#268 Thordur Arnason on Why Capgemini Is Building an AI Speech Translator

5 Nov 2025 · 33 min · 13 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Capgemini Invent’s shift from consulting time-selling to productizing AI, focused on BabelSpeak (BabbleSpeak) speech-to-speech translation, plus discussion of “agentic AI,” sovereign AI hosting, EU AI Act/regulation, and AI infrastructure investment.

Guest

Thordur Arnason (spelled Tordor/Thordur in transcript), global AI go-to-market lead at Capgemini Invent. Background in software engineering, then management/executive roles in consulting; led Frog (Capgemini design agency) in the Nordics; focused on AI since 2022. Helped build AI Futures Lab work on multimodality.

Key claims

Real-time voice-to-voice translation is feasible using FAIR’s Seamless M4T and engineering to cut latency to <300ms. Moats: hardcore real-time pipeline engineering and “sovereign” deployment. BabelSpeak is a tool for agents. Agentic AI = perceive/reason/act systems; multi-agent systems will automate manual work as capabilities rise and costs fall.

Notable examples

DNB Bank pilot for Ukrainian refugees (voice-to-voice via mobile/web app); pilots with Norwegian Red Cross and Norwegian Police for ad hoc translation needs. Hosting via Telenor’s sovereign AI factory; NVIDIA partnership for GPUs and software stack (Riva suite exploration).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Tordor Arnason's Background

0:45 to 1:54

Tordor shares his journey in tech leadership and his role at Capgemini.

“and consulting company with what Tordor just told me, over 400 ,000 employees globally.”

Capgemini's Business Model

1:54 to 3:05

Discussion on Capgemini's consulting model and the shift towards AI products.

“Well, in brief, out of uni, I was trained in software engineering and started my career precisely there, doing coding for a living, which was fun until I got promoted into management after about two years.”

Inception of BobbleSpeak

3:05 to 4:52

Exploration of how BobbleSpeak was conceived from AI research.

“Well, you know, in these big corp things, it's a funny story.”

Motivation Behind BobbleSpeak

4:52 to 7:12

Understanding the reason for launching a speech translation product.

“So voice as a modality that only two years ago was not that great.”

Initial Pilots with Clients

7:12 to 10:04

Tordor discusses pilot projects with DNB, Red Cross, and Norwegian Police.

“You came across this, you thought, well, what are we going to do with this?”

Collaboration with NVIDIA and Telenor

10:04 to 12:48

Details on partnerships with NVIDIA and Telenor for BabelSpeak's development.

“didn't speak Norwegian, and many of them didn't speak English.”

BobbleSpeak's Technical Foundation

12:48 to 14:01

Discussion on the technical aspects and security measures for BobbleSpeak.

“Yes, so we will never be able to compete, nor do we want to compete with services like Google Translate.”

AI Translation Technology and Infrastructure

14:01 to 18:09

Explore the advancements in AI translation technology and the infrastructure supporting it.

“to worry about GDPR, you don't have to worry about security because it's running in a critical infrastructure data center.”

The Future of Agentic AI Systems

18:10 to 23:10

Learn about agentic AI systems and their potential to automate complex tasks.

“Jensen, I think, of course, he said something like, every country needs to control the production of their own intelligence, which is interestingly put.”

No-Code Agentic Tools and Client Needs

23:11 to 25:48

Understand the development of no-code tools for agentic AI and their applications.

“in a potential chain of agents in a workflow or not?”
Show all 13 chapters

Regulatory Landscape for AI in Global Markets

25:49 to 28:00

Discuss the complexities of AI regulations across different regions and industries.

“Obviously, there's huge debates around US versus EU versus Asia, I guess mostly China.”

AI Investment and Market Dynamics

28:00 to 31:33

Explore the challenges and opportunities in AI investment and market predictions.

“SME might be a little harder, but that's why people come to you, right?”

Future of Capgemini and Language Tools

31:33 to 32:13

Learn about Capgemini's ongoing development of language tools under Babelspeak.

“So final question, what's next for Capgemini Invent?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Thordur Arnason:Predominantly, Capgemini runs on a consulting model, meaning that we sell time for money, basically. So we normally don't build products that much. We normally don't do big ventures into other models. But this is shifting gradually now that AI is turning most things upside down.

0:25All right.

0:25SlatorPod:Welcome back to SlatorPod. But today on the podcast, we welcome Tordor Arneson. Tordor is the global AI go-to-market lead at Capgemini Invent. And Capgemini Invent is the digital transformation, digital innovation, and consulting arm of Capgemini. And Capgemini is a small French-based multinational tech services and consulting company with what Tordor just told me, over 400 ,000 employees globally. and Tortor recently launched an AI speech-to-speech translation product called BobbleSpeak and that really put them on our radar. So we wanted to know why a consulting company would launch a Language AI product and ask Tortor to tell us more on the podcast today.

1:08SlatorPod:So thanks so much for joining. Thank you for having me. So where in the world are you recording this from today? What part?

1:16Thordur Arnason:So this morning I'm sitting an hour north of Oslo in Norway at an old farm near the biggest lake in Norway with beautiful views and weather outside. So that is my safe space.

1:29SlatorPod:Safe space. And the sun has already risen at 9 a.m. or you're still waiting for it? No, we have sunlight. So that's good. All right. Yeah. Spent some time in Norway and I remember those dark mornings and early evenings. So in the winter. All right. So tell us a bit about your professional background in tech leadership and your professional journey so far with Capgemini.

1:54Thordur Arnason:Well, in brief, out of uni, I was trained in software engineering and started my career precisely there, doing coding for a living, which was fun until I got promoted into management after about two years. And ever since then, we're talking about the late 90s here, just to give you context. I've been mostly in management and executive roles in the consulting industry, but also some years in what you would call the more creative consulting setups like design and experience firms. Been with Capgemini for about eight years. I led the Nordic part of Frog, that is the design agency of Capgemini. But now, since 22, I've been focusing solely on AI, and that's why I'm the lead on go-to-market and AI.

2:52SlatorPod:Just on a bit of a tangent, Frog was a big client in my pre-Slater days for my previous company. So when did Frog become part of Capgemini? Is that a long time ago?

3:05Thordur Arnason:Well, you know, in these big corp things, it's a funny story. Sorry. So Capgemini acquired a consulting firm called Altran a few years back that previously had acquired Frog. So Frog was kind of in the portfolio that got acquired by Capgemini.

3:25SlatorPod:Huh. Interesting. Just side note, they were working on Singapore Airlines kind of website redesign like in the early 2010s and we were part of that. So yeah, very impressive company, Very interesting. All right. So, but tell us just for the listeners who may not be familiar with kind of Keptgemini's just general business model, tell us a bit more about that. And then, yeah, we want to segue into the Baublespeak launch that you announced a couple of weeks ago.

3:52Thordur Arnason:Predominantly Keptgemini runs on a consulting model, meaning that we sell time for money, basically. So we normally don't build products that much. We normally don't do big ventures into other models, but this is shifting gradually now that AI is turning most things upside down.

4:15SlatorPod:That's what kind of turned my head. So I'm glad that I wasn't totally off, right? So yeah, you sell hours for money, but typically you don't build products. So what triggered you to launch a kind of standalone language AI product? and tell us more about the product in general.

4:34Thordur Arnason:A little more than two years ago, I also had a role in something called the AI Futures Lab in Capgemini, looking at emerging technologies within the AI field, new models, all that fun stuff going on. And we were doing some research on what we now call multimodality. modality. So voice as a modality that only two years ago was not that great. But at the time doing research we came across a new model from FAIR that so that is Mera's now canned research arm in AI, they released a model called Seamless M4T. And Seamless M4T showed us that doing near real-time translation with voice as a modality would be possible in a near future.

5:32Thordur Arnason:So that started it. And me being an old sci-fi fan immediately thought about the beautiful concept of the Babelfish from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. If you're not familiar with it, it's basically a small fish you put in your air, and once it's in your air, you will understand not every language spoken on Earth, but in the universe. So we took that as an inspiration, and that's why the solution is called Babel Speak, a little homage to Douglas Adams there. And we started building based on the work that FAIR had done and also combining other models and engineering we had done into an early proof of concept of near real-time voice-to-voice translation.

6:24SlatorPod:So what's kind of the motivation for this? Is it more of a kind of a tactical show of product capability? Is it a bit of a long-term vision for Capgemini? Is it something you're looking to monetize aggressively? Well, it started out in the lab.

6:40Thordur Arnason:And the lab has primarily not a commercial focus, but it has an exploration focus. So in the labs we run around the world, they explore new things. And sometimes we come across models or systems or technology that shows promise. And we then lift them out of the lab and start thinking about how we can potentially commercialize this. and that is the story of BabelSpeak as well.

7:09SlatorPod:And you chose like speech translation specifically because of that fair model. So that was the story, right? You came across this, you thought, well, what are we going to do with this? And then you chose that particular use case, right? It wasn't like you had the use case in mind and then looked for ways to solve it.

7:27Thordur Arnason:No, so back two years ago, we were doing a lot of experimentation on translation, but with text as modality. So, you know, the normal LLM kind of things you do. And even back then, though it seems like forever in this space, we were doing pretty accurate translation across dozens, 50 plus languages that were fully usable to be used in client projects. So LLMs and text as a modality seemed like not a topic for the lab to explore. So we shifted to the hard one, which was voice at the time. So that was the reason for us trying to solve something that wasn't solved before.

8:14SlatorPod:And you chose, in essence, like a horizontal use case. It's quite broad, rather than maybe like a domain-specific AI product. Why is that?

8:24Thordur Arnason:Language in itself and the abilities of degenerative AI models on manipulating working with languages is per definition a horizontal. This is something that is relevant everywhere in every industry, in every aspect of both professional but life itself. So in its nature, it's a vertical thing to think about. So we quickly discovered that the unmet need of being understood is tremendous. So we have translation services, we have professional services, You have your Google Translates and all that stuff. But still, there are big gaps in providing reliable and safe translation services across a bunch of industries.

9:14SlatorPod:And so when we did the research, I think you already ran some pilot projects with organizations like the DNB Bank, Norwegian Red Cross, Norwegian Police. Tell us a bit more about those initial pilots, what they involved, outcomes.

9:28Thordur Arnason:Yeah, so once we took our research out of the lab, we went looking for a client to do a proof of concept with them on a real-world scenario. And at the time, I had discussions with DNB, largest bank in Norway, on a very specific use case. Back two years ago, we got a lot of Ukrainian refugees coming to Norway, as we all did in Europe. And the bank had a very specific problem. Quite a few of these refugees, they needed banking, but they didn't speak, for sure, didn't speak Norwegian, and many of them didn't speak English. And none of the bank employees understood Ukrainian. So you had a group of people, refugees, with an acute need of being integrated into society and we couldn't understand each other.

10:21Thordur Arnason:And of course with the influx of refugees from a specific area, the capacity of translation was absolutely non-existent. It was overbooked like months and almost half a year in advance. So we didn't have enough translators to solve the actual problem on the ground. So we shaped a very distinct use case for the bank, making bank employees and Ukrainian-speaking potential customers understand each other, voice-to-voice. That's it. And we built that.

10:58SlatorPod:And the platform was just an iPhone or a mobile?

11:00Thordur Arnason:The platform was both on mobile, but also on your laptop. So the rep from the bank would typically then either put his or her phone on the table or use his or her laptop. And we ran this as a web app to make it flexible.

11:19SlatorPod:And I guess the Red Cross and Norwegian police would have been the same case?

11:25Thordur Arnason:So this, with the DMV, that was a very narrow case. With the Red Cross on intention, we went to them and started to collaborate with them on this half a year later, because they had multiple needs in multiple domains and situations and contexts. It's a way more complex set of use cases. And we wanted to work with the Red Cross because they are heavily exposed to situations where translation services are needed ad hoc, where you can't wait, there are acute situations, and that was a good fit for this technology. So we've been working with them since the beginning of 25, so almost a year now, and are going to run a pilot with them towards next summer because it takes time to learn in this space.

12:15Thordur Arnason:The police, about the same thing, a little less complicated because we had distinct use cases, border control, in jails, stuff like that where we could shape the use cases a bit more. But same story, needed to expose the technology to real world use cases.

12:36SlatorPod:Got it. And you also said, when we spoke to you for our coverage on our website, you said that it was developed in partnership with NVIDIA and Telenor. So tell us more, like, so NVIDIA for obviously kind of the underlying tech and Telenor as the channel or? I need to do a bit of explaining. Please do. Yes.

12:57Thordur Arnason:Yes, so we will never be able to compete, nor do we want to compete with services like Google Translate. Obviously, they and their competition have that space. What we shaped BabelSpeak to be is something that runs in as secure an environment as possible. meaning that we needed to find a place to run the service from that was sovereign and secure and that's where Telenor came into the picture because at the time we were also helping them build the first so-called sovereign AI factory in the Nordics and that was the perfect place to run Babel Speak because doing that we could guarantee, like the police, like the Red Cross, like a lot of entities in the public sector, other sensitive industries, we could guarantee that we own the pipeline, we have full control, it's sovereign on Norwegian soil, you don't have to worry about GDPR, you don't have to worry about security because it's running in a critical infrastructure data center.

14:09Thordur Arnason:And all these normal worries you have when you want to use services like this in sensitive situations, we took away by putting it there.

14:21SlatorPod:That makes a lot of sense. I was wrong with the channel. So it was basically, yeah, I mean, the hosting, the actually underlying... Yes. Got it. Got it.

14:29Thordur Arnason:And NVIDIA, obviously, are other GPUs that this runs on. in the AI factory, but we're also working with NVIDIA on the software stack side. So we are exploring their models because they also have translation models. The Riva suite is pretty good. So we are continuously exploring together with NVIDIA how we can use parts of their stack in our service.

14:57SlatorPod:All right, I want to get back to Bobble Speaker, but I want to run something by you that I saw on Twitter slash X literally a couple of days ago. and I want to get your thoughts on it. So there was a post and I hope it was real, but one of the major consulting firms said they advised an investor on due diligence for an AI startup. And the consulting firm says they were able to build a prototype of that startup's product within like two weeks that was better than the original product. So naturally the client of the consulting firm, the investor, didn't end up investing. Is this something that has ever crossed your desk?

15:33SlatorPod:where you're looking at something as part of a consulting engagement, say, well, that's quite easy to do. We could do this in like a week or two. Yeah.

15:42Thordur Arnason:This is what we're in the middle of right now. This is quite dramatic. And no, it's not just someone bragging on X. It is a real thing. So listen, I'm a senior, quite old VP, Jude, with engineering degree from the 90s. I am building products as a side gig to show to my clients now. I'm doing stuff in five days that would, two years ago, would take me and a team three months to do. This is what's happening right now. And that is both very cool and very scary at the same time.

16:24SlatorPod:Where's the moat then for something like kind of a B2B or B2 government speech translation product? Where do you think is a moat? I mean, you mentioned the sovereign aspect. Maybe there's, obviously there's some quality issues, language coverage issues, but do you see any other moats that would be like long-term defensible there?

16:45Thordur Arnason:Long-term, I don't know, but at least for now, our moat is all the engineering effort we put into this pipeline, making it real-time, because that wasn't easy. It wasn't easy back then. It wasn't easy this year either. So we have been able to work down the latency. So the time it takes from me to speak to you to hear from three seconds to less than 300 milliseconds by hard engineering work together with NVIDIA. So optimizing a product like that takes a lot of effort. And the changes we are seeing now in tooling and what people can and cannot do does not affect that because this is hardcore engineering.

17:30Thordur Arnason:That's one moat. The second one is the sovereign play, obviously.

17:34SlatorPod:And when you go with the sovereign play, like are these, let's talk about maybe Europe, are the Telenors, the Swisscoms, the Deutsche Telekoms, would those be kind of the preferred partners for something like this in Europe?

Read the full transcript

17:47Thordur Arnason:In a way, we have shaped Babelspeak. this needs to run in places like that, yes. And in the coming months and next year, you will see the sovereign compute factories pop up everywhere in Europe. There is a drive to increase the capability of running your own intelligence production in a sovereign fashion. Jensen, I think, of course, he said something like, every country needs to control the production of their own intelligence, which is interestingly put. But what it means is, buy my GPUs.

18:28SlatorPod:Sure, as long as he delivers the brain cells, right? Exactly.

18:33Thordur Arnason:But, you know, in a geopolitical situation like we are now in 25, this has gone from being interesting to quite acute. And that is why you're seeing a lot of these initiatives across Europe. We need to regain more control over increasingly critical systems that we are running in these facilities and factories. This is not for fun anymore. This is what holds society together.

19:04SlatorPod:And you being Norway, do you think it's easier for a country like Norway where I guess energy is abundant and easily accessible as opposed to maybe some of the more central European countries where it's a little harder?

19:18Thordur Arnason:So the interesting thing with Norway is that it's the luckiest little country I ever saw. You have the hydropower, you have the oil and gas, you have the nature. that everything is working in favor of Norway in this situation right now. We have abundance of energy, or debatable, but plenty of energy to do like we're doing in Norway right now in the north. We're building a giga AI factory, a joint venture with OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Norwegian industry to power a lot of the intelligence needed for the European market. because it makes sense to put it there. Up north, we have energy. It's cold, so cooling needs are reduced.

20:04Thordur Arnason:As long as we have the infrastructure ready, this is where you should build these data centers.

20:09SlatorPod:We should put some of that in the Swiss mountains as well, maybe like 2 ,000, 3 ,000 meters. There you go. Yeah, yeah, why not? That would take some visionary thinking, which we're not exactly known for.

20:23SlatorPod:So you also wrote about agentic AI multi-agent systems. So I want to know from you, like, how do you define agentic AI? I've been struggling with this and we've even had panels about it. I've tried to really understand it and why kind of, is it the next big thing or is it just a 2025 thing that's, you know, going to move away slightly in 2026?

20:43Thordur Arnason:Let's unpack this a bit. So an AI agent in itself is a system that can perceive, reason, and take action. Quite simply. You have to be able to read externally something in. You have to understand what you caught into the system, and then you reason on it. You plan for action, and then you take action. If you do that as a system, you're an AI agent. If you don't, you're marketing. And then when you put these AI agents together in concert to do more complicated tasks than what one AI agent can do on its own, you get agentic. You get multi-agent systems. And in what I'm saying here is the promise of automating a lot of things that is done manually by humans right now.

21:41Thordur Arnason:That is why everyone's talking about it and everyone is calling their whatever it is agentic. Because it's a play for a promise of lowering costs. Predominantly. The reality though, and this is where it gets interesting, is that right now in late 2025, most of these things we want agentic to do, they can't. Yet. But they will. Because if you look at the development in AI over the last three years, I call it the Sullyman curve. We have not an exponential, but a very sharp curve of rising capabilities and at the same time falling costs. meaning every month that passes I can do more with these models and systems for less investment.

22:43Thordur Arnason:And this has been in place since 22 and it's still working. So if I look into 26, 27, 28, I know that these agentic systems will gradually and slowly be able to do more and more of the manual human work done today, beginning in the mundane and simple end, but creeping upwards. Would you see Babelspeak as like one agent

23:13SlatorPod:in a potential chain of agents in a workflow or not?

23:18Thordur Arnason:I see Babelspeak as a capability, as a tool for agents. Got it. So agents, they need tools to do actions. And one tool could be the ability to do real-time voice-to-voice translations. We can equip any agent, any agentic system with the capability of BabelSpeak.

23:37SlatorPod:And then if you string some of these capabilities together, I guess the challenge is then if one of them fails, I guess the error would compound throughout the workflow. That's why we maybe need a couple more years.

23:49Thordur Arnason:That is why it's so hard because we have this, as you well put, it's the compounding problem. And we have drifting as a problem because we're using LLMs to power the brains, so to speak, in the agents. Those are probabilistic by nature and will always be. So you can get system drift. If one agent goes a little bit off script, this will then amplify throughout your chain, rendering what you're trying to do unusable.

24:21SlatorPod:I think we also read that you launched a no-code agentic self-service tool at Capgemini? Is this, again, like, is it the product that you want to display your capabilities? Is it an actual thing that a lot of clients would be using? What are your plans for this?

24:39Thordur Arnason:Kind of the same story. It started as a lab experiment late last year, because what the problem we were trying to solve there is, how can we get people that are not heavily technical on board here? How can they start experimenting with AI agents and agentic as a technology? That was the starting point. So we actually built what we call the agentic word bench as an educational tool internally for upskilling our own people and ourselves in the process. It developed then into something that we are now seeing that our clients also need. So it went from an educational tool based on an experiment to something we bring to our clients as a potential capability for them to have in their organizations.

25:32Thordur Arnason:Meaning that you don't have to have any technical background to design agents and agentic systems and run them in a sandbox ready for production. So safe play with agentic.

25:47SlatorPod:I want to talk to you about regulatory as well. Obviously, there's huge debates around US versus EU versus Asia, I guess mostly China. And what would you alluded to before with sovereign? I mean, some of this is also driven by regulations, by internal regulations of each country. What are your thoughts around the kind of narrative? of Europe falling behind, the US now obviously undoing some of the Biden regulations that we're putting in China. I mean, who knows what's going on in China anyway? So what are your thoughts around that?

26:23Thordur Arnason:So this is not my area of deep expertise, but I have been working quite a bit with the EU AI Act, I have, as we all have been doing. Since we're a European company, we have a lot of big clients in Europe and we needed to understand and advice on the AI Act, meaning we also needed to understand the regulations going on in North America. We needed to understand the regulations in the UK, not a part of EU anymore, in China, and in other areas where we are seeing regulations start to shape up. We are mapping this landscape and trying to understand the implications, especially for our multinational clients that need to operate in various markets with different regulations.

27:13Thordur Arnason:Most of them are providers of services, not builders of technology, but some of our clients are builders of technology that are directly regulated by the likes of the EU AI Act. So we as an advisory capability help them navigate in this landscape. And it's complex, but it's not that hard. And you can quickly get a grasp and understanding of your ability to play and your responsibilities that you bear in the different markets, depending on who you are, of course.

27:54SlatorPod:Yeah, I guess it may not be super hard if you have over 400 ,000 staff that can crunch through this if you're smaller. SME might be a little harder, but that's why people come to you, right? Maybe I want to close on a question. Like you mentioned before, capability up, costs down in AI, right? That's why you're very kind of bullish on the capabilities of this technology in the future. But there's also talk about a bubble, like too much CapEx going into by the hyperscalers and at the end of the day, like not actual revenue being generated by AI at a scale that would justify hundreds of billions of dollars in CapEx or even trillions of dollars in CapEx.

28:39SlatorPod:What are your thoughts around that in the next maybe four to five years?

28:42Thordur Arnason:I am a bit on the fence here, to be honest, but this is me speaking with my personal opinions because I'm observing the things you're describing. There is massive investments being done on a historic scale. Obviously some of it based on actual value we can get out of this right now but a lot of it is based on hopes for the future. So a return on belief if you want. The interesting thing here that I'm observing is that we are building these data centers, this infrastructure. Many like to compare it with when we started building railroads, but it's not the same thing. Because railroads, we still run trains on a hundred-year-old infra easily.

29:33Thordur Arnason:You won't run anything on a hundred-year-old NVIDIA setup in a data center. So the infra here is a bit different. So we cannot directly compare to earlier waves of industrialization and earlier waves of infrastructure development because it's slightly different. And the metrics here are hard. And I can't really, I'm not seeing a bubble, but I'm seeing a very heated market. Back in Jan, a lot of the analytics thought that now NVIDIA had peaked and would drop because of the Chinese DeepSeq model arriving on the scene. If you look at how NVIDIA has done this year, they almost doubled their value since that DeepSeq moment where analytics thought that this was the downward spiral starting.

30:36Thordur Arnason:My point is, it's hard to really predict what's going on here.

30:42SlatorPod:Yeah, absolutely. Very tricky. I mean, I heard one line of argument that said that if you compare it to the 2001 bubble, internet bubble, there was a lot of dark fiber that just nobody was using, but there isn't a dark GPU out there in the world. Everything's being used right now.

30:59Thordur Arnason:Yeah, you can't really comment. I was, you know, I'm old, so I lived through the whole dot-com thing and the boom and all those. That was different. This is way bigger, much more important, potentially much more changing in, you know, the reality of our societies, our businesses, our jobs, perhaps. But for me, this is the second. I'm lucky I've been able to live through two pretty hefty shifts. and this one is much more interesting.

31:33SlatorPod:So final question, what's next for Capgemini Invent? Anything on your roadmap in the language or the language AI space or you're continuing to develop Babelspeak?

31:43Thordur Arnason:We will be continuing developing what will be a family of language tools under the umbrella of Babelspeak. That is for sure because our clients are asking about this and that that is not in the core of what we have built and we are expanding, providing batch translations of documents, providing ad hoc text translations with guaranteed quality of translation in a set group of languages, stuff like that. So we're expanding what BabelSpeak is at the moment.

32:17SlatorPod:All right, Tordor, thank you so much for joining the podcast today. This was super, super interesting. Thank you.

32:23Thordur Arnason:Thank you for having me. Nice conversation like this. We'll see you next time.

From the publisher

Thordur Arnason, Global AI GTM Lead at Capgemini Invent, joins SlatorPod to talk about how the consulting giant is embracing language AI through BabelSpeak, its new real-time AI speech translation platform.

Thordur explains that the idea emerged from Capgemini’s AI Futures Lab while researching multimodal AI. Inspired by Meta’s launch of the Seamless M4T model, the team set out to tackle the hard problem of live AI speech translation.

He notes that early pilots with DNB Bank, the Norwegian Red Cross, and the Norwegian Police tested BabelSpeak in critical situations — from refugee banking access to emergency communication.

Thordur highlights Capgemini’s partnerships with Nvidia and Telenor, saying Nvidia provides the AI hardware and models, while Telenor’s sovereign AI infrastructure ensures security, GDPR compliance, and data sovereignty.

He emphasizes that BabelSpeak’s reliability comes not just from AI models but from engineering precision, reducing latency from three seconds to under 300 milliseconds.

Thordur discusses Capgemini’s exploration of agentic AI, where autonomous systems perceive, reason, and act independently. He describes how the company built an “Agentic Workbench” to help non-technical users experiment with AI agents safely and sees BabelSpeak as a potential tool within larger agentic systems.

He concludes that Capgemini is expanding BabelSpeak into a broader suite of language tools, combining secure AI infrastructure with advanced multilingual communication for enterprise and government clients.

More from SlatorPod

All 39 episodes
#268 Thordur Arnason on Why Capgemini Is Building an AI Speech TranslatorSlatorPod · 33 min
Listen in VO