In short
Real Vision Podcast Episode Notes
Episode Overview
- Title: Marko Papic: Global Stakes High as Iran Strikes Israel | Geopolitics
- Host: Maggie Lake
- Guest: Marko Papic, Partner and Chief Strategist at Clocktower Group
- Date: [Insert Date]
- Focus: Analyzing the implications of Iran's drone and missile attacks on Israel and the broader geopolitical landscape.
Key Themes
- Iran's Military Actions
- Iran's unprecedented direct attack on Israel marked a significant escalation in their conflict.
- The attack was a retaliation for Israel's strike in Damascus that killed high-ranking Iranian officials.
- Papic suggests the attack was more about political messaging than military effectiveness.
- Political Theater vs. Military Strategy
- Arguments Presented:
- Political Theater: Iran's use of drones and missiles was calculated to limit casualties and portray a narrative of defending sovereignty.
- Military Weakness Narrative: Some commentators argue that the attack showcased Iran's military inadequacy against Israel's advanced military capabilities.
- Geopolitical Implications
- Israel's Response: The potential responses from Israel are crucial and could affect regional stability.
- Papic posits that Israel may leverage U.S. support for a strategic advantage in Gaza rather than retaliate directly against Iran.
- Market Reactions: Papic notes the market's calm reaction to the strikes suggests a belief that further escalation may not be imminent.
- Iran's Nuclear Program
- Papic discusses the critical concern regarding Iran's uranium enrichment and its implications for regional security.
- There is a risk that Israel could justify a military response based on Iran's growing nuclear capabilities.
- Saudi Arabia's Position
- Saudi Arabia's recent rapprochement with Iran complicates the dynamics, as they focus on their domestic economic development over regional conflicts.
- The deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran is viewed as pivotal in maintaining stability in the region.
- U.S. Involvement and Support for Israel
- Papic emphasizes that while U.S. support for Israel is significant, it may not extend to military action against Iran unless provoked directly.
- The Biden administration's stance is influenced by domestic political pressures and upcoming elections.
Market Considerations
- Oil Price Projections
- Papic suggests that geopolitical tensions could lead to a temporary increase in oil prices but emphasizes that the market may not fully price in these risks yet.
- He assesses potential scenarios for oil price movements based on military escalations in the region.
- Equity Markets and Federal Reserves
- The interplay between geopolitical events and the Federal Reserve's policy decisions is crucial, as the Fed may remain lenient to avoid negatively impacting the economy during elections.
- Papic notes the potential for stock market impacts due to rising bond yields and inflation expectations.
Conclusion
- The episode concludes with an emphasis on the need for investors to be cautious and consider broader macroeconomic trends rather than just geopolitical events.
- Papic expresses a need for continuous monitoring of the evolving situation, both from a geopolitical and market perspective.
Key Takeaways
- Iran's Actions: Seen as a combination of political messaging and military strategy rather than a sign of weakness.
- Regional Dynamics: Saudi Arabia's focus on economic growth alters the response to Iranian aggression.
- U.S. Support: While strong, U.S. backing for Israel may have limits if it requires direct conflict with Iran.
- Market Implications: Investors should assess the influence of geopolitical events on oil prices and broader economic indicators.
--- *These notes encapsulate the insights shared during the podcast episode, providing a comprehensive overview of the discussions around Iran, Israel, and the implications for global markets.*
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Today's Real Vision Daily Briefing is brought to you by Chintai, your partner in asset tokenization. Licensed and regulated by Singapore's monetary authority and powered by the innovative Chex token, Chintai offers a compliant, one-stop solution for bringing real-world assets on chain. Chintai enables the tokenization of virtually any asset, from carbon credits to corporate debt, private funds and real estate, enhancing liquidity and optimizing efficiency for all. The technology becomes largely invisible and seamless to the end user. I can take a selective store of value within a wider portfolio in a fairly liquid form, very efficiently, to anything, whether it's some high-value whiskey, whether it's a particular supercar that's a one of three limited edition, therefore, in this fungible trading of them in a liquid form, is the true endgame here for tokenization.
0:54With billions of dollars in client deals facilitated, explore how you can take advantage of tokenization by visiting realvision.com slash chintai.
1:13hi everyone welcome to the splash update on geopolitics in the wake of iran's military strike on israel with me to share his insights is marco papich partner and chief strategist at the clock tower group hey marco how are you hey maggie it's always fun to be uh live with you Yeah, gosh, there is a lot to unpack. So happy that you could break away, because I know it's probably been crazy for you, because I think everyone feels the same way. We saw that flash on our phones wherever we were, and our kind of stomachs dropped at what the implications must be. So things a bit calmer today, obviously, than what we saw on the weekend.
1:49But give us your assessment of what transpired. Well, I think what transpired was that Iran has been saying that it would retaliate to the Israeli strike in Damascus. They basically hit an annex to their embassy and killed several very high-ranking members of Iranian military and government. And so Iran has been saying, like, look, this is our sovereign territory. We're going to strike back. And after about, you know, week and a half of telling us about this every day, they proceeded to attack Israel in an unprecedented attack because they've never actually done this directly. It's always been through proxies in Syria and mainly Lebanon, of course, Hezbollah.
2:28And then, you know, we had this very strange announcements by global media where they said, well, there's drones coming towards Israel and it's going to take him hours to get there. And that was like right off the bat, the first sign that there's something a little bit different about this attack. I mean, when you can basically track a military device on flightaware.com, you know it's extremely well telegraphed. And I think the mix between ballistic missiles and drones is important. Drones are not a military tool you would use in this kind of a strike. Drones, you know, they're slow, they're visible, especially those that can carry explosives over long distances.
3:09This is something you use when you target terrorism, when you target individuals, as the U.S. has done extensively. So I think Iran used this on purpose so that they can be intercepted and so that they can limit the casualties and effectiveness while maximizing the sort of immediate attention to the fact that they are defending their sovereignty. So that's what transpired. And now, of course, everyone's watching what the retaliation from Israel will be. And if there is one, right? So just on that point, it sounds like you think that it was more political theater than it was an actual attack meant to cause destruction and pain.
3:56because there's a there's kind of two narratives floating understandably some are like this is a this shows that it's impossible to attack israel the you know the advanced military might this is an embarrassment to iran and then the flip side of this is like listen this was iran's response but they did so in a way to make sure that or to try to lay the groundwork where this would be the end of it it's over and they issued a statement at the end saying this is now done but the ball now in Israel's court. Sounds like you think it was more political theater than just a sign of weakness or their military is ineffective.
4:32Yes, I do think it's the latter. I mean, first of all, one of the advantages that Iran has over Israel is just geography. Israel doesn't have proxies next to Iran. Iran has proxies next to Israel. And so if it were to fire sophisticated missiles out of Syria and Lebanon, it would be a different story. Some of these long range air defense systems like the Patriot systems work better over longer distances when they have more time to intercept. So just keep that in mind. I mean, Iran could supply its own military that is present in Syria with sophisticated missiles and then use it against Israel.
5:08So yes, I do think that that would have been a different story. Also, those drones are far more effective if they can slip under radar, flying at low altitude, again, from Syria or Lebanon. If you release them like 10 kilometers away from Israel, like it's game over. There's no way that an Israeli F-16, F-15 or American fighter jets are going to be able to scramble and intercept them in that case. So I do think it was a message like, hey, we have these tools. We're going to fire them from, you know, half of the region away. You're going to have hours. I'll give you three hours to get yourself.
5:40Yeah. You can like make yourself a cup of tea, watch it on FlightAware, you know, like all that stuff. Have Jordanian Air Force intercept them. But so, yeah, I do think it's actually a mix of both. I don't think it proves that Israel is imprenetrable. It shows Iran has sophisticated weapons and it can elect where it can fire them from. So, you know, both sides have a good argument here. Iran has an argument like, look, we were responsible about how we did this. Israel has an argument to say like, look, even though we fended off this attack, it shows Iran means us harm and it could be much more serious next time.
6:16So both sides, It will be interesting to see now what develops. In my view, however, because of the point you made that Iran said it's over, I mean, the ball is in Israel's court. And I feel that the market reaction today was pretty sanguine because everyone kind of said, oh, well, Iranians didn't do much and they said it was over. Fine, fair, I agree. The question is, what does Israel do? And so we should be focusing on that, not on Iran's reaction function. Hey, everyone, we're going to take a quick break right now to hear a word from our partners. We'll be right back with more of the day's top analysis on the Real Vision Daily Briefing.
6:51Today's Real Vision Daily Briefing is brought to you by Chintai, your partner in asset tokenization. Licensed and regulated by Singapore's Monetary Authority and powered by the innovative Chex token, Chintai offers a compliant, one-stop solution for bringing real-world assets on-chain. Chintai enables the tokenization of virtually any asset, from carbon credits to corporate debt, private funds and real estate, enhancing liquidity and optimizing efficiency for all. The technology becomes largely invisible and seamless to the end user. I can take a selective store of value within a wider portfolio in a fairly liquid form, very efficiently to anything, whether it's some high value whiskey, whether it's a particular supercar that's a one of three limited edition, therefore in this fungible trading of them in a liquid form is the true end game here for tokenization.
7:45With billions of dollars in client deals facilitated, explore how you can take advantage of tokenization by visiting realvision.com slash chintai.
8:15as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments. S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you could trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone.
8:49Not all applicants will qualify. Plus 500, it's trading with a plus.
8:58Exactly. And it seems that at least based on the reaction in the markets, and again, you know, where the money's flowing, that everyone kind of believes that it's over and that Israel's not going to retaliate. Is that too simplistic of a view? Should we have that high of a conviction when it comes to what Netanyahu may choose to do? Yes, I do think that's a mistake. So I'm comfortable with the consensus on Iran. I think, as you say, the statement right after the attack, it was almost Trumpian. I don't know how many folks remember January 2020, when America assassinated General Soleimani of the IRGC with a drone strike.
9:42And then Iran retaliated by basically using ballistic missiles against U.S. military bases in Iraq. And once that happened, President Trump came out and said, I consider this the end of it. Like, you know, almost like, hey, I understand Iran had to retaliate. Chapeau. It's over. And that was it. That was 2020. You know, it was a very kind of, and Iran basically almost used verbatim the Trumpian statement. Like, yeah, we now consider this the end of it. The issue is that Israel has a number of reasons why it may not want to consider this the end of it. First of all, it's an unprecedented attack against their sovereign territory by another regional power using ballistic missiles and drones.
10:22Okay. Number two, there is the issue of increased enrichment of uranium by Iran. And I'm just going to share a screen here for a second and show you something. So this is something that's been unsaid. Nobody's really pointing this out over the past several weeks and months. This is out of a client note that I just published for my clients a couple hours ago. And basically, this is kind of the elephant in the room, the growing stockpile of 20 % enriched uranium, which is an important stockpile because then you enrich it further to get highly enriched uranium for nuclear device. And as you can see, since Biden became a president, Iran's stockpile has absolutely ballooned.
11:10And this is an issue. I mean, Israel can claim that it has to retaliate because Iran is a bad actor that attacked them. But he can also say like, hey, listen, it's time to settle the score with Iran and attack their nuclear facilities. Now, that's the negative. That's the very kind of a scary scenario where we do get Israel-Iran fighting. A more sanguine view would be that Benjamin Netanyahu just completely flipped the script on the entire planet. that he just got a huge PR victory. Israel has gone from being the aggressor in the eye of most media and Western commentators to being the victim. And he now has a sword of Democles over the Biden presidency.
11:56He can tell President Biden in a conversation, hey, look, man, I think I'm going to retaliate. I think I'm going to get oil prices to 150 bucks. And I think I'm going to scuttle your presidency See, unless you tell your friends in the Democratic Party, particularly Chuck Schumer, to tone down the criticism of my operations in Gaza and that you give me a blank check to finish what I started in Gaza. And so I fall in the camp that believes that Benjamin Netanyahu will do the latter. He will use this as a trade ship and refocus on Gaza. But that's a low conviction view. And I could be very wrong on that.
12:30I mean, Benjamin Netanyahu has been around long enough to see the way that Washington works, and it's not Biden's decision, and it's not clear who really controls some of the lawmakers in Congress. They don't seem to be towing the line when it comes to aid to any particular person or political view. The Republicans are traditionally hawks, and there are some breakaway Republicans who don't want to fund anybody, who are very isolationist, not to mention we're approaching a U.S. election. That seems like a big gamble to think that he can make that sort of demand for a blank check. Yes, but it's working.
13:07Let me give you a very simple example of this. on Friday, when we all went to sleep, the top story on CNN.com was that hundreds of Israeli settlers basically broke into West Bank and assaulted and burned some Palestinian homes. That was the top story on Friday. Saturday, that had gone down. And both parties, almost every member of both parties, naturally said, look, we stand with Israel. They just got attacked by Iran. And so that media shift, that PR shift is really, really important. As President Trump said, by the way, in an interview with Israeli media about a month ago, President Trump, mind you, probably one of the most vociferously supportive presidents on Israel, he basically said, look, you guys have a PR problem right now.
13:58You need to wrap up the situation in Gaza very quickly, almost verbatim quote by President Trump. Even President Trump, in other words, was calling for an end to the situation in Gaza. No one was calling for that over the weekend. No one's even thinking about that. Again, those news have fallen down the scrolling kind of screen. And so I think that's very important because it does give Benjamin Netanyahu the opportunity to finish the situation in Gaza. Now, why is it complicated? It's complicated because Rafa in the south of Gaza is where you have almost 2 million Palestinian internally displaced people.
14:32And yet that is the last stronghold that the IDF needs to handle. So it's going to be very messy. There's going to be a lot of civilian casualties. Israel is basically telling Palestinians to go back to the rest of Gaza, which is destroyed. So this last bit of dealing with Hamas in Gaza is going to be the most difficult for Israel, both militarily and from a PR perspective. And I do think that they just got a blank check from the U.S. because, again, Joe Biden already called Netanyahu, said, please don't retaliate against Iran. There's something that Netanyahu will want in return for that. And I think it's effectively a free hand.
15:13So they may not retaliate against Iran directly, but they will use this to finish what they intend to do in Gaza and expect to do so without any public criticism from the Biden administration. So I think that that's a it's a low conviction view, but I can see that being the tradeoff. And I can see why the market would assume that that's what's going to happen. So the market may be sanguine, both because Iran has said it's over. President Biden has been quoted by Axios as saying that he has asked Israel not to retaliate. And then Marco Popich in Real Vision says there'll be a tradeoff. You know, the problem with all of that is that there is some probability that we're all wrong and that Israel says, no, guys, look, you showed the highly enriched uranium stockpile.
15:58They attacked us. We're going to retaliate directly against Iran. And in that case, we have to talk about what that means for all prices. Yeah, so let's do that. And by the way, this is not at all priced in. The idea that they would, because everyone's talking about, and as you point out, rightly so, let's finish, like this will give us finish to cover the job that we started in Gaza. What we are not, the real risk, it sounds like you're saying, and what's not priced in is much more serious, and that's a direct attack on uranium facilities within Iran. That or targeting all sorts of other military facilities.
16:32I mean, Iran targeted supposedly Israeli defense installations so that we're not targeting civilians in this Saturday attack. And then, you know, Israel could do the same. Let me share the screen for a second. Yeah. Because first of all, there is some question of what is already priced in. Is there some geopolitical risk premium in all prices? I think it's difficult to say that. Because as you can see on the chart on the left, this is Brent. Brent bottom, so there's basically December, and there's the Fed's pivot in December towards leniency. This is where the Fed essentially said, look, we're going to be cutting rates in 2024, almost no matter what.
17:14And then they doubled down on that view in March, which sent oil flying even further. Maybe this last bit here, you can see it right here, maybe the last kind of, so you have the first third is Fed announces in December it's leniency. Then in March, it doubles down on that view. Maybe this is related to geopolitical premium. So in other words, I would argue that maybe you can argue there's$2 to$5 right now. I know Goldman Sachs, for example, argues there's already$10 of geopolitical risk premium. I disagree. And I disagree because methodologically, my team and I, we went long oil right here. So we went long oil in February for no geopolitical reason.
17:54None. Zero. It was purely fundamentals. There is no recession. China is showing green shoots of growth. And so we want to be long oil. And the Fed has stepped back and is not going to be a headwind with hawkish monetary policy to risk assets and cyclicals like energy. So this is purely a monetary policy, global macro view. It has nothing to do with geopolitics. So I would argue that when you look at this chart, if you're arguing that geopolitics played a role in oil going from 75 to 90, then you've got a problem with your framework. First of all, why did oil collapse after October 7th, Hamas attack then?
18:35And why did the Fed pivoting trigger all of this? So that's the first issue. And this is important, Maggie, because if you take my view, it means there's very little priced in, not just today, but over the past two weeks. This is all related to the Fed. It's all related to the macro context, which is very bullish oil and energy. And so I do think that there needs to be a little bit more of a risk premium. I've been long oil since early February, expecting it to hit about 100, 105. So I thought there was another$10 worth of action without any geopolitical events. Just over the next three to four months, I was going to keep my long oil until it hit 100, 105.
19:16I expected Joe Biden then to release SPR ahead of the U.S. election and probably settle prices between 90 and 100. Now, if you think about outcomes, let's go down to the table of probabilities. I know it's very difficult for your readers to read this, but you can see on the left-hand side different scenarios. Here's that expanded Gaza operation scenario, right? So my view is that this probability is about 60%. This means that, yes, Benjamin Netanyahu will trade, like trading chips. Oil impact, none, obviously. There hasn't been any. VIX impact, none. Expanded regional conflict by going to Lebanon, Syria.
19:57Probability, 20%. Oil impact, minimal. I don't think it matters. Now, there's two versions here, as you can see, of direct war with Iran. Why? This requires us to spend some time unpacking the current regional context. You know, Iranian proxies, the Houthis, Hezbollah, Syria, have not been impacting oil production facilities in the region. This is very important to remind ourselves. And that's because Saudi Arabia and Iran have a detente. a detente that's really helping Iran and that has given Iran a lot in the region. Which is why that even if there's a direct war between Iran and Israel, it could be a clean type of a war where only Iran and Israel are involved.
20:42And Iran does not retaliate against the Gulf monarchies producing oil because they have a deal with it. In that case, I think the probability is that Brent could maybe go up$20, but not more, and it would be temporary. And then there's, of course, a more dirtier version, a more complicated version of a war, where, yes, the Saudis do join Israelis. I just don't see that happening. I assign very low probability. So when you actually do the math on this, what I get is that it's appropriate to have around a$7 increase in Brent at this point. I mean, I hate to be very specific, but that does get me to that final$100,$105 that I thought we would get to in the next two to four months anyways.
21:24We're going to take another quick break to hear a word from our partners. We'll be right back with more of the day's top analysis on the Real Vision Daily Briefing.
21:35it's it's so interesting because the regionals you know the the regional dynamics do play such an important role talk to me a little bit about the saudis since they're they are so central here uh what are they thinking about this what are they worried about because anytime we're talking about this complex of the situation it's it's often not the intended it's the it's the unintended unintended, you know, or unforced error that just has the ability to spiral things in a way that I think that this is what the worry is. How are the Saudis positioning themselves here? What do we know about how they're thinking about this?
22:16Listen, Maggie, this is the most underappreciated part of all of this since October 7. I don't see anyone in the Western media focusing on this, especially in the U.S. And it's why everybody gets it wrong, I think. That's why everybody in October 8th thought that oil prices would go$20,$30, and it didn't. Saudi Arabia is focused on priority number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 to 170, and its economic development of Saudi Arabia. That is what Prime Prince Mohammed bin Salman is focused on. They really, truly couldn't care less about anything else. I mean, truly. And God bless them for that. They're focusing on economic development, like Southeast Asian economies in 50s and 60s.
23:00This is all they care about. And so what they did in 2022 is they concluded a deal with Iran. They gave Iran honestly everything Iran wanted. Prime Prince Mohammed bin Salman met with Bashar al-Assad, recognized him as the official ruler of Syria, pulled funding from all the Sunni militant groups that were trying to overthrow the Syrian regime in concert with the U.S. He started negotiating with the Houthis in Yemen a peace deal and ended the war, which Saudi Arabia was obviously the primary aggressor in that conflict. And then finally, in 2022, Iran essentially acquired all of Iraq. The Saudis pulled the funding and support for the nationalist Muqtada al-Sadr, giving the Iranian proxies in Iraq the free reign to rule that country.
23:51And that's really the jewel of the Middle East. It's Iraq. It's not anything else. It's Iraq. It's the buffer state between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Now, here in the U.S., we know this deal, but we obsessed about it because China was involved. I mean, when you look at the media coverage of this Iran-Saudi Arabia deal, the only thing American media reported was that somehow Beijing concluded that deal, which is complete nonsense, first of all. The Saudis just waved in the Chinese at the last minute just to kind of troll the Americans, quite frankly. It's like going out with somebody and putting it on Instagram so your other guy sees it.
24:27Literally, that's what the Saudis did. China's role was minimal. This was mainly a deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran. So why does it matter? It matters because in 2019, Houthis attacked Saudi energy facilities. In 2022, they attacked the Abu Dhabi airport that I landed on three weeks ago. And so think about it. Everyone's obsessing about Houthis and the fact that they're attacking some container ship carrying your toys, toasters, and t-shirts. But remember, the Houthis could easily send those drones north and attack facilities. Why aren't they doing that? Because Iran is saying, hey, listen, we have a deal with Saudi Arabia.
25:09So this deal is the most important factor in the Middle East right now. It's a major, major change in dynamics in the region. Yes. And that's why the Saudis are not on Israel's side. They're saying, look, a big risk to Saudi Arabia is Iran. And we concluded a deal. We gave Iran what they want. They kept their proxies from attacking us. So Israel, you're on your own. Now, there are some rumors Saudis were involved in interdicting some of these drones. And, you know, that's fine. They're probably telling Iran, like, hey, listen, we want peace here. And Iran is like, no, we get it. We get it. We also want this to end.
Read the full transcript
25:44So fine, you can shoot some drones now. The point is, Iran could very easily cause oil prices to go$150 if they wanted to. they could very easily do that by attacking Saudi facilities. They have not done that. And so that's why even in a scenario where Israel decides we're going to strike Iranian nuclear facilities, we're going to start a war with Iran, there is a scenario where that does not impact oil supplies because Saudi Arabia decides to be neutral and let Israel and Iran wage a war, which, by the way, will be very short, brief, and difficult to wage. These are countries that don't have the military technology capability to wage a war against one another over long distances.
26:27And so what about the U.S. in that situation? And we have a question coming in from Paul saying, when Biden says U.S. support for Israel is ironclad, what does that really mean? How ironclad is the Biden administration's support for Israel? And I would also say, even if we have a change in leadership and Trump wins the American public's appetite to be engaged in what appears to be World War III. That's how it will be laid out on the headlines. So it's not just the president's decision, but how it plays back at home. What does Ironclad really mean? Well, I think that if Iran continues to be the aggressor, the U.S.
27:09will continue to do what it did on Saturday, which is to interdict any of Iran's ability to attack Israel. And that will probably include, if Iran transitions and repositions some of their sophisticated missiles and drones into Syria and Lebanon, I can see the United States participating with its air force, with its air assets, in eliminating those supplies and those ammunition caches in Syria and Lebanon. I can see that. Like attacking Israeli territory is a red line for the U.S. and U.S. will continue to participate in defending Israel. So that's what ironclad means. I do think that is ironclad.
27:50You just saw it. U.S. and Israel have never had as big of a break as it is today, given the civilian deaths in Gaza. And the U.S. of course didn't hesitate to interdict projectiles heading towards Israel. But if Israel decides to attack Iran, that's where, well, hold on a second. and you're being the aggressor, you're attacking Iran, you're on your own. And that's a problem for Israel for a couple of reasons. Number one, and this is on purpose, by the way, there's intentionality in this. The United States has never given Israel the highly sophisticated bunker buster technology that Israel would need to actually effectively attack Iran's nuclear facilities.
28:29This isn't the Osirak reactor in Iraq. This isn't the nuclear reactor in Syria, which Israel could easily destroy. These facilities are 40 meters underground, where an F-16 has no chance of blowing that up. You need very sophisticated, highly, highly specialized bunker buster technology, which the U.S. has not given Israel. The second thing the U.S. has dragged its feet on is giving Israel refueling technology, so planes that can refuel their fighter jets in air. Donald Trump did sell those to Israel, but the deliveries are from 2025 onwards. And so the other problem that Israel has is that it would have to attack Iran in a very sophisticated flotilla of fighter jets because it doesn't have strategic bombers.
29:16Fighter jets don't have the fuel capacity to get to Iran and back without refueling. I mean, they kind of do, but it would have to be a straight shot. Literally, if they have to maneuver around an Iranian jet, no matter how old and decrepit it is, they cannot deliver their payloads. They got to go back. One maneuver and you're out. So how do they refuel? Do they fly to Azerbaijan, a close ally of Israel? Do they refuel there? Who's going to provide Israelis with that refueling capacity? So what I'm describing here is that even if Israel is motivated and wants to attack Iran without American support, it will be a very strange conflict.
29:55It will be a very strained, strained conflict. It will be more like something like the United Kingdom and Argentina over the Falklands than it would be a land war like Russia-Ukraine. And so like comparisons to World War III, I think are just nonsense. And if anyone thinks they should be buying bonds because of this, please don't. There's an election put. The Fed is lenient and inflation is sticky. Do not buy bonds because of Israel-Iran war. underscore exclamation point what in your mind would so you have your probability table and and you're not buying bonds for safe haven and you are think that there's not quite enough of a premium a risk premium priced into oil what is the risk that this is not as contained what do you see as the greatest risk whether it comes from the players we talked about or from another another angular regional player, what would worry you?
30:53What development would worry you where you'd say, I've got to change my probability outcomes? First of all, just on the bonds, I want to show the viewers this chart. This is your 10-year treasury yield. Here's your Russian invasion of Ukraine. Here's a nuclear power invading a neighbor in the middle of Europe. Here's a little rally by the bonds, and then boom. So the macro context matters so much more. And And just to be clear, throughout March, intelligent people were talking about a nuclear war, use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russians, and bombs just did not care. They just sold off. So be very, very careful on trading major assets based on geopolitics, says the geopolitics guy, right?
31:35So just keep that in mind. But that's part of what you do is make sure that people don't get caught up in either a knee-jerk reaction from a past that may have made sense and just focus on the politics. You have to focus on the macro fundamentals and understand, are you in a profoundly bullish or bearish environment for a particular asset? I think we're in a bullish environment for oil. I didn't think so on October 8th. So our note on October 8th said investors should kind of not care about Israel-Hamas conflict. This is not going to be macro relevant. But that's also because the context was bearish for oil.
32:09Today, it's bullish. And that's why I can see that$7 to$10 kind of premium. And I think the market is getting a little bit too fancy right now by being sanguine. But to answer your question, what would change my view? You know, what would change my view is if Joe Biden thought that maybe the only way to save his presidency is to show that he's tough. You know, let's play that argument out. What if he says, what if he pivots from the view over the weekend? So as I said, Israel is constrained. You know, there's a lot of people out there who think Israel is like a magical unicorn that can do whatever it wants.
32:44It just can't. You know, it can't. It doesn't have the military technology because it wasn't given that technology on purpose by the U.S. So it wouldn't have agency. America doesn't want Israel to have agency on Iran. It wants to control that agency. Now, what happens if the U.S. changes its view? Mainly because Joe Biden is suffering in the polls, and also because there is a concrete reality of that nuclear enrichment that I just showed you. And that's a really damning chart. By the way, if I'm Donald Trump, I'm copy-pasting this chart from Marcus Charpak and taking it to every single rally that I can.
33:20And I'm showing my, look, look at this. I left the nuclear deal here. Iran was afraid of me. Joe Biden becomes the president. Doesn't look like they're afraid of Joe Biden. You cannot put a clearer chart if you're Trump. And so there could be a world in which over the next several weeks, Joe Biden comes under a lot of pressure, both in his own party because he's not doing that great in the polls, but also from, you know, the sort of the hawkish establishment in the military. and those two views kind of marry themselves. And he decides like, look, maybe I should just take care of Iran's nuclear facilities myself.
34:01And so if the calculus were to change in the US, if the political calculus were to change, I'm taking a different view of this. And I'm saying like maybe seven to$10 of geopolitical risk premium is not enough. You probably want to be in the$20 range because if the US decides to target Iranian nuclear facilities, they'll be far more successful than Israel. And then I can see Iran retaliating to that American attack by bidding up the price of oil through pretty aggressive actions around the region. I mean, they have to impose a cost to the US for doing what they did. So that would be my real concern.
34:41Israel itself attacking Iran, again, remember, there's two scenarios. And I do think that the most likely scenario is more of a clean war if Israel decides to go against Iran. I just don't see why Iran would abrogate its detente with Saudi Arabia because of Israeli aggression. I just don't see them doing that. It would seem to be, right, it would seem to be against so much of their interests that it would be hard to imagine, hard to play that out. Domestically in Iran, is this strengthening the leadership's hands? Is it going to give fodder for some of the resistance or some of the people aren't happy what's going on there?
35:21Are we, how do you see that playing out you know it's very difficult to tell i think it's very difficult to tell i know a lot of western media has been pointing out that there were graffiti all over tehran talking about um um talking about how there was no retaliation to israel it shows weakness and then that they were they were basically motivated by that domestic political you know angst to show some force. I think it's very dangerous to try to make sense of domestic politics in Iran because we're not there on the ground. And one of the experiences that I've had is that every time the West gets excited about protests in Iran, the regime just cracks down on them.
36:03Right, which they have been doing. Yeah, which they've been doing. So I'm not sure to what extent the domestic politics played a role, but I'm open to that interpretation. I think the bigger issue for Iran is that they're in a period of transition, not because of any political unrest, but because of generational issues. A lot of their leaders, including the Supreme Ayatollah, they're basically extremely old, sick, and are about to die. And so in those moments of transition, the regime has to show strength in order to smooth out any external pressures during the transition period. And I just think we should assume that they will have to act with force.
36:44And it's very difficult for them to negotiate any substantive deal with the West, including the US, because they don't know who will be in charge in six months to five years. Right. And speaking of elections where generational forces are at work and the leaders are old, and we were facing some of that here as well. So this comes against the backdrop and we've rightly been digging in and focusing on the region there. One more question for that, and then I want to expand it a little bit because it's significant that this is happening when there are issues and tensions globally. But the supply chains, we've been talking a lot about oil, supply chains going through the Red Sea.
37:29Is this an issue? Are they at risk? Is this something that's going to be a macroeconomic issue or manageable? Well, look, I think it depends on how the conflict unravels, obviously. And I think in most of my scenarios, it's manageable. I mean, I assign only 5 % probability to global interruption of supply. I could be massively wrong. And so I think it's appropriate if you're managing assets right now, if you're managing money, whether your own personal account or institutional funds, I mean, I think it's appropriate to assign a higher probability than me and to think about it that way. Will that have an impact on macroeconomics?
38:12No, I don't think so. In fact, I would be even more bullish. So by the way, just for due diligence, I set my end of the year target for S &P 500 to 5 ,500 in December. And that's because I expected an election put. I do not subscribe to the sort of view in the US, which is very, very consensus that the Fed is independent. I just think that's silly. And I think that this election, more than any other, is influencing their thinking. And so that's why I thought, well, they're going to be lenient for no good reason. You probably want to be long stocks. By the way, just as a little caveat to that view, my strike is not December 31st.
38:54It's November 6th. So no guarantees what happens afterwards. But what does that mean? So let's say oil prices go up$10,$15. Let's imagine that scenario. And let's imagine Marco's right. There is an election put, which I think is now obvious. Why are they cutting rates? There's no reason for it. So at that point, what happens? Well, they have a ready-made excuse now to ignore CPI prints. It's not about demand. It's not about the R star. It's about geopolitics, which we don't control. We're not going to raise rates. Transitory. Well, it's transitory. And also, we're not going to negatively impact the US economy because of a rogue regime, Iran, messing with global oil supply.
39:38We're going to what? We're going to cause a recession because we're at war? That makes no sense. No, no, no. We're going to look through this temporary transitory geopolitical impact to the oil supply. Joe Biden is going to release SPR. Saudi Arabia is going to reverse its production cuts and export cuts. You know, I can see all of that happening. And so if you're an investor, what was your biggest concern on April 12th, before the attack? What was your biggest concern? What was everybody obsessing about? Oh, it was that instead of three cuts, we're going to get two or one or none. And then some people are even talking, no, it's a hike.
40:14That was what we were all obsessing about. Why? Because inflation is sticky, right? Well, the Fed just got a ready-made excuse to keep its election put exactly where it is. and to just blame stickiness of inflation on geopolitical mumbo-jumbo that they're not in charge of anyways. Does the bond market have to go along with them for that to work? So yeah, that's right. And that is the seesaw that we are seeing. Because we see yields moving up and very few people remember, but there is a time when the bond market sees through. And if we have inflation on the rise, they're going to say, you're crazy, you're making it worse.
40:51And they're going to demand to be compensated for that risk. Well, I mean, I think that's exactly what happened. In fact, bonds have sold off since the attack, proving my point that geopolitics does not cause bonds to go up, yields to go down, not anymore. And why are the bonds going up? I mean, bond yields going up. Bond yields are going up because I think the market is interpreting my argument, which is that now the Fed is really going to just not care. Gold. Gold is shooting through the roof in a world where real yields are extremely high. That's one of my favorite charts in the world right now, which is this incredible divergence between gold and real yields.
41:29You know, like basically what's happening is that investors who are bidding up gold are telling you, we don't believe your long-term inflation expectations charts. We just don't believe them. We believe that, you know, gold is a hedge. And I think that that's very important to keep in mind because it suggests that, you know, the Fed is basically making a policy error and it's losing credibility ahead of the US election for political reasons. Now, I think that members of the F1C - Right, so do you think that the Fed has already lost control of the bond market? Well, we'll see. I mean, the slope of the 10-year yield has to become uncontrolled.
42:09Right now, it's been gently moving from 425 to 4.6. The closer we get to 5%, then you'll be right, Maggie. Then we're going to have indigestion in the equity market. Remember, we're in a world where equities and bonds are actually positively correlated. We've been in that world. It's weird, right? I mean, that's like, well, I shouldn't say weird. That is contrary to what was generally accepted in the past. Well, let's put it this way, Maggie. It's weird given our secular stagnation context of post-2008, but it was actually the norm before. And the way you should think about it is that the negative correlation between bonds and equities was a function of low growth, low inflation macro context we were in.
42:52Once we exit that, then it's positively correlated because yields are just much higher. And that's a problem not for every stock market. It's particularly a problem for the US because so much of the US stock market is overweight through tech and other kind of long duration plays. And so that's where I think that the Fed election put could get out of hands. And so you're absolutely right to be focusing on the bar market. I am too. And I think the closer we get to five, the more agita you'll have in the market. Let me ask you a question about the general, and then I'm going to flag that there's so many different elements of this that we just began to touch on, but you're going to be kind enough to come back with us today with Jacob Shapiro.
43:38And so I want to really focus forward on some, we're getting some questions about some other areas of geopolitics, but we'll tackle that this afternoon. But when we're talking about trying to gauge the probability of a response of a widening conflict, and we haven't even tied into what are the implications for what's happening in Ukraine? What about China and Asia Pacific? Should we be thinking about this in terms of military conflict? What about cybersecurity, even the nature of what's happening militarily, where it can be smaller scale, it could be drones, it could be the technology that's possible?
44:20How should we think about how we quantify what escalation looks like? Yeah, I mean, we should be thinking about cybersecurity as well. I just never talk about it because I agree with the consensus on that one. and I really don't have anything to add on it. In other words, it's a risk. If you can get exposure to cybersecurity as an investment team, you should. And yeah, I mean, it's the number one way to wage asymmetric warfare now. So I agree. The interesting thing about Israel is I was saying earlier, it's a country that cannot defend itself on its own. And this is one of the myths of Israel that I think a lot of people take for granted.
45:06And I always point out, like, look, its nuclear program comes from France. Other than the Iron Dome, every piece of their air defense comes from the United States. It cannot produce a fighter jet. It cannot really produce main battle tanks. Like, this is a country that definitely relies on the West for military supremacy. But one thing it doesn't is cybersecurity. So Israel is a global leader in cybersecurity. So if there's one thing that it does not need anybody's help on, it's this issue. Yeah. And when we're thinking about next steps, you know, this weekend was an example of what we tend to think about in terms of an attack, an escalation in conflict.
45:46But it can take lots of different forms now, which I think we're just starting to wrap our head around. It's hard to quantify those risks moving forward. Marco, we're going to leave it here, but I think that next time we talk, it seems to me, and I'd love your thoughts on this, that we're at a point of we've got all these elections happening around the world. We're seeing incredible pressure on currencies. If you look at Japan, if you look at China, and now this sort of inflationary period we're in, which has lots of implications as well when it comes to that kind of intersection that you live at, which is macroeconomics and geopolitics.
46:27How important is it? Do you feel like we're at a really important juncture here, especially as we are coming up on the U.S. election? So I would say that this narrative that there's a lot of elections going on, and so you should pay attention to them, is wrong. It's actually incorrect. The only election that matters is the U.S. The U.S. election is a black hole of macro. It sucks all time and light and space into itself. It is the reason, it's the only reason that I have been so bullish in stocks, because it warps everything, including the independence of the Fed. And so as long as the US election is the sword of Damocles over the markets, I can see the Fed being overly lenient.
47:15And I can see that influencing markets more than really any geopolitical factor. But once the US election is over, I mean, it could be a very, very rude wake-up call. And your point about the bond market is one. And I just want to leave everyone with this chart here, which I think is very important. This is the chart that I was saying is one of my favorite charts, Maggie. This is the blue line here on the right is US real yield inverted. So when you take a 10-year yield, you have to deflate it by what? By long-term inflation expectations, not by CPI. As you can see, we've had an increase, an immense increase in real yields from negative one to 2%.
47:56And yet gold doesn't care. Look at that, parabolic. So why is that happening? Yeah, central banks around the world are buying gold. That's part of the reason. But the other reason is that I believe most investors just don't believe this math is correct. They don't believe that we're deflating long-term bonds with the correct long-term inflation expectations. And so what gold is sniffing out is that long-term inflation expectations are much higher than the consensus, which is about 2.5%. And I think that's the biggest macro story right now in the world. I think that's a macro story that is going to really matter going forward.
48:37Amazing stuff. And we're going to pick up on that and get a great session on that with Jacob this afternoon. But Marco, fantastic. I mean, everyone came in and I think was just wondering, is the next shoe going to drop? What's going to happen? How should I be thinking about this? So enormous amount of thanks for sort of walking us through all the different scenarios and what we should be thinking about, not only from a political point of view, but for what it means for markets too. Great stuff. Thanks so much. Awesome. And I'm going to see you later today. Thanks, everybody. And if you were listening or you listened to this just after we're live and you have questions, go ahead and drop them in the comments because Marco is going to come back later today.
49:14And we'll see you then at 4 p.m. at the U.S. market close. Thanks.
49:36analysis updates, private Discord channel, monthly drinks online, and more. And it's led by a team of RV favorites, including Chris Bullock, Jamie Kutz, Peter Pinkossoff, and more to be announced soon. So, barely have time to listen to the end of this ad, but want to take part in this crypto cycle without having to dedicate all of your time to figuring it out? Go to realvision.com forward slash RV crypto. That's realvision.com forward slash RV crypto to see if RV crypto is the right fit for you. Have you ever wanted to trade Bitcoin but haven't dared try? With plus 500 futures, you can trade crypto without the hassle of opening a wallet.
50:19With just a few clicks, you can register and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo. See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments. S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you could trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500.
50:53With over 20 years of experience, Plus 500 is your gateway to the markets. Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus 500. It's trading with a plus.
From the publisher
馃敟 Chintai: Explore how you can take advantage of tokenizing by visiting www.realvision.com/chintai.
Maggie Lake welcomes Clocktower Group鈥檚 partner and chief strategist, Marko Papic, for an in-depth geopolitical analysis of last Saturday鈥檚 drone and missile attack by Iran on Israel and its potential ramifications. With global voices urging restraint, what will Israel do next? And what are the dangers for the region now that Iran has crossed this line in the sand?
Unlock the potential to showcase your brand to our global audience. Contact us at partnerships@realvision.com for advertising inquiries.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
