When Data Drives the Revolution ft. Sol Rashidi

12 Jun 2024 · 54 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Real Vision Podcast Notes: When Data Drives the Revolution ft. Sol Rashidi

Podcast Overview

  • Title: Real Vision: Finance & Investing
  • Description: A podcast providing insights and expert analysis in finance and investing through in-depth interviews with industry leaders.
  • Episode Title: When Data Drives the Revolution ft. Sol Rashidi
  • Episode Description: Sol Rashidi, a C-suite data leader and author, discusses AI's current state and the future of smart data.

Key Themes and Discussions

Introduction to AI and Its Definition

  • Sol Rashidi's Explanation of AI:
  • Describes AI as a "super smart shooter" that learns from humans.
  • AI is great at repetitive tasks and finite responses but has limitations in emotional intelligence and cognitive capabilities.
  • Emphasizes the foundational needs for AI to learn and grow (software, data science, hardware, etc.).

Misconceptions About AI

  • What is Not AI:
  • Decision trees and scripted automation (e.g., "if this then that") are not AI.
  • Many products are labeled as AI for marketing purposes, leading to confusion among consumers.

The Journey of AI Development

  • Rashidi's experience with IBM Watson and the challenges faced in deploying AI.
  • Highlights that 70% of AI deployment failures are caused by issues unrelated to technology.

Writing "Your AI Survival Guide"

  • Rashidi's motivation for writing the book came from observing a lack of real-world deployment discussions in existing literature.
  • The importance of sharing lessons learned from failures and successes in AI implementation.

Factors for Successful AI Implementation

  1. Human Factors:
  2. The need for a strategic partner who understands the AI project's importance.
  3. The crucial role of stakeholders in supporting AI initiatives.
  1. Infrastructure and Data Access:
  2. The quality and availability of data for AI training.
  3. The necessity of robust DevOps practices to support AI products.
  1. Choosing the Right Use Cases:
  2. Emphasizes selecting problems to solve rather than forcing AI as a solution.
  3. Business value should not be the sole criterion for choosing AI projects.
  1. Human Oversight:
  2. The necessity for humans in the AI decision-making process to ensure results are accurate and contextual.

The Future of AI

  • Opportunities and Risks:
  • The blending of AI into everyday life will offer efficiencies but raises concerns about privacy and data security.
  • The potential for societal implications, including ethical considerations around data use and decision-making.

The Role of Major Tech Companies

  • Discussion of Apple's advancements in AI and the skepticism surrounding their marketing of "Apple Intelligence."
  • Concerns about data privacy, especially as companies like Apple and X push the boundaries of data usage for AI development.

Observations and Predictions

  • The fast-paced evolution of AI technologies makes it challenging to predict winners and losers in the market.
  • Companies providing foundational infrastructure will likely remain essential, while the application layer continues to evolve rapidly.

Key Takeaways

  • AI as a Permanent Fixture: AI is here to stay, and it will increasingly integrate into daily life, even if consumers are unaware of its presence.
  • Educating Society: There’s a need for increased literacy around AI and data privacy to empower individuals to make informed decisions.
  • Ethical Considerations: Companies must navigate the balance between leveraging data for growth and respecting consumer privacy.
  • Importance of Human Involvement: Continuous human oversight is essential for successful AI deployments to mitigate risks and ensure relevancy.

Conclusion

  • The podcast highlights the complexities of AI deployment, the critical role of data and human involvement, and the ongoing challenges related to ethics and privacy. Sol Rashidi’s insights emphasize a pragmatic approach to navigating the AI landscape and the importance of awareness among consumers.

For further knowledge on finance and investing, consider visiting [Real Vision](https://rvtv.io/41tyn6M).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Do you know the number one obstacle to financial success? time or lack of it without enough time you can't learn efficiently plan effectively or focus on the right strategies that's why real vision offers you a simple and efficient way to gain expert knowledge using time-saving market tools and leverage the brain power of our community to help you succeed faster get a taste of financial freedom with our offer at realvision.com forward slash free. That's realvision.com forward slash free.

0:42Welcome back to Real Vision. I'm Ash Bennington. We're joined today by Sol Rashidi, C-suite data leader and author of the new bestselling book, Your AI Survival Guide, scraped knees, bruised elbows, and lessons from real-world AI deployment. Saul, welcome to Real Vision. Thank you so much, Ash. It's amazing to be here. It's so great to have you here. And boy, we couldn't have had better news flow leading into this with the Apple intelligence announcement and the kerfuffle around it last night. Gosh, where do we begin? Obviously, huge topic. Let's start at the very beginning. Let's define AI in the context that you see it.

1:23And I think I is kind of like having, it's so funny just to back up that I'm having this conversation with my kids and I'm teaching them a little bit about prompt engineering. And my six-year-old daughter, who's obsessed with axolotls right now, I'm like, you can create any type of axolotl you want. And so we would go into chat GPT, I'd open up the dolly, prompt, and I'd be like, okay, go ahead and type what kind of axolotl you want. And she went through a few exercises and generated images. And I'm like, well, you've got to tell if it's doing a good job or a bad job, just like mommy tells you when you're like getting good grades or not so good grades.

1:58And be specific in detail. So she'll go through a second round and a third round and then a fourth round. And now every Saturday is part of our weekend creative time. She gets 45 minutes just doing a variety of props, creating different axolotl images and colors. And she'll write, make it cuter, but this time add uniform horns, things like that. so the way they explain to them when they ask well ultimately what is ai and i said well it's kind of like a super smart shooter um that can learn to a degree what we humans have learned um it's great at certain things and not so good at other things like it can't necessarily read emotion um it can't process uh emotional intelligence um there's certain cognitive capabilities it can't really quite do but if it's something to be learned that's repetitive in nature or something to be learned that has a finite set of responses or something to be learned that we've learned in school, like grammar and spelling, it can actually learn what we've learned up to a certain point.

2:59And it learns so in zeros and ones, because that's ultimately computer language. So a combination of software, data science, code, hardware, storage, compute, all of that is needed as a necessary foundation. just like you have food, just like you have a root, just like you have mommy and daddy that take you to school and bring you back home. Those are foundational needs so that it can learn and grow as you are learning and growing. And then through our teachings, it learns with time and it gets better with time. So if you ask me what AI was, that's pretty much how I describe it to my kids. It's the ability for a computer to learn what we learn to observe.

3:41It doesn't necessarily pass that point, but right now there are still limitations to it. as a student of Charlie Munger, I love this idea of invert, always invert. What is not AI? Because if you listen to chief marketing officers in Silicon Valley right now, everything under the sun is AI. So what's not AI? Yeah. And may he rest in peace. I was a big Munger fan. Um, and I learned Munger's philosophies and principles to a dear friend of mine about a few years back. So there is a lot of sleep oil. There is a lot of hype. There are things that we are putting the AI logo on it because it sells better.

4:17It gets you in the door and you can charge a framing for it. I unfortunately can't lie about that. And I think for people who aren't in the space or people who don't know what questions to ask, it's hard for them to make the distinction that ultimately makes the difference. So in our world, what's not AI is decision trees that have been scripted. if this then that if this then that if this then that so if x it's y if it's z it's b if it's a choose c like those are specific script that you can code that you can automate that could essentially very finite in nature there's no ability or need to think to come up with ad hoc responses to be able to understand contextual references but the beauty of ai is it can understand context after it hits a certain level of maturity.

5:12So like if I were to example, as an example, type in wet feet. What's not AI is they don't know what wet feet means. What is AI is they would understand that, okay, am I standing in the rain and fundamentally my feet are wet or am I getting wet feet before I'm about to get married? There's context, there's language. It can have a dialogue with you as a result. So like that would be a good one. Or another one is the word gray. okay are we talking about mood or are we talking about the color what is not ai can't tell the difference it's just a word with more letters but if it is ai it can understand context because it learns that there's fundamentally a distinction between rays and i'm in a gray mood versus rays and the color so what was it that compelled you to write this book obviously writing a book is an enormous undertaking what did you feel needed to be communicated what did you think wasn't being said in the marketplace of ideas?

6:06It's interesting. I helped IBM launch Watson in 2011. And it means several leaders and several teams, right? It takes an army to do something like that. And I've said it in the book, and I've said it a few times. I don't think IBM got the credit it deserves for launching something at that magnitude. And it's always hard, right? Being first to market, first to launch, because all arrows are pointing at your back, and the exposure in the limelight is large. So people can be very, very fearful. But when Watson went live, right, it was the first commercial-grade AI application. It was B2B, but it was enterprise-grade, and it could be deployed at organizations of mass scale.

6:44And I've been doing it in 2011. It was me connecting with clients, establishing strategies, use cases, being the project lead on deployments. And so I've been doing deployments since Watson went live up until a few years ago. I should say a few years ago, up until about 11 months ago. and now I'm consulting and advising and helping guys do the deployments. But I've rolled up my sleeves. I've gotten into the weeds. I've gotten into the nitty gritty of things. And it's not things that you read about. There are so many nuances. And I think, you know, everyone assumes if AI is going to work, the technology problem.

7:19But 70 % of the reasons why AI applications or AI deployments don't work, nothing to do with technology. But unless you've done the deployment and unless you've gotten your hands dirty, everything is either rumor hearsay or regurgitation of something that's been read and so when things sort of the hockey stick curve the ai trend started going upwards you know people were encouraging me to write they're like you've been in space longer than you know and i was like well let me just do some research because i'm not a writer i've been so busy doing the work i haven't written about it and every ai book i saw out there was either from a researcher or an academic or someone claiming to be an AI expert, but they had, if you look at the LinkedIn profile, there were no signs of it for like until a year and a half ago.

8:04And I'm like, you know, you've got a bunch of kind of your risks and pocus-pocus out there. I'm like, who's talking about what it actually takes to make it work? And there wasn't. So with the encouragement of a few peers of mine and friends of mine, I was like, all right, I'm going to talk about the real, real, real, like real world, excuse me, real world deployments. and you had to have had a lot of failures to peek out a few successes, if that makes sense. It's kind of like the winery business. You've got to invest a ton of money to make a little. You've got to have gone through a lot of lessons learned, scraped knees, bruised elbows, failures, what sees assumptions that didn't hold true in order to be able to take things out of prototype and POC and into production.

8:46And so I think it's one of the reasons why most things stay in perpetual PFC purgatory. They're just not familiar and no one's ever coached them or advised them of what to watch out for because everyone's trying it for the first time. So I mean, to precisely that point, you've got, I think, something like 30 different applications in production either today or have been in production. What have you learned from that experience? Yeah, there's nearly 40 products or capabilities or applications or solutions, however you define it that I have in production to the state. Two have been retired, but I still have nearly 40.

9:23The first is 70 % of the issues have nothing to do with the tech. The tech part, figuring that out, is actually the easiest. It's dealing with the individuals, the agendas, right? There's just so much to dissect there. But the first is 70 % has nothing to do with the tech. The second is it's oftentimes, we talk about strategy and it's a magnanimous proposition on a deck. But I think what some people fail to acknowledge is your strategy, if you can't execute on your strategy, it's pure hallucination. Meaning delivery excellence and your ability to execute on it is just as important as the pretty powerful that you put together.

10:01And what people sometimes forget with AI is they may not have the fundamentals of infrastructure or data access or talent in place. So why pick a strategy and build this magnanimous profile of what you're going to do when you haven't even invested in fundamentals in the last two, three, five? eight years. And so I always say that bend it, but don't break it. And most people think this like utopic view of where they're going to go without the reality of knowing what they can actually deliver. So I would say that's the second. The third is, you know, a lot of people are going through the process and kicking the tires as well.

10:35What use case should we choose? Well, they're picking a problem to be solved by AI versus just looking at the problem and figuring out how should we solve it so sometimes it's best to choose a hammer and not a sledgehammer to solve the problem um a guy's not the answer for everything and but yet some people just want to shoot one and then i would say that's another layer and then the fourth layer that i could say is you know when it comes to picking the use case a lot of people choose business value as the primary operative to determine whether or not it should be chosen and that's not a good way and the The reason is, whether it's within a business unit or in manufacturing or in supply chain or in picture or in legal, there's a number of business functions and a number of business units.

11:24If they're plagued with a problem or if there's an issue that they want to solve, they all inherently have business value associated with them. Whether it's business cost savings, so it's going to increase our EBITDA, whether it's top-line growth, so this is going to increase our revenue, there's inherent business value in that. AI shouldn't be the tiebreaker. An individual shouldn't be the tiebreaker, understanding which use case should actually go into prototyping. And so a framework that I created at IBM after I had gone through a few deployments is based off of criticality and complexity. You have to also take a look at five factors associated with what makes the use case complicated, and then five factors associated with what makes the use case critical.

12:07Business value is one of the 10 measures. and so it's 10 % it's not 100 % and so that it goes into great detail of how to do the calculations and how to approach it in the book as well so I think like those I would say is there a portion of the 70 % there's others of course Hey everyone we're going to take a quick pause and hear a word from our partners we'll be right back Have you ever wanted to trade Bitcoin but haven't dared try? With Plus500 Futures you can trade crypto without the hassle of opening a wallet With just a few clicks, you can register and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo.

12:44See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments. S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, Forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you could trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets.

13:17Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus500, it's trading with a plus.

13:34so what is it other than adding value on the business side that goes into that calculation what else is most critical in determining whether or not an application for ai will succeed or won't your ability to actually deploy it that's a huge turning back because

13:56if you're wanting to run a marathon and you choose january 1st my goal for this year is to run a marathon you're not going to run the marathon january 2nd or february 1st right it's a muscle that needs to be developed so you're going to have a lot of individuals coming together and trying to align on this stuff and then you're going to bring in internal talent you're going to have to hire external talent most companies spend millions to be able to eat out a few hundred thousand it. That's just the reality of it because it's part of that learning curve. And so if you're going to invest that amount, you have to be very, very poignant and decisive about what it is about this use case that's worth enough, the investment, because we're going to lose more than we're going to gain the first time around.

14:42And so when you take a look at criticality, it's not just about margin savings, productivity, this is capacity, this is a top line growth. The criticality of it Is there an imminent threat in our industry? And we have to do this for relevancy and survivalship. Is the industry consolidating? Are we losing market share? Are we in dire straits that we have to do something desperate that's going to begin changing in our industry, even though technically the industry in and of itself is stable? Are there new regulations that have come through that we are going to be fined or at risk of exposure if we don't do this?

15:16Like these are critical business decisions that you have to go through. And there's a list of the five. And then business value, of course, is one of them. What are we going to get as a result of this? So those things are very critical, but there's four other considerations that we have. Business value is one of them. But the biggest is the ability to actually deploy. Is the data that you need to be able to train the model or to be able to run the solution? Is it in place? Is it of okay quality? And do you have access to it? Or do you have to go and find that one person in IT who has to grant you access to get the data and then send you a file over?

15:51Like, that just won't work. So that's like the first one. The second is the stakeholder, the business executive who's going to support this. Are they a good partner? I can't tell you how many times I fumbled because I had a really bad partner. And so I don't want to fumble again. And so I actually choose my stakeholders very carefully. Do they have a good reputation? Are they going to allot time on their calendar every two weeks to go through and understanding the progress? where we're at and the importance of being able to operationalize this use case once we're past prototyping who you actually partner with and say what are you serving is also very good for us and then there's infrastructure do you even have the basics in place and i'm not talking about like hardware per se but do you have a strong dev ops team so that when you go live with something like this and ai products are live wires they're not like software products software products are something that you essentially put into code, you push it into production, and it lives on forever.

16:51AI products don't live like that. You're only as good as your last piece of data. So it's like this live wire stream that consistently needs to flow through. Do you even have the DevOps mechanism, the CICD pipelines? And I know I'm getting all of it technically here, but it's a basic component of support and maintenance when something's in production. And if you don't have a strong process or a strong team, you won't be able to push it to production. So like there's just elements. So there's 10 key considerations. All right. So when we're talking about pushing to production, all of these underlying back end factors, infrastructure, the mechanism of deployment, ongoing support via DevOps, it certainly seems based on the news flow that we got yesterday out of Cupertino, that these folks out at Apple are going to be deploying this and deploying it at massive scale within the next 12 months or thereabout, not just on phones, but on tablets and on laptops and desktops as well.

17:45It's a tremendously complicated effort, as you point out, in terms of the actual deployment of something at scale like that. When you think about the potential applications of AI essentially on every iPhone in America at a certain point in time and indeed every iPhone in the world, What do you think that world looks like? How is it different from where we are today? What opportunities does it present? And of course, what risks a great deal of kerfuffle, as you might imagine, on Twitter? Some very critical comments from Elon Musk. I believe the spirit of which was essentially if Apple does not figure out a way to segregate data in a way that they can credibly demonstrate to him, he is not going to allow Apple devices in any of his companies.

18:25It's quite a statement. And I know people are going to say, well, that's just Elon being Elon on Twitter. but this is a fear that I think a lot of people have about privacy, about data security. So there's a lot around this. Talk a little bit about how you think about these issues as they're going to continue to move to the forefront of our consciousness. AI has been relatively siloed over the last 12 months that I've been playing with ChatGPT or the Google version. Talk a little bit about what this world is going to look like as we start to wrestle with these issues. Like with any innovation, it's a double-edged sword.

19:06on a day-to-day basis i go through a number of apps and a lot of the stuff i do even though i've automated it even though i use a lot of AI i still have to sometimes go between apps to be able to answer a question or be able to say wait let me let me check on my calendar hold on that's actually in a tab in my notes and then cross connect and then be able to respond via text the day i'm available for a talk or the day of it, I'm available for book signing. Right. So I'm excited by the fact that it's going to increase my professional productivity based on what they claim is coming down the line.

19:37So just to be clear for folks who are following along, essentially what you're saying is we do live still in this very siloed world. AI is a thing out there that you use, but it's not directly interacting with our lives on a day-to-day basis. It's not. And so right now it's still, it's like spot treating a shirt when it just needs to go the wash. You know, at some point in time, it's a futile game, right? You're just going to continuously spot treat. By the way, this is a great metaphor, and I love it because it shows you both the opportunities and the risk, right? When you spot treat a shirt, if you get a little coffee on your shirt and you try to get it out, you know, essentially that you're working on an area that's the size of a quarter.

20:16But when you throw in the wash, you know, you can shrink it, you can do whatever. I mean, this is really the sort of this globalized AI risk where you have the interconnectivity of all the data, all the applications, tremendous opportunity, but also I think as Elon Musk has correctly pointed out, tremendous risk. Agreed. And I know he's a character that people love to love and love to hate. He's not wrong in this one because if I spill my cup of coffee or if I put it on the counter typically, I get seven splashes. I have to now clean all seven. It's laborious. It's like time. It just takes time, time that I don't have.

20:52I get frustrated. But each of those seven is contained. And so if I choose not to clean three of the seven, it's a choice I have. So you have a choice, you have a ton, but you know, on the flip side, it could be more time consuming. It's a bit more laborious in nature when you choose to clean all seven, because it's not integrated, it's not throwing it into the wash. Whereas if you throw it into wash, you're going to clean it all at once, whether you want it to or not, that choice has been removed. right so that's the analogy that i use and so i would love for my apps to be integrated that data to be integrated it will save me a lot of time the flip side of that is and this is why the double-edged sword is it will provide me conveniences but at a cost to my privacy and so everyone has a different spectrum on convenience to invasion of privacy of where if they lie, which is why it's not a clean answer.

21:46It's not black or white. It's shades of gray to be funny. Um, because everyone's on a different spectrum now, specifically about Apple. I think for those of us who were in the industry, at first we laughed when they called AI, Apple intelligence. Now, some of us are kind of pissed off. We're like, that's just really marketing. Like that's what you wanted to do. That was too much in your face. I think the second aspect of it, the company that holds the most data on any individual is Apple. And years since they started, they have done nothing but institute philosophy of our consumers come first.

22:30We respect their pussy. We respect our data. Nothing will be shared and nothing will be cross-referenced. Hey, everyone. We're going to take another quick break and hear a word from our partners, and then we'll be right back.

22:46Right. And by the way, in fairness, it's been relatively easy for Apple to be the good guys in this equation. Why? Because, you know, you spend a ton of money buying their devices. Lots of the services that you use online and SaaS applications, you do stuff in a browser, or you do stuff on your phone, the way that that gets monetized is via your data. Apple has had the luxury for decades now of having these incredibly fat margins on hardware and increasingly on data services that people were willing to pay for. So now you have this point in time where you get precisely to the challenges that you're talking about, where you have data privacy issues and you have this incredibly powerful technology, this very rich set of data that people have been very comfortable giving Apple access to over the years.

23:28And now, I mean, it is just a huge open question. It's not that people feel comfortable. They have no choice. If you want a phone that's as powerful or as beautiful or as elegant or as convenient as an iPhone, you have no choice. What's the alternative? And so by default, you also felt more comfortable because part of their institution principles and values were, we preserve and respect your privacy and we will not show and share your information for any purposes. until we want to create AI products on our own. And now we have to access this stuff. But the goal is they always had it. They never accessed it for gain.

24:07This is the implication where they're showing that they are going to access it for gain. Now, I've got to see some of these products because there is also a lot of hype. They've been talking about Siri for how long and how many times have you said, hey, what's the direction to the nearest post office? And it shows me the direction to Costco. Like completely unrelated. C3 is not the best, right? Their natural language processing technology, the ability to describe speech into what it actually heard. And then, you know, set that in motion with directions. We all know we've gotten frustrated with C3s.

24:37And there's a ton of jokes, especially on Reddit and YouTube about arguments between the individual and Siri. So I would have said, Apple, just don't prove Siri alone. And I think people would have been happy. But they took it like a hundred steps further. And so to do the things that they're saying, I don't know how you can do it. And again, I don't work on this, right? I'm not in the Apple safeguards, but either it's amazing marketing and hype and they're really not integrating things, or if they're going to deliver on what they said, it is a violation of the institutional values and principles.

25:12Historically, they've said, we respect your data. We're not going to use your data for our dating whatsoever. And that's the crux of this right now. So it's a watch what we can see. but a lot of us are pretty busy. We're on edge a little bit because Apple was supposed to be at that one company. Yeah, it's going to be really interesting to see how they navigate these waters with all of the opportunities and all of the threats. Talking of threats, another question that Elon Musk raised last night or a series of questions is about the question of essentially who's going to train the data set and what values is it going to reflect?

25:50Elon Musk retweeting a couple of tweets that I'll let folks go and read on their own. But they're these very provocative questions asking AI, would you prevent a global thermonuclear war if you had to do X, Y, and Z? And there are groups of things that are relatively, I should say, very, I guess, taboo. And the answer is, well, I'll let you evaluate them for yourself. But the question that he's asking fundamentally, it seems to me at least, is this question of what values are going to be reflected in AI when they begin to play an incredibly important role in the way that the day-to-day mechanics of society unfold.

Read the full transcript

26:24I mean, these are real existential questions that we have just not faced as a society until right now, this moment. Agreed. And I think there's three legs to that stool.

26:38Before OpenAI even came out with Chatsy Beteen, I don't know if most people know this, but the early origins, they had already spent$2 billion in eight years in research. And Elon was one of the original investors. And then you think about, but he went in it because he said that, listen, we need to democratize artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence cannot just be in the hands of the tech companies. It's too dangerous. It's too powerful. So we need to put it in the hands of individuals. So he chose to invest and they went down this path. OpenAI was supposed to be a nonprofit company and then they pivoted to being a for-profit company and then Elon Musk filed suit.

27:19it went against the reason the very very reason why they all came together and invested but over time people became a little bit greedy and they're like oh we can actually make money back on what we've invested and so he pulled out and he started his own thing then you've got microsoft they did what they did with open ai a bit of a trojan horse strategy there and then now you've got apple and so So Elon, I would assume, and again, it's not like he's my brother. And even though he's a character and a persona in the world that people love to criticize, but also love to love, he's not wrong in that.

27:57From the very get-go, he understands the power of artificial intelligence. And in the wrong hands and for the wrong purposes, there is an exchange of our personal privacy, period. partially also because ai has been with the national defense for quite a bit of time and partially because we've got to be able to move forward very thoughtfully and deliberately because russia and china have invested in it and they have quite a bit of time so our techniques and advancements need to be as mature as theirs we can't fall behind in the war but at the same time we've got to be able to regulate it to a certain degree for any company that's there for commercial gain because that has its own like sidebar thing what are you saying when you say you know, we've got to figure this out and we've got to figure out a way to regulate this, is that the genie is out of the bottle.

28:44The toothpaste is never going back in the tube. This is the world that we live in now. We have to just address these questions. And Elon has the influence. He has the reach. And he's got the proof points where he's the only person at this point in time who's willing to stick the neck out and bring some transparency to the greater global impact of you tech companies have a responsibility. Be responsible. and so i think that's why he's being so vocal about a lot of these things yeah um i think the second part of it is is that as a society as a whole we just we've got loud critics there's no doubt about it but it's mostly reserved for the people who live on the coasts unless it comes to political views then you've got folks in the middle etc but for the most part for the majority of the population has an icon as an example they're not going to question if what Apple is doing is ethical or not.

29:40Either they don't have the education, they don't know what they don't know, so they don't have the knowledge, or they're just happy with the fact that things just kind of work and they don't know what they've given up in exchange. And so now you're getting the point with critical mass with the majority where people are just going to be like, okay, I guess this is the new normal without enforcing, without pushing any regulations or demands on here's the line and go across it. because they don't have the education. So I think with Elon having the discussions and trying to create transparency and being very vocal about it, and some may say his tactics are extreme.

30:18I think at this point, you kind of have to be extreme to wake people up. Plus the fact that we as a society tend to give up conveniences, our data just for conveniences. We tend to be a little bit lazier to question. With the third leg of, well, Apple hasn't done us wrong, so they won't do us wrong. they've created a persona but i think now that they've redefined or trying to redefine ai's apple intelligence and they're really talking about integrating everything we do to want to come together they're tapping into the very data that they said they never commercialize on or productize um i don't know how they're going to get away with that if what they've claimed on the marketing stuff again it's just videos we've all only seen videos and i don't even have paid access.

31:02I don't know how they're going to do it without not using our data to train those capabilities. So to be honest with you, I'm just as curious as you are as how all this is going to unfold. Yeah. I mean, from a technological standpoint, it seems like we're going to be enormous challenge in figuring out how to essentially sterilize that data in a way that's segregated and secure enclaves. But to your point, how do you then train these language models on the data if you don't have access to it. It seems sort of like a catch-22. Since we're talking about Apple, since we're talking about X and other Musk companies, when you look at the landscape out there from a competitive perspective, who do you see as the potential winners and losers in this game in terms of companies?

31:45You're going to need this answer. I don't know what this point is. I do know Moore's law is a full effect. We are at an age where things are exponentially changing and growing, not incrementally. The pace of change is so fast. Even for those of us in the field, we can't catch up. I can't keep my finger on the pulse. I have a list of seven different feeds that tell me which AI companies were born today, which AI companies have died today. So the curve of evolution, that life cycle, it's alive and real. companies that I thought would survive aren't surviving companies that I thought should be ahead aren't nearly as companies that had no idea would climb ahead have are now valued as the top 10 most valued companies in the world so um and I do again it's not a preferred answer but I'm not going to make any assumptions I'm going eyes wide in I'm watching I'm observing I'm taking note I'm looking at the trajectory of things but the pace of change is so fast the world we know today has exponentially changed tomorrow, whether we feel it or not.

32:52But in three months, we're going to feel the effect by Christmas. We're definitely going to feel the effect. It's just, if you're, if you're alive and paying attention and living in now moment, it's an exhilarating and also a very, very exhausting. Well, you know, that's actually a very interesting answer. What I hear you saying in essence is, listen, everything's getting thrown into the blender and it's just too soon to call right now. I mean, that in itself is pretty interesting and provocative statement. This idea that essentially the old paradigms that we use to value things incrementally, probably not going to be in place because of the degree and influence of the changes that are about to come down the pike.

33:30And you're, by the way, talking about, you know, six to 12 month time rises. This is incredibly, incredibly close. This isn't yet. I think any company, no matter who you are, if they are fundamentally providing the infrastructure, the hardware, they're not going to lose because you can't do AI without a few key formulas. At this point in time, you can't do AI without people, which is a missed amount of nowhere. Most people don't know that. You can't do AI without infrastructure, data storage, being able to handle GPUs, CPUs, workloads. So if you are in the cloud infrastructure business, you're not going to lose.

34:02You've now only just created, feathered a stronger dependency on you. But in terms of software, AI-based companies, who knows? but there's also i think another thing it's even though we're talking about the pace of change and i have a very in my brain is split up into a two to a few different worlds there's a technologist in me that's watching and observing and like understanding what's actually happening there in the patient there's the enterprise side of me because i worked for fortune 100s and 500s and and their their pace of change isn't the innovators of the futurists of the world it It takes them a long time.

34:37So like these legacy-based industries, companies like legal, insurance, the medical field, the payer, provider, patient advancements, but these are like these big, giant icebergs that you need to move. So I think companies are dependent on, like the oracles of the world as an example. They're not the sexiest. A lot of companies are still leveraging Oracle. They're still leveraging Terry data. You don't hear them. You know, they're not the apples or the boocles of the world anymore, the opening eyes of the world. But you still have enterprises fundamentally dependent on the infrastructure that are going to be around you.

35:11They're not going away. So I always say it's like the three-tier cake, the foundational layer, the infrastructure, the hardware, the not sexy stuff. Once that's implanted into an enterprise or the masses are using it, you're solid. It's not going away. the middle layer the integration layer the middleware layer um that is rapidly evolving because with the proliferation of data the needs and demands of performance are a lot greater so there's smarter ways of doing things and passing exchanging information between the user interface the app in which we see and the foundation that i think is going to continue to evolve but then in terms of the application layer the things that we use the apps that we download the the programs that we have, you know, on our computer, I can't keep up.

36:00That stuff is changing more rapidly. New features, new functionality, different companies. So that middle layer and that top layer, the eight, those layers are changing very, very, very rapidly. Well, it's interesting. Two points. You talk about cloud compute, cloud services, cloud infrastructure. I think that probably makes a lot of sense to people. Seems very intuitive. The interesting thing that you said to me that was counterintuitive was this idea that people still matter. That's really interesting. I'd love to hear you expand on that point, because I think a lot of people who look at this space casually think, well, you know, this is really all about owning the data, having access to the SaaS platforms where you can do the cloud compute.

36:39Talk a little bit about people as a competitive advantage, because I don't think that's something that gets covered enough. Well, I think there's three legs to that stool as well. The first is you can't do any AI model without data. And that data is being generated by us, whether it's our personal data or our interactions with different systems and applications. We're generating stuff to train the model that eventually becomes the AI solution. So we actually have a direct involvement and direct influence on almost creating the food that feeds the algorithms and the models and the capabilities.

37:18There's that. The second is that we as humans fundamentally are doing the training. And so the example I give is parents and kids. In this world, we've got great parents and we've got some negligent parents. And as a great parent, your job is to provide a safe environment for your child, nurture, teach, expose, at a minimum provide just the basics, right? So that child can thrive. But we have parents who are very negligent and they're mean and they don't provide the basics. And the same goes for the humans that are training the models. We've got some, and the majority are phenomenal researchers and inventors and futurists who are trying to create AI capabilities for the betterment of humanity.

38:03And then we've got some not so great caretakers like parents who are applying it and treating it for evil. And unfortunately, that's the stuff that we're fearing because it's very much a possibility, just like having bad parents. And then I think the third is, as of now, right, as of June 2024, any AI application that's being deployed at an enterprise level, at a mid-size level, and I'm talking about purely within companies, there must always be a human in the loop because it's not perfect nor should it be perfect i think that's unrealistic expectations you know sometimes i go into the conversation they're like well it hallucinates and it comes out with fake data and i'm like listen you can only be judgmental of this ai capability or of this model and the fact that it's not perfect if we've calculated our human error rate and then let's do a side-by-side comparison of our human error rate with the machine error rate.

39:00And I've gone into situations where I'm like, our error rate as humans right now in the system on a day-to-day is 22%. The machine's error rate is 6%. So you're right. It's not perfect. It does. But if I'm doing a side-by-side comparison, it is still double digits better than what we're doing today. So I think there's that. But second, because it's not perfect, you always need to have a human in the loop to be able to do sort of what I call the second pair eyeballs just to make sure if the results it's coming up with or what it's producing passes that sniff test passes that test before anything is published or publicized and this is especially needed and true if it's an external facing capability but you've got some leniency because if ai produces a result that is detrimental to the company but beneficial to the customer there's a financial but it could also produce a result that could lead the consumer down the raw path, which also can be a PR nightmare for you.

39:59So I always say it must pass the success. And this happened with me. It was December 18th, 5.30 a.m. I got a Google alert that there was an article in Google published with my name on it. And it was titled, Unveiling the Man Behind the Name, that is Sol Rishi. It was an HPA article on my husband. He never named him, but it talked about him and how he's been my greatest support and how he's been a phenomenal individual at my my successes and career paths i'm like what is this so i go to tell my husband i was like drew and it's bad for you did you have anything to do with this he's like no what i'm talking about it's an eight page article it doesn't name you all i named you is the husband that has helped me in my success as a majority.

40:46And he thinks it. He's like, clearly not. Like, they left out how charming and good-looking I am. And like, we giggle. And I'm like, I'm serious. Did you or did you not have something? And he's just like, no. Well, I put word out to my network. And by 2 p.m., I was off the phone with the CEO of that company that released that conversation. I'm like, we're lucky. The article's kind of humorous and funny and neutral. But if this was a declamation on my career, we would have been having a conversation. decision so in this case i'm going to make margaritas at a lemon and i want to know what the heck happened because this article is clearly bogus it's talking about how adventurous my husband if i left him he'd be on the couch for seven days in a row like like and how he takes long walks in the forest like are you kidding me like i have to drive us everywhere because he loses direction you wouldn't even be able to find the forest like he's got many many wonderful qualities but everything this article was talking about like no that's not true no that's not true I'm like, so tell me what happened.

41:39And here's the story. They have a small marketing team, four to five individuals. An AI company approached them and said, we can increase your impressions by 68%. We can increase your site traffic by over 100%. We're going to identify the top 100 keywords in your industry. And we're going to write articles about those keywords. And we are going to put them across part of our social media. And you should be able to see increases in impressions and site traffic. And so this small marketing team was like, we need all the muscle. Why not? The funny thing was, that was December 18th. They logged in December 18th.

42:16Sorry, that was December 17th. They logged into their dashboard on December 18th. And sure enough, impressions have gone up. Site traffic has gone up. So according to the marketing KPIs, they met every goal that the company said they worked. But then this happened. the 100 key words that the guy company chose were not validated by the marketers and my name appeared as one of the 100 i don't even know how many other focus keywords now it was a business intelligence so i've written a few articles but i'm not a key word on business intelligence if anyone in the marketing team has second pair of eyeballs looked at that and they'll be removed this this this this it's not irrelevant and then the company generated seven it articles created by generative AI capabilities per keyword.

43:06So then they flooded the market with 700 articles. And one of those articles was about my husband. But did that marketing team validate any of the articles to go, that's not relevant, that's not relevant, that's not relevant to understand what was fake, what was just pure garbage, et cetera. So they just assumed the AI would do everything and it was going to be better than nothing when they logged in. They're like, oh my gosh, we've got our KPIs, this is powerful, but only to provide the market with just a bunch of crap and trash. So that's why I'm saying human must be in the loop. You still have to be in the process of looking at the location.

43:39You still need to provide common sense, critical thinking, say whatever it produced is right and good enough, or no, this is absolutely bogus. The context is incorrect. This isn't something that we can do with the market. So as of June of 2024, you must because there's enough errors where you can't afford. And that's what I meant. You need to have it. It's almost like identifying an extraneous or spurious route in a math problem. You look at it and you go like, this just doesn't fit the equation. It doesn't make any sense. Gosh, we've covered just a tremendous amount of ground here today. Lots of talk about the opportunities as well as material risks, which I think in that story does a great job of sort of, you know, framing up.

44:22Obviously, as you suggest, very early right now, hard to make firm determinations about the direction that things are going and who will be the winners, who will be the losers. But let me ask you this. What are you going to be looking at over the next six to 12 months to try and make some of those determinations? What are the things on your dashboard that you're going to be looking for? What are the things that our viewers and our listeners should be looking for and thinking about as this technology continues to steamroll forward? I think, one, overall, the society have increased our literacy just to become more knowledgeable about some of the choices that people have.

45:00So if we started with a zero in November 2022 and our literacy has gone up to 4 % or whatever that number may be by the end of 2020, where are we now? Is our knowledge base and literacy at the end of its capabilities? That double-edged sword has it increased because we have to be educated. And it can't be restricted to people who do podcasts or write books or work in enterprises or have access to management. It just needs to be democratized, this information. So that's one thing I'm going to do. Are we educating people on that? I think the second goal is which companies are going to do the right thing and not do it just for commercial gain, just because we can get bigger.

45:44It's just not right. And so I think for me, understanding which ones have a moral compass and they're abiding by it. And then third, I think the pace of change amongst hardware, software, the middleware, and then that user interface. And seeing if there are and they're rooted and grounded and if they're going to be around. So longevity, I would say this.

46:15yeah by the way i should say as we as we say this i'm looking right now i here at apple stock looks like up about 10 year-to-date new high over three trillion dollars in market cap i'm just eyeballing the charts here but that's what the numbers look like to me so incredible conversation today final thoughts key takeaways that you'd like to leave our listeners and our viewers with

46:38and not just with ai right but whatever the buzzword or soup du jour of the two year three year one i don't think ai is going to be like web 3.0 or metaverse it's not going to be a trend it is here to stay we may not be referencing it as ai we may not call it ai we may not know it's AI, but it is going to be embedded in our day-to-day. And when it's done right, we won't even know it's done. My perfect example, has anyone ever noticed that sometimes there's an orange dot that appears on your phone or on your Apple Watch? That orange dot means that one of your apps is listening. And it's listening to your actions and interactions.

47:23And the green dot means it's watching and listening. it's not by accident that you could be talking about something and before you know it when you walk in you get a recommendation very almost everyone i talked to didn't even know and that's a sad reality part of it is anytime you download a new app when you click terms and conditions you don't read it you just click it because you just want to use the app but you're you're giving up a piece and you're giving them the right to do what they want. And that's where that orange dot and that's where that green dot appears. So you have the ability to disable it, but you have to actively and coactively go to the table if it's equal because you're giving information.

48:07And we also have to be trusting that Apple and Google and the OS providers are getting their security models right, getting the containerization right so that you can segregate those data, making sure that the apps in the store are abiding by the policies. It is just a whole stack of technical challenges? 100%, but we just take it for granted and we just assume they must be doing the right thing. So I think everyone should become knowledgeable or at least informed of what some of these things mean. Second, know that you do pay a price for convenience and there's your data. Three, there is an opportunity for people to be mobile, just like with GDPR, which is a legislation passed around consumer data, consumer use.

48:52yeah and it spilled over right to us and then we got ccpa and california co-fide like you know different regions but the goal was to protect consumer data and if we didn't want our data to be used we've had the option of opting out so i think there is an opportunity for something similar in the ai space if enough people and cohorts and organizations speak up um so they did the first gets into what you said earlier which is you know the number of people who are going to opt out when the, when the convenience and when someone, you know, the social pressure, when someone says you can't find the restaurant, I just shared it with you.

49:25I don't know where you got disabled on your phone, turn it on. So you can find where we're having dinner tonight. We're halfway through appetizers. I don't know where you are. Right.

49:38It's not a trend. It is here to stay, but we may get the tea with the term. So the term may not be is overly used, but it's going to be embedded and we won't even know what's going to happen to us. The second would be, it's just to know that for conveniences, there's always an exchange. Don't be deaf to that, if that makes sense. And then third, pick and choose where you want conveniences. Be smart about productivity. Be smart about, you know, bandwidth and capacity. As of right now, there needs to be human involved. Use good judgment. Verify everything, whether you work for an organization or you're a personal individual and you download that map, that's just really fun.

50:17I would say those would be the tough ones. I want to get into the mess involved, especially for the non-technologists or those who don't work in tech companies or interact with technology. It's too much to keep track of right now. Just think about the moral implications and that double-edged sword and that we're all given a choice because you're in that position. So Rashidi, author of the new best-selling book, Your AI Survival Guide, Scrape Bees, Bruised Elbows, and lessons from real-world AI deployments. I hope as we continue to negotiate these questions and challenges, you'll come back and join us again and give us your insights.

50:52Thank you. Thank you, Asher. Thanks so much for joining us, and thank you for watching.

51:03We hope you enjoyed this episode. At Real Vision, we arm you with expert knowledge, time-efficient tools, and a powerful network to help you succeed on your financial journey. Get a taste of financial freedom with our free offer at realvision.com forward slash free. That's realvision.com forward slash free.

51:39and start practicing with their free and unlimited demo. See a trading opportunity? You'll be able to trade it in just two clicks. Feel ready? You can move to real money with as little as$100 once your account is approved. And the great thing is that in addition to crypto, Plus500 gives you access to a wide range of instruments. S &P 500, NASDAQ, gas, and much more. Explore equity indices, energy, metals, Forex, and beyond. With a simple and intuitive platform, you could trade anytime, anywhere. Experience the fast, accessible futures trading you've been waiting for with Plus500. With over 20 years of experience, Plus500 is your gateway to the markets.

52:15Visit us.plus500.com to learn more. Trading in futures involves the risk of loss and is not suitable for everyone. Not all applicants will qualify. Plus500. It's trading with a plus.

From the publisher

🔥 Get FREE ACCESS to Real Vision https://rvtv.io/41tyn6M
C-suite data leader and author of Your AI Survival Guide, Sol Rashidi, joins Ash Bennington to discuss her extensive background and experience as a chief data officer for multiple AI, data, and technology companies, her thoughts on the current state of artificial intelligence, and what the future of smart data looks like.

About Real Vision™:
We arm you with the knowledge, the tools, and the network to succeed in your financial journey.

Unlock the potential to showcase your brand to our global audience. Contact us at partnerships@realvision.com for advertising inquiries.

Connect with Real Vision™ Online:
Twitter: https://rvtv.io/twitter
Instagram: https://rvtv.io/instagram
Facebook: https://rvtv.io/facebook
Linkedin: https://rvtv.io/linkedin

Disclaimer: https://media.realvision.com/wp/20231004185303/Disclaimer-1.pdf
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Real Vision: Finance & Investing

All 984 episodes
When Data Drives the Revolution ft. Sol RashidiReal Vision: Finance & Investing · 54 min
Listen in VO