In short
Podcast Summary: Secret Leaders - Episode with Nadhim Zahawi
Episode Overview
- Title: From building a Unicorn to Leading a Nation during Covid - Nadhim Zahawi
- Hosts: Dan Murray-Serter and Chris Donnelly
- Guest: Nadhim Zahawi, Conservative MP, Chancellor of the Exchequer
- Air Date: [Insert Date]
- Podcast Description: An exploration of business insights from successful entrepreneurs and leaders.
- Episode Theme: Nadhim Zahawi discusses his experiences in both business and government, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Key Themes and Discussions
- Background of Nadhim Zahawi
- Early Career: Zahawi started in local government in the 1990s before transitioning to entrepreneurship with YouGov, which achieved significant success.
- Business Accomplishments:
- YouGov went public in 2005, expanding into the United States and generating substantial revenue.
- Currently serves as chairman of Very Group, which operates a successful online retail business.
- Transition to Government
- Zahawi describes his shift from business to politics as one of the best decisions of his career, emphasizing the importance of public service.
- He highlights the unique skills gained from his entrepreneurial background, particularly in risk management and decision-making.
- Insights on Leadership during Crisis
- COVID-19 Response:
- Discusses the complexities and urgent decision-making required during the pandemic.
- Describes how his experience with YouGov helped in scaling the vaccine rollout effectively.
- Shares anecdotes about the challenges faced and the collaboration between various sectors to address the crisis.
- The Role of Risk in Business and Politics
- Zahawi compares the risks faced in entrepreneurship with those in government decision-making.
- He emphasizes the need for quick, informed decision-making and the importance of intuition and expert advice.
- Criticism and Challenges in Government
- Addresses the controversies surrounding government actions during the pandemic, including the Partygate scandal and PPE procurement issues.
- Reflects on the perception of government corruption and the challenges of maintaining public trust.
- Importance of Cross-Party Collaboration
- Advocates for a collaborative approach in tackling national issues, urging for cross-party initiatives similar to the vaccine rollout.
- Discusses the challenges of political divisiveness and the need for unity in governance.
Key Takeaways
- Experience Matters: Zahawi's blend of business acumen and political experience shaped his approach during the pandemic.
- Risk Management: Effective leadership requires comfort with risk, informed decisions, and collaboration with experts.
- Public Trust: Transparency and accountability are crucial for maintaining trust in government, especially during crises.
- Talent in Politics: The need for skilled individuals in political roles is emphasized, suggesting that more business leaders should consider public service.
Conclusion This episode provides valuable insights into the intersections of business and governance, particularly during unprecedented times like the COVID-19 pandemic. Nadhim Zahawi's unique perspective as both a successful entrepreneur and a government leader highlights the importance of effective leadership, risk management, and public accountability in addressing national challenges.
For those interested in the dynamics of leadership and the complexities of decision-making in both business and government, this episode serves as an informative resource.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Nadeem Zahawi, welcome to Secret Leaders. Thank you for having me. Most welcome. So most people watching will know you as a Conservative MP, Chancellor of the Exchequer, the man behind the vaccine rollout. But, you know, for us and we're a business show, we're also so interested in the fact that you built a company, YouGov, that has, as I Googled earlier, an annual revenue of 250 million. So, you know, what's new with you? What are you doing now? Yeah, where do you go from that? Yeah, I was very lucky in many ways. So I was a unique type of politician in the sense that I initially entered politics in the 90s in local government, in Wandsworth, then stopped doing politics, founded YouGov, took it public in 2005, stayed on for a further five years, so 10 years in total as chief exec, running it in the public markets, taking it to the United States of America, which was our big break.
0:57what made you go of a unicorn was going to America and growing in America. I'm loving life. I'm now chairman of Very Group, which is actually the old great universal Gus catalog business and Littlewood's catalog business combined. We've got about 4 million customers. We sell them about 1.7 billion pounds worth of goods. So we sell everything other than books and groceries, but everything from sports apparel to toys to electronics and white goods. It's a great business, genuinely a great business. It's got amazing heritage, over 100 years of heritage, pure online now, but with an amazing financial service element.
1:44So the pure online players in the fashion world will probably make net-net about 5%, 5.4 % margin. Our margins are close to 13%, 13.5 % margin because our customer actually has an account with us. They're able to borrow that little bit extra to buy the things that they want to buy and then pay over time. And it's an incredibly successful business. And I'm very lucky to be chairman of it. And that was all before you joined. So really, the pressure's on. Yeah, exactly right. That's very true. Very, very true. I mean, I love businesses where I think I can make a big contribution. I think I can. In this case, we've got an amazing team, CEO, CFO, finance director, and actually a great COO.
2:33I said to him, you know, many, many decades ago, it's in the book, there's a whole chapter about, I think it's called Pete and Johnny, where I worked with Peter Dubins and Jonathan Seif, selling initially sort of hard rock cafe t-shirts, then changing colour t-shirts, supplying everybody on the high street from M &S to Tesco's, Littlewood's catalogue at the time. In fact, when I became chairman, they found an old docket with my signature on it, where basically they bought some licensed children's wear from us. A little full circle moment. It is. I mean, but what was fascinating about the business is I initially sort of went to have a look at the fulfillment center.
3:16We've got this incredible place called Skygate in the East Midlands. And it wasn't the robots, which was high tech, latest robotics. I spent about a quarter of a billion pounds building this incredible fulfillment center. I asked our really super talented COO, what's your secret here? because you've clearly done something unique compared to the rest of the market because your fulfillment is as competitive as Amazon's. He said, look, Nadia, I designed the whole thing. He said, I went around the whole world. We went to South Korea. We had a look at Japan, the US. We designed the whole fulfillment center for our 4.4 million customers based on a simple principle, and that is my biggest supplier into the fulfillment center is the returns department because online people will order three shirts and will send two back.
4:08If I can't reprocess them, everybody does, right? If you think about it, if I can't reprocess them in a few hours and get them out for the next customer in a day, then my inventory control, my stock control is blown apart. And that is terrible for any retailer, as you know. And so it's an exciting business, genuinely exciting business. and I'm really delighted to chair it and chair such a strong team of leaders. In the book, which was great, by the way, super engaging. I mean, it's a very colourful life, right? I've done lots of things, so it was always going to be good. You talk a lot about risk-taking.
4:43Yeah. It's an essential ingredient for entrepreneurship, obviously. And government. And government. Okay. Interesting. Yeah. Yeah, so where would you relate, you know, your understanding and appetite for risk in business and risk in government? Yeah, absolutely. So one of the things I try and address in the book, a couple of things. One is to try and demystify politics because I'd like, I hope, some of your listeners after a great business career to think about going to public service. I would, you know, and we can talk about sort of the ups and downs of my career, including my painful exit, ultimately after becoming chairman of the Conservative Party and leaving cabinet over my issues with HMRC.
5:26But with all of that said, it's the best career decision I've ever made to go into public service after YouGov. We all strive to be a footnote in history. And I think being able to say, look, I delivered the vaccine program for the United Kingdom, where we got to just shy of a million doses a day from a standing start, no infrastructure, to build that whole thing was, I think, a remarkable achievement for the team that we put together and an amazing team to lead. um but to your very good question so in business you hold risk daily you make decisions every day you're bombarded with information and you've got to very quickly decide what information is material to the decisions you have to make today and this week uh what you can sort of park for a week and then return to it and look at it next week and what is just noise that you need to just block out because if you don't block it out you're going to lose focus that must be a very good skill in politics it's a great skill in in politics and i think part of that is because you know i'm i trained as an engineer i'm a chemical engineer from university college london but actually there's another skill which is really important which is holding risk right in business you sort of think about you know what are the trade-offs almost every day in your business and actually what are you comfortable holding risk whether it's supplying a client and giving them credit it, right, or, you know, taking a risk on a big order where you haven't sold it yet, right?
6:55And that is a skill that I think sometimes can be lacking in government, lacking in politicians, because the background of most politicians is not business or engineering. It tends to be either special advisors, a number of very talented lawyers, lots of different backgrounds, but few entrepreneurs in many ways and let me try and bring it to life for you from an example so at the early days of the pandemic the NHS thought that actually the biggest challenge to the system to the NHS so that it doesn't break was we needed more intubation so we need to effectively build ventilators because we saw what was happening in Italy as the pandemic took hold people didn't have ventilation and were dying because they couldn't get them intubated as the medical term is.
7:52And so the prime minister put out a challenge to British industry. We had everyone on the call. We had about 65 industrials on the call. James Dyson, Ford, Airbus, everybody was on the call. And Boris Johnson said, your country needs you. We've got to produce these ventilators, not in six months. We don't have six months. We've got 12 weeks at best. Otherwise, the NHS will break in the way the Italian health system had broken. And to his credit, people like James Dice said, look, I'll try and design one quickly and build it. And you don't want that to be the story where it's like, I only took 5 ,325 goes.
8:29Right. So then I'm the junior minister on the call who does the sweeper role, right? So almost like my COO now, right? After the call, I have to be the one then trying to operationalize some of this stuff and decide who do we back? how do we back it what support do they need from government right from the machine um i walk into the department for business and we have a brilliant man called dick elsey we've knighted him he's now sir dick elsey um who's an engineer who headed up the high value manufacturing catapults for us around the country this is pre-covid uh who was waiting for me and i could see he was concerned walks into my office he's minister we're never going to build these ventilators if we try and build them from scratch you know i love what james dice is trying to do and it's great and i said explain to me why he said well because if you build them from scratch you're gonna have to go through the regulatory approval rightly so because what you don't want is to build the machine that then chokes someone or kills someone right this is life or death here um and i said dick you sound like you've got a solution for me right you haven't just come with a problem he said yes i do nadine I think we can do this.
9:40There are two designs, one by Smith Industries, one by a small company in Oxfordshire, that if we talk to the companies and allow us to use their designs, we could bring them together with Ford and with Airbus. So couple their designs with big manufacturing capacity and we can ramp up. And that way we don't need to go through the regulatory approval, which would take months to get through anyway. Now, I could have easily said, look, that's too much risk for me. I need to go to tender because actually, you know, we want to tend this. Actually, having an expert like Dick Elsie made me comfortable enough to say to my team, go.
10:22I made the decision right there and there. I said, right, go. What do you need from me for your approval? Where do I need to sign as the minister in charge? Because I know I can defend it at the dispatch box in parliament if anyone says why did you do that i say here's why i did it right i had no time i had 12 weeks to save lives and actually we've got two approved designs we've got one of the best engineers recommending this and we've got airbus and ford ready to put their whole production muscle behind this for the nation how much of those decisions by the way um are based on an intuition of understanding uh this is the timeline and practicality therefore it has to be done in a certain way and also understanding how you're able to post-rationalize it and defend it if it doesn't go well so that's exactly right so it's part of i think every businessman or woman entrepreneurs um strength dna is to calculate risk right and the ones that do it well become incredibly successful byproducts financial success but actually build some great businesses right and I think the combination of me being an engineer probably having a failure and then a success with UGA failure with Alan Hinckley Limited which we can talk about every entrepreneur, anyone who tells you that they've had success throughout their whole life is either naive or lying or maybe not that successful right because actually the failures are a great pathway for what you can learn to be more successful absolutely right and I think the point I'm trying to make is that I was comfortable holding risk because I had an expert.
11:57In the way we did with Kate Bingham, who we brought in, her day job was investing in different teams in life sciences, in new medicines. And we brought her in to say, right, there is over 100 teams telling us they're going to make a vaccine. Who are we going to basically bet on and how are we going to option those bets and contract with them early so that we'd have the most successful vaccination program in Europe, if not in the world. And we did that well. Where did we do it badly? On PPE. When you go back to the pandemic, and I think the inquiry will ultimately say this, is when we initially were hit by the pandemic and the system needed more masks and gowns and everything else in hospitals, in care homes, we didn't think of bringing in a Justin King.
12:50Now, hindsight is a wonderful thing. But if that had been my remit, I was in a different department then. I was only brought in once we needed the vaccine to be deployed. I would have asked Justin King to come in and say, right, the next six months of your life are mine, in the way we did with Kate Bingham. And she did it for free, by the way. She didn't charge anything for it. You are very comfortable bringing thousands of products into your supermarkets on time, on budget, every single minute, hour, day, you're going to do the same for me by sourcing PPE from around the world. That human being is an expert.
13:31Justin would have had a system for it. Instead, I don't think there was corruption. I think it was naivety that politicians thought. They told every ambassador around the world, get hold of your contact list, start finding out. What were the major mistakes of PPE? so i think that's the the the biggest the biggest mistake is the is the perception publicly um that somehow people are being corrupt right by the way they're deciding who should get a contract for ppe one people forget that the whole world was at the time competing for this product right we were hearing stories of you know agency secret agencies around the world boarding airplanes in Asia with, you know, duffel bags of cash and commandeering the flights to go to their country versus the ultimate, you know, owner or the, the, the, um, uh, where it needed to go.
14:28Um, so the mistake is, I think, not bringing in an expert so that you're comfortable holding risk. It's interesting, isn't it? Cause you always take a very different approach on experts to Michael Gove. So you've got that interesting dichotomy on the value of expertise. I think you're being slightly unfair to Mike. I don't think he's misquoted and much maligned on this. I think he would agree with me that actually it makes a huge difference. The difficulty for him at the time for Matt Hancock is everything was moving so fast. And hindsight is a wonderful thing but i would say if you're asking me what the mistake was i think some of the early mistakes is people you know driven by wanting to move fast and get the stuff in didn't think about okay you know how do we structure how do we build an infrastructure to cope and get this stuff in in a sustainable way in a way that is systematic and avoids abuse because clearly there must have been abuse you know people um and it'll come out probably in courts and in the inquiry there were some people who behaved badly who decided that actually the pandemic was a good time to try and make money rather than do the right thing uh and that's that that was the weakness in the system it's frustrating obviously because it feels like the perfect micro but then became macro example of the downfall of the conservative party from a narrative point of view because then everyone's looking for another example that is the same thing again the narrative of the greed the in you know the in club you're the inner or not and that has like just infested the whole public perception hasn't of the entire party from a what was a single moment in time let me say quite a hard one to judge because it's a global crisis what's interesting and obviously something for you to be proud of whether it's correlation or your own brilliance who knows um yeah you are absolutely the person behind the part that people really respect it was really i mean rare for british people to not complain about something to be honest but absolutely the covid rollout was one of the only things everyone's like oh well they did pretty well and i think your business experience is probably like such a defining part of that skill.
16:58Because to scale, I mean, we have seen so many, hundreds of founders, good ideas and can't scale. And it's the ability to understand how to scale something that I think... That is the toughest thing in both business and in government. And to your point, why Justin King would have been the perfect example. The toughest thing is to scale. After completing the... Zero to one. The vaccine, you know, zero to 100 miles an hour, get the system up and running, right? I was then promoted and made Secretary of State for Education. And we were doing some really great things in education. You see it now in the way our kids are moving up the league tables for literacy and numeracy.
17:36But again, you see lots of examples, T-levels, right? A great piece of innovation by a sort of Labour minister. It was Lord Sainsbury. One of the first things he did when I became Secretary of State was reach out to me and say, look can i talk to you and he showed me you know the whole t-level program which was in my department and he convinced me that actually this is really well thought through really well designed and what we should be focusing on is scaling it i didn't care who invented it you know one of the strengths i remember growing up you know with ronald reagan is is actually the real success is you don't have to be the inventor of it i'll take good ideas from anywhere as long as i can scale them it's hard The reason, again, I say to you, I was lucky with YouGov in that I found a business model.
18:23We built a mousetrap better than anyone else's that we could scale. It's hard to scale, right? Most of your listeners today who are running businesses, their biggest challenge is they look at their little business and think, God, this is brilliant. If only I could get it to the next 1 ,000 customers and the 10 ,000 and the millionth customer. And then people could see how good this thing is. But it's hard. And it's hard in government, right? It's much easier, by the way, to do lots of pilots. So the way one of the real weaknesses of government is the churn, the change. Now, it's a strength because actually democracy is important.
18:59I fled a country where there was no democracy. But what happens is a new minister comes in. Rather than saying, actually, I'm not proud. Show me all the good ideas. Show me the evidence. If it's a good idea invented by a different government, let's just adopt it and scale it. That was my attitude. too political right yeah but as my some sadly some ministers don't behave that way if it's not invented by them or by their party they'll want to just cut it right and so what happens is the civil service the the dna of the civil service is to serve the minister right and we'll you will try initially politely to say actually minister this is quite a good thing look at it properly blah blah but if the minister's adamant they get their way so then they have to start all over again with another pilot so this you know there's a sort of plurif
19:51proliferation yeah exactly um i still have to improve my english after all these years of pilots everywhere and little scale the skill of an entrepreneur i think at scale is the ability to almost do nothing and allow other people to do everything and just be a very very good decision maker and you know guide on the mission and i think that for what you did that must have been the defining skill we're all marching in this direction this is the goal we're going for you must all deliver on your degrees and that's where most entrepreneurs fail i think in my opinion i i felt that probably where the most important parts of my job as vaccine deployment minister was just to protect my team i had a great team i went to nhs headquarters is to kick the tires.
20:38There's a brilliant lady called Emily Lawson, one of the real unsung heroes of the vaccine deployment. She had a brilliant team with her. We embedded our army into the deployment team. And again, really strong leadership there as well. And what I really needed to do was just protect them from both, you know, number 10, which was nervous, cabinet officers nervous, and kept pulling them into more meetings to go through yet another presentation of, you know, have you got everything right? Are you ready? So that when the first doses arrive, you know, we're going to be able to scale quickly. And I just had to make sure that people sort of almost just held back.
21:22We had an incredible private public partnership. So we brought in Palantir to give us Foundry, the technology, so I can see literally almost in real time who's being vaccinated we brought in DHL to deliver what I call my pizza boxes to the front line to the GPs who'd come together five or six together in an area to decide you know who does the support bit for the current patient that they need to look after as well as then deploy vaccine so it was an incredible we worked with local government we worked with the Scottish government the Welsh Labour government the mayor's Sadiq Khan and Andy Burnham and Andy Street in Birmingham but I felt my biggest challenge was just to tell everyone just calm down we know what we're doing right one just give us a chance we will demonstrate for you and that's what we did week in week out as we ramped up the numbers people began to have faith and that's why the program was so successful coming back to your point about you know you hope that successful entrepreneurs the people that listen to this show consider public service and a life in business.
22:29Sorry, a life in government. Obviously, one of the big reasons people aren't attracted to government and don't go into government is you get a lot of criticism, a lot of flack from everyone. It's really badly paid. It's just not set up for career ambitious enthusiasts. And I watched this really interesting clip the other day from Tony Blair actually and he was talking about you know his greatest admiration is Singapore and the founding story of Singapore and apparently in Singapore no one can be paid any more than the people in government so the highest paid people there as a rule are all the people who work in government and so if you work in business that's the second best obviously there are going to be exceptions with CEOs founders etc but that's the general rule and so the brightest smartest people will go work in government in singapore it does seem like a very smart solution i know not everything's about money but it's really difficult when the narrative to someone starting in business is it's all on you you're going to fail you've got to figure it out um but the payoff at the end is it can be glorious and you'll learn so much everything else the narrative of going into government really is the most toxic stuff you know i see how people talk about you about boris about michael you know no no one basically lasts long enough anyway to not become the talking point or negativity and just is it worth it yes like why are entrepreneurs going into politics yeah i do worry i genuinely worry i tell you for why um that you know I don't want us to end up in a place where the only people who go into parliament and parliament is the sort of the talent pool from which we select our cabinet right that's our system that's how it works in our country is that whichever party has a majority in parliament gets to form the front bench the government right and the prime minister the leader of that party has to choose his ministers from parliament now he can promote people into the house of lords and bring them in as ministers but it's it that's the system we have right so the talent pool is from those 650 odd people who will put their name forward uh and will work you know burning you know shoe leather to get elected that's a really important process right democracy is important you know again i go back to saddam who said you do not want to live in a country where you give that up because you end up with a Saddam Hussein.
25:04But, and this is genuinely a concern for me, what you don't want is to end up in a place where either the people who are putting their name forward are people who would never be able to in any real economy command the salary of a current MP. Or people you wouldn't hire. Or you wouldn't hire them. Or people who just happen to be very rich or marry well or inherit wealth because there's a huge talent pool in between right of people who may be you know leaders in education in schools in colleges and universities in business in all sorts of walks of life but who will look at that and go you know what one i don't want the grief right the stuff that your family gets put through that you get put through the gotcha moment um in in in you know in the media um and they think actually you know i can do better anyway in the private sector that's my big concern and you look at actually you mentioned singapore singapore do it really well what they do and i met them very early on uh we had a a sort of several meetings with ministerial meetings is they peg the salary of their prime minister and the cabinet to the um salary of a ceo of their public companies so i can't remember the exact numbers but something like you know three quarters of the salary of the average of a ceo of a public company but and here's the rub right the prime minister has to deliver their strategy and they actually go on television by the way and do two hours two and a half hours of presentation to the nation of what this strategy is for health for you know house building uh welfare economic growth everything right and people watch this stuff And I wanted to do the same.
26:56You know, we built this incredible studio with a cost of 2.7 million quid. I kept saying to Boris, you know, every week post-pandemic, you know, the nation got used to seeing Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallors deliver data. We should have a minister stand up and say, here's my strategy over the next 6, 12, 18, 24 months. And here's why we're doing it post-pandemic. And I think it'll make a real difference because the first few presentations, you'll get the shock horror headline saying, oh look at this number that's terrible but once you teach people once you treat them like grown-ups then they behave differently towards you and towards the politics and you're providing two-way accountability right and you see other countries doing you know really clever things with with attracting talent you know in the uae for example uh if you're a a minister minister grade um i think after serving three years i can't remember three or four years you keep your pension for life a really really high pension as well which again it i think it's a great incentive to say to people come and serve for three four years right you're not going to lose out in fact you'll you'll do well as well it's the warren buffett thing right show the incentive i'll show you the outcome our incentives are terrible and my and that's my fear is you end up if you end up with with um uh that what I call the sort of the large mid-level talent, right, of really good people not entering the political process.
28:23I think it would be a much weaker parliament and actually much more susceptible to making mistakes or doing things badly. There is a caveat, I guess, which is Liz Truss. You know, good incentive. She gets her prime ministerial pension. Does she get the pension? she gets pension forever no yeah I mean once you make prime minister it's not bad yeah but you've got to be PM yeah I know I get it but not for that long so it's okay but just coming back to the book so after you worked on Geoffrey Archer's campaign yes you end up having a business meeting in a greasy spoon that's right and tell us not far from here yeah so where was that what were you talking about yeah yeah so Stefan Shakespeare who was my wonderful fellow traveler during the campaign.
29:13He was the only salaried member of the Geoffrey Archer for Mayor of London campaign. Stephen was chief of staff. All the rest of us were volunteers. And if you, I mean, when I look back now, I think there was a young conservative activists around that table. It was Priti Patel, myself, Tobias Elwood, Shailesh Vara, who else? Sajid Javid, Robert Halfon, right? All ended up in Parliament, pretty much. And pretty much all, bar maybe one or two, ended up in Cabinet. Geoffrey was a remarkable scout for talent and genuinely colourblind. So when his campaign collapsed, Stefan was out of work. We all went back to it.
30:01I was probably the highest paid marketing director in the land. I loved working with him. you know it's very rare that you meet a human being who is genuinely capable of original thought most of us will sort of pull ideas together there's an engineering term called clujing right you cluj lots of ideas right to come up with something that hopefully becomes a success uh Stefan is the opposite he will come up with something completely original um and uh we sat in a greasy spoon uh near his home in the Barbican I said I loved working with you uh for a good couple years being activists and trying to get this man to be mayor of london um you know we we should be able to do some do something together and i you know i if we've got a good idea let's make it happen one of the ideas we had for jeffrey remember i mean this is a different world you guys are much younger than i am and we'll probably not remember this but we still read jeffrey archer books yeah you did no but no i'm talking about something slightly different no i know it was the days of america online right dial up connections right there was no surveys online just caught that this was this was literally you know free serve was the the probably the most important uh thing that had happened in tech in the uk with a portal so when you buy your pc from curry's or pc world you got this disc with it that which loaded up as free serve and and i think yahoo was probably the biggest at the time well this was an idea for So the idea was that if Geoffrey was going to be mayor of London, we were going to call it LondonGov.
31:35And the mayor would say to Londoners two things. One, you're going to pay your taxes online because everyone paid taxes by writing a check, literally with a checkbook and sending it in, or going to their bank and transferring money. So online payments. And you would then ask people their views as to how they want their money spent. So, you know, romantic idea of, you know, Boston Tea Party, no taxation without representation. I.e., if I'm going to pay my taxes to London, I want to know how they're going to be spent. You know, how much is he going to spend on improving the roads, rail, you know, whatever it happens to be.
32:13Anyway, once the campaign blew up, there was no campaign. And so when we sat in the greasy spoon and we. Out of jobs. He's out of jobs. I was European marketing director for Smith & Brooks, a very successful business. Anyway, we came up with the idea of, well, why don't we do this commercially? He's not going to be mayor. Let's try and see if we can build a business where people pay their taxes in London and then get to tell their government how they want the money spent. And then I said to Stephen, well, why are we restricting our ambitions to just London? right this could be for the whole country in fact could be the whole world so i came up with the name you gov and it's an amalgamation of two words you and govern i you know it's consumer democracy right the internet this thing that's going to network us all together is going to shift the equilibrium in favor of we the people right boston tea party no taxation without representation right away from the executive the executive being either government or big corporates so we're going to be able to tell big corporates and government actually you know collectively we want you to do this or that or the other and that's the idea of you gov um so what was product one then i was going to tell you very painful and for all the entrepreneurs listening were you did you make money early were you profitable early no did you raise money i want to know a little we had an amazing guy called neil bruscott god bless his soul he passed away sadly from cancer who had built again an incredible business by finding a gap and filling it so he was a luggage manufacturer in the uk and uh on a train journey selling to a client he he got this magazine and he's flicking through it and he saw that in america uh luggage manufacturers were beginning to make a piece of luggage to carry this thing called a laptop.
34:11And so he built a company called, I think, Targus to effectively fill the gap when people were just beginning to move away from PC towards laptops and sold it to his American rival for hundreds of millions. Anyway, he gave us our seed funding. um do you remember the amount i think it was about 300 000 oh my father helped us a little bit as well which you know part of the reason i had a problem at the end with uh hmrc and leaving government um it goes back to that it goes back to the dad funded but my dad did both put a little bit of funding in and uh basically i had just come out of a failure of you know terrible business experience yeah and i really used it as my crutch to help me you know build the early uh sort of corporate strategy for yougov we began by trying to convince local authorities that we can build a tax payment system for them so i was going around the country trying to convince all these local authorities that you know let us give us the access to your legacy system we'll build this thing but that was tough oh my god um it was um pretty hard um graft i managed to get one out of i think something like over 60 presentations i've sold to local authorities really brutal right anyway wire forest district council um gave us a go uh we very quickly worked out that the money we'd raised will just disappear in five minutes trying to build this stuff because you had capita and eds all these giants beginning to build tax payment systems um but what worked for us was the asking people where they want their money spent the public opinion bit uh and so we very quickly pivoted and again entrepreneurs if they're smart they very quickly pivot and don't Exactly.
36:13Sometimes you get so emotionally attached to an idea that you can't see that this thing is just not going to work. We did. We very quickly dropped the tax payment investment, told YFORs, we're really sorry, we can't build this thing for them. But we focused on building a panel that is broadly representative of the adult population. And then the computers will pull a subsample of that that would be much closely representative of the adult population. and then be able to ask them questions and move basically the ability to poll people from telephone or clipboard to online. And that's the story of YouGov.
36:54And the real break we got was when we went to see Stanley Carms, who had obviously... Dixon's? Absolutely right. So PC World Dixon's exactly right. And of course was... Impressed myself. was the the the the then owner of FreeServe because FreeServe was the idea of his uh uh store manager in Manchester a guy called Ajaz Ahmed uh who'd come up with the idea of FreeServe uh and we went to see him and he said you know you've got five minutes you pair of jokers you know to pitch me we pitched him the idea of YouGov being this engine for public opinion 45 minutes later we're still in his office in in Mayfair we must be doing something right um and um He brings Agis up about an hour, 45 minutes into this.
37:43We're now talking terms about how we're going to be the news engine for FreeServe. So when you clicked on news on FreeServe, we went to YouGov servers. And what we did was we built this thing called Interactive News. So we hired young graduates from journalism school 24-7 to cull the news every day, 24-7. But most importantly, every news story had either sort of three or six questions below it that the reader would have to answer to tell us their opinion about the news story. Fascinating. To get people used to interacting with online surveys. And then we thought, how do we broaden the panel? So we hired a bunch of talent for more money.
38:29So it was Faye Weldon, because she had a particular type of readership, who's an author. One John Humphreys. One Boris Johnson. Ian Hargreaves. Peter Kellner. And they had to deliver an article for us each, I think, about on a once-a-month basis. Again, the condition is they have to ask questions of their readers. And that was part of the way we built the panel. for you gov and i guess where the real break came through is when the telegraph and enough uh they had an amazing sophologist uh called professor anthony king and anti king was then using gallop and i think nop as their pollsters for the telegraph and after the general election of 2001 where we demonstrated how accurate this stuff can be he gave us a chance and said look, we won't give you the whole contract, but we're going to contract with you for a survey, maybe once a month, I think it was, at the time.
39:40But once the industry accepted the methodology, then everything else fell into place, i.e. it's a no-brainer. It's faster, deeper, and much, much more affordable to do it online. And so we were the sort of online pioneers. Amazing. What was your biggest challenge building that business? like what was the darkest day the darkest day was oh i know the answer managing boris johnson no uh that that was relatively straightforward yes he uh the first time
40:14but but the toughest challenge was not you know invoicing anyone for about 18 months all right imagine going to work every day and you're just watching these they made no money these pounds just go out the door because all these you know we've got these young journalists working 24 7 um yeah we're trying to run the business we're trying to tell people by the way this stuff look at the data it's amazing and everyone going yeah yeah it really looks interesting um yeah i'll give you a call later we'll still use the the you know mori or someone else or you know can you remember how confident you were that it was going to succeed at the time i was deeply concerned the real confidence came i tell you where the confidence came I talked about the 2001 general election.
40:55So we had this young man called Joe Twyman, who's a friend of Stefan's, who's another great sophologist. And there is an academic study that goes around the world, the democratic world. And in our country, it's called the British Election Study. And there's the American Election Study, Australian Election Study, and so on. And it's done by the sort of the best academics in the world of polling, of sophology. and they do it at every general election that occurs in these democracies and then they write a big paper afterwards and what they do is they commission pollsters to give them their data and you had to provide the raw data not just the the sort of the the models that you predict the outcome with the actual underlying data the raw data beneath it and joe managed to get us a meeting with them uh pre the 2001 election they said this is really interesting what you're doing we want to include you in the british election study um we're doing the face-to-face and and telephone with i think it was icm and um you know one of the other pulses mori or nop or gallop anyway um you'll be the only online guys to do this the condition is you have to give us your raw data because we have to analyze the raw data as well um and by the way we've allocated all the funds to the other uh companies just what every ceo wants to hear it's a big academic right and that's where my sort of my heart fell i'm like i just thought we're going to make some money but you know we were we were drowning then and we were the challenger brand right i thought you know what let's at least go out with a bank how much runway did you have at the time oh next to nothing i mean we were just like you know living so then what happened so how did you so we we kept going um we gave them the raw data um and they wrote the the uh study up and we wiped the floor with the others much more accurate um than the others on the outcome of the 2001 general election and that was our real breakthrough i.e the the academic world then started taking notice of us Anthony King took notice of us to the telegraph management look I'd like to give them a go this is really interesting and we think the world is shifting towards these guys we were so desperate back to that desperation I took um uh you gov uh to ICM Nick Sparrow a good man to be fair to him who was at the time one of our biggest pollsters but telephone based icm research and i said look buy the company for a pound and we'll come and work for you let me show you some of this data yeah right because it's worth saving and um he wrote a letter back to me i should actually try and find it and frame it um saying nadine you know thank you for for coming and i've got huge respect and time for you and stephan and the team and joe twyman um but i put it to my board and we don't think that online online research will ever take you know play a major part in opinion research and just to be clear what was the highest valuation that you guys achieved i think we got to about 1.35 billion yeah amazing just shows the smartest people can be blind to the best opportunities so a minute ago you mentioned uh boris johnson and i think my fun question is what was it like boris johnson working for you what was that experience like incredible talent yeah um you're talking about yourself boris always always he was always yes he always late uh with his filing his piece but when it did come very good it was beautifully constructed beautifully written yeah he's unbelievable words to be fair yeah yeah i mean john humphreys was the opposite yeah beautifully written but always on time you know and super smart because he decided not to take money but to take equity which was a smart move by John Humphreys at the time but no it was an absolute pleasure to build a business and I always say look you've got to get lucky any entrepreneur says to you that they designed everything and everything worked exactly as good as they're either naive or they're lying to you right you need you need you know lady luck to smile on you well let's figure out if you're naive or lying to us then adim what was it like working for boris johnson a a privilege i'll tell you for why yeah um knife when when boris made me the the business minister he gave me a great break because i was in the business department the department i'm probably most comfortable working in because of my background um i we were making preparations for Brexit.
Read the full transcript
45:53I had to sell British Steel because it had collapsed. And looking after everything from nuclear to life science to aero, auto, across the board was an amazing break. He then made me vaccine deployment minister, which was really my big break to demonstrate to the nation and to my colleagues in government that I can actually run things. Promoted me into cabinet as Secretary of State for Education and then made me as Chancellor of the Exchequer. The theme in the book is there are no superhumans in politics, as there are no superhumans in business, right? Everybody makes mistakes as long as you own those mistakes.
46:40With Boris, on vaccine, I can only speak from my own experience, right? You can only judge people. If I was asking about someone you've worked with, you'll say, look, I don't know what they were like working in XYZ company, but when they worked with me, here's what I learned and here's what we did together. And so when he picked up the phone and said, I want you to be my beaver brewer, I want you to run the vaccine, your nation needs you. And I said, Boris, I'll take the job, of course. By the way, I got a text message when I was announced from a very close friend of mine saying, do not take the job, this is a poison chalice, this will ruin you, right?
47:13This will not go well and you will forever be remembered as failing to vaccinate the nation, protect the nation. um i'm glad i did take the job but i had one condition on the phone when he called me and i said boris i will only do this if we have a party at yours no um quite the opposite um i said i'll only do this if i can speak with your authority and he said what does that mean and i said i've got to be able to access you in minutes hours not in days and weeks i'm going to be moving so fast making decisions so fast right to say we were we were locked down right um i need to be able to speak with your authority and therefore get access to you and he was good to his word you know every evening at about 11 o 'clock my phone would go and the primers would be on the phone and we'd run through what we want to do the next day in the meeting with the team um what i needed from him and he was good to his word absolutely brilliant decision making when uh we were faced with war on our continent right i was in the cabinet sitting you know two seats away from him when we We had the military briefing that Wladimir Zelensky would have at best a fortnight, at worth three days, and he'd be dead because Putin was going to roll him, according to all the analysis that we had done and intelligence that we had.
48:31And Boris banged the table and said, we put everything in now. It doesn't matter if the guy's got three days and we've got to take carcass out of the country, but we're going to try everything we can to stop Putin from this aggression. it's why i say he's the most consequential prime minister of his generation so yeah on a sort of serious point you can only judge people of the way they they responded to you when you work with them and when you you know would would make the call to say i need this decision made he made those brave decisions and i think that's that history will judge him well on those things what's it been like working for so many like prime ministers like just the revolving door you know just never seen anything like it yeah i i languished on the back so in the mark so for the first i think seven or eight years of my career i never got promoted all of my friends but all of my intake it's a bit like uni right coming together people like sajid javid and others right priti patel they all sort of went straight through you know pps junior ministerial role you know minister of state into cabinet and i'm sitting there going what have i done wrong here right uh and i i couldn't get promoted and then can i just ask do you think a part of that was your success and like and well so actually what was interesting was sad said to me because he's successful and is wealthy he said not him you know because he worked at deutsche big big institution before entering politics he said you've got to get better at managing up and he was right because i'd always been an entrepreneur i've been a ceo right and and i managed other people and they sort of managed up towards me right uh and i think i built teams really well um and i just i guess i just felt that in politics if i apply the same principles as in business i do my job well you know build a small team that that really looks after my constituents really really well right and then demonstrate that i can do well on things like the business committee where i interrogate paula vennells over the post office stuff um then people will notice right and they'll say right let's give him a chance but it doesn't work that way you had to sort of almost find a a patron uh uh sajid attached himself to george osborne very quickly uh and then that you know helped him rise through the ranks and i guess sometimes if you haven't worked for a very large organization um it's more challenging do you think part of your ability to therefore finally get that break actually was a coincidence that you'd worked with boris in the past possibly yeah uh and i think he's at least able to see through the fact that the narrative of well if you're wealthy it's difficult it's like you need the best man for the job and i've got good experience working with you so i think i think it was i was told that it was um uh his then chief of staff um uh who said to him actually i think the best person to do this job would be Nadine because we need someone with business experience that can sort of try and really take this vaccine deployment program and pull it together because what we had to do was pull the supply chain side and the deployment.
51:49So make sure that we're getting vaccines in on time. We had Pfizer and, of course, AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca was 80 % being manufactured in the UK. Pfizer, we were relying on manufacturing in Belgium. And then we had to make sure, as any business would, right, you've got to work out that your constraint is supply in this case. If we had no constraint on supply, I'd build a much bigger infrastructure on the deployment side. But it didn't... there was no point you know building an even bigger infrastructure if i don't have the the supply so um um yeah i mean that was my big break can you tell us a little bit about the first 24 hours of covid what was that like because obviously we all saw it from our homes and the chaos but being on the inside what was that actually like and i talk a little bit about that in the book um so i was then the junior minister in in the business department yeah and I was pulled into a COBRA meeting, which was going to be a run-through of how the nation would and what we would need to do.
53:09Are you feeling excited or fearful in this moment? At this moment, I was almost, before entering the Cobra, I really was just doing my job. It was one of several things I had to do that day. And it just said, you know, we're going to do a run through of what would happen in the case of, it was an influenza virus in this case. and so I walked in as the representative of the business energy and industrial strategy department and other ministers were in the room and we was led by Matt Hancock and by Simon Stevens who was chief executive of the NHS and Chris Whitty and the moment we went live you had to sort of stop anything to do with the real world and pretend that actually we are now in the world of a virus that has taken over the country and is spreading and killing people and that we're, you know, the estimates are there'll be half a million people dead and, you know, having to sort of think about, okay, who makes a decision as to who to treat in hospital?
54:23And we very quickly decided that it would be the clinicians who would have to, it can't be a politician making those trade-offs. You know, what do we do about morgues? Do we build morgues in Hyde Park and the other parks? It was that sort of thing. what do you do about nuclear facilities in my case as the energy minister um you know what do you do about um the markets do you shut down the markets you know it was literally having to go through um what each department would do you know same for the minister of transport minister of defense and so on um and you know i walked out out of that meeting thinking god you know i wish this would never happen.
55:02Little did I know that actually the Department of Health was already had an earlier... Already briefed. Several meetings. Was that terrified? So the next meeting was when we had to make the decision on the first lockdown. And I remember walking out of 70 Whitehall and heading towards Parliament Square and just looking around me. I don't know whether you guys remember, there was a sort of series called The Day of the Triffids until many, many, many decades ago. You won't remember it. Anyway. My dad made me watch that. Right. Yeah. Anyway, I was literally just looking around and I called my wife to say, you know, we're about to lock the nation down.
55:55And I was looking at thousands of people, right? Walking into, down the steps into Westminster tube station. And that is when I was really frightened. I thought, how are we going to tell these people, right? In the next 24 hours, we're going to change their life completely. And the other bit was no one really knew whether we'd all survive, right? I mean, you then start thinking about your family, your kids, what's going to happen next? Are we all going to, you know, will aliens come into this place and think, well, this is how they lived until the pandemic hit? Today were the really frightening moments.
56:46The other moment was when I was made vaccine minister. Yeah. where I was one of the few people, obviously, who could travel around the country, because I had to... So I turned my ground floor in my home as my office. And then, you know, I had to go to, obviously, NHS headquarters, number 10, Department of Health. And I walked down Piccadilly one evening and, you know, heading to one of the meetings in Whitehall. and there was no one there. I literally, I walked in the middle of the road, right, and there wasn't even a police car. You're ghost town. Everything was boarded up. Like from a movie, 28 days later.
57:30Oh, 28 days, I was about to say, 28 days. I was looking around thinking, you know, is this the end? Yeah. Right? Is this where, as I say, a new life form will come down and go, actually, this is where they lived. Can I ask, you mentioned about, you know, risks and being a founder and CEO, decisions and how you make decisions. That is the most critical part. And like you said earlier, don't mess around with the small ones, the noise, figure out the really important key ones. And I suppose also the hierarchy of how those decisions are made. In a room like you were in, that you just described, where you have to make a decision about we're going to do a lockdown.
58:13Can you just explain to us, how does a decision like that get made? Is it Boris up? Are you taking a vote together? Is everyone pitching in? Is there time for that? Like, I'd love to literally know, you know, we've got boardroom experience. But what is the experience of that? An actual decision affects the entire country. How is it made and how quickly? The important bits of government is we can pull in experts and data. And everybody's view around the table was we have to listen to Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer. and they present first and then the virologists will talk to us about what they think they know about the virus from their opposite numbers in China and in Europe.
59:04And we then question the data, question the presentation and then come to a decision at the end which usually the Prime Minister or the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, so who runs the Cabinet Office, I was CDL for a while under Liz, might chair this. So I chaired all the Cobra meetings, bar the first one, for the funeral for Her Majesty. So we'd have a Cobra meeting every afternoon with every Cabinet Minister around the table, and we'd go through. It was like organising the Olympics in 11 days, basically. That's crazy. And then you'd make a decision. You say, look, the first lockdown, whether actually in many ways, probably the easiest decision because no one knew how lethal this virus is.
59:53And this is risk reward. And we had no vaccine and no protection against it. And therefore it would be completely irresponsible to just say, hey, let's do nothing on this and see where we land. and then you know once we got to a place where you know we knew a little bit more about it the biggest concern or the determinant of decision is at which point does the NHS break right and one of the things you have to sort of worry about is okay if we don't try and slow it down, will the NHS break? And then obviously cause many more deaths. But then as we got into our stride and scaled the vaccination program, certainly for me, it became an easy decision to push back and say, we don't need another lockdown.
1:00:53Because if you look at all the real world outcomes versus the modeling at every stage from the beginning of the of the pandemic actually where the real world outcome ended up was in the most optimistic part of the model rather than the most pessimistic and therefore now that we've vaccinated the nation pretty much uh and people have have obviously been infected um uh uh naturally um we didn't need to go uh any harder because actually if you believe the models, right, why should the next model be much worse than the ones in terms of real world outcome? But coming back to the question in the room, is it Chris Whitty?
1:01:34Is it Boris? No, no, it goes back to the prime minister or to the lead minister in the room who will then say, look, obviously now we've heard from everyone. Here's the recommendation. So what happens is the civil service do a lot of work beforehand. So you've got a lot of papers in front of you with different options, and then you debate those options, and then you arrive at an outcome as to which option you're all comfortable going with. What did you guys think of Sweden and their policy? Like it's just the opposite approach. It's fascinating, right? So yeah, and actually if you look at what happened with Omicron, right, where when we took the decision not to lock down and say actually we're going to warn people to be careful uh in terms of visiting elderly during the holiday period and so on um people then self-regulated plus we had the confidence that uh the vaccine program has pretty much delivered what it needs to deliver um and back to what i was just saying to you my argument in cabinet for that particular is to say actually if you look at the modeling versus real world outcomes, at every stage historically, right, we've come out of the most optimistic range of the model.
1:02:53And therefore, why should it be any different this time? And therefore, if the energy is not going to break and we are the most optimistic end of the model for Omicron, yes, it's more infectious, but it's much less lethal, then we shouldn't lock down. Obviously, I think in hindsight, there are so many mistakes or things people would have done differently. but I think from a perception point of view, the number 10 parties and the Matt Hancock story as a whole, I think will probably go down as two things that damaged public perception of government. I think that's right. And politics probably for generations.
1:03:30What's your take on those two things? How much was that in the wrong, I suppose? I think that's right. i think look um no doubt the the what took place in number 10 was wrong um you know was it a good party though what's that was it a good party i was never at any of those uh events interesting enough by the way none of my team uh was it such commas that i copied anyone anyway any of those And actually, you know, it was painful for the team, for the vaccine deployment team, for the vaccine procurement team. Well, that's probably it, right? You probably feel like your reputation is damaged. And we were working in 15, 19-hour days.
1:04:19And you did the good part that everyone respected. And we did the good part. And you sort of think, how can this happen? And so that was, I think, deeply damaging. I think the issue around the perception around PPE I don't think people like Matt Hancock were in any way meaning for it to go wrong but I think the perception of abuse because of the lack of controls around the procurement because of what I said to you we should have brought in they did later on by the way I remember they brought in Lord Dayton who then onshored a lot of the vaccine, a lot of the PPE production in a really professional way.
1:05:04And it tells you everything about if there's a lesson to learn, and it's in the book, is the more we can work together, private and public sector, we can do great things. And cross-party. And cross-party. If we take away some of the sort of Yabu politics, right? I remember very early on, Kate Bingham was really hurt. She was very close to me, right? a close friend her husband is a close friend and she's in the middle of trying to work out right how to uh your due diligence these teams get the right contracts in place quickly right and she was like six months ahead of europe by the way you know we signed up and they hadn't even begun negotiating in europe um with with with what ended up to be the most successful teams in in vaccine manufacturing in the middle of all this she's being attacked uh by the labor party you know at the dispatch box uh because oh you know where does this you know woman come from and you know she must be a crony because her husband is jesse norman is a member of parliament she's doing it for free right she was giving her time and effort you know 90 hour days for her country and she was being attacked and briefed against um somebody was coming internally as well uh that oh she'd hired a PR person to try and communicate actually how she's doing her job in terms of optioning which vaccine to go with.
1:06:29That, I think, was probably the worst bits of the crisis, the challenge for the country. The best bits, by the way, is I decided when I became vaccine minister to brief mps every friday right on zoom and in the first few weeks smart business thing right we had we had 600 mps on the call yeah and i would open by saying i'm going to share data with you that will be public probably in the next 24 48 hours but at the moment it's private and i've got with me two leaders from the nhs um who can answer your questions right and from vaccine deployment and we would answer all their questions why because one i they're my conduit to the nation right they are the representatives of their constituents right and they will go out and hopefully take the message that we we knew what we're doing we've got a plan they can ask any question how we're prioritizing who gets the vaccine first you know how we're allocating vaccine stocks around the country all of that and and no one played games yeah literally everybody behaved well no one tried to brief or leak or do anything bad you've like you've talked so well about your business success and having failures.
1:07:46And the YouGov story, obviously, as well. It's like this, right? It's waves. It's like sometimes it's incredible and then there's troughs and all of the things because you're a normal entrepreneur and that's the game. Right now, you've led the Conservative Party for a long time. You were there from junior to chairman, right? So they've done all the roles. Back to foot soldier. Exactly, back to foot soldier. And right now, it's fair to say it's at a real low point right like reform is killing it compared to the tories and it feels like most centrist ish people who would have normally voted tory are voting reform it's a real shift it feels that way anyway um and the polls are saying true so that's obviously your area of expertise knowing what you know in business how where do the tories go from here how do they turn this around how do they turn this trough into the next opportunity and save the party so the first thing you got to do is learn from your mistakes right if you remember at the end of the last government we got to such a painful bizarre place where some of my colleagues would go on television and be proud to talk about you know the five families meeting in a smoke-filled room at midnight i exaggerate to make a point but just imagine what your listeners what tv viewers would be thinking when they're just trying to pay the mortgage for that month or their their bills or you know make sure their kids are safe you know and doing well at school when they see their governing party right the party that has governed this country for 80 of the last century last hundred years right talk about itself as if it's an episode of sopranos right we started we formed a circular firing squad right you know the footballing and analogy works here i.e and people say to me about the book you know why did you back boris on this i just think politics is a team game right when you put the jersey on you got to do your best on the pitch right now there may be problems in the dressing room there may be issues but you don't take them out in public so the first thing we've got to do is unite right and i'm looking for the candidate that can demonstrate to me how they can unite the party because if we don't far more disciplined parties than ours will fill that void right you're seeing it in germany with the afd and others right labor i think are making mistakes disappointingly i think you know walking away from a deterrent against the illegal crossings, right?
1:10:28Legal migration we can talk about, and I think we need to have almost a cross party, a bit like what we did on vaccine, debate as to what level of migration do we want? Who do we want to allow to come to our shores legally, but also have some safe routes for asylum seekers, people who flee persecution like my family did. But before we do any of that, we've got to be disciplined and come back together and demonstrate to the nation that we're serious about governing. We became completely unserious at the end, and the nation was right to punish us for that. And I think Rishi clearly got to a stage where he realised, my view, is that this party is becoming ungovernable, and he had to go to the country.
1:11:13It felt like kamikaze moved, didn't it? Knowledgeably. What do you think of Nigel Farage at the moment? like what's your view of the movement that they have so so i think look um what nigel farage and reform are tapping into by the way talk about consequential politicians like him or not he'd be off that he'd be up there competing i don't disagree with you i don't disagree with you and um they're tapping into a deep frustration and people say to me you talk about um refugees and and immigrants and that we should you know when we get into the back of an uber or see people who were sort of you know polishing the the the wards in our hospitals um just remember that they they probably you know fled lives that are probably much better than what they're having to put up with uh now to get um to make ends meet uh but i think even immigrant families uh are upset by the queue jumping or people who are perceived to be breaking the law to come to these shores, also putting their lives at risk, right?
1:12:21And these gangs making money out of these crossings. Now, if you look at that, that's about 40 ,000 of the net migration numbers. The big number is the legal migration, which is running at about 700 ,000 a year at the moment, right? Which is like 10x over a decade or something, right? It's just unsustainable. Right, and can our public services really sustain that level of migration. We need to have a debate about this, right? We need, I quite like the idea that Robert Jenrick is saying, look, let's have a parliamentary vote as to, you know, what quotas of migration do we think we need and why?
1:13:03And this is the sort of smart stuff that, you know, Singapore and the UAE and other guys are doing is working out actually how do we attract the best talent and of course have safe and legal routes for those fleeing persecution because what what we seem to be doing at the moment is we are importing low-skilled labor right which on the face of it looks like it's driving gdp growth but actually when you look at gdp per capita it's doing the opposite right it's making us poorer not richer and we are exporting talent right i think we're second only to china of losing before losing millionaires on a gdb basis or per capita basis rather we're number one we're over china so so so my fear right and i know look some people listening to this or you know some people attack me on social media will say of course you know your wealth is not the only proxy for talent right but it's a pretty good one right in terms of wealth creation right we need to be a country that aspires for that that's where the us really gets it and the uk doesn't we criticize the idea of accumulating wealth but if you accumulate wealth you can distribute the wealth as well and you can help society and be a philanthropist and all the great things that people quite often do in good western societies put this man in parliament it's so frustrating maybe that's maybe that's what we'll do next yeah it's so frustrating that's our official get out yeah madim yeah it's been an absolute pleasure thank you so much for coming in and talking to us for helping us solve the world's problems together thank you very much genuinely
From the publisher
Nadhim Zahawi uncovers the secrets of working in government as he gives his hot take on Boris Johnson, the pandemic, and his feelings about the Partygate and Matt Hancock scandal!
He also dives into the challenges of navigating Covid-19, sharing candid insights about the highs and lows of decision-making in a crisis.
Zahawi reveals how his experience building a billion-dollar company played a crucial role in scaling the successful vaccine rollout. If you're curious about leadership, resilience, and the inside scoop on government during one of the toughest times in history, this episode is a must-watch!
________________
Sign up to Wise Business banking:
https://wise.com/gb/business/?utm_sou...
Thanks to HP our sponsor for this episode. For 10% off the HP Omnibook UltraFlip with built-in AI, use code 'HPLOVEWORK'.
Valid until 31st January 2025, UK only. T&Cs apply. https://bit.ly/HPOmnibook-SLQ424
Join Vanta and recieve $1000 off:
http://vanta.com/secretleaders



