Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday to witness the dignified transfer of four more Americans who lost their lives in this war.”

Economic Costs of Trump's Wars

3:00 to 5:00

Exploration of the economic repercussions of Trump's foreign policies.

“But sometimes there are bad things, apparently.”

The Reality of U.S.-Iran Relations

5:00 to 8:00

Discussion on the complexities of U.S.-Iran negotiations and military strategies.

“The whole, like, what victory does he want?”

Saudi Arabia's Nuclear Program

8:00 to 12:36

Examination of the implications of Trump's deal with Saudi Arabia regarding nuclear capabilities.

“And like it, it, it very much seems like we're going to be dealing with us through the election.”

Saudi Arabia's Nuclear Program

14:11 to 14:27

Examination of the implications of Trump's deal with Saudi Arabia regarding nuclear capabilities.

“Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at midmobile.com slash crooked.”

Funding Trump's Defense Budget

14:27 to 14:40

Discussion about the financial implications of ongoing military operations and defense budget.

“Initial plan term only greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy.”

Military Funding Crisis

14:40 to 20:50

Discussion on the impending funding crisis for the U.S. military and its implications.

“Also, a reminder that we're not just paying for this war at the gas pump, but with our tax dollars.”

Tariffs and Economic Policies

20:52 to 24:14

Analysis of Trump's new tariffs and their impact on the economy and public opinion.

“I mean, you really don't have to say much more.”

Data Centers and Public Sentiment

24:18 to 28:00

Exploration of public opposition to data centers and their political implications.

“would say on it though, is if you're going to talk about, you must be prepared for the pushback on, uh, increasing the tax base locally and economic growth.”
Show all 25 chapters

Changing Dynamics in the Economy

28:00 to 29:45

Learn about the shifting political landscape and its impact on the economy.

“The economy is a more resonant issue this time.”

Changing Dynamics in the Economy

29:48 to 30:11

Learn about the shifting political landscape and its impact on the economy.

“Walmart is actually making that happen for their associates by investing over a billion dollars in training and education.”

Early State Primary Calendar Drama

30:19 to 36:58

Explore the controversy over the early state primary selection process.

“That's what the people in the know call it, the RBC.”

Implications of Demographics in Primaries

36:58 to 42:00

Analyze the importance of demographic representation in early primaries.

“Yeah, you could theoretically do that, although I'm not sure – there must be a way to do it, but I'm not sure how you would fund that if the governor didn't want you to do it.”

Debate on Southern Primary States

42:00 to 44:20

Exploring the relevance of Southern states in primary elections and the impact of demographic changes.

“And you get a bonus delegate if you perform above a certain level.”

Critique of Trump's Oval Office

44:20 to 47:30

A humorous critique of Trump's Oval Office decor and its political implications.

“Last thing before we get to Dan's conversation with Jen Palmieri about long play.”

Chime Advertisement

47:30 to 48:30

A promotion for Chime's banking services and benefits.

“John, you know, if all he did was just run around and sourcing fucking gold leaf from other places and just left everything alone, we would probably be we wouldn't be doing a lot better.”

Analyzing Southern Elections

49:35 to 56:03

A deep dive into the dynamics of voting in Georgia and Texas, and the importance of intentional political strategies.

“And now it's also out in the world and people know about it.”

MAGA School Board Voters' Realities

56:03 to 57:50

Exploring the misconceptions and realities faced by MAGA voters in education.

“the clap back to 20, to Glenn Youngkin and Loudoun County and critical race theory and all of that in 21 and in the 22 midterms.”

Hispanic Voters' Shift in Texas

57:51 to 1:00:00

Discussion on how immigration enforcement affects Hispanic voters in Texas.

“said were happening in school districts, but were there things that MAGA school ward was doing in the schools, whether it was, you know, book banning, changing the history curriculum that they were reacting to as well?”

Political Dynamics in Southern States

1:00:01 to 1:02:08

Examining the political landscape and changing demographics in Southern states.

“Yeah, I mean, I'm very fascinated by Texas.”

Democratic Challenges in Alabama and Tennessee

1:02:09 to 1:03:58

Analyzing the potential political shifts in Alabama and Tennessee.

“I mean, here's the thing with Mississippi and Alabama, right, that it is I think Georgia probably has the third highest per capita percentage black voters.”

The Importance of Southern Democratic Primaries

1:03:59 to 1:09:08

Debating the benefits of holding Democratic primaries in Southern states.

“They gerrymandered Jim Cooper out a few years ago and now they're gerrymandering the last standing Democrat and it will be nine zero.”

Candidate Spotlight: Jamie Ager

1:09:09 to 1:10:03

Highlighting the campaign of Jamie Ager in North Carolina and his background.

“And just this is this is not going to be a seven point race.”

Discussion with Jen Palmieri

1:10:03 to 1:10:24

The hosts express their excitement about a project involving Jen Palmieri.

“Cause I am a long time Jen Palmieri fan.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:20Welcome to Pod Save America. I'm Dan Pfeiffer. I'm Dan Pfeiffer. On today's show, we got some fresh new polling that shows Trump's forever wars dragging down his party and boosting Democrats. We'll also talk about the president's spirited defensive data centers and launching Saudi Arabia's nuclear program. Congratulations. As well as all the drama over which states will go first in the 2028 presidential primary calendar, which the DNC is debating as we speak. Then Dan talks to our pal and former Obama colleague, Jennifer Palmieri, who's out with a new series co-produced by your friends here at Crooked about the politics of the South.

0:57All right. With just about 100 days left until the midterms, Trump is ramping up the two forever wars he started that are now bankrupting the country, his war with Iran and his trade war with everyone. He told Axios this morning, quote, I am considering a massive attack on Iran bigger than ever before because Iran, quote, hasn't received enough pain yet. This despite a U.S. intelligence report that more bombing won't change Iran's negotiating position. Nothing's getting through the straits right now. Oil is now back over$100 a barrel. Gas is back over$4 a gallon. And Trump had to go to Dover Air Force Base on Wednesday to witness the dignified transfer of four more Americans who lost their lives in this war.

1:43Here's what the commander in chief had to say about all of this at an event in Georgia later in the day. This is with this skirmish we have with the Islamic Republic of Iran. And I call it that because let me tell you, they're getting hit so hard. When I go to Dover, I read charts on all of the young people. And some are unbelievable. Some are a little bit, you know, they got a little bit of a little couple of little bad things put in. This is a son who is like a flawless, perfect person. He's looking down right here. He's so proud right now. so together we're making our country safer and stronger and far more successful than it's ever been before and that's happening before your very eyes was uh i fought ourselves before as you know and we won we had a great success against this guy he reminds me of pinky herman do you ever see pinky herman you ever see pinky herman dan no no i haven't seen pinky herman a few things about that But now we're talking about all the bad things about the soldiers who died, whose bodies he greets for a dignified transfer at Dover.

2:55Luckily for the soldier who died that he talked about in that rally, there were only good things. But sometimes there are bad things, apparently. So that was normal. On the charts. On the charts. Bad things on the charts. I don't know if you also saw at the beginning there. Did you see the guy in the suit behind Trump who was who's doing an impression of Trump, I think? Yeah. Was that flattery, mockery? I assume flattery. I don't know. Who's who can say? Who can say? Pinky Herman. He really can't land the Ossoff name. It was remember on Truth Social. he had uh john os uh jerk off and he had jerk in parentheses it's just that was better than pinky herman wasn't it reads better it doesn't it doesn't sound you can't really say it you can you can read it and you get the jerk off thing yeah it's hard to do air parentheses at a rally better than pinky herman though um all right is there a pinky like there's no i know there's Pee Wee Herman.

3:54There's no Pinky, and he didn't conflate two 1920s characters or something, right? I don't believe so. Because later he did say Pee Wee Herman. I think he read it wrong. But he's also a creature of the 80s, so you'd think he would know Pee Wee Herman? Not know him personally, but would have been familiar. I mean, there's a very good chance he would know him personally. Maybe. Who knows where they used to hang out? Right. All right. I was going to have a question about all this. Oh, yeah, right. So in a May Politico poll, half of MAGA voters said that the Iran war was worth the economic costs. In this week's poll, only one third of MAGA voters think that.

4:38These aren't just Republican voters. These are MAGA voters. These are Trump supporters. One person close to the White House told Politico, the president is now fully aware that the only way to the victory he wants is completely politically impossible. Do you think he's actually aware of that? That's a great question, John. It's hard to say. The whole, like, what victory does he want? He doesn't really care, I think, about anything other than getting gas prices and oil prices down without looking like he surrendered to Iran. He wants the war to go away, but he doesn't want to look like a loser in doing that, which seems like an impossible circle to square in the current situation.

5:27Also, he seems in the – I'm thinking of the worst attack ever. he like maybe there is a plan somewhere that pete hicks have to drawn up for the worst attack they probably have some contingency plans but it's really seems like trump trying to threaten them again but he's done this a hundred times now you know i'm gonna blow up the bridges i'm gonna blow up the power plants i'm gonna do all these things then he doesn't do them and iran just keeps doing what iran is doing and nothing really changes and so his threats his words which is not a great place for a president to be but his words mean nothing domestically or diplomatically now when he's talking about the war.

6:00I've always thought that the best way to understand Trump is that he is just a like a cable news viewer who became president, like a cable news fanatic. And so his understanding of war is that of someone who has watched, you know, the Iraq war and other wars unfold on cable television. He thinks you just press some buttons and drop some bombs. And if you drop enough bombs, then the war stops. And because he now is in control of the most powerful military in the world. I'm sure he's running around the White House being like, we just got to bomb them more. We got to bomb them harder. We'll bomb bridges.

6:32We'll bomb power plants. We'll do all the war crimes. I don't care. And the more we do that, suddenly Iran will stop. And he clearly has no idea what the reality of the situation is, which, you know, the Wall Street Journal just had a story that satellite imagery shows that they are rebuilding in Iran faster than the Israelis or the U.S. anticipated after all the strikes. And so like there is and like I mentioned, there's that U.S. intel report from again from our own intelligence agencies just the other week that says, you know, no amount of bombing is going to change the Iranian negotiating position.

7:10You just cannot bomb your way out of this war. And I don't think Trump has come to grips with that. And I think when they say his optimal outcome is politically impossible and he's realizing it, or maybe he's not, it is ground troops and some kind of a ground invasion. I guess. I mean, I guess that's what he, I mean, I guess if the military assessment would probably be the only way to actually force Iran to open the strait, to give up their power, to give the dust, whatever it else would be to simply invade the country. Yes, that is politically impossible. And I think some of the things they might be considering now is they're back to the if we take Carg Island and maybe some of those islands around there, then perhaps we don't need like a full ground invasion, but we can take those islands and that'll help open the strait.

8:00I don't know. I think they are. This is very bad. It's very bad. And like it, it, it very much seems like we're going to be dealing with us through the election. Oh, at least. And maybe many, many, many years longer because it's entirely asymmetric. In order for the strait to be open, we have to stop Iran from even threatening the idea of firing missiles or drones at ships. So if we open it, let's say we take all these islands that, you know, cause lives, money, et cetera. Let's say we do that and 20 ships go by. But if the 21st ship gets hit with a drone, a missile gets damaged, that is going to then dramatically reduce traffic.

8:42Yep. Like we're trying to do something that is not actually possible in the situation we're in, unless Iran must either surrender or cooperate. And Trump can't get them to do neither. It's wild. There was, however, one exciting diplomatic breakthrough in the Middle East this week that I'm sure Americans will love. Trump reached a deal that would allow Saudi Arabia to pursue a civilian nuclear program, which could lead to them enriching nuclear fuel, though Trump denies that. He also says it's on the condition that the kingdom normalizes relations with Israel. I guess if you can't destroy Iran's nuclear program, the next best thing is to launch Saudi Arabia's.

9:23It's wild timing on this plan. I mean, what? Also, when Trump's like, he denies it could allow them to enrich uranium. Of course it can. Like, that is the deal. That's the whole point is. What does he think is going to happen? But then he, I mean, this is sort of very Trumpian, which is there are substantive arguments why someone would want Saudi Arabia to do this. This was a long process. There's a long memorandum. There's all these agreements on how it goes forward and how it will comply with nonproliferation and safety and all of this. They do all of that. it gets very bad reviews. Trump must probably seize a bad review on television or on social media or someone calls them.

10:04So then he tweets out a condition that is not in the deal. Saudi Arabia must normalize relations with Israel. Something Saudi Arabia said it will never do and undoes all of the work. Also, though, why are we launching a nuclear program with an autocratic regime. I know that we are ostensibly allies with Saudi Arabia because we have to be for a number of very complicated geopolitical reasons. Maybe not that complicated. Yeah, it's pretty simple, John. Yeah, it's oil and Israel and everything else. Okay, so there's that. But like, I don't know. We've already looked the other way when MBS brought out the bone saw and they are an extremely repressive regime.

10:53And now we think that it's a good idea to launch a nuclear program that could lead to more nuclear weapons, another nuclear powered country in the world of all the countries too, not even a democracy. Yes, you're a hundred percent right. Like, why are we going out of our way to make this happen? Fair question. Because the Trump family's in business with them and has done some good deals. That's one reason. But then there just is, from the perspective of timing, which is just very funny. I can imagine – I couldn't imagine being Trump's communication director. Imagine being the White House communication director, and you've spent the last four months arguing how the greatest threat to America is Iran having a nuclear weapon.

11:29We cannot do it. Then as you're doing it, as the war to, quote unquote, stop them from doing that is ramping up, some other part of the administration, the fucking Yahoo Energy Secretary, whose name no one can remember, negotiates a deal to give Saudi Arabia one. To the American public, that makes zero sense. You're like, yeah, but, you know, but Iran is an autocratic regime that's repressive. Oh, yes. That's right. Yeah, but they're on our side. They're on our side for now. I mean, the way a lot of the American people interpret it is, yes, we are giving a nuclear weapon to the country where 15 of the 19 9-11 hijackers came from.

12:05Right. Yeah, of course. It's an important thing to do. That's right. I'm sure everyone understands the difference between the different factions and alliances in the Middle East and why we're helping Saudi Arabia get nukes, but not unfuck. I mean, there was a YouGov flash poll that showed that only 19 % of people supported this idea. Yeah, I can't imagine it's a winner. I don't know if I needed to throw that in a poll, but it's good to know.

12:37Today's show is sponsored by Strawberry.me. Do you ever look at someone really succeeding in their chosen field and think, how did they get there? And what am I missing? Yeah, Cash Patel. Well, succeeding. Right, yeah, fair enough. One thing is certain, they didn't get there alone. Those who reached the highest levels of career success had mentors, coaches, people in their corner who helped them think through big decisions and see what they can't see themselves. like Donald Trump. That's exactly what today's sponsor, strawberry.me, is all about. A lot of us know we're capable of more. We just don't know what the next step is.

13:06It starts with getting clear on what you want, not what everyone else expects. Then you uncover the blind spots and obstacles that are keeping you stuck. And finally, you build an actionable plan instead of waiting for the perfect opportunity to fall into your lap. Whether you're trying to land a new job, earn a promotion, or completely reinvent your career, strawberry.me gives you a roadmap and a dedicated coach who's with you every step of the way. Scan the QR code on your screen or head to strawberry.me slash crooked to get 50 % off your first session. That's strawberry.me slash crooked, strawberry.me.

13:33It's like therapy for your career. Pod Save America is brought to you by Mint Mobile. There are things in life that you don't want to be transparent, like your swimsuit or your search history. But when it comes to your wireless bill, transparency is everything. That's why Mint Mobile's wireless plans have no gimmicks and no gotchas, just high-speed data and reliable coverage on the T-Mobile 5G network. And right now, all plans are$15 per month, even unlimited. Mint Mobile took what's wrong with wireless and made it right with premium wireless for 15 bucks a month. It's like Bill Clinton line. There's nothing wrong with America's wireless system.

14:00They can't be fixed by what's right with it. You know, you can even bring your current phone and your number, choose from three, six or 12 months plans and say goodbye to a monthly bill. To get your new wireless plan for 15 bucks a month, go to midmobile.com slash crooked. That's midmobile.com slash crooked. Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a month at midmobile.com slash crooked. That's it. There is no catch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months, $90 for six months or$180 for 12 months. Plan required, $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy.

14:31Includes up to 20 gigabyte hotspot capable device required. Availability. Speeding coverage varies. See mintmobile.com. Also, a reminder that we're not just paying for this war at the gas pump, but with our tax dollars. Pete Hegseth, who oversees a$1 trillion defense budget, is apparently about to run out of money in a few weeks because, in his words, quote, quote, it takes money to kill bad guys, which apparently they haven't done enough of. He's asking for an immediate cash infusion of about 70 billion dollars, which doesn't yet have the votes in the Senate. And in order to pass, would certainly need some combination of the three Republican senators up in November, all in very tight races.

15:15Susan Collins of Maine, John Husted of Ohio and Dan Sullivan of Alaska. do you think it'll pass? And also, is this the easiest no vote ever for Democrats? I would imagine that this does not pass before the election. And then they just run out of money at the Pentagon? Well, they can find money in the Pentagon. Yeah, I do think they're about to run out of lines of funding that have to do with this war and I guess Hegseth is moving some stuff around. They're canceling military exercises. Well, not the ones that Kid Rock's house. They're parking jets to like, I mean, this is crazy. This war has fucking, is bankrupting the country and the defense department as if there are no other threats in the world.

16:02I mean, it does, once again, get the asymmetry of this, which is Iran is sending cheap fabricated drones towards us. And then we're shooting them down with very, very expensive missiles. It's wild. But I think, you know, the in the Senate, John Thune has said he will not work on the on this reconciliation bill that would fund this until after they do government funding for the September 30th deadline, which suggests to me that he really would like to do this in the lame duck. Although did you see that they want to he was he was contemplating attaching government funding to the reconciliation package so that government funding could pass with just 51 votes?

16:38Yeah, that'd be another option for them to do it. But then you'd still have to force Collins, Husted, and Sullivan to vote. I forget how many you would need of those. Well, you're going to get Fetterman's vote almost certainly. Right. So they could all take a walk. All three of them? Well, we are at 53-47. Okay. You have to get to 50. You only have to get to 50. They have 53. But they all have 54 with Fetterman. They all have 54 with Fetterman. You lose three, which gets you to – and you only need 50 anyway because he can break the tie. So they could all take a walk on it if they want to. And Murkowski.

17:13And Murkowski, yeah. What about Rand Paul? I bet Rand Paul won't vote for it. Well, yeah. I mean, it'd be easier for Thune to do this because in addition to his vulnerable senators, he also has other people who don't want to vote for it. Right. And Rand Paul. And so you could see why he... My guess is if he had his druthers... He'll wait. And he may not. He would push this thing till after the election. Man. Take the vote. Go ahead. Do it. Yeah. Do it right now. Love to run on that. So the political poll I mentioned earlier showed that people correctly view Iran as the top reason shit is so expensive.

17:48But a runner up was tariffs, which Trump has apparently decided to double down on. Also great timing, just like the Saudi deal. This week he announced a new 50 percent tariff on most imports from Canada, including wine, hockey sticks and cement. He also announced tariffs as high as 200 percent on imported generic drugs within a few years. Imported generic drugs make up the vast, vast majority of people's prescriptions in the United States. His theory here is that he's telling all the drug manufacturers to come back to America and manufacture here. And if they don't do it by 2028, just in time for the next election, the next presidential election, everyone's getting hit with a 200 percent tariff.

18:37On prescription drugs, stupid, like stupid and probably politically inconsequential in the short term. Right. But you could you should people should talk about it, but it's that it's coming that he wants to do it because he's out there. the only affordability thing he can talk about is he's he's like making up some shit about trump rx as if it's like some big discount that he's offering people on prescription drugs which it isn't but they clearly know that prescription drugs is a very salient issue for people and one that they had been on the wrong side of so they tried to get on the right side and now he's doing a 200 tariff well let's go back to the tariffs on canada so i think he left that important part why john tell me why he put these tariffs on canada um i don't i is it did he say that it's because of the smoke because because that's what the reports say i mean i knew he was pissed at them about the smoke and then i knew the terrorists came but for some reason i thought it was another explanation but of course it's the smoke yeah the it seems like the most the reason that americans are going to pay more in costs for many things it's because donald trump doesn't understand how wind works i mean if you imagine you were sitting at the nrcc the nrsc the house senate republican leadership and you're just trying or even any one of these campaigns, right?

19:53You work for John Husted or Mike Collins, guys running in John Ossoff or in any of these races and you're just like, truly, the White House is trying to destroy us in this election at every single turn. Yeah, he is. I mean, he finally passed a bipartisan housing bill. He refuses to sign it because he wants to take he wants to prevent people from voting. He starts a war. He starts a, he reignites his tariff war. He spends all of his time talking about building corporate funded monuments in Washington, D.C. It's like, it's like deep down in his soul. I really think Trump doesn't want to win the midterms.

20:34Like he just, he's trying. He doesn't like intellectually, he wants to win the midterms. He thinks he wants to win the midterms, but his subconscious is trying to lose the midterms. Unpopular wars that are bankrupting the country while he makes$2 billion. dollars since he's been in office. That's it. That's the that's the midterm argument right there. I mean, you really don't have to say much more. Speaking of voter anger, the White House held an affordability event on Thursday where Trump was supposed to show how he's protecting Americans from increasing power costs because of data center construction, a hugely salient and unpopular issue.

21:08And as usual, he nailed the whole I'm on your side thing. You have communities that really want the data centers. And frankly, those are the smart communities. You have to convince your community how great these things, you can't fight it. You have to go with it. To your last point, he's just, he's really trying to lose. I mean, a Gallup poll in May showed 70 % of people do not want, would not want a data center built in their local community, 70%. I think data centers are the sleeper issue of 2026 and beyond. The polling is very clear. It is a bipartisan issue. It is an issue that elicits tremendous passion for Republicans and Democrats.

21:52As you say, more than two thirds of voters do not want data centers in their communities. Majorities of voters think that the pace at which data centers are being built nationally is happening too fast. The large majority of voters, in some cases, two-thirds of voters, believe that data centers are leading to higher electricity and utility costs. They think it is poisoning their water. It is bad for their community. Some of them, most of them do not buy the arguments about job creation and economic growth. It is, and this is an issue that is bipartisan, it unites Democrats, it fires people up, and is an issue of absolutely crystal clear contrast with Trump.

22:29who not, yeah, he said some dumb shit here, but the policy of his administration is to build a data center on every corner. Not because that's what's good for America, not because that's what's good for those communities, but because the billionaire roligarchs in the AI companies have told them that's what they want. Like this is like Democrats, there are some Democrats who are very strong on this, but for the most part, Democrats have been overly cautious on this because they're so afraid of the AI super PACs coming in and raising the ground with their hundreds of millions of dollars, but we are, this is a sleeper issue.

23:03Trump's on the wrong side. We have to be on the right side. There's also, I've noticed some Democrats, maybe not Democratic electeds, but sort of center left writers, pundits, who like defend data centers by saying that like, you know, if they could lead to, it could help with more energy and energy efficiency and all this other shit. And I'm like, I think, I think that no one is ready to hear of the possible benefits of data centers when people are looking around their communities, seeing these awful things being built that could jeopardize the environment, that could send their electricity costs soaring.

23:43and it is a stand-in for everything that people don't like about AI, which is a lot right now, because when you look at the polling too, it's not just that people oppose them in their own, it's not just like a NIMBY thing where people like oppose them in their own community, people oppose them in other communities as well, which makes you think that it's not just about the physical data center, like where you live, it's about what it represents, which is AI taking over everything. This is an issue I've been working a lot with, with candidates and campaigns and activists who subscribe to message box pro.

24:16So I think this is a huge issue. A couple of things I would say on it though, is if you're going to talk about, you must be prepared for the pushback on, uh, increasing the tax base locally and economic growth. Cause there is those arguments do have some purchase with voters. There was also a skepticism on a national ban that has changed. that's been changing a little bit recently, but people, voters have very conflicted views of AI. They're deeply concerned about it. There is some optimism that, you know, it could be good for the country in the long run, if done, if done right with the right amount of regulation.

24:49And so there is some hesitancy to saying stop everything right now, because there's a fear that we could fall behind. And interestingly enough, I know you guys talked a little about the Equis, the more most recent Equis poll on Tuesday's pod, but Latino voters are actually more positive towards AI and data centers than the population writ large, or at least open to the idea that they could help with economic growth and job opportunities, both locally and nationally. And so it is an issue we have to be very strong on, but there is a little nuance to the argument. But if you are overly nuanced and you're not standing up, particularly if it's in your local community, I think you're making a huge mistake.

25:28What are the arguments against data center construction that are the most resonant with people um that you're going to pay for it with your utility bills and that it is bad for the environment and the community are the ones that have the most but by far it's going to raise your cost is like a number one and where you've seen the biggest battles on data centers are in states that have very high utility costs right like in maine that's one of the reasons that janet mills's popularity has been down is people are very upset about data centers in maine uh She vetoed a bill on this. All right. So you would expect all of this to translate into good polling results for Democrats.

26:05And it is. Some eye-popping numbers in this week's polls. Emerson has Democrats at plus 11 on the generic ballot. Pew has D's at plus 6. And Fox News has it at plus 7. and in their poll, Dems are at 53%, which is the highest percentage either party has received on the generic ballot in Fox polling since 1996. Fox also showed Democrats more trusted to handle income inequality by 22 points, healthcare by 21 points, inflation by 10, the economy by nine, foreign policy by seven. In April, Republicans had an eight point lead on immigration as an issue. Now Democrats are up by one point on immigration.

26:49Anything else jump out at you from all these polls? It's funny. When I saw that 1996 number, I was like, holy shit. I don't remember 1996 being a wave year. Well, it wasn't. We picked up like three seats. So it's like, I don't know. That's good. But I think these numbers are excellent. And we may look back and just say that these were a little bit of outliers because the polls were in any moment of intense focus on the Iran war and tariffs, Trump's two worst issues. But I also think we could look back on this in a few months and say this was the hinge moment in the election where it broke in Democrats' favor.

Read the full transcript

27:26Bottom dropped out, yeah. Yeah, but it's like the ceiling on Democrats to this point has been people do not like Trump. They do not. They think he's doing a terrible job on these issues, but they trust Republicans more than Democrats on these issues, particularly the economy and inflation. And there was a member of that Wall Street Journal poll that was, I think, late last year, earlier this year, which showed on almost every single issue other than health care and climate, Republicans, people voted for Republicans over Democrats. The fact that Democrats have a 10-point advantage on the economy in this Fox News poll is incredibly consequential.

27:58Trump had an advantage on the economy in 2018. We picked up 40 seats. The economy is a more resonant issue this time. That's very good for us. And just to give you a perspective of how much things have shifted on the economy in that Fox News poll, Republicans have only a seven point advantage among white non-college voters on the economy. Oh, wow. Trump won that group by 34 points in 2024. And the economy always has been Trump's superpower. It has been the thing that has held him afloat to this point. He lost that superpower, but Democrats were unable to take advantage of that. We are starting to make real gains there.

28:34And if that stays the case, we will have a very good 2026 in terms of the national popular vote. It won't look like the seat gains from 2018 because of all the gerrymandering and redistricting that's taken place, but it could be a very good year if these numbers hold. Yeah, I was happy to see this because I feel like in the last month, there have been a number of polls where Trump's approval is in the shitter, but the generic ballot was closer than you'd expect from Trump's approval being that bad in the same poll, right? And so that you have polls where it's three, four, five. Now, all three of these polls could be outliers, but they're also all three of them high quality polls, rated very highly, Fox, Emerson, and Pew.

29:19So who knows? But maybe, like you said, maybe it's a focus on Iran. Look, I mean, gas prices were going down before the MOU went kaput and we were back to full-scale war. So, you know, it could be as simple as that. They could come down again, for sure. They could come down again.

29:45Pod Save America is brought to you by Walmart. You know, we talk a lot about finding a job, but what about building a career? Walmart is actually making that happen for their associates by investing over a billion dollars in training and education. And the proof is in the numbers. Last year, more than 100 ,000 associates earned promotions, adding great benefits like 401k matching and paid parental leave. And it's clear, Walmart isn't just a place to work, it's a place to grow. Go see for yourself at walmart.com slash grow at Walmart. That's walmart.com slash grow at Walmart.

30:18All right, let's get to the latest on the presidential race, which we're talking about because the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee met this week. The RBC. The RBC. Yes. That's what the people in the know call it, the RBC. Yeah. They met this week to figure out the early state primary calendar for 2028. Most of the reporting points to four states that are likely to make that window before Super Tuesday in March. So this is in the January, February window. South Carolina, Nevada, New Hampshire, and Michigan. There may also be a fifth state added. And now reporting is centered around possibly New Mexico or Virginia.

30:59But the order of which states go first is very much up for grabs and the source of all the drama that's been leaking out of these meetings. South Carolina and Nevada are jockeying to be the first state fueled by what Axios called a long simmering feud between black and Latino leaders. New Hampshire has a law that requires the state to hold the first primary. So that's tricky. There are 49 people on the committee who will decide this. And one of them told notice, quote, it's going to be a bloodbath. Most states represented have at least one or two members on the committee. And I think they're all going to fight to the death for this.

31:37Great. So what are the big issues here and how much does the sequence matter? So let's do the issues first. I think there are a handful of things that need to be in consideration as you do this. The first is the first four or maybe five states, any states that come before Super Tuesday have dramatically more impact than all the states that come afterwards. Right. These are the states that window the field. They are the states that help pick the front runner. they matter a ton. And so if they're going to matter a ton, they must represent the full breadth of the Democratic Party in the electorate, right?

32:09You need to have states with large black population. You need Latino voters to have a say. You want theoretically a swing state in play. You want rural voters to have a say. So it's got to have real representation of all the parts of the Democratic Party. That's one. Two, you also want the states to be states that play in ways, both in terms of the voters you appeal to, the size of the state that give us the best chance of picking our best nominee. Right. It can't be for giant states where the person with the highest name ID automatically wins. It shouldn't be for rural states or for states that are demographically similar.

32:49You want it to look like, you want it to be a good trial run for a general election. And then what I think is really important is you want, because millions of dollars and thousands of hours of tens of thousands, a hundred thousand hours of organizing is going to go into these states. You don't want all that investment to go to waste in the general election. Like you remember this, we were together in Iowa in the 2020 caucuses. We're flying out the day after the caucuses ended, but there's still no winner declared. And at the airport with us were all these organizers who worked for Bernie, Pete, Biden, Elizabeth Warren, who had spent the last year in Iowa, who knew the names of every Democrat and caucus goer, their names, their fund numbers, their kids' names in these communities in Iowa, and they were leaving to go to another state to never return to Iowa again.

33:39If you're going to organize these states, you want to have some benefit in the general election. So I think those are sort of the main considerations. There's one more thing, which is you need if you're going to move a state's primary, you need control, democratic control of the state. Yeah, this is the most practical concern. Yeah, this is not like something about winning the election or anything, but like you can't because some of these states have already had their primary set and the legislature sets it. And so if the Democrats have said, oh, we want to move it up, you'd have to go to the legislature.

34:12And if it's a Republican legislature, like in Georgia, because Georgia was being considered instead of South Carolina, because it would make more sense for a whole bunch of reasons. It's a competitive state. South Carolina is not still also has a very large black population. but we don't control the legislature in Georgia. And so there's no reason to believe they would ever move the primary date for us. So, yeah. I mean, there's all these like little things in here that are really seem like they should be done, but are quite consequential. It is New Hampshire law that New Hampshire goes first no matter what.

34:40New Hampshire insisted on going first anyway in 2024 and got no delicates, faced a huge price. And they had to sit like in the back of the convention. They had to theoretically change their law if they don't go first, If they're not picked first here, they probably shouldn't be picked first. Nevada, this is really interesting. Nevada is a vote by mail state where votes count if they are postmarked by election day. So if Nevada is the first state, you couldn't call – there's a chance you wouldn't be able to call the winner on election night. Therefore, depriving that winner of that moment where they accept the – they give their victory speech.

35:16It is the moment that's propelled Obama in 2008. So that's a consideration. There's a bunch of little ones like that. If we won the governorship in Georgia, which I'll talk to Jennifer Palmieri about later in the show, you can maybe do it there, but you won't know that when you have to make the decision on this. So New Hampshire, they have this law. They can't change the law. I mean, they could change the law, but we have a Republican governor there and a Republican. They control at least one part of the legislature. Can't do it. Kelly Ayotte is not going to do it. Yeah, because the Republicans want New Hampshire to be first.

35:49Right. So I don't know how. all the reporting is like, well, it's between South Carolina and Nevada for first. How are they getting around the New Hampshire problem? Even if New Hampshire, even if the New Hampshire Democrats at the DNC agree, they still have the law. So I don't know why they're talking about South Carolina or Nevada first. They would just not, if New Hampshire can't change the law, New Hampshire would not count. It would be just like 2024. Remember, I mean, And this has happened in the past. You may remember this from a different period of our lives in 2008. Florida and Michigan moved up to go too early against DNC rules.

36:27Their primaries did not count because they were awarded no delegates when we didn't even compete in those primaries. And so New Hampshire could, if they don't pick New Hampshire, New Hampshire has its primary on that day. It's for nothing. No vote, no delegates are awarded. I guess they could have – and I heard a rumor that this is possible, that they could have that primary that day, no delegates awarded, and then the state party can organize and put on a primary when they're supposed to have it agreed by the Rules and Bylaws Committee. Yeah, you could theoretically do that, although I'm not sure – there must be a way to do it, but I'm not sure how you would fund that if the governor didn't want you to do it.

37:09So that's one issue. The issue you cited with Nevada is worrisome to me that we would not know who the winner is for. That seems like a disaster in the making. but like there's this big fight between South Carolina and Nevada and the chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party said in the New York Times that if Nevada goes first then it will say something about how the Democratic Party views black voters which I think is quite a statement to make and then the chair of the Nevada Democratic Party who is a black woman as well she was like well, 15 % of our electorate is black also. And what are you talking about?

37:50And also, does that mean that if South Carolina goes first, that the Democratic Party is saying to Latino voters that they don't count as much like this? But I just feel like the best way to deal with that is to let the state with the law that says it's supposed to have the first primary go first and then next have South Carolina, Nevada go like within days of each other. like yeah like how much does the order matter among the early states right like i get why you want to be in one of those five states in that window but but like if new hampshire's one week and then south carolina and then nevada or then nevada then south carolina like how much how much does that matter it matters a lot to the people who own tv stations cool in those states it matters a lot to people who own hotels in those states, people who have companies that rent bike rack and other things for rallies.

38:42Because the first state people will be there for a long time. For longer and spend more time. And then it's diminishing, right? Because you put most of your resources in the first state because for most candidates, they don't get out of the first state. They're not going anywhere. The front runners then put their second most resource in second state. And you're sort of like, well, if I make it to South Carolina, which used to be the third state or Nevada, we'll figure it out from that point on. A lot of the calculus on this is really dumb because there is this reporting. I think this is in Peter Hamby's excellent piece in Puck, that there are some folks who are very worried about Nevada because they think AOC could win.

39:17You and I both. Yeah, this is so stupid. And the argument is because Bernie won. But just to put some numbers on this and because it was a caucus in 2020 when Bernie won and they made it. It was a hybrid caucus. There were four days of early vote and then the actual caucus day. But even with that, there were 105 ,000 Democrats who participated in the primary in 2024, where when they're when Biden was running uncontested, essentially 150 ,000 people voted. And if there are 500 ,000 registered Democrats in the state, if it participated, if it operated at a turnout level, like a typically contested presidential primary, there'd be like 250 to 300 ,000 people would vote.

39:54So it's a very different electorate. And it's a more moderate electorate because for a couple of reasons, like just because primary electorates are always more moderate than caucus electorates, because to go to a caucus, you tend to be highly engaged, more of an activist. You're getting out of your house in the middle at night and going to sit in a town hall somewhere for hours and hours. And so the people are more committed. They tend to be more partisan. And so like Bernie Sanders organizing the culinary workers in Nevada and winning the caucus that way versus an AOC trying to win over a larger primary electorate of.

40:35And yes, younger than South Carolina, more heavily Latino, but still a lot of like non-college working class voters, which like, yeah, she could do well. But like so could any candidate. And it's not it's not obvious that that would benefit a progressive candidate like AOC over anyone else. And then there's there is concern about Michigan because they think Gaza would make Gaza a dominant issue in the primary. Yeah, I think everyone's overthinking this. We don't know what the world's going to look like when people are campaigning, you know, when these elections happen, you know, a little less than two years from now.

41:14Yeah, it's it's fascinating and how they ordered will does affect things a lot. The only other thing I'd say is the identity politics fight about which voters we care, that is not particularly constructive. It is true that black political power in this country has been decimated in a lot of ways by the Supreme Court in terms of congressional representation and all of that. But one thing that I think has not gotten a ton of attention is because of the way the districts where all these majority minority districts, which are mostly black across the South, have been written out of existence, that is going to diminish black voters influence in a longer primary process because those districts are ones that perform incredibly well.

42:02And you get a bonus delegate if you perform above a certain level. And so the way Obama and Clinton really cleaned up across the South is that they were claiming all five delegates in those districts. There are fewer – there will be almost no districts like that left across the South. And so there is a – the opportunity to have a say in the process earlier. I don't think the South Carolina should necessarily be first. But that it's the process doesn't look like it used to for black voters now post the VRA decision that did before. Undoubtedly, one of the five early states should have a heavily black population.

42:39Undoubtedly. It is particularly rich for South Carolina to be the ones complaining about this, because that is a state that plays no role. And it is the one state we're talking about. Yeah. That plays no role in the general election whatsoever. whatsoever. And so when you talk about like time wasted by candidates who are organizing in a state that they're never going to go back to, that's, I mean, you could make the same argument for New Hampshire, but Michigan, Nevada, you know, again, it would have been much better if we had democratic control of Georgia to make just, Georgia would be the state and that would be it.

43:14But you also have a lot of black voters in Michigan. You have about one in five, uh, democratic primary voters is black in michigan yeah and you and look ideally you'd want a southern state um to be in the top five that um uh no matter what and it just because of who controls the legislatures it seems like we're stuck with south carolina yeah north carolina is also an option that could have could have easily put in there north carolina would have been good where we control the governorship why didn't north that's an interesting one i wonder why north carolina didn't and then i guess virginia also but virginia the reason people are floating virginia is because it is a way to have a southern state that solves the Georgia problem because we control the legislature there.

43:52So you can easily move it up. Well, I'll tell you this. If it is Nevada, we will be moving production of this show to Las Vegas for many months, maybe even a year. John, I've been to Vegas with you. We should do it one weekend at a time. I just don't think an extended period is not going to be good for anyone. I'd love it. I don't know what would even happen to him. Oh, my gosh. Yeah, this could be a real problem. Staff's going to love it. I can just tell. I can already see the excitement here. All right. Last thing before we get to Dan's conversation with Jen Palmieri about long play. On Tuesday evening, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino posted a minute-long video on his official Twitter account, set to some theme music that some of you might recognize who are millennials or older, in which he panned his phone camera around the walls of the Oval Office in admiration of Donald Trump's interior decorating.

44:43Check it out.

44:50For those of you just listening, this is a lot of gold. Some more gold. There's a lot of model airplanes here. Uh, oof. It's like fucking Saddam's palace.

45:11I don't know what's with all the planes. yeah it the saddam's palace thing is right except this makes saddam's palace like a pottery barn oh god it's so much is that the liberty bell

45:28oh uh okay so what'd you think dan it's not often you get to see you know when you see the oval office on tv you only get to see part of it at a time so you don't fully understand how absolutely gaudy it is now it's just it's gross it's gross there's just too much there's too much gold and it also looks like cheap gold and i'm sure it's not i'm sure he just like spent whatever but it's just it's it's busy it's too it's tacky the model airplanes make no sense um there's some real substance here that we can talk about uh The Washington Post was out with a new poll about Trump's big self-memorials, found that about two-thirds of Americans are unhappy about the renovations in D.C., the Trump renovations, led mostly by Democrats and independents.

46:22There is a big intensity gap. 67 % of Democrats chose the most negative answer, upset, whereas only 31 % of Republicans chose the most positive descriptor, enthusiastic. stick. How much of a political liability do you think? Not just that oval, but all of this shit is? Every one of these things is an affordability issue. It's just like, this is... Do people... Are they really passionate about an ugly arch on the mall or the amount of time the president or what the reflecting pool looks like? No. What they are upset about is that when the prices are going up, the president is spending so much time on the resin on the bottom of the pool.

47:03or on individually hand sourcing gold flake for the White House, or when he went shopping for marble armrests like that, that is to people just like, he's supposed to be fighting for me, and he's doing all of this shit for himself. What a waste of time and energy. I will say, I'd rather him be doing that than focusing on the economy, because when he focuses on the economy, he makes everything more expensive, not less expensive. That is a very glass half full take. John, you know, if all he did was just run around and sourcing fucking gold leaf from other places and just left everything alone, we would probably be we wouldn't be doing a lot better.

47:44We'd be probably doing better than when he actually focuses and decides he's going to slap more tariffs on shit, start more trade wars and forever wars. So he basically needs at all times some sort of fidget toy. Yes. Maybe taxpayer funded fidget toy or billionaire funded fidget toy. But that's what you want to be doing. Yeah, that's just a thought. All right. When we come back, Dan talks to Jen Palmieri.

48:31no overdraft fees, no monthly fees, no minimum balance fees. You get 5 % cash back on Chime card in a category of choice like gas or groceries, all while building credit through regular, everyday spending. No credit check required. You can also grow your money faster with a savings rate that's nine times the national average. And if you're ever in a pinch, SpotMe lets you overdraft up to$200 fee-free. Join the millions who are already banking fee-free with America's number one choice for banking. Head to chime.com slash crooked. That's chime.com slash crooked. Sign up now. It only takes a few minutes.

49:03Chime is a fintech, not a bank. Banking services and Chime card provided by Chime's bank partners. Qualifying direct deposits required. Terms and limits apply. Go to chime.com slash disclosures for details.

49:19Joining me now is the former White House Communications Director, the Emmy-nominated host of the sarcastic and creator of the new show long play, which you can find on YouTube, anywhere you get your podcasts. Join me now is my old coworker, my friend, Jennifer Palmieri. How are you? I'm good. I'm psyched. I'm so psyched that this is like this, that we're actually doing the show. And now it's also out in the world and people know about it. It's very exciting. On Monday. On Monday. We have two episodes. Our first two episodes drop on Monday. They're about Georgia and Texas. Okay. That's right. So this is a six part series on how Democrats win back power in the South.

49:52I'm impressed you can do this in six parts. It seems like quite a task. you have been to Georgia and Texas. What did you find and where are you going next? So, okay. So Georgia, I mean, every state is super interesting. Right now we're in North Carolina. So this is episode three will be North Carolina. We're going to go to Tennessee next. Then we're going to go to Alabama. And then episode six is a jump ball between Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Kentucky. So we're figuring that out. Does the Oklahoma count as the South? It does. It is. I mean, I looked it up in like whatever, you know, I think it's MSAs.

50:24Do you remember that? Like metropolitan statistical areas. It is classified as part of the South. I think they consider themselves pretty Western, but I just find it an interesting place. There's interesting Republican leaders there. Mayor David Holt from Oklahoma City, Governor Stitt's kind of interesting guy. So we'll see. So let me start with Georgia, because what's fascinating about that place is why it is different from all other Southern states and why it became a belt. I'm in North Carolina right now, right? And why did Georgia flip first? Why did Georgia flip before North Carolina? Like, I think we're both old enough to have, when like we thought North Carolina would be the one, right?

51:03Hillary lost Georgia by five points and then Biden won. Hillary lost North Carolina by like one point something points. And Trump came back and won in 20. He won in 24. And I think, you know, and what you learn with Georgia is intention matters that that state like there was decisions made in Atlanta 50 years ago at the end of Jim Crow, beginning of civil rights by a white mayor, Mayor Hartsfield, that Atlanta was going to be the city too busy to hate. You know, that was like partly an economic reason, right? Because racism is bad for business. But with intention, Mayor Jackson, you know, the first black mayor of Georgia, of Atlanta, followed him and built.

51:46That's why Hartsfield is so huge, the airport, because they wanted it to sustain a black middle class. Georgia is the state that was the heart of the Confederacy. It was the heart of the civil rights movement. And and just as, you know, 50 years ago, the civil rights leaders had to come together to make things to make change in Georgia. So did Black Voters Matter. So did Stacey Abrams. You know, they didn't because like, Dan, remember in Georgia 10 years ago or so, it was let's run conservative Democrats in the Zell Miller, you know, sort of mold. Right. They're like kind of almost Republican.

52:26And most of the Republican governors of Georgia, by the way, were former Democrats. And then Stacey Abrams is like, no, we're going to do something different. We're going to like build a different electorate. We're going to change the electorate. You have Senator John Ossoff, Senator Raphael Warnock. They are running different kinds of campaigns and they, you know, and they won in very tough years. Warnock won again in 22. You know, John Ossoff is like in a good it's in good shape right now. But it mattered what happened 50 years ago and that decisions that were made in Atlanta that are different than decisions that were made in Birmingham, different than decisions that were made in Raleigh, North Carolina.

53:02So that reverberate today. And so you just get a sense of. And then, of course, moving with intention now and trying to do things differently in Georgia, like it matters. And that's sort of the inspiring part is if people come together and try to make change and they're smart and consistent about it, you can do it. And so let's talk about Texas. Super interesting. Yeah. So I spent a lot of time in Texas in 2018, as many people did. Oh, for Beto. Bunch of events with Beto, you know, watching that race. Democrats got their hopes up there. This was a state that where it's the one state, I believe, that Hillary Clinton outperformed Barack Obama from 2012 was Texas.

53:45And she did so somewhat substantially in 2018 look good. And then snap back in 20, snap back further in 2024. Seen to be moving much redder. Democrats are pretty optimistic about James Tallarico this time. What did you find in the state? I was pretty, you know, I was a little skeptical of Tallarico coming into the state and I left with a different view. You know, what is I think faith is a faith is a very big deal that Democrats discount too much in the South. You know, I think there are there are big structural reasons of why Democrats and black voters are disenfranchised in the South. And, you know, that was sort of the impetus for this series to understand all of that.

54:22But also there's a there's a big cultural disconnect. What was amazing about and I did feel this in Georgia and also in North Carolina. It's like I'm not saying Tallarico is necessarily going to win, but it feels more fluid, I think, as we're sort of the tail end of Trump's popularity. And since he was not an ideological conservative, voters are it's more of a jump ball for them. Right. So, for example, we went to Tarrant County. I interviewed Taylor Remitt, who's the guy who's the state senator that flipped a Trump seat earlier this year because I had an open election, open seat. You know, and he was basically like, look, I'm a machinist that just knocks on people's doors and, you know, meets them where they are.

55:08And they understand, like, who I am, where I come from. I don't associate with the Democratic Party, national, local level. And they know that they can rely on me. The other thing that happened was we interviewed PTA moms in Tarrant County. Right. So Terrence Fort Worth is the big swing. It's the swing of the swings in Texas, particularly this year. these are three Republican women one was like a never Trump Republican the other two identify themselves as evangelical Christian conservatives and they are not just voting they're just not like sitting out not just voting for Governor Abinett for re-election and they're not just not voting for Ken Paxton they are voting for James Tallarico and Gina Inahosa because they're so upset about, wait for it, the MAGA takeover of their school districts.

55:58So like there was a big, it's so interesting, Dan, because it's like the call, it's like the clap back to 20, to Glenn Youngkin and Loudoun County and critical race theory and all of that in 21 and in the 22 midterms. And what one of these moms said is her child was an infant during COVID. And she said, I heard about critical race theory. She's like, I was concerned about it because I don't want any children to feel like they're not equal or victimized. I heard that boys were going into girls' bathrooms and boys are playing sports. She's like, so I voted for this MAGA school board candidate. And then she said, my son goes to school and I come to find out they're not teaching critical race theory.

56:38They're just teaching normal history. And, you know, we need to know the good and the bad parts of history. They're just teaching like ABCs and one, two, three. She's like, there's no boys going in the girls' bathrooms or boys trying to play in girls' sports, not at our school. And she said, I kept saying, show me where it's happening. And so then I came back to her and I said, well, you know, you're saying you're going to vote for Tallarico, but what about like Jimmy Six Genders that Ken Paxton throws at him? And what about low T Tallarico? And they're like, we're tired of that. We're tired of that.

57:06So it's, if that's breaking down, if people feel, she said, I feel duped now. So I think a lot of times we can hear MAGA voters and think they're wrong, but not understand that they're saying what they believe to be true. And once these women found out that that was not true, and they're super fresh, they like the dual language programs. They liked the DEI program centered the school because it gave their kids more opportunity. So I'm like, if these women are voting for James Tallarico, that's a different deal. But also sort of more importantly for the democracy, it felt like people questioning things more and being more open.

57:48Were there things that the, not just the absence of all the things they said were happening in school districts, but were there things that MAGA school ward was doing in the schools, whether it was, you know, book banning, changing the history curriculum that they were reacting to as well? Yeah, it was book banning. They hated that. You know, oh, interestingly, both of these women who were evangelical Christians said, you know um i don't want the 10 commandments taught in school that is not what school is there for she said i do that they i do this at home um and i think that um and they also didn't like they had i guess very aggressive and good dual language programs so that from a young age you know english-speaking students are being taught um spanish and they're gonna they're going to come out of that school district fluent and they got rid of all of that and then there And then there was a confusing takeover where the states started closing schools as well.

58:45And that happened, too. And of course, it's also very this sort of state takeover is also very antithetical to the you know, what we think of as traditional Republican ideology. And that rubbed in the wrong way as as well. He's not, you know, Trump is not popular there. We also fascinating Mitch Landrieu spoke with two Hispanic small business owners who had both their construction, have a construction company. They had both voted for Trump. They were very patriotic, voted for him for the economy. And they're going to vote for Democrats now, too, because the way he's corrupted immigration enforcement, you know, has like has handicapped their business.

59:31And also it's really and Gina and a host have brought this up, too. It seems it's really struck a chord with Hispanics in Texas, their patriotic pride. You know, they're really proud to be American. They think they've worked really hard for that. They're culturally conservative. And it's an insult to them when they're, you know, when everyone is rounded up, when no one, when, you know, whether you're here with documentation or not is treated as the same. Super interesting place. Yeah, I mean, I'm very fascinated by Texas. It's, you know, I don't want to get my hopes up for it, but this is there's a convergence here between the kind of Republican Paxton is the kind of Democrat Tallarico is the dramatic.

1:00:18This is the dramatic shift in the Latino vote, which is happening to Trump across the country. But it happened. This is. Yeah. I mean, if it's going to he's going to pay a price for it. It is in Texas more than almost anywhere else in the country. 53 % of Hispanic men in Texas voted for him in 24, I think. A big jump. It was like a 15-point jump from 20. But that feels tough now. I mean, Texas is still super conservative. Just to remind everyone, it's not all Austin. Houston, it's places like Tyler. It's places like Laredo. We went to Laredo, which was super cool. You know, right on the my hotel balcony looked out over the Rio Grande and the barter was like our hotel was sort of part of the Border Patrol.

1:01:06I did not understand what I was looking at for like two minutes. I mean, Dan, I thought it was like the catering part of the hotel. I was like, oh, that chain link fence with the awning, that must be where they bring the catering down. I was like, oh, that's that's not what happened. Oh, no, that's what the Border Patrol is. Yes. Democrats are going to have to do better in the South, particularly when the as the electoral map is going to change up the 2032 census, the blue wall will be insufficient to win the presidency in and of itself as Pennsylvania and Wisconsin potentially lose electoral votes and Texas and Florida gain them.

1:01:42So there's Georgia and North Carolina. Georgia is a battleground state. North Carolina is a battleground state, but as you point out, it's one that we've struggled with at the presidential level, although we've run three statewide governance races there. We run a few statewide races last time. Is there another southern state that you look at that could be the next one to go? Like, is there a Georgia in the making out there somewhere? I think it's a long way off, but people point to Alabama as that state. Because of the size of the black population? Because of the sign. I mean, here's the thing with Mississippi and Alabama, right, that it is I think Georgia probably has the third highest per capita percentage black voters.

1:02:20Mississippi and Alabama have the highest or about thirty nine percent. And but what's happening and they just have not been you know, and I was born in Mississippi. I lived in Mississippi and South Carolina until I was 11. So I kind of, you know, I love this part of the region. It like would kill me, Dan, how we just like a summer class, like I left and I never had a reason to go back because even for work. Right. Because we just like it's like, well, this is this is what happens when you ignore a region. Um, and the thing with Alabama is, uh, there's a high percentage of black folks. There's just a lot happening there.

1:03:01Um, Huntsville is a big, you know, NASA is there. There's a lot of research there. There's people moving to Huntsville. I think it's like the second fastest growing city in the South. It's diverse. So kind of the way that the research triangle in North Carolina attracted new kinds of voters. Huntsville is doing that. And then Birmingham is really growing economically. But also you're starting to see new kinds of Democratic infrastructure come into Birmingham. So Doug Jones is running for governor there, former Democratic United States senator. We're going to go. I'm super sorry to go to Alabama because, you know, you just don't hear.

1:03:45really interesting culture too interesting music music's a big part of the show too um so that people are moving with a little more intention in Alabama but like it's a way Tennessee is kind of the uh I feel like Tennessee is another place that with focus could change there's a lot of um people that are pretty you know really angry at the way They they've just you know, I think at the after this election that there will probably not be a Democratic member of the House representing Tennessee anymore. Right. They gerrymandered Jim Cooper out a few years ago and now they're gerrymandering the last standing Democrat and it will be nine zero.

1:04:30And then the expectation has come next year. They will gerrymander the state legislature as well. And that the resentment there is building now because you got to get better candidates. As we are having this conversation, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee is meeting about what the presidential calendar is going to look like. There's – John and I talked earlier in the show a lot about it. But one of the things that some people think is very important is that there's a southern state in there and maybe two southern states, South Carolina being one and then possibly either North Carolina, Virginia, or possibly Georgia.

1:05:04Although, as John and I discussed, you need the governor to change the law to move the primary, which is possible. You need the governor and the legislature, which could be an impediment there. Do you think that having the Democratic presidential primary take place in the South would be a net positive or a net negative for impressions of the Democratic Party in the South and their ability to win a general election? I think it's better. First of all, I think Democrats would learn the South more, which I think is really important. And, you know, I think if you look at the stereotype of a Christian conservative mother who's Republican and voted for Trump three times and Greg Abbott three times, you probably didn't imagine that she didn't want the 10 commandments taught in school and that she wanted her children to be taught Spanish.

1:05:52And she did not want this kind of takeover of schools. Right. So there's so many stereotypes that I feel like familiarity, our candidates in these states, and the staff, the infrastructure, democratic infrastructure having to focus on the state too, I think is a net plus. But I can imagine some of the concerns that you and Favs might have raised. Yeah, we didn't get too much into the long-term impact. The question we have is about, obviously, we need the states to be representative of the party in the country. And you want the states to be – there's sort of a short term and a long term. The short term is it's great if it's in a swing state because you do all this investment in building infrastructure there.

1:06:36And then you can use infrastructure in the general, which worked great in the years in which Iowa and New Hampshire were swing states. Right, yeah. Right. Iowa less so at the presidential level, New Hampshire sort of on the cusp there. But there is this argument for long term, which is if you actually had people investing in the state, you know, you had a two year cycle or an 18 month cycle where people were organizing the state within an inch of his life. That could be, you know, then you have the right demographic movement. You have the right political environment. you might actually, that's kind of the, a get some investment in the state that could lead to some of the things you talked about in Georgia, at least on the, on the progressive organizing side.

1:07:18I think that would really help in North Carolina in particular, you know, because I think the problem in North Carolina is inattention to rural areas. And, you know, I talked to some rural state lawmakers that represent us with the black rural counties. And they're like, there's just, you know, maybe if they heard something other than caricatures of Democrats, they would feel differently. So it is like, it's that kind of stuff that's killing Democrats. It's the national, you know, particularly if you're running for a federal state, whether that's in the House or the Senate, it's like, that's, you know, that's why North Carolina is sort of the inverse of Georgia, which is it can elect governors, but it can elect senators in Georgia.

1:08:02They elect senators, Democrats, but not governors. Although hopefully we'll be electing a Democratic senator in North Carolina this year. Because if we don't, we're in big trouble. If Roy Cooper's not winning, we're not taking the Senate. That looks good, but I'll just say the thing that they're nervous about, the Cooper people are nervous about a couple of things. One, Michael Watley, who's the Republican opponent, has not gone up on air yet. That may, you know, he's not, you know, so they're like, hey, we're at 48, his approval rating is 48%. I would like Roy Cooper's approval for him to be at 50%.

1:08:30You know, it's not. And they haven't even gone after him yet. And then, you know, it's just a tough state. And people aren't giving him as much money as other candidates because they think North Carolina is fine. But North Carolina has elected that guy a lot. I think four times in 80? Six? Yes, and twice with Trump on the ballot, which is a great feat. I talked to Governor Cooper a couple weeks ago on Ponce America, and you can feel the trepidation of people. Too many people are counting their chickens before they're hatched here. And just this is this is not going to be a seven point race. He's not winning my seven points.

1:09:12It's going to be a very close race. It's just there's this, as you point out, he's right kind of, you know, right around 50 in his in a lot of this polling. But either but he's not high above it. And so a lot of that vote, Watley is going to pick up and make it close. And so it's going to be a close race. One interesting Democratic congressional candidate I met in North Carolina is Jamie Ager, who he is running. He's in West North Carolina near Asheville. His grandfather was a congressman, but he is not, does not, he just does not feel political at all. He's a farmer. And he's running against Chuck Edwards, the incumbent, who just about a month ago was like, oh, wait for it.

1:09:53Shocker has like, you know, a problem with like sexually harassing his staffers and there's an ethics investigation of him. So, uh, that's like newly interesting. And he's like a very compelling guy. All right. We will, we will check him out. Fed hogs with him. I am. I'm very excited for long play. Everyone should check it out. Uh, YouTube more, you get your podcast. This is fun for me. Cause I am a long time Jen Palmieri fan. So I'm excited to watch it myself. Um, it's a very, very cool project. We're very, very excited to be participating in it with you. And, uh, it's Great to talk to you. Thanks, Fiverr.

1:10:25That's our show for today. Thanks to Jen Palmieri for coming on. Everyone check out Long Play on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. It'll be out on Tuesday. I'll be back on Sunday with Slow Boring's Matt Iglesias diving deeper into the midterms in 2028. Can't wait. Bye, everyone. Pods of America is a Crooked Media production. Our show is produced by Austin Fisher, Saul Rubin, McKenna Roberts, and Farrah Safari with Ree Cherlin, Elijah Cohn, and Adrian Hill. Our team includes Matt DeGroat, Ben Hefcoat, Jordan Cantor, Charlotte Landis, Kirill Pellaviv, David Tolles, Mia Kelman, Ryan Young, and Naomi Single.

1:10:54Our staff is proudly unionized with the Writers Guild of America East.

From the publisher

The White House doubles down on both of Trump's wars — the war against Iran and his trade war — sending Pete Hegseth to the Hill to request a $70 billion cash infusion for the Pentagon and imposing new tariffs on Canadian imports and prescription drugs. Jon and Dan discuss how Democrats should approach the administration's funding request, how voters — especially MAGA Republicans — are reacting to Trump's moves, and the president's warning to Americans that they "can't fight" the construction of new data centers in their communities.

Then, the guys break down a series of new polls that show the Democrats carrying a big lead into November, the "fight to the death" at the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee to determine which state will lead off the 2028 Democratic presidential primary, and a new video showing the extent of Trump's Oval Office renovations.

Then, Dan talks to former White House communications director Jen Palmieri about her new series, "Long Play," on winning back power in the South, available at youtube.com/@longplayseries or wherever you get your podcasts.

For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@crooked.com and include the name of the podcast, episode title, and episode date.

More from Pod Save America

All 187 episodes
Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting AmericaPod Save America · 1 h 11 min
Listen in VO